Urban Green Spaces, Human Health and Happiness

A special issue of Forests (ISSN 1999-4907). This special issue belongs to the section "Urban Forestry".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 October 2024) | Viewed by 3667

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Botany, Faculty of Pharmacy, Campus de Cartuja, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain
Interests: urban forests; ecosystem services; ecosystem disservices; green infrastructures
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor Assistant
Department of Sociology, University of Granada, E-18071 Granada, Spain
Interests: social capital; conservation values; sociology of health; green infrastructures; social cohesion

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Happiness is an emotion or a state of the mind that a conscious being experiences when it reaches a moment of conformation and well-being, or certain desirable objectives have been achieved. One of the bases of happiness is having good health and an adequate living environment, which includes the setting in which most of the daily life takes place, such as the city. Among the urban elements that have the greatest contribution to the quality of life in cities are green spaces. There is numerous evidence that exposure to urban green spaces can be beneficial for human health, both physical and mental. Some studies have noted that urban green areas are likely to provide safe, accessible and attractive settings in which physical activities can be conducted, which in turn produce greater psychological and physiological benefits than physical activity performed in other settings. However, fewer studies have considered the negative impact on citizens' quality of life, and by extension, on happiness, that green spaces can have. The lack of accessibility and inclusion for vulnerable social groups, of equity, insecurity and fear of crime due to gender disparities, or the impact on health that some negative factors (disservices) intrinsic to green spaces may have, such as the presence of undesirable fauna, pests or emission of allergens, are some aspects that can affect an emotional response to green spaces for a longer or shorter time. In this Special Issue, we want to accommodate all these topics, which undoubtedly depict the direct relationship between green spaces, physical and mental health and happiness, with an emphasis on works that highlight which aspects of green spaces make people happier. On the other hand, works that highlight factors and issues that have a negative impact on the quality of life, health or happiness of people are also of interest. We will be delighted to receive works from broad perspectives and disciplines, from botany, environmental sciences, forestry sciences, urban forestry, ecology, to sociology, health, human geography, architecture, urban planning, etc., providing a multidisciplinary approach to the relationship between green spaces and happiness.

Potential topics include, but are not limited to:

  • Evidence on the contribution of green spaces to health and happiness;
  • Negative factors (disservices) of green spaces that affect people's health and happiness;
  • Perception of citizens about the benefits that green spaces provide;
  • Future perspectives to improve the participation of green spaces in the well-being of citizens;
  • Challenges of urban green spaces in the face of climate change and urban resilience;
  • Social capital and values ​​related to the use of urban green spaces;
  • Qualitative and quantitative methodology for evaluating green spaces and emotions;
  • Green spaces, emotions and social inequality;
  • Green spaces as a natural capital;
  • The role of green spaces in emotions and the rehabilitation of pathologies;
  • Environmental pollutants and health in green spaces;
  • Green space architecture and emotions;
  • Methodological strategies for the analysis of the proximity of the population to green spaces in cities.

Prof. Dr. Paloma Cariñanos
Guest Editor

Prof. Dr. María del Mar Ramos Lorente
Guest Editor Assistant

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Forests is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • quality of life
  • urban green spaces
  • happiness
  • living environment
  • social capital
  • health
  • inequality

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review, Other

27 pages, 18241 KiB  
Article
The Restorative Effects of Unique Green Space Design: Comparing the Restorative Quality of Classical Chinese Gardens and Modern Urban Parks
by Zhenyu Zhang, Mu Jiang and Jingwei Zhao
Forests 2024, 15(9), 1611; https://doi.org/10.3390/f15091611 - 12 Sep 2024
Viewed by 860
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to explore the restorative effects of two unique Urban Green Spaces (UGSs): modern urban parks (MUPs) and classical Chinese gardens (CCGs). Compared to MUPs, little research has been conducted on the potential restorative effects of CCGs. To [...] Read more.
The purpose of this paper is to explore the restorative effects of two unique Urban Green Spaces (UGSs): modern urban parks (MUPs) and classical Chinese gardens (CCGs). Compared to MUPs, little research has been conducted on the potential restorative effects of CCGs. To fill this gap, we collected video clips of various scenes in Suzhou, Jiangsu Province, ‘the city of gardens’ in China, and produced video images of CCGs and MUPs representing UGSs. Public ratings of these videos were collected using the Short-Version Revision Repair Scale (SRRS) to analyze the perceived restorative effects and drivers of CCGs and MUPs in combination with landscape elements, which were deeply parsed using computer vision techniques (semantic segmentation techniques) and expert scoring methods. The aim is to enhance the therapeutic effects of CCGs and MUPs. The results indicate that the differences between the two landscape types in terms of their restorative effects are not significant. The videos representing CCGs had a greater standard deviation of restorative effects (a lower level of consensus) compared to the videos depicting MUPs. Deep learning techniques for semantic segmentation combined with expert scoring methods can effectively help us to understand the drivers influencing restorative effects, and we combined our findings to conclude that improved waterscape design is an essential driver for enhancing the perceived restorative effects of CCGs and that decreasing specific artificial modern structures, enhancing vegetation cover, and increasing public exposure to nature are critical to strengthening the restorative effects of both. Hopefully, these findings will improve visitors’ recovery in UGS environments and guide landscape architects to more effectively design healing UGSs. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Urban Green Spaces, Human Health and Happiness)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research, Other

11 pages, 734 KiB  
Review
The Beneficial Elements in Forest Environment Based on Human Health and Well-Being Perspective
by Deqiang Gao, Jiapeng Shen, Yunchang Gao and Zhiyong Zhang
Forests 2024, 15(9), 1604; https://doi.org/10.3390/f15091604 - 11 Sep 2024
Viewed by 714
Abstract
Illness is a significant global societal issue in the 21st century. Forest, as an important part of terrestrial ecosystem, holds substantial health and well-being benefits. People can gain health benefits from interacting with forests, even for short periods. Unfortunately, there is a lack [...] Read more.
Illness is a significant global societal issue in the 21st century. Forest, as an important part of terrestrial ecosystem, holds substantial health and well-being benefits. People can gain health benefits from interacting with forests, even for short periods. Unfortunately, there is a lack of systematic concern regarding the beneficial elements that forest provides to humans. In this study, a systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following established guidelines, comprehensively evaluating the beneficial elements of the forest environment. The results indicated that the beneficial forest elements relevant to human health include beneficial substances (clean air, high-quality freshwater, CO2/O2 balance, negative air ions, and phytoncides) and beneficial factors (moderate thermal environment and biodiversity). These beneficial forest elements are products of plant’s physiological processes. While their production pathways are relatively well understood, the mechanisms by which these elements impact health are unclear. This review provided the foundational data and theoretical insights for future research on the health benefits of forest elements. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Urban Green Spaces, Human Health and Happiness)

Other

Jump to: Research, Review

21 pages, 1734 KiB  
Systematic Review
Greenspace Exposure with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Systematic Review
by Yijie Gao, Kunhao Pan, Hongyi Li and Bing Zhao
Forests 2024, 15(4), 634; https://doi.org/10.3390/f15040634 - 30 Mar 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1190
Abstract
Although a growing number of studies have suggested the relevance of greenspace exposure to respiratory health, most have explored single greenfield indicators or selected disease outcomes. This systematic review aimed to comprehensively assess the evidence that greenspace exposure is associated with chronic obstructive [...] Read more.
Although a growing number of studies have suggested the relevance of greenspace exposure to respiratory health, most have explored single greenfield indicators or selected disease outcomes. This systematic review aimed to comprehensively assess the evidence that greenspace exposure is associated with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) incidence, prevalence, mortality, and related lung function indicators and to explore the impact of greenspace exposure on COPD-related disease outcomes. We searched the literature published before 28 September 2023, using six electronic databases and snowball searches. After screening 3689 studies, 16 eligible studies were included. These studies examined various greenspace indicators such as the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), canopy coverage, greenspace coverage, and land cover conditions. Most studies have reported the positive effects of greenspace exposure. However, the findings had significant heterogeneity, with large differences in the greenness assessment, COPD identification methods, and population characteristics. The mechanisms of this impact have not been conclusively determined, but we propose several hypotheses to explain the pathways by which greenspace exposure affects COPD. Overall, our findings contribute valuable knowledge for understanding the relationship between greenspace exposure and COPD, informing future research in this field. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Urban Green Spaces, Human Health and Happiness)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop