2.1. Materials
In the experiments, we used two types of monodisperse melamine-formaldehyde (MF) spheres: one with a density of
ρp = 1.61 g/cm
−3 and a diameter of 9.95 μm as a dust component, without any coating; and another with a surface covered by 200 nm of copper (see
Figure 1). To detect possible erosion of the particle surfaces in the plasma or as a result of exposure to laser radiation, the particles were observed before and after the experiment by means of scanning electron microscopy. No changes in the structure or continuity of the coating were found, as opposed to work [
12] in which laser with power in three orders of magnitude higher than in our experiments damaged the surface of particles.
As noted above, MF particles practically do not absorb light at a wavelength of 532 nm. However, after covering the particles with a thin copper coating, their absorption capacity increases dramatically. If such particles are exposed by laser radiation, their surfaces will be heated up to ΔT ~ 10–100 K, as estimates show. Thus, laser radiation can lead to at least two observed effects. Firstly, according to [
10], there will be a noticeable increase in the kinetic temperature of the particles under the action of a photophoretic force, and secondly the directional flow will be observed. The photophoretic force, according to [
13], depends on the thermal conductivity of dust particles and is equal to:
where
æ is particle thermal conductivity and
I is the luminous flux density.
The thermal conductivity of melamine-formaldehyde
æmf ≈ 0.2 W/(m·K) is rather small, compared to the thermal conductivity of the copper coating
æCu ≈ 400 W/(m·K), that is three orders of magnitude larger. Consequently, the temperature distribution on the surfaces of the particles, which is a cause of the photophoretic force, will be determined mainly by the thermal conductivity of copper. An elementary estimate shows that the characteristic time for temperature equalization on the surfaces of the particles is ~10
−6 s. The heating of the inner region of the particle occurs after ~10
−3 s. In addition, the temperature distribution can be affected by the heterogeneity of the copper coating, which takes place according to
Figure 1. Therefore, the direction of the photophoretic effect for different particles may not quite coincide with the direction of the laser beam.
2.2. Experimental Data
We observed flow formation for a structure formed by uncoated particles, while varying the power of the pushing laser (see
Section 3) beam in the range of 0–250 mW. The power of the illuminating laser (see
Section 3) was about ~100 mW, so that particles were clearly detectable by video camera. Before starting the laser exposure, we estimated for each set of experiments the magnitude of the effective coupling parameter for the unperturbed monolayer structure formed by uncoated MF particles. This estimation was based on the analysis of the first maximum of the pair correlation function of the dust structure [
14]. In our experiments, the effective coupling parameter was Γ* ~ 500. We should mention that an increase of the illuminating laser power up to 100 mW did not influence the particle motion or phase state of structure (and the value of Γ*), since uncoated particles barely absorbed laser radiation.
Figure 2 presents the trajectories of dust particles in the structure over a period of 0.5 s for various pushing laser power values. Solid red lines define boundaries of the area affected by the pushing laser beam.
Figure 3 shows the velocity distribution profile for uncoated MF particles in the monolayer dust structure under the action of the pushing laser, with a power W varying from 0 to 250 mW.
From the analysis of the trajectories of the particle motions (see
Figure 2), as well as of the distribution of their velocities in the structure (see
Figure 3), we can consider the threshold nature of the flow, which is consistent with the experimental results obtained in [
6,
7]. Under the influence of a pushing laser with a power close to the critical value, we observed a deformation of the structure, however the flow still did not occur. With a further increase in the power of the laser radiation, the formation of a directional motion of dust particles in the region of the laser beam exposure was observed.
In the experiment with the copper-coated MF particles, the illuminating laser power was chosen to be as weak as possible, so as not to heat the particles via radiation absorption, but still strong enough for illumination in order to detect particles via video camera (~36 mW). With similar discharge parameters of P = 5.3 Pa and Wrf = 12.5 W, the effective coupling parameter for the unperturbed dust structure, which was reconstructed from the first peaks of the pair correlation function, was Γ* ~ 180. This value of Γ* is considered to be an indicator of a crystalline type of structure.
Figure 4 presents the trajectories of dust particles in a monolayer dust structure formed by copper-coated MF particles during t = 0.5 s under the action of a pushing laser beam with power values W varying from 0 to 100 mW. We should note that the side view camera did not detect any amplitude gain of vertical particle motion.
2.3. Data Analysis
In order to study the difference in the laser’s effects on the dust structure for particles with and without a copper coating, let us estimate the magnitudes of the force of light pressure, photophoretic force, and threshold pressure needed for a flow to occur in the structure under consideration.
Light pressure
Pγ is determined by radiation power
W, as indicated in [
15]
where
θ is a coefficient varying from 0 to 1, depending on the nature of the reflection of light from the surface of the particle;
Sγ is a sectional area of the light beam; and
c is the light’s velocity. Corresponding to this pressure, the force acting on the particle is equal to
PγSd, where
Sd is a sectional area of the dust particles.
For example, in the case of a beam generated by an illuminating laser with transverse dimensions of 5 × 70 mm and a maximum power of 100 mW, this pressure is ≈10−9 Pa, while the corresponding force acting on a dust particle measuring 10 μm in size equals 0.79 × 10−19 N. For copper-coated particles with an illuminating laser power 36 mW, this force is almost three times lower.
According to
Figure 2, the threshold pressure acting on the particle at which a flow occurs is created by a cylindrical beam with a transverse size of 4 mm and power of ~75 mW. This pressure is 10
−7 Pa and the corresponding force is 0.62 × 10
−17 N.
Comparison of these values shows that the light pressure of the illuminating laser is two orders of magnitude weaker than the action of a pushing laser, at which the flow of uncoated particles occurs. Thus, the action of the illuminating laser cannot lead to the flow of a colloidal plasma medium.
Now let us compare the force of the light pressure of the pushing laser and the photophoretic force created by it. In order to estimate the power of the light pressure in the case of coated particles, we set the coefficient
θ to 0 in Relation (3), assuming complete absorption of the light flux. For coated particles, the maximum laser power used in our experiments was 100 mW, with a beam diameter of 4 mm. In this case, F
γ ≈ 0.83 × 10
−17 N. This means that the force reached the values at which a laminar flow occurred for the uncoated particles. For the coated particles, as noted above, no visible evidence of flow of the dust component was observed (see
Figure 4). At the same time, detailed image processing made it possible to detect an increase in the average particle velocity in the direction of a pushing laser beam (see
Figure 5).
To estimate the photophoretic force, we used Relation (2). Assuming the thermal conductivity of the particles to be æ ≈ 400 W/(m·K), with all other conditions being equal, we find Fph ≈ 0.92 × 10−19 N. This means that in the considered case, the maximum value of the photophoretic force is two orders of magnitude lower than the threshold, meaning this force should not cause a laminar flow in the dust structure. However, even with a relatively small power of the pushing laser (~20 mW), the kinetic heating of the dust structure in the area of the action of the pushing laser is visually observed, which noticeably increases with the growth of the beam power.
It should be noted that the photophoretic force at an illuminating laser power of W = 36 mW is only 0.3 × 10
−21 N, which is two orders of magnitude less than the photophoretic force from a pushing laser of equivalent power. Nonetheless, even under the influence of such an insignificant photophoretic force, kinetic heating of the dust component occurs (see
Figure 4).
2.4. Discussion
Taking all of the aforementioned information into consideration, we revealed completely different behavior for coated and uncoated particles in colloidal plasma under the action of laser radiation. For the uncoated MF particles, the light pressure effect occurred, leading to the appearance of a laminar flow. For the coated particles, we distinguished two action forces–light pressure and photophoretic force. Moreover, the actions behind these forces are significantly different. Light pressure causes some movement in the direction of the light beam, while the photophoretic force leads to heating and an increase of the kinetic energy, leading to chaotic movements of the dust component. However, the heating mechanism behind this phenomenon is still undetermined. Apparently, we must assume that there is a change of the direction of the particle movement when the laser radiation acts on the coated particles. This means that under the action of radiation, the particles deviate from the straight direction determined by the laser beam. Since the heating of the particles probably happens due to the photophoretic force (the force of light pressure acts strictly along the direction of the light beam and does not lead to the heating of the dust component of the plasma), we should note that this force is firstly estimated to be insufficient to form a laminar flow, and secondly the direction of its action does not coincide with the direction of the laser beam. A dusty particle in a gas discharge collides with electrons and ions, as well as with neutral particles from the buffer gas. During collisions, neutral atoms accumulate on the heated particle’s surface. Then, they leave the dust grain with greater speed, thus giving it an additional impulse.
In addition, when evaluating the magnitude of the photophoretic force, we assumed that the coating was homogeneous and that there were no uncoated areas. However, if there are uncovered spots on the surfaces of the particles (see
Figure 1), the temperature distribution can change dramatically, which will cause a significant increase in the photophoretic force. Therefore, the considered stochastic process, together with the inhomogeneity of the metal shell, can lead to asymmetry of the heating of the particles, resulting in chaotic deviation of the photophoretic force from the direction of the laser beam for different particles.