1. Introduction
With the emergence of many online review platforms and apps, such as TripAdvisor and Google, electronic word–of–mouth (eWOM) is playing an increasingly important role in the branding operations of businesses [
1,
2,
3]. Specifically, for platforms, providing valuable eWOM can enable an increasing number of tourists and businesses to use their software. For customers, a new consumer group is born, users of online commenting platforms, which is a group of consumers who connect, communicate, share information, and purchase goods or services through an Internet platform. For businesses, understanding and participating in the discussions of these groups can help them better understand consumer needs, improve their products and services, and conduct effective marketing campaigns. In this study, “users of online commenting platforms” refers to those groups who are willing to share information on an Internet platform after completing the actual experience of the consumption process offline in restaurants, hotels, etc. [
4]. The information from online ratings and eWOM can help them choose satisfactory businesses. Customers’ participation in eWOM can build a good platform reputation, and historical eWOM can even help businesses understand the advantages and disadvantages of their product, thus optimizing products [
5]. In conclusion, the information from eWOM on online platforms can create a mutually beneficial solution for customers, businesses, and platforms [
6].
The competition for traffic among online review platforms is increasingly fierce, especially following the emergence of short video platforms. The rich information of eWOM on online review platforms not only increases a user’s stay time, but also enhances user interaction. Therefore, more and more online review platforms are paying attention to the update frequency and length of eWOM and specifying relevant platform rules. On the one hand, platforms require updates of business reviews, such as linking a business ranking with eWOM. Newer reviews have a higher weight in ranking algorithms, while older reviews have a lower weight. New businesses can only obtain star ratings after receiving at least 10 reviews; if the number of recent comment updates is insufficient, the store’s star rating may decrease at any time [
7]. On the other hand, platforms also have requirements for comments posted by consumers due to the increasing number of fake reviews. For example, TripAdvisor requires a minimum length of at least 200 characters for online consumer reviews (OCRs). Thus, businesses need online reviewers to make greater efforts when posting new reviews.
The emphasis on eWOM also encourages researchers to conduct research on the motivations of users to post eWOM [
8,
9]. Online ratings and historical reviews improve users’ purchase intent [
10,
11,
12], and historical reviews affects online business reputations [
13]. Previous studies have focused on emphasizing the importance of historical reviews to users and businesses, explaining the mechanism of interaction between ratings and reviews [
14,
15]; rating changes closely relate to changes in reviews information. Many studies have investigated individual factors (personal reputation, altruism, economic incentives, emotional expression) influencing reviews initiators’ posting their motivations when ratings show slight differences [
16,
17]. Furthermore, from users’ perspective, reviews updating stems from continuous sharing; from businesses’ perspective, users’ continued review sharing requires positive interaction with a business’ online reviews, reaching psychological consensus pre–posting and satisfying psychological motivations post–posting [
18,
19].
However, these studies and measures target consumer behavior, putting merchants in a passive position in the eWOM mechanism, and the impact of online reviews has a strong latency. From a research content perspective, most eWOM research has focused on consumers’ willingness to consume, emotions, and trust, reflecting historical eWOM information interaction and affecting user business decisions and behaviors [
20,
21]. Research on eWOM publishing has focused on consumers’ sharing motivations, such as altruism, rewards, and emotional venting [
22,
23]. eWOM affects sales volumes, while users’ sharing motivations influence eWOM updates. From the perspective of the consumption process of online reviews, starting with consumers’ browsing of eWOM, to generating consumption, and finally posting reviews, each link requires rich information from merchants. This demands information richness to generate consumption willingness and assist in the successful posting of new reviews. However, current research cannot provide a closed–loop conclusion on how eWOM information richness affects final user review posting. This is a relevant research gap. First, multilingual commenting is currently a more typical phenomenon on online commenting platforms, but current research on eWOM and consumer behavior seldom takes into account the impact of this phenomenon on the research results [
24]. Second, the mechanism of users’ sharing of comments is a well–established topic of research [
25], but most of the current research focuses on the study of the subjective reasons of users’ sharing of comments, e.g., altruism, emotional outbursts, and so on. However, there is little literature that examines the relationship between the information environment created by eWOM and user sharing mechanisms. This study explores the relationship patterns between users of the growing online review platforms and eWOM, with OCR platforms and merchant operators increasingly focusing on eWOM. Specifically, we focus on merchants and aim to address the following research questions:
How Does the Information Richness of Sellers’ Electronic Word of Mouth Affect the Frequency and Length of Users’ eWOM Sharing?To address the above issues and understand the relationship between eWOM and user review behavior, we first used media richness theory (MRT) to quantify eWOM content information richness: linguistic, textual, and photographical [
26,
27,
28]. For the research data, we used advanced big data analytics to retrieve and analyze TripAdvisor data on restaurant services in nine major tourist destinations, the United States, Mexico, and mainland Europe (including European countries such as the United Kingdom, Spain, France, the Netherlands, etc.), over a long period of time. Based on >10 million eWOM, this study used multiple regression to examine the impact of eWOM information richness on users’ online review behavior, controlling for the moderating effect of information ambiguity. Our research results show that content information richness positively affects users’ online review behavior, increasing their frequency and length. Information ambiguity play a moderating role that strengthens this relationship. This supports our theoretical hypothesis. Finally, for greater applicability and reliability, we conducted a comparative study on the degree of differences in the relationship between eWOM and users based on different cultural backgrounds across countries.
The remainder of this study is organized as follows. A literature review, the theoretical background, and our hypotheses are provided in
Section 2.
Section 3 presents the research methods and models.
Section 4 presents our research findings. Finally, a discussion and our conclusions are presented in
Section 5.
5. Discussion and Conclusions
5.1. Summary of Key Findings
In this study, we utilized over 10 million online, multilingual, restaurant consumer reviews collected from an OCR platform (TripAdvisor.com) in nine countries and processed them through complex big data analysis techniques. We applied a framework to investigate the mechanism between the richness of eWOM restaurant information, information ambiguity, and frequency and length of user–sharing reviews. The innovation of this study is that it explores an old topic in the field of consumer behavior from a new perspective, an area of research with significant business implications. That is, we started from the enterprises that are on online review platforms, to the moderating role of information ambiguity, and then to incorporating the two cultural dimensions of individualism and long–termism into the context of online review information dissemination. More specifically, since the H1–H3 hypotheses held, we found that consumers’ behavior of posting reviews on online platforms for specific merchants (in terms of update frequency and content length) was influenced by the information richness of the merchant’s eWOM on the platform. Language type, text richness, and image richness all had a positive impact on this behavior of consumers sharing reviews. On the other hand, since the H4a–H4c hypotheses also held, the information ambiguity (generated by ratings) of eWOM can serve as a moderating variable, strengthening the impact of information richness on consumers’ behavior of posting reviews for specific merchants. Overall, our research results contribute to a deeper understanding of the mechanism of merchant–centered eWOM and ratings in the role of review updates. Therefore, we have contributed to the emerging research stream of eWOM for businesses (e.g., [
3,
10,
30,
84]). The following sections discuss the theoretical and managerial contributions and impacts.
5.2. Theoretical Contributions
This study provides theoretical insights into the existing literature. First, our research explored user enthusiasm for sharing reviews on online business platforms, considering information richness and ambiguity in eWOM as influencing factors. It expands eWOM research focused on businesses. In our study, we propose a measurement method for information richness: treating each enterprise as an individual, defining language richness by calculating language types, and analyzing text media richness and photo media richness by counting text and image reviews for each enterprise. Therefore, compared to previous consumer centered review–sharing behavior research (e.g., consumer motivation [
2,
85,
86], photo sharing [
5], and review updating [
84]), the research of Berger and others suggests that interesting products drive immediate and ongoing word–of–mouth [
87], while our research provides a new answer: “interesting” and rich historical reviews can also drive immediate and ongoing reviews. This study expands upon the opposite of these studies by establishing online reviews sharing mechanisms around businesses.
Second, our research focuses on the role of information richness and differences in online reviews. On social media, previous research has shown that information richness and rating ambiguity positively affect users’ commenting on specific businesses [
40]. Conversely, our results suggest that rich comment content and ambiguous ratings also negatively impact user engagement. This finding suggests that while rich comment content and ambiguous ratings have been widely confirmed as positive factors, they may also play a negative role in commercial intervention. Therefore, this study enriches MRT theory and previous reputation inflation research by clarifying information richness and these differences’ positive and negative effects [
30,
53].
Finally, our research contributes to the field of cross–cultural research. We also explored the different performances of each variable in two different datasets of Type 1 (individualism–low, long term orientation–low context) and Type 2 (individualism–high, long term orientation–high context). For a long time, the literature on the cross–cultural management of multinational corporations and consumer behavior has discussed these topics separately, leading to many research conclusions about consumer preferences in different countries and cultural backgrounds and how corporations can change their products or services to obtain positive feedback. However, a large body of literature has not answered the question of what role corporate self–image (i.e., reputation) plays in this process. Our research shows that the historical reputation accumulated by corporations through long–term efforts is also valuable in facing cross–cultural markets, whether it is through positive or negative feedback. For a long time, the literature on the cross–cultural management of multinational corporations and consumer behavior has discussed them separately, leading to many research conclusions about consumer preferences in different countries and cultures and how corporations can change products or services to obtain positive feedback [
81,
88,
89]. However, much of the literature has not answered the question: what role does a corporation’s self–image (i.e., reputation) play in this process? Our research shows that the historical reputation accumulated by corporations through long–term efforts is also valuable in facing cross–cultural markets, whether it is through receiving positive or negative feedback.
5.3. Practical Significance
This work has some practical implications, including for marketing managers and practitioners, as well as for digital platform managers and developers. Marketing managers and practitioners should be aware that content–rich and rating–rich reviews allow them to obtain continuous and sufficiently long online reviews, while the comment policies of online review platforms have limitations on the length of their published written text, which means that these reviews have a high success rate in passing the platforms’ reviews. This is a clear indication of the positive and negative effects of information richness in reviews. This finding should encourage marketing managers to encourage non–native English–speaking consumers to post reviews in their native language, which will increase the language richness of the restaurant; for a seller with an already low rating, not to limit the posting of negative reviews, as the difference in ratings will lead to information ambiguity; and know that the amount of texts and images of historical reviews is a long–term accumulation process, so operating an online platform for reviews should persist for a period of time before it produces results, which may be one year or two years or even ten years. However, research on user–sharing mechanisms can accelerate this process, and our research proves that the realization of this process is positive. Cross–cultural factors also play an important role in this process. Multinational company managers need to pay attention to the important roles of collectivism and individualism in the influencing mechanism of reviews, in order to implement different management measures in countries with different cultures. For example, restaurants in individualist countries need to maintain a large difference in their polarity of reviews, because the information ambiguity caused by rating differences will strengthen the positive effect of information richness on comment update frequency, while restaurants in collectivist countries need to maintain a uniform polarity of reviews, because the information ambiguity caused by rating differences will weaken the positive effect of information richness on comment update frequency.
Online platforms can manipulate the attractiveness of merchants’ products and the natural ranking order of sellers, but such behavior clearly violates business ethics [
90]. By studying the mechanism of historical reviews on the update frequency and review length of reviews, merchants can adjust and optimize the information structure of historical reviews to completely achieve their own reputation operations management. This approach is low–cost and feasible.
5.4. Conclusion, Limitations, and Future Research Directions
This work contributes to the relationship between online consumer behavior and a firm’s reputation, with a focus on restaurant firms that use platforms to publish their eWOM. We empirically measured the relationship between the information richness (texts, photos, and language types) of a firm’s historical reviews, the information ambiguity caused by rating differences, and the updates of new reviews based on a quantitative model. Using online reviews from the platform (TripAdvisor), we pursued our goals of investigating online review policies and services involving consumption in different companies and countries. Therefore, this article contributes to the intersection of online review platforms, corporate reputation management, and big data analytics.
This study has important limitations. First, this study was designed to investigate factors such as information richness. However, consumers’ post–purchase eWOM may be influenced by many different factors, such as cultural acceptance and social media. Therefore, future research will investigate various factors that affect the new eWOM of online users from different cultural backgrounds, especially emphasizing the roles of social and cultural factors. Second, this study did not consider new forms of eWOM such as short videos related to companies. We believe that the investigation of short video platforms could be included in new research as a next step. Finally, although our study revealed that companies can play a key role in the speed and length of eWOM generation, further research is still needed to determine the mechanisms underlying the new eWOM management of online platforms.