Next Article in Journal
Sage, Salvia officinalis L., Constituents, Hepatoprotective Activity, and Cytotoxicity Evaluations of the Essential Oils Obtained from Fresh and Differently Timed Dried Herbs: A Comparative Analysis
Next Article in Special Issue
Mechanochemical Applications of Reactive Extrusion from Organic Synthesis to Catalytic and Active Materials
Previous Article in Journal
Gelatin Reinforced with CNCs as Nanocomposite Matrix for Trichoderma harzianum KUEN 1585 Spores in Seed Coatings
Previous Article in Special Issue
Synthesis of Biologically Relevant 1,2,3- and 1,3,4-Triazoles: From Classical Pathway to Green Chemistry
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Ionic Liquid-Assisted Grinding: An Electrophilic Fluorination Benchmark

by
Pavel A. Zaikin
1,*,
Ok Ton Dyan
1,2,*,
Innokenty R. Elanov
1 and
Gennady I. Borodkin
1,2
1
Vorozhtsov Novosibirsk Institute of Organic Chemistry, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, 9 Acad. Lavrentiev Ave., 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia
2
Department of Natural Sciences, Novosibirsk State University, 2 Pirogov St., 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2021, 26(19), 5756; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26195756
Submission received: 2 September 2021 / Revised: 18 September 2021 / Accepted: 20 September 2021 / Published: 23 September 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Mechanochemical Synthesis of Organic Compounds)

Abstract

:
We demonstrated the influence of liquid additives on the rate and selectivity of mechanochemical fluorination of aromatic and 1,3-dicarbonyl compounds with F-TEDA-BF4. Substoichiometric catalytic quantities of ionic liquids speed up the reaction. We proposed an improved protocol for ionic liquids-assisted fluorination that allows easy and efficient isolation of fluorinated products by vacuum sublimation. A careful choice of additive results in high yields of fluorinated products and low E-factor for the overall process. Here, we report a benchmarking study of various ionic liquids in comparison with representative molecular solvents. A lower viscosity of ionic liquid additive is typically associated with higher yields and a higher degree of difluorination. Ionic liquids with fluorous anions (triflate and triflimide) are shown to be the most efficient catalysts for ionic liquid-assisted grinding.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Organofluorine compounds play an important role in the development of new materials, modern drugs, and efficient agrochemicals. Many modern fluorine-containing drugs contain fluoroaromatic moieties [1]. Therefore, the development of methods of incorporating C–F bonds in organic molecules attracts much attention [2]. One of the prospective methods of the synthesis of fluoroaromatic compounds is direct electrophilic fluorination of C–H bonds with NF-reagents [3,4]. Such reactions are typically carried out in polar organic solvents like acetonitrile or DMF, and the development of greener alternatives is on the agenda [5]. Many attempts have been made to develop efficient and green fluorination reactions, including reactions in aqueous media [6,7,8], ionic liquids [9,10], and finally, under solvent-free reaction conditions [11,12,13]. We have recently published a solvent-free protocol for the fluorination of phenols and naphthols by manual grinding with mortar and pestle (Scheme 1) [14]. In addition to being tedious, manual grinding is also less reproducible in comparison with mechanical grinding. Several approaches have been proposed for mechanochemical fluorination, but the use of high-speed mixer mills greatly limits the scale-up capabilities of the method [15,16]. The use of continuous reactive extrusion apparently removes the scale-up restrictions but requires huge amounts of grinding additives to be performed [17]. In the present study, we first aimed to translate the mechanochemical fluorination from manual grinding to a mechanical setup that resembles classical grinding with mortar and pestle. Our second goal was the choice of a proper grinding additive to speed up fluorination. As shown in the literature, the use of grinding additives can strongly affect the reaction rates and the selectivity of fluorination [18]. In our previous paper, we used solvent-free fluorination in conjunction with vacuum sublimation of the products directly from the reaction mixture; the process did not involve any solvent at any stage [14]. Therefore, we aimed to use low-volatile additives, and we considered ionic liquids as promising grinding additives. Ionic liquids currently attract much attention due to their polarity, dissolution properties, thermal stability, negligible vapor pressure for the use as reaction media, extraction, or chromatographic separation [19,20]. Recently, ionic liquids were also used as promoters of electrophilic fluorination in organic solvents [21].
Here, we report a first comparison of various ionic liquids as grinding additives in mechanochemical electrophilic fluorination of aromatic and 1,3-dicarbonyl compounds with F-TEDA-BF4 1 in a vibratory mortar grinder. A combination of mechanochemical ionic liquid-assisted grinding with a vacuum sublimation of the product provided low E-factor for the studied reaction. An E-factor of 3 was the lowest achieved. The fluorination reaction was scaled up to 20 mmol and was adapted for the fluorination of the anti-inflammatory drug naproxene.

2. Results

In the first step, we adapted a solvent-free fluorination by manual grinding to a mechanical vibratory mortar grinder. We chose 2-naphthol 2a as a model substrate that proved to have high activity in electrophilic fluorination and particularly in mechanochemical fluorination [14]. The choice of substrate was also associated with the increased importance of fluorinated naphthalene derivatives in the synthesis of nematic liquid crystals [22] and polyaromatic compounds [23]. We chose a mechanical vibrating mortar grinder as a close simulation of manual grinding by mortar and pestle but in a much more controllable and reproducible manner. The fluorination of 2-naphthol with two molar equivalents of F-TEDA-BF4 on a 1 mmol scale after 2 h of grinding resulted in the formation of a mixture of two products, 1-fluoro-2-naphthol 3a and 1,1-difluoronaphthalen-2(1H)-one 4a with 9% and 4% yields, respectively (Table 1, Scheme 2). The ratio of difluoroketone to monofluoronaphthol, 4a:3a, was 2.25 in this case, with 13% overall conversion of the aromatic substrate. The 4a:3a ratio indicates the efficiency of the fluorinating reagent consumption. Full conversion of the starting material was achieved only after 4 days of grinding.
To improve the rate of fluorination, we decided to try a liquid-assisted grinding (LAG) approach with the addition of small amounts of solvents as grinding additives. As we demonstrated previously, the products of fluorination of 2-naphthols can be easily separated and purified by vacuum sublimation [14]. Therefore, non-volatile solvents were our choice as grinding additives. Ionic liquids represent a class of non-volatile [24], recyclable solvents that attract much attention as solvents, co-solvents, and catalysts [25,26,27,28].
In the second step, we chose PEG-400 as a representative non-volatile molecular grinding additive that has already been employed for green fluorination [29,30]. The addition of 10 mol% of relatively non-polar PEG-400 led to a moderate increase of the conversion of starting 2-naphthol to 22%. At the same time, 1-fluoro-2-naphthol became the major product, and the 4a:3a ratio was 0.17. One of the possible explanations for this is the prevention of the dissociation of 2-naphthol and 1-fluoro-2-naphthol that led to lower activity and better selectivity of monofluorination (Table 1).
The addition of 10 mol% of low volatile but polar DMF to the mixture of 1 and 2a led to a slightly higher conversion of 2-naphthol. The 4a:3a ratio obtained demonstrates the prevalence of naphthalenone 4a as the main product (Table 1, entry 3).
To further investigate the effects of additives on the reaction outcome, we used several ionic liquids, varying both cations and anions. First of all, we studied 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium-based ILs containing the complex fluoride anions BF4 and PF6 (Table 1, entries 4 and 5). In both cases, the conversion of 2-naphthol was only slightly higher than in the absence of additive, and 1-fluoro-2-naphthol 3a was obtained as the major product. Additionally, the selectivity of monofluorination was much lower than in the case of PEG-400 additive. In contrast, the triflate (OTf) IL demonstrated an acceleration of fluorination with the formation of ketone 4a as the major product (Table 1, entry 6). Finally, we investigated 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium bis(trifluorometanesulfonimide) (NTf2) as a hydrophobic ionic liquid additive. The conversion of 2-naphthol was higher than in cases of the complex anions but slightly lower than in the presence of the triflate IL (Table 1, entry 7).
To elucidate the effect of cation in IL, we repeated the fluorination with the addition of 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium ionic liquids. An increased conversion was achieved in the case of the triflate IL (Table 1, entry 9). Then, we investigated the influence of fluorosulfonimide (FSI) and trifluoromethylsulfonimide (NTf2) anions. A relatively high selectivity of difluorination was achieved, comparable with the fluorination without additives (emim NTf2), or even higher (emim FSI).
To further study the effect of cation in IL, we carried out fluorination in the presence of 1-butyl-2,3-dimethylimidazolium, 1-butyl-1-methylpyrrolidinium, 1-butylpyridinium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonimides), and 1-butyl-1-methylpyrrolidinium triflate. In all cases, the obtained conversions of 2-naphthol were lower than for bmim- or emim-based ILs (Table 1, entries 12–15).
The performed screening revealed that emim and bmim ILs with fluorous anions OTf and NTf2 work best as grinding additives. The obtained results are shown on Figure 1.
To elucidate the effect of additive quantity, we chose two emim-based ILs with OTf and NTf2 anions that most significantly increase the rate of fluorination (Table 2). The increase of loadings of IL additive to 15% led to an expected growth of conversion of 2-naphthol. But for triflate ILs, such an increase of conversion was not accompanied with improved selectivity; for the run with 15 mol% of emim OTf, 4a and 3a formed in almost equal quantities. On the contrary, an increase of emim NTf2 loading led to a pronounced increase of not only the conversion of 2-naphthol, but also the 4a:3a ratio, which indicated a higher conversion of fluorinating reagent. Therefore, we chose emim NTf2 for further reaction optimization. Moreover, this ionic liquid is particularly hydrophobic; hence, it should prevent or at least diminish the absorption of ambient moisture during synthesis.
To define an optimal time for the synthesis of the difluorinated product, we monitored the fluorination of 2-naphthol in the presence of 10 mol% of emim NTf2 until the fluorinating reagent was completely consumed (Table 2). Most of the aromatic substrate (>80%) was consumed after 4 h, with the formation of a mixture of mono- and difluorinated products. High selectivity towards difluoroketone 4a was achieved after 20 h, and after 24 h, only trace amounts of 3a could be detected spectroscopically.
We recently reported the dry method for the synthesis of organofluorine compounds based on mechanochemical fluorination followed by vacuum sublimation of the product directly from the reaction mixture.
A combination of ionic liquid-assisted grinding with vacuum sublimation of products resulted in improved preparative yields of 1,1-difluoronaphthalen-2(1H)-ones in comparison with previously reported manual grinding procedures. We consider Sheldon’s E-factor to analyze the outcome of the improved mechanochemical procedure. The E(nvironmental)-factor is one of the green chemistry metrics, calculated as a ratio of mass of waste/mass of product expressed as kgs/kg [31]. On a 1 mmol scale, we isolated unsubstituted 1,1-difluoronaphthalen-2(1H)-one with 88% yield, and the E-factor was determined to be as low as 4.6. The preparative yield of 6-bromo-1,1-difluoronaphthalen-2(1H)-one on the same molar loadings was even higher—94%, with an even lower E-factor of 3.0.
To prove the scalability of the reaction studied, we carried out the fluorination of 2-naphthol 2a on a 10 mmol scale. Fluorination of 1.44 g of 2-naphthol with 2-fold excess of F-TEDA-BF4 in the presence of emim NTf2 followed by vacuum sublimation of the product resulted in 68% preparative yield of the target 1,1-difluoronaphthalen-2(1H)-one 4a with 99% purity by GC. Even with a large excess of fluorinating reagent, the E-factor for this process could be estimated as 6.7.
Further, we decided to adapt the fluorination procedure to the late-stage functionalization of a practically important molecule. Thus, we performed a modification of naproxen, a widely used non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) that contains a fragment of 2-naphthol ether. Phenol ethers are typically less reactive in electrophilic aromatic substitution reactions. Thus, the fluorination of naproxen in the presence of emimNTf2 required 72 h of grinding to complete. The fluorination of naproxen led to the formation of a complex mixture of monofluoronaproxen 5, demethylated monofluoro derivative 3c, the target ketone 4c, and its hydrated form 6 (Scheme 3). After the completion of the reaction, the reaction mixture consisted of naphthalenone 4c and dihydroxy derivative 6. Drying of the ethereal solution resulted in obtaining pure 4c with 70% yield. The use of more hygroscopic emim OTf led to the isolation of a 7:1 mixture of 4c and 6 with 72% overall yield.
Finally, we investigated the ionic liquid-assisted fluorination of 1,3-dicarbonyl compounds. The fluorination of 2-methylcyclopenta-1,3-dione 7 with an equimolar amount of F-TEDA-BF4 on a 1 mmol scale in the presence of emim NTf2 led to complete conversion of the starting material to the expected 2-fluoro-2-methylcyclopenta-1,3-dione 8. Vacuum sublimation from the reaction mixture yielded pure 8 with 75% isolated yield; and the overall process has an E-factor of 4.2.
This procedure was employed for the fluorination of another NSAID, phenylbutazone 9 (Scheme 4). Already after 24 h of grinding, a 23% conversion to the corresponding product 10 was observed. Unfortunately, further grinding resulted in the formation of a viscous mixture that prevented efficient mixing of the reagents. After 55 h, only 25% of the target fluoro derivative 10 was formed.

3. Discussion

Solvent-free synthesis typically suffers from the insufficient diffusion rate of the reagents toward each other. During high-speed mixing, a local increase of temperature at the impact sites can result in local melting that speeds up the reaction. But such an intense impact can also cause the degradation of organic compounds. The use of milder grinding techniques results in low reaction rates. The addition of small amounts of liquid additives typically speeds up mechanochemical transformations. The possible mechanism of such an effect is the formation of a thin interface layer on the grain boundaries of solid reagents or solutions of both reagents at the interface. In that case, a lower viscosity of an additive should result in a higher reaction rate. As demonstrated in Figure 2, while no distinct correlation has been obtained, the lower viscosities of ionic liquids are typically associated with higher conversions of both aromatic substrate and fluorinating reagent.

4. Materials and Methods

1H-, 13C- and 19F-NMR spectra were recorded in CDCl3 or acetone-d6 on a Bruker AV-300 spectrometer (Karlsruhe, Germany) and chemical shifts are given in ppm relative to TMS and CFCl3, respectively, with C6F6 (19F, −162.9 ppm) or residual solvent signals (1H, 13C) as secondary external standards. GC/MS spectra were recorded on Agilent 6890 instrument operating at 70 eV with MSD Agilent 5973 (Santa Clara, CA, USA). High resolution mass spectra (HRMS) were measured using Thermo Fisher Scientific Double Focusing System (DFS) Magnetic Sector high resolution mass-spectrometer (Santa Clara, CA, USA) operating at 70 eV electron ionization and 200 °C ion source temperature. All reactants were obtained from commercial sources and used without further purification (F-TEDA-BF4 > 96%, 2-naphthol > 95%, 6-bromo-2-naphthol > 98%, ionic liquids > 99%, 2-Methyl-1,3-cyclopentanedione > 99%, (S)-naproxene, and phenylbutazone, pharm. grade). The spectral data of the products obtained were consistent with literature data. Mechanochemical experiments were carried out in the vibratory mortar grinder MLW KM1 (Leipzig, Germany) equipped with an agate grinding ball (198 g, Ø52 mm (See Supplementary Materials, Figure S1)). The experiments were carried out at 20–21 °C and 50–55% relative humidity (RH).

4.1. General Procedure for Screening of Additives in Liquid-Assisted Grinding

A mixture of 2-naphthol (144 mg, 1 mmol), F-TEDA-BF4 (709 mg, 2 mmol), and the additive (0.1–0.15 mmol, see Table 1 and Table 2) was manually homogenized for 1 min in a porcelain mortar. The reaction mixture was then transferred to the vibratory mortar grinder and was ground for the time required (Table 1 and Table 2). After the end of the process, the resulting mixture was transferred to a Soxhlet apparatus and continuously extracted with ether. The solvent was removed in vacuo to yield crude products which were analyzed by 1H-, 19F-NMR spectroscopy and GC/MS. Alternatively, the reaction mixture was transferred to a 1.5 mL centrifuge tube and extracted three times with CDCl3 by intensive vortex mixing followed by centrifugating. The combined extracts containing the aromatic substrate, the products, and the grinding additive were directly analyzed by 1H-, 19F-NMR spectroscopy. Yields were determined by comparing the intensities of signals of products in NMR spectra relative to the signal intensity of the additive or the weighted standard added (emim NTf2).

4.2. General Procedure for Fluorination Followed by Vacuum Sublimation

2-Naphthol (144 mg, 1 mmol), F-TEDA-BF4 (709 mg, 2 mmol), and emim NTf2 (39 mg, 0.1 mmol, 10 mol%) were homogenized manually by mortar and pestle for 1 min and transferred to the vibratory mortar grinder. The mixture was ground at room temperature until the fluorinating reagent was fully consumed (10 days). Then, the reaction mixture was transferred to a sublimation apparatus and the target 1,1-difluoronaphthalen-2(1H)-one was sublimed in vacuo at 70 °C; 1,1-Difluoronaphthalen-2(1H)-one (4a); yellow needles (158 mg, 88%); m.p. 50–51 °C; E-factor 4.6.
6-Bromo-1,1-difluoronaphthalen-2(1H)-one (4b) was obtained as yellow needles (244 mg, 94%); m.p. 67–68 °C [14]; E-factor 3.0.
2-Fluoro-2-methylcyclopenta-1,3-dione (8); colorless crystals (98 mg, 75%); E-factor 4.2.

4.3. General Procedure for the Scale-Up of Fluorination of 2-Naphthol with F-TEDA-BF4 Followed by Vacuum Sublimation

2-Naphthol (1.44 g, 10 mmol), F-TEDA-BF4 (7.78 g, 22 mmol), and emim NTf2 (196 mg, 0.5 mmol, 5 mol%) were homogenized manually by mortar and pestle for 1 min and then transferred to the vibratory mortar grinder. The mixture was ground at room temperature until the fluorinating reagent was fully consumed (36 h) as determined by 1H- and 19F-NMR. Then, the reaction mixture (9 g) was transferred to a sublimation apparatus and the target 1,1-difluoronaphthalen-2(1H)-one was sublimed in vacuo at 70 °C; 1,1-Difluoronaphthalen-2(1H)-one (4a); yellow needles (1.23 g, 68%); m.p. 50–51 °C; E-factor 6.7.

4.4. Fluorination of Naproxen

(2S)-2-(6-methoxy(2-naphthyl))propanoic acid (naproxen) (115.2 mg, 0.5 mmol), F-TEDA-BF4 (390.0 mg, 1.1 mmol), and emim NTf2 (19.8 mg, 0.05 mmol) were ground in the vibratory mortar grinder for 72 h with occasional manual mixing of the reaction mixture. After the end of the grinding time, the reaction mixture was extracted with ether, and the extract was washed with water to remove the IL additive, dried, and evaporated in vacuo; 2-(5,5-difluoro-6-oxo-5,6-dihydronaphthalen-2-yl)propionic acid was obtained (88 mg, 70%) [32].

5. Conclusions

An efficient and ecologically benign method for fluorination of activated aromatic compounds and 1,3-dicarbonyl compounds was developed using small amounts of ionic liquids as grinding additives. The influence of cation and anion of ionic liquids on the rate and selectivity of solvent-free fluorination of 2-naphthol was investigated. Emim-derived ionic liquids with the fluorous anions OTf or NTf2 were shown to be the most efficient promoters. A solvent-free fluorination of 2-naphthol and 6-bromo-2-naphthol was performed, followed by vacuum sublimation for the isolation of fluorinated products, with high yields and purity. The fluorination procedure was adapted for the fluorination of 1,3-dicarbonyl compounds. The low E-factor values of 3–6.7 were achieved for the proposed dry fluorination method. Fluorination of the practically useful non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs naproxen and phenylbutazone was also performed.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online, Figure S1: mechanochemical setup.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.A.Z.; methodology, P.A.Z.; investigation, P.A.Z., O.T.D. and I.R.E.; writing—original draft preparation, P.A.Z., O.T.D.; writing—review and editing, P.A.Z., O.T.D. and I.R.E.; supervision, P.A.Z., G.I.B.; project administration, P.A.Z.; funding acquisition, P.A.Z., O.T.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, grant numbers 20-03-00700 (P.A.Z., I.R.E., G.I.B.) and 19-33-60101 (O.T.D.).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in the present article.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Multi-Access Chemical Service Centre of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences at the N.N. Vorozhtsov Novosibirsk Institute of Organic Chemistry SB RAS for spectral analyses.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

Sample Availability

Samples of the compounds 4ac are available from the authors.

References

  1. Zhou, Y.; Wang, J.; Gu, Z.; Wang, S.; Zhu, W.; Aceña, J.L.; Soloshonok, V.A.; Izawa, K.; Liu, H. Next Generation of Fluorine-Containing Pharmaceuticals, Compounds Currently in Phase II–III Clinical Trials of Major Pharmaceutical Companies: New Structural Trends and Therapeutic Areas. Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 422–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Lin, A.; Huehls, C.B.; Yang, J. Recent advances in C–H fluorination. Org. Chem. Front. 2014, 1, 434–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zaikin, P.A.; Borodkin, G.I. Electrophilic and Oxidative Fluorination of Aromatic Compounds. In Late-Stage Fluorination of Bioactive Molecules and Biologically-Relevant Substrates; Postigo, A., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 105–135. ISBN 978-0-12-812958-6. [Google Scholar]
  4. Borodkin, G.I.; Shubin, V.G. The selectivity problem in electrophilic fluorination of aromatic compounds. Russ. Chem. Rev. 2010, 79, 259–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Bryan, M.C.; Dunn, P.J.; Entwistle, D.; Gallou, F.; Koenig, S.G.; Hayler, J.D.; Hickey, M.R.; Hughes, S.; Kopach, M.E.; Moine, G.; et al. Key Green Chemistry research areas from a pharmaceutical manufacturers’ perspective revisited. Green Chem. 2018, 20, 5082–5103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Stavber, G.; Zupan, M.; Jereb, M.; Stavber, S. Selective and Effective Fluorination of Organic Compounds in Water Using Selectfluor F-TEDA-BF 4. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 4973–4976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Borodkin, G.I.; Zaikin, P.A.; Shubin, V.G. Eco-Friendly Fluorination of Aromatic Compounds with F-TEDA-BF4 Reagent in Water. Chem. Sust. Devel. 2011, 19, 593–598. [Google Scholar]
  8. Fields, S.C.; Lo, W.C.; Brewster, W.K.; Lowe, C.T. Electrophilic fluorination: The aminopyridine dilemma. Tetrahedron Lett. 2010, 51, 79–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Laali, K.K.; Borodkin, G.I. First application of ionic liquids in electrophilic fluorination of arenes; SelectfluorTM (F-TEDA-BF4) for “green” fluorination. J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 2 2002, 2, 953–957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Baudequin, C.; Loubassou, J.F.; Plaquevent, J.C.; Cahard, D. Enantioselective electrophilic fluorinations: A study of the fluorine-transfer from achiral N-F reagents to cinchona alkaloids. J. Fluor. Chem. 2003, 122, 189–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Stavber, G.; Zupan, M.; Stavber, S. Solvent-free fluorination of organic compounds using N-F reagents. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48, 2671–2673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Andreev, R.V.; Borodkin, G.I.; Shubin, V.G. Fluorination of aromatic compounds with N-fluorobenzenesulfonimide under solvent-free conditions. Russ. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 45, 1468–1473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Stavber, G.; Stavber, S. Towards greener fluorine organic chemistry: Direct electrophilic fluorination of carbonyl compounds in water and under solvent-free reaction conditions. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2010, 352, 2838–2846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zaikin, P.A.; Dyan, O.T.; Evtushok, D.V.; Usoltsev, A.N.; Borodkin, G.I.; Karpova, E.V.; Shubin, V.G. Solvent-Free Fluorination of Electron-Rich Aromatic Compounds with F-TEDA-BF 4 : Toward “Dry” Processes. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2017, 2017, 2469–2474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Howard, J.L.; Sagatov, Y.; Browne, D.L. Mechanochemical electrophilic fluorination of liquid beta-ketoesters. Tetrahedron 2018, 74, 3118–3123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Howard, J.L.; Nicholson, W.; Sagatov, Y.; Browne, D.L. One-pot multistep mechanochemical synthesis of fluorinated pyrazolones. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2017, 13, 1950–1956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Cao, Q.; Howard, J.L.; Crawford, D.E.; James, S.L.; Browne, D.L. Translating solid state organic synthesis from a mixer mill to a continuous twin screw extruder. Green Chem. 2018, 20, 4443–4447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Howard, J.L.; Sagatov, Y.; Repusseau, L.; Schotten, C.; Browne, D.L. Controlling reactivity through liquid assisted grinding: The curious case of mechanochemical fluorination. Green Chem. 2017, 19, 2798–2802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhang, S.; Sun, N.; He, X.; Lu, X.; Zhang, X. Physical Properties of Ionic Liquids: Database and Evaluation. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 2006, 35, 1475–1517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hashkov, M.V.; Sidelnikov, V.N.; Zaikin, P.A. Selectivity of stationary phases based on pyridinium ionic liquids for capillary gas chromatography. Russ. J. Phys. Chem. A 2014, 88, 717–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Borodkin, G.I.; Elanov, I.R.; Shubin, V.G. Promotional effect of ionic liquids in electrophilic fluorination of phenols. Arkivoc 2017, 2018, 60–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Negishi, M.; Ogawa, S.; Osawa, M.; Kawara, T.; Kusumoto, T.; Takeuchi, K.; Takehara, S.; Takatsu, H. Design, Synthesis and Physical Properties of New Liquid Crystal Materials for Active Matrix LCD (2). Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. Sci. Technol. Sect. A Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 2001, 364, 865–872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Dyan, O.T.; Zaikin, P.A.; Fadeev, D.S.; Gatilov, Y.V.; Borodkin, G.I. 1,1-Difluoronaphthalen-2(1 H)-ones as building blocks for fluorinated tetraphenes. J. Fluor. Chem. 2018, 210, 88–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Esperança, J.M.S.S.; Canongia Lopes, J.N.; Tariq, M.; Santos, L.M.N.B.F.; Magee, J.W.; Rebelo, L.P.N. Volatility of Aprotic Ionic Liquids—A Review. J. Chem. Eng. Data 2010, 55, 3–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Heravi, M.R.P. Fluorination of activated aromatic systems with SelectfluorTM F-TEDA-BF4 in ionic liquids. J. Fluor. Chem. 2008, 129, 217–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Mai, N.L.; Ahn, K.; Koo, Y.M. Methods for recovery of ionic liquids—A review. Process Biochem. 2014, 49, 872–881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhou, J.; Sui, H.; Jia, Z.; Yang, Z.; He, L.; Li, X. Recovery and purification of ionic liquids from solutions: A review. RSC Adv. 2018, 8, 32832–32864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Vekariya, R.L. A review of ionic liquids: Applications towards catalytic organic transformations. J. Mol. Liq. 2017, 227, 44–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Bi, J.; Zhang, Z.; Liu, Q.; Zhang, G. Catalyst-free and highly selective electrophilic mono-fluorination of acetoacetamides: Facile and efficient preparation of 2-fluoroacetoacetamides in PEG-400. Green Chem. 2012, 14, 1159–1162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhang, Z.; Bi, J.; Liu, Q.; Zhang, G. The synthesis of α,α-difluoroacetamides via electrophilic fluorination in the mixed-solvent of water and PEG-400. J. Fluor. Chem. 2013, 151, 45–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Sheldon, R.A. The E factor 25 years on: The rise of green chemistry and sustainability. Green Chem. 2017, 19, 18–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Borodkin, G.I.; Elanov, I.R.; Gatilov, Y.V.; Shubin, V.G. Direct electrophilic fluorination of naproxen with NF-reagents. J. Fluor. Chem. 2019, 228, 109412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Scheme 1. Solvent-free electrophilic fluorination of aromatic and 1,3-dicarbonyl compounds.
Scheme 1. Solvent-free electrophilic fluorination of aromatic and 1,3-dicarbonyl compounds.
Molecules 26 05756 sch001
Scheme 2. Mechanochemical electrophilic fluorination of naphthols in the presence of grinding additives.
Scheme 2. Mechanochemical electrophilic fluorination of naphthols in the presence of grinding additives.
Molecules 26 05756 sch002
Figure 1. Effect of grinding additives on the electrophilic fluorination of 2-naphthol.
Figure 1. Effect of grinding additives on the electrophilic fluorination of 2-naphthol.
Molecules 26 05756 g001
Scheme 3. Mechanochemical electrophilic fluorination of naproxen in the presence of emim NTf2.
Scheme 3. Mechanochemical electrophilic fluorination of naproxen in the presence of emim NTf2.
Molecules 26 05756 sch003
Scheme 4. Mechanochemical electrophilic fluorination of 2-methylcyclopenta-1,3-dione and phenylbutazone in the presence of emim NTf2.
Scheme 4. Mechanochemical electrophilic fluorination of 2-methylcyclopenta-1,3-dione and phenylbutazone in the presence of emim NTf2.
Molecules 26 05756 sch004
Figure 2. Effect of viscosity of grinding additives on the electrophilic fluorination of 2-naphthol.
Figure 2. Effect of viscosity of grinding additives on the electrophilic fluorination of 2-naphthol.
Molecules 26 05756 g002
Table 1. The influence of grinding additives on the rate and selectivity of fluorination of 2-naphthol with F-TEDA-BF4.
Table 1. The influence of grinding additives on the rate and selectivity of fluorination of 2-naphthol with F-TEDA-BF4.
EntryAdditive 1Products Yields 2Conversion of 2a, %4a:3a
1None4a (9%), 3a (4%)132.3
2PEG-4004a (4%), 3a (26%)300.2
3DMF4a (20%), 3a (16%)361.2
4bmim BF44a (8%), 3a (17%)250.5
5bmim PF64a (6%), 3a (10%)160.6
6bmim OTf4a (36%), 3a (31%)671.2
7bmim NTf24a (28%), 3a (21%)491.3
8emim BF44a (9%), 3a (14%)230.6
9emim OTf4a (40%), 3a (32%)721.2
10emim NTf24a (35%), 3a (23%)581.5
11emim FSI4a (27%), 3a (7%)343.9
12bmp OTf4a (11%), 3a (22%)330.5
13bmp NTf24a (16%), 3a (16%)321.0
14bdmim NTf24a (22%), 3a (21%)431.0
15bpy NTf24a (25%), 3a (21%)461.2
1 1 mmol of 2a, 2 mmol of 1, 0.1 mmol of additives, 2 h, RT. 2 Yields are determined by 19F-NMR using internal standard.
Table 2. The influence of grinding additives on the rate and selectivity of fluorination of 2-naphthol with F-TEDA-BF4.
Table 2. The influence of grinding additives on the rate and selectivity of fluorination of 2-naphthol with F-TEDA-BF4.
EntryAdditiveIL Amount,
mol%
Reaction Time,
h
Products Yields 14a:3a
1emim OTf1024a (40%), 3a (32%)1.2
2emim NTf21024a (35%), 3a (23%)1.5
3emim OTf1524a (40%), 3a (37%)1.1
4emim NTf21524a (69%), 3a (16%)4.1
5emim NTf21724a (77%), 3a (5%)14.0
6emim OTf1044a (62%), 3a (21%)2.9
7emim NTf21044a (59%), 3a (21%)2.8
8emim NTf210204a (89%), 3a (2%)44.5
9emim NTf210244a (87%), 3a (1%)87
1 Yields are determined by 19F-NMR using internal standard.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zaikin, P.A.; Dyan, O.T.; Elanov, I.R.; Borodkin, G.I. Ionic Liquid-Assisted Grinding: An Electrophilic Fluorination Benchmark. Molecules 2021, 26, 5756. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26195756

AMA Style

Zaikin PA, Dyan OT, Elanov IR, Borodkin GI. Ionic Liquid-Assisted Grinding: An Electrophilic Fluorination Benchmark. Molecules. 2021; 26(19):5756. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26195756

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zaikin, Pavel A., Ok Ton Dyan, Innokenty R. Elanov, and Gennady I. Borodkin. 2021. "Ionic Liquid-Assisted Grinding: An Electrophilic Fluorination Benchmark" Molecules 26, no. 19: 5756. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26195756

APA Style

Zaikin, P. A., Dyan, O. T., Elanov, I. R., & Borodkin, G. I. (2021). Ionic Liquid-Assisted Grinding: An Electrophilic Fluorination Benchmark. Molecules, 26(19), 5756. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26195756

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop