Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
4.8
2.5
Journals
Education Sciences
Special Issues
Challenges of Project Based Learning (PBL) in Engineering Education
share announcement

Challenges of Project Based Learning (PBL) in Engineering Education

A special issue of Education Sciences (ISSN 2227-7102). This special issue belongs to the section "Higher Education".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 May 2024) | Viewed by 24748

Special Issue Editors

Prof. Dr. María-José Terrón-López

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Architecture, Engineering and Design, Universidad Europea de Madrid, 28670 Villaviciosa de Odón, Spain
Interests: engineering education; educational robotics; project based learning
Dr. Paloma J. Velasco-Quintana

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Architecture, Engineering and Design, Universidad Europea de Madrid, 28670 Villaviciosa de Odón, Spain
Interests: engineering education; project-based learning; sustainability

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Over the past decades, Project-Based Learning (PBL) has proved to be a highly successful method for training engineers as accrediting agencies ask universities to prepare future professionals for a globalized world. As such, traditional teacher-centered educational approaches must be changed towards preparing students to face real engineering projects and using PBL is an effective strategy.

PBL is perfect for developing competencies such as lifelong learning, teamwork, communication, critical thinking and creativity, but several questions will arise from its implementation:

How are engineers’ educators expected to help their students to develop the needed competencies for their future profession? What is the impact of PBL on engineering students’ learning and competences? Are the teachers prepared to encourage them to work using this method? Is coordination needed for an efficient implementation? What elements in PBL are essential for an efficient implementation? Are learning outcomes aligned with the curriculum design when using PBL? How can we face the problems that appear in PBL due to teamworking? What happens during the different stages of the project activity and what has each member done? How can PBL be assessed for each individual member of a team?

This Special Issue calls for papers to address these questions.

Topics of interest include:

  1. Past, present and future of PBL in engineering education
  2. Approaches to implement PBL in engineering education
  3. Virtual or hybrid PBL in engineering education
  4. PBL for professional development
  5. Challenges and problems in PBL course design or implementation
  6. Methods, tools and applications for assessing teamwork using PBL
  7. PBL and engineering student engagement
  8. Diversity and Inclusion through PBL in engineering education
  9. Sustainability in engineering education using PBL
  10. Cross-disciplinary PBL

We look forward to receiving your contributions.

Prof. Dr. María-José Terrón-López
Dr. Paloma J. Velasco-Quintana
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Education Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • engineering education
  • project-based learning (PBL) in engineering education
  • online PBL
  • diversity and inclusion through PBL
  • designing PBL in engineering
  • teamwork in PBL
  • challenges in PBL engineering education

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (10 papers)

Download All Papers
Order results
Result details
Show export options expand_more Show export options expand_less
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Other

14 pages, 3903 KiB  
Article
Impact of Physical Model Projects and Multidisciplinary Teams in Fluid Mechanics Education
by Aarthi Sekaran and Carolyn M. Rodak
Educ. Sci. 2024, 14(6), 658; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14060658 - 17 Jun 2024
Viewed by 984
Abstract
Fluid mechanics, a required course in many undergraduate engineering disciplines, is often described as a challenging subject as it weaves together advanced mathematics and physics to solve conventional engineering problems. This study examines the effect of incorporating a physical model project via multidisciplinary [...] Read more.
Fluid mechanics, a required course in many undergraduate engineering disciplines, is often described as a challenging subject as it weaves together advanced mathematics and physics to solve conventional engineering problems. This study examines the effect of incorporating a physical model project via multidisciplinary teams into two theory-based fluid mechanics courses to address two general questions: Does the design and construction of the physical model aid in understanding fluid mechanics concepts? Does working with students of different engineering disciplines improve student experience and comprehension? The study was conducted in Spring 2023 with a cohort of 49 mechanical and civil engineering students; each project team had a mix of both disciplines. At the end of the semester, all projects were presented at a common venue, followed by an anonymous paper-based survey. The results indicate that around 83.7% of students felt the project had an overall positive impact on their learning experience. Despite initial student apprehension about multidisciplinary teams, 72% of students appreciated the opportunity to work with engineers from other disciplines, with qualitative inputs describing the value added from varied skill sets. In conclusion, this project enabled students to apply their in-class training to a real-world model while working in multidisciplinary teams. The results provide insight into the implementation of similar projects and the value of multidisciplinary teams. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Challenges of Project Based Learning (PBL) in Engineering Education)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 2727 KiB  
Article
PBL Impact on Learning Outcomes in Computer Engineering: A 12-Year Analysis
by Pedro José Lara-Bercial, María Cruz Gaya-López, Juan-Miguel Martínez-Orozco and Silvia Lavado-Anguera
Educ. Sci. 2024, 14(6), 653; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14060653 - 17 Jun 2024
Viewed by 1357
Abstract
This article describes an evaluation of the Project-Based Learning (PBL) methodology implemented in the STEAM School of Universidad Europea in the Computer Engineering degree. The study raises research questions related to the perception of technical and soft skills acquired by students who used [...] Read more.
This article describes an evaluation of the Project-Based Learning (PBL) methodology implemented in the STEAM School of Universidad Europea in the Computer Engineering degree. The study raises research questions related to the perception of technical and soft skills acquired by students who used or considered PBL as their primary learning methodology compared to those who did not. Students’ motivation and adaptability to work after graduation have also been examined. The sample of students includes graduates from the last 20 years and therefore analyzes both the period in which the methodology was already implemented (from 2012) and some previous years. The study concludes that students who have identified or experienced PBL as their main learning methodology perceive a better acquisition of technical competencies and some soft skills, as well as better motivation and adaptability to the work environment. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Challenges of Project Based Learning (PBL) in Engineering Education)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

35 pages, 3573 KiB  
Article
The Academic System Influence on Instructional Change: A Conceptual Systems Dynamics Model of Faculty Motivation to Adopt Research-Based Instructional Strategies (RBIS)
by Juan Manuel Cruz-Bohorquez, Stephanie G. Adams and Flor Angela Bravo
Educ. Sci. 2024, 14(5), 544; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14050544 - 17 May 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1134
Abstract
Many universities have implemented initiatives to drive instructional change, yet their success has often been limited due to a lack of recognition of academia as a complex dynamic system. This paper explores how the interconnected and dynamic nature of academic systems influences faculty [...] Read more.
Many universities have implemented initiatives to drive instructional change, yet their success has often been limited due to a lack of recognition of academia as a complex dynamic system. This paper explores how the interconnected and dynamic nature of academic systems influences faculty motivation to adopt instructional innovations, such as project-based learning (PBL) and small group collaborations (SGCs). We present a Conceptual Systems Dynamics Model (CSDM) that illustrates these interconnections, demonstrating how systemic factors create feedback loops that either reinforce or hinder faculty motivation, as well as other related factors. These loops, represented as Causal Loop Diagrams (CLDs), were derived from literature reviews and qualitative data obtained from interviews and focus groups involving 17 faculty and administrators within an Engineering Department at a research university in South America. The paper identifies thirteen CLDs, comprising seven reinforcing dynamics that positively influence faculty motivation and six balancing dynamics that exert negative pressure. Using empirical evidence and analysis, we describe how the systemic factors influence faculty motivation, and how shifts in motivation reciprocally impact these interconnected factors. By elucidating the complex dynamics at play, this research contributes to a deeper understanding of how to promote sustainable instructional change within academic institutions. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Challenges of Project Based Learning (PBL) in Engineering Education)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 1157 KiB  
Article
Using Problem-Based Learning and Gamification as a Catalyst for Student Engagement in Data-Driven Engineering Education: A Report
by Dino Čubela, Alexander Rossner and Pascal Neis
Educ. Sci. 2023, 13(12), 1223; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13121223 - 9 Dec 2023
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 2420
Abstract
This report explores the integration of problem-based learning, gamification, and data-driven approaches in engineering education. With a focus on the course “GeoGovernment 1”, this framework aimed to engage students actively and foster self-directed learning. By tackling real-world issues like automated teller machine (ATM) [...] Read more.
This report explores the integration of problem-based learning, gamification, and data-driven approaches in engineering education. With a focus on the course “GeoGovernment 1”, this framework aimed to engage students actively and foster self-directed learning. By tackling real-world issues like automated teller machine (ATM) burglaries in Rhineland-Palatinate (Germany), students gained experience in data analyses and geoinformatics technology. This approach not only motivated students but also enhanced their prospects in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields, equipping them with skills necessary for their future careers. The course structure emphasized student-centered learning, with educators playing facilitative roles to provide guidance. In summary, the combination of problem-based learning, gamification, and data-driven approaches offers a promising solution to address the challenges faced by STEM education, providing an engaging and effective learning experience for students, and ultimately preparing them for the demands of the ever-evolving professional landscape. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Challenges of Project Based Learning (PBL) in Engineering Education)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 713 KiB  
Article
An Analysis of Problem-Based Learning vs. Traditional Teaching among Students in Azerbaijan
by Ulkar Sattarova, Jelena Arsenijevic and Wim Groot
Educ. Sci. 2023, 13(12), 1167; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13121167 - 22 Nov 2023
Viewed by 2273
Abstract
Objective: Our goal was to analyze the effects of implementing problem-based learning (PBL) at the Azerbaijan University of Architecture and Construction. Method: We compared students that attended lectures and tutorials using PBL and students that attended lectures and tutorials using traditional teaching methods. [...] Read more.
Objective: Our goal was to analyze the effects of implementing problem-based learning (PBL) at the Azerbaijan University of Architecture and Construction. Method: We compared students that attended lectures and tutorials using PBL and students that attended lectures and tutorials using traditional teaching methods. In total, 737 students (intervention group) participated in PBL and 2201 in non-PBL (Control group A and Control group B) at the university. Descriptive statistics and a statistical Kruskal–Wallis test were used to analyze the data and determine whether groups could be compared. We used propensity score matching to make groups comparable and analyzed the differences between groups. Results: The results of the statistical analysis and descriptive statistical characteristics for the unmatched samples are presented in this paper. We also present the differences between the PBL group and two non-PBL groups based on the unmatched samples. All calculations were performed on one outcome measure: the final scores of students. The results show that even within a short period of time (one semester or academic year), applying PBL can have promising effects, although these effects are generally not statistically significant. However, after matching, the differences between the PBL and non-PBL groups were significant. Discussion and conclusions: Even a preliminary and limited introduction of PBL appears to have promising impacts on learning outcomes, as demonstrated by students’ final scores on subjects that were taught using the PBL approach. The results suggest that post-Soviet countries with education traditions that differ from Western ones can benefit from PBL. It is advised to prolong the implementation of PBL and advocate for wider dissemination of this method in Azerbaijan and elsewhere in post-Soviet countries. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Challenges of Project Based Learning (PBL) in Engineering Education)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure A1

17 pages, 7244 KiB  
Article
Project-Based Learning of Mechanical Design Utilizing CAE Structural Analyses
by Atsushi Kondo, Hiroyuki Hayashi and Takuya Toyoshi
Educ. Sci. 2023, 13(7), 687; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13070687 - 5 Jul 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2013
Abstract
A university course on mechanical design utilizing CAE structural analyses is reported. To develop students’ skills to solve practical open-ended engineering problems, a project-based learning (PBL) approach was adopted. The course taught not only technical skills to use CAE software but also fundamental [...] Read more.
A university course on mechanical design utilizing CAE structural analyses is reported. To develop students’ skills to solve practical open-ended engineering problems, a project-based learning (PBL) approach was adopted. The course taught not only technical skills to use CAE software but also fundamental knowledge that links theoretical and practical problems in engineering. Each segment of this course consisted of a lecture and workshop. The basic concepts of structural analysis and the background theory of finite element analysis were described in the lecture. Students conducted structural analyses in a CAE software through workshop problems and compared its results to the theory learned in the lecture. CAE structural analyses were conducted in the integrated environment of the 3D CAD software Autodesk Inventor. As the final project of the course, groups of students designed an original structure under restrictions based on functionality, strength and weight. Data of the students’ performance in related courses were collected to analyse the improvement of skills needed to solve engineering problems, and a short survey was conducted to summarize responses from the students after the course had finished. The results of the data analysis and short survey indicated that the combination of the theoretical lectures and the PBL workshop improved the students’ motivation and performance. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Challenges of Project Based Learning (PBL) in Engineering Education)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 1210 KiB  
Article
Embracing Co-Design: A Case Study Examining How Community Partners Became Co-Creators
by Liam Murdock, Libby (Elizabeth) Osgood and Luke McCarvill
Educ. Sci. 2023, 13(5), 492; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13050492 - 13 May 2023
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1840
Abstract
Co-design increases the number of voices in a design project, which enhances the experience for all co-creators and produces a better product. A case study is presented of a ten-month co-design project-based learning experience between two engineering design students and two community partners [...] Read more.
Co-design increases the number of voices in a design project, which enhances the experience for all co-creators and produces a better product. A case study is presented of a ten-month co-design project-based learning experience between two engineering design students and two community partners during a first-year engineering design course, which resulted in the implementation of the device across campus. This paper evaluates the elements of co-design in the design process that was employed, documents the design product that was produced, and examines the experience of the community partners through a qualitative study. Through a retrospective examination of artifacts and files, the design process demonstrated an increase in the amount of collaboration between co-creators as the project progressed and identified 15 iterations of the design. Comparing the experience of community partners throughout the design process, five themes emerged from the semi-structured interviews: (1) emotional effects, (2) physical and mental effects, (3) productivity, (4) safety, and (5) job satisfaction. Documenting the experience of community partners throughout the design project can encourage educators to adopt co-design practices in project-based learning. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Challenges of Project Based Learning (PBL) in Engineering Education)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

Other

Jump to: Research

10 pages, 612 KiB  
Systematic Review
Evaluation of the Implementation of Project-Based-Learning in Engineering Programs: A Review of the Literature
by Marta Ramírez de Dampierre, Maria Cruz Gaya-López and Pedro J. Lara-Bercial
Educ. Sci. 2024, 14(10), 1107; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14101107 - 13 Oct 2024
Viewed by 1386
Abstract
Project-Based Learning (PBL), as an experiential methodology, improves learning outcomes and competencies (technical and non-technical) in engineering students. The Conceive–Design–Implement–Operate (CDIO) approach, adopted globally in engineering education, is based on PBL but expands the curriculum framework. Developed by MIT and the Royal Institute [...] Read more.
Project-Based Learning (PBL), as an experiential methodology, improves learning outcomes and competencies (technical and non-technical) in engineering students. The Conceive–Design–Implement–Operate (CDIO) approach, adopted globally in engineering education, is based on PBL but expands the curriculum framework. Developed by MIT and the Royal Institute of Technology (KTH) in Sweden, CDIO focuses on the entire life cycle of engineering projects to train engineers so that they are capable of applying knowledge in real-life situations. Integrating CDIO and PBL into engineering curricula requires changes in teaching methodologies, teacher training and workspaces. The literature has explored their combination, highlighting shared values and mutual reinforcements. An assessment model is crucial for implementing PBL and evidencing improvement in student and course skills. Only through assessment and the cycle of continuous improvement will the adoption of PBL in engineering programs be advanced. A systematic review of the literature is proposed to identify effective methods in the evaluation of educational programs based on PBL, analyzing related research areas and evaluations according to the CDIO approach. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Challenges of Project Based Learning (PBL) in Engineering Education)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 1543 KiB  
Systematic Review
Project-Based Learning (PBL) as an Experiential Pedagogical Methodology in Engineering Education: A Review of the Literature
by Silvia Lavado-Anguera, Paloma-Julia Velasco-Quintana and María-José Terrón-López
Educ. Sci. 2024, 14(6), 617; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14060617 - 7 Jun 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 5823
Abstract
This systematic literature review explores how the implementation of project-based-learning (PBL) as an experiential pedagogical methodology in engineering education contributes to the development of real-world skills among students. The methodology applied was the PRISMA protocol with searches in two databases in a 24 [...] Read more.
This systematic literature review explores how the implementation of project-based-learning (PBL) as an experiential pedagogical methodology in engineering education contributes to the development of real-world skills among students. The methodology applied was the PRISMA protocol with searches in two databases in a 24 year timeframe. The research reviewed 54 pieces to explore the contribution of PBL to seven pillars of a holistic pedagogical model comprising the following categories: technology, an integrated curriculum, an international focus, sustainability, a multidisciplinary focus, simulation, and professional environments. Varied PBL developments across these pillars reveal challenges, including aligning with real-world complexities and promoting interdisciplinary integration. Despite obstacles, PBL in engineering shows promise for enhancing students’ skills and channeling the added value of a holistic pedagogical model, despite significant differences in the number of experiences associated with each category. Limitations include restricted article access, emphasizing the need for open science promotion. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Challenges of Project Based Learning (PBL) in Engineering Education)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 2830 KiB  
Case Report
Fostering Project-Based Learning through Industry Engagement in Capstone Design Projects
by Ashraf Badir, Robert O’Neill, Kristoph-Dietrich Kinzli, Simeon Komisar and Jong-Yeop Kim
Educ. Sci. 2023, 13(4), 361; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13040361 - 31 Mar 2023
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 2425
Abstract
Extensive studies have indicated that real-life project-based learning through industry involvement in capstone design courses provides benefits to students, faculty, and industry practitioners. This paper presents the contributions of industry participants to student experiential and project-based learning in the civil and environmental engineering [...] Read more.
Extensive studies have indicated that real-life project-based learning through industry involvement in capstone design courses provides benefits to students, faculty, and industry practitioners. This paper presents the contributions of industry participants to student experiential and project-based learning in the civil and environmental engineering senior design courses at Florida Gulf Coast University (FGCU). Surveys were conducted to obtain insights into the contributions of industry involvement in the capstone design course from the perspectives of both students and practitioners. Practitioners have been involved in various roles, including project mentors for capstone design projects and/or judges for students’ capstone design project presentations. Practitioners, through the students, are provided with new ways of looking at and solving problems. Practitioners, through their involvement, provide valuable feedback to the faculty and students that enriches the overall experience gained in the capstone design course. This feedback helps improve student performance on their projects and provides them with additional tools to carry forward into their engineering careers. However, there was a gap in perception between students and practitioners with regard to the benefits of industry involvement. This paper also describes two successful capstone design projects and culminates success drivers from the reflection of instructors teaching these courses. The results of this study have substantial implications for faculty teaching these courses. They showed what students did well and pinpointed areas for improvement through the lens of industry practitioners. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Challenges of Project Based Learning (PBL) in Engineering Education)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

Show export options expand_more Show export options expand_less
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
 
Displaying articles 1-10
Back to TopTop