Next Article in Journal
Understanding the Social Value of Geelong’s Design and Manufacturing Heritage for Extended Reality
Next Article in Special Issue
Environmental Decay of Ignimbrite Patrimonial Monuments in the Dry, Urban, and Non-Industrial Atmosphere of Morelia (México)
Previous Article in Journal
Color and Light: A Hellenistic Terracotta Figurine of a Maenad from Myrina
Previous Article in Special Issue
Treatment of Acid Hydrolysis of a 1900 Large-Scale Composite Artwork by the Artist Roberto Sebastian Matta: Comparison between Traditional and Innovative Deacidifying Methodologies
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Heritage
Volume 6
Issue 3
10.3390/heritage6030161
heritage-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Development and Intervention Proposal with Earthen Refurbishments with Vegetal Origin Gel (VOG) for the Preservation of Traditional Adobe Buildings

by
B. González-Sánchez
1,*,
K. Sandoval-Castro
1,
A. Navarro-Ezquerra
1,
J. Ramírez-Casas
1,
A. Sanchez-Calvillo
2,
E. M. Alonso-Guzmán
2,3 and
E. G. Navarro-Mendoza
3
1
Barcelona School of Building Construction, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, 08034 Barcelona, Spain
2
Faculty of Architecture, Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo, Morelia 58000, Mexico
3
Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo, Morelia 58000, Mexico
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Heritage 2023, 6(3), 3025-3042; https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage6030161
Submission received: 31 January 2023 / Revised: 27 February 2023 / Accepted: 8 March 2023 / Published: 12 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue YOCOCU2022 We’ve Got Questions, You’ve Got Answers)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
This research focuses on the addition of an ecological, sustainable material to improve the durability of earthen constructions and for use in rehabilitation and restoration processes. Specifically, it studies the mechanical and waterproof performance of an earthen mixture with the addition of a vegetal origin gel (VOG) obtained by extracting the starch contained in rice. This solution increases the durability of the mixture and the behavior against water and improves the mechanical resistance of the system. This study is divided into two parts. First, an experimental phase was carried out in the Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya laboratory to design and develop the earthen mixtures stabilized with VOG to obtain an ecological, economical and easily replicable technology that can be transferred to any population group. The second stage consisted of the application of these mixtures and a real intervention in adobe dwellings in the community of Santa Ana Chapitiro, in the State of Michoacan, Mexico. The rehabilitation solutions and dosages were transferred to the residents of the community and applied to local adobe constructions by means of participatory design through an international development cooperation project. Good behavior of the material was found in the early stage.

1. Introduction

As a construction material, earth was one of the first resources humankind utilized to build structures and develop traditional and vernacular architecture, which today is considered part of our cultural heritage [1]. There are examples worldwide of earthen architecture: from the adobe structures in Neolithic period farms in Mesopotamia from around 7000 B.C. [2] to the rammed earth walls of the Nk’Mip Desert Cultural Centre, built in 2006.
Notwithstanding the availability of earth, we can find a great diversity of earthen construction techniques around the world, depending on local factors like the way of life, the culture or socioeconomic and productive aspects of the region [3] and the abundance of geomaterials. The environment and the territory are also essential factors, and they determine the uniqueness of the built heritage on land. By way of example, in the Iberian Peninsula, there is considerable earthen heritage based fundamentally on three building typologies: rammed earth, earth block and adobe [4,5]. The use of each of these construction techniques depends on access to water and the degree of soil humidity. In the case of walls, a soil of humid consistency is required with a degree of humidity of 10 to 12%. For adobes, a soil of plastic consistency is needed with a degree of humidity of 20 to 25%. In terms of the granulometry of the soil, adobes require up to twice as much clay as rammed earth and will not contain gravel in their composition. Another aspect is the availability of natural fibers from agricultural crops. When such fibers are mixed in a percentage between 25% and 75% in volume with the surrounding soil, they will improve the mechanical properties of the adobes to produce a solid, durable construction material [6]. In this way, native people learned to artificially improve the properties of the soil through the use of renewable materials and the easy handling of the land, which with the passage of time is used less and less.
Since the last decades of the nineteenth century, industrialized materials based on the scientific development of steel and concrete have replaced traditional construction materials. The old systems have been neglected and abandoned by the new generations. This, general perception was very common in our times [7,8,9]. Currently, in developing countries where earthen architecture is widely spread among the poorest sectors and lacks maintenance and industrialization processes, this type of architecture tends to be associated with lower socioeconomic levels and is perceived as a technology of the poor or of rural areas.
Nevertheless, traditional earth construction techniques have seen a resurgence due to their potential as a construction material with environmental qualities and hygro-thermal and acoustic benefits [10]. In recent decades, the number of studies looking at earth’s potential as a contemporary construction material has increased [11]. European countries, such as Germany, France and the UK, have started to revive their earthen building tradition. For sustainability reasons, countries, such as the USA, Brazil and Australia, have followed the same path [12].
In fact, 20–25% of the world’s population in what is known as the Global South live in earthen dwellings, which are mainly found in the least developed countries [13,14]. However, the knowledge of traditional building techniques and their use is being lost. Therefore, the myth must be dispelled that building with earth is a symbol of poverty and that the use of cement-based materials is better [15].
The problem that is addressed here is related to the fact that current construction is dominated by the use of materials with high environmental impact, which is why construction is one of the most polluting industries. The construction industry is responsible for at least 30% of carbon dioxide emissions and leads the list of raw material consumers globally over other economic activities, which clearly indicates its unsustainability [12]. One of the main causes of the high percentage of carbon dioxide emissions is the cement industry, which represents approximately 5% of global CO2 production and 3.8% of greenhouse gas emissions. The demand for cement increases annually and is estimated to increase to 4.38 billion tons by 2050 [16].
This industry has a manufacturing process that requires a considerable amount of energy from the use of coal in rotary kilns and the energy needed to grind clinker [17]. In addition, most of the CO2 emissions generated during the manufacture of cement originate from the burning of fossil fuel and the decarbonization of limestone [18]. For all these reasons, we must opt for new renewable materials that help to reduce the CO2 emissions generated by the construction industry.
We can find extensive literature about the real development of earthen materials that not only improve the comfort of buildings [19] but constitute a sustainable construction technique due to their low environmental demand and infinite recyclability [20]. However, the biggest concerns regarding earthen materials are related to their durability against external factors, such as rain and humidity [21], and the type of treatments and solutions we can apply to increase the length of their life cycle.
This study proposes an alternative method to improve the durability of earthen constructions. The process of the loss of vernacular heritage built with earth is remarkable, so it is important to find sustainable solutions for its preservation, which is a global concern.
The main objective of the research is based on a new sustainable proposal to repair and restore existing buildings using local earthen materials with natural additives derived from the reutilization and recycling of other processes, in this case vegetal origin gels (VOGs), to increase the durability of these constructions. In addition to the experimental purpose, the project considered from the outset the socioeconomic and territorial issues of earthen construction and cooperation with local communities to adapt these new construction technologies.
Some of the secondary objectives were to guarantee the viability of the solution and to apply it to real scenarios to benefit the communities that were involved, to increase the durability of traditional buildings and help to preserve vernacular heritage, to include participatory design during the process to meet the specific needs of the case study and the local context and to foster the appropriation of this technology within the local community and promote its continuous use.

1.1. Earthen Refurbishments and Modern Solutions for Cultural Heritage Buildings

Historically, the majority of earthen structures were plastered and refurbished to protect them and guarantee their durability (see Figure 1 and Figure 2). For these reasons, the maintenance of these buildings has always been very important and even further depends on the level of aggressiveness of the environment. The refurbishments could be based on earthen mortars, in many instances stabilized with additions [22] or mortars with conglomerating materials like lime or gypsum [23,24].
In recent years, authors have proposed the incorporation of mass ratio additives to the earthen mixtures due to the great resistance they provide, the reduction in maintenance and the adaption to current standards [25]. Nevertheless, the addition of materials, such as cement or lime, in substantial percentages of above 4% significantly increases the carbon footprint and hampers the recycling of the mixtures [26]. Thus, they lose, the definition of sustainable, ecological constructions but gain durability. However, we can find another architecture that seeks to improve the properties of the traditional construction systems with the incorporation of renewable materials [27].

1.2. Vegetal Origin Gel (VOG) and Earthen Architecture

Recycled materials, such as clays, mixed with renewable materials like plant products can be used many times with a small energy demand, so these mortars are low energy products or have a meaningful Environmental Product Declaration. Renewable building materials must be based on plant or animal materials, either obtained by natural growth or deliberate cultivation [28]. However, their application in conventional constructions is limited by a lack of experience in their application or by limited evidence provided by scientific data to quantify their performance [29].
Materials of organic, inorganic or geological origin have been incorporated into construction mixed with aggregates to create hybrid materials since ancient times. They date back to 3000 B.C., when the Sumerians incorporated bitumen into their clay and straw mixtures [30]. The Romans used volcanic ash to improve their mortars, while in Mexico, we can find several examples and applications of opuntia ficus-indica mucilages (cactus species) for the stabilization of soils and earthen components like adobes [31,32]
In China, a paste of lime with glutinous rice was used, commonly mixed with other organic components such as tung oil, vegetable leaf juice, egg white and animal blood [33,34,35,36]. Glutinous rice was a good stabilizer due to its high content of amylopectin, which is one of the main components of starch. The addition of starch to mortars is a traditional technique in which glutinous rice was incorporated into mixtures due to its high adhesive strength, good durability and impermeability [35,37]. In addition, due to the waterproof properties of this mortar, it was used in facilities for water resources [36]. This starch mortar has also been used in modern times, for example, in the Kaiping towers in Guangdong province in China [38].
Starch is one of the most important plant products in the food industry and in other industries. It is relevant as a relatively cheap and renewable product. It has been used for centuries as an adhesive by the Romans and for medicinal purposes by the Greeks. Currently, it is used for industrial purposes, such as an additive in cement, substituting additives derived from petroleum, in the manufacture of plaster, for plasterboards, as an adhesive and in bioplastics [39,40,41]. Starch is a polysaccharide mixture of two polymers, amylose and amylopectin, in different proportions with a predominance of amylopectin content. It is present in plants naturally, in the form of grains. Starch in industrial processes is used in the form of an aqueous gel. This gel is formed by boiling grains in water to release polymer chains. Within biopolymers, this polysaccharide improves the mechanical strength of the earth by up to 50%. However, it must be considered that the improvement achieved will depend on the nature of the clay and its chemistry [42,43].
Research about tabia, which is a mortar of lime and glutinous rice, has shown that there is an improvement in its mechanical resistance due to the change in the structure of the mortar caused by the introduction of the starch contained in the rice. It is possible to obtain a finer porous structure, so it has a more compact texture, which leads to an improvement in its mechanical behavior [44]. Studies of the interaction between soil and starch from glutinous rice show that starch particles uniformly disperse and wrap around soil particles, filling in the porosity in the soil structure, which reduces the porosity ratio and increases cohesion. When water evaporates, soil particles are solidified and result in a compact structure [37,45]. A previous study focused on the introduction of starch from rice to the soil mixture for earth blocks. It was proved that starch in the form of gel combined with soil improved the physical and mechanical properties of the blocks [46].

1.3. Case Study of the Research: The Vernacular Adobe Houses of Santa Ana Chapitiro, Michoacan

The second stage of the research focused on the application of earthen mixtures in case studies with conservation demands. The participative methods and the involvement of local communities with their own heritage conservation were included as key factors in the project [47], to search for a more collaborative approach. This approach was achieved through the cooperation project entitled “Diagnosis of traditional constructions and intervention proposal with earthen refurbishments stabilized with vegetal origin gels (VOGs)”, which was carried out by the Barcelona School of Building Construction–Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (EPSEB–UPC) in collaboration with the Faculty of Civil Engineering–Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo (FIC–UMSNH).
The case study selected for the project was the indigenous community of Santa Ana Chapitiro, in the State of Michoacan, Mexico (see Figure 3a). Engagement with the community was enabled by the non-profit civil organization GIRA and the research group VIVE–UNAM. The locality belongs to the municipality and lacustrine region of Patzcuaro (see Figure 3b), which has great historical relevance [48] and presents unique cultural and social aspects that make the traditional architecture of the zone really interesting.
The representative houses of the region are made of volcanic stone foundations, adobe walls and wooden roofs, utilizing local resources (see Figure 4). The walls have historically been covered with lime mortars or earthen refurbishments to protect them from atmospheric agents, fauna and flora. However, with the abandonment and oblivion of traditional knowledge, most of the buildings now have unprotected adobe walls, which are very vulnerable to moisture.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Earthen mixtures studied in the laboratory were made of clay, fine aggregate and the vegetal origin gel (VOG) produced from boiling rice. The clay was a Lila micronized clay from the company Argiles Colades S.A., which was used and characterized in previous research [49]. The composition was determined by means of X-ray diffraction (XRD) and fluorescence (XRF) analysis, and the granulometry was obtained from laser diffraction (ADL). The Atteberg limits of the material were also calculated. The results of these tests can be observed in Table 1.
The fine aggregate was crushed calcareous marble, with a particle size fraction between 0 mm and 0.85 mm. It is made by Aymar S.A. and its commercial name is Micromar 800. The VOG was produced by cooking rice grains in boiling water in a proportion of 1 cup per 5 cups of water until a viscous texture was acquired, with a density of 1.11 g/mL. The rice grains were then removed, leaving the gel, which was cooled to room temperature before use.

2.2. Samples Preparation

The samples that ware made were classified into two groups. The first ones were made only with water, as a binding activator for the clays. The second set of samples was made by completely substituting the water for the VOG. In addition, the two groups of samples were made with two dosages of aggregates. The optimum dosage of water required to make the mortar was found to be 25% with respect to the clay. This conclusion was reached through a previous phase of observation of the shrinkage and cracking of different dosages of water, clay and aggregates. Table 2 shows the final dosage of the mixtures. Each mortar was mechanically mixed for one minute, with a mortar mixer model E93 of the MASTEST brand, with a working speed in rotation of 140 ± 5 rpm and in planetary movement of 62 ± 5 rpm, according to the UNE-EN 196-1:2018 standard [50]. Samples of dimensions 4 cm × 4 cm × 16 cm were made for the two groups of mortars according to standard UNE-EN 1015-11:2020 [51], although this regulation is not specifically for testing soil mortars. The samples were made by compacting layers as thick as 1 cm manually in molds until completely filled. After 24 h, the samples were removed from the molds and left to dry at room temperature for 2 weeks, until they reached stable weight in the temperature and relative humidity of the laboratory (23 °C and 50% HR).

2.3. Characterization of the Materials in the Laboratory

The consistency of the fresh mortar was tested, following the test described according to standard UNE-EN 1015-3 [52]. To determine the mechanical characteristics and the porosity accessible to water the following were determined. The dynamic Young’s Modulus was calculated following the procedure of standard UNE-EN 14579:2005 [53], using equipment for ultrasound PROCEQ Pundit Lab and an Ultrasonic Instrument ultrasound device, which emits at 55 kHz. The maximum flexural and compressive strength were determined following the procedure of standard UNE 41410:2008 [54] (for both tests, the Wykeham Farrance press of 5000 kg, and a load application speed of 1000 mm/min were used; for the flexural strength test, the same press was used with an element that allows the application of the load at three points of the specimen). The bulk density and percentage of porosity available to water were defined according to standard UNE-EN 1015-10:1999 [55] but using white spirit as the liquid.
To study the behavior of the mortar against the action of water, the capillary suction, the permeability to water vapor and the erosion generated by the continuous fall of water on its surface were determined. The water absorption by capillarity effect of the samples that were studied was determined, according to standard UNE-EN 772-11:2011 [56]. The permeability to water vapor was determined according to the standard UNE-EN ISO 12572:2018 [57]. Additionally, the erosion of the samples was determined according to the standard UNE 41410:2008 [54]. All tests were performed with the number of samples required in the specified standards.
Finally, the moisture-drying accelerated artificial aging test was carried out, according to standard UNE 41410:2008 [54], with a total of 12 cycles of immersion and subsequent drying under ambient conditions. Afterwards, it was checked whether the weathered mortars had experienced modifications in their percentage porosity, bulk density, mechanical characteristics and Young’s modulus.

2.4. Empirical Application of the Earthen Mixtures in Adobe Buildings

With the experimental part completed in the laboratory, the purpose of the research was to apply the designed earthen mixtures to real traditional buildings to observe the performance and protect these structures from the surrounding environment. As discussed before, the case study that was selected was the community of Santa Ana Chapitiro in Michoacan, Mexico, and the vision of the project included the participative design of the houses’ inhabitants and users [47]. Even though most of the houses had mixed systems and poor construction solutions, most of the walls were built with adobe masonry. Some of the walls had cracks and light structural damage (see Figure 5). They were repaired with earthen mortars before the earthen refurbishments were applied.
The materials (clays and sand) used for the intervention proposal in the community were characterized according to Mexican and international standards (ONNCCE and ASTM, respectively) in the soil mechanics laboratory of the Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo. The results are shown in Table 3.
The representative samples of the fine material were submitted to a sieve analysis, and the Atterberg limits were calculated. The sieve analysis was carried out following the Mexican standard NMX-C-496-ONNCCE-2014 [58], which is based on the international standard ASTM D6913/D6913M-17 [59]. The Atterberg test was performed following the Mexican standard NMX-C-493-ONNCCE-2018 [60] (see Table 3). The sand that was utilized was found at the same workplace (maximum size 0.5 mm), and the rice starch gel was prepared and brought from the laboratory. As this was an empirical application of the experimental research, only a basic analysis was carried out to characterize the fine material.
Before the intervention of the houses in Santa Ana Chapitiro, three dosages of sand, clay and gels were tested on the adobe walls of a kitchen unit in the facilities of the non-profit organization GIRA (see Figure 6) to monitor the behavior of the mixtures in a real environment and to select the ones that presented less shrinkage (see Table 4).
The refurbishment was applied in two layers (see Figure 7). First, the adobe wall was thoroughly dampened to guarantee the mechanical adherence of the mixture, and a first layer, approximately 3–4 cm thick, was applied, composed of clay and sand mixed with water at a 1:1 volume dosage. After letting the layer dry for approximately 24 h, the surface was moistened again to apply the second and last layer that was approximately 2 cm thick. It consisted of a mixture of clay and sand with VOG at a 3:4 volume dosage.

3. Results

3.1. Comparative Laboratory Test

The consistency of the mortars made with water and VOG for the two dosages studied was dry and without slump, as shown in Figure 8a The only difference observed is that the mortars made with water dried before those made with the addition of VOG (see Figure 8b).
Table 5 shows the values of the parameters studied for the two types of mortar and their dosages.
As can be seen, VOG produced earth mortars with lower porosity, which hampers the access of water and provides a higher modulus of elasticity with a consequent increase in mechanical strength. The higher the clay content, the better the mechanical performance. The two dosages without VOG had very similar mechanical performance, water-accessible porosity and bulk density. Regarding the coefficients that condition the mobility of water through the porous network of the mortars, Table 6 shows the values of capillary suction and permeability to water vapor.
The use of VOG in mortars modifies the behavior towards water. It considerably reduces capillary suction and prevents the mobility of water vapor through the porosity. When the dry cup test is carried out, that is, when the humidity has to pass from the outside to the inside of the permeameter, the VOG mortars are very impermeable. In contrast, when the humidity has to pass from the inside to the outside of the permeameter, the permeability of the VOG mortars has similar behavior to those made with water.
The Swinburne (SAET) test, normalized by the UNE 41410:2008 standard [54], provides criteria to determine whether a sample of mortar is suitable to resist the erosive effects of the direct, constant action of water. The test was carried out on samples of mortar made with water or VOG. All the specimens tested are “suitable” according to this test because the cavity generated does not exceed 10 mm in depth. However, the samples made with VOG did not suffer any marks, while those made with water had marks of 1.5 mm on average. Figure 9 shows the images of the test specimens before and after testing.
After the 12 moisture-drying cycles, the samples made with water showed a general loss of the outer layers and local pitting. In contrast, the samples made with VOG did not suffer significant impact from the action of water. The state of the samples after the 12 cycles is shown in Figure 10.
The final percentage variation of the mass of the aged samples is shown in Table 7.
The accelerated artificial aging by moisture-drying affected the structure of the specimens and, consequently, their water-accessible porosity and mechanical properties. Notably, the modifications experienced by specimens manufactured with VOG resulted in a reduction of their porosity and a significant increase in their Young’s modulus and compressive strength, as shown in Figure 11.
The circles correspond to values before aging, and the triangles correspond to values after aging. The blue and green colors correspond to values of the samples made with water, and the orange and yellow colors correspond to values of the samples made with water and VOG.

3.2. Application of the Earthen Refurbishments

Regarding the application of the stabilized mixtures in the community of Santa Ana Chapitiro, the refurbishments proved to be functional and had a homogeneous appearance after the rainy season during the summer. The users of the dwellings were very pleased with the intervention and the behavior of the system, and it improved the appearance of the walls. After the rainy season, approximately six months after the intervention, the mixtures still had a homogeneous aspect and texture with almost no cracks or deterioration (see Figure 12).
After this first intervention, the refurbishments will be monitored for a long period of time, to determine and compare the behavior of the system in a real environment with rainy seasons. This will help to corroborate the experimental analysis of accelerated artificial aging developed in the laboratory to predict the performance of the mixtures. Additionally, we can observe the impact on the walls depending on the orientation and construction aspects of the building.

4. Conclusions

As earthen architecture is at risk, the incorporation of renewable, sustainable materials, such as rice starch, to improve the properties of traditional systems is a sustainable path to protect and preserve our cultural heritage. The main vulnerability of adobe constructions is against water and moisture. Therefore, solutions that increase their durability and resistance to erosion are the most suitable and efficient for these buildings.
As shown with the correlation of the testing methods, the replacement of mixing water with VOG considerably improves the properties of earthen mixtures. The samples show better resistance to erosion; no alteration of the samples was visible, which is very important for earthen architecture to resist inclemency and mitigate the effect of rainwater. The compression strength also increased, doubling its value compared to samples made with water alone. These results are encouraging since they show that traditional buildings with earthen refurbishments can be well-protected against atmospheric elements. Additionally, the VOG uses an available resource that is economically viable and does not have detrimental residues or effects on the environment. Furthermore, the use of VOG by mass ratio increases the durability of the refurbishment and the entire system, which increases the life cycle of adobe constructions and decreases the maintenance costs and times.
The mortar in the Santa Ana community buildings is at present six months old, and the plasters show no major cracks, fissures or delamination. They withstood the rainy season. It is important to keep monitoring the intervention as the long-term behavior of the refurbishments will assess the real durability of the solution. Follow-up is needed to determine whether the full-scale alteration resembles the results obtained in the laboratory since it is well-known that laboratory-accelerated weathering tests do not include all the variables that occur in reality.
Cooperation activities in the region are expected to be continued, and the initiative will be extended to other communities and case studies. Furthermore, other locally available resources that could be used to optimize earthen mortars and refurbishments should be examined and explored. Thus, another future research area would be experimentation combining VOGs with other additions and dosages to consolidate better solutions for durability purposes.
Apart from empirical testing of the material designed in the laboratory, the social and human learning from this experience was even more important. The community of Santa Ana Chapitiro accepted and embraced this new technology. In recent decades, the interventions to protect and maintain the adobe walls of vernacular buildings have usually used cement mortars although the traditional solutions involved earthen, lime or mixed mortars. In addition to the bad compatibility of these systems, the communities are losing their traditions and, consequently, their cultural heritage.
It is important for the rural communities to bring back the local materials and in the process incorporate renewable resources, all without losing sight of their construction techniques, their traditions and their territorial identity. We should stress the involvement of local communities in the cultural heritage projects as historically the institutions and elite have made the decision themselves. The incorporation of participatory design is essential since everyone can contribute and the final result is more satisfactory.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, B.G.-S. and A.S.-C.; methodology, B.G.-S.; software, K.S.-C.; validation, A.N.-E., J.R.-C. and E.M.A.-G.; formal analysis, B.G.-S., A.S.-C. and K.S.-C.; investigation, B.G.-S., A.S.-C., K.S.-C. and E.M.A.-G.; resources, B.G.-S., A.S.-C., K.S.-C. and E.G.N.-M.; writing—original draft preparation, B.G.-S., A.S.-C., K.S.-C. and E.G.N.-M.; writing—review and editing, B.G.-S., A.S.-C. and A.N.-E.; visualization, B.G.-S. and A.S.-C.; supervision, A.N.-E., J.R.-C. and E.M.A.-G.; project administration, A.N.-E., J.R.-C. and E.M.A.-G.; funding acquisition, B.G.-S. and A.N.-E. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Centre de Cooperació per al Desenvolupament de la UPC, in Barcelona, Spain, through the call for grants to carry out cooperation activities in 2022.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the economic support given by Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya for the support under a studentship FPI-2018 scholarship and CONACYT. The authors also thank the Materials Laboratory of the Barcelona School of Building Construction (EPSEB) of the UPC in Barcelona and the Materials Laboratory “Ing. Luis Silva Ruelas” of the Faculty of Civil Engineering of the UMSNH in Morelia, Michoacan, for the technical support. The sponsors Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC) and Universidad Michoacana San Nicolás de Hidalgo (UMSNH) helped to develop this project. Lastly, the authors acknowledge the community of Santa Ana Chapitiro for allowing the intervention works in their buildings and for their participation in the project.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest for the fulfillment of this research work.

References

  1. Fontaine, L.; Anger, R. Bâtir en Terre: Du Grain de Sable à L’architecture; Belin: Paris, France, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  2. Vilane, B. Assessment of stabilisation of adobes by confined compression tests. Biosyst. Eng. 2010, 106, 551–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Calderón Peñafiel, J.C. Tecnología para la Fabricación de Bloques de Tierra de Gran Resistencia. Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya. 2013. Available online: https://upcommons.upc.edu/handle/2099.1/19817 (accessed on 25 May 2022).
  4. García-Soriano, L.; Crespo, L.V.; Gómez-Patrocinio, F.J. Earthen elements in the Iberian Peninsula: Cataloging and preliminary study. In Vernacular and Earthen Architecture: Conservation and Sustainability; Press, C., Ed.; Taylor & Francis: Valencia, Spain, 2017; p. 4. [Google Scholar]
  5. Mileto, C.; López-Manzanares, F.V.; Crespo, L.V.; García-Soriano, L. The Influence of Geographical Factors in Traditional Earthen Architecture: The Case of the Iberian Peninsula. Sustainability 2019, 11, 2369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Guillaud, H. An approach to the evolution of earthen building cultures in Orient and Mediterranean regions What future for such an exceptional legacy? Al-Râfidân J. West. Asiat. Stud. 2003. hal-01663127. [Google Scholar]
  7. González-Sánchez, B.; Rosell Amigó, J.R.; Navarro Ezquerra, A. The influence of ambient conditions into rammed earth compressive strenght. In Vernacular and Earthen Architecture; Conservation and Sustainability; Press, C., Ed.; Taylor & Francis: Valencia, Spain, 2017; pp. 751–754. [Google Scholar]
  8. Serrano, S.; Rincón, L.; González, B.; Navarro, A.; Bosch, M.; Cabeza, L.F. Rammed earth walls in Mediterranean climate: Material characterization and thermal behaviour. Int. J. Low-Carbon Technol. 2016, 12, 281–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Correia, M.; Carlos, G.D. Introduction: Earthen architecture, an endangered vernacular heritage. Built Herit. 2021, 5, 21–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Fabbri, A.; Morel, J.C.; Aubert, J.-E.; Bui, Q.-B.; Gallipoli, D.; Ventura, A.; Reddy, V.B.V.; Hamard, E.; Pelé-Peltier, A.; Abhilash, H.N. An overview of the remaining challenges of the RILEM TC 274-TCE, testing and characterisation of earth-based building materials and elements. RILEM Tech. Lett. 2022, 6, 150–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Dove, C. The development of unfired earth bricks using seaweed biopolymers. WIT Trans. Built Environ. 2014, 142, 219–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Pacheco-Torgal, F.; Jalali, S. Earth construction: Lessons from the past for future eco-efficient construction. Constr. Build. Mater. 2012, 29, 512–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Marsh, A.T.M.; Kulshreshtha, Y. The state of earthen housing worldwide: How development affects attitudes and adoption. Build. Res. Inf. 2022, 50, 485–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Cairo Carou, H. Articulaciones del Sur Global: Afinidad cultural internacionalismo solidario e Iberoamérica en la globalización contraejemónica. Geopolítica(S) Rev. Estud. Sobre Espac. Poder 2010, 1, 41–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Tomasi, J.; Barada, J. The technical and the social: Challenges in the conservation of earthen vernacular architecture in a changing world (Jujuy, Argentina). Built Herit. 2021, 5, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hasanbeigi, A.; Price, L.; Lin, E. Emerging energy-efficiency and CO2 emission-reduction technologies for cement and concrete production: A technical review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2012, 16, 6220–6238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Reddy, B.V.; Jagadish, K.S. Embodied energy of common and alternative building materials and technologies. Energy Build. 2003, 35, 129–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Rehan, R.; Nehdi, M. Carbon dioxide emissions and climate change: Policy implications for the cement industry. Environ. Sci. Policy 2005, 8, 105–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Araya-Letelier, G.; Antico, F.; Burbano-Garcia, C.; Concha-Riedel, J.; Norambuena-Contreras, J.; Concha, J.; Flores, E.S. Experimental evaluation of adobe mixtures reinforced with jute fibers. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 276, 122127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Moriset, S.; Rakotomamonjy, B.; Gandreau, D. Can earthen architectural heritage save us? Built Herit. 2021, 5, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Beckett, C.; Jaquin, P.; Morel, J.-C. Weathering the storm: A framework to assess the resistance of earthen structures to water damage. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 242, 118098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Carreira, I.; Cardoso, I.P.; Faria, P. Earth mortars stabilization: A review. Conserv. Património 2020, 37, 35–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Santos, T.; Faria, P.; Silva, A.S. Eco-efficient earth plasters: The effect of sand grading and additions on fresh and mechanical properties. J. Build. Eng. 2021, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Mattone, M.; Rescic, S.; Fratini, F.; Del Fà, R.M. Experimentation of Earth-Gypsum Plasters for the Conservation of Earthen Constructions. Int. J. Arch. Herit. 2017, 11, 763–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Castilla, F.J. Revestimientos y acabados superficiales en construcciones con tierra contemporáneas. Inf. Constr. 2011, 63, 143–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Ouedraogo, K.A.J.; Aubert, J.-E.; Tribout, C.; Escadeillas, G. Is stabilization of earth bricks using low cement or lime contents relevant? Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Pedergnana, M.; Elias-Ozkan, S.T. Impact of various sands and fibres on the physical and mechanical properties of earth mortars for plasters and renders. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 308, 125013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Felton, D.; Fuller, R.; Crawford, R. The potential for renewable materials to reduce the embodied energy and associated greenhouse gas emissions of medium-rise buildings. Arch. Sci. Rev. 2013, 57, 31–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. MacDougall, C. Natural Building materials in mainstream construction: Lessons from the U.K. Simulation 1996, 66, 91–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Plank, J. Applications of biopolymers and other biotechnological products in building materials. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2004, 66, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hernández, L.N.; Vidales, J.M.M.; Fraga, J.I.M. Valoración inicial de las propiedades de la goma de nopal como posible aditivo en la conservación de edificaciones de adobe. Intervención 2022, 1, 159–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Aranda-Jiménez, Y.G.; Suárez-Domínguez, E.J. Cactus stalk waterproof effect in compressed eath blocks. Nova Sci. Rev. Investig. Univ. Salle Bajío 2013, 11, 311–323. [Google Scholar]
  33. Wei, G.; Zhang, H.; Wang, H.; Fang, S.; Zhang, B.; Yang, F. An experimental study on application of sticky rice–lime mortar in conservation of the stone tower in the Xiangji Temple. Constr. Build. Mater. 2012, 28, 624–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Xiao, Y.; Fu, X.; Gu, H.; Gao, F.; Liu, S. Properties, characterization, and decay of sticky rice–lime mortars from the Wugang Ming dynasty city wall (China). Mater. Charact. 2014, 90, 164–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Yang, F.; Zhang, B.; Pan, C.; Zeng, Y. Traditional mortar represented by sticky rice lime mortar—One of the great inventions in ancient China. Sci. China Ser. E Technol. Sci. 2009, 52, 1641–1647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Fuwei, Y.; Bingjian, Z.; Qinglin, M. Study of Sticky Rice—Lime Mortar Technology. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 43, 936–944. [Google Scholar]
  37. Pei, Q.Q.; Wang, X.D.; Zhao, L.Y.; Zhang, B.; Guo, Q.L. A sticky rice paste preparation method for reinforcing earthen heritage sites. J. Cult. Herit. 2020, 44, 98–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Huadong, G. Kaiping Diaolou and Villages. In Atlas of Remote Sensing for World Heritage: China; Huadong, G., Ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2013; pp. 112–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Andreu-Rodríguez, J.; Ferrández-García, C.; Ferrández-Villena, M.; García-Ortuño, T. Estudio de los Usos del Almidón en la Construcción; Universidad Miguel Hernández de Elche-España: Alicante, Spain, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  40. Pinos, J.B.A. Estudio de la dosificación del almidón extraído del banano en un polímero de tipo termoplástico. Rev. Colomb. Química 2019, 48, 43–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Burrell, M.M. Starch: The need for improved quality or quantity—An overview. J. Exp. Bot. 2003, 54, 451–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Tourtelot, J.; Fourdrin, C.; de Lacaillerie, J.B.D.; Bourgès, A.; Keita, E. Starch Reinforcement of Raw Earth Constructions. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Bio-Based Building Materials, Paris, France, 14–15 November 2022; Volume 1, pp. 443–447. [Google Scholar]
  43. Ardant, D.; Brumaud, C.; Habert, G. Influence of additives on poured earth strength development. Mater. Struct. 2020, 53, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Yang, R.; Zhang, Z.; Xie, M.; Li, K. Microstructural insights into the lime mortars mixed with sticky rice sol–gel or water: A comparative study. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 125, 974–980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Jannat, N.; Al-Mufti, R.L.; Hussien, A.; Abdullah, B.; Cotgrave, A. Influences of agro-wastes on the physico-mechanical and durability properties of unfired clay blocks. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 318, 126011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. López Dávalos, A. Desarrollo de un Nuevo Bloque de Tierra Mejorado con la Incorporación del Gel de Origen Vegetal. Master’s Thesis, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  47. Sacko, O. The involvement of local communities in the conservation process of earthen architecture in the Sahel-Sahara region—The case of Djenné, Mali. Built Herit. 2021, 5, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Fisher, C.T.; Cohen, A.S.; Solinis-Casparius, R.; Pezzutti, F.L.; Bush, J.; Forest, M.; Torvinen, A. A Typology of Ancient Purépecha (Tarascan) Architecture from Angamuco, Michoacán, Mexico. Lat. Am. Antiq. 2019, 30, 510–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Calderón Peñafiel, J.C. Estudio Experimental de Geopolímeros de Arcillas en Función de la Resistencia Mecáninca. Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya. 2019. Available online: https://upcommons.upc.edu/handle/2117/166149 (accessed on 25 May 2022).
  50. UNE-EN 196-1:2018; Métodos de Ensayo de Cementos. Parte 1: Determinación de Resistencias. Aenor: Madrid, Spain, 2018.
  51. UNE-EN 1015-11:2020; Métodos de Ensayo de los Morteros para Albañilería. Parte 11: Determinación de la Resistencia a Flexión y a Compresión del Mortero Endurecido. Aenor: Madrid, Spain, 2020.
  52. UNE-EN 1015-3:2000; Métodos de Ensayo para Morteros de Albañilería. Parte 3: Determinación de la Consistencia del Mortero Fresco (por la Mesa de Sacudidas). Aenor: Madrid, Spain, 2000.
  53. UNE-EN 14579:2005; Métodos de Ensayo para Piedra Natural: Determinación de la Velocidad de Propagación del Sonido. Aenor: Madrid, Spain, 2005.
  54. UNE 41410:2008; Bloques de Tierra Comprimida para Muros y Tabiques. Definiciones, Especificaciones y Métodos de Ensayo. Aenor: Madrid, Spain, 2008.
  55. UNE-EN 1015-10:1999; Métodos de Ensayo de los Morteros para Albañilería. Parte 10: Determinación de la Densidad Aparente en seco del Mortero Endurecido. Aenor: Madrid, Spain, 1999.
  56. UNE-EN 772-11:2011; Métodos de Ensayo de Piezas para Fábrica de Albañilería. Parte 11: Determinación de la Absorción de Agua por Capilaridad de Piezas para Fábrica de Albañilería de Hormigón, Hormigón Celular Curado en Autoclave, Piedra Artificial y Piedr. Aenor: Madrid, Spain, 2011.
  57. UNE-EN ISO 12572:2018; Prestaciones Higrotérmicas de los Productos y Materiales para Edificación. Determinación de las Propiedades de Transmisión de Vapor de Agua. Método del Vaso. Aenor: Madrid, Spain, 2018.
  58. NMX-C-496-ONNCCE-2014; Industria de la Construcción—Geotecnia—Materiales para Terracerías—Determinación de la Composición Granular. ONNCCE: Mexico City, México, 2014.
  59. ASTM D6913/D6913M-17; Standard Test Method for Particle-Size Distribution (Gradation) of Soils Using Sieve Analysis. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2021.
  60. NMX-C-493-ONNCCE-2018; Industria de la Construcción—Geotecnia—Límites de Consistencia de Suelos—Método de Ensayo. ONNCCE: Mexico City, México, 2018.
Heritage 06 00161 g001 550
Figure 1. Pathology in contemporary cladding on a historical building in Patzcuaro, Michoacan, Mexico. Source: B. González-Sánchez.
Figure 1. Pathology in contemporary cladding on a historical building in Patzcuaro, Michoacan, Mexico. Source: B. González-Sánchez.
Heritage 06 00161 g001
Heritage 06 00161 g002 550
Figure 2. Pathology in traditional cladding on a historical building in Patzcuaro, Michoacan, Mexico. Source: B. González-Sánchez.
Figure 2. Pathology in traditional cladding on a historical building in Patzcuaro, Michoacan, Mexico. Source: B. González-Sánchez.
Heritage 06 00161 g002
Heritage 06 00161 g003 550
Figure 3. (a) Location of the State of Michoacan within Mexico; (b) location of the municipality of Patzcuaro within Michoacan.
Figure 3. (a) Location of the State of Michoacan within Mexico; (b) location of the municipality of Patzcuaro within Michoacan.
Heritage 06 00161 g003
Heritage 06 00161 g004 550
Figure 4. Traditional adobe houses in Patzcuaro, Michoacan, Mexico. Source: A. Solís-Sánchez.
Figure 4. Traditional adobe houses in Patzcuaro, Michoacan, Mexico. Source: A. Solís-Sánchez.
Heritage 06 00161 g004
Heritage 06 00161 g005 550
Figure 5. Adobe walls of Santa Anna Chapitiro before the intervention. Source: A. Navarro-Ezquerra.
Figure 5. Adobe walls of Santa Anna Chapitiro before the intervention. Source: A. Navarro-Ezquerra.
Heritage 06 00161 g005
Heritage 06 00161 g006 550
Figure 6. Testing mixtures by application on an adobe wall. Source: A. Solís-Sánchez and A. Navarro-Ezquerra.
Figure 6. Testing mixtures by application on an adobe wall. Source: A. Solís-Sánchez and A. Navarro-Ezquerra.
Heritage 06 00161 g006
Heritage 06 00161 g007 550
Figure 7. Preparation and application of the earthen refurbishments. Source: A. Solís-Sánchez.
Figure 7. Preparation and application of the earthen refurbishments. Source: A. Solís-Sánchez.
Heritage 06 00161 g007
Heritage 06 00161 g008 550
Figure 8. (a) Consistency test and (b) specimens with water (the lighter ones) and with VOG (the darker ones) of the 3:1 dosage. Source: K. Sandoval-Castro.
Figure 8. (a) Consistency test and (b) specimens with water (the lighter ones) and with VOG (the darker ones) of the 3:1 dosage. Source: K. Sandoval-Castro.
Heritage 06 00161 g008
Heritage 06 00161 g009a 550Heritage 06 00161 g009b 550
Figure 9. Images of the test specimens before and after testing SAET. Samples: (a,c) before erosion test and (b,d) after erosion test. Source: K. Sandoval-Castro.
Figure 9. Images of the test specimens before and after testing SAET. Samples: (a,c) before erosion test and (b,d) after erosion test. Source: K. Sandoval-Castro.
Heritage 06 00161 g009aHeritage 06 00161 g009b
Heritage 06 00161 g010 550
Figure 10. Specimen images after the 12 moisture-drying cycles. Source: K. Sandoval-Castro.
Figure 10. Specimen images after the 12 moisture-drying cycles. Source: K. Sandoval-Castro.
Heritage 06 00161 g010
Heritage 06 00161 g011 550
Figure 11. Correlation graph of porosity with respect to simple compression (a) and MOE with respect to simple compression (b) before and after moisture-dry aging.
Figure 11. Correlation graph of porosity with respect to simple compression (a) and MOE with respect to simple compression (b) before and after moisture-dry aging.
Heritage 06 00161 g011
Heritage 06 00161 g012 550
Figure 12. Final result of the earthen refurbishment after the rainy season. Source: A. Sanchez-Calvillo.
Figure 12. Final result of the earthen refurbishment after the rainy season. Source: A. Sanchez-Calvillo.
Heritage 06 00161 g012
Table
Table 1. Mineralogical and particle size characterization of clay.
Table 1. Mineralogical and particle size characterization of clay.
FRX (%)XRD
SiO259.87Na2O0.32Quartz (SiO2)***
Al2O322.87P2O50.06Kaolinite (Al2(Si2O5)(OH)4)***
Fe2O36.33MnO0.02Illite ((K,H3O)(Al,Mg,Fe)2(Si,Al)4O10 [(OH)2,(H2O)])**
K2O1.38LOI6.87Chlorite (Mg,Fe)3(Si,Al)4O10(OH)2·(Mg,Fe)3(OH)6*
TiO21.04 Calcite (CaCO3)*
CaO0.73 Hematite (Fe2O3)*
MgO0.61 Orthoclase (KAlSi3O8)*
Atterberg limitsADL
LL: 40.80
PL: 25.40
IP: 15.40
MH: Mud,
medium plasticity		Heritage 06 00161 i001
*** Predominant, ** abundant, * present.
Table
Table 2. Matrix composition of the samples.
Table 2. Matrix composition of the samples.
SampleDosage (Volume)
WaterVOGClaySand
W 2:10.50-21
W 3:10.75-31
VOG 2:1-0.5021
VOG 3:1-0.7531
Table
Table 3. Characterization of soil mixtures designed for traditional community buildings.
Table 3. Characterization of soil mixtures designed for traditional community buildings.
Mesh Size (mm)Retained (g)Pass (%)Heritage 06 00161 i002
2.003.298.4
0.844.296.3
0.424.494.1
0.253.292.5
0.134.890.1
0.0747.286.5
<0.0741.73
Atterberg limitsLL: 52.8; PL: 44.7; IP: 8.1; MH: Mud, medium plasticity
Table
Table 4. Composition of soil mixtures designed for traditional community buildings.
Table 4. Composition of soil mixtures designed for traditional community buildings.
MixtureDosage (Volume)No. Test
WaterVOGClaySand
W A1/2-112
W B1/2-122
VOG A-1/2222
VOG B-1/2322
VOG C-2/3342
Table
Table 5. Porosity and mechanical properties of mortar.
Table 5. Porosity and mechanical properties of mortar.
SampleMechanical Properties and Porosity
n0 (%)Da (g/cm3)MOE (GPa)Cs (N/mm2)Fs (N/mm2)
W 2:121.52.045.30 ± 0.383.29 ± 0.772.11 ± 0.45
W 3:121.92.075.38 ± 0.504.06 ± 0.292.31 ± 0.09
VOG 2:118.82.0810.58 ± 0.787.64 ± 0.395.51 ± 0.56
VOG 3:117.32.137.82 ± 0.478.01 ± 2.146.45 ± 0.35
n0 (%): porosity accessible to water; Da: bulk density; MOE: dynamic Young’s modulus; Cs: compressive strength; Fs: flexural strength.
Table
Table 6. Capillary suction and permeability to water vapor of mortar.
Table 6. Capillary suction and permeability to water vapor of mortar.
SampleMobility of Water
C.S.c (Kg/(m2 min)μ Dry Glassμ Wet Glass
W 2:12.88 ± 0.0939.38 ± 8.1614.84 ± 1.34
W 3:13.27 ± 0.3526.20 ± 5.2614.35 ± 0.41
VOG 2:11.29 ± 0.31123.76 ± 64.4817.73 ± 0.90
VOG 3:11.29 ± 0.17119.21 ± 30.7516.20 ± 0.85
C.S.s: capillary suction coefficient; μ: water vapor resistance factor (dimensionless).
Table
Table 7. Percentage variation of the mass of the aged samples.
Table 7. Percentage variation of the mass of the aged samples.
Sample
W 2:1W 3:1VOG 2:1VOG 3:1
% percentage variation mass−1.30−0.81−0.38−0.59
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

González-Sánchez, B.; Sandoval-Castro, K.; Navarro-Ezquerra, A.; Ramírez-Casas, J.; Sanchez-Calvillo, A.; Alonso-Guzmán, E.M.; Navarro-Mendoza, E.G. Development and Intervention Proposal with Earthen Refurbishments with Vegetal Origin Gel (VOG) for the Preservation of Traditional Adobe Buildings. Heritage 2023, 6, 3025-3042. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage6030161

AMA Style

González-Sánchez B, Sandoval-Castro K, Navarro-Ezquerra A, Ramírez-Casas J, Sanchez-Calvillo A, Alonso-Guzmán EM, Navarro-Mendoza EG. Development and Intervention Proposal with Earthen Refurbishments with Vegetal Origin Gel (VOG) for the Preservation of Traditional Adobe Buildings. Heritage. 2023; 6(3):3025-3042. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage6030161

Chicago/Turabian Style

González-Sánchez, B., K. Sandoval-Castro, A. Navarro-Ezquerra, J. Ramírez-Casas, A. Sanchez-Calvillo, E. M. Alonso-Guzmán, and E. G. Navarro-Mendoza. 2023. "Development and Intervention Proposal with Earthen Refurbishments with Vegetal Origin Gel (VOG) for the Preservation of Traditional Adobe Buildings" Heritage 6, no. 3: 3025-3042. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage6030161

APA Style

González-Sánchez, B., Sandoval-Castro, K., Navarro-Ezquerra, A., Ramírez-Casas, J., Sanchez-Calvillo, A., Alonso-Guzmán, E. M., & Navarro-Mendoza, E. G. (2023). Development and Intervention Proposal with Earthen Refurbishments with Vegetal Origin Gel (VOG) for the Preservation of Traditional Adobe Buildings. Heritage, 6(3), 3025-3042. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage6030161

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop