Next Article in Journal
Development and Characterization of Cultured Buttermilk Fortified with Spirulina plantensis and Its Physico-Chemical and Functional Characteristics
Next Article in Special Issue
Cheese and Yogurt By-Products as Valuable Ingredients for the Production of Prebiotic Oligosaccharides
Previous Article in Journal
Developing New High-Protein-Content Traditional-Type Greek Yoghurts Based on Jersey Cow Milk
Previous Article in Special Issue
Descriptive Characteristics and Cheesemaking Technology of Greek Cheeses Not Listed in the EU Geographical Indications Registers
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Dairy
Volume 4
Issue 2
10.3390/dairy4020018
dairy-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Sustainable Approaches in Whey Cheese Production: A Review

by
Thomas Bintsis
1,* and
Photis Papademas
2
1
Laboratory of Safety and Quality of Milk and Dairy Products, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
2
Department of Agricultural Sciences, Biotechnology and Food Science, Cyprus University of Technology, Limassol 50329, Cyprus
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Dairy 2023, 4(2), 249-270; https://doi.org/10.3390/dairy4020018
Submission received: 1 March 2023 / Revised: 15 March 2023 / Accepted: 22 March 2023 / Published: 28 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Delivering Sustainable Dairy Products with Added Value)
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Whey cheeses have been produced from the very early steps of cheesemaking practices as a sustainable way to utilize whey, which is the main by-product of cheesemaking. Traditional whey cheeses, manufactured with similar processes, are Ricotta, Ricotta salata or Ricottone, and Ricotta fresca in Italy; Anthotyros, Myzithra, Manouri, Xynomyzithra, and Urda in Greece; Urda in Serbia and Romania as well as in other countries such as Israel; Lor in Turkey; Anari in Cyprus; Skuta in Croatia and Serbia; Gjetost and Brunost in Norway; Mesost and Messmör in Sweden; Mysuostur in Iceland; Myseost in Denmark; Requeijão in Portugal; and Requesón in Spain and Mexico. The production of whey cheese is based on the denaturation of whey proteins by heating to 88–92 °C. The specific processing conditions and aspects of the microbiology of whey cheeses are discussed. The special characteristics of whey cheeses, which are high pH and high moisture content, make them susceptible to microbial growth. Due to the limited shelf life of these products, extended research has been carried out to extend the shelf life of whey cheese. The sustainable preservation approaches, such as modified atmosphere packaging, addition of herbs and/or plant extracts, and bio-preservation methods are reviewed. Moreover, novel whey cheeses focused on functional properties have developed during the last 10 years.

1. Introduction

The nutritional properties of whey were very early recognized, and from the fifth century BC, the Greek physician Hippocrates prescribed cheese whey for gastrointestinal disorders and to enhance the immune system [1,2]. It is not known when exactly whey was first utilized to produce whey cheese. From the seventh century BC, rennet-coagulated Caprino and Pecorino were produced in Tuscany; Columella, in his treatise on agriculture, De Re Rustica (50 AD), describes the production of Ricotta cheese [3,4,5,6]. Whey cheese was very common in Roman times for breakfast and Caseum sanctuarie was the cheese made with the milk provided on the celebration of St. J. Baptist [5,6]. Anari cheese is produced from the whey released during the production of Halloumi and its manufacture dates back to Halloumi making [7]. Norwegian whey cheeses have their origins back to the Vikings, about a thousand years ago [8].
Whey cheeses are, nowadays, produced globally, under various names: Ricotta, Ricotta salata or Ricottone, and Ricotta fresca in Italy; Anthotyros, Myzithra, Manouri, Xynomyzithra, and Urda in Greece; Urda in Serbia and Romania as well as in other countries such as Israel; Lor in Turkey; Anari in Cyprus; Skuta in Croatia and Serbia; Gjetost and Brunost in Norway; Mesost and Messmör in Sweden; Mysuostur in Iceland; Myseost in Denmark; Requeijão in Portugal; and Requesón in Spain and Mexico [5,7,8,9].
Among the different whey cheeses, Ricotta di Bufala Campana and Ricotta Romana in Italy, Brocciu corse in France, Manouri and Xinomyzithra Kritis in Greece, and Requeijão da Beira Baixa and Requeijão Serra da Estrela in Portugal, all having proved connection with regional history and culture, have been designated as protected designation of origin (PDO) [10].
The manufacture of whey cheeses has traditionally been developed as a sustainable way to utilize the main by-product of rennet and acid-coagulated cheesemaking practices. Traditional cheese production has positive, social, and economic impacts in terms of maintaining local employment and retaining farmers and their families in rural areas [11]. According to the Codex Alimentarius [12], ‘whey cheeses are solid, semi-solid, or soft products which are principally obtained through either of the following processes: (1) the concentration of whey and the molding of the concentrated product or (2) the coagulation of whey by heat with or without the addition of acid’.
The aim of the current review is to present the sustainable aspects of utilization of whey to produce traditional and novel whey cheeses and to give an overview of the properties of these products.

2. Whey Types and Composition

Whey has a greenish-yellow color, and it is the part of milk which remains after the removal of the coagulum formed during cheese manufacture; the coagulum can be formed either by using acids or rennet and other plant-based coagulants [13,14]. Whey is considered as a pollutant by-product of the cheesemaking process and high amounts are produced; it is estimated that the whey produced annually is 145–200 million tons [15,16], causing serious environmental problems when disposed as a waste material with a BOD of 40,000 mg/kg [17]. Thus, environmental issues have led to the study of the properties of whey, its composition, nutritional value, and technological uses. It should be noted that whey maintains a high nutrient value, i.e., mainly residual proteins, and consequently, several studies are focusing on the whey valorization [18].
The whey produced by rennet- or plant-coagulated cheeses is called cheese whey or sweet whey (pH > 6.0); the whey with an acidic pH (<5.8), obtained from acid-coagulated cheese is called acid whey [19,20,21,22], and acid whey is also produced from Greek or other strained yoghurts [23]. The whey released from the production of whey cheese, such as Ricotta fresca, is called second whey cheese [24,25], which is an acidic whey and has lower fat and protein contents in comparison to the primary whey [25,26,27]; second, whey is also released from the production of non-acidified whey cheeses and has higher pH. The composition of whey from different sources is presented in Table 1.
Great variation in the chemical composition of whey is reported, and this differs according to the type of cheese produced, which is the main cheesemaking product, and the kind of milk from which the main cheese is made [35,36,37,38]. Additionally, seasonal differences due to lactation or other reasons or feed differences also cause the observed variations [39]. Due to the composition of sheep milk, sheep whey consists of significantly higher levels of total solids, lipids, and proteins than cow whey [14,40]. Whey proteins have a higher nutritive value than casein and are considered as one of the richest proteins available. Whey contains essential amino acids, e.g., branched-chain amino acids (isoleucine, leucine, and valine) and sulfur amino acids (cysteine and methionine), and antioxidant properties have been reported [41]. Sheep whey contains more β-lactoglobulin, about the same proportion of α-lactalbumin, and lower proportions of serum albumin and immunoglobulins compared to cow whey [42]. Goat whey contains twice as much α-lactalbumin and lower levels of β-lactoglobulin, serum albumin, and immunoglobulins compared to cow whey [43,44]. Nudda et al. [45] observed seasonal variation in conjugated linoleic acid and vaccenic acid in milk fat of sheep whey used to make Ricotta cheese; conjugated linoleic acid and vaccenic acid decreased as lactation progressed, probably due to variation in pasture availability and fatty acid composition of grass.
The nutritional value of whey has been well documented [32,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56]. Lorieau et al. [57,58] observed that whey cheese showed different digestion and absorption behavior in comparison to the rennet-coagulated cheese. Lorieau et al. [58] observed a higher amino acid bioavailability in whey cheese, and cheese based on whey proteins has been suggested for muscle synthesis in elderly people. Whey proteins are valued for their multiple health benefits, i.e., they enhance immunity, inhibit HIV, and have anti-cancer effects against colon cancer [51,55,59,60].

3. Sustainable Valorization of Whey

Based on the principles of circular economy, whey is nowadays used in the manufacturing of various products, such as whey cheeses, whey powder, edible films, beverages, as well as feed supplement and biogas production. Whey has been proved to be a valuable product due to its components and their functional properties, and food-related applications containing whey components, mainly proteins, have been developed [21,22,61,62]. The valorization of whey has been reviewed by Smithers [2], Papademas and Kotsaki [63], Prazeres et al. [64], Panghal et al. [65], Wang et al. [66], Lappa et al. [67], Asunis et al. [68], Rocha-Mendoza et al. [69], Tsermoula et al. [70], Barba [16], Arshad et al. [71], Osorio-González et al. [72], León-López et al. [73], Buchanan et al. [74], Gergihon et al. [75], and Rocha and Guerra [76]. Rama et al. reviewed the potential applications of whey, as cryoprotectants for freeze-drying and as encapsulating agents for the spray-drying used to produce lactic acid bacteria (LAB) cultures [77]. Valta et al. [78] investigated the technologies of treatment of cheese whey applied by Greek dairies and suggested potential whey valorization opportunities.
Membrane processing, such as ultrafiltration, microfiltration, and reverse osmosis technologies, has been used in the cheese industry to fractionate whey components and to enable whey proteins and other valuable constituents to be retained in the cheese [79,80,81,82,83]. New or improved products derived from whey have gained commercial success due to the enhanced functional properties, which have enabled their incorporation into a number of food and drinks [63,79]. Whey cheeses such as Ricotta cheese, have been produced using ultrafiltrated whey, with reduced cost and improved cheesemaking efficiency [26].
Cheese whey exploitation by the Brazilian dairy industry was studied using a questionnaire survey [84]; most of the dairy industries produced and processed sweet cheese whey, using it in whey dairy beverages, Ricotta, and different types of whey concentrates. Kotoupas et al. [85] compared five alternative scenarios for the treatment of cheese whey wastewater resulting from a cheese factory and concluded that the production of Manouri cheese was the most profitable one. Masotti et al. [86] reviewed the effect of different technologies used for the fortification of cheese with whey proteins: heat treatment of cheese milk, membrane separation technologies, and the direct addition of milk- or whey-based derivatives and more recent technologies such as high hydrostatic pressure, ultra-high-pressure homogenization, transglutaminase treatment of cheese milk, and direct addition of buttermilk.

4. The Manufacture of Traditional Whey cheeses

Whey cheeses belong to a special category of cheeses that are produced by heating the whey at high temperatures to form a coagulum following the denaturation of whey proteins. Whey cheeses are globally produced by traditional methods either as artisanal or standardized industrial processes as a sustainable method of utilizing the whey according to the principles of circular economy [14,32]. There are many whey cheeses that were originally produced from sheep or goat whey as by-products. Nowadays, since their consumption has increased, dairies have started to produce whey cheese from cows’ whey or add cows’ milk. Most of them are heat- and/or acid-coagulated cheeses, and their technology varies in respect of the raw material (type of whey) used, the quantity and type of the milk and/or cream added, and the cheesemaking recipe followed [87,88]. The most important whey cheeses and their composition and processing characteristics are shown in Table 2.
In general, to produce whey cheese, the whey is heated at a temperature of 88–92 °C while stirred. The rate of heating is important to be such as to attain the selected temperature in 40–45 min. Another critical step is the rate of stirring. The first small particles of denaturated whey proteins appear at temperatures around 80 °C. This temperature could be lower according to the type of whey, the acidity and the quantity and proportion of milk and/or cream added [14,112]. The final temperature is lower when whey cheeses are to be consumed fresh, whereas higher temperature heating is applied for dried whey cheeses. The curd obtained is left for 15–20 min on the surface at the selected temperature to lose part of its moisture and then it is scooped and molded for drainage; whey cheese is mainly consumed fresh [14,112].
In the cases in which only the whey is used for the production of whey cheese, the particles of denatured proteins floating on the surface are small and the yield is low. Usually, a certain amount of milk and/or cream is added during heating; the quantity of milk is 30–50 mL/L; however, for higher quality cheeses, milk percentage could be 10% or higher, and cream may also be added [112]. Whey cheese, in most cases, is consumed fresh, that is, without fermentation and ripening; only a few whey cheeses, e.g., Ricotta forte and Xynomyzithra, undergo the ripening process [111,113]. Coprecipitation of caseins may be improved by acidification; the yield is improved when addition of acid is coupled with the addition of calcium chloride [112].
Salt may also be added to the whey, as well as an acidification agent; the latter is usually needed in the case of cow whey to help denaturation and final precipitation of the whey proteins [114]. Acidification is applied in the form of an aqueous solution of citric acid at the rate of 6 mL/L and this quantity decreases the pH to about 5.2 [112,114].
Kaminarides et al. [115] studied the effect of the addition of milk and cream on the characteristics of Greek whey cheeses and reported that the addition of milk and cream led to higher yields; cheese produced with 79% whey, 15% milk, and 6% cream had the most preferred sensory characteristics. More recently, Kaminarides et al. [27] studied the effect of whey fat content on the yield, physicochemical, textural, and sensory properties of cheeses made from sheep whey; cheese with 5% added cream of 50% fat was the most preferred in sensory evaluation. Similarly, Ricotta can be produced by using whey resulting from cow, buffalo, sheep, and goat cheese manufacturing, as well as mixtures of them (Table 2). Biancolillo et al. [116] investigated the fatty acid profiles of 240 samples of Ricotta cheese made from sheep, goat, cow, or buffalo milk. Low-salt whey cheeses can be manufactured with a combination of NaCl and KCl salts to lower the sodium content in Requesón while maintaining the accepted sensory characteristics [117].
As shown in Table 2, there is a great variability in the composition of whey cheeses. The variability is mainly reflecting the differences in composition of the whey (Table 1), differences in the cheese-making technology, the kind of cheese milk used for the main cheese, the kind of milk and/or cream added, or the use of sweet or acid whey; these factors lead to a large variability in the characteristics of whey cheeses. Sensory properties of Ricotta cheese, such as softness, granularity, and greasiness, as well as the fatty acid profile, were significantly different among goat breeds [118].

5. Aspects of the Microbiology of Whey Cheese

Whey cheeses are undergoing a high temperature heat treatment at 88–92 °C for the denaturation of whey proteins, and this treatment has a severe impact on the microbiota of the whey or of the milk and/or cream added to the whey. The indigenous microbiota is inactivated and no starter cultures are applied after heating [7,8,9].
Escherichia coli O157:H7 was reported to grow in Myzithra, Anthotyros, and Manouri whey cheeses at 12 °C and survive at 2 °C storage [119]. The growth of L. monocytogenes in the same whey cheeses was reported to be very rapid; maximum populations were significantly lower in Myzithra cheese at 5 and 12 °C than maximum populations in Anthotyros and Manouri cheese at the same temperatures independent of the inoculated strain. In addition, Aeromonas hydrophila was recovered in 4 (10.2%) and 3 (8.3%) of the Anthotyros and Manouri cheese samples analyzed, respectively, but not countable populations were noted [120]. A. hydrophila grew in Myzithra and Anthotyros, but no growth was observed in Manouri [121].
Anthotyros showed high numbers of coliforms (106–107), micrococci and staphylococci (104–105), yeasts (105–106), and enterococci (105–106) [122]. Lioliou et al. [123] studied the microbiology of Manouri cheese throughout storage at 4 °C for 20 days and concluded that the counts, of all the microbial groups studied, increased throughout storage. Suzzi et al. [124] studied the microbiological properties of Manteca cheese and the technological significance of the different naturally occurring yeast species.
Theodoridis et al. [125] reported 4% and 2% of Manouri and Anthotyros cheese samples, respectively, positive for Listeria spp. Additionally, 2% of samples of Anthotyros were reported positive for L. monocytogenes. Later, Angelidis et al. [126] in a survey of L. monocytogenes in soft cheeses for sale in retail outlets found no positive soft cheeses, including Anthotyros, Manouri, fresh Myzithra, dry Myzithra and Ricotta, and only 1 sample out of the 137 cheese samples examined contained Listeria innocua at levels of 4.5 × 102 cfu/g. Different physicochemical and microbiological characteristics of cheeses may affect L. monocytogenes potential to grow and/or survive during storage [127]. A study conducted on Sardinian dairies revealed that the prevalence of L. monocytogenes on Ricotta salata rind was approximately 18% [128]. Requesón showed a 6.7% prevalence of L. monocytogenes [129,130], whereas, 30 samples of Ricotta examined were free of L. monocytogenes [131]. Villarruel-Lopez et al. [99] studied the presence of aerobic mesophilic bacteria, coliform bacteria, yeasts, molds, and certain pathogenic bacteria and staphylococcal enterotoxins in Mexican commercial Requesón cheeses; although they reported samples at high risk of contamination, neither L. monocytogenes nor staphylococcal enterotoxins were detected. Scatassa et al. [132] reported that during a 15 year (2002–2016) investigation of the microbiological profile of Sicilian Ricotta, made from sheep whey, Ricotta represented a safe cheese from a hygienic point of view, and during the entire period of investigation, the pathogenic bacteria (L. monocytogenes, Salmonella spp. and Brucella spp.) were never detected, while the levels of undesired microorganisms such as Enterobacteriaceae, E.coli, and coagulase-positive staphylococci were found in reduced numbers.
Whey cheeses have reported to be able to support the growth of L. monocytogenes and low initial levels of contamination can lead to concentration potentially threatening to human health [133,134,135,136,137]. Evidence that L. monocytogenes can contaminate whey cheeses and that these cheeses support its growth, even during refrigerated storage, has been documented [133,134,135,136,137,138].
Adame-Gómez et al. [139] reported 9 positive samples of Requeson cheese out of 16 examined with Bacillus cereus contamination at a 5.52 log cfu/g, whereas Sattin et al. [140] identified a Bacillus strain that caused pink discoloration in the same cheese. Cosentino et al. [141] reported 78% positive samples for Bacillus spp. in Ricotta cheese, with counts rarely exceeding 10 cfu/g, but also counts higher than 1000 cfu/g were found (16% of positive samples). The level of B. cereus vegetative cells in naturally contaminated Ricotta salata decreased during refrigerated storage, while the presence of spores was rare [142,143].
Post-process handling of the curd results in cross-contamination with a diverse native microbiota, mainly psychrotrophic Gram-negative bacteria, lactic acid bacteria (LAB), staphylococci, spore-forming bacilli, clostridia, yeasts, and molds [14,144,145,146,147]. Considering that whey cheeses have a high pH, high moisture content, and a low salt content (Table 2) these dairy products are very susceptible to microbial spoilage, especially under abuse temperatures. Additionally, whey cheeses constitute a major food safety concern due to their lower hurdle effect compared with ripened cheeses, showing a higher incidence and potential for survival/growth of pathogens [14,144,145,146,147]. Psychrotrophic food-borne pathogenic bacteria possessing elaborate cold-adaptation mechanisms can grow in milk and whey products during refrigerated storage [148]. The main route of contamination is the contact with surfaces of the processing plant environment and equipment [149]. Spanu et al. [135] studied the effect of a post-process heat treatment on the survival of L. monocytogenes cells in artificially contaminated Ricotta salata and demonstrated that the reduction in L. monocytogenes count was entirely accountable to the hot water treatment.

6. Sustainable Preservation Approaches of Whey cheeses

6.1. Modified Atmosphere Packaging

The use of effective and sustainable methods for the preservation and safety of whey cheeses is necessary to control cross-contamination of fresh whey cheeses throughout their storage. The increased consumer demand for fresh, preservative-free foods has led to extended research on advances in cheese preservation focusing on ‘clean labels’ [150]. The use of modified atmosphere packaging (MAP) as a technique to improve product’ safety and extend the shelf life satisfies the chemical preservative-free strategies for various foods [151]; MAP is widely used as a storage method, extending the shelf life and improving the appearance of several foods. The potential of MAP and active packaging for extending shelf life of dairy products, including cheese, has been demonstrated [152,153,154].
Several MAP conditions were used to assess the effect of MAP on the characteristics, that is, free fatty acids, lactose, lactic acid, moisture, pH, and texture of whey cheeses [24,155,156,157,158,159,160,161,162,163,164]. The MAP conditions and the best practice and/or effect on whey cheeses is presented in Table 3. Different mixtures have been applied in different whey cheeses; in most studies, a specific mixture of gases provided an extension in the shelf life.
Ramírez-Rivas et al. [164] studied the effect of packaging and salt content and type on antioxidant and angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE)-inhibitory activities in Requeson. Di Pierro et al. [165] studied the application of chitosan/whey protein film as active coating in combination with 40% CO2/60% N2 MAP conditions to extend the shelf life of Ricotta cheese; the treatment reduced the viable numbers of mesophilic and psychrotrophic bacteria and delayed the development of undesirable acidity, better maintained the texture, and did not modify the sensory characteristics.

6.2. Addition of Herbs and/or Plant Extracts

There are a number of studies in the literature on the addition of various herbs and/or plant extracts and their potential use in combination with different packaging materials to extend the shelf life of whey cheeses [20,164,165,166,167,168,169,170]. Black cumin, thyme, and rosemary are frequently added to cheeses because of their sensory and antioxidant properties [20,166]. Akpinar et al. [20] studied whey cheeses packaged in goat-skin bags used for the storage of traditional cheeses with a long shelf life (semi-hard and hard cheeses) and alternatively studied cheeses in artificial casings. In addition to different packaging materials, the potential usage of different plants (black cumin, thyme, and rosemary) in Lor cheese production was evaluated.
Christaki et al. [170] studied the effect of oregano essential oil and extracts on two Greek whey cheeses. The authors evaluated the feasibility of employing oregano essential oil and extracts in whey cheese to control fungal contamination that causes cheese spoilage and important economic losses and reported that the combination of oregano essential oil and extracts produced nanoemulsions with potent antioxidant and antifungal activity against Penicillium expansum in vitro.

6.3. Bio-Preservation

The use of natural antimicrobial compounds from a wide variety of natural sources, or protective LAB cultures, i.e., bio-preservation, has been studied extensively [144,171,172,173,174,175,176,177,178,179,180,181,182,183,184,185,186,187,188,189,190]. Bio-preservation is of high interest due to its ecological sustainability and consumer friendly nature [177]. Unlike artificially synthesized chemical preservatives that have toxic effects over long-term usage, bio-preservatives offer little or no harmful health effects [182,183,184,185,186,187]. Nisin, a bacteriocin produced by strains of Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis has been used as a natural preservative to extend the self-life of certain dairy products [170,178]. Nisin inhibits Gram-positive bacteria, including L. monocytogenes and B. cereus and outgrows the spores of members of the genus Bacillus and Clostridium [171,178]. Wu et al. [188] concluded that the combined use of nisin with other antibacterial methods showed more advantageous activities against L. monocytogenes than single use.
Samelis et al. [179] investigated the use of nisin as a bio-preservative to control L. monocytogenes introduced post-processing on Anthotyros stored in refrigerated storage in vacuum packages for up to 45 days; they reported that this treatment suppressed L. monocytogenes growth below the inoculation level for 30 and 45 days [179]. Interestingly, nisin resulted in a switch in the natural spoilage flora of Anthotyros from Gram-positive to Gram-negative [179]. Aspri et al. [180] applied a bacteriocin-producing Enterococcus faecium isolated from donkey milk in the bio-control of L. monocytogenes in fresh whey cheese. Spanu et al. [181] investigated bio-preservatives to control the growth of spoilage microorganism, that is Pseudomonas spp., on the surface of MAP-packed Ricotta fresca during refrigerated storage and Carnobacterium spp. inoculated on the surface of the finished product; they reported promising results in controlling contamination of Ricotta fresca with certain spoilage microorganisms. In another study, Carnobacterium spp. significantly reduced the growth of Pseudomonas spp. at 1.28 log and 0.83 log after 14 and 21 days of refrigerated storage, respectively [182]. Fernández et al. [187] studied the effect of nisin alone and in combination with Microgard, that is bacteriocin-like inhibitory products, on the microbial flora of Ricotta cheese.
Bacteriocin production in situ from several LAB and its impact on food preservation have been examined; thermophilin T, a bacteriocin produced by Streptococcus thermophilus ACA-DC 0040, had an inhibitory activity against a large number of related LAB as well as Clostridium spp. [189]. Kaminarides et al. [190] evaluated the effect of thermophilin T, previously produced in fermented milk, on the microbiological and physicochemical characteristics of Myzithra cheese.
More recently, Sameli et al. [185] studied the effect of an enterocin A-B-P crude extract on the spoilage microbiota in fresh Anthotyros whey cheeses stored at refrigeration temperatures in vacuum for 40 days; Pseudomonas spp., Aeromonas spp., Hafnia spp., and Serratia spp. grew faster than LAB during early storage. Later, LAB outgrew the Gram-negative bacteria and prevailed by mid- to late storage in all cheese batches, causing an acidification effect [185]. Sameli and Samelis [144] assessed the growth and bio-control of inoculated L. monocytogenes in Anthotyros whey cheeses, without or with 5% of a crude enterocin A-B-P extract during storage at 4° C. From day 15 to the sell-by date (days 35–40), L. monocytogenes growth ceased, and progressively, the populations of the pathogen declined in most cheeses; this was due to an unmonitored, batch-dependent natural acidification by spoilage lactic acid bacteria, predominantly Leuconostoc mesenteroides, which reduced the cheese pH to 5.5 and finally to a value of 5.0 [144].

6.4. Novel Treatments for Extending the Shelf Life

During the last 10 years, a number of novel treatments have been applied to whey cheeses in order to extend the shelf life and to enhance their functional and sensory characteristics. Duarte et al. [191] proposed an alternative to refrigerated storage technology for Requeijão; they stored the cheese under 100 MPa hyperbaric storage at variable room temperature, and total aerobic mesophiles and Enterobacteriaceae growth was inhibited. For LAB, yeasts, and molds, hyperbaric storage showed an additional microbial inactivation effect. This technology is an environmentally friendlier technology, with a carbon footprint estimated to be about 26-fold lower compared to refrigerated storage [191]. The possibilities of using the continuous type of UV-C light on the surface of Lor cheese was studied, and it was found that the application of UV-C light (1.617, 4.018, and 36.832 kJ/m2) to the cheese surface allowed delaying mold growth during storage; however, extreme doses could induce lipid and protein oxidation reactions, leading to quality deterioration [192].
Two novel food preservation technologies were applied to Ricotta, that is pulsed light [193] and plasma treatment [194]. The authors concluded that both methods could be used to extend the shelf life of Ricotta cheese. To extend the shelf life of buffalo Ricotta cheese, a process was assessed that included a second heat treatment followed by homogenization and hot packaging. In another study, Tripaldi et al. [101] reported that homogenized buffalo Ricotta cheese had a longer shelf life than traditional Ricotta cheese, although the process could be optimized to reduce the total bacterial load during storage.

7. Novel Whey Cheeses and Whey Products

A modified form of Myzithra cheese was produced by substituting the fresh cheese whey by dried whey protein concentrate 65% [195]. The modified Myzithra cheese had a higher lactose, potassium, and sodium content and lower total bacteria, protein, ash, calcium, hardness, and adhesiveness than control Myzithra cheese, while yeasts and molds were absent. Attempts to incorporate fresh whey protein concentrates in Queso fresco showed good results in terms of yield and acceptance, although excessive levels may cause detrimental changes in the texture and flavor of Cheeses and the process needs to be optimized [38]. The incorporation of whey cheese in milk used to make Queso fresco was suggested as an alternative technology for small and medium scale producers for revalorizing cheese whey, increasing yield, and lowering production costs, although physicochemical characteristics were affected [196].
An application for salted whey produced from Domiati, Ras, and Cheddar cheese making is to use it as an ingredient in processed cheese [197]. An added-value whey cheese through addition of pine nuts was developed by Semenium et al. [198]; different concentrations of pine nuts were added to whey cheese, and the whey cheese sample with 4% pine nuts was the most appreciated by the sensory panel [198]. A whey cheese analogue was made from 65% whey protein concentrate and vegetable fat with 15% olive oil, and the product was enriched with thyme leaves, film-packed, and then subjected to heat treatment; the product was characterized as a new whey cheese easy to produce, with improved health enhancing properties, acceptable textural characteristics, a rich aroma profile, and extended shelf life [199].
In addition, novel dairy products using whey cheese or whey components have been studied. Ice cream made from sheep’s milk was manufactured with addition of whey protein concentrates [200]. Ricotta cheese powder, prepared from different blends of whey and milk, was used for the manufacture of dried cheese [201]. Marnotes et al. [202] manufactured frozen yoghurts using goat and sheep liquid whey concentrates produced by ultrafiltration; different concentrations of inulin were also added. Maragkoudakis et al. [203] studied the use of scotta, that is, the second whey remaining after the manufacture of Ricotta, as substrate for bacterial fermentation with the objective of obtaining a novel fermented drink and a selection of a starter consisting of S. thermophilus, Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus, and L. acidophilus, was chosen; the authors speculated that further studies are needed to optimize the organoleptic aspects of the final product. Moreover, an economic and feasible option for dairy products is the production of butter using cheese whey; whey cream is separated from the aqueous fraction of cheese whey and processed to obtain whey cream butter [204,205,206]. Costa et al. [206] reviewed the technology of production of butter from whey cream and the physico-chemical, sensory, and nutritional characteristics of the product.

8. Functional and Probiotic Products

Although Hippocrates (460–370 BC) said ‘Let food be thy medicine and medicine be thy food’, and the term ‘functional food’ was first mentioned in Japan [207], nowadays, there is an increasingly awareness that a good health is directly associated with food and nutrition habits, and functional foods are increasingly demanded by the consumers. Dairy products are leading the research and development of health-promoting and therapeutic products [23,208,209,210,211]. Madureira et al. [212,213,214] effectively applied probiotic cultures in whey cheese, and this type of cheese has proven to be a good vehicle to deliver probiotic bacteria into the gastrointestinal tract. Whey cheese and whey products have several functions to be classified as functional foods [215,216,217]. Whey-protein-derived peptides have several beneficial effects, e.g., ACE-inhibitory peptides in the treatment of hypertension and β-lactotensin peptide in cholesterol-lowering, anti-stress, and memory-enhancing activities [91,215,216,217].
Dimitrellou et al. [218] evaluated the feasibility of producing a novel whey cheese with extended shelf life using probiotic lactobacilli immobilized on casein. Pires et al. [219] evaluated the application of kefir culture and probiotics, i.e., Bifidobacterium spp., which has previously added and fermented the cream added to the whey for the manufacture of Requeijão cheese. In another study, the addition of L. delbrueckii ssp. bulgaricus NCFB 2772 was investigated to manufacture a functional acid whey cheese [220]. Nzekoue et al. [221] suggested Ricotta cheese as a cheese matrix for vitamin D fortification.
By considering the potential of whey cheese as a probiotic carrier, the combination of traditional Requeijão with second cheese whey protein, probiotic cultures, and ingredients improving the organoleptic characteristics of the final product was studied [222]; this approach enabled minimizing the environmental impact of the cheese whey and especially whey by-products, assuring a sustainable cheese supply chain. Rosa et al. [223] evaluated the effect of probiotic strains of L. acidophilus, Bifidobacterium Bb-12, and Lacticaseibacillus casei-01 on the characteristics of fermented whey/milk beverages during refrigerated storage for 30 days [221]. Schlabitz et al. [224] investigated the shelf life of a symbiotic fermented dairy beverage using Ricotta cheese whey, prebiotics, and probiotics; since the aim of the study was to reduce the amount of whey incorporated into the dairy wastewater, the authors concluded that the whey drink proved to be a viable way to use whey, reducing thus the effluent generated at dairy industries. In addition, Mileriene et al. [225] suggested a valuable way to utilize acid whey and apple pomace with the fermentation from L. lactis LL16, with the potential to produce a sustainable cheese with functional properties.

9. Conclusions

Whey cheese production has a long history as a sustainable way to utilize the released whey after the milk curdling. Whey cheeses are produced and consumed worldwide due to their nutritional value and acceptable sensory characteristics. There is a great variation in the technology used, the kind of whey, and thus the variation in composition and characteristics common among different types. In any case, the exploitation of whey for the manufacture of whey cheeses has many practical and financial benefits.
The special cheesemaking processes and the composition have an impact on the type of microorganisms present in the final product. Because whey cheeses have a neutral pH and high moisture content, they may be exposed to contamination and should be consumed in a short period after production. Initially, after the coagulation of whey proteins, and due to the heating of the whey, the natural milk and whey microbiota is inactivated, starter cultures are not applicable and thereby whey cheeses present very low counts of microorganisms after manufacture. However, handling of the fresh curd post-heating results in cross-contamination with a large variety of spoilage, mainly yeasts, molds, coliforms, pseudomonads, and potentially pathogenic bacteria. Therefore, hygienic practices throughout the handling, packaging, and storage are of high importance.
The functional properties of the whey have forced researchers to investigate novel and more attractive products based on whey, some of them with health-promoting potential. Although the production of whey cheese is one sustainable way to utilize the valuable whey, the current review presents specific knowledge concerning whey cheeses to help further research for the development of novel cheeses and other dairy products for sustainable valorization of whey, a proven valuable by-product of the cheesemaking process in a sustainable way.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.B. and P.P.; writing—original draft preparation, T.B. and P.P.; writing—review and editing, T.B. and P.P.; visualization, T.B. and P.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Guo, M.; Wang, G. History of whey production and whey protein manufacturing. In Whey Protein Production, Chemistry, Functionality and Applications; Guo, M., Ed.; John Wiley & Sons Ltd: Chichester, UK, 2019; pp. 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  2. Smithers, G.W. Whey-ing up the options: Yesterday, today and tomorrow. Int. Dairy J. 2015, 48, 2–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kindstedt, P.S. The history of cheese. In Global Cheesemaking Technology—Cheese Quality and Characteristics; Papademas, P., Bintsis, T., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: Chichester, UK, 2018; pp. 3–19. [Google Scholar]
  4. Kindar, S.S. A review of the world’ s whey cheeses. In Research & reviews in Agriculture, Foresty and Aquaculture; Akar, T., Ed.; Gece Publishing: Ankara, Turkey, 2022; pp. 174–200. [Google Scholar]
  5. Gobbetti, M.; Neviani, E.; Fox, P. (Eds.) The origins of cheesemaking. In The cheeses of Italy: Science and Technology; Springer International Publishing AG: Cham, Switzerland; pp. 1–12.
  6. Licitra, G.; Carpino, S. The microfloras and sensory profiles of selected protected designation of origin Italian cheeses. Microbiol. Spectr. 2014, 2, CM-0007-2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Papademas, P.; Bintsis, T.; Alichanidis, E.; Ardö, Y. Whey cheeses (Heat coagulated). In Global Cheesemaking Technology—Cheese Quality and Characteristics; Papademas, P., Bintsis, T., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: Chichester, UK, 2018; pp. 446–452. [Google Scholar]
  8. Kosikowski, F.V.; Mistry, V.V. Whey cheese. In Cheese and Fermented Milk Foods, Vol I: Origins and Principles, 3rd ed.; Kosikowski, L.L.C.: Westport, CT, USA, 1997; pp. 314–317. [Google Scholar]
  9. Fox, P.F.; Guinee, T.P.; Cogan, T.M.; McSweeney, P.L.H. (Eds.) Whey and whey products. In Fundamentals of Cheese Science, 2nd ed.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2017; pp. 755–770. [Google Scholar]
  10. eAmbrosia—The EU Geographical Indications Register. 2003. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/info/food-farming-fisheries/food-safety-and-quality/certification/quality-labels/geographical-indications-register/ (accessed on 3 February 2023).
  11. Pappa, E.C.; Samelis, J.; Kondyli, E.; Pappas, A.C. Characterisation of Urda whey cheese: Evolution of main biochemical and microbiological parameters during ripening and vacuum packaged cold storage. Int. Dairy J. 2016, 58, 54–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Codex Alimentarius CODEX STAN 284-1971; FAO/WHO Standard for Whey cheeses. FAO/WHO Food Standards: Rome, Italy, 2010.
  13. Ryan, M.P.; Walsh, G. The biotechnological potential of whey. Rev. Environ. Sci. Bio Technol. 2016, 15, 479–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Pintado, M.E.; Macedo, A.C.; Malcata, F.X. Review: Technology, chemistry and microbiology of whey cheeses. Food Sci. Technol. Int. 2001, 7, 105–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lavelli, V.; Beccalli, M.P. Cheese whey recycling in the perspective of the circular economy: Modeling processes and the supply chain to design the involvement of the small and medium enterprises. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2022, 126, 86–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Barba, F.J. An integrated approach for the valorization of cheese whey. Foods 2021, 10, 564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Jelen, P. Whey Processing—Utilization and Products. In Encyclopedia of Dairy Sciences, 2nd ed.; Fuquay, J.W., Fox, P.F., McSweeney, P.L.H., Eds.; Academic Press: Oxford, UK, 2011; pp. 731–737. [Google Scholar]
  18. Gregg, J.S.; Jürgens, J.; Happel, M.K.; Strom-Andersen, N.; Tanner, A.N.; Bolwig, S.; Klitkou, A. Valorization of bio-residuals in the food and foresty sectors in support of a circular bioeconomy: A review. J. Cleaner. Prod. 2020, 267, 122093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Moatsou, G.; Moschopoulou, E. Cheese and whey: The outcome of milk curdling. Foods 2021, 10, 1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Akpinar, A.; Yerlikaya, O.; Akan Karagozlu, C.; Kinik, O.; Uysal, H.R. The effect of packaging materials on physicochemical, microbiological, and sensorial properties of Turkish whey (Lor) cheese with some plants. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2022, 46, e17060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Pires, A.F.; Marnotes, N.G.; Rubio, O.D.; Garcia, A.C.; Pereira, C.D. Dairy by-products: A review on the valorization of whey and second cheese whey. Foods 2021, 10, 1067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Zotta, T.; Solieri, L.; Iacumin, L.; Picozzi, C.; Gullo, M. Valorization of cheese whey using microbial fermentations. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2020, 104, 2749–2764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Bintsis, T.; Papademas, P. The evolution of fermented milks, from artisanal to industrial products: A critical review. Fermentation 2022, 8, 679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Pala, C.; Scarano, C.; Venusti, M.; Sardo, D.; Casti, D.; Cossu, F.; Lamon, S.; Spanu, V.; Ibba, M.; Marras, M. Shelf life evaluation of ricotta fresca sheep cheese in modified atmosphere packaging. Ital. J. Food Saf. 2016, 5, 5502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Macedo, A.; Bilau, J.; Cambóias, E.; Duarte, E. Integration of membrane processes for by-product valorization to improve the ecoefficiency of small/medium size cheese dairy plants. Foods 2021, 10, 1740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Macedo, A.; Azedo, D.; Duarte, E.; Pereira, C. Valorization of goat cheese whey through an integrated process of ultrafiltration and nanofiltration. Membranes 2021, 11, 477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Kaminarides, S.; Zagari, H.; Zoidou, E. Effect of whey fat content on the properties and yields of whey cheese and serum. J. Hellenic Vet. Medical Soc. 2020, 71, 2149–2156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Macedo, R.F.; Freitas, R.J.S.; Pandey, A.; Soccol, C.R. Production and shelf-life studies of low cost beverage with soymilk, buffalo cheese whey and cow milk fermented by mixed cultures of Lactobacillus casei ssp. shirota and Bifidobacterium adolescentis. J. Basic Microbiol. 1999, 39, 243–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Blaschek, K.M.; Wendorff, W.L.; Rankin, S.A. Survey of salty and sweet whey composition from various cheese plants in Wisconsin. J. Dairy Sci. 2007, 90, 2029–2034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Kandarakis, J.G. Traditional whey cheeses. Bull. Int. Dairy Fed. 1986, 202, 118–123. [Google Scholar]
  31. Kalatzopoulos, G.C. Cheeses from ewes’ and goats’ milk. In Cheese: Chemistry, Physics and Microbiology; Fox, P.F., Ed.; Springer: Boston, MA, USA, 1993; pp. 507–553. [Google Scholar]
  32. Anand, S.; Khanal, S.N.; Marella, C. Whey and whey products. In Milk and Dairy Products in Human Nutrition: Production, Composition and Health; Park, Y.W., Haenlein, G.F.W., Eds.; Wiley-Blackwell: Chichester, UK, 2013; pp. 477–497. [Google Scholar]
  33. Jandal, J.M. Comparative aspects of goat and sheep milk. Small Rumin. Res. 1996, 22, 177–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Jaeggi, J.J.; Wendorff, W.L.; Romero, J.; Berger, Y.M.; Johnson, M.E. Impact of seasonal changes in ovine milk on composition and yield of a hard-pressed cheese. J. Dairy Sci. 2005, 88, 1358–1363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Siso, M.I.G. The biotechnological utilization of cheese whey: A review. Bioresour. Technol. 1996, 57, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Silanikove, N.; Leitner, G.; Merin, U.; Prosser, C.G. Recent advances in exploiting goat’s milk: Quality, safety and production aspects. Small Rumin. Res. 2010, 89, 110–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Pereira, C.D.; Henriques, M.; Gomes, D.; Gouveia, R.; Gomez-Zavaglia, A.; de Antoni, G. Fermented dairy products based on ovine cheese whey. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 52, 7401–7408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Henriques, M.H.F.; Gomes, D.M.G.S.; Pereira, C.J.D.; Gil, M.H.M. Effects of liquid whey protein concentrate on functional and sensorial properties of set yoghurts and fresh cheese. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2012, 6, 952–963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Casper, J.L.; Wendorff, W.L.; Thomas, D.L. Seasonal changes in protein composition of whey from commercial manufacture of caprine and ovine specialty cheeses. J. Dairy Sci. 1998, 81, 3117–3122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Milani, F.X.; Wendorff, W.L. Goat and sheep milk products in the United States (USA). Small Rumin. Res. 2011, 101, 134–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Smithers, G.W. Whey and whey proteins-from ‘gutter-to-gold’. Int. Dairy J. 2008, 18, 695–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Hejtmánková, A.; Pivec, V.; Trnková, E.; Dragounová, H. Differences in the composition of total and whey proteins in goat and ewe milk and their changes throughout the lactation period. Czech J. Anim. Sci. 2012, 57, 323–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Moatsou, G.; Hatzinaki, A.; Samolada, M.; Anifantakis, E. Major whey proteins in ovine and caprine acid wheys from indigenous Greek breeds. Int. Dairy J. 2005, 15, 123–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Pintado, M.E.; Lopes da Silva, J.A.; Malcata, F.X. Comparative characterization of whey protein concentrates from ovine, caprine and bovine breeds. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 1999, 32, 231–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Nudda, A.; McGuire, M.A.; Battacone, G.; Pulina, G. Seasonal variation in conjugated linoleic acid and vaccenic acid in milk fat of sheep and its transfer to cheese and ricotta. J. Dairy Sci. 2005, 88, 1311–1319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Mangano, K.M.; Bao, Y.; Zhao, C. Nutritional properties of whey proteins. In Whey Protein Production, Chemistry, Functionality and Applications; Guo, M., Ed.; John Wiley & Sons Ltd: Chichester, UK, 2019; pp. 103–140. [Google Scholar]
  47. Madadlou, A.; Abbaspourrad, A. Bioactive whey peptide particles: An emerging class of nutraceutical carriers. Critic. Rev. Food Sci. Nutrit. 2018, 58, 1468–1477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Gupta, C.; Prakash, D. Therapeutic potential of milk whey. Beverages 2017, 3, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Patel, S. Functional food relevance of whey protein: A review of recent findings and scopes ahead. J. Function. Foods 2015, 19, 308–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Kilara, A. Whey and whey products. In Dairy Processing and Quality Assurance, 2nd ed.; Chandan, R.C., Kilara, A., Shah, N.P., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons Ltd.: Oxford, UK, 2016; pp. 349–366. [Google Scholar]
  51. Sommella, E.; Pepe, G.; Ventre, G.; Pagano, F.; Conte, G.M.; Ostacolo, C.; Campiglia, P. Detailed peptide profiling of “Scotta”: From a dairy waste to a source of potential health-promoting compounds. Dairy Sci. Technol. 2016, 96, 763–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Kareb, O.; Aider, M. Whey and its derivatives for probiotics, prebiotics, symbiotics, and functional foods: A critical review. Prob. Antimicrob. Prot. 2019, 11, 348–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Yadav, J.S.S.; Yan, S.; Pilli, S.; Kumar, L.; Tyagi, R.D.; Surampalli, R.Y. Cheese whey: A potential resource to transform into bioprotein, functional/nutritional proteins and bioactive peptides. Biotechn. Adv. 2015, 33, 756–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Zhao, C.; Chen, N.; Ashaolu, T.J. Whey proteins and peptides in health-promoting functions—A review. Int. Dairy J. 2022, 126, 105269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Teixeira, F.J.; Santos, H.O.; Howell, S.L.; Pimentel, G.D. Whey protein in cancer therapy: A narrative review. Pharmacol. Res. 2019, 144, 245–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Li, Y.; Fan, Y.; Liu, J.; Meng, Z.; Huang, A.; Xu, F.; Wang, X. Identification, characterization and in vitro activity of hypoglycemic peptides in whey hydrolysates from rubing cheese by-product. Food Res. Int. 2023, 164, 112382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Lorieau, L.; Halabi, A.; Ligneul, A.; Hazart, E.; Dupont, D.; Floury, J. Impact of the dairy product structure and protein nature on the proteolysis and amino acid bioaccessibility during in vitro digestion. Food Hydrocoll. 2018, 82, 399–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Lorieau, L.; Le Gouar, Y.; Henry, G.; Mao, T.T.; Ligneul, A.; Hazart, E.; Dupont, D.; Floury, J. Whey-based cheese provides more postprandial plasma leucine than casein-based cheese: A pig study. Food Chem. 2019, 277, 63–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Boscaini, S.; Skuse, P.; Nilaweera, K.N.; Cryan, J.F.; Cotter, P.D. The ‘Whey’ to good health: Whey protein and its beneficial effect on metabolism, gut microbiota and mental health. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2023, 133, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Pontonio, E.; Montemurro, M.; De Gennaro, G.V.; Miceli, V.; Rizzello, C.G. Antihypertensive peptides from ultrafiltration and fermentation of the Ricotta cheese exhausted whey: Design and characterization of a functional Ricotta cheese. Foods 2021, 10, 2573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Augustin, M.A.; Udabage, P.; Juliano, P.; Clarke, P.T. Towards a more sustainable dairy industry: Integration across the farm—Factory interface and the dairy factory of the future. Int. Dairy J. 2013, 31, 2–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Minj, S.; Anand, S. Whey proteins and its derivatives: Bioactivity, functionality, and current applications. Dairy 2020, 1, 233–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Papademas, P.; Kotsaki, P. Technological utilization of whey towards sustainable exploitation. J. Adv. Dairy Res. 2019, 7, 231. [Google Scholar]
  64. Prazeres, A.R.; Carvalho, F.; Rivas, J. Cheese whey management: A review. J. Environ. Manag. 2012, 110, 48–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Panghal, A.; Patidar, R.; Jaglan, S.; Chhikara, N.; Khatkar, S.; Gat, Y.; Sindhu, N. Whey valorization: Current options and future scenario—A critical review. Nutr. Food Sci. 2018, 48, 520–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Wang, C.; Killpatrick, A.; Humphrey, A.; Guo, M. Whey protein functional properties and applications in food formulations. In Whey Protein Production, Chemistry, Functionality and Applications; Guo, M., Ed.; John Wiley & Sons Ltd.: Chichester, UK, 2019; pp. 157–204. [Google Scholar]
  67. Lappa, I.K.; Papadaki, A.; Kachrimanidou, V.; Terpou, A.; Koulougliotis, D.; Eriotou, E.; Kopsahelis, N. Cheese whey processing: Integrated biorefinery concepts and emerging food applications. Foods 2019, 8, 347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  68. Asunis, F.; De Gioannis, G.; Dessi, P.; Isipato, M.; Lens, P.N.L.; Muntoni, A.; Polettini, A.; Pomi, R.; Rossi, A.; Spiga, D. The dairy biorefinery: Integrating treatment processes for cheese whey valorisation. J. Environ. Manag. 2020, 276, 111240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Rocha-Mendoza, D.; Kosmeri, E.; Krentz, A.; Zhang, L.; Badiger, S.; Miyagusuku-Cruzado, G.; Mayta-Apaza, A.; Giusti, M.; Jimenez-Flores, R.; Garcia-Cano, I. 2021 Invited review: Acid whey trends and health benefits. J. Dairy Sci. 2021, 104, 1262–1275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Tsermoula, P.; Khakimov, B.; Nielsen, J.H.; Engelsen, S.B. WHEY—The waste-stream that became more valuable than the food product. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 118, 230–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Arshad, U.-e.-T.; Hassan, A.; Ahmad, T.; Naeem, M.; Chaudhary, M.T.; Abbas, S.Q.; Randhawa, M.A.; Pimentel, T.C.; Gomes da Cruz, A.; Aadil, R.M. A recent glance on the valorisation of cheese whey for industrial prerogative: High-value-added products development and integrated reutilising strategies. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2022, 58, 2001–2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Osorio-González, C.S.; Gómez-Falcon, N.; Brar, S.K.; Ramírez, A.A. Cheese whey as a potential feedstock for producing Renewable Biofuels: A Review. Energies 2022, 15, 6828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. León-López, A.; Pérez-Marroquín, X.A.; Estrada-Fernández, A.G.; Campos-Lozada, G.; Morales-Peñaloza, A.; Campos-Montiel, R.G.; Aguirre-Álvarez, G. Milk whey hydrolysates as high value-added natural polymers: Functional properties and ppplications. Polymers 2022, 14, 1258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Buchanan, D.; Martindale, W.; Romeih, E.; Hebishy, E. Recent advances in whey processing and valorisation: Technological and environmental perspectives. Int. J. Dairy Technol. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Gergihon, G.; Schuck, P.; Jeantet, R. Processing of Mozzarella cheese wheys and stretchwaters: A preliminary review. Dairy Sci. Technol. 2010, 90, 27–46. [Google Scholar]
  76. Rocha, J.M.; Guerra, A. On the valorization of lactose and its derivatives from cheese whey as a dairy industry by-product: An overview. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2020, 246, 2161–2174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Rama, G.R.; Kuhn, D.; Beux, S.; Maciel, M.J.; de Souza, C.F.V. Potential applications of dairy whey for the production of lactic acid bacteria cultures. Int. Dairy J. 2019, 98, 25–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Valta, K.; Damala, P.; Angeli, E.; Antonopoulou, G.; Malamis, D.; Haralambous, K.J. Current treatment technologies of cheese whey and wastewater by Greek cheese manufacturing units and potential valorisation opportunities. Waste Biomass Valor. 2017, 8, 1649–1663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Johnson, M.E.; Lucey, J.A. Major technological advances and trends in cheese. J. Dairy Sci. 2006, 89, 1174–1178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Riera, F.; González, P.; Muro, C. Whey cheese: Membrane technology to increase yields. J. Dairy Res. 2016, 83, 96–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Carter, B.G.; Cheng, N.; Kapoor, R.; Melethatayil, G.H.; Drake, M.A. Invited review: Microfiltration-derived casein and whey proteins from milk. J. Dairy Sci. 2021, 104, 2465–2479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Macedo, A.; Duarte, E.; Fragoso, R. Assessment of the performance of three ultrafiltration membranes for fractionation of ovine second cheese whey. Int. Dairy J. 2015, 48, 31–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Macedo, A.; Monteiro, J.; Duarte, E. A contribution for the valorisation of sheep and goat cheese whey through nanofiltration. Membranes 2018, 8, 114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. Trindade, M.B.; Soares, B.C.; Scudino, H.; Guimaraes, J.T.; Esmerino, E.A.; Freitas, M.Q.; Pimentel, T.C.; Silva, M.C.; Souza, S.L.; Almada, R.B.; et al. Cheese whey exploitation in Brazil: A questionnaire survey. Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 39, 788–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. Kotoupas, A.; Rigas, F.; Chalaris, M. Computer-aided process design, economic evaluation and environmental impact assessment for treatment of cheese whey wastewater. Desalination 2007, 213, 238–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Masotti, F.; Cattaneo, S.; Stuknyté, M.; De Noni, I. Technological tools to include whey proteins in cheese: Current status and perspectives. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 64, 102–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Bintsis, T.; Papademas, P. An overview of the cheesemaking process. In Global Cheesemaking Technology—Cheese Quality and Characteristics; Papademas, P., Bintsis, T., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: Chichester, UK, 2018; pp. 120–156. [Google Scholar]
  88. Robinson, R.K.; Wilbey, R.A. (Eds.) Cheese Whey and Its Uses; Cheesemaking Practice R. Scott: New York, NY, USA, 1998; pp. 320–326. [Google Scholar]
  89. Tsiotsias, A.; Savvaidis, I.; Vassila, A.; Kontominas, M.; Kotzekidou, P. Control of Listeria monocytogenes by low-dose irradation in combination with refrigeration in the soft whey cheese Anthotyros. Food Microbiol. 2002, 19, 117–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Hassan, H.F.; Tabarani, P.; Abiad, M.G. Microbiological, chemical, and sensory characteristics of Arishi cheese. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2022, 46, e16383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Rako, A.; Kalit, T.M.; Kalit, S.; Soldo, B.; Ljubenkov, I. Nutritional characteristics of Croatian whey cheese (Bračka skuta) produced in different stages of lactation. LWT—Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 96, 657–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Ribeiro, A.C.; Ribeiro, S.D.A. Specialty products made from goat milk. Small Rumin. Res. 2010, 89, 225–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Loewenstein, M.; Speck, S.J.; Barnhart, H.M. Research on goat milk products: A review. J. Dairy Sci. 1980, 63, 1631–1648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Park, Y.W.; Guo, M.R. Goat milk products: Processing technology, types and consumption trends. In Handbook of Milk of Non-bovine Mammals. Blackwell Publishers, Ames; Park, Y.W., Haenlein, G.F.W., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons: Oxford, UK, 2006; pp. 59–106. [Google Scholar]
  95. Skeie, S.B. Quality aspects of goat milk for cheese production in Norway: A review. Small Rumin. Res. 2014, 122, 10–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Kamber, U. The traditional cheeses of Turkey: Cheeses common to all regions. Food Rev. Int. 2007, 24, 1–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Dermiki, M.; Ntzimani, A.; Badeka, A.; Savvaidis, I.N.; Kontominas, M.G. Shelf-life extension and quality attributes of the whey cheese “Myzithra Kalathaki” using modified atmosphere packaging. LWT—Food Sci. Technol. 2008, 41, 284–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Pintado, M.E.; Lopes da Silva, J.A.; Malcata, F.X. Characterization of Requeijão and technological optimization of its manufacturing process. J. Food Eng. 1996, 30, 363–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Villarruel-López, A.; Castro-Rosas, J.; Gómez-Aldapa, C.A.; Nuňo, K.; Torres-Vitela, M.R.; Martinez-Gonzáles, N.E.; Garay-Martinez, L.E. Indicator microorganisms, Salmonella, Listeria monocytogenes, Staphylococcal enterotoxin, and physicochemical parameters in requeson cheese. Afric. J. Food Sci. 2016, 10, 178–184. [Google Scholar]
  100. Cavaliere, A. Characteristics of some dairy products produced in Diano Valley from ewe’s milk. Mondo Latte 1988, 42, 599–604. [Google Scholar]
  101. Tripaldi, C.; Rinaldi, S.; Palocci, G.; Di Giovanni, S.; Campagna, M.C.; Di Russo, C.; Zottola, T. Chemical and microbiological characteristics of homogenized Ricotta cheese produced from buffalo whey. Ital. J. Food Sci. 2020, 32, 292–309. [Google Scholar]
  102. Paskaš, S.; Mioćinović, J.; Savić, M.; Ješić, G.; Rašeta, M.; Becskei, Z. Comparison of the chemical composition of whey cheeses: Urda and Ricotta. Mac. Vet. Rev. 2019, 42, 151–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  103. Modler, H.W. Development of a continuous process for the production of Ricotta cheese. J. Dairy Sci. 1988, 71, 2003–2009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Weaterup, W. The effect of processing variables on the yield and quality of Ricotta cheese. Dairy Ind. Int. 1986, 51, 414345. [Google Scholar]
  105. Montone, A.; De felice, A.; Brunetti, R.; Mollica, D.; Capo, S.; Capuano, F.; Guarino, A.; Nava, D. Evaluation of some microbiological and chemical parameters of Campania buffalo ricotta cheese. Ital. J. Food Saf. 2017, 6, 6316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  106. Faccia, M.; Trani, A.; Natrella, G.; Gambacorta, G. Chemical-sensory and volatile compound characterization of ricotta forte, a traditional fermented whey cheese. J. Dairy Sci. 2018, 101, 5751–5757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  107. Filippetti, F.; Giangolini, G.; Boselli, C.; Amatiste, S.; Patriarca, D.; Rosati, R. Ricotta Romana: Manufacturing technique, chemical and microbiological conditions. In Proceedings of the FIL-IDF World Dairy Summit Exibition, Dublin, Ireland, 11–14 November 2007. [Google Scholar]
  108. Giangolini, G.; Amatiste, S.; Filippetti, F.; Boselli, C.; Fagiolo, A.; Rosati, R. Caratteristiche chimiche della Ricotta Romana DOP. Sci. Tecn. Latt-Cas. 2009, 60, 131–135. [Google Scholar]
  109. Casti, D.; Scarano, C.; Pala, C.; Cossu, F.; Lamon, S.; Spanu, V.; Ibba, M.; Mocci, A.M.; Tedde, F.; Nieddu, G.; et al. Evolution of the microbiological profile of vacuum-packed ricotta salata cheese during shelf-life. Ital. J. Food Safety 2016, 5, 5501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  110. Rasovic, B.M.; Nikolic, N.; Rasovic, R. Quality of “urda” obtained after production of montenegrin semi-hard cheese. Food Res. 2017, 1, 166–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Litopoulou-Tzanetaki, E.; Tzanetakis, N. The microfloras of traditional Greek cheeses. Microbiol. Spectr. 2014, 2, CM-0009-2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  112. Alichanidis, E.; Polychroniadou, A. Characteristics of major traditional regional cheese varieties of East-Mediterranean countries: A review. Dairy Sci. Technol. 2008, 88, 495–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  113. Baruzzi, F.; Morea, M.; Matarante, A.; Cocconcelli, P.S. Changes in the Lactobacillus community during Ricotta forte cheese natural fermentation. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2000, 89, 807–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Hill, A.R.; Irvine, D.M.; Bullock, D.H. Precipitation and recovery of whey proteins: A review. Canad. Instit. Food Sci. Technol. J. 1982, 15, 155–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Kaminarides, S.; Nestoratos, K.; Massouras, T. Effect of added milk and cream on the physicochemical, rheological and volatile compounds of Greek whey cheeses. Small Rumin. Res. 2013, 113, 446–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Biancolillo, A.; Reale, S.; Foschi, M.; Bertini, E.; Antonelli, L.; D’Archivio, A.A. Characterization and authentication of “Ricotta” whey cheeses through GC-FID analysis of fatty acid profile and chemometrics. Molecules 2022, 27, 7401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Ramírez-Rivas, I.K.; Gutiérrez-Méndez, N.; Rentería-Monterrubio, A.L.; Sánchez-Vega, R.; Tirado-Gallegos, J.M.; Santellano-Estrada, E.; Chávez-Martínez, A. Effect of different types and concentrations of salts added to Requeson cheese on texture, sensory, and physiochemical characteristics. J. Food Process Preserv. 2022, 46, e16336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Pizzillo, M.; Claps, S.; Cifuni, G.F.; Fedele, V.; Rubino, R. Effect of goat breed on the sensory, chemical and nutritional characteristics of ricotta cheese. Livest. Prod. Sci. 2005, 94, 33–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Govaris, A.; Koidis, P.; Papatheodorou, K. The fate of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in Myzithra, Anthotyros, and Manouri whey cheeses during storage at 2 and 12 °C. Food Microbiol. 2001, 18, 565–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Melas, D.S.; Papageorgiou, D.K.; Mantis, A.I. Enumeration and Confirmation of Aeromonas hydrophila, Aeromonas caviae, and Aeromonas sobria Isolated from Raw Milk and Other Milk Products in Northern Greece. J. Food Protect. 1999, 62, 463–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Papageorgiou, D.K.; Bori, M.; Mantis, A. Growth of Listeria monocytogenes in the whey cheeses Myzithra, Anthotyros, and Manouri during storage at 5, 12, and 22 C. J. Food Prot. 1996, 59, 1193–1199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Papageorgiou, D.K.; Melas, D.S.; Abrahim, A.; Angelidis, A.S. Growth of Aeromonas hydrophila in the whey cheeses Myzithra, Anthotyros, and Manouri during storage at 4 and 12 °C. J. Food Protect. 2006, 69, 308–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Kalogridou-Vassiliadou, D.; Tzanetakis, N.; Litopoulou-Tzanetaki, E. Microbiological and physicochemical characteristics of “Anthotyro”, a Greek traditional whey cheese. Food Microbiol. 1994, 11, 15–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Lioliou, K.; Litopoulou-Tzanetaki, E.; Tzanetakis, N.; Robinson, R.K. Changes in the microflora of Manouri, a traditional Greek whey cheese, during storage. Int. J. Dairy Technol. 2001, 54, 100–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Suzzi, G.; Schirone, M.; Martuscelli, M.; Gatti, M.; Fornasari, M.E.; Neviani, E. Yeasts associated with Manteca. FEMS Yeast Res. 2003, 3, 159–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  126. Theodoridis, A.; Abrahim, A.; Sarimvei, A.; Panoulis, C.; Karaioannoglou, P.; Genigeorgis, C.; Mantis, A. Prevalence and significance of Listeria monocytogenes in Greek whey cheeses. A comparison between the years 1990 and 1996. Milchwissenschaft 1998, 53, 147–148. [Google Scholar]
  127. Angelidis, A.S.; Georgiadou, S.S.; Zafeiropoulou, V.; Velonakis, E.N.; Papageorgiou, D.K.; Vatopoulos, A. A survey of soft cheeses in Greek retail outlets highlights a low prevalence of Listeria spp. Dairy Sci. Technol. 2012, 92, 189–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  128. Kapetanakou, A.E.; Gkerekou, M.A.; Vitzilaiou, E.S.; Skandamis, P.N. Assessing the capacity of growth, survival, and acid adaptive response of Listeria monocytogenes during storage of various cheeses and subsequent simulated gastric digestion. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2017, 246, 50–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Pilo, A.L.; Marongiu, P.; Corgiolu, G.; Virdis, S.; Scarano, C.; De Santis, E.P.L. Listeria monocytogenes contamination sources in sheep cheese processing plants and strains virulence genes typing. In Proceedings of the 5th IDF International Symposium on the Challenge to Sheep and Goats Milk Sectors, Alghero, Italy, 18–20 April 2008. [Google Scholar]
  130. Rosas-Barbosa, B.T.; Morales, A.L.J.; Alaniz-de la, O.R.; Ramirez-Alvarez, A.; Soltero-Ramos, J.P.; de la Mora-Quiroz, R.; Martin, P.; Jacquet, C. Presence and persistence of Listeria in four artisanal cheese plants in Jalisco, Mexico. E-CUCBA 2014, 2, 3–37. [Google Scholar]
  131. Gérard, A.; El-Hajjaji, S.; Niyonzima, E.; Daube, G.; Sindic, M. Prevalence and survival of Listeria monocytogenes in various types of cheese—A review. Int. J. Dairy Technol. 2018, 71, 825–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Parisi, A.; Latorre, L.; Fraccalvieri, R.; Miccolupo, A.; Normanno, G.; Caruso, M.; Santagada, G. Occurrence of Listeria spp. in dairy plants in Southern Italy and molecular subtyping of isolates using ALP. Food Control 2013, 29, 91–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Scatassa, M.L.; Mancuso, I.; Sciortino, S.; Macaluso, G.; Palmeri, M.; Arcuri, L.; Todaro, M.; Cardamone, C. Retrospective study on the hygienic quality of fresh ricotta cheeses produced in Sicily, Italy. Ital. J. Food Saf. 2018, 7, 6911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Spanu, C.; Scarano, C.; Spanu, V.; Penna, C.; Virdis, S.; De Santis, E.P.L. Listeria monocytogenes growth potential in Ricotta salata cheese. Int. Dairy J. 2012, 24, 120–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Spanu, C.; Spanu, V.; Pala, C.; Virdis, S.; Scarano, C.; De Santis, E.P.L. Evaluation of a post-lethality treatment against Listeria monocytogenes on Ricotta salata cheese. Food Control 2013, 30, 200–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Spanu, C.; Scarano, C.; Spanu, V.; Pala, C.; Di Salvo, R.; Piga, C.; Buschettu, L.; Casti, D.; Lamon, S.; Cossu, F. Comparison of post-lethality thermal treatment conditions on the reduction of Listeria monocytogenes and sensory properties of vacuum packed ricotta salata cheese. Food Control 2015, 50, 740–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Ibba, M.; Cossu, F.; Spanu, V.; Virdis, S.; Spanu, C.; Scarano, C.; De Santis, E.P.L. Listeria monocytogenes contamination in dairy plants: Evaluation of Listeria monocytogenes environmental contamination in two cheese-making plants using sheeps milk. Ital. J. Food Saf. 2013, 2, 109e112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  138. Allesandria, V.; Rantsiou, K.; Dolci, P.; Cocolin, L. Molecular methods to assess Listeria monocytogenes route of contamination in a dairy processing plant. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2010, 141, S156–S162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Adame-Gómez, R.; Muňoz-Barrios, S.; Castro-Alarcón, N.; Leyva-Vázquez, M.-A.; Toribio-Jiménez, J.; Ramirez-Peralta, A. Prevalence of the strains of Bacillus cereus group in artisanal Mexican cheese. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 2019, 17, 8–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Sattin, E.; Andreani, N.A.; Carraro, L.; Fasolato, L.; Balzan, S.; Novelli, E.; Squartini, A.; Telatin, A.; Simionati, B.; Cardazzo, B. Microbial dynamics during shelf-life of industrial Ricotta cheese and identification of a Bacillus strain as a cause of a pink discolouration. Food Microbiol. 2016, 57, 8–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Cosentino, S.; Mulargia, A.F.; Pisano, B.; Tuveri, P.; Palmas, F. Incidence and biochemical characteristics of Bacillus flora in Sardinian dairy products. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 1997, 38, 235–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Spanu, C.; Scarano, C.; Spanu, V.; Pala, C.; Casti, D.; Lamon, S.; Cossu, F.; Ibba, M.; Nieddu, G.; De Santis, E.P.L. Occurrence and behavior of Bacillus cereus in naturally contaminated ricotta salata cheese during refrigerated storage. Food Microbiol. 2016, 58, 135–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Sattin, E.; Andreani, N.A.; Carraro, L.; Lucchini, R.; Fasolato, L.; Telatin, A.; Balzan, S.; Novelli, E.; Simionati, B.; Cardazzo, B. A multi-omics approach to evaluate the quality of milk whey used in ricotta cheese production. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 1272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  144. Sameli, N.; Samelis, J. Growth and biocontrol of Listeria monocytogenes in Greek Anthotyros whey cheese without or with a crude Enterocin A-B-P extract: Interactive effects of the native spoilage microbiota during vacuum-packed storage at 4 °C. Foods 2022, 11, 334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Genigeorgis, C.; Carniciu, M.; Dutulescu, D.; Farver, T.B. Growth and survival of Listeria monocytogenes in market cheeses stored at 4 C to 30 C. J. Food Prot. 1991, 54, 662–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Coroneo, V.; Carraro, V.; Aissani, N.; Sanna, A.; Ruggeri, A.; Succa, S.; Meloni, B.; Pinna, A.; Sanna, C. Detection of virulence genes and growth potential in Listeria monocytogenes strains isolated from ricotta salata cheese. J. Food Sci. 2016, 81, M114–M120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Angelidis, A.S.; Govaris, A. The behavior of Listeria monocytogenes during the manufacture and storage of Greek Protected Designation of Origin (PDO) cheeses. In Listeria Infections Epidemiology, Pathogenesis and Treatment; Romano, A., Giordano, C.F., Eds.; Nova Science Publishers: New York, NY, USA, 2012; pp. 1–34. [Google Scholar]
  148. Angelidis, A.S.; Smith, L.T.; Smith, G.M. Elevated carnitine accumulation by Listeria monocytogenes impaired in glycine betaine transport is insufficient to restore wild-type cryotolerance in milk whey. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2002, 75, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Santorum, P.; Garcia, R.; Lopez, V.; Martinez-Suarez, J.V. Review. Dairy farm management and production practices associated with the presence of Listeria monocytogenes in raw milk and beef. Span. J. Agric. Res. 2012, 10, 360–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  150. Moula Ali, A.M.; Sant’ Ana, A.S.; Bavisetty, S.C.B. Sustainable preservation of cheese: Advanced technologies, physicochemical properties and sensory attributes. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2022, 129, 306–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Phillips, C.A. Modified atmosphere packaging and its effects on the microbiological quality and safety of produce. A review. Int J. Food Sci. Technol. 1999, 31, 463–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Mortensen, G.; Sørensen, J.; Stapelfeldt, H. Effect of modified atmosphere packaging and storage conditions on photooxidation of sliced Havarti cheese. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2003, 216, 57–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Floros, J.D.; Nielsen, P.V.; Farkas, J.K. Advances in modified atmosphere and active packaging with applications in the dairy industry. Bull. IDF 2000, 346, 22–28. [Google Scholar]
  154. Khoshgozaran, S.; Azizi, M.H.; Bagheripoor-Fallah, N. Evaluating the effect of modified atmosphere packaging on cheese characteristics: A review. Dairy Sci. Technol. 2011, 92, 1–2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  155. Feeney, E.L.; Lamichhane, P.; Sheehan, J.J. The cheese matrix: Understanding the impact of cheese structure on aspects of cardiovascular health—A food science and a human nutrition perspective. Int. J. Dairy Technol. 2021, 74, 656–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Pintado, M.E.; Malcata, F.X. Characterization of whey cheese packaged under vacuum. J. Food Prot. 2000, 63, 216–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  157. Pintado, M.E.; Malcata, F.X. The effect of modified atmosphere packaging on the microbial ecology in Requeijao, a Portuguese whey cheese. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2000, 24, 107–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Arvanitoyannis, I.S.; Kargaki, G.K.; Hadjichristodoulou, C. Effect of three MAP compositions on the physical and microbiological properties of a low fat Greek cheese known as “Anthotyros”. Anaerobe 2011, 17, 295–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Papaioannou, G.; Chouliara, I.; Karatapanis, A.E.; Kontominas, M.G.; Savvaidis, I.N. Shelf-life of a Greek whey cheese under modified atmosphere packaging. Int. Dairy J. 2007, 17, 358–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Tsiraki, M.I.; Savvaidis, I.N. Effect of packaging and basil essential oil on the quality characteristics of whey cheese “Anthotyros”. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2013, 6, 124–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Temiz, H.; Aykut, U.; Hursit, A.K. Shelf life of Turkish whey cheese (Lor) under modified atmosphere packaging. Int. J. Dairy Technol. 2009, 62, 378–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Irkin, R. Shelf-life of unsalted and light ‘Lor’ whey cheese stored under various packaging conditions: Microbiological and sensory attributes. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2011, 35, 163–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Pintado, M.E.; Malcata, F.X. Optimization of modified atmosphere packaging with respect to physicochemical characteristics of Requeijao. Food Res. Int. 2000, 33, 821–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Ramírez-Rivas, I.K.; Gutiérrez-Méndez, N.; Rentería-Monterrubio, A.L.; Sánchez-Vega, R.; Tirado-Gallegos, J.M.; Santellano-Estrada, E.; Arevalos-Sánchez, M.M.; Chávez-Martínez, A. Effect of packaging and salt content and type on antioxidant and ACE-inhibitory activities in Requeson cheese. Foods 2022, 11, 1264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Di Pierro, P.; Sorrentino, A.; Mariniello, L.; Giosafatto, C.V.L.; Porta, R. Chitosan/whey protein film as active coating to extend Ricotta cheese shelf-life. LWT—Food Sci. Technol. 2011, 44, 2324–2327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Staszewski, M.; Jagus, R. Natural antimicrobials: Effect of MicrogardTM and nisin against Listeria innocua in liquid cheese whey. Int. Dairy J. 2008, 18, 255–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Kaptan, B.; Sivri, G.T. Products dairy in plants aromatic and medicinal of utilization. J. Adv. Plant Sci. 2018, 1, 205. [Google Scholar]
  168. Ritota, M.; Manzi, P. Natural Preservatives from Plant in Cheese Making. Animals 2020, 10, 749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  169. Khorshidian, N.; Yousefi, M.; Khanniri, E.; Mortazavian, A.M. Potential application of essential oils as antimicrobial preservatives in cheese. Inn. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2018, 45, 62–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Christaki, S.; Moschakis, T.; Hatzikamari, M.; Mourtzinos, I. Nanoemulsions of oregano essential oil and green extracts: Characterization and application in whey cheese. Food Control 2022, 14, 109190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Davies, E.A.; Bevis, H.E.; Delves-Broughton, J. The use of bacteriocin nisin, as a preservative in ricotta-type cheeses to control the food-borne pathogen Listeria monocytogenes. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 1997, 24, 343–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Ehsani, A.; Rezaeiyan, A.; Hashemi, M.; Aminzare, M.; Jannat, B.; Afshari, A. Antibacterial activity and sensory properties of Heracleum persicum essential oil, nisin, and Lactobacillus acidophilus against Listeria monocytogenes in cheese. Vet World 2019, 12, 90–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  173. Ibarra-Sánchez, L.A.; El-Haddad, N.; Mahmoud, D.; Miller, M.J.; Karam, L. Invited review: Advances in nisin use for preservation of dairy products. J. Dairy Sci. 2020, 103, 2041–2052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  174. Ibarra-Sánchez, L.A.; Van Tassell, M.L.; Miller, M.J. Antimicrobial behavior of phage endolysin PlyP100 and its synergy with nisin to control Listeria monocytogenes in Queso Fresco. Food Microbiol. 2018, 72, 128–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Divsalar, E.; Tajik, H.; Moradi, M.; Forough, M.; Lotfi, M.; Kuswandi, B. Characterization of cellulosic paper coated with chitosan-zinc oxide nanocomposite containing nisin and its application in packaging of UF cheese. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 109, 1311–1318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Hales, B.R.; Walsh, M.K.; Bastarrachea, L.J. Synergistic effect of high-intensity ultrasound, UV-A light, and natural preservatives on microbial inactivation in milk. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2022, 46, e1639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Dwivedi, S.; Prajapati, P.; Vyas, N.; Malviya, S.; Kharia, A. A review on food preservation: Methods, harmful effects and better alternatives. Asian J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2017, 3, 193–199. [Google Scholar]
  178. Silva, C.C.G.; Silva, S.P.M.; Ribeiro, S.C. Application of bacteriocins and protective cultures in dairy food preservation. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Samelis, J.; Kakouri, A.; Rogga, K.J.; Savvaidis, I.N.; Kontominas, M.G. Nisin treatments to control Listeria monocytogenes post processing contamination on Anthotyros, a traditional Greek whey cheese, stored at 4 °C in vacuum packages. Food Microbiol. 2003, 20, 661–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Aspri, M.; O’Connor, P.M.; Field, D.; Cotter, P.D.; Ross, P.; Hill, C.; Papademas, P. Application of bacteriocin-producing Enterococcus faecium isolated from donkey milk, in the bio-control of Listeria monocytogenes in fresh whey cheese. Int. Dairy J. 2017, 73, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Spanu, C.; Scarano, C.; Piras, F.; Spanu, V.; Pala, C.; Casti, D.; Lamon, S.; Cossu, F.; Ibba, M.; Nieddu, G. Testing commercial biopreservative against spoilage microorganisms in MAP packed Ricotta fresca cheese. Food Microbiol. 2017, 66, 72–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Spanu, C.; Piras, F.; Mocci, A.M.; Nieddu, G.; De Santis, E.P.L.; Scarano, C. Use of Carnobacterium spp protective culture in MAP packed Ricotta fresca cheese to control Pseudomonas spp. Food Microbiol. 2018, 74, 50–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  183. Gould, G.W. Industry perspectives on the use of natural antimicrobials and inhibitors for food applications. J. Food Prot. 1996, 59, 82–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  184. Tiwari, B.K.; Valdramidis, V.P.; O’Donnell, C.P.; Muthukumarappan, K.; Bourke, P.; Cullen, P.J. Applications of natural antimicrobials for food preservation. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57, 5987–6000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  185. Sameli, N.; Sioziou, E.; Bosnea, L.; Kakouri, A.; Samelis, J. Assessment of the spoilage microbiota during refrigerated (4 °C) vacuum-packed storage of fresh Greek Anthotyros whey cheese without or with a crude enterocin A-B-P-containing extract. Foods 2021, 10, 2946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  186. Udayakumar, S.; Rasika, D.M.D.; Priyashantha, H.; Vidanarachchi, J.K.; Ranadheera, C.S. Probiotics and Beneficial Microorganisms in Biopreservation of Plant-Based Foods and Beverages. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 11737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Fernández, M.V.; Jagus, R.J.; Mugliaroli, S.L. Effect of combined natural antimicrobials on spoilage microorganisms and Listeria innocua in a whey cheese “Ricotta”. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2014, 7, 2528–2537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Wu, M.; Ma, Y.; Dou, X.; Aslam, M.Z.; Liu, Y.; Xia, X.; Yang, S.; Wang, X.; Qin, X.; Hirata, T.; et al. A review of potential antibacterial activities of nisin against Listeria monocytogenes: The combined use of nisin shows more advantages than single use. Food Res. Int. 2023, 164, 112363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Aktypis, A.; Kalantzopoulos, G.; Huis in’t Veld, J.H.J.; Ten brink, B. Purification and characterization of thermophilin T, a novel bacteriocin produced by Streptococcus thermophilus ACA-DC 0040. J. Appl. Microbiol. 1998, 84, 568–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Kaminarides, S.; Aktypis, A.; Koronios, G.; Massouras, T.; Papanikolaou, S. Effect of ‘in situ’ produced bacteriocin thermophilin T on the microbiological and physicochemical characteristics of Myzithra whey cheese. Int. J. Dairy Technol. 2018, 71, 213–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Duarte, R.; Moreira, S.A.; Fernandes, P.A.R.; Santos, D.; Inacio, R.S.; Alves, S.P.; Bessa, R.J.B.; Saraiva, J.A. Whey cheese longer shelf-life achievement at variable uncontrolled room temperature and comparison to refrigeration. J. Food Process Preserv. 2017, 41, e13307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Urgu-Ozturk, M. Possibilities of using the continuous type of UV light on the surface of lor (whey) cheese: Impacts on mould growth, oxidative stability, sensory and colour attributes during storage. J. Dairy Res. 2022, 89, 335–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  193. Ricciardi, F.E.; Plazzotta, S.; Conte, A.; Manzocco, L. Effect of pulsed light on microbial inactivation, sensory properties and protein structure of fresh ricotta cheese. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 139, 110556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Ricciardi, E.F.; del Nobile, M.A.; Conte, A.; Fracassi, F.; Sardella, E. Effects of plasma treatments applied to fresh ricotta cheese. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2022, 76, 102935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Kaminarides, S. A modified form of Myzithra cheese produced by substituting the fresh cheese whey by dried whey protein concentrate and ovine milk and cream. Small Rum. Res. 2015, 131, 118–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Aguilar-Raymundo, V.G.; Ramírez-Murillo, J.I.; Barajas-Ramírez, J.A. Assessing the yield, physicochemical, sensory characteristics, and acceptance of queso fresco added with whey cheese. Int. J Food Sci. Technol. 2022, 57, 6038–6045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Awad, S.; Ahmed, N.; Soda, M. Application of Salt Whey from Egyptian Ras Cheese in Processed Cheese Making. Food Nutr. Sci. 2013, 4, 79–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  198. Semenium, C.A.; Zăpãrtan, L.; Stan, L.; Pop, C.R.; Borş, M.D.; Rotar, A.M. Physicochemical and sensory properties of whey cheese with pine nuts. Bul. UASVM Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 72, 177–181. [Google Scholar]
  199. Zoidou, E.; Andreadaki, I.; Massouras, T.; Kaminarides, S. A new whey cheese analogue made from whey protein concentrate and vegetable fat with 15% olive oil. J. Nutr. Medic. Diet Care 2016, 2, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Moschopoulou, E.; Dernikos, D.; Zoidou, E. Ovine ice cream made with addition of whey protein concentrates of ovine-caprine origin. Int. Dairy J. 2021, 122, 105146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Motamedzadegan, A.; Rahmani, S.; Reza kasaai, M.; Amiri, Z.R. Physicochemical and sensory characteristics of foam mat dried ricotta cheese as a function of raw material composition and drying temperature. J. Food Process Preserv. 2022, 46, e16510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Marnotes, N.G.; Pires, A.F.; Díaz, O.; Cobos, A.; Pereira, C.D. Sheep’s and goat’s frozen yoghurts produced with ultrafiltrated whey concentrates. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 6568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Maragkoudakis, P.; Vendramin, V.; Bovo, B.; Treu, L.; Corich, V.; Giacomini, A. Potential use of scotta, the by-product of the ricotta cheese manufacturing process, for the production of fermented drinks. J. Dairy Res. 2016, 83, 104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  204. Jinjarak, S.; Olabi, A.; Jiménez-Florez, R.; Sodini, I.; Walker, J.H. Sensory evaluation of whey and sweet cream buttermilk. J. Dairy Sci. 2006, 89, 2441–2450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  205. Nadeem, M.; Mahud, A.; Imran, M.; Khalique, A. Enhancement of the oxidative stability of whey butter through almonds (Prunus dulcis) peel extract. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2015, 39, 591–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  206. Costa, M.A.; Kuhn, D.; Rama, G.R.; Lehn, D.N.; Souza, C.F.V. Whey butter: A promising perspective for the dairy industry. Braz. J. Food Technol. 2022, 25, e2021088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. Martirosyan, D.M.; Singh, J. A new definition of functional food by FFC. Funct. Foods Health Dis. 2015, 5, 209–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Dimidi, E.; Cox, S.R.; Rossi, M.; Whelan, K. Fermented Foods: Definitions and Characteristics, Impact on the Gut Microbiota and Effects on Gastrointestinal Health and Disease. Nutrients 2019, 11, 1806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  209. Kaur, H.; Kaur, G.; Ali, S.A. Dairy-based probiotic-fermented functional foods: An update on their health-promoting properties. Fermentation 2022, 8, 425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Khorshidian, N.; Yousefi, M.; Mortazavian, A.M. Fermented milk: The most popular probiotic food carrier. In Probiotic and Prebiotics in Foods: Challenges, Innovations and Advances; Gomes da Cruz, A., Prudencio, E.S., Esmerino, E.A., Cristina da Silva, M., Eds.; Academic Press: London, UK, 2020; Volume 94, pp. 91–114. [Google Scholar]
  211. Voidarou, C.; Antoniadou, M.; Rozos, G.; Tzora, A.; Skoufos, I.; Varzakas, T.; Lagiou, A.; Bezirtzoglou, E. Fermentative foods: Microbiology, biochemistry, potential human health benefits and public health issues. Foods 2021, 10, 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  212. Madureira, A.R.; Gião, M.S.; Pintado, M.E.; Gomes, A.M.P.; Freitas, A.C.; Malcata, F.X. Incorporation and survival of probiotic bacteria in whey cheese matrices. J. Food Sci. 2006, 70, M160–M165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  213. Madureira, A.R.; Pintado, M.E.; Gomes, A.M.P.; Malcata, F.X. Incorporation of probiotic bacteria in whey cheese: Decreasing the risk of microbial contamination. J. Food Prot. 2011, 74, 1194–1199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  214. Madureira, A.R.; Amorim, M.; Gomes, A.M.; Pintado, M.E.; Malcata, F.X. Protective effect of whey cheese matrix on probiotic strains exposed to simulated gastrointestinal conditions. Food Res. Int. 2011, 44, 465–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  215. Madureira, A.R.; Soares, J.C.; Amorim, M.; Tavares, T.; Gomes, A.M.; Pintado, M.M.; Malcata, F.X. Bioactivity of probiotic whey cheese: Characterization of the content of peptides and organic acids. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2013, 93, 1458–1465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  216. Hernández-Ledesma, B.; Ramos, M.; Gómez-Ruiz, J.A. Bioactive components of ovine and caprine cheese whey. Small Rum. Res. 2011, 101, 196–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  217. Madureira, A.R.; Soares, J.C.; Pintado, M.E.; Gomes, A.M.P.; Freitas, A.C.; Xavier Malcata, F. Effect of the incorporation of salted additives on probiotic whey cheeses. Food Biosci. 2015, 10, 8–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  218. Dimitrellou, D.; Kandylis, P.; Kourkoutas, Y.; Kanellaki, M. Novel probiotic whey cheese with immobilized lactobacilli on casein. LWT—Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 86, 627–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  219. Pires, A.F.; Marnotes, N.G.; Bella, A.; Viegas, J.; Gomes, D.M.; Henriques, M.H.F.; Pereira, C.J.D. Use of ultrafiltrated cow’s whey for the production of whey cheese with Kefir or probiotics. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2021, 101, 555–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  220. Carrero-Puentes, S.; Fuenmayor, C.; Jiménez-Pérez, C.; Guzmán-Rodríguez, F.; Gómez-Ruiz, L.; Rodríguez-Serrano, G.; Alatorre-Santamaría, S.; García-Garibay, M.; Cruz-Guerrero, A. Development and characterization of an exopolysaccharide-functionalized acid whey cheese (requesón) using Lactobacillus delbrueckii ssp. bulgaricus. J. Food Process Preserv. 2022, 46, e16095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  221. Nzekoue, F.K.; Alesi, A.; Vittori, S.; Sagratini, G.; Caprioli, G. Development of functional whey cheese enriched in vitamin D3: Nutritional composition, fortification, analysis, and stability study during cheese processing and storage. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 2021, 72, 746–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  222. Garcia, M.M.E.; Pereira, C.J.D.; Freitas, A.C.; Gomes, A.M.P.; Pintado, M.M.E. Development and Characterization of a Novel Sustainable Probiotic Goat Whey Cheese Containing Second Cheese Whey Powder and Stabilized with Thyme Essential Oil and Sodium Citrate. Foods 2022, 11, 2698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  223. Rosa, L.S.; Santos, M.L.; Abreu, J.P.; Rocha, R.S.; Esmerino, E.A.; Freitas, M.Q.; Mársico, E.T.; Campelo, P.H.; Pimentel, T.C.; Cristina Silva, M.; et al. Probiotic fermented whey-milk beverages: Effect of different probiotic strains on the physicochemical characteristics, biological activity, and bioactive peptides. Food Res. Int. 2023, 164, 112396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  224. Schlabitz, C.; Gennari, A.; De Mello Araújo, A.L.; Bald, J.A.; De Souza, C.F.V.; Hoehne, L. Shelf life of a synbiotic fermented dairy beverage using ricotta cheese whey. Am. J. Food Technol. 2015, 10, 254–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  225. Mileriene, J.; Serniene, L.; Kasparaviciene, B.; Lauciene, L.; Kasetiene, N.; Zakariene, G.; Kersiene, M.; Leskauskaite, D.; Viskelis, J.; Kourkoutas, Y.; et al. Exploring the potential of sustainable acid whey cheese supplemented with apple pomace and GABA-producing indigenous Lactococcus lactis strain. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table
Table 1. Chemical composition (g/100 g) and pH of whey from different milk and cheese sources.
Table 1. Chemical composition (g/100 g) and pH of whey from different milk and cheese sources.
pHFatLactoseProteinTotal SolidsReference
Buffalo wheyna0.504.900.736.50[28]
Cow whey5.7–6.30.205.000.806.60[29,30]
Cow whey (from Feta-type)6.30.254.720.826.32[31]
Cow whey (from Graviera)6.30.604.900.906.90[31]
Cow whey (from Kefalotyri)6.40.404.850.806.55[31]
Cow whey (from Cottage)4.6–4.50.044.900.755.50[31]
Goat wheynana4.100.405.10[32,33]
Sheep whey (from Feta)na0.395.331.617.87[31]
Sheep whey (from Graviera)6.31.265.271.528.74[31]
Sheep whey (from Kefalotyri)6.20.704.991.417.48[31]
Sheep wheyna1.503.701.809.50[32,34]
na: not available.
Table
Table 2. Composition (%) and specific processing conditions of whey cheeses.
Table 2. Composition (%) and specific processing conditions of whey cheeses.
CheeseCountrySource of WheySpecific Processing ConditionspHFatProteinSaltMoistureReference
Anari (fresh)CyprusS, GFresh Anari has a short shelf life, that is 2–3 days once packaging is openedna21.711.0na65.4[7]
Anari (dry)CyprusS, GSalted fresh Anari cheese is dried until it becomes hard and easy to gratena34.921.7na33.8[7]
AnthotyrosGreeceS, GSheep or goat cream and/or milk is added6.416.66.9na68.4[31]
AnthotyrosGreeceS, GSheep or goat cream and/or milk is added6.3–6.416.5–16.69.6–9.70.5–0.665.0–66.5[89]
Arishi (from sweet whey)LebanonCWhey is coagulated by heating at 85 °C for 5–10 min5.84.914.4na70.2[90]
Arishi (from acid whey)LebanonCCitric acid is added4.47.08.1na77.6[90]
Bračka skutaCroatiaS The whey is heated until proteins are coagulated and then is further boiled at 95–97 °C6.527.9 10.9na58.7[91]
GjestostNorwayGCaramelized lactose in concentrated whey is combined with whey proteins and fatna349.7na13.4[7,92,93,94,95]
LorTurkeyS, G, CThe raw cheese is strained in a hemp or other straining cloth and press is appliedna5.3–15.39.7–13.50.964.3–72.4[96]
Manouri PDOGreeceS, GSalt is added at 1% and milk and/or cream up to a proportion of 25%5.936.710.90.848.1[7,31]
MesostSwedenG, CThe whey is boiled to evaporate waterna17.0nana20.0[7]
MessmörSwedenG, CThe whey is boiled to evaporate water; the concentrated mass is homogenizedna2.0nana30.0–35.0[7]
MysostNorwayC, GIt is produced either as a hard or soft-spread cheesena24.711.5na83.8[14]
MyzithraGreeceS, GIt is produced either from sweet or acid whey; in case of sweet whey, partial acidification is required during heating6.015.913.10.866.4[31]
Myzithra dryGreeceS, GThe cheese is dried in the air4.720.825.48.738.6[31]
Myzithra KalathakiGreeceS, GSimilar to Myzithra6.815.0–20.0na1.0–1.575.0[97]
PrimostNorwayG Addition of creamna3510.9na13.8[7]
RequeijãoPortugalS, G90% S whey and 10% G milk; at 95 °C for at least 15 min under stirring; this cheese is usually eaten freshna29.58.5na59.0[98]
RequesónMexico, SpainC, S, G10% milk is added to the whey6.14.1–13.05.1–7.0nana[14,99]
RicottaItalySSweet whey is used, mixed with 5–10% milk, salt is added at 0.1% and citric acid at 0.11 kg/L and heating is carried out up to 80–85 °Cna26.04.1na56.8[14,100]
Ricotta ItalyBSee above (Ricotta)6.6–6.922.55.63na65.5[101]
RicottaSerbiaCSee above (Ricotta)5.7–5.96.416.92.269.8[102]
RicottaUSCAddition of 20% milkna11.616.3na66.5[103]
RicottaUSCAddition of 5% milkna3.37.0na81.6[104]
Ricotta (buffalo)ItalyBSee above (Ricotta)na18.010.0na65.0[100]
Ricotta (cow)ItalyCSee above (Ricotta)na10.09.0na76.0[100]
Ricotta (sheep)ItalySSee above (Ricotta)na18.08.0na70.0[100]
Ricotta di Bufala Campana DOPItalyBSee above (Ricotta)6.2–6.7nananana[105]
Ricotta forteItalynaFreshly produced Ricotta is put into a small tank and thoroughly mixed; then, the tank is covered and kept in a cool place for at least 6 months at room temperature; natural fermentation takes place; at the end of the ripening period, salt is added (20–40 g/kg)4.721.412.2na64.1[106]
Ricotta RomanaItalySSee above (Ricotta)na15.58.9na71.1[107,108]
Ricotta salata (0 days)ItalySSee above (Ricotta)6.5419.514.83.4257.9[109]
Ricotta salata (60 days)ItalySSee above (Ricotta)6.0421.215.23.156.3[109]
Ricotta salata (90 days)ItalySSee above (Ricotta)5.6820.115.23.457.2[109]
SkutaSerbiaS, GMilk and/or cream can be added to the whey, before or after coagulationna11.7nana30.0[102,110]
Skuta DalmatianCroatianaAcidification of Skuta is achieved by the addition of sour whey in an amount up to 10%, vinegar or citric acidna35.4nana26.4[110]
UrdaSerbiaCSweet whey is heated to 80–85 °C; citric acid is added5.77–5.975.6310.71.979.6[102]
Urda dryGreeceS, GFresh Urda is ripened on wooden shelves in ventilated room at 19 °C and 70–75% RH for 25 days5.04–5.4643.5–45.718.4–21.93.4–3.627.5–30.8[11]
Urda freshGreeceS, GArtisanal Urda cheese is naturally fermented by spontaneous fermentation and undergoes ripening6.39–6.4128.8–29.712.6–14.60.5–0.654.1–57.0[11]
Xynomyzithra Kritis PDOGreeceS, GMyzithra is first manufactured and, after draining, press is applied for 7 days; salt is added, and the cheese is ripened for 60 days at 5–10 °C4.8nana1.8638.6[111]
B: buffalo, C: cow, G: goat, S: sheep, na: not available.
Table
Table 3. Modified atmosphere packaging (MAP) conditions and the best practice and/or effect on whey cheeses.
Table 3. Modified atmosphere packaging (MAP) conditions and the best practice and/or effect on whey cheeses.
CheeseMAP Conditions UsedBest Practice/EffectReference
Anthotyros40% CO2/55% N2/5% O2, 60% CO2/40% N2 and 50% CO2/50% N2 60% CO2/40% N2 and 50% CO2/50% N2 mixtures proved to be most effective for inhibiting total mesophilic microorganisms and E. coli[158]
Anthotyros30% CO2/70% N2 and 70% CO2/30% N2The use of MAP conditions 70% CO2/30% N2 extended the shelf-life of fresh cheese for 20 days[159]
Anthotyros40% CO2/60% N2 and basil essential oil (0.4% v/w)Extend the shelf life by approximately 10–12 days compared to aerobic packaging[160]
Lor40% CO2/60% N2, 60% CO2/40% N2 and 70% CO2/30% N260% and 70% CO2 were the most effective mixture for inhibition of growth of micro-organisms[161]
Lor80% CO2/20% N2 and 60% CO2/40% N280% CO2/20% N2 was the most effective for inhibiting growth of micro-organisms[162]
Myzithra Kalathaki20% CO2/80% N2, 40% CO2/60% N2 and 60% CO2/40% N240% CO2/60% N2 was the most effective treatment for the inhibition of psychrotrophs in Myzithra cheese until days 40; control samples were sensorily unacceptable after 10–12 days of storage[97]
Requeijao100% CO2, 100% N2 and 50% CO2/50% N2CO2 alone ensured more consistent cheese composition until 15 days of storage and provided protection against lipolysis[163]
Ricotta fresca30% CO2/70% N2 and 100% N2No evidence that MAP conditions used in Sardinian dairies allowed to extend the shelf life to 21 days[24]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bintsis, T.; Papademas, P. Sustainable Approaches in Whey Cheese Production: A Review. Dairy 2023, 4, 249-270. https://doi.org/10.3390/dairy4020018

AMA Style

Bintsis T, Papademas P. Sustainable Approaches in Whey Cheese Production: A Review. Dairy. 2023; 4(2):249-270. https://doi.org/10.3390/dairy4020018

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bintsis, Thomas, and Photis Papademas. 2023. "Sustainable Approaches in Whey Cheese Production: A Review" Dairy 4, no. 2: 249-270. https://doi.org/10.3390/dairy4020018

APA Style

Bintsis, T., & Papademas, P. (2023). Sustainable Approaches in Whey Cheese Production: A Review. Dairy, 4(2), 249-270. https://doi.org/10.3390/dairy4020018

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop