Using a Data Mining Method to Explore Strategies for Improving the Social Interaction Environment Quality of Urban Neighborhood Open Spaces
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. The Influence of the Physical Environment on the Urban POS Social Environment
3. Methodology and Data Collection
4. Results and Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Chen, H.; Jia, B.; Lau, S.S.Y. Sustainable urban form for Chinese compact cities: Challenges of a rapid urbanized economy. Habitat Int. 2008, 32, 28–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sodhi, N.; Shirowzhan, S.; Sepasgozar, S. The Impact of Increased Density on Residential Property Values in Sydney, New South Wales. Buildings 2021, 11, 650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- El Khateeb, S.; Shawket, I.M. A new perception; generating well-being urban public spaces after the era of pandemics. Dev. Built Environ. 2022, 9, 100065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ng, M.K.; Yeung, T.C.; Kwan, M.P.; Tieben, H.; Lau, T.Y.T.; Zhu, J.; Xu, Y. Place qualities, sense of place and subjective well-being: A study of two typical urban neighbourhoods in Hong Kong. Cities Health 2022, 6, 1122–1133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goh, A.Y.; Chia, S.M.; Majeed, N.M.; Chen, N.R.; Hartanto, A. Untangling the Additive and Multiplicative Relations between Natural Scenery Exposure and Human–Animal Interaction on Affective Well-Being: Evidence from Daily Diary Studies. Sustainability 2023, 15, 2910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, B.W.; Zhang, J.R.; Tzeng, G.H.; Huang, S.L.; Xiong, L. Public open space development for elderly people by using the DANP-V model to establish continuous improvement strategies towards a sustainable and healthy aging society. Sustainability 2017, 9, 420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Van Dinter, M.; Kools, M.; Dane, G.; Weijs-Perrée, M.; Chamilothori, K.; Van Leeuwen, E.; Van Den Berg, P. Urban Green Parks for Long-Term Subjective Well-Being: Empirical Relationships between Personal Characteristics, Park Characteristics, Park Use, Sense of Place, and Satisfaction with Life in The Netherlands. Sustainability 2022, 14, 4911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Collins, C.; Haase, D.; Heiland, S.; Kabisch, N. Urban green space interaction and wellbeing–investigating the experience of international students in Berlin during the first COVID-19 lockdown. Urban For. Urban Green. 2022, 70, 127543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Luo, S.; Xie, J.; Furuya, K. “We need such a space”: Residents’ motives for visiting urban green spaces during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sustainability 2021, 13, 6806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tansil, D.; Plecak, C.; Taczanowska, K.; Jiricka-Pürrer, A. Experience Them, Love Them, Protect Them—Has the COVID-19 Pandemic Changed People’s Perception of Urban and Suburban Green Spaces and Their Conservation Targets. Environ. Manag. 2022, 70, 1004–1022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Markvica, K.; Richter, G.; Lenz, G. Impact of urban street lighting on road users’ perception of public space and mobility behavior. Build. Environ. 2019, 154, 32–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Behnisch, M.; Ultsch, A. Urban data-mining: Spatiotemporal exploration of multidimensional data. Build. Res. Inf. 2009, 37, 520–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Balsas, C.J. Measuring the livability of an urban centre: An exploratory study of key performance indicators. Plan. Pract. Res. 2004, 19, 101–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pasaogullari, N.; Doratli, N. Measuring accessibility and utilization of public spaces in Famagusta. Cities 2004, 21, 225–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Villanueva, K.; Badland, H.; Hooper, P.; Koohsari, M.J.; Mavoa, S.; Davern, M.; Giles-Corti, B. Developing indicators of public open space to promote health and wellbeing in communities. Appl. Geogr. 2015, 57, 112–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yingli, H. Research on the Effects of Urban Residential Space Renewal on Neighborhood Relationship. Master’s Thesis, Harbin Institute of Technology, Heilongjiang, China, 1 June 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Rostami, R.; Lamit, H.; Khoshnava, S.M.; Rostami, R. Successful public places: A case study of historical Persian gardens. Urban For. Urban Green. 2016, 15, 211–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rasidi, M.H.; Jamirsah, N.; Said, I. Urban green space design affects urban residents’ social interaction. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci. 2012, 68, 464–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Peters, K.; Elands, B.; Buijs, A. Social interactions in urban parks: Stimulating social cohesion. Urban For. Urban Green. 2010, 9, 93–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Yung, E.H.; Conejos, S.; Chan, E.H. Social needs of the elderly and active aging in public open spaces in urban renewal. Cities 2016, 52, 114–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wood, L.; Hooper, P.; Foster, S.; Bull, F. Public green spaces and positive mental health–investigating the relationship between access, quantity and types of parks and mental wellbeing. Health Place 2017, 48, 63–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, A.C.K.; Jordan, H.C.; Horsley, J. Value of urban green spaces in promoting healthy living and wellbeing: Prospects for planning. Risk Manag. Healthc. Policy 2015, 8, 131–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Wang, Z.; Stevens, Q. How do open space characteristics influence open space use A study of Melbourne’s Southbank Promenade. Urban Res. Pract. 2020, 13, 22–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Temelová, J.; Dvořáková, N. Residential satisfaction of elderly in the city centre: The case of revitalizing neighbourhoods in Prague. Cities 2012, 29, 310–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pawlak, Z. Rough set theory and its applications to data analysis. Cybern. Syst. 1998, 29, 661–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Larcher, F.; Pomatto, E.; Battisti, L.; Gullino, P.; Devecchi, M. Perceptions of urban green areas during the social distancing period for COVID-19 containment in Italy. Horticulturae 2021, 7, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Spennemann, D.H. Exercising under COVID-2x: Conceptualizing future green spaces in Australia’s neighborhoods. Urban Sci. 2021, 5, 93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Design Elements | Description | Citations |
---|---|---|
Greenbelt form planning (C1) | Organizational form and morphological characteristics of green space in urban public open space. | [18,20] |
Ped and bike system (C2) | Infrastructure, paths and grounds to support walking, jogging, and biking. | [21] |
Waters-cape (C3) | Area, shape, and positional relationship of the water body in the place. | [6,22] |
Arbor shrub configuration (C4) | Size, type, and collocation of trees and flowers | [20] |
Interior to exterior linkages (C5) | Connectivity and inter-linkages: layering and sequence from private zone to community gathering zone and neighborhood | [20] |
Space organization and zoning planning (C6) | Organizational distribution of subspaces or partitions | [23] |
Relationship with urban neighborhood (C7) | Spatial location relationship with neighboring neighborhoods | [24] |
Public facilities (C8) | Seating area for rest, communal spaces, special seating, talking spaces | [19] |
Conditional Attributes (C) | Decision Attributes (D) | |
---|---|---|
No. | Semantic Scale | Likert Scale (5 Point) |
C1 | 1. Fragmentation and scattered layout; 2. Large area, concentrated and complete arrangement; 3. Arranged in columns, arranged according to the path. | 1: Extremely low-quality social interaction environment; 2: Low quality social interaction environment 3: Average quality social interaction environment; 4: Higher quality social interaction environment; 5: Excellent quality social interaction environment. |
C2 | 1. Fully equipped (exercise bike, spinning bike, etc.); 2. Greenway coverage for running (without supporting equipment); 3. No supporting facilities, no greenways. | |
C3 | 1. With large lakes and rivers; 2. Small lakes, fragmented bodies of water; 3. Anhydrous. | |
C4 | 1. Complete variety, including shrubs, flowers and large trees; 2. Fewer types of grass, small trees. | |
C5 | 1. Multiple forms of transportation paths (public transportation vehicles, bicycles, pedestrians) and the paths radiate to connect the community; 2. The path can only pass through (pedestrians, bicycles) and has a single path. | |
C6 | 1. Wrap-around space; 2. The open space; 3. Irregular spaces. | |
C7 | 1. Centralized layout in the center of the community; 2. Fragmented, inlaid in the neighborhoods of the community, distributed in a node-like manner. | |
C8 | 1. Complete facilities, benches, garbage cans, drinking pool; 2. Lack of facilities (fewer benches, no drinking pools); 3. The facilities are poor (most of them are unusable or damaged). |
Case No. | Conditional Attributes | Decision Attributes | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C1 | C2 | C3 | C4 | C5 | C6 | C7 | C8 | ||
SZ01 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
SZ02 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
SZ03 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
SZ04 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
SZ05 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
SZ06 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 |
SZ07 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
... | |||||||||
GZ01 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
GZ02 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 |
GZ03 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
GZ04 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
GZ05 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
GZ06 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 |
GZ07 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
... |
Decision Attributes (D) | Core Attributes | Quality of Classification |
---|---|---|
Epidemic Prevention and Control Level | C1, C2, C6, C8 | 0.700 |
Rule No. | Conditions | Decision | Number of Objects |
---|---|---|---|
1 | (C2 = 2), (C3 = 3), (C5 = 2) | Good class (D = 1) | 80% |
2 | (C7 = 2), (C8 = 1) | Good class (D = 1) | 40% |
3 | (C5 = 2), (C6 = 1), (C8 = 2) | Poor class (D = 5) | 28% |
4 | (C8 = 3) | Poor class (D = 5) | 71% |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Zhang, J.; Wang, G.; Xiong, L. Using a Data Mining Method to Explore Strategies for Improving the Social Interaction Environment Quality of Urban Neighborhood Open Spaces. Architecture 2023, 3, 128-136. https://doi.org/10.3390/architecture3010009
Zhang J, Wang G, Xiong L. Using a Data Mining Method to Explore Strategies for Improving the Social Interaction Environment Quality of Urban Neighborhood Open Spaces. Architecture. 2023; 3(1):128-136. https://doi.org/10.3390/architecture3010009
Chicago/Turabian StyleZhang, Jiaming, Guanqiang Wang, and Lei Xiong. 2023. "Using a Data Mining Method to Explore Strategies for Improving the Social Interaction Environment Quality of Urban Neighborhood Open Spaces" Architecture 3, no. 1: 128-136. https://doi.org/10.3390/architecture3010009
APA StyleZhang, J., Wang, G., & Xiong, L. (2023). Using a Data Mining Method to Explore Strategies for Improving the Social Interaction Environment Quality of Urban Neighborhood Open Spaces. Architecture, 3(1), 128-136. https://doi.org/10.3390/architecture3010009