Next Article in Journal
The Cuts Selection Method Based on Histogram Segmentation and Impact on Discretization Algorithms
Previous Article in Journal
Implementation and Evaluation of Age-Aware Downlink Scheduling Policies in Push-Based and Pull-Based Communication
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Entropy
Volume 24
Issue 5
10.3390/e24050674
entropy-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
Correction to Entropy 2019, 21(7), 692.
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Correction

Correction: Stuckey et al. Why the Tsirelson Bound? Bub’s Question and Fuchs’ Desideratum. Entropy 2019, 21, 692

by
William Stuckey
1,*,
Michael Silberstein
2,3,
Timothy McDevitt
4 and
Ian Kohler
1
1
Department of Physics, Elizabethtown College, Elizabethtown, PA 17022, USA
2
Department of Philosophy, Elizabethtown College, Elizabethtown, PA 17022, USA
3
Department of Philosophy, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA
4
Department of Mathematical Sciences, Elizabethtown College, Elizabethtown, PA 17022, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Entropy 2022, 24(5), 674; https://doi.org/10.3390/e24050674
Submission received: 22 April 2022 / Accepted: 29 April 2022 / Published: 11 May 2022
Versions Notes
The authors wish to make the following correction to this paper [1]:
The four Bell basis states, Equation (30) on p. 13, represent one “unlike state” and three “like states”, not two “unlike states” and two “like states”. Thus, the analysis and Figure 8 on pages 13 and 14 for “unlike states” apply to only the first state in Equation (30), and the analysis and Figure 9 on pages 13 and 14 for “like states” apply to the other three states in Equation (30).
The conclusion is the same for “unlike states” and “like states”, so it is unaffected by this change in wording about which states in Equation (30) correspond to “unlike” and “like states” in the analysis. The original publication has been updated.

Reference

  1. Stuckey, W.; Silberstein, M.; McDevitt, T.; Kohler, I. Why the Tsirelson Bound? Bub’s Question and Fuchs’ Desideratum. Entropy 2019, 21, 692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Stuckey, W.; Silberstein, M.; McDevitt, T.; Kohler, I. Correction: Stuckey et al. Why the Tsirelson Bound? Bub’s Question and Fuchs’ Desideratum. Entropy 2019, 21, 692. Entropy 2022, 24, 674. https://doi.org/10.3390/e24050674

AMA Style

Stuckey W, Silberstein M, McDevitt T, Kohler I. Correction: Stuckey et al. Why the Tsirelson Bound? Bub’s Question and Fuchs’ Desideratum. Entropy 2019, 21, 692. Entropy. 2022; 24(5):674. https://doi.org/10.3390/e24050674

Chicago/Turabian Style

Stuckey, William, Michael Silberstein, Timothy McDevitt, and Ian Kohler. 2022. "Correction: Stuckey et al. Why the Tsirelson Bound? Bub’s Question and Fuchs’ Desideratum. Entropy 2019, 21, 692" Entropy 24, no. 5: 674. https://doi.org/10.3390/e24050674

APA Style

Stuckey, W., Silberstein, M., McDevitt, T., & Kohler, I. (2022). Correction: Stuckey et al. Why the Tsirelson Bound? Bub’s Question and Fuchs’ Desideratum. Entropy 2019, 21, 692. Entropy, 24(5), 674. https://doi.org/10.3390/e24050674

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop