Next Article in Journal
Bioinformatics Resources and Tools for Phage Display
Next Article in Special Issue
Locked and Unlocked Nucleosides in Functional Nucleic Acids
Previous Article in Journal
Bioassay-Guided Isolation of an Anti-Ulcer Compound, Tagitinin C, from Tithonia diversifolia: Role of Nitric Oxide, Prostaglandins and Sulfhydryls
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Role of Adenosine Receptor Agonists in Regulation of Hematopoiesis

Working Group of Experimental Hematology, Institute of Biophysics, v.v.i., Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Královopolská 135, CZ-61265 Brno, Czech Republic
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2011, 16(1), 675-685; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules16010675
Submission received: 20 December 2010 / Revised: 4 January 2011 / Accepted: 17 January 2011 / Published: 17 January 2011
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nucleoside Analogues)

Abstract

:
The review summarizes data evaluating the role of adenosine receptor signaling in murine hematopoietic functions. The studies carried out utilized either non-selective activation of adenosine receptors induced by elevation of extracellular adenosine or by administration of synthetic adenosine analogs having various proportions of selectivity for a particular receptor. Numerous studies have described stimulatory effects of non-selective activation of adenosine receptors, manifested as enhancement of proliferation of cells at various levels of the hematopoietic hierarchy. Subsequent experimental approaches, considering the hematopoiesis-modulating action of adenosine receptor agonists with a high level of selectivity to individual adenosine receptor subtypes, have revealed differential effects of various adenosine analogs. Whereas selective activation of A1 receptors has resulted in suppression of proliferation of hematopoietic progenitor and precursor cells, that of A3 receptors has led to stimulated cell proliferation in these cell compartments. Thus, A1 and A3 receptors have been found to play a homeostatic role in suppressed and regenerating hematopoiesis. Selective activation of adenosine A3 receptors has been found to act curatively under conditions of drug- and radiation-induced myelosuppression. The findings in these and further research areas will be summarized and mechanisms of hematopoiesis-modulating action of adenosine receptor agonists will be discussed.

1. Introductory Remarks to the Problem of Adenosine Receptor Signaling

In 1929, Drury and Szent-Györgyi [1] described striking cardiovascular effects of adenosine injected into mammals. Since that time ample evidence has accumulated suggesting the regulatory action of adenosine in many functions and organ systems of the mammalian organism. Adenosine, a naturally occurring nucleoside, is formed in the body by degradation of adenine nucleotides. It can be formed intracellularly as well as extracellularly but acts in a regulatory sense only on extracellular receptors. Such an action of adenosine seems to be phylogenetically ancient and represents a universal intracellular communication system in plants and animals [2]. As stated by Linden [3], “adenosine is a primordial signaling molecule that has evolved to modulate physiological responses in all mammalian tissues”. In general, the action of adenosine can be designated as protective and homeostatic. This central paradigm of adenosine research is based on the hypothesis of Berne [4] that adenosine is the metabolite that increases blood flow during hypoxia, Newby’s [5] concept denoting adenosine as a retaliatory metabolite, and Brun’s idea [6] that adenosine controls energy supply/demand balance by reducing energy demand and increasing energy supply. An important turning-point in adenosine research has been the discovery and description of adenosine receptors that are integral membrane molecules for binding extracellular adenosine agonists and can initiate the transmembrane signal to activate the second messenger system. Up to date four subtypes of adenosine receptors have been described, namely A1, A2a, A2b, and A3. Activation of these receptors can be achieved either non-selectively by the endogenous agonist adenosine, or selectively by use of various adenosine analogs exhibiting different degrees of receptor specificity. The potency of adenosine receptor agonists is dependent not only on the type of the receptor activated but also on the expression of the individual receptor subtypes which may be supposed to possess the ability to change in dependence on the functional state of the cell population investigated. In addition, it has to be taken into account that more adenosine receptor subtypes can be present on the same cell [7,8,9,10,11,12].
The aim of this review is to summarize the published data related to the effects of adenosine receptor signaling on various parameters of murine hematopoiesis, including quantitative indices of various compartments of the bone marrow, as well as the proliferation status and regeneration potential of hematopoietic cell populations investigated under conditions of the steady state, myelosuppression, and regeneration. Attention has been also given to the problem of interactions of control mechanisms based on adenosine receptor signaling and action of hematopoietic cytokines. It has to be noted that the range of problems reviewed here does not include those dealing with adenosine receptor influence on functions of mature peripheral blood cells and on immune and inflammatory functions [13,14].

2. Hematological Effects of Non-Selective Activation of Adenosine Receptors

Adenosine can interact with a cell either by a mechanism not mediated by receptors (by a direct membrane uptake) or by a receptor-mediated mechanism. Adenosine is a natural endogenous adenosine receptor agonist and pharmacologically induced elevation of extracellular adenosine can lead to an enhancement of non-selective receptor-mediated adenosine action. Dipyridamole, a drug inhibiting the cellular uptake of adenosine [15,16], has been used in studies on a number of cell types [17,18,19,20] for obtaining higher extracellular adenosine levels, for discrimination between receptor-mediated and non-receptor-mediated mechanisms of adenosine actions, and/or for potentiation of the receptor-mediated mode of adenosine functioning. Less attention has been paid to the effects of elevated extracellular adenosine levels on various populations of the hierarchically organized hematopoietic cell system, which is under the control of a complex regulatory network. In the published studies on mice, elevated extracellular adenosine levels and thereby evoked enhancement of non-selective activation of adenosine membrane receptors have been achieved by combined administration of dipyridamole and adenosine monophosphate. Adenosine monophosphate (AMP), which is rapidly metabolized extracellularly to adenosine by cell-surface ectonucleotidase [21], has served as an adenosine prodrug having a higher solubility in water as compared with adenosine. Therefore, AMP is more convenient for in vivo administration because its administration makes it possible to avoid loading the mice with a large volume of fluid. It should be noted that doses of dipyridamole and AMP used in the experiments described in this review exhibit significant pharmacological effects at low toxicity [22]. The efficiency of the combined action of the drugs compared to their action when given alone has been verified [23].
First suggestions concerning the role of extracellular adenosine in modulation of hematopoietic functions under in vivo conditions when using the combined administration of dipyridamole and AMP for increasing its levels were brought by radiobiological experiments aimed at the assessment of radiation-induced cellular damage. The combination of dipyridamole and AMP administered several minutes before whole-body gamma-irradiation of mice decreased cellular damage as revealed by the thymidine level in plasma and the amount of free polynucleotides in the thymus and spleen [24]. Similar effects of the drug combination were found when administering the drugs immediately after irradiation [25]. In addition, it has been ascertained that pre-irradiation administration of the drugs decreases the formation of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes, an indicator of the genetic radiation damage [26]. Mechanisms of the effects of adenosine receptor participation on these early indices of cell radiosensitivity are not clear. However, it seems that the short-termed reduction of the blood pressure due to bradycardia and vasodilation, which are known effects of the receptor action of extracellular adenosine [27] leading to transient systemic hypoxia, can be responsible for this effect; hypoxia-induced radioprotection is a classical radiobiological phenomenon. Another alternative can be the enhancement of the mechanisms of intracellular repair: it was reported that the addition of the drugs elevating extracellular adenosine to irradiated thymocytes enhanced the rejoining processes of DNA strand breaks [25].
Further experiments investigated the manifestations of the postirradiation bone marrow syndrome, i.e. suppression of hematopoiesis in sublethally irradiated mice, when administering the drugs in the protective regimen, i.e. before irradiation. Survival of animals irradiated with absolute lethal doses under this drug treatment regimen has been evaluated, as well. These experiments confirmed the protective action of dipyridamole and AMP combination under conditions of single [23,27,28,29] and also fractionated irradiation [30,31]. These effects are most probably due to the modulation of regulatory functions, i.e. to the stimulatory action of adenosine receptor signaling on hematopoiesis. This has been suggested on the basis of experiments utilizing administration of noradrenaline which reduces cardiovascular and thus hypoxia-inducing effects of the combination of dipyridamole and AMP [28]. Furthermore, results of experiments prolonging the time interval between the administration for the drug combination and irradiation in order to avoid the operation of hypoxia during the radiation exposure have also supported the above hypothesis [31]. In both these situations protective action of adenosine receptor signaling occurring in hematopoiesis and postirradiation survival of animals was preserved.
In several studies attention was focused at the action of extracellular adenosine in normal and myelosuppressed mice. It has been found that administration of dipyridamole and AMP to normal mice induces pleiotropic amplification effects in cell compartments of the bone marrow and spleen [22,23], enhances cycling of committed hematopoietic progenitor cells [32] and mobilizes these cells into peripheral blood [33]. The possibility that the elevation of extracellular adenosine activates mechanisms of the positive control of hematopoiesis has been also supported by findings demonstrating curative effects of the drugs administered repeatedly under conditions of myelosuppression induced in mice by irradiation [34], cytostatic drugs [35,36] and combination of both these myelosuppressive actions [37]. Enhancement of the regeneration of hematopoiesis by the combination of drugs elevating extracellular adenosine has been found in all these experiments.
Previously it has been shown that adenosine signaling can act in concert with conventional growth factors, cytokines and other growth regulatory molecules to modulate cell functions in various non-hematopoietic cell systems [2]. Such effects have been also observed in studies investigating the effects of combined administration of drugs elevating extracellular adenosine with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) on hematopoiesis. Mutual potentiation of granulopoiesis-stimulating effects of these agents has been observed in normal mice [22,33] and in mice treated under conditions of myelosuppression induced by radiation [34,38], cytostatic drugs [36], or a combination of both these myelosuppressive actions [37]. These results might have a clinical impact, especially in chemotherapy and radiotherapy.

3. Hematological Effects of Selective Activation of Adenosine Receptors

To obtain more detailed information about mechanisms of extracellular, receptor-mediated adenosine action on hematopoiesis and to uncover new therapeutic possibilities of treatment of hematopoietic suppression by activating adenosine receptors, further experimental steps should be carried out taking into account the known adenosine receptor diversity. Discrimination between adenosine receptors was made possible when more or less selective adenosine receptor agonists became available. These agents, adenosine analogs, do not undergo facilitated uptake nor represent a substrate for cellular metabolism and are relatively resistant to extracellular adenosine-metabolizing enzymes [39]. Their serum half-lives are in the order of minutes [40,41]; however, as it will be shown below, these rather short half-lives do not prevent adenosine analogs from being functional. In our recent experiments investigating murine hematopoiesis, three synthetic adenosine analogs, selective for A1, A2a, and A3 adenosine receptors, i.e. N6-cyclopentyladenosine (CPA), 2-p-(2-carboxyethyl)-phenethylamino-5’-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine (CGS 21680), and N6-(3-iodobenzyl)adenosine-5’-N-methyluronamide (IB-MECA), respectively, have been compared in terms of their ability to modulate cell cycling in hematopoietic progenitor bone marrow cells as inferred from the action of the cell cycle-specific drug 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) administered to mice in vivo [42]. The most interesting findings of these experiments have been the opposite effects of the selective agonists for A1 and A3 receptors, i.e. of CPA and IB-MECA, manifesting themselves as inhibitory or stimulatory actions on cell cycling in the compartments of the bone marrow progenitor cells. In terms of their signaling pathways, both these receptors inhibit adenylyl cyclase [43], but it has been reported that they differ in their coupling to phospholipases C and D [44]. Further studies comparing the effects of these two selective agonists on states of myelosuppression and regeneration induced by 5-FU have confirmed marked stimulatory action of IB-MECA administered in the phase of cell depletion and its ineffectiveness when given in the phase of cell recovery [45]. However, the agonist of adenosine A1 receptors, CPA, has been found to be effective as inhibitor of cell cycling when administered in the phase of cell regeneration [46]. These effects suggest the homeostatic role of adenosine receptor signaling when influencing hematopoiesis. The effects observed might be logically explainable as evidence of the changing expression of different adenosine receptors during various functional states of the investigated cell systems [47,48]. Our findings on the hematopoiesis-stimulating effect of pharmacological activation of adenosine A3 receptors confirm earlier observations of Merimsky et al. [49] on myelostimulatory effects of IB-MECA in cyclophosphamide-treated mice.

4. Adenosine Receptors—Participation in Various Signaling Pathways

Until recently, only findings on the expression of adenosine receptor mRNAs in isolated mature human peripheral blood cells have been reported: all four subtypes of adenosine receptors have been described in human neutrophils [50] and monocytes [51], A2a, A2b, and A3 receptors have been found in human lymphocytes [52,53,54]. As late as in 2010, our laboratory has reported that mRNAs of all four subtypes of adenosine receptors are expressed, though in different relative amounts, in differentiating and proliferating cells of various hematopoietic cell compartments, namely in mouse bone marrow granulopoietic/monocytopoietic, erythropoietic and B-lymphopoietic cells, as well as T-lymphopoietic cells in thymus [55]. However, these data represent only a limited information related to the resting and balanced state of the hematopoietic system. As shown in the preceding paragraph, expression of receptors deduced from different actions of various agonists is supposed to be variable and in accordance with the requirements of the system to maintain homeostasis. Furthermore, it is important to note that the effects of the actions of adenosine receptor agonists on hematopoietic cells can be influenced additively by activation of adenosine receptors in the cells of the supportive microenvironment in the hematopoietic tissues. Macrophages are known to represent an important constituent of the hematopoietic microenviroment and to produce hematopoiesis-stimulating factors like e.g. interleukin-6 and G-CSF [56,57]. Recent studies on mouse macrophages have shown that whereas the mRNA expression of adenosine A1 receptors in both normal and lipopolysaccharide-activated cells is very low and unquantifiable, the other three receptor subtypes are expressed at various but always quantifiable levels [58,59]. Other marrow-derived cells, including fibrocytes and endothelial precursor cells are also influenced by modulating the activity of A2a adenosine receptors [60,61,62]. In addition to these data it is appropriate to mention results of experiments demonstrating that the serum of mice, which received drugs increasing extracellular adenosine, exhibited enhanced ability to support proliferation of granulocyte-macrophage colony-forming cells in vitro and to elevate serum levels of interleukin-6 [63]. Worth mentioning are also experiments of Bar-Yehuda et al. [64] who have described a stimulatory effect of the agonist of A3 receptors, IB-MECA, on production of G-CSF in mice receiving this drug per os for several days. Interesting findings have been reported on the positive interaction of the agonist of adenosine A3 receptors with the growth factors interleukin-3 and stem cell factor that influenced the growth of hematopoietic progenitor cells for granulocytes and macrophages in suspension of normal murine bone marrow cells in vitro [65]. These data indicate the possibility of cooperation and/or coalescence of the two different signaling pathways into a common pathway even under in vivo conditions. Indeed, combined treatment of the γ-irradiated mice with the agonist of adenosine A3 receptors IB-MECA and G-CSF induced the highest recovery of hematopoiesis as compared with the effects induced by the drugs administered alone [66]. The above-mentioned topics are quite open and deserve further research.

5. Possibilities of Practical Utilization of Adenosine Receptor Agonists in Clinical Hematology

The results on hematopoiesis-stimulating effects of IB-MECA, the selective A3 adenosine receptor agonist, suggest the possibility to use this drug in clinical practice as a part of the spectrum of pharmacological approaches aimed at treating myelosuppression of various etiology. This view is supported by the fact that IB-MECA is at present available as a good manufacturing practice (GMP) grade for peroral use [67]. Currently investigated directions of possible therapeutic applications include not only myelostimulatory effects of IB-MECA but also antitumor, cardioprotective, neuroprotective, and antiinflammatory actions of the drug [68], the latter ones having passed already through a phase II clinical trial [69]. Therefore, the way to the use pharmacological activation of adenosine A3 receptor may prove to be a promising approach in clinical hematology.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Grant Agency of the Czech Republic (grants nos. 305/08/0158 and P303/11/0128), by the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic (grants nos. AV0Z50050507 and AV0Z50040702), and by the Ministry of Defense of the Czech Republic (project “Receptor”, project No. 1001 8 5090).

References

  1. Drury, A.N.; Szent-Györgyi, A. The physiological activity of adenine compounds with especial reference to their action upon the mammalian heart. J. Physiol. (London) 1929, 68, 213–237. [Google Scholar]
  2. Abbracchio, M.P. P1 and P2 receptors in cell growth and differentiation. Drug Dev. Res. 1996, 39, 393–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Linden, J. Molecular approach to adenosine receptors: Receptor-mediated mechanisms of tissue protection. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2001, 41, 775–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Berne, R.M. Cardiac nucleotides in hypoxia – possible role in regulation of coronary blood flow. Am. J. Physiol. 1963, 204, 317–322. [Google Scholar]
  5. Newby, A.C. Adenosine and the concept of ‘retaliatory metabolites’. Trends Biochem. Sci. 1984, 9, 42–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Bruns, R.F. Role of adenosine in energy supply/demand balance. Nucleos. Nucleot. 1991, 10, 931–943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Abbracchio, M.P.; Burnstock, G. Purinergic signalling: Pathophysiological roles. Jap. J. Pharmacol. 1998, 78, 113–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Poulsen, S.-A.; Quinn, R.J. Adenosine receptors: New opportunities for future drugs. Bioorgan. Med. Chem. 1998, 6, 619–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Olah, M.E.; Stiles, G.L. Adenosine receptor subtypes: Characterization and therapeutic regulation. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 1995, 35, 581–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Fredholm, B.B.; Arslan, G.; Halldner, L.; Kull, B.; Schulte, G.; Wasserman, W. Structure and function of adenosine receptors and their genes. Naunyn-Schmied. Arch. Pharmacol. 2000, 362, 364–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Fredholm, B.B.; Arslan, G.; Halldner, L; Kull, B.; Schulte, G.; Ådén, U.; Svenningsson, P. Adenosine receptor signaling in vitro and in vivo. Drug Dev. Res. 2001, 52, 274–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Klotz, K.-N. Adenosine receptors and their ligands. Naunyn-Schmied. Arch. Pharmacol. 2000, 362, 382–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Cronstein, B.N.; Bouma, M.G.; Becker, B.F. Purinergic mechanisms in inflammation. Drug Dev. Res. 1996, 39, 426–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Haskó, G.; Linden, J.; Cronstein, B.; Pacher, P. Adenosine receptors: therapeutic aspects for inflammatory and immune diseases. Nat. Rev. Drug Dis. 2008, 7, 759–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Plagemann, P.G.W.; Wohlhueter, R.W.; Woffendin, C. Nucleoside and nucleobase transport in animal cells. Biochim. Biophy. Acta 1988, 947, 405–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Thorn, J.A.; Jarvis, S.M. Adenosine transporters. Gen. Pharmacol. 1996, 27, 613–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Brown, J.R.; Cornell, K.; Cook, P.W. Adenosine- and adenine-nucleotide-mediated inhibition of normal and transformed keratinocyte proliferation is dependent upon dipyridamole-sensitive adenosine transport. J. Invest. Dermatol. 2000, 115, 849–859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Schrier, S.M.; van Tilburg, E.W.; van der Meulen, H.; Ijzerman, A.P.; Mulder, G.J.; Nagelkerke, J.F. Extracellular adenosine-induced apoptosis in mouse neuroblastoma cells-studies on involvement of adenosine receptors and adenosine uptake. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2001, 61, 417–425. [Google Scholar]
  19. Nucciarelli, F.; Mearini, E.; Minelli, A. Effects of adenosine on prostate adenocarcinoma PC-3 and bladder carcinoma J82 cells lines. Drug Dev. Res. 2003, 58, 390–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hofer, M.; Hoferová, Z.; Pospíšil, M; Znojil, V.; Chramostová, K. Effects of adenosine on the growth of murine G:5:113 fibrosarcoma cells in vitro. FoliaBiologica (Praha) 2003, 49, 207–210. [Google Scholar]
  21. Gordon, E.L.; Pearson, J.D.; Dickinson, E.S.; Moreau, D.; Slakey, L.L. The hydrolysis of extracellular adenine nucleotides by arterial smooth muscle cells - Regulation of adenosine production at the cell-surface. J. Biol. Chem. 1989, 264, 18986–18992. [Google Scholar]
  22. Pospíšil, M.; Hofer, M.; Znojil, V.; Vácha, J.; Netíková, J.; Holá, J. Synergistic effect of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and drugs elevating extracellular adenosine on neutrophil production in mice. Blood 1995, 86, 3692–3697. [Google Scholar]
  23. Pospíšil, M.; Hofer, M.; Netíková, J.; Viklická, Š.; Pipalová, I.; Bartoníčková, A. Effect of dipyridamole and adenosine monophosphate on cell proliferation in the hemopoietic tissue of normal and gamma-irradiated mice. Experientia 1992, 48, 253–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Hošek, B.; Boháček, J.; Šikulová, J.; Pospíšil, M.; Vacek, A. Protection of early cellular damage in 1 Gy-irradiated mice by the elevation of extracellular adenosine. Radiat. Environ. Biophys. 1992, 31, 289–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Boháček, J.; Hošek, B.; Pospíšil, M. Postirradiation administration of adenosine monophosphate with dipyridamole reduces early cellular damage in mice. Life Sci. 1993, 53, 1317–1324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Hofer, M.; Mazur, L.; Pospíšil, M.; Weiterová, L.; Znojil, V. Radioprotective action of extracellular adenosine on bone marrow cells in mice exposed to gamma rays as assayed by the micronucleus test. Radiat. Res. 2000, 154, 217–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Pospíšil, M.; Hofer, M.; Netíková, J.; Pipalová, I.; Vacek, A.; Bartoníčková, A.; Volenec, K. Elevation of extracellular adenosine induces radioprotective effects in mice. Radiat. Res. 1993, 134, 323–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Pospíšil, M.; Hofer, M.; Vacek, A.; Netíková, J.; Pipalová, I.; Viklická, Š. Noradrenaline reduces cardiovascular effects of the combined dipyridamole and AMP administration but preserves radioprotective effects of these drugs on hematopoiesis in mice. Physiol. Res. 1993, 42, 333–340. [Google Scholar]
  29. Hofer, M.; Pospíšil, M.; Netíková, J.; Znojil, V.; Vácha, J. Enhancement of haemopoietic spleen colony formation by drugs elevating extracellular adenosine: Effects of repeated in vivo treatment. Physiol. Res. 1997, 46, 285–290. [Google Scholar]
  30. Pospíšil, M.; Hofer, M.; Znojil, V.; Vácha, J.; Netíková, J.; Holá, J. Radioprotection of mouse hemopoiesis by dipyridamole and adenosine monophosphate in fractionated treatment. Radiat. Res. 1995, 142, 16–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hofer, M.; Pospíšil, M.; Netíková, J.; Znojil, V.; Vácha, J.; Holá, J. Radioprotective efficacy of dipyridamole and AMP combination in fractionated radiation regimen, and its dependence on the time of administration of the drugs prior to irradiation. Physiol. Res. 1995, 44, 93–98. [Google Scholar]
  32. Pospíšil, M.; Hofer, M.; Vacek, A.; Netíková, J.; Holá, J.; Znojil, V.; Weiterová, L. Drugs elevating extracellular adenosine enhance cell-cycling of hematopoietic progenitor cells as inferred from the cytotoxic effects of 5-fluorouracil. Exp. Hematol. 2001, 29, 557–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Hofer, M.; Weiterová, L.; Vacek, A.; Znojil, V.; Pospíšil, M.; Vácha, J. Elevation of of extracellular adenosine mobilizes haematopoietic progenitor cells into peripheral blood and enhances the mobilizing effects of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. Eur. J. Haematol. 2003, 71, 204–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Pospíšil, M.; Hofer, M.; Znojil, V.; Netíková, J.; Vácha, J.; Holá, J.; Vacek, A. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and drugs elevating extracellular adenosine synergize to enhance haematopoietic reconstitution in irradiated mice. Eur. J. Haematol. 1998, 60, 172–180. [Google Scholar]
  35. Weiterová, L.; Hofer, M.; Pospíšil, M.; Znojil, V.; Vácha, J.; Vacek, A.; Pipalová, I. Influence of the joint treatment with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and drugs elevating extracellular adenosine on erythropoietic recovery following 5-fluorouracil-induced hematotoxicity in mice. Eur. J. Haematol. 2000, 65, 310–316. [Google Scholar]
  36. Hofer, M.; Pospíšil, M.; Weiterová, L.; Znojil, V.; Vácha, J.; Holá, J.; Vacek, A.; Pipalová, I. Combination of drugs elevating extracellular adenosine with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor promotes granulopoietic recovery in mouse bone marrow after 5-fluorouracil treatment. Physiol. Res. 2001, 50, 521–524. [Google Scholar]
  37. Hofer, M.; Pospíšil, M.; Znojil, V.; Vacek, A.; Weiterová, L.; Holá, J.; Vácha, J. Drugs elevating extracellular adenosine promote regeneration of haematopoietic progenitor cells in severely myelosuppressed mice: their comparison and joint effects with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. Eur. J. Haematol. 2002, 68, 4–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Hofer, M.; Pospíšil, M.; Netíková, J.; Znojil, V.; Vácha, J. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and drugs elevating extracellular adenosine act additively to enhance the hemopoietic spleen colony formation in irradiated mice. Physiol. Res. 1999, 48, 37–42. [Google Scholar]
  39. Jacobson, M.A. Adenosine receptor agonists. Expert Opin. Ther. Patents 2002, 12, 489–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Tuovinen, K.; Tarjanen, J. Clearance of cyclopentyladenosine and cyclohexyladenosine in rats following a single subcutaneous dose. Pharmacol. Res. 2004, 50, 329–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Martin, P.L.; Barrett, R.J.; Sykes, A.; Droppleman, D.A.; Wright, K.F.; Mossem, D. Pharmacology and toxicology of the A2A -adenosine receptor agonist 2-[(cyclohexylmethylene)hydrazino]adenosine (MRE-0470) in the rat. Drug Dev. Res. 1997, 42, 76–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Pospíšil, M.; Hofer, M.; Vacek, A.; Znojil, V.; Pipalová, I. Effects of stable adenosine receptor agonists on bone marrow hematopoietic cells as inferred from the cytotoxic action of 5-fluorouracil. Physiol. Res. 2004, 53, 549–556. [Google Scholar]
  43. Fredholm, B.B.; Arslan, G.; Halldner, L.; Kull, B.; Schulte, G.; Wassermann, G. Structure and function of adenosine receptors and their genes. Naunyn-Schmied. Arch. Pharmacol. 2000, 362, 364–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Parsons, M.; Young, L.; Lee, J.E.; Jacobson, K.A.; Liang, B.T. Distinct cardioprotective effects of adenosine mediated by differential coupling of receptor subtypes to phospholipases C and D. FASEB J. 2000, 14, 1423–1431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Hofer, M.; Pospíšil, M.; Vacek, A.; Holá, J.; Znojil, V.; Weiterová, L.; Štreitová, D. Effects of adenosine A3 receptor agonist on bone marrow granulocytic system in 5-fluorouracil-treated mice. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2006, 538, 163–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Pospíšil, M.; Hofer, M.; Vacek, A.; Holá, J.; Pipalová, I.; Znojil, V. N6-Cyclopentyladenosine inhibits proliferation of haematopoietic progenitor cells in vivo. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2005, 507, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Hofer, M.; Pospíšil, M.; Znojil, V.; Holá, J.; Vacek, A.; Štreitová, D. Adenosine A3 receptor agonist acts as a homeostatic regulator of bone marrow hematopoiesis. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2007, 61, 356–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Hofer, M.; Pospíšil, M.; Znojil, V.; Holá, J.; Štreitová, D.; Vacek, A. Homeostatic action of adenosine A3 and A1 receptor agonists on proliferation of hematopoietic precursor cells. Exp. Biol. Med. 2008, 233, 897–900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Merimsky, O.; Bar-Yehuda, S.; Madi, L.; Fishman, P. Modulation of the A3 adenosine receptor by low agonist concentration induces antitumor and myelostimulatory effects. Drug Dev. Res. 2003, 58, 386–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Fortin, A.; Harbour, D.; Fernandes, M.; Borgeat, P.; Bourgoin, S. Differential expression of adenosine receptors in human neutrophils: up-regulation by specific Th1 cytokines and lipopolysaccharide. J. Leukocyte Biol. 2006, 79, 574–585. [Google Scholar]
  51. Thiele, A.; Kronstein, R.; Wetzel, A.; Gerth, A.; Nieber, K.; Hauschildt, S. Regulation of adenosine receptor subtypes during cultivation of human monocytes: Role of receptors in preventing lipopolysaccharide-triggered respiratory burst. Infec. Immunity 2004, 72, 1349–1357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Himer, L.; Csoka, B.; Selmeczy, Z.; Koscso, B.; Pocza, T.; Pacher, P.; Nemeth, Z.H.; Deitch, E.A.; Vizi, E.S.; Cronstein, B.N.; Hasko, G. Adenosine A2a receptor activation protects CD4+ T lymphocytes against activation-induced cell death. FASEB J. 2010, 24, 2631–2640. [Google Scholar]
  53. Mirabet, M.; Herrera, C.; Cordero, O.J.; Mallol, J.; Lluis, C.; Franco, R. Expression of A2B adenosine receptors in human lymphocytes: their role in T cell activation. J. Cell Sci. 1999, 112, 491–502. [Google Scholar]
  54. Gessi, S.; Varani, K.; Merighi, S.; Cattabriga, E.; Avitabile, A.; Gavioli, R.; Fortini, C.; Leung, E.; Mac Lennan, S.; Borea, P.A. Expression of adenosine A3 receptors in human lymphocytes: up-regulation in T-cell activation. Mol. Pharmacol. 2004, 65, 711–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Štreitová, D.; Šefc, L.; Savvulidi, F.; Pospíšil, M.; Holá, J.; Hofer, M. Adenosine A1, A2a, A2b, and A3 receptors in hematopoiesis. 1. Expression of receptor mRNA in four mouse hematopoietic precursor cells. Physiol. Res. 2010, 59, 133–137. [Google Scholar]
  56. Hofer, M.; Vacek, A.; Lojek, A.; Holá, J.; Štreitová, D. Ultrafiltered pig leukocyte extract (IMUNOR®) decreases nitric oxide formation and hematopoiesis-stimulating cytokine production in lipopolysaccharide-stimulated RAW 264.7 macrophages. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2007, 7, 1369–1374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Kamio, N.; Akifusa, S.; Yamaguchi, N.; Yamashita, Y. Induction of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor by globular adiponectin via the MEK-ERK pathway. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2008, 292, 20–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Murphree, L.J.; Sullivan, G.W.; Marshall, M.A.; Linden, J. Lipopolysaccharide rapidly modifies adenosine receptor transcripts in murine and human macrophages: role of NF-κB in A2A adenosine receptor induction. Biochem. J. 2005, 391, 575–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Štreitová, D.; Hofer, M.; Holá, J.; Vacek, A.; Pospíšil, M. Adenosine A1, A2a, A2b, and A3 receptors in hematopoiesis. 2. Expression of receptor mRNA in resting and lipopolysaccharide-activated mouse RAW 264.7 macrophages. Physiol. Res. 2010, 59, 139–144. [Google Scholar]
  60. Katebi, M.; Fernandez, P.; Chan, E.S.; Cronstein, B.N. Adenosine A2a receptor blockade or deletion diminishes fibrocyte accumulation in the skin in a murine model of scleroderma, bleomycin-induced fibrosis. Inflammation 2008, 31, 299–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Katebi, M.; Soleimani, M.; Cronstein, B.N. Adenosine A2a receptors play an active role in mouse bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cell development. J. Leukocyte Biol. 2009, 85, 438–444. [Google Scholar]
  62. Montesinos, M.C.; Shaw, J.P.; Yee, H.; Shamamian, P.; Cronstein, B.N. Adenosine A2a receptor activation promotes wound neovascularization by stimulating angiogenesis and vasculogenesis. Am. J. Pathol. 2004, 164, 1887–1892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Weiterová, L.; Hofer, M.; Pospíšil, M.; Znojil, V.; Štreitová, D. Drugs elevating extracellular adenosine administered in vivo induce serum colony forming activity and interleukin-6 in mice. Physiol. Res. 2007, 56, 463–473. [Google Scholar]
  64. Bar-Yehuda, S.; Madi, L.; Barak, D.; Mittelman, M.; Ardon, E.; Ochaion, A.; Cohn, S.; Fishman, P. Agonists to the A3 adenosine receptor induce G-CSF production via NF-κ B activation: A new class of myeloprotective agents. Exp. Hematol. 2002, 30, 1390–1398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Hofer, M.; Vacek, A.; Pospíšil, M.; Weiterová, L.; Holá, J.; Štreitová, D.; Znojil, V. Adenosine potentiates stimulatory effects on granulocyte-macrophage hematopoietic progenitor cells in vitro of IL-3 and SCF, but not those of G-CSF, GM-CSF and IL-11. Physiol. Res. 2006, 55, 591–596. [Google Scholar]
  66. Hofer, M.; Pospíšil, M.; Šefc, L.; Dušek, L.; Vacek, A.; Holá, J.; Hoferová, Z.; Štreitová, D. Activation of adenosine A3 receptors supports hematopoiesis-stimulating effects of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in sublethally irradiated mice. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 2010, 86, 649–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Van Troostenburg, A.-R.; Clark, E.V.; Carey, W.O.H., Warrington; Kerns, W.D.; Cohn, I.; Silverman, M.H.; Bar-Yehuda, S.; Fong, K.-L.L.; Fishman, P. Tolerability, pharmacokinetics and concentration-dependent hemodynamic effects of oral CF 101, an A3 adenosine receptor agonist, in healthy young men. Int. J. Clin. Pharma. Therapeutics 2004, 42, 534–542. [Google Scholar]
  68. Fishman, P.; Bar-Yehuda, S. Pharmacology and therapeutic applications of A3 receptor subtype. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2003, 3, 463–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Silverman, M.H.; Strand, V.; Markovits, D.; Nahir, M.; Reitblat, T.; Molad, Y.; Rosner, I.; Rozenbaum, M.; Mader, R.; Adawi, M.; et al. Clinical evidence for utilization of the A3 adenosine receptor as a target to treat rheumatoid arthritis: Data from a Phase II clinical trial. J. Rheumatol. 2008, 35, 41–48. [Google Scholar]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hofer, M.; Pospisil, M.; Weiterova, L.; Hoferova, Z. The Role of Adenosine Receptor Agonists in Regulation of Hematopoiesis. Molecules 2011, 16, 675-685. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules16010675

AMA Style

Hofer M, Pospisil M, Weiterova L, Hoferova Z. The Role of Adenosine Receptor Agonists in Regulation of Hematopoiesis. Molecules. 2011; 16(1):675-685. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules16010675

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hofer, Michal, Milan Pospisil, Lenka Weiterova, and Zuzana Hoferova. 2011. "The Role of Adenosine Receptor Agonists in Regulation of Hematopoiesis" Molecules 16, no. 1: 675-685. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules16010675

APA Style

Hofer, M., Pospisil, M., Weiterova, L., & Hoferova, Z. (2011). The Role of Adenosine Receptor Agonists in Regulation of Hematopoiesis. Molecules, 16(1), 675-685. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules16010675

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop