Next Article in Journal
Design, Synthesis and Characterization of a Novel Type of Thermo-Responsible Phospholipid Microcapsule–Alginate Composite Hydrogel for Drug Delivery
Next Article in Special Issue
Amyloidogenic Peptides in Human Neuro-Degenerative Diseases and in Microorganisms: A Sorrow Shared Is a Sorrow Halved?
Previous Article in Journal
Formal [3+2] Cycloaddition Reactions of Electron-Rich Aryl Epoxides with Alkenes under Lewis Acid Catalysis Affording Tetrasubstituted Tetrahydrofurans
Previous Article in Special Issue
Substrate-Specific Activation of α-Secretase by 7-Deoxy-Trans-Dihydronarciclasine Increases Non-Amyloidogenic Processing of β-Amyloid Protein Precursor
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Amyloid-Beta1-42 -Induced Increase in GABAergic Tonic Conductance in Mouse Hippocampal CA1 Pyramidal Cells

1
Centre for Brain Research, Department of Anatomy and Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland 1023, New Zealand
2
Department of Biochemistry, University of Otago, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand
3
Centre for Brain Research, Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland 1023, New Zealand
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2020, 25(3), 693; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25030693
Submission received: 28 November 2019 / Revised: 3 February 2020 / Accepted: 3 February 2020 / Published: 6 February 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Amyloids in Neurodegenerative Diseases)

Abstract

:
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a complex and chronic neurodegenerative disorder that involves a progressive and severe decline in cognition and memory. During the last few decades a considerable amount of research has been done in order to better understand tau-pathology, inflammatory activity and neuronal synapse loss in AD, all of them contributing to cognitive decline. Early hippocampal network dysfunction is one of the main factors associated with cognitive decline in AD. Much has been published about amyloid-beta1-42 (Aβ1-42)-mediated excitotoxicity in AD. However, increasing evidence demonstrates that the remodeling of the inhibitory gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABAergic) system contributes to the excitatory/inhibitory (E/I) disruption in the AD hippocampus, but the underlying mechanisms are not well understood. In the present study, we show that hippocampal injection of Aβ1-42 is sufficient to induce cognitive deficits 7 days post-injection. We demonstrate using in vitro whole-cell patch-clamping an increased inhibitory GABAergic tonic conductance mediated by extrasynaptic type A GABA receptors (GABAARs), recorded in the CA1 region of the mouse hippocampus following Aβ1-42 micro injection. Such alterations in GABA neurotransmission and/or inhibitory GABAARs could have a significant impact on both hippocampal structure and function, causing E/I balance disruption and potentially contributing to cognitive deficits in AD.

1. Introduction

The role of the inhibitory gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) system in excitatory/inhibitory (E/I) balance disruption in the Alzheimer’s disease (AD) brain has been described to occur before, and to possibly underlie, amyloid-beta (Aβ) mediated-excitotoxicity. Despite that GABAergic neurons seem to be relatively spared during AD progression, there is evidence that demonstrates that they are vulnerable to exposure to Aβ neurotoxic protein fragments [1]. For example, GABAergic parvalbumin (PV)-positive interneurons that are inhibitory and fast spiking, key regulators of E/I balance through the synchronization of excitatory neuronal network activity in the cortex and in the hippocampus [2], have been shown to be impaired by Aβ, ultimately causing the impairment of inhibitory function, disrupting of E/I balance and causing cognitive decline in AD [3].
Increases in ambient GABA levels may also be involved in learning and memory dysfunction in AD [4]. Deficits in mitochondrial ATP occurring with ageing promotes increased ambient GABA levels through release of GABA in the extrasynaptic space [5]. However, Aβ may also be indirectly involved in the release of ambient GABA by astrocytes to the extrasynaptic space [6,7]. In the hippocampus, ambient GABA levels activate extrasynaptic α5 subunit-containing type A GABA receptors (GABAARs), mostly expressed in the somatodendritic region of CA1 pyramidal layer of the hippocampus, where they mediate tonic inhibition [8,9]. Persistent and continuous activation of these receptors due to increased ambient GABA levels generates chronic hyperpolarizing conductance, ultimately affecting the excitability of neurons in the hippocampus [10], thus contributing to the alteration of the E/I balance.
Restoration of E/I balance could reverse neuronal dysfunction, contributing to the amelioration of cognitive decline in AD [11,12]. Given the potentially promising pharmacological advances in this direction [13,14,15], we aimed to assess Aβ1-42-induced changes in the functional activity of the GABAARs in CA1 pyramidal cells.

2. Results and Discussion

Whole-cell voltage-clamp recordings were performed in naïve control (NC), artificial cerebrospinal fluid (ACSF) -injected and Aβ1-42-injected mice in the str. pyramidale of the CA1 hippocampal region (Figure 1). Application of 100 µM of bicuculline methiodide (BMI), along with the inhibitory postsynaptic currents (IPSC) blockade, resulted in tonic inhibition in the CA1 pyramidal cells measured as a shift in the holding current [16]. Mice injected with Aβ1-42 were found to exhibit a significant increase in tonic inhibition in comparison to NC (78.070 ± 19.950 pA versus 50.948 ± 9.263 pA, p = 0.0184) and artificial cerebrospinal fluid (ACSF)-injected (78.070 ± 19.950 pA versus 35.051 ± 5.340 pA, p = 0.0015) mice (Figure 1). Aβ1-42 did not induce changes either in the input resistance (NC = 150.20 ± 48.53 MΩ, ACSF-injected = 170.70 ± 52.57 MΩ, Aβ1-42-injected = 115.70 ± 35.63 MΩ), or the membrane capacitance of the cell (NC = 76.27 ± 17.75 pF, ACSF-injected = 62.39 ± 17.75 pF, Aβ1-42-injected = 83.43 ± 18.25 pF). Likewise, no changes were found between groups for the series resistance (NC = 21.15 ± 4.21 MΩ, ACSF-injected = 19.07 ± 6.804 MΩ, Aβ1-42-injected = 20.32 ± 6.04 MΩ).
Similar to our observations, increased tonic conductance has also been observed previously in the dentate gyrus (DG) region of a Tg 5xFAD and APP/PS1 AD mouse model, in which it was associated with cognitive decline [6,7]. Overall, the findings from these AD mouse models imply that excessive amounts of GABA in the extracellular space is potentially released from reactive astrocytes, and reduction of tonic inhibition in these mice rescues long-term potentiation (LTP) impairment and memory decline [6,7]. It is important to point out that, other potential factors might also contribute to the altered extrasynaptic GABA levels, from changes in GABA uptake and clearance processes. Furthermore, remodeling of GABAAR subunit expression, along with alteration of the expression of GABA transporters (GATs) in the AD brain, may buffer changes in synaptic GABA levels, and ultimately, affect the total levels of extrasynaptic GABA [16,17,18,19,20].
We measured tonic inhibition in the CA1 region of Aβ1-42 treated mice as the CA1 region has been reported to be one of the earliest hippocampal regions to exhibit functional changes in AD [21]. The hippocampus might have discrete functional domains along its regions and subregions that affect learning and memory processes, so region-specific differences could also be observed in the deterioration of the LTP during AD progression. Several studies have reported differences in LTP induction and amplitude within the dorsal and ventral parts of the CA1 region in rodents [22]. While some studies using Tg AD mouse models [6,7] have indicated the relevance of DG-related impaired LTP and memory deficits in the AD rodent brain, our data indicate that the CA1 region might be, at least, equally critical in the process of the memory decline in AD. Increased tonic inhibition after Aβ injection might be a consequence of increased extracellular GABA levels that lead to the overactivation of α5 subunit containing receptors in the CA1 pyramidal cells of the hippocampus. We have also considered the possibility of α5 subunit upregulation as a contributing factor to increased tonic inhibition. However, our results show no Aβ1-42 induced alterations in α5 subunit expression (Figure 2A–K). Previous data suggest that the α5 subunit containing GABAA receptor plays a key role in cognition, and it potentially represents an important component of synaptic transmission in the CA1 region of the hippocampus, which might be impaired by the action of the Aβ protein fragment [23]. The enhanced performance of α5-deficient mice in learning tasks was linked to decreased GABA-mediated synaptic inhibition in the hippocampus, as shown by the reduced peak amplitudes and slower decay times of IPSCs [24]. Increased tonic GABAergic inhibition can alter E/I balance in the hippocampus, which potentially contributes to the cognitive decline observed in Aβ1-42-treated mice. At day 7 post-injection, Aβ1−42-injected mice showed significant spatial memory impairment compared with NC (p = 0.002 and p = 0.0481), ACSF-injected (p = 0.0003 and p = 0.0445) and scrambled Aβ1-42 (scrAβ1-42)-injected (p = 0.0015 and p = 0.005) mice in the novel object recognition (NOR) and Water Morris Maze (MWM) tasks (Figure 2L,M). The significantly lower discrimination ratio found in Aβ1−42-injected mice compared with ACSF-injected and NC mice, indicates that Aβ1−42-injected mice could not discriminate between familiar and novel objects (Figure 2L). Aβ1−42-injected mice also show an increased escape latency to find the platform in the MWM (Figure 2M).
Tonic inhibition is relevant not only for the control of pyramidal cell excitability in the hippocampus, but also for the control of oscillatory network activity mediated by interneurons. Interneurons from the CA1 region of the hippocampus exhibit tonic currents that reduce their excitability, thus limiting their inhibitory output to excitatory pyramidal cells [25]. Fast-spiking PV positive basket cell interneurons that create perisomatic synapses with excitatory pyramidal neurons mediate network oscillations in the hippocampus [26,27], and this is critical for learning and memory processes in the hippocampus. Interestingly, these interneurons display a dual function, which is modulated by extracellular GABA levels. At low extracellular GABA levels, extrasynaptic GABAARs induce depolarization in these interneurons, which facilitates the transmission of inhibitory signals to the excitatory pyramidal cells. However, under pathological conditions, such as with the accumulation of Aβ1-42, increased extracellular GABA levels would induce hyperpolarization in the interneurons [28]. Furthermore, the aforementioned tonic inhibition-dependent effects in the hippocampal circuitry would manifest as a loss of oscillatory and rhythmic hippocampal activity [16,29]. Thus, increased extrasynaptic tonic inhibition in the hippocampus would affect interneuron function by altering communication with other interneurons and with principal pyramidal cells. In turn, this would affect the modulation of hippocampal excitability and the maintenance of a normal neuronal network.
Much research has effectively shown that neuronal loss, and the resulting brain atrophy, might be one of the leading factors associated with cognitive impairment in AD [30]. However, other neuropathological processes are likely to contribute to the dysfunctional E/I network balance in the hippocampus that leads to cognitive deterioration. Although cognitive decline in AD has been largely related to Aβ oligomers and the glutamatergic system through multiple interactions [31,32], there is growing evidence to suggest that cognitive decline in the AD brain is influenced and also partly precipitated by altered GABAergic function [19], and this has been linked to cognitive decline [33]. In the extrasynaptic space, Aβ1-42 mediates increase in ambient GABA levels which chronically activates tonic inhibitory currents in the hippocampus, that are involved in the maintenance of the excitatory network and synchronization, and in turn might contribute to the cognitive deficits - but the exact mechanism requires further elucidation.
In summary, we demonstrated that tonic GABAergic current is increased in Aβ1-42-injected mice, suggesting that, along with the classic features of AD that contribute to the cognitive decline, such as neuronal loss, tau and vascular pathology and neuroinflammation, increased GABAergic tonic inhibitory currents may also play a key role in hippocampal deficits in AD.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Animals

The animals were housed at the University of Auckland, Vernon Jensen Unit and the University of Otago, Hercus Taieri Resource Unit under 12 h reverse light-cycle conditions (lights on at 8 PM), with ad libitum access to food and water. All experiments were conducted in accordance with the National Animal Ethics Advisory Committee guidelines and the approval of the institutional animal ethics committee of the University of Auckland and University of Otago (Approval numbers: 60/13, 001586 and 001655). The animals were maintained under conditions of a 12 h light/dark cycle (lights on at 7:00 P.M.) with food and water available ad libitum. Experiments were performed on young 2 months old C57BL/6 wild-type male mice (whole-cell voltage-clamp recording, n = 4–5; behavioural testing and immunohistochemistry, n = 9).

3.2. Aβ1-42 Preparation

1-42 is routinely produced as a recombinant protein fused with maltose-binding protein (MBP), with a proteolytic cleavage site for Factor X protease between the two segments based on (Wilson C. MSc Thesis, University of Otago, 2007) [34,35]. This strategy utilizes the solubilizing character of the maltose-binding protein, a product of the MalE gene, to ensure expression of the soluble protein at a high concentration in Escherichia coli. After the expression of this recombinant fusion protein in bacteria, the product was purified on an amylose column to which the MBP segment of the protein binds. The affinity selected fusion protein was eluted from the resin with maltose and concentrated by ammonium sulphate precipitation. The carrier MBP was then cleaved off the fusion protein by Factor X protease, and the released Aβ1-42 was isolated and further purified by hydrophobic chromatography in 0–50% v/v acetonitrile/0.1% v/v trifluoroacetic acid (TFA), using fast protein liquid chromatography (FPLC). The fractions containing pure Aβ1-42 were detected immunologically with an antibody against residues 17–24 of Aβ1-42 and lyophilized to remove the solvent. Mass spectrometry was used to confirm the expected molecular ion for the desired product. The concentration of the protein fragment has been determined by bicinchoninic acid assay (BCA) at 60 °C for 30 min. Incubating the BCA assay at higher temperatures is recommended as a way to increase assay sensitivity while minimizing the variances caused by unequal amino acid composition. Before intra-hippocampal injection of this product, we diluted the prepared monomer in ACSF (147 mM Na+, 3.5 mM K+, 2 mM Ca2+, 1 mM Mg2+ [pH 7.3]) and ‘aged’ the solution at 37 °C for 48 h to facilitate the formation of soluble aggregates, which was confirmed by SDS/PAGE and by non-dissociating PAGE. For the non dissociating gel, the separating gel was a 12.5% (w/v) acrylamide gel (buffer 750 mM Tris-HCL pH 8.8), stacking gel 9% (w/v) acrylamide (buffer 125 mM Tris- HCL pH 6.8) with the running buffer 25 mM Tris and 19.2 mM glycine. Electrophoresis was at 200 V for 1.5 h.
The optimal incubation time required to produce the highly toxic oligomers is 48–120 h. Western blots of an ageing profile of Aβ1-42 were analyzed both on non-dissociating gels, where the monomer decreases, and an oligomer appears by 48 h, and SDS gels where the dimer and trimer of Aβ1-42 are seen as well as a higher molecular weight oligomer [35]. Only aggregates from misfolded Aβ1-42 are deduced to be SDS insoluble [36], explaining why SDS gels show lower amounts with the less stably-aggregated species dissociated by the SDS [35]. Furthermore, it is very likely that the aged amyloid beta sample injected that included dimers, trimers and possible tetramers underwent further aggregation in the extracellular space following intracerebral injection. Importantly, there are several studies that provide evidence for the existence of toxic oligomeric Aβ species in the AD brain but there is controversy and unanswered questions regarding their precise structures, spread, amplification and how they induce neuronal dysfunction and death [37].

3.3. Aβ1-42 Stereotaxic Injection

Mice were anesthetized by subcutaneous injection of 75 mg/kg ketamine and 1 mg/kg domitor. Bilateral coordinates for stereotaxic Aβ1-42 injection at three depths within the CA1 region of the hippocampus were determined relative to bregma (antero-posterior, −2.0 mm; medial-lateral, ±1.3 mm; dorsal-ventral, −1.9, 2.4, and 2.9 mm) according to the Paxinos and Franklin’s mouse brain atlas [38]. Stereotaxic bilateral administration of 1 μL of 20 μM neurotoxic Aβ1-42 [34,35] or ACSF as vehicle or scrAβ1-42 (AS-25382, AnaSpec) into the CA1 region was performed at a rate of 0.1 µL/min.

3.4. Whole-Cell Voltage-Clamp Recording

3.4.1. Slice Preparation

Mice from the NC, ACSF-injected and Aβ1-42-injected groups were euthanized by cervical dislocation and decapitated at 7 days after Aβ1-42 injection. The brain was rapidly placed in protective ice-cold ACSF containing (mM): N-methyl-D-glucamine (NMDG) (93), KCl (93), NaH2PO4 (1.2), NaHCO3 (30), HEPES (20), D-glucose (25), sodium ascorbate (5), thiourea (2), sodium pyruvate (3), MgSO4 (10) and CaCl2 (0.5), pH 7.35. Hippocampal slices were cut at 350 µm using a vibratome (Leica VT 12000, Wetzlar, Germany). The slices were incubated in a chamber (GD100, Grant, Cambridge, UK) containing protective ACSF at 34 °C for 12 min and transferred and stored for recovery at 21 °C in a holding chamber in ACSF recording solution containing (mM): NaCl (97), KCl (2.5), NaH2PO4 (1.2), NaHCO3 (30), HEPES (20), D-glucose (25), sodium ascorbate (5), thiourea (2), sodium pyruvate (3), MgSO4 (2) and CaCl2 (2) pH 7.35, in the presence of 3 mM kynurenic acid (K3375, Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and 5 µM GABA (A2129, Sigma Aldrich).

3.4.2. Whole-Cell Patch-Clamp Recording

CA1 pyramidal cells were visualized under IR-DIC optics (Olympus TH4-200, BX51WI, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with a video camera (CCD, C7500-51, S.No 6 × 0047; Hamamatsu, Hamamatsu, Japan). Voltage-clamp recordings were performed using a MultiClamp 700B amplifier (Axon Instruments, San Jose, CA, USA). Slices were continuously perfused with ACSF saturated with 95% O2/5% CO2, containing 3 mM kynurenic acid and 5 µM GABA. Glass microelectrodes (resistance 3–5 MΩ) were created using a dual-stage glass micropipette puller PC-10 (Narishige, Tokyo, Japan) and were filled with the following internal solution (mM): CsCl (140), MgCl2 (1), HEPES (10), EGTA (0.1), NaCl (4), MgATP (2), NaGTP (0.3) pH 7.28, (osmolarity, ~280 mOsm). Neurons were held at −70 mV in voltage-clamp configuration. Recordings were discarded if series resistance altered more than 30% during the duration of the recording. After obtaining a stable 5 min baseline recording, defined as a lack of change in the holding current, drugs were perfused and tonic conductance was recorded.
Before recording, hippocampal slices were pre-incubated in ACSF with 5 μM GABA to increase the ambient GABA levels, so as to facilitate the measurement of tonic conductance, as well as with 3 mM kynurenic acid to block ionotropic glutamate receptors. Tetrodotoxin (TTX) (1078, Tocris, Bristol, UK) at 5 µM and CdCl2 (202908, Sigma Aldrich) at 50 µM were used to block voltage-gated Na+ and Ca++ channels, respectively. Finally, the GABA receptor antagonist BMI was used at 100 µM to measure tonic conductance. All recordings were low-pass filtered at 3 kHz and digitized at 10 Hz using an Axon Digidata 1550B plus HumSilencer apparatus (Axon Instruments, San Jose, CA, USA and SDR Scientific, Sydney, NSW, Australia).

3.4.3. Tonic Current Measurements in Hippocampal Slices

The tonic current was measured based on the shift in the holding current caused by the addition of the GABAA receptor antagonist BMI. Tonic current measurement was performed following the method described by [16]. Briefly, tonic current was defined by generating all-points histograms for the control and the BMI periods, and later, a Gaussian curve was fit to the data. Tonic inhibition was determined by subtracting the mean current value for the control period from the mean current value for the BMI period.

3.5. Behavioral Testing

Behavioral testing was performed to elucidate the effects of Aβ1−42 on the cognitive performance of the mice using the NOR and MWM tasks. On day 6 and 7 after Aβ1−42 injection the NOR test was started at 9 AM and on day 7 the MWM test at 11 AM. The behavioral analysis was performed using the tracking image analyzer system EthoVision XT 9 (Noldus; Wageningen, Netherlands).

3.5.1. Novel Object Recognition Test

To evaluate long-term spatial memory, the NOR test was performed in a square arena with non-transparent plexiglass walls (25 cm × 29 cm × 25 cm). Each mouse was placed in the arena individually and given 10 min to habituate to the environment. Next, two identical objects were introduced in the arena at designated locations, and the mice were given 5 min to interact with and explore the objects. The following day (24 h later), the animals were presented with a similar set of objects but one object was novel to them; they were allowed to freely explore the objects again for a 5 min period. The amount of time spent to explore the new object is considered as an index of recognition memory. The discrimination ratio for a novel over a familiar object was calculated as follows: time near a new object minus the time near the old object, divided by time near the new object plus the time near the old object [34,35].

3.5.2. Morris Water Maze Test

The MWM task was used to assess short-term spatial memory. The MWM apparatus comprises a circular black tank (diameter, 130 cm; height, 130 cm) filled with tap water. A constant temperature of 20 °C was maintained during every test. A circular escape platform of 10 cm diameter and several navigation cues were used to provide spatial orientation for the mice. A video camera suspended from the ceiling was used to record every test. The starting position of every mouse was assigned randomly. The location of the hidden platform was kept constant. If the mouse did not find the hidden platform within 90 s, the animal was placed on the platform for 10 s before being returned to the cage. Spatial learning was tested across four repeat trials on day 7 after Aβ1−42 injection. Between trials, mice were dried with a towel, placed in their cages and kept over a heating blanket for 10 min. The latency period before the mouse reached the platform was measured.

3.6. Tissue Processing and Immunohistochemistry

Following behavioral testing, for immunohistochemistry experiments mice were deeply anesthetized with 75 mg/kg ketamine and 1 mg/kg domitor (Pfizer; New York, NY, USA) and perfused transcardially with 20 mL of ice-cold 4% paraformaldehyde in phosphate buffer, pH 7.6. Brains were removed and post-fixed in paraformaldehyde solution for 2 h at 21 °C and then incubated in 30% sucrose in Tris-phosphate saline (TBS; pH 7.6, 0.05 M Tris, 0.15 M NaCl) solution overnight at 4 °C. Four serial sets of 30 μm-thick coronal brain sections were cut using a freezing microtome [34,35,39].
Free-floating single-label fluorescence immunohistochemistry was performed to detect the GABAAR α5 subunit within the mouse hippocampus [34]. Two hippocampal brain sections from each animal were first incubated in blocking solution containing 0.25% bovine serum albumin, 0.3% Triton X-100, and 1% donkey serum in TBS for 1 h at 21 °C followed by incubation with the primary antibody (1:1000, Thermo Fisher Scientific, PA5-31163, Waltham, MA, USA) for 48 h at 4 °C. The sections were then incubated in donkey anti-rabbit Alexa 647 (1:500; ThermoFisher Scientific) for 2 h at 21 °C. Nuclei were counterstained with Hoechst 33,342 (1:10,000; Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Sections were then mounted on slides, air dried overnight, and coverslipped with Mowiol mounting medium. Omission of primary antibodies resulted in a complete absence of immunoreactivity. The experimenter was blinded to avoid any potential bias during image acquisition and analysis. Imaging was conducted using a Zeiss 710 confocal laser-scanning microscope (Carl Zeiss; Oberkochen, Germany) as described in [39]. Integrated density measurements were undertaken using ImageJ, with the size of the measured areas as follows: 21,352 μm2 for the CA1 region, 4761 μm2 for the CA3 region, and 12,295 μm2 for the DG in each layer. Intensity measurements were taken in the regions of the stratum (str.) pyramidale, str. radiatum, and str. moleculare of the CA1 region.

3.7. Statistical Analysis

All data are expressed as mean ± SD. One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey post-hoc test was used to examine differences between the different groups in all experiments. All statistical analyses were conducted using Prism (version 8, GraphPad), and a p < 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance.

Author Contributions

B.C.-F.G., S.K., B.C., K.P. and A.K. performed research; B.C.-F.G., J.M., S.K. and A.K. analyzed data; B.C.-F.G, J.M., W.P.T., H.J.W., R.L.F. and A.K. wrote the paper; B.C.-F.G, J.M., W.P.T. and A.K. designed research, B.C.-F.G, R.L.F. and A.K. funding acquisition, B.C.-F.G., J.M. and A.K. project administration, J.M., W.P.T., H.J.W., R.L.F. and A.K. supervision. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by Alzheimers New Zealand (A.K.; 3718869); Freemasons New Zealand (A.K.; 3719321); Alzheimers New Zealand Charitable Trust (A.K.; 502575); Aotearoa Foundation, Centre for Brain Research, University of Auckland (A.K.; 3705579); Brain Research New Zealand (B.C.F.G., J.M., H.J.W., R.L.F., A.K.; 3710638); Health Research Council of New Zealand (R.L.F., H.J.W.; 3627373), Otago Medical School and the Department of Physiology, University of Otago (A.K.; 110089.01).

Acknowledgments

We thank Kristina Hubbard, Marika Eszes and Jacqueline Ross for excellent work and assistance, members of the Montgomery lab for practical and theoretical electrophysiological assistance, and members of the Vernon Jansen Unit, University of Auckland and the Hercus Taieri Resource Unit, University of Otago for excellent work.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Pakaski, M.; Farkas, Z.; Kasa, P.; Forgon, M.; Papp, H.; Zarandi, M.; Penke, B.; Kasa, P. Vulnerability of small GABAergic neurons to human beta-amyloid pentapeptide. Brain Res. 1998, 796, 239–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Gao, R.; Penzes, P. Common mechanisms of excitatory and inhibitory imbalance in schizophrenia and autism spectrum disorders. Curr. Mol. Med. 2015, 15, 146–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Ren, S.-Q.; Yao, W.; Yan, J.-Z.; Jin, C.; Yin, J.-J.; Yuan, J.; Yu, S.; Cheng, Z. Amyloid β causes excitation/inhibition imbalance through dopamine receptor 1-dependent disruption of fast-spiking GABAergic input in anterior cingulate cortex. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Li, Y.; Sun, H.; Chen, Z.; Xu, H.; Bu, G.; Zheng, H. Implications of GABAergic Neurotransmission in Alzheimer’s Disease. Front Aging Neurosci. 2016, 8, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Madl, J.E.; Royer, S.M. Glutamate dependence of GABA levels in neurons of hypoxic and hypoglycemic rat hippocampal slices. Neuroscience 2000, 96, 657–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wu, Z.; Guo, Z.; Gearing, M.; Chen, G. Tonic inhibition in dentate gyrus impairs long-term potentiation and memory in an Alzheimer’s disease model. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 4159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Jo, S.; Yarishkin, O.; Hwang, Y.J.; Chun, Y.E.; Park, M.; Woo, D.H.; Bae, J.Y.; Kim, T.; Lee, J.; Chun, H.; et al. GABA from reactive astrocytes impairs memory in mouse models of Alzheimer’s disease. Nat. Med. 2014, 20, 886–896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Crestani, F.; Keist, R.; Fritschy, J.M.; Benke, D.; Vogt, K.; Prut, L.; Bluthmann, H.; Mohler, H.; Rudolph, U. Trace fear conditioning involves hippocampal alpha5 GABA(A) receptors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99, 8980–8985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Martin, L.; Oh, G.; Orser, B. Etomidate targets alpha5 gamma-aminobutyric acid subtype A receptors to regulate synaptic plasticity and memory blockade. Anesthesiology 2009, 111, 1025–1035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Limon, A.; Reyes-Ruiz, J.M.; Miledi, R. GABAergic drugs and Alzheimer’s disease. Future Med. Chem. 2011, 3, 149–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Louzada, P.; Lima, A.; Mendonca-Silva, D.; Noël, F.; de Mello, F.; Ferreira, S. Taurine prevents the neurotoxicity of β-amyloid and glutamate receptor agonists: Activation of GABA receptors and possible implications for Alzheimer’s disease and other neurological disorders. Faseb. J. 2004, 18, 511–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Sanchez, P.E.; Zhu, L.; Verret, L.; Vossel, K.A.; Orr, A.G.; Cirrito, J.R.; Devidze, N.; Ho, K.; Yu, G.-Q.; Palop, J.J. Levetiracetam suppresses neuronal network dysfunction and reverses synaptic and cognitive deficits in an Alzheimer’s disease model. P. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2012, 109, E2895–E2903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Marcade, M.; Bourdin, J.; Loiseau, N.; Peillon, H.; Rayer, A.; Drouin, D.; Schweighoffer, F.; Désiré, L. Etazolate, a neuroprotective drug linking GABAA receptor pharmacology to amyloid precursor protein processing. J. Neurochem. 2008, 106, 392–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Vellas, B.; Sol, O.; Snyder, P.J.; Ousset, P.J.; Haddad, R.; Maurin, M.; Lemarie, J.C.; Desire, L.; Pando, M.P. EHT0202 in Alzheimer’s disease: A 3-month, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study. Curr. Alzheimer Res. 2011, 8, 203–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Calvo-Flores Guzman, B.; Vinnakota, C.; Govindpani, K.; Waldvogel, H.J.; Faull, R.L.M.; Kwakowsky, A. The GABAergic system as a therapeutic target for Alzheimer’s disease. J. Neurochem. 2018, 146, 649–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Glykys, J.; Mody, I. Hippocampal network hyperactivity after selective reduction of tonic inhibition in GABA A receptor alpha5 subunit-deficient mice. J. Neurophysiol. 2006, 95, 2796–2807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Marczynski, T.J. GABAergic deafferentation hypothesis of brain aging and Alzheimer’s disease revisited. Brain Res. Bull. 1998, 45, 341–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Fuhrer, T.E.; Palpagama, T.H.; Waldvogel, H.J.; Synek, B.J.L.; Turner, C.; Faull, R.L.; Kwakowsky, A.L. Impaired expression of GABA transporters in the human Alzheimer’s disease hippocampus, subiculum, entorhinal cortex and superior temporal gyrus. Neuroscience 2017, 351, 108–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Govindpani, K.; Calvo-Flores Guzman, B.; Vinnakota, C.; Waldvogel, H.J.; Faull, R.L.; Kwakowsky, A. Towards a Better Understanding of GABAergic Remodeling in Alzheimer’s Disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 1813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Kwakowsky, A.; Calvo-Flores Guzmán, B.; Govindpani, K.; Waldvogel, H.J.; Faull, R.L. Gamma-aminobutyric acid A receptors in Alzheimer’s disease: Highly localized remodeling of a complex and diverse signaling pathway. Neural Regen. Res. 2018, 8, 1362–1363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kwakowsky, A.; Calvo-Flores Guzman, B.; Pandya, M.; Turner, C.; Waldvogel, H.J.; Faull, R.L. GABAA receptor subunit expression changes in the human Alzheimer’s disease hippocampus, subiculum, entorhinal cortex and superior temporal gyrus. J. Neurochem. 2018, 145, 374–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Masurkar, A.V. Towards a circuit-level understanding of hippocampal CA1 dysfunction in Alzheimer’s disease across anatomical axes. J. Alzheimers Dis. Parkinsonism 2018, 8, 412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Maruki, K.; Izaki, Y.; Nomura, M.; Yamauchi, T. Differences in paired-pulse facilitation and long-term potentiation between dorsal and ventral CA1 regions in anesthetized rats. Hippocampus 2001, 11, 655–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Collinson, N.; Kuenzi, F.M.; Jarolimek, W.; Maubach, K.A.; Cothliff, R.; Sur, C.; Smith, A.; Otu, F.M.; Howell, O.; Atack, J.R.; et al. Enhanced learning and memory and altered GABAergic synaptic transmission in mice lacking the alpha 5 subunit of the GABAA receptor. J. Neurosci. 2002, 22, 5572–5580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Semyanov, A.; Walker, M.C.; Kullmann, D.M. GABA uptake regulates cortical excitability via cell type–specific tonic inhibition. Nat. neurosci. 2003, 6, 484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Bartos, M.; Vida, I.; Jonas, P. Synaptic mechanisms of synchronized gamma oscillations in inhibitory interneuron networks. Nat. rev. neurosci. 2007, 8, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Mann, E.O.; Paulsen, O. Role of GABAergic inhibition in hippocampal network oscillations. Trends Neurosci. 2007, 30, 343–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Song, J.; Zhong, C.; Bonaguidi, M.A.; Sun, G.J.; Hsu, D.; Gu, Y.; Meletis, K.; Huang, Z.J.; Ge, S.; Enikolopov, G.; et al. Neuronal circuitry mechanism regulating adult quiescent neural stem-cell fate decision. Nature 2012, 489, 150–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Lee, V.; Maguire, J. The impact of tonic GABAA receptor-mediated inhibition on neuronal excitability varies across brain region and cell type. Front Neural Circuits 2014, 8, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Fox, N.C.; Scahill, R.I.; Crum, W.R.; Rossor, M.N. Correlation between rates of brain atrophy and cognitive decline in AD. Neurology 1999, 52, 1687–1689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lauren, J.; Gimbel, D.A.; Nygaard, H.B.; Gilbert, J.W.; Strittmatter, S.M. Cellular prion protein mediates impairment of synaptic plasticity by amyloid-beta oligomers. Nature 2009, 457, 1128–1132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Revett, T.; Baker, G.; Jhamandas, J.; Kar, S. Glutamate system, amyloid β peptides and tau protein: Functional interrelationships and relevance to Alzheimer disease pathology. J. Psychiatry Neurosci. 2013, 38, 6–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Ramos-Miguel, A.; Hercher, C.; Beasley, C.L.; Barr, A.M.; Bayer, T.A.; Falkai, P.; Leurgans, S.E.; Schneider, J.A.; Bennett, D.A.; Honer, W.G. Loss of Munc18-1 long splice variant in GABAergic terminals is associated with cognitive decline and increased risk of dementia in a community sample. Mol. Neurodegener. 2015, 10, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Kwakowsky, A.; Potapov, K.; Kim, S.; Peppercorn, K.; Tate, W.; Ábrahám, I. Treatment of beta amyloid 1-42(Aβ1-42)-induced basal forebrain cholinergic damage by a non-classical estrogen signaling activator in vivo. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 21101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Yeung, J.; Tate, W.; Palpagama, T.; Peppercorn, K.; Waldvogel, H.; Faull, R.L.; Kwakowsky, A. The Acute Effects of Amyloid-Beta1−42 on Glutamatergic Receptor and Transporter Expression in the Mouse Hippocampus. Front. Neurosci. 2020, 13, 1427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Hillen, H. The Beta Amyloid Dysfunction (BAD) Hypothesis for Alzheimer’s Disease. Front. Neurosci. 2019, 13, 1154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Chen, X.-Q.; Mobley, W.C. lzheimer Disease Pathogenesis: Insights From Molecular and Cellular Biology Studies of Oligomeric Aβ and Tau Species. Front Neurosci. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Paxinos, G.; Franklin, K. The Mouse Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates, 2nd ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  39. Palpagama, T.; Sagniez, M.; Kim, S.H.; Waldvogel, H.J.; Faull, R.L.; Kwakowsky, A. GABAA receptors are well preserved in the hippocampus of aged mice. eNeuro 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Sample Availability: Samples of the compounds are available from the authors.
Figure 1.1-42-induced increase in gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABAergic) tonic conductance in CA1 pyramidal cells. (A) Representative whole cell traces from voltage-clamp recording of CA1 pyramidal cells (PCs) (Vh = −70 mV) from naïve control (NC), artificial cerebrospinal fluid (ACSF) -injected and Aβ1-42-injected mice in the presence of 3 mM kynurenic acid and 5 µM GABA. The lines above the traces indicate the points at which TTX (5 µM) + CdCl2 (50 µM) and bicuculline methiodide (BMI) (100 µM) were applied. (B) Histogram plot of tonic current measured in the NC, ACSF-injected and Aβ1-42-injected mice. Data are expressed as mean ± SD (one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s post-hoc test (* p = 0.0382, ** p = 0.0025; NC n = 4, ACSF-injected n = 4, and Aβ1-42-injected n = 5). (C) For a given CA1 PC (in this case from a NC), tonic current was determined by generating all-points histograms for the control period (before BMI application) and during the BMI application period, corresponding to 60 s per period (600001 points each). Mean values from each histogram were used to determine the current during the control and BMI periods. Tonic current in this given CA1 PC is 410.19 − 351.95 = 58.24 pA.
Figure 1.1-42-induced increase in gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABAergic) tonic conductance in CA1 pyramidal cells. (A) Representative whole cell traces from voltage-clamp recording of CA1 pyramidal cells (PCs) (Vh = −70 mV) from naïve control (NC), artificial cerebrospinal fluid (ACSF) -injected and Aβ1-42-injected mice in the presence of 3 mM kynurenic acid and 5 µM GABA. The lines above the traces indicate the points at which TTX (5 µM) + CdCl2 (50 µM) and bicuculline methiodide (BMI) (100 µM) were applied. (B) Histogram plot of tonic current measured in the NC, ACSF-injected and Aβ1-42-injected mice. Data are expressed as mean ± SD (one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s post-hoc test (* p = 0.0382, ** p = 0.0025; NC n = 4, ACSF-injected n = 4, and Aβ1-42-injected n = 5). (C) For a given CA1 PC (in this case from a NC), tonic current was determined by generating all-points histograms for the control period (before BMI application) and during the BMI application period, corresponding to 60 s per period (600001 points each). Mean values from each histogram were used to determine the current during the control and BMI periods. Tonic current in this given CA1 PC is 410.19 − 351.95 = 58.24 pA.
Molecules 25 00693 g001
Figure 2. (AH) Representative photomicrographs of the hippocampal CA1 region showing GABAAR α5 subunit expression (red) and α5 immunoreactivity overlaid with Hoechst (blue) labeling for representative naïve control, artificial cerebrospinal fluid- (ACSF), scrambled Aβ1-42- (scrAβ1-42) and Aβ1−42-injected mice (Aβ1−42). (IK): Quantification of GABAAR α5 subunit immunoreactivity in the regions and layers of the hippocampus in NC, ACSF-, scrAβ1-42- and Aβ1-42-injected mice. Scale bar, 50 μm. (L,M) Aβ1−42-injected mice show long- and short-term spatial memory impairment revealed by the novel object recognition (L) and Water Morris Maze (M) tests, respectively. The Aβ1-42-lesioned mice do not discriminate between novel and familiar objects and show longer escape latency in trial 4 of the MWM task. Data are expressed as mean ± SD (one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s post-hoc test (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.001, *** p < 0.001; NC n = 9, ACSF-injected n = 9, scrAβ1-42-injected n = 9 and Aβ1-42-injected n = 9).
Figure 2. (AH) Representative photomicrographs of the hippocampal CA1 region showing GABAAR α5 subunit expression (red) and α5 immunoreactivity overlaid with Hoechst (blue) labeling for representative naïve control, artificial cerebrospinal fluid- (ACSF), scrambled Aβ1-42- (scrAβ1-42) and Aβ1−42-injected mice (Aβ1−42). (IK): Quantification of GABAAR α5 subunit immunoreactivity in the regions and layers of the hippocampus in NC, ACSF-, scrAβ1-42- and Aβ1-42-injected mice. Scale bar, 50 μm. (L,M) Aβ1−42-injected mice show long- and short-term spatial memory impairment revealed by the novel object recognition (L) and Water Morris Maze (M) tests, respectively. The Aβ1-42-lesioned mice do not discriminate between novel and familiar objects and show longer escape latency in trial 4 of the MWM task. Data are expressed as mean ± SD (one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s post-hoc test (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.001, *** p < 0.001; NC n = 9, ACSF-injected n = 9, scrAβ1-42-injected n = 9 and Aβ1-42-injected n = 9).
Molecules 25 00693 g002

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Calvo-Flores Guzmán, B.; Kim, S.; Chawdhary, B.; Peppercorn, K.; Tate, W.P.; Waldvogel, H.J.; Faull, R.L.; Montgomery, J.; Kwakowsky, A. Amyloid-Beta1-42 -Induced Increase in GABAergic Tonic Conductance in Mouse Hippocampal CA1 Pyramidal Cells. Molecules 2020, 25, 693. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25030693

AMA Style

Calvo-Flores Guzmán B, Kim S, Chawdhary B, Peppercorn K, Tate WP, Waldvogel HJ, Faull RL, Montgomery J, Kwakowsky A. Amyloid-Beta1-42 -Induced Increase in GABAergic Tonic Conductance in Mouse Hippocampal CA1 Pyramidal Cells. Molecules. 2020; 25(3):693. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25030693

Chicago/Turabian Style

Calvo-Flores Guzmán, Beatriz, SooHyun Kim, Bhavya Chawdhary, Katie Peppercorn, Warren P Tate, Henry J Waldvogel, Richard LM Faull, Johanna Montgomery, and Andrea Kwakowsky. 2020. "Amyloid-Beta1-42 -Induced Increase in GABAergic Tonic Conductance in Mouse Hippocampal CA1 Pyramidal Cells" Molecules 25, no. 3: 693. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25030693

APA Style

Calvo-Flores Guzmán, B., Kim, S., Chawdhary, B., Peppercorn, K., Tate, W. P., Waldvogel, H. J., Faull, R. L., Montgomery, J., & Kwakowsky, A. (2020). Amyloid-Beta1-42 -Induced Increase in GABAergic Tonic Conductance in Mouse Hippocampal CA1 Pyramidal Cells. Molecules, 25(3), 693. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25030693

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop