Next Article in Journal
How Nostalgia Drives and Derails Living with Wildland Fire in the American West
Previous Article in Journal
Detecting Fire-Caused Forest Loss in a Moroccan Protected Area
 
 
Reply published on 20 April 2022, see Fire 2022, 5(3), 56.
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Comment

Comment on Otón et al. Analysis of Trends in the FireCCI Global Long Term Burned Area Product (1982–2018). Fire 2021, 4, 74

1
Department of Geographical Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA
2
Center for Global Change and Earth Observations, Department of Geography, Environment, and Spatial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 19 February 2022 / Revised: 1 April 2022 / Accepted: 2 April 2022 / Published: 11 April 2022

1. Introduction

In a recent study, Otón et al. [1] compared trends in global burned area (BA) mapped by the ESA Climate Change Initiative (CCI) MODIS-based FireCCI51 and AVHRR-based FireCCILT11 data sets. As noted by the authors, the two data sets were expected to be consistent, since the former was used to train the classification algorithm that generated the latter. To help establish this expected consistency, Otón et al. [1] examined the correlation between the respective gridded annual BA time series for the common 2001–2018 period, from which they concluded that “High spatial correlations are displayed with Pearson correlation (r) > 0.75 in pixels of all regions”. However, the authors overlooked several extensive zones in Africa where the BA time series were inconsistent and poorly correlated. The presence of these low-correlation zones notwithstanding, Otón et al. [1] reported widely predominant spatial agreement and only minor disagreement in BA trends for the 2001–2018 period.
In this study, we explore inconsistencies between the FireCCI51 and FireCCILT11 BA in Africa, over zones that collectively encompass nearly one third of the entire continent. In addition, we note that the spatial extent over which FireCCI51 and FireCCILT11 BA trends do not agree was significantly larger when a more appropriate and less selective criterion for trend consistency was used.

2. Consistency of 2001–2018 BA Time Series

As in Otón et al. [1], we computed the correlation between the FireCCI51 and FireCCILT11 gridded annual BA time series in 0.5° × 0.5° grid cells for 2001–2018. The result is shown in Figure 1, with a continuous color scale to provide more detail than the four-level quantized correlation map shown in Otón et al. [1] (cf. Figure 7). Grid cells where the correlation coefficient (r) was undefined or otherwise meaningless (generally because one of the data sets never reported burned area within a grid cell) were colored pink.
Figure 1 reveals extensive zones in which the BA time series are inconsistent and poorly correlated. Notably, nearly half (48.5%) of the total global FireCCILT11 BA mapped from 2001–2018 was located within grid cells for which r < 0.5. Curiously, some 12.1% of the total global FireCCILT11 BA mapped during this period was located within grid cells where the FireCCILT11 and FireCCI51 annual time series were inversely correlated (i.e., r < 0).
While zones of low correlation occur on every continent except Antarctica, where there is no burning, our focus is on Africa since it has extensive regions with low correlation (Figure 1) and, by continent, has the most burning globally [2]. Figure 2 (left) shows the Figure 1 results for Africa, where 31% of all grid cells have r < 0.5. Figure 2 (right) depicts the 2001–2018 mean annual FireCCILT11 BA. Notably, 62.9% of the FireCCILT11 BA mapped in Africa from 2001–2018 was located within grid cells with r < 0.5.
The three boxes shown in Figure 2 illustrates two low-correlation regions (A and B) and a high-correlation region (C) that were selected for further analysis. The low correlation regions account for 12.8% (A) and 19.0% (B) of the ≈318 Mha mean annual continental BA mapped by FireCCILT11, and the high correlation region accounts for 1.6% (C).
The BA within the three regions was examined in detail for 2001–2018 in Figure 3. The left column of Figure 3 shows the annual FireCCI51 and FireCCILT11 BA time series for each region. In addition, annual counts of Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) Visible and Infrared Scanner (VIRS) active fire detections for 2001–2010 are shown (green lines). The VIRS active fire detections were available for 2001–2010 and provide a useful indicator of fire activity [3] that is independent of the MODIS-based FireCCI51 and AVHRR-based FireCCILT11 data sets. Several features were immediately apparent for the low-correlation regions (A and B). First, the FireCCILT11 time series replicates almost none of the interannual variability present in the FireCCI51 data set. Second, the FireCCI51 and FireCCILT11 BA totals diverge substantially in 2001 and 2002, with the former significantly underreporting relative to the latter. The low FireCCI51 BA totals are likely an artifact of the June 2001 Terra MODIS data outage [4], and because Aqua MODIS active fire data were not produced before July 2002. Active fire detections from both the MODIS Terra and Aqua instruments are nominally used to guide the seeding and growing phases of the FireCCI51 BA mapping algorithm [5]. This attribution is consistent with the absence of similarly low totals in the VIRS active fire record for 2001 and 2002, as would be expected if the outliers were real and not merely a reflection of the FireCCI51 mapping algorithm having to operate with less input data. Third, the FireCCILT11 and FireCCI51 BA results diverged significantly in 2018, a discrepancy we have separately attributed to the rapid decay of the NOAA-19 satellite [6]. Indeed, the product documentation for the AVHRR LTDR data set used to generate FireCCILT11 specifically recognizes NOAA-19 orbit decay as a known problem and cautions that “Data past year 2016 is not recommended for quantitative analysis” [7]. Finally, while the VIRS time series exhibits similar annual temporal variation as the annual FireCCI51 and FireCCILT11 BA for region C, it does not for regions A and B.
The right column of Figure 3 shows plots of annual FireCCILT11 BA versus FireCCI51 BA, and illustrates the poor consistency in regions A and B. In these regions, the FireCCI51 and FireCCILT11 annual time series are essentially uncorrelated. The results for region C illustrate that these issues are not always present. However, while the agreement in region C is high (r = 0.926), much less BA occurs in this region each year than in regions A and B.

3. Consistency of 2001–2018 BA Trends

The main objective of Otón et al. [1] was to analyze BA trends using the FireCCILT11 product. For this reason, their FireCCI51 consistency analysis focused on comparing BA trends derived from each data set for the common 2001–2018 period. However, their reported map of trend consistency ([1], cf. Figure 8) is substantively influenced by their unusually selective criterion of considering only significant opposite trends as constituting disagreement. Locations where only one BA product exhibits a significant trend, even when the other exhibits an opposite trend, were not considered. The spatial extent of inconsistent trends was consequently understated, to the point of implying that the disagreement was restricted to a handful of grid cells worldwide. An additional issue is whether it was sufficient to assess trend agreement solely with respect to direction (i.e., increasing versus decreasing). Agreement in trend magnitude is an important consideration as well, and in this regard, the analysis of Otón et al. [1] provides no insight. Other trend based statistical analyses techniques were suggested (e.g., [8]).

4. Conclusions

Otón et al. [1] described the FireCCI51 and FireCCILT11 BA data sets as “quite consistent during the common temporal period” spanning 2001–2018. Our analysis demonstrated that this claim was not justified for much of Africa, where the majority of global BA occurred annually. We found that a sizable majority (62.9%) of the FireCCILT11 BA mapped in Africa from 2001–2018 occurred in large zones where the time series were inconsistent and poorly correlated (r < 0.5). This result is somewhat surprising, given that FireCCI51 provided the training data used to generate FireCCILT11. Within these zones, we additionally found that the FireCCILT11 time series replicated almost none of the interannual variability present in FireCCI51, and that the FireCCI51 and FireCCILT11 BA totals diverged substantially in 2001 and 2002 (due likely to a June 2001 Terra MODIS data gap and the lack of Aqua MODIS data), and again in 2018. Setting aside the larger issue of poor correlation, the outliers in these years can, by themselves, confound any attempt to analyze or compare trends over Africa with a combination of the two data sets. Despite these problems, Otón et al. reported widely predominant spatial agreement and only minor disagreement in the FireCCI51 and FireCCILT11 BA trends for the period of 2001–2018. However, this finding is, at least in part, a result of the unusually selective criterion they used to flag disagreement.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.G. and D.P.R.; methodology, L.G, D.P.R. and M.Z.; software, L.G. and M.Z.; formal analysis, L.G. and M.Z.; investigation, M.Z. and L.G.; writing—original draft preparation, L.G. and D.P.R.; writing—review and editing, L.G., D.P.R. and M.Z.; visualization, L.G. and M.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

The FireCCIL51 and FireCCILT11 data sets are freely available through the CCI Open Data Portal (https://climate.esa.int/en/odp/#/dashboard, last accessed 3 February 2022). The TRMM VIRS monthly fire product is freely available from the University of Maryland secure ftp server fuoco.geog.umd.edu (last accessed 3 February 2022).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Otón, G.; Pereira, J.M.C.; Silva, J.M.N.; Chuvieco, E. Analysis of Trends in the FireCCI Global Long Term Burned Area Product (1982–2018). Fire 2021, 4, 74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Giglio, L.; Boschetti, L.; Roy, D.P.; Humber, M.L.; Justice, C.O. The Collection 6 MODIS burned area mapping algorithm and product. Remote Sens. Environ. 2018, 217, 72–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Giglio, L.; Kendall, J.D.; Mack, R. A multi-year active fire data set for the tropics derived from the TRMM VIRS. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2003, 24, 4505–4525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Justice, C.O.; Townshend, J.R.G.; Vermote, E.F.; Masuoka, E.; Wolfe, R.E.; Saleous, N.; Roy, D.P.; Morisette, J.T. An overview of MODIS Land data processing and product status. Remote Sens. Environ. 2002, 83, 3–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Lizundia-Loiola, J.; Otón, G.; Ramo, R.; Chuvieco, E. A spatio-temporal active-fire clustering approach for global burned area mapping at 250 m from MODIS data. Remote Sens. Environ. 2020, 236, 111493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Giglio, L.; Roy, D.P. Assessment of satellite orbit-drive artifacts in the long-term AVHRR FireCCILT11 global burned area data set. Sci. Remote Sens. 2022, 5, 100044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Roger, J.C.; Santamaria Artigas, A.; Ray, J.P.; Villaescusa Nadal, J.L.; Vermote, E.F.; Devadiga, S. LTDR AVHRR Products (Version 5) User’s Guide. 2021. Available online: https://landweb.modaps.eosdis.nasa.gov/QA_WWW/forPage/user_guide/avhrr/LTDR_Ver5_Products_UserGuide_v1.0.pdf (accessed on 17 February 2021).
  8. Ives, A.R.; Zhu, L.; Wang, F.; Zhu, J.; Morrow, C.J.; Radeloff, V.C. Statistical inference for trends in spatiotemporal data. Remote Sens. Environ. 2021, 266, 112678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Correlation (Pearson coefficient) between the 2001–2018 FireCCILT11and FireCCI51 annual BA time series at a spatial resolution of 0.5°.
Figure 1. Correlation (Pearson coefficient) between the 2001–2018 FireCCILT11and FireCCI51 annual BA time series at a spatial resolution of 0.5°.
Fire 05 00052 g001
Figure 2. (Left) African subset of Figure 1 with three regions of interest (A, B, and C). (Right) 2001–2018 mean annual FireCCILT11 BA, shown as the mean fraction of the grid cell that burns annually.
Figure 2. (Left) African subset of Figure 1 with three regions of interest (A, B, and C). (Right) 2001–2018 mean annual FireCCILT11 BA, shown as the mean fraction of the grid cell that burns annually.
Fire 05 00052 g002
Figure 3. Detailed annual time series analysis at the three regions (AC) shown in Figure 2. Left column: 2001–2018 total annual FireCCILT11 and FireCCI51 BA time series for each region, with corresponding 2001–2010 normalized annual TRMM VIRS active fire counts (green line). Right column: Plots of total annual FireCCILT11 BA versus FireCCI51 BA for each region, with least-squares regression line (red) and linear correlation coefficient (r), and grey 1:1 line included for reference.
Figure 3. Detailed annual time series analysis at the three regions (AC) shown in Figure 2. Left column: 2001–2018 total annual FireCCILT11 and FireCCI51 BA time series for each region, with corresponding 2001–2010 normalized annual TRMM VIRS active fire counts (green line). Right column: Plots of total annual FireCCILT11 BA versus FireCCI51 BA for each region, with least-squares regression line (red) and linear correlation coefficient (r), and grey 1:1 line included for reference.
Fire 05 00052 g003
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Giglio, L.; Zubkova, M.; Roy, D.P. Comment on Otón et al. Analysis of Trends in the FireCCI Global Long Term Burned Area Product (1982–2018). Fire 2021, 4, 74. Fire 2022, 5, 52. https://doi.org/10.3390/fire5020052

AMA Style

Giglio L, Zubkova M, Roy DP. Comment on Otón et al. Analysis of Trends in the FireCCI Global Long Term Burned Area Product (1982–2018). Fire 2021, 4, 74. Fire. 2022; 5(2):52. https://doi.org/10.3390/fire5020052

Chicago/Turabian Style

Giglio, Louis, Maria Zubkova, and David P. Roy. 2022. "Comment on Otón et al. Analysis of Trends in the FireCCI Global Long Term Burned Area Product (1982–2018). Fire 2021, 4, 74" Fire 5, no. 2: 52. https://doi.org/10.3390/fire5020052

APA Style

Giglio, L., Zubkova, M., & Roy, D. P. (2022). Comment on Otón et al. Analysis of Trends in the FireCCI Global Long Term Burned Area Product (1982–2018). Fire 2021, 4, 74. Fire, 5(2), 52. https://doi.org/10.3390/fire5020052

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop