jcm-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Management of Cardiovascular Disease Risk in Rheumatoid Arthritis

A special issue of Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383). This special issue belongs to the section "Immunology".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (15 December 2021) | Viewed by 16900

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
1. Departments of Medicine and Physiology, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
2. Rheumatology Unit, Free University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Free University, Brussels, Belgium
Interests: rheumatoid arthritis; autoimmune disease; clinical rheumatology; autoantibodies; rheumatology; arthritis; cardiovascular risk
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
1. Division of Rheumatology, IIS-Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Avenida de los Reyes Católicos, 2, 28040 Madrid, Spain
2. Department of Medicine and Psychiatry, Universidad de Cantabria, 39008 Santander, Cantabria, Spain
Interests: rheumatic diseases; musculoskeletal disorders; rheumatoid arthritis inflammation; autoimmune disease; autoimmunity; psoriasis; cardiovascular; genetics; T lymphocytes
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory disease that causes mainly joint damage and increases the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) to a similar extent as diabetes. CVD in RA patients is associated with adverse traditional cardiovascular risk factor profiles, systemic inflammation, and their interactions, as well as genetic components. Additionally, medications used to treat disease activity, as well as population origin, impact CVD risk in RA patients. The increased atherogenesis that is experienced by RA patients awaits further elucidation. CVD risk assessment and prevention are currently suboptimal in RA patients.

This Special Issue aims to improve CVD risk management in the presence of RA. We therefore invite original basic science and clinical papers, meta-analyses, and state-of-the-art reviews that deal with atherogenic mechanisms, cardiovascular risk stratification, and the role of lifestyle modification, cardiovascular drugs, and antirheumatic agents in reducing CVD risk in RA patients.

Prof. Dr. Patrick H.M.C. Dessein
Prof. Dr. Miguel Angel Gonzalez-Gay
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Journal of Clinical Medicine is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • Rheumatoid arthritis
  • Endothelial dysfunction
  • Atherosclerosis
  • Cardiac function
  • Arterial function
  • Cardiovascular events
  • Lifestyle factors
  • Antihypertensive agents
  • Lipid-lowering drugs
  • Antirheumatic agents

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (7 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Editorial

Jump to: Research, Review

5 pages, 211 KiB  
Editorial
Management of Cardiovascular Disease Risk in Rheumatoid Arthritis
by Patrick H. Dessein and Miguel A. Gonzalez-Gay
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(12), 3487; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11123487 - 17 Jun 2022
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 1706
Abstract
Cardiovascular diseases, including ischemic heart disease and stroke, reportedly comprise the top two causes of global mortality [...] Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Management of Cardiovascular Disease Risk in Rheumatoid Arthritis)

Research

Jump to: Editorial, Review

12 pages, 296 KiB  
Article
Subclinical Atherosclerosis Measure by Carotid Ultrasound and Inflammatory Activity in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis and Spondylarthritis
by Marta Rojas-Giménez, Clementina López-Medina, María Lourdes Ladehesa-Pineda, María Ángeles Puche-Larrubia, Ignacio Gómez-García, Jerusalem Calvo-Gutiérrez, Pedro Seguí-Azpilcueta, María del Carmen Ábalos-Aguilera, Desirée Ruíz-Vilchez, Alejandro Escudero-Contreras and Eduardo Collantes-Estévez
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(3), 662; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11030662 - 27 Jan 2022
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 1864
Abstract
Objective: To compare the effect of inflammation on subclinical atherosclerosis using carotid ultrasound in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and spondyloarthritis (SpA). Methods: Cross-sectional study including 347 participants (148 RA, 159 SpA, and 40 controls). We measured the carotid intima media thickness (cIMT) [...] Read more.
Objective: To compare the effect of inflammation on subclinical atherosclerosis using carotid ultrasound in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and spondyloarthritis (SpA). Methods: Cross-sectional study including 347 participants (148 RA, 159 SpA, and 40 controls). We measured the carotid intima media thickness (cIMT) and detection of atheromatous plaques using carotid ultrasound. We recorded disease activity (DAS28-CRP/ASDAS-CRP) and traditional cardiovascular risk factors. We performed descriptive, bivariate, and linear multivariate analyses (dependent variable: cIMT) to evaluate the influence of diagnosis on cIMT in all patients. Two additional multivariate analyses were performed by stratifying patients according to their inflammatory activity. Results: cIMT correlated with the mean CRP during the previous 5 years in RA, but not with CRP at the cut-off date. We did not find such differences in patients with SpA. The first multivariate model revealed that increased cIMT was more common in patients with RA than in those with SpA (β coefficient, 0.045; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.0002–0.09; p = 0.048) after adjusting for age, sex, disease course, and differential cardiovascular risk factors (arterial hypertension, smoking, statins, and corticosteroids). The second model revealed no differences in cIMT between the 2 groups of patients classified as remission–low activity (β coefficient, 0.020; 95% CI, −0.03 to 0.080; p = 0.500). However, when only patients with moderate–high disease activity were analysed, the cIMT was 0.112 mm greater in those with RA (95% CI, 0.013–0.212; p = 0.026) than in those with SpA after adjusting for the same variables. Conclusions: Subclinical atherosclerosis measured by carotid ultrasound in patients with RA and SpA is comparable when the disease is well controlled. However, when patients have moderate–high disease activity, cIMT is greater in patients with RA than in those with SpA after adjusting for age, sex, disease course, and cardiovascular risk factors. Our results point to greater involvement of disease activity in subclinical atherosclerosis in patients with RA than in those with SpA. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Management of Cardiovascular Disease Risk in Rheumatoid Arthritis)
8 pages, 256 KiB  
Article
Moderate and High Disease Activity Predicts the Development of Carotid Plaque in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients without Classic Cardiovascular Risk Factors: Six Years Follow-Up Study
by Iván Ferraz-Amaro, Alfonso Corrales, Belén Atienza-Mateo, Nuria Vegas-Revenga, Diana Prieto-Peña, Ricardo Blanco and Miguel Á. González-Gay
J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10(21), 4975; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10214975 - 27 Oct 2021
Cited by 12 | Viewed by 1740
Abstract
Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have a higher incidence of subclinical atherosclerosis and cardiovascular (CV) disease. It is postulated that the appearance of accelerated atherosclerosis in these patients is a consequence of the inflammation present in the disease. In this study, we aim [...] Read more.
Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have a higher incidence of subclinical atherosclerosis and cardiovascular (CV) disease. It is postulated that the appearance of accelerated atherosclerosis in these patients is a consequence of the inflammation present in the disease. In this study, we aim to determine if baseline disease activity in patients with RA predicts the future development of carotid plaque. A set of consecutive RA patients without a history of CV events, cancer or chronic kidney disease, who did not show carotid plaque in a carotid ultrasound assessment, were prospectively followed up for at least 5 years. At the time of recruitment, CV risk factors and disease-related data, including disease activity scores, were assessed. At the end of the follow-up, a carotid ultrasound was repeated and patients were divided into two groups; those who developed carotid plaque, and those who did not. A multivariable regression analysis was performed to define the predictors for the development of carotid plaque. One hundred and sixty patients with RA were followed up for an average of 6 ± 1 years. After this time, 66 (41%) of the patients had developed carotid plaque, and 94 (59%) did not. Patients with carotid plaque were significantly older (47 ± 13 vs. 55 ± 9 years, p < 0.001) at baseline, were more frequently diabetic (0% vs. 6%, p = 0.028), and had higher total cholesterol (197 ± 36 vs. 214 ± 40 mg/dL, p = 0.004) and LDL cholesterol (114 ± 35 vs. 126 ± 35 mg/dL, p = 0.037) at the beginning of the study. After multivariable adjustment, patients who were in the moderate and high disease activity (DAS28-CRP) categories displayed a higher odds ratio for the appearance of carotid plaque (OR 2.26 [95% CI 1.02–5.00], p = 0.044) compared to those in the DAS-28-CRP remission category. Remarkably, when patients were divided in patients within the low-risk SCORE category, and patients included in the remaining SCORE categories (moderate, high and very high), the relation between DAS28-CRP and the development of carotid plaque was only significant in the low-risk SCORE category. In conclusion, disease activity predicts the future development of subclinical atherosclerosis in patients with RA. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Management of Cardiovascular Disease Risk in Rheumatoid Arthritis)
11 pages, 3213 KiB  
Article
Angiotensin-Inhibiting Drugs Do Not Impact Disease Activity in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study
by Dorien M. C. F. Sluijsmans, Daphne C. Rohrich, Calin D. Popa and Bart J. F. van den Bemt
J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10(9), 1985; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10091985 - 5 May 2021
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2206
Abstract
Objectives: Besides their proven effectivity in decreasing the risk of cardiovascular events, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) and angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers (ARBs) are likely to possess anti-inflammatory properties as well. This study aims to investigate whether the use of ACEi and [...] Read more.
Objectives: Besides their proven effectivity in decreasing the risk of cardiovascular events, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) and angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers (ARBs) are likely to possess anti-inflammatory properties as well. This study aims to investigate whether the use of ACEi and ARBs additionally lowers disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods: In this cross-sectional study, we used ARBs or ACEi to study RA patients who had at least one DAS28-CRP measurement during a one-year period. A control group of RA patients without ACEi/ARBs was randomly selected. The primary outcome was the difference between the DAS28-CRP scores of ACEi/ARBs users and controls. The secondary outcomes were the differences between administered dosages of csDMARDs and bDMARDs for users and controls, respectively; these were expressed in defined daily dose (DDD). Confounders were included in the multiple regression analyses. Results: A total of 584 ACEi/ARBs users and 552 controls were finally examined. Multiple linear regression analyses showed no association between the use of ACEi or ARBs and the DAS28-CRP scores (ACEi factor 1.00, 95% CI 0.94–1.06; ARBs 1.02, 95% CI 0.96–1.09), nor with the dosage of csDMARDs (ACEi 0.97, 95% CI 0.89–1.07; ARBs 0.99, 95% CI 0.90–1.10). Furthermore, the use of ACEi was not associated with reduced dosages of bDMARDs (OR 1.14, 95% CI 0.79–1.64), whereas ARBs users tended to use less bDMARDs (1.46, 95% CI 0.98–2.18, p = 0.06). Conclusion: In this study, the use of either ACEi or ARBs in RA patients had no impact on disease activity as measured by the DAS28-CRP. A trend towards lower bDMARD dosages was observed in ARBs users, but the significance of this finding is still unclear. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Management of Cardiovascular Disease Risk in Rheumatoid Arthritis)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 296 KiB  
Article
Body Mass Index and Disease Activity in Chronic Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases: Results of the Cardiovascular in Rheumatology (Carma) Project
by Jesús A. Valero-Jaimes, Ruth López-González, María A. Martín-Martínez, Carmen García-Gómez, Fernando Sánchez-Alonso, Jesús T. Sánchez-Costa, Carlos González-Juanatey, Eva Revuelta-Evrad, César Díaz-Torné, Cruz Fernández-Espartero, Carolina Pérez-García, Vicenç Torrente-Segarra, Ginés Sánchez-Nievas, Trinidad Pérez-Sandoval, Pilar Font-Ugalde, María L. García-Vivar, Elena Aurrecoechea, Olga Maiz-Alonso, Ramón Valls-García, José A. Miranda-Filloy, Javier Llorca, Santos Castañeda and Miguel A. Gonzalez-Gayadd Show full author list remove Hide full author list
J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10(3), 382; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10030382 - 20 Jan 2021
Cited by 12 | Viewed by 3075
Abstract
Objective: Since obesity has been associated with a higher inflammatory burden and worse response to therapy in patients with chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases (CIRD), we aimed to confirm the potential association between body mass index (BMI) and disease activity in a large series [...] Read more.
Objective: Since obesity has been associated with a higher inflammatory burden and worse response to therapy in patients with chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases (CIRD), we aimed to confirm the potential association between body mass index (BMI) and disease activity in a large series of patients with CIRDs included in the Spanish CARdiovascular in rheuMAtology (CARMA) registry. Methods: Baseline data analysis of patients included from the CARMA project, a 10-year prospective study of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), ankylosing spondylitis (AS), and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) attending outpatient rheumatology clinics from 67 Spanish hospitals. Obesity was defined when BMI (kg/m2) was >30 according to the WHO criteria. Scores used to evaluate disease activity were Disease Activity Score of 28 joints (DAS28) in RA, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) in AS, and modified DAS for PsA. Results: Data from 2234 patients (775 RA, 738 AS, and 721 PsA) were assessed. The mean ± SD BMI at the baseline visit were: 26.9 ± 4.8 in RA, 27.4 ± 4.4 in AS, and 28.2 ± 4.7 in PsA. A positive association between BMI and disease activity in patients with RA (β = 0.029; 95%CI (0.01–0.05); p = 0.007) and PsA (β = 0.036; 95%CI (0.015–0.058); p = 0.001) but not in those with AS (β = 0.001; 95%CI (−0.03–0.03); p = 0.926) was found. Disease activity was associated with female sex and rheumatoid factor in RA and with Psoriasis Area Severity Index and enthesitis in PsA. Conclusions: BMI is associated with disease activity in RA and PsA, but not in AS. Given that obesity is a potentially modifiable factor, adequate control of body weight can improve the outcome of patients with CIRD and, therefore, weight control should be included in the management strategy of these patients. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Management of Cardiovascular Disease Risk in Rheumatoid Arthritis)
9 pages, 767 KiB  
Article
The Performance of Vascular Age in the Assessment of Cardiovascular Risk of Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis
by Iván Ferraz-Amaro, Alfonso Corrales, Juan Carlos Quevedo-Abeledo, Belén Atienza-Mateo, Diana Prieto-Peña, Ricardo Blanco, Javier Llorca and Miguel Á. González-Gay
J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9(12), 4065; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9124065 - 16 Dec 2020
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1973
Abstract
Background. Cardiovascular (CV) disease risk prediction models developed for use in the general population have suboptimal performance in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Vascular age (VA) is a new concept that has been proposed as a measure of CV ‘relative’ risk instead of [...] Read more.
Background. Cardiovascular (CV) disease risk prediction models developed for use in the general population have suboptimal performance in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Vascular age (VA) is a new concept that has been proposed as a measure of CV ‘relative’ risk instead of the ‘absolute’ risk that current prediction models provide. In the present study we aim to study the performance of vascular age (VA) in the assessment of CV risk in patients with RA. We additionally aimed to analyze its relation with subclinical atherosclerosis as measured through carotid plaque ultrasound. Methods. A total of 1173 non-diabetic RA patients without previous CV events were included. Disease characteristics, SCORE, VA determined on SCORE and on carotid intima media thickness (cIMT), and the presence of plaque through carotid ultrasound were assessed. The interrelations of VA with SCORE, and its associations with subclinical carotid atherosclerosis were studied. Results. On average, RA patients had both a SCORE determined VA (4.7 years) and a cIMT-based VA (2.4 years) significantly higher than the chronological age. When these differences were analyzed in different age intervals, while VA based on SCORE was significantly higher compared to chronological age in all age ranges, VA determined on cIMT was significantly elevated only in RA patients younger than 60 years. The area under the curve analysis for the association of SCORE and VA with the presence of carotid plaque disclosed no differences between both parameters. VA was associated with the presence of carotid plaque after multivariable regression analysis in patients younger than 60 years old. Conclusion. VA is significantly higher than chronological age in patients with RA. The performance of VA in its relation to carotid plaque is similar to that of the SCORE. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Management of Cardiovascular Disease Risk in Rheumatoid Arthritis)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Editorial, Research

11 pages, 282 KiB  
Review
Cardiovascular Disease Risk in Rheumatoid Arthritis Anno 2022
by Bas Dijkshoorn, Reinder Raadsen and Michael T. Nurmohamed
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(10), 2704; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11102704 - 11 May 2022
Cited by 31 | Viewed by 3530
Abstract
The risk for developing cardiovascular diseases (CVD) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients is 1.5 times higher compared to the general population. This risk is partly due to the contribution of systemic inflammation in increased atherogenesis, while an increased prevalence of “traditional” cardiovascular risk [...] Read more.
The risk for developing cardiovascular diseases (CVD) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients is 1.5 times higher compared to the general population. This risk is partly due to the contribution of systemic inflammation in increased atherogenesis, while an increased prevalence of “traditional” cardiovascular risk factors, such as hypertension and dyslipidemia, is also attributed to nearly 50% of the total CVD risk. Most anti-rheumatic medication partly reduces this CVD risk, primarily by reducing inflammation. The increased risk is recognized by most guidelines, which advise consequent screening and multiplying calculated risk scores by 1.5. However, screening in daily clinical practice is poorly done, and RA patients often have undiagnosed and untreated risk factors. In conclusion, even nowadays, RA patients still have an increased risk of developing CVD. Advances in anti-inflammatory treatment partly mitigate this risk, but RA patients need mandatory screening for CV risk factors to turn their CVD risk towards that of the general population. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Management of Cardiovascular Disease Risk in Rheumatoid Arthritis)
Back to TopTop