Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
Dynamics of a Homogeneous and Isotropic Space in Pure Cubic f(R) Gravity
Previous Article in Journal
Spontaneous Curvature Induced Stretching-Bending Mode Coupling in Membranes
Previous Article in Special Issue
Entropy Production Due to Electroweak Phase Transition in the Framework of Two Higgs Doublet Model
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

The Merger Rate of Black Holes in a Primordial Black Hole Cluster

by
Viktor D. Stasenko
* and
Alexander A. Kirillov
Moscow Engineering Physics Institute, National Research Nuclear University MEPhI, 115409 Moscow, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Physics 2021, 3(2), 372-378; https://doi.org/10.3390/physics3020026
Submission received: 19 March 2021 / Revised: 7 May 2021 / Accepted: 10 May 2021 / Published: 17 May 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Beyond the Standard Models of Physics and Cosmology)

Abstract

:
In this paper, the merger rate of black holes in a cluster of primordial black holes (PBHs) is investigated. The clusters have characteristics close to those of typical globular star clusters. A cluster that has a wide mass spectrum ranging from 10 2 to 10 M (Solar mass) and contains a massive central black hole of the mass M = 10 3 M is considered. It is shown that in the process of the evolution of cluster, the merger rate changed significantly, and by now, the PBH clusters have passed the stage of active merging of the black holes inside them.

1. Introduction

Since the registration of gravitational waves from black hole mergers, interest in primordial black holes (PBHs) and their clusters has increased. Models of the formation of PBH clusters are considered with a narrow mass spectrum [1,2,3] and a wide one [4,5,6]. The first type of clusters appears in the early Universe due to the collapse of density perturbations. The second type describes cluster formation via gravitational collapse of domain walls appearing in the early Universe as a result of the evolution of scalar fields in the inflationary epoch; see review [7] and references therein. A cluster is formed after detachment from the Hubble flow and consequent collapse of domain walls into PBHs. Finally, it forms at the redshift z 10 4 and obtains characteristics close to those of globular star clusters. Despite the similarities, the considered PBHs clusters might have black holes with a wide range of masses and a massive black hole at the center. We discussed the evolution of these systems in Refs. [8,9] in the framework of two-body relaxation; however, the question of the black hole merger rate was not studied. This paper continues the previous investigation and explores the merger rate of black holes during the evolution of such clusters.
There are two possibilities: mergers of black holes with each other and with a massive central black hole (CBH). The first possibility was discussed in Refs. [7,10,11,12,13] in the context of PBH clusters with narrow mass spectra (with the number of PBH N PBH 10 4 ) and in Refs. [14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22] in the context of a dense globular star cluster. The second possibility was considered for globular star clusters [23,24,25,26,27,28] and galactic nuclei [29,30,31,32,33] in the loss-cone treatment [34,35]. In the calculations described in this paper, it is shown that during cluster evolution, mergers mainly occur with a central black hole; nevertheless, the merger rate is low.

2. Estimations

Let us estimate the merger rate of black holes for a single-mass PBH cluster. For the cluster with the total mass M = 10 5 M (Solar mass) and the characteristic radius R 1 pc, the characteristic velocity of the PBHs is v = G M / R 20 km s 1 [7], where G is the Newtonian gravitational constant. The merger cross-section of two black holes with masses m and m is given by [14,36]:
σ = 2 π 85 π 6 2 2 / 7 G 2 ( m + m ) 10 / 7 m 2 / 7 m 2 / 7 c 10 / 7 | v v | 18 / 7 .
This cross-section describes the formation of PBHs of binaries due to gravitational radiation. In the present calculations, it is assumed that the lifetime of a binary is less than the dynamical time of the PBH cluster, the approximation similar to one used in Refs. [14,17,22].
The merger rate can be estimated as Γ N v σ n , where N is the number of PBHs in the cluster, n is the number density of the PBHs. For simplicity, let us consider a cluster with a constant number density of n = 3 N / 4 π R 3 . Thus, the merger rate is:
Γ 10 10 M 10 5 M 17 / 14 R 1 pc 31 / 14 yr 1 .
During the cluster evolution, black holes evaporate from the core. This process is a slow diffusion in the velocity space. Therefore, one can assume that black holes escaping the cluster carry away zero energy. Hence, the total energy of the core is conserved. According to the virial theorem, the total energy is E = G ( m N ) 2 / 2 R . Therefore, in the process of BH evaporation, the core size is R N 2 . As a result, the relationship between the number of black holes in the cluster core and the merger rate is: Γ N 3.2 .
In this study, one considers the clusters with a massive CBH. As a result of the capture of less massive black holes, the CBH mass grows as M ˙ = ρ σ c v , where ρ is the density of black holes in the cluster, and σ c = 4 π r g 2 ( c / v ) 2 is the cross-section for particle capture by a Schwarzschild black hole [37], r g is the gravitational radius of the CBH. Estimation of M ˙ gives
M ˙ 10 11 R 1 pc 5 / 2 M 10 5 M 1 / 2 M 10 3 M 2 M yr 1 .
If the mass of the CBH M is much less than the core mass, M c , then the CBH does not affect the core collapse. Hence, the growth rate of the CBH evolves as M ˙ N 4.5 . Hence, the merger rate of the BHs may play a significant role in both cases. Note that when the core contracts significantly, the CBH stops the collapse and causes an expansion phase [27,28,33,38,39].
Note that there is also another mechanism of creating PBH binaries in a cluster based on three-body interaction. The third body can carry away enough energy to form a binary from the two others. The formed binaries lose energy through interactions with single black holes and gravitational radiation. As a result, pairs of mergers are caused. This possibility was studied for globular star clusters with black holes in Refs. [17,18,19,20,21,22]. In addition, these binaries might significantly affect the cluster evolution, stop the core collapse, and cause gravothermal oscillations [40,41,42,43,44]. These binaries will descend towards the cluster center under the influence of dynamical friction. In the case considered in this paper, they will be destroyed as a result of interactions with the massive central black hole (∼ 10 3 M ) [45,46]. The characteristic time scale for this process is [34]:
t df v B 3 4 π G 2 m B ρ ln Λ 1.7 v B 20 km s 1 3 ρ 10 5 M pc 1 1 m B 20 M 1 Myr ,
where v B and m B are the velocity and the mass of the PBH binary, and ln Λ = 10 , where ln Λ is the Coulomb logarithm. On the other hand, the merger time t gw of two black holes of the same mass m in a circular orbit with the separation a due to an emission of gravitational waves is given by the expression [37]:
t gw = 5 c 5 a 4 512 G 3 m 3 1.6 a 0.01 au 4 m 10 M 3 Myr .
The condition t gw < t df leads to the maximum value of a for a binary system that merges before its destruction:
a 10 2 t df 2 Myr 1 / 4 m 10 M 3 / 4 au .
The probability of the formation of such hard binaries requires a careful analysis. Thus, we assume that all binaries that are forming are destroyed by the CBH. The destruction mechanism also remains true if the PBH binaries are primordial in a cluster. These binaries may have a similar origin that of those formed in the early Universe [47,48,49].

3. Merger Rate of Black Holes

The merger rate of black holes with the mass m per unit of phase space, per unit of mass, and per unit of time is given by [14]:
γ = f ( r , v , m ) d m d v f ( r , v , m ) | v v | σ m , m , | v v | ,
where f is the distribution function of black holes in the cluster and σ is the merger cross section is defined by (1). The expression (1) shows that the cross-section is σ = σ ( m , m ) | v v | 18 / 7 . In the case of spherical symmetry, Equation (7) reads:
γ = 14 π f ( r , v , m ) 3 v d m d v v σ ( m , m ) f ( r , v , m ) ( v + v ) 3 / 7 | v v | 3 / 7 .
Let us take the delta-functional approximation for the distribution function of the i-th black hole type:
f i ( r , v , m ) = n i ( r ) 2 π v δ v 2 v i 2 ¯ ( r ) δ ( m m i ) ,
where v i 2 ¯ ( r ) is the mean-squared velocity [50]:
v i 2 ¯ ( r ) = 4 π n i ( r ) ϕ ( r ) 0 d E f i ( E ) 2 E ϕ ( r ) 3 / 2 ,
and m i and n i are, respectively, the mass and the number density of the i-th PBH type and ϕ ( r ) is the gravitational potential of the cluster. In other words, it is assumed that at any point r, black holes have the same velocity v i 2 ¯ ( r ) , and their direction is isotropic. Upon integrating in Equation (8), one obtains the merger rate of the j-th BH type with the others:
Γ j = 14 π 3 i σ ( m j , m i ) d r r 2 n j n i v ¯ j v ¯ i ( v ¯ j + v ¯ i ) 3 / 7 | v ¯ j v ¯ i | 3 / 7 ,
where we introduce the notation v 2 ¯ = v ¯ . In order to obtain the merger rate of the j-th and i-th BH types only, one should take only the i-th term under the sum in Equation (11).

4. Results

To study the evolution of a PBH cluster, the orbit-averaged Fokker–Planck equation with the loss-cone term [8,33] is used here. The following form of the density profile is considered:
ρ i ( r ) = ρ 0 , i r r 0 1 1 + r 2 r 0 2 2 ,
where r 0 = 1 pc, and ρ 0 , i is the normalization constant. The profile (12) is the modified Plummer model and is often used as a toy model for globular star clusters [50]. The central cusp ρ r 1 is necessary due to the presence of a CBH. It is known that a physically valid density profile in the presence of a CBH must be steeper than r 1 / 2 [34]. For convenience, the profile power index is set to 1 in the calculations here as soon as the central cusp obeys the Bachkoll–Wolf law, ρ r 7 / 4 [23] below 1 Myr. Moreover, the results do not depend on the profile shape because the expansion phase starts very quickly after 100 Myr [8,9], the time when the core collapse occurs in the model without a CBH for this cluster.
The mass spectrum of the black holes for the cluster was found to be [7]
d N d m m α .
The black hole masses m range from 10 2 to 10 M . In the calculations in this paper, the number of mass types of BHs is set to 6, the total mass of the cluster to 10 5 M , and the mass of the CBH to M = 10 3 M .
The results of the calculations are shown in Figure 1, which illustrates the evolution of the merger rate of different mass types of black holes with the massive central black hole. The initial peak appears due to the Bahcall–Wolf cusp formation [23]. Further evolution is similar to the core collapse for a cluster without a CBH. After the core collapse time, the cluster slowly expands because the CBH acts as an energy source [27,28,33,38]. In Figure 1a one can see that, after ∼100 Myr, the merger rate of the BHs decreases. For instance, over the next 10 Gyr, the CBH captures ∼10 black holes with the mass m = 10 M for the model with α = 1 . The maximum merger number for the period under consideration is ∼100, and it is achieved for the model with α = 2.5 and BH masses m = 10 2 M .
The evolution of the BH merger rate in the cluster of black hole with no CBH for the different values of α of the mass spectrum (13) is shown in Figure 2. One can see that the merger rate of the black holes with each other is much lower than that with the CBH. Nevertheless, the results can be used to restrict the abundance of PBH clusters with the LIGO/Virgo data [51]. Here, a rough estimate for the clusters in question is given. One can see that the modern merger rate in the cluster is Γ 10 13 yr 1 . On the other hand, the merger rate of black holes with the mass O ( 10 M ) is estimated by LIGO/Virgo data as Γ 100 Gpc 3 yr 1 [51]. Thus, one can obtain the constraints on the number density of the PBH clusters n cl 10 15 Gpc 3 . Taking into account the cluster mass M cl = 10 5   M , one gets ρ cl 100 M kpc 3 . The critical density has the same order of magnitude: ρ c 126 M kpc 3 [52]. However, an accurate analysis might use more robust constraints.

5. Discussion

In this paper, the merger rate evolution of black holes in a primordial black hole (PBH) cluster with a wide mass spectrum and a massive central black hole (CBH) was studied via the Fokker–Planck equation. It was shown that black hole mergers might mainly occur in a typical PBH cluster due to absorption by a CBH. However, the rapid evolution of the PBH clusters leads to a small merger rate at the present time, compared to the merger rate below 100 Myr. Even the most effective merging process—for the CBH of the mass of 10 3 M and black holes of 10 M —only gives the rate Γ 10 10 yr 1 . In addition, the merger rate of black holes with masses ∼ 10 M observed by LIGO/Virgo experiment does not impose restrictions on the abundance of PBH clusters.
This study might serve as a starting point for studying the frequency of gravitational wave signals from mergers of black holes in PBH clusters for the planned LISA experiment [53]. The analysis of the future LISA data can give additional information about the abundance of PBH clusters and/or constrain some models.

Author Contributions

The authors made equal contributions to the work. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation, Project “Fundamental properties of elementary particles and cosmology” № 0723-2020-0041.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
BHsBlack holes
CBHCentral black hole
PBHsPrimordial black holes

References

  1. Chisholm, J.R. Clustering of primordial black holes: Basic results. Phys. Rev. D 2006, 73, 083504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Matsubara, T.; Terada, T.; Kohri, K.; Yokoyama, S. Clustering of primordial black holes formed in a matter-dominated epoch. Phys. Rev. D 2019, 100, 123544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Desjacques, V.; Riotto, A. Spatial clustering of primordial black holes. Phys. Rev. D 2018, 98, 123533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Rubin, S.G.; Khlopov, M.Y.; Sakharov, A.S. Primordial black holes from non-equilibrium second order phase transition. Grav. Cosmol. 2000, S6, 51–58. [Google Scholar]
  5. Rubin, S.G.; Sakharov, A.S.; Khlopov, M.Y. The formation of primary galactic nuclei during phase transitions in the early Universe. J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 2001, 92, 921–929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Khlopov, M.Y.; Rubin, S.G.; Sakharov, A.S. Primordial structure of massive black hole clusters. Astropart. Phys. 2005, 23, 265–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Belotsky, K.M.; Dokuchaev, V.I.; Eroshenko, Y.N.; Esipova, E.A.; Khlopov, M.Y.; Khromykh, L.A.; Kirillov, A.A.; Nikulin, V.V.; Rubin, S.G.; Svadkovsky, I.V. Clusters of primordial black holes. Eur. Phys. J. C 2019, 79, 246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Stasenko, V.D.; Kirillov, A.A. Evolution of the cluster of primordial black holes within the Fokker-Planck approach. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2020, 1690, 012147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Stasenko, V.D.; Kirillov, A.A. Dynamical evolution of a cluster of primordial black holes. Bled Workshop Phys. 2020, 21, 162–167. [Google Scholar]
  10. Ballesteros, G.; Serpico, P.D.; Taoso, M. On the merger rate of primordial black holes: Effects of nearest neighbours distribution and clustering. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2018, 2018, 043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. De Luca, V.; Desjacques, V.; Franciolini, G.; Riotto, A. The clustering evolution of primordial black holes. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2020, 2020, 028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Korol, V.; Mandel, I.; Miller, M.C.; Church, R.P.; Davies, M.B. Merger rates in primordial black hole clusters without initial binaries. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2020, 496, 994–1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Trashorras, M.; Garćia-Bellido, J.; Nesseris, S. The clustering dynamics of primordial black holes in N-body simulations. Universe 2021, 7, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Quinlan, G.D.; Shapiro, S.L. Dynamical evolution of dense clusters of compact stars. Astrophys. J. 1989, 343, 725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lee, M.H. N-body evolution of dense clusters of compact stars. Astrophys. J. 1993, 418, 147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Gürkan, M.A.; Freitag, M.; Rasio, F.A. Formation of massive black holes in dense star clusters. I. Mass segregation and core collapse. Astrophys. J. 2004, 604, 632–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kritos, K.; Cholis, I. Evaluating the merger rate of binary black holes from direct captures and third-body soft interactions using the Milky Way globular clusters. Phys. Rev. D 2020, 102, 083016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Choksi, N.; Volonteri, M.; Colpi, M.; Gnedin, O.Y.; Li, H. The star clusters that make black hole binaries across cosmic time. Astrophys. J. 2019, 873, 100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Rodriguez, C.L.; Amaro-Seoane, P.; Chatterjee, S.; Kremer, K.; Rasio, F.A.; Samsing, J.; Ye, C.S.; Zevin, M. Post-Newtonian dynamics in dense star clusters: Formation, masses, and merger rates of highly-eccentric black hole binaries. Phys. Rev. D 2018, 98, 123005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Rodriguez, C.L.; Amaro-Seoane, P.; Chatterjee, S.; Rasio, F.A. Post-Newtonian dynamics in dense star clusters: Highly eccentric, highly spinning, and repeated binary black hole mergers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2018, 120, 151101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  21. Weatherford, N.C.; Fragione, G.; Kremer, K.; Chatterjee, S.; Ye, C.S.; Rodriguez, C.L.; Rasio, F.A. Black hole mergers from star clusters with top-heavy initial mass functions. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2021, 907, L25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kritos, K.; De Luca, V.; Franciolini, G.; Kehagias, A.; Riotto, A. The astro-primordial black hole merger rates: A reappraisal. arXiv 2020, arXiv:2012.03585. [Google Scholar]
  23. Bahcall, J.N.; Wolf, R.A. Star distribution around a massive black hole in a globular cluster. Astrophys. J. 1976, 209, 214–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Lightman, A.P.; Shapiro, S.L. The distribution and consumption rate of stars around a massive, collapsed object. Astrophys. J. 1977, 211, 244–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Bahcall, J.N.; Wolf, R.A. The star distribution around a massive black hole in a globular cluster. II. Unequal star masses. Astrophys. J. 1977, 216, 883–907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Cohn, H.; Kulsrud, R.M. The stellar distribution around a black hole: Numerical integration of the Fokker-Planck equation. Astrophys. J. 1978, 226, 1087–1108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Marchant, A.B.; Shapiro, S.L. Star clusters containing massive, central black holes. III—Evolution calculations. Astrophys. J. 1980, 239, 685–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Shapiro, S.L. Star clusters, self-interacting dark matter halos, and black hole cusps: The fluid conduction model and its extension to general relativity. Phys. Rev. D 2018, 98, 023021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Murphy, B.W.; Cohn, H.N.; Durisen, R.H. Dynamical and luminosity evolution of active galactic nuclei: Models with a mass spectrum. Astrophys. J. 1991, 370, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Alexander, T. Stellar processes near the massive black hole in the Galactic center [review article]. Phys. Rep. 2005, 419, 65–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Merritt, D. Evolution of Nuclear Star Clusters. Astrophys. J. 2009, 694, 959–970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Merritt, D. Gravitational encounters and the evolution of galactic nuclei. I. Method. Astrophys. J. 2015, 804, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Vasiliev, E. A New Fokker-Planck approach for the relaxation-driven evolution of galactic nuclei. Astrophys. J. 2017, 848, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Merritt, D. Dynamics and Evolution of Galactic Nuclei; Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  35. Merritt, D. Loss-cone dynamics. Class. Quant. Grav. 2013, 30, 244005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Mouri, H.; Taniguchi, Y. Runaway merging of black holes: Analytical constraint on the timescale. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2002, 566, L17–L20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Landau, L.D.; Lifshitz, E.M. The Classical Theory of Fields; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1975. [Google Scholar]
  38. Shapiro, S.L. The dissolution of globular clusters containing massive black holes. Astrophys. J. 1977, 217, 281–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Heggie, D.C.; Hut, P.; Mineshige, S.; Makino, J.; Baumgardt, H. The core radius of a star cluster containing a massive black hole. Publ. Astron. Soc. Jpn. 2007, 59, L11–L14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Heggie, D.C. Binary evolution in stellar dynamics. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 1975, 173, 729–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Goodman, J. On Gravothermal oscillations. Astrophys. J. 1987, 313, 576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Heggie, D.C.; Ramamani, N. Evolution of star clusters after core collapse. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 1989, 237, 757–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Hut, P.; McMillan, S.; Goodman, J.; Mateo, M.; Phinney, E.S.; Pryor, C.; Richer, H.B.; Verbunt, F.; Weinberg, M. Binaries in globular clusters. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 1992, 104, 981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Breen, P.G.; Heggie, D.C. Gravothermal oscillations in multicomponent models of star clusters. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2012, 425, 2493–2500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Hills, J.G.; Fullerton, L.W. Computer simulations of close encounters between single stars and hard binaries. Astron. J. 1980, 85, 1281–1291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Hong, J.; Askar, A.; Giersz, M.; Hypki, A.; Yoon, S.J. MOCCA-SURVEY database I: Binary black hole mergers from globular clusters with intermediate mass black holes. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2020, 498, 4287–4294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Vaskonen, V.; Veermäe, H. Lower bound on the primordial black hole merger rate. Phys. Rev. D 2020, 101, 043015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Ali-Haïmoud, Y.; Kovetz, E.D.; Kamionkowski, M. Merger rate of primordial black-hole binaries. Phys. Rev. D 2017, 96, 123523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Raidal, M.; Vaskonen, V.; Veermäe, H. Gravitational waves from primordial black hole mergers. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2017, 2017, 037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Binney, J.; Tremaine, S. Galactic Dynamics; Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  51. Abbott, B.P.; Abbott, R.; Abbott, T.D.; Acernese, F.; Ackley, K.; Adams, C.; Adams, T.; Addesso, P.; Adhikari, R.X.; Adya, V.B.; et al. GW170104: Observation of a 50-Solar-mass binary black hole coalescence at redshift 0.2. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2017, 118, 221101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Particle Data Group; Zyla, P.A.; Barnett, R.M.; Beringer, J.; Dahl, O.; Dwyer, D.A.; Groom, D.E.; Lin, C.J.; Lugovsky, K.S.; Pianori, E.; et al. Review of Particle Physics. Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2020, 2020, 083C01. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Amaro-Seoane, P.; Audley, H.; Babak, S.; Baker, J.; Barausse, E.; Bender, P.; Berti, E.; Binetruy, P.; Born, M.; Bortoluzzi, D.; et al. Laser Interferometer Space Antenna. arXiv 2017, arXiv:1702.00786. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. The rate evolution of the capture of black holes by the central black hole (CBH) for black holes with the mass of (a) 10 M and (b) 10 2 M . The mass of the CBH is set to M = 10 3 M .
Figure 1. The rate evolution of the capture of black holes by the central black hole (CBH) for black holes with the mass of (a) 10 M and (b) 10 2 M . The mass of the CBH is set to M = 10 3 M .
Physics 03 00026 g001
Figure 2. The evolution of the merger rate of the most massive black holes (of the mass of 10 M ) in the cluster.
Figure 2. The evolution of the merger rate of the most massive black holes (of the mass of 10 M ) in the cluster.
Physics 03 00026 g002
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Stasenko, V.D.; Kirillov, A.A. The Merger Rate of Black Holes in a Primordial Black Hole Cluster. Physics 2021, 3, 372-378. https://doi.org/10.3390/physics3020026

AMA Style

Stasenko VD, Kirillov AA. The Merger Rate of Black Holes in a Primordial Black Hole Cluster. Physics. 2021; 3(2):372-378. https://doi.org/10.3390/physics3020026

Chicago/Turabian Style

Stasenko, Viktor D., and Alexander A. Kirillov. 2021. "The Merger Rate of Black Holes in a Primordial Black Hole Cluster" Physics 3, no. 2: 372-378. https://doi.org/10.3390/physics3020026

APA Style

Stasenko, V. D., & Kirillov, A. A. (2021). The Merger Rate of Black Holes in a Primordial Black Hole Cluster. Physics, 3(2), 372-378. https://doi.org/10.3390/physics3020026

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop