Awareness in (I)SLA

A special issue of Languages (ISSN 2226-471X).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 October 2021) | Viewed by 3660

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Spanish & Portuguese, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20057, USA
Interests: language curriculum development; teacher education; instructed language learning; psycholinguistics; cognitive processes in language learning; research methodology; (written) corrective feedback; CALL
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear colleagues:

The construct ‘awareness’ is undoubtedly one of the more challenging constructs to operationalize and measure in both (instructed) second language acquisition and non-SLA fields of research. As Leow and Donatelli (2017) pointed out, “the multi-faceted nature of awareness is clearly exemplified in concepts that include perception, detection, and noticing, and also in type of learning or learning conditions (implicit, explicit, incidental, subliminal), type of consciousness (autonoetic, noetic, anoetic), and type of awareness (language, phenomenal, meta-cognitive, situational).” (p. 189). The construct has also been methodologically approached from both a nonconcurrent product-oriented (e.g., Robinson, 1996; Williams, 2005; Rebuschat, Hamrick, Riestenberg, Sachs, & Ziegler, 2013) and concurrent process-oriented (e.g., Leow, 1997, 2000; Rosa & Leow, 2004) perspective.  However, while the beneficial role of awareness (operationalized and measured both concurrently and non-concurrently) in L2 learning has been well established (e.g., Leow, 2000; Kerz, Wiechmann, & Riedel, 2017), there remains controversy as to whether such a role is important, clearly warranting further research on the role of awareness in the L2 learning process. 

The purpose of this issue is to probe deeper into several unanswered issues associated with the role of awareness in L2 learning, from theoretical, empirical, methodological, and pedagogical perspectives.  Issues may include the need to establish whether the construct ‘awareness’ is a dichotomy (aware vs. unaware) or occurs on a continuum (Hulstijn 2015; Leow 2000).  Similarly, further research needs to investigate the potential co-occurrence of implicit and/or explicit learning during the L2 learning process leading to implicit and/or explicit knowledge (N. Ellis 2015; R. Ellis 2005; Rebuschat et al., 2013).  In addition, there is a paucity of studies addressing different types or levels of the participant population.  To robustly address these and other associated awareness issues, there is clear need for methodological innovations designed to allow a more sensitive operationalization and coding of concurrent awareness data when levels of awareness are considered during the process of learning.  Similarly, nonconcurrent measures need to be designed to gather (triangulated) data on whether L2 learners do possess lower levels of target grammatical rules that fail to attain the level of partial or full metalinguistic verbalization, as coded by offline verbal reports or questionnaires.  These procedures may address the important appropriateness of categorizing participants to (a) aware or unaware status or (b) accessing implicit or explicit knowledge while shedding important information that contributes to a deeper understanding of the role of awareness in L2 learning and L2 knowledge.

We request that, prior to submitting a manuscript, interested authors initially submit a proposed title and an abstract of 400–600 words summarizing their intended contribution. Please send it to the Guest Editor ([email protected]) or to the Languages editorial office ([email protected]). Abstracts will be reviewed by the Guest Editor for the purposes of ensuring proper fit within the scope of the Special Issue. Full manuscripts will undergo double-blind peer review.

The tentative completion schedule is as follows:

  • Abstract submission deadline: 1 March 2021
  • Notification of abstract acceptance: 15 April 2021
  • Full manuscript deadline: 31 October 2021

References

Ellis, N. C. (2015). Implicit AND explicit language learning: Their dynamic interface and complexity. In P. Rebuschat (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp. 3-23). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Ellis, R. (2005). Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language: A psychometric study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 141-172.

Hulstijn, J. H. (2015). Explaining phenomena of first and second language acquisition with the constructs of implicit and explicit learning: The virtues and pitfalls of a two-system view. In P. Rebuschat (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp. 25-46). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Kerz, E., Wiechmann, D., & Riedel, F. B. (2017). Implicit learning in the cloud: Investigating the role of awareness in the acquisition of L2 knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 39, 711-734.

Leow, R. P.  (2001). Attention, awareness and foreign language behavior.   Language Learning, 51, 113-155.

Leow, R. P.  (2000). A study of the role of awareness in foreign language behavior: Aware vs. unaware learners.  Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 557-584.

Leow, R. P., & Donatelli, L. (2017). The role of (un)awareness in SLA. Language Teaching, 50, 189-211.

Rebuschat, P., Hamrick, P., Sachs, R., Riestenberg, K., & Ziegler, N. (2013) Implicit and explicit knowledge of form–meaning connections: Evidence from subjective measures of awareness. In J. Bergsleithner, S. Frota, & J. K. Yoshioka (Eds.), Noticing: L2 studies and essays in honor of Dick Schmidt (pp. 255–275). Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.

Robinson, P.  (1996). Learning simple and complex second language rules under implicit, incidental, rule-search and instructed conditions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 27-68.

Rosa, E. M., & Leow, R. P. (2004). Awareness, different learning conditions, and second language development. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 269-292.

Williams, J. N. (2005). Learning without awareness. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 269-304.

Prof. Dr. Ronald Leow
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Languages is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • awareness
  • unawareness
  • implicit learning
  • incidental learning

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

27 pages, 2534 KiB  
Article
Exploring the Pronunciation Awareness Continuum through Self-Reflection in the L2 French Learning Process
by Camille Meritan
Languages 2021, 6(4), 182; https://doi.org/10.3390/languages6040182 - 1 Nov 2021
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2945
Abstract
Second language (L2) researchers have established that examining learners’ awareness of their own learning process and progress is essential. However, learners exposed to the same input in the classroom may differ in the way that they perform. This difference may be due to [...] Read more.
Second language (L2) researchers have established that examining learners’ awareness of their own learning process and progress is essential. However, learners exposed to the same input in the classroom may differ in the way that they perform. This difference may be due to the way and depth with which learners process the L2 information. The present study explores self-reflection (i.e., introspective verbal reports) to enhance L2 learning, helping learners develop an awareness of learning as a process. This four-semester-long study investigates whether there is a connection between phonological awareness and self-reflection and explores under which conditions self-reflection could be most beneficial for pronunciation. Sixty learners of French, divided into a Treatment group (with self-reflection) and a Comparison group (without self-reflection), were tracked across semesters. Results on pre/post read-aloud tests surrounding pronunciation lessons—on the vowels /y/-/u/ and the use of liaisons—were contrasted with students’ responses to self-reflection questionnaires to explore their learning process. The study revealed that overall, self-reflection led to better learning outcomes, and that a link between attention and understanding may exist, but when this link is absent, learners using self-reflection may not linearly progress. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Awareness in (I)SLA)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop