Submit to Water Review for Water Propose a Special Issue

Journal Menu

Journal Browser

Rainfall Erosivity in Soil Erosion Processes

Print Special Issue Flyer
Special Issue Editors
Special Issue Information
Keywords
Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue
Published Papers

A special issue of Water (ISSN 2073-4441). This special issue belongs to the section "Water Erosion and Sediment Transport".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 December 2019) | Viewed by 38700

Printed Edition Available!
A printed edition of this Special Issue is available here.

Special issue Rainfall Erosivity in Soil Erosion Processes book cover image

Share This Special Issue

Special Issue Editors

Dr. Nazzareno Diodato

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor

Met European Research Observatory, 82100 Benevento, Italy
Interests: climate history; geostatistics; hydrological modelling; precipitation extremes; soil erosion; water resources management

Dr. Gianni Bellocchi

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor

Grassland Ecosystem Research Unit (UREP), French National Research Institute for Agriculture, Food and Environment (INRAE), 63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France
Interests: agricultural and environmental climatology; biogeochemical fluxes; hydro-meteorology
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The challenges that soils are facing today imply that aspects related to the intensifying precipitation cycle, such as rainfall erosivity, cannot be ignored. Large portions of land in the world are exposed to multiple damaging hydrological events. They include destructive phenomena like landslides and floods, which cause disruption to people and goods. Climate and land-use changes are the primary causes of accelerated soil erosion, which has substantial implications for macro- and micro-nutrient transformations in soils and water, and for the control of terrestrial carbon feedback. Data and modelling approaches are still scarce on how changes in the spatial and temporal features of rainfall patterns influence the magnitude and timing of erosive storms, which in turn results in changes in the landscape response.

There appears to be rich potential for innovative research for variable spatial and temporal scales at the interface between geomorphology, hydrogeology, and ecology. This Special Issue plays a major emphasis on the landscape–rainfall interplay as a dynamic concept. We call for contributions that explore (i) how erosive rainfall and soil erosion respond to climatic variability and human activity, and (ii) how such changes explain the changes in carbon and nutrient pools (and their spatial heterogeneity) in terrestrial and water systems. We welcome contributions providing evidence that changing precipitation regimes are altering the risk and magnitude of landscape changes. Contributors are encouraged to show how current process studies can extend the historical erosion records, while unravelling the complex interactions between internal landscape dynamics, human impacts, and changes in precipitation regimes. Contributions should also aim consider issues of land‐use management in addressing the changes and geomorphic process regimes that extreme precipitation can trigger. They should illustrate how climate change impacts can be disentangled from other controlling factors, thereby contributing to debates over societal adaptation to extreme rainfalls towards developing more resilient, less vulnerable socio‐geomorphological systems.

Dr. Nazzareno Diodato
Dr. Gianni Bellocchi
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Water is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

climate variability
hydrogeomorphology
land management
landscape response
rainfall erosivity
soil erosion

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (9 papers)

Download All Papers

Order results

Result details

Show export options Show export options

Select all

Export citation of selected articles as:

Editorial

Jump to: Research

4 pages, 170 KiB

Open AccessEditorial

Rainfall Erosivity in Soil Erosion Processes

by Gianni Bellocchi and Nazzareno Diodato

Water 2020, 12(3), 722; https://doi.org/10.3390/w12030722 - 6 Mar 2020

Cited by 4 | Viewed by 3552

Abstract

Regional studies on the erosive power of rainfall patterns are still limited and the actual impacts that may follow on erosional and sedimentation processes are poorly understood. Given the several interrelated challenges of environmental management, it is also not always unclear what is relevant for the development of adaptive and integrated approaches facilitating sustainable water resource management. This editorial introduces the Special Issue entitled “Rainfall Erosivity in Soil Erosion Processes”, which offers options to fill some of these gaps. Three studies performed in China and Central Asia (by Duulatov et al., Water 2019, 11, 897, Xu et al., 2019, 11, 2429, Gu et al. 2020, 12, 200) show that the erosion potential of rainfall is increasing in this region, driving social, economic, and environmental consequences. In the same region (the Weibei Plateau in China), Fu et al. (Water 2019, 11, 1514) assessed the effect of raindrop energy on the splash distance and particle size distribution of aggregate splash erosion. In the Mediterranean, updated estimates of current and future rainfall erosivity for Greece are provided by Vantas et al. (Water 2020, 12, 687), while Diodato and Bellocchi (Water 2019, 11, 2306) reconstructed and investigated seasonal net erosion in an Italian catchment using parsimonious modelling. Then, this Special Issue includes two technologically oriented articles by Ricks at al. The first (Water 2019, 11, 2386) evaluated a large-scale rainfall simulator design to simulate rainfall with characteristics similar to natural rainfall. The data provided contribute to the information that may be useful for the government’s decision making when considering landscape changes caused by variations in the intensity of a rainfall event. The second article (Water 2020, 12, 515) illustrated a laboratory-scale test of mulching methods to protect against the discharge of sediment-laden stormwater from active construction sites (e.g., highway construction projects). Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Rainfall Erosivity in Soil Erosion Processes)

Research

Jump to: Editorial

20 pages, 3630 KiB

Open AccessFeature PaperArticle

Estimating Current and Future Rainfall Erosivity in Greece Using Regional Climate Models and Spatial Quantile Regression Forests

by Konstantinos Vantas, Epaminondas Sidiropoulos and Athanasios Loukas

Water 2020, 12(3), 687; https://doi.org/10.3390/w12030687 - 3 Mar 2020

Cited by 21 | Viewed by 4658

Abstract

A future variation of precipitation characteristics, due to climate change, will affect the ability of rainfall to precipitate soil loss. In this paper, the monthly and annual values of rainfall erosivity (R) in Greece are calculated, for the historical period 1971–2000, using precipitation records that suffer from a significant volume of missing values. In order to overcome the data limitations, an intermediate step is applied using the calculation of monthly erosivity density, which is more robust to the presence of missing values. Spatial Quantile Regression Forests, a data driven algorithm that imitates kriging without the need of strict statistical assumptions, was utilized and validated, in order to create maps of R and its uncertainty using error propagation. The monthly average precipitation for the historical period 1971–2000 estimated by five (5) Global Circulation Models-Regional Climatic Models were validated against observed values and the one with the best performance was used to estimate projected changes of R in Greece for the future time period 2011–2100 and two different greenhouse gases concentration scenarios. The main findings of this study are: (a) the mean annual R in Greece is 1039 MJ·mm/ha/h/y, with a range between 405.1 and 3160.2 MJ·mm/ha/h/y. The highest values are calculated at the mountain range of Pindos and the lowest at central Greece; (b) the monthly R maps adhere to the spatiotemporal characteristics of precipitation depth and intensities over the country; (c) the projected R values, as an average over Greece, follow the projected changes of precipitation of climatic models, but not in a spatially homogenous way. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Rainfall Erosivity in Soil Erosion Processes)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 1577 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Evaluation of Hydromulches as an Erosion Control Measure Using Laboratory-Scale Experiments

by Matthew D. Ricks, Wesley T. Wilson, Wesley C. Zech, Xing Fang and Wesley N. Donald

Water 2020, 12(2), 515; https://doi.org/10.3390/w12020515 - 13 Feb 2020

Cited by 13 | Viewed by 3558

Abstract

Discharge of sediment-laden stormwater from active construction sites, such as highway construction projects, continues to be a growing concern in the construction industry. Therefore, there has been an increased interest in research efforts to test many different erosion and sediment control practices. The purpose of this research effort was to test the laboratory-scale performance of four hydromulches and two methods of mulching (crimped and tackified), normalized to a bare soil control condition using 0.6 m (2 ft) wide by 1.2 m (4 ft) long test plots. The treatments consisted of a (1) bare soil control, (2) conventional straw, crimped, (3) conventional straw, tackified, (4) wood fiber hydromulch, (5) straw and cotton hydromulch, (6) cotton fiber reinforced matrix hydromulch, and (7) bonded wheat fiber matrix hydromulch. Each treatment was subject to simulated rainfall, divided into four 15 min rainfall events with 15 min breaks in between, producing a total cumulative rainfall of 11.2 cm (4.4 in.). To determine the overall performance of each treatment, turbidity and soil loss measurements were continuously collected from plot runoff. The products tested provided a reduction in turbidity of 80%, 98%, 85%, 92%, 95%, and 99%; and a soil loss reduction of 96%, 98%, 94%, 97%, 99%, and 100%, respectively. Overall, the results showed that the four tested hydromulch practices and conventional straw applications were successful in controlling and reducing erosion under laboratory-scale simulated rainfall conditions. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Rainfall Erosivity in Soil Erosion Processes)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 13890 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Spatial and Temporal Patterns of Rainfall Erosivity in the Tibetan Plateau

by Zhijia Gu, Detai Feng, Xingwu Duan, Kuifang Gong, Yawen Li and Tianyu Yue

Water 2020, 12(1), 200; https://doi.org/10.3390/w12010200 - 10 Jan 2020

Cited by 21 | Viewed by 3641

Abstract

The Tibetan Plateau is influenced by global climate change which results in frequent melting of glaciers and snow, and in heavy rainfalls. These conditions may increase the risk of soil erosion, but prediction is not feasible due to scarcity of rainfall data in the high altitudes of the region. In this study, daily precipitation data from 1 January 1981 to 31 December 2015 were selected for 38 meteorological stations in the Tibetan Plateau, and annual and seasonal rainfall erosivity were calculated for each station. Additionally, we used the Mann–Kendall trend test, Sen’s slope, trend coefficient, and climate tendency rate indicators to detect the temporal variation trend of rainfall erosivity. The results showed that the spatial distribution of rainfall erosivity in the Tibetan Plateau exhibited a significant decreasing trend from southeast to northwest. The average annual rainfall erosivity is 714 MJ·mm·ha⁻¹·h⁻¹, and varies from 61 to 1776 MJ·mm·ha⁻¹·h⁻¹. Rainfall erosivity was mainly concentrated in summer and autumn, accounting for 67.5% and 18.5%, respectively. In addition, annual, spring, and summer rainfall erosivity were increasing, with spring rainfall erosivity highly significant. Temporal and spatial patterns of rainfall erosivity indicated that the risk of soil erosion was relatively high in the Hengduan mountains in the eastern Tibetan Plateau, as well as in the Yarlung Zangbo River Valley and its vicinity. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Rainfall Erosivity in Soil Erosion Processes)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 3401 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Effect of Rain Peak Morphology on Runoff and Sediment Yield in Miyun Water Source Reserve in China

by Jiajia Xu, Jianjun Zhang, Minyi Li and Fenzhong Wang

Water 2019, 11(12), 2429; https://doi.org/10.3390/w11122429 - 20 Nov 2019

Cited by 6 | Viewed by 2748

Abstract

The research on the impact of rainfall patterns on runoff and sediment yield is still insufficient, especially under natural rainfall conditions. We analyzed the influence of rain peak morphology on runoff and sediment yield based on the data of rainfall, runoff, and sediment in the bare runoff plot of Shixia, a small watershed in the Miyun district of Beijing, from 2007 to 2016. We took 0.4 mm min⁻¹ as the standard of rain peak classification and the peak width, peak number, peak value, peak position and multi-peak continuity as the indexes of rain peak morphology. The results showed that: (1) Peak number, peak value, and peak width were significantly correlated with runoff and sediment yield, while peak position was irrelevant. The order of correlation between rain peak morphology indexes and runoff yield was peak width (0.71) > peak number (0.69) > peak value (0.33) > peak position (0.05). The order of correlation between rain peak morphological indexes and sediment yield was peak width (0.62) > peak value (0.36) > peak number (0.36) > peak position (−0.09). The multi-peak continuity was not correlated with runoff (0.12) and sediment yield (0.45). (2) When the number of rain peaks was greater than one in a single rainfall, the amount of runoff and sediment production increased significantly. (3) For multi-peak rainfall, 90 min was the boundary point of the rain peak interval, and the sediment yield formed by rainfall with a rain peak continuity >1/90 min⁻¹ was significantly larger than the rainfall of ≤1/90 min⁻¹. (4) Covariance analysis showed that the runoff caused by rainfall with a peak at the middle positions was obviously more than rainfall with a peak at the front position. However, the peak position had no significant effect on the sediment yield. (5) The peak rainfall amount of a rainfall (TPR) was a comprehensive index reflecting peak number, peak value and peak width, and the correlation between it and the sediment yield and runoff reached 0.60 and 0.71, respectively. Statistical rainfall characteristic indexes included rainfall amount, average rainfall intensity, rainfall duration, I₅ (maximum 5-min rainfall intensity), I₁₀, I₁₅, I₂₀, I₃₀, and I₆₀, among which I₆₀ had the strongest correlation with runoff and sediment yield (0.69, 0.60), which were much larger than other rainfall indexes (0.08~0.47, 0.14~0.48) except rainfall amount (0.75, 0.37). By establishing a regression equation, it was found that both TPR and I₆₀ had good explanatory power for runoff and weak explanatory power for sediment yield. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Rainfall Erosivity in Soil Erosion Processes)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 3474 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Design of a Pressurized Rainfall Simulator for Evaluating Performance of Erosion Control Practices

by Matthew D. Ricks, Matthew A. Horne, Brian Faulkner, Wesley C. Zech, Xing Fang, Wesley N. Donald and Michael A. Perez

Water 2019, 11(11), 2386; https://doi.org/10.3390/w11112386 - 14 Nov 2019

Cited by 19 | Viewed by 5524

Abstract

Construction site erosion and resulting sedimentation constitutes one of the greatest non-point source pollution threats to our nation’s waterways. Erosion control practices are important aspects of any construction project due to their ability to limit the process of erosion. Testing erosion control practices under simulated rainfall representative of conditions experienced on construction sites is important to better understand their erosion reduction capabilities. Full-scale testing using simulated rainfall has been shown to provide controllable and repeatable results, in comparison to field-testing under natural conditions. Therefore, the focus of this study was to design, construct, and calibrate a pressurized rainfall simulator testing apparatus capable of accurately and repeatedly simulating rainfall intensities of 50.8, 101.6, and 152.4 mm/hr (2.0, 4.0, and 6.0 in/hr) for 20-min intervals. The developed testing apparatus consisted of a 12 m (40 ft) long by 2.4 m (8.0 ft) earthen slope at a 3H:1V slope. Ten sprinkler risers at a height of 4.27 m (14 ft) were installed around the perimeter of the slope to create a uniform distribution of rainfall. Data collection procedures consisted of collecting and analyzing rainfall depth, drop size distributions, and sediment concentrations. The optimum location for each sprinkler riser, as well as the most accurate nozzle configuration, were determined through test procedures developed for this study. Through calibration testing, the simulator was found to produce accurate rainfall intensities with relative errors of 1.17–4.00% of the target intensities. Uniformity of rainfall distribution ranged from 85.7 to 87.5%. Average drop sizes were determined to be between 2.35 and 2.58 mm (0.093 to 0.102 in.). Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Rainfall Erosivity in Soil Erosion Processes)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 3370 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Reconstruction of Seasonal Net Erosion in a Mediterranean Landscape (Alento River Basin, Southern Italy) over the Past Five Decades

by Nazzareno Diodato and Gianni Bellocchi

Water 2019, 11(11), 2306; https://doi.org/10.3390/w11112306 - 4 Nov 2019

Cited by 6 | Viewed by 2965

Abstract

In the low Mediterranean basin, late spring and autumn rainfall events have the potential to increase discharge and transport substantial amounts of sediment soil (that is, the net soil erosion from a watershed). For the Alento River Basin (ARB), located in the low Tyrrhenian coast of Italy, we estimated changes of net erosion as dependent on the seasonality of antecedent soil moisture and its control on rainfall-runoff and erosivity. Based on rainfall and runoff erosivity sub-models, we developed a simplified model to evaluate basin-wide sediment yields on a monthly basis by upscaling point rainfall input. For the period 1951–2018, the reconstruction of a time series of monthly net erosion data indicated a decreasing trend of the sediment yield after 1991. Revegetation and land abandonment that occurred in the last decades can explain such a decrease of net erosion, which occurred even when rainfall erosivity increased. This response, obtained at the basic scale, does not exclude that rapidly developing mesoscale convective systems, typically responsible for the heaviest and most destructive rainfall events in the ARB, can affect small catchments, which are the most vulnerable systems to storm-driven flash floods and soil erosion hazards during soil tilling in spring and at beginning of autumn. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Rainfall Erosivity in Soil Erosion Processes)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 1349 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Raindrop Energy Impact on the Distribution Characteristics of Splash Aggregates of Cultivated Dark Loessial Cores

by Yu Fu, Guanglu Li, Dong Wang, Tenghui Zheng and Mingxi Yang

Water 2019, 11(7), 1514; https://doi.org/10.3390/w11071514 - 21 Jul 2019

Cited by 15 | Viewed by 4016

Abstract

To determine the effect of different rainfall energy levels on the breakdown of soil aggregates, this study analyzed the soil splash erosion amounts and the distribution of particle sizes under six rainfall conditions (rainfall energy: 2.41 × 10⁻⁵–22.4 × 10⁻⁵ J m⁻² s⁻¹ and 1.29 × 10⁻⁴ J m⁻² s⁻¹) at five splash distances (from 0–10 cm to 40–50 cm). Cores of the size 10 × 20 cm of undisturbed cultivated dark loessial soil were selected in tree replicates as the research subject. The results indicated that splashed aggregates were distributed mainly at splash distances of 0–20 cm, which accounted for 66%–90% of the total splash erosion amount. The splash erosion amount significantly decreased exponentially with increasing splash distance for the same rainfall energy (p < 0.01). The splash erosion amount significantly increased in the power function relationship with increasing rainfall energy at the same splash distance (p < 0.05). A model was obtained to predict the splash erosion amount for rainfall energy and splash distance. The fractal dimension (D) of the aggregates showed a downward opening parabolic relationship with raindrop energy. The maximal value of the rainfall energy was 1.286 × 10⁻⁴ J m⁻² s⁻¹, which broke the aggregates to the largest degree. Enrichment ratio (ER) values for fragments >2 mm were close to 0. A particle size of 0.25 mm was the critical particle level for splash erosion. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Rainfall Erosivity in Soil Erosion Processes)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 8031 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Projected Rainfall Erosivity Over Central Asia Based on CMIP5 Climate Models

by Eldiiar Duulatov, Xi Chen, Amobichukwu C. Amanambu, Friday U. Ochege, Rustam Orozbaev, Gulnura Issanova and Gulkaiyr Omurakunova

Water 2019, 11(5), 897; https://doi.org/10.3390/w11050897 - 28 Apr 2019

Cited by 37 | Viewed by 6086

Abstract

Climate change-induced precipitation variability is the leading cause of rainfall erosivity that leads to excessive soil losses in most countries of the world. In this paper, four global climate models (GCMs) were used to characterize the spatiotemporal prediction of rainfall erosivity and assess the effect of variations of rainfall erosivity in Central Asia. The GCMs (BCCCSM1-1, IPSLCM5BLR, MIROC5, and MPIESMLR) were statistically downscaled using the delta method under Representative Concentration Pathways (RCPs) 2.6 and 8.5 for two time periods: “Near” and “Far” future (2030s and 2070s). These GCMs data were used to estimate rainfall erosivity and its projected changes over Central Asia. WorldClim data was used as the present baseline precipitation scenario for the study area. The rainfall erosivity (R) factor of the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE) was used to determine rainfall erosivity. The results show an increase in the future periods of the annual rainfall erosivity compared to the baseline. For all GCMs, with an average change in rainfall erosivity of about 5.6% (424.49 MJ mm ha⁻¹ h⁻¹ year⁻¹) in 2030s and 9.6% (440.57 MJ mm ha⁻¹ h⁻¹ year⁻¹) in 2070s as compared to the baseline of 402 MJ mm ha⁻¹ h⁻¹ year⁻¹. The magnitude of the change varies with the GCMs, with the largest change being 26.6% (508.85 MJ mm ha⁻¹ h⁻¹ year⁻¹), occurring in the MIROC-5 RCP8.5 scenario in the 2070s. Although annual rainfall erosivity shows a steady increase, IPSLCM5ALR (both RCPs and periods) shows a decrease in the average erosivity. Higher rainfall amounts were the prime causes of increasing spatial-temporal rainfall erosivity. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Rainfall Erosivity in Soil Erosion Processes)

► Show Figures

Journal Menu

Journal Browser

Rainfall Erosivity in Soil Erosion Processes

Share This Special Issue

Special Issue Editors

Special Issue Information

Keywords

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

Published Papers (9 papers)

Editorial

Research

Further Information

Guidelines

MDPI Initiatives

Follow MDPI