Effects of Atmospheric Aerosol Types on Ultraviolet Flux at Different Stations in the Indo-Gangetic Plain †
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Methodology
2.1. Observational Sites and Data Collection
2.2. Methodology
- For Dust-Dominant (DT): FMF < 0.4 with SSA > 0.8;
- For Polluted-Continental-Dominant (PCD): 0.4 ≤ FMF ≤ 0.6 with any SSA value;
- For Black-Carbon-Dominant (BCD): FMF > 0.6 with SSA ≤ 0.9;
- For Organic-Carbon-Dominant (OCD): FMF > 0.6 with SSA > 0.9.
- For Dust-Dominant (DT): AE < 0.6 with any AOD values;
- For Polluted-Continental-Dominant (PCD): 0.6 ≤ AE ≤ 1.0 with any AOD values;
- For Black-Carbon-Dominant (BCD): AE ≥ 1.0 with AOD ≤ 1.0;
- For Organic-Carbon-Dominant (OCD): AE ≥ 1.0 with AOD > 1.0 values.
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Annual Concentration of Distinct Aerosol Types
3.2. Relationship between Distinct Aerosol Types and UVA and UVB Radiation
4. Conclusions
- Different stations showed the dominance of different types of aerosols in the IGP. DT types dominated at Karachi, with 55.48%, OCD dominated at Lahore (31.74%), BCD at Kanpur (43.32%) and BCD at Jaipur (37.32%). The polluted continental PCD had a significant contribution at all the stations, contributing in the range 15–22%.
- Different aerosol types are shown to decrease the UVA/UVB flux with a per-unit increase in AOD. The black-carbon-dominant (BCD)-type aerosol showed the highest capacity to decrease the UVA Flux, followed by DT, OCD and PCD.
- The correlation coefficients between UVA/B flux and AOD for the segregated aerosol types were <0.5 in most of the cases, possibly due to the smaller size of the data. The effects of AOD on UVA/B for the entire combined aerosol types were studied, and it was found that at four stations in the IGP, a unit rise in AOD led to a reduction of 5–7 Wm−2 in UVA and 0.14–0.23 Wm−2 in UVB.
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Lodhi, N.K.; Beegum, S.N.; Singh, S.; Kumar, K. Aerosol climatology at Delhi in the western Indo-Gangetic Plain: Microphysics, long-term trends, and source strengths. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2013, 118, 1361–1375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pandithurai, G.; Dipu, S.; Dani, K.K.; Tiwari, S.; Bisht, D.S.; Devara, P.C.S.; Pinker, R.T. Aerosol radiative forcing during dust events over New Delhi, India. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2008, 113, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tiwari, S.; Tiwari, S.; Hopke, P.K.; Attri, S.D.; Soni, V.K.; Singh, A.K. Variability in optical properties of atmospheric aerosols and their frequency distribution over a mega city ‘New Delhi’, India. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2016, 87, 81–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ramachandran, S. Aerosols and Climate Change: Present Understanding, Challenges, and Future Outlook. Land-Atmos. Res. Appl. South Southeast Asia 2018, 1, 341–378. [Google Scholar]
- Kedia, S.; Ramachandran, S.; Holben, B.N.; Tripathi, S.N. Quantification of aerosol type, and sources of aerosols over the Indo-Gangetic Plain. Atmos. Environ. 2014, 98, 607–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ansari, K.; Ramachandran, S. Radiative effects of absorbing aerosol types over South Asia. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 858, 159969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Orte, F.; Wolfram, E.; Bali, J.; Carmona, F.; Lusi, A.; D’elía, R.; Liberteli, C. Comparison of monthly means daily UVA from CERES with ground-based measurements. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE Biennial Congress of Argentina, ARGENCON 2018, San Miguel de Tucuman, Argentina, 6–8 June 2019; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, M.; Parmar, K.S.; Kumar, D.B.; Mhawish, A.; Broday, D.M.; Mall, R.K.; Banerjee, T. Long-term aerosol climatology over Indo-Gangetic Plain: Trend, prediction and potential source fields. Atmos. Environ. 2018, 180, 37–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dadhich, A.P.; Goyal, R.; Dadhich, P.N. An assessment of urban space expansion and its impact on air quality using geospatial approach. J. Urban Environ. Eng. 2017, 11, 79–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Banerjee, T.; Shitole, A.S.; Mhawish, A.; Anand, A.; Ranjan, R.; Khan, M.F.; Srithawirat, T.; Latif, M.T.; Mall, R.K. Aerosol Climatology over South and Southeast Asia: Aerosol Types, Vertical Profile, and Source Fields. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2021, 126, e2020JD033554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET) Homepage. Available online: https://aeronet.gsfc.nasa.gov/new_web/index.html (accessed on 22 August 2023).
- CERES Data Products—CERES. Available online: https://ceres.larc.nasa.gov/data/ (accessed on 22 August 2023).
- Tiwari, S.; Srivastava, A.K.; Singh, A.K.; Singh, S. Identification of aerosol types over Indo-Gangetic Basin: Implications to optical properties and associated radiative forcing. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2015, 22, 12246–12260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Srivastava, A.K.; Tripathi, S.N.; Dey, S.; Kanawade, V.P.; Tiwari, S. Inferring aerosol types over the Indo-Gangetic Basin from ground based sunphotometer measurements. Atmos. Res. 2012, 109–110, 64–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, S.; Lodhi, N.K.; Mishra, A.K.; Jose, S.; Kumar, S.N.; Kotnala, R.K. Assessment of satellite-retrieved surface UVA and UVB radiation by comparison with ground-measurements and trends over Mega-city Delhi. Atmos. Environ. 2018, 188, 60–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Study Sites | Altitude (m asl) | Duration | Aerosol Types | Mean ± Standard Deviation | Annual Contribution (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Kanpur [26.51° N, 80.23° E] | 126 | January 2021–December 2021 | DT | 0.59 ± 0.25 | 9.45 |
PCD | 0.60 ± 0.23 | 17.98 | |||
BCD | 0.59 ± 0.21 | 43.32 | |||
OCD | 1.35 ± 0.36 | 29.73 | |||
Jaipur [26.92° N, 75.78° E] | 431 | January 2021–December 2021 | DT | 0.47 ± 0.14 | 30.80 |
PCD | 0.48 ± 0.20 | 15.60 | |||
BCD | 0.44 ± 0.20 | 37.32 | |||
OCD | 1.36 ± 0.41 | 16.28 | |||
Karachi [24.94° N, 67.13° E] | 10 | January 2021–December 2021 | DT | 0.57 ± 0.25 | 55.48 |
PCD | 0.39 ± 0.14 | 19.92 | |||
BCD | 0.48 ± 0.19 | 21.55 | |||
OCD | 1.17 ± 0.10 | 3.34 | |||
Lahore [31.47° N, 74.26° E] | 217 | January 2021–December 2021 | DT | 0.70 ± 0.23 | 16.01 |
PCD | 0.58 ± 0.19 | 22.31 | |||
BCD | 0.61 ± 0.21 | 29.95 | |||
OCD | 1.36 ± 0.34 | 31.74 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Mall, A.; Singh, S. Effects of Atmospheric Aerosol Types on Ultraviolet Flux at Different Stations in the Indo-Gangetic Plain. Environ. Sci. Proc. 2023, 27, 33. https://doi.org/10.3390/ecas2023-15118
Mall A, Singh S. Effects of Atmospheric Aerosol Types on Ultraviolet Flux at Different Stations in the Indo-Gangetic Plain. Environmental Sciences Proceedings. 2023; 27(1):33. https://doi.org/10.3390/ecas2023-15118
Chicago/Turabian StyleMall, Ankita, and Sachchidanand Singh. 2023. "Effects of Atmospheric Aerosol Types on Ultraviolet Flux at Different Stations in the Indo-Gangetic Plain" Environmental Sciences Proceedings 27, no. 1: 33. https://doi.org/10.3390/ecas2023-15118
APA StyleMall, A., & Singh, S. (2023). Effects of Atmospheric Aerosol Types on Ultraviolet Flux at Different Stations in the Indo-Gangetic Plain. Environmental Sciences Proceedings, 27(1), 33. https://doi.org/10.3390/ecas2023-15118