Next Article in Journal
Pharmacokinetics of Two Chlorine-Substituted Bis-Pyridinium Mono-Aldoximes with Regenerating Effect on Butyrylcholinesterase
Next Article in Special Issue
Solubility and Selectivity Effects of the Anion on the Adsorption of Different Heavy Metal Ions onto Chitosan
Previous Article in Journal
On Column Binding a Real-Time Biosensor for β-lactam Antibiotics Quantification
Previous Article in Special Issue
Amidoxime Functionalization of Algal/Polyethyleneimine Beads for the Sorption of Sr(II) from Aqueous Solutions
 
 
Erratum published on 12 June 2020, see Molecules 2020, 25(12), 2736.
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Contribution of Cross-Linker and Silica Morphology on Cr(VI) Sorption Performances of Organic Anion Exchangers Embedded into Silica Pores

by
Ecaterina Stela Dragan
1,* and
Doina Humelnicu
2
1
“Petru Poni” Institute of Macromolecular Chemistry, Grigore Ghica Voda Alley 41 A, 700487 Iasi, Romania
2
Faculty of Chemistry, “Al. I. Cuza” University of Iasi, Bd. 11 Carol I, 700506 Iasi, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2020, 25(5), 1249; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25051249
Submission received: 13 February 2020 / Revised: 5 March 2020 / Accepted: 8 March 2020 / Published: 10 March 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Application of Sorption Materials in Environment)

Abstract

:
Removal of Cr(VI) from the environment represents a stringent issue because of its tremendous effects on living organisms. In this context, design of sorbents with high sorption capacity for Cr(VI) is getting a strong need. For this purpose, poly(vinylbenzyl chloride), impregnated into porous silica (PSi), was cross-linked with either N,N,N’,N’-tetramethyl-1,2-ethylenediamine (TEMED) or N,N,N’,N’-tetramethyl-1,3-propanediamine, followed by the reaction of the free -CH2Cl groups with N,N-diethyl-2-hydroxyethylamine to generate strong base anion exchangers (ANEX) inside the pores. The PSi/ANEX composite sorbents were deeply characterized by FTIR spectroscopy, SEM-energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), and water uptake. The sorption performances of composites against Cr(VI) were investigated as a function of pH, contact time, initial concentration of Cr(VI), and temperature. It was found that the cross-linker structure and the silica morphology are the key factors controlling the sorption capacity. The adsorption process was spontaneous and endothermic and well described by pseudo-second-order kinetic and Sips isotherm models. The maximum sorption capacity of 311.2 mg Cr(VI)/g sorbent was found for the composite prepared with mesoporous silica using TEMED as cross-linker. The PSi/ANEX composite sorbents represent an excellent alternative for the removal of Cr(VI) oxyanions, being endowed with fast kinetics, equilibrium in about 60 min, and a high level of reusability in successive sorption/desorption cycles.

1. Introduction

Nowadays, finding highly efficient systems for the removal of heavy metal ions (HMIs) from the aquatic environment is a stringent issue in front of the scientists all over the world, because they are highly toxic (even at low concentrations), not biodegradable, and have an accumulation tendency in living organisms—most of them being carcinogenic. Synthetic polymeric sorbents [1,2,3,4,5,6] and various biosorbents [7,8,9,10,11,12] are investigated for their performances in the recovery/removal of HMIs. Among the HMIs present in the wastewaters, chromium, especially Cr(VI), is one of the most dangerous contaminants of the surface and ground water, being considered a powerful carcinogenic and teratogenic agent threatening living organisms [1,2,11,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29]. On the other hand, Chromium(III) is listed as an essential element, as a micronutrient, being involved to maintain the normal metabolism of glucose, cholesterol, and fat in human bodies [1,2], being poisonous only at a high concentration. The main source of chromium into the natural waters are the industrial wastewaters coming from the chrome plating, paints, and pigments production, leather tanning, metal finishing, electroplating industry, and wood preservation. Cr(VI) is highly mobile in the environment, can easily penetrate the cell membrane having a corrosive effect on tissues, including lung cancer, and kidney, liver, and stomach [17]. According to the World Health Organization (WHO) drinking water guidelines, the maximum allowable limit for total chromium is 50 μg/L [1,2]. Therefore, to avoid the dangerous impact of Cr(VI) on human health and on the environment, as well as for economic considerations, it is essential to remove/recover Cr(VI) from the wastewaters before disposal [1,2,3]. Various techniques are available for the removal of Cr(VI) such as ion exchange, chemical precipitation, reduction [13,14], reverse osmosis, foam flotation, electrolysis, membrane filtration [15,16], ultrafiltration [17], sorption, and biosorption [18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31]. Some of these techniques have disadvantages of either producing toxic sludge as is the case of chemical precipitation, or asking for high capital costs (reverse osmosis), recovery of value metal being difficult [27,28]. Therefore, the research interest is lately concentrated more on the sorption methods because they offer high efficiency and selectivity, are easy to handle, the metal can be recovered, the sorption process is reversible, and it is cost-effective. In aqueous environment, at pH > 2.0, Cr(VI) exists as oxyanion, and that is the reason why ligands carrying a positive charge, generated by protonation or quaternization, have been successfully used—sorption by electrostatic attractions being favored [21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30]. Synthetic sorbents offer the possibility to introduce almost any reactive functionality, which could be involved in the retention of HMIs. Thus, Zhang et al. have developed a composite sorbent consisting of a weak base anion exchanger having tertiary amine groups (D301) modified by poly(epichlorohydrin-dimethylamine) with a maximum sorption capacity of 194 mg Cr(VI)/g [22]. Macroporous strong base anion exchangers (SBAE) bearing quaternary ammonium salt groups have been synthesized and successfully used by our group in the removal of Cr(VI) either as single anion exchangers [25] or embedded in a composite consisting of chitosan and poly(vinyl amine) as cryobeads [24], their maximum sorption capacity being of 200–320 mg Cr(VI)/g sorbent. A biosorbent consisting of chitosan beads modified with malic acid by Zhang et al. have showed a maximum equilibrium sorption capacity of 383.2 mg Cr(VI)/g [29].
It was reported that organic ion exchangers have usually high ion exchange capacities, but low mechanical strength, slow kinetics, and present multiple variation of volume during the ion exchange processes. Therefore, the scientific and technological interest is lately focused on designing novel sorbents endowed with fast adsorption/desorption rate of Cr(VI) oxyanions, high mechanical strength, selectivity, and high reusability. These requirements could be successfully fulfilled by organic/inorganic composites [18,19,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41]. Thus, magnetic composite sorbents, which allow their easy magnetic separation from the aqueous environment, have been recently reported [31,33,34]. Graphene oxide (GO) and reduced GO represent other attractive inorganic constituents of the composite sorbents used in the removal of Cr(VI) [19,35,38].
Silica/organic polymer composites have been recently promoted for the removal of Cr(VI) due to their performances proved by the mechanical resistance in the successive sorption/desorption cycles of heavy metal ions [39,41]. Composite ion exchangers, having silica as a core coated with organic polymer layers, are endowed with a fast uptake of the ionic solutes and mass transfer properties more favorable for high-performance chromatographic separations [42,43], but their sorption capacity for ionic species is low in many cases, because most of the composite is occupied by the inorganic component. To remediate this limitation, various organic ionic polymers have been lately generated inside the silica pores [44,45,46]. The exchange kinetics and the dimensional stability of the ion exchangers during the multiple sorption/desorption cycles have been thus improved [44,45].
In our previous work we have synthesized novel composite sorbents by cross-linking poly(vinylbenzyl chloride) (PVBC), impregnated into silica pores, with N,N,N’,N’-tetramethyl-1,3-propanediamine (TMPDA), followed by the reaction of the free -CH2Cl groups with N,N-diethyl 2-hydroxyethylamine (DEHEA) [47]. These composite sorbents demonstrated excellent sorption capacity and selectivity for methyl orange, as well as high reusability. Our hypothesis for the present study is that such composite sorbents endowed with a high stability of the particle size and a high number of quaternary ammonium groups could represent an alternative for the sorption Cr(VI) as oxyanions. The adsorption behavior of such composite sorbents toward Cr(VI) has never been accomplished until now. Furthermore, it was assumed that the structure of the tertiary diamine used as cross-linker could influence the sorption performances of the composite sorbents. Therefore, another cross-linker was used in this work, i.e., N,N,N’,N’-tetramethyl-1,2-ethylenediamine (TEMED). The composite sorbents investigated in this work were abbreviated as PSi.1/ANEX1, PSi.1/ANEX2, and PSi.2/ANEX2, which means: PSi-porous silica, 1 or 2; ANEX-for anion exchanger, followed by 1, when the cross-linker used was TEMED, or 2, when the cross-linker was TMPDA. The adsorption performances of the composite sorbents toward Cr(VI) were systematically investigated as a function of pH, contact time, initial concentration of Cr(VI), temperature.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Synthesis of PSi/ANEX Composite Sorbents

Three PSi/ANEX composite sorbents were synthesized in this work (PSi1/ANEX1, PSi1/ANEX2, and PSi2/ANEX2) by the generation of SBAEs into the pores of two kinds of porous silica: a mesoporous silica, coded with PSi1, and a macroporous silica, coded with PSi2. From the N2 adsorption isotherms (Figure S1a,b), the following values were found for their textural characteristics: Ssp of 95.097 m2/g and pore volume of 0.332 cm3/g (for pores with diameter < 45.5 nm), for PSi1; Ssp of 23.963 m2/g and pore volume of 0.0337 cm3/g (for pores with diameter < 46.9 nm), for PSi2. As cross-likers for PVBC, two ditertiary amines were used: TEMED and TMPDA, at a mole ratio of 0.2 moles diamine: 1 mole -CH2Cl. The -CH2Cl groups remained after cross-linking were used for the generation of (vinylbenzyl N,N-diethyl 2-hydroxyethyl) ammonium chloride units by the reaction with DEHEA in excess. Scheme 1 presents the strategy for the synthesis of the PSi/ANEX composites.
The PSi/ANEX composites thus prepared are very rich in quaternary ammonium salt groups, which are expected to electrostatically bind Cr(VI) oxyanions. The PSi/ANEX composites were characterized by FTIR spectroscopy, TGA and SEM-EDX.

2.2. Characterization of PSi/ANEX Composites

2.2.1. Structural Characterization

Structural characterization of the bare PSi and of the PSi/ANEX composites was performed by FTIR spectroscopy, the spectra being presented in Figure S2 and Figure 1, respectively.
As can be seen in Figure 1, the following peaks are visible in all FTIR spectra of the composites: around 3437 cm−1, assigned to the stretching vibrations of -OH groups from silica and from ANEX; 2927 and 2854 cm−1 attributed to the -CH3 and -CH2-CH3 groups from ANEX; the shoulder at around 1450 cm−1 attributed to the stretching vibrations of -CH2- groups; the peaks at 1633 cm−1 in PSi1/ANEX1, and at 1629 cm−1 in the spectra of PSi1/ANEX2 and PSi2/ANEX2, are assigned to in-plane bending of the primary OH from the substituents -CH2-CH2-OH in quaternary ammonium salt groups. The peak at around 712 cm−1, visible in all spectra, confirms the presence of ANEX, attributed to the stretching vibrations of aromatic ring (in PVBC). The peaks located at around 1103, 804 and 470 cm−1 in all spectra were assigned to the asymmetric stretching vibration of Si–O–Si bonds, bending vibrations of Si–O bonds, and deformation out-of-plane vibrations of Si–O bonds, respectively. In the FTIR spectra of PSi1 and PSi2, presented in Figure S2, these peaks are located at 1088, 817, and 470 cm−1. Even if the silica main peaks are screening the peaks of the organic ANEX, after loading with Cr(VI) (Figure 1), a new peak is visible at 943 cm−1, which could be assigned to νCr–O bonds [24,48].

2.2.2. Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA)

Thermal behavior of the composites allow to establish the real content of organic part in each composite and to discriminate them from the thermal feature. Therefore, the content in ANEX of all composites was evaluated by TGA. Figure S3 shows that no weight was lost from the pristine PSi2, taken as an example, up to 700 °C.
Figure 2 presents the TG (2a) and DTG (2b) curves characteristic for the thermal degradation of the three samples of PSi/ANEX. As Figure 2 shows, all PSi/ANEX composites present four stages for their thermal degradation. The first stage, with a weight loss of 1.64%, 1.57%, and 1.92%, for PSi1/ANEX1, PSi1/ANEX2, and PSi2/ANEX2, respectively, corresponds to the loss of residual water. The second stage, with a maximum located at 190.02 °C, 190.15 °C, and 207.96 °C, and a weight loss of 4%, 2.55%, and 4.39%, found for PSi1/ANEX1, PSi1/ANEX2, and PSi2/ANEX2, respectively, was attributed to the dealkylation of the quaternary ammonium salt groups; the third stage with a maximum located at 296.14 °C, 290 °C, and 266 °C, and a weight loss of 1.39%, 1.6%, and 1.41%, found for PSi1/ANEX1, PSi1/ANEX2, and PSi2/ANEX2, respectively, was ascribed to the degradation of the cross-linking between the main chains; the main stage of thermal degradation is the fourth stage, with the peaks located at 432.34 °C, 435.45 °C, and 420 °C, the weight loss being of 7.45%, 6.85, and 7.12%, found for PSi1/ANEX1, PSi1/ANEX2, and PSi2/ANEX2, respectively, this stage being assigned to the degradation of the main chains. Taking into account the weight loss in the second, the third and the fourth stages, the amount of ANEX in each composite would be of 12.84%, 11%, and 12.92%, in PSi1/ANEX1, PSi1/ANEX2, and PSi2/ANEX2, respectively.

2.2.3. Morphological and Textural Characterization

By SEM analysis, information about the external and internal morphology of the PSi/ANEX composites were obtained. The SEM images before and after loading with Cr(VI) for the three composites are presented in Figure 3. As Figure 3a1–c1 show, there are not significant differences between the three composite microspheres as from the external point of view. However, the silica porosity has a strong influence on the internal morphology visible into the broken PSi/ANEX composites (see Figure 3a2–c2).
As can be seen, the organic part is difficult to be identified in the two composites based on mesoporous silica (PSi1/ANEX1 and PSi1/ANEX2), while the larger pores of macroporous silica (PSi2/ANEX2) give the possibility to identify the organic material entrapped into the silica pores (Figure 3c2). The SEM images of the internal morphology of the composites after their loading with Cr(VI), presented in Figure 3a4–c4 support the strong interaction between the ANEX and metal oxyanions by the more compact surfaces. The EDX profiles of the three PSi/ANEX composites are presented in Figure S3. As can be seen the content in nitrogen is in the range 2.95–3.85, and that of chlorine in the range 0.77–1.32.
As Figure S1c,d shows, the textural characteristics of porous silica were also changed after the synthesis of ANEX inside the pores. Thus, the values of Ssp decreased from 95.097 m2/g, found for PSi1, to 84.463 m2/g found for PSi1/ANEX2, and from 23.963 m2/g, found for PSi2, to 14.831 m2/g found for PSi2/ANEX2. These changes support the presence of the ANEX inside the silica pores.
The values of water uptake of (WU) of pristine PSi and of the PSi/ANEX composites are presented in Table S1. As ca be seen, the WU decreased after the synthesis of ANEX inside the silica channels, more in the case of PSi1/ANEX1 (0.9271 g/g) than in the case of the other two composites (1.281 g/g and 1.176 g/g for PSi1/ANEX2 and PSi2/ANEX2, respectively). This lower value of WU in the case of the former sorbent could be attributed to a higher density of hydrophobic substituents in this case, which could also explain the higher sorption capacity for Cr(VI) oxyanions.

2.2.4. Determination of pHPZC

As Figure 4 shows, the pHPZC values of both PSi1 and PSi2 are situated at pH 3.32 and 3.7, respectively. By the construction of the strong base anion exchangers inside the silica pores, the values of pHPZC dramatically increased up to 8.2, 10.5, and 11.2 for PSi1/ANEX1, PSi1/ANEX2 and PSi2/ANEX2, respectively.
Potentiometric titration curves of PSi1/ANEX1, before and after loading with Cr(VI) shows that pHPZC decreased from 8.2 to about 6 after the sorption of Cr(VI) oxyanions. This demonstrates the strong interaction between the composite sorbent having quaternary ammonium salt groups and the sorbate anions.

2.3. Sorption of Cr(VI) onto PSi/ANEX Composites

2.3.1. pH Effect

Initial solution pH is one essential parameter that strongly influences the performances and the sorption mechanism of a sorbent because it determines the sorbent surface charge and the metal ion species in solution [7,10,26,32,38,49]. The effect of solution pH on the Cr(VI) removal by the PSi/ANEX composites is shown in Figure 5.
As can be seen in Figure 5, all composite sorbents display the same trend when the pH increased in the range 2–7. Thus, the qe values abruptly increased when pH increased from 2 to 4 and gradually decreased with the increase of pH up to 7, as follows: for PSi1/ANEX1, the sorption capacity increased from 65.29 mg/g at pH 2, up to 91.54 mg/g at pH 4; from 60.15 mg/g up to 81.43 mg/g, for PSi1/ANEX2, and from 50.74 mg/g up to 72.62 mg/g, in the case of PSi2/ANEX2, for the same pH values. However, the decrease of qe was not so dramatic when the pH increased from 4 to 7, the values being still 73.81 mg/g, 69.38, and 58.76, for PSi1/ANEX1, PSi1/ANEX2, and PSi2/ANEX2, respectively. The effect of pH on the removal of Cr(VI) by the PSi/ANEX composites is almost similar with that reported for other sorbents containing quaternary ammonium salt groups, which could electrostatically interact with Cr(VI) oxyanions [21,24,27,28]. The explanation for this behavior is based on the ionic species present in solution as a function of pH. When the H+ are in excess, Cr(VI) can exist as several oxyanions (Cr2O72, HCr2O7, HCrO4, and CrO42) [19,22,37,38,49]. The majority of the sorbents tested for the removal of Cr(VI) have an optimum pH located in the range 2–3. However, at pH 1.0, the uptake capacity is low because the chromium is predominantly present as H2CrO4, a strong competition between H2CrO4 and protons for adsorption sites being possible [50]. From literature, it is known that the main possible interactions between an ion exchanger and the ions in solutions are ion exchange and chelation, depending on the type of functional groups. When the main functional groups involved in the sorption process are amines [19,22,32,37,48,49,50], or nonionic polymers [41], after a maximum of sorption located at pH about 2, a dramatic decrease of the removal efficiency of chromium has been reported. Increasing the pH, the OH ions are present at higher concentration, and compete with metal oxyanions for the sorption sites of the composite sorbent, the sorption capacity and removal efficiency of chromium decreasing accordingly [34,50]. Concerning the sorption of Cr(VI) onto the composite sorbents under study in this work, at pH located in the range 2–6, Cr(VI), which can exists as HCr2O7 or HCrO4, will need one site on the composite sorbent as the adsorption process to occur, the reaction being described by the following Equation (1) [21,22]:
RCl + HCrO4 = R+ HCrO4 + Cl
At pH > 6, the most part of Cr(VI) exists as Cr2O72− and CrO42−, and these divalent oxyanions need two sites on the sorbent to realize the sorption, the reaction taking place according to the following Equation (2) [22]:
2RCl + CrO42− = R22+ CrO42− + 2Cl
This explains why the sorption capacity decreases at pH > 6. Increasing further the pH, the OH ions competed with Cr(VI) oxyanions, and the sorption capacity dramatically decreased. This sorption mechanism has been reported for other sorbents containing quaternary ammonium salt groups [21,24,27,28].

2.3.2. Kinetic Study

The effect of contact time on the sorption of Cr(VI) oxyanions by the PSi/ANEX composites is presented in Figure 6.
Figure 6a presents the experimental values of qt as a function of time, fitted with three kinetic models, pseudo-first order (PFO), pseudo-second order (PSO), and Elovich kinetic models, the equations corresponding to each model being presented in Table S2. The kinetic parameters obtained by fitting four kinetic models on the experimental data are presented in Table 1.
As can be seen in Table 1, the kinetic data for the sorption of Cr(VI) onto the composite sorbents were more accurately described by the PSO and Elovich kinetic models, the values of R2 and of the χ2 being higher and respectively lower for these models than for the PFO kinetic model. The calculated values of qe (qe calc.), were also very close to the experimental qe (qe, exp). These results would indicate the chemisorption as possible mechanism of sorption, but as it was already shown in Section 2.3.1. (the effect of pH, Figure 5), the most probable mechanism of sorption is the ion exchange between the charged sites of the strong base anion exchanger hosted in the porous silica and the Cr(VI) anionic species present in solution, as a function of pH. In the case of chemisorption, the sorption process is dependent on the sharing of electrons between the adsorbate and the surface of the prepared adsorbents and the availability of sorption sites [25,32,47,51,52,53], but it is not the case of the composite sorbents described in this work (Scheme 1). The well-fitting of the experimental data by the Elovich model indicates the heterogeneity of adsorbent surfaces [32,47]. The values of Elovich parameter α for PSi1/ANEX1 is higher than that of PSi1/ANEX2 and much higher than that of PSi2/ANEX2, demonstrating that, the number of sites available for adsorption in the first composite sorbent is higher than that in the PSi1/ANEX2, and much higher than in PSi2/ANEX2.
In an agitated system, the transport of the metal ions through the boundary layer to the sorbent surface, and the transport of solute from the sorbent surface into the pores, called intra-particle diffusion, or inner diffusion, are the most important steps. The intra-particle diffusion (IPD) model proposed by Weber and Morris is used to explain the diffusion mechanism of the adsorption process (see equation which describes the IPD model, Table S2). Ci term in the Weber and Morris equation gives information about the thickness of boundary layer, which means the larger the intercept, the greater the contribution of the film diffusion in the rate limiting step [32,47,49,54]. If the plot of qt vs t0.5 gives a straight line, which passes through the origin, then the sorption process is controlled only by IPD process. As can be seen in Figure 6b, the plots of qt vs t0.5 for the PSi/ANEX composite sorbents are two-linear: the first region could be ascribed to the external resistance to mass transfer. The second linear part is attributed to the IPD or pore diffusion. In this region, the decrease in the concentration of metal ions, as well as the diminution of the sites available for adsorption took place. Hence, even if the adsorption process involved IPD, this is not the only rate-controlling step. The values of kid, Ci, and R2 corresponding to the first region in Figure 6b are listed in Table 1. As can be seen, the highest value of Ci was found for the PSi1/ANEX1 (35.42 mg/g), the lowest for PSi2/ANEX2 (12.36 mg/g), the value for PSi1/ANEX2 being in the middle (29.205 mg/g). These values indicate that the role of film diffusion is more important in the case of PSi1/ANEX1 than in the case of PSi1/ANEX2, and much larger than for PSi2/ANEX2. The morphology of the pristine silica (PSi1—mesoporous, and PSi2—macroporous) could have also a contribution. The high values of kid.1 obtained by using PSi/ANEX composites indicate that these composite sorbents have a fast removal rate for Cr(VI) from aqueous solution.

2.3.3. Adsorption Isotherm Models

The experiments of sorption at equilibrium were conducted at 23 °C with all PSi/ANEX composites, the experimental data for the adsorption capacity at equilibrium (qe) as a function of the Cr(VI) concentration in solution at equilibrium and their modeling with five isotherm models are presented in Figure 7a–c. The non-linear forms of the equations corresponding to the isotherm models can be seen in Table S3.
The isotherm parameters obtained by modeling the experimental data of sorption at equilibrium are presented in Table 2. As can be seen in Figure 7a–c, the sorption process of Cr(VI) oxyanions is described by L type isotherms, on all composite sorbents. As Table 2 shows, the most suitable isotherm models, which describes the sorption of Cr(VI) are Sips and Langmuir, the values of R2 and χ2 being the highest and, respectively, the lowest for Sips isotherm than for Langmuir model. The values of the maximum sorption capacity given by Sips isotherm allow to discriminate the influence of the cross-linker structure and of silica morphology, being the highest for PSi1/ANEX1 and the lowest for PSi2/ANEX2. This shows that TEMED led to an ANEX with a higher sorption capacity than DMPDA and the mesoporous silica (PSi1), having a higher surface area, was more efficient than the macroporous silica (PSi2) in the sorption of Cr(VI) oxyanions.
Based on the values of KL (Table 2) and the initial concentration of metal ions, the values of constant separation factor (RL, Table S3) were calculated for the initial concentrations varying in the range 25–1000 mg/L. As can be seen in Table 2, the values of RL for all sorbents lies in the range 0 < RL < 1, supporting the suitability of the PSi/ANEX composite sorbents for the removal of Cr(VI) from the aqueous solutions. The values of 1/n < 1 in the Freundlich isotherm show the bond energies increase with the surface density and support the feasibility of sorption for all composites.
Modeling the adsorption data with D-R isotherm allows the calculation of the mean free energy of adsorption, E, which values give information about the sorption mechanism [8,24,32,47]. The values of E, which magnitude is higher than 40 kJ·mol−1 for PSi1/ANEX1 and PSi1/ANEX2, and about 36 kJ·mol−1 for PSi2/ANEX2, would indicate chemisorption as possible mechanism of Cr(VI) sorption. However, for these composite sorbents, the ion exchange seems to be the most probable sorption mechanism (Section 2.3.1 and Section 2.3.2).
The Temkin constant, bT, related to heat of sorption of Cr(VI) oxyanions were 40.52 J/mol, 35.69 J/mol, and 35.15 J/mol for PSi1/ANEX1, PSi1/ANEX2, and PSi1/ANEX2, respectively.
The maximum sorption capacity for Cr(VI) of the PSi1/ANEX1 composite given by the Langmuir isotherm was compared in Table 3 with the values recently reported in literature for other sorbents.
As can be observed, by the value of qm, the novel composite sorbent designed in this work is situated among the best composite sorbents, making it a promising sorbent for the removal of Cr(VI) from aqueous solution.

2.3.4. Reusability

The regeneration in convenient conditions and the level of reusability of the composite sorbents are two characteristics of paramount significance when the feasibility of a sorbent is under study and therefore they must be investigated. The behavior of all three sorbents during five consecutive sorption/desorption cycles of Cr(VI) can be seen in Figure 7d. The fast desorption of the metal ions in one step with 0.1 M NaOH and the almost integral preservation of the sorption capacity at the end of the fifth cycle recommend these composites as promising sorbents for the removal of Cr(VI) as oxyanions.

2.3.5. Thermodynamics

To get further information on the sorption mechanism of Cr(VI) oxyanions onto the PSi/ANEX composites, the thermodynamic parameters (ΔG°, ΔH°, and ΔS°) have been evaluated from the values of the sorption equilibrium constant (Kc) calculated at five temperatures in the range 298 K–318 K, with Equation (3).
K c = q e C e
where: qe is the amount of Cr(VI) sorbed at equilibrium, mg/g, and Ce is the concentration of metal ions at equilibrium in aqueous phase, mg/L.
According to Equation (3), the units of Kc are L/g, but it should be dimensionless [51,56,57]. To solve this problem, the concentration of Cr(VI) was transformed in molar form, and, according to Tran et al., considered the standard state Co = 1 mol/L [51,56,57].
The values of enthalpy (ΔH°) and entropy change (ΔS°) for the sorption of Cr(VI) ions onto the PSi/ANEX composite sorbents were evaluated using Van’t Hoff equation (Equation (4)) from the slope and intercept of the plot lnKc vs. 1/T (Figure 8):
ln K c = Δ S ° R   Δ H ° RT
The change in the standard Gibbs free energy ΔG° was calculated with Equation (5):
Δ G ° =   RT ln K C
The thermodynamic parameters for the sorption of Cr(VI) ions onto the three composite sorbents are presented in Table 4.
The negative values of ΔG° show that the sorption process was spontaneous, and the increase of the negative value with the increase of temperature supports the increase of the degree of spontaneity for the sorption of Cr(VI) ions onto all PSi/ANEX composites. The most negative values of ΔG° found for Psi.1/ANEX1 support the highest amount of metal ions sorbed at equilibrium (Table 2). The positive values of ΔH° show the sorption process was endothermic, and the positive values of ΔS° indicate the increase of the randomness at the solid−liquid interface [19,21,24,36].

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Materials

Two sorts of porous silica, different by their morphological characteristics were purchased from the Daiso Co. (Nishi-Ku, Osaka, Japan). Dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO), tetrahydrofuran (THF), TEMED, and TMPDA, purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Chemie (GmbH, Germany), were used as received. DEHEA, from Fluka Chemical Co. (Buchs, Switzerland), was used after distillation under reduced pressure. 2,2’-Azo-bis(isobutyronitrile) (AIBN), from Sigma-Aldrich, was purified by recrystallization three times from methanol. Potassium dichromate analytical grade and 1,5-diphenylcarbazide, purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Chemie (GmbH, Germany), were used as received. Vinylbenzyl chloride (VBC), purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, was used after distillation under reduced pressure (about 4 mm Hg), being kept at +4 °C. The synthesis of PVBC was performed by free radical polymerization of VBC with AIBN as initiator, at a concentration of 1.12 g/100 g VBC. The separation and characterization of PVBC have been presented in detail, elsewhere [47]. The PVBC used in this work had: Mw = 31,900 g/mol and Mw/Mn = 1.74.

3.2. Synthesis of PSi/ANEX Composites

The synthesis of all PSi/ANEX composites was performed in three steps. In the first step, PVBC was introduced into the pores of PSi (1 or 2) by the sorption of polymer solution in THF, the concentration being 10 wt%. In the second step, PVBC was cross-linked with one of the diamine cross-linkers. Finally, the free -CH2Cl groups were reacted with DEHEA. The synthesis of the PSi1/ANEX1 is given as an example. 1 g of PVBC dissolved in 10 mL THF was added to 5 g PSi1 microspheres, and kept 2 h, at room temperature (RT). The polymer in excess was removed by a fast stirring (2 min) of silica microspheres in 8 mL THF. The supernatant was removed; the PVBC was precipitated in methanol p.a., separated by filtration, and kept in the air overnight. After that, the polymer was further dried 24 h in the oven at 40 °C, and weighed. The real amount of PVBC embedded into the silica pores was determined as 0.64 g. In the second step, silica containing PVBC was let overnight in air to remove THF, and then the crosslinking of PVBC with TEMED in a mole ratio of 0.2 moles TEMED:1 mole -CH2Cl was performed; in this case, the volume of the cross-linker was 0.2 mL in 9.8 mL THF added under fast stirring, and allowed to react at room temperature, 18 h, in a well closed bottle. Then, the THF was completely removed from the sample by evaporation (about 2 h). Finally, the -CH2Cl groups remained available after cross-linking were reacted with an excess of DEHEA (1.5 mL), in DMSO, at 60 °C, 15 h, the reaction being conducted in a horizontal plate thermostated shaker. To remove the solvent and the amine in excess, the composite microspheres were washed several times with methanol and water, as follows: first with methanol p.a. (1:1), under manual stirring, for 10 min; four times with distilled water (2:1), each 1 h; two times with methanol p.a., each 1 h. At this end, the composite was recovered and let overnight in the air to loose methanol. The PSi1/ANEX1 composite was then dried under vacuo, in the oven, four days at 40 °C. For the synthesis of PSi.2/ANEX2, the reaction steps were similar with those presented above, the only difference being that the amount of PVBC immobilized in 5 g of silica was 0.67 g, and the volume of the cross-linker (TMPDA) was 0.148 mL.

3.3. Equipments for Characterization

The organic material immobilized in porous silica was evaluated by TGA, under air at a heating rate of 10 °C/min with a device NETZSCH STA 449F1 (NETZSCH, Selb, Germany), with 5–8 mg composite. The structure of the PSi/ANEX composite sorbents was investigated by FTIR spectroscopy with a Bruker Vertex FTIR spectrometer (Bruker, Ettlingen, Germany), resolution of 2 cm−1, by KBr pellet technique, with 5 mg composite. The samples were scanned in the range of 4000–400 cm−1. The surface and interior morphology of the composite microspheres were investigated by SEM using an Environmental Scanning Electron Microscope (ESEM) (FEI Company, Hillsboro, OR, USA) type Quanta 200, coupled with EDX (SEM-EDX) for determination of the elemental composition. The specific surface area (Ssp) of the composites along with pore volume were evaluated by N2 adsorption-desorption performed at 77 K by an Autosorb-1-MP surface area analyzer (NOVA, Quantachrome Company, Boynton beach, FL, USA). The isotherms of N2 adsorption/desorption were registered at the relative pressure p/po in the domain 0.01–1.0. The Ssp was evaluated from the linear portion of the adsorption isotherms by Brunauer–Emmet–Teller (BET) method. The adsorbed volume was determined at values of the relative pressure p/po of about 0.95. Determination of the pHPZC values, defined as the numeric value of pH where the potential is zero mV, of pristine silica and of the PSi/ANEX composites was performed by potentiometric titrations with a PCD 03 (Mütek, Germany) particle charge detector, between pH 2 and 12, using 0.01 mol·L−1 HCl and NaOH, respectively.
The evaluation of the water uptake (WU) of the PSi/ANEX composites was performed by immersing the composite samples in distilled water for 48 h. The WU (g/g) was calculated by Equation (6) [46]:
WU = ( W t W d ) / W d
where: Wd is the weight (g) of the dried microspheres, and Wt is the weight (g) of the hydrated composite at time t.

3.4. Sorption of Cr(VI) onto PSi/ANEX Composite in Batch Mode

Sorption experiments of Cr(VI) oxyanions from aqueous solution were performed in duplicates using a batch equilibrium procedure carried out on a water bath temperature controlled shaker (GFL 1083, Gemini BV, Apeldoorn, Nederland). The Cr(VI) aqueous solutions of various concentrations were prepared by suitable dilution of a stock solution of K2Cr2O7 with a concentration of 1000 mg Cr(VI)/L. The influence of the initial pH on the sorption Cr(VI) oxyanions at equilibrium, onto the PSi/ANEX composite sorbents was investigated in the range 2–7, using aqueous solutions with the initial concentration of 100 mg/L, adjusting the initial pH with 0.1 M HCl or 0.1 M NaOH. The samples collected at different contact times and at equilibrium were subsequently diluted, and the metal ion concentration was then evaluated by 1,5-diphenylcarbazide method, in acidic medium, using a UV-Vis spectrophotometer (Hitachi U-2001, λ = 540 nm, Triad Scientific Inc., Manasquan, NJ, USA) [25,48,58,59].
The amount of Cr(VI) ions sorbed by the PSi/ANEX samples, at equilibrium, qe (mg Cr(VI)/g composite), was calculated with Equation (7):
q e = ( C o C e ) V W
where: Co and Ce represent the metal ion concentration (mg/L) before and after the interaction with the composite sorbent, respectively; V—the volume of aqueous phase (L); W–the mass of composite sorbent (g).
Removal efficiency (RE, %), was evaluated using Equation (8):
RE = C o C e C o × 100
where: Co and Ce have the same meaning as in Equation (7).
The sorption kinetics were investigated by adding 10 mL aqueous solution of K2Cr2O7 with a concentration of 100 mg/L in a flask containing about 0.01 g of dried PSi/ANEX composite, and allowed in contact at 23 °C, and 180 rpm for contact times increasing from 5 min to 8 h.
The experimental isotherms for the sorption of Cr(VI) oxyanions onto PSI/ANEX microspheres were determined at 23 °C, the metal concentration increasing from 10 to 1000 mg/L, at the initial pH of 4.0.
Desorption of the metal ions was performed with 0.1 M NaOH, at 23 °C, 6 h, under stirring.
Error analysis—two different error functions were used to determine the validity of the kinetic models and of the isotherm models fitted by the non-linear regression method: coefficient of determination (R2), and the non-linear Chi-square (χ2) test mathematically represented by Equation (9):
χ 2 = Σ ( q e , exp q e , cal ) 2 q e , cal
where qe,exp and qe,cal represent the experimental data (mg/g) and the data calculated by models (mg/g), respectively. If the data from a model are similar to the experimental data, χ2 is a small number, and if they strongly differ, χ2 is a big number.

4. Conclusions

The influence of the cross-linker type used in the synthesis of strong base anion exchangers (ANEX) embedded into the pores of two porous silica, a mesoporous one having Ssp of 95.097 m2/g (PSi1), and a macroporous having Ssp of 23.963 m2/g (PSi2), and of the silica morphology on the sorption capacity of Cr(VI) oxyanions in aqueous solution was deeply investigated in this work. The maximum sorption capacity was found when TEMED was used as cross-linker and PSi1 as support for ANEX, with a value of 311.2 mg Cr(VI)/g composite. Modeling of the sorption process showed that the sorption kinetics was well fitted with PSO kinetic model, and sorption at equilibrium was well described by Sips isotherm. The effect of pH on the sorption capacity and the thermodynamic parameters support ion exchange as the most probable mechanism of sorption. The novel composite sorbents are endowed with fast kinetics, the equilibrium of sorption established in about 60 min, and a remarkable reusability.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/25/5/1249/s1. Figure S1: N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms on the pristine silica (a and b) and on the PSi/ANEX composites (c and d); distribution of pore diameter (BJH) for the pristine silica (e and f) and for PSi1/ANEX2 (g) and PSi/2/ANEX2 (h), Figure S2: FTIR spectra of pristine PSi1 and PSi2, Figure S3: Comparative EDX profiles of the PSi/ANEX composites, Figure S4: TG-DTG curves of the pristine PSi2. Figure S5: Calibration curve for spectrophotometric determination of Cr(VI) in aqueous solutions. Table S1: Water uptake (WU) of the PSi/ANEX composites compared with pristine porous silica, Table S2: Non-linear forms of the kinetic models fitted on the kinetic data, Table S3, Non-linear forms of the isotherm models applied in this work.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.S.D.; methodology, E.S.D. and D.H.; investigation, E.S.D. and D.H.; resources, E.S.D. and D.H.; writing—original draft preparation, E.S.D.; writing—review and editing, E.S.D. and D.H.; funding acquisition, E.S.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

“This research was funded by European Social Fund for Regional Development, Competitiveness Operational Programme Axis 1—Project “Petru Poni Institute of Macromolecular Chemistry-Interdisciplinary Pol for Smart Specialization through Research and Innovation and Technology Transfer in Bio(nano)polymeric Materials and (Eco)Technology”, InoMatPol (ID P_36_570, Contract 142/10.10.2016, cod MySMIS: 107464).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Owlad, M.; Aroua, M.K.; Wan Daud, W.A.; Baroutian, S. Removal of hexavalent chromium-contaminated water and wastewater: A review. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2009, 200, 59–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Pakade, V.; Tavengwa, N.T.; Madikizela, L.M. Recent advances in hexavalent chromium removal from aqueous solutions by adsorptive methods. RSC Adv. 2019, 9, 26142–26164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Baymenov, A.; Berillo, D.A.; Poulopoulos, S.G.; Inglezakis, V.J. A review of cryogels synthesis, characterization and applications on the removal of heavy metals from aqueous solutions. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2020, 276, 102088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Jaspal, D.; Malviya, A. Composites for wastewater purification: A review. Chemosphere 2020, 246, 125788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Dragan, E.S.; Avram, E.; Axente, D.; Marcu, C. Ion-exchange resins. III. Functionalization-morphology correlations in the synthesis of some macroporous, strong basic anion exchangers and uranium-sorption properties evaluation. J. Polym. Sci. Part A Polym. Chem. 2004, 42, 2451–2461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Dragan, E.S.; Dinu, M.V.; Lisa, G.; Trochimczuk, A.W. Study on metal complexes of chelating resins bearing iminodiacetate groups. Eur. Polym. J. 2009, 45, 2119–2130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Guibal, E.; Vincent, T.; Navarro, R. Metal ion biosorption on chitosan for the synthesis of advanced materials. J. Mater. Sci. 2014, 49, 5505–5518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Dragan, E.S.; Cocarta, A.I.; Dinu, M.V. Facile fabrication of chitosan/poly(vinyl amine) composite beads with enhanced sorption of Cu2+. Equilibrium, kinetics, and thermodynamics. Chem. Eng. J. 2014, 255, 659–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhang, L.; Zeng, Y.; Cheng, Z. Removal of heavy metal ions using chitosan and modified chitosan: A review. J. Mol. Liq. 2016, 214, 175–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Dragan, E.S.; Apopei Loghin, D.F. Fabrication and characterization of composite cryobeads based on chitosan and starches-g-PAN as efficient and reusable biosorbents for removal of Cu2+, Ni2+, and Co2+ ions. Int. J. Biolog. Macromol. 2018, 120, 1883–1972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sharma, R.K.; Lalita; Singh, A.P. Sorption of Pb(II), Cu(II), Fe(II) and Cr(VI) metal ions onto cross-linked graft copolymers of chitosan with binary vinyl monomer mixtures. React. Funct. Polym. 2017, 121, 32–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Dragan, E.S.; Dinu, M.V. Advances in porous chitosan-based composite hydrogels, Synthesis and applications. React. Funct. Polym. 2020, 146, 104372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zheng, S.; Jiang, W.; Rashid, M.; Cai, Y.; Dionysiou, D.D.; O’Shea, K.E. Selective reduction of Cr(VI) in chromium, copper and arsenic (CCA) mixed waste streams using UV/TiO2 photocatalysis. Molecules 2015, 20, 2622–2635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Zheng, Y.; Yu, Z.; Lin, F.; Guo, F.; Alamry, K.A.; Taib, L.A.; Asiri, A.M.; Wang, X. Sulfur-doped carbon nitride polymers for photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutant and reduction of Cr(VI). Molecules 2017, 22, 572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Gherasim, C.V.; Bourceanu, G. Removal of chromium (VI) from aqueous solutions using a polyvinyl-chloride inclusion membrane: Experimental study and modeling. Chem. Eng. J. 2013, 220, 24–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Alguacil, F.J. Facilitated Chromium(VI) transport across an ionic liquid membrane impregnated with Cyphos IL102. Molecules 2019, 24, 2437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Sánchez, J.; Espinosa, C.; Pooch, F.; Tenhu, H.; Pizarro, G.C.; Oyarzún, D.P. Poly(N,N-dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate) for removing chromium (VI) through polymer-enhanced ultrafiltration technique. React. Funct. Polym. 2018, 127, 67–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Chen, X.; Zhang, W.; Luo, X.; Zhao, F.; Li, Y.; Li, R.; Li, Z. Efficient removal and environmentally benign detoxification of Cr(VI) in aqueous solutions by Zr(IV) cross-linking chitosan magnetic microspheres. Chemosphere 2017, 185, 991–1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhang, Z.; Gao, T.; Si, S.; Liu, Q.; Wu, Y.; Zhou, G. One-pot preparation of P(TA-TEPA)-PAM-RGO ternary composite for high efficient Cr(VI) removal from aqueous solution. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 343, 207–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Korak, J.A.; Huggins, R.; Arias-Paic, M. Regeneration of pilot-scale ion exchange columns for hexavalent chromium removal. Water Res. 2017, 118, 141–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Pehlivan, E.; Cetin, S. Sorption of Cr(VI) ions on two Lewatit-anion exchange resins and their quantitative determination using UV–visible spectrophotometer. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 163, 448–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Zang, Y.; Yue, Q.; Kan, Y.; Zhang, L.; Gao, B. Research on adsorption of Cr(VI) by Poly-epichlorohydrin-dimethylamine (EPIDMA) modified weakly basic anion exchange resin D301. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Safety 2018, 161, 467–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Markovic, B.M.; Stefanovic, I.S.; Hercigonja, R.V.; Pergal, M.V.; Markovic, J.P.; Onjia, A.E.; Nastasovic, A.B. Novel hexamethylene diamine-functionalized macroporous copolymer for chromium removal from aqueous solutions. Polym. Int. 2017, 66, 679–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Dragan, E.S.; Humelnicu, D.; Dinu, M.V.; Olariu, R. Kinetics, equilibrium modeling, and thermodynamics on removal of Cr(VI) ions from aqueous solution using novel composites with strong base anion exchanger microspheres embedded into chitosan/poly(vinyl amine) cryogels. Chem. Eng. J. 2017, 330, 675–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Dragan, E.S.; Humelnicu, D.; Dinu, M.V. Design of porous strong base anion exchangers bearing N,N-dialkyl 2-hydroxyethyl ammonium groups with enhanced retention of Cr(VI) ions from aqueous solution. React. Funct. Polym. 2018, 124, 55–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Liu, L.; Yang, Z.; Zhao, L.; Liu, J.; Liu, X.; Xue, J.; Tang, A. Removal performance and mechanism of poly(N1,N1,N3,N3-tetraallylpropane-1,3-diaminium chloride) toward Cr(VI). Environ. Technol. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Shi, T.; Wang, Z.; Liu, Y.; Jia, S.; Changming, D. Removal of hexavalent chromium from aqueous solutions by D301, D314 and D354 anion-exchange resins. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 161, 900–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Cheng, Q.; Li, C.; Xu, L.; Li, J.; Zhai, M. Adsorption of Cr(VI) ions using the amphiphilic gels based on 2-(dimethylamino)ethyl methacrylate modified with 1-bromoalkanes. Chem. Eng. J. 2011, 173, 42–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhang, Y.; Lin, S.; Qiao, J.; Kołodyńska, D.; Ju, Y.; Zhang, M.; Cai, M.; Deng, D.; Dionysiou, D.D. Malic acid-enhanced chitosan hydrogel beads (mCHBs) for the removal of Cr(VI) and Cu(II) from aqueous solution. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 353, 225–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wang, X.; Wu, C.; Tian, L.; Li, G.; Zhang, X.; Lei, F.; Qu, J.; Liu, P. Cationic polymer chain tethered on the pore-wall of 3-D ordered macroporous resin for the removal of hexavalent chromium from aqueous solution. React. Funct. Polym. 2015, 95, 55–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Li, K.; Li, P.; Cai, J.; Xiao, S.; Yang, H.; Li, A. Efficient adsorption of both methyl orange and chromium from their aqueous mixtures using a quaternary ammonium salt modified chitosan magnetic composite adsorbent. Chemosphere 2016, 154, 310–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Khalil, T.E.; Elhusseiny, A.F.; El-dissouky, A.; Ibrahim, N.M. Functionalized chitosan nanocomposites for removal of toxic Cr (VI) from aqueous solution. React. Funct. Polym. 2020, 146, 104407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Toli, A.; Chalastara, K.; Mystrioti, C.; Xenidis, A.; Papassiopi, N. Incorporation of zero valent iron nanoparticles in the matrix of cationic resin beads for the remediation of Cr(VI) contaminated waters. Environ. Pollut. 2016, 214, 419–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Campos, A.F.C.; de Oliveira, H.A.L.; da Silva, F.N.; da Silva, F.G.; Coppola, P.; Aquino, R.; Mezzi, A.; Depeyrot, J. Core-shell bimagnetic nanoadsorbents for hexavalent chromium removal from aqueous solutions. J. Hazard. Mater. 2019, 362, 82–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Ali, M.E.A. Synthesis and adsorption properties of chitosan-CDTA-GO nanocomposite for removal of hexavalent chromium from aqueous solutions. Arabian J. Chem. 2018, 11, 1107–1116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Hokkanen, S.; Bhatnagar, A.; Repo, E.; Lou, S.; Sillanpää, M. Calcium hydroxyapatite microfibrillated cellulose composite as a potential sorbent for the removal of Cr(VI) from aqueous solution. Chem. Eng. J. 2016, 283, 445–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Wang, J.; Wang, X.; Zhao, G.; Song, G.; Chen, D.; Chen, H.; Xie, J.; Hayat, T.; Alsaedi, A.; Wang, X. Polyvinylpyrrolidone and polyacrylamide intercalated molybdenum disulfide as adsorbents for enhanced removal of chromium(VI) from aqueous solutions. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 334, 569–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Geng, J.; Yin, Y.; Liang, Q.; Zhu, Z.; Luo, H. Polyethyleneimine cross-linked graphene oxide for removing hazardous hexavalent chromium: Adsorption performance and mechanism. Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 361, 1497–1510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Dinker, M.K.; Kulkarni, P.S. Recent advances in silica-based materials for the removal of hexavalent chromium: A review. J. Chem. Eng. Data 2015, 60, 2521–2540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Liu, S.; Mishra, S.B.; Zhang, Y.; Qi, L. Uptake of hexavalent chromium in electroplating wastewater by hydrothermally treated and functionalized sand and its sustainable reutilization for glass production. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2017, 5, 1509–1516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Dinari, M.; Soltani, R.; Mohammadnezhad, G. Kinetics and thermodynamic study on novel modified-mesoporous silica MCM-41/polymer matrix nanocomposites: Effective adsorbents for trace CrVI removal. J. Chem. Eng. Data 2017, 62, 2316–2329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Buszewski, B.; Jackowska, M.; Bocian, S.; Kosobucki, P.; Gawdzik, B. Functionalized polymeric stationary phases for ion chromatography. J. Sep. Sci. 2011, 34, 601–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. El-Debs, R.; Marechal, A.; Dugas, V.; Demesmay, C. Photopolymerization of acrylamide as a new functionalization way of silica monoliths for hydrophilic interaction chromatography and coated silica capillaries for capillary electrophoresis. J. Chromatogr. A 2014, 1326, 89–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Zhang, W.; Yu, S.; Zhang, S.; Zhou, J.; Ning, S.; Wang, X.; Wei, Y. Separation of scandium from the other rare earth elements with a novel macro-porous silica-polymer based adsorbent HDEPAP/SiO2-P. Hydrometallurgy 2019, 185, 117–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Wang, X.; Ye, Z.; Chen, L.; Zheng, Q.; Liu, C.; Ning, S.; Khayambashi, A.; Wei, Y. Microporous silica-supported cation exchanger with superior dimensional stability and outstanding exchange kinetics, and its application in element removal and enrichment. React. Funct. Polym. 2019, 142, 87–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Dragan, E.S.; Bucatariu, F. Design and Characterization of Anionic Hydrogels Confined in Daisogel Silica Composites Microspheres and Their Application in Sustained Release of Proteins. Colloids Surf. A 2016, 489, 46–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Dragan, E.S.; Dinu, M.V. Spectacular selectivity in the capture of methyl orange by composite anion exchangers with the organic part hosted by DAISOGEL microspheres. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 20499–20511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Gandhi, M.R.; Viswanathan, N.; Meenakshi, S. Synthetic and characterization of a few amino-functionalized copolymeric resins and their environmental applications. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2012, 51, 5677–5684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Bhaumik, M.; Maity, A.; Srinivasu, V.V.; Onyango, M.S. Removal of hexavalent chromium from aqueous solution using polypyrrole-polyaniline nanofibers. Chem. Eng. J. 2012, 181–182, 323–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Hu, X.; Wang, J.; Liu, Y.; Li, X.; Zeng, G.; Bao, Z.; Zeng, X.; Chen, A.; Long, F. Adsorption of chromium (VI) by ethylenediamine-modified cross-linked magnetic chitosan resin: Isotherms, kinetics and thermodynamics. J. Hazard. Mater. 2011, 185, 306–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Tran, H.N.; You, S.-J.; Hosseini-Bandegharaei, A.; Chao, H. Mistakes and inconsistencies regarding adsorption of contaminants from aqueous solutions: A critical review. Water Res. 2017, 120, 88–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Kumar, K.V. Comments on “Adsorption of acid dye onto organobentonite”. J. Hazard. Mater. 2006, B137, 638–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Lima, E.C.; Adebayo, M.A.; Machado, F.M. Kinetic and equilibrium models of adsorption. In Carbon Nanomaterials as Adsorbents for Environmental and Biological Applications; Bergmann, C.P., Machado, F.M., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Ma, J.; Yu, F.; Zhou, L.; Jin, L.; Yang, M.; Luan, J.; Tang, Y.; Fan, H.; Yuan, Z.J.; Chen, J. Enhanced Adsorptive Removal of Methyl Orange and Methylene Blue from Aqueous Solution by Alkali-Activated Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2012, 4, 5749–5760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Wang, J.; Pan, K.; He, Q.; Cao, B. Polyacrylonitrile/polypyrrole core/shell nanofiber mat for the removal of hexavalent chromium from aqueous solution. J. Hazard. Mater. 2013, 244–245, 121–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Tran, H.N.; You, S.; Chao, H. Thermodynamic parameters of cadmium adsorption onto orange peel calculated from various methods: A comparison study. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2016, 4, 2671–2682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Tran, H.N.; Tomul, F.; Hoang Nguyen, H.T.; Nguyen, D.T.; Lima, E.C.; Le, G.T.; Chang, C.T.; Masindi, V.; Woo, S.H. Innovative spherical biochar for pharmaceutical removal from water: Insight into adsorption mechanism. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Qiu, B.; Guo, J.; Zhang, X.; Sun, D.; Gu, H.; Wang, Q.; Wang, H.; Wang, X.; Zhang, X.; Weeks, B.L.; et al. Polyethylenimine facilitated ethyl cellulose for hexavalent chromium removal with a wide pH range. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 19816–19824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Duranoglu, D.; Trochimczuk, A.W.; Beker, U. Kinetics and thermodynamics of hexavalent chromium adsorption onto activated carbon derived from acrylonitrile-divinylbenzene copolymer. Chem. Eng. J. 2012, 187, 193–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Sample Availability: Samples of the compounds PSi1/ANEX1, PSi1/ANEX2 and PSi2/ANEX2 are available from the authors.
Scheme 1. Synthesis of porous silica (PSi)/anion exchangers (ANEX) composite by impregnation first of poly(vinylbenzyl chloride) (PVBC) into PSi pores followed by cross-linking with TEMED, and then generation of the quaternary ammonium salt groups by the reaction of the free -CH2Cl groups with N,N-diethyl 2-hydroxyethyl amine (DEHEA); RT-room temperature.
Scheme 1. Synthesis of porous silica (PSi)/anion exchangers (ANEX) composite by impregnation first of poly(vinylbenzyl chloride) (PVBC) into PSi pores followed by cross-linking with TEMED, and then generation of the quaternary ammonium salt groups by the reaction of the free -CH2Cl groups with N,N-diethyl 2-hydroxyethyl amine (DEHEA); RT-room temperature.
Molecules 25 01249 sch001
Figure 1. FTIR spectra of the PSi/ANEX composites before loading with Cr(VI) and of the composite PSi1/ANEX1 after loading with Cr(VI).
Figure 1. FTIR spectra of the PSi/ANEX composites before loading with Cr(VI) and of the composite PSi1/ANEX1 after loading with Cr(VI).
Molecules 25 01249 g001
Figure 2. TG (a) and DTG (b) curves of the PSi/ANEX composite sorbents.
Figure 2. TG (a) and DTG (b) curves of the PSi/ANEX composite sorbents.
Molecules 25 01249 g002
Figure 3. SEM images of the exterior (mag 1000×), and the interior morphology (mag. 4000×) of the PSi/ANEX composites before loading with Cr(VI) of the PSi1/ANEX1 (a1 and a2), PSi1/ANEX2 (b1 and b2), PSi2/ANEX2 (c1 and c2) composites, and after loading with Cr(VI) of PSi1/ANEX1 (a3 and a4), PSi1/ANEX2 (b3 and b4), and PSi2/ANEX2 (c3 and c4).
Figure 3. SEM images of the exterior (mag 1000×), and the interior morphology (mag. 4000×) of the PSi/ANEX composites before loading with Cr(VI) of the PSi1/ANEX1 (a1 and a2), PSi1/ANEX2 (b1 and b2), PSi2/ANEX2 (c1 and c2) composites, and after loading with Cr(VI) of PSi1/ANEX1 (a3 and a4), PSi1/ANEX2 (b3 and b4), and PSi2/ANEX2 (c3 and c4).
Molecules 25 01249 g003
Figure 4. Potentiometric titrations of bare silica microspheres (PSi1 and PSi2) and of the PSi/ANEX composites. pHPZC for PSi1/ANEX1 has been measured both before (empty triangle) and after loading with Cr(VI) (filled triangle).
Figure 4. Potentiometric titrations of bare silica microspheres (PSi1 and PSi2) and of the PSi/ANEX composites. pHPZC for PSi1/ANEX1 has been measured both before (empty triangle) and after loading with Cr(VI) (filled triangle).
Molecules 25 01249 g004
Figure 5. Effect of pH on the sorption capacity (qe) of the SiO2/ANEX composite sorbents for Cr(VI) oxyanions: sorbent dose 1 g/L; temp. 23 °C; contact time 6 h; shaking rate 180 r.p.m.
Figure 5. Effect of pH on the sorption capacity (qe) of the SiO2/ANEX composite sorbents for Cr(VI) oxyanions: sorbent dose 1 g/L; temp. 23 °C; contact time 6 h; shaking rate 180 r.p.m.
Molecules 25 01249 g005
Figure 6. (a) Sorption kinetics of Cr(VI) onto PSi/ANEX composite microspheres fitted with three kinetic models: (b) Fitting IPD model on the sorption kinetics data of Cr(VI) onto the PSi/ANEX composites: sorbent dose 1 g/L; temp. 23 °C; initial pH 4.0; initial concentration of Cr(VI) 100 mg/L.
Figure 6. (a) Sorption kinetics of Cr(VI) onto PSi/ANEX composite microspheres fitted with three kinetic models: (b) Fitting IPD model on the sorption kinetics data of Cr(VI) onto the PSi/ANEX composites: sorbent dose 1 g/L; temp. 23 °C; initial pH 4.0; initial concentration of Cr(VI) 100 mg/L.
Molecules 25 01249 g006
Figure 7. Sorption isotherms of Cr(VI) onto PSi.1/ANEX1 (a), PSi.1/ANEX2 (b), PSi.2/ANEX2 (c), and removal efficiency as a function of number of sorption/desorption cycles (d); sorption conditions: sorbent dose 1 g/L, pH 4, temperature 23 °C, contact time 6 h; desorption conditions: 0.1 M NaOH, 6 h, pH 4.
Figure 7. Sorption isotherms of Cr(VI) onto PSi.1/ANEX1 (a), PSi.1/ANEX2 (b), PSi.2/ANEX2 (c), and removal efficiency as a function of number of sorption/desorption cycles (d); sorption conditions: sorbent dose 1 g/L, pH 4, temperature 23 °C, contact time 6 h; desorption conditions: 0.1 M NaOH, 6 h, pH 4.
Molecules 25 01249 g007
Figure 8. Plot of ln Kc versus 1/T for the sorption of Cr(VI) ions onto the porous silica/ANEX composite sorbents; sorption conditions: sorbent dose 1 g/L, pH 4, Cin = 100 mg/L, contact time 6 h.
Figure 8. Plot of ln Kc versus 1/T for the sorption of Cr(VI) ions onto the porous silica/ANEX composite sorbents; sorption conditions: sorbent dose 1 g/L, pH 4, Cin = 100 mg/L, contact time 6 h.
Molecules 25 01249 g008
Table 1. Kinetic parameters (msorbent = 10 mg, Vsol = 10 mL, Cin = 100 mg/L, temp. 23 °C, pH 4).
Table 1. Kinetic parameters (msorbent = 10 mg, Vsol = 10 mL, Cin = 100 mg/L, temp. 23 °C, pH 4).
Kinetic ModelKinetic ParametersPSi.1/ANEX1PSi.1/ANEX2PSi.2/ANEX2
qe, exp.92.3180.9671.87
PFOqe, cal. (mg/g)88.978.0869.97
k1 (min−1)0.05730.05530.0363
R20.95310.9550.976
χ237.3727.8213.07
PSOqe calc. (mg/g)95.2683.7576.75
k2 (g/mg·min)9.494 × 10−40.0016.74 × 10−4
R20.98950.98950.9925
χ28.40.464.1
Elovichα (mg/g·min)115.2988.1917.76
β (g/mg)0.08490.0950.083
R20.97580.97380.9631
χ219.2816.1720.09
IPD modelkid.1, mg·g−1·min−0.55.2744.8885.63
C1, mg·g−135.4229.20512.36
R120.98510.99280.9891
Table 2. Isotherm model parameters of Langmuir, Freundlich, Sips, Dubinin-Radushkevich (D-R), and Temkin models for the sorption of Cr(VI) onto the porous silica/ANEX composite sorbents, at 23 °C.
Table 2. Isotherm model parameters of Langmuir, Freundlich, Sips, Dubinin-Radushkevich (D-R), and Temkin models for the sorption of Cr(VI) onto the porous silica/ANEX composite sorbents, at 23 °C.
IsothermIsotherm ParametersPSi.1/ANEX1PSi.1/ANEX2PSi.2/ANEX2
Langmuirqm, mg/g311.2311.78299.19
KL, L/mg0.016160.01150.00861
RL0.0062–0.7120.0086–0.7760.0115–0.2152
R20.99790.97040.9532
χ222304417
FreundlichKF,mg1−1/n·L1/n·g−132.5424.6618.01
1/n0.34760.38160.4153
R20.92690.86590.8496
χ279113781341
Sipsqm, mg/g301.55265.19242.19
aS0.012439.71 × 10−42.679 × 10−4
1/n1.0861.71.937
R20.99850.99790.9956
χ216.421.438
D-RqDR. mg/g249.4247.29230.1
β, mol2/kJ21.348 × 10−42.51 × 10−43.95 × 10−4
E, kJ/mol60.944.6335.58
R20.89100.96330.9747
χ21171377226
TemkinaT, L/mg0.2120.10570.0709
bT, J/mol40.5235.6935.15
R20.98450.96040.9547
χ2168407403
Table 3. Comparison of the maximum sorption capacity (Langmuir model) of the porous silica/ANEX composite sorbents for Cr(VI) removal with other sorbents recently reported in literature.
Table 3. Comparison of the maximum sorption capacity (Langmuir model) of the porous silica/ANEX composite sorbents for Cr(VI) removal with other sorbents recently reported in literature.
Sorbent [ref]Initial pHT, °CSorbent Dose, g/Lqm, mg/g
Weakly basic anion exchange resin D301 modified with poly-epichlorohydrin-dimethylamine (EPIDMA) [22]2250.6194
Macroporous copolymers of poly(glycidyl methacrylate-co-ethyleneglycol dimethacrylate functionalized with hexamethylene diamine (GMA-60 HD) [23]22510156
Composites with strong base anion exchangers embedded into chitosan/poly(vinyl amine) cryogels [24]5.5251.25295.92
Macroporous styrene-divinylbenzene matrix, functional group—+N(CH2CH3)2CH2CH2OH [25]5.5251313.81
poly(N1,N1,N3,N3-tetraallylpropane-1,3-diaminium chloride) [26]3–7201273.17
Macroporous anion exchange resin D301 [27]3271.7151.52
Gels of poly[2-(dimethylamino)ethyl methacrylate] with bromethan [28]4.5251210.5
Chitosan modified with cinnamaldehyde nanocomposites [32]225361.35
Hydroxyapatite microfibrillated cellulose composite [35]5250.8114.8
Polyvinylpyrrolidone intercalated molybdenum disulfide [36]5250.5142.2
Mesoporous silica MCM-41/PMMA [41]225 20
Polypyrrole-polyaniline nanofibers [49]2251227
Polyacrylonitrile/polypyrole core/shell nanofiber mat [55]2253.3361.8
Porous silica PSi.1/ANEX1 composite [this study]4231311.8
Table 4. Thermodynamic parameters for the sorption of Cr(VI) oxyanions onto the porous silica/ANEX composite sorbents.
Table 4. Thermodynamic parameters for the sorption of Cr(VI) oxyanions onto the porous silica/ANEX composite sorbents.
SorbentΔH, kJ/molΔS, kJ/mol.KΔG, kJ/mol
298 K303 K308 K313 K318 K
PSi.1/ANEX133.40.214−30.37−31.44−32.51−33.58−34.65
PSi.1/ANEX233.350.209−28.93−29.98−31.02−32.07−33.11
PSi.2/ANEX232.960.205−28.13−29.16−29.79−31.21−32.23

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dragan, E.S.; Humelnicu, D. Contribution of Cross-Linker and Silica Morphology on Cr(VI) Sorption Performances of Organic Anion Exchangers Embedded into Silica Pores. Molecules 2020, 25, 1249. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25051249

AMA Style

Dragan ES, Humelnicu D. Contribution of Cross-Linker and Silica Morphology on Cr(VI) Sorption Performances of Organic Anion Exchangers Embedded into Silica Pores. Molecules. 2020; 25(5):1249. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25051249

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dragan, Ecaterina Stela, and Doina Humelnicu. 2020. "Contribution of Cross-Linker and Silica Morphology on Cr(VI) Sorption Performances of Organic Anion Exchangers Embedded into Silica Pores" Molecules 25, no. 5: 1249. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25051249

APA Style

Dragan, E. S., & Humelnicu, D. (2020). Contribution of Cross-Linker and Silica Morphology on Cr(VI) Sorption Performances of Organic Anion Exchangers Embedded into Silica Pores. Molecules, 25(5), 1249. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25051249

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop