Organic Cotton Clothing Purchase Behavior: A Comparative Study of Consumers in the United States and Bangladesh
Abstract
:1. Introduction
- To understand how consumers’ knowledge of environmental sustainability influences attitudes towards OCC purchase behavior and the difference between the US and Bangladeshi consumers.
- To understand how social norms influence consumers’ attitudes towards OCC purchase behavior and the difference between the US and Bangladeshi consumers.
2. Organic Cotton Clothing (OCC)
3. Literature Review
4. Theoretical Framework
5. Methodology
6. Questionnaire Design
7. Sample
8. Results Analysis
9. Discussion
10. Limitations and Future Research
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
Construct | Items | Source |
---|---|---|
Sustainability knowledge | Growing organic cotton does not need hazardous chemical and pesticides. Organic cotton clothing good for human health and environment. I am concerned about the impact of clothing production on the environment. The use of larger quantities of natural fibers will significantly decrease energy consumption. Organic cotton clothing ensure fair trade, and sustainable environmental development. | [51] |
Social Norms | People who influence my decisions would approve of me buying organic cotton clothing. People who are important in my life would approve of me buying organic cotton clothing. Close friends and family think it is a good idea for me to purchase organic cotton clothing. | [32] |
Attitudes | For me buying organic cotton clothing would be: Bad/Good Negative/Positive Not favorable/Favorable Unpleasant/Pleasant Undesirable/Desirable A bad idea/A good idea | [32] |
Purchase Intentions | I would like to purchase organic cotton clothing in the future. If I see organic cotton clothing, I intend to purchase or consider purchasing it. If I see a retail store selling organic cotton clothing, I intend to visit the store to purchase a product. | [32] |
References
- U.S. Department of Agriculture. 2019 Agricultural Chemical Use Survey: Cotton. NASS Highlights. No. 2020-3. 2020. Available online: https://www.nass.usda.gov/Surveys/Guide_to_NASS_Surveys/Chemical_Use/2019_Field_Crops/chem-highlights-cotton-2019.pdf (accessed on 28 April 2021).
- Ferrigno, S.; Guadagnini, R.; Tyrell, K. Is Cotton Conquering its Chemical Addiction? A Review of Pesticide Use in Global Cotton Production; Pesticide Action Network UK: Brighton, UK, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Rajan, K.; Sundramurthy, V.P.; Merine, M.K. A Harmless Approach on Textile Effluent Detoxification: Bioremediation and Recent Strategies. In Strategies and Tools for Pollutant Mitigation; Aravind, J., Kamaraj, M., Prashanthi Devi, M., Rajakumar, S., Eds.; Springer Nature Switzerland AG: Gewerbestrasse, Switzerland, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Eyupoglu, S. Organic Cotton and Environmental Impacts. In Organic Cotton; Springer: Singapore, 2019; pp. 157–176. [Google Scholar]
- Kooistra, K.; Termorshuizen, A.J.; Pyburn, R. The Sustainability of Cotton: Consequences for Man and Environment; Science Shop Wageningen UR: Wageningen, The Netherlands, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Kumar, P.S.; Yaashikaa, P. Organic Cotton and Its Environmental Impacts. In Organic Cotton; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2019; pp. 127–139. [Google Scholar]
- The Soil Association. Cool Cotton—Cotton and Climate Change. 2015. Available online: https://www.soilassociation.org/media/6491/cool-cotton-organic-cotton-and-climate-change-2015.pdf (accessed on 28 April 2021).
- Green Generation: Millennials Say Sustainability Is a Shopping Priority. 2015. Available online: https://www.nielsen.com/us/en/insights/article/2015/green-generation-millennials-say-sustainability-is-a-shopping-priority/ (accessed on 15 February 2021).
- Khare, A.; Kautish, P. Cosmopolitanism, self-identity, online communities and green apparel perception. Mark. Intell. Plan. 2021, 39, 91–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fashion Revolution. Consumer Survey Report. 2018. Available online: https://www.fashionrevolution.org/resources/consumer-survey/201118_resultsonly_fashrev_consumersurvey_2018/ (accessed on 16 December 2020).
- Speranskaya, O.; Buonsante, V.A.; Adan, H.; Gorial, M. The Sustainability of Fashion: What Role can Consumers Play? Hej-support. 2020. Available online: https://hej-support.org/the-sustainability-of-fashion-what-role-can-consumers-play/ (accessed on 24 April 2021).
- Textile Exchange. 2020 Organic Cotton Market Report (OCMR) Released. 2020. Available online: https://textileexchange.org/2020-organic-cotton-market-report-ocmr-released-2/ (accessed on 10 June 2021).
- Cengiarslan, F. Global Organic Cotton Production Increased by 31%. Textilegence. 2020. Available online: https://www.textilegence.com/en/global-organic-cotton-production-increased/ (accessed on 15 January 2021).
- Organic Trade Association. Get the Facts about Organic Cotton. 2019. Available online: https://ota.com/advocacy/fiber-and-textiles/get-facts-about-organic-cotton#:~:text=HOW%20MUCH%20ORGANIC%20COTTON%20IS,metric%20tons%20(831%2C193%20bales) (accessed on 14 June 2021).
- Sakamoto, M.; Ahmed, T.; Begum, S.; Huq, H. Water pollution and the textile industry in Bangladesh: Flawed corporate practices or restrictive opportunities? Sustainability 2019, 11, 1951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mehta, A. Apparel brands join forces to clean up their act in Bangladesh. Reuters. 2018. Available online: https://www.reutersevents.com/sustainability/apparel-brands-join-forces-clean-their-act-bangladesh (accessed on 16 December 2020).
- Star Business Report. ‘Justice still Eludes Rana Plaza Victims: CPD’. The Daily Star. 2016. Available online: http://www.thedailystar.net/business/justice-still-eludes-rana-plaza-victims-cpd-1213720 (accessed on 24 April 2021).
- International Labor Rights Forum. 5 Years after Rana Plaza, What has Changed? 2018. Available online: https://laborrights.org/releases/5-years-after-rana-plaza-what-has-changed (accessed on 13 August 2021).
- Brooker. The Country with the Most Certified Sustainable Garment Factories is…. 2019. Available online: https://www.techstyler.fashion/post/the-country-with-the-most-certified-sustainable-garment-factories-is (accessed on 15 January 2021).
- Mirdha, R.U. Organic Push Earns Global Praise. The Daily Star. Available online: https://www.thedailystar.net/business/organic-textile-manufacturing-earns-global-praise-1718191 (accessed on 21 March 2019).
- Textile Today. BD Sees Highest Growth in using Organic Raw Materials. Textile Today. 2019. Available online: https://www.textiletoday.com.bd/bd-sees-highest-growth-in-using-organic-raw-materials-in-world/ (accessed on 24 April 2021).
- Merriam-Webster. Organic. Merriam-Webster.com Dictionary. Available online: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/organic (accessed on 15 August 2021).
- EJF. The Deadly Chemicals in Cotton; Environmental Justice Foundation in Collaboration with Pesticide Action Network UK: London, UK, 2007; ISBN 1-904523-10-2. [Google Scholar]
- Zulfiqar, F.; Thapa, G.B. Is ‘Better cotton’ better than conventional cotton in terms of input use efficiency and financial performance? Land Use Policy 2016, 52, 136–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reganold, J.P.; Glover, J.D.; Andrews, P.K.; Hinman, H.R. Sustainability of three apple production systems. Nature 2001, 410, 926–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Angelova, R.A. Organic Cotton: Technological and Environmental Aspects. In Proceedings of the XXIII Int. Scientific Conference FPEPM, Sozopol, Bulgaria, 17–20 September 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Textile Exchange. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Organic Cotton, PE International. 2014. Available online: http://farmhub.textileexchange.org/upload/library/Farm%20reports/LCA_of_Organic_Cotton%20FiberSummary_of%20Findings.pdf (accessed on 25 April 2021).
- Chang, H.J.; Watchravesringkan, K.T. Who are sustainably minded apparel shoppers? An investigation to the influencing factors of sustainable apparel consumption. Int. J. Retail. Distrib. Manag. 2018, 46, 148–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fu, W.; Kim, Y.K. Eco-fashion consumption: Cognitive-experiential self-theory. Fam. Consum. Sci. Res. J. 2019, 47, 220–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Koszewska, M. A typology of Polish consumers and their behaviours in the market for sustainable textiles and clothing. Int. J. Consum. Stud. 2013, 37, 507–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khare, A.; Varshneya, G. Antecedents to organic cotton clothing purchase behaviour: Study on Indian youth. J. Fash. Mark. Manag. Int. J. 2017, 21, 51–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, T.-I. Determinants of organic cotton apparel purchase: A comparison of young consumers in the USA and South Korea. Sustainability 2018, 10, 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Su, J.; Watchravesringkan, K.T.; Zhou, J.; Gil, M. Sustainable clothing: Perspectives from US and Chinese young Millennials. Int. J. Retail. Distrib. Manag. 2019, 47, 1141–1162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Young, C.; Jirousek, C.; Ashdown, S. Undesigned: A study in sustainable design of apparel using post-consumer recycled clothing. Cloth. Text. Res. J. 2004, 22, 61–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Azjen, I. Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. In Englewood Cliffs; Prentice-Hall: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1980. [Google Scholar]
- Ajzen, I. Attitudes, Traits, and Actions: Dispositional Prediction of Behavior in Personality and Social Psychology. In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1987; Volume 20, pp. 1–63. [Google Scholar]
- Zareie, B.; Navimipour, N.J. The impact of electronic environmental knowledge on the environmental behaviors of people. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2016, 59, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weiner, H.E. Wearing your Ethics: Investigating Consumer Purchase Intention of Ethically Produced Fashion Products. 2017. Available online: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd/4351 (accessed on 28 April 2021).
- Harland, P.; Staats, H.; Wilke, H.A. Situational and personality factors as direct or personal norm mediated predictors of pro-environmental behavior: Questions derived from norm-activation theory. Basic Appl. Soc. Psychol. 2007, 29, 323–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, K. Gender differences in Hong Kong adolescent consumers’ green purchasing behavior. J. Consum. Mark. 2009, 26, 87–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lee, K. Opportunities for green marketing: Young consumers. Mark. Intell. Plan. 2008, 26, 573–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Geng, D.; Liu, J.; Zhu, Q. Motivating sustainable consumption among Chinese adolescents: An empirical examination. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 141, 315–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paul, J.; Modi, A.; Patel, J. Predicting green product consumption using theory of planned behavior and reasoned action. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2016, 29, 123–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McNeill, L.; Moore, R. Sustainable fashion consumption and the fast fashion conundrum: Fashionable consumers and attitudes to sustainability in clothing choice. Int. J. Consum. Stud. 2015, 39, 212–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Harris, F.; Roby, H.; Dibb, S. Sustainable clothing: Challenges, barriers and interventions for encouraging more sustainable consumer behaviour. Int. J. Consum. Stud. 2016, 40, 309–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ham, M.; Jeger, M.; Ivković, A.F. The role of subjective norms in forming the intention to purchase green food. Econ. Res. Ekon. Istraživanja 2015, 28, 738–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Vermeir, I.; Verbeke, W. Sustainable food consumption among young adults in Belgium: Theory of planned behaviour and the role of confidence and values. Ecol. Econ. 2008, 64, 542–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, H.Y.; Chung, J.E. Consumer purchase intention for organic personal care products. J. Consum. Mark. 2011, 28, 40–47. [Google Scholar]
- Yan, R.-N.; Hyllegard, K.H.; Blaesi, L.F. Marketing eco-fashion: The influence of brand name and message explicitness. J. Mark. Commun. 2012, 18, 151–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahn, J.-M.; Koo, D.-M.; Chang, H.-S. Different impacts of normative influences on pro-environmental purchasing behavior explained by differences in individual characteristics. J. Glob. Sch. Mark. Sci. 2012, 22, 163–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hustvedt, G.; Dickson Marsha, A. Consumer likelihood of purchasing organic cotton apparel: Influence of attitudes and self-identity. J. Fash. Mark. Manag. Int. J. 2009, 13, 49–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yahya, W.K.; Hashim, N.H. The Role of Public Awareness and Government Regulations in Stimulating Sustainable Consumption of Malaysian Consumers. In Proceedings of the 2011 International Conference on Business, Engineering and Industrial Applications, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 5–7 June 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, T.B.; Chai, L.T. Attitudes towards the environment and green products: Consumers’ perspective. Manag. Sci. Eng. 2010, 4, 27–39. [Google Scholar]
- Markus, H.R.; Kitayama, S. Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychol. Rev. 1991, 98, 224–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, S.P.; Shavitt, S. Persuasion and culture: Advertising appeals in individualistic and collectivistic societies. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 1994, 30, 326–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kabir, T.; Sarker, B.C. Effect of cultural dimensions on customers’ susceptibility to interpersonal influence in the context of Bangladesh. Prime Univ. J. 2015, 9, 77–108. [Google Scholar]
- Hofstede, G.; Hofstede, G.J.; Minkov, M. Cultures and Organizations—Software of the Mind: Intercultural Cooperation and Its Importance for Survival; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Minton, E.A.; Kahle, L.R.; Kim, C.-H. Religion and motives for sustainable behaviors: A cross-cultural comparison and contrast. J. Bus. Res. 2015, 68, 1937–1944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thøgersen, J. Country differences in sustainable consumption: The case of organic food. J. Macromarketing 2010, 30, 171–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Premkumar, G.; Ramamurthy, K. The role of interorganizational and organizational factors on the decision mode for adoption of interorganizational systems. Decis. Sci. 1995, 26, 303–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kline, R.B. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, 3rd ed.; The Guilford Press: New York, NY, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Anderson, J.C.; Gerbing, D.W. Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychol. Bull. 1988, 103, 411–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Babin, B.J.; Darden, W.R.; Griffin, M. Work and/or fun: Measuring hedonic and utilitarian shopping value. J. Consum. Res. 1994, 20, 644–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khare, A. Influence of hedonic and utilitarian values in determining attitudes towards malls: A case of Indian small city consumers. J. Retail. Leis. Prop. 2011, 9, 429–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hofstede, G. Values and Culture. In Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values; Sage Publications: Beverly Hills, CA, USA, 1980. [Google Scholar]
- Kitayama, S.; Markus, H.R.; Lieberman, C. The Collective Construction of Self Esteem. In Everyday Conceptions of Emotion; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1995; pp. 523–550. [Google Scholar]
USA (n1 = 85) | Bangladesh (n2 = 51) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Variable | Description | Percentage | Percentage |
Gender | Female | 91.76% | 7.84% |
Male | 4.71% | 88.24% | |
Other | 3.53% | 3.92% | |
Age | 18 to 25 years | 92.94% | 49.02% |
26 to 35 years | 3.53% | 47.06% | |
36 to 45 years | 3.53% | 3.92% | |
Education | Did not graduate high school | - | 1.96% |
High school graduate | 17.65% | - | |
Some college/Associate degree | 69.41% | 13.73% | |
College graduate | 9.41% | 54.90% | |
Masters/MBA | 1.18% | 21.57% | |
PhD or higher | 2.35% | 7.84% |
USA | Bangladesh | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
β | p-Value | β | p-Value | |
H1: Sustainability Knowledge → Attitudes | 0.35 ** | 0.004 | 0.14 | 0.274 |
H2: Social Norms → Attitudes | −0.08 | 0.451 | 0.34 * | 0.010 |
H3: Social Norms → Intention | 0.50 *** | .0001 | 0.59 * | 0.003 |
H4: Attitudes → Intention | 0.24 * | 0.033 | 0.19 | 0.349 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Hasan, M.N.U.; Liu, C.; Ahmed, B. Organic Cotton Clothing Purchase Behavior: A Comparative Study of Consumers in the United States and Bangladesh. Textiles 2021, 1, 376-386. https://doi.org/10.3390/textiles1020019
Hasan MNU, Liu C, Ahmed B. Organic Cotton Clothing Purchase Behavior: A Comparative Study of Consumers in the United States and Bangladesh. Textiles. 2021; 1(2):376-386. https://doi.org/10.3390/textiles1020019
Chicago/Turabian StyleHasan, Md Nakib Ul, Chuanlan Liu, and Bulbul Ahmed. 2021. "Organic Cotton Clothing Purchase Behavior: A Comparative Study of Consumers in the United States and Bangladesh" Textiles 1, no. 2: 376-386. https://doi.org/10.3390/textiles1020019
APA StyleHasan, M. N. U., Liu, C., & Ahmed, B. (2021). Organic Cotton Clothing Purchase Behavior: A Comparative Study of Consumers in the United States and Bangladesh. Textiles, 1(2), 376-386. https://doi.org/10.3390/textiles1020019