Next Article in Journal
Compositional Changes in Grapes and Leaves as a Consequence of Smoke Exposure of Vineyards from Multiple Bushfires across a Ripening Season
Next Article in Special Issue
Selective Inhibitors of the Inducible Nitric Oxide Synthase as Modulators of Cell Responses in LPS-Stimulated Human Monocytes
Previous Article in Journal
Solubility Determination, Hansen Solubility Parameters and Thermodynamic Evaluation of Thymoquinone in (Isopropanol + Water) Compositions
Previous Article in Special Issue
Redox and Antioxidant Modulation of Circadian Rhythms: Effects of Nitroxyl, N-Acetylcysteine and Glutathione
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Nitric Oxide (NO) Donor Sodium Nitroprusside (SNP) and Its Potential for the Schizophrenia Therapy: Lights and Shadows

Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Thessaly, Biopolis, Panepistimiou 3, 415-00 Larissa, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2021, 26(11), 3196; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26113196
Submission received: 26 April 2021 / Revised: 24 May 2021 / Accepted: 25 May 2021 / Published: 26 May 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nitric Oxide Modulators in Health and Disease)

Abstract

:
Schizophrenia is a severe psychiatric disorder affecting up to 1% of the worldwide population. Available therapy presents different limits comprising lack of efficiency in attenuating negative symptoms and cognitive deficits, typical features of schizophrenia and severe side effects. There is pressing requirement, therefore, to develop novel neuroleptics with higher efficacy and safety. Nitric oxide (NO), an intra- and inter-cellular messenger in the brain, appears to be implicated in the pathogenesis of schizophrenia. In particular, underproduction of this gaseous molecule is associated to this mental disease. The latter suggests that increment of nitrergic activity might be of utility for the medication of schizophrenia. Based on the above, molecules able to enhance NO production, as are NO donors, might represent a class of compounds candidates. Sodium nitroprusside (SNP) is a NO donor and is proposed as a promising novel compound for the treatment of schizophrenia. In the present review, we intended to critically assess advances in research of SNP for the therapy of schizophrenia and discuss its potential superiority over currently used neuroleptics.

1. Schizophrenia

Schizophrenia is a severe devastating mental disease. Epidemiological findings indicate that up to 1% of the people around the world experience this psychiatric disorder. Schizophrenia disrupts social, occupational and individual functioning and compromizes the quality of life of patients. This illness commonly is attested in former youth or early maturity.
Schizophrenia patients exhibit grave psychotic symptoms, which can be categorized into three distinct groups: positive symptoms, negative symptoms and cognitive deficits. Positive symptoms are characterized by the presence of exaggerated behaviors which do not appear in healthy people [e.g., hallucinations (auditory and visual), delusions, thought disorder, hyperactivity, disorganized speech, bizarre behaviors]. By contrast, negative symptoms characterize absent or decreased healthy behavior. Typical domains of negative symptoms are blunted affect (flat expressions), asociality (social withdrawal), anhedonia (inability to feel pleasure), alogia (poverty of speech) and avolition (lack of motivation). Cognitive deficits (e.g., in attention, executive functioning and memory) are the earliest and most prominent symptoms of the disease [1].
Schizophrenia’s causes and pathophysiology still remain unclear. Nonetheless, it is largely recognized as a complex neurodevelopmental disorder in which genetic and environmental factors have a critical impact [2,3]. In particular, it has been reported that monozygotic siblings of patients suffering from schizophrenia have a 50–80% risk of developing the disease. Moreover, insufficient maturation of the brain and anomalous synaptic connections between different brain regions are also noticed [4]. Further, several lines of evidence propose the involvement of oxidative stress in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia [5].
That impaired functioning of various neurotransmitters such as dopamine (DA), glutamate, acetylcholine, serotonin and GABA is related with the onset of schizophrenia is well-documented [6]. Specifically, positive symptoms of schizophrenia are linked to increased activity of dopaminergic (DAergic) neurotransmission in the striatum, whereas negative symptoms and cognitive disturbances are associated with decreased DAergic activity in the prefrontal cortex (PFC) [7].
Glutamate system hypoactivity has also been indicated in schizophrenia. In particular, disturbed glutamatergic transmission elicits secondary DAergic dysfunction in the striatum and PFC. In this context, it has been demonstrated that pharmacological blockade of NMDA receptor causes negative symptoms and cognitive impairments that were not relieved by currently used antipsychotics [7]. GABAergic transmission too seems to be seriously compromised in schizophrenia [8]. Since GABAergic system exerts an inhibitory action on DAergic transmission in the PFC, improper functioning of GABA interneurons results in the appearance of some of the clinical symptoms observed in schizophrenia patients [9].
The outcome of clinical studies suggests that conventional neuroleptics (both typical and atypical) are able to relief positive symptoms but are ineffective in alleviating negative symptoms and cognitive deficits of schizophrenics. Treatment with neuroleptics however, is correlated with important negative consequences which compromize their effectiveness. Specifically, motor side effects (Parkinsonism) are associated with application of traditional (typical) antipsychotics (e.g., chlorpromazine, haloperidol). By contrast, administration of atypical antipsychotics (e.g., clozapine, olanzapine, risperidone) do not induces Parkinsonism but causes increase of body weight. Further 30% of schizophrenics is resistant to the above described therapy. As a whole, these findings clearly indicate that there is a pressing requirement to discover novel molecules which could provide relief of negative symptoms and cognitive deficits common features of schizophrenics [10,11].
Among the different alternative approaches for the therapy of schizophrenia, the involvement of modulators of the gas nitric oxide (NO) as potential anti-schizophrenia agents has lately been suggested. In the current analysis, we intend to assess with critical feeling the potential beneficial action of the NO donor sodium nitroprusside (SNP) for the treatment of schizophrenia.

2. Nitric oxide (NO)

NO is a soluble, instable, highly diffusible gas with very short life (4 s). Consistent experimental evidence suggests that NO is an important intra- and inter-cellular messenger in the brain [12]. NO is formed by the conversion of L-arginine to L-citrulline by a calcium (Ca2+)/calmoduline dependent enzyme NO synthase (NOS) [12]. To this end, the activation of the N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor is of critical value [13]. The principal target of the NO effects is thought to be soluble guanylyl cyclase (sGC). Its activation produces cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) which in turn, activates a cGMP-dependent protein kinase (PKG) which phosphorylates different proteins [14]. NO action is terminated by the enzyme phosphodiesterase which neutralizes cGMP [15].
Further, it has been reported that NO can affect the activities, expression levels and cellular localization of various epigenetic modulatory enzymes suggesting therefore, that NO may act as an endogenous epigenetic regulator of gene expression and cell phenotype. In particular, NO was found able to effect crucial aspects of epigenetic regulation that comprise histone posttranslational modifications, DNA methylation and microRNA levels [16,17].
NO seems to be implicated in a plethora of physiological processes comprising cellular immunity [18], vascular tone [19] and neurotransmission [12]. With regard the central nervous system, it is well documented that NO plays a crucial role in synaptic plasticity, learning and memory [20,21] and seems to exert a modulatory action on the release of various neurotransmitters as are acetylcholine, GABA, glutamate, DA and serotonin [20,22,23,24]. Additionally, NO enhances neuronal survival and differentiation and displays enduring effects across modulation of transcriptional factors and action on gene expression [25]. What emerges from the literature is that low concentrations of NO might confer neuroprotection and regulate physiological signaling such as neurotransmission or vasorelaxation whereas at high levels promote immune/inflammatory effects which are neurotoxic [25].

3. NO and Schizophrenia

Several lines of evidence propose the involvement of NO in schizophrenia. In spite of it, its exact role in this psychiatric disorder is not yet fully clarified. In this context, it has been reported that either exaggerated or low levels of NO are associated with this psychiatric disorder although the direction the aberrations is still unclear [26,27]. In the current analysis we intended to evaluate the relationship between underproduction of NO and schizophrenia.
The outcome of a series of genetic studies corroborate a role of polymorphisms in the nNOS gene as a risk factor for schizophrenia [28]. Histochemical findings have revealed an irregular distribution of nitrergic neurons in the frontal and temporal lobes of schizophrenia patients [29]. Post-mortem studies evidenced a reduction in nitrergic neurons in striatum [30] and in hypothalamic neurons expressing NOS [31]. Moreover, Ca2+-dependent NOS activity was found to be decreased in the post-mortem prefrontal cortices of schizophrenics [32].
Biochemical results also endorse the implication of NO in schizophrenia. In particular, low quantities of NO metabolites were noticed in plasma [33,34,35] and serum of first-episode, drug-naïve schizophrenics [36,37,38]. Bearing in mind that cognitive deficits is a typical feature of schizophrenics, lowering NO levels might indeed has severe repercussions for patients suffering from schizophrenia [27]. Moreover, this decrement of NO metabolites concentrations in biological fluids of schizophrenics has also been linked with the pathophysiology of negative symptoms of this disease [35]. Further, it should be pointed out that dislocated NOS-containing gray and white matter cortical [29,39] and possibly, hippocampal [40] interneurons support a nearly neurodevelopmental component to schizophrenia [39,41].
Overall, the above reported results denote that underproduction of NO might be critical and promote the development of schizophrenia. Normalizing NO levels by incrementing NO production in the brain of patients, would thus be beneficial in this context. In agreement with the above, compounds which enhance NO production as are NO donors might be potential novel candidates for the treatment of schizophrenia.

4. Sodium Nitroprusside (SNP)

SNP is a NO donor and a member of the prussides family (iron nitrosyls). It consists of an iron core surrounded by five cyanide ion molecules and one molecule of the nitrosonium ion (NO+) [42]. SNP’s chemical structure is illustrated in Figure 1.
SNP is a potent releaser of NO, exerts its action at the vascular system by augmented vascular capacitance and coronary vasodilatation. For these interesting properties SNP is largely utilized as medication for the treatment of hypertension and heart failure [43]. Additionally, in a series of reports SNP’s strong antioxidant profile has been emerged. Thus, its usefulness as a potential neuroprotective agent for brain stroke and neurodegenerative diseases such as Parkinson or Alzheimer disease actually is under evaluation [44].

5. SNP and Schizophrenia

5.1. Preclinical Studies

Preclinical literature concerning the effects of SNP in schizophrenia is outlined in Table 1. Intraperitoneal (i.p.) administration of SNP (0.3–3 mg/kg) did not affect rats’ attentional skills evaluated in the prepulse inhibition (PPI) test [45]. By contrast, acute application of SNP (2–6 mg/kg, i.p.) attenuated hyperactivity, stereotypies and c-fos expression, which is a metabolic marker of neuronal activation, in cortical areas caused by the NMDA receptor antagonist phencyclidine (PCP) (5 mg/kg, i.p.) in the rat [46]. A subsequent study, revealed that SNP given acutely (0.3–1 mg/kg, i.p.), reversed recognition memory deficits induced by the D1/D2 DAergic receptor agonist apomorphine (1 mg/kg, i.p.) evidenced in the object recognition task (ORT) in the rat [47]. Issy and colleagues [48] reported that a single injection of SNP (2.5 mg/kg, i.p.) reduced attentional impairments produced by the enhancer of DA release amphetamine (10 mg/kg, i.p.) in the PPI procedure in mice.
Additionally, in line with previous findings [46] pretreatment with SNP (4 mg/kg, i.p.) was efficient in counteracting hyperlocomotion and bizarre behaviour (stereotypies) caused by another NMDA receptor antagonist (ketamine, 25 mg/kg, i.p.) in mice [49]. Further, subsequent results of the same group of researchers showed that posttreatment with SNP (5 mg/kg, i.p.) reduced ketamine (30 mg/kg, i.p.)-induced hypermotility in the rat. It is important to emphasize, however, that this dose of SNP (5 mg/kg) caused hypomotility by itself [50]. It is difficult, therefore, to exclude whether or not sedation might has confounded the effects of SNP on ketamine-induced hyperactivity [50].
ORT and social interaction test (SIT) were used to assess in rats the ability of SNP (0.3–1 mg/kg, i.p.) to attenuate the detrimental action of ketamine on recognition memory and social withdrawal, the latter being a model of negative symptoms of schizophrenia. Acute administration of SNP (0.3–1 mg/kg) counteracted recognition memory deficits induced by ketamine (3 mg/kg, i.p.). Interestingly, SNP (1 mg/kg, i.p.) attenuated the social isolation produced by sub-chronic treatment with ketamine (8 mg/kg, i.p.) [51].
In a rat model mimicking working memory deficits [the trial-unique-delayed nonmatching to location test (TUNLT)] SNP (2–5 mg/kg, i.p.) failed to reduce disruption of working memory caused by treatment with the NMDA receptor antagonist MK-801 (0.05–0.1 mg/kg, i.p.). In spite of it, SNP (2 mg/kg, i.p.) exerted some minor beneficial effects on task accuracy and reduced perseverative behaviour [52].
In a non-pharmacological animal model of schizophrenia, the spontaneously hypertensive (SHR) rat, the effects of administration of SNP were tested using behavioural models resembling positive symptoms, cognitive impairments and negative symptoms of schizophrenia. SNP given chronically (30 days, 0.5–2.5 mg/kg, i.p.) but not acutely (0.5–5 mg/kg, i.p.) reduced hyperactivity and social isolation. Moreover, SNP, at the same dose range, attenuated contextual fear conditioning deficits [53].
In a subsequent study, the potential synergistic effects of administration of sub-threshold doses SNP and the atypical neuroleptic clozapine were tested on schizophrenia-like behaviour induced by MK-801 and amphetamine in mice. Combination of inactive doses of SNP (1 mg/kg, i.p.) and clozapine (1 mg/kg, i.p.) reduced attentional deficits induced by amphetamine (1 mg/kg, i.p.) but not MK-801 (0.5 mg/kg, i.p.) in the PPI test. Interestingly, SNP (2.5–4 mg/kg, i.p.) failed to attenuate the disruption of mice performance caused by MK-801 (0.5 mg/kg, i.p.) in the PPI test. It has also been evidenced that SNP attenuated the amphetamine-induced increase of cAMP in the striatum [54].
In addition, SNP (2.5 mg/kg, i.p., acutely) reduced hypermotility caused by MK-801 (0.4 mg/kg, i.p., acutely) but did not reverse attentional and memory deficits induced by the same dose of MK-801 in rats [55]. It cannot be ruled out, however, that this apparent failure of SNP to counteract behavioural impairments caused by MK-801 might resides to the especially high dose of MK-801 utilized in the present study (0.4 mg/kg) respect to what is commonly applied (0.05–0.25 mg/kg) (for review see [56]).
Finally, it has recently been reported that a combination of SNP (2.5 mg/kg, i.p., acutely) and the second generation antipsychotic risperidone (0.25 mg/kg, i.p., acutely) facilitated rats’ performance in the conditioned avoidance response test (CART) and enhanced the risperidone-induced release of DA from PFC [57].
In summary, SNP seems to attenuate psychotomimetic effects and cognitive deficits evaluated across different animal pharmacological models of schizophrenia reflecting malfunction of the DAergic and the glutamatergic system respectively. Similar results were obtained when the SHR rat model was used. Further, the combination of SNP with atypical antipsychotics (clozapine or risperidone) was also demonstrated fruitful. In spite of it, information is incomplete since is not yet examined whether a potential antipsychotic profile of SNP could also be emerged from other than pharmacological preclinical models (e.g., neurodevelopmental, genetic, etc.).

5.2. Clinical Studies

A summary of the literature dealing with the clinical effects of administration of SNP in schizophrenia is provided in Table 2. Initial findings reported were promising. In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted on 20 schizophrenics (aged from 19 to 40 years) who were in the first 5 years of disease and receiving appropriate medication, a single SNP 4 h infusion [0.5 μg/min intravenous, (i.v.)] attenuated positive, negative, anxiety and depression symptoms [58]. Interestingly, it has been reported that these effects of SNP lasted for 4 weeks following infusion [58]. A subsequent clinical study performed by the same group of researchers confirmed the effectiveness of SNP previously observed. SNP administered at the same treatment schedule of the first here reported study [59], reduced cognitive disorders such as executive functions (selective attention and working memory), a typical feature usually disrupted in patients suffering from schizophrenia [59].
Subsequent research, however, did not replicate the above described promising results [60,61,62,63]. Specifically, Stone and colleagues, by using the same treatment scheme of the previous studies [58,59] did not detect a beneficial impact of SNP on psychotic symptoms and spatial working memory abilities of schizophrenics [60]. Authors of this latter study, hypothesized that SNP might be effective in patients with a shorter history of pathology, or with more acute exacerbation of symptoms [60]. Repeated administration of SNP (twice, at seven days interval) also failed to decrease psychotic symptoms and improve cognitive functions in patients with schizophrenia [61]. A trial carried out in treatment-resistant outpatients also did not reveal a beneficial effect of acute challenge with SNP [62]. Finally, repeated challenge with SNP was unable to improve symptoms in treatment resistant chronic schizophrenia subjects. Reportedly, in this context, authors suggest that SNP’s presumed antipsychotic effects might have limited to the initial phase of this psychiatric disorder [63].
Overall, the exciting results of the first set of studies [58,59] were not reproduced by subsequent clinical research [60,61,62,63]. This inconsistency might depend on important differences in experimental protocols. Specifically, in studies in which the antipsychotic effects of SNP were revealed, participants were young subjects, no cigarette smokers, displaying serious negative symptoms and with relative short illness course [58,59]. Conversely, SNP was unable to express an antipsychotic profile in clinical trials in which patients were older, cigarette smokers, presenting less serious negative symptoms and with longer disease course respect to the studies in which the efficacy of SNP was revealed [60,61,62,63]. The role of nicotine as a critical factor of the ineffectiveness of SNP should also be considered since it interferes with NO and reduces SNP efficacy [64]. It can be thus hypothesized that SNP seem to improve schizophrenia symptoms when is administered in young patients, no smokers and having a short history of the disease. It is important to underline finally, that in all the aforementioned clinical studies designed to test the effectiveness of SNP as antipsychotic agent, this NO donor was well tolerated and no adverse side effects were reported [58,59,60,61,62,63].
There is scant evidence concerning the clinical efficacy of other NO modulators in schizophrenia and the results reported are contradictory. Specifically, in randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies either the NO precursor L-arginine (repeatedly administered in patients under medication) [64] or the NO donor glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) (chronically administered in first-episode unmedicated patients) [65] failed to improve schizophrenia symptoms. Both studies were conducted in a small size of participants and only one dose of compound was used.
Recently, however, promising results were obtained following administration of the NO donor isosorbide mononitrate (ISMN). In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled preliminary trial performed in 24 schizophrenics under medication, repeated treatment with ISMN exerted a beneficial effect on positive symptoms and functioning. In spite of it, important limitations characterize this interesting study including the sample size, the absence of healthy controls and the investigation of a single dose of ISMN [66]. Future research is mandatory to evaluate the efficacy of this NO donor as a potential antipsychotic agent.

5.3. Potential Mechanism(s) of Action of SNP in Schizophrenia

The mechanism(s) by which SNP might reduce psychotic symptoms is not yet fully elucidated. SNP is a fast, short-acting vasodilator agent and seems to stimulate cerebral perfusion and consequently might alleviate cerebral hypoperfusion, a common feature of schizophrenia patients [67]. Further, SNP appears to exert a tonic effect on the NMDA-nNOS-cGMP pathway [58] which functionality is compromised in schizophrenia.
Several lines of evidence suggest that SNP reversed schizophrenia-like symptoms in rodents induced by pharmacological manipulation of the glutamatergic and DAergic system respectively [45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57]. In this context, it has been demonstrated that SNP counteracted psychotomimetic effects caused by hypofunction of the glutamatergic system by blocking PCP-induced brain c-fos expression [46], promoting a feedback inhibition of NOS [58] and normalizing the up-regulation of NOS-expressing neurons in the rat hippocampus following ketamine administration [68].
In line with the above, SNP attenuated cognitive deficits associated with abnormal DAergic transmission. It has been shown that the impairing effect exerted by apomorphine on memory is mediated by the activation of the D2 DA receptor in PFC [69]. It has been proposed that SNP attenuated the amnestic effects of apomorphine probably by blocking the stimulatory action of this DAergic agonist on the D2 DA receptor [47]. Additionally, it has been reported that apomorphine inhibits the induction of long-term potentiation (LTP), which is considered an electrophysiological marker of learning [70], while SNP promotes its formation [71]. Regarding the mechanism that might underlie the efficacy of SNP in counteracting attentional deficits induced by enhancers of DAergic transmission as are apomorphine and amphetamine, the implication of the nucleotide cAMP in this matter might be critical [48,54]. Interestingly, the ability of SNP to amplify the stimulatory action of risperidone on DA release in PFC has recently been reported and this action may be of relevance for the relief of cognitive impairments and negative symptoms in schizophrenics [57].
A relationship between oxidative stress and schizophrenia is well-documented [5]. In this context, it has been reported that both ketamine [72] and apomorphine [73] were found to increase oxidative stress in rodent’s brain. Taken the above into account, the potent antioxidant properties of SNP revealed in various experimental models of neurodegenerative diseases [44] may also represent a plausible explanation of SNP’s effects. Further research is required aiming to elucidate this important issue. A summary of the potential mechanism(s) of action of SNP in schizophrenia is provided in Table 3.

6. Conclusions

The majority of preclinical findings were encouraging and strongly recommended design and conduction of clinical trials aiming to assess the potential antipsychotic profile of SNP. Mixed results were reported, however, regarding the efficacy of this NO donor to alleviate schizophrenia symptoms in patients. What emerges from a careful evaluation of data produced is that SNP treatment might be beneficial in specific subgroups of schizophrenics as are young patients, no smokers, in the early phase of the illness. On the contrary, SNP’s efficacy is inconsistent when it administered in older chronic patients. Nonetheless, the good safety profile of SNP observed in all clinical studies should might be acknowledged [58,59,60,61,62,63].
Interestingly, both preclinical and clinical studies conducted to evaluate the efficacy of SNP as a potential candidate for the treatment of schizophrenia present some limitations. In animal studies, the effects of SNP were exclusively examined in pharmacological models of schizophrenia and were never evaluated using neurodevelopmental or genetic models of this illness. Concerning clinical research, in all studies the sample size of participants was small and only a single dose of SNP was tested eliciting therefore, that the effects of multiple doses of SNP on schizophrenia were not yet examined.
Thus, future research should be designed and conducted appropriately aiming to address the above aforementioned unresolved issues. In this, context, future clinical trials might focus on younger non-smoking patients, with recent onset of schizophrenia and utilizing different treatment schedules (multiple dose range, administered either acutely or repeatedly, at different time windows). Finally, it is important to take into consideration, however, the narrow therapeutic window of NO-related compounds. Small changes in local NO levels, and the time of administration thus, may be critical in determining their biological effects [74]. Finally, in this context, is important to emphasize that the efficiency of SNP as a potential therapeutic agent might depend on the integrity of the nitrergic system [17].

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, N.P.; data curation, N.P. and E.Z.; writing original draft preparation, N.P. and E.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Freedman, R. Schizophrenia. N. Engl. J. Med. 2003, 349, 1738–1749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Lewis, D.A.; Lieberman, J.A. Catching up on schizophrenia: Natural history and neurobiology. Neuron 2000, 28, 325–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Van Os, J.; Kenis, G.; Rutten, B.P. The environment and schizophrenia. Nature 2010, 468, 203–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Weinberger, D.R. Implications of normal brain development for the pathogenesis of schizophrenia. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 1987, 44, 660–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Bitanihirwe, B.K.; Woo, T.U. Oxidative stress in schizophrenia: An integrated approach. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2011, 35, 878–893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Steeds, H.; Carhart-Harris, R.L.; Stone, J.M. Drug models of schizophrenia. Ther. Adv. Psychopharmacol. 2015, 5, 43–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Javitt, D.C. Glutamate and schizophrenia: Phencyclidine, N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors, and dopamine-glutamate interactions. Int. Rev. Neurobiol. 2007, 78, 69–108. [Google Scholar]
  8. Pratt, J.; Winchester, C.; Dawson, N.; Morris, B. Advancing schizophrenia drug discovery: Optimizing rodent models to bridge the translational gap. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2012, 11, 560–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lewis, D.A.; Pierri, J.; Volk, D.; Melchitzky, D.; Woo, T. Altered GABA neurotransmission and prefrontal cortical dysfunction in schizophrenia. Biol. Psychiatry 1999, 46, 616–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Field, J.R.; Walker, A.G.; Conn, P.J. Targeting glutamate synapses in schizophrenia. Trends Mol. Med. 2011, 17, 689–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Abbott, A. Schizophrenia: The drug deadlook. Nature 2010, 468, 158–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Garthwaite, J.; Charles, S.L.; Chess-Williams, R. Endothelium-derived relaxing factor release on activation of NMDA receptors suggests a role as intercellular messenger in the brain. Nature 1988, 336, 385–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Knowles, R.G.; Moncada, S. Nitric oxide synthases in mammals. Biochem. J. 1994, 298, 249–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Arnold, W.P.; Mittal, C.K.; Katsuki, S.; Murad, F. Nitric oxide activates guanylate cyclase and increases guanosine 3′5′-cyclic monophosphate levels in various tissue preparations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1977, 74, 3203–3207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Kleppisch, T. Phosphodiesterases in the central nervous system. Hand. Exp. Pharmacol. 2009, 191, 71–92. [Google Scholar]
  16. Socco, S.; Bovee, R.H.; Palczewski, M.B.; Hickok, J.R.; Thomas, D.D. Epigenetics: The third pillar of nitric oxide signaling. Pharmacol. Res. 2017, 121, 52–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Oh, S.J.; Fan, X. Current understanding on the role of nitric oxide and therapeutic potential of NO supplementation in schizophrenia. Schizophr. Res. 2020, 222, 23–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hibbs, J.B., Jr.; Taintor, R.R.; Vavrin, Z.; Rachlin, E.M. Nitric oxide a cytotoxic activated macrophage effector molecule. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1988, 157, 87–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Palmer, R.M.; Ferrige, A.G.; Moncada, S. Nitric oxide release accounts for the biological activity of endothelium-derived relaxing factor. Nature 1987, 327, 524–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Prast, H.; Philippu, A. Nitric oxide as modulator of neuronal function. Prog. Neurobiol. 2001, 64, 51–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Pitsikas, N. The role of nitric oxide in the object recognition memory. Behav. Brain Res. 2015, 285, 200–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Lonart, G.; Wang, J.; Johnson, K.M. Nitric oxide induces neurotransmitter release from the hippocampal slices. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 1992, 220, 271–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. West., A.R.; Galloway, M.P.; Grace, A.A. Regulation of striatal dopamine neurotransmission by nitric oxide: Effector pathways and signalling mechanisms. Synapse 2002, 44, 227–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Trabace, L.; Cassano, T.; Tucci, P.; Steardo, L.; Kendrick, K.M.; Cuomo, V. The effects of nitric oxide on striatal serotoninergic transmission involve multiple targets: An in vivo microdialysis study in the awake rat. Brain Res. 2004, 1008, 293–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Calabrese, V.; Mancuso, C.; Calvani, M.; Rizzarelli, E.; Butterfield, D.A.; Stella, A.M. Nitric oxide in the central nervous system: Neuroprotection versus neurotoxicity. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2007, 8, 766–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Bernstein, H.G.; Bogerts, B.; Keilhoff, G. The many faces of nitric oxide in schizophrenia. A review. Schizophr. Res. 2005, 78, 69–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Bernstein, H.G.; Keilhoff, G.; Steiner, J.; Dobrowonly, H.; Bogerts, B. Nitric oxide and schizophrenia. Present knowledge and emerging concepts of therapy. CNS Neurol. Disord. Drug Targets 2011, 10, 792–807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Reif, A.; Herterich, S.; Strobel, A.; Ehlis, A.C.; Saur, D.; Jacob, C.P.; Wienker, T.; Topner, T.; Fritzen, S.; Walter, U.; et al. A neuronal nitric oxide (NOS-1) haplotype associated with schizophrenia modifies prefrontal cortex function. Mol. Psychiatry 2006, 11, 286–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Akbarian, S.; Bunney, W.E.; Potkin, S.G.; Wigal, S.B.; Hagman, J.O.; Sandman, C.A.; Jones, E.G. Altered distribution of nicotinamide-adenine dinucleotide phosphate-diaphorase cells in frontal lobe of schizophrenics implies disturbances of cortical development. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 1993, 50, 169–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Lauer, M.; Johannes, S.; Fritzen, S.; Senitz, D.; Riederer, P.; Reif, A. Morphological abnormalities in nitric-oxide-synthase-positive striatal interneurons of schizophrenic patients. Neuropsychobiology 2005, 52, 111–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Bernstein, H.G.; Stanarius, A.; Baumann, B.; Henning, H.; Krell, D.; Danos, P.; Falkai, P.; Bogerts, B. Nitric oxide synthase-containing neurons in the human hypothalamus: Reduced number of immunoreactive cells in the paraventricular nucleus of depressed patients and schizophrenics. Neuroscience 1998, 83, 867–875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Xing, G.; Chavko, M.; Zhang, L.X.; Yang, S.; Post, R.M. Decreased calcium-dependent constitutive nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) activity in prefrontal cortex in schizophrenia and depression. Schizophr. Res. 2002, 58, 21–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Suzuki, E.; Nakaki, T.; Nakamura, M.; Miyaoka, H. Plasma nitrite levels in deficit versus non-deficit forms of schizophrenia. J. Psychiatry Neurosci. 2003, 28, 288–292. [Google Scholar]
  34. Lee, B.H.; Kim, Y.K. Reduced plasma nitric oxide metabolites before and after antipsychotic treatment in patients with schizophrenia compared to controls. Schizophr. Res. 2008, 104, 36–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Nakano, Y.; Yoshimura, R.; Nakano, H.; Ikenouchi-Sugita, A.; Hori, H.; Umene-Nakano, W.; Ueda, N.; Nakamura, J. Association between plasma nitric oxide metabolites levels and negative symptoms of schizophrenia: A pilot study. Hum. Psychopharmacol. 2010, 20, 139–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Das, I.; Khan, N.S.; Puri, B.K.; Hirsch, S.R. Elevated endogenous nitric oxide synthase inhibitor in schizophrenic plasma may reflect abnormalities in brain nitric oxide production. Neurosci. Lett. 1996, 215, 209–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Das, I.; Ramchand, C.N.; Gliddon, A.; Hirsch, S.R. Nitric oxide, free radicals and polyamines may have a role in membrane pathology of schizophrenia. Neuropsychobiology 1998, 37, 65–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ramirez, J.; Garnica, R.; Boll, M.C.; Montes, S.; Rios, C. Low concentrations of nitrite and nitrate in the cerebrospinal fluid from schizophrenic patients. Schizophr. Res. 2004, 68, 357–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Eastwood, S.L.; Harrison, P.J. Interstitial white matter neurons express less reelin and are abnormally distributed in schizophrenia: Towards an integration of molecular and morphologic aspects of the neurodevelopmental hypothesis. Mol. Psychiatry 2003, 8, 821–831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Benes, F.M.; Berretta, S. GABAergic interneurons: Implications for understanding schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Neuropsychopharmacology 2001, 25, 1–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Connor, C.M.; Guo, Y.; Akbarian, S. Cingulate white matter neurons in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Biol. Psychiatry 2009, 66, 486–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Miller, M.R.; Megson, I.L. Recent development in nitric oxide donor drugs. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2007, 151, 305–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Scatena, R.; Bottoni, P.; Pontoglio, A.; Giardina, P. Pharmacological modulation of nitric oxide release: New pharmacological perspectives, potential benefits and risks. Curr. Med. Chem. 2010, 17, 61–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Godinez-Rubi, M.; Rojas-Mayorquin, A.E.; Ortuno-Sahagun, D. Nitric oxide donors as neuroprotective agents after an ischemic stroke-related inflammatory reaction. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2013, 97357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Wiley, J.L.; Golden, K.M.; Bowen, S.E. Effects of modulation of nitric oxide on acoustic startle responding and prepulse inhibition in rats. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 1997, 328, 125–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Bujas-Bobanovic, M.; Bird, D.C.; Robertson, H.A.; Dursun, S.M. Blockade of phencyclidine-induced effects by a nitric oxide donor. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2000, 130, 1005–1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Gourgiotis, I.; Kampouri, N.; Koulouri, V.; Lempesis, I.; Prasinou, M.; Georgiadou, G.; Pitsikas, N. Nitric oxide modulates apomorphine-induced recognition memory deficits in rats. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 2012, 102, 507–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Issy, A.C.; Pedrazzi, J.F.C.; Yoneyama, B.H.; Del Bel, E.A. Critical role of nitric oxide in the modulation of prepulse inhibition in Swiss mice. Psychopharmacology 2014, 231, 663–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Maja-de-Oliveira, J.P.; Lobao-Soares, B.; Ramalho, T.; Gavioli, E.C.; Soares, V.P.; Teixeira, L.; Baker, G.B.; Dusun, M.S.; Hallak, J.C.E. Nitroprusside single-dose prevents the psychosis-like behavior induced by ketamine in rats up to one week. Schizophr. Res. 2015, 162, 211–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Kandratavicius, L.; Balista, P.A.; Wolf, D.C.; Abrao, J.; Evora, P.R.; Rodriguez, A.J.; Chaves, C.; Maia-de-Oliveira, J.P.; Leite, J.P.; Dursun, S.M.; et al. Effects of the nitric oxide-related compounds in the acute ketamine animal model of schizophrenia. BMC Neurosci. 2015, 16, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Trevlopoulou, A.; Touzlatzi, N.; Pitsikas, N. The nitric oxide donor sodium nitroprusside attenuates recognition memory deficits and social withdrawal produced by the NMDA receptor antagonist ketamine and induces anxiolytic-like behaviour in rats. Psychopharmacology 2016, 233, 1045–1054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Hurtubise, J.L.; Marks, D.N.; Davies, D.A.; Catton, J.K.; Baker, G.B.; Howland, J.G. MK-801-induced impairments on the trial-unique, delayed nonmatching-to-location task in rats: Effects of acute sodium nitroprusside. Psychopharmacology 2017, 234, 211–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Diana, M.C.; Peres, F.F.; Justi, V.; Bressan, R.A.; Lacerda, A.L.T.; Crippa, J.A.; Hallak, J.C.E.; Costhek-Abilio, V. Sodium nitroprusside is effective in preventing and/or reversing the development of schizophrenia-related behaviors in an animal model: The SHR strain. CNS Neurosci. Ther. 2018, 24, 624–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Issy, A.C.; dos Santos-Pereira, M.; Cordeiro-Pedrazzi, J.F.; Cussa-Kubrusly, R.C.; Del-Bel, E.A. The role of striatum and prefrontal cortex in the prevention of amphetamine-induced schizophrenia-like effects mediated by nitric oxide compounds. Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 2018, 86, 353–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Wang, X.; Ding, S.; Lu, Y.; Jiao, Z.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Li, D.; Lv, L. Effects of sodium nitroprusside in the acute dizolcipine (MK-801) animal model of schizophrenia. Brain Res. Bull. 2019, 147, 140–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Pitsikas, N. The role of nitric oxide synthase inhibitors in schizophrenia. Curr. Med. Chem. 2016, 23, 2692–2705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Titulaer, J.; Malmerfelt, A.; Marcus, M.M.; Svensson, T.H. Enhancement of the antipsychotic effect of risperidone by sodium nitroprusside in rats. Eur. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2019, 29, 1282–1287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Hallak, J.C.E.; Maia-De-Oliveira, J.P.; Abrao, J.; Evora, P.R.; Zuardi, A.W.; Crippa, J.E.; Belmonte-de Abreu, P.; Baker, G.B.; Dursun, S.M. Rapid improvement of acute schizophrenia symptoms after intravenous sodium nitroprusside. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. JAMA Psychiatry 2013, 70, 668–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Maja-de-Oliveira, J.P.; Abrao, J.; Evora, P.R.; Zuardi, A.W.; Crippa, J.A.; Belmonte-de-Abreu, P.; Baker, G.B.; Dursun, S.M.; Hallak, J.C.E. The effects of sodium nitroprusside treatment on cognitive deficits in schizophrenia: A pilot study. J. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 2015, 35, 83–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Stone, J.M.; Morrison, P.D.; Koychev, I.; Gao, F.; Reilly, T.J.; Kolanko, M.; Mohammadinasab, M.; Kapur, S.; McGuire, P.K. The effect of sodium nitroprusside on psychotic symptoms and spatial working memory in patients with schizophrenia: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Psychol. Med. 2016, 46, 3443–3450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Wang, X.; Zhao, J.; Hu, Y.; Jiao, Z.; Lu, Y.; Ding, M.; Kou, Y.; Li, B.; Meng, F.; Zhao, H.; et al. Sodium nitroprusside treatment for psychotic symptoms and cognitive deficits of schizophrenia. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Psychiatry Res. 2018, 269, 271–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Brown, H.E.; Freudenreich, O.; Fan, X.; O’ Heard, S.; Goff, D.; Petrides, G.; Harrington, A.L.; Kane, J.M.; Judge, H.; Hoeppner, B.; et al. Efficacy and tolerability of adjunctive intravenous sodium nitroprusside treatment for outpatients with schizophrenia: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiatry 2019, 76, 691–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Adelino, M.P.M.; Nunes, M.V.; Nunes, M.F.Q.; Costa, E.R., Jr.; Ajub, E.; Mitrovich, M.P.B.; Ushirohira, J.M.; Quarantini, L.C.; Hallak, J.C.E.; Lacerda, A.L.T. Treatment-resistant schizophrenia-A RCT on the effectiveness of repeated-dose sodium nitroprusside. Schizophr. Res. 2021, 231, 70–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Kocygit, Y.; Yoca, G.; Karahan, S.; Ayhan, Y.; Yazici, M.K. L arginine add-on treatment for schizophrenia: A randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled, crossover study. Turk. Psychiatri. Derg. 2018, 29, 147–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Merritt, K.; Catalan, A.; Cowley, S.; Demjaha, A.; Taylor, M.; McGuire, P.; Cooper, R.; Morrison, P. Glyceryl trinitrate in first-episode psychosis unmedicated with antipsychotics: A randomized controlled pilot study. J. Psychopharmacol. 2020, 34, 839–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Guimaraes, T.M.; Guimaraes, M.R.C.; Oliveira, I.A.F.; Leoni, R.F.; Santos, A.C.; Dursun, S.M.; Crippa, J.A.S.; Bressan, R.A.; Machado-de-Sousa, J.P.; Lacerda, A.L.T.; et al. Mononitrate isosorbide as an adjunctive therapy in schizophrenia. J. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 2021, 41, 260–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Pinkham, A.; Loughead, J.; Ruparel, K.; Wu, W.C.; Overton, E.; Gur, R.; Gur, R. Resting quantitative cerebral blood flow in schizophrenia measured by pulsed arterial spin labeling perfusion MRI. Psychiatry Res. 2011, 194, 64–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Keilhoff, G.; Becker, A.; Grecksch, G.; Wolf, G.; Bernstein, H.G. Repeated application of ketamine to rats induces changes in the hippocampal expression of parvalbumin, neuronal nitric oxide synthase and cFOS expression similar to those found in human schizophrenia. Neuroscience 2004, 126, 591–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Xu, T.X.; Sotnikova, T.D.; Liang, C.; Zhang, J.; Jung, J.U.; Spealman, R.D.; Gainetdinov, R.R.; Yao, W.D. Hyperdopaminergic tone erodes prefrontal long-term potential via a D2 receptor operated protein phosphatase gate. J. Neurosci. 2009, 29, 14086–14099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Arroyo-Garcia, L.E.; Rodriguez-Moreno, A.; Flores, G. Apomorphine effects on hippocampus. Neural Regen. Res. 2018, 13, 2064–2066. [Google Scholar]
  71. Bohme, G.A.; Bon, C.; Stutzmann, J.M.; Doble, A.; Blanchard, J.C. Possible involvement of nitric oxide in long-term potentiation. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 1991, 199, 379–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. de Oliveira, L.; Spiazzi, C.M.; Bortolin, T.; Canever, L.; Petronilho, F.; Mina, F.G.; Dal Pizzol, F.; Quevedo, J.; Zugno, A.I. Different sub-anesthetic doses of ketamine increase oxidative stress in the brain of rats. Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 2009, 33, 1003–1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Moreira, J.C.F.; Dal Pizzol, F.; Bonatto, F.; Gomez Da Silva, E.; Flores, D.G.; Picada, J.N.; Roesler, R.; Pegas Henriques, J.A. Oxidative damage in brains of mice treated with apomorphine and its oxidized derivative. Brain Res. 2003, 992, 246–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Contestabile, A.; Monti, B.; Contestabile, A.; Ciani, E. Brain nitric oxide and its dual effect in neuroprotection/neurodegeneration: Understanding molecular mechanisms to devise drug approaches. Curr. Med. Chem. 2003, 10, 1241–1253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Chemical structure of sodium nitroprusside (SNP).
Figure 1. Chemical structure of sodium nitroprusside (SNP).
Molecules 26 03196 g001
Table 1. Effects of sodium nitroprusside (SNP) on preclinical models of schizophrenia.
Table 1. Effects of sodium nitroprusside (SNP) on preclinical models of schizophrenia.
Species AgentDose RangeRouteBehavioural TaskEffectReference
RatSNP0.3, 1, 3 mg/kgi.p. acutePPINo effect[45]
RatSNP2, 6 mg/kgi.p. acuteActivity cageReversed PCP-induced hypermotility, stereotypies, ataxia[46]
PCP5 mg/kgi.p. acute
RatSNP0.3, 1 mg/kgi.p. acuteORTReversed apomorphine-induced recognition memory deficits[47]
Apomorphine1 mg/kgi.p. acute
MouseSNP2.5 mg/kgi.p. acutePPIReversed amphetamine-induced attentional deficits [48]
Amphetamine10 mg/kgi.p. acute
MouseSNP4 mg/kgi.p. acuteOFTPrevented ketamine-induced hypermotility and stereotypies[49]
Ketamine25 mg/kgi.p. acute
RatSNP5 mg/kgi.p. acuteORTImpaired STM but counteracted ketamine-induced LTM deficits[50]
Ketamine30 mg/kgi.p. acuteOFTReversed ketamine-induced hypermotulity
RatSNP0.3, 1 mg/kgi.p. acuteORTReversed ketamine-induced recognition memory deficits[51]
Ketamine3 mg/kgi.p. acute
SNP1 mg/kgi.p. acuteSITReversed ketamine-induced social isolation
Ketamine8 mg/kgi.p. subchronic
RatSNP2, 5 mg/kgi.p. acuteTUNLTIneffective on MK-801-induced memory deficits.[52]
MK-8010.05, 0.1 mg/kgi.p. acute Minor effects on task accuracy and perseveration.
SHR RatSNP0.5, 2.5 mg/kgi.p. chronicActivity cageAttenuated hypermotility in the SHR rat[53]
SNP2.5 mg/kgi.p. chronicSITAttenuated social isolation in the SHR rat
SNP0.5, 1, 2.5 mg/kgi.p. chronicCFCTReversed memory deficits in the SHR rat
MouseSNP1 mg/kgi.p. acutePPICombination of subthresold doses of SNP and clozapine reversed amphetamine but no MK-801 induced attentional deficits[54]
Clozapine1 mg/kgi.p. acute amphetamine but not MK-801-induced attentional deficits
Amphetamine5 mg/kgi.p. acute
MK-8010.5 mg/kgi.p. acute
SNP2.5, 3.5, 4 mg/kgi.p. acute No effect
MK-8010.5 mg/kgi.p. acute
RatSNP2.5 mg/kgi.p. acuteOFTAttenuated MK-801-induced hypermotility[55]
MK-8010.4 mg/kgi.p. acutePPINo effect
Y-mazeNo effect
RatSNP2.5 mg/kgi.p. acuteCART [57]
Risperidone0..25 mg/kgi.p. acute Combination of SNP and risperidone attenuated behavior avoidance behaviour
Abbreviations: CART, conditioned avoidance response test; CFCT, contextual fear conditioning test; i.p., intraperitoneally; MWM, Morris water maze; OFT, open field test; ORT, object recognition task; PPI, prepulse inhibition; SIT, social interaction test; TUNLT, trial-unique, delayed-non-matching to location test.
Table 2. Effects of sodium nitroprusside (SNP) in schizophrenia. Clinical studies.
Table 2. Effects of sodium nitroprusside (SNP) in schizophrenia. Clinical studies.
Design of StudyEvaluationParticipantsAgentDose RangeRoute Outcome MeasureEffectReference
Double-blind placebo-controlledJust after infusion20 patients
(19–40 years old)
SNP0.5 μg/min × 4 hi.v. BPRS-18
PANSS
Effective and safe[58]
Double-blind placebo-controlledJust after infusion18 patientsSNP0.5 μg/min × 4 hi.v. Cognitive testsImprovement of executive functions and safe[59]
Double-blind placebo-controlledJust after infusion/four weeks later20 patients
(18–60 years old)
SNP0.5 μg/min × 4 hi.v. BPRS-18
PANSS
CANTAB
Ineffective but safe[60]
Double-blind placebo-controlledJust after the first and second infusion42 patients
(18–45 years old)
SNP0.5 μg/min × 4 h (twice at one week interval)i.v. PANSS
Cognitive tests
Ineffective but safe[61]
Double-blind placebo-controlledJust after infusion/one week later52 patients
(18–65 years old)
SNP0.5 μg/min × 4 hi.v. PANSSIneffective but safe[62]
Double-blind placebo-controlledJust after infusion
4 follow up evaluations
20 treatment-resistant patients
(18–60 years old)
SNP0.5 μg/min × 4 h (four times) at 2 weeks of intervali.v. PANSS
BPRS-18
Ineffective and safe[63]
BPRS-18, 18-item Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale; CANTAB, Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery; i.v., intravenous; PANSS, Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale; SNP, sodium nitroprusside.
Table 3. Summary of the potential mechanism(s) of action of sodium nitroprusside (SNP) in schizophrenia.
Table 3. Summary of the potential mechanism(s) of action of sodium nitroprusside (SNP) in schizophrenia.
Normalization of the functionality of the NMDA-nNOS-cGMP pathway
Alleviation of cerebral hypoperfusion
Normalization of the functionality of the glutamatergic and dopaminergic neurotransmission
Potent antioxidant properties
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zoupa, E.; Pitsikas, N. The Nitric Oxide (NO) Donor Sodium Nitroprusside (SNP) and Its Potential for the Schizophrenia Therapy: Lights and Shadows. Molecules 2021, 26, 3196. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26113196

AMA Style

Zoupa E, Pitsikas N. The Nitric Oxide (NO) Donor Sodium Nitroprusside (SNP) and Its Potential for the Schizophrenia Therapy: Lights and Shadows. Molecules. 2021; 26(11):3196. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26113196

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zoupa, Elli, and Nikolaos Pitsikas. 2021. "The Nitric Oxide (NO) Donor Sodium Nitroprusside (SNP) and Its Potential for the Schizophrenia Therapy: Lights and Shadows" Molecules 26, no. 11: 3196. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26113196

APA Style

Zoupa, E., & Pitsikas, N. (2021). The Nitric Oxide (NO) Donor Sodium Nitroprusside (SNP) and Its Potential for the Schizophrenia Therapy: Lights and Shadows. Molecules, 26(11), 3196. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26113196

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop