Membrane Surface Modification and Functionalization

A special issue of Membranes (ISSN 2077-0375). This special issue belongs to the section "Membrane Surfaces and Interfaces".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (20 September 2021) | Viewed by 37978

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Center for Advanced Materials, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar
Interests: nanocomposite membranes; membrane-based separation; oil/water separation, carbon dioxide removal, wastewater treatment; desalination; elastomeric and mixed matrix membranes
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Chemical Engineering, College of Engineering, Qatar University, Doha 2713, Qatar
Interests: Ionic liquids; natural gas hydrates; membrane distillation; carbon dioxide removal and conversion; wastewater treatment; adsorption; desalination
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Sr. Chemist, The Sherwin-Williams Company, 2001 Tracy Street, Pittsburgh, PA-15233, USA
Interests: nanocomposite membranes; membrane-based separation; carbon dioxide removal; elastomeric and mixed matrix membranes; packaging coatings; corrosion; scanning acoustic microscopy
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Surface functionalization is one of the efficient techniques that can confer the membranes with novel properties and transform them into valuable finished products. It has been widely applied to polymeric membranes in many fields and has progressed rapidly in recent years. The modified membranes have been widely used in many separation processes that include liquid and gaseous mixtures (gas separation, reverse osmosis, pervaporation, nanofiltration, ultrafiltration, microfiltration). This issue will cover and highlight the various approaches utilized in surface modification and functionalization of polymeric membranes. We welcome articles and reviews that address the aspects of antifouling, reverse osmosis, gas separation, forward osmosis, direct contact membrane distillation, adsorption, environmental stimuli-responsive gating, pervaporation, and energy conversion applications.

Dr. Mohammad K. Hassan
Prof. Majeda Khraisheh
Dr. Vivek Vasagar
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Membranes is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2200 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • Surface grafting
  • Polyzwitterion
  • Oxidative stability of membrane surface
  • layer-by-layer assembly
  • Hydrophilic/hydrophobic surface modifiers
  • Membrane fouling
  • Plasma and UV treatment

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (9 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Editorial

Jump to: Research, Review

4 pages, 191 KiB  
Editorial
Membrane Surface Modification and Functionalization
by Vivek Vasagar, Mohammad K. Hassan and Majeda Khraisheh
Membranes 2021, 11(11), 877; https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes11110877 - 15 Nov 2021
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 2483
Abstract
With the increase in water scarcity, and as only 2 [...] Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Membrane Surface Modification and Functionalization)

Research

Jump to: Editorial, Review

15 pages, 4001 KiB  
Article
Enhancing H2O2 Tolerance and Separation Performance through the Modification of the Polyamide Layer of a Thin-Film Composite Nanofiltration Membrane by Using Graphene Oxide
by Yi-Li Lin, Nai-Yun Zheng and Yu-Shen Chen
Membranes 2021, 11(8), 592; https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes11080592 - 31 Jul 2021
Cited by 10 | Viewed by 3347
Abstract
Through interfacial polymerization (IP), a polyamide (PA) layer was synthesized on the top of a commercialized polysulfone substrate to form a thin-film composite (TFC) nanofiltration membrane. Graphene oxide (GO) was dosed during the IP process to modify the NF membrane, termed TFC-GO, to [...] Read more.
Through interfacial polymerization (IP), a polyamide (PA) layer was synthesized on the top of a commercialized polysulfone substrate to form a thin-film composite (TFC) nanofiltration membrane. Graphene oxide (GO) was dosed during the IP process to modify the NF membrane, termed TFC-GO, to enhance oxidant resistance and membrane performance. TFC-GO exhibited increased surface hydrophilicity, water permeability, salt rejection, removal efficiency of pharmaceutical and personal care products (PPCPs), and H2O2 resistance compared with TFC. When H2O2 exposure was 0–96,000 ppm-h, the surfaces of the TFC and TFC-GO membranes were damaged, and swelling was observed using scanning electron microscopy. However, the permeate flux of TFC-GO remained stable, with significantly higher NaCl, MgSO4, and PPCP rejection with increasing H2O2 exposure intensity than TFC, which exhibited a 3.5-fold flux increase with an approximate 50% decrease in salt and PPCP rejection. GO incorporated into a PA layer could react with oxidants to mitigate membrane surface damage and increase the negative charge on the membrane surface, resulting in the enhancement of the electrostatic repulsion of negatively charged PPCPs. This hypothesis was confirmed by the significant decrease in PPCP adsorption onto the surface of TFC-GO compared with TFC. Therefore, TFC-GO membranes exhibited superior water permeability, salt rejection, and PPCP rejection and satisfactory resistance to H2O2, indicating its great potential for practical applications. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Membrane Surface Modification and Functionalization)
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 14123 KiB  
Article
Stability of Ar/O2 Plasma-Treated Polypropylene Membranes Applied for Membrane Distillation
by Marek Gryta and Wirginia Tomczak
Membranes 2021, 11(7), 531; https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes11070531 - 14 Jul 2021
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 2885
Abstract
In the present work, Ar/O2 plasma treatment was used as a surface modification tool for polypropylene (PP) membranes. The effect of the plasma conditions on the properties of the modified PP surface has been investigated. For this purpose, the influence of gas [...] Read more.
In the present work, Ar/O2 plasma treatment was used as a surface modification tool for polypropylene (PP) membranes. The effect of the plasma conditions on the properties of the modified PP surface has been investigated. For this purpose, the influence of gas composition and its flow rate, plasma power excitation as well as treatment time on the contact angle of PP membranes has been investigated. The properties of used membranes were determined after various periods of time: immediately after the modification process as well as after one, four and five years of storage. Moreover, the used membranes were evaluated in terms of their performance in long-term MD process. Through detailed studies, we demonstrated that the performed plasma treatment process effectively enhanced the performance of the modified membranes. In addition, it was shown that the surface modification did not affect the degradation of the membrane matrix. Indeed, the used membranes maintained stable process properties throughout the studied period. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Membrane Surface Modification and Functionalization)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 2052 KiB  
Article
A Hybrid NF-FO-RO Process for the Supply of Irrigation Water from Treated Wastewater: Simulation Study
by MhdAmmar Hafiz, Radwan Alfahel, Alaa H. Hawari, Mohammad K. Hassan and Ali Altaee
Membranes 2021, 11(3), 191; https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes11030191 - 10 Mar 2021
Cited by 14 | Viewed by 2679
Abstract
Municipal treated wastewater could be considered as a water source for food crop irrigation purposes. Enhancing the quality of treated wastewater to meet irrigation standards has become a necessary practice. Nanofiltration (NF) was used in the first stage to produce permeate at relatively [...] Read more.
Municipal treated wastewater could be considered as a water source for food crop irrigation purposes. Enhancing the quality of treated wastewater to meet irrigation standards has become a necessary practice. Nanofiltration (NF) was used in the first stage to produce permeate at relatively low energy consumption. In the second stage, two membrane combinations were tested for additional water extraction from the brine generated by the NF process. The simulation results showed that using a hybrid forward osmosis (FO)–reverse osmosis (RO) system is more efficient than using the RO process alone for the further extraction of water from the brine generated by the NF process. The total specific energy consumption can be reduced by 27% after using FO as an intermediate process between NF and RO. In addition, the final permeate water quality produced using the hybrid FO-RO system was within the allowable standards for food crops irrigation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Membrane Surface Modification and Functionalization)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 41930 KiB  
Article
Inactivation of E. coli Using Atmospheric Pressure Plasma Jet with Dry and Wet Argon Discharges
by Atif H. Asghar, Omar B. Ahmed and Ahmed Rida Galaly
Membranes 2021, 11(1), 46; https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes11010046 - 9 Jan 2021
Cited by 14 | Viewed by 3491
Abstract
The acceleration of inactivating viable cells of Escherichia coli (E. coli), by using new direct and indirect innovative methods, is the targeted method of using an atmospheric pressure plasma jet (APPJ) operated by an AC high-voltage power source with variable frequency [...] Read more.
The acceleration of inactivating viable cells of Escherichia coli (E. coli), by using new direct and indirect innovative methods, is the targeted method of using an atmospheric pressure plasma jet (APPJ) operated by an AC high-voltage power source with variable frequency up to 60 kHz and voltage ranging from 2.5 to 25 kV. Discharges using dry argon (0% O2) discharges and different wet argon discharges using admixtures with O2/Ar ratios ranging from 0.25% to 1.5% were studied. The combined effects of dry and wet argon discharges, direct and indirect exposure using a mesh controller, and hollow magnets were studied to reach a complete bacterial inactivation in short application times. Survival curves showed that the inactivation rate increased as the wettability increased. The application of magnetized non-thermal plasma discharge with a 1.5% wetness ratio causes a fast inactivation rate of microbes on surfaces, and a dramatic decrease of the residual survival of the bacterial ratio due to an increase in the jet width and the enhanced ability of fast transport of the charges to viable cells, especially at the edge of the Petri dish. The membrane damage of E. coli mechanism factors in the activation process by APPJ is discussed. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Membrane Surface Modification and Functionalization)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 2221 KiB  
Communication
Facile Method for Surface-Grafted Chitooligosaccharide on Medical Segmented Poly(ester-urethane) Film to Improve Surface Biocompatibility
by Yifan Liu, Zhengqi Liu, Ya Gao, Weiwei Gao, Zhaosheng Hou and Yuzheng Zhu
Membranes 2021, 11(1), 37; https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes11010037 - 4 Jan 2021
Cited by 14 | Viewed by 2250
Abstract
In the paper, the chitooligosaccharide (CHO) was surface-grafted on the medical segmented poly(ester-urethane) (SPU) film by a facile two-step procedure to improve the surface biocompatibility. By chemical treatment of SPU film with hexamethylene diisocyanate under mild reaction condition, free -NCO groups were first [...] Read more.
In the paper, the chitooligosaccharide (CHO) was surface-grafted on the medical segmented poly(ester-urethane) (SPU) film by a facile two-step procedure to improve the surface biocompatibility. By chemical treatment of SPU film with hexamethylene diisocyanate under mild reaction condition, free -NCO groups were first introduced on the surface with high grafting density, which were then coupled with -NH2 groups of CHO to immobilize CHO on the SPU surface (SPU-CHO). The CHO-covered surface was characterized by FT-IR and water contact angle test. Due to the hydrophilicity of CHO, the SPU-CHO possessed higher surface hydrophilicity and faster hydrolytic degradation rate than blank SPU. The almost overlapping stress-strain curves of SPU and SPU-CHO films demonstrated that the chemical treatments had little destruction on the intrinsic properties of the substrate. In addition, the significant inhibition of platelet adhesion and protein adsorption on CHO-covered surface endowed SPU-CHO an outstanding surface biocompatibility (especially blood compatibility). These results indicated that the CHO-grafted SPU was a promising candidate as blood-contacting biomaterial for biomedical applications. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Membrane Surface Modification and Functionalization)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 3661 KiB  
Article
Comparison of Nanofiltration with Reverse Osmosis in Reclaiming Tertiary Treated Municipal Wastewater for Irrigation Purposes
by MhdAmmar Hafiz, Alaa H. Hawari, Radwan Alfahel, Mohammad K. Hassan and Ali Altaee
Membranes 2021, 11(1), 32; https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes11010032 - 2 Jan 2021
Cited by 36 | Viewed by 4624
Abstract
This study compares the performance of nanofiltration (NF) and reverse osmosis (RO) for the reclamation of ultrafiltered municipal wastewater for irrigation of food crops. RO and NF technologies were evaluated at different applied pressures; the performance of each technology was evaluated in terms [...] Read more.
This study compares the performance of nanofiltration (NF) and reverse osmosis (RO) for the reclamation of ultrafiltered municipal wastewater for irrigation of food crops. RO and NF technologies were evaluated at different applied pressures; the performance of each technology was evaluated in terms of water flux, recovery rate, specific energy consumption and quality of permeate. It was found that the permeate from the reverse osmosis (RO) process complied with Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) standards at pressures applied between 10 and 18 bar. At an applied pressure of 20 bar, the permeate quality did not comply with irrigation water standards in terms of chloride, sodium and calcium concentration. It was found that nanofiltration process was not suitable for the reclamation of wastewater as the concentration of chloride, sodium and calcium exceeded the allowable limits at all applied pressures. In the reverse osmosis process, the highest recovery rate was 36%, which was achieved at a pressure of 16 bar. The specific energy consumption at this applied pressure was 0.56 kWh/m3. The lowest specific energy of 0.46 kWh/m3 was achieved at an applied pressure of 12 bar with a water recovery rate of 32.7%. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Membrane Surface Modification and Functionalization)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

16 pages, 2430 KiB  
Article
Effect of Membrane Fouling on Fertilizer-Drawn Forward Osmosis Desalination Performance
by Majeda Khraisheh, Mona Gulied and Fares AlMomani
Membranes 2020, 10(9), 243; https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes10090243 - 18 Sep 2020
Cited by 10 | Viewed by 4060
Abstract
Fertilizer-drawn forward osmosis (FDFO) has garnered immense attention for its application in the agricultural field and its potential to reuse wastewater sustainably. Membrane fouling, however, remains to be a challenge for the process. This study aims to investigate the influence of membrane fouling [...] Read more.
Fertilizer-drawn forward osmosis (FDFO) has garnered immense attention for its application in the agricultural field and its potential to reuse wastewater sustainably. Membrane fouling, however, remains to be a challenge for the process. This study aims to investigate the influence of membrane fouling on the performance of the FDFO process. Synthetic wastewater (SWW) and multi-component fertilizer (MCF) were used as feed solution (FS) and draw solution (DS) with cellulose triacetate (CTA) forward osmosis (FO) membrane orientation. The performance was evaluated through water flux (WF), percentage recovery and percentage of salt reject. The WF declined from 10.32 LMH (L/m2·h) to 3.30 LMH when ultra-pure water as FS was switched with concentration FS indicating the dependence of the performance on the type of FS used. Accelerated fouling experiments conducted to verify the fouling behavior showed a decline in the water flux from 8.6 LMH to 3.09 LMH with SWW and 13.1 LMH to 3.42 LMH when deionized water was used as FS. The effects of osmotic backwashing and in situ flushing as physical cleaning methods of the foul membrane were studied through water flux and salt recovery percentage. Both cleaning methods yielded a WF close to the baseline. Osmotic backwashing yielded better results by eliminating foulant–foulant and foulant–membrane adhesion. The cleaning methods were able to recover 75% of phosphate and 60% of nitrate salts. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM), atomic force microscopy (AFM) and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) results validated the effectiveness of the methods for the physical cleaning of foul membranes. This study underlines the importance of the FS used in FDFO and the effectiveness of osmotic backwashing as a cleaning method of FO membranes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Membrane Surface Modification and Functionalization)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Review

Jump to: Editorial, Research

54 pages, 12920 KiB  
Review
Polymer Membranes for All-Vanadium Redox Flow Batteries: A Review
by Dennis Düerkop, Hartmut Widdecke, Carsten Schilde, Ulrich Kunz and Achim Schmiemann
Membranes 2021, 11(3), 214; https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes11030214 - 18 Mar 2021
Cited by 47 | Viewed by 10763
Abstract
Redox flow batteries such as the all-vanadium redox flow battery (VRFB) are a technical solution for storing fluctuating renewable energies on a large scale. The optimization of cells regarding performance, cycle stability as well as cost reduction are the main areas of research [...] Read more.
Redox flow batteries such as the all-vanadium redox flow battery (VRFB) are a technical solution for storing fluctuating renewable energies on a large scale. The optimization of cells regarding performance, cycle stability as well as cost reduction are the main areas of research which aim to enable more environmentally friendly energy conversion, especially for stationary applications. As a critical component of the electrochemical cell, the membrane influences battery performance, cycle stability, initial investment and maintenance costs. This review provides an overview about flow-battery targeted membranes in the past years (1995–2020). More than 200 membrane samples are sorted into fluoro-carbons, hydro-carbons or N-heterocycles according to the basic polymer used. Furthermore, the common description in membrane technology regarding the membrane structure is applied, whereby the samples are categorized as dense homogeneous, dense heterogeneous, symmetrical or asymmetrically porous. Moreover, these properties as well as the efficiencies achieved from VRFB cycling tests are discussed, e.g., membrane samples of fluoro-carbons, hydro-carbons and N-heterocycles as a function of current density. Membrane properties taken into consideration include membrane thickness, ion-exchange capacity, water uptake and vanadium-ion diffusion. The data on cycle stability and costs of commercial membranes, as well as membrane developments, are compared. Overall, this investigation shows that dense anion-exchange membranes (AEM) and N-heterocycle-based membranes, especially poly(benzimidazole) (PBI) membranes, are suitable for VRFB requiring low self-discharge. Symmetric and asymmetric porous membranes, as well as cation-exchange membranes (CEM) enable VRFB operation at high current densities. Amphoteric ion-exchange membranes (AIEM) and dense heterogeneous CEM are the choice for operation mode with the highest energy efficiency. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Membrane Surface Modification and Functionalization)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop