Potential of Oil Palm (Elaeisguineensis) Empty Fruit Bunch Fibres Cement Composites for Building Applications
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Collection and Preparation of Materials
2.1.1. Oil Palm Empty Fruit Bunch Collection and Preparation
2.1.1.1. Pre-Treatment of the Oil Palm Empty Fruit Bunch Fibres with Potable Water at Varying Temperature
2.1.1.2. Pre-Treatment of Oil Palm Empty Fruit Bunch Fibres with Sodium Hydroxide Solution
2.1.1.3. Ashing the Oil Palm Fibres for Partial Replacement of Cement
2.2. Methods
The Fibre–Cement Composite Production
2.3. Composite Tests and Test Procedure
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Water Absorption (WA) and Thickness Swelling (TS)
3.2. Density of Composites
3.3. The Mechanical Properties
4. Conclusions
- (1)
- Pre-treatment of fibre with water at temperature of 60 °C, as well as a treatment in 8% NaOH concentration, increased MOE from 5.5 to 8.9 GPa and MOR from 3.6 to 7.3 MPa, and decreased WA from 26.2 to 12.8% and TS from 2.5 to 0.5%.
- (2)
- There were also significant differences in WA and TS values when untreated and pre-treated OPEFB fibres were used for cement composite production. Low values of WA and TS obtained for the pre-treated fibres indicated that the composites produced were dimensionally stable and could be used for both interior and exterior applications.
- (3)
- Density and compressive strength decreased as fibre contents increased. The fibre–cement composites can be used to produce lightweight blocks of densities less than 1680 kgm−3
- (4)
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Hassan, A.I.; Arshad, A.S.; Nasir, F.; Baka, A.A. A Review on Oil Palm Empty Fruit Bunch Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Composite Materials. Polym. Compos. 2010, 31, 2079–2101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Onuorah, O.E. Properties of Fibre-boards Made from Oil Palm (Elaeis guineensis) Stem and/or Mixed Tropical Hardwood Sawmill Residues. J. Trop. For. Sci. 2005, 17, 497–507. [Google Scholar]
- Ajayi, B. The use of Coconut fibre, a non-convectional material for inorganic bonded Manufacturing: Mitigating approach to scare housing products. In Proceedings of the 1 Pro-African Conference: Non-conventional Building Materials Based on Agro-industrial Wastes, Pirassununga, São Paulo, Brazil, 18–19 October 2010; pp. 66–169. [Google Scholar]
- Olorunnisola, A.O. Strength and Water absorption characteristics of cement bonded particleboard produced from coconut husk. J. Civ. Eng. Res. Pract. 2006, 31, 41–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ajayi, B.; Olufemi, B. Properties of cement-bonded flake-boards from Gmelina arborea and Leucaena leucocephala. Int. J. Biol. Chem. Sci. 2010, 5, 586–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Raju, G.U.; Kumarapa, S.; Gaitonde, V.N. Mechanical and physical characterization of agricultural waste reinforced polymer composites. J. Mater. Environ. Sci. 2012, 3, 907–916. [Google Scholar]
- Papadopoulus, A.N.; Ntalos, G.A.; Karakas, I. Mechanical and physical properties of Cement-Bonded OSB. Holz Roh Werkst. 2006, 64, 517–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khorami, M.; Ganjian, E. Comparing flexural behaviour of fibre-cement composites reinforced bagasse: Wheat and eucalyptus. Constr. Build. Mater. 2011, 24, 187–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- American Society for Testing and Materials. Annual Book of ASTM Standards; ASTM D 570-98, reapproved in 2005; American Society for Testing and Materials: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2005; pp. 35–37. [Google Scholar]
- American Society for Testing and Materials. Standard Specification for Fibre Cement Roofing Shingles, Shakes, ASTM International; American Society for Testing and Materials: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Olorunnisola, A.O.; Pitman, A.; Mansfield-William, H. Hydration characteristics of cement-bonded composites made from rattan cane and coconut husk. J. Bamboo Ratt. 2005, 42, 193–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Olorunnisola, A.O. Effects of particle geometry and chemical accelerator on strength properties of rattan-cement composites. Afr. J. Sci. Eng. 2007, 8, 22–27. [Google Scholar]
- Olorunnisola, A.O.; Adefisan, O.O. Trial production and testing of cement-bonded Particle board from rattan furniture waste. Wood Fibre Sci. 2002, 34, 116–124. [Google Scholar]
- Olorunnisola, A.O.; Agrawal, S. Effects of NaOH concentration and fibre content on physio-mechanical properties of cement-bonded rattan fibre composites. Pro Ligno 2015, 11, 192–198. [Google Scholar]
- Tan, C.; Ahmad, I.; Heng, M. Characterization of polyester composites from recycled polyethylene terephthalate reinforced with empty fruit bunch fibers. Mater. Des. 2011, 32, 4493–4501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mrema, A.L. Cement Bonded Wood Wool Boards from Podocarpus species for low cost housing. J. Civ. Eng. Res. Pract. 2006, 31, 51–64. [Google Scholar]
- Sreekala, M.S.; Thomas, S. Utilization of Short Oil Palm Empty Fruit Bunch Fiber (OPEFB) as a Reinforcement in Phenol-formaldehyde resins: Studies on Mechanical properties. J. Polym. Eng. 1997, 16, 265–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aggarwal, L.K.; Agrawal, S.P.; Thapliyal, P.C.; Karade, S.R. Cement-bonded composite boards with arhar stalks. Cem. Concr. Comp. 2008, 30, 44–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Badejo, S.O.; Omole, A.O.; Fuwape, J.A.; Oyeleye, B.O. Static bending and moisture response of cement bonded Particleboard produced at different levels of percent chemical additive content in board. Niger. J. Agric. Food Environ. 2011, 7, 111–120. [Google Scholar]
- Falemara, B.C.; Ajayi, B.; Agbaje, J.; Binuyo, G. Strength and Dimensional Stability Properties of Cement Bonded Board Produced from Arachis hypogaea (Groundnut) Shell. In Sudano Sahelian Landscape and Renewable Natural Resources Development in Nigeria, Proceedings of the 37th Annual Conference of the Forestry Association of Nigeria, Minna, Niger State, 9–14 November 2014; Forestry Association of Nigeria: Minna, Nigeria, 2014; pp. 496–506. [Google Scholar]
- Frybort, S.; Mauritz, R.; Teischinger, A.; Muller, U. Cement Bonded Composites: A Mechanical Review. BioResuorces 2008, 3, 602–626. [Google Scholar]
Production Variables | Specifications |
---|---|
1. Pre-treatment of fibres with water | Cold, 60 °C, and 100 °C |
2. Chemical additives (NaOH) | 2%, 4%, 6%, 8% and 10% |
3. Ash–cement content | 10%, 20% and 30% |
4. Fibre–cement content | 5%, 10% and 15% |
Fibre Treatment | Fibre Content (%) per Cement Weight | Water Absorption (%) | Thickness Swelling (%) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2 h | 24 h | 2 h | 24 h | ||
Untreated fibre | 2.5 | 8.8 | 23.4 | 1.4 | 1.9 |
5 | 10.2 | 25.9 | 1.6 | 2.3 | |
7.5 | 16.4 | 26.2 | 1.9 | 2.5 | |
Cold water | 2.5 | 5.5 | 14.6 | 0.3 | 0.4 |
5 | 5.8 | 16.1 | 0.5 | 0.6 | |
7.5 | 6.2 | 17.9 | 0.7 | 0.9 | |
Water treated @ 60 °C | 2.5 | 5.3 | 14.2 | 0.3 | 0.3 |
5 | 5.7 | 14.9 | 0.4 | 0.4 | |
7.5 | 5.6 | 16.2 | 0.5 | 0.6 | |
Water treated @ 100 °C | 2.5 | 4.8 | 13.9 | 0.2 | 0.3 |
5 | 5.1 | 14.7 | 0.3 | 0.4 | |
7.5 | 5.2 | 15.4 | 0.5 | 0.6 | |
NaOH (8%) | 2.5 | 4.4 | 11.4 | 0.2 | 0.3 |
5 | 4.5 | 12.3 | 0.3 | 0.4 | |
7.5 | 4.5 | 12.8 | 0.3 | 0.5 |
Fibre Treatment | Fibre Content (%) per Cement Weight | WA per % of Fibre at 2 h | WA per % of Fibre at 24 h | TS per % of Fibre at 2 h | TS per % of Fibre at 24 h |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Untreated fibre | 2.5 | 3.5 | 9.4 | 0.56 | 0.76 |
5 | 2.0 | 5.2 | 0.32 | 0.46 | |
7.5 | 2.2 | 3.5 | 0.25 | 0.33 | |
Cold water | 2.5 | 2.2 | 5.8 | 0.12 | 0.16 |
5 | 1.2 | 3.2 | 0.10 | 0.12 | |
7.5 | 0.8 | 2.4 | 0.09 | 0.12 | |
Water treated @ 60 °C | 2.5 | 2.1 | 5.7 | 0.12 | 0.12 |
5 | 1.1 | 3.0 | 0.08 | 0.08 | |
7.5 | 0.7 | 2.2 | 0.07 | 0.08 | |
Water treated @ 100 °C | 2.5 | 1.9 | 5.6 | 0.08 | 0.12 |
5 | 1.0 | 2.9 | 0.06 | 0.08 | |
7.5 | 0.7 | 2.1 | 0.07 | 0.08 | |
NaOH (8%) | 2.5 | 1.8 | 4.6 | 0.08 | 0.12 |
5 | 0.9 | 2.5 | 0.06 | 0.08 | |
7.5 | 0.6 | 1.7 | 0.04 | 0.07 |
NaOH Content (%) | Density kgm−3 | MOR (MPa) | MOE (GPa) | IBS (MPa) |
---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1550 | 3.6 | 5.5 | 0.33 |
2 | 1575 | 3.9 | 6.2 | 0.35 |
4 | 1580 | 4.5 | 6.3 | 0.37 |
6 | 1654 | 5.1 | 7.7 | 0.37 |
8 | 1694 | 7.3 | 8.9 | 0.40 |
10 | 1683 | 3.8 | 4.1 | 0.33 |
Percentage of Ash (%) | Mean Oven Dry Density (kgm−3) | ||
---|---|---|---|
7 days | 14 days | 28 days | |
0 | 2216 | 2297 | 2311 |
5 | 1750 | 1882 | 1997 |
10 | 1732 | 1827 | 1895 |
15 | 1691 | 1791 | 1803 |
20 | 1680 | 1688 | 1756 |
25 | 1654 | 1678 | 1704 |
30 | 1628 | 1649 | 1678 |
Percentage of Fibre (%) | Compressive Strength (MPa N/mm2) | MOR (MPa) | MOE (GPa) |
---|---|---|---|
0 (Plain) | 15.02 | 3.5 | 5.5 |
2.5 | 13.26 | 3.7 | 5.8 |
5.0 | 12.65 | 4.9 | 6.5 |
7.5 | 10.98 | 4.1 | 3.4 |
Percentage of Ash (%) | Mean Compressive Strength (N/mm2) | ||
---|---|---|---|
7 days | 14 days | 28 days | |
0 | 11.58 | 13.36 | 15.22 |
5 | 10.26 | 10.54 | 10.89 |
10 | 8.45 | 8.89 | 9.46 |
15 | 7.97 | 8.16 | 8.63 |
20 | 6.54 | 72 | 7.42 |
25 | 6.10 | 6.44 | 6.85 |
30 | 5.40 | 5.94 | 6.63 |
Grade | Compressive Strength | Concrete Class |
---|---|---|
7 | 5 | Plain concrete |
10 | 10 | |
15 | 15 | Reinforced concrete with light weight aggregate |
20 | 20 | Reinforced Concrete with dense aggregate |
25 | 25 |
© 2019 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Omoniyi, T.E. Potential of Oil Palm (Elaeisguineensis) Empty Fruit Bunch Fibres Cement Composites for Building Applications. AgriEngineering 2019, 1, 153-163. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriengineering1020012
Omoniyi TE. Potential of Oil Palm (Elaeisguineensis) Empty Fruit Bunch Fibres Cement Composites for Building Applications. AgriEngineering. 2019; 1(2):153-163. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriengineering1020012
Chicago/Turabian StyleOmoniyi, Temidayo E. 2019. "Potential of Oil Palm (Elaeisguineensis) Empty Fruit Bunch Fibres Cement Composites for Building Applications" AgriEngineering 1, no. 2: 153-163. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriengineering1020012
APA StyleOmoniyi, T. E. (2019). Potential of Oil Palm (Elaeisguineensis) Empty Fruit Bunch Fibres Cement Composites for Building Applications. AgriEngineering, 1(2), 153-163. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriengineering1020012