1. Introduction
Phloroglucinols are naturally occurring derivatives of 1,3,5-trihydroxy-benzene encountered in several plant species [
1]. Acylated phloroglucinols, characteristic constituents of
Hypericum plants, have been correlated with some of the biological activities of this genus, so they are considered as potential novel therapeutic agents [
2,
3]. In a recent review published by Bridi and coll. [
3], the authors summarized the distributions and biological activities of more than 400 phloroglucinol derivatives isolated from
Hypericum species, as proof of the growing interest devoted to these bioactive compounds. Most importantly, hypericin and pseudohypericin from
H. perforatum have been considered as responsible for its anti-depressant activity [
4]. Uliginosin B, a dimeric acylphloroglucinol from
H. uliginosum and
H. brasiliense, among the others, has shown antinociceptive [
5] and antidepressant-like activities in mice [
6], antiprotozoal activity against
Trichomonas vaginalis [
7] and antibacterial activity against
Staphylococcus aureus and
S. epidermidis [
8]. Three prenylated phloroglucinols isolated from the leaves of
H. scruglii from Sardinia (Italy) have been identified as novel dual HIV-1 inhibitors, and were able to inhibit the HIV-1 replication in cell-based assays [
9]. Bioactivity-guided fractionation of
H. empetrifolium and
H. japonicum extracts led to the isolation of acylphloroglucinols that were considered the active compounds responsible for the observed in vitro anti-inflammatory and anti-proliferative activities [
10]. The same activities have been recently reported for the methanolic extract of
H. japonicum from Nepal, and it has been supposed that the eleven phloroglucinol derivatives identified among the secondary metabolites could be co-responsible for the biological effects observed in vitro [
11].
Even though synthetic approaches to obtaining substituted acylphloroglucinols from 1,3,5-trihydroxy-benzene are challenging [
1], their isolation from natural sources is actually the most straightforward strategy to provide purified compounds for pharmacological evaluations and further drug development. However, reference standards for these compounds are difficult to find on the market; hence, there is a need for methods that allow their fast (although tentative) identification on the basis of experimental data, such as the analysis of fragmentation patterns using multiple-level tandem mass spectrometry (MS
n). The hyphenation of liquid chromatography (LC) with ion trap MS allows one to monitor the multi-stage fragmentation of single components in a complex mixture, without the need for previous isolation [
12,
13]. Furthermore, the utilization of high-resolution MS (HR-MS), such as quadrupole-time of flight (QTOF) instrumentation, allows one to obtain information about the accurate masses of these components, and to calculate their molecular formulas. Hence, analytical data obtained from integrated LC-MS
n and LC-QTOF approaches are sufficient to perform tentative assignation of phloroglucinols directly from natural extracts and without the use of reference standards, allowing one to perform rapid screening of natural sources for their content in these bioactive compounds.
In this study, as a continuation of our previous work on Nepalese
H. japonicum [
11], we report the detailed MS fragmentation of eleven phloroglucinol derivatives previously identified in the methanol extract of the same species. These compounds represent characteristic constituents of
H. japonicum and could be of potential interest for the development of novel anti-inflammatory and anti-proliferative agents [
11,
14]. Using multi-stage structural information and accurate
m/
z values obtained from an integrated LC-MS
n (3D ion trap) and LC-QTOF approach, we evaluated the fragmentation pathways of phloroglucinols directly from the methanol extract of
H. japonicum (HJME). Overall, the data presented here could represent useful information for the qualitative analysis of phloroglucinols from
H. japonicum and other plant species, and could help their characterization and identification from crude extracts for the further development of novel therapeutic agents.
2. Results and Discussion
The chromatographic method here presented allows the separation of the main phloroglucinol derivatives of HJME in a 35 min-long gradient on a C-18 column. The chemical structures of the analyzed compounds are reported in
Figure 1. Representative LC-MS ion trap chromatograms of the whole HJME showing the base peak ion trace and the extracted ion chromatograms of each identified phloroglucinol derivative are reported in
Figure 2. As proposed by other authors [
15], due to the fact that not all the phloroglucinols have trivial and commonly used names, they will be referred to by abbreviations according to their chemical properties, referring to the basic structure of phlorisobutyrophenone (PIB) and its related derivatives.
The tentative identification of the eleven phloroglucinols from HJME has been performed by comparing the accurate
m/
z values obtained by QTOF analysis and the main fragments formed by MS/MS with literature data [
15], and they have been already reported in [
11]. The aim of the present work was that of going further, by exploring the fragmentation pathways of the single phloroglucinols and determining characteristic fragments that could help with their determination in
H. japonicum extracts and other plant materials.
The HR-MS analysis of 3′,3′-dimethyl-6′-oxo-PIB (3′3′me6′oxoPIB) yielded a
m/
z value of 223.0961 for its [M-H]
− ion (Δ = 4.28 ppm for C
12H
15O
4−). The MS2 spectrum in ion trap (
Figure 3) shows the characteristic fragment [
15] at
m/
z 179 (
m/
z 179.1064 from HR-MS; Δ = 4.73 ppm for C
11H
15O
2−), presumably formed by the loss of CO
2 (−44 amu) (see the fragmentation scheme in
Figure 4). Two other main fragments were observed in the MS2 spectrum, namely, that at
m/
z 205 (
m/
z 205.0865 from HR-MS; Δ = 5.69 ppm for C
12H
13O
3−), formed from the elimination of a molecule of water (−18 amu), and that at
m/
z 153 (
m/
z 153.0545 from HR-MS; Δ = 4.85 ppm for C
8H
9O
3−), formed by the loss of 70 amu, corresponding to C
4H
7O (isobutyryl moiety). Another minor fragment at
m/
z 195 (
m/
z 195.1016 from HR-MS; Δ = 5.97 ppm for C
11H
15O
3−) supports the loss of CO (−28 amu) (
Figure 4).
The MS3 fragmentation of the base peak ion at
m/
z 179 yielded the formation of a main signal at
m/
z 109, due to the loss of the isobutyryl moiety (−70 amu), as observed before. MS4 spectrum generated from the ion at
m/
z 109 shows a base peak fragment at
m/
z 83, corresponding to loss of C
2H
2 (−26 amu) from the ring, and signals at
m/
z 91 and 67, corresponding respectively to the loss of water and C
2H
2O (−42 amu). Overall, the fragments at
m/
z 109 and 83 could be considered as characteristic of 3′3′me6′oxoPIB fragmentation, together with that at
m/
z 179, already reported in [
15].
The MS2 spectrum generated from the fragmentation of 2-acetyl-3,5-dihydroxy-1-geranoxy-6-methyl-4-(2-methyl)butyryl-benzene (
m/
z 401.2313 from HR-MS; Δ = 5.28 ppm for C
24H
33O
5−) shows two intense signals at
m/
z 221 (
m/
z 221.0808 from HR-MS; Δ = 5.27 ppm for C
12H
13O
4−) and 177 (
m/
z 177.0912 from HR-MS; Δ = 5.39 ppm for C
11H
13O
2−) (
Figure S1). The first fragment is generated after the breakage of the geranyl chain (−138 amu) from the ether in position 3 of the ring and the acetyl group (−42 amu) (
Fragmentation Scheme S1, Supplementary Material). The loss of a molecule of CO
2 from this structure yields the fragment at
m/
z 177, in a step similar to that observed for 3′3′me6′oxoPIB.
The pseudomolecular ion of 1′,3′-diprenyl-4,5′-dimethyl-4′-oxo-PIB (1′3′pren45′me4′oxoPIB) shows an
m/
z value of 359.2209 in HR-MS analysis (Δ = 3.84 ppm for C
22H
31O
4−). The MS2 spectrum (
Figure S2) shows a base peak at
m/
z 289 (
m/
z 289.1429 from HR-MS; Δ = 7.70 ppm for C
17H
21O
4−), formed after the loss of a prenyl group (−70 amu). This can cause the loss of an isobutenyl group (−56 amu) to give a second intense signal at
m/
z 233 (
m/
z 233.0809 from HR-MS; Δ = 4.55 ppm for C
13H
13O
4−), from which the fragment at
m/
z 205 (
m/
z 205.0855 from HR-MS; Δ = 7.75 ppm for C
12H
13O
3−) is formed after the elimination of a CO. The main fragment at
m/
z 289 can also undergo the typical elimination of CO
2 previously observed for the two derivatives described above, leading to the signal at
m/
z 245 (
m/
z 245.1534 from HR-MS; Δ = 5.62 ppm for C
16H
21O
2−) (
Fragmentation Scheme S2, Supplementary Material).
The loss of CO from the pseudomolecular ion leads to the fragment at
m/
z 331 (
m/
z 331.2261 from HR-MS; Δ = 3.84 ppm for C
21H
31O
3−), which undergoes the elimination of several methyl radicals (−15 amu each) and C
2H
2 groups to form the fragments at
m/
z 301 (
m/
z 301.1789 from HR-MS; Δ = 4.92 ppm for C
19H
25O
3−), 275 (
m/
z 275.1634 from HR-MS; Δ = 7.32 ppm for C
17H
23O
3−), 260 (
m/
z 260.1408 from HR-MS; Δ = 4.07 ppm for C
16H
20O
3−), 245 (
m/
z 245.1171 from HR-MS; Δ = 5.19 ppm for C
15H
17O
3−) and 219 (
m/
z 219.1015 from HR-MS; Δ = 5.80 ppm for C
13H
15O
3−)—which after the elimination of CO, generates the fragment at
m/
z 191 (
m/
z 191.1066 from HR-MS; Δ = 6.66 ppm for C
12H
15O
2−) (
Fragmentation Scheme S2, Supplementary Material).
The fragmentation of geranyl-PIB (
m/
z 331.1897 from HR-MS; Δ = 3.84 ppm for C
20H
27O
4−) yields the base peak fragment at
m/
z 287 (
m/
z 287.1272 from HR-MS; Δ = 6.28 ppm for C
17H
19O
4−), formed by the loss of CO
2. This structure generates two main fragments in MS3, corresponding respectively to the loss of an isoprenyl from the geranyl chain (signal at
m/
z 217) and to different fragments (
m/
z 151 and 136) formed by the rupture of the same chain (
Figure S3 and Fragmentation Scheme S3, Supplementary Material).
The MS2 spectrum of geranyl-PIB shows also signals at
m/
z 313 (
m/
z 313.1796 from HR-MS; Δ = 4.40 ppm for C
20H
25O
3−), corresponding to the elimination of a molecule of water; 262 (
m/
z 262.1192 from HR-MS; Δ = 7.68 ppm for C
15H
18O
4−), 233 (
m/
z 233.0803 from HR-MS; Δ = 7.28 ppm for C
13H
13O
4−) and 194 (
m/
z 194.0577 from HR-MS; Δ = 4.37 ppm for C
10H
10O
4−), corresponding to different breakages of the geranyl chain; and 207 (
m/
z 207.1744 from HR-MS; Δ = 5.11 ppm for C
14H
23O
−), attributable to the entire geranyl chain (
Fragmentation Scheme S3, Supplementary Material).
As can be observed from the data shown above, polysubstituted monomeric PIB derivatives undergo characteristic fragmentations, detectable through typical mass losses that could be exploited for compound identification (
Figure 5). Specifically, frequent losses of 44, 28 and 18 amu are observed, attributable respectively to the loss of a molecule of CO
2, CO or water. The first two involve the breakage of the PIB ring, followed by rearrangement to a cyclopentadiene derivative, while the elimination of water leads to the formation of a triple bond (
Figure 5). Similar fragmentation patterns have been already observed in flavonoids, where the fragments formed after the loss of CO and CO
2 from pyrane and substituted benzene, respectively, are stabilized by a rearrangement to five-membered rings [
16]. In the case of 3′3′me6′oxoPIB, we supposed that this intramolecular stabilization drives the loss of CO and CO
2 from the ring, instead from the side chain. In fact, this latter would require an intermolecular rearrangement, and hence more energy.
Sarothralens A, C, D and G; saroaspidin A and saroaspidin B; and uliginosin A present the same core structure, characterized by the substituted phloroglucinol ring bonded to 3′3′me6′oxoPIB by a methylene bridge. Hence, their MS2 fragmentation spectra present common fragments, i.e., at
m/
z 235 (
m/
z 235.0960 from HR-MS; Δ = 3.61 ppm for C
13H
15O
4−) and
m/
z 223, corresponding to the cyclohexa-2,5-dien-1-one moiety with or without the residue methylene group in position 6. As already observed and reported in the scheme in
Figure 4, MS3 fragmentation of the structure at
m/
z 223 yields a base peak at
m/
z 179, due to the formal loss of CO
2, which in turn yields the major fragment at
m/
z 109 at the MS4 level, corresponding to the loss of an isobutyl moiety. As a generic rule, the presence of both the signals at
m/
z 235 and 223 in the MS2 spectra of phloroglucinols from
H. japonicum could be considered as indicative of dimeric derivatives, which can be further identified by the detection of peculiar fragments in the MS/MS spectra of the substituted phloroglucinol ring, as reported below. Exemplificative MS2–MS4 spectra of a dimeric phloroglucinol (uliginosin A) are reported in
Figure 6.
The MS2 spectrum of sarothralen A (
m/
z 567.2944 from HR-MS; Δ = 2.62 ppm for C
33H
44O
8−) (
Figure S4) shows several fragmentation pathways from different portions of the molecule (
Fragmentation Scheme S4, Supplementary Material). The fragment at
m/
z 343 (
m/
z 343.1904 from HR-MS; Δ = 3.40 ppm for C
21H
27O
4−) corresponds to the polysubstituted phloroglucinol portion bringing the residue of the methylene bridge in position 6, while that at
m/
z 331 (
m/
z 331.1901 from HR-MS; Δ = 4.48 ppm for C
20H
27O
4−) corresponds to the same portion without the methylene residue. This latter fragment gives the structure at
m/
z 314 (
m/
z 314.1798 from HR-MS; Δ = 3.72 ppm for C
20H
25O
3−) after the elimination of a molecule of water.
The MS2 spectrum of saroaspidin B (
m/
z 459.2005 from HR-MS; Δ = 4.38 ppm for C
25H
31O
8−) presents a base peak ion at
m/
z 413 (
m/
z 413.1952 from HR-MS; Δ = 4.62 ppm for C
24H
29O
6−), indicating the elimination of a molecule of water and a carbonyl group (-18 and -28 amu, respectively) from the cyclohexadienone ring (
Figure S5), and a signal at
m/
z 388 (
m/
z 388.1512 from HR-MS; Δ = 4.37 ppm for C
21H
24O
7−), corresponding to a fragment generated by the loss of the isobutyl moiety from the cyclohexadienone (
Fragmentation Scheme S5, Supplementary Material).
The fragment at m/z 413 undergoes several fragmentation pathways in MS3, leading to the formation of the base peak at m/z 343 and the fragments at m/z 395, 370, 299 and 177. The base peak at m/z 343 indicates the rupture of the rearranged isobutyl moiety from the parent compound, and after the loss of CO2, generates the fragment at m/z 299. The fragment at m/z 395 is generated by the elimination of a molecule of water, and that at m/z 370 is generated by sequential loss of a CO and a methyl radical. Finally, the structure at m/z 177 corresponds with the 1,1,5-trimethyl-4-oxo-1,4,5,6-tetrahydropentalen-2-olate portion of the structure at m/z 413, after the rupture of the methylene bridge linking the two core rings.
The MS2 spectrum of sarothralen G (
m/
z 601.2780 from HR-MS; Δ = 4.76 ppm for C
36H
41O
8−) shows fragments generated from three different fragmentation pathways (
Figure S6). The rupture of the methylene bridge linking the phloroglucinol ring with 3′3′me6′oxoPIB leads to fragments at
m/
z 377 (
m/
z 377.1743 from HR-MS; Δ = 4.22 ppm for C
24H
25O
4−) and 365 (
m/
z 365.1743 from HR-MS; Δ = 4.35 ppm for C
23H
25O
4−), together with those at 235 and 223. The first two correspond to the phloroglucinol portion with and without the methylene residue, respectively. Other two fragments, at
m/
z 389 (
m/
z 389.1229 from HR-MS; Δ = 3.54 ppm for C
20H
21O
8−) and 347 (
m/
z 347.0750 from HR-MS; Δ = 6.72 ppm for C
17H
15O
8−), indicate the loss of the geranyl chain from the phloroglucinol ring, followed by the rupture of the aromatic ring from the ketone on the same portion of the structure (fragment at
m/
z 389), and the rupture of the ketones in both phloroglucinol and 3′3′me6′oxoPIB rings (fragment at
m/
z 347) (
Fragmentation Scheme S6, Supplementary Material).
Saroaspidin A (
m/
z 445.1845 from HR-MS; Δ = 5.48 ppm for C
24H
29O
8−) shows a simple MS2 spectrum (
Figure S7), in which the signals could be assigned to the fragments formed after the rupture of the methylene bridge (
Fragmentation Scheme S7, Supplementary Material). Fragments at
m/
z 235 and 221 (
m/
z 221.0807 from HR-MS; Δ = 5.74 ppm for C
12H
13O
4−) keep the residue bonded, while those at
m/
z 223 and 209 (
m/
z 209.0808 from HR-MS; Δ = 5.77 ppm for C
11H
13O
4−) do not.
In the MS2 spectrum of uliginosin A (
m/
z 499.2314 from HR-MS; Δ = 4.88 ppm for C
28H
35O
8−), the fragments at
m/
z 275 (
m/
z 275.1275 from HR-MS; Δ = 5.40 ppm for C
16H
19O
4−) and 235 are those that keep the methylene residue bonded, while those at
m/
z and 263 (
m/
z 263.1277 from HR-MS; Δ = 4.83 ppm for C
15H
19O
4−) and 223 do not (
Figure 5 and
Fragmentation Scheme S8, Supplementary Material). In the MS3 spectrum, fragmentation of the structure at
m/
z 263 gives the fragment at
m/
z 194 by the loss of 2-methylbut-2-ene, which in turn gives the fragment at
m/
z 152 after the loss of C
3H
6 from the ketone in the side chain of the aromatic ring. The base peak of MS3, corresponding to the fragment at
m/
z 219, is formed by the loss of a molecule of CO
2 from the parent compound. This latter fragment could generate several signals in MS4 by different breakages of the 2-methylbut-2-ene moiety or the ketone in the side chain. The loss of a methyl radical gives the fragment at
m/
z 204, and the complete loss of the alkyl chain leads to the signal at
m/
z 151. The latter could undergo the elimination of C
3H
6 (−42 amu) from the ketone in the side chain, leading to the signal at
m/
z 109. The loss of C
3H
6 from the structure at
m/
z 219 gives the fragment at
m/
z 177, which, after the sequential loss of CO and a methyl radical, gives the fragments at
m/
z 149 and 134, respectively.
Sarothralens C and D show the same MW (
m/
z 583.2888 from HR-MS; Δ = 4.54 ppm for C
33H
43O
9−) and the same fragmentation pathways, being isomers (
Fragmentation Scheme S9, Supplementary Material). MS2 spectra (
Figure S8) show signals at
m/
z 347 (
m/
z 347.1845 from HR-MS; Δ = 5.80 ppm for C
20H
27O
5−), 235, 223 and 359 (
m/
z 359.1852 from HR-MS; Δ = 3.54 ppm for C
21H
27O
5−) formed by the rupture of the methylene bridge. The structure at
m/
z 359 can undergo the loss of isobutene from the 4-methylpentene bonded to the tetrahydropyran, giving the signal at
m/
z 303 (
m/
z 303.1222 from HR-MS; Δ = 5.60 ppm for C
17H
19O
5−). However, the spectra of the two isomers do not contain distinctive signals that allow their differentiation; hence, using only MS data it is not feasible for distinguishing between the two.