Political Violence, Religion and the Secular

A special issue of Religions (ISSN 2077-1444). This special issue belongs to the section "Religions and Humanities/Philosophies".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 October 2023) | Viewed by 4471

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of War Studies, King’s College London, London WC2R 2LS, UK
Interests: analysing intersections between peace, violence, religion and the secular; the Middle East

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

There is a rich academic discussion of the various relationships between religion and violence. However, there is relatively little that engages in-depth on the intersection between violence and the secular. These two discussions have largely proceeded in parallel. There are extensive debates about what “the secular” is as a Protestant-infused socially constructed category whose relevance and explanatory power for a wide range of case studies around the world is by no means settled. Further, there are extensive debates around how to define forms of violence and grey areas between its many forms such as war, terrorism, crime, domestic abuse and what Galtung calls structural violence. This Special Issue provides an opportunity to bring these two strands of discussion together. Violence is one lens through which to ask what, if anything, is (are) the secular(s)? and, in turn, what does considering questions of religion and the secular offer to our understanding of political violence?

This Special Issue seeks contributions that engage in an empirically rich, theoretically lively way with intersections of violence in all its forms, religious traditions, and questions about the secular. It seeks to bring together scholars working across social science and humanities disciplines. It seeks to bring together comparative case studies from around the world, including cases where the relevance of “the secular” as a useful conceptual category is questioned.

The Special Issue invites us to use the concept of violence to rethink the terms of the secular. Preliminary questions include, but are not limited to:

  • How do different religious traditions conceive violence? In which traditions and case studies are questions about the secular relevant or irrelevant?
  • What are the strengths and limitations of using the idea of “the secular” as a conceptual framework for understanding and analyzing what happens in instances of violence, particularly political violence?
  • How might we conceptualize, problematize and interrogate empirically such matters in case studies that elude any religious–secular binary, outside and also within the West?
  • How do different forms of violence in the public and private sphere shape what questions are possible to ask about “the secular”?
  • Of what importance is the significance of the strength of religious tradition within a particular society and the ways in which such strength intersects with various forms of power, including political, economic, social, spiritual, and military?
  • How might such interrogations help us or hold us back from understanding various forms of oppression and resistance around the world?

Dr. Stacey Gutkowski
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Religions is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • political violence
  • war
  • terrorism
  • secular

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

12 pages, 262 KiB  
Article
Is Violence Critique?
by Ryan Williams
Religions 2022, 13(11), 1111; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13111111 - 16 Nov 2022
Viewed by 1609
Abstract
The offence and violence surrounding episodes like the Salman Rushdie Affair and the Danish cartoon controversies have furnished Western critique of Islam. While important work has challenged this criticism of Islam by interrogating the secular foundations of critique, the relationship between violence and [...] Read more.
The offence and violence surrounding episodes like the Salman Rushdie Affair and the Danish cartoon controversies have furnished Western critique of Islam. While important work has challenged this criticism of Islam by interrogating the secular foundations of critique, the relationship between violence and critique remains troubling. Through reflecting on an excerpt from an attempted murder trial following an attack in purported retaliation for offending Islam in an English prison, this article considers an expanded notion of violence that recognizes the structural conditions behind violence and the political stakes that prioritize the psychological and ideological drivers that service criticism of Islam. This article builds on scholarship that explored the State and the violent actions of non-State actors and the critical studies of hate crimes, Islamist extremism, and radicalization to reflect on the role of critique in the aftermath of violence and to ask: “Is violence critique?” It argues for an approach to violence-as-critique by recognizing how emotion and violence are not merely resident inside the fanatical body that protrudes outwards but are instead part of the wider, circulating, and unstable affective economies of structural violence where violences can be mutually reinforcing. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Political Violence, Religion and the Secular)
20 pages, 319 KiB  
Article
Civil War Secularity Talk
by Stacey Gutkowski
Religions 2022, 13(8), 749; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13080749 - 16 Aug 2022
Viewed by 1781
Abstract
Despite important advances in the study of war and religion, the role of the secular remains under-analyzed. This article develops a theory of secularity talk in civil wars, examining two instances where actors have made religion and sect salient. In comparing patterns of [...] Read more.
Despite important advances in the study of war and religion, the role of the secular remains under-analyzed. This article develops a theory of secularity talk in civil wars, examining two instances where actors have made religion and sect salient. In comparing patterns of secularity talk among non-elites found in oral history sources from the Syrian civil war and the Northern Irish Troubles, this article contributes to the recent peace turn in the religion-and-conflict literature. Greater attention to religion’s borderlands, to how actors distinguish religion from other arenas of human life can tell us more about what happens to the secular when people are under extreme pressure, including during war. This approach also sheds light on non-elite ambivalence towards elite mobilization of religion to fuel conflict, a common but as-yet under-theorized phenomenon. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Political Violence, Religion and the Secular)
Back to TopTop