Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
4.1
3.0
Journals
JPM
Special Issues
Updates and Challenges in Endoscopic and Laparoscopic Surgery
share announcement

Updates and Challenges in Endoscopic and Laparoscopic Surgery

A special issue of Journal of Personalized Medicine (ISSN 2075-4426). This special issue belongs to the section "Methodology, Drug and Device Discovery".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 25 November 2024 | Viewed by 2403

Special Issue Editor

Dr. Gabriella Teresa Capolupo

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
UUOC Chirurgia Colorettale, Fondazione Policlinico Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Univeristà Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy
Interests: colorectal surgery; minimally invasive surgery; colorectal cancer; laparoscopic surgery; robotic surgery

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

With the spread of endoscopic and laparoscopic techniques, minimally invasive surgical approaches have completely changed the field of surgery. This Special Issue examines surgical procedures, cutting-edge techniques, and clinical results, with an emphasis on the most recent research and technical developments in these fields. It seeks to address the challenges faced by surgeons and offer insightful information on the changing field of minimally invasive surgery.

Endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) has become a feasible method for treating gastrointestinal tract (GIT) mucosal and sub-epithelial lesions that are resistant to traditional treatment modalities.

Therefore, although laparoscopic and endoscopic procedures have revolutionized the surgical field, persistent issues still require attention to improve surgical outcomes and patient care.

Dr. Gabriella Teresa Capolupo
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Journal of Personalized Medicine is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • gastrointestinal surgery
  • minimally invasive surgery
  • endoscopic surgery
  • endoscopic full-thickness resection
  • natural orifice surgery
  • artificial intelligence

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Download All Papers
Order results
Result details
Show export options expand_more Show export options expand_less
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

13 pages, 559 KiB  
Article
The Effect of Increased Intra-Abdominal Pressure on Hemodynamics in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy—The Experience of a Single Centre
by Elena Stamate, Alin-Ionut Piraianu, Oana-Monica Duca, Oana Roxana Ciobotaru, Ana Fulga, Iuliu Fulga, Cristian Onisor, Madalina Nicoleta Matei, Alexandru-Stefan Luchian, Adrian George Dumitrascu and Octavian Catalin Ciobotaru
J. Pers. Med. 2024, 14(8), 871; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm14080871 - 17 Aug 2024
Viewed by 1271
Abstract
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is characterized by reduced postoperative pain, shorter hospital stays, rapid return to preoperative physical activity, and less psychological impact on the patient. During laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the intra-abdominal insufflation of carbon dioxide with secondary increase in intra-abdominal pressure can cause important hemodynamic [...] Read more.
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is characterized by reduced postoperative pain, shorter hospital stays, rapid return to preoperative physical activity, and less psychological impact on the patient. During laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the intra-abdominal insufflation of carbon dioxide with secondary increase in intra-abdominal pressure can cause important hemodynamic consequences, like decreased cardiac output and blood pressure, as well as compensatory increase in heart rate. The purpose of this study is to evaluate changes in cardiovascular parameters during general anesthesia in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Retrospective data from 342 patients with cholecystectomy for cholelithiasis performed at Railway Hospital Galati, Romania, were reviewed. All patients received the same intraoperative anesthetics. Female patients were 85.7% (n = 293). More than half of the patients, 53.51% (n = 183), were 40–59 years old, and only 16.37% (n = 56) were under 40 years old. Patients with a normal body mass index (BMI) represented 45.6% (n = 156), 33.3% (n = 114) were underweight, and 12% (n = 42) had grade 1 obesity (BMI 25–29.9 kg/m2). The minimum intraoperative blood pressure correlated with patient gender (p 0.015 < 0.005), with men having a higher blood pressure than women (p 0.006 < 0.05), and for BMI, a higher BMI was associated with elevated blood pressure (p 0.025 < 0.05). Older age correlated with an increased maximum intraoperative blood pressure (p < 0.001 < 0.05) and with maximum intraoperative heart rate (p 0.015 < 0.05). Patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy experienced significant hemodynamic changes with pneumoperitoneum, but this type of surgical intervention was safe for patients regardless of their age. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Updates and Challenges in Endoscopic and Laparoscopic Surgery)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 438 KiB  
Article
An Institutional Shift from Routine to Selective Diversion of Low Anastomosis in Robotic TME Surgery for Rectal Cancer Patients Using the KHANS Technique: A Single-Centre Cohort Study
by Rauand Duhoky, Guglielmo Niccolò Piozzi, Marieke L. W. Rutgers, Ioannis Mykoniatis, Najaf Siddiqi, Syed Naqvi and Jim S. Khan
J. Pers. Med. 2024, 14(7), 725; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm14070725 - 4 Jul 2024
Viewed by 836
Abstract
(1) Background: In recent years, there has been a change in practice for diverting stomas in rectal cancer surgery, shifting from routine diverting stomas to a more selective approach. Studies suggest that the benefits of temporary ileostomies do not live up to their [...] Read more.
(1) Background: In recent years, there has been a change in practice for diverting stomas in rectal cancer surgery, shifting from routine diverting stomas to a more selective approach. Studies suggest that the benefits of temporary ileostomies do not live up to their risks, such as high-output stomas, stoma dysfunction, and reoperation. (2) Methods: All rectal cancer patients treated with a robotic resection in a single tertiary colorectal centre in the UK from 2013 to 2021 were analysed. In 2015, our unit made a shift to a more selective approach to temporary diverting ileostomies. The cohort was divided into a routine diversion group treated before 2015 and a selective diversion group treated after 2015. Both groups were analysed and compared for short-term outcomes and morbidities. (3) Results: In group A, 63/70 patients (90%) had a diverting stoma compared to 98/135 patients (72.6%) in group B (p = 0.004). There were no significant differences between the groups in anastomotic leakages (11.8% vs. 17.8%, p = 0.312) or other complications (p = 0.117). There were also no significant differences in readmission (3.8% vs. 2.6%, p = 0.312) or reoperation (3.8% vs. 2.6%, p = 1.000) after stoma closure. After 1 year, 71.6% and 71.9% (p = 1.000) of patients were stoma-free. One major reason for the delay in stoma reversal was the COVID-19 pandemic, which only occurred in group B (0% vs. 22%, p = 0.054). (4) Conclusions: A more selective approach to diverting stomas for robotic rectal cancer patients does not lead to more complications or leaks and can be considered in the treatment of rectal cancer tumours. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Updates and Challenges in Endoscopic and Laparoscopic Surgery)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

Show export options expand_more Show export options expand_less
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
 
Displaying articles 1-2
Back to TopTop