Next Article in Journal
Potentials of Numerical Methods for Increasing the Productivity of Additive Manufacturing Processes
Next Article in Special Issue
Affect of the Scattering Asymmetry by Structural Element of Thermal- or Environmental-Barrier Ceramics on Subsurface Radiant Overheating
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
Ceramic Materials in Na2O-CaO-P2O5 System, Obtained via Heat Treatment of Cement-Salt Stone Based on Powder Mixture of Ca3(C6H5O7)2∙4H2O, Ca(H2PO4)2∙H2O and NaH2PO4
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Synthesis and Dielectric Relaxation Studies of KxFeyTi8-yO16 (x = 1.4–1.8 and y = 1.4–1.6) Ceramics with Hollandite Structure

1
Department of Chemistry and Technology of Materials, Yuri Gagarin State Technical University of Saratov, 77 Polytecnicheskaya Street, 410054 Saratov, Russia
2
Department of Power and Electrical Engineering, Yuri Gagarin State Technical University of Saratov, 77 Polytecnicheskaya Street, 410054 Saratov, Russia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Ceramics 2023, 6(1), 619-629; https://doi.org/10.3390/ceramics6010037
Submission received: 16 December 2022 / Revised: 13 February 2023 / Accepted: 27 February 2023 / Published: 1 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Ceramics)

Abstract

:
Some solid solutions with the chemical composition KxFeyTi8-yO16 (KFTO) and a hollandite-like structure were successfully synthesized by modified sol–gel method. The obtained powders were characterized using X-ray diffraction (XRD) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The ceramic pellets based on KFTO powders were obtained by compressing and sintering at 1080 °C for 4 h. The sinters were characterized by X-ray and impedance spectroscopy. XRD results show that KFTO powders have a mono-phase tetragonal structure at x = 1.4–1.8 and y = 1.4–1.6. However, it was recognized that the hollandite-like phase could be broken during sintering to form TiO2 and Fe2TiO5 crystals distributed throughout the volume of the ceramics. A frequency dependency of dielectric properties for the sinters was studied by impedance spectroscopy. It was found that an increase in the TiO2 (rutile) phase during the sintering contributes to a decrease in dielectric losses. At the same time, the KFTO ceramics with reduced content of potassium had increased permittivity. The contribution of electron-pinned defect dipoles (EPDD) and internal barrier layer capacitance (IBLC) in the permittivity of the obtained ceramics was estimated using the Havriliak–Negami equation. It is shown that the KFTO ceramics have the polydisperse characteristic of dielectric relaxation. The observed grain and grain boundary dipole relaxation times were 1.03 × 10−6 to 5.51 × 10−6 s and 0.197 to 0.687 s, respectively.

1. Introduction

Nowadays, complex oxides with a layered and tunnel structure have attracted much attention in terms of their synthesis, modification, and control of various chemical and physical functional properties.
The hollandite-type compounds became the most popular due to the variety of their chemical compositions and structural features. A general chemical formula of hollandites can be described as AxB8O16, where x ≤ 2, A is a mono- or two-valent ion (i.e., Na, Ag, K, Tl, Rb, Cs, Ba, Sr, and Pb) and B is any ion, with a valence varied in the range from two to five, forming octahedral sites (i.e., Mg, Cu, Zn, Co, Ni, Al, Ga, Fe, In, Sc, Cr, Si, Ge, Ti, Mn, Sn, and Sb). The ideal hollandite-like structure has a tetragonal symmetry, I4/m, and is formed by BO6 octahedra in the form of two types of 1D channels (1 × 1 and 2 × 2 octahedra wide), and the A-ions occupy 2 × 2 octahedra-wide channels [1,2,3]. Consequently, there are several applications of oxides with the hollandite-like structure: (I) as a host for the immobilization of radioactive wastes [4,5,6,7]; (II) as ion sieves [8,9,10]; (III) as cathode materials for lithium or potassium batteries [11,12,13,14]; and (IV) as conductors for alkali ions [15,16,17].
The Ax(Ti4+, Ti3+)8O16 titanates constitute a particular group of complex oxides with a hollandite-type structure. These substances are of great interest due to a wide range of possibilities to modify their structure and properties to improve functional properties [18]. Various two- and three-valent transition metal cations can be easily introduced into the hollandite-type framework by Ti3+ replacing, and transformed in the solid solutions Ax[Ti4+, M3+/2+]8O16 (M is Al3+, Fe3+, Mg2+, Ti3+, Ga3+, Cr3+, Sc3+, etc.) [19,20,21,22,23,24].
Most of the scientific research on Fe-doped hollandites, including K1.46Fe0.8Ti7.2O16 [25] and K1.75Fe1.75Ti6.25O16 [26], is devoted to the development of synthesis procedures that allow for influencing the chemical composition, structure, and properties of the final materials, as well as a stability of the hollandite-like structure [27,28,29].
There are several works on investigations of the electrical properties of titanate hollandites. In particular, the electrical conductivity of some hollandites, obtained in the system of K2O–MeO–TiO2 (Me = Mg, Ni, Cu) by sol–gel synthesis in the air and H2 atmosphere, was investigated. The obtained results show that these materials are promising in the in the production of gas sensors and electrode materials in the hydrogen fuel cells [30]. In the research [31], it was shown that the titanate hollandites such as Ba1.33Ga2.67Ti5.33O16, K1.33Ga1.33Ti6.67O16, and K1.54Mg0.77Ti7.23O16 have high electron conductivity at high temperatures in the H2 atmosphere. In the work [32], the electrical conductivity of the ceramics obtained in the K2O–TiO2–Fe2O3 system were also studied, but a comprehensive study of the dielectric properties of iron-doped titanate hollandites has not been carried out yet.
In this regard, the complex investigation of permittivity, dielectric losses, and conductivity of new kinds of the hollandite-like solid solutions remains an urgent task. In recent works, it was noted that Kx(Me,Ti)8O16 materials, which can be synthesized by solid-state, sol–gel, and hydrothermal methods [25,33], had high permittivity [34,35,36]. In particular, the ceramics obtained by calcination of K1.6(Cu0.8Ti7.2)O16 powder at T > 1050 °C had ε ~104 and tan δ ~0.2–0.6 at low frequencies. In addition, hollandite-like solid solutions can be used as effective ceramic fillers in the dielectric polymer matrix composites due to their stable and high permittivity [37,38]. However, the mechanism, describing high permittivity of hollandite-like solid solutions, has not yet been studied. Further, this may hinder the development of hybrid ceramic materials with improved properties. Out of many possible types of complex oxides with a hollandite-like structure, one of the most promising is this one based on the K2O–TiO2–Fe2O3 system, in which we can expect an increase in permittivity due to increased polarization related to variable valence of the iron ions. This system was obtained earlier in works [37,38], but, until now, its dielectric properties have not been studied.
In this work, we focus on investigation of low cost and environment friendly hollandites of the KxFeyTi8-yO16 (KFTO) composition. The novelty of this research is due to a study of structural features and electrical properties of this group of hollandites characterized with different contents of potassium and iron.

2. Materials and Methods

KxFeyTi8-yO16 powders were obtained using a modified sol–gel synthesis according to the method described in [37]. The amount of K+ and Fe3+ in the KxFeyTi8-yO16 structure is usually varied in the ranges of: x = 1.4–1.8, y = 1.2–1.6; in our case, the solid solutions corresponding to the compositions of K1.4Fe1.6Ti6.4O16, K1.6Fe1.2Ti6.8O16, K1.6Fe1.4Ti6.6O16, K1.6Fe1.6Ti6.4O16, and K1.8Fe1.6Ti6.4O16 were synthesized (here and further are marked as KFTO-1, KFTO-2, KFTO-3, KFTO-4, and KFTO-5, respectively). The following reagents were used as sources of corresponding metals: KNO3 (purity of 98%, Buyskiy himicheskiy zavod, Buy, Russia), Fe(NO3)2·9H2O (purity of 98%, Buyskiy himicheskiy zavod, Buy, Russia), and titanium isopropoxide (C16H36O4Ti, purity of 97%, Acros Organics, Geel, Belgium). Citric acid (C6H8O7·2H2O, purity of 99.5%, Aricon, Moskow, Russia) was applied as a chelating agent. Ethylene glycol (C2H6O2, purity of 98.5%, Aricon, Moskow, Russia) was used to form an organic ester. At the first stage of synthesis in the reactor, an aqueous solution containing citric acid and ethylene glycol was added to a weighed mixture of potassium nitrate, iron nitrate, and titanium isopropoxide, taken in stoichiometric ratios. Further nitric acid (HNO3, 65% aqueous solution, Buyskiy himicheskiy zavod, Buy, Russia) was added in the obtained mixture until complete dissolution of all the components. Citric acid and ethylene glycol were introduced in the appropriate proportions of 5 and 1.5 mol for each mol of titanium ions. Then, the 25% aqueous solution of ammonia (NH4OH) was added into the mixture until pH = 8. The resulting solution was thermally treated at 250 °C to obtain a viscous polymer product, transformed into an amorphous powder as a result of auto-ignition. The resulting precursor material was grinded and calcined in air at 900 °C for 2 h. As a result, KFTO powders with different contents of potassium and titanium were obtained.
Next, 5 wt. % polyvinyl alcohol in the form of a 10 % aqueous solution was added to fine KFTO particles and the homogenized powder was used to produce green body ceramics in the form of disks with a diameter of 12 mm and a thickness of 1.5 ± 0.1 mm. These disks further were sintered in air at 1080 °C for 3 h and then cooled to room temperature in a furnace. The heating rate was 190 °C/h. To study the electrical properties and phase composition, the sintered ceramic specimens were polished. The bases of the ceramic disks were coated with a silver paste and burned at the temperature of 690 °C for 1 h to form the electrodes.
The phase composition of the obtained products was identified by X-ray diffractometry using Cu(Kα) radiation (λ = 0.15412 nm) (Thermo Scientific ARL X’TRA, Ecublens, Switzerland). A semi-quantitative phase analysis was carried out by the Rietveld method using the GSAS and EXPGUI software packages. The chemical composition of the KFTO powders was studied by BRA-135F spectrometer (BOUREVESTNIK, Saint Petersburg, Russia). The morphology of KFTO particles was analyzed by scanning electron microscopy (Aspex EXplorer, Aspex LLC, Framingham, MA, USA). The dielectric characteristics of the obtained ceramics were measured using Novocontrol Alpha AN impedance spectroscopy (Novocontrol Technologies GmbH & Co. KG, Montabaur, Germany) in the frequency range from 10−2 to 106 Hz at voltage amplitude of 100 mV. The data on conductivity, permittivity, and dielectric losses were found from the experimental values of the real and imaginary parts of impedance (Z′ and Z″) using well-known standard computational operations.

3. Results and Discussion

Figure 1 (left) shows X-ray diffraction patterns of the synthesized KFTO powders. As can be seen, X-ray diffraction patterns of all the powders, except the KFTO-2 sample, only contain the reflections corresponding to the priderite phase KxTi8-yFeyO16 with a tetragonal hollandite-like structure (space group l4/m, JCPDS No 77-0990). For the KFTO-2 sample, which is characterized by the lowest iron content, the X-ray diffractogram, in addition to the main priderite, also has weak reflections of the secondary phases identified as TiO2 and Fe2TiO5. It can be concluded that, in this case, monophasic KxTi8-yFeyO16 powders can be only obtained when y ≥ 1.4. A Rietveld refinement of the XRD data was carried out to determine values of the unit cell parameters (Table 1), as well as the semi-quantitative phase composition of the KFTO-2 sample and theoretical density of the obtained powders. The XRF method made it possible to determine the quantitative ratio of K:Fe:Ti in the obtained powders, and, in combination with the XRD method, identify their chemical formulas, which are reported in Table 1. It is seen that the chemical composition of the obtained powders differs somewhat from the theoretical composition, which makes it difficult to identify the dependences of the unit cell parameters on contents of potassium and iron. However, it can be observed that the parameters of the unit cells change slightly with a change in the chemical composition. The Rietveld method made it possible to show that the KFTO-2 sample contains 11 wt. % TiO2 and 3.7 wt. % Fe2TiO5, however, in this case, the potassium content of KFTO is too high (x > 2). This suggests that potassium compounds are contained in the sample in the form of amorphous phases, which cannot be identified using this method.
XRD patterns of the KFTO ceramics of various chemical compositions sintered at 1080 °C are shown in Figure 1 (right). It is seen that, in addition to the reflections of the hollandite-like crystalline phase, some reflections of the secondary phases of Fe2TiO5 and TiO2 take place in the diffractograms. As mentioned earlier, the diffraction patterns were obtained from polished ceramic samples, therefore, it can be assumed that during the sintering of ceramics, the hollandite-like structure decomposes with the formation of secondary phases Fe2TiO5 and TiO2 at the grain boundaries. Depending on the chemical composition of the powders, the following features can be observed during the sintering. In the samples KFTO-1, KFTO-4, and KFTO-5 at a fixed value of y = 1.6 and variable contents of potassium (x = 1.4–1.8), only a presence of the TiO2 phase is characteristic, and the intensity of its reflections increases with increasing x. For KFTO-3 and KFTO-4, it can be seen that at a fixed content of potassium (x = 1.6), a decrease in the amount of iron from y = 1.6 to y = 1.4 leads to an appearance of the reflections identified as Fe2TiO5.
Table 2 shows the values of the theoretical and measured ceramics density depending on the chemical composition. The theoretical values of density were determined by the Rietveld method using the XRD data. As can be seen, these values are in the range from 3.854 to 3.856 g/cm3, which is associated with a small range of variation in the amount of potassium and iron in the structure of different KFTO samples. In addition, comparing the samples KFTO-1, KFTO-4, and KFTO-5, it can be seen that the theoretical density increases with an increased amount of potassium, and, comparing with the samples KFTO-2, KFTO-3, and KFTO-4, the density increases with [Fe] in the KFTO structure, more likely due to a larger ionic radius of Fe3+6/2 in comparison with Ti4+6/2 (0.79 and 0.75 Å, respectively).
The measured values of density are varied in the range from 3.300 to 3.469 g/cm3. Due to a presence of different crystalline phases (KFTO, TiO2, and Fe2TiO5) in the obtained ceramic materials, it is difficult to obtain accurate data on their porosity. However, neglecting a presence of secondary phases, it can be said that the porosity of the obtained ceramics is in the range from 10 to 14.
Typical SEM microphotograph of KFTO powders is shown in Figure 2a. As seen, the crystals have a shape matching the hollandite family I4/m tetragonal structure. The base width is approximately 250 nm and the height is 700 nm.
SEM micrographs of the ceramic samples KFTO-2 and KFTO-5 (cross-section) are shown in Figure 2c,d, respectively. As can be seen, in both cases, grain growth occurs. However, in the KFTO-2 sample, pronounced crystals are observed and further grain growth during the sintering is more problematic in comparison with the KFTO-5 sample, which has a microstructure with difficult-to-distinguish grain boundaries and fewer pores. Thus, it can be assumed that the crystals of secondary phases in the parent KFTO-2 powder (TiO2, Fe2TiO5, Figure 1) act as a barrier to form grain boundaries.
Frequency dependences of the KFTO ceramics permittivity in the frequency range from 0.1 Hz to 1 MHz at 25 °C are reported in Figure 3a. A value of permittivity for all the investigated KFTO ceramic compositions tends to decrease with increasing frequency, showing the phenomenon of dielectric relaxation. This behavior is typical for polar ceramic materials, since the dipoles have less time to orient themselves under the action of the electric field.
In addition, the curve ε′(f) changes the angles of inclination at frequencies of about 10 and 105 Hz. This fact indicates a contribution of several types of relaxation processes to the permittivity. In addition, analyzing the graphs ε′(f) for the ceramics based on KFTO-1, KFTO-4, and KFTO-5 powders, it can be seen that the permittivity of ceramics decreases with increasing the potassium content. The ceramic samples KFTO-1, KFTO-4, and KFTO-5 are characterized with ε′ = 666, 600, and 456 at 1 kHz and ε′ = 227, 167, and 180 at 1 MHz, respectively. An increase in the permittivity of KFTO with a decrease in the content of potassium can be supported by increased polarizability of potassium appearing as a result of a larger number of vacancies on A-sites. Depending on the iron content, the samples KFTO-2, KFTO-3, and KFTO-4 have similar values of ε′ ≈ 600 at 1 kHz, whereas, at 1 MHz this parameter decreases with an increase in [Fe] (ε′ = 338, 320, and 227, respectively).
The frequency dependence of the dielectric loss tangent is shown in Figure 3b. For all the KFTO ceramic samples, the highest values of dielectric losses are observed in the low-frequency region. As the frequency increases to 1–10 kHz, the dielectric losses tend to decrease and reach their minimum values, followed by a sharp increase with increasing frequency. This phenomenon can be explained by the Debye dipole relaxation process. KFTO-4 has the highest tanδ = 0.24 at 1 kHz, which can be associated with the highest porosity (Table 2). For other samples, the dielectric losses decrease at 1 kHz with an increase in the amount of the TiO2 phase formed in the bulk of the ceramics by sintering (Figure 1b). For the KFTO-1 ceramics characterized with a low TiO2 content, the dielectric loss tangent is of 0.17, and for the KFTO-3 and KFTO-5 samples with high contents of the TiO2 phase, the dielectric loss decreases down to 0.09 and 0.06 at 1 kHz, respectively. This decrease in dielectric loss can be explained by a presence of TiO2, which contributes to an increase in the grain boundary insulation resistance.
As shown in Figure 3c, the real components of the AC conductivity σ A C tend to increase with increasing frequency of the external field, which is similar to the cases of other potassium titanates [39] and can be explained by the universal Johnscher law:
σ A C ( ω ) = σ D C + A ω n
where σDC is the DC conductivity, ω is the angular frequency, A is the constant representing the polarizability power, and n is the exponent parameter varied from 0 to 1. Accordingly, the DC conductivity has values varying from 0.81 × 10−9 to 2.23 × 10−9 S × cm−1 at 0.1 Hz, and from 1.00 × 10−4 to 1.92 × 10−4 S × cm−1 at 1 MHz.
Nyquist plots of the KFTO ceramics with various compositions are shown in Figure 3d. As can be seen, all the graphs represent one semicircle only. Similar impedance hodographs can be supplemented with an equivalent circuit, which contains two series resistors (Rg and Rgb) with a constant phase element (CPE), where Rg and Rgb determine the grain resistance and grain boundary resistance. In this case, the semi-circle implies that the grain resistance is low and the grain boundary resistance is approximately equal to the value of Z’ at low frequencies. In addition, one semicircle does not allow separating the impacts of volume and grain boundary contributions.
Cole–Cole plots for the permittivity are shown in Figure 4a. The semicircles and a straight line with a certain angle of inclination are observed in all the diagrams. These features indicate a presence of two relaxation processes, as well as the contribution of different components to the permittivity. The frequency dependences of permittivity and dielectric losses allow for estimating the contributions of three main processes to the polarization of dielectrics: induced dipole orientation of grains (electronically pinned defective dipoles (EPDD)), grain boundaries (internal barrier layer of the capacitance (IBLC)) and ceramic/electrode boundary [40,41,42]. The main contribution of grains to the permittivity occurs at high frequencies (f > 0.1 MHz). The boundary contribution of the IBLC model to the permittivity appears at medium frequencies (1 Hz < f < 0.1 MHz), while the electrode polarization effect appears at low frequencies (f < 10 Hz). The contribution of the listed relaxations to the permittivity can be analyzed using the Havriliak–Negami (HN) equation [43], which analyzes the totality of molecular relaxations, particle interactions, phase transitions, conductivity, etc., and helps to explain the differences in permittivity and dipole relaxation times. The Havriliak–Negami function has the following form:
ε * = j σ D C ω ε 0 + ( ε + Δ ε ( 1 + ( j ω τ ) α ) β ) E P D D + ( ε + Δ ε ( 1 + ( j ω τ ) α ) β ) I B L C
where ε* is the complex permittivity; ω is the angular frequency; τ is the average relaxation time; σDC is the DC conductivity; α is the maximum width of the relaxation time variance; and β is the peak of the parameter asymmetry, Δ ε = ε s ε . Here, εs is the static permittivity at low frequencies, ε is the permittivity at infinitely high frequencies. For α = 1 and β < 1, the equation can be transformed to a Cole–Davidson function (CD); for α < 1 and β = 1 it takes the form of a Cole–Cole function (CC), and for α = 1 and β = 1 it converts to a form of Debye’s law.
The parameters of the HN equation determined using the software DielParamFit_2 [44,45], calculated with high accuracy (Figure 4b), are presented in Table 3. The calculated values of direct current conductivity are σDC = 0.34–52.9 × 10−10 S/cm. As shown in Table 3, the relaxation behavior of grain dipoles obeys the Cole–Cole equation (α = 0.4–0.9, β ≈ 1). This means that grain dipoles are represented not by a single relaxation time, but by a set of relaxation times, the distribution of which narrows as the parameter α increases. The calculated dipole relaxation time of the grain is varied from 1.03 × 10−6 to 5.51 × 10−6 s. Analyzing the parameters of the HN equation, we can see that a higher value of α corresponds to a narrower distribution of relaxation times. The relaxation process in the grains is caused by the migration of K+ ions inside the channel to neighboring vacancies. At the same time, as the potassium content increases, the number of vacancies decreases, hence, the number of variations of overshoots to longer distances decreases and causes an increase in the parameter α. This is observed for the KFTO-5 ceramic, which is characterized by the largest lattice parameter c at high potassium content. The KFTO-1, KFTO-3, and KFTO-4 samples are characterized with a wider distribution of relaxation times, which is associated with a larger parameter c and lower potassium occupancy. The KFTO-2 ceramic is characterized by the smallest size c at high potassium content, which corresponds to a high value of the parameter α.
For dipoles at the grain boundary, the parameters of the HN equation are α ≈ 1 and β = 0.24–0.35. This means that the grain boundaries have the population of interacting dipoles characterized with dispersion of the relaxation times and a shift in the distribution to the high-frequency region. In this case, small values of β (<0.5) promote an increase in permittivity at higher frequencies and the contribution of grain boundary dipoles to the permittivity is observed at f >1. The calculated average relaxation time of the accumulated dipoles at the grain boundary is varied from 0.197 to 0.687 s. A similar dependence is observed for the relaxation time. For the samples KFTO-2 and KFTO-5, relaxation times have the smallest values. The analysis of the HN equation parameters for IBLC does not allow us to identify a characteristic trend in the dependence on chemical composition of the KFTO ceramics, due to the complex formed grain boundary. In addition, the calculated values of permittivity (∆ε) for IBLC are much higher than those estimated for EPDD. Thus, we can conclude that, in the high-frequency region, the permittivity of the KFTO ceramics is determined mainly by polarization of the dipoles of grains, and, as the frequency decreases, the polarization of the dipoles at the grain boundary contributes most to the permittivity.

4. Conclusions

Some solid solutions with a hollandite-like structure and KxFeyTi8-yO16 chemical composition (KFTO) were successfully synthesized using a modified sol–gel technique. The XRD and SEM data show that the obtained mono-phase KFTO powders have a tetragonal structure at x = 1.4–1.8 and y = 1.4–1.6. The ceramic materials based on KFTO powders were produced by compressing and sintering at 1080 °C for 3 h. It was recognized that the hollandite-like crystalline phase could be partially broken during the high-temperature treatment, forming TiO2 and Fe2TiO5 crystals distributed over the volume of the ceramic material. Frequency dependences of the electric properties were studied using impedance spectroscopy. It is found that increased contents of the rutile secondary phase promote a decrease in dielectric losses during the sintering, whereas reduced concentrations of potassium in the KFTO composition lead to an increase in permittivity. In addition, an appearance of the Fe2TiO5 phase in the obtained ceramics prevents the sintering process. The contribution of electron-pinned defect dipoles (EPDD) and internal barrier layer capacitance (IBLC) to the permittivity were estimated using the Havriliak–Negami equation. In accordance with the calculated parameters of the Havriliak–Negami equation, the complex nature of the dielectric relaxation processes taking place in the KFTO-based ceramics was shown. The dipole relaxation times of the grain and grain boundary were estimated as varying in the range from 1.03 × 10−6 to 5.51 × 10−6 s and from 0.197 to 0.687, respectively.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.T. and N.G.; methodology, A.T.; software, D.A.; validation, M.V.; formal analysis, A.T. and D.A.; investigation, N.M., I.Z. and S.B.; resources, N.G.; data curation, A.G.; writing—original draft preparation, A.T.; writing—review and editing, D.A. and M.V.; visualization, D.A. and N.G.; supervision, D.Z. and A.A.; project administration and funding acquisition, N.G.; writing—review and editing, A.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Russian Science Foundation, grant number 19-73-10133, https://rscf.ru/en/project/19-73-10133/ (accessed on 3 August 2022). The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Cheary, R.W. An analysis of the structural characteristics of hollandite compounds. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. B Struct. Sci. 1986, 42, 229–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Aubin-Chevaldonnet, V.; Caurant, D.; Dannoux, A.; Gourier, D.; Charpentier, T.; Mazerolles, L.; Advocat, T. Preparation and characterization of (Ba, Cs)(M, Ti)8O16 (M = Al3+, Fe3+, Ga3+, Cr3+, Sc3+, Mg2+) hollandite ceramics developed for radioactive cesium immobilization. J. Nucl. Mater. 2007, 366, 137–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Carter, M.L.; Withers, R.L. A universally applicable composite modulated structure approach to ordered BaxMyTi8−yO16 hollandite-type solid solutions. J. Solid State Chem. 2005, 178, 1903–1914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Amoroso, J.; Marra, J.; Conradson, S.D.; Tang, M.; Brinkman, K. Melt processed single phase hollandite waste forms for nuclear waste immobilization: Ba1.0Cs0.3A2.3Ti5.7O16; A = Cr, Fe, Al. J. Alloys Compd. 2014, 584, 590–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Fang, Z.; Xu, X.; Yang, X.; Xie, H.; Zhao, X.; Wang, B.; Yang, Y. Structural stability and aqueous durability of Cs incorporation into BaAl2Ti6O16 hollandite. J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 2022, 565, 153716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ma, J.; Fang, Z.; Yang, X.; Wang, B.; Luo, F.; Zhao, X.; Yang, Y. Investigating hollandite–perovskite composite ceramics as a potential waste form for immobilization of radioactive cesium and strontium. J. Mater. Sci. 2021, 56, 9644–9654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Bailey, D.J.; Stennett, M.C.; Hyatt, N.C. Ba1.2-xCsxM1.2-x/2Ti6.8+ x/2O16 (M = Ni, Zn) hollandites for the immobilisation of radiocaesium. MRS Adv. 2020, 5, 55–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Weng, D.; Duan, H.; Hou, Y.; Huo, J.; Chen, L.; Zhang, F.; Wang, J. Introduction of manganese based lithium-ion Sieve-A review. Prog. Nat. Sci. 2020, 30, 139–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Sabaté, F.; Sabater, M.J. Recent Manganese Oxide Octahedral Molecular Sieves (OMS–2) with Isomorphically Substituted Cationic Dopants and Their Catalytic Applications. Catalysts 2021, 11, 1147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sabaté, F.; Jordà, J.L.; Sabater, M.J. Ruthenium isomorphic substitution into manganese oxide octahedral molecular sieve OMS-2: Comparative physic-chemical and catalytic studies of Ru versus abundant metal cationic dopants. Catal. Today 2022, 394, 414–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Jo, J.H.; Kim, H.J.; Yaqoob, N.; Ihm, K.; Guillon, O.; Sohn, K.S.; Myung, S.T. Hollandite-type potassium titanium oxide with exceptionally stable cycling performance as a new cathode material for potassium-ion batteries. Energy Stor. Mater. 2023, 54, 680–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Drozhzhin, O.A.; Grigoriev, V.V.; Alekseeva, A.M.; Ryazantsev, S.V.; Tyablikov, O.A.; Chernyshov, D.; Abakumov, A.M.; Antipov, E.V. Phase Transformations and Charge Ordering during Li+ Intercalation into Hollandite-Type TiO2 Studied by Operando Synchrotron X-ray Powder Diffraction. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2020, 2020, 743–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Dai, J.; Li, S.F.; Siow, K.S.; Gao, Z. Synthesis and characterization of the hollandite-type MnO2 as a cathode material in lithium batteries. Electrochim. Acta 2000, 45, 2211–2217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Barbato, S.; Gautier, J.L. Hollandite cathodes for lithium ion batteries. 2. Thermodynamic and kinetics studies of lithium insertion into BaMMn7O16 (M = Mg, Mn, Fe, Ni). Electrochim. Acta 2001, 46, 2767–2776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Yoshikado, S.; Michiue, Y.; Onoda, Y.; Watanabe, M. Ion conduction in single crystals of the hollandite-type one-dimensional superionic conductor NaxCrxTi8−xO16 (x = 1.7). Solid State Ion. 2000, 136, 371–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. He, Y.; Sun, Y.; Lu, X.; Gao, J.; Li, H.; Li, H. First-principles prediction of fast migration channels of potassium ions in KAlSi3O8 hollandite: Implications for high conductivity anomalies in subduction zones. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2016, 43, 6228–6233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Takahashi, T.; Kuwabara, K. Ionic conductivities of hollandites. Electrochim. Acta 1978, 23, 375–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Rahimi, N.; Pax, R.A.; Gray, E.M. Review of functional titanium oxides. I: TiO2 and its modifications. Prog. Solid State Chem. 2016, 44, 86–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Whittle, K.R.; Ashbrook, S.E.; Lumpkin, G.R.; Farnan, I.; Smith, R.I.; Redfern, S.A. The effect of caesium on barium hollandites studied by neutron diffraction and magic-angle spinning (MAS) nuclear magnetic resonance. J. Mater. Sci. 2007, 42, 9379–9391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kesson, S.E.; White, T.J. [BaxCsy][(Ti,Al)3+2x+yTi4+8-2x-y]O16 Synroc-Type Hollandites. I. Phase Chemistry. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A Math. Phys. Sci. 1986, 405, 73–101. [Google Scholar]
  21. Kesson, S.E.; White, T.J. [BaxCsy][(Ti,Al)3+2x+yTi4+8-2x-y]O16 Synroc-Type Hollandites. II. Structural Chemistry. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A Math. Phys. Sci. 1986, 408, 295–319. [Google Scholar]
  22. Cheary, R.W. Structural Analysis of Hollandite BaxTi3+2xTi4+8-2xO16 with x = 1.07 and 1.31 from 5 to 500 K. Acta Crystallogr. 1990, 46, 599–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Cheary, R.W. Caesium Substitution in the Titanate Hollandites BaxCsy(Ti3+y+2xTi4+8-2x-y)O16 from 5 to 400 K. Acta Crystallogr. 1991, 47, 325–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kesson, S.; White, T. Radius ratio tolerance factors and the stability of hollandites. J. Solid State Chem. 1986, 63, 122–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hassan, Q.U.; Yang, D.; Zhou, J.P.; Lei, Y.X.; Wang, J.Z.; Awan, S.U. Novel single-crystal hollandite K1.46Fe0.8Ti7.2O16 microrods: Synthesis, double absorption, and magnetism. Inorg. Chem. 2018, 57, 15187–15197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Hayashi, F.; Furui, K.; Shiiba, H.; Yubuta, K.; Sudare, T.; Terashima, C.; Teshima, K. Flux growth of single-crystalline hollandite-type potassium ferrotitanate microrods from KCl flux. Front. Chem. 2020, 8, 714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Gorshkov, N.V.; Goffman, V.G.; Vikulova, M.A.; Kovaleva, D.S.; Tretyachenko, E.V.; Gorokhovsky, A.V. Temperature-dependence of electrical properties for the ceramic composites based on potassium polytitanates of different chemical composition. J. Electroceram. 2018, 40, 306–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Carter, M.L. Tetragonal to monoclinic phase transformation at room temperature in BaxFe2xTi8− 2xO16 hollandite due to increased Ba occupancy. Mater. Res. Bull. 2004, 39, 1075–1081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ebinumoliseh, I.; Grosvenor, A.P. Effect of Synthetic Method and Annealing Temperature on the Structure of Hollandite-Type Oxides. Inorg. Chem. 2018, 57, 14353–14361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Besprozvannykh, N.V.; Sinel’shchikova, O.Y.; Morozov, N.A.; Kuchaeva, S.K.; Galankina, O.L. Combustion synthesis and electrophysical properties of hollandites of the system K2O–MeO–TiO2 (Me = Mg, Ni, Cu). Ceram. Int. 2022, 48, 24283–24289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Cao, C.; Singh, K.; Kan, W.H.; Avdeev, M.; Thangadurai, V. Electrical Properties of Hollandite-Type Ba1.33Ga2.67Ti5.33O16, K1.33Ga1.33Ti6.67O16, and K1.54Mg0.77Ti7.23O16. Inorg. Chem. 2019, 58, 4782–4791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Morozov, N.A.; Sinelshchikova, O.Y.; Besprozvannykh, N.V.; Ugolkov, V.L. Citrate-Nitrate Synthesis and the Electrophysical Properties of Ceramics in the K2O–TiO2–Fe2O3 System. Glass Phys. Chem. 2021, 47, 481–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Moetakef, P.; Larson, A.M.; Hodges, B.C.; Zavalij, P.; Gaskell, K.J.; Piccoli, P.M.; Rodriguez, E.E. Synthesis and crystal chemistry of microporous titanates Kx(Ti, M)8O16 where M = Sc – Ni. J. Solid State Chem. 2014, 220, 45–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Gorshkov, N.; Vikulova, M.; Gorbunov, M.; Mikhailova, D.; Burmistrov, I.; Kiselev, M.; Artyukhov, D.; Gorokhovsky, A. Synthesis of the hollandite-like copper doped potassium titanate high-k ceramics. Ceram. Int. 2021, 47, 5721–5729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Gorokhovsky, A.V.; Tretyachenko, E.V.; Goffman, V.G.; Gorshkov, N.V.; Fedorov, F.S.; Sevryugin, A.V. Preparation and dielectric properties of ceramics based on mixed potassium titanates with the hollandite structure. Inorg. Mater. 2016, 52, 587–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Pearsall, F.; Farahmand, N.; Lombardi, J.; Dehipawala, S.; Gai, Z.; O’Brien, S. Structure–property trends in a hollandite multiferroic by Fe doping: Structural, magnetic and dielectric characterization of nanocrystalline BaMn3−xFexTi4O14+δ. J. Mater. Chem. C. 2020, 8, 7916–7927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Tsyganov, A.; Vikulova, M.; Artyukhov, D.; Bainyashev, A.; Goffman, V.; Gorokhovsky, A.; Gorshkov, N. Carbon Modification of K1.6Fe1.6Ti6.4O16 Nanoparticles to Optimize the Dielectric Properties of PTFE-Based Composites. Polymetrs 2022, 14, 4010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Tsyganov, A.; Vikulova, M.; Artyukhov, D.; Bainyashev, A.; Goffman, V.; Gorokhovsky, A.; Gorshkov, N. Permittivity and Dielectric Loss Balance of PVDF/K1.6Fe1.6Ti6.4O16/MWCNT Three-Phase Composites. Polymetrs 2022, 14, 4609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Charoonsuk, T.; Sriphan, S.; Pulphol, P.; Vittayakorn, W.; Vittayakorn, N.; Maluangnont, T. AC conductivity and dielectric properties of lepidocrocite-type alkali titanate tunable by interlayer cation and intralayer metal. Inorg. Chem. 2020, 59, 15813–15823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wang, M.; Li, L.; Zhang, K.; Xie, J. Colossal Permittivity Ti1–x(Eu0.5Ta0.5)xO2 Ceramics with Excellent Thermal Stability. ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. 2020, 2, 1700–1708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zhou, L.; Jiang, M.; Sun, Y.; Yang, D.; Xu, J.; Peng, Z.; Yang, Z. Good temperature stability and colossal permittivity in TiO2 ceramics doped with Cu2+ and W6+ ions. Ceram. Int. 2022, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Kumar, R.; Zulfequar, M.; Senguttuvan, T.D. Molecular Kinetic Based Dielectric Polarization in Sol-gel Derived Nanocrystalline CaCu3Ti4O12. Adv. Mater. Res. 2013, 699, 387–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Volkov, A.S.; Koposov, G.D.; Perfiliev, R.O. On the physical meaning of disperse parameters of frequency dependence of dielectric permittivity in the Havriliak–Negami model. Opt. Spectrosc. 2018, 125, 379–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Grosse, C. A program for the fitting of Debye, Cole–Cole, Cole–Davidson, and Havriliak–Negami dispersions to dielectric data. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2014, 419, 102–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Grosse, C. A program for the fitting of up to three Havriliak–Negami dispersions to dielectric data. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2021, 600, 318–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. XRD patterns of the KFTO powders (left) and ceramics based thereon (right).
Figure 1. XRD patterns of the KFTO powders (left) and ceramics based thereon (right).
Ceramics 06 00037 g001
Figure 2. (a) SEM image of KFTO powder, (b) XRF spectrum of KFTO powder, (c) SEM image of the KFTO-2 ceramics, (d) SEM image of the KFTO-5 ceramics.
Figure 2. (a) SEM image of KFTO powder, (b) XRF spectrum of KFTO powder, (c) SEM image of the KFTO-2 ceramics, (d) SEM image of the KFTO-5 ceramics.
Ceramics 06 00037 g002
Figure 3. Frequency dependences of permittivity, ε′ (a); dielectric losses, tanδ (b), conductivity, σ (c); and Nyquist plots (d) for different kinds of the KFTO ceramics.
Figure 3. Frequency dependences of permittivity, ε′ (a); dielectric losses, tanδ (b), conductivity, σ (c); and Nyquist plots (d) for different kinds of the KFTO ceramics.
Ceramics 06 00037 g003
Figure 4. (a) The Cole–Cole plots of the KFTO ceramics at 25 °C, (b) experimental and calculated Cole–Cole plot.
Figure 4. (a) The Cole–Cole plots of the KFTO ceramics at 25 °C, (b) experimental and calculated Cole–Cole plot.
Ceramics 06 00037 g004
Table 1. Unit cell parameters and quantitative phase composition of KFTO powders.
Table 1. Unit cell parameters and quantitative phase composition of KFTO powders.
SampleUnit Cell ParametersMolar Ratio
K:Fe:Ti
Quantitative Phase
Composition
Content of the Secondary Phases of Ceramics, wt. %
a = b, Åc, Å
KFTO-110.1574132.9692361:1.128:4.239K1.49Fe1.68Ti6.32O16TiO2–8.1
KFTO-210.1584432.9673881:0.762:3.292K2.64Fe1.86Ti6.14O16 TiO2—19.6 wt. %
Fe2TiO5—3.7 wt. %
TiO2–17.2
Fe2TiO5–2.8
KFTO-310.1597332.9675881:0.903:4.119K1.59Fe1.44Ti6.56O16TiO2–18.2
Fe2TiO5–3.6
KFTO-410.1538142.9702121:1.005:3.287K1.86Fe1.87Ti6.13O16TiO2–14.4
KFTO-510.1578612.9673881:0.929:3.476K1.81Fe1.69Ti6.31O16TiO2–17.7
Table 2. The theoretical and measured ceramics density.
Table 2. The theoretical and measured ceramics density.
KFTO-1KFTO-2KFTO-3KFTO-4KFTO-5
Ρmeas., g/cm33.4693.4333.4013.3003.421
Ρtheor., g/cm33.8543.8553.8553.8563.856
Table 3. Results of the Havriliak–Negami function fitting from the experimental data using DielParamFit_2 software.
Table 3. Results of the Havriliak–Negami function fitting from the experimental data using DielParamFit_2 software.
ParametersKFTO-1KFTO-2KFTO-3KFTO-4KFTO-5
EPDDIBLCEPDDIBLCEPDDIBLCEPDDIBLCEPDDIBLC
∆ε451113437751130621194032734554527
α0.3710.510.880.4110.310.920.581
β10.240.770.3510.250.2610.440.21
τ,s5.51 × 10−60.3561.15 × 10−60.1972.53 × 10−60.3853.74 × 10−60.2591.03 × 10−60.689
σDC, S·cm−11.63 × 10−100.82 × 10−101.89 × 10−1052.9 × 10−100.34 × 10−10
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tsyganov, A.; Artyukhov, D.; Vikulova, M.; Morozova, N.; Zotov, I.; Brudnik, S.; Asmolova, A.; Zheleznov, D.; Gorokhovsky, A.; Gorshkov, N. Synthesis and Dielectric Relaxation Studies of KxFeyTi8-yO16 (x = 1.4–1.8 and y = 1.4–1.6) Ceramics with Hollandite Structure. Ceramics 2023, 6, 619-629. https://doi.org/10.3390/ceramics6010037

AMA Style

Tsyganov A, Artyukhov D, Vikulova M, Morozova N, Zotov I, Brudnik S, Asmolova A, Zheleznov D, Gorokhovsky A, Gorshkov N. Synthesis and Dielectric Relaxation Studies of KxFeyTi8-yO16 (x = 1.4–1.8 and y = 1.4–1.6) Ceramics with Hollandite Structure. Ceramics. 2023; 6(1):619-629. https://doi.org/10.3390/ceramics6010037

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tsyganov, Alexey, Denis Artyukhov, Maria Vikulova, Natalia Morozova, Ilya Zotov, Sergey Brudnik, Aleksandra Asmolova, Denis Zheleznov, Alexander Gorokhovsky, and Nikolay Gorshkov. 2023. "Synthesis and Dielectric Relaxation Studies of KxFeyTi8-yO16 (x = 1.4–1.8 and y = 1.4–1.6) Ceramics with Hollandite Structure" Ceramics 6, no. 1: 619-629. https://doi.org/10.3390/ceramics6010037

APA Style

Tsyganov, A., Artyukhov, D., Vikulova, M., Morozova, N., Zotov, I., Brudnik, S., Asmolova, A., Zheleznov, D., Gorokhovsky, A., & Gorshkov, N. (2023). Synthesis and Dielectric Relaxation Studies of KxFeyTi8-yO16 (x = 1.4–1.8 and y = 1.4–1.6) Ceramics with Hollandite Structure. Ceramics, 6(1), 619-629. https://doi.org/10.3390/ceramics6010037

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop