2.1. Historic Placement
The manuscript was donated in 2020 to the Museum of Industry in Ghent by a local textile school, without any contextual information. It was part of the collection preserved within the institution, but it lacked links to the rest of the artifacts, especially when it came to relevant elements for our research. The manuscript itself had no clear indications about the manufacturer it belonged to or who the compiler might have been. Despite this absence, an examination of the artifact’s contents yielded very valuable information.
The geographical provenance was quickly determined as Antwerp, primarily through the addresses found in the correspondences. Another pivotal component in the identification process was a small map (
Figure 3) contained within the manuscript, depicting the presumed location of the manufactory in the cityscape. Several features surrounding the building were named, the most pertinent reference being the indication of the ‘Oude Leeuwen Rui’, which persists as an existing road in today’s city network and allowed us to considerably narrow the geographical scope.
Another crucial element is presented in (
Figure 4)
4, conserved in one of the city archives, containing a segment of the systematic land registers for the year 1800. This map facilitated the correlation of the remaining locations outlined in the manuscript’s drawn map, including Tucht-huis (Penal structure), Ankervliet, Oude Leeuwenrui, Hanseatisch huis (House of the Hansa), and others.
As a result, the dyer’s establishment could be precisely located within the old city. Further validation arose as the name indicated on the manuscript’s map for the domain north of the dyer (Blomaert) aligns with the one documented in the ‘Gevelplan’, associated with it (
Figure 4). This ‘Gevelplan’, detailed the names of the owners of various buildings and domains within the city walls. However, despite these confirmations, the name of the manufacturer remained elusive, as this building is listed as the property of ‘La Commune’, signifying the city itself.
Subsequent research revealed that it was common practice for city magistrates to stipulate long-term rental agreements or grant permission for manufacturers to use public or city-owned buildings, particularly for activities or industries they sought to promote. [
4] Dyeing, unlike spinning and weaving, posed a series of challenges when looking for a suitable location. The specialized and heavy equipment required, including large kettles and furnaces, often necessitated their integration into the building’s structure, making relocation impractical or impossible without substantial investment. Consequently, buildings housing dyeing operations were less likely to undergo repurposing between multiple rental contracts or companies [
4].
Further evidence of the dyer’s presence is documented in the ‘Wijkboeken’ (
Figure 5), also preserved within the Felix Archief [
5]. These books contain records of legal acts about buildings in specific neighborhoods, organized by period. Numerous dyers are mentioned throughout the books and pages (e.g., De Blauwe Hand, Ververij de Schaapskooi). However, it remains challenging to determine which of these is the manufacturer in question [
6].
Also interesting is the proximity of the dyer to a penal institution. Although seemingly unrelated, the so-called tucht- or rasp-huizen (grind-houses), were common correctional institutions in which criminals were engaged in labor [
7]. Often, these structures provided manpower for tasks related to the textile/dyeing industry, such as the chipping of dyewoods, for example, redwood and brazilwood [
8]. While historical records attest to this practice, specific details regarding this particular instance were not found.
2.3. Socio-Economic Context
During the 18th century, Antwerp and the rest of the Austrian Netherlands witnessed important political and economic evolutions [
9]. The first half of the century had been a period of stagnation, marked by instability and limited growth which also affected the local textile industry. Small textile manufacturers had become outdated through lacking investments. Moreover, they were often outcompeted by large, modern, and more complex companies in the Northern Dutch Republic and other cities in the empire. In these competing organizations, all activities were centralized within company-owned buildings, which were systematically monitored and sealed from the outside world for daily operations. This allowed these foreign enterprises to efficiently increase their output, making it impossible for the smaller companies of the south to survive [
10].
Nevertheless, in the second half of the century, the economy of the southern region benefitted from a stable political climate and economic growth. In combination with some state-driven measures and private investment, this led to a period of flourishing for the local textile industry [
11]. Conspicuous investments were set directly into the creation of new companies, and the old, small-scale local enterprises were replaced by modern industries that could produce at the same pace and price as their competitors. One of the first companies established by these investments was ‘Compagnie Beerenbroek’, a textile printing enterprise. The company was founded in 1753 and obtained a 25-year-long exclusive patent on production from the Hapsburgian Empress. Once this first company had set the pace, multiple similar initiatives within different sectors of textile production grew in the city. The period between 1770 and 1795 witnessed important growth, with new companies hiring hundreds of people every year in Antwerp alone [
12].
Despite being a large port city, the main outputs of Antwerp’s production were inland, towards the central cities of the empire. This was mainly due to the blockade of the estuary of the Schelde River, which had been imposed since 1578 by the forces of the northern Netherlands [
13].
The era of growth in the southern Netherlands came to abrupt end in the late years of the century with the entry of French revolutionary armies into the region. The ensuing battles and eventual integration into the French Empire in 1796 marked a period of socio-political instability, leading to the return of economic challenges for local enterprises [
14]. Despite the removal of the blockade of the Schelde River, which in the first instance seemed to re-open possibilities for the city’s exports, assimilation to France introduced unfamiliar contexts and limited the established trade towards the Hapsburg Empire. Unable to rapidly adapt to the new context and competition, local enterprises again faced economic struggles throughout the first half of the 19th century [
15].
The manuscript discussed in this research serves as a business-related report and lacks explicit details about the impact of the political situation on everyday operations. The sole visible related detail is the use of the French revolutionary month name ‘Le Floréal’ (20th or 21st of April to the 19th or 20th of May) in one of the French-written delivery notes (
Figure 6) [
16]. The manuscript’s last dated page is in 1802, with a few blank pages preceding the closing cover. The absence of a clear ending and the organic structure of the book’s contents, including recipes, accounts, and letters, make it challenging to establish if the manuscript was concluded due to historical events or spatial constraints. Nevertheless, through this socio-economic analysis, we were able to better understand the conditions in which this business developed, and most likely came to an end.
2.4. Contents of the Manuscript
To fully grasp the relevance of the manuscript in its complexity, we opted for a broad approach. Rather than exclusively focus on the dyeing practices, our analysis extended also to social and historical contexts. This approach led us to interesting hypotheses and conclusions, which will be presented in the subsequent section.
The manuscript, featuring its original binding, is the work of a single main author. Of the 160 pages, about 110 are physically part of the book and exhibit the same regular, vertical indentations due to the mold used to produce them. The remaining 50 are loose pages with irregular patterns, written on different papers and then added to the manuscript [
17]. This second group of pages also appears to be written mostly by the same hand and forms the main cluster composing the accounting section of the manuscript.
Content-wise, the manuscript can be broadly categorized into three groups, although these are not strictly delineated:
Recipes and dyeing tips exemplified by dyed fabric;
Accounting notes related to the acquisition and sale of goods;
Correspondences of different sorts.
Distributed across 160 pages, the main and predominant section of the manuscript comprises the 132 recipes and dyeing tips. Additionally, we find about 25 notes forming the accounting section related to the business operations (
Figure 7). As mentioned, these notes are often external additions, either pinned or inserted within the pages. Most likely, they represent only a fraction of the total accounting documents produced by the dyer and were also likely added to the manuscript as reminders (of materials and quantities thereof) concerning the described recipe.
The third section consists of six examples of correspondence between the dyer and the customers (
Figure 8). Despite this being the smallest section of the manuscript, these letters offer us interesting and relevant insights into daily matters such as payment requests, deliveries, and legal matters. Finally, it is important to mention the 104 colored fabric samples, which are included in the manuscript and pinned to the recipe they were supposedly produced with. This addition even further increases the rarity and the value of the manuscript, as these well-preserved samples are a direct testament to the practices of the dyer and are a precious reference with which to further study the recipes.
2.5. Wool and Cotton Substrates, a Middle-Class Dyer
Examining the Antwerp Manuscript, it is possible to hypothesize that the dyer’s production was destined for a broad middle-class public, offering recipes suitable for ‘the poor’ as well as expensive ones for a wealthier range of customers. The manuscript concentrates on wool dyeing, with exceptions made for three recipes specifically destined for cotton. Confirming this, nearly all the available fabric swatches are woolen, with some exceptions being cotton.
Historical sources indicate that the finest quality of wool was used to produce long and fine broadcloth. Especially proficient in this field were some of the dyers of the Languedoc, located in the south of France, of which a collection of documents has remained preserved and analyzed [
18]. Additionally, the South of England also historically served as a significant hub for the production and trade of high-quality wool in Europe [
19], but not much is known about the Low Countries.
The manuscript also provides indications regarding the type and quality of cloth being dyed. While the general term used is ‘goet’ (‘wares’), specific textile-related terminology such as ‘bayes’ (a plain, woven, napped woolen fabric, generally coarse depending on quality) and ‘sayes’ (a light, twilled form of wool) [
20] is mentioned in about 30 between recipes and accounting notes. Other references to dyed textiles include ‘garens’ (yarns), cited six times, and ‘kerseys’, (a coarser, thinner, woolen product with a distinct, visible weave pattern) [
20,
21] cited eight times. Bayes and sayes (
Figure 9) are consistently mentioned together, reflecting their similarities and frequent production by the same clothiers [
19]. These types of cloth were primarily intended for the middle class, sold as products of medium quality, and were less refined than broadcloth [
22].
Historical sources attest to the widespread production of these fabrics across multiple European hubs. Venice, renowned for its high-quality textile production, excelled in the production of sayes. This form of textile was then exported, especially to markets in the East, where demand was high [
23]. Notably, Venetian sayes and bayes were so popular that they were not only bought and sold, but also imitated by producers in other regions, who hoped to pick up a share of this profitable market. Some of the locations we have information about include the Languedoc in France and the Low Countires [
23].
The production of sayes and bayes in Flanders and Brabant predates the 16th century, but with time, knowledge from there and Italy traveled to England, especially to the Colchester area, where sayes and bayes were termed ‘The new Draperies’ [
24]. Proximity to the sources of raw materials and important trading hubs facilitated the rapid establishment of a sizeable production there, leading to a growth in exports toward the continent [
19]. These practices are examples of intense competition within the cloth market, which, by the 17th century, had turned into an immense theater of economic operations. This included the borrowing or sometimes the smuggling of technologies, patterns, and designs, as well as materials. The entire production process, from raw materials to finished products, developed on a massive scale, exemplifying the complexity and the interconnectedness of European cloth trading [
21]. Knowledge in textile production spread across Europe through the hands of different actors, determining a diversification of the quality of the same product. These variations then depended on the quality of raw materials and the skill, infrastructure, and effort invested in the production process. Sayes and bayes, being versatile products, presented an ample spectrum of qualities and ranged from semi-luxurious products, especially high-end Venetian ones [
18], to more affordable ones, such as those used in the clothing of monks and nuns and produced, for instance, in the northern Netherlands and England [
19].
The quality and price of the product were then also determined by the choice of the dyestuff. Cheaper dyes were used for more economical products [
25]. In this case, for sayes and bayes, dyestuffs like sappan and brazilwood fell into this category. In contrast, expensive dyes like cochineal, were mostly reserved for the production of high-end products, reflecting the correlation between the choice of dyestuff and the value of the finished product [
22].
As the microscopical and technical analysis (HPLC, XRF, and color measurement) of the textile samples within the Antwerp manuscript is currently pending, it is premature to provide a definitive statement regarding the overall quality of the production. However, based on the translated text and the range of employed dyes, it can be reasonably stated that the dyer worked with a range of different qualities of textiles.
Within the recipes, the prevalence of brazilwood and redwood, is potentially indicative of lower-quality products. On the other sid, the abundant presence of cochineal points towards a more refined range of goods (
Figure 10) [
18].
Moreover, the inclusion of colored yarn production in the manuscript, along with the mention of kersey, adds another layer to the diversity of the dyer’s production. Kerseys, being cheaper than sayes and bayes, likely supplied less wealthy markets. Notably, these were dyed exclusively with lesser-quality dyes or recycled color baths from previous dyeing processes. Historical sources mention the practice of dyeing kerseys and yarns in Antwerp already during the 16th century. Despite this, this specific kind of production did not gain significant importance in the city [
4].
Dyeing yarns before weaving ensures a better color penetration within the fibers and results in more vibrant hues afterward. This process was mainly applied when brilliant hues were necessary, for example, in the production of expensive multi-colored fabrics such as tapestries. However, despite this, it was rarely done, and Antwerp was not an exception in this regard. Dyeing the finished piece, or after the weaving process, remained the more prevalent practice. One key advantage of dyeing with this method was the minimization of waste, as both the dye and textile were used efficiently in the coloring stage [
4]. The result is that, even though dyeing yarn yielded the best result, dyers still retained the habit of first coloring the finished pieces, and only after that, the yarns. Consequently, the latter were always dyed in partially exhausted dyeing vats, rendering the results less appealing [
4].
The manuscript also documents this practice of recycling dye vats, with a noteworthy illustration found in the recipe (
Figure 11). This particular recipe refers to the brown dyeing process applied to three kerseys directly addressed to be ‘For the poor’. In this instance, the dyer utilized a vat containing residual dyes from prior black and red coloring procedures. These residual dyes were mixed and reheated, resulting in deep, dark brown hues on the fabric.
From this analysis, it can be concluded that the dyer opted for a versatile production approach, supplying a diverse clientele. The selection of textile and dye qualities was tied to the audience for whom the final product was intended. This audience spanned from the lower middle class, as seen in the aforementioned recipe (
Figure 11), to the higher middle class, as shown in the recipe that presents a meticulous procedure for dyeing intense scarlet through a double cochineal bath (
Figure 10).
Wool emerged as the central focus of production, with cotton playing a secondary role, mentioned in the manuscript on three occasions. The primary emphasis on sayes and bayes suggests that these forms of textiles were the core of the production within the enterprise, as well as the highest-quality products within the capabilities of the dyer. Utilizing leftovers from these higher-end products and employing less stable and economical dyes, the dyer then produced mainly kerseys, a more affordable form of wool. Furthermore, hybrid recipes, blending both inexpensive and premium dyes, were likely aimed at creating an intermediate range of products to accommodate varying consumer preferences.
2.6. Small-Sized Enterprise
Closely tied to the previous paragraph is a hypothesis about the possible size of the enterprise that generated this document. The central deduction that led us to this consideration is mostly found in the accounting notes and in some of the recipes, more specifically, the ones carrying references to specific orders that included the quantity of material that was dyed.
One example (
Figure 12) describes the most sizeable order in the document and reports on the production of 12 woolen kerseys. On page 133 of the document, (
Figure 13) a single kersey is reported to weigh about 30 pounds (about 13.5 kg), thus 12 kerseys is equivalent to an order of roughly 360 pounds (about 160kg) of dyed goods [
26]. To compare the order with other available sources, the industrial-sized production of the dye master Antoine Janot in Saint-Chinian, Languedoc, would export woolen fabric in bales weighing in at about 200 kg each [
27]. Consequently, the largest order we have an account of is smaller than the average unit an industrial-sized dyer would export.
Another indicative measure of the scale of the enterprise was deduced through a comparison with the Crutchley Archive’s cashbook, which mirrors similar accounts to those found in the Antwerp manuscript, including transactions and tabs. The financial records in the Crutchley Archive extend up to GBP 2586 (equivalent to over EUR 345,000 today) for a single order. In contrast, the Antwerp dyer’s accounts (
Figure 14) document tabs up to 643 fl. (approximately EUR 5000 based on contemporary currency conversion rates) [
28].
A similar juxtaposition can be traced between the size and timeframe of the two accounts. the Crutchleys produced a total of 15 books in 28 years [
22], whilst we only have one book covering the whole timespan between 23 years (1779–1802) for the Antwerp dyer. The final element contributing to the proposition regarding the scale of the enterprise is the range of cities referenced in the manuscript, including Brussels, Liege, Dendermonde, and Louvain. These cities seem to sketch the boundaries of a network that was limited to the borders of today’s Belgium. Within the manuscript, accounts are only given in the Flemish pound and the north-Netherlandic gulden, further indicating the local nature of the business. Lastly, also within the material orders, there are no indications of long-range business activities.
While acknowledging that this comparison may not offer an exhaustive conclusion due to the potential lack of complete accounts of the Antwerp company, which is limited to one single manuscript, it nonetheless provides consistent indicators supporting our hypothesis. Altogether, these clues suggest the profile of a local enterprise, primarily serving regional customers and retailers in line with a market orientation focused on the middle and lower-middle classes.