Next Article in Journal
[18F]fallypride-PET/CT Analysis of the Dopamine D2/D3 Receptor in the Hemiparkinsonian Rat Brain Following Intrastriatal Botulinum Neurotoxin A Injection
Next Article in Special Issue
Preliminary Quality Evaluation and Characterization of Phenolic Constituents in Cynanchi Wilfordii Radix
Previous Article in Journal
Special Issue: Antibacterial Materials and Coatings
Previous Article in Special Issue
Chemical and Biological Significance of Oenothein B and Related Ellagitannin Oligomers with Macrocyclic Structure
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 23
Issue 3
10.3390/molecules23030586
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Characterization of Condensed Tannins from Purple Prairie Clover (Dalea purpurea Vent.) Conserved as either Freeze-Dried Forage, Sun-Cured Hay or Silage

by
Kai Peng
1,2,3,
Qianqian Huang
4,
Zhongjun Xu
2,
Tim A. McAllister
2,
Surya Acharya
2,
Irene Mueller-Harvey
5,
Christopher Drake
5,
Junming Cao
1,
Yanhua Huang
1,
Yuping Sun
1,
Shunxi Wang
3 and
Yuxi Wang
2,*
1
Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science (South China) of Ministry of Agriculture, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Animal Breeding and Nutrition, Institute of Animal Science, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Science, Guangzhou 510640, China
2
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lethbridge Research and Development Centre, Lethbridge, AB T1J 4B1, Canada
3
College of Engineering, China Agriculture University, Beijing 100083, China
4
College of Animal Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China
5
Chemistry and Biochemistry Laboratory, School of Agriculture, Policy and Development, University of Reading, Reading RG6 6AT, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2018, 23(3), 586; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23030586
Submission received: 1 February 2018 / Revised: 27 February 2018 / Accepted: 2 March 2018 / Published: 6 March 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Special Issue Dedicated to Late Professor Takuo Okuda, “Tannins and Related Polyphenols Revisited: Chemistry, Biochemistry and Biological Activities”)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Conservation methods have been shown to affect forage nutrient composition and value, but little information is available about the effect of forage conservation on plant condensed tannins (CT). The objective of this study was to assess the effects of conservation method on the concentration, chemical composition and biological activity of CT. Whole-plant purple prairie clover (PPC, Dalea purpurea Vent.) was harvested at full flower and conserved as freeze-dried forage (FD), hay (HAY) or silage (SIL). Concentration of CT in conserved PPC was determined by the butanol-HCl-acetone method. Structural composition, protein-precipitation capacity and anti-bacterial activity of CT isolated from conserved forage were determined by in situ thiolytic degradation followed by HPLC-MS analysis, a protein precipitation assay using bovine serum albumin and ribulose 1,5-disphosphate carboxylase as model proteins and by an Escherichia coli (E. coli) growth test, respectively. Conservation method had no effect on concentration of total CT, but ensiling decreased (p < 0.001) extractable CT and increased (p < 0.001) protein- and fiber-bound CT. In contrast, hay-making only increased (p < 0.01) protein-bound CT. Regardless of conservation method, epigallocatechin (EGC), catechin (C) and epicatechin (EC) were the major flavan-3-ol units, and gallocatechin (GC) was absent from both terminal and extension units of PPC CT. The SIL CT had the lowest (p < 0.001) EGC, but the highest (p < 0.01) EC in the extension units. Similarly, SIL CT exhibited a lower (p < 0.001) mean degree of polymerization (mDP), but higher (p < 0.001) procyanidins (PC) than FD or HAY CT. The protein-precipitating capacity of CT in conserved PPC ranked (p < 0.001) as FD > HAY > SIL. E. coli growth n M9 medium was inhibited by 25–100 µg/mL of CT isolated from FD, HAY and SIL (p < 0.05), but preservation method had no effect on the ability of CT to inhibit bacterial growth. The results demonstrated that ensiling decreased the extractability and protein-precipitating capacity of CT by increasing the proportions of PC. Purple prairie clover conserved as hay retained more biologically active CT than if it was conserved as silage.

1. Introduction

Condensed tannins (CT) are a group of naturally occurring phenolic compounds that are widely present in plants including a number of common forages. Condensed tannins are oligomeric or polymeric flavonoids consisting of flavan-3-ol units that commonly include catechin (C), epicatechin (EC), gallocatechin (GC) and epigallocatechin (EGC) with the relative proportions of these flavonoids differing among plant types. Condensed tannins exhibit various antimicrobial, anti-parasitic, anti-oxidant, and anti-inflammatory activities and as a result are seen as a promising natural alternative to in-feed antibiotics [1]. It has been shown that concentration and composition of CT in a plant are affected by the growing conditions, phenological growth stage as well as tissue type [2,3,4,5]. Ensiling and hay-making are two common methods used to conserve forage as silage or hay for ruminant livestock. It is generally recognized that these conservation methods alter the nutrient composition of forage, leading to changes in the feed value of conserved forages [6]. For example, excessive proteolysis can occur during ensiling, decreasing protein nutritive value [7]. Although studies have found that forage conservation methods also reduce the extractability of CT [6], their effects on the structural nature and specific biological activity of CT have not been examined. Research in this area is needed because the biological activities of CT in forage are closely associated with their concentrations and chemical structures [8].
Purple prairie clover (PPC; Dalea purpurea Vent.) is a native legume that is widely distributed in the North America prairie and contains high concentrations of CT (up to 94 g/kg DM). It has been shown that CT in PPC possess strong anti-Escherichia coli activity [9,10,11,12]. In addition, PPC CT cause greater precipitation of bovine serum albumin (BSA) and spinach ribulose 1,5-disphosphate carboxylase (Rubisco) [5,9] than CT from other plant sources. Huang et al. [6] suggested that the biological activity of CT in PPC conserved as hay was higher than that in silage because more of the CT remained in an extractable form. However, the chemical composition of the extractable CT in these conserved forages was not determined. The objective of this study was to assess the effects of PPC conservation method on the concentration, chemical composition and biological activity of CT.

2. Results

2.1. Characteristics of PPC Conserved as FD, HAY and SIL

Although organic matter (OM) and crude protein (CP) were not affected by forage conservation method (Table 1), PPC conserved as FD had lower (p < 0.01) concentrations of neutral detergent fibre (NDF) and acid detergent fibre (ADF) than HAY or SIL.
The acid detergent lignin (ADL) content of FD was lower (p < 0.01) than HAY. Contents of NDF, ADF and ADL were similar (p > 0.05) between HAY and SIL. The water-soluble carbohydrate (WSC) concentration in conserved forages ranked as FD > HAY > SIL (p < 0.001). Among the conserved forages, SIL contained the lowest (p < 0.001) level of total phenolics, followed by HAY and FD, respectively. Similarly, SIL exhibited lower (p < 0.001) extractable CT than FD or HAY. However, SIL had greater (p < 0.001) concentrations of fiber-bound and protein-bound CT than FD or HAY. Protein-bound CT were also greater (p < 0.001) in HAY than in FD. Conservation method had no effect on the concentration of total CT (p > 0.05).

2.2. CT Terminal and Extension Units

Regardless of conservation method, the terminal units of PPC CT were composed of C and EC only, and no GC or EGC was detected.
Following thiolytic degradation, two flavan-3-ols (i.e., C and EC), were detected in terminal units as well as EGC-benzyl mercaptan (BM), C-BM and EC-BM adducts in extension units in all samples, regardless of conservation method (Figure 1). Terminal units accounted on average for 5–8% of all flavan-3-ol units in tannins. The extension units (92–95%) contained three flavanols, i.e., EGC (19–28%), C (2–4%) and EC (64–69%), but lacked GC (Table 2).
Condensed tannins present in HAY had greater (p < 0.001) proportion of EGC, but lower (p < 0.01) EC in the extension units than FD and SIL. In contrast, CT from SIL had lower (p < 0.001) EGC, but a greater (p < 0.001) proportion of C as compared to FD.
The average polymer size of CT, ranged from 12.4 to 18.6 of mean degree polymerization (mDP) in conserved PPC (Table 3). The mDP was lower (p < 0.001) in SIL as compared to FD or HAY.
Similarly, CT in SIL had a lower (p < 0.001) proportion of prodelphinidins (PD; i.e., GC + EGC), but a higher (p < 0.001) proportion of procyanidins (PC; i.e., C + EC) than FD and HAY. In contrast, CT in HAY had a higher (p < 0.001) proportion of PD but lower (p < 0.001) proportion of PC than FD PPC. Irrespective of conservation method, PPC CT were dominated by the cis-isomers (i.e., EC + EGC). SIL had a lower (p < 0.001) proportion of cis-isomers and higher (p < 0.001) proportion of trans-isomers than in FD or HAY. There was no difference (p > 0.05) in cis- and trans-isomers between FD and HAY.

2.3. Protein-Precipitating Capacities of CT in PPC Conserved as FD, HAY and SIL

Bovine serum albumin was completely precipitated by ≥1000 μg PPC CT (Figure 2a), whereas Rubisco was completely precipitated by ≥750 μg PPC CT (Figure 2b). The protein-precipitating capacity of CT in the conserved PPC ranked in the order of FD > HAY > SIL (p < 0.001) for both BSA and Rubisco proteins. Condensed tannins from PPC, consistently exhibited a lower (p < 0.001) ability to precipitate BSA than Rubisco, irrespective of conservation method (Table 4).

2.4. Growth of E. coli Affected by CT in PPC Conserved as FD, HAY and SIL

Compared to the control and irrespective of conservation method, growth of E. coli 25922 and 35281 was inhibited (p < 0.001) at all concentrations of CT tested (Table 5). The maximal growth rate (µ) of strain E. coli 25922 decreased (p < 0.001) as the CT increased from 25 to 100 µg/mL, whereas no difference was observed at CT < 100 µg/mL for E. coli 35281. Lag times (L) increased with increasing CT concentrations for both E. coli 25922 (p < 0.001) and 35281 (p < 0.05).
The maximal growth rate of E. coli 25922 did not differ among conservation methods with the exception of CT at 25 µg/mL. Strain E. coli 25922 exposed to 25 µg/mL of FD CT had a greater (p < 0.01) L, but a lower (p < 0.01) µ than that exposed to HAY or SIL CT. In contrast, µ and the L of E. coli 35218 were not affected by the source or concentration of CT, excepting that 100 µg/mL of CT from HAY and SIL decreased (p < 0.05) L as compared to CT from FD.

3. Discussion

3.1. Effect of Conservation Method on the Compositions of PPC

The chemical composition of PPC forage conserved as FD, HAY and SIL was similar to the report by Huang et al. [6]. The concentrations of extractable, protein-bound and fiber-bound CT were also comparable with previous reports [6,13,14]. In this study, the higher NDF concentration in HAY and SIL compared with FD suggests that hay-making or ensiling increased the fibre concentration of PPC. The increased NDF in SIL reflects the microbial fermentation of soluble nutrients during ensiling as shown by the lower WSC content of SIL PPC compared to FD PPC. A significant increase in the post-ensiling NDF content of alfalfa was also observed by Broderick [15]. Although the increase of NDF in HAY may also reflect plant and microbial utilization of WSC during drying and post-baling, it is also a result of the loss of leaves, which lowers the leaf-to-stem ratio. As stems contain more NDF than leaves, it also increases the NDF content of the conserved forage [16]. Loss of leaves during hay-making is one of the major factors that contribute to differences in the nutritive value between hay and other forage conservation methods [17]. Enoh et al. [18] also reported that hay-making increased NDF content of Brachiaria as compared to green forage.
Similar concentration of extractable CT in HAY and FD PPC suggests that sun-drying had minimal effect on biological activity of CT in PPC. Similar results were also reported for PPC [6] and sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia Scop.) hay [19,20,21]. On the contrary, other studies have observed that extractable CT in sun-cured sericea lespedeza (Lespedeza cuneate (Dum. Cours.) G. Don) and sainfoin hay was lower than that in the fresh forage [22,23]. The discrepancy among these studies is likely due to variations in drying conditions and forage type. Scharenberg et al. [20] dried sainfoin in a closed system at 30 °C, while Lorenz et al. [21] wilted sainfoin to a moisture level of 50%, while the PPC in the present study was wilted in the field under hot and windy conditions.
It is interesting to note that ensiling reduced extractable, but increased protein-bound and fiber-bound CT, with no effect on total CT. This result indicates that a portion of extractable CT has been transformed into protein-bound and fiber-bound during ensiling. A shift from extractable to bound CT during the ensiling of PPC was also observed by Huang et al. [6]. It is likely that partial disruption of plant cells as a result of physical chopping before ensiling and microbial fermentation during ensiling enables CT to react with other plant fractions, increasing the bound CT fraction [24]. Ensiling sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia Scop.) also decreases extractable and increases bound CT [19,20]. Because biological activity of CT in the plant depends on both chemical structure as well as the concentration of the extractable CT [8,25], the reduced extractability of CT in PPC silage suggests that this is the primary factor responsible for the reduced biological activity of PPC CT.

3.2. Effects of Forage Conservation Method on the Structure and Chemical Composition of PPC CT

Although it has been found that conservation methods affect the concentration of CT in forage [6,24], there is no information available about the effects of forage conservation on the chemical structure of CT. To our knowledge, this is the first study that demonstrates that ensiling and hay-making alters the structural characteristics of CT in conserved forage.
The flavan-3-ol composition of PPC in this study was consistent with that of CT extracted from various phenological PPC tissues, with epicatechin (average 72.2%) and epigallocatechin (average 24.2%) being the dominant monomers and gallocatechin being noticably absent from both terminal and extension units [5]. This is comparable to Lotus corniculatus CT, which contained about 67% epicatechin and lacked gallocatechin in both terminal and extension units [26,27]. However, the structural composition of CT in PPC also differs from some other forage sources. For examples, epigallocatechin was the principal monomer (≈64%) in Lotus pedunculatus [27] and sainfoin CT (52–63%) [28]. In addition, PPC CT in the present study contained more PC than PD, which was consistent with our previous study with PPC [5] but differing from sainfoin CT, which contain more PD than PC [28,29,30,31]. Consistent with most sources of CT, both sainfoin and PPC CT contained more cis than trans units. These results indicate that the structural composition of CT are plant species specific, which probably also contributes to the varying biological activity of different CT.
Compared to altering the extractability of CT, forage conservation method had a relatively minor impact on the structural composition of CT in PPC. Those minor alterations that were noticeable included an increase in PC with ensiling and PD with hay-making. Ensiling apparently decreased mDP and the proportion of cis-isomers, whereas hay-making did not affect these parameters. This suggests that ensiling had a greater effect on the composition of CT than hay-making. The reason that ensiling decreased mDP are unknown, but may be attributed to the higher proportion of PC in the ensiled PPC. It has been reported that CT with higher PC tend to have lower mDP and lower extractable CT concentrations [32,33,34]. Vidal et al. [35] and Tharayil et al. [36] also observed that mild acidic conditions could cleave interflavanic bonds, reducing the degree of polymerization of CTs. In the present study, the pH of PPC declined to 4.8 after one week and remained at this level throughout 10 weeks of storage. Therefore, the mild acidic conditions of the ensiling process may have contributed to a decline in mDP of CT in silage. Whether microbial activity during ensiling had any effect on this response is unknown, although there are significant CT-microbe interactions during ensiling [37]. As compared with ensiling, results indicated that hay-making by sun-curing under the conditions in this study had little effect on CT composition as demonstrated by the similar mDP and proportions of cis- and trans-isomers of FD and HAY samples.

3.3. Effect of Forage Conservation Method on the Protein-Precipitating Capacity of PPC CT

Previous studies have reported that the protein-precipitating capacities of PPC CT in different phenological tissues of differing maturity is a reflection of the chemical composition of CT [5]. The fact that the protein-precipitating capacity of CT decreased in the order of FD > HAY > SIL indicates that both ensiling and hay-making decreased protein-precipitating capacity, with this response being greater for silage. Binding and precipitating proteins is a common characteristic of CT and is the principal factor responsible for their biological activity [38]. The capacity of CT to bind proteins is determined by their chemical traits including chain length, molecular weight, PC/PD ratio, number of potential hydrogen and hydrophobic bonding sites and conformation [26,39,40]. Therefore, the decreased protein-precipitating capacity of CT by hay-making and ensiling in this study is likely due to alterations in their chemical structure. It has been demonstrated that the affinity of CT for proteins decreases with decreasing mDP [41,42,43,44,45] and proportions of PD [46,47,48]. Moreover, De Freitas and Mateus [49] found that the number of active sites that were able to bind proteins increased with the number of cis-flavanol units. Therefore, the decreased protein-precipitating capacity of CT after ensiling is likely attributable to the decline in mDP, proportions of PD and cis-flavanol units. However, the decrease in the protein-precipitating capacity of CT in HAY as compared to FD PPC cannot be explained by these factors as they did not differ between these two methods of forage conservation. This suggests that the protein-binding capacity may not only be related to mDP or the proportions of PD proportion or cis-flavanol units, but also due to the comprehensive effect of flavanol units or the spatial distribution of these monomers within CT [50]. Additional studies have indicated that CT with higher molecular weight (MW) exhibit stronger protein-binding capacities [51,52,53,54] as CT with higher MW contain a larger number of hydroxyl groups that promote the formation of cross-links with proteins [55]. It is also possible that the lower protein-precipitating capacities of ensiled CTs as compared to those from hay may reflect a reduction in the MW of CT during ensiling, but this was not determined in this study. Further research is needed to confirm this.

3.4. Effect of Forage Conservation Method on Anti-E. coli Activity of PPC CT

Condensed tannins in PPC have been shown to possess strong anti-E. coli activity both in vitro [9,10,56] and in vivo [12,13]. Results of the present study were consistent with these previous observations. Furthermore, this study demonstrated that although ensiling and hay-making altered the structural composition and protein-precipitating capacity to a degree, they did not affect the anti-E. coli activity of the PPC CT. This suggests that in addition to protein-precipitating ability, other factors may also be responsible for the involved in anti-E. coli activity of PPC CT. This is conceivable given the fact that protein-precipitation is a universal property of CT, but only CT from certain plant sources (e.g., Acacia catechu, Holarrhena antidysenterica, Quercus infectoria, Uncaria gambir, Walsura robusta, Vaccinium macrocarpon, PPC) have known anti-E. coli activity [10,57,58,59,60,61,62]. Liu et al. [9] reported that the anti-E. coli activity of PPC CT is attributable to their high affinity for proteins and ability to cause cell aggregation. This destabilizes the bacterial outer membrane (OM) and commensurately causes an alteration in its fatty acid composition [10]. Flavan-3-ol monomers, such as catechins in green tea (Camellia sinensis), have also been reported to express anti-E. coli activity by directly binding peptides of bacterial origin [63], damaging the liquid bilayer and increasing OM permeability [64,65]. It should be noted that although anti-E. coli actity of CT isolated from SIL and HAY did not differ to that from FD PPC, the actual anti-E. coli activity would be reduced because of a reduction in the extractibility of CT from the whole plant. Conservation method, especially ensiling, decreased the extractability of CT. Therefore further study is needed to elucidate the mechanisms by which forage conservation method affect biological activity of CT.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Conservation of PPC as Freeze-Dried, Hay or Silage

Whole-plant PPC was harvested at full-bloom from three irrigated plots (approximately 0.25 acre each) of the Swinton silt loam soil (Orthic Brown Chernozem) [66] at the Lethbridge Research and Development Centre (Lethbridge, AB, Canada). Harvested forage from each plot was divided into three equal lots to be conserved as FD, HAY, or SIL. The lot for FD was frozen at −40 °C immediately after harvest and then lyophilized. The FD was used to simulate green chopped forage and therefore its CT content was considered to represent that of freshly harvested forage. HAY was allowed to sun cure in the field to <15% moisture, and was subsequently baled in approximately 20-kg square bales (90 × 50 × 30 cm; 3 bales) and stored in an enclosed shed at ambient temperature for 120 d. Subsamples from at least 3 locations of each bales were collected, composited and lyophilized. Forage for SIL was wilted in the field to ≈30% DM and chopped to a theoretical chop length of 1.0 cm using a paper cutter (X-ACTO 26612, Westerville, OH, USA). Chopped PPC was then packed (≈2.7 kg) into three PVC laboratory silos (10 × 35.5 cm) and compacted with a hydraulic press to achieve a packing density of approximately 890 kg (fresh weight)/m3. Silos were sealed at both ends with rubber lids and metal bands, with one lid fitted with a 7.0-cm-long rubber tube as a vent. Laboratory silos were stored indoors at 22 °C and were opened after 76 d of ensiling. Upon opening, silage within 5.0 cm at both ends was discarded, and the remaining content of each silo was thoroughly hand mixed and subsamples taken. The subsamples from the three silos of each plot were composited, frozen at −40 °C and immediately lyophilized.
All forage samples were ground to pass 1.0 mm screen using a Thomas Wiley Cutting Mill (Arthur H. Thomas Co., Philadelphia, PA, USA) and stored in amber glass containers for chemical analyses. Subsamples of each type of preserved forages were also composited across the three plots to form a single sample for CT extraction, estimation of protein precipitating capacity and anti-E. coli activity.

4.2. Chemical Analysis

Conserved forage samples were analyzed for DM, OM and acid detergent lignin using AOAC method [67], NDF and ADF using an ANKOM 200 system (ANKOM Technology Corp., Fairport, NY, USA) with sodium sulfite and α-amylase added for NDF analysis. Samples were ball-ground in a planetary micro mill (Retsch Inc., Newtown, PA, USA) for measurement of total nitrogen (N) by flash combustion analysis using a NA1500 Nitrogen Analyzer (Carlo Erba Instruments, Milan, Italy). For WSC, 15 g subsamples from conserved forage were combined with 135 g of deionized H2O and blended in a homogenizer (Osterizer, Sunbeam, Fontana, CA, USA) for 30 s. The homogenate was strained through four layers of cheesecloth and the supernatant was sampled and analyzed for WSC as described by Zahiroddini et al. [68]. Conserved PPC samples were analyzed for total phenolic compounds by the Folin-Ciocalteu method [69] with tannic acid (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) as the standard and were expressed as tannic acid equivalents. The concentrations of extractable, protein-bound and fibre-bound CT were determined using the method of Terrill et al. [70] with CT purified from whole PPC plants as a standard.

4.3. In Situ Thiolysis of PPC Tannins and HPLC Analysis of Thiolysis Products

Condensed tannins were degraded with BM as described previously [31]. The resulting flavan-3-ols (terminal subunits) and their BM-adducts (extension subunits) were identified by HPLC-MS analysis [71,72] and quantified using peak areas at 280 nm in conjunction with published flavan-3-ol response factors against taxifolin [31,73]. This yielded data on the mean degree of CT polymerization, molar percentages of PC and PD within CT, and molar percentages of cis- and trans-flavan-3-ols [73].

4.4. Determination of the Protein Precipitation Capacities of CT from Freeze-Dried, Silage or Hay PPC

Condensed tannins from PPC conserved as FD, HAY and SIL were extracted and purified as described by Wang et al. [74]. The purified CT were stored in a sealed amber glass bottle at −20 °C and the same batch of each CT were used in all assays. The protein precipitation capacities of these purified CT were determined using a modified precedure described by McAllister et al. [75]. Bovine serum albumin and Rubisco (MW 557) from spinach (Sigma-Aldrich) were used as model proteins for determining the relative capacities of the extracted CT to bind protein. The BSA was dissolved (3 mg/mL) in 0.2 M acetate buffer (pH = 5.0) containing 0.17 M NaCl, and the Rubisco was dissolved (4 mg/mL) in 1 M 2-amino-2-(hydroxymethyl)-1, 3-propanediol hydrochloride (Tris HCl; pH = 7.8). One milliliter of each protein solution was combined with 0.5 mL of aqueous solutions containing 0, 50, 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 750, 1000, 1250 or 1500 µg of CT from each source. Each mixture was vortexed, allowed to stand at room temperature for 30 min and centrifuged (15,600× g, 10 min). The CT remaining in a 1-mL subsample of supernatant were removed by adding 0.5 mL of aqueous polyethylene glycol (Sigma-Aldrich; MW 6000; 12 mg/mL) followed by centrifugation. Protein remaining in solution was quantified colorimetrically (OD595) using a Dye Reagent Concentrate Kit (BioRad Laboratories, Mississauga, ON, Canada) against an original freshly prepared solution of BSA or Rubisco protein as a standard. Each assay consisted of six replicates for each dose of CT and the assay was repeated three times over a 1-week period.
The amount of protein precipitated was calculated as the difference between added protein and that present in the supernatant after CT addition. Data were fitted to a sigmoidal curve using nonlinear regression in SigmaPlot for Windows (version 13.0; Systat Software Inc., Santa Jose, CA, USA):
y   =   a 0   +   a / ( 1   +   exp ( − ( x   −   b ) / c ) )
where y = mg of protein (BSA or Rubisco) precipitated, x = μg of CT incubated, a0 + a = estimated maximum amount (mg) of protein (BSA or Rubisco) precipitated, b = sigmoidal centre (mg of CT at the 50% of maximal protein precipitation), and c = sigmoidal width. The protein-precipitating capacity (PP) of each CT was expressed as the amount (μg) of the CT required to precipitate 1.0 mg of BSA or Rubisco protein.

4.5. Determination of CT from Freeze-Dried, Silage or Hay PPC on the Growth of E. coli

Two generic E. coli strains (ATCC 25922 and ATCC 35281) were obtained from the Lethbridge Research and Development Centre culture collection. Both strains of bacteria were grown at 37 °C with shaking (175 rpm, 16 h) for pre-incubation prior to being used as inoculants. An in vitro pure culture experiment was conducted using glass tubes (13 × 100 mm) with M9 medium including (g/L) M9 minimal salt (11.28), casamino acids (5), glucose (4.5), MgSO4·7H2O (0.239) and CaCl2 (0.011). Prepared M9 medium (500 mL) was transferred into 1.0-L serum vials and sterilized by autoclaving. After cooling, each of pre-incubated bacterial cultures (30 µL) were added to a 200 mL of M9 medium and cultures were adjusted to identical densities (OD600 value was approximately 0.01) by diluting with M9 medium. Immediately after inoculation, 30 µL of filter-sterilized solutions of each purified CT (FD, HAY and SIL) at the concentrations of 0, 2, 500, 5000 and 10,000 µg/mL were added to the bacterial culture (3 mL), yielding 0, 25, 50 or 100 µg CT/mL in inoculated cultures. Triplicate vials were prepared for each bacterial strain and CT concentration. Triplicate vials for each CT concentration, but without bacterial inoculum were also prepared as blank controls. All glass tubes were incubated aerobically with shaking (175 rpm) at 37 °C and assessed for bacterial growth after 0, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 24 h of incubation by measuring optical density at 600 nm (UltraSpec Plus 4054; Pharmacia, Baie, QC, Canada). Optical densities were corrected for the blank controls and the culture was diluted with M9 medium so that all OD600 were within the range of 0–0.5. The OD600 values were then fitted to the following modified Gompertz equation [76]:
In   ( OD t / OD 0 )   =   A × exp   { − exp [ ( μ × e / A ) × ( L − t )   +   1 ] }
where A is the logarithmic increase of bacterial population, µ is maximum growth rate (per hour), L is the lag time, t is the time (in hours), and ODt and OD0 are the optical densities obtained at times t and zero, respectively.

4.6. Statistical Analysis

All data were subjected to analysis of variance as a completely randomized design using the PROC MIXED procedure of SAS [77]. Conservation method was the fix effect for all determinations and plot where the original forage was obtained was the random effect for chemical and CT structural data analysis, whereas repeated run was the random effect for protein precipitating capacity data analysis. Data from E. coli strains were originally analyzed as a 3 × 4 factorial design with individual glass tube as a random factor. This revealed a CT level × conservation method interaction over the incubation period. Therefore, data were re-analyzed as a randomized complete block design for each conservation method of each E. coli strain. When CT level or CT level × conservation method interactions were significant (i.e., p < 0.05), means of the conservation methods were compared at each CT level. Differences among treatments were determined using LSMEANS with PDIFF function and adjusted by a Tukey’s test in SAS with significance declared at p < 0.05.

5. Conclusions

Ensiling and hay-making both impacted CT extractability, structural composition and protein-precipitating capacity with the effect being greater for silage than for hay. Ensiling decreased the extractability of CT and reduced cis-isomers, mDP and protein-precipitating capacity of extractable CT. However, conservation methods did not affect the anti-E. coli activity of CT isolated from conserved forage. Overall, purple prairie clover preserved as hay conserved the biological activity of CT via preserving extractable CT more than silage.

Acknowledgments

This study was partially supported by AAFC-Beef Science Cluster, and Alberta Livestock and Meat Agency. K. Peng acknowledges the China Scholarship Council for awarding scholarship to conduct this research at Lethbridge Research and Development Centre (LRDC) of Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada. This is LRDC contribution number 38717038.

Author Contributions

Y.W. conceived and designed the experiments; K.P., Q.H. and Z.X. performed the experiments; C.D. and I.M.-H. analyzed structure information of condensed tannins; K.P., Y.W. and Y.S. analyzed the data; Y.W., T.A.M., S.A. and S.W. contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools; K.P., Y.W., T.A.M., J.C. and Y.H. wrote the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Huang, Q.; Liu, X.; Zhao, G.; Hu, T.; Wang, Y. Potential and challenges of tannins as an alternative to in-feed antibiotics for farm animal production. Anim. Nutr. 2018, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Azuhnwi, B.N.; Boller, B.; Dohme-Meier, F.; Hess, H.D.; Kreuzer, M.; Stringano, E.; Mueller-Harvey, I. Exploring variation in proanthocyanidin composition and content of sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia). J. Sci. Food Agric. 2013, 93, 2102–2109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Lorenz, M.; Alkhafadji, L.; Stringano, E.; Nilsson, S.; Mueller-Harvey, I.; Uden, P. Relationship between condensed tannin structures and their ability to precipitate feed proteins in the rumen. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2014, 94, 963–968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Hatew, B.; Stringano, E.; Mueller-Harvey, I.; Hendriks, W.H.; Cabonero, C.H.; Smith, L.M.J.; Pellikaan, W.F. Impact of variation in structure of condensed tannins from sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia) on in vitro ruminal methane production and fermentation characteristics. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 2016, 100, 348–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Huang, Q.; Hu, T.M.; Xu, Z.; Jin, L.; McAllister, T.A.; Acharya, S.; Zeller, W.; Hardcastle, E.; Drake, C.; Wang, Y. Structural composition and protein precipitation capacity of condensed tannins from purple prairie clover (Dalea purpurea Vent.). J. Anim. Sci. 2017, 95 (Suppl. 4), 141–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Huang, Q.Q.; Jin, L.; Xu, Z.; Acharya, S.; McAllister, T.A.; Hu, T.M.; Peng, K.; Iwaasa, A.; Schellenberg, M.; Wang, Y. Effects of conservation method on condensed tannin content, ruminal degradation, and in vitro intestinal digestion of purple prairie clover (Dalea purpurea Vent.). Can. J. Anim. Sci. 2016, 96, 524–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wang, Y.; Barbieri, L.R.; Berg, B.P.; McAllister, T.A. Effects of mixing sainfoin with alfalfa on ensiling, ruminal fermentation and total tract digestion of silage. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2007, 135, 296–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Waghorn, G. Beneficial and detrimental effects of dietary condensed tannins for sustainable sheep and goat production-Progress and challenges. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2008, 147, 116–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Liu, X.L.; Hao, Y.Q.; Jin, L.; Xu, Z.J.; McAllister, T.A.; Wang, Y. Anti-Escherichia coli O157:H7 properties of purple prairie clover and sainfoin condensed tannins. Molecules 2013, 18, 2183–2199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Wang, Y.; Jin, L.; Ominski, K.H.; He, M.; Xu, Z.; Krause, D.O.; Acharya, S.N.; Wittenberg, K.M.; Liu, X.L.; Stanford, K.; et al. Screening of condensed tannins from Canadian prairie forages for anti-Escherichia coli O157:H7 with an emphasis on purple prairie clover (Dalea purpurea Vent.). J. Food Prot. 2013, 76, 560–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Jin, L.; Wang, Y.; Iwaasa, A.D.; Xu, Z.; Li, Y.; Schellenberg, M.P.; Liu, X.L.; McAllister, T.A.; Stanford, K. Purple prairie clover (Dalea purpurea Vent.) reduces fecal shedding of Escherichia coli in pastured cattle. J. Food Prot. 2015, 78, 1434–1441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Huang, Q.Q.; Jin, L.; Xu, Z.; Barbieria, L.R.; Acharyaa, S.; Hu, T.M.; Stanford, K.; McAllister, T.A.; Wang, Y. Effects of purple prairie clover (Dalea purpurea Vent.) on feed intake, nutrient digestibility and faecal shedding of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in lambs. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2015, 207, 51–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Jin, L.; Wang, Y.; Iwaasa, A.D.; Xu, Z.; Schellenberg, M.P.; Zhang, Y.G.; Liu, X.L.; McAllister, T.A. Effect of condensed tannins on ruminal degradability of purple prairie clover (Dalea purpurea Vent.) harvested at two growth stages. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2012, 176, 17–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Li, Y.; Iwaasa, A.D.; Wang, Y.; Jin, L.; Han, G.; Zhao, M. Condensed tannins concentration of selected prairie legume forages as affected by phenological stages during two consecutive growth seasons in western Canada. Can. J. Plant Sci. 2014, 94, 817–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Broderick, G.A. Performance of lactating dairy cows fed either alfalfa silage or alfalfa hay as the sole forage. J. Dairy Sci. 1995, 78, 320–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Griffin, J.L.; Jung, G.A. Leaf and stem forage quality of big bluestem and switchgrass. Agron. J. 2003, 75, 723–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wilkins, R.J. The Preservation of Forages. In Feed Science; Orskov, E.R., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1988; pp. 231–255. [Google Scholar]
  18. Enoh, M.B.; Kijora, C.; Peters, K.J.; Tanya, V.N.; Fonkem, D.; Mbanya, J. Investigation on change of forage quality at harvesting, during hay making and storage of hay harvested at different growth stages in the Adamawa plateau of Cameroon. Livest. Res. Rural Dev. 2005, 17, 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  19. Scharenberg, A.; Arrigo, Y.; Gutzwiller, A.; Soliva, C.R.; Wyss, U.; Kreuzer, M.; Dohme, F. Palatability in sheep and in vitro nutritional value of dried and ensiled sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia) birdsfoot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus), and chicory (Cichorium intybus). Arch. Anim. Nutr. 2007, 61, 481–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Scharenberg, A.; Arrigo, Y.; Gutzwiller, A.; Wyss, U.; Hess, H.D.; Kreuzer, M.; Dohme, F. Effect of feeding dehydrated and ensiled tanniferous sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia) on nitrogen and mineral digestion and metabolism of lambs. Arch. Anim. Nutr. 2007, 61, 390–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Lorenz, M.M.; Eriksson, T.; Uden, P. Effect of wilting, silage additive, PEG treatment and tannin content on the distribution of N between different fractions after ensiling of three different sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia) varieties. Grass Forage Sci. 2010, 65, 175–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Terrill, T.H.; Windham, W.R.; Evans, J.J.; Hoveland, C.S. Condensed tannins in sericea lespedeza: Effect of preservation method on tannin concentration. Crop Sci. 1990, 30, 219–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Aufrère, J.; Dudilieu, M.; Poncet, C. In vivo and in situ measurements of the digestive characteristics of sainfoin in comparison with lucerne fed to sheep as fresh forages at two growth stages and as hay. Animal 2008, 2, 1331–1339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Wang, Y.; McAllister, T.A.; Acharya, S. Condensed tannins in sainfoin: Composition, concentration, and effects on nutritive and feeding value of sainfoin forage. Crop Sci. 2015, 55, 13–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Mueller-Harvey, I. Unravelling the conundrum of tannins in animal nutrition and health. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2006, 86, 2010–2037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Foo, L.Y.; Newman, R.; Waghorn, G.; McNabb, W.C.; Ulyatt, M.J. Proanthocyanidins from Lotus corniculatus. Phytochemistry 1996, 41, 617–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Foo, L.Y.; Lu, Y.; Mcnabb, W.C.; Waghorn, G.; Ulyatt, M.J. Proanthocyanidins from Lotus pedunculatus. Phytochemistry 1997, 45, 1689–1696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Koupai-Abyazani, M.R.; Mccallum, J.; Muir, A.D.; Bohm, B.A.; Towers, G.H.N.; Gruber, M.Y. Developmental changes in the composition of proanthocyanidins from leaves of sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia Scop.) as determined by HPLC analysis. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1993, 41, 613–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Foo, L.Y.; Jones, W.T.; Porter, L.J.; Williams, V.M. Proanthocyanidin polymers of fodder legumes. Phytochemistry 1982, 21, 933–935. [Google Scholar]
  30. Marais, J.P.; Mueller-Harvey, I.; Brandt, E.V.; Ferreira, D. Polyphenols, condensed tannins, and other natural products in Onobrychis viciifolia (Sainfoin). J. Agric. Food Chem. 2000, 48, 3440–3447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Gea, A.; Stringano, E.; Brown, R.H.; Mueller-Harvey, I. In situ analysis and structural elucidation of sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia) tannins for high-throughput germplasm screening. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2011, 59, 495–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Kommuru, D.S.; Barker, T.; Desai, S.; Burke, J.M.; Ramsay, A.; Mueller-Harvey, I.; Miller, J.E.; Mosjidis, J.A.; Kamisetti, N.; Terrill, T.H. Use of pelleted sericea lespedeza (Lespedeza cuneata) for natural control of coccidia and gastrointestinal nematodes in weaned goats. Vet. Parasitol. 2014, 204, 191–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Laaksonen, O.A.; Salminen, J.P.; Makila, L.; Kallio, H.P.; Yang, B. Proanthocyanidins and their contribution to sensory attributes of black currant juices. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2015, 63, 5373–5380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Mueller-Harvey, I.; Bee, G.; Dohme-Meier., F.; Hoste, H.; Karonen, M.; Kölliker, R.; Lüscher, A.; Niderkorn, V.; Pellikaan, W.; Salminen, J.P.; Skot, L.; Smith, L.; Thamsborg, S.; et al. Benefits of condensed tannins in forages fed to ruminants: Importance of structure, concentration and diet. Crop Sci. 2018, in press. [Google Scholar]
  35. Vidal, S.; Cartalade, D.; Souquet, J.M.; Fulcrand, H.; Cheynier, V. Changes in proanthocyanidin chain length in winelike model solutions. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2002, 50, 2261–2266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Tharayil, N.; Suseela, V.; Triebwasser, D.J.; Preston, C.M.; Gerard, P.D.; Dukes, J.S. Changes in the structural composition and reactivity of Acer rubrum leaf litter tannins exposed to warming and altered precipitation: Climatic stress-induced tannins are more reactive. New Phytol. 2011, 191, 132–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Peng, K.; Jin, L.; Niu, D.; Huang, Q.; McAllister, T.A.; Yang, H.E.; Denise, H.; Xu, Z.; Acharya, S.; Wang, S.; et al. Condensed tannins affect bacterial and fungal microbiomes and mycotoxin production during ensiling and upon aerobic exposure. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2018, 84, e02274-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Haslam, E. Plant Polyphenols, Vegetable Tannins Revisited; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1989. [Google Scholar]
  39. Hagerman, A.E.; Butler, L.G. The specificity of proanthocyanidin-protein interactions. J. Biol. Chem. 1981, 256, 4494–4497. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  40. Hagerman, A.E.; Rice, M.E.; Ritchard, N.T. Mechanisms of protein precipitation for two tannins, pentagalloyl glucose and epicatechin16 (4→8) catechin (procyanidin). J. Agric. Food Chem. 1998, 46, 2590–2595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Horigome, T.; Kumar, R.; Okamoto, K. Effects of condensed tannins prepared from leaves of fodder plants on digestive enzymes in vitro and in the intestine of rats. Br. J. Nutr. 1988, 60, 275–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Theodoridou, K.; Aufrère, J.; Andueza, D.; Pourrat, J.; Morvan, A.L.; Stringano, E.; Mueller-Harvey, I.; Baumont, R. Effects of condensed tannins in fresh sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia) on in vivo and in situ digestion in sheep. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2010, 160, 23–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Theodoridou, K.; Aufrère, J.; Niderkorn, V.; Andueza, D.; Morvan, A.L.; Picard, F.; Baumont, R. Effect of plant development during first and second growth cycle on chemical composition, condensed tannins and nutritive value of three sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia) varieties and lucerne. Grass Forage Sci. 2011, 66, 402–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Harbertson, J.F.; Kilmister, R.L.; Kelm, M.A.; Downey, M.O. Impact of condensed tannin size as individual and mixed polymers on bovine serum albumin precipitation. Food Chem. 2014, 160, 16–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Ropiak, H.M.; Lachmann, P.; Ramsay, A.; Green, R.J.; Mueller-Harvey, I. Identification of structural features of condensed tannins that affect protein aggregation. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0170768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Jones, W.T.; Broadhurst, R.B.; Lyttleton, J.W. The condensed tannins of pasture legume species. Phytochemistry 1976, 15, 1407–1409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Mangan, J.L. Nutritional effects of tannins in animal feeds. Nutr. Res. Rev. 1988, 1, 209–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Guimarães-Beelen, P.M.; Berchielli, T.T.; Beelen, R.; Filho, J.A.; Oliveira, S.G. Characterization of condensed tannins from native legumes of the Brazilian northeastern semi-arid. Sci. Agric. 2006, 63, 150–153. [Google Scholar]
  49. De Freitas, V.; Mateus, N. Structural features of procyanidin interactions with salivary proteins. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2001, 49, 940–945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Rosales, R.B. Condensed Tannins in Tropical Forage Legumes: Their Characterization and Study of Their Nutritional Impact from the Standpoint of Structure-Activity Relationships. Ph.D Thesis, University of Reading, Reading, UK, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  51. Kumar, R.; Horigome, T. Fractionation, characterization and protein precipitating capacity of the condensed tannins from Robinia pseudoacacia (L.) leaves. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1986, 34, 487–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Osborne, N.J.T.; McNeill, D.M. Characterisation of Leucaena condensed tannins by size and protein precipitation capacity. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2001, 81, 1113–1119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Huang, X.D.; Liang, J.B.; Tan, H.Y.; Yahya, R.; Khamseekhiew, B.; Ho, Y.W. Molecular weight and protein binding affinity of Leucaena condensed tannins and their effects on in vitro fermentation parameters. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2010, 159, 81–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Huang, X.D.; Liang, J.B.; Tan, H.Y.; Yahya, R.; Long, R.; Ho, Y.W. Protein-binding affinity of Leucaena condensed tannins of differing molecular weights. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2011, 59, 10677–10682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Bacon, J.R.; Rhodes, M.J.C. Binding affinity of hydrolyzable tannins to parotid saliva and to proline-rich proteins derived from it. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2000, 48, 838–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Wang, Y.; McAllister, T.A.; Iwaasa, A. Effects of condensed tannins from purple prairie clover on the growth of E. coli O157:H7. J. Anim. Sci. 2009, 87, 31. [Google Scholar]
  57. Foo, L.Y.; Yinrong, L.; Howell, A.B.; Vorsa, N. A-type proamthocyanidin trimers from cranberry that inhibit adherence of uropathogenic P-fimbricated Escherichia coli. J. Nat. Prod. 2000, 63, 1225–1228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Voravuthikunchai, S.; Lortheeranuwat, A.; Jeeju, W.; Sririrak, T.; Phongpaichit, S.; Supawita, T. Effective medicinal plants against enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7. J. Ethnopharm. 2004, 94, 49–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Vattem, D.A.; Lin, Y.T.; Labbe, R.G.; Shetty, K. Antimicrobial activity against select food-borne pathogens by phenolic antioxidants enriched in cranberry pomace by solid-state bioprocessing using the food grade fungus Rhizopus oligosporus. Process Biochem. 2004, 39, 1939–1946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Puupponen-Pimia, R.; Nohynek, L.; Hartmann-Schmidlin, S.; Kahkonen, M.; Heinonen, M.; Maatta-Riihinen, M.; Oksman-Caldentey, K.M. Berry phenolics selectively inhibit the growth of intestinal pathogens. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2005, 98, 991–1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Min, B.R.; Pinchak, W.E.; Anderson, R.C.; Callaway, T.R. Effect of tannins on the in vitro growth of Escherichia coli O157:H7 and in vivo growth of generic Escherichia coli excreted from steers. J. Food Prot. 2007, 70, 543–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Kim, T.J.; Weng, W.L.; Stojanovic, J.; Lu, Y.; Jung, Y.S.; Silva, J.L. Antimicrobial effect of water-soluble muscadine seed extracts on Escherichia coli O157:H7. J. Food Prot. 2008, 71, 1465–1468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Shimamura, T.; Zhao, W.H.; Hu, Z.Q. Mechanism of action and potential for use of tea catechin as an anti-infective agent. Anti-Infect. Agents Med. Chem. 2007, 6, 57–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Ikigai, H.; Nakae, T.; Hara, Y.; Shimamura, T. Bactericidal catechins damage the lipid bilayer. Biochem. Biophys. Acta 1993, 1147, 132–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Tsuchiya, H. Stereospecificity in membrane effects of catechins. Chem.-Biol. Interact. 2001, 134, 41–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Ayres, K.W.; Acton, D.F.; Ellis, J.G. The Soils of Swift Current Map Area 725 Saskatchewan, Publ. 56; University of Saskatchewan: Saskatoon, SK, Canada, 1985; p. 226. [Google Scholar]
  67. AOAC. Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Agricultural Chemists, 16th ed.; AOAC International: Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  68. Zahiroddini, H.; Baah, J.; Absalom, W.; McAllister, T.A. Effect of an inoculant and hydrolytic enzymes on fermentation and nutritive value of whole crop barley silage. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2004, 117, 317–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Makkar, H.P.S.; Blummel, M.; Borowy, N.K.; Becker, K. Gravimetric determination of tannins and their correlations with chemical and protein precipitation methods. J. Sci. Food Agric. 1993, 61, 161–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Terrill, T.; Rowan, A.; Douglas, G.; Barry, T. Determination of extractable and bound condensed tannin concentrations in forage plants, protein concentrate meals and cereal grains. J. Sci. Food Agric. 1992, 58, 321–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Williams, A.R.; Fryganas, C.; Ramsay, A.; Mueller-Harvey, I.; Thamsborg, S.M. Direct anthelmintic effects of condensed tannins from diverse plant sources against Ascaris suum. PLoS ONE 2014, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Desrues, O.; Mueller-Harvey, I.; Pellikaan, W.F.; Enemark, H.L.; Thamsborg, S.M. Condensed tannins in the gastrointestinal tract of cattle after sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia) intake and their possible relationship with anthelmintic effects. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2017, 65, 1420–1427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Ropiak, H.M.; Ramsay, A.; Mueller-Harvey, I. Condensed tannins in extracts from European medicinal plants and herbal products. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2016, 121, 225–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Wang, Y.; Xu, Z.; Bach, S.J.; McAllister, T.A. Sensitivity of Escherichia coli to seaweed (Ascophyllum nodosum) phlorotannins and terrestrial tannins. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 2009, 22, 238–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. McAllister, T.A.; Martinez, T.; Bae, H.D.; Muir, A.D.; Yanke, L.J.; Jones, G.A. Characterization of condensed tannins purified from legume forages: Chromophore production, protein precipitation, and inhibitory effects on cellulose digestion. J. Chem. Ecol. 2005, 31, 2049–2068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Dalgaard, P.; Koutsoumanis, K. Comparison of maximum specific growth rates and lag times estimated from absorbance and viable count data by different mathematical models. J. Microbiol. Methods 2001, 43, 183–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. SAS Institute Inc. SAS Online Doc® 9.1.3; SAS Institute Inc.: Cary, NC, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
Sample Availability: Samples of the PPC CT are available from the authors.
Molecules 23 00586 g001a 550Molecules 23 00586 g001b 550
Figure 1. HPLC chromatograms (280 nm) of thiolysis reaction products that were obtained from (a) freeze-dried; (b) hay and (c) silage of whole-plant purple prairie clover. Terminal units: C = catechin, EC = epicatechin; Extension units as BM-adducts: EGC-BM = epigallocatechin, C-BM = catechin, EC-BM = epicatechin, where BM = benzyl mercaptan.
Figure 1. HPLC chromatograms (280 nm) of thiolysis reaction products that were obtained from (a) freeze-dried; (b) hay and (c) silage of whole-plant purple prairie clover. Terminal units: C = catechin, EC = epicatechin; Extension units as BM-adducts: EGC-BM = epigallocatechin, C-BM = catechin, EC-BM = epicatechin, where BM = benzyl mercaptan.
Molecules 23 00586 g001aMolecules 23 00586 g001b
Molecules 23 00586 g002 550
Figure 2. Precipitation of bovine serum albumin (BSA; a) and spinach ribulose 1,5-disphosphate carboxylase (Rubisco; b) by condensed tannins (CT) isolated from freeze-dried purple prairie clover (♦FD), or conserved as hay (■HAY) or silage (▲SIL). The dash lines relate to corresponding CT data which were fitted to a SigmaPlot curve as described under statistical analysis. Bars indicate standard error and where not visible, fall within symbols.
Figure 2. Precipitation of bovine serum albumin (BSA; a) and spinach ribulose 1,5-disphosphate carboxylase (Rubisco; b) by condensed tannins (CT) isolated from freeze-dried purple prairie clover (♦FD), or conserved as hay (■HAY) or silage (▲SIL). The dash lines relate to corresponding CT data which were fitted to a SigmaPlot curve as described under statistical analysis. Bars indicate standard error and where not visible, fall within symbols.
Molecules 23 00586 g002
Table
Table 1. Chemical composition (g/kg DM) of whole-plant purple prairie clover conserved as freeze-dried forage (FD), hay (HAY) or silage (SIL) (n = 3).
Table 1. Chemical composition (g/kg DM) of whole-plant purple prairie clover conserved as freeze-dried forage (FD), hay (HAY) or silage (SIL) (n = 3).
ItemFDHAYSILSEMp-Value
Organic matter9249239133.960.174
Crude protein (N × 6.25)1581571652.200.058
Neutral detergent fibre439 b497 a480 a5.740.001
Acid detergent fibre405 b422 a417 a2.380.006
Acid detergent lignin79.8 b98.3 a90.1 a,b2.790.009
Water-soluble carbohydrate 25.4 a11.5 b2.4 c0.34<0.001
Total phenols 166.2 a51.4 b28.6 c0.95<0.001
Condensed tannins (CT)
Extractable CT70.2 a64.1 a27.4 b1.53<0.001
Fibre-bound CT5.2 b5.6 b7.1 a0.17<0.001
Protein-bound CT9.0 c12.4 b44.3 a0.17<0.001
Total CT84.582.278.91.450.083
1 Determined as tannic acid equivalent. a, b, c Means with different letters differ within rows (p < 0.05). SEM, standard error of the mean.
Table
Table 2. Flavan-3-ol composition (% molar percentages) in condensed tannins of whole-plant purple prairie clover conserved as freeze-dried forage (FD), hay (HAY) or silage (SIL).
Table 2. Flavan-3-ol composition (% molar percentages) in condensed tannins of whole-plant purple prairie clover conserved as freeze-dried forage (FD), hay (HAY) or silage (SIL).
Terminal Units (%)Extension Units (%)
GC 1EGCCECGC-BM 2EGC-BMC-BMEC-BM
FD001.56 a4.26 b023.50 b2.42 b68.26 a
HAY001.26 b4.13 b027.97 a2.19 b64.45 b
SIL001.29 b6.94 a019.17 c3.78 a68.82 a
SEM--0.0630.282-0.9280.1640.743
p-value--0.008<0.001-<0.001<0.0010.002
1 GC = gallocatechin, EGC = epigallocatechin, C = catechin, EC = epicatechin. 2 Extension units as BM-adducts: EGC-BM = epigallocatechin, C-BM = catechin, EC-BM = epicatechin, where BM = benzyl mercaptan. a, b, c Means with different letters differ within columns (p < 0.05). SEM, standard error of the mean.
Table
Table 3. Structural composition of condensed tannins from whole-plant purple prairie clover conserved as freeze-dried forage (FD), hay (HAY) or silage (SIL).
Table 3. Structural composition of condensed tannins from whole-plant purple prairie clover conserved as freeze-dried forage (FD), hay (HAY) or silage (SIL).
mDP 1PC (%) 2PD (%)Cis (%) 3Trans (%)
FD17.3 a76.5 b23.5 b96.0 a4.0 b
HAY18.6 a72.0 c28.0 a96.6 a3.4 b
SIL12.4 b80.8 a19.2 c94.9 b5.1 a
SEM0.660.930.930.200.20
p-value<0.001<0.001<0.001<0.001<0.001
1 mDP = mean degree of polymerization; 2 PC = procyanidin tannins (C + EC); PD = prodelphinidin tannins (GC + EGC); 3 cis = cis isomers of flavan-3-ol subunits (EC + EGC); trans = trans isomers of flavan-3-ol subunits (C + GC); a, b, c Means in a column with different letters differ within columns (p < 0.05). SEM, standard error of the mean.
Table
Table 4. Precipitating capacities of condensed tannins from purple prairie clover conserved as freeze-dried forage (FD), hay (HAY) or silage (SIL).
Table 4. Precipitating capacities of condensed tannins from purple prairie clover conserved as freeze-dried forage (FD), hay (HAY) or silage (SIL).
Protein 1Parameters 2FDHAYSILSEMp-Value
BSAa0 + a3.1 a2.9 b2.4 c0.01<0.001
b323 b467 a541 a0.01<0.001
c244 a185 b200 b7.720.004
PP124 c172 b223 a2.57<0.001
Rubiscoa0 + a3.4 a3.3 b3.0 c0.02<0.001
b17316615211.100.428
c120 b152 b242 a17.140.006
PP62 c70 b97 a1.08<0.001
a, b, c Means within a row followed by different letters differ (p < 0.05). 1 BSA = bovine serum albumin; Rubisco = ribulose 1, 5-disphosphate carboxylase. 2 Parameters were obtained by fitting the amount of precipitated protein (mg) and amount of CT (μg) incubated with the equation: y = a0 + a/(1 + exp(−(x−b)/c)), where y = mg of protein (BSA or Rubisco) precipitated, x = μg of CT incubated, a0 + a = estimated maximal amount (mg) of protein (BSA or Rubisco) precipitated, b = sigmoidal centre (μg of CT at the 50% of maximal protein precipitation), and c = sigmoidal width. PP: protein-precipitating capacity, expressed as μg CT required to precipitate 1 mg of protein. SEM, standard error of the mean.
Table
Table 5. Effects of condensed tannins in purple prairie clover conserved as freeze-dried forage (FD), hay (HAY) or silage (SIL) on the growth of the Escherichia coli 25922 and 35218.
Table 5. Effects of condensed tannins in purple prairie clover conserved as freeze-dried forage (FD), hay (HAY) or silage (SIL) on the growth of the Escherichia coli 25922 and 35218.
StrainParameterConservation MethodTannin Concentration (µg/mL)SEMp-Value
02550100
E. coli 25922µFD1.24 a1.06 B,b1.06 b0.91 c0.032<0.001
HAY1.23 a1.12 A,b1.02 c0.98 c0.018<0.001
SIL1.25 a1.15 A,b1.00 c0.94 c0.016<0.001
SEM0.0140.0140.030.03
p-value0.5980.0080.3680.250
LFD0.52 b0.59 A,b0.85 a0.82 a0.028<0.001
HAY0.53 b0.49 B,b0.86 a0.89 a0.011<0.001
SIL0.52 b0.51 B,b0.82 a,b0.95 a0.0730.006
SEM0.0040.0120.0300.085
p-value0.4220.0030.6590.570
E. coli 35281µFD1.04 a0.92 b0.92 b0.91 b0.014<0.001
HAY1.06 a0.91 b0.90 b0.86 b0.015<0.001
SIL1.05 a0.89 b0.91 b0.91 b0.016<0.001
SEM0.0110.0180.0150.016
p-value0.5720.5830.7470.133
LFD0.32 b0.32 b0.33 b0.41 A,a0.0160.011
HAY0.32 b0.30 b0.32 b0.39 B,a0.007<0.001
SIL0.31 c0.34 b,c0.35 a,b0.38 B,a0.006<0.001
SEM0.0080.0160.0110.005
p-value0.5300.3100.1580.032
Note: The values were obtained by fitting the OD600 to the modified Gompertz equation, In (ODt/OD0) = A × exp{−exp ((µ × e/A) × (L − t) + 1)}, where A is the logarithmic increase of bacterial population, µ is maximum growth rate (per hour), L is the lag time, t is the time (in hours), and ODt and OD0 are the optical densities obtained at time t and at zero hour, respectively. Means with different letters differ (p < 0.05). A, B Capital letters show differences between conservation methods. a, b, c Lowercase show differences between tannin concentrations. SEM, standard error of the mean.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Peng, K.; Huang, Q.; Xu, Z.; McAllister, T.A.; Acharya, S.; Mueller-Harvey, I.; Drake, C.; Cao, J.; Huang, Y.; Sun, Y.; et al. Characterization of Condensed Tannins from Purple Prairie Clover (Dalea purpurea Vent.) Conserved as either Freeze-Dried Forage, Sun-Cured Hay or Silage. Molecules 2018, 23, 586. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23030586

AMA Style

Peng K, Huang Q, Xu Z, McAllister TA, Acharya S, Mueller-Harvey I, Drake C, Cao J, Huang Y, Sun Y, et al. Characterization of Condensed Tannins from Purple Prairie Clover (Dalea purpurea Vent.) Conserved as either Freeze-Dried Forage, Sun-Cured Hay or Silage. Molecules. 2018; 23(3):586. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23030586

Chicago/Turabian Style

Peng, Kai, Qianqian Huang, Zhongjun Xu, Tim A. McAllister, Surya Acharya, Irene Mueller-Harvey, Christopher Drake, Junming Cao, Yanhua Huang, Yuping Sun, and et al. 2018. "Characterization of Condensed Tannins from Purple Prairie Clover (Dalea purpurea Vent.) Conserved as either Freeze-Dried Forage, Sun-Cured Hay or Silage" Molecules 23, no. 3: 586. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23030586

APA Style

Peng, K., Huang, Q., Xu, Z., McAllister, T. A., Acharya, S., Mueller-Harvey, I., Drake, C., Cao, J., Huang, Y., Sun, Y., Wang, S., & Wang, Y. (2018). Characterization of Condensed Tannins from Purple Prairie Clover (Dalea purpurea Vent.) Conserved as either Freeze-Dried Forage, Sun-Cured Hay or Silage. Molecules, 23(3), 586. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23030586

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop