Next Article in Journal
Spectroscopic and Structural Study of Some Oligosilanylalkyne Complexes of Cobalt, Molybdenum and Nickel
Next Article in Special Issue
Mycosporine-Like Amino Acids (MAAs) in Time-Series of Lichen Specimens from Natural History Collections
Previous Article in Journal
Biological Activities and Chemical Composition of Santolina africana Jord. et Fourr. Aerial Part Essential Oil from Algeria: Occurrence of Polyacetylene Derivatives
Previous Article in Special Issue
Nitrogen-Fixing Bacteria Associated with Peltigera Cyanolichens and Cladonia Chlorolichens
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 24
Issue 1
10.3390/molecules24010203
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Biosynthetic Gene Content of the ‘Perfume Lichens’ Evernia prunastri and Pseudevernia furfuracea

by
Anjuli Calchera
1,2,
Francesco Dal Grande
2,
Helge B. Bode
3 and
Imke Schmitt
1,2,*
1
Institute of Ecology, Evolution and Diversity, Goethe University Frankfurt, 60438 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
2
Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (S-BiKF), Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung, 60325 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
3
Molecular Biotechnology, Department for Biosciences, Goethe University Frankfurt, 60438 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2019, 24(1), 203; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24010203
Submission received: 14 December 2018 / Revised: 29 December 2018 / Accepted: 4 January 2019 / Published: 8 January 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Lichens: Chemistry, Ecological and Biological Activities II)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Lichen-forming fungi produce a vast number of unique natural products with a wide variety of biological activities and human uses. Although lichens have remarkable potential in natural product research and industry, the molecular mechanisms underlying the biosynthesis of lichen metabolites are poorly understood. Here we use genome mining and comparative genomics to assess biosynthetic gene clusters and their putative regulators in the genomes of two lichen-forming fungi, which have substantial commercial value in the perfume industry, Evernia prunastri and Pseudevernia furfuracea. We report a total of 80 biosynthetic gene clusters (polyketide synthases (PKS), non-ribosomal peptide synthetases and terpene synthases) in E. prunastri and 51 in P. furfuracea. We present an in-depth comparison of 11 clusters, which show high homology between the two species. A ketosynthase (KS) phylogeny shows that biosynthetic gene clusters from E. prunastri and P. furfuracea are widespread across the Fungi. The phylogeny includes 15 genomes of lichenized fungi and all fungal PKSs with known functions from the MIBiG database. Phylogenetically closely related KS domains predict not only similar PKS architecture but also similar cluster architecture. Our study highlights the untapped biosynthetic richness of lichen-forming fungi, provides new insights into lichen biosynthetic pathways and facilitates heterologous expression of lichen biosynthetic gene clusters.

1. Introduction

Lichens are symbioses, composed of a fungal partner (mycobiont) and one or more photosynthetic partners (photobiont) [1]. Approximately one fifth of all described fungi form lichens and more than 19,000 lichen species are described [2]. Lichens can be found in most terrestrial ecosystems. They impact various community processes, also because of their rich and diverse secondary chemistry [3,4]. Recent studies have shown that lichens represent complex multi-species symbiotic assemblages, forming microhabitats and harbouring a high diversity of other eukaryotic and prokaryotic microorganisms [5,6,7]. High-throughput sequencing technologies have revealed the presence of multiple fungal and algal species, along with hyper-diverse bacterial communities, within individual lichen thalli [7,8,9,10,11,12,13].
Lichens produce a great variety of natural compounds, and more than 1000 secondary metabolites have been identified to date, many of which are exclusively found in lichens [14,15,16,17]. The vast majority of these characteristic lichen secondary metabolites is of fungal origin. Many lichen secondary metabolites have important ecological roles including light-screening, chemical weathering, allelopathic and anti-herbivore defence [18,19,20]. Furthermore, lichens are a promising source for pharmaceutically interesting natural products, because of the manifold biological activities of lichen compounds—including antiviral, antibiotic, antitumor, allergenic, plant growth inhibitory, antiherbivore and enzyme inhibitory activities [15,19,21,22]. For example, the secondary metabolites atranorin, evernic acid, physodic acid and usnic acid found in the lichens Evernia prunastri and Pseudevernia prunastri are strong metabolic enzyme inhibitors, and atranorin may inhibit lung cancer cell mobility and tumorigenesis [22,23]. A wide range of lichens have been used in traditional medicines all around the world [24]. Today, one of the more significant economic uses of lichens is in the perfume industry. Combined lichen material is used for extracts added to perfumes for a sweet and mossy smell and to ensure persistence on the skin. Several hundred to thousands of tons of E. prunastri and P. furfuracea are harvested every year in France, Morocco and South-eastern Europe for this purpose [16,19,25,26].
The most abundant classes of lichen secondary metabolites are phenolic compounds, dibenzofurans, depsides and depsidones built by multienzyme polyketide synthases (PKS). Derived monoaromatic subunits (orcinol, β-orcinol type or methylphloroacetophenone) are then linked by ester, ether or carbon-carbon bonds [1,22,27]. Fungal PKSs consist of a set of active site domains used in an iterative fashion for multiple catalytic cycles and are subdivided into non-reducing (NR-PKS), or reducing (R-PKS) according to the level of reductive processing [28]. Both types of polyketides are found in lichen-forming fungi but fully oxidized polyketides account for most of the well-known and common lichen substance classes such as depsides and depsidones whose formation is controlled by NR-PKS genes [16,29]. Fungal secondary metabolic pathway genes are often grouped in gene clusters including genes encoding tailoring functions, transporters, and pathway-specific regulatory genes along with the core genes [30,31,32].
Recent advances in genome sequencing and bioinformatic mining algorithms have enabled the identification and characterization of biosynthetic gene clusters from genome sequences and led to the discovery of thousands of biosynthetic gene clusters [33,34,35,36]. However, the identity, structure and function of the metabolites encoded by these gene clusters remain mostly unknown. The clusters are therefore referred to as cryptic or orphan clusters [37]. In particular, fungal PKS gene clusters are challenging to functionally characterize, mainly due to the unpredictable intrinsic cryptic programming concealed within iterative PKS genes themselves and missing knowledge on precise selectivity and activity of tailoring enzymes [30,31,38]. From the vast biosynthetic potential found in genomes only a small fraction has been investigated experimentally to connect genes to metabolite production—for example through gene knockout or heterologous expression. But the presence of cryptic or orphan gene clusters in many genomes, and the fact that a vast number of biosynthetic genes is not reflected by the metabolic profile, hint at a plethora of yet undiscovered chemical compounds [32,39,40].
Despite the rich chemical diversity found in lichens, only few biosynthetic studies are available. In lichen-forming fungi the slow growth rates and difficulties in aposymbiotic mycobiont cultivation further hinder the characterization of the molecular mechanisms underlying the biosynthesis of characteristic lichen metabolites [14,41]. The biosynthesis of substances may depend on abiotic factors such as geographic, altitudinal or microhabitat conditions or the response to microclimatic fluctuations, seasonality, chemical signals, hydration, or UV radiation [14,22]. Biosynthesis of natural products may also be influenced by biological factors, such as the presence of competing plant or lichen species, predation by insects, or contact to other symbionts that are part of the lichen [27]. Furthermore, lichen mycobionts synthesize significant quantities of secondary metabolites only under permissive conditions and therefore the production in axenic cultures can differ substantially from that in nature [21,22,42].
In lichen-forming fungi no secondary metabolite has been directly linked with experimental proof (i.e., gene knockout, heterologous expression) to a biosynthetic gene cluster, although several assignments have been proposed. The first identification of a lichen secondary metabolic gene cluster—grayanic acid in Cladonia grayi—was accomplished by Armaleo et al. [43] combining phylogenetic analysis, biosynthetic prediction from PKS domain arrangement and correlation of mRNA levels with metabolic production. Later, the putative gene clusters encoding usnic acid and 6-hydroxymellein in Cladonia uncials were identified by Abdel-Hameed et al. [41,44] on the basis of PKS domain arrangement and prediction of the functions of tailoring enzymes encoded in the same gene cluster.
Several methods are applied and combined to discover PKS genes in lichenized fungi: amplification of PKS gene fragments from genomic DNA using degenerate primers and design of probes for library screening; the use of cDNA-based templates generated from reverse-transcribed mRNA, or gaining biosynthetic insights directly from transcriptomes or genomes sequenced from mycobiont cultures or reconstructed from metagenomic thalli [45,46,47]. The latter became possible through the advances of sequencing technologies and taxonomic assignment tools and led to the publication of several draft genomes of lichen-forming fungi over the last few years (see below). For the prediction of biosynthetic function of PKS genes there are diverse strategies, apart from experimental evidence through gene knockout, heterologous expression, radiolabelling or oxidation experiments [48,49,50,51]. These include phylogenetic approaches to infer the functions through a close phylogenetic relatedness to characterized genes [52,53], transcriptional profiling [43,47], or comparative homology mapping of entire gene clusters [31,36,54]. These approaches are often combined to provide putative assignments [47]. A review on reported PKS genes from lichenized fungi including an overview on approaches for PKS identification and characterization has been published recently and highlights the prospects of genomics-driven natural product discovery in lichens [45].
Here, we combine genome mining with comparative genetic mapping and phylogenetics of the two lichenized fungi Evernia prunastri and Pseudevernia furfuracea. Both lichens are of economic importance [1,19] and their fungal genomes contain a high number of biosynthetic gene clusters [46]. Moreover, a comprehensive review on the multitude of extracts identified from both lichens is available [25,26] and includes, for example, the bioactive metabolite atranorin detected in both lichens. The secondary metabolite richness and partially overlapping chemical profiles make these species particularly interesting study systems for combining genome mining and comparative genomics to investigate biosynthetic enzymes that may be responsible for the production of characteristic lichen substance classes. We further compare the biosynthetic gene richness found in these species with that of 13 other lichenized fungi and 57 representative fungal species and thereby provide the most complete comparison of biosynthetic gene families in lichen genomes based on entire genomes. We present mapped biosynthetic gene clusters of E. prunastri and P. furfuracea with functionally annotated accessory genes and putative regulatory genes. These carefully annotated clusters provide baseline information for heterologous expression of lichen biosynthetic gene clusters. Furthermore, we present all PKS genes mined from 15 genomes of lichenized fungi in a phylogenetic framework of characterized biosynthetic genes. Information on phylogenetic relatedness to previously characterized genes broadens our understanding of lichen biosynthetic pathways and may help us to identify promising clusters for the production of characteristic substance classes.
Specifically, we address the following questions:
(I)
What is the diversity of biosynthetic gene clusters in Evernia prunastri and Pseudevernia furfuracea and how does it compare to other lichenized fungi and non-lichenized fungi?
(II)
What is the architecture and gene content of those clusters with high homology between E. prunastri and P. furfuracea?
(III)
Where do PKSs from E. prunastri and P. furfuracea group phylogenetically in a phylogeny of PKSs with known functions?

2. Results & Discussion

2.1. Biosynthetic Gene Richness in Fifteen Annotated Genomes of Lichen-Forming Fungi

We investigated the biosynthetic gene richness in a total of fifteen genomes of lichen-forming fungi. The species belong to different phylogenetic groups and synthesize a variety of lichen substances (Table 1).
The genomes differ substantially in assembly status—from 7 to 3891 scaffolds—but most are 90–96% complete according to BUSCO (Figure 1a). Only the genomes of Ramalina peruviana (86%) and Cladonia uncialis (89%) score lower in completeness and also have the lowest scaffold N50 (see genome statistics given in Table 1 and Table S1). Since seven genomes did not have available gene sets, we predicted gene models. The limitations of gene prediction without transcriptome data are evident in the assessment of gene set completeness in Figure 1b. The gene sets for which we performed gene annotation are less complete (72–80% compared to 82–97%) and show more fragmented BUSCO marker genes. Nevertheless, the predicted number of genes is in the range of most of the gene sets available for lichen-forming fungi (~8200 to 11,800). The only exception here is the genome of Lobaria pulmonaria which has a considerable larger genome size with 56.1 Mb and 15,607 genes but also the highest rate of duplicated marker genes (Table 1, Table S1). Even though the gene prediction done here is not optimal, it improves the downstream biosynthetic gene cluster detection over the less specific annotation that can be done within antiSMASH [62].
We identified a high number of biosynthetic gene clusters in all genomes of lichen-forming fungi (Table 2). The fungal version of antiSMASH annotated on average ~47 clusters per genome, ranging from 27 clusters for Umbilicaria pustulata up to as many as 80 gene clusters in Evernia prunastri. The most abundant family of secondary metabolite enzymes identified in all genomes are reducing type I polyketides (R-PKS) followed by terpene synthases and non-reducing type I polyketides (NR-PKS). We also detected non-ribosomal peptide synthetases (NRPS), hybrid PKS-NRPS and type III PKSs in most genomes.
Polyketides represent the most abundant class of lichen secondary metabolites and can be reduced or fully oxidized [16,22,27]. It has been reported that most polyketides found in lichens are fully oxidized [63]. Nevertheless, we find that the number of R-PKS genes exceeds by far the number of NR-PKS genes. The genomes of the lichen-forming fungi show—through their large number of secondary metabolic genes and gene clusters—the potential for a much greater number of natural products than have been reported to occur in the respective lichen species (Table 1).
The genomes of lichen-forming fungi in the Lecanoromycetes show a remarkable richness of secondary metabolic gene clusters in comparison with genomes of species from all major fungal classes. We present the number of predicted secondary metabolite gene clusters in 15 genomes of lichenized fungi (this study) and 57 ascomycete and basidiomycete genomes of non-lichenized fungi analysed in a previous study [32] (Figure 2). The average number of predicted secondary gene clusters is ~31 clusters and the average number of predicted PKS clusters is ~11. Except for two Umbilicaria species the number of lichen gene clusters is above average and all lichen genomes harbour more than the average amount of PKS gene cluster (~24 clusters on overage). Indeed, the highest number of PKS gene clusters are found in Evernia prunastri (38 PKS clusters) together with six other lichens including Pseudevernia furfuracea in the top ten PKS cluster count. We used a non-representative selection of fungal genomes for the comparison and thus did not include all fungal species that are reported to be rich in secondary metabolite gene clusters, for example, Pestalotiopsis fici (Sordariomycetes) [64]. The comparison is meant for the sole purpose of placing the richness of secondary metabolite gene clusters found in lichen-forming fungi in a broader context (Figure 2).

2.2. Gene Cluster Comparison

Pseudevernia furfuracea and especially E. prunastri show a high number of biosynthetic gene clusters (Table 2), and a high number of natural products has been reported for both species [25,26]. This richness in secondary metabolites and partially overlapping chemical profiles (e.g., atranorin and chloroatranorin) make these species particularly interesting study systems for combining genome mining and comparative genomics to investigate biosynthetic enzymes that may be responsible for the production of characteristic lichen substance classes. Moreover, both species are harvested in large quantities for the perfume industry and are of economic importance [1,19]. A detailed list of the biosynthetic gene clusters detected in both species can be found in Tables S2 and S3.
For the gene cluster comparison, we functionally annotated 887 cluster genes of E. prunastri and 548 cluster genes of P. furfuracea with gene ontology terms and protein names. The full Blast2GO annotation is presented in Tables S4 and S5. We then identified 126 orthologous pairs as Reciprocal Best Blast Hits (RBH) between the E. prunastri and P. furfuracea cluster genes. The full list of RBHs is given in Table S6. From these results we chose all biosynthetic gene clusters that contained an orthologous core PKS, NRPS or hybrid PKS-NRPS for our comparative genetic mapping approach presented in the following synteny plots of Figure 3, Figure 4 and Figure 5. The phylogenetic placements of these clusters containing a ketosynthase (KS) domain are presented below.
Four NR-PKS clusters show a core RBH gene (Figure 3). Three of these (Figure 3A,B,D) show a high cluster homology between E. prunastri and P. furfuracea with several genes carrying similar functional annotation and RBHs of each other. The homologous genes include for example cytochrome P450, monooxygenases, serine/threonine kinases, and regulatory genes. Most of the homologous regions between the clusters are confined within genes but there are a few exceptions (Figure 3D). These exceptions with high homology of coding sequences to non-coding regions may be an artefact of gene prediction, and may indicate genes missed in the annotation. The clusters in Figure 3C on the other hand display only similarity between the two core PKS genes—one of which is a R-PKSs—and not between any accessory genes. Closer inspection of the domain architecture of the NR-PKSs in Figure 3 using BLASTp indicates the presence of acyl carrier protein (ACP) transacylase starter units (SAT) and product templates (PT). Both conserved domains were shown to be typical for NR-PKSs in addition to the minimal PKS domain structure of a KS, AT (acyltransferase) and ACP [65,66,67,68].
We further identified four R-PKS clusters with orthologous core genes (Figure 4). Two cluster comparisons (Figure 4A,B) show a high homology between both species. The entire R-PKS in Figure 4A is split over two to three genes—possibly an artefact of gene prediction—but we detected nine RBH accessory genes in the clusters including oxidases and calcium-binding domain proteins. The homologous cluster genes in Figure 4B include cytochrome P450, dehydrogenases, transporter genes and chalcone synthases (type III PKS). The other two comparative mapped clusters (Figure 4C,D) share only the core gene as a RBH. In Figure 4C we detected a homologous region with annotated genes in P. furfuracea while E. prunastri lacked any predicted gene models in the concurrent region.
Last, we included NRPS and hybrid PKS-NRPS clusters with orthologous core genes in the comparative analyses (Figure 5). We detected two hybrid PKS-NRPS clusters (Figure 5A,C) and two NRPS clusters (Figure 5B,C) all showing a high similarity in functionally annotated genes and through RBHs. Accessory genes include transporter genes, hydrolases and putative regulatory genes. In Figure 5C a hybrid PKS-NRPS and a NRPS are encoded closely together. This might suggest that both enzymes participate in the biosynthesis of one natural product or that the two natural products might function together.

2.3. Putative Regulators of Biosynthetic Gene Clusters

We identified a total of 60 putative intracluster regulators in the biosynthetic gene clusters of E. prunastri and P. furfuracea. Most of these were present in the gene clusters of E. prunastri (44 genes). Two pairs are orthologs between both species based on RBH analysis and can be found among the clusters investigated with comparative mapping (see clusters in Figure 3B and Figure 5C). We detected ten C6 zinc finger domain proteins, six Zn2Cys6 DNA-binding proteins and two ankyrin repeat proteins among other fungal specific transcription factors. These are typical regulators of secondary metabolites [37,69]. A detailed list of these putative regulatory genes can be found in Table S7.

2.4. Phylogenetic Analysis with Characterized Fungal Polyketides

We reconstructed a maximum likelihood tree of the conserved KS domain that allows inference of domain architecture and pathway association of PKSs [52,70,71]. We included a total of 413 KS sequences from fifteen genomes of lichen-forming fungi in relation to 131 MIBiG entries of characterized fungal PKSs and six animal fatty acid synthases (FAS) as an outgroup. We also included partial PKSs from lichen-forming fungi that lack one of the required domains AT or ACP for a minimal PKS organization. Out of 413 lichen KS sequences five originate from a PKS without an AT domain and 136 from a PKS without an ACP domain. We included these since such partial PKSs are also present in the MIBiG repository of characterized enzymes [72] and may nevertheless represent functional and interesting genes. In our manually curated MIBiG dataset we found one entry without an AT domain and 32 entries without an ACP domain.
The entire phylogenetic tree is shown in full length in Supplementary Figure S1. Overall the phylogeny shows support for a clade with NR-PKSs, a clade with R-PKS and a clade containing 6-methylsalicyclic acid synthases (6-MSAS). Hybrid PKS-NRPS genes contain reducing domains and fall within the clade of R-PKS. We provide here a few examples of interesting clades found in the phylogenetic analysis with a focus on NR-PKS since the basic building subunits for lichen-specific depsides and depsidones are believed to be encoded by this gene family [1,14,27,73].
Within the NR-PKS clade we find one supported clade of PKSs containing C-methyltransferase (cMT) domains including a subclade with the PKS proposed to produce the lichen substance usnic acid [41]. Evernia prunastri is also known to produce usnic acid (Table 1) and one PKS (gene 02873) falls phylogenetically close to the potential usnic acid producer (Figure 6).
Another clade contains the NR-PKSs of E. prunastri and P. furfuracea (Figure 3A) which are phylogenetically close to the PKS gene that is putatively associated with grayanic acid biosynthesis [43]. All Cladonia species included in this study (C. grayi, C. macilenta, C. metacorallifera and C. uncialis) have members within this clade (Figure 7).
We further inspected the phylogenetic placement of the comparative mapped NR-PKSs of the E. prunastri and P. furfuracea gene clusters. The gene clusters mapped in Figure 3B fall into a group with tandem ACP domains and in the proximity of characterized PKSs involved in the production of hydroxy naphthalenes [74,75] (Figure 8). Naphthalene is found in the extracts of E. prunastri and P. furfuracea used for the perfume industry [1] (pp. 132–133).
Two closely related clusters of E. prunastri and P. furfuracea (Figure 3C) fall into a clade with the experimentally characterized PKS gene orsA known to be involved in orsellinic acid biosynthesis in Aspergillus nidulans [76]. This clade (Figure 9) provides an especially interesting starting point for further investigations as the most abundant class of lichen metabolites are composed of orcinol or β-orcinol monomers [27].
We also want to underline that combining comparative mapping of entire gene clusters with a phylogenetic approach based only on the KS sequence of the core PKS gene shows that entire cluster similarities correspond to KS topology. This is in line with findings that emphasize the predictive power of the conserved KS domains for the investigation of enzyme architecture and pathway association [52,70,71].
Our study combines genome mining and comparative genomics and highlights the high diversity of biosynthetic gene clusters that can be found in fifteen genomes of lichen-forming fungi. This number exceeds by far the number of lichen metabolites that are reported for these species. The secondary metabolite gene cluster richness found in the genomes of lichen-forming fungi is above the average richness found in other representative fungal species, especially polyketide synthase gene clusters. The comparative mapping of interesting biosynthetic gene clusters, functional annotation of accessory genes together with the identification of putative regulatory genes presented here will aid in providing new insights into lichen biosynthetic pathways and serve as a valuable resource for developing heterologous expression of lichen biosynthetic gene clusters.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Identification and Annotations of Biosynthetic Gene Clusters

We used the genomes of the two lichen-forming fungi of Evernia prunastri and Pseudevernia furfuracea for biosynthetic gene cluster identification (accession numbers in Table 1). Sequencing of cultures, genome assemblies, gene prediction and genome mining for biosynthetic gene clusters in both species were done as described in Meiser et al. [46]. We provide here a short description on the identification of biosynthetic gene clusters to give a full depiction on our focused genome mining approach. We identified typical gene families of secondary metabolism and annotated biosynthetic gene clusters with the fungal version of antiSMASH v.4.0.2 (fungiSMASH) [62,77], including polyketide synthases (PKS), non-ribosomal peptide synthetases (NRPS) and terpene synthases. These gene families are typical targets in lichen-metabolite genome mining, because they encode the structural frame of most secondary metabolites [19,37,41,44]. As input for antiSMASH we used an annotated nucleotide file (EMBL format) constructed from the genome FASTA file and the GFF file from gene prediction.
Both investigated species show a high number of biosynthetic gene clusters with reducing and non-reducing PKSs, NRPSs, and terpene synthases [46] and represent a promising source of bioactive secondary metabolites. To further investigate these biosynthetic gene clusters for accessory genes involved in the lichen metabolite synthesis, we annotated all predicted protein sequences belonging to an antiSMASH cluster with gene ontology (GO) terms and protein names. The functional annotation was done using Blast2GO [78] v.5.0.22 and by running BLASTp [79] v.2.2.29 against the NCBI GenBank protein database nr (downloaded May 2017) [80] and InterProScan [81] v.5.28–67.0 with a matching lookup service and the Pfam (protein family) database v.31.0 [82].

3.2. Gene Cluster Comparison in Evernia prunastri and Pseudevernia furfuracea

We applied a two-step approach to compare the biosynthetic genes cluster of E. prunastri and P. furfuracea. First, as a simple and fast way of detecting orthologous pairs [83], we identified Reciprocal Best Blast Hits (RBH) between all cluster genes of both species. For better detecting orthologs we used BLASTp v.2.2.31 + with final Smith-Waterman alignment and soft filtering (BLAST flags use_sw_tback, soft_masking true, seq yes and evalue 1e-6) [83,84]. The BLAST hits were then filtered for a minimum query coverage of 50% (qcovhsp) and a minimum identity of 70% over the alignment length (pident) and sorted for highest bit-score and lowest e-value [85].
Second, we used comparative genetic mapping to analyse the homology and arrangement of entire clusters instead of looking at core gene orthologs only. For the comparison we chose all biosynthetic gene clusters that contained a RBH core PKS, NRPS, or hybrid PKS-NRPS. Synteny plots were generated with Easyfig python script v.2.2.3 [86] and the tBLASTx option with a minimum identity value of 40% and a minimum alignment length of 50 [87]. Gene clusters were reversed when necessary to have a matching orientation. We generated GBK files with seqkit [88] v.0.7.2 and the seqret tool in the EMBOSS package [89] v6.6.0.0 as input for Easyfig.

3.3. Putative Regulators of Biosynthetic Gene Clusters

The transcriptional control of biosynthetic genes by transcription factors is complex and can occur on several levels from pathway-specific to a broader global regulation [37]. Specific acting regulatory genes are usually found in the cluster that the factors regulate. Examples include Zn(II)2Cys6, Cys2His2, basic leucine zipper (bZip), winged helix, zinc-finger, or ankyrin repeat proteins [30,69]. The identification of these regulators involved in the synthesis of secondary metabolites may be crucial for successful heterologous expression experiments or for activating silent gene clusters.
For the detection of putative regulators within the biosynthetic gene clusters of E. prunastri and P. furfuracea we made use of the Blast2GO annotation. We searched for the following key terms in the GO names: ‘signal transducer activity’, ‘transcription factor activity’ and ‘transcription factor binding’.

3.4. Biosynthetic Gene Richness in Other Genomes of Lichenized and Non-Lichenized Fungi

We assessed the chemical diversity and biosynthetic gene richness of E. prunastri and P. furfuracea in comparison to the genomes of other lichen-forming fungi. We analysed all genomes of lichen-forming fungi from fungal culture available in NCBI (National Center for Biotechnology Information) and for authorized genomes in JGI (DOE Joint Genome Institute) (Table 1). The only genome not derived from fungal culture is the genome of Umbilicaria pustulata where the fungal genome was reconstructed with metagenomic sequencing of the lichen thallus instead [90]. We ran antiSMASH as described above on all thirteen additional genomes.
For seven of these genomes no gene set was available and gene models had to be predicted before running antiSMASH to improve the biosynthetic gene cluster detection. The de novo gene prediction and annotation of these genomes was done with MAKER [91] v2.31.8 using an iterative approach as recommended in the protocols of Campbell et al. [92]. In the first round of MAKER we used Hidden Markov Models (HMMs) generated with GeneMark-ES [93] v4.33 and SNAP [94] with hints from CEGMA [95] v2.4 (performed on iPlant [96]) as training data for gene finding. The first-round results were then converted to new SNAP and Augustus [97] v3.0.2 HMMs for the second round of MAKER resulting in the final set of gene models.
The genome and gene set completeness of all 15 lichen genomes was assessed based on evolutionarily-informed expectations of gene content with BUSCO (Benchmarking Universal Single-Copy Orthologs) [98] v.3.0 and a lineage-specific set of 1315 Ascomycota single-copy orthologs from OrthoDB [99] v.9. Completeness estimates were visualized with the package ggplot2 [100] v.2.2.1 in R [101] v.3.4.4.
Additionally, we provide an overview on how richness of biosynthetic gene clusters found in lichenized fungi compare to the cluster richness found in non-lichenized fungi. Therefore, we combined the secondary metabolic gene cluster counts for the 15 genomes of lichenized fungi obtained from antiSMASH in this study with a recently published analysis from 57 genomes of representative fungal ascomycete and basidiomycete species [32].

3.5. Phylogenetic Analysis with Characterized Fungal Polyketides

We used phylogenetics to analyse the core enzymes of PKS and hybrid PKS-NRPS gene clusters in relation to characterized fungal biosynthetic gene clusters. Combining genome mining with phylogenetic analysis may provide clues for identifying promising clusters for the production of characteristic substance classes through phylogenetic relatedness to previously characterized genes [36,62,102].
Our phylogenetic approach is based on protein sequences of the ketosynthase (KS) domain of PKSs and hybrid PKS-NRPSs. The KS domains are the most conserved and essential part of a PKS cluster and are highly predictive of enzyme architecture and pathway association [52,70,71]. We included all KS sequences identified in the fifteen genomes of lichen-forming fungi (Table 2) that stem from genes with at least three PKS domains and with KS sequences longer than 200 bases. This resulted in a dataset of 413 KS sequences originating from lichen-forming fungi. Additionally, we made use of the MIBiG repository (Minimum Information about Biosynthetic Gene cluster [103]) to include experimentally characterized biosynthetic gene clusters [72]. We compiled a custom database with 131 entries of all fungal PKS records in MIBiG (downloaded January 2018). Further we included six animal fatty acid synthase (FAS) protein sequences as outgroup for the phylogenetic inference (NCBI Reference Sequence accessions: Bos taurus NP_001012687.1; Gallus gallus NP_990486.2; Homo sapiens NP_004095.4; Mus musculus NP_032014.3; Rattus norvegicus NP_059028.1; Sus scrofa NP_001093400.1).
We ran MAFFT [104,105] v7.309 in Geneious v9.1.8 (https://www.geneious.com) to generate a multiple sequence alignment of all 550 KS amino acid sequences resulting in an alignment with a length of 1043 characters. We chose the iterative refinement algorithm G-INS-i with a BLOSUM62 scoring matrix, a gap open penalty of 1.53 and an offset value of 0.123. We performed ProtTest [106] v.3.4.2 on our alignment to select the best-fitting substitution model of amino acid replacement for subsequent tree reconstruction. Model-testing indicated LG + I + G as the best model for both the Akaike and the Bayesian Information Criterion. The phylogenetic tree was then generated with RAxML-HPC Black Box v.8.2.10 (Randomized Axelerated Maximum Likelihood) [107] on CIPRES v3.3 (Cyperinfrastructure for Phylogenetic Research) [108,109] with automated bootstrapping, protein sequence type, FAS sequences set as outgroup, estimating proportion of invariable sites (GTRGAMMA + I), protein substitution matrix LG, no empirical base frequencies and printing branch lengths. The tree was visualized with Figtree v.1.4.3 (http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree) rooting the tree with the help of the FAS outgroup and ordering nodes increasingly.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online, Table S1: Genome Statistics and Completeness of Lichen-Forming Fungi; Table S2: Overview of Biosynthetic Gene Clusters in Evernia prunastri; Table S3: Overview of Biosynthetic Gene Clusters in Pseudevernia prunastri; Table S4: Functional Annotation of Evernia prunastri Cluster Genes; Table S5: Functional Annotation of Pseudevernia furfuracea Cluster Genes; Table S6: Reciprocal Best Blast Hits of Evernia prunastri and Pseudevernia furfuracea Cluster Genes; Table S7: List of Putative Regulatory Genes in Evernia prunastri and Pseudevernia furfuracea; Figure S1: Phylogenetic Tree Based on the Ketosynthase (KS) Domain; Supplementary File S1: Ketosynthase (KS) Alignment for Phylogenetic Tree Reconstruction (FASTA); Supplementary Files S2: Predicted Gene Models for Seven Genomes of Lichen-Forming Fungi (GFF3); All output of antiSMASH analyses are available upon request from the corresponding author.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.C., F.D.G. and I.S.; formal analysis, A.C.; investigation A.C.; methodology A.C.; validation, F.D.G., I.S. and H.B.B.; writing—original draft preparation, A.C.; visualization, A.C.; writing—review and editing, F.D.G., I.S. and H.B.B.; supervision, F.D.G. and I.S.; project administration, I.S.

Funding

This research was supported by the research funding program Landes-Offensive zur Entwicklung Wissenschaftlich-Ökonomischer Exzellenz (LOEWE) of Hesse’s Ministry of Higher Education, Research and the Arts through the Priority Programme Integrative Pilzforschung (IPF) and the Translational Biodiversity Genomics (TBG) Center. Additional funding came from the RMU Initiativfond “Biotic interactions”. Some analyses were performed on the FUCHS cluster of the Center for Scientific Computing (CSC) of the Goethe University in Frankfurt am Main.

Acknowledgments

We thank the following colleagues for permission to use genomes prior to full publication: Daniele Armaleo (Duke University)—Cladonia grayi, Ólafur S. Andrésson (University of Iceland)—Lobaria pulmonaria and Paul Dyer (University of Nottingham)—Xanthoria parietina.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Nash, T.H. Lichen Biology, 2nd ed.; Nash, T.H., Ed.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2008; ISBN 9780521871624. [Google Scholar]
  2. Lücking, R.; Hodkinson, B.P.; Leavitt, S.D. The 2016 classification of lichenized fungi in the Ascomycota and Basidiomycota—Approaching one thousand genera. Bryologist 2016, 119, 361–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Asplund, J.; Wardle, D.A. How lichens impact on terrestrial community and ecosystem properties. Biol. Rev. 2017, 92, 1720–1738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Seaward, M.R.D. Environmental role of lichens. In Lichen Biology; Nash, T.H., Ed.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2008; pp. 274–298. ISBN 9780521871624. [Google Scholar]
  5. Grube, M.; Wedin, M. Lichenized fungi and the evolution of symbiotic organization. Microbiol. Spectr. 2016, 4, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Cernava, T.; Berg, G.; Grube, M. High life expectancy of bacteria on lichens. Microb. Ecol. 2016, 72, 510–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Aschenbrenner, I.A.; Cernava, T.; Berg, G.; Grube, M. Understanding microbial multi-species symbioses. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Spribille, T.; Tuovinen, V.; Resl, P.; Vanderpool, D.; Wolinski, H.; Aime, M.C.; Schneider, K.; Stabentheiner, E.; Toome-Heller, M.; Thor, G.; et al. Basidiomycete yeasts in the cortex of ascomycete macrolichens. Science 2016, 353, 488–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Fernández-Mendoza, F.; Fleischhacker, A.; Kopun, T.; Grube, M.; Muggia, L. ITS1 metabarcoding highlights low specificity of lichen mycobiomes at a local scale. Mol. Ecol. 2017, 26, 4811–4830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Dal Grande, F.; Rolshausen, G.; Divakar, P.K.; Crespo, A.; Otte, J.; Schleuning, M.; Schmitt, I. Environment and host identity structure communities of green algal symbionts in lichens. New Phytol. 2018, 217, 277–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Machado, H.; Tuttle, R.N.; Jensen, P.R. Omics-based natural product discovery and the lexicon of genome mining. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2017, 39, 136–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Cernava, T.; Erlacher, A.; Aschenbrenner, I.A.; Krug, L.; Lassek, C.; Riedel, K.; Grube, M.; Berg, G. Deciphering functional diversification within the lichen microbiota by meta-omics. Microbiome 2017, 5, 82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Moya, P.; Molins, A.; Martínez-Alberola, F.; Muggia, L.; Barreno, E. Unexpected associated microalgal diversity in the lichen Ramalina farinacea is uncovered by pyrosequencing analyses. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0175091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Stocker-Wörgötter, E. Metabolic diversity of lichen-forming ascomycetous fungi: Culturing, polyketide and shikimatemetabolite production, and PKS genes. Nat. Prod. Rep. Prod. Rep. 2008, 25, 188–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Molnár, K.; Farkas, E. Current results on biological activities of lichen secondary metabolites: A review. Z. Naturforsch. C 2010, 65, 157–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Elix, J.A.; Stocker-Wörgötter, E. Biochemistry and secondary metabolites. In Lichen Biology; Nash, T.H., Ed.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2008; pp. 104–133. ISBN 9780521871624. [Google Scholar]
  17. Huneck, S.; Yoshimura, I. Identification of Lichen Substances; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1996; ISBN 978-3-642-85245-9. [Google Scholar]
  18. Rundel, P.W. The ecological role of secondary lichen substances. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 1978, 6, 157–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Huneck, S. The significance of lichens and their metabolites. Naturwissenschaften 1999, 86, 559–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Lawrey, J.D. Biological role of lichen substances. Bryologist 1986, 89, 111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ranković, B.; Kosanić, M. Lichen Secondary Metabolites; Ranković, B., Ed.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2015; ISBN 978-3-319-13373-7. [Google Scholar]
  22. Boustie, J.; Grube, M. Lichens—A promising source of bioactive secondary metabolites. Plant Genet. Resour. Charact. Util. 2005, 3, 273–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zhou, R.; Yang, Y.; Park, S.-Y.; Nguyen, T.T.; Seo, Y.-W.; Lee, K.H.; Lee, J.H.; Kim, K.K.; Hur, J.-S.; Kim, H. The lichen secondary metabolite atranorin suppresses lung cancer cell motility and tumorigenesis. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 8136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Crawford, S.D. Lichens used in traditional medicine. In Lichen Secondary Metabolites; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2015; pp. 27–80. ISBN 9783319133744. [Google Scholar]
  25. Joulain, D.; Tabacchi, R. Lichen extracts as raw materials in perfumery. Part 1: Oakmoss. Flavour Fragr. J. 2009, 24, 49–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Joulain, D.; Tabacchi, R. Lichen extracts as raw materials in perfumery. Part 2: Treemoss. Flavour Fragr. J. 2009, 24, 105–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Calcott, M.J.; Ackerley, D.F.; Knight, A.; Keyzers, R.A.; Owen, J.G. Secondary metabolism in the lichen symbiosis. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018, 47, 1730–1760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Crawford, J.M.; Townsend, C.A. New insights into the formation of fungal aromatic polyketides. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2010, 8, 879–889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Schmitt, I.; Martín, M.P.; Kautz, S.; Lumbsch, H.T. Diversity of non-reducing polyketide synthase genes in the Pertusariales (lichenized Ascomycota): A phylogenetic perspective. Phytochemistry 2005, 66, 1241–1253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Keller, N.P.; Turner, G.; Bennett, J.W. Fungal secondary metabolism—From biochemistry to genomics. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2005, 3, 937–947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Cox, R.J.; Skellam, E.; Williams, K. Biosynthesis of fungal polyketides. In Physiology and Genetics; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; pp. 385–412. [Google Scholar]
  32. Rokas, A.; Wisecaver, J.H.; Lind, A.L. The birth, evolution and death of metabolic gene clusters in fungi. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2018, 16, 731–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Cimermancic, P.; Medema, M.H.; Claesen, J.; Kurita, K.; Wieland Brown, L.C.; Mavrommatis, K.; Pati, A.; Godfrey, P.A.; Koehrsen, M.; Clardy, J.; et al. Insights into secondary metabolism from a global analysis of prokaryotic biosynthetic gene clusters. Cell 2014, 158, 412–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Doroghazi, J.R.; Albright, J.C.; Goering, A.W.; Ju, K.-S.; Haines, R.R.; Tchalukov, K.A.; Labeda, D.P.; Kelleher, N.L.; Metcalf, W.W. A roadmap for natural product discovery based on large-scale genomics and metabolomics. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2014, 10, 963–968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zhao, H.; Medema, M.H. Standardization for natural product synthetic biology. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2016, 33, 920–924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Nielsen, J.C.; Grijseels, S.; Prigent, S.; Ji, B.; Dainat, J.; Nielsen, K.F.; Frisvad, J.C.; Workman, M.; Nielsen, J. Global analysis of biosynthetic gene clusters reveals vast potential of secondary metabolite production in Penicillium species. Nat. Microbiol. 2017, 2, 17044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Brakhage, A.A. Regulation of fungal secondary metabolism. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2013, 11, 21–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Schümann, J.; Hertweck, C. Advances in cloning, functional analysis and heterologous expression of fungal polyketide synthase genes. J. Biotechnol. 2006, 124, 690–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Hertweck, C. Hidden biosynthetic treasures brought to light. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2009, 5, 450–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Bergmann, S.; Schümann, J.; Scherlach, K.; Lange, C.; Brakhage, A.A.; Hertweck, C. Genomics-driven discovery of PKS-NRPS hybrid metabolites from Aspergillus nidulans. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2007, 3, 213–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Abdel-Hameed, M.; Bertrand, R.L.; Piercey-Normore, M.D.; Sorensen, J.L. Putative identification of the usnic acid biosynthetic gene cluster by de novo whole-genome sequencing of a lichen-forming fungus. Fungal Biol. 2016, 120, 306–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Muggia, L.; Schmitt, I.; Grube, M. Lichens as treasure chests of natural products. Sim News 2009, 59, 85–97. [Google Scholar]
  43. Armaleo, D.; Sun, X.; Culberson, C. Insights from the first putative biosynthetic gene cluster for a lichen depside and depsidone. Mycologia 2011, 103, 741–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Abdel-Hameed, M.; Bertrand, R.L.; Piercey-Normore, M.D.; Sorensen, J.L. Identification of 6-hydroxymellein synthase and accessory genes in the lichen Cladonia uncialis. J. Nat. Prod. 2016, 79, 1645–1650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Bertrand, R.L.; Sorensen, J.L. A comprehensive catalogue of polyketide synthase gene clusters in lichenizing fungi. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2018, 45, 1067–1081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Meiser, A.; Otte, J.; Schmitt, I.; Dal Grande, F. Sequencing genomes from mixed DNA samples—Evaluating the metagenome skimming approach in lichenized fungi. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 14881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Wang, Y.; Geng, C.; Yuan, X.; Hua, M.; Tian, F.; Li, C. Identification of a putative polyketide synthase gene involved in usnic acid biosynthesis in the lichen Nephromopsis pallescens. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0199110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Taguchi, H.; Sankawa, U.; Shibata, S. Biosynthesis of natural products. VI. Biosynthesis of usnic acid in lichens. (1). A general scheme of biosynthesis of usnic acid. Chem. Pharm. Bull. (Tokyo) 1969, 17, 2054–2060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Barton, D.H.R.; Deflorin, A.M.; Edwards, O.E. 108. The synthesis of usnic acid. J. Chem. Soc. 1956, 108, 530–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Gagunashvili, A.N.; Davíðsson, S.P.; Jónsson, Z.O.; Andrésson, Ó.S. Cloning and heterologous transcription of a polyketide synthase gene from the lichen Solorina crocea. Mycol. Res. 2009, 113, 354–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Chooi, Y.-H.; Stalker, D.M.; Davis, M.A.; Fujii, I.; Elix, J.A.; Louwhoff, S.H.J.J.; Lawrie, A.C. Cloning and sequence characterization of a non-reducing polyketide synthase gene from the lichen Xanthoparmelia semiviridis. Mycol. Res. 2008, 112, 147–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Ziemert, N.; Jensen, P.R. Phylogenetic approaches to natural product structure prediction. In Methods in Enzymology; Elsevier Inc.: San Diego, CA, USA, 2012; Volume 517, pp. 161–182. ISBN 9780124046344. [Google Scholar]
  53. Wang, Y.; Wang, J.; Cheong, Y.H.; Hur, J.-S. Three new non-reducing polyketide synthase genes from the lichen-forming fungus Usnea longissima. Mycobiology 2014, 42, 34–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Bertrand, R.L.; Abdel-Hameed, M.; Sorensen, J.L. Lichen biosynthetic gene clusters part II: Homology mapping suggests a functional diversity. J. Nat. Prod. 2018, 81, 732–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Purvis, O.W.; Coppins, B.J.; Hawksworth, D.L.; James, P.W.; Moore, D.M. (Eds.) The Lichen Flora of Great Britain and Ireland; Natural History Museum Publications in association with The British Lichen Society: London, UK, 1992; ISBN 0952304902. [Google Scholar]
  56. Brodo, I.M.; Sharnoff, S.D.; Sharnoff, S. (Eds.) Lichens of North America; Yale University Press: New Haven, CO, USA; London, UK, 2001; ISBN 0-300-08249-5. [Google Scholar]
  57. Stenroos, S.; Velmala, S.; Pykälä, J.; Ahti, T. (Eds.) Lichens of Finland; Finnish Museum of Natural History LUMOS, University of Helsinki: Helsinki, Finland, 2016; ISBN 978-951-51-2266-7. [Google Scholar]
  58. Posner, B.; Feige, G.B.; Leuckert, C. Beiträge zur Chemie der Flechtengattung Lasallia Mérat/On the Chemistry of the lichen genus Lasallia Merat. Z. Naturforsch. C 1991, 46, 19–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Dal Grande, F.; Meiser, A.; Greshake Tzovaras, B.; Otte, J.; Ebersberger, I.; Schmitt, I. The draft genome of the lichen-forming fungus Lasallia hispanica (Frey) Sancho & A. Crespo. Lichenologist 2018, 50, 329–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Park, S.-Y.; Choi, J.; Lee, G.-W.; Park, C.-H.; Kim, J.A.; Oh, S.-O.; Lee, Y.-H.; Hur, J.-S. Draft Genome Sequence of Endocarpon pusillum Strain KoLRILF000583. Genome Announc. 2014, 2, e00452-14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Wang, Y.-Y.; Liu, B.; Zhang, X.-Y.; Zhou, Q.-M.; Zhang, T.; Li, H.; Yu, Y.-F.; Zhang, X.-L.; Hao, X.-Y.; Wang, M.; et al. Genome characteristics reveal the impact of lichenization on lichen-forming fungus Endocarpon pusillum Hedwig (Verrucariales, Ascomycota). BMC Genom. 2014, 15, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Blin, K.; Kim, H.U.; Medema, M.H.; Weber, T. Recent development of antiSMASH and other computational approaches to mine secondary metabolite biosynthetic gene clusters. Brief. Bioinform. 2017, bbx146, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Stocker-Wörgötter, E. Biochemical diversity and ecology of lichen-forming fungi: Lichen substances, chemosyndromic variation and origin of polyketide-type metabolites (biosynthetic pathways). In Recent Advances in Lichenology; Springer: New Delhi, India, 2015; pp. 161–179. ISBN 9788132222354. [Google Scholar]
  64. Wang, X.; Zhang, X.; Liu, L.; Xiang, M.; Wang, W.; Sun, X.; Che, Y.; Guo, L.; Liu, G.; Guo, L.; et al. Genomic and transcriptomic analysis of the endophytic fungus Pestalotiopsis fici reveals its lifestyle and high potential for synthesis of natural products. BMC Genom. 2015, 16, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Crawford, J.M.; Dancy, B.C.R.; Hill, E.A.; Udwary, D.W.; Townsend, C.A. Identification of a starter unit acyl-carrier protein transacylase domain in an iterative type I polyketide synthase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 16728–16733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Crawford, J.M.; Thomas, P.M.; Scheerer, J.R.; Vagstad, A.L.; Kelleher, N.L.; Townsend, C.A. Deconstruction of iterative multidomain polyketide synthase function. Science 2008, 320, 243–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Crawford, J.M.; Korman, T.P.; Labonte, J.W.; Vagstad, A.L.; Hill, E.A.; Kamari-Bidkorpeh, O.; Tsai, S.-C.; Townsend, C.A. Structural basis for biosynthetic programming of fungal aromatic polyketide cyclization. Nature 2009, 461, 1139–1143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Cacho, R.A.; Tang, Y.; Chooi, Y.-H. Next-generation sequencing approach for connecting secondary metabolites to biosynthetic gene clusters in fungi. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 5, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Knox, B.P.; Keller, N.P. Key players in the regulation of fungal secondary metabolism. In Biosynthesis and Molecular Genetics of Fungal Secondary Metabolites, Volume 2; Zeilinger, S., Martín, J.-F., García-Estrada, C., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2015; Volume 2, pp. 13–28. ISBN 978-1-4939-2530-8. [Google Scholar]
  70. Kroken, S.; Glass, N.L.; Taylor, J.W.; Yoder, O.C.; Turgeon, B.G. Phylogenomic analysis of type I polyketide synthase genes in pathogenic and saprobic ascomycetes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 15670–15675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  71. Jenke-Kodama, H.; Sandmann, A.; Müller, R.; Dittmann, E. Evolutionary implications of bacterial polyketide synthases. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2005, 22, 2027–2039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Li, Y.F.; Tsai, K.J.S.; Harvey, C.J.B.; Li, J.J.; Ary, B.E.; Berlew, E.E.; Boehman, B.L.; Findley, D.M.; Friant, A.G.; Gardner, C.A.; et al. Comprehensive curation and analysis of fungal biosynthetic gene clusters of published natural products. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2016, 89, 18–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Nguyen, K.-H.; Chollet-Krugler, M.; Gouault, N.; Tomasi, S. UV-protectant metabolites from lichens and their symbiotic partners. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2013, 30, 1490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Fulton, T.R.; Ibrahim, N.; Losada, M.C.; Grzegorski, D.; Tkacz, J.S. A melanin polyketide synthase (PKS) gene from Nodulisporium sp. that shows homology to the pks1 gene of Colletotrichum lagenarium. Mol. Gen. Genet. 1999, 262, 714–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Zhang, A.; Lu, P.; Dahl-Roshak, A.M.; Paress, P.S.; Kennedy, S.; Tkacz, J.S.; An, Z. Efficient disruption of a polyketide synthase gene (pks1) required for melanin synthesis through Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Glarea lozoyensis. Mol. Genet. Genom. 2003, 268, 645–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Sanchez, J.F.; Chiang, Y.-M.; Szewczyk, E.; Davidson, A.D.; Ahuja, M.; Elizabeth Oakley, C.; Woo Bok, J.; Keller, N.; Oakley, B.R.; Wang, C.C.C. Molecular genetic analysis of the orsellinic acid/F9775 genecluster of Aspergillus nidulans. Mol. Biosyst. 2010, 6, 587–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Blin, K.; Wolf, T.; Chevrette, M.G.; Lu, X.; Schwalen, C.J.; Kautsar, S.A.; Suarez Duran, H.G.; de los Santos, E.L.C.; Kim, H.U.; Nave, M.; et al. antiSMASH 4.0—Improvements in chemistry prediction and gene cluster boundary identification. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017, 45, W36–W41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Conesa, A.; Götz, S. Blast2GO: A comprehensive suite for functional analysis in plant genomics. Int. J. Plant Genom. 2008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Altschul, S. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: A new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997, 25, 3389–3402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Benson, D.A.; Cavanaugh, M.; Clark, K.; Karsch-Mizrachi, I.; Lipman, D.J.; Ostell, J.; Sayers, E.W. GenBank. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017, 45, D37–D42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Jones, P.; Binns, D.; Chang, H.-Y.; Fraser, M.; Li, W.; McAnulla, C.; McWilliam, H.; Maslen, J.; Mitchell, A.; Nuka, G.; et al. InterProScan 5: Genome-scale protein function classification. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 1236–1240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Finn, R.D.; Coggill, P.; Eberhardt, R.Y.; Eddy, S.R.; Mistry, J.; Mitchell, A.L.; Potter, S.C.; Punta, M.; Qureshi, M.; Sangrador-Vegas, A.; et al. The Pfam protein families database: Towards a more sustainable future. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016, 44, D279–D285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Ward, N.; Moreno-Hagelsieb, G. Quickly finding orthologs as reciprocal best hits with BLAT, LAST, and UBLAST: How much do we miss? PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e101850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Moreno-Hagelsieb, G.; Latimer, K. Choosing BLAST options for better detection of orthologs as reciprocal best hits. Bioinformatics 2008, 24, 319–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Camacho, C.; Coulouris, G.; Avagyan, V.; Ma, N.; Papadopoulos, J.; Bealer, K.; Madden, T.L. BLAST+: Architecture and applications. BMC Bioinform. 2009, 10, 421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Sullivan, M.J.; Petty, N.K.; Beatson, S.A. Easyfig: A genome comparison visualizer. Bioinformatics 2011, 27, 1009–1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Kjærbølling, I.; Vesth, T.C.; Frisvad, J.C.; Nybo, J.L.; Theobald, S.; Kuo, A.; Bowyer, P.; Matsuda, Y.; Mondo, S.; Lyhne, E.K.; et al. Linking secondary metabolites to gene clusters through genome sequencing of six diverse Aspergillus species. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, E753–E761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Shen, W.; Le, S.; Li, Y.; Hu, F. SeqKit: A cross-platform and ultrafast toolkit for FASTA/Q file manipulation. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0163962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Rice, P.; Longden, I.; Bleasby, A. EMBOSS: The European Molecular Biology Open Software Suite. Trends Genet. 2000, 16, 276–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Dal Grande, F.; Sharma, R.; Meiser, A.; Rolshausen, G.; Büdel, B.; Mishra, B.; Thines, M.; Otte, J.; Pfenninger, M.; Schmitt, I. Adaptive differentiation coincides with local bioclimatic conditions along an elevational cline in populations of a lichen-forming fungus. BMC Evol. Biol. 2017, 17, 93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Holt, C.; Yandell, M. MAKER2: An annotation pipeline and genome-database management tool for second-generation genome projects. BMC Bioinform. 2011, 12, 491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Campbell, M.S.; Holt, C.; Moore, B.; Yandell, M. Genome annotation and curation using MAKER and MAKER-P. In Current Protocols in Bioinformatics; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2014; Volume 48, pp. 4.11.1–4.11.39. ISBN 0471250953. [Google Scholar]
  93. Ter-Hovhannisyan, V.; Lomsadze, A.; Chernoff, Y.O.; Borodovsky, M. Gene prediction in novel fungal genomes using an ab initio algorithm with unsupervised training. Genome Res. 2008, 18, 1979–1990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  94. Korf, I. Gene finding in novel genomes. BMC Bioinform. 2004, 5, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Parra, G.; Bradnam, K.; Korf, I. CEGMA: A pipeline to accurately annotate core genes in eukaryotic genomes. Bioinformatics 2007, 23, 1061–1067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Goff, S.A.; Vaughn, M.; McKay, S.; Lyons, E.; Stapleton, A.E.; Gessler, D.; Matasci, N.; Wang, L.; Hanlon, M.; Lenards, A.; et al. The iPlant collaborative: Cyberinfrastructure for plant biology. Front. Plant Sci. 2011, 2, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Stanke, M.; Schöffmann, O.; Morgenstern, B.; Waack, S. Gene prediction in eukaryotes with a generalized hidden Markov model that uses hints from external sources. BMC Bioinform. 2006, 7, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Simão, F.A.; Waterhouse, R.M.; Ioannidis, P.; Kriventseva, E.V.; Zdobnov, E.M. BUSCO: Assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs. Bioinformatics 2015, 31, 3210–3212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Zdobnov, E.M.; Tegenfeldt, F.; Kuznetsov, D.; Waterhouse, R.M.; Simão, F.A.; Ioannidis, P.; Seppey, M.; Loetscher, A.; Kriventseva, E.V. OrthoDB v9.1: Cataloging evolutionary and functional annotations for animal, fungal, plant, archaeal, bacterial and viral orthologs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017, 45, D744–D749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Wickham, H. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2009; ISBN 978-0-387-98140-6. [Google Scholar]
  101. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2015; Available online: https://www.R-project.org/ (accessed on 29 March 2018).
  102. Bahram, M.; Hildebrand, F.; Forslund, S.K.; Anderson, J.L.; Soudzilovskaia, N.A.; Bodegom, P.M.; Bengtsson-Palme, J.; Anslan, S.; Coelho, L.P.; Harend, H.; et al. Structure and function of the global topsoil microbiome. Nature 2018, 560, 233–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Medema, M.H.; Kottmann, R.; Yilmaz, P.; Cummings, M.; Biggins, J.B.; Blin, K.; de Bruijn, I.; Chooi, Y.H.; Claesen, J.; Coates, R.C.; et al. Minimum Information about a Biosynthetic Gene cluster. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2015, 11, 625–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  104. Katoh, K. MAFFT: A novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002, 30, 3059–3066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Katoh, K.; Standley, D.M. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: Improvements in performance and usability. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2013, 30, 772–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Darriba, D.; Taboada, G.L.; Doallo, R.; Posada, D. ProtTest 3: Fast selection of best-fit models of protein evolution. Bioinformatics 2011, 27, 1164–1165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Stamatakis, A. RAxML version 8: A tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 1312–1313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Miller, M.A.; Pfeiffer, W.; Schwartz, T. Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees. In 2010 Gateway Computing Environments Workshop (GCE); IEEE: New Orleans, LA, USA, 2010; pp. 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  109. Miller, M.A.; Schwartz, T.; Pickett, B.E.; He, S.; Klem, E.B.; Scheuermann, R.H.; Passarotti, M.; Kaufman, S.; O’Leary, M.A. A RESTful API for access to phylogenetic tools via the CIPRES Science Gateway. Evol. Bioinform. 2015, 11, EBO.S21501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Sample Availability: Samples of the compounds are not available from the authors.
Molecules 24 00203 g001 550
Figure 1. (a) Genome completeness for assemblies and (b) gene set completeness for gene annotations of lichen-forming fungi. The completeness is compared against 1315 orthologous BUSCO marker genes for Ascomycota. Exact percentages can be found together with basic genome statistics in Supplementary Table S1. Asterisk indicates genomes annotated in the present study (without RNA evidence).
Figure 1. (a) Genome completeness for assemblies and (b) gene set completeness for gene annotations of lichen-forming fungi. The completeness is compared against 1315 orthologous BUSCO marker genes for Ascomycota. Exact percentages can be found together with basic genome statistics in Supplementary Table S1. Asterisk indicates genomes annotated in the present study (without RNA evidence).
Molecules 24 00203 g001
Molecules 24 00203 g002 550
Figure 2. Overview of predicted secondary metabolic gene clusters across the genomes of representative fungal species adopted from [32]. Bold font indicates genomes of lichen-forming fungi included from this study. The dashed line shows the average number of PKS gene clusters found in a genome. “Hybrid” refers to clusters with multiple core genes belonging to different secondary metabolite families. PKS = polyketide synthase; NRPS = non-ribosomal peptide synthetase.
Figure 2. Overview of predicted secondary metabolic gene clusters across the genomes of representative fungal species adopted from [32]. Bold font indicates genomes of lichen-forming fungi included from this study. The dashed line shows the average number of PKS gene clusters found in a genome. “Hybrid” refers to clusters with multiple core genes belonging to different secondary metabolite families. PKS = polyketide synthase; NRPS = non-ribosomal peptide synthetase.
Molecules 24 00203 g002
Molecules 24 00203 g003 550
Figure 3. Synteny plots of biosynthetic gene clusters with an ortholog non-reducing polyketide synthase (NR-PKS) core gene in Evernia prunastri and Pseudevernia furfuracea. Orthologous genes identified with the reciprocal best hit (RBH) approach are highlighted in bold. ACP = Acyl carrier protein; AT = Acyltransferase; cMT = C-Methyltransferase; DH = Dehydratase; ER = Enoylreductase; KR = Ketoreductase; KS = Ketosynthase; TE = Thioesterase.
Figure 3. Synteny plots of biosynthetic gene clusters with an ortholog non-reducing polyketide synthase (NR-PKS) core gene in Evernia prunastri and Pseudevernia furfuracea. Orthologous genes identified with the reciprocal best hit (RBH) approach are highlighted in bold. ACP = Acyl carrier protein; AT = Acyltransferase; cMT = C-Methyltransferase; DH = Dehydratase; ER = Enoylreductase; KR = Ketoreductase; KS = Ketosynthase; TE = Thioesterase.
Molecules 24 00203 g003
Molecules 24 00203 g004 550
Figure 4. Synteny plots of biosynthetic gene clusters with an ortholog reducing polyketide synthase (R-PKS) core gene in Evernia prunastri and Pseudevernia furfuracea. Orthologous genes identified with the reciprocal best hit (RBH) approach are highlighted in bold. ACP = Acyl carrier protein; AT = Acyltransferase; cMT = C-Methyltransferase; DH = Dehydratase; ER = Enoylreductase; KR = Ketoreductase; KS = Ketosynthase; TE = Thioesterase.
Figure 4. Synteny plots of biosynthetic gene clusters with an ortholog reducing polyketide synthase (R-PKS) core gene in Evernia prunastri and Pseudevernia furfuracea. Orthologous genes identified with the reciprocal best hit (RBH) approach are highlighted in bold. ACP = Acyl carrier protein; AT = Acyltransferase; cMT = C-Methyltransferase; DH = Dehydratase; ER = Enoylreductase; KR = Ketoreductase; KS = Ketosynthase; TE = Thioesterase.
Molecules 24 00203 g004
Molecules 24 00203 g005 550
Figure 5. Synteny plots of biosynthetic gene clusters with an ortholog non-ribosomal peptide synthetase (NRPS) core gene or hybrid with polyketide synthase (PKS-NRPS) in Evernia prunastri and Pseudevernia furfuracea. Orthologous genes identified with the reciprocal best hit (RBH) approach are highlighted in bold. A = Adenylation; ACP = Acyl carrier protein; AT = Acyltransferase; C = Condensation; cMT = C-Methyltransferase; DH = Dehydratase; E = Epimerization; ER = Enoylreductase; KR = Ketoreductase; KS = Ketosynthase; PCP = peptide carrier protein; T = Thiolation; TD = Terminal domain.
Figure 5. Synteny plots of biosynthetic gene clusters with an ortholog non-ribosomal peptide synthetase (NRPS) core gene or hybrid with polyketide synthase (PKS-NRPS) in Evernia prunastri and Pseudevernia furfuracea. Orthologous genes identified with the reciprocal best hit (RBH) approach are highlighted in bold. A = Adenylation; ACP = Acyl carrier protein; AT = Acyltransferase; C = Condensation; cMT = C-Methyltransferase; DH = Dehydratase; E = Epimerization; ER = Enoylreductase; KR = Ketoreductase; KS = Ketosynthase; PCP = peptide carrier protein; T = Thiolation; TD = Terminal domain.
Molecules 24 00203 g005
Molecules 24 00203 g006 550
Figure 6. Supported clade containing the gene MPAS (methylphloroacetophenone synthase) of Cladonia uncialis (MIBiG-ID BGC0001309) putatively associated with usnic acid biosynthesis. For the complete KS tree see Figure S1.
Figure 6. Supported clade containing the gene MPAS (methylphloroacetophenone synthase) of Cladonia uncialis (MIBiG-ID BGC0001309) putatively associated with usnic acid biosynthesis. For the complete KS tree see Figure S1.
Molecules 24 00203 g006
Molecules 24 00203 g007 550
Figure 7. Supported clade containing the gene PKS16 of Cladonia grayi (MIBiG-ID BGC0001266), putatively involved in grayanic acid biosynthesis. The cluster 35 of Evernia prunastri (EPRU35) and cluster 17 of Pseudevernia prunastri (PFUR17) are phylogenetically close and are presented in detail in synteny plot Figure 3A. For the complete KS tree see Figure S1.
Figure 7. Supported clade containing the gene PKS16 of Cladonia grayi (MIBiG-ID BGC0001266), putatively involved in grayanic acid biosynthesis. The cluster 35 of Evernia prunastri (EPRU35) and cluster 17 of Pseudevernia prunastri (PFUR17) are phylogenetically close and are presented in detail in synteny plot Figure 3A. For the complete KS tree see Figure S1.
Molecules 24 00203 g007
Molecules 24 00203 g008 550
Figure 8. Supported clade containing PKSs from dihydroxy and tetrahydroxy naphthalene producers (MIBiG-ID BGC0001257, BGC0001258). For the complete KS tree see Figure S1.
Figure 8. Supported clade containing PKSs from dihydroxy and tetrahydroxy naphthalene producers (MIBiG-ID BGC0001257, BGC0001258). For the complete KS tree see Figure S1.
Molecules 24 00203 g008
Molecules 24 00203 g009 550
Figure 9. Supported clade containing the PKS orsA for orsellinic acid in Aspergillus nidulans (MIBiG-ID BGC0000057). For the complete KS tree see Figure S1.
Figure 9. Supported clade containing the PKS orsA for orsellinic acid in Aspergillus nidulans (MIBiG-ID BGC0000057). For the complete KS tree see Figure S1.
Molecules 24 00203 g009
Table
Table 1. Overview of genomes of lichen-forming fungi used in this study.
Table 1. Overview of genomes of lichen-forming fungi used in this study.
SpeciesTaxonomic GroupData Repository 1Gene Set Previously AvailableGenome SizeNumber of ScaffoldsScaffold N50Number of GenesAbbreviationMetabolites Reported [55,56,57,58,59]
Cladonia grayiLecanoromycetes, LecanoralesJGI Clagr3 v2.0yes34.6 Mb414243,41211,389CGRAgrayanic acid, fumarprotocetraric acid complex
Cladonia macilentaLecanoromycetes, LecanoralesNCBI AUPP00000000.1no37.1 Mb2401,469,03610,559CMACthamnolic acid, barbatic acid, didymic acid, squamatic acid, usnic acid, rhodocladonic acid
Cladonia metacoralliferaLecanoromycetes, LecanoralesNCBI AXCT00000000.2no36.7 Mb301,591,85010,497CMETusnic acid, didymic acid, squamatic acid, rhodocladonic acid
Cladonia uncialisLecanoromycetes, LecanoralesNCBI NAPT00000000.1no32.9 Mb212434,87110,902CUNCusnic acid, squamatic acid
Endocarpon pusillum
(Park et al.) [60]		Eurotiomycetes, VerrucarialesNCBI JFDM00000000.1no37.2 Mb401,340,79411,756EPUP(none reported)
Endocarpon pusillum
(Wang et al.) [61]		Eurotiomycetes, VerrucarialesNCBI APWS00000000.1yes37.1 Mb908178,2259238EPUW(none reported)
Evernia prunastriLecanoromycetes, LecanoralesNCBI NKYR00000000.1yes40.3 Mb277264,45410,992EPRUevernic acid, atranorin, usnic acid
Gyalolechia flavorubescensLecanoromycetes, TeloschistalesNCBI AUPK00000000.1no34.5 Mb361,693,30010,460GFLAparietin, emodin, fallacinal, fragilin
Lobaria pulmonariaLecanoromycetes, PeltigeralesJGI Lobpul1 v1.0yes56.1 Mb191150,54115,607LPULstictic acid, norstictic acid, constictic acid
Pseudevernia furfuraceaLecanoromycetes, LecanoralesNCBI NKYQ00000000.1yes37.8 Mb461,178,7998842PFURatranorin, olivetoric acid, physodic acid
Ramalina peruvianaLecanoromycetes, LecanoralesNCBI MSTJ00000000.1no27.0 Mb165740,4319338RPERsekikaic acid complex
Umbilicaria hispanicaLecanoromycetes, UmbilicarialesNCBI PKMA00000000.1yes41.2 Mb1619145,0358488LHISgyrophoric acid, lecanoric acid, umbilicaric acid, skyrin
Umbilicaria muehlenbergiiLecanoromycetes, UmbilicarialesNCBI JFDN00000000.1no34.8 Mb77,009,2488968UMUEgyrophoric acid
Umbilicaria pustulataLecanoromycetes, UmbilicarialesNCBI FWEW00000000.1yes39.2 Mb3891104,2978268LPUSgyrophoric acid, lecanoric acid, hiascinic acid, skyrin
Xanthoria parietinaLecanoromycetes, TeloschistalesJGI Xanpa2 v1.1yes31.9 Mb391,731,18611,065XPARphyscion, parietinic acid, teloschistin, emodin
1 NCBI: National Center for Biotechnology Information; JGI: DOE Joint Genome Institute.
Table
Table 2. Number of biosynthetic gene clusters and main families of secondary metabolite genes found in the genomes of lichen-forming fungi.
Table 2. Number of biosynthetic gene clusters and main families of secondary metabolite genes found in the genomes of lichen-forming fungi.
SpeciesAbbreviationNumber of ClustersType I NR-PKSType I R-PKSType I PKSType III PKSHybrid PKS-NRPSNRPSTerpene SynthasesTotal KS Sequences for PhylogenyComplete PKS (KS + AT + ACP)
Cladonia grayiCGRA51817131252715
Cladonia macilentaCMAC521123-24253825
Cladonia metacoralliferaCMET591326122284229
Cladonia uncialisCUNC591025123183925
Endocarpon pusillum [8] (Park et al.)EPUP3149-1226159
Endocarpon pusillum [9] (Wang et al.)EPUW31512-12161912
Evernia prunastriEPRU809291244134330
Gyalolechia flavorubescensGFLA37712-11362010
Lobaria pulmonariaLPUL77828--49164022
Pseudevernia furfuraceaPFUR51523-23453117
Ramalina peruvianaRPER47918311323115
Umbilicaria hispanicaLHIS2871011--61814
Umbilicaria muehlenbergiiUMUE31515-1--42017
Umbilicaria pustulataLPUS2769-11-61613
Xanthoria parietinaXPAR51518112572613
Sum 7121122749253038125425266
NR-PKS = Non-reducing type I polyketide synthase; R-PKS = Reducing type I polyketide synthase; NRPS = Non-ribosomal peptide synthetase. KS = Ketosynthase; AT = Acyltransferase; ACP = Acyl carrier protein.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Calchera, A.; Dal Grande, F.; Bode, H.B.; Schmitt, I. Biosynthetic Gene Content of the ‘Perfume Lichens’ Evernia prunastri and Pseudevernia furfuracea. Molecules 2019, 24, 203. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24010203

AMA Style

Calchera A, Dal Grande F, Bode HB, Schmitt I. Biosynthetic Gene Content of the ‘Perfume Lichens’ Evernia prunastri and Pseudevernia furfuracea. Molecules. 2019; 24(1):203. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24010203

Chicago/Turabian Style

Calchera, Anjuli, Francesco Dal Grande, Helge B. Bode, and Imke Schmitt. 2019. "Biosynthetic Gene Content of the ‘Perfume Lichens’ Evernia prunastri and Pseudevernia furfuracea" Molecules 24, no. 1: 203. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24010203

APA Style

Calchera, A., Dal Grande, F., Bode, H. B., & Schmitt, I. (2019). Biosynthetic Gene Content of the ‘Perfume Lichens’ Evernia prunastri and Pseudevernia furfuracea. Molecules, 24(1), 203. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24010203

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop