Next Article in Journal
A Review of Characteristics of Bio-Oils and Their Utilization as Additives of Asphalts
Next Article in Special Issue
Quantitative Determination and Environmental Risk Assessment of 102 Chemicals of Emerging Concern in Wastewater-Impacted Rivers Using Rapid Direct-Injection Liquid Chromatography—Tandem Mass Spectrometry
Previous Article in Journal
Definitive Screening Design and Artificial Neural Network for Modeling a Rapid Biodegradation of Date Palm Fronds by a New Trichoderma sp. PWN6 into Citric Acid
Previous Article in Special Issue
Energy Properties and Biomass Yield of Miscanthus x Giganteus Fertilized by Municipal Sewage Sludge
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 26
Issue 16
10.3390/molecules26165047
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Pharmaceutical Residues in Senior Residences Wastewaters: High Loads, Emerging Risks

by
Silvia Lacorte
1,*,
Cristian Gómez-Canela
2 and
Carole Calas-Blanchard
3,4
1
Department of Environmental Chemistry, IDAEA-CSIC, Jordi Girona 18-26, 08034 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
2
Department of Analytical Chemistry and Applied (Chromatography Section), School of Engineering, Institut Químic de Sarrià-Universitat Ramon Llull, Via Augusta 390, 08017 Barcelona, Spain
3
Biocapteurs-Analyses-Environnement, Université de Perpignan Via Domitia, 52 Av. Paul Alduy, CEDEX, 66860 Perpignan, France
4
Laboratoire de Biodiversité et Biotechnologies Microbiennes, USR 3579 Sorbonne Universités (UPMC) Paris 6 et CNRS Observatoire Océanologique, 66650 Banyuls-sur-Mer, France
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2021, 26(16), 5047; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26165047
Submission received: 4 July 2021 / Revised: 8 August 2021 / Accepted: 12 August 2021 / Published: 20 August 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Residues of Organic Pollutants in Environmental Samples)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Senior residences are health-care facilities that are socially-accepted for the assistance of elderly people. Since the elderly account for the foremost pharmaceutical-consuming age-group, senior residences become a hot-spot for pharmaceuticals discharge to the sewage grid. The objectives of the present study were to identify the bioactive pharmaceuticals in sewage waters from senior residences and to propose an on-site monitoring strategy for their control. In this study, we have studied the presence of 43 pharmaceuticals highly consumed by the elderly population in six senior residences located in Spain, France and Portugal. Wastewater was sampled directly from the water-chest in each residence during different times of the day throughout one week. Main compounds detected at the high µg L−1 level were analgesic and antipyretic drugs such as acetylsalicylic acid, paracetamol, ibuprofen; antibiotics such as amoxicillin and sulfamethoxazole; compounds for the treatment of neuropathies as gabapentin, trazodone and valsartan; pharmaceuticals for the treatment of diabetes (vildagliptin) and anticancer drugs. The daily loads discharged were estimated and their fate was evaluated. The final objective of this study is to highlight the need to implement at-source waste water treatment procedures in senior residences, which have been identified as a point source pollution of pharmaceuticals.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

More than 20 years have passed since pharmaceuticals have been detected in river waters as a result of their extensive use in human treatments and veterinary purposes [1,2]. Pharmaceuticals account for a total pharmaceutical market value of 220,200 M€ in Europe, with more than 4000 active ingredients and production volumes of tons [3]. After administration, many drugs are excreted unchanged or as metabolites by urine and feces, and reach the aquatic systems either via Wastewater Treatment Plants (WWTPs) [4,5], wetlands [6], untreated effluents or run-off [7].
The overwhelming problem of pharmaceutical pollution is especially relevant in urban areas suffering from water scarcity [8]. This type of pollution is exacerbated due to the increased consumption of drugs as the population ages. According to the United Nations, in Europe, Japan, North America and some regions of China the phenomenon of aging and over-aging has led to societies where 14–23% of the population is over 65, and this percentage is expected to grow in the next 10 years [9]. This over-aging phenomenon is reaching concerning levels in Portugal, Italy, Germany, Finland and Greece which account for the worst percentages in the UE. In plain figures, the number of people aged above 65 years is tens of millions and varies by country. This age-group consumes a higher quantity of pharmaceuticals than the rest of the population, with an estimated intake 5 to 10 pills inhab−1 day−1 [10]. The most consumed pharmaceuticals are within the category of nervous system (N, according to the Anatomic Therapeutic Code, ATC), alimentary tract (A), anti-infective (J) and antineoplastic for the treatment of cancer (L) and the doses administered increase compared to the younger population [11].
In the last years the homes for the elderly and socio-sanitary centers have become a good option to provide services, an adequate milieu and ensure the public health according to the demand and needs of the elderly people. The homes for the elderly are infrastructures that articulate diverse services in response to biopsychosocial needs and have become popular in most European countries. Senior residences have a configuration of typically 50–150 individuals and provide lodging, meal services and health assistance. Following medical prescription patterns, the total amount of pharmaceuticals consumed in conventional senior residences range from 1 to 400 g day−1, and concomitantly hundreds of milligrams of drugs of different therapeutic use are excreted [12]. Wastewaters from senior residences, as in most hospitals, are discharged untreated to the sewage grid and enter into the WWTPs. As many pharmaceuticals are not eliminated with the conventional activated sludge treatment, these compounds are discharged to receiving waters, posing environmental risks [5]. Considering that senior residences have become a popular and well-accepted option for the health-care system, especially in southern Europe due mainly to the mild climate, these establishments have become a hot-spot for pharmaceutical discharge [12].
The objective of the present study was to monitor the presence of 43 pharmaceuticals in the effluents of six senior residences, located in Spain, France and Portugal (Table 1) in order to determine the type and concentration of widely consumed pharmaceuticals and the hourly/daily variations. Based on compounds detected, the total discharge in the sewage grid has been estimated according to their ATC group and their fate evaluated. Finally, pharmacological data of studied drugs is provided as well as a list of main metabolites excreted that can be future compounds to be analyzed in water. Studied target compounds (Table 2) were selected based on it their consumption by the elderly according to previous published papers about the Predicted Environmental Concentrations (PECs) calculated in senior residences [12] and regionally [13]. Therefore, this is one of the first papers focused on the determination of pharmaceuticals directly in the effluents from senior residences.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Pharmaceuticals Released from Senior Residences

The total concentration of pharmaceuticals in the effluents collected directly in the 6 senior residences is indicated in Figure 1 according to the sampling hour (9 h, 13 h, 16 h) and during one week. Among the different senior residences studied, SP1 accounted for the highest concentration and this was expected as it corresponds to a socio-sanitary center where the degree of illness is much higher than in senior residences and thus the amount of pharmaceuticals administered [12]. Considering the 5 other senior residences, the mean levels decreased in the order SP2 > FR1 > PT1 > PT2 >> FR2. Considering all sampling points in each residence, the total concentrations ordered from the highest to lowest in each country ranged from 72 to 4209 µg L−1 in SP1, 219 to 1800 µg L−1 in SP2, 109 to 2292 µg L−1 in FR 1, 18 to 52 µg L−1 in FR 2, 14 to 2352 µg L−1 in PT1 and 4 to 326 µg L−1 in PT 2. These very high concentrations at the µg L−1 level are explained by the fact that samples corresponded to the morning and afternoon flush waters and were collected from the chest without any dilution with water from laundry or showers (in general showers are scheduled latter), and correspond to the pharmaceuticals excreted through urine and feces by the residents not yet diluted from the general sewage grid. Considering the mean concentration of all drugs detected in each residence, specific contamination patterns were observed. The Pearson correlation coefficient (r) was of 0.884 between SP 1 and SP2 and indicated a high relationship among the pharmaceuticals detected in these 2 residences. FR 1 was well correlated with PT 1 and PT 2 with r of 0.872 and 0.985 and PT 1 and PT 2 had an r of 0.919. No other relationships were found.
Within each residence, no correlation was observed among sampling days except for SP 1 in 16 and 17 May (r = 0.884), SP 2 in 18 and 19 May (r = 0.862) and PT 2 in 27 and 30 June (r = 0.986). We assessed samples from 3 different periods of the day (except for SP 2 and FR 2 and Portugal which were sampled only in the morning and in the afternoon) to cover the daily variability. We found differences in the detected concentrations according to the sampling period suggesting that the punctual sampling provides a “picture” of the precise moment that bathrooms are flushing (Figure 1). The sampling at 9 h corresponds to the time residents are waking-up and going to the bathroom, and in here we observed that the concentrations were slightly higher than in other sampling periods, especially in residences from Spain. At 13 h, it is the time before lunch that the bathroom is used and at 16–17 h corresponds to the time after the lunch rest where the bathroom is used again. We avoided sampling after 10 h as it is the time of washing machines and showers which would dilute the pharmaceuticals excreted. The intra-day and inter-day variability was high in SP although there was a good correlation among samples collected at 9, 13 and 16 h (r > 0.645), with some peak concentrations in the morning sample attributed to specific high concentration on some of the drugs analyzed which might be explained by the coincidence of collecting water at the time these pharmaceuticals were excreted. In FR, the concentration of the different drugs did not vary so much and this was recognized by a higher correlation among days (r of 0.716, 0.720 and 0.895 in 3 days). Specifically, in FR 2 the overall concentrations were much lower and more constant considering daily variations (r from 0.646 to 0.936 for intra-day variability and r between 0.616 and 0.989 for inter-day variability at 9 and 16 h), indicating a very similar contamination pattern among days. In Portugal, no correlation was observed by sampling in different hours. The great differences of total pharmaceuticals detected in the different days (and hours) largely vary because grab sampling is only able to detect those contaminants in the punctual period that sampling has been performed, so there is high variability depending on “the chance” to collect the flushes with the highest levels of pharmaceuticals. However, due to sampling constraints or unavailability of personnel from the residences to assist in the sampling, not all days and times could be sampled in each residence and this makes comparability and statistical analysis difficult.
The minimum, maximum and 25th and 75th quartile concentrations detected in the 6 senior residences are indicated in Figure 2. Compounds displayed were present in more than 50% of the samples and are ordered from the highest to the lowest 75th quartile concentrations. The number of pharmaceuticals detected in each residence varied among sampling days and ranged between 20 and 30 in SP 1 and SP 2, from 16 to 23 in FR 1, from 13 to 17 in FR 2, and 18–20 in PT 1 and 9–22 in PT 2. The high detectability of contaminants reflects the compounds consumed by the elderly. Tables S2–S7 of the Supplementary Information indicate the concentrations detected in each residence.
Pharmaceuticals detected in all senior residences were: L-ascorbic acid, macrogol, acetylsalicylic acid, furosemide, carbamazepine, paracetamol and diclofenac. All these compounds were preferentially prescribed in the studied residences [12]. Caffeine was also detected as being mostly attributed to coffee, tea, refreshments or products containing cocoa or chocolate, but also as a component of cold medicines, painkillers, and stimulants. The highest concentrations of caffeine were found in SP 1, SP 2 and FR 2 (Figure 2) and surprisingly were within those reported in environmental waters worldwide [15], indicating that senior residences do not represent an extra source of caffeine compared to the general population. Caffeine is a marker of urban contamination but also has environmental impacts [16], indicating that its monitoring is well-justified. Compounds detected in 5 residences (among the 6) in a reiterative way although with varying levels were valsartan, cyclophosphamide, ibuprofen, donepezil, levetiracetam, dichlorobenzyl alcohol and amylmetacresol. For other compounds, we observed a residence specific pattern which is in line with the different prescription doses which mainly vary among countries. For instance, estrone was only detected in FR 1 and FR 2 and this is in accordance to the standardized use of this compound for perimenopausal symptoms in France but not in Spain or Portugal (personal communication). On the other hand, megestrol was only detected in Spanish residences. Surprisingly also, gabapentin, quetiapine and trazodone, all of them belonging to the N (Nervous system) category, were only detected in Spain and Portugal and this might be also related to prescription models. Ifosfamide was detected in all residences from France and Portugal but never detected in Spain. L-ascorbic acid was detected at much higher concentrations in residences from France and Portugal than from Spain. Other compounds shown in Figure 2 were also residence-specific. Overall, these detected pharmaceuticals are in general excreted in relatively high percentages (Table 2) and are detected in river waters on a regular basis [17,18].
Compounds detected sporadically (less than 50% of the samples) were bicalutamide and dextromethorphan only detected in SP1 and tiotropium was occasionally detected. Chlormethiazole, chlorpheniramine and clarithromycin were only detected in SP 1 and SP 2, with the highest concentrations in SP 1, and cloperastine in SP 2 at very low concentrations (Table S2). Dutasteride was the only compound not detected in any sample as the dose administered is low (0.5 mg day−1) and it has low excretion rates (Table 2) as it undergoes extensive hepatic metabolism mediated by CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 and is excreted as metabolites. Therefore it is unlikely that it is detected in waters.

2.2. Main Patterns and Potential Metabolites

Figure 3 shows the main patterns of pharmaceuticals detected in each residence. In all residences, the most consumed were pharmaceuticals for the treatment of the nervous system (ATC code N), followed by drugs for the treatment of cardiovascular diseases (ATC code C) and antiinfectives (ATC code J). Although in minor proportions, drugs from other ATC codes were also identified. Because the concentrations detected are in general high, and some of the drugs can be excreted as metabolites, the identification of metabolites gain importance. In this study we made a theoretical approach on potential metabolites that could be potentially released from wastewaters from senior residences detected. Table 2 indicates the pharmacological information extracted from the Drugbank database [14] that is used to define whether drugs are excreted in a larger or minor proportion and serves to identify compounds that will be detected in receiving waters as unchanged drug or as metabolites. The levels detected in wastewaters depend also on the rate at which drugs are eliminated from the body and compounds with very small half-life will be rapidly excreted (Table 2). Some compounds as dichlorobenzyl alcohol, amoxicillin, acetylsalicylic acid, carbamazepine, diclofenac, ezetimibe, fluticasone, gabapentin, levetiracetam, levofloxacin, macrogol, pregabalin, rosuvastatin, tiotropium and valsartan are excreted unchanged at >60% of the administered dose. This means that their chances to be detected are very high. In fact, these are the most ubiquitous compounds detected in wastewaters from senior residences. Our empirical data coincides with previous studies indicating that antipsychotics, laxatives, benzodiazepines and antiplatelets among others are highly consumed by the elderly [11,19] and have been detected in river waters with quite high frequency [8,17,18,20].
Upon administration, pharmaceuticals can be metabolized in the liver and in a lesser extent in the kidney, hydrolyzed in plasma or can be excreted unchanged. Table 2 also provides a list of metabolites identified according to the Drugbank database [14]. These metabolites are mainly the hydroxylated, decarboxylated or oxydated forms of the parental drug and also glucuronide or sulfate conjugates. The presence of metabolites in urine is a first step to track their identification in river waters, as recently reported [21,22,23]. Because some metabolites are the active form of pharmaceuticals, it is envisaged to include them in future monitoring programs.

2.3. Total Discharges and Fate

Figure 4 shows the amount of pharmaceuticals discharged to the sewage grid on a daily basis. Values ranged from 0.4 to 17 g day−1 for residences of 52 to 130 beds, being the Spanish residences the ones discharging the highest amounts of contaminants, in line with their higher levels detected compared to the rest, also considering that they are bigger in size. The main categories of pharmaceuticals are also indicated, showing that neurological drugs (N) are the most consumed, followed by cardiovascular (C), alimentary tract (A), neoplastic (L), respiratory (R) or anti-infective (J), depending on the residence. This is of relevance for neurotoxic compounds as they can have negative effects on biota [24], antibiotics can be absorbed by plants upon irrigation with river or reclaimed water [25] or anticancer drugs can have chronic effects on aquatic biota [26].
Considering that senior residences have become very popular in southern countries, the daily amounts of pharmaceuticals discharged to the sewage grid can be relevant. Considering Catalonia, with a population of 7.5 M inhabitants, the number of residences is of 60.954 [27], with almost one third in Barcelona serving a population of 3 M persons. Based on these figures, the total amount of pharmaceuticals discharged are rapidly rocketing. Considering a grid dilution factor of 1000, one order of magnitude higher that the value proposed in a previous paper [12], each residence discharges 17 g of active ingredients per day (considering e.g., SP 1) to the sewage grid, which multiplied by the number of residences in Catalonia represents kg of pharmaceuticals entering the different WWTPs. A similar situation would be found for hospitals [28], but despite their higher capacity, the number of hospitals in a city is much smaller. Therefore, effluents from health institutions can be identified as an important and continuous source of pharmaceuticals to the sewage-grid, and thus, to receiving waters considering that WWTP operating with conventional treatment do not have the capacity to eliminate the total loads of pharmaceuticals received [4,5]. Despite the elimination of pharmaceuticals during WWTP and the dilution factor once discharged to receiving waters, many compounds are detected at concentrations from 0.001 to 1 µg L−1, and in some cases exceeding the Environmental Quality Standards [17]. According to the Pharmaceutical Strategy of the EU [29], there is an imminent need to reduce wastage and improve the management of waste containing pharmaceutical residues. In this direction, actions are required to reduce the release of these compounds using new technological solutions for at-source treatment as recently proposed [30]. Other initiatives include social, governmental, medical and analytical actuations to minimize the presence of pharmaceuticals in the environment [31] so that risk perception regarding pharmaceutical contamination can be contained [32].

3. Material and Methods

3.1. Chemicals and Reagents

Thirty-three standards of 98–99% purity were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA) and ten from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA, USA). Acetaminophen-methyl-d3 (Sigma-Aldrich) was used as internal standard. All the target compounds and the main uses and category according to the ATC code are indicated in Table 2. Stock standard solutions were prepared at a concentration of 1000 ng µL−1 and working solutions at 1–10 ng µL−1, all in methanol.
Methanol (MeOH) and HPLC water (LiChrosolv grade) were supplied by Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). Formic acid (HCOOH), hydrochloric acid 37% (HCl), and ammonium acetate (NH4OAc) were supplied by Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA) and acetonitrile (ACN) was supplied by Fisher Scientific Chemical (Bridgewater, NJ, USA).

3.2. Study Site and Sample Collection

Samples were collected from 6 senior residences located in north-east Spain (SP 1 and SP 2), in south of France (FR 1 and FR 2), and Portugal (PT 1 and PT 2). The characteristics of each residence, number of residents, the number of pharmaceuticals administered and water consumption are indicted in Table 1. These residences host general medicine patients except in S1 which is a socio-sanitary center administering also drugs for psychiatric treatment, neurologic, palliative assistance and traumatology.
In all cases, samples were collected from the wastewater chest located inside the residences’ premises. These chests collect all the water used within each residence including flush, tap water and laundry, and are thereafter, connected with the municipal sewage grid. The number of samples collected in each residence are listed in Table 1 and varied depending on the accessibility in each residence and availability of maintenance personnel that was essential to obtain water from the chests. To avoid dilution from laundry-waters, samples were collected in different times according to the advices given by personnel from the residences. In general, samples were collected 2 or 3 times between 9 and 17 h to have intra-day variability and during one week (5 days) to have inter-day variability, except in SP 1 and FR 2 that in some days only 2 samples were collected and in Portugal (PT 1 and PT 2) that only 2 samples were collected in the morning and at 16 h in 4 days instead of 5. Wastewater was collected using a telescopic rod connected to a glass-jar and were dosed in an amber glass bottles. To obtain 1 L of water this operation was repeated 5–7 times. Samples were transported refrigerated to the main laboratory in IDAEA-CSIC and upon reception were centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 10 min and then filtered through 0.45 µm nylon membrane filters (Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA) to remove the large amount of solid material and particulate matter. Samples were stored at 4 °C and extracted within 2–3 days to avoid degradation of pharmaceuticals. To ensure representative sampling, identical sampling strategies were used for all the residences. Sampling was performed May 2017 for Barcelona’s residences, June 2017 for Portuguese residences and July 2017 for French residences.

3.3. Sample Extraction and Analysis

Samples were extracted using solid phase extraction (SPE) according to a previous study [19] where the extraction and the mass-spectrometric conditions were optimized to have high extraction yields and low errors for a suite of pharmaceuticals consumed by the elderly. Briefly, samples were acidified with HCl 0.1 N at pH 2, and spiked with the internal standard acetaminophen-methyl-d3 at 0.1 µg L−1. One hundred mL of filtered water was extracted using Oasis HLB cartridges (200 mg, Waters, Milford, MA, USA), rinsed with 2 mL of Milli-Q water to eliminate potential interferences and eluted with 6 mL of HCOOH:MeOH (5:95) and 6 mL of MeOH. Extracts were then evaporated to almost dryness in a TurboVap® LV (Uppsala, Sweden) under a stream of N2, filtered with a 0.22 µm polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) syringe filter (Advantec, Tokyo, Japan) and transferred to a 2 mL chromatographic vial, evaporated to dryness with a ReactiVap®, and reconstituted with 200 µL of a 30:70 (v/v) ACN:HPLC water mixture. Samples were analyzed by liquid chromatography coupled to a triple quadrupole detector (Xevo TQS, Acquity Waters, Milford, CT, USA) (LC-MS/MS) with the conditions optimized in a previous study [14]. A Synergy Polar-RP column (250 mm × 4.6 mm, particle size 4 µm, Phenomenex, Torrace, USA) was used with the mobile phase consisting in (A) 0.1% of formic acid in acetonitrile and (B) 0.1% formic acid in water. Gradient elution started at 10%A, increasing to 70% A in 20 min and to 100% of A in 5 min, held for 7 min and returned to initial conditions after 3 min. The flow rate was set at 0.4 mL min−1 and the volume injection was 10 µL. Except for aspirin and furosemide that were detected in negative electrospray ionization (ESI−), the rest of the compounds were measured under positive electrospray ionization (ESI+). Mode of acquisition was selected reaction monitoring (SRM) using two transitions from the precursor ion to the product ion to identify each pharmaceutical. Data was processed using the MassLynx software (v4.1, Waters, Milford, MA, USA). Internal standard quantification was performed using acetaminophen-methyl-d3. Calibration was performed over a concentration range from 0.001 to 2.5 ng µL−1. Quality control parameters for wastewaters are indicated in a previous paper on method development [19]. Method detection Limits (MDL) calculated with wastewater spiked at a concentration of 0.1 µg L−1 are indicated in Table S1 of the Supplementary information.

4. Conclusions

This study shows that senior residences are a point source for pharmaceutical discharge to the sewage grid, and hence, to receiving waters. The analysis of 43 drugs consumed by the elderly has revealed that effluents from senior residences contained from 14 to 30 drugs at concentrations at the high µg L−1 level, and that in most cases the concentrations varied according to the sampling period. Some compounds such as L-ascorbic acid, macrogol, acetylsalicylic acid, furosemide, carbamazepine, paracetamol and diclofenac were systematically detected in all senior residences and corresponded to those compounds that are excreted unchanged in large proportions. Other compounds were residence-specific and corresponded most probably to the medical prescriptions in each residence or country. This study also highlights the importance to use pharmacological data (e.g., Drugbank database) to determine the extent of excretion of the parental drug and the metabolites formed, as they can be potentially identified in waters. According to the concentration of pharmaceuticals in each residence and the water use, the total amount of drugs discharged to the sewage grid varied from 0.4 g to 17 g day−1, indicating that senior residences are important sources of pharmaceutical pollution and that treatment at the source is essential for minimizing their subsequent release to the environment.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online, Table S1: Method Detection Limits (MDL, µg/L) of the SPE and LC-MS/MS methodology used. Table S2: Concentration (µg/L) of pharmaceuticals in SP 1. For clarity, shaded areas indicate values below MDL. Table S3: Concentration (µg/L) of pharmaceuticals in SP 2. Shaded areas indicate values below MDL. Table S4: Concentration (µg/L) of pharmaceuticals in FR 1. Shaded areas indicate values below MDL. Table S5: Concentration (µg/L) of pharmaceuticals in FR 2. Shaded areas indicate values below MDL. Table S6: Concentration (µg/L) of pharmaceuticals in PT 1. Shaded areas indicate values below MDL. Table S7: Concentration (µg/L) of pharmaceuticals in PT 2.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.C.-B., S.L.; methodology, C.G.-C.; validation, C.G.-C., S.L.; formal analysis, C.G.-C.; investigation, C.C.-B., C.G.-C., S.L.; resources, S.L.; data curation, S.L.; writing—original draft preparation, S.L.; writing—review and editing, S.L., C.C.-B., C.G.-C.; supervision, S.L.; project administration, C.C.-B., S.L.; funding acquisition, C.C.-B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Interreg SUDOE program funded by FEDER [Innovec’EAU (2016–2019)/Project SOE1/P1/F0173. http://innovec-eau.univ-perp.fr (accessed on 4 July 2021)]. The Ministry of Science and Innovation of Spain under the project PID2019-105732GB-C21 is also acknowledged.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

Victor Pueyo and Teresa Sala-Comorera are acknowledged for carrying out the sampling and analysis of waters. Syndicat National des Établissements et Résidences Privés pour Personnes Âgées (SYNERPA), Jordi Cayetano and Marc Antoni Rovira from Sant Joan de Deu, Cinta Pascual and Arnald Pannocchia from Llars d’Avis de Catalunya (L’Onada), and Marisa Cristino, Filomena Gerardo, and Sónia Pereira da Silva from Santa Casa da Misericórdia de Lisboa are acknowledged for sampling assistance and permission.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Sample Availability

Samples are not available from the authors as extracts are old and cannot be used further with reliability.

References

  1. Ternes, T.A. Occurrence of drugs in German sewage treatment plants and rivers. Water Res. 1998, 32, 3245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Daughton, C.G.; Ternes, T.A. Pharmaceuticals and Personal Care Products in the Environment: Agents of Subtle Change? Environ. Health Perspec. 1999, 107, 907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. OECD Data on Pharmaceuticals. Available online: https://www.oecd.org/health/health-systems/pharmaceuticals.htm (accessed on 1 June 2021).
  4. Zuccato, E.; Castiglioni, S.; Fanelli, R. Identification of the pharmaceuticals for human use contaminating the Italian aquatic environment. J. Hazard. Mater. 2005, 122, 205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Castiglioni, S.; Bagnati, R.; Fanelli, R.; Pomati, F.; Calamari, D.; Zuccato, E. Removal of Pharmaceuticals in Sewage Treatment Plants in Italy. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 40, 357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Hijosa-Valsero, M.; Reyes-Contreras, C.; Domínguez, C.; Bécares, E.; Bayona, J.M. Behaviour of pharmaceuticals and personal care products in constructed wetland compartments: Influent, effluent, pore water, substrate and plant roots. Chemosphere 2016, 145, 508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Proctor, K.; Petrie, B.; Lopardo, L.; Camacho Muñoz, D.; Rice, J.; Barden, R.; Arnot, T.; Kasprzyk-Hordern, B. Micropollutant fluxes in urban environment-A catchment perspective. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 401, 123745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Jameel, Y.; Valle, D.; Kay, P. Spatial variation in the detection rates of frequently studied pharmaceuticals in Asian, European and North American rivers. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 724, 137947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. González Peña, O.I.; López Zavala, M.Á.; Cabral Ruelas, H. Pharmaceuticals Market, Consumption Trends and Disease Incidence Are Not Driving the Pharmaceutical Research on Water and Wastewater. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 2532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hajjar, E.R.; Cafiero, A.C.; Hanlon, J.T. Polypharmacy in elderly patients. Am. J. Geriatr. Pharm. 2007, 5, 345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Pasina, L.; Novella, A.; Cortesi Nobili, L.A.; Lettamanti, M.; Ianes, A. Drug prescriptions in nursing home residents: An Italian multicenter observational study. Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2020, 76, 1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Lacorte, S.; Luis, S.; Gómez-Canela, C.; Sala-Comorera, T.; Courtier, A.; Roig, B.; Oliveira-Brett, A.M.; Joannis-Cassan, C.; Aragonés, J.I.; Poggio, L. Pharmaceuticals released from senior residences: Occurrence and risk evaluation. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2018, 25, 6095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Gómez-Canela, C.; Sala-Comorera, T.; Pueyo, V.; Barata, C.; Lacorte, S. Analysis of 44 pharmaceuticals consumed by elderly using liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry. J. Pharmac. Biomed. Anal. 2019, 168, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Drugbank. Available online: https://go.drugbank.com/ (accessed on 1 June 2021).
  15. Korekar, G.; Kumar, A.; Ugale, C. Occurrence, fate, persistence and remediation of caffeine: A review. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 27, 34715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Quadra, G.R.; Paranaíba, J.R.; Vilas-Boas, J.; Roland, F.; Amado, A.M.; Barros, N.; Dias, A.J.; Simone Cardoso, J.P. A global trend of caffeine consumption over time and related-environmental impacts. Environ. Pollut. 2020, 256, 113343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Pereira, A.; Silva, L.; Laranjeiro, C.; Lino, C.; Pena, A. Selected Pharmaceuticals in Different Aquatic Compartments: Part I—Source, Fate and Occurrence. Molecules 2020, 25, 1026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Burns, E.E.; Carter, L.J.; Kolpin, D.W.; Thomas-Oates, J.; Boxall, A.B.A. Temporal and spatial variation in pharmaceutical concentrations in an urban river system. Water Res. 2018, 137, 72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Gómez-Canela, C.; Pueyo, V.; Barata, C.; Lacorte, S.; Marcé, R.M. Development of predicted environmental concentrations to prioritize the occurrence of pharmaceuticals in rivers from Catalonia. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 666, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hollender, J.; Rothardt, J.; Radny, D.; Loos, M.; Epting, J.; Huggenberger, P.; Borer, P.; Singer, H. Comprehensive micropollutant screening using LC-HRMS/MS at three riverbank filtration sites to assess natural attenuation and potential implications for human health. Water Res. X 2018, 1, 100007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Nguyen, P.Y.; Carvalho, G.; Reis MA, M.; Oehmen, A. A review of the biotransformations of priority pharmaceuticals in biological wastewater treatment processes. Water Res. 2021, 188, 116446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Fabregat-Safont, D.; Ibáñez, M.; Bijlsma, L.; Hernández, F.; Waichman, A.V.; de Oliveira, R.; Rico, A. Wide-scope screening of pharmaceuticals, illicit drugs and their metabolites in the Amazon River. Water Res. 2021, 200, 117251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Sabater-Liesa, L.; Montemurro, N.; Ginebreda, A.; Barceló, D.; Eichhorn, P.; Pérez, D. Retrospective mass spectrometric analysis of wastewater-fed mesocosms to assess the degradation of drugs and their human metabolites. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 408, 124984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Gómez-Canela, C.; Rovira García, X.; Martínez-Jerónimo, F.; Marcé, R.M.; Barata, C. Analysis of neurotransmitters in Daphnia magna affected by neuroactive pharmaceuticals using liquid chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometry. Environ. Pollut. 2019, 254, 113029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Piña, B.; Bayona, J.M.; Christou, A.; Fatta-Kassinos, D.; Guillon, E.; Lambropoulou, D.; Costas, M.; Polesel, F.; Sayen, S. On the contribution of reclaimed wastewater irrigation to the potential exposure of humans to antibiotics, antibiotic resistant bacteria and antibiotic resistance genes—NEREUS COST Action ES1403 position paper. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 10213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Li, D.; Chen, H.; Liu, H.; Schlenk, D.; Mu, J.; Lacorte, S.; Ying, G.G.; Xie, L. Anticancer drugs in the aquatic ecosystem: Environmental occurrence, ecotoxicological effect and risk assessment. Environ. Int. 2021, 153, 106543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Institute of Statistics of Catalonia. Iidescat. Available online: https://www.idescat.cat/pub/?id=aec&n=849 (accessed on 10 June 2021).
  28. Kümmerer, K. Drugs in the environment: Emission of drugs, diagnostic aids and disinfectants into wastewater by hospitals in relation to other sources—A review. Chemosphere 2001, 45, 957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. European Union Strategic Approach to Pharmaceuticals in the Environment. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council and the European Economic and Social Committee, Brussels; 11.3.2019, COM(2019) 128 Final. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/environment/water/water-dangersub/pdf/strategic_approach_pharmaceuticals_env.PDF (accessed on 10 June 2021).
  30. Joannis-Cassan, C.; Rodriguez Castillo, A.S.; Dezani, C.; Gómez-Canela, C.; Reoyo-Prats, B.; Calas-Blanchard, C.; Barata, C.; Lacorte, S.; Plantard, G. Towards an innovative combined process coupling biodegradation and photo-oxidation for the removal of pharmaceutical residues. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2021, 96, 755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Caban, M.; Stepnowski, P. How to decrease pharmaceuticals in the environment? A review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2021, 19, 3115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Luís, S.; Lima, M.L.; Poggio, L.; Aragonés, J.I.; Courtier, A.; Roig, B.; Blanchard, C. Lay people and experts’ risk perception of pharmaceuticals in the environment in Southwestern Europe. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2020, 117, 104783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Molecules 26 05047 g001 550
Figure 1. Total pharmaceuticals detected in water (µg L−1) in each sampling day within one week and at the different time frames (morning and afternoon flushes) in senior residences from Spain (SP 1 and SP 2), France (FR 1 and FR 2) and Portugal (PT 1 and PT 2).
Figure 1. Total pharmaceuticals detected in water (µg L−1) in each sampling day within one week and at the different time frames (morning and afternoon flushes) in senior residences from Spain (SP 1 and SP 2), France (FR 1 and FR 2) and Portugal (PT 1 and PT 2).
Molecules 26 05047 g001
Molecules 26 05047 g002 550
Figure 2. Boxplots indicating the minimum, maximum, 25th and 75th percentile concentrations of the different drugs detected (µg L−1) in more than 50% of the samples in each senior residence, ordered from the highest to lowest concentrations (red SP, blue FR and green PT). The Y axis is in logarithmic scale to allow better comparison.
Figure 2. Boxplots indicating the minimum, maximum, 25th and 75th percentile concentrations of the different drugs detected (µg L−1) in more than 50% of the samples in each senior residence, ordered from the highest to lowest concentrations (red SP, blue FR and green PT). The Y axis is in logarithmic scale to allow better comparison.
Molecules 26 05047 g002
Molecules 26 05047 g003 550
Figure 3. Profile of pharmaceuticals detected in each residence according to the ATC code: A = Alimentary tract and metabolism; B = Blood and blood forming organs; C = Cardiovascular system; G = Genito urinary system and sex hormones; H = Systemic hormonal preparations, excl. Sex hormones and insulins; J = Antiinfectives for systemic use; L = Antineoplastic and immunomodulating agents; M = Musculo-skeletal system, others; N = Nervous system; R = Respiratory system; S = Sensory organs.
Figure 3. Profile of pharmaceuticals detected in each residence according to the ATC code: A = Alimentary tract and metabolism; B = Blood and blood forming organs; C = Cardiovascular system; G = Genito urinary system and sex hormones; H = Systemic hormonal preparations, excl. Sex hormones and insulins; J = Antiinfectives for systemic use; L = Antineoplastic and immunomodulating agents; M = Musculo-skeletal system, others; N = Nervous system; R = Respiratory system; S = Sensory organs.
Molecules 26 05047 g003
Molecules 26 05047 g004 550
Figure 4. Total discharge of pharmaceuticals (g day−1) in the 6 senior residences and main families of compounds discharged according to ATC general category neurological drugs (N), cardiovascular (C), alimentary tract (A), neoplastic (L), anti-infective (J), respiratory (R).
Figure 4. Total discharge of pharmaceuticals (g day−1) in the 6 senior residences and main families of compounds discharged according to ATC general category neurological drugs (N), cardiovascular (C), alimentary tract (A), neoplastic (L), anti-infective (J), respiratory (R).
Molecules 26 05047 g004
Table
Table 1. Characteristics of the residences sampled, indicating their origin, the capacity as number of beds, the type of residence, the water consumption, the number of pharmaceuticals administered during the period of sampling and the main compounds administered.
Table 1. Characteristics of the residences sampled, indicating their origin, the capacity as number of beds, the type of residence, the water consumption, the number of pharmaceuticals administered during the period of sampling and the main compounds administered.
ResidencesCapacity
(Beds)		Type of ResidenceWater Consumption (m3 year−1)Number of Pharmaceuticals AdministeredNumber of Samples Collected
S1130Sociosanitary, general impairment & psychiatric unit667916415
S2126Housing and general impairment71001349
F181Housing and general impairment456013315
F282Housing and general impairment516418812
P152Housing and general impairment52301168
P261Housing and general impairment48591468
Table
Table 2. Pharmacological properties of drugs used to determine their elimination and main metabolites excreted from each drug that can be potentially detected in water. Source: Drugbank [14].
Table 2. Pharmacological properties of drugs used to determine their elimination and main metabolites excreted from each drug that can be potentially detected in water. Source: Drugbank [14].
DrugUsesMetabolismHalf-Life (h)Elimination RouteExcreted UnchangedMetabolites Formed
Dichlorobenzyl alcohol
R02AA03		Mild antiseptic with a broad spectrum for bacterial and virus to treat mouth and throat infectionsHepatic Urine90%hippuric acid
Amoxicillin
J01CA04		Penicillin derivative used for the treatment of infections caused by gram-positive bacteriaHepatic1Urine70–78%7 metabolites formed by hydroxylation; oxidative deamination; decarboxylation and glucuronidation
AmylmetacresolAntiseptic used to treat infections in the mouth and throat.n.a.n.a.Urinen.a.n.a.
Acetylsalicylic acid
B01AC06		Salicylate used to treat pain, fever, inflammation, migraines, and reducing the risk of major adverse cardiovascular eventsHydrolyzed in plasma0.2–0.3Urine10–85%
as salicylate		salicylic acid; salicyluric acid; ether; phenolic glucuronide and ester; acyl glucuronide; gentisic acid; hydroxybenzoic acids
Atorvastatin
C10AA05		Lipid-lowering drug to treat several types of dyslipidemiasP450 (rapid)14Bilen.a.para-hydroxyatorvastatin; para-hydroxyatorvastatin glucuronide;
para and ortho-hydroxyatorvastatin lactone; ortho-hydroxyatorvastatin;
ortho-hydroxyatorvastatin glucuronide
Bicalutamide
L02BB03		Androgen receptor inhibitor used to treat metastatic prostate carcinoma.Stereo specific metabolism142n.a.n.a.bicalutamide glucuronides
Budesonide
D07AC09, R01AD05, A07EA06		Corticosteroid used to treat Crohn’s disease, asthma, COPD, hay fever and allergies, and ulcerative colitis.CYP3A (>80-metabolized)2–6Urine0% (60% as metabolite)6-beta-hydroxybudesonide;
22-hydroxy Intermediate; 16alpha-butyrloxyprednisolone;
16-alpha-hydroxyprednisolone;
delta6-budesonide; 23-hydroxybudesonide
Caffeine
N06BC01		Stimulant present in tea, coffee, cola beverages, analgesic drugs, and agents used to increase alertness.Hepatic CYP1A25Urine2% (mainly adsorbed in renal tubules)theobromine; theophylline;
1-methylxanthine; 1-methyluric acid; 1,3,7-trimethyluric acid; 1,7-dimethylxanthine; 1-methylxanthine; 5-acetylamino-6-formylamino-3-methyluracil; 1,7-dimethyluric acid
Carbamazepine
N03AF01		Anticonvulsant to treat seizures and pain resulting from trigeminal neuralgiaHepatic CYP3A427–36.8Urine72%10,11-epoxycarbamazepine; 10,11-dihydroxycarbamazepine;
3-hydroxycarbamazepine; 2,3-dihydroxycarbamazepine; carbamazepine-o-quinione; carbamazepine 2,3-epoxide; 2-hydroxycarbamazepine; 2-hydroxyiminostilbene; iminoquinone
Clomethiazole
N05CM02		γ-aminobutyric acid (GABAA)-mimetic drug used as sedative and hypnotic to prevent symptoms of acute alcohol withdrawal.n.a.n.a.n.a.n.a.n.a.
Chlorpheniramine
R06AB04		Histamine to treat upper respiratory allergiesHepatic CYP 45021–27n.a.n.a.n.a.
Clarythromycin
J01FA09		Macrolide antibioticHepatic-CYP3A43–4Urine20–30%14-hydroxyclarithromycin; N-desmethylclarithromycin
Cloperastine
R05DB21		Cough suppressantn.a.n.a.n.a.n.a.n.a.
Cyclophosphamide
L01AA01		Nitrogen mustard to treat lymphomas, myelomas, leukemia, mycosis fungoides, neuroblastoma, ovarian adenocarcinoma, retinoblastoma, and breast carcinoma.Hepatic CYP450
(75% of the drug activated)		3–12Urine10–20%4-hydroxycyclophosphamide; aldophosphamide; phosphoramide mustard; phosphoramide aziridinium;
acrolein; acrylic acid; carboxyphosphamide; alcophosphamide; carboxyphosphamide; nornitrogen mustard; 4-ketocyclophosphamide; dechloroethyl cyclophosphamide;
chloroacetaldehyde
Dextromethorphan
R05DA09		To treat cases of dry coughCYP3A4, CYP2D6, CYP2C9;
CYP2D6 CYP2C9		3–30n.a.n.a.dextrorphan; 3-hydroxymorphinan; 3-hydroxymorphinan sulfate; 3-hydroxymorphinan o-glucuronide; dextrorphan sulfate; dextrorphan o-glucuronide; (+)-3-methoxymorphinan
3-hydroxymorphinan
Diclofenac
M01AB05, others		SAID used to treat pain and inflammationCYP2C92Urine60–70%4’-hydroxydiclofenac; diclofenac acyl glucuronide; 3’-hydroxydiclofenac; 5-hydroxy diclofenac; diclofenac o-imine methine; diclofenac 2’;3’-oxide; diclofenac radical and the hydroxylated and gluthathion conjugated derivatives
Donepezil
N06DA02		Acetylcholinesterase inhibitor to treat mild to moderate Alzheimer’s DiseaseHepatic CYP3A470Urine57%6-O-desmethyl donepezil and O-dealkylation, hydroxylation, N-oxidation, hydrolysis, and O-glucuronidation metabolites
Dutasteride
G04CB02		Antiandrogenic compound to treat benign prostatic hyperplasiaHepatic CYP3A4, CYP3A5840Feces1–15%
(2–90% as metabolites)		4′-hydroxydutasteride; 6-hydroxydutasteride; 6,4′-dihydroxydutasteride; 1,2-dihydrodutasteride; 15-hydroxydutasteride; 6,4′-dihydroxydutasteride; 15-hydroxydutasteride
Escitalopram
N06AB10		Serotonin re-uptake inhibitor to treat depressive, anxiety and obsessive-compulsive disordersHepatic, CYP2C19, CYP3A4 CYP2D627–32Urine8%S-desmethylcitalopram; S-didesmethylcitalopram; escitalopram propionic acid
Estrone
G03CA07		Estrogen to treat perimenopausal and postmenopausal symptomsHepatic19n.a.n.a.2-hydroxyestrone; 4-hydroxyestrone; estrone sulfate; estrone glucuronide; 2-hydroxyestrone sulfate; 4-hydroxyestrone sulfate; 2-OH-estrone; 4-OH-estrone; 6alpha-H-estrone; 6beta-estrone; 7alpha-OH-estrone; 15alpha-OH -estrone; 16alpha-OH-estrone; 16beta-OH-estrone
Ezetimibe
C10AX09		Cholesterol absorption inhibitor used to lower total cholesterolSmall intestine and hepatic22Feces69%ezetimibe glucuronide; SCH 57871; SCH 57871-glucuronide, SCH 488128
Fluticasone
R03BA05		Corticosteroid to treat and manage asthma, dermatosesHepatic CYP 450 3A424Feces90%fluticasone propionate
Furosemide
C03CA01		Diuretic to treat hypertension, and edemasKidney Hepatic4.5Urine50%furosemide glucuronide; saluamine; 4-chloro-5-sulfamoylanthranilic acid
Gabapentin
N03AX12		Anticonvulsant for peripheral neuropathy, neuralgia and seizuresNot metabolized5–7Urine100%No metabolites; excreted as unchanged drug
Ibuprofen
M02AA13, others		NSAID analgesic, anti-inflammatory and antipyreticHepatic (rapid biotransformed)1.2–2Urine0%ibuprofen glucuronide; 2-hydroxyibuprofen; 3-hydroxyibuprofen; carboxy-ibuprofen; 1-hydroxyibuprofen
Ifosfamide
L01AA06		Alkylating and immunosuppressive agent used in chemotherapy for the treatment of cancersHepatic7–15Urine12–18%3-dechloroethylifosfamide; dechloroethylifosfamide; chloroacetaldehyde; 4-hydroxyifosfamide and derivatives
L-ascorbic acid
A11GA01		Vitamin used to correct vitamin C deficiency, scurvy, iron sorptionHepatic384n.a.n.a.ascorbic acid-2-sulfate; dehydroascorbate; 2;3-dikeogulonic acid; erythrulose; threosone; oxalic acid
Levetiracetam
N03AX14		Novel anticonvulsant agent to treat onset seizures in epileptic patientsMinimally metabolized6–8Urine66%levetiracetam carboxilic acid
Levofloxacin
J01MA12		Fluoroquinolone antibiotic to treat infectionsn.a.6–8Urine87%desmethyl-levofloxacin
levofloxacin-N-oxide
Lidocaine
S01HA07, D04AB01,
R02AD02, C01BB01,
N01BB52		Local anesthetic used in superficial and invasive proceduresHepatic (rapid)1.3–2Urine5%3-hydroxylidocaine; monoethylglycinexylidide; 2,6-dimethylaniline (2,6-xylidine)and hydroxyl and amino derivatives
Macrogol
A06AD15		Laxative to treat constipation and used before colonoscopiesNot metabolized4.1Feces85–99%No metabolites formed
Megestrol
G03AC05, others		Progestin to treat anorexia and cachexia and antineoplastic agentHepatic34Urinen.a.n.a.
Mycophenolic acid
L04AA06		Immunosuppressant to prevent organ transplant rejectionsGlucuronyl transferase8–16n.a.n.a.mycophenolic acid-acyl glucuronide; 6-O-desmethyl-mycophenolic acid; mycophenolic acid-7-O-glucuornide
Paracetamol
N02BE01		Analgesic drug for pain management and as antipyreticHepatic2.5Urine5%N-acetyl-p-benzoquinone imine; acetaminophen cysteine, glucuronide and sulfate
Prednisone
H02AB07		Corticosteroid to treat inflammation, immune-mediated reactions and endocrine or neoplastic diseasesn.a.2–3Urinen.a.prednisolone and hydroxy and dihydro prednisone and further metabolized to sulfate and glucuronide conjugates
Pregabalin
N03AX16		Anticonvulsant drug to treat neuropathy, fibromyalgia, seizuresLess than 2%6.3Urine98%N-methylpregabalin
Quetiapine
N05AH04		Psychotropic for the management of bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, and major depressive disorderHepatic6–7Urine1%n-desalkylquetiapine; 7-hydroxyquetiapine; quetiapine sulfoxide; o-desalkylquetiapine
Rosuvastatin
C10AA07		Lipid regulatorHepatic19Feces77%n-desmethylrosuvastatin;
rosuvastatin 5 S-lactone
Sulfamethoxazole
J01EC01		Sulfonamide antibiotic to treat urinary, gastrointestinal and respiratory infectionsKidney10Urine30%5-hydroxysulfamethoxazole;
N-acetylsulfamethoxazole;
sulfamethoxazole N4-hydroxylamine; sulfamethoxazole N-glucuronide
Tiotropium
R03BB04		Bronchodilator to treat chronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseNot heavily metabolized24Urine74%N-methylscopine + dithienylglycolic acid
Trazodone
N06AX05		Serotonin uptake inhibitor to treat major depressive disorderHepatic CYP3A47.3Feces21%m-chlorophenylpiperazine;
triazolopyridinone dihydrodiol;
triazolopyridinone epoxide;
4’-hydroxytrazodone
Valsartan
C09CA03		Angiotensin-receptor blocker to manage hypertensionMinimal hepatic6Feces83%valeryl-4-hydroxyvalsartan
Vildagliptin
A10BH02		Treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitusHydrolyzed2Urine23%vildagliptin M20.7; M15.3; M20.2; M20.9;M21.6 metabolites
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lacorte, S.; Gómez-Canela, C.; Calas-Blanchard, C. Pharmaceutical Residues in Senior Residences Wastewaters: High Loads, Emerging Risks. Molecules 2021, 26, 5047. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26165047

AMA Style

Lacorte S, Gómez-Canela C, Calas-Blanchard C. Pharmaceutical Residues in Senior Residences Wastewaters: High Loads, Emerging Risks. Molecules. 2021; 26(16):5047. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26165047

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lacorte, Silvia, Cristian Gómez-Canela, and Carole Calas-Blanchard. 2021. "Pharmaceutical Residues in Senior Residences Wastewaters: High Loads, Emerging Risks" Molecules 26, no. 16: 5047. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26165047

APA Style

Lacorte, S., Gómez-Canela, C., & Calas-Blanchard, C. (2021). Pharmaceutical Residues in Senior Residences Wastewaters: High Loads, Emerging Risks. Molecules, 26(16), 5047. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26165047

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop