Next Article in Journal
Novel Synthesis of 8-Deaza-5,6,7,8-tetrahydroaminopterin Analogues via an Aziridine Intermediate
Next Article in Special Issue
Silica Gel-Mediated Organic Reactions under Organic Solvent-Free Conditions
Previous Article in Journal
Fluorescent Nanoprobes Dedicated to in Vivo Imaging: From Preclinical Validations to Clinical Translation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Large-Scale Solvent-Free Chlorination of Hydroxy-Pyrimidines, -Pyridines, -Pyrazines and -Amides Using Equimolar POCl3
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 17
Issue 5
10.3390/molecules17055592
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Microwave Synthesis Under Solvent-Free Conditions and Spectral Studies of Some Mesoporphyrinic Complexes

by
Rica Boscencu
Department of Inorganic Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 6 Traian Vuia St., 020956 Bucharest, Romania
Molecules 2012, 17(5), 5592-5603; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules17055592
Submission received: 20 March 2012 / Revised: 4 May 2012 / Accepted: 7 May 2012 / Published: 10 May 2012
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Solvent-Free Synthesis)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
A series of A3B and A4 type mesoporphyrinic complexes were synthesized with superior yields using microwave irradiation under solvent-free conditions. The structures of the complexes were confirmed using elemental analysis, FT-IR, UV-Vis, EPR and NMR spectral data. The influence of environmental polarity on spectral properties of the mesoporphyrinic complexes was investigated. The obtained results indicate that the shape of absorption and fluorescence spectra does not depend on the solvent polarity under the experimental conditions used. The small shifts of the absorption and emission maximums that occur by increasing of solvent polarity reflects the physical interaction between the porphyrinic substituents and the solvent molecules.

1. Introduction

The synthesis of mesoporphyrinic complexes and the investigation of their spectral and biological properties have attracted increasing interest in medicinal chemistry, mainly due to their use in photodiagnosis and photodynamic therapy of malignant tumors [1,2,3,4,5,6].
Photodynamic therapy involves topical or systemic administration of a pharmaceutical formulation containing photosensitizer, its selective accumulation in the tumor tissue, followed by generation of cytotoxic species such as singlet oxygen, by irradiation with light in the red region of the visible spectrum and subsequent destruction of the sick cells [7,8,9,10]. Photodynamic diagnostics are a cancerous lesion detection procedure based on the accumulation of the photosensitizer at a specific target, which emits fluorescence upon light excitation [3,6,11].
The increasing use of metalloporphyrins in diagnosis and therapy is justified by their convenient activation wavelengths, situated in the near-red infrared region, adequate for deep tissue penetration, complemented by their low toxicity and high capacity to generate singlet oxygen [3,4]. A good localization of the metalloporphyrinic compounds at a subcellular level is directly influenced by the amphiphilicity of these structures and plays a major role in their biomedical efficiency [12,13,14]. The degree of purity of the metalloporphyrins used in biomedical purpose is very important because the presence of trace amounts of impurities can introduce significant errors in pharmacological activity. In addition, obtaining these complexes under environmental and reproducible laboratory conditions is of critical importance. In this regard, this paper aims to develop an ecological, efficient and versatile synthetic method, able to produce A3B and A4 type metalloporphyrins, with a high degree of purity and a good reaction yield. Solvent free reactions activated by microwave irradiation have become increasingly important in the synthesis of mesoporphyrinic complexes due to their advantages such as shorter reaction times, higher reaction yields, absence of solvent in the reaction mixtures and increased selectivity of the synthetic reactions [15,16,17,18].
In this study synthesis of Zn(II)-5,10,15,20-meso-tetrakis-(4-acetoxy-3-methoxyphenyl) porphyrin, Zn(II)-5-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-10,15,20-tris-(4-acetoxy-3-methoxyphenyl) porphyrin, Cu(II)-5,10,15,20-meso-tetrakis-(4-acetoxy-3-methoxyphenyl) porphyrin and Cu(II)-5-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-10,15,20-tris-(4-acetoxy-3-methoxyphenyl) porphyrin (Figure 1), was carried out using microwave irradiation of the reaction mixtures consisting of substituted benzaldehydes, pyrrole and metallic salts in the presence of the basic catalyst in dry media. The reactions have been successfully repeated several times with identical results and then the mesoporphyrinic complexes were characterized by spectral analysis. In addition, a study of the solubility and their spectral behavior in environments with different polarities was performed.
Molecules 17 05592 g001 550
Figure 1. General structures of the mesoporphyriniccomplexes used in this study.
Figure 1. General structures of the mesoporphyriniccomplexes used in this study.
Molecules 17 05592 g001

2. Results and Discussion

Mesoporphyrinic complexes can be obtained by the classical pathway [19,20,21] that involves refluxing of equimolar ratios of the porphyrinic ligands and metal salts in the presence of a basic catalyst. This requires as a first step preparation of the porphyrinic ligand by condensation of pyrrole and substituted benzaldehydes in propionic acid at high temperature (~140 °C). Under these conditions, chlorins (reduced forms of the porphyrins) result from the synthesis as secondary products and isolation of mesoporphyrinic compound requires tedious chromatographic separations with decreasing reaction yield.
In recent years, research specialists concerned with obtaining pharmacologically active mesoporphyrins have been focused on developing new ecological methods as an alternative method to the classical way in order to decrease the reaction times, improving the degree of purity of the final products and implicitly increasing the reaction yields [15,16,17,18,22,23,24,25,26,18,22].
Solvent-free synthesis by microwave irradiation has been successfully applied to obtaining mesoporphyrinic compounds because the absence of solvent from the reaction environment has the effect of decreased interaction time between reactant molecules and improves the reaction yield. Furthermore, specific conditions for initiating these synthetic reactions (absence of acidic medium, moderate temperatures) have eliminated the formation of chlorins and allow for an easy purification of the mesoporphyrinic compounds.

2.1. Infrared Spectra

The IR spectra recorded for the synthesized metalloporphyrins include typical vibration modes of both porphyrin macrocycle and phenyl substituents (Table 1) and infrared spectral assignments are generally in agreement with those previously reported for similar structures [27,28].
Table
Table 1. Infrared spectral assignments of the mesoporphyrinic complexes (cm−1).
Table 1. Infrared spectral assignments of the mesoporphyrinic complexes (cm−1).
AssignmentsZn(II)TMAPCu(II)TMAPZn(II)TMAPOHPCu(II)TMAPOHP
νO-H--3422 m3420 m
νC-H2922 m2923 m2922 m2924 m
νC-H from -O-CH32853 m2852 m2852 m2853 m
νC=O1762 m1763 m1764 m1765 m
νC-N1598 m1600 m1597 m1598 m
νC=N1505 m1501 m1506 m1503 m
νC-Hpyrrole1462 m1461 m1462 m1462 m
νC-O1194 s1196 s1195 s1196 s
δC-H998 m1001 m999 m1000 m
γC-C860 w862 w868 w858 w
γC-Npyrrole797 m800 m798 m788 m
The intensities of the signals are described as weak (w), medium (m), strong (s).
The presence of the –OH functional group in the structure of the Zn(II)TMAPOHP Cu(II)TMAPOHP is confirmed by appearance in the IR spectra of a large band at about 3,420 cm−1 assigned to O-H stretching vibration. The medium band observed at ~2,923 cm−1 can be assigned to C–H vibrations of the phenyl groups. Also, in the IR spectra of the complexes, a medium band was evidenced at ~2,852 cm−1, corresponding to C-H vibration frequencies of the –O–CH3 group.
The IR band identified in the spectral range of 1,762–1,765 cm−1 are assigned to C=O stretching vibration while the strong absorption band at about 1,196 cm−1 can be attributed to the C-O bond vibrations. The medium bands corresponding the stretching vibration C=N and C-N were highlighted in the spectral range of 1,500–1,505 cm−1 and 1,600 cm−1, respectively. Another band observed at ~1,462 cm−1 in the infrared spectra of the synthesized complexes is due to the stretching vibration of C-H bond motion of the porphyrin ring.

2.2. Absorption and Fluorescence Spectra

The analysis of mesoporphyrinic complexes by UV–Vis spectroscopy is an efficient method used to confirm their structure because their molecular absorption spectra are typical. These contain a intense Soret band (400–440 nm) as a result of the a1u (π) → eg (π∗) transition and less intense Q bands (500–650 nm) corresponding to the a2u (π) → eg (π∗) transitions [29].
UV-Vis spectral analysis reveals for the mesoporphyrinic complexes synthesized in this study a Soret band with a maximum in the range 412–430 nm, accompanied by Q bands situated in the 537–602 nm range (Figure 2 and Table 2).
The analysis of the spectral data obtained for the zinc and copper mesoporphyrinic complexes in solvents with different polarities (Table 2) show that the main differences that occur between the absorption characteristics are determined by the nature of the metallic ion and environmental polarity. Thus, molecular absorption spectra of the Zn(II)TMAP and Zn(II)TMAPOHP displayed one Soret band (418–432 nm) and two Q bands (546–602 nm), while for both copper complexes Soret band (412–421nm) is accompanied by only one Q band (537–543 nm).
As can be seen in Table 2, the Soret band of the copper porphyrins is hypsochromically shifted (~10 nm) compared to the zinc porphyrins having the same ligand. The Q bands of the copper porphyrins are blue shifted about 20 nm compared to the corresponding zinc porphyrins. These spectral shifts of the Soret and Q bands are the result of stronger conjugation effects that occur between the metallic ion orbital and the π electrons of the porphyrinic ring. For copper porphyrins these conjugation effects cause an energy decrease of the a1u (π) and a2u (π) orbitals relative to the eg (π∗) orbitals, with increased energy available for electron transitions leading to a blue shift of the spectral bands compared to the zinc porphyrins [30].
The analysis of UV-Vis spectral data obtained for the porphyrinic complexes synthesized in this paper reveals changes in the relative positions of the Soret band and the Q bands, depending on the environmental polarity (Table 2). For the same porphyrinic complex, a small blue shift of the spectral bands was observed with increasing solvent polarity. These spectral changes can be associated of the physical interaction between the solvent molecules and the functional groups in the meso positions of the porphyrinic macrocycle.
Molecules 17 05592 g002 550
Figure 2. Absorption spectra of Cu(II)-5,10,15,20-meso-tetrakis-(4-acetoxy-3-methoxy-phenyl) porphyrin in different solvents (c = 2.5 × 10−6 M, a-Soret band; b-Q band).
Figure 2. Absorption spectra of Cu(II)-5,10,15,20-meso-tetrakis-(4-acetoxy-3-methoxy-phenyl) porphyrin in different solvents (c = 2.5 × 10−6 M, a-Soret band; b-Q band).
Molecules 17 05592 g002
Table
Table 2. Maximum wavelength and molar absorptivity of the mesoporphyrinic complexes in different solvents (c = 2.5 × 10−6 M).
Table 2. Maximum wavelength and molar absorptivity of the mesoporphyrinic complexes in different solvents (c = 2.5 × 10−6 M).
Solventλmax (nm) [lgε (L mol−1 cm−1)]
Soret band B(0,0)Q bands Qy(0,0) Qx(1,0)
Zn(II)-5,10,15,20-meso-tetrakis-(4-acetoxy-3-methoxyphenyl) porphyrin
MeOH422.5 [5.750]556.8 [4.342] 595.8 [4.017]
EtOH423.9 [5.769]557.1 [4.318] 597.0 [3.924]
iso-PrOH424.4 [5.750] 557.4 [4.292] 597.0 [3.857]
CH2Cl2420.7 [5.718] 548.2 [4.342]585.9 [3.681]
DMF427.1 [5.744] 559.2 [4.326] 599.7 [3.833]
DMSO429.6 [5.756] 561.0 [4.334]601.2 [4.049]
Chx418.0 [5.733]549.4 [4.292] 601.8 [3.964]
Cu(II)- 5, 10, 15, 20-meso-tetrakis-(4-acetoxy-3-methoxyphenyl) porphyrin
MeOH412.6 [5.595]537.4 [4.292]
EtOH413.1 [5.639]537.3 [4.107]
iso-PrOH413.3 [5,623]537.3 [4.265]
CH2Cl2416.2 [5.528] 539.4 [4.182]
DMF417.3 [5.584]539.9 [4.301]
DMSO419.6 [5.525]541.7 [4.255]
Chx414.9 [5.674] 538.7 [4.318]
Zn(II)-5-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-10,15,20–tris-(4-acetoxy-3-methoxyphenyl) porphyrin
MeOH423.0 [5.706] 556.1 [4.236] 597.2 [3.806]
EtOH424.5 [5.725] 557.4 [4.283] 597.5 [3.880]
iso-PrOH424.8 [5.735] 557.6 [4.274] 597.5 [3.833]
CH2Cl2421.4 [5.678] 548.5 [3.301] 587.4 [3.602]
DMF427.7 [5.693] 559.8 [4.292] 600.3 [3.982]
DMSO430.2 [5.648] 561.4 [4.225] 602.3 [3.924]
Chx418.4 [5.674] 546.6 [4.334] 601.0 [3.84]
Cu(II)-5-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-10,15,20–tris-(4-acetoxy-3-methoxyphenyl) porphyrin
MeOH413.3 [5.491] 538.0 [4.204]
EtOH413.6 [5.515] 537.6 [4.182]
iso-PrOH414.0 [5,505] 537.9 [4.170]
CH2Cl2416.4 [5.483] 539.5 [4.134]
DMF418.1 [5.465] 540.3 [4.215]
DMSO420.8 [5.389] 542.5 [4.167]
Chx415.2 [5.534] 542.5 [4.158]
MeOH = methanol, EtOH = ethanol, iso-PrOH = isopropyl alcohol, DMF = dimethylformamide, CH2Cl2= dichloromethane, DMSO = dimethyl sulfoxide, Chx = cyclohexane.
The fluorescence measurements were performed on the zinc mesoporphyrinic complexes in solvents with different polarities, at room temperature for λex = 420 nm and their fluorescence spectral data are presented in Table 3. Figure 3 illustrates the fluorescence spectra of Zn(II)-5-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-10,15,20–tris-(4-acetoxy-3-methoxyphenyl)porphyrin in different solvents.
Molecules 17 05592 g003 550
Figure 3. Fluorescence emission of Zn(II)-5-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-10,15,20-tris-(4-acetoxy-3-methoxyphenyl) porphyrin in different solvents (c = 2.5 × 10–6 M, λex = 420 nm).
Figure 3. Fluorescence emission of Zn(II)-5-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-10,15,20-tris-(4-acetoxy-3-methoxyphenyl) porphyrin in different solvents (c = 2.5 × 10–6 M, λex = 420 nm).
Molecules 17 05592 g003
Table
Table 3. The fluorescence data of zinc mesoporphyrinic complexes in different solvents(c = 2.5 × 10−6 M, λex = 420 nm).
Table 3. The fluorescence data of zinc mesoporphyrinic complexes in different solvents(c = 2.5 × 10−6 M, λex = 420 nm).
Solventλmax (nm) [If] (a.u.)
Q(0,0) Q(0,1)
Zn(II)-5,10,15,20-meso-tetrakis-(4-acetoxy-3-methoxyphenyl)porphyrin
MeOH602.1 [495.5] 650.0 [49.8]
EtOH602.3 [534.2] 650.5 [112.7]
iso-PrOH602.6 [537.8] 651.0 [116.2]
CH2Cl2600.3 [476.7] 642.4 [139.7]
DMF605.2 [533.1] 653.6 [89.2]
DMSO607.0 [399.2] 656.5 [63.4]
Chx605.8 [307.6] 653.5 [196.0]
Zn(II)-5-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-10,15,20–tris-(4-acetoxy-3-methoxyphenyl)porphyrin
MeOH602.3 [480.2] 650.0 [93.9]
EtOH602.5 [472.0] 650.3 [93.9]
iso-PrOH602.7 [413.3] 650.8 [86.9]
CH2Cl2600.6 [432.5] 643.5 [128.0]
DMF603.1 [544.8] 651.8 [112.7]
DMSO607.6 [394.5] 654.7 [62.2]
Chx603.9 [430.9] 651.0 [89.2]
MeOH = methanol, EtOH = ethanol, iso-PrOH = isopropyl alcohol, DMF = dimethylformamide, CH2Cl2= dichloromethane, DMSO = dimethyl sulfoxide, Chx = cyclohexane.
The fluorescence spectral data shows for Zn(II)TMAP and Zn(II)TMAPOHP two emision bands located in the spectral region of 593–657 nm.
Analyzing the influence of solvent polarity on the emission spectra of the two zinc porphyrins it was found that the shape of fluorescence spectrum does not depend on polarity of solvent under the experimental conditions used. The smaller blue shifts of the emission maxims by increase of environmental polarity reflect the physical interaction between the porphyrinic substituents and the solvent molecules.

3. Experimental

3.1. General

Commercially available chemicals and solvents were used as received from Sigma-Aldrich and Merck. For the microwave assisted synthesis a CLATRONIC MWG775 H type temperature-controlled microwave oven was used. The elemental analysis of C, H and N was performed with an automatic Carlo Erba 1108 analyzer. IR spectra were recorded with a FT-IR 400D Nicolet Impact spectrophotometer. The substances under analysis, dried for 24 h at 150 °C, were processed as KBr pellets. The spectra were recorded in the 4,000–500 cm−1 spectral range. The NMR spectra of the zinc porphyrinic complexes were recorded with a 400 MHz Bruker NMR Spectrometer. EPR spectra of the copper porphyrinic complex were recorded on powders at room temperature using an ART-6 spectrometer, operating in the X band (9.01 GHz), equipped with a field modulation unit of 100 KHz. The UV-Vis spectra of the mesoporphyrinic complexes were recorded with the use of a Lambda 35 Perkin-Elmer spectrophotometer using a 10 mm path length quartz cell, in single beam mode. Fluorescence spectra were recorded with a Jasco FP 6500 spectrofluorimeter. The metalloporphyrin solutions in different solvents (methanol, ethanol, isopropyl alcohol, dimethylformamide, dichloromethane, dimethyl sulfoxide, cyclohexan) were freshly prepared in the spectrally pure solvents at the concentration 2.5 × 10−6 M and kept in dark until the measurement to prevent photodegradation.

3.2. Synthesis of Zinc Mesoporphyrinic Complexes

A mixture of 4-hydroxybenzaldehyde (1.22 g, 0.01 mol), 4-acetoxy-3-methoxybenzaldehyde (5.82 g, 0.03 mol), pyrrole (2.76 mL, 0.04 mol), anhydrous zinc acetate (1.83 g, 0.01 mol) and 2–3 g of silica gel 60 (200–500 μm, 35–70 mesh) was subjected to microwave irradiation at 550 W for 8 min in the presence of 2,6-dimethylpyridine (0.1 mL). The presence of the metalloporphyrins in the reaction mixture was monitored by UV-Vis spectroscopy. Statistically, the reaction may provide a mixture of six metalloporphyrin isomers [A4, A3B, A2B2 (cis and trans), AB3 and B4-type]. Thin layer chromatography (dichloromethane/diethyl ether 30:1 v/v) has confirmed their presence in the final product while absence of chlorins was confirmed by monitoring the Q bands in the UV-Vis spectra.
The reaction product was extracted with dichloromethane/diethyl ether (30:1, v/v). The extract was filtered, the solvent was removed under vacuum and the product was purified by column chromatography, using silica gel (100–200 mesh size) as stationary phase and dichloromethane/diethyl ether (30:1, v/v) as eluent. In order of comparative evaluation the first two isomers were separated and characterized. The first band that passes through the chromatographic column corresponds to the Zn(II)-5,10,15,20-meso-tetrakis-(4-acetoxy-3-methoxyphenyl)porphyrin (A4 isomer) while the second band contains Zn(II)-5-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-10,15,20–tris-(4-acetoxy-3-methoxyphenyl)porphyrin (A3B isomer). The solutions of the zinc complexes were concentrated by simple distillation. The final zinc mesoporphyrinic complexes was obtained by preparative TLC (2 mm, silicagel 60 plates were used).
Zn(II)-5-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-10,15,20–tris-(4-acetoxy-3-methoxyphenyl) porphyrin was obtained as violet crystals with a yield of 36%. Elemental analysis for C53H40N4O10 Zn: calculated C 66.45, H 4.18, N 5.85; found C 66.37, H 4.11, N 5.77. The chemical shifts of the NMR signals for the Zn(II)TMAPOHP are as follows: 1H-NMR (CDCl3), δH, ppm: 3.93 (s, 9H, CH3COO), 4.03 (s, 9H, O-CH3), 6.8 (s, 1H, OH), 7.25 (s, 3H, Hortho,-Ph-CH3COO), 7.42 (d, 3H, Hortho-Ph-CH3COO), 7.72 (d, 3H, Hmeta-Ph-CH3COO), 7.78 (d, 2H, Hmeta-Ph-OH), 8.0 (d, 2H, Hortho-Ph-OH), 8.92 (d, 8H, Hβpyrr). 13C-NMR (CDCl3), δC, ppm: 56.2, 76.7, 77.0, 115.8, 117.6, 119.1, 119.8, 126.2, 127.2, 128.8, 130.1, 132.3, 133.5, 146.8, 148.3, 149.6.
Zn(II)-5,10,15,20-meso-tetrakis-(4-acetoxy-3-methoxyphenyl) porphyrin was obtained with a yield of 23%. Elemental analysis for C56H44N4O12 Zn: calculated C 65.3, H 4.27, N 5.44; found C 65.22, H 4.18, N 5.33. The chemical shifts of the NMR signals for the Zn(II)TMAP are as follows: 1H-NMR (CDCl3), δH, ppm: 3.75 (s, 12H, CH3COO), 3.96 (s, 12H, O-CH3), 7.03 (s, 4H, Hortho,-Ph-CH3COO), 7.40 (d, 4H, Hortho-Ph-CH3COO), 7.43 (d, 4H, Hmeta-Ph-CH3COO), 8.92 (d, 8H, Hβpyrr). 13C-NMR (CDCl3), δC, ppm: 56.2, 76.7, 77.3, 109.7, 115.8, 119.4, 128.6, 129.8, 134.5, 144.0, 145.2, 146.6.

3.3. Synthesis of Copper Mesoporphyrinic Complexes

A mixture of 4-acetoxy-3-methoxybenzaldehyde (5.82 g, 0.03 mol), pyrrole (2.76 mL, 0.04 mol), 4-hydroxybenzaldehyde (1.22 g, 0.01 mol), anhydrous copper(II) chloride (1.34 g, 0.01 mol), 2–3 g of silica gel 60 (200–500 μm, 35–70 mesh) in the presence of 2,6-dimethylpyridine (0.1 mL) was irradiated in a Pyrex bottle by a microwave oven at 550 W for 8 min. The extent of the complexation reaction was monitored by UV-Vis spectroscopy. For this purpose, extraction of samples was performed after every 2 min of irradiation. Monitoring the reaction by UV-Vis and TLC revealed the presence in the final mixture of six isomers of porphyrin type.
The first two copper mesoporphyrinic isomers (A4 and A3B type) were separated for this study. For this purpose the crude product was dissolved in dichloromethane/diethyl ether (30:1, v/v), filtered and finally purified on a chromatography column by repeated elution, using silica gel (100–200 mesh size) as stationary phase and dichloromethane/diethyl ether (30:1, v/v) as eluent. The first band that passes through the chromatographic column corresponds to the symmetrical copper porphyrin while the second band containing A3B isomer. The final copper mesoporphyrinic complexes was obtained by preparative TLC (2 mm, silicagel 60 plates were used). The solutions of the copper porphyrinic complexes were concentrated by simple distillation and the obtained dark red crystals were dried at ≈100 °C for 12 h.
Cu(II)-5-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-10,15,20-tris-(4-acetoxy-3-methoxyphenyl)porphyrin was obtained with a yield of 38%. Elemental analysis for C53H40N4O10Cu: Calculated C 66.56, H 4.18, N 5.86; found C 66.45, H 4.12, N 5.78.
Cu(II)-5,10,15,20-meso-tetrakis-(4-acetoxy-3-methoxyphenyl)porphyrin was obtained with a yield of 25%. Elemental analysis for C56H44N4O12Cu: Calculated C 65.4, H 4.28, N 5.45; found C 65.28, H 4.21, N 5.36.
EPR spectra of the copper mesoporphyrinic complexes were recorded in solid state at room temperature in order to obtain information about the coordination environment around copper ion.
The EPR parameters evaluated for the copper porphyrinic complexes are: Cu(II)TMAP g|| = 2.165, g⊥ = 2.048, α2 = 0.7827, A|| = 202 × 10−4 cm−1 and g|| = 2.173, g⊥ = 2.05, α2 = 0.7942, A|| = 203 × 10−4 cm−1 for Cu(II)TMAPOHP. These magnetic parameters values are close to those reported in the literature for copper porphyrins and confirm a square planar geometrical arrangement of nitrogen atoms around the copper ion [31,32]. The α2 and g|| values indicates a covalent character of the copper-nitrogen bonds in the copper porphyrinic complex [33].

4. Conclusions

The main task of this study was to synthesize some A3B and A4 mesoporphyrinic type complexes by microwave irradiation under solvent-free conditions. The complexes were obtained in a short time with good yields (about 36% for the unsymmetrical mesoporphyrinic complexes), using an ecological method of synthesis. The structures of metalloporphyrins were confirmed by elemental analysis, UV-Vis, FT-IR, NMR and EPR spectroscopy. Furthermore the influence of the metallic ion and solvent polarity on spectral properties of the mesoporphyrinic complexes was investigated. The main differences observed in the spectral characteristics of the complexes are the result of the conjugation effects that occur between the central metallic ion orbital and the π electrons of the porphyrinic ring. The spectral changes that occur by increasing environmental polarity, which are smaller than those produced by the nature of the central ion, can be ascribed to the physical interaction between the solvent molecules and the functional groups in the meso positions of the porphyrinic macrocycles.

Acknowledgments

The research was supported by MNT ERA NET projects No. 7-030/2010.

References and Notes

  1. Detty, M.R.; Gibson, S.L.; Wagner, S.J. Current clinical and preclinical photosensitizers for use in photodynamic therapy. J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47, 3897–3195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kamuhabwa, A.; Agostinis, P.; Ahmed, B.; Landuyt, W.; van Cleynenbreugel, B.; van Poppel, H.; de Witte, P. Hypericin as a potential phototherapeutic agent in superficial transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 2004, 3, 772–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Hilderbrand, S.; Weissleder, R. Near-infrared fluorescence: Application to in vivo molecular imaging. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2010, 14, 71–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Chatterjee, D.K.; Fong, L.S.; Zhang, Y. Nanoparticles in photodynamic therapy: An emerging paradigm. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2008, 60, 1627–1637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Bonneau, S.; Bizet, C.V.; Mojzisova, H.; Brault, D. Tetrapyrrole-photosensitizers vectorization and plasma LDL: A physic-chemical approach. Int. J. Pharm. 2007, 344, 78–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Chin, W.W.L.; Lau, O.W.K.; Bhuvaneswari, R.; Heng, P.W.S.; Olivo, M. Chlorin e6-polyvinylpyrrolidone as a fluorescent marker for fluorescence diagnosis of humanbladder cancer implanted on the chick chorioallantoic membrane model. Cancer Lett. 2007, 245, 127–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Stockert, J.C.; Cañete, M.; Juarranz, A.; Villanueva, A.; Horobin, R.W.; Borrell, J.I.; Teixidó, J.; Nonell, S. Porphycenes: Facts and prospects in photodynamic therapy of cancer. Curr. Med. Chem. 2007, 14, 997–1026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Banfi, S.; Caruso, E.; Caprioli, S.; Mazzagatti, L.; Canti, G.; Ravizza, R.; Gariboldia, M.; Montia, E. Photodynamic effects of porphyrin and chlorin photosensitizers in human colon adenocarcinoma cells. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2004, 12, 4853–4860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Grosseweiner, L.I. The Science of Phototherapy; CRC Press: London, UK, 1994; pp. 139–155, Chapter 8. [Google Scholar]
  10. Schweiter, C.; Schmidt, R. Physical mechanisms of generation and deactivation of singlet oxygen. Chem. Rev. 2003, 103, 1685–1758. [Google Scholar]
  11. Berg, K.; Selbo, P.K.; Weyergang, A.; Dietze, A.; Prasmickaite, L.; Bonsted, A. Porphyrin related photosensitizers for cancer imaging and therapeutic applications. J. Microsc. 2005, 218, 133–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Rosenkranz, A.A.; Jans, D.A.; Sobolev, A.S. Targeted intracellular delivery of photosensitizers to enhance photodynamic efficiency. Immunol. Cell Biol. 2002, 78, 452–464. [Google Scholar]
  13. Osterloh, J.; Vicente, M.G.H. Mechanisms of porphyrinoid localization in tumors. J. Porph. Phthal. 2002, 5, 305–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Milgrom, L.; MacRobert, S. Light years ahead. Chem. Br. 1998, 34, 45–50. [Google Scholar]
  15. Sharma, R.K.; Ahuja, G.; Sidhwani, I.T. A new one pot and solvent-free synthesis of nickel porphyrin complex. Green Chem. Lett. Rev. 2009, 2, 101–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Collman, J.P.; Decreau, R.A. Microwave-assisted synthesis of corroles. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 1207–1210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kappe, C.O.; Dallinger, D. The impact of microwave synthesis on drug discovery. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2006, 5, 51–63. [Google Scholar]
  18. Bougrin, K.; Loupy, A.; Soufiaoui, M. Microwave-assisted solvent-free heterocyclic synthesis. J. Photochem. Photobiol. C: Photochem. 2005, 6, 139–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Buchler, J.W. Static Coordination Chemistry of Metalloporphyrins. In Porphyrins and Metalloporphyrins; Smith, K.M., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1975; pp. 157–224, Chapter 5. [Google Scholar]
  20. Boscencu, R.; Socoteanu, R.; Oliveira, A.S.; Vieira Ferreira, L.F.; Nacea, V.; Patrinoiu, G. Synthesis and characterization of some unsymmetrically-substituted mesoporphyrinic mono-hydroxyphenyl complexes of Copper(II). Pol. J. Chem. 2008, 82, 509–522. [Google Scholar]
  21. Boscencu, R.; Socoteanu, R.; Oliveira, A.S.; Ferreira, L.F.V. Studies on Zn(II) monohydroxyphenyl mesoporphyrinic complexes. Synthesis and characterization. J. Serb. Chem. Soc. 2008, 73, 713–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Machado, A.E.; Gomes, W.R.; Araújo, D.M.; Miglio, H.S.; Ueno, L.T.; Paula, R.D.; Cavaleiro, J.A.; Neto, N.M.B. Synthesis and spectroscopic characterization of two tetrasubstituted cationic porphyrin derivatives. Molecules 2011, 16, 5807–5821. [Google Scholar]
  23. Liu, M.O.; Tai, C.H.; Hu, A.T. Synthesis of metalloporphyrins by microwave irradiation and their fluorescent properties. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2005, 92, 322–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Lindsey, J.S. Synthetic routes to meso-patterned porphyrins. Acc. Chem. Res. 2010, 43, 300–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Senge, M.O. Nucleophilic substitution as a tool for the synthesis of unsymmetrical porphyrins. Acc. Chem. Res. 2005, 38, 733–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Senge, M.O.; Shaker, Y.M.; Pintea, M.; Ryppa, C.; Hatscher, S.S.; Ryan, A.; Sergeeva, Y. Synthesis of meso-substituted ABCD-type porphyrins by functionalization reactions. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2010, 2, 237–258. [Google Scholar]
  27. Boscencu, R.; Ilie, M.; Socoteanu, R.; Oliveira, A.S.; Constantin, C.; Neagu, M.; Manda, G.; Vieira Ferreira, L.F. Microwave synthesis, basic spectral and biological evaluation of some Copper (II) mesoporphyrinic complexes. Molecules 2010, 15, 3731–3743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Boscencu, R. Unsymmetrical mesoporphyrinic complexes of Copper (II) and Zinc (II). microwave-assisted synthesis, spectral characterization and cytotoxicity evaluation. Molecules 2011, 16, 5604–5617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Gouterman, M. Optical Spectra and Electronic Structure of Porphyrins and Related Rings. In The Porphyrins; Dolphin, D., Ed.; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1978; Volume 3, pp. 11–87. [Google Scholar]
  30. Gouterman, M.; Wagniere, G.H.; Snyder, L.C. Spectra of porphyrins: Part II. Four orbital model. J. Mol. Spectrosc. 1963, 11, 108–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lin, W.C. Electron Spin Resonance and Electronic Structure of Metalloporphyrins. In The Porphyrins; Dolphin, D., Ed.; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1978; Volume 4, pp. 358–364. [Google Scholar]
  32. Manoharan, P.T.; Roger, M.T. ESR Study of Copper (II) and Silver (II) Tetraphenylporphyrin. In Electron Spin Resonance of Metal Complexes; Yen, T.F, Ed.; Plenum Press: New York, NY, USA, 1969; pp. 143–173. [Google Scholar]
  33. Kivelson, D.; Neiman, R.R. ESR studies on the bonding in copper complexes. J. Chem. Phys. 1961, 35, 149–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  • Sample Availability: Samples of the compounds Zn(II)TMAP, Cu(II)TMAP, Zn(II)TMAPOHP, Cu(II)TMAPOHP are available from the authors.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Boscencu, R. Microwave Synthesis Under Solvent-Free Conditions and Spectral Studies of Some Mesoporphyrinic Complexes. Molecules 2012, 17, 5592-5603. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules17055592

AMA Style

Boscencu R. Microwave Synthesis Under Solvent-Free Conditions and Spectral Studies of Some Mesoporphyrinic Complexes. Molecules. 2012; 17(5):5592-5603. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules17055592

Chicago/Turabian Style

Boscencu, Rica. 2012. "Microwave Synthesis Under Solvent-Free Conditions and Spectral Studies of Some Mesoporphyrinic Complexes" Molecules 17, no. 5: 5592-5603. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules17055592

APA Style

Boscencu, R. (2012). Microwave Synthesis Under Solvent-Free Conditions and Spectral Studies of Some Mesoporphyrinic Complexes. Molecules, 17(5), 5592-5603. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules17055592

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop