Studies on Dental Enamel

A special issue of Dentistry Journal (ISSN 2304-6767).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 15 May 2025 | Viewed by 7377

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Laboratory of Instrumentation, Biomedical Engineering and Radiation Physics (LIBPhys-UNL), Department of Physics, NOVA School of Science and Technology, NOVA University of Lisbon, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal
Interests: biomarker determination; environmental exposure assessment; sustainable technologies; spectroscopic techniques; contaminant characterization; human tissue analysis
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Dental enamel is one of the most important tissues in the human body. Although highly mineralized, it is susceptible to degradation, making it the scientific community’s role to obtain a full understanding of how this tissue behaves when it encounters external and internal agents.

The purpose of this Special Issue is to gather multidisciplinary contributions on novel studies pertaining to the characterization and assessment of dental enamel in both in vivo and in vitro studies. Literature reviews, new clinical application techniques and clinical cases pertaining to diagnosis, tissue evaluation and preventive treatments are also welcome.

 This Special Issue provides a great opportunity for scholars to exchange and discuss their research.

Dr. Sofia Pessanha
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Dentistry Journal is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2000 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • enamel
  • hydroxyapatite
  • lesions
  • de/re-mineralization
  • diagnostic
  • preventive dentistry

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (4 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

11 pages, 904 KiB  
Article
Salivary Proteins in Human Acquired Enamel Pellicle (AEP) on Eroded and Uneroded Teeth in Patients with Gastro-Oesophageal Reflux Disease (GORD)
by Rasha Alharthi, Mahdi Mutahar, David Bartlett, Jafar Jafari and Rebecca Moazzez
Dent. J. 2024, 12(8), 235; https://doi.org/10.3390/dj12080235 - 26 Jul 2024
Viewed by 921
Abstract
The aim of this in vivo study was to compare total protein present in the salivary films (F) and acquired enamel pellicle (AEP) on eroded and non-eroded surfaces in patients suffering from GORD symptoms with and without GORD diagnosis (GORD, No-GORD). Thirty-nine patients [...] Read more.
The aim of this in vivo study was to compare total protein present in the salivary films (F) and acquired enamel pellicle (AEP) on eroded and non-eroded surfaces in patients suffering from GORD symptoms with and without GORD diagnosis (GORD, No-GORD). Thirty-nine patients suffering from GORD symptoms and erosive tooth wear on lower first molars and an unaffected posterior occlusal surface in the same quadrant were recruited from Guy’s hospital, London. Salivary film and AEP were collected from the eroded and uneroded occlusal surfaces, using 0.5% sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS)-soaked filter papers. Total protein concentration was analysed using bicinchoninic acid assay (BCA). Statistical analysis was conducted using Shapiro–Wilk, ANOVA, and Tukey’s tests (p < 0.05), comparing four GDS sample types and GORD vs. No-GORD groups. The level of significance was set as p < 0.05. Data were compared between eroded and uneroded surfaces in the same patient with GORD symptoms, as well as between those with or without a GORD diagnosis (GORD, No-GORD). The AEP total protein concentration from the eroded [2.17 (0.49) mg/mL] and uneroded surfaces [2.24 (0.66) mg/mL] of the GORD group were statistically significantly lower than those on eroded [3.27 (1.01) mg/mL] and uneroded [3.33 (1.57) mg/mL] surfaces in the No-GORD group (p = 0.007) (p = 0.008), respectively. No statistically significant differences were observed for film and AEP between eroded and uneroded surfaces (p > 0.05). Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Studies on Dental Enamel)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 1161 KiB  
Article
Enamel Remineralisation with a Novel Sodium Fluoride-Infused Bristle Toothbrush
by Xiaotian Liu, Chun Lok Bryan Lau, Hao Ding, Jukka Pekka Matinlinna and James K. H. Tsoi
Dent. J. 2024, 12(5), 142; https://doi.org/10.3390/dj12050142 - 15 May 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1082
Abstract
This study aims to investigate whether toothbrushes with fluoride-infused bristles have any (re)mineralisation effects on bovine enamel. Bovine incisors (N = 160) were extracted, and the buccal side of the crown was cut into dimensions of ~5 mm × 5 mm with a [...] Read more.
This study aims to investigate whether toothbrushes with fluoride-infused bristles have any (re)mineralisation effects on bovine enamel. Bovine incisors (N = 160) were extracted, and the buccal side of the crown was cut into dimensions of ~5 mm × 5 mm with a low-speed saw. These specimens were randomly allocated into four groups: half (80 teeth) were stored in demineralising solution (DM), and the other half were stored in deionised water (DW) for 96 h. Then, they were brushed with a force of 2.0 ± 0.1 N for five min with a manual toothbrush with either fluoride-infused (TF) or regular (TR) bristles. Microhardness (Vickers), X-ray diffraction (XRD), energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) were used to investigate the surfaces of the bovine enamel specimens before and after brushing. Two-way ANOVA was used to analyse the hardness data, and the pairwise comparison method was used to analyse the Ca/P ratio, for each group at α = 0.05. The results show that brushing with either of these toothbrushes increased the Vickers microhardness on DM and DW enamel (p < 0.001), whereas hydroxyapatite was revealed in all groups by XRD. The DM samples showed a significant increase (p < 0.05) in the Ca/P ratios after brushing with TR and TF. Conversely, under DW conditions, these ratios decreased significantly after brushing. In terms of the F atomic%, TF increased significantly. SEM revealed mineral deposition in the DM groups after toothbrushing. To conclude, toothbrushing effectively induces the microhardness of sound and demineralised enamel, while fluoride-infused bristles might be able to retain fluoride on the enamel surface. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Studies on Dental Enamel)
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 2006 KiB  
Article
Evaluation of the Efficacy of CPP-ACP Remineralizing Mousse in MIH White and Yellow Opacities—In Vitro Vickers Microhardness Analysis
by Inês Cardoso-Martins, Sofia Arantes-Oliveira, Ana Coelho, Sofia Pessanha and Paula F. Marques
Dent. J. 2022, 10(10), 186; https://doi.org/10.3390/dj10100186 - 2 Oct 2022
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 3481
Abstract
Remineralization of tooth enamel can be partially achieved by the application of a casein phosphopeptides and amorphous phosphate (CPP-ACP) complex. However, evidence to support its effectiveness in Molar-incisor-hypomineralization (MIH)-affected teeth is scarce. The study’s aim is to evaluate the efficacy of CPP-ACP mousse [...] Read more.
Remineralization of tooth enamel can be partially achieved by the application of a casein phosphopeptides and amorphous phosphate (CPP-ACP) complex. However, evidence to support its effectiveness in Molar-incisor-hypomineralization (MIH)-affected teeth is scarce. The study’s aim is to evaluate the efficacy of CPP-ACP mousse in remineralizing MIH-affected enamel using a Vickers microhardness test. Two groups of enamel opacities of hypomineralized permanent teeth, white (group A) and yellow (group B) lesions (n = 14), went through a 28-day treatment protocol with GC Tooth Mousse. Before and after treatment, microhardness was measured in three different areas of each tooth (hypomineralized, transition, and outside the hypomineralized area). Data were analyzed using parametric and non-parametric tests with a significance of p < 0.05. The mean microhardness values increased in the hypomineralized and transition areas in both groups after the treatment protocol (in group A, 105.38 ± 11.70 to 158.26 ± 37.34; 123.04 ± 22.84 to 156.33 ± 35.70; in group B, 108.63 ± 14.66 to 143.06 ± 22.81; 132.55 ± 20.66 to 146.00 ± 12.88) and the differences pre/post-treatment were statistically significant within each group (p < 0.001 for both groups). Between groups, there was a statistically significant difference in the same areas (hypomineralized: p = 0.003; transition: p = 0.008) with a higher improvement in enamel hardness in group A. Topical application of CPP-ACP showed an increase in the physical strength of the hypomineralized and transition areas of MIH-affected enamel, likely due to an increase in mineral content. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Studies on Dental Enamel)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research

16 pages, 1513 KiB  
Review
The Remineralization of Enamel from Saliva: A Chemical Perspective
by Joachim Enax, Pascal Fandrich, Erik Schulze zur Wiesche and Matthias Epple
Dent. J. 2024, 12(11), 339; https://doi.org/10.3390/dj12110339 - 23 Oct 2024
Viewed by 1126
Abstract
The natural remineralization of enamel is of major importance for oral health. In principle, early erosions (demineralization) induced by acidic beverages and foods as well as initial caries lesions can be covered and remineralized by the deposition of calcium phosphate, i.e., tooth mineral. [...] Read more.
The natural remineralization of enamel is of major importance for oral health. In principle, early erosions (demineralization) induced by acidic beverages and foods as well as initial caries lesions can be covered and remineralized by the deposition of calcium phosphate, i.e., tooth mineral. This remineralization effect is characterized by the presence of calcium and phosphate ions in saliva that form hydroxyapatite on the enamel surface. Although it is apparently a simple crystallization, it turns out that remineralization under in vivo conditions is actually a very complex process. Calcium phosphate can form a number of solid phases of which hydroxyapatite is only one. Precipitation involves the formation of metastable phases like amorphous calcium phosphate that convert into biological apatite in a number of steps. Nanoscopic clusters of calcium phosphate that can attach on the enamel surface are also present in saliva. Thus, remineralization under strictly controlled in vitro conditions (e.g., pH, ion concentrations, no additives) is already complex, but it becomes even more complicated under the actual conditions in the oral cavity. Here, biomolecules are present in saliva, which interact with the forming calcium phosphate mineral. For instance, there are salivary proteins which have the function of inhibiting crystallization to avoid overshooting remineralization. Finally, the presence of bacteria and an extracellular matrix in plaque and the presence of proteins in the pellicle have strong influences on the precipitation on the enamel surface. The current knowledge on the remineralization of the enamel is reviewed from a chemical perspective with a special focus on the underlying crystallization phenomena and the effects of biological compounds that are present in saliva, pellicle, and plaque. Basically, the remineralization of enamel follows the same principles as calculus formation. Notably, both processes are far too complex to be understood on a microscopic basis under in vivo conditions, given the complicated process of mineral formation in the presence of a plethora of foreign ions and biomolecules. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Studies on Dental Enamel)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop