Next Article in Journal
Utilization of Flavonoid Compounds from Bark and Wood. III. Application in Health Foods
Next Article in Special Issue
Synthesis and Evolution of Berberine Derivatives as a New Class of Antiviral Agents against Enterovirus 71 through the MEK/ERK Pathway and Autophagy
Previous Article in Journal
Oregano Essential Oil Attenuates RAW264.7 Cells from Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Inflammatory Response through Regulating NADPH Oxidase Activation-Driven Oxidative Stress
Previous Article in Special Issue
Combining New Non-Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors (RTIs) with AZT Results in Strong Synergism against Multi-RTI-Resistant HIV-1 Strains
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 23
Issue 8
10.3390/molecules23081858
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

HIV-1 Integrase-Targeted Short Peptides Derived from a Viral Protein R Sequence

by
Xue Zhi Zhao
1,*,
Mathieu Métifiot
2,
Evgeny Kiselev
2,
Jacques J. Kessl
3,4,
Kasthuraiah Maddali
2,
Christophe Marchand
2,
Mamuka Kvaratskhelia
3,5,
Yves Pommier
2 and
Terrence R. Burke, Jr.
1,*
1
Chemical Biology Laboratory, Center of Cancer Research, Frederick, MD 21702, USA
2
Developmental Therapeutics Branch and Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
3
College of Pharmacy and Center for Retrovirus Research, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
4
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, The University of Southern Mississippi, Hattiesburg, MS 39406, USA
5
Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2018, 23(8), 1858; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23081858
Submission received: 25 June 2018 / Revised: 18 July 2018 / Accepted: 23 July 2018 / Published: 26 July 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in the Development of Antiviral Agents)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
HIV-1 integrase (IN) inhibitors represent a new class of highly effective anti-AIDS therapeutics. Current FDA-approved IN strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) share a common mechanism of action that involves chelation of catalytic divalent metal ions. However, the emergence of IN mutants having reduced sensitivity to these inhibitors underlies efforts to derive agents that antagonize IN function by alternate mechanisms. Integrase along with the 96-residue multifunctional accessory protein, viral protein R (Vpr), are both components of the HIV-1 pre-integration complex (PIC). Coordinated interactions within the PIC are important for viral replication. Herein, we report a 7-mer peptide based on the shortened Vpr (69–75) sequence containing a biotin group and a photo-reactive benzoylphenylalanyl residue, and which exhibits low micromolar IN inhibitory potency. Photo-crosslinking experiments have indicated that the peptide directly binds IN. The peptide does not interfere with IN-DNA interactions or induce higher-order, aberrant IN multimerization, suggesting a mode of action for the peptide that is distinct from clinically used INSTIs and developmental allosteric IN inhibitors. This compact Vpr-derived peptide may serve as a valuable pharmacological tool to identify a potential new pharmacologic site.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

HIV-1 integrase (IN) is a virally encoded polynucleotidyl transferase that inserts reverse-transcribed viral cDNA into the host genome using two sequential reactions, cleavage of the 3′-dinucleotides from viral DNA, referred to as 3′-processing (3′-P), and insertion of the processed ends of viral DNA into the host genome, termed strand transfer (ST) [1]. Integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) are the newest class of AIDS therapeutic, with three FDA-approved agents now being on the market (raltegravir (RAL, October 2007) [2], elvitegravir (EVG, August 2012) [3] and dolutegravir (DTG, August 2013) [4]). Drug resistance can be an unwanted side effect of long-term therapy using anti-AIDS drugs and the most recently introduced INSTIs do not present an exception [5,6]. Therefore, efforts continue to develop new inhibitors that are not affected by the extant INSTI-resistant forms of IN.
Binding of INSTIs to the enzyme catalytic site occurs in the cytoplasm, where IN exists in multimeric form as part of a pre-integration complex (PIC), which contains other viral proteins that include reverse transcriptase (RT), matrix protein (MA) and viral protein R (Vpr). Multiple host cofactors are also involved in the formation of the PIC, such as lens epithelium-derived growth factor (LEDGF)/transcriptional coactivator p75. Full proviral DNA integration requires entry of the PIC into the nucleus and proper chromosomal insertion. The catalytic activity and nuclear localization of IN are facilitated by cellular and viral proteins including Vpr and LEDGF [7,8]. Synthetic peptides that mimic structural elements employed by these cofactors to carry out their roles in viral replication may provide new classes of inhibitors that are less affected by resistance mutants arising from catalytic site-binding INSTIs [9,10,11]. Indeed, peptides based on sequences of the LEDGF integrase-binding domain (IBD) have been shown to inhibit catalytic function, in part by shifting the equilibrium of IN oligomerization [12]. As Vpr exerts its complex and not completely understood role in the pathogensis of HIV-1 in non-dividing cells, it potentially affords a new and alternate non-catalytic target for therapeutic exploration [13,14,15,16,17,18].
Vpr is a 96-residue protein having flexible N- and C-termini. These bracket three internal, well-defined α-helices (I–III; residues 17–33, 38–50 and 56–77, respectively), which are folded about a hydrophobic core (Figure 1A) [19]. An early report showed that C-terminal residues [Vpr (52–96)] are responsible for binding of IN to viral DNA, with evidence suggesting that residues 88–96 are particularly important [20,21]. A screen of peptides sharing 11-amino acid overlaps and covering the full Vpr protein, identified Vpr (61–75) (IRILQQLLFIHRIG) in α-helix III as being able to inhibit most potently both the 3′-P and ST in vitro (Figure 1B) [22]. Recent work examining the ability of peptides derived from HIV-1 gene products to inhibit IN has identified the Vpr (64–69) sequence “LQQLLF” as being shared by pooled 15-mer Vpr-derived peptides. These peptides showed good ST-inhibitory potencies (IC50 = 68 µM) [23]. Their sequence occupies the central region of the Vpr C-terminal α-helix. Extending the sequence to cover more of the α-helix by adding the Vpr (69–75) residues (IHFRIG) was shown to increase inhibitory potency [23]. In further work, these authors examined the effects on IN inhibitory potencies incurred by employing ring-closing metathesis “stapling” to stabilize α-helix conformations of the Vpr (58–75)-derived sequence, “EAIIRILQQLL FIHFRIG” [24]. These structural modifications left unchanged the C-terminal “FIHFRIG”-containing region.
The assays described above were performed using purified IN in the absence of other proteins that comprise essential components of the PIC. There is no evidence that Vpr binds directly to IN within a cellular context [18]. In light of this, the ability of Vpr-derived peptides to inhibit IN in in vitro assays may reflect binding to sites on IN that may be unrelated to the other functions of Vpr in vivo. Our current work was undertaken to identify minimal Vpr-derived sequences that retain micromolar IN inhibitory potencies in in vitro assays and to introduce photoaffinity crosslinking functionality into the best peptides to provide pharmacological probes that might be useful in delineating regions of IN that are important for peptide binding [25].

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Development of a Core Vpr-Derived IN Inhibitory Peptide

We began our work by exploring the Vpr (69–75) peptide “FIHGRIG”. This sequence was of interest, not only because it had been shown to increase inhibitory potency when added to shorter Vpr (65–69) derived peptides from the Vpr α-helix III, but also because it is contained within a Vpr (65–79) peptide (QQLLFIHFRIGCQHS), which had been reported to exhibit good IN ST-inhibitory potency (IC50 = 14 µM) [22]. We found that the shortened sequence can exhibit low micromolar inhibitory potency in in vitro IN assays, with greater efficacy against the ST reaction relative to 3′-P reactions. The charge-state of the peptide terminal groups affected inhibitory potencies. Peptides having both termini free (1a; 3′-P IC50 = 18 ± 1 µM; ST IC50 = 1.3 ± 0.3 µM) or the C-terminus as a carboxamide and the amino terminus as its acetamide (1c; 3′-P IC50 = 24 ± 3 µM; ST IC50 = 4.7 ± 0.3 µM) were marginally more potent than the carboxamide peptide having a free amino terminus (1b; 3′-P IC50 = 32 ± 6 µM; ST IC50 = 7.3 ± 0.8 µM) (Table 1).
Next, to determine the relative contribution of each residue to overall inhibitory potency, we performed a sequential alanine scan on the peptides 1a–c. This yielded three series of congeners 2a–c through 8a–c. Alanine substitution at all positions decreased IN inhibitory potencies relative to the parent peptides. Peptides containing a free amino terminus with a C-terminal carboxamide showed the lowest potency for a given alanine substitution (peptides 2b–8b) (Table 1). The greatest loss of potencies occurred by substitution of the Arg (Vpr73), Phe (Vpr72) and Ile (Vpr70) residues. The Arg and Ile residues are of note, as they occupy the i and i + 4 positions on the same side of α-helix III that faces outward from the hydrophobic core comprised of α-helices I and II (Figure 1B). This could potentially make them accessible for interactions with other proteins. Interestingly, while replacing the amino-terminal Phe (Vpr69) residue with hydrophobic residues was generally well tolerated, replacement with Glu abrogated both 3′-P and ST-inhibitory potencies (IC50 values greater than 111 µM; data not shown). This may reflect formation of an intramolecular salt bridge arising between the anionic Glu side chain and the guanidinium moiety of the Arg (Vpr73) residue, which could interfere with the ability of this latter residue to engage in protein-protein interactions (PPIs) (refer to Figure 1B for side chain proximity).

2.2. Peptide 1a Does Not Interfere with IN–DNA Binding or Induce Aberrant IN Multimerization

To further our understanding of the mode of IN inhibition by Vpr-derived peptides, we evaluated the effect of 1a on IN–DNA complex formation using fluorescence anisotropy. The results showed that preincubation of IN with 1a did not block the IN–DNA interactions, but rather promoted IN–DNA complex formation (Figure 2A), as demonstrated by the increased fluorescence polarization upon treatment with increasing concentrations of 1a. Consistent with this finding, the C-terminal Vpr peptides, including Vpr (65–79), have been shown to interact with IN [20]. We also investigated the binding of 1a to the DNA substrate alone (Figure 2B) and found no detectable binding of 1a to DNA at concentrations up to 37 µM, which were sufficient for inhibition of IN by 1a [IC50 (3′-P) 17.6 µM, IC50 (ST) 1.3 µM, Table 1]. The increase in fluorescence at high concentrations of 1a, [111 µM and 333 µM (Figure 2)], can potentially be associated with multimerization of 1a [26]. Indeed, the Vpr Helix III motif residues within 1a, (69–71 and 74) were shown to contribute to the Vpr dimerization interfaces via either parallel or antiparallel modes [26]. Because the increase of fluorescence polarization, which is indicative of 1a–DNA binding, was only observed at concentrations of 1a above 37 µM (Figure 2B), while this concentration did not disrupt IN–DNA complex formation, it is likely that 1a multimers are not the IN-inhibiting species. These fluorescence experiments show that 1a does not disrupt IN–DNA complexes and that it does not bind to DNA alone at concentrations relevant to IN inhibition. This suggests that 1a exerts its inhibitory activity by binding to IN or IN–DNA complexes.
Recently, allosteric HIV-1 IN inhibitors (ALLINIs) have been identified, which induce higher-order, aberrant IN multimerization in vitro and in virions, and inhibit proper virus particle maturation [27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35]. Using a homogeneous time-resolved fluorescence resonance energy transfer (HTRF) assay [36], we found that unlike a representative ALLINI (BI-1001), 1a did not induce higher-order IN multimerization, suggesting an allosteric IN inhibition mechanism that differs from that used by ALLINIs (Figure 3) [27].

2.3. Development of a Vpr Peptide-Based Photoprobe

How Vpr-derived peptides interact with IN to inhibit its catalytic function is not known. However, identifying the region of IN engaged by the Vpr (69–75) peptides may clarify the processes involved. This could serve as a first step in developing novel allosteric inhibitors with a distinct mechanism from small molecule catalytic site-directed IN inhibitors. Photoaffinity crosslinking can be a highly useful means to identify ligand-binding regions. The benzophenone moiety is stable in ambient light, yet at wavelengths of light in the region 350–360 nm, photo-activation can occur, which can lead to covalent modification of C–H bonds, even under aqueous conditions [37,38,39]. We have previously incorporated benzophenones into coumarin-based IN inhibitors [40] and used this approach to identify their binding sites on HIV-1 IN through photo-crosslinking [41]. We have also applied this photophore to 2,4-dioxobutanoic acid-based IN inhibitors [42,43]. The benzoylphenylalanine (Bpa) variant of phenylalanine can be used to render peptides photo-reactive for the identification peptide-protein interactions [44].
It was unclear whether introducing a Bpa residue into the parent peptide 1a could be done in a fashion that would not disrupt its binding to IN. Accordingly, beginning with the Vpr74 Ile residue, we conducted a positional scan that sequentially replaced each residue of the peptide with Bpa (peptides 9a–14a). Substitution was notably well tolerated at nearly all positions examined. Relative to the parent peptide 1a, replacement of the Vpr74 Ile residue with Bpa did not diminish inhibitory potency [1a, 3′-P IC50 = 18 µM, ST IC50 = 1 µM as compared to 9a, 3′-P IC50 = 20 µM, ST IC50 = 4 µM (Table 1)]. Consistent with the results of the alanine scan, replacement of the Vpr73 Arg with Bpa gave the most dramatic loss of inhibitory potency as compared with substitutions of other Vpr residues (10a, 3′-P IC50 > 300 µM, ST IC50 ⋍ 50 µM). This further supports the hypothesis that this Arg residue may play a critical role in binding to IN. The second-most adverse impact on inhibitory potency occurred by substitution of the Vpr70 Ile residue (13a, 3′-P IC50 = 37 ± 5 µM, ST IC50 = 20 ± 3 µM). This also parallels results of the alanine scan, where substitution at this position had the next-to greatest effect (peptide 7a). As pointed out above, the Vpr70 Ile and Vpr73 Arg residues occupy relative i and i + 4 positions within the α-helix III, which would place them on the same outward-facing side (Figure 1B). The best inhibitory potency was observed by replacing the Vpr69 Phe residue with Bpa [14a, 3′-P IC50 = 7.2 ± 1.2 µM, ST IC50 = 2.1 ± 0.3 µM) (Table 1)]. These values are approximately 10-fold lower than what was observed by replacing Phe with Ala (peptide 8a).
Based on the above results, we selected peptide 14a as a platform for further photoprobe construction. Because low crosslinking efficiency and high background noise can be problematic barriers to effective applications of photoaffinity ligands, biotin tags are often included as parts of the photoaffinity ligands to allow visualization and purification of covalent adducts [45,46,47]. Accordingly, we incorporated a biotin moiety by tethering it from the amino terminus using a hydrophilic linker and we found that inhibitory potency was retained [15, 3’-P IC50 = 32 ± 7 µM, ST IC50 = 2.3 ± 0.3 µM (Figure 4A)].
We incubated 15 with IN and subjected the mixture to UV irradiation followed by SDS-PAGE separation of protein products. The presence of IN was detected by Western blotting using an anti-IN C-terminal domain (CTD) polyclonal antibody (Figure 4B). The presence of 15 was revealed on the same Western blot membrane using streptavidin-coupled AlexaFluor 750. To facilitate the detection of crosslinking products by Western blot, relatively high concentrations of 15 (111 µM) and IN (3.2 µM) were used. The biotin-bound entities were visualized as green on the blot, whereas IN and some of the proteins from the prestained standard were colored red (Figure 4B). Upon UV irradiation of the preincubated mixture containing 15 and IN, a product was formed that contained biotin label and comigrated with IN on the gel (Figure 4B, Lanes 3–6). This indicated the presence of covalent adducts of 15 with IN. Such adducts are lacking when IN was irradiated in absence of 15 (Figure 4B, Lane 1) or when the mixture was not UV treated (Figure 4B, lane 9). Additionally, the crosslinked product (Figure 4B, Lanes 3–6) migrated at the same rate as the non-crosslinked IN (Figure 4B, Lane 7). This suggests that a monomeric IN subunit (molecular weight of 34.5 kDa) forms a single crosslink to 15 (molecular weight of 1449 Da), which indicates close to a 1:1 stoichiometry for 15–IN interaction. In addition to the 15–IN product, a high molecular weight product was formed, which also contained the biotin label (Figure 4B, Lanes 2–6, top bands). This product formed in the absence of IN (Figure 4B, Lane 2) and its accumulation was time-dependent (Figure 4B, Lanes 3–6). Formation of biotinylated high molecular weight product could be explained by polymerization of 15 upon irradiation. Potential multimerization of the Vpr-derived peptides would likely facilitate such polymerization. This corroborates the results of fluorescence anisotropy experiments, which demonstrated the binding of 1a to DNA at high concentrations [111 µM and 333 µM (Figure 2)]. Despite polymerization of 15, no reaction of polymeric product with IN could be detected as shown by UV irradiation of 15 in absence and in presence of IN (Figure 4B, Lanes 2 and 3, respectively). This further suggests that potential multimers of Vpr-derived peptide do not bind or inhibit IN. Although the multimerization of Vpr-derived peptide inhibitors of IN could not be entirely ruled out, our anisotropy and crosslinking results indicate that it is monomeric peptides (i.e., 1a or 15) that are responsible for IN inhibition.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. General Synthetic

Preparative high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) was conducted using a Waters Prep LC4000 system (Milford, MA, USA) having photodiode array detection and a Phenomenex C18 column (00G-4436-P0-AX, 250 mm × 21.2 mm, 10 µm particle size, 110 Å pore Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA) at a flow rate of 10 mL/min. Binary solvent systems consisting of A = 0.1% aqueous trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) and B = 0.1% TFA in acetonitrile were employed with gradients, as indicated. Products were obtained as amorphous solids following lyophilization. Electrospray ionization-mass spectra (ESI-MS) and the purity of final peptides were determined with an Agilent LC/MS system (Santa Clara, CA, USA). Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI) mass spectra were acquired on a Shimadzu Biotech Axima-CFR time-of-flight instrument (Columbia, MD, USA) using a-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid as matrix. High-resolution mass spectra (HRMS) were acquired by LC/MS-ESI using an LTQ-Orbitrap-XL (ThermoFisher Scientific, Grand Island, NY, USA) at 30 K resolution.

3.2. Peptide Synthesis

Amino acid reagents, Fmoc-Gly-OH, Fmoc-Phe-OH, Fmoc-His(Trt)-OH, Fmoc-Ile-OH and Fmoc-Ala-OH were obtained from NOVA Biochem (MilliporeSigma, Burlington, MA, USA). Fmoc-Arg(Pbf)-OH, Fmoc-Ala-OH, Fmoc-4-benzoyl-l-phenylalanine [Fmoc-L-Bpa-OH], d-(+)-biotin and were obtained from Chem-Impex International, Inc (Wood Dale, IL, USA). The linker reagent for appending biotin to the amino terminus in peptide 15 [1-(9H-fluoren-9-yl)-3,14-dioxo-2,7,10-trioxa-4,13-diazaheptadecan-17-oic acid] was prepared from succinic anhydride and 2,2′-(ethylenedioxy)bis(ethylamine) according to literature procedures [48]. Fmoc-Gly-Wang resin and Rink amide MBHA (4-methylbenzhydrylamine) resin were obtained from Novabiochem.
Peptides were synthesized using standard Fmoc solid-phase peptide synthesis (SPPS) protocols using active ester coupling methodology in N-methylpyrrolidinone (NMP) using a CEM Liberty Microwave Peptide Synthesizer (CEM Corporation, Matthews, NC, USA). In summary, the protected amino acids or acid (5.0 eq. based on resin loading, 0.2 M in NMP), O-(benzotriazol-1-yl)-N,N,N′,N′-tetramethyluronium hexafluorophosphate (HBTU) (5.0 eq., 0.45 M in NMP) and N,N-diisopropylethylamine (DIEA) (5.0 eq., 2 M in NMP) were coupled using microwave irradiation (75 °C, 5 min, double couple). Fmoc deprotection was accomplished using 20% piperidine in NMP (with 0.1 M 1-hydroxybenzotriazole hydrate (HOBt). Where appropriate, N-terminal acetylation was achieved by manual coupling using 1-acetylimidazole (10% w/v in DMF). Final resins were washed sequentially with NMP, MeOH, CH2Cl2, and Et2O and dried under vacuum (overnight). Peptides were cleaved from the resin by treatment with a cocktail solution of TFA: triisopropylsilane (TIS): H2O (95: 2.5: 2.5; 5 mL, 4 h). The resin was removed by filtration and the peptide was precipitated in cold Et2O and the precipitate was centrifuged and washed with Et2O. The resulting white solid was dissolved in 50% aqueous acetonitrile (4 mL) and purified by reverse phase preparative HPLC using linear gradients as indicated below. Final peptides were characterized as indicated in the General Synthetic section using ESI-MS, MALDI-MS or HRMS. Data are presented below:
Peptide1a. Linear gradient of 15% B to 30% B over 30 min; retention time = 25.9 min. ESI-MS calcd for C44H65N12O8 [MH+], 889.5; found, 889.3.
Peptide1b. Linear gradient of 15% B to 30% B over 30 min; retention time = 22.9 min. ESI-MS calcd for C44H66N13O7 [MH+], 888.5; found, 888.4.
Peptide1c. Linear gradient of 20% B to 40% B over 30 min; retention time = 22.4 min. ESI-MS calcd for C46H68N13O8 [MH+], 930.5; found, 930.4.
Peptide2a. Linear gradient of 15% B to 30% B over 30 min; retention time = 27.0 min. MALDI-MS calcd for C45H67N12O8 [MH+], 903.5; found, 903.7.
Peptide2b. Linear gradient of 15% B to 30% B over 30 min; retention time = 24.2 min. ESI-MS calcd for C45H68N13O7 [MH+], 902.5; found, 902.4.
Peptide2c. Linear gradient of 20% B to 40% B over 30 min; retention time = 22.3 min. ESI-MS calcd for C47H70N13O8 [MH+], 944.5; found, 944.4.
Peptide3a. Linear gradient of 15% B to 25% B over 30 min; retention time = 20.7 min. ESI-MS calcd for C41H59N12O8 [MH+], 847.5; found, 847.4.
Peptide3b. Linear gradient of 15% B to 25% B over 30 min; retention time = 18.2 min. MALDI-MS calcd for C41H60N13O7 [MH+], 846.5; found, 846.3.
Peptide3c. Linear gradient of 20% B to 40% B over 30 min; retention time = 17.1 min. ESI-MS calcd for C43H62N13O8 [MH+], 888.5; found, 888.4.
Peptide4a. Linear gradient of 15% B to 40% B over 30 min; retention time = 23.7 min. MALDI-MS calcd for C41H58N9O8 [MH+], 804.4; found, 804.6.
Peptide4b. Linear gradient of 15% B to 25% B over 30 min; retention time = 28.5 min. MALDI-MS calcd for C41H59N10O7 [MH+], 803.5; found, 803.7.
Peptide4c. Linear gradient of 20% B to 40% B over 30 min; retention time = 28.1 min. ESI-MS calcd for C43H61N10O8 [MH+], 845.5; found, 845.4.
Peptide5a. Linear gradient of 10% B to 20% B over 30 min; retention time = 27.9 min. MALDI-MS calcd for C38H61N12O8 [MH+], 813.5; found, 813.5.
Peptide5b. Linear gradient of 10% B to 20% B over 30 min; retention time = 23.4 min. MALDI-MS calcd for C38H62N13O7 [MH+], 812.5; found, 812.5.
Peptide5c. Linear gradient of 20% B to 30% B over 30 min; retention time = 14.4 min. ESI-MS calcd for C40H64N13O8 [MH+], 854.5; found, 854.4.
Peptide6a. Linear gradient of 15% B to 40% B over 30 min; retention time = 23.9 min. MALDI-MS calcd for C41H63N10O8 [MH+], 823.5; found, 823.7.
Peptide6b. Linear gradient of 15% B to 30% B over 30 min; retention time = 29.1 min. ESI-MS calcd for C41H64N11O7 [MH+], 822.5; found, 822.3.
Peptide6c. Linear gradient of 20% B to 40% B over 30 min; retention time = 28.8 min. ESI-MS calcd for C43H66N11O8 [MH+], 864.5; found, 864.4.
Peptide7a. Linear gradient of 15% B to 25% B over 30 min; retention time = 25.9 min. MALDI-MS calcd for C41H59N12O8 [MH+], 847.5; found, 847.9.
Peptide7b. Linear gradient of 15% B to 25% B over 30 min; retention time = 21.9 min. ESI-MS calcd for C41H60N13O7 [MH+], 846.5; found, 846.4.
Peptide7c. Linear gradient of 20% B to 40% B over 30 min; retention time = 18.4 min. ESI-MS calcd for C43H62N13O8 [MH+], 888.5; found, 888.4.
Peptide8a. Linear gradient of 15% B to 25% B over 30 min; retention time = 25.9 min. ESI-MS calcd for C38H61N12O8 [MH+], 813.5; found, 813.3.
Peptide8b. Linear gradient of 15% B to 25% B over 30 min; retention time = 21.4 min. ESI-MS calcd for C38H62N13O7 [MH+], 812.5; found, 812.8.
Peptide8c. Linear gradient of 20% B to 30% B over 30 min; retention time = 17.9 min. ESI-MS calcd for C40H64N13O8 [MH+], 854.5; found, 854.4.
Peptide9a. Linear gradient of 15% B to 50% B over 30 min; retention time = 22.0 min. ESI-MS m/z: 1027.3 (MH+). HRMS calcd for C54H67N12O9 [MH+], 1027.5148; found, 1027.5161.
Peptide10a. Linear gradient of 20% B to 50% B over 30 min; retention time = 24.0 min. ESI-MS m/z: 984.4 (MH+). HRMS calcd for C54H66N9O9 [MH+], 984.4978; found, 984.4969.
Peptide11a. Linear gradient of 20% B to 35% B over 30 min; retention time = 24.9 min. ESI-MS m/z: 993.4 (MH+). HRMS calcd for C51H69N12O9 [MH+], 993.5305; found, 993.5310.
Peptide12a. Linear gradient of 20% B to 50% B over 30 min; retention time = 24.1 min. ESI-MS m/z: 1003.3 (MH+). HRMS calcd for C54H71N10O9 [MH+], 1003.5400; found, 1003.5402.
Peptide13a. Linear gradient of 20% B to 40% B over 30 min; retention time = 21.0 min. ESI-MS m/z: 1027.3 (MH+). HRMS calcd for C54H67N12O9 [MH+], 1027.5148; found, 1027.5168.
Peptide14a. Linear gradient of 20% B to 50% B over 30 min; retention time = 17.6 min. ESI-MS m/z: 993.4 (MH+). HRMS calcd for C51H69N12O9 [MH+], 993.5305; found, 993.5315.
Peptide15. Linear gradient of 20% B to 45% B over 30 min; retention time = 25.7 min. ESI-MS m/z: 1449.6 (MH+). HRMS calcd for C71H101N18O15S [MH+], 1449.7348; found, 1449.7358.

3.3. In Vitro Integrase Catalytic Assays

IN reactions were performed as previously described [49]. The reactions were carried by incubating a mixture of 20 nM [γ-32P]-labeled DNA and 400 nM IN in a buffer containing 50 mM morpholinepropanesulfonic acid (pH 7.2), 7.5 mM MgCl2, and 14 mM 2-mercaptoethanol in the absence or presence of peptide inhibitors in DMSO (vehicle) at eight three-fold dilutions ranging from 111 μM to 50 nM. Reactions were performed at 37 °C (2 h) and quenched by the addition of an equal volume of loading buffer (formamide containing 1% sodium dodecyl sulfate, 0.25% bromophenol blue, and xylene cyanol). Reaction products were separated in 16% polyacrylamide denaturing sequencing gels. Dried gels were visualized using a Typhoon 8600 instrument (GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL, USA). Densitometric analyses were performed using ImageQuant 5.1 software (GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL, USA). Data analyses (linear regression, 50% inhibitory concentration [IC50] determination, standard deviation [SD]) were performed from at least 3 independent determinations using Prism 5.0c software from GraphPad (La Jolla, CA, USA). To assay 3′-P inhibitory potency, reactions were carried out with [γ-32P]-labeled full-length oligonucleotide 21T (GTGTGGAAAATCTCTAGCAGT) annealed to the complementary oligonucleotide 21B (ACTGCTAGAGATTTTCCACAC). Formation of the shorter processed 19T products was monitored and quantified to assess enzyme performance and inhibitor potency. The ST reactions were carried out with the [γ-32P]-labeled pre-cleaved oligonucleotide 19T (GTGTGGAAAATCTCTAGCA) annealed to the complementary oligonucleotide 21B (ACTGCTAGAGATTTTCCACAC) and formation of integration products (longer and slower migrating than the starting 19T substrate) was monitored to assess enzyme performance and inhibitor potency.

3.4. Homogeneous Time-Resolved Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer (HTRF)-Based Protein-Protein Interaction Assays

WT HIV-1 IN recombinant proteins with His or FLAG tags [50] were expressed in Escherichia coli and purified as described previously [27]. The His6–tagged IN construct was purified by loading the cell lysate onto a Nickel-Sepharose column (GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL, USA) and eluting bound integrase with an imidazole gradient in a 50 mM HEPES (pH 7.5) buffer containing 1 M NaCl, 7.5 mM CHAPS, 2 mM beta-mercaptoethanol. Peak fractions were pooled, diluted and loaded onto a heparin column (GE Healthcare), and integrase was eluted with an increasing NaCl gradient in a 50 mM HEPES (pH 7.5) buffer containing 7.5 mM CHAPS and 2 mM beta-mercaptoethanol. The FLAG-tagged IN construct was purified by loading the ammonium sulfate precipitate of cell lysate onto a phenyl-Sepharose column (GE Healthcare) and eluting bound integrase with a decreasing ammonium sulfate gradient in a 50 mM HEPES (pH 7.5) buffer containing 200 mM NaCl, 7.5 mM CHAPS, 2 mM beta-mercaptoethanol. Peak fractions were pooled and loaded onto a heparin column (GE Healthcare), and integrase was eluted with an increasing NaCl gradient in a 50 mM HEPES (pH 7.5) buffer containing 7.5 mM CHAPS and 2 mM beta-mercaptoethanol. The HTRF-based IN multimerization assays were performed by mixing 6 × His-tagged and FLAG-tagged INs (each at 10 nM final concentration) in a 25 mM Tris (pH 7.4) buffer containing 150 mM NaCl, 2 mM MgCl2, 0.1% Nonidet P-40, 1 mg/mL BSA. Test compounds were then added to the mixture and incubated for 2.5 h at room temperature. 6.6 nM anti-His6-XL665 and 0.45 nM anti-FLAG-EuCryptate antibodies (Cisbio, Inc., Bedford, MA, USA) were then added to the reaction and incubated at room temperature for 3 h. The HTRF signal was recorded using a PerkinElmer EnSpire multimode plate reader [27].

3.5. DNA Binding Experiments

DNA binding was measured using a plate-based assay following fluorescence polarization of a fluorescent 21-mer duplex DNA substrate (21T/21B duplex oligonucleotide) with an AlexaFluor 488 modification at the 5′-end of the 21T oligonucleotide. Peptide or DMSO (control, without peptide) were incubated at room temperature for 5 min in the IN-activity buffer in the absence or the presence of IN (400 nM). After addition of the DNA (10 nM), fluorescence anisotropy was measured every 30 s for 30 min using an Envision plate reader (Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA).

3.6. Crosslinking Experiments

Peptide 15 (111 µM), containing a photo-reactive Bpa group and a biotin linked to its amino terminus, was incubated for 2 h at 37 °C in the absence or the presence of IN (3.2 µM) before UV irradiation (5 min at 254 nM). After adding 2 × 10 µL of loading buffer, samples were heat-denatured at 95 °C (5 min). Products were separated on 16% SDS-PAGE and transferred to a PVDF membrane using an iBlot system (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). IN was revealed by Western blot using a primary rabbit polyclonal antibody directed against the IN CTD (AIDS Reagent program, cat. No. 758) and an anti-rabbit secondary antibody from Li-COR (680 nm), while the biotinylated peptide was revealed using streptavidin coupled to AlexaFluor 750. Reading was performed using an Odyssey® Infrared Imaging System (LI-COR Biotechnology, Lincoln, NE, USA).

4. Conclusions

Vpr-derived peptides have previously been shown to inhibit IN function in in vitro assays. Identification of the sites where these peptides interact with IN could potentially facilitate the development of a new class of IN inhibitors. Starting with the Vpr (69–75) sequence found in the α-helix III, we developed peptide 1a, which inhibits IN in vitro at low micromolar concentrations by a mechanism that does not appear to involve disrupting IN–DNA interactions. Furthermore, unlike ALLINIs, peptide 1a fails to promote aberrant IN multimerization. We have further identified the outward-facing i and i + 4 α-helix III residues Vpr73 Arg and Vpr70 Ile as being particularly important for IN inhibitory potency, which may suggest that these residues interact with IN. Collectively, our findings indicate that the mode of action of peptide 1a is distinct from both clinically used INSTIs and investigational ALLINIs.
To define the interactions of Vpr-derived peptides with IN, we prepared 15 as a biotinylated photoprobe variant of peptide 1a and demonstrated its ability to covalently bind to IN. It should be noted that the same helix III motif of Vpr, which gives rise to the peptide IN inhibitors, is also involved in interactions of Vpr with the human Vpr-binding protein DCAF1 [51]. This further supports the potential of Vpr-derived biotinylated probes, such as 15, to investigate the specificity of Vpr-based IN inhibitors and their role and potential binding partners. Peptide 15 may facilitate studies directed at the development of Vpr-based allosteric inhibitors.

Author Contributions

X.Z.Z. and T.R.B.Jr. designed the peptides. X.Z.Z., T.R.B.Jr. and Y.P. wrote the manuscript with input from the coauthors. X.Z.Z., M.M., E.K., J.J.K., K.M. and C.M. performed the experiments. X.Z.Z., M.K., Y.P. and T.R.B.Jr. analyzed the data. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported in part by the Intramural Research Program of the NIH (BC 007333-09 and BC007363-23), Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute at Frederick and the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health and the Joint Science and Technology Office of the Department of Defense and funds from the Intramural AIDS Targeted Antiviral Program. The content of this publication does not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Department of Health and Human Services, nor does mention of trade names, commercial products, or organizations imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. This work was also partly supported by NIH grants R01 AI062520 (to M.K.) and R21AI127282 (to J.J.K.).

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Pratibha Koneru and Jared Lindenberger for their efforts with characterizing the peptides.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Di Santo, R. Inhibiting the HIV integration process: Past, present, and the future. J. Med. Chem. 2014, 57, 539–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Croxtall, J.D.; Scott, L.J. Raltegravir: In treatment-naive patients with HIV-1 infection. Drugs 2010, 70, 631–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Wills, T.; Vega, V. Elvitegravir: A once-daily inhibitor of HIV-1 integrase. Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs 2012, 21, 395–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Shah, B.M.; Schafer, J.J.; Desimone, J.A., Jr. Dolutegravir: A new integrase strand transfer inhibitor for the treatment of HIV. Pharmacotherapy 2013, 34, 506–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Wainberg, M.A.; Zaharatos, G.J.; Brenner, B.G. Development of antiretroviral drug resistance. N. Engl. J. Med. 2011, 365, 637–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Hurt, C.B.; Sebastian, J.; Hicks, C.B.; Eron, J.J. Resistance to HIV integrase strand transfer inhibitors among clinical specimens in the united states, 2009–2012. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2014, 58, 423–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Llano, M.; Vanegas, M.; Fregoso, O.; Saenz, D.; Chung, S.; Peretz, M.; Poeschla, E.M. LEDGF/p75 determines cellular trafficking of diverse lentiviral but not murine oncoretroviral integrase proteins and Is a component of functional lentiviral preintegration complexes. J. Virol. 2004, 78, 9524–9537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Romani, B.; Engelbrecht, S. Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Vpr: Functions and molecular interactions. J. Gen. Virol. 2009, 90, 1795–1805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Al-Mawsawi, L.Q.; Neamati, N. Blocking interactions between HIV-1 integrase and cellular cofactors: An emerging anti-retroviral strategy. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2007, 28, 526–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Richter, S.N.; Frasson, I.; Palù, G. Strategies for inhibiting function of HIV-1 accessory proteins: A necessary route to AIDS therapy? Curr. Med. Chem. 2009, 9, 267–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Debyser, Z.; Desimmie, B.A.; Taltynov, O.; Demeulemeester, J.; Christ, F. Validation of host factors of HIV integration as novel drug targets for anti-HIV therapy. MedChemComm 2014, 5, 314–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Hayouka, Z.; Rosenbluh, J.; Levin, A.; Loya, S.; Lebendiker, M.; Veprintsev, D.; Kotler, M.; Hizi, A.; Loyter, A.; Friedler, A. Inhibiting HIV-1 integrase by shifting its oligomerization equilibrium. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 8316–8321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Connor, R.I.; Chen, B.K.; Choe, S.; Landau, N.R. Vpr is Required for efficient replication of human immunodeficiency virus type-1 in mononuclear phagocytes. Virology 1995, 206, 935–944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Eckstein, D.A.; Sherman, M.P.; Penn, M.L.; Chin, P.S.; De Noronha, C.M.C.; Greene, W.C.; Goldsmith, M.A. HIV-1 Vpr enhances viral burden by facilitating infection of tissue macrophages but not nondividing CD4+ T cells. J. Exp. Med. 2001, 194, 1407–1419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Kogan, M.; Rappaport, J. HIV-1 accessory protein Vpr: Relevance in the pathogenesis of HIV and potential for therapeutic intervention. Retrovirology 2011, 8, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Zhou, T.; Dang, Y.; Baker, J.J.; Zhou, J.; Zheng, Y.-H. Evidence for Vpr-dependent HIV-1 replication in human CD4+ CEM.NKR T-cells. Retrovirology 2012, 9, 93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Maes, M.; Loyter, A.; Friedler, A. Peptides that inhibit HIV-1 integrase by blocking its protein-protein interactions. FEBS J. 2012, 279, 2795–2809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Gonzalez, M.E. The HIV-1 Vpr protein: A multifaceted target for therapeutic intervention. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Morellet, N.; Bouaziz, S.; Petitjean, P.; Roques, B.P. NMR structure of the HIV-1 regulatory protein VPR. J. Mol. Biol. 2003, 327, 215–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Bischerour, J.; Tauc, P.; Leh, H.; de, R.H.; Roques, B.; Mouscadet, J.-F. The (52–96) C-terminal domain of Vpr stimulates HIV-1 IN-mediated homologous strand transfer of mini-viral DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003, 31, 2694–2702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Zhang, S.; Pointer, D.; Singer, G.; Feng, Y.; Park, K.; Zhao, L.J. Direct binding to nucleic acids by Vpr of human immunodeficiency virus type 1. Gene 1998, 212, 157–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Gleenberg, I.O.; Herschhorn, A.; Hizi, A. Inhibition of the activities of reverse transcriptase and integrase of human immunodeficiency virus type-1 by peptides derived from the homologous viral protein R (Vpr). J. Mol. Biol. 2007, 369, 1230–1243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Suzuki, S.; Urano, E.; Hashimoto, C.; Tsutsumi, H.; Nakahara, T.; Tanaka, T.; Nakanishi, Y.; Maddali, K.; Han, Y.; Hamatake, M.; et al. Peptide HIV-1 integrase inhibitors from HIV-1 gene products. J. Med. Chem. 2010, 53, 5356–5360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Nomura, W.; Aikawa, H.; Ohashi, N.; Urano, E.; Metifiot, M.; Fujino, M.; Maddali, K.; Ozaki, T.; Nozue, A.; Narumi, T.; et al. Cell-permeable stapled peptides based on HIV-1 integrase inhibitors derived from HIV-1 gene sroducts. ACS Chem. Biol. 2013, 8, 2235–2244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Zhao, X.Z.; Metifiot, M.; Maddali, K.; Smith, S.J.; Marchand, C.; Hughes, S.H.; Pommier, Y.; Burke, T.R., Jr. HIV viral protein R (Vpr)-derived peptides designed as HIV-1 integrase photoaffinity ligands. In Proceedings of the 23rd American Peptide Symposium, Honolulu, HI, USA, 22–27 June 2013; Lebl, M., Ed.; American Peptide Society: San Diego, CA, USA, 2013; Volume 23, pp. 84–85. [Google Scholar]
  26. Venkatachari, N.J.; Walker, L.A.; Tastan, O.; Le, T.; Dempsey, T.M.; Li, Y.; Yanamala, N.; Srinivasan, A.; Klein-Seetharaman, J.; Montelaro, R.C.; et al. Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Vpr: Oligomerization is an essential feature for its incorporation into virus particles. Virol. J. 2010, 7, 119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Kessl, J.; Jena, N.; Koh, Y.; Taskent-Sezgin, H.; Slaughter, A.; Feng, L.; de Silva, S.; Wu, L.; Le Grice, S.; Engelman, A. Multimode, cooperative mechanism of action of allosteric HIV-1 integrase inhibitors. J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287, 16801–16811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Tsiang, M.; Jones, G.S.; Niedziela-Majka, A.; Kan, E.; Lansdon, E.B.; Huang, W.; Hung, M.; Samuel, D.; Novikov, N.; Xu, Y.; et al. New class of HIV-1 integrase (IN) inhibitors with a dual mode of action. J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287, 21189–21203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Feng, L.; Sharma, A.; Slaughter, A.; Jena, N.; Koh, Y.; Shkriabai, N.; Larue, R.; Patel, P.; Mitsuya, H.; Kessl, J. The A128T resistance mutation reveals aberrant protein multimerization as the primary mechanism of action of allosteric HIV-1 integrase inhibitors. J. Biol. Chem. 2013, 288, 15813–15820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Christ, F.; Voet, A.; Marchand, A.; Nicolet, S.; Desimmie, B.A.; Marchand, D.; Bardiot, D.; Van der Veken, N.J.; Van, R.B.; Strelkov, S.V.; et al. Rational design of small-molecule inhibitors of the LEDGF/p75-integrase interaction and HIV replication. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2010, 6, 442–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  31. Fader, L.D.; Malenfant, E.; Parisien, M.; Carson, R.; Bilodeau, F.; Landry, S.; Pesant, M.; Brochu, C.; Morin, S.; Chabot, C.; et al. Discovery of BI 224436, a noncatalytic site integrase inhibitor (NCINI) of HIV-1. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 2014, 5, 422–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Gupta, K.; Brady, T.; Dyer, B.M.; Malani, N.; Hwang, Y.; Male, F.; Nolte, R.T.; Wang, L.; Velthuisen, E.; Jeffrey, J.; et al. Allosteric inhibition of human immunodeficiency virus integrase: Late block during viral replication and abnormal multimerization involving specific protein domains. J. Biol. Chem. 2014, 289, 20477–20488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Le Rouzic, E.; Bonnard, D.; Chasset, S.; Bruneau, J.-M.; Chevreuil, F.; Le Strat, F.; Nguyen, J.; Beauvoir, R.; Amadori, C.; Brias, J.; et al. Dual inhibition of HIV-1 replication by integrase-LEDGF allosteric inhibitors is predominant at the post-integration stage. Retrovirology 2013, 10, 144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Jurado, K.A.; Wang, H.; Slaughter, A.; Feng, L.; Kessl, J.J.; Koh, Y.; Wang, W.; Ballandras-Colas, A.; Patel, P.A.; Fuchs, J.R.; et al. Allosteric integrase inhibitor potency is determined through the inhibition of HIV-1 particle maturation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 8690–8695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Sharma, A.; Slaughter, A.; Jena, N.; Feng, L.; Kessl, J.J.; Fadel, H.J.; Malani, N.; Male, F.; Wu, L.; Poeschla, E.; et al. A new class of multimerization selective inhibitors of HIV-1 integrase. PLoS Pathog. 2014, 10, e1004171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Tsiang, M.; Jones, G.S.; Hung, M.; Mukund, S.; Han, B.; Liu, X.; Babaoglu, K.; Lansdon, E.; Chen, X.; Todd, J.; et al. Affinities between the binding partners of the HIV-1 integrase dimer-lens epithelium-derived growth factor (IN dimer-LEDGF) complex. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284, 33580–33599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Prestwich, G.D.; Dorman, G.; Elliott, J.T.; Marecak, D.M.; Chaudhary, A. Benzophenone photoprobes for phosphoinositides, peptides and drugs. Photochem. Photobiol. 1997, 65, 222–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Dorman, G.; Prestwich, G.D. Benzophenone photophores in biochemistry. Biochemistry 1994, 33, 5661–5673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Hatanaka, Y.; Sadakane, Y. Photoaffinity labeling in drug discovery and developments: Chemical gateway for entering proteomic frontier. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2002, 2, 271–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Zhao, H.; Neamati, N.; Pommier, Y.; Burke, T.R., Jr. Design and synthesis of photoactivable coumarin-containing HIV-1 integrase inhibitors. Heterocycles 1997, 45, 2277–2282. [Google Scholar]
  41. Al-Mawsawi, L.Q.; Fikkert, V.; Dayam, R.; Witvrouw, M.; Burke, T.R., Jr.; Borchers, C.H.; Neamati, N. Discovery of a small-molecule HIV-1 integrase inhibitor-binding site. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 10080–10085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Zhang, X.; Marchand, C.; Pommier, Y.; Burke, T.R. Design and synthesis of photoactivatable aryl diketo acid-containing HIV-1 integrase inhibitors as potential affinity probes. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2004, 14, 1205–1207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Zhao, X.Z.; Semenova, E.A.; Liao, C.; Nicklaus, M.; Pommier, Y.; Burke, T.R. Biotinylated biphenyl ketone-containing 2,4-dioxobutanoic acids designed as HIV-1 integrase photoaffinity ligands. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2006, 14, 7816–7825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Kauer, J.C.; Erickson-Viitanen, S.; Wolfe, H.R., Jr.; DeGrado, W.F. p-Benzoyl-l-phenylalanine, a new photoreactive amino acid. Photolabeling of calmodulin with a synthetic calmodulin-binding peptide. J. Biol. Chem. 1986, 261, 10695–10700. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  45. Wahlstrom, J.L.; Randall, M.A.; Lawson, J.D.; Lyons, D.E.; Siems, W.F.; Crouch, G.J.; Barr, R.; Facemyer, K.C.; Cremo, C.R. Structural model of the regulatory domain of smooth muscle heavy meromyosin. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 5123–5131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Bongo, N.B.; Tomohiro, T.; Hatanaka, Y. Efficient approach for profiling photoaffinity labeled peptides with a cleavable biotinyl photoprobe. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2010, 20, 1834–1836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Kyro, K.; Manandhar, S.P.; Mullen, D.; Schmidt, W.K.; Distefano, M.D. Photoaffinity labeling of Ras converting enzyme using peptide substrates that incorporate benzoylphenylalanine (Bpa) residues: Improved labeling and structural implications. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2011, 19, 7559–7569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Song, A.; Wang, X.; Zhang, J.; Marik, J.; Lebrilla, C.B.; Lam, K.S. Synthesis of hydrophilic and flexible linkers for peptide derivatization in solid phase. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2004, 14, 161–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Metifiot, M.; Maddali, K.; Naumova, A.; Zhang, X.; Marchand, C.; Pommier, Y. Biochemical and pharmacological analyses of HIV-1 integrase flexible loop mutants resistant to raltegravir. Biochemistry 2010, 49, 3715–3722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Einhauer, A.; Jungbauer, A. The FLAG™ peptide, a versatile fusion tag for the purification of recombinant proteins. J. Biochem. Biophys. Methods 2001, 49, 455–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Wu, Y.; Zhou, X.; Barnes, C.O.; DeLucia, M.; Cohen, A.E.; Gronenborn, A.M.; Ahn, J.; Calero, G. The DDB1–DCAF1–Vpr–UNG2 crystal structure reveals how HIV-1 Vpr steers human UNG2 toward destruction. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2016, 23, 933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Sample Availability: Samples of select peptides are available from the authors in limited quantities.
Molecules 23 01858 g001a 550Molecules 23 01858 g001b 550
Figure 1. NMR solution structure of Vpr (1–96) (PDB accession code: 1M8L [19]). (A) Full-length structure showing helices; (B) Closeup of α-helix III showing residues “FIHFRIG” (69–75) overlain on a ribbon depiction.
Figure 1. NMR solution structure of Vpr (1–96) (PDB accession code: 1M8L [19]). (A) Full-length structure showing helices; (B) Closeup of α-helix III showing residues “FIHFRIG” (69–75) overlain on a ribbon depiction.
Molecules 23 01858 g001aMolecules 23 01858 g001b
Molecules 23 01858 g002 550
Figure 2. The binding properties of peptide 1a to IN–DNA complex and DNA alone evaluated over time by fluorescence anisotropy or in the presence of IN (400 nM) preincubated with 1a at the indicated concentrations (A) or in the absence of IN (B). Different concentrations of peptide 1a are color-coded: 0 µM in black; 12 µM in red; 37 µM in pink; 111 µM in gray; 333 µM in blue.
Figure 2. The binding properties of peptide 1a to IN–DNA complex and DNA alone evaluated over time by fluorescence anisotropy or in the presence of IN (400 nM) preincubated with 1a at the indicated concentrations (A) or in the absence of IN (B). Different concentrations of peptide 1a are color-coded: 0 µM in black; 12 µM in red; 37 µM in pink; 111 µM in gray; 333 µM in blue.
Molecules 23 01858 g002
Molecules 23 01858 g003 550
Figure 3. Effects of peptide 1a on integrase multimerization. HTRF-based integrase multimerization signal recorded with a control ALLINI compound (BI-1001) [27] or 100 µM of peptide 1a. Each data point represents the mean of three independent experiments.
Figure 3. Effects of peptide 1a on integrase multimerization. HTRF-based integrase multimerization signal recorded with a control ALLINI compound (BI-1001) [27] or 100 µM of peptide 1a. Each data point represents the mean of three independent experiments.
Molecules 23 01858 g003
Molecules 23 01858 g004a 550Molecules 23 01858 g004b 550
Figure 4. Integrase crosslinking studies. (A) Structure of photoprobe 15 showing inhibitory potencies in an in vitro IN assay. (B) Interaction of 15 with IN as evaluated by Western blotting after UV crosslinking (254 nM) and separation on Invitrogen Novex 4–20% Tris-Glycine gels (Invitrogen™ Novex™ SeeBlue™ Plus2 prestained protein standard is included in the outmost left lane): Lane 1, HIV-1 IN only (60 min UV); Lane 2, Peptide 15 only (60 min UV); Lane 3, IN and peptide 15 (60 min UV); Lane 4, 30 min UV; Lane 5, 15 min UV; Lane 6, 5 min UV; Lane 7, HIV-1 IN only; Lane 8, Peptide 15 only; Lane 9, IN and 15. Gel stained with rabbit anti-IN CTD polyclonal (260–280)/anti-rabbit Licor, 680 nm (center, red), streptavidine-AlexaFluor 750 nm (right, green), merged image (left, merged). Molecular size markers are indicated at left (kDa).
Figure 4. Integrase crosslinking studies. (A) Structure of photoprobe 15 showing inhibitory potencies in an in vitro IN assay. (B) Interaction of 15 with IN as evaluated by Western blotting after UV crosslinking (254 nM) and separation on Invitrogen Novex 4–20% Tris-Glycine gels (Invitrogen™ Novex™ SeeBlue™ Plus2 prestained protein standard is included in the outmost left lane): Lane 1, HIV-1 IN only (60 min UV); Lane 2, Peptide 15 only (60 min UV); Lane 3, IN and peptide 15 (60 min UV); Lane 4, 30 min UV; Lane 5, 15 min UV; Lane 6, 5 min UV; Lane 7, HIV-1 IN only; Lane 8, Peptide 15 only; Lane 9, IN and 15. Gel stained with rabbit anti-IN CTD polyclonal (260–280)/anti-rabbit Licor, 680 nm (center, red), streptavidine-AlexaFluor 750 nm (right, green), merged image (left, merged). Molecular size markers are indicated at left (kDa).
Molecules 23 01858 g004aMolecules 23 01858 g004b
Table
Table 1. Structures of peptides and 3′-P and ST-inhibitory potencies in in vitro IN assays.
Table 1. Structures of peptides and 3′-P and ST-inhibitory potencies in in vitro IN assays.
No.SEQUENCE i3’-P IC50 (µM)ST IC50 (µM)
1aFIHFRIG17.6 ± 1.21.3 ± 0.3
1bFIHFRIG-amide31.5 ± 67.3 ± 0.8
1cAc-FIHFRIG-amide23.5 ± 34.7 ± 0.3
2aFIHFRIA>11134.7 ± 2.3
2bFIHFRIA-amide>11160.6 ± 8
2cAc-FIHFRIA-amide74.5 ± 730.4 ± 0.7
3aFIHFRAG66.5 ± 722.4 ± 1.7
3bFIHFRAG-amide> 111>111
3cAc-FIHFRAG-amide208 ± 1228 ± 4
4aFIHFAIG>111>111
4bFIHFAIG-amide>111>111
4cAc-FIHFAIG-amide>33381 ± 9
5aFIHARIG>11146.6 ± 6.5
5bFIHARIG-amide>111>111
5cAc-FIHARIG-amide>333117 ± 10
6aFIAFRIG17.4 ± 2.06.7 ± 1.0
6bFIAFRIG-amide95.4 ± 535.0 ± 3.2
6cAc-FIAFRIG-amide94 ± 133.5 ± 0.3
7aFAHFRIG>11173.5 ± 6.0
7bFAHFRIG-amide>111>111
7cAc-FAHFRIG-amide>333127 ± 14
8aAIHFRIG86.3 ± 5.022.7 ± 1.4
8bAIHFRIG-amide>111>111
8cAc-AIHFRIG-amide>33346 ± 8
9aFIHFRBG20 ± 34.3 ± 1.3
10aFIHFBIG>33348 ± 8
11aFIHBRIG34 ± 64.2 ± 0.7
12aFIBFRIG6.5 ± 0.92.2 ± 0.6
13aFBHFRIG37 ± 520 ± 3
14aBIHFRIG7.2 ± 1.22.1 ± 0.3
15Biotin-linker-BIHFRIG32 ± 72.3 ± 0.3
i “A” represents “Ala, Alanine”, “B” represents “Bpa, benzoylphenylalanine”.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhao, X.Z.; Métifiot, M.; Kiselev, E.; Kessl, J.J.; Maddali, K.; Marchand, C.; Kvaratskhelia, M.; Pommier, Y.; Burke, T.R., Jr. HIV-1 Integrase-Targeted Short Peptides Derived from a Viral Protein R Sequence. Molecules 2018, 23, 1858. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23081858

AMA Style

Zhao XZ, Métifiot M, Kiselev E, Kessl JJ, Maddali K, Marchand C, Kvaratskhelia M, Pommier Y, Burke TR Jr. HIV-1 Integrase-Targeted Short Peptides Derived from a Viral Protein R Sequence. Molecules. 2018; 23(8):1858. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23081858

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhao, Xue Zhi, Mathieu Métifiot, Evgeny Kiselev, Jacques J. Kessl, Kasthuraiah Maddali, Christophe Marchand, Mamuka Kvaratskhelia, Yves Pommier, and Terrence R. Burke, Jr. 2018. "HIV-1 Integrase-Targeted Short Peptides Derived from a Viral Protein R Sequence" Molecules 23, no. 8: 1858. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23081858

APA Style

Zhao, X. Z., Métifiot, M., Kiselev, E., Kessl, J. J., Maddali, K., Marchand, C., Kvaratskhelia, M., Pommier, Y., & Burke, T. R., Jr. (2018). HIV-1 Integrase-Targeted Short Peptides Derived from a Viral Protein R Sequence. Molecules, 23(8), 1858. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23081858

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop