A New Strategic Marketing Management Model for the Specificities of E-Commerce in the Supply Chain
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
2.1. Changes in Sales Methods from E-Commerce to M-Commerce
- Social networking. The focus is to reach customers as well as ensuring that interest is maintained while creating relevant contents. Facebook and LinkedIn, for example, are suitable for reaching different audiences.
- Social knowledge. These are information service sites like Yahoo, Google! They provide answers, help users while also influencing consumers. Wikipedia is similarly suited to influencing society, although the options are much narrower.
- Social sharing. These are social bookmarks that allow you to quickly share and spread information, mostly with the help of interesting contents.
- Social news. It draws attention to a new way of being informed, from which classic roles are also changing (information collecting, share, reader etc.).
- Social streaming. Rich content that achieves quick effects through instant responses, commenting, and sharing (Podcasting).
- Company user-generated content and community. In this regard, it is possible for companies, organizations to create independent contents corresponding their own image. Creating a customer community, creating brand loyalty, direct customer contacts can be the goal.
- online media is extremely suitable for the application of content marketing techniques, but their impact and learning curve work differently platform by platform [1];
- video and podcast content is becoming more popular instead of textual information, partly due to communication degradation, partly due to denser stimulus and information compression, anyone is now able to produce cost-effective videos [35] and YouTube is the third most visited site after Facebook and Google;
- the combination of different media is also a striking phenomenon, which is expected to mutually reinforce each other’s short-term image, sound and online content, for example, images in most of the cases can amplify the message [36]-a, and in order to achieve stronger marketing, each platform can also be combined [36]-b;
- bloggers and influencers are able to influence the opinions of their big mass of followers with their own view points and unique appearances [36]-c;
- the importance of marketing automation is rapidly growing year by year, as the diversified activity involves a lot of resources, these duties take over daily tasks like communication, maintaining of contacts, sending e-mail, invoicing, payment [37], Business Intelligence-based demand assessment or offer making and pricing have grate novelty, and the significance of sales funnel is increasing, which goes through the product pyramid [38];
- chatbots are a separate category, which are intelligent robots that can even communicate and take over certain repetitive information handling tasks [39];
- in addition to SEM and SEO (search engine marketing, search engine optimization) [40], Google Ads (adWords) is becoming increasingly important where targeted and re-targeted ads are possible on search and display networks while the focus will be shifted from previous appearance concepts to click-through rate (ctr) method;
- in addition to search engine marketing and search engine optimization (SEM, SEO), automated information collection and profiling is also being strengthened which in some cases (in case of large service companies) are on the borders on the framework of legality;
- Google Analytics is a legal and accepted option for monitoring user activity which allows statistical analysis and activity tracking of web content from several perspectives [41];
- the importance and effectiveness of direct mails are declining [42].
2.2. Online Sales Data (E-Commerce)
3. Methodology
Demographics
4. Results
Cluster Analysis
5. Conclusions and Recommendations
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Voorveld, H.A.M.; Van Noort, G.; Muntinga, D.G.; Bronner, F. Engagement with Social Media and Social Media Advertising: The Differentiating Role of Platform Type. J. Advert. 2018, 47, 38–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Gamble, J.; Gilmore, A.; McCartan-Quinn, D.; Durkan, P. The Marketing concept in the 21st century: A review of how Marketing has been defined since the 1960s. Mark. Rev. 2011, 11, 227–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schwarzl, S.; Grabowska, M. Online marketing strategies: The future is here. J. Int. Stud. 2015, 8, 187–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hoi, H.T. Attractiveness of Online Marketing in the Age of Industry 4.0. In Proceedings of the 2020 The 6th International Conference on E-Business and Applications, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 25–27 February 2020; Published: ICEBA 2020. pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
- Hossain, M.S.; Rahman, M.F. Tools of online marketing. Int. J. Sci. Bus. 2017, 1, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fehér, A. Online élelmiszer-vásárlói és -fogyasztói magatartás. In Élelmiszer-Marketing; Szakály, Z., Ed.; Akadémiai Kiadó: Budapest, Hungary, 2017; pp. 108–120. [Google Scholar]
- Kotler, P.; Keller, P.K. Marketing Management, 15th ed.; Pearson Education Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Kozák, T.; Madleňak, R.; Neszmélyi, G. How the lean management decision influences the transportation cost in the supply chain? Commun. Sci. Lett. Univ. Žilina 2020, 4, 13–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chaffey, D.; Ellis-Chadwick, F.; Mayer, R.; Johnston, K. Internet Marketing: Strategy, Implementation and Practice, 3rd ed.; Financial Times Prentice Hall, Edinburgh Gate: Harlow Essex, UK, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Hahn, J. E-Commerce Site Design, Online Consumer Behavior and Business Value. Ph.D. Thesis, Information and Decision Sciences Carlson School of Management University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
- Ngai, E.; Gunasekaran, A. A review for mobile commerce research and applications. Decis. Support. Syst. 2007, 43, 3–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhenga, X.; Mena, J.; Yanga, F.; Gongb, X. Understanding impulse buying in mobile commerce: An investigation into hedonic and utilitarian browsing. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2019, 48, 151–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghose, A.; Goldfarb, A.; Han, S.P. How Is the Mobile Internet Different? Search Costs and Local Activities. Inf. Syst. Res. 2013, 24, 613–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lee, T.; Park, C.; Jun, J. Two Faces of Mobile Shopping: Self-Efficacy and Impulsivity. Int. J. E-Bus. Res. 2014, 10, 15–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kim, H.-W.; Chan, H.C.; Gupta, S. Value-based Adoption of Mobile Internet: An empirical investigation. Decis. Support. Syst. 2007, 43, 111–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luo, X.; Andrews, M.; Fang, Z.; Phang, C.W. Mobile Targeting. SSRN Electron. J. 2013, 60, 1738–1756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Janal, S.D. Online Marketing Handbook (Business Technology Series); John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1999. [Google Scholar]
- Fehér, A. Az online marketing lehetőségei és megítélése a hazai élelmiszergazdaságban. Agrártudományi Közlemények 2014, 58, 77–84. [Google Scholar]
- Pakurár, M.; Benedek, S.; Popp, J.; Magda, R.; Oláh, J. Trust or Doubt: Accuracy of Determining Factors for Supply Chain Performance. Pol. J. Manag. Stud. 2019, 19, 283–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mičík, M.; Mičudová, K. Employer Brand Building: Using Social Media and Career Websites to Attract Generation Y. Econ. Sociol. 2018, 11, 171–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Victor, V.; Thoppan, J.J.; Fekete-Farkas, M.; Grabara, J. Pricing strategies in the era of digitalisation and the perceived shift in consumer behaviour of youth in Poland. J. Int. Stud. 2019, 12, 74–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Z.; Liu, Z.; Min, Q. The Impact of Mobile TradeManager on Fashion Product Sales: From Usability Perspective. Math. Probl. Eng. 2014, 2014, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, K.C. Exploring factors affecting the adoption of mobile commerce in Singapore. Telemat. Inform. 2005, 22, 257–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Balasubraman, S.; Peterson, R.A.; Jarvenpaa, S.L.; Balasubramanian, S. Exploring the Implications of M-Commerce for Markets and Marketing. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 2002, 30, 348–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Barnes, S.J. The mobile commerce value chain: Analysis and future developments. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2002, 22, 91–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gupta, G.; Miller, M.K.; Darda, M. The key to successful online marketing for an orthodontic practice: Mastering the plan. Semin. Orthod. 2016, 22, 313–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weinberg, B.D. Reasearch in exploring the online consumer experience. Adv. Consum. Res. J. 2001, 28, 227–232. [Google Scholar]
- Hu, X.; Ocloo, C.E.; Akaba, S.; Worwui-Brown, D. Effects of business to business e-commerce adoption on competitive advantage of small and medium-sized manufacturing enterprises. Econ. Sociol. 2019, 1, 80–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oláh, J.; Kitukutha, N.; Haddad, H.; Pakurár, M.; Máté, D.; Popp, J. Achieving Sustainable E-Commerce in Environmental, Social and Economic Dimensions by Taking Possible Trade-Offs. Sustainability 2018, 11, 89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Oláh, J.; Aburumman, N.; Popp, J.; Khan, M.A.; Haddad, H.; Kitukutha, N. Impact of Industry 4.0 on Environmental Sustainability. Sustainability 2020, 12, 4674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weinberg, T. The New Community Rules: Marketing on the Social Web; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2010; pp. 28–29. [Google Scholar]
- Roudposhti, V.; Nilashi, M.; Mardani, A.; Streimikiene, D.; Samad, S.; Ibrahim, O. A new model for customer purchase intention in e-commerce recommendation agents. J. Int. Stud. 2018, 11, 237–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Késmárki-Gally, S. Application of a modern marketplace in the European agribusiness. Agroecon. Croat. 2015, 1, 41–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vasa, L.; Baranyai, Z.; Kovacs, Z.; Szabó, G.G. Drivers of Trust: Some Experiences from Hungarian Agricultural Cooperatives. J. Int. Food Agribus. Mark. 2014, 26, 286–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dufett, R. The YouTube Marketing Communication Effect on Cognitive, Affective and Behavioural Attitudes among Generation Z Consumers. Sustainability 2020, 5075, 5075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tóth, M. Online Marketing; Netkreatív.huLtd. Publishing: Százhalombatta, Hungary, 2012; (a) pp. 173–186, (b) pp. 75–82, (c) pp. 63–68. [Google Scholar]
- Tóth, M. Marketing Automatizálás Egyszerűen; Netkreatív.hu Publishing: Százhalombatta, Hungary, 2017; pp. 21–32. [Google Scholar]
- Szőke, A.; Domán, Z. Online Vevőszerzés Csúcsra Járatva; Nitronet Media Publishing: Budapest, Hungary, 2015; pp. 42–46. [Google Scholar]
- Balogh, D. Mindent a Messengers Chatbotokról! Available online: https://boommarketing.hu/messenger-chatbotok/mindent-messengeres-chatbotokrol/ (accessed on 11 November 2020).
- Bányai, E.; Novák, P. Online Üzlet és Marketing; Akadémia Kiadó: Budapest, Hungary, 2011; pp. 188–190. [Google Scholar]
- Geiger, T. Miért Fontos az Analitika?—és Hogyan Szerezz Használható Adatokat a Google Analyticsből? Available online: https://webshark.hu/hirek/google-analytics-hasznalata/ (accessed on 1 November 2020).
- Benyó, D. E-Mail Marketing; Kreatív Kontroll Publishing: Budapest, Hungary, 2017; pp. 8–18. [Google Scholar]
- Késmárki-Gally, S.; Fenyvesi, L.; Takács-György, K. The role of agricultural e-marketplace in public organizations. Optim. Studia Ekon. 2015, 6, 15–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Szalka, É.; Tamándl, L.; Kovács, Z.; Pupp, Z. Hatékonyság vizsgálata a mezőgazdasági vállalkozásoknál. Acta Agron. Óváriensis 2020, 1, 123–158. [Google Scholar]
- Global E-Commerce 2019. Available online: https://www.emarketer.com/content/global-ecommerce-2019 (accessed on 27 November 2020).
- Kochkodin, B. Alibaba Tops Amazon to Become the Biggest E-Commerce Company; Bloomberg L.P.: Frankfurt, Germany, 2017; Available online: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-10-10/alibaba-tops-amazon-to-become-biggest-e-commerce-company-chart (accessed on 25 October 2018).
- EuroCommerce. The European Ecommerce Report 2018: Relevant Findings Outlined; EuroCommerce: Brussels, Belgium, 2018; Available online: https://www.eurocommerce.eu/media/159952/2018.07.02%20-%20Ecommerce%20report_annex.pdf (accessed on 23 October 2020).
- GKI, Economic Forecast for 2020, GKI Economic Research Co, Hungary. Available online: https://www.gki.hu/language/en/tag/world-economy/ (accessed on 25 October 2018).
- eNet Új Szintre Léphet a Hazai E-kereskedelem. Available online: https://enet.hu/hirek/uj-szintre-lephet-a-hazai-e-kereskedelem/ (accessed on 20 March 2021).
- Pantelimon, F.-V.; Georgescu, T.M.; Posedaru, B.-S. The Impact of Mobile e-Commerce on GDP: A Comparative Analysis between Romania and Germany and how Covid-19 Influences the e-Commerce Activity Worldwide. Inform. Econ. 2020, 24, 27–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Statista. Increases in CPG Demand Due to COVID-19 Outbreak Worldwide March 2020, by Country; Statista GmbH: Hamburg, Germany, 2020; Available online: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1105409/coronavirus-change-in-cpg-purchasesby-country-worldwide/ (accessed on 28 November 2020).
- Statista. Coronavirus Impact on Online Traffic of Selected Industries Worldwide in Week Ending April 26, 2020; Statista GmbH: Hamburg, Germany, 2020; Available online: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1105486/coronavirus-traffic-impact-industry/ (accessed on 25 November 2020).
- WebShop Experts. Lezárult a Nagy Webáruház Felmérés 2018. pp. 3–22. Available online: https://www.webshopexperts.hu/lezarult_a_nagy_webaruhaz_felmeres_2018 (accessed on 14 October 2020).
- Nagy, S. E-Commerce in Hungary: A Market Analysis, Theory, Methodology, Practice. Theory Methodol. Pract. 2016, 12, 25–32. Available online: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2915031 (accessed on 25 November 2020).
- Gáti, M.; Simay, A.E. How consumers can understand the role and relevance of social mobile e-commerce. In Tanulmányok a Digitális Marketing, Média és Design Területéről; Corvinus University: Budapest, Hungary, 2019; pp. 9–17. ISBN 978-963-503-798-8. [Google Scholar]
- Jayawardhena, C.; Wright, L.T. Consumers online: Intentions, orientations and segmentation. Int. J. Retail. Distrib. Manag. 2007, 35, 515–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Garcia-Diaz, J.; Sanchez-Hernandez, J.; Menchaca-Mendez, R.; Menchaca-Mendez, R. When a worse approximation factor gives better performance: A 3-approximation algorithm for the vertex k-center problem. J. Heuristics Springer 2017, 23, 349–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Naumova, O.; Bilan, S.; Naumova, M. Luxury consumers’ behavior: A cross-cultural aspect. Innov. Mark. 2019, 15, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Similarities | Differences |
---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
F-Pointer | Significance | |
---|---|---|
What is your age? | 68.220 | 0.000 |
How much is your monthly income? (Net) HUF | 143.961 | 0.000 |
Do you use social networks to search for companies or products? | 2592 | 0.055 |
Do you click on these ads? | 36.474 | 0.000 |
Have you ever used a chat window on websites? | 9006 | 0.000 |
Do you watch these commercials all the way through? | 10.642 | 0.000 |
K-Central Cluster | Suggested Group Assignment | Total | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||
ple | 1 | 44 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 44 |
2 | 1 | 54 | 0 | 1 | 56 | |
3 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 0 | 19 | |
4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 27 | 28 | |
% | 1 | 100.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 |
2 | 1.8 | 96.4 | 0.0 | 1.8 | 100.0 | |
3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | |
4 | 3.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 96.4 | 100.0 |
1. Buying Less | 2. Young Conscious People | 3. Today’s Youth | 4. Prudent Users | |
---|---|---|---|---|
difference type | age: 35–50 money: 100–150 FaceBook use: no click-through: no chat: no YouTube: rarely | age: 26–35 money: 150–200 FaceBook use: yes click-through: no chat: yes YouTube: never | age: 19–25 money: no FaceBook use:yes click-through: no chat: yes YouTube: never | age: 36–50 money: 150–200 FaceBook use: yes click-through: yes chat: no YouTube: rarely |
product channel or place utility value difference in product and transaction process: available anywhere | purchasing convenience, argument to be emphasized | smart-app, application development | smart app, application development + trend and fashion influence | purchasing convenience, argument to be emphasized (it has value) respond to well-placed clicks (social share and media combinations, Google Ads) |
place, time utility value difference between product and transaction process: is available at any time | online order discount (when the shops are closed) | smart-app, application development | smart-app, application development + trend and fashion influence | purchasing convenience, argument, to be emphasized (it has value) respond to well-placed clicks (s. share and media combinations, Google Ads) |
transport costs are borne by the service provider or can be passed onto the buyer | do not use an expensive method! (cannot shift or pass) | cost is transferable, traceability, flexibility, phone connection required | cost is transferable | cost is transferable, traceability, flexibility, phone connection required |
purchasing convenience higher | purchasing convenience, argument to be emphasized | providing flexibility benefits | simplicity is required | purchasing convenience, argument to be emphasized (it has value) |
assortment and reliability more alternatives | they not react to it, only wasting money | they react to it, organised information suitable for them, chatbot works | chatbot, product mix | image of the company influences the purchase, content marketing, more information |
different possession utility value ‘not so living relationship’ is harder to customize | make video from flexibility of usage, YouTube, Facebook | customizable offers, product, and service options are interested in, Chatbot, FaceBook (FB), Search Engine Optimalisation (SEO) demand detection, | customization is not necessary (few options enough) | Google Ads, Google Analytics (activity monitoring), BI, Artificial intelligence, product, and service options are interested in, Chatbot, FB, SEO demand detection |
higher time utility value, but ’external’—independent organisation of transport, customer has less influence | very cheap, efficient logistics, such as pick pack points, or personal pick up | traceability, flexibility, phone connection required, delivery company | speed, simplicity, delivery company | traceability, flexibility, phone contact required, delivery company, personal pick up |
lack of testing and physical detection (less security utility value) | only personal reference is recommended | AR-VR options, enhanced security utility, reference, assessment, influencer, product return (or send back) | AR-VR options, enhanced security utility, reference, assessment, influencer, product return | AR-VR options, enhanced security utility, reference, assessment, influencer, product return |
less personal contact on selling or purchase | this is not a problem, they respond to traditional marketing tools: e.g., direct mail | content marketing, they respond to segmented communication, blogger, influencer worth it, but they do not like the obvious influence, do not use direct mail | YouTube entertainment covert advertising, content marketing, brand learning, influencing, FB, influencer, use direct promotion | automated information gathering and profiling, sales funnel, combining media YouTube advertising—click-through, online advertising has the most effect Google and FB ads |
regular or individual purchases are different | unique FB offers, discount videos | willing to buy regularly, it is worth to use invitation into customer communities and marketing automation | willing to buy regularly (not he or she pay), invitation into customer communities and marketing automation | unique purchase and regular purchase are both interested in |
lack of advantages and disadvantages of geographical zones | limited access because unlimited is not worth it | he or she prefers unlimited access | he or she prefers unlimited access | he or she prefers unlimited access |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Gyenge, B.; Máté, Z.; Vida, I.; Bilan, Y.; Vasa, L. A New Strategic Marketing Management Model for the Specificities of E-Commerce in the Supply Chain. J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 2021, 16, 1136-1149. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer16040064
Gyenge B, Máté Z, Vida I, Bilan Y, Vasa L. A New Strategic Marketing Management Model for the Specificities of E-Commerce in the Supply Chain. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research. 2021; 16(4):1136-1149. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer16040064
Chicago/Turabian StyleGyenge, Balázs, Zoltán Máté, Imre Vida, Yuriy Bilan, and László Vasa. 2021. "A New Strategic Marketing Management Model for the Specificities of E-Commerce in the Supply Chain" Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research 16, no. 4: 1136-1149. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer16040064
APA StyleGyenge, B., Máté, Z., Vida, I., Bilan, Y., & Vasa, L. (2021). A New Strategic Marketing Management Model for the Specificities of E-Commerce in the Supply Chain. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 16(4), 1136-1149. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer16040064