Bioengineered Strategies for Surgical Innovation

A special issue of Bioengineering (ISSN 2306-5354).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 May 2023) | Viewed by 31075

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA 91010, USA
Interests: plastic and reconstructive surgery; microsurgery; lymphatic regeneration; wound healing

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Complex surgical problems warrant innovative solutions to elevate patient care and outcomes.  Scientific advances have supported novel therapies in both medicine and surgery and will continue to be the foundation for the development of next generation treatment platforms.  

This Special Issue, “Bioengineered Strategies for Surgical Innovation”, will highlight novel or recent advances that have the potential to improve surgical treatments and outcomes.  The issue seeks to include original research papers and comprehensive reviews that describe cutting-edge experimental, translational, and clinical work. 

Topics of interest for this Special Issue include, but are not limited to, the following:

(1) Skin and soft tissue substiutites;

(2) Adipose tissue engineering and grafting;

(3) Nerve grafts and conduits;

(4) Vascular grafts and bioengineered solutions;

(5) Bone tissue engineering;

(6) Lymphatic regeneration;

(7) Xenograft based materials;

(8) Tissue preseration;

(9) Stem cell transplantation in conjunction with surgery;

(10) Tissue regeneration.

Guest Editor

Dr. Alex K. Wong
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Bioengineering is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2700 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • surgery
  • bioengineering
  • tissue regeneration
  • stem cell
  • wound healing
  • angiogenesis
  • lymphangiogenesis
  • scar

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (8 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

18 pages, 4903 KiB  
Article
Differential Immune Response to Bioprosthetic Heart Valve Tissues in the α1,3Galactosyltransferase-Knockout Mouse Model
by Kelly Casós, Roger Llatjós, Arnau Blasco-Lucas, Sebastián G. Kuguel, Fabrizio Sbraga, Cesare Galli, Vered Padler-Karavani, Thierry Le Tourneau, Marta Vadori, Andrea Perota, Jean-Christian Roussel, Tomaso Bottio, Emanuele Cozzi, Jean-Paul Soulillou, Manuel Galiñanes, Rafael Máñez and Cristina Costa
Bioengineering 2023, 10(7), 833; https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10070833 - 13 Jul 2023
Viewed by 1547
Abstract
Structural valve deterioration (SVD) of bioprosthetic heart valves (BHVs) has great clinical and economic consequences. Notably, immunity against BHVs plays a major role in SVD, especially when implanted in young and middle-aged patients. However, the complex pathogenesis of SVD remains to be fully [...] Read more.
Structural valve deterioration (SVD) of bioprosthetic heart valves (BHVs) has great clinical and economic consequences. Notably, immunity against BHVs plays a major role in SVD, especially when implanted in young and middle-aged patients. However, the complex pathogenesis of SVD remains to be fully characterized, and analyses of commercial BHVs in standardized-preclinical settings are needed for further advancement. Here, we studied the immune response to commercial BHV tissue of bovine, porcine, and equine origin after subcutaneous implantation into adult α1,3-galactosyltransferase-knockout (Gal KO) mice. The levels of serum anti-galactose α1,3-galactose (Gal) and -non-Gal IgM and IgG antibodies were determined up to 2 months post-implantation. Based on histological analyses, all BHV tissues studied triggered distinct infiltrating cellular immune responses that related to tissue degeneration. Increased anti-Gal antibody levels were found in serum after ATS 3f and Freedom/Solo implantation but not for Crown or Hancock II grafts. Overall, there were no correlations between cellular-immunity scores and post-implantation antibodies, suggesting these are independent factors differentially affecting the outcome of distinct commercial BHVs. These findings provide further insights into the understanding of SVD immunopathogenesis and highlight the need to evaluate immune responses as a confounding factor. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bioengineered Strategies for Surgical Innovation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 6867 KiB  
Article
Long-Term Follow-Up of a Novel Surgical Option Combining Fibula Free Flap and 3D-Bioprinted, Patient-Specific Polycaprolactone (PCL) Implant for Mandible Reconstruction
by Bo-Yeon Hwang, Kwantae Noh and Jung-Woo Lee
Bioengineering 2023, 10(6), 684; https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10060684 - 4 Jun 2023
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2019
Abstract
As the fibula free flap became the gold standard in mandibular reconstruction that required both hard tissue and soft tissue, various methods have been sought to solve the height discrepancy between the mandible and fibula. The purpose of this paper was to propose [...] Read more.
As the fibula free flap became the gold standard in mandibular reconstruction that required both hard tissue and soft tissue, various methods have been sought to solve the height discrepancy between the mandible and fibula. The purpose of this paper was to propose a surgical option that combined the microvascular fibula free flap with a 3D-bioprinted, patient-specific polycaprolactone (PCL) implant as a safe and simple novel method that achieved the best functional and aesthetic results in mandibular reconstruction surgery for young patients with malignant tumors. The patient’s reconstructed mandible maintained volume symmetry without any deformation or complications for over 6 years. Computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) and 3D printing technology enabled accurate and safe surgical results. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bioengineered Strategies for Surgical Innovation)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

16 pages, 4192 KiB  
Communication
Co-Graft of Acellular Dermal Matrix and Split Thickness Skin Graft—A New Reconstructive Surgical Method in the Treatment of Hidradenitis Suppurativa
by Marcin Gierek, Wojciech Łabuś, Anna Słaboń, Karolina Ziółkowska, Gabriela Ochała-Gierek, Diana Kitala, Karol Szyluk and Paweł Niemiec
Bioengineering 2022, 9(8), 389; https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering9080389 - 14 Aug 2022
Cited by 22 | Viewed by 4950
Abstract
Hidradenitis suppurativa is a chronic disease that significantly reduces patients’ quality of life. Patients are chronically treated with systemic therapies, which are often ineffective. Surgical treatment for severe cases of hidradenitis suppurativa is one option for affected patients. Surgical treatment has its limitations, [...] Read more.
Hidradenitis suppurativa is a chronic disease that significantly reduces patients’ quality of life. Patients are chronically treated with systemic therapies, which are often ineffective. Surgical treatment for severe cases of hidradenitis suppurativa is one option for affected patients. Surgical treatment has its limitations, and wound closure may be particularly problematic. This requires the use of reconstructive techniques. The methods of choice for wound closure are split-thickness skin grafts or local flaps reconstructions. However, each method has its limitations. This is a presentation of a new reconstructive surgical method in hidradenitis suppurativa surgery: the use of a co-graft of Acellular dermal matrix and split thickness skin graft as a novel method in wound closure after wide excisions, based on two cases. The results of this method are very promising: we achieved very fast wound closure with good aesthetic results regarding scar formation. In this paper, we used several examinations: laser speckle analysis, cutometer tests, and health-related quality of life (QoL) questionnaire to check the clinical impact of this method. Our initial results are very encouraging. ADM with STSG as a co-graft could be widely used in reconstructive surgery. This is a preliminary study, which should be continued in further, extended research. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bioengineered Strategies for Surgical Innovation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

6 pages, 1270 KiB  
Article
Telehealth and Burn Care: From Faxes to Augmented Reality
by Caroline Park, Youngwoo Cho, Jalen Harvey, Brett Arnoldo and Benjamin Levi
Bioengineering 2022, 9(5), 211; https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering9050211 - 13 May 2022
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2520
Abstract
Despite advances in telemedicine, practices remain diverse, ranging from telephonic to still images and video-based conferencing. We review the various modes of telemedicine in burn care and summarize relevant studies, including their contributions and limitations. We also review the role of a more [...] Read more.
Despite advances in telemedicine, practices remain diverse, ranging from telephonic to still images and video-based conferencing. We review the various modes of telemedicine in burn care and summarize relevant studies, including their contributions and limitations. We also review the role of a more recent technology, augmented reality, and its role in the triage and management of burn patients. Telemedicine in burn care remains diverse, with varied outcomes in accuracy and efficiency. Newer technologies such as augmented reality have not been extensively studied or implemented but show promise in immersive, real-time triage. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bioengineered Strategies for Surgical Innovation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research

13 pages, 616 KiB  
Review
Deconstructing Fat to Reverse Radiation Induced Soft Tissue Fibrosis
by Hannes Prescher, Jill R. Froimson and Summer E. Hanson
Bioengineering 2023, 10(6), 742; https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10060742 - 20 Jun 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2164
Abstract
Adipose tissue is composed of a collection of cells with valuable structural and regenerative function. Taken as an autologous graft, these cells can be used to address soft tissue defects and irregularities, while also providing a reparative effect on the surrounding tissues. Adipose-derived [...] Read more.
Adipose tissue is composed of a collection of cells with valuable structural and regenerative function. Taken as an autologous graft, these cells can be used to address soft tissue defects and irregularities, while also providing a reparative effect on the surrounding tissues. Adipose-derived stem or stromal cells are primarily responsible for this regenerative effect through direct differentiation into native cells and via secretion of numerous growth factors and cytokines that stimulate angiogenesis and disrupt pro-inflammatory pathways. Separating adipose tissue into its component parts, i.e., cells, scaffolds and proteins, has provided new regenerative therapies for skin and soft tissue pathology, including that resulting from radiation. Recent studies in both animal models and clinical trials have demonstrated the ability of autologous fat grafting to reverse radiation induced skin fibrosis. An improved understanding of the complex pathologic mechanism of RIF has allowed researchers to harness the specific function of the ASCs to engineer enriched fat graft constructs to improve the therapeutic effect of AFG. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bioengineered Strategies for Surgical Innovation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

24 pages, 1103 KiB  
Review
Lymphatic Tissue Bioengineering for the Treatment of Postsurgical Lymphedema
by Cynthia J. Sung, Kshitij Gupta, Jin Wang and Alex K. Wong
Bioengineering 2022, 9(4), 162; https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering9040162 - 6 Apr 2022
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 5090
Abstract
Lymphedema is characterized by progressive and chronic tissue swelling and inflammation from local accumulation of interstitial fluid due to lymphatic injury or dysfunction. It is a debilitating condition that significantly impacts a patient’s quality of life, and has limited treatment options. With better [...] Read more.
Lymphedema is characterized by progressive and chronic tissue swelling and inflammation from local accumulation of interstitial fluid due to lymphatic injury or dysfunction. It is a debilitating condition that significantly impacts a patient’s quality of life, and has limited treatment options. With better understanding of the molecular mechanisms and pathophysiology of lymphedema and advances in tissue engineering technologies, lymphatic tissue bioengineering and regeneration have emerged as a potential therapeutic option for postsurgical lymphedema. Various strategies involving stem cells, lymphangiogenic factors, bioengineered matrices and mechanical stimuli allow more precisely controlled regeneration of lymphatic tissue at the site of lymphedema without subjecting patients to complications or iatrogenic injuries associated with surgeries. This review provides an overview of current innovative approaches of lymphatic tissue bioengineering that represent a promising treatment option for postsurgical lymphedema. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bioengineered Strategies for Surgical Innovation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 1792 KiB  
Review
Surgical Applications of Materials Engineered with Antimicrobial Properties
by David P. Perrault, Ayushi Sharma, Jessica F. Kim, Geoffrey C. Gurtner and Derrick C. Wan
Bioengineering 2022, 9(4), 138; https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering9040138 - 26 Mar 2022
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 3644
Abstract
The infection of surgically placed implants is a problem that is both large in magnitude and that broadly affects nearly all surgical specialties. Implant-associated infections deleteriously affect patient quality-of-life and can lead to greater morbidity, mortality, and cost to the health care system. [...] Read more.
The infection of surgically placed implants is a problem that is both large in magnitude and that broadly affects nearly all surgical specialties. Implant-associated infections deleteriously affect patient quality-of-life and can lead to greater morbidity, mortality, and cost to the health care system. The impact of this problem has prompted extensive pre-clinical and clinical investigation into decreasing implant infection rates. More recently, antimicrobial approaches that modify or treat the implant directly have been of great interest. These approaches include antibacterial implant coatings (antifouling materials, antibiotics, metal ions, and antimicrobial peptides), antibacterial nanostructured implant surfaces, and antibiotic-releasing implants. This review provides a compendium of these approaches and the clinical applications and outcomes. In general, implant-specific modalities for reducing infections have been effective; however, most applications remain in the preclinical or early clinical stages. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bioengineered Strategies for Surgical Innovation)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

14 pages, 2471 KiB  
Review
The History and Innovations of Blood Vessel Anastomosis
by William R. Moritz, Shreya Raman, Sydney Pessin, Cameron Martin, Xiaowei Li, Amanda Westman and Justin M. Sacks
Bioengineering 2022, 9(2), 75; https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering9020075 - 15 Feb 2022
Cited by 13 | Viewed by 7626
Abstract
Surgical technique and technology frequently coevolve. The brief history of blood vessel anastomosis is full of famous names. While the techniques pioneered by these surgeons have been well described, the technology that facilitated their advancements and their inventors deserve recognition. The mass production [...] Read more.
Surgical technique and technology frequently coevolve. The brief history of blood vessel anastomosis is full of famous names. While the techniques pioneered by these surgeons have been well described, the technology that facilitated their advancements and their inventors deserve recognition. The mass production of laboratory microscopes in the mid-1800s allowed for an explosion of interest in tissue histology. This improved understanding of vascular physiology and thrombosis laid the groundwork for Carrel and Guthrie to report some of the first successful vascular anastomoses. In 1916, McLean discovered heparin. Twenty-four years later, Gordon Murray found that it could prevent thrombosis when performing end-to-end anastomosis. These discoveries paved the way for the first-in-human kidney transplantations. Otolaryngologists Nylen and Holmgren were the first to bring the laboratory microscope into the operating room, but Jacobson was the first to apply these techniques to microvascular anastomosis. His first successful attempt in 1960 and the subsequent development of microsurgical tools allowed for an explosion of interest in microsurgery, and several decades of innovation followed. Today, new advancements promise to make microvascular and vascular surgery faster, cheaper, and safer for patients. The future of surgery will always be inextricably tied to the creativity and vision of its innovators. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bioengineered Strategies for Surgical Innovation)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Back to TopTop