jcm-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Clinical Updates on the Aortic Aneurysm and Aortic Dissection

A special issue of Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383). This special issue belongs to the section "Cardiovascular Medicine".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (28 August 2024) | Viewed by 13873

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
Interests: fenestrated and branched aortic repair; physician modified stent-graft; open aortic surgery

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
1. Vascular Medicine, St. Josef's Hospital, 65189 Wiesbaden, Germany
2. Vascular Surgery, TUM School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany
Interests: vascular surgery; endovascular surgery; aortic diseases; aneurysm; vascular diseases

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection are potentially life-threatening conditions that require urgent attention. In recent years, a substantial amount of research has been conducted, evidenced by over 18,094 papers that have been published and indexed by the Web of Science since 2019.

Despite advances in diagnosis and treatment, there are significant treatment gaps that need to be addressed to save lives.

One major gap is the early detection and diagnosis of aortic aneurysms, as they often present no symptoms until a catastrophic event occurs. Increased awareness and effective screening programs are crucial to identify at-risk individuals. With falling incidence in the Western world, cost–benefit analyses or more targeted screening methods are becoming increasingly important.

Similarly, there is a need for timely recognition and diagnosis of aortic dissections, as symptoms can be easily mistaken for other conditions. Medical professionals must be equipped with the necessary knowledge and tools for prompt identification.

Bridging these gaps requires optimizing treatment strategies, refining surgical approaches, and developing novel therapies.

Comprehensive long-term management strategies are also essential for individuals who have survived aortic dissections. Standardized guidelines and protocols for post-dissection care, including regular imaging studies and medication management, are vital for optimal outcomes.

This Special Issue aims to address these gaps, gives updates on current clinical research developments and invites articles on screening methods, treatment gaps, and innovative approaches to diagnosis.

Let us collaborate and together take a step towards overcoming the treatment gap for aortic aneurysms and aortic dissection.

Sincerely,

Dr. Benedikt Reutersberg
Dr. Matthias Trenner
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Journal of Clinical Medicine is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • aortic dissections
  • aortic aneurysms
  • endovascular aortic repair
  • open surgery
  • screening
  • atherosclerosis
  • aortic arch
  • tevar
  • bevar
  • fevar
  • complex endovascular aortic repair

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (11 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

10 pages, 1463 KiB  
Article
Sex Differences in Long-Term Survival and Cancer Incidence After Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair
by Jasmin Epple, Dittmar Böckler and Reinhart T. Grundmann
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(22), 6934; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13226934 - 18 Nov 2024
Viewed by 220
Abstract
Background: Long-term gender-specific survival and cancer incidence in patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) were investigated after endovascular (EVAR) and open repair (OAR). Methods: Data from 2933 patients (EVAR n = 1187, OAR n = 1746) from a health insurance company [...] Read more.
Background: Long-term gender-specific survival and cancer incidence in patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) were investigated after endovascular (EVAR) and open repair (OAR). Methods: Data from 2933 patients (EVAR n = 1187, OAR n = 1746) from a health insurance company in Germany (men n = 2391, women n = 542) were analyzed. All patients were cancer-free in their history. Results: Perioperative mortality was significantly higher after OAR (42.6%) than after EVAR (21.2%; p < 0.001). Women had significantly higher in-hospital mortality (41.5%) than men (32.2%). Notably, the 5-year survival was 36.9% after OAR and 40.8% after EVAR (p < 0.001), and 40.7% in men and 29.1% in women (p < 0.001). Overall, 17.2% of EVAR and 14.6% of OAR patients had cancer at 5 years (p = 0.328). Cancer incidence did not differ significantly between men and women. Patients with cancer had a significantly less favorable outcome compared to patients with no cancer (p = 0.002). Treatment of rAAA was also indicated in octogenarians, with survival rates of 19.9% after 5 years and even 38.4% with perioperative deaths excluded. Conclusions: Cancer represents a significant risk factor for survival in patients with rAAA. These patients should be monitored during follow-up, particularly regarding the development of lung cancer. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Updates on the Aortic Aneurysm and Aortic Dissection)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 686 KiB  
Article
Prevalence and Influence of Genetic Variants on Follow-Up Results in Patients Surviving Thoracic Aortic Therapy
by Tamer Ghazy, Nesma Elzanaty, Helmut Karl Lackner, Marc Irqsusi, Ardawan J. Rastan, Christian-Alexander Behrendt and Adrian Mahlmann
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(17), 5254; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13175254 - 5 Sep 2024
Viewed by 688
Abstract
Background/Objective: To investigate the prevalence and effects of genetic variants (GVs) in survivors of thoracic aortic dissection/aneurysm repair. Methods: Patients aged 18–80 years who survived follow-up after cardiosurgical or endovascular repair of thoracic aortic aneurysm or dissection at a single tertiary center between [...] Read more.
Background/Objective: To investigate the prevalence and effects of genetic variants (GVs) in survivors of thoracic aortic dissection/aneurysm repair. Methods: Patients aged 18–80 years who survived follow-up after cardiosurgical or endovascular repair of thoracic aortic aneurysm or dissection at a single tertiary center between 2008 and 2019 and underwent genetic testing were enrolled. The exclusion criteria were age >60 years, no offspring, and inflammatory- or trauma-related pathogenesis. Follow-up entailed computed tomography-angiography at 3 and 9 months and annually thereafter. All patients underwent genetic analyses of nine genes using next-generation sequencing. In cases of specific suspicion, the analysis was expanded to include 32 genes. Results: The study included 95 patients. The follow-up period was 3 ± 2.5 years. GVs were detected in 40% of patients. Correlation analysis according to primary diagnosis showed no significant correlation in disease persistence, progression, or in reintervention rates in aneurysm patients and a correlation of disease persistence with genetic variants according to variant class in dissection patients (p = 0.037). Correlation analysis according to follow-up CD finding revealed that patients with detected dissection, irrespective of original pathology, showed a strong correlation with genetic variants regarding disease progression and reintervention rates (p = 0.012 and p = 0.047, respectively). Conclusions: The prevalence of VUS is high in patients with aortic pathology. In patients with dissected aorta in the follow-up, irrespective of original pathology, genetic variants correlate with higher reintervention rates, warranting extended-spectrum genetic testing. The role of VUS may be greater than is currently known. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Updates on the Aortic Aneurysm and Aortic Dissection)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 2145 KiB  
Article
Hospital Incidence and Treatment Outcomes of Patients with Aneurysms and Dissections of the Iliac Artery in Switzerland—A Secondary Analysis of Swiss DRG Statistics Data
by Roland Bozalka, Anna-Leonie Menges, Alexander Zimmermann and Lorenz Meuli
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(8), 2267; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13082267 - 14 Apr 2024
Viewed by 779
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Aneurysms and dissections of the iliac artery (ADIAs) are significant vascular conditions often associated with aortic pathologies. Despite their importance, reports on isolated iliac artery pathologies are rare. This study aimed to investigate the epidemiology of ADIA in Switzerland including treatment [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Aneurysms and dissections of the iliac artery (ADIAs) are significant vascular conditions often associated with aortic pathologies. Despite their importance, reports on isolated iliac artery pathologies are rare. This study aimed to investigate the epidemiology of ADIA in Switzerland including treatment incidence and hospital outcomes. Methods: A retrospective analysis of diagnosis-related group (DRG) statistics from 2011 to 2018 in Switzerland was conducted, identifying all cases of ADIA while excluding those with concomitant treatment of aortic pathologies. Age-standardized incidence rates and treatment outcomes were assessed, with multivariable logistic regression performed to identify factors associated with hospital mortality. Results: From 2011 to 2018, 1037 ADIA cases were hospitalized in Switzerland. Incidence rates for elective treatment were significantly higher in men than women, increasing in men from 1.5 to 2.4 cases per 100,000 men (p = 0.007), while remaining stable in women at around 0.2 cases per 100,000 women. Acute treatment incidence rates were lower but still higher in men, at 0.9 cases per 100,000 men and 0.2 cases per 100,000 women. Crude hospital mortality rates were lower for endovascular repair than open surgical repair in both elective (0.8% vs. 3.1%, p = 0.023) and emergency treatment (6.7% vs. 18.4%, p = 0.045). Multivariable analysis showed that endovascular repair was associated with significantly reduced hospital mortality compared to open repair (OR 0.27, 95%-CI: 0.10 to 0.66, p = 0.006). Conclusions: This nationwide study of iliac artery pathologies shows that the treatment incidence was about 10 times higher in men than in women for elective procedures, but only about five times higher for emergency treatment. Endovascular procedures were associated with significantly lower hospital mortality than open procedures, while hospital mortality rates were comparable for men and women. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Updates on the Aortic Aneurysm and Aortic Dissection)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 1440 KiB  
Article
Long-Term Health-Related Quality of Life following Acute Type A Aortic Dissection with a Focus on Male–Female Differences: A Cross Sectional Study
by Frederike Meccanici, Carlijn G. E. Thijssen, Arjen L. Gökalp, Annemijn W. Bom, Guillaume S. C. Geuzebroek, Joost F. ter Woorst, Roland R. J. van Kimmenade, Marco C. Post, Johanna J. M. Takkenberg and Jolien W. Roos-Hesselink
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(8), 2265; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13082265 - 13 Apr 2024
Viewed by 1274
Abstract
Objectives: Acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) is a life-threatening cardiovascular emergency, of which the long-term impact on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and male–female-specific insights remain inadequately clarified. Methods: Consecutive adult ATAAD patients who underwent surgery were retrospectively included between [...] Read more.
Objectives: Acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) is a life-threatening cardiovascular emergency, of which the long-term impact on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and male–female-specific insights remain inadequately clarified. Methods: Consecutive adult ATAAD patients who underwent surgery were retrospectively included between 2007 and 2017 in four referral centers in the Netherlands, and baseline data were collected. The 36-Item Short-Form (SF-36) Health Survey was sent to all survivors between 2019 and 2021 and compared to validated SF-36 scores of the Dutch general population stratified by age group and sex. Results: In total, 324/555 surviving patients returned the SF-36 questionnaire (response rate 58%), of which 40.0% were female; the median follow-up was 6.5 years (range: 1.7–13.9, IQR: 4.0–9.4) after surgery for ATAAD. In comparison to the general population, ATAAD patients scored significantly lower on 6/8 SF-36 subdomains and higher on bodily pain. Differences in HRQoL domains compared to the sex-matched data were largely comparable between sexes, apart from bodily pain. In the age-matched subgroups impaired HRQoL was most pronounced in younger patients aged 41–60 (5/8 impaired domains). Female ATAAD patients scored significantly worse on 5/8 SF-36 subdomains and the physical component summary (PCS) scores than male patients. Age at ATAAD, female sex, hypertension, COPD, and prior thoracic aortic aneurysm were associated with worse PCS scores. Conclusions: Long-term HRQoL was impaired in both male and female ATAAD patients when compared to the general population. Further studies on the nature of this impairment and on interventions to improve HRQoL after ATAAD are clearly warranted, with special attention to females and younger patients. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Updates on the Aortic Aneurysm and Aortic Dissection)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

11 pages, 1073 KiB  
Article
Factors Associated with Early Mortality in Acute Type A Aortic Dissection—A Single-Centre Experience
by Panagiotis Doukas, Nicola Dalibor, András Keszei, Jelle Frankort, Julia Krabbe, Rachad Zayat, Michael J. Jacobs, Alexander Gombert, Payam Akhyari and Arash Mehdiani
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(4), 1023; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13041023 - 10 Feb 2024
Viewed by 1444
Abstract
Background: Acute aortic dissection type A (AADA) is a surgical emergency with relevant mortality and morbidity despite improvements in current management protocols. Identifying patients at risk of a fatal outcome and controlling the factors associated with mortality remain of paramount importance. Methods: In [...] Read more.
Background: Acute aortic dissection type A (AADA) is a surgical emergency with relevant mortality and morbidity despite improvements in current management protocols. Identifying patients at risk of a fatal outcome and controlling the factors associated with mortality remain of paramount importance. Methods: In this retrospective observational study, we reviewed the medical records of 117 patients with AADA, who were referred to our centre and operated on between 2005 and 2021. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative variables were analysed and tested for their correlation with in-hospital mortality. Results: The overall survival rate was 83%. Preoperatively, factors associated with mortality were age (p = 0.02), chronic hypertension (p = 0.02), any grade of aortic valve stenosis in the patient’s medical history (p = 0.03), atrial fibrillation (p = 0.04), and oral anticoagulation (p = 0.04). Non-survivors had significantly longer operative times (p = 0.002). During the postoperative phase, mortality was strongly associated with acute kidney injury (AKI) (p < 0.001), acute heart failure (p < 0.001), stroke (p = 0.02), focal neurological deficits (p = 0.02), and sepsis (p = 0.001). In the multivariate regression analysis, the onset of postoperative focal neurological deficits was the best predictor of a fatal outcome after adjusting for ARDS (odds ratio: 5.8, 95%-CI: 1.2–41.7, p = 0.04). Conclusions: In this retrospective analysis, atrial fibrillation, oral anticoagulation, hypertension, and age were significantly correlated with mortality. Postoperatively, acute kidney injury, acute heart failure, sepsis, and focal neurological deficits were correlated with in-hospital mortality, and focal neurological deficit has been identified as a significant predictor of fatal outcomes. Early detection and interdisciplinary management of at-risk patients remain crucial throughout the postoperative phase. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Updates on the Aortic Aneurysm and Aortic Dissection)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 964 KiB  
Article
Relative Thrombus Burden Ratio Reveals Overproportioned Intraluminal Thrombus Growth—Potential Implications for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm
by Joscha Mulorz, Agnesa Mazrekaj, Justus Sehl, Amir Arnautovic, Waseem Garabet, Kim-Jürgen Krott, Hubert Schelzig, Margitta Elvers and Markus Udo Wagenhäuser
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(4), 962; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13040962 - 8 Feb 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 945
Abstract
Background: An intraluminal, non-occlusive thrombus (ILT) is a common feature in an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). This study investigated the relative progression of ILT vs. AAA volume using a novel parameter, the so-called thrombus burden ratio (TBR), in non-treated AAAs. Parameters potentially associated [...] Read more.
Background: An intraluminal, non-occlusive thrombus (ILT) is a common feature in an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). This study investigated the relative progression of ILT vs. AAA volume using a novel parameter, the so-called thrombus burden ratio (TBR), in non-treated AAAs. Parameters potentially associated with TBR progression were analyzed and TBR progression in large vs. small and fast- vs. slow-growing AAAs was assessed. Methods: This retrospective, single-center study analyzed sequential contrast-enhanced computed tomography angiography (CTA) scans between 2009 and 2018 from patients with an AAA before surgical treatment. Patients’ medical data and CTA scans were analyzed at two given time points. The TBR was calculated as a ratio of ILT and AAA volume, and relative TBR progression was calculated by normalization for time between sequential CTA scans. Spearman’s correlation was applied to identify morphologic parameters correlating with TBR progression, and multivariate linear regression analysis was used to evaluate the association of clinical and morphological parameters with TBR progression. Results: A total of 35 patients were included. The mean time between CT scans was 16 ± 15.9 months. AAA volume progression was 12 ± 3% and ILT volume progression was 36 ± 13%, resulting in a TBR progression of 11 ± 4%, suggesting overproportioned ILT growth. TBR progression was 0.8 ± 0.8% per month. Spearman’s correlation verified ILT growth as the most relevant parameter contributing to TBR progression (R = 0.51). Relative TBR progression did not differ significantly in large vs. small and fast- vs. slow-growing AAAs. In the multivariate regression analysis, none of the studied factors were associated with TBR progression. Conclusion: TBR increases during AAA development, indicating an overproportioned ILT vs. AAA volume growth. The TBR may serve as a useful parameter, as it incorporates the ILT volume growth relative to the AAA volume, therefore combining two important parameters that are usually reported separately. Yet, the clinical relevance in helping to identify potential corresponding risk factors and the evaluation of patients at risk needs to be further validated in a larger study cohort. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Updates on the Aortic Aneurysm and Aortic Dissection)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 1705 KiB  
Article
Aortic Vascular Graft and Endograft Infection–Patient Outcome Cannot Be Determined Based on Pre-Operative Characteristics
by Ilaria Puttini, Marvin Kapalla, Anja Braune, Enrico Michler, Joselyn Kröger, Brigitta Lutz, Natzi Sakhalihasan, Matthias Trenner, Gabor Biro, Wolfgang Weber, Thomas Rössel, Christian Reeps, Hans-Henning Eckstein, Steffen Wolk, Christoph Knappich, Susan Notohamiprodjo and Albert Busch
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(1), 269; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13010269 - 3 Jan 2024
Viewed by 1222
Abstract
Vascular graft/endograft infection (VGEI) is a serious complication after aortic surgery. This study investigates VGEI and patient characteristics, PET/CT quantification before surgical or conservative management of VGEI and post-intervention outcomes in order to identify patients who might benefit from such a procedure. PET [...] Read more.
Vascular graft/endograft infection (VGEI) is a serious complication after aortic surgery. This study investigates VGEI and patient characteristics, PET/CT quantification before surgical or conservative management of VGEI and post-intervention outcomes in order to identify patients who might benefit from such a procedure. PET standard uptake values (SUV) were quantitatively assessed and compared to a non-VGEI cohort. The primary endpoints were in-hospital mortality and aortic reintervention-free survival at six months. Ninety-three patients (75% male, 65 ± 10 years, 82% operated) were included. The initial operation was mainly for aneurysm (67.7%: 31% EVAR, 12% TEVAR, 57% open aortic repair). Thirty-two patients presented with fistulae. PET SUVTLR (target-to-liver ratio) showed 94% sensitivity and 89% specificity. Replacement included silver-coated Dacron (21.3%), pericardium (61.3%) and femoral vein (17.3%), yet the material did not influence the overall survival (p = 0.745). In-hospital mortality did not differ between operative and conservative treatment (19.7% vs. 17.6%, p = 0.84). At six months, 50% of the operated cohort survived without aortic reintervention. Short- and midterm morbidity and mortality remained high after aortic graft removal. Neither preoperative characteristics nor the material used for reconstruction influenced the overall survival, and, with limitations, both the in-hospital and midterm survival were similar between the surgically and conservatively managed patients. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Updates on the Aortic Aneurysm and Aortic Dissection)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 474 KiB  
Article
Preoperative Imaging Signs of Cerebral Malperfusion in Acute Type A Aortic Dissection: Influence on Outcomes and Prognostic Implications—A 20-Year Experience
by Mohammed Al-Tawil, Mohamed Salem, Christine Friedrich, Shirin Diraz, Alexandra Broll, Najma Rezahie, Jan Schoettler, Nora de Silva, Thomas Puehler, Jochen Cremer and Assad Haneya
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(20), 6659; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12206659 - 20 Oct 2023
Viewed by 1111
Abstract
Background: Acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) continues to be a subject of active research due to its high mortality rates and associated complications. Cerebral malperfusion in ATAAD can have a devastating impact on patients’ neurological function and overall quality of life. We [...] Read more.
Background: Acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) continues to be a subject of active research due to its high mortality rates and associated complications. Cerebral malperfusion in ATAAD can have a devastating impact on patients’ neurological function and overall quality of life. We aimed to explore the risk profile and prognosis in ATAAD patients presenting with preoperative imaging signs of cerebral malperfusion (PSCM). Methods: We obtained patient data from our Aortic Dissection Registry, which included 480 consecutive ATAAD cases who underwent surgical repair between 2001 and 2021. Primary endpoint outcomes included the in-hospital and 30-day mortality, postoperative new neurological deficit, mechanical ventilation hours, and intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay. Results: Of the total cohort, 82 patients (17.1%) had PSCM. Both groups had similar distributions in terms of age, sex, and body mass index. The patients in the PSCM group presented with a higher logistic EuroSCORE (47, IQR [31, 64] vs. 24, IQR [15, 39]; p < 0.001) and a higher portion of patients with a previous cardiac surgery (7.3% vs. 2.0%; p = 0.020). Intraoperatively, the bypass, cardioplegia, and aortic cross-clamp times were similar between both groups. However, the patients in the PSCM group received significantly more intraoperative packed red blood cells, fresh frozen plasma, and platelets transfusions (p < 0.05). Following the surgery, the patients who presented with PSCM had markedly longer ventilation hours (108.5 h, IQR [44, 277] vs. 43 h, IQR [16, 158], p < 0.001) and a significantly longer ICU length of stay (7 days, IQR [4, 13] vs. 5 days, IQR [2, 11]; p = 0.013). Additionally, the patients with PSCM had significantly higher rates of postoperative new neurological deficits (35.4% vs. 19.4%; p = 0.002). In the Cox regression analysis, PSCM was associated with significantly poorer long-term survival (hazard ratio (HR) 1.75, 95%CI [1.20–2.53], p = 0.003). Surprisingly, hypertension was shown as a protective factor against long-term mortality (HR: 0.59, 95%CI [0.43–0.82], p = 0.001). Conclusion: PSCM in ATAAD patients is linked to worse postoperative outcomes and poorer long-term survival, emphasizing the need for early recognition and tailored management. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Updates on the Aortic Aneurysm and Aortic Dissection)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 2089 KiB  
Article
Paracolic Gutter Routing: A Novel Retroperitoneal Extra-Anatomical Repair for Infected Aorto-Iliac Axis
by Hazem El Beyrouti, Mohamed Omar, Cristi-Teodor Calimanescu, Hendrik Treede and Nancy Halloum
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(17), 5765; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12175765 - 4 Sep 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1884
Abstract
Objective: We describe and analyze outcomes of a novel extra-anatomical paracolic gutter routing technique for surgical repair of aorto-iliac infections. Methods: A double-center, observational, cohort study of all consecutive patients with aorto-iliac infections treated using extra-anatomical paracolic gutter technique. Between May 2015 and [...] Read more.
Objective: We describe and analyze outcomes of a novel extra-anatomical paracolic gutter routing technique for surgical repair of aorto-iliac infections. Methods: A double-center, observational, cohort study of all consecutive patients with aorto-iliac infections treated using extra-anatomical paracolic gutter technique. Between May 2015 and December 2022, six patients with aorto-iliac infections were treated with the paracolic gutter routing technique. Cases were identified retrospectively in an institutional database, and data were retrieved from surgical records, imaging studies, and follow-up records. Results: Aorto-bifemoral vascular reconstructions were performed using this technique in six patients. During mean follow-up of 52 ± 44 months, there was one case of graft thrombosis (17%) with subsequent successful thrombectomy. Primary and secondary graft patency rates were 83% and 100%, respectively. There was one mortality (17%) due to candida sepsis. All graft prostheses were patent at last follow-up. Conclusions: The paracolic gutter technique is a useful technique in patients with extensive aorto-iliac infections, arteriovenous and iliac-ureteric fistulas, or at a high risk of vascular graft infection and is associated with favorable reinfection and patency rates. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Updates on the Aortic Aneurysm and Aortic Dissection)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Review

Jump to: Research

11 pages, 2088 KiB  
Review
The Ascyrus Medical Dissection Stent: A One-Fits-All Strategy for the Treatment of Acute Type A Aortic Dissection?
by Leonard Pitts, Michael C. Moon, Maximilian Luehr, Markus Kofler, Matteo Montagner, Simon Sündermann, Semih Buz, Christoph Starck, Volkmar Falk and Jörg Kempfert
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(9), 2593; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13092593 - 28 Apr 2024
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 1336
Abstract
The treatment of DeBakey type I aortic dissection remains a major challenge in the field of aortic surgery. To upgrade the standard of care hemiarch replacement, a novel device called an “Ascyrus Medical Dissection Stent” (AMDS) is now available. This hybrid device composed [...] Read more.
The treatment of DeBakey type I aortic dissection remains a major challenge in the field of aortic surgery. To upgrade the standard of care hemiarch replacement, a novel device called an “Ascyrus Medical Dissection Stent” (AMDS) is now available. This hybrid device composed of a proximal polytetrafluoroethylene cuff and a distal non-covered nitinol stent is inserted into the aortic arch and the descending thoracic aorta during hypothermic circulatory arrest in addition to hemiarch replacement. Due to its specific design, it may result in a reduced risk for distal anastomotic new entries, the effective restoration of branch vessel malperfusion and positive aortic remodeling. In this narrative review, we provide an overview about the indications and the technical use of the AMDS. Additionally, we summarize the current available literature and discuss potential pitfalls in the application of the AMDS regarding device failure and aortic re-intervention. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Updates on the Aortic Aneurysm and Aortic Dissection)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

16 pages, 503 KiB  
Review
Acute Aortic Syndromes from Diagnosis to Treatment—A Comprehensive Review
by Cosmin M. Banceu, Diana M. Banceu, David S. Kauvar, Adrian Popentiu, Vladimir Voth, Markus Liebrich, Marius Halic Neamtu, Marvin Oprean, Daiana Cristutiu, Marius Harpa, Klara Brinzaniuc and Horatiu Suciu
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(5), 1231; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13051231 - 21 Feb 2024
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2181
Abstract
This work aims to provide a comprehensive description of the characteristics of a group of acute aortic diseases that are all potentially life-threatening and are collectively referred to as acute aortic syndromes (AASs). There have been recent developments in the care and diagnostic [...] Read more.
This work aims to provide a comprehensive description of the characteristics of a group of acute aortic diseases that are all potentially life-threatening and are collectively referred to as acute aortic syndromes (AASs). There have been recent developments in the care and diagnostic plan for AAS. A substantial clinical index of suspicion is required to identify AASs before irreversible fatal consequences arise because of their indefinite symptoms and physical indicators. A methodical approach to the diagnosis of AAS is addressed. Timely and suitable therapy should be started immediately after diagnosis. Improving clinical outcomes requires centralising patients with AAS in high-volume centres with high-volume surgeons. Consequently, the management of these patients benefits from the increased use of aortic centres, multidisciplinary teams and an “aorta code”. Each acute aortic entity requires a different patient treatment strategy; these are outlined below. Finally, numerous preventive strategies for AAS are discussed. The keys to good results are early diagnosis, understanding the natural history of these disorders and, where necessary, prompt surgical intervention. It is important to keep in mind that chest pain does not necessarily correspond with coronary heart disease and to be alert to the possible existence of aortic diseases because once antiplatelet drugs are administered, a blocked coagulation system can complicate aortic surgery and affect prognosis. The management of AAS in “aortic centres” improves long-term outcomes and decreases mortality rates. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Updates on the Aortic Aneurysm and Aortic Dissection)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop