Extreme Geomagnetic Events

A special issue of Geosciences (ISSN 2076-3263). This special issue belongs to the section "Geophysics".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (15 August 2021) | Viewed by 10680

Special Issue Editors

UMR 6112 Laboratoire de Planétologie et Géodynamique, University of Nantes, Nantes, France
Interests: geomagnetic field; secular variation; core dynamics; geodynamo; core–mantle interactions; dipole decay; planetary magnetic fields

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Earth & Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
Interests: core convection; thermal history of the Earth; dynamos; high-performance computing
Departamento de Fisica, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Tecnologia, Universidad Nacional de Tucuman, 4000 Tucuman, Argentina
Interests: physics of the upper atmosphere; geomagnetic field secular variation; space weather

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
EOST, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
Interests: Earth’s and planetary magnetic fields; time series analysis

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Extreme geomagnetic field events are evident in numerous observations over various time scales. The nucleation of the inner core marked a dramatic change in convection style at Earth’s core, though detecting its signature on the paleomagnetic field is challenging. Most prominent extreme events are reversals and excursions, which are abrupt transitions of the dipole axis observed in paleomagnetic records that last several millennia and punctuate chrons that last several hundred thousand years. Extremely rapid field direction changes were reported during the last reversal. In archeomagnetic records, local short-lived spikes are enigmatic. Since the advent of direct intensity measurements, the geomagnetic dipole has been rapidly decreasing, provoking speculations of an imminent reversal. In parallel, a region of weak field intensity at the Earth’s surface, the South Atlantic Anomaly, has been expanding. Another intriguing phenomenon observed at the Earth’s surface is the recent acceleration of the North Magnetic Pole, which is rapidly moving poleward. The fastest field variability, termed geomagnetic jerks, correspond to local abrupt transitions in the trend of the secular variation (SV). The SV also affects ionosphere-thermosphere systems and the magnetosphere, which in turn affects surface phenomena such as the aurorae areas. The dipole decrease and the South Atlantic Anomaly expansion accentuate the impact of space weather events, increasing geomagnetic storms’ effectiveness and allowing energetic particles to penetrate deeper into the magnetosphere. These observations are challenging to explain in terms of their underlying core dynamics and the impact on magnetospheric conditions.

Recent years have seen remarkable progress in the monitoring of the geomagnetic field and its interpretation in terms of core dynamics on various timescales. Dedicated satellites (e.g., the Swarm constellation) provide unprecedented high-quality data with global coverage. New archeomagnetic and paleomagnetic measurements improve the dataset over millennial to hundreds of millennia timescales. Ensembles of field models reflect the uncertainty of the geomagnetic observations. Recent modelling of magnetic flux expulsion was invoked to explain the entire SV or archeomagnetic spikes. New approaches of core flow modelling account for subgrid and magnetic diffusion effects. In parallel, recent progress has been achieved in the modelling of the geodynamo action in the outer core by thermochemical convection. Current numerical dynamos reach unprecedented resolution and approach Earth-like force balance. These models successfully reproduce key aspects of core dynamics, most notably large-scale field and SV morphologies, Theoretical progress is facilitated in new data assimilation techniques, where core flow models are constrained with statistics from dynamo models. General circulation and magneto-hydrodynamic models have recently been used to assess the effects of SV and extreme geomagnetic field events over the magnetosphere and ionosphere-thermosphere systems.

Extreme events are particularly challenging to explain. Here we invite contributions from all research areas related to geomagnetism to advance the understanding of the underlying core dynamics of extreme geomagnetic events and the consequences of these events on processes outside the solid Earth. These include related geomagnetic observations on various timescales, the analysis of field models, numerical modelling, and theory aiming to explain these enigmatic phenomena. Core dynamics studies may include papers about magnetic induction and diffusion, dynamo action, waves in the core, core–mantle interactions, stratification, double-diffusive convection, etc. These contributions may provide insights into the impact of core dynamics on the extreme geomagnetic events from deep in the core, to the core–mantle boundary, through the Earth’s surface and up to the ionosphere.

Dr. Hagay Amit
Dr. Chris Davies
Dr. Ana Elias
Dr. Ingo Wardinski
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Geosciences is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • Geomagnetic field
  • Secular variation
  • Core dynamics
  • Geodynamo
  • Core–mantle boundary
  • Inner core nucleation
  • Reversals
  • Dipole decay
  • Jerks
  • South Atlantic Anomaly
  • Aurorae
  • Geomagnetic storms
  • Space weather

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

16 pages, 3739 KiB  
Article
Eccentric Dipole Evolution during the Last Reversal, Last Excursions, and Holocene Anomalies. Interpretation Using a 360-Dipole Ring Model
by Alicia González-López, María Luisa Osete, Saioa A. Campuzano, Alberto Molina-Cardín, Pablo Rivera and Francisco Javier Pavón-Carrasco
Geosciences 2021, 11(11), 438; https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences11110438 - 23 Oct 2021
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2867
Abstract
The eccentric dipole (ED) is the next approach of the geomagnetic field after the generally used geocentric dipole. Here, we analyzed the evolution of the ED during extreme events, such as the Matuyama-Brunhes polarity transition (~780 ka), the Laschamp (~41 ka) and Mono [...] Read more.
The eccentric dipole (ED) is the next approach of the geomagnetic field after the generally used geocentric dipole. Here, we analyzed the evolution of the ED during extreme events, such as the Matuyama-Brunhes polarity transition (~780 ka), the Laschamp (~41 ka) and Mono Lake (~34 ka) excursions, and during the time of two anomalous features of the geomagnetic field observed during the Holocene: the Levantine Iron Age Anomaly (LIAA, ~1000 BC) and the South Atlantic Anomaly (SAA, analyzed from ~700 AD to present day). The analysis was carried out using the paleoreconstructions that cover the time of the mentioned events (IMMAB4, IMOLEe, LSMOD.2, SHAWQ-Iron Age, and SHAWQ2k). We found that the ED moves around the meridian plane of 0–180° during the reversal and the excursions; it moves towards the region of the LIAA; and it moves away from the SAA. To investigate what information can be extracted from its evolution, we designed a simple model based on 360-point dipoles evenly distributed in a ring close to the inner core boundary that can be reversed and their magnitude changed. We tried to reproduce with our simple model the observed evolution of the ED, and the total field energy at the Earth’s surface. We observed that the modeled ED moves away from the region where we set the dipoles to reverse. If we consider that the ring dipoles could be related to convective columns in the outer core of the Earth, our simple model would indicate the potential of the displacement of the ED to give information about the regions in the outer core where changes start for polarity transitions and for the generation of important anomalies of the geomagnetic field. According to our simple model, the regions in which the most important events of the Holocene occur, or in which the last polarity reversal or excursion begin, are related to the regions of the Core Mantle Boundary (CMB), where the heat flux is low. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Extreme Geomagnetic Events)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

14 pages, 4745 KiB  
Article
Observed Auroral Ovals Secular Variation Inferred from Auroral Boundary Data
by Bruno Zossi, Hagay Amit, Mariano Fagre and Ana G. Elias
Geosciences 2021, 11(8), 351; https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences11080351 - 23 Aug 2021
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2708
Abstract
We analyze the auroral boundary corrected geomagnetic latitude provided by the Auroral Boundary Index (ABI) database to estimate long-term changes of core origin in the area enclosed by this boundary during 1983–2016. We design a four-step filtering process to minimize the solar contribution [...] Read more.
We analyze the auroral boundary corrected geomagnetic latitude provided by the Auroral Boundary Index (ABI) database to estimate long-term changes of core origin in the area enclosed by this boundary during 1983–2016. We design a four-step filtering process to minimize the solar contribution to the auroral boundary temporal variation for the northern and southern hemispheres. This process includes filtering geomagnetic and solar activity effects, removal of high-frequency signal, and additional removal of a ~20–30-year dominant solar periodicity. Comparison of our results with the secular change of auroral plus polar cap areas obtained using a simple model of the magnetosphere and a geomagnetic core field model reveals a decent agreement, with area increase/decrease in the southern/northern hemisphere respectively for both observations and model. This encouraging agreement provides observational evidence for the surprising recent decrease of the auroral zone area. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Extreme Geomagnetic Events)
Show Figures

Figure 1

34 pages, 21944 KiB  
Article
Fast Directional Changes during Geomagnetic Transitions: Global Reversals or Local Fluctuations?
by Stefano Maffei, Philip W. Livermore, Jon E. Mound, Sam Greenwood and Christopher J. Davies
Geosciences 2021, 11(8), 318; https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences11080318 - 28 Jul 2021
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 4072
Abstract
Paleomagnetic investigations from sediments in Central and Southern Italy found directional changes of the order of 10 per year during the last geomagnetic field reversal (which took place about 780,000 years ago). These values are orders of magnitudes larger than what is [...] Read more.
Paleomagnetic investigations from sediments in Central and Southern Italy found directional changes of the order of 10 per year during the last geomagnetic field reversal (which took place about 780,000 years ago). These values are orders of magnitudes larger than what is expected from the estimated millennial timescales for geomagnetic field reversals. It is yet unclear whether these extreme changes define the timescale of global dipolar change or whether they indicate a rapid, but spatially localised feature that is not indicative of global variations. Here, we address this issue by calculating the minimum amount of kinetic energy that flows at the top of the core required to instantaneously reproduce these two scenarios. We found that optimised flow structures compatible with the global-scale interpretation of directional change require about one order of magnitude more energy than those that reproduce local change. In particular, we found that the most recently reported directional variations from the Sulmona Basin, in Central Italy, can be reproduced by a core-surface flow with rms values comparable to, or significantly lower than, present-day estimates of about 8 to 22 km/y. Conversely, interpreting the observations as global changes requires rms flow values in excess of 77 km/y, with pointwise maximal velocities of 127 km/y, which we deem improbable. We therefore concluded that the extreme variations reported for the Sulmona Basin were likely caused by a local, transient feature during a longer transition. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Extreme Geomagnetic Events)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop