Resin-Based Materials in Restorative Dentistry: Innovations, Characterization and Clinical Implications

A special issue of Journal of Functional Biomaterials (ISSN 2079-4983). This special issue belongs to the section "Dental Biomaterials".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (20 October 2024) | Viewed by 4571

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Dental Materials Laboratory, Academic Area of Dentistry, Autonomous University of Hidalgo State, San Agustín Tlaxiaca, Mexico
Interests: dental composites; dental adhesives; bonding; dental biomaterials

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Saint-Joseph University, Beirut, Lebanon
Interests: dental adhesive; antibacterial activity; restoration; endodontically treated tooth; dental biomaterials; resin cement; digital dentistry
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Faculty of Dentistry, Universidad de los Andes, Santiago, Chile
Interests: dental bonding; ceramics; cementation; digital dentistry; clinical trials; oral rehabilitation

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Faculty of Dentistry, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil
Interests: dental biomaterials; biomaterials; restorative dentistry
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

This Special Issue, entitled “Resin-Based Materials in Restorative Dentistry: Innovations, Characterization and Clinical Implications”, aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the current state of the art in the development and use of resin-based materials for restorative dental applications. The scope of the discussion will include but not be limited to the synthesis, characterization, and properties of these materials, as well as their clinical applications and performance. Manuscripts related to the application of CAD-CAM technology in restorative dentistry are also welcome.

The use of resin materials for restorative dentistry has been rapidly growing in recent years due to their aesthetic and functional benefits. This Special Issue seeks to explore the latest advances in the field, including new synthetic approaches, innovative material formulations, and novel processing techniques that are driving the development of next-generation materials with improved performance and clinical outcomes.

This Special Issue will be situated within the existing literature by providing a critical review of the current state of the art and identifying gaps and challenges that need to be addressed in future research. We will also highlight the key opportunities and emerging trends in the field, including the growing focus on bioinspired materials, personalized dental implants, and the use of artificial intelligence and machine learning to optimize material design and selection.

Overall, this Special Issue aims to provide a platform for researchers, clinicians, and industry professionals to share their latest findings and insights, and to foster collaborations and partnerships that will advance the field of resin materials for restorative dentistry.

Dr. Carlos Enrique Cuevas-Suárez
Prof. Dr. Monika Lukomska-Szymanska
Prof. Dr. Louis Hardan
Dr. Mario Felipe Gutiérrez
Dr. Rafael Guerra Lund
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Journal of Functional Biomaterials is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2700 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • biomaterials
  • resin-based materials
  • resin composites
  • bonding
  • restorative dentistry

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

10 pages, 774 KiB  
Article
Effect of Bleaching on Resin-Infiltration-Masked Artificial White Spots In Vitro
by Alan Leon Sinanovic, Philipp Messer-Hannemann, Mariam Samadi, Falk Schwendicke and Susanne Effenberger
J. Funct. Biomater. 2024, 15(5), 125; https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb15050125 - 13 May 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1466
Abstract
Resin infiltration is an effective method to mask vestibular white spots. If needed, external bleaching is usually recommended before infiltration, whilst in clinical practice, this sequence may not always be feasible. This in vitro study evaluated the effect of bleaching after resin infiltration [...] Read more.
Resin infiltration is an effective method to mask vestibular white spots. If needed, external bleaching is usually recommended before infiltration, whilst in clinical practice, this sequence may not always be feasible. This in vitro study evaluated the effect of bleaching after resin infiltration regarding surface roughness and color using bovine incisors. Unlike for the untreated specimens (control, n = 25), artificial caries lesions were created within the test group (n = 25) using a demineralization solution at 37 °C for five days (pH = 4.95). The lesions were subsequently infiltrated using a resin infiltrant (Icon, DMG, Hamburg, Germany), followed by polishing. Afterwards, all specimens were bleached with a 10% carbamide peroxide gel (Opalescence, Ultradent, South Jordan, UT, USA) for 8 h/day over a ten-day period. Between bleaching treatments, specimens were stored in an opaque container with moistened paper tissues at 37 °C. Surface roughness was measured using a profilometer, and color in the L*a*b* space was assessed spectrophotometrically before and after bleaching. Bleaching increased the L*-values of both infiltrated (mean ± SD; ΔL* = 3.52 ± 1.98) and untreated (control) specimens (ΔL* = 3.53 ± 2.30) without any significant difference between the groups (p = 0.983). Bleaching also induced a significant increase in the mean surface roughness of both infiltrated (p < 0.001) and untreated (p = 0.0134) teeth. In terms of clinical relevance; it can be concluded that bleaching resin-infiltrated enamel is as effective as bleaching sound enamel. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 4802 KiB  
Article
Effect of Modified Triple-Layer Application on the Bond Strength of Different Dental Adhesive Systems to Dentin
by Rim Bourgi, Naji Kharouf, Carlos Enrique Cuevas-Suárez, Monika Lukomska-Szymańska, Walter Devoto, Cynthia Kassis, Omar Hasbini, Davide Mancino, Youssef Haikel and Louis Hardan
J. Funct. Biomater. 2023, 14(10), 522; https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb14100522 - 17 Oct 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2485
Abstract
The goal of this article was to assess the effect of modified triple-layer application (MTLA) in conjunction with the active bonding technique on the bond strength of four adhesive systems to dentinal substrate. The adhesives tested were Prime&Bond Universal (PBU), OptiBond Universal (OBU), [...] Read more.
The goal of this article was to assess the effect of modified triple-layer application (MTLA) in conjunction with the active bonding technique on the bond strength of four adhesive systems to dentinal substrate. The adhesives tested were Prime&Bond Universal (PBU), OptiBond Universal (OBU), OptiBond FL (OBFL), and Clearfil SE (CSE). The adhesives were applied according to the following strategies: single active application (A) and triple adhesive layer application including Active–Passive–Passive (APP); AAP; and AAA. The micro-tensile bond strength test was evaluated following 24 h or 6 months of storage. The composite–dentin interface morphology was investigated using scanning electron microscopy. The data were statistically analyzed with a significance level of α = 0.05. At 24 h of aging, all of the factors tested were not significant (p > 0.05) for CSE. For OBFL, OBU, and PBU, statistically higher values were observed for the A technique (p < 0.05). Plus, there were no significant variances between the APP, AAP, and AAA techniques (p > 0.05) for OBFL and PBU. However, for OBU, there were no significant differences between the A and AAA techniques (p > 0.05). After 6 months of aging, the A technique showed statistically higher values when compared to the other techniques (p < 0.01), except for OBFL, where the A and AAA techniques showed promising outcomes. When comparing the bond strength values of 24 h and 6 months, only for PBU, all of the techniques used resulted in bond strength stability over time (p > 0.05). Thicker adhesive layers were observed when MTLA was applied. Only the OBFL adhesive showed the formation of resin tags in all of the modalities tested. The bonding performances of the different application techniques used were material-dependent. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop