What Deters Online Grocery Shopping? Investigating the Effect of Arithmetic Complexity and Product Type on User Satisfaction
Abstract
:1. Introduction
1.1. Research Gap and Objectives
1.2. Literature Review
1.2.1. Product Type
1.2.2. Arithmetic Complexity
1.2.3. Mental Effort
1.2.4. Cognitive Absorption
1.3. Contributions
2. Hypotheses and Research Method
2.1. Hypotheses
2.2. Methodology
2.2.1. Experimental Design and Tasks
2.2.2. Measures
2.2.3. Data Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Participants
3.2. Descriptive Statistics
3.3. Hypothesis Tests
4. Discussion and Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
Variables | Cronbach Alpha |
---|---|
Perceived mental effort | 0.8 |
I invested a lot of mental effort in the task; | |
The task required a high level of mental effort; | |
The task required a lot of concentration; | |
The task did not require a high level of mental effort; | |
I had to work mentally hard on the task. | |
Scale: Likert 7 points (strongly disagree—strongly agree) | |
Adapted from [33] | |
E-satisfaction | 0.86 |
By shopping products on the website, I felt surprised, amazed or astonished. | |
By shopping products on the website, I sometimes felt angry, enraged or annoyed. | |
The choice to shop for products on the website was a wise choice | |
I think I made a bad choice in deciding to purchase products on the website. | |
I am satisfied with my overall experience with the online grocery site. | |
Overall, I am not satisfied with the online grocery site. | |
Scale: Likert 7 points (strongly disagree—strongly agree). | |
Adapted from [55,56]. | |
Cognitive absorption | |
Temporal dissociation | 0.67 |
Time passed very quickly when I was using the website. | |
At times, I did not notice the time passing when I was surfing the website. | |
I spent more time than expected to browse the website than I had thought. | |
Immersion | 0.71 |
When I used the website, I was able to focus on what needed to be done. | |
When I interacted with the website, I was absorbed in the task at hand. | |
When on the website, I did not get distracted easily from my task. | |
Pleasure | 0.86 |
The use of the website was nice. | |
The use of the website made me happy. | |
The use of the website bored me. | |
Control | 0.77 |
I felt I had complete control of how I used the website. | |
I can use the various features of the website. | |
Curiosity | 0.82 |
Using the website evokes my interest. | |
Interaction with the website made me curious about it. | |
Interaction with the website made me curious (honest) about the information technology of this type in general. | |
Scale: Likert 7 points (strongly disagree—Completely agree) | |
Adapted from [38]. |
Appendix B. Tasks
- ○
- Butter
- ○
- eggs
- ○
- Vanilla extract
- ○
- Ginger
- ○
- Cardamom
- ○
- Almonds
- Your order must be over $45.00 for free shipping.
- You have no budget limit.
- If you can not find the exact product, find products that are the most similar.
- ○
- Olive oil
- ○
- Clove garlic
- ○
- Pizza Sauce
- ○
- Chicken broth
- ○
- Sour cream
- ○
- Pancetta
- Your order must be over $45.00 for free shipping.
- You have no budget limit.
- If you can not find the exact product, find products that are the most similar.
- ○
- 100 mL non-hydrogenated margarine
- ○
- 100 mL brown sugar
- ○
- Eggs
- ○
- Sweet potatoes
- ○
- Vanilla
- ○
- All purpose flour
- ○
- Whole wheat flour
- ○
- Baking soda
- ○
- Baking powder
- ○
- 250 mL dark chocolate chips
- Your order must be over $45.00 for free shipping.
- You have no budget limit.
- If you can not find the exact product, find products that are the most similar.
- ○
- 150 g of salt pork streaky
- ○
- Veal stew cubes
- ○
- Water
- ○
- Beer
- ○
- Onion
- ○
- salted herbs
- ○
- Turnip
- ○
- Green beans
- ○
- 5 carrots
- ○
- 15 bells potatoes
- ○
- Corncobs
- ○
- Pepper
- Your order must be over $45.00 for free shipping.
- You have no budget limit.
- If you can not find the exact product, find products that are the most similar.
References
- Statistica, E-commerce Share of Total Retail Revenue in the United States as of February 2019, by Product Category. 2019. Available online: https://www.statista.com/statistics/187439/share-of-e-commerce-sales-in-total-us-retail-sales-in-2010/ (accessed on 10 February 2020).
- Dastin, J. Amazon Looks to New Food Technology for Home Delivery, in Reuters. 2017. Available online: https://reut.rs/2hQoNJ9 (accessed on 10 February 2020).
- Wikipedia Tesco. n.d. Available online: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tesco (accessed on 10 February 2020).
- Euromonitor, Internet Retailing in Canada, in Passport. 2016. Available online: https://www.euromonitor.com/internet-retailing-in-canada/report (accessed on 10 February 2020).
- Huang, Y.; Oppewal, H. Why consumers hesitate to shop online: An experimental choice analysis of grocery shop-ping and the role of delivery fees. Int. J. Retail. Distrib. Manag. 2006, 34, 334–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chung, F. Online Grocery Delivery Hampered by Picky Shoppers. 2017. Available online: https://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/online-grocery-delivery-hampered-by-picky-shoppers/ZQ4TZNECXH4HZKWPAVWXE22XTU/ (accessed on 10 February 2020).
- Griswold, A. There’s Still One Big Reason Why People Aren’t Buying Their Groceries Online, in Quartz. 2017. Available online: https://qz.com/1077743/people-dont-buy-groceries-online-because-they-prefer-to-pick-things-out-in-stores/ (accessed on 10 February 2020).
- Taylor, K. Costco Has 2 New Weapons in Its Battle against Amazon. Business Insider. 2017. Available online: https://www.businessinsider.in/Costco-has-two-new-weapons-in-its-battle-against-Amazon/articleshow/60973509.cms (accessed on 10 February 2020).
- Stevens, L.; Haddon, H. Amazon Looks to Whole Foods to Boost Online Grocery Shopping, in The Wall Street Journal. 2017. Available online: https://www.wsj.com/articles/amazon-looks-to-whole-foods-to-boost-online-grocery-shopping-1504085400?reflink=desktopwebshare_permalink (accessed on 10 February 2020).
- Walmart, Walmart to Open 1000th Online Grocery Pickup Location. 2017. Available online: https://corporate.walmart.com/newsroom/2017/09/06/walmart-to-open-1-000th-online-grocery-pickup-location (accessed on 10 February 2020).
- Rai, S. Alibaba to Invest $200 Million in India Online Grocer. 2017. Available online: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-12-08/alibaba-is-said-to-invest-200-million-in-india-online-grocer (accessed on 10 February 2020).
- Desrochers, C. The influence of product type, mathematical complexity, and visual attention on the attitude to-ward the website: The case of online grocery shopping. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth Pre-ICIS SIG-HCI Workshop, Fort Worth, TX, USA, 23 October 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Chris, H. Online grocery shopping: The influence of situational factors. Eur. J. Mark. 2009, 43, 1205–1219. [Google Scholar]
- Muriel, W.J.; Jonathan, R. Understanding shoppers’ expectations of online grocery retailing. Int. J. Retail. Distrib. Manag. 2006, 34, 529–540. [Google Scholar]
- Ramus, K.; Nielsen, N.A. Online grocery retailing: What do consumers think? Internet Res. 2005, 15, 335–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kervenoael, R.D. Exploring value through integrated service solutions: The case of e-grocery shopping. Manag. Serv. Qual. 2006, 16, 185–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Droogenbroeck, E.; Van Hove, L. Adoption of Online Grocery Shopping: Personal or Household Characteristics? J. Internet Commer. 2017, 16, 255–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- DesRochers, C.; Léger, P.-M.; Fredette, M.; Mirhoseini, S.; Senecal, S. The arithmetic complexity of online grocery shopping: The moderating role of product pictures. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 2019, 119, 1206–1222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Loketkrawee, P.; Bhatiasevi, V. Elucidating the Behavior of Consumers toward Online Grocery Shopping: The Role of Shopping Orientation. J. Internet Commer. 2018, 17, 418–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nelson, P. Information and Consumer Behavior. J. Politi Econ. 1970, 78, 311–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nakayama, M.; Wan, Y. Exploratory Study on Anchoring: Fake Vote Counts in Consumer Reviews Affect Judgments of Information Quality. J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 2017, 12, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ha, Y.-W.; Hoch, S.J. Ambiguity, Processing Strategy, and Advertising-Evidence Interactions. J. Consum. Res. 1989, 16, 354–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, J.-D. A Study on Online Shopping Cart Abandonment: A Product Category Perspective. J. Internet Commer. 2019, 18, 337–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peterson, R.A.; Balasubramanian, S.; Bronnenberg, B.J. Exploring the implications of the internet for consumer mar-keting. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 1997, 25, 329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eppright, D.R.; Hawkins, R.R. Determinants of Emerging e-Commerce Markets: A Developmental Perspective. J. Internet Commer. 2009, 8, 113–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, D.J.; Song, Y.I.; Braynov, S.B.; Rao, H.R. A multidimensional trust formation model in B-to-C e-commerce: A conceptual framework and content analyses of academia/practitioner perspectives. Decis. Support. Syst. 2005, 40, 143–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pan, Y.; Torres, I.M.; Zúñiga, M.A. Social Media Communications and Marketing Strategy: A Taxonomical Review of Potential Explanatory Approaches. J. Internet Commer. 2019, 18, 73–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, D.J.; Ferrin, D.L.; Rao, H.R. A trust-based consumer decision-making model in electronic commerce: The role of trust, perceived risk, and their antecedents. Decis. Support. Syst. 2008, 44, 544–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Murtaugh, M. The Practice of Arithmetic by American Grocery Shoppers. Anthr. Educ. Q. 1985, 16, 186–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lederman, S.J.; Klatzky, R.L. Hand movements: A window into haptic object recognition. Cogn. Psychol. 1987, 19, 342–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eastin, M.S. Diffusion of e-commerce: An analysis of the adoption of four e-commerce activities. Telemat. Inform. 2002, 19, 251–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roca, J.C.; Chiu, C.-M.; Martínez, F.J. Understanding e-learning continuance intention: An extension of the Tech-nology Acceptance Model. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 2006, 64, 683–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Paas, F.; Tuovinen, J.E.; Tabbers, H.; Van Gerven, P.W.M. Cognitive Load Measurement as a Means to Advance Cognitive Load Theory. Educ. Psychol. 2003, 38, 63–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jarvenpaa, S.L.; Todd, P.A. Consumer Reactions to Electronic Shopping on the World Wide Web. Int. J. Electron. Commer. 1996, 1, 59–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paas, F.G.W.C.; Van Merriënboer, J.J.G. Variability of worked examples and transfer of geometrical problem-solving skills: A cognitive-load approach. J. Educ. Psychol. 1994, 86, 122–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paas, F.; Renkl, A.; Sweller, J. Cognitive Load Theory and Instructional Design: Recent Developments. Educ. Psychol. 2003, 38, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Santiago Walser, R.; Seeber, I.; Maier, R. Designing a Digital Nudge for Convergence: The Role of Decomposition of Information Load for Decision Making and Choice Accuracy. AIS Trans. Hum. Comput. Interact. 2019, 11, 179–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Agarwal, R.; Karahanna, E. Time Flies When You’re Having Fun: Cognitive Absorption and Beliefs about Information Technology Usage. MIS Q. 2000, 24, 665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oluwajana, D.; Nat, M.; Idowu, A.; Vanduhe, V.; Fadiya, S. The Adoption of Students’ Hedonic Motivation System Model to Gamified Learning Environment. J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 2019, 14, 156–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hong, Y.; Pavlou, P.A. Product Fit Uncertainty in Online Markets: Nature, Effects, and Antecedents. Inf. Syst. Res. 2014, 25, 328–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Giese, J.L.; Cote, J.A. Defining consumer satisfaction. Acad. Mark. Sci. Rev. 2000, 1, 1–22. [Google Scholar]
- Szymanski, D.M.; Hise, R.T. E-satisfaction: An initial examination. J. Retail. 2000, 76, 309–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zipf, G.K. Human Behavior and the Principle of Least Effort: An Introduction to Human Ecology; Ravenio Books: Cambridge, UK, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Garbarino, E.C.; Edell, J.A. Cognitive Effort, Affect, and Choice. J. Consum. Res. 1997, 24, 147–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mosteller, J.; Donthu, N.; Eroglu, S.A. The fluent online shopping experience. J. Bus. Res. 2014, 67, 2486–2493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Davis, F.D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 1989, 13, 319–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Van der Heijden, H. User acceptance of hedonic information systems. MIS Q. 2004, 28, 695–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schaupp, L.C. Web Site Success: Antecedents of Web Site Satisfaction and Re-use. J. Internet Commer. 2010, 9, 42–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sfenrianto, S.; Wijaya, T.; Wang, G. Assessing the Buyer Trust and Satisfaction Factors in the E-Marketplace. J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 2018, 13, 43–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Jensen, M.L. Exploring failure and engagement in a complex digital training game: A multi-method examination. AIS Trans. Hum. Comput. Interact. 2016, 8, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Deng, L.; Turner, D.E.; Gehling, R.; Prince, B. User experience, satisfaction, and continual usage intention of IT. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 2010, 19, 60–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, C.S.; Wu, S.; Tsai, R.J. Integrating perceived playfulness into expectation-confirmation model for web portal context. Inf. Manag. 2005, 42, 683–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, X.; Venkatesh, V. From design principles to impacts: A theoretical framework and research agenda. AIS Trans. Hum. Comput. Interact. 2018, 10, 105–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Zhang, X.; Venkatesh, V. A nomological network of knowledge management system use: Antecedents and conse-quences. MIS Q. 2017, 41, 1275–1306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cronin, J.; Brady, M.K.; Hult, G.M. Assessing the effects of quality, value, and customer satisfaction on consumer behavioral intentions in service environments. J. Retail. 2000, 76, 193–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Harris, L.C.; Goode, M.M. The four levels of loyalty and the pivotal role of trust: A study of online service dynamics. J. Retail. 2004, 80, 139–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baron, R.M.; Kenny, D.A. The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 1986, 51, 1173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mirhoseini, S.M.M.; Léger, P.-M.; Sénécal, S. The Influence of Task Characteristics on Multiple Objective and Subjective Cognitive Load Measures. In Information Systems and Neuroscience; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2017; pp. 149–156. [Google Scholar]
- Debue, N.; Van De Leemput, C. What does germane load mean? An empirical contribution to the cognitive load theory. Front. Psychol. 2014, 5, 1099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Number | Percentage | |
---|---|---|
Gender | ||
Female | 14 | 44% |
Male | 18 | 56% |
Age | ||
19–35 | 31 | 97% |
35 and older | 1 | 3% |
Education | ||
College/BA | 29 | 91% |
Graduate | 3 | 9% |
Arithmetic Complexity | Product | Effort Mean (Std) | Satisfaction Mean (Std) | Cognitive Absorption | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Time Mean (Std) | Curiosity Mean (Std) | Immersion Mean (Std) | Pleasure Mean (Std) | Control Mean (Std) | ||||
High | Experience | 4.881 (0.978) | 4.229 (1.113) | 4.500 (0.916) | 4.078 (1.033) | 5.094 (1.024) | 4.097 (1.300) | 4.328 (1.560) |
High | Search | 4.019 (1.006) | 4.396 (1.100) | 4.333 (0.955) | 4.297 (1.294) | 4.906 (1.098) | 4.391 (1.113) | 4.813 (1.268) |
Low | Experience | 3.329 (0.990) | 4.667 (0.749) | 4.281 (1.033) | 4.581 (0.984) | 5.356 (0.783) | 4.672 (0.930) | 4.855 (0.985) |
Low | Search | 3.188 (0.977) | 4.814 (0.974) | 4.146 (0.954) | 4.234 (1.225) | 5.452 (0.876) | 4.766 (1.000) | 5.156 (0.937) |
Variables | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Perceived mental effort | ||||||
2 | Satisfaction | −0.36 * | |||||
3 | CA Temporal dissociation | 0.16 | 0.18 | ||||
4 | CA Curiosity | −0.03 | 0.55 * | 0.37 * | |||
5 | CA Immersion | −0.06 | 0.35 * | 0.25 * | 0.38 * | ||
6 | CA Pleasure | −0.26 * | 0.78 * | 0.26 * | 0.50 * | 0.32 * | |
7 | CA Control | −0.22 * | 0.63 * | 0.18 * | 0.41 * | 0.34 * | 0.63 * |
Variables | β | Std.Err. | p Value | 95% CI Upper | 95% CI Lower |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Intercept | 3.899 | 0.334 | <0.001 | 3.245 | 4.554 |
Order | −0.012 | 0.088 | 0.894 | −0.183 | 0.16 |
Intercept | 3.603 | 0.160 | <0.001 | 3.289 | 3.917 |
Product (H1) | 0.515 | 0.189 | 0.006 * | 0.147 | 0.883 |
Goodness of fit | Chi2 = 59.33 | <0.001 | |||
Intercept | 3.256 | 0.151 | <0.001 | 2.960 | 3.552 |
Complexity (H2) | 1.194 | 0.152 | <0.001 ** | 0.896 | 1.492 |
Goodness of fit | Chi2 = 62.33 | <0.001 |
Variables | β | Std.Err. | p Value | 95% CI Upper | 95% CI Lower |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Intercept | 5.595 | 0.25 | <0.001 | 5.106 | 6.085 |
Effort (H4) | −0.278 | 0.053 | <0.001 ** | −0.382 | −0.173 |
Goodness of fit | Chi2 = 25.37 | <0.001 |
Time | Curiosity | Immersion | Pleasure | Control | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
β | 0.113 | −0.066 | −0.146 | −0.250 | −0.209 |
p value | 0.027 * | 0.362 | 0.007 * | 0.001 * | 0.007 * |
Chi2 | 3.87 | 1.44 | 6.95 | 11.49 | 23.97 |
Time | Curiosity | Immersion | Pleasure | Control | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
β (x2) | 0.020 | −0.020 | 0.027 | 0.093 | 0.095 |
p value | 0.514 | 0.658 | 0.416 | 0.038 * | 0.046 * |
β (x) | −0.047 | 0.089 | −0.357 | −0.989 | −0.959 |
p value | 0.851 | 0.803 | 0.178 | 0.007 * | 0.013 * |
Chi2 | 5.32 | 1.94 | 7.55 | 11.49 | 27.91 |
Variables | β | Std.Err. | p Value | 95% CI Upper | 95% CI Lower |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Intercept | 1.578 | 0.456 | 0.001 | 0.684 | 2.473 |
Effort | −0.119 | 0.044 | 0.007 * | −0.205 | −0.032 |
Time | −0.04 | 0.067 | 0.55 | −0.172 | 0.091 |
Curiosity | 0.199 | 0.057 | <0.001 | 0.088 | 0.31 |
Immersion | 0.071 | 0.069 | 0.305 | −0.064 | 0.205 |
Pleasure | 0.389 | 0.065 | <0.001 ** | 0.261 | 0.517 |
Control | 0.13 | 0.059 | 0.027 * | 0.015 | 0.246 |
Goodness of fit | Chi2 = 113.34 | <0.001 |
Hypothesis | Regression Test | Result |
---|---|---|
H1 | Product type → Mental Effort | Supported |
H2 | Arithmetic complexity → Mental Effort | Supported |
H3 | Product types × Arithmetic complexity → Mental Effort | Supported |
H4 | Mental effort → Satisfaction | Supported |
H5 | Mental effort → CA dimensions | Supported |
Mental effort × CA dimensions → Satisfaction |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Mirhoseini, M.; Pagé, S.-A.; Léger, P.-M.; Sénécal, S. What Deters Online Grocery Shopping? Investigating the Effect of Arithmetic Complexity and Product Type on User Satisfaction. J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 2021, 16, 828-845. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer16040047
Mirhoseini M, Pagé S-A, Léger P-M, Sénécal S. What Deters Online Grocery Shopping? Investigating the Effect of Arithmetic Complexity and Product Type on User Satisfaction. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research. 2021; 16(4):828-845. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer16040047
Chicago/Turabian StyleMirhoseini, Mahdi, Shirley-Anne Pagé, Pierre-Majorique Léger, and Sylvain Sénécal. 2021. "What Deters Online Grocery Shopping? Investigating the Effect of Arithmetic Complexity and Product Type on User Satisfaction" Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research 16, no. 4: 828-845. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer16040047
APA StyleMirhoseini, M., Pagé, S. -A., Léger, P. -M., & Sénécal, S. (2021). What Deters Online Grocery Shopping? Investigating the Effect of Arithmetic Complexity and Product Type on User Satisfaction. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 16(4), 828-845. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer16040047