ijms-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

The Development and Application of Computational Models for Identifying Disease Markers

A special issue of International Journal of Molecular Sciences (ISSN 1422-0067). This special issue belongs to the section "Molecular Informatics".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (30 September 2023) | Viewed by 13321

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Center for Informational Biology, School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 610054, China
Interests: protein informatics; peptide sequence analysis; machine learning application in biological macromolecular data; biomarker; protein post-translational modification site; systems biology; clinical data analysis; disease risk prediction; analysis and identification of DNA regulatory element
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The identification and prediction of disease and genetic markers could provide important clues for disease diagnosis, drug target discovery, and genetic character analysis. However, using the traditional method to identify and analyze these markers becomes more and more difficult because of its expensive experimental materials, long experimental period and low computational efficiency. The advent of big data and advanced technology provides us with an opportunity to mine data and samples for the discovery of various disease and genetic markers. Some dry and wet experimental methods have been developed to deal with various medical samples and biological data. The results obtained from wet experimental methods should at least be demonstrated in an in vitro experiment. This Special Issue will focus on various aspects of the development and application of computational methods and techniques in biological and medical data for discovering disease markers. The subtopics include, but are not limited to:

  • The identification of disease markers from DNA regulatory elements;
  • The identification of gene and RNA markers in disease using machine learning methods;
  • The recognition of differential gene expression in disease;
  • The discovery of drug target using computational method;
  • Pathogenicity island identification using a machine learning method;
  • Disease diagnosis based on DNA, RNA and protein data using data mining;
  • Epigenetics markers discovery for disease using systems biology;
  • Molecular network marker for disease diagnosis and therapy;
  • Mining disease markers from 3D genomes using computational model;
  • Design new computational model for disease marker discovery.

Prof. Dr. Hao Lin
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. International Journal of Molecular Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. There is an Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal. For details about the APC please see here. Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • identification
  • DNA regulatory elements
  • gene and RNA markers
  • machine learning methods
  • differential gene expression
  • computational method
  • pathogenicity island identification
  • data mining
  • epigenetics markers
  • systems biology
  • molecular network marker
  • computational model

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (5 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

13 pages, 4784 KiB  
Communication
Identification of Potential Biomarkers and Small Molecule Drugs for Bisphosphonate-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw (BRONJ): An Integrated Bioinformatics Study Using Big Data
by Kumarendran Balachandran, Roszalina Ramli, Saiful Anuar Karsani and Mariati Abdul Rahman
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(10), 8635; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24108635 - 11 May 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2173
Abstract
This study aimed to identify potential molecular mechanisms and therapeutic targets for bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (BRONJ), a rare but serious side effect of bisphosphonate therapy. This study analyzed a microarray dataset (GSE7116) of multiple myeloma patients with BRONJ (n = 11) [...] Read more.
This study aimed to identify potential molecular mechanisms and therapeutic targets for bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (BRONJ), a rare but serious side effect of bisphosphonate therapy. This study analyzed a microarray dataset (GSE7116) of multiple myeloma patients with BRONJ (n = 11) and controls (n = 10), and performed gene ontology, a pathway enrichment analysis, and a protein–protein interaction network analysis. A total of 1481 differentially expressed genes were identified, including 381 upregulated and 1100 downregulated genes, with enriched functions and pathways related to apoptosis, RNA splicing, signaling pathways, and lipid metabolism. Seven hub genes (FN1, TNF, JUN, STAT3, ACTB, GAPDH, and PTPRC) were also identified using the cytoHubba plugin in Cytoscape. This study further screened small-molecule drugs using CMap and verified the results using molecular docking methods. This study identified 3-(5-(4-(Cyclopentyloxy)-2-hydroxybenzoyl)-2-((3-hydroxybenzo[d]isoxazol-6-yl) methoxy) phenyl) propanoic acid as a potential drug treatment and prognostic marker for BRONJ. The findings of this study provide reliable molecular insight for biomarker validation and potential drug development for the screening, diagnosis, and treatment of BRONJ. Further research is needed to validate these findings and develop an effective biomarker for BRONJ. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 3225 KiB  
Article
Assessing the Differential Methylation Analysis Quality for Microarray and NGS Platforms
by Anna Budkina, Yulia A. Medvedeva and Alexey Stupnikov
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(10), 8591; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24108591 - 11 May 2023
Viewed by 2283
Abstract
Differential methylation (DM) is actively recruited in different types of fundamental and translational studies. Currently, microarray- and NGS-based approaches for methylation analysis are the most widely used with multiple statistical models designed to extract differential methylation signatures. The benchmarking of DM models is [...] Read more.
Differential methylation (DM) is actively recruited in different types of fundamental and translational studies. Currently, microarray- and NGS-based approaches for methylation analysis are the most widely used with multiple statistical models designed to extract differential methylation signatures. The benchmarking of DM models is challenging due to the absence of gold standard data. In this study, we analyze an extensive number of publicly available NGS and microarray datasets with divergent and widely utilized statistical models and apply the recently suggested and validated rank-statistic-based approach Hobotnica to evaluate the quality of their results. Overall, microarray-based methods demonstrate more robust and convergent results, while NGS-based models are highly dissimilar. Tests on the simulated NGS data tend to overestimate the quality of the DM methods and therefore are recommended for use with caution. Evaluation of the top 10 DMC and top 100 DMC in addition to the not-subset signature also shows more stable results for microarray data. Summing up, given the observed heterogeneity in NGS methylation data, the evaluation of newly generated methylation signatures is a crucial step in DM analysis. The Hobotnica metric is coordinated with previously developed quality metrics and provides a robust, sensitive, and informative estimation of methods’ performance and DM signatures’ quality in the absence of gold standard data solving a long-existing problem in DM analysis. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 9897 KiB  
Article
iADRGSE: A Graph-Embedding and Self-Attention Encoding for Identifying Adverse Drug Reaction in the Earlier Phase of Drug Development
by Xiang Cheng, Meiling Cheng, Liyi Yu and Xuan Xiao
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(24), 16216; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232416216 - 19 Dec 2022
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2975
Abstract
Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are a major issue to be addressed by the pharmaceutical industry. Early and accurate detection of potential ADRs contributes to enhancing drug safety and reducing financial expenses. The majority of the approaches that have been employed to identify ADRs [...] Read more.
Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are a major issue to be addressed by the pharmaceutical industry. Early and accurate detection of potential ADRs contributes to enhancing drug safety and reducing financial expenses. The majority of the approaches that have been employed to identify ADRs are limited to determining whether a drug exhibits an ADR, rather than identifying the exact type of ADR. By introducing the “multi-level feature-fusion deep-learning model”, a new predictor, called iADRGSE, has been developed, which can be used to identify adverse drug reactions at the early stage of drug discovery. iADRGSE integrates a self-attentive module and a graph-network module that can extract one-dimensional sub-structure sequence information and two-dimensional chemical-structure graph information of drug molecules. As a demonstration, cross-validation and independent testing were performed with iADRGSE on a dataset of ADRs classified into 27 categories, based on SOC (system organ classification). In addition, experiments comparing iADRGSE with approaches such as NPF were conducted on the OMOP dataset, using the jackknife test method. Experiments show that iADRGSE was superior to existing state-of-the-art predictors. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 2123 KiB  
Article
DLm6Am: A Deep-Learning-Based Tool for Identifying N6,2′-O-Dimethyladenosine Sites in RNA Sequences
by Zhengtao Luo, Wei Su, Liliang Lou, Wangren Qiu, Xuan Xiao and Zhaochun Xu
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(19), 11026; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms231911026 - 20 Sep 2022
Cited by 18 | Viewed by 2246
Abstract
N6,2′-O-dimethyladenosine (m6Am) is a post-transcriptional modification that may be associated with regulatory roles in the control of cellular functions. Therefore, it is crucial to accurately identify transcriptome-wide m6Am sites to understand underlying m6Am-dependent mRNA regulation mechanisms and [...] Read more.
N6,2′-O-dimethyladenosine (m6Am) is a post-transcriptional modification that may be associated with regulatory roles in the control of cellular functions. Therefore, it is crucial to accurately identify transcriptome-wide m6Am sites to understand underlying m6Am-dependent mRNA regulation mechanisms and biological functions. Here, we used three sequence-based feature-encoding schemes, including one-hot, nucleotide chemical property (NCP), and nucleotide density (ND), to represent RNA sequence samples. Additionally, we proposed an ensemble deep learning framework, named DLm6Am, to identify m6Am sites. DLm6Am consists of three similar base classifiers, each of which contains a multi-head attention module, an embedding module with two parallel deep learning sub-modules, a convolutional neural network (CNN) and a Bi-directional long short-term memory (BiLSTM), and a prediction module. To demonstrate the superior performance of our model’s architecture, we compared multiple model frameworks with our method by analyzing the training data and independent testing data. Additionally, we compared our model with the existing state-of-the-art computational methods, m6AmPred and MultiRM. The accuracy (ACC) for the DLm6Am model was improved by 6.45% and 8.42% compared to that of m6AmPred and MultiRM on independent testing data, respectively, while the area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for the DLm6Am model was increased by 4.28% and 5.75%, respectively. All the results indicate that DLm6Am achieved the best prediction performance in terms of ACC, Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC), AUROC, and the area under precision and recall curves (AUPR). To further assess the generalization performance of our proposed model, we implemented chromosome-level leave-out cross-validation, and found that the obtained AUROC values were greater than 0.83, indicating that our proposed method is robust and can accurately predict m6Am sites. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 2237 KiB  
Article
A Statistical Analysis of the Sequence and Structure of Thermophilic and Non-Thermophilic Proteins
by Zahoor Ahmed, Hasan Zulfiqar, Lixia Tang and Hao Lin
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(17), 10116; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms231710116 - 4 Sep 2022
Cited by 25 | Viewed by 2827
Abstract
Thermophilic proteins have various practical applications in theoretical research and in industry. In recent years, the demand for thermophilic proteins on an industrial scale has been increasing; therefore, the engineering of thermophilic proteins has become a hot direction in the field of protein [...] Read more.
Thermophilic proteins have various practical applications in theoretical research and in industry. In recent years, the demand for thermophilic proteins on an industrial scale has been increasing; therefore, the engineering of thermophilic proteins has become a hot direction in the field of protein engineering. However, the exact mechanism of thermostability of proteins is not yet known, for engineering thermophilic proteins knowing the basis of thermostability is necessary. In order to understand the basis of the thermostability in proteins, we have made a statistical analysis of the sequences, secondary structures, hydrogen bonds, salt bridges, DHA (Donor–Hydrogen–Accepter) angles, and bond lengths of ten pairs of thermophilic proteins and their non-thermophilic orthologous. Our findings suggest that polar amino acids contribute to thermostability in proteins by forming hydrogen bonds and salt bridges which provide resistance against protein denaturation. Short bond length and a wider DHA angle provide greater bond stability in thermophilic proteins. Moreover, the increased frequency of aromatic amino acids in thermophilic proteins contributes to thermal stability by forming more aromatic interactions. Additionally, the coil, helix, and loop in the secondary structure also contribute to thermostability. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop