Next Article in Journal
Energetic Bio-Activation of Some Organic Molecules and Their Antioxidant Activity in the Pulp of the Moroccan Argan Tree «Argania spinosa L.»
Previous Article in Journal
Metabolite Profiling of “Green” Extracts of Cynara cardunculus subsp. scolymus, Cultivar “Carciofo di Paestum” PGI by 1H NMR and HRMS-Based Metabolomics
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 27
Issue 10
10.3390/molecules27103330
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Thermo-Responsive ZnPc-g-TiO2-g-PNIPAM Photocatalysts Sensitized with Phthalocyanines for Water Purification under Visible Light

by
Bingxin Mao
1,
Cong Liu
1,
Xu Cui
1,*,
Yanhui Li
1 and
Qian Duan
1,2,*
1
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Changchun University of Science and Technology, Changchun 130022, China
2
Engineering Research Center of Optoelectronic Functional Materials, Ministry of Education, Changchun 130022, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2022, 27(10), 3330; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27103330
Submission received: 26 April 2022 / Revised: 14 May 2022 / Accepted: 20 May 2022 / Published: 22 May 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Photochemistry)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
A novel thermo-responsive 2,9(10),16(17),23(24)-tetrakis[(3-carboxyacrylamide) phthalocyaninato] zinc (ZnPc)-g-TiO2-g-poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) (PNIPAM) photocatalyst modified with phthalocyanines was prepared. The photocatalyst exhibited thermo-responsive properties due to the introduction of PNIPAM, which performed recovery for reuse above the lower critical solution temperature (LCST, about 26 °C). ZnPc-g-TiO2-g-PNIPAM effectively expanded the light response range to the visible light region and inhibited the recombination of electron–hole pairs, which enhanced the performance of the photocatalyst. As expected, ZnPc-g-TiO2-g-PNIPAM (0.3 g/L) exhibited excellent photocatalytic performance for the removal of Rhodamine B (RhB, 1.0 × 10−5 mol/L) and methylene blue (MB, 1.0 × 10−5 mol/L) under visible light, which reached 97.2% and 88.6% at 20 °C within 40 min, respectively. Furthermore, the influence of temperature upon photocatalytic performance was also investigated. When the temperature increased from 20 °C to 45 °C, the removal of RhB decreased by approximately 53.8%. The stability of the photocatalyst demonstrated that the photocatalytic activity was still above 80% for the removal of RhB after 3 cycles. Above all, this work provided an intelligent thermally responsive photocatalyst based on phthalocyanine for water purification under visible light.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

In recent years, industrial development has led to undesirable environmental problems around the world, especially water pollution, causing serious health consequences for all living beings [1,2]. As a green and energy-saving technology, photocatalysis has been considered to be one of the most effective methods in environmental protection by means of the utilization of solar energy, especially in eliminating hazardous pollutants in water [3,4]. The realization of photocatalytic technology depends on the preparation of high-performance photocatalysts [5,6,7]. As the first reported photocatalyst in 1972 [8], TiO2 has received an increasing amount of attention, owing to its chemical stability, low cost, nontoxicity and high photocatalytic activity [9,10]. Unfortunately, in addition to the above advantages, the large band gaps (3.2 eV), the limitation of visible light absorption and the fast recombination rate of electron–hole pairs still restrict the application of TiO2 in the field of photocatalysis [11,12].
In order to overcome the shortcomings of TiO2, various methods have been developed by doping, defecting, modifying surface and sensitizing [10]. Among the various possible strategies, sensitizing appears to be a good option due to the simple operating procedure and mild reaction [13]. Phthalocyanines (Pcs), as a kind of organic semiconductor, have a strong response at around 600~800 nm and can broaden the light response range of TiO2 to the visible light area [14], which can also accelerate the transmission of photogenerated electrons [15]. Pcs-sensitized TiO2 shows a higher degradation rate than pure TiO2; however, there are still some drawbacks which limit its further development, such as easy aggregation, which reduces catalytic efficiency, and inefficient recovery, inducing secondary pollution in water treatment.
As a thermo-responsive polymer, poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) (PNIPAM) possesses a lower critical solution temperature (LCST) of about 32 °C [16,17], and PNIPAM-grafted materials also exhibit temperature-sensitive properties. Above LCST, PNIPAM-grafted materials are hydrophobic, and they will push material chains out of the water to facilitate recovery, which can effectively overcome the above shortage of photocatalysts. Duan et al. reported PNIPAM/TiO2 nanoparticles with thermal responsibility, and their photocatalytic activity was enhanced by combining them with polymers [18]. Therefore, constructing a thermal-responsive photocatalyst will enable composites to have a broader application field. Herein, we prepared a novel phthalocyanine-based thermo-responsive ZnPc-g-TiO2-g-PNIPAM photocatalyst, as shown in Scheme 1. PNIPAM and ZnPc were grafted on TiO2 by radical polymerization and chemical bonds, respectively. PNIPAM grafting possesses excellent thermo-responsive properties and ZnPc-sensitizing enhances photocatalytic activity for the pollutant removal. In addition, recyclability and photocatalytic mechanism were investigated. The results show that the recovery efficiency of ZnPc-g-TiO2-g-PNIPAM is improved while maintaining excellent photocatalytic performance and cycling stability. Above all, this work was expected to fabricate an effective, stable and recyclable photocatalyst for organic pollutants removal.

2. Results and Discussion

Figure 1A shows the XRD patterns of TiO2, TiO2-g-MPS, TiO2-g-PNIPAM and ZnPc-g-TiO2-g-PNIPAM. TiO2 exhibited high crystallinity and all the diffraction peaks were attributed to anatase TiO2 (PDF # 21-1272). After MPS, PNIPAM and ZnPc were grafted on TiO2, the prepared TiO2-g-MPS, TiO2-g-PNIPAM and ZnPc-g-TiO2-g-PNIPAM show the same diffraction peaks belonging to anatase TiO2 and no new diffraction peaks were found, indicating surface modification has little effect on the structure of TiO2.
FT-IR spectra were performed to further explore the composition of prepared samples, as shown in Figure 1B. Compared with TiO2, the absorption peaks of TiO2-g-MPS at 1320 and 1299 cm−1 were attributed to -C-CO-O- skeletal vibration, and C-H bending vibration was found at 1469 cm−1, which indicates that TiO2 was successfully modified by MPS. For TiO2-g-PNIPAM, the strong characteristic peaks at 1645 and 1542 cm−1 were attributed to -C=O vibration and N-H bending vibration, indicating PNIPAM grafted on TiO2. For ZnPc-g-TiO2-g-PNIPAM, the characteristic peak at 1651 cm−1 was overlapped with the amide I band of PNIPAM, and 1395 cm−1 was attributed to the -COOTi- bond, which was formed by the reaction between -OH on TiO2 and -COOH of ZnPc [19,20]. The above analysis shows that ZnPc and PNIPAM were successfully grafted on TiO2.
In order to further explore the structure of ZnPc-g-TiO2-g-PNIPAM, XPS spectra of ZnPc-g-TiO2-g-PNIPAM were examined. It can be found from Figure 2A that there are four main elements (Ti, C, N and O) in ZnPc-g-TiO2-g-PNIPAM. Figure 2B presents the Ti 2p peaks of ZnPc-g-TiO2-g-PNIPAM, with two peaks at 463.9 eV and 458.2 eV, respectively. The difference between the two peaks was 5.7 eV, indicating Ti4+ existed in ZnPc-g-TiO2-g-PNIPAM [21]. Figure 2C shows the C 1s peaks at 288.2 eV, 287.0 eV, 285.6 eV and 284.5 eV due to N-C=N, N-C=O, C-C=O and C-C, respectively [14,22]. The O1s peaks at 531.8 eV, 529.5 eV and 532.8 eV are observed in Figure 2D, corresponding to -OH species, lattice oxygen in TiO2 and C=O in PNIPAM. The N 1s peak at 398.3 eV was assigned to C-N for the PNIPAM-grafted TiO2 in Figure 2E. Meanwhile, the N 1s peaks at 400.0 eV and 399.1 eV were attributed to pyridyl N and pyrrolic N. The above results reveal that ZnPc and PNIPAM were successfully combined with TiO2.
The SEM images of TiO2, TiO2-g-PNIPAM and ZnPc-g-TiO2-g-PNIPAM were shown in Figure 3. In Figure 3A, TiO2 nanoparticles displayed uniform spherical morphology with the diameter of about 20–50 nm. Compared with TiO2, there was no obvious change for TiO2-g-PNIPAM and ZnPc-g-TiO2-g-PNIPAM in Figure 3B,C. Moreover, the elemental mapping image confirmed Ti, C, O and Zn elements in ZnPc-g-TiO2-g-PNIPAM (Figure S1), further proving that ZnPcs were distributed on ZnPc-g-TiO2-g-PNIPAM.
The thermal stability of the prepared samples by TG further confirmed the organic layer coating on TiO2 in Figure 4. Compared with TiO2, TiO2-g-MPS shows a weight loss of about 7.6 wt% when heating to 900 °C, due to the desorption of adsorbed water and decomposition of MPS. For TiO2-g-PNIPAM, there was obvious weightlessness at 290–440 °C originating from the decomposition of PNIPAM. Meanwhile, by comparing TiO2-g-PNIPAM and ZnPc-g-TiO2-g-PNIPAM at 800–900 °C, the tiny difference might be due to the ZnPc decomposition in ZnPc-g-TiO2-g-PNIPAM.
The specific surface areas and porous structures of TiO2 and ZnPc-g-TiO2-g-PNIPAM were investigated, as shown in Figure S2. The specific surface areas of TiO2 and ZnPc-g-TiO2-g-PNIPAM were 64 m2/g and 36 m2/g in Figure S2A and their pore size distributions were mainly around 3–15 nm in Figure S2B. Compared with TiO2, ZnPc-g-TiO2-g-PNIPAM had lower specific surface area, which might be due to the more crowded particle internal space with PNIPAM and ZnPc grafting.
UV-vis spectra of ZnPc in dimethyl sulfoxide shows B band at 361 nm and Q band at 699 nm (Figure S3), revealing a strong absorption of ZnPc in visible light region. The optical properties of TiO2 and ZnPc-g-TiO2-g-PNIPAM were also studied by UV-vis diffuse reflectance spectroscopy in Figure 5. The absorption of pure TiO2 was mainly in the UV region, and almost no absorption under visible light is observed in Figure 5A. Compared with TiO2, ZnPc-g-TiO2-g-PNIPAM shows strong absorption in the visible light region, indicating that ZnPc-sensitized TiO2 could effectively broaden the light response range. Meanwhile, Figure 5B shows the estimated band gaps of TiO2 and ZnPc-g-TiO2-g-PNIPAM, which are about 3.19 eV and 2.88 eV, respectively. Although pure TiO2 had a large band gap, ZnPc-sensitized TiO2 could significantly reduce the band gap and benefit the absorption of visible light.
In this study, the LSCT was arbitrarily defined as the temperature corresponding to a 10% decrease in transmittance (see Supplementary Materials). The LCST of ZnPc-g-TiO2-g-PNIPAM was 26 °C (Figure S4), which is lower than PNIPAM homopolymers. It can be attributed to hydrophobic ZnPc existing in the photocatalyst, which decreases its hydrophilicity, resulting in the low LCST. When the temperature reached 45 °C (>LCST), the PNIPAM chain grafted on the surface of TiO2 became hydrophobic and ZnPc-g-TiO2-g-PNIPAM quickly separated from the solution in 120 min, as seen in Figure S5. Meanwhile, for TiO2, there was no obvious change at 45 °C in 120 min. Therefore, the introduction of PNIPAM facilitates the recovery of photocatalyst.

2.1. Photocatalytic Activity

The photocatalytic activities of prepared photocatalysts were mainly evaluated by the removal of RhB and MB. First, the removal efficiencies of RhB by different amounts of ZnPc-g-TiO2-g-PNIPAM with H2O2 (1 mL) under visible light in 40 min at 20 °C were studied. As shown in Figure 6A, the photocatalytic activity improved steadily with photocatalyst concentration increased to 0.3 g/L. However, when the concentration of ZnPc-g-TiO2-g-PNIPAM reached 0.4 g/L, the removal efficiency decreased, which can be attributed to the aggregation of photocatalysts and the reduction in effective active sites.
Figure 6B shows the removal efficiencies of RhB (4.8 mg/L) by blank, H2O2, ZnPc-g-TiO2-g-PNIPAM and ZnPc-g-TiO2-g-PNIPAM/H2O2 under visible light at 20 °C. It can be found that RhB was difficult to removed without photocatalysts, and the removal of RhB by pure H2O2 (1 mL) was only 27% in 40 min. Meanwhile, for TiO2, which did not absorb visible light, the removal efficiency of RhB could reach 25.8% under visible light in 40 min. That was because RhB can be excited by visible light, and when the concentration of RhB was high, photogenerated electrons could be transferred to TiO2, resulting in a low efficiency in the photocatalytic activity of TiO2 in RhB solution under visible light [23,24]. It can also be found that the removal of RhB was 97.2% after ZnPc-g-TiO2-g-PNIPAM (0.3 g/L) combined with H2O2 in 40 min under visible light, which was higher than ZnPc-g-TiO2-g-PNIPAM. More radicals were generated to remove RhB under visible light because photocatalysts absorbed visible light and transferred energy to H2O2.
Figure 6C also shows the removal of MB (8.0 mg/L) with prepared samples. The removal efficiency of H2O2, ZnPc-g-TiO2-g-PNIPAM and ZnPc-g-TiO2-g-PNIPAM/H2O2 was 24.7%, 20.9% and 88.6%, respectively, in 40 min under visible light at 20 °C. ZnPc-g-TiO2-g-PNIPAM/H2O2 also shows better photocatalytic performance than others. The effects of temperature on the visible-light photocatalytic properties of the ZnPc-g-TiO2-g-PNIPAM were investigated. Figure 6D shows the photocatalytic efficiency of ZnPc-g-TiO2-g-PNIPAM/H2O2 for RhB removal at different temperatures, including lower that (20 °C), similar to (38 °C) and significantly higher than (45 °C) LCST. It can be found that ZnPc-g-TiO2-g-PNIPAM at 20 °C exhibited better photocatalytic performance than 38 °C and 45 °C, and the removal efficiency of RhB at 45 °C in 40 min was 43.4%. This indicates that temperature variation can significantly affect the activity of photocatalytic performance for RhB removal, which might be due to PNIPAM chains becoming hydrophobic above LCST and covering the surface of TiO2, thus resulting in the reduction in active sites in the photocatalytic reaction. ZnPc-g-TiO2-g-PNIPAM also exhibited high photocatalytic activity for the removal of TC•HCl (10 mg/L), and the removal efficiency could reach 31.9% in 75 min under visible light (Figure S6). To investigate the kinetic behavior of RhB and MB photodegradation, experimental data were fitted with zero-order, first-order and second-order models. The R2 values are shown in Figure S7; the higher correlation coefficient of zero-order kinetics illustrates good agreement between the data and the equation [2].
ZnPc-g-TiO2-g-PNIPAM after the photocatalytic reaction was collected at 45 °C and washed with ethanol/water solution for 90 min then dried at 60 °C under vacuum for the next experiment. As shown in Figure 7A, ZnPc-g-TiO2-g-PNIPAM still maintained high photocatalytic activity after three cycles, and the decreased efficiency was mainly caused by the loss in the recovery process. Moreover, after three photocatalytic tests, FT-IR spectra (Figure 7B), the XRD pattern (Figure 7C) and the SEM image of ZnPc-g-TiO2-g-PNIPAM displayed no obvious changes compared with the pristine photocatalyst. Therefore, the above results show that ZnPc-g-TiO2-g-PNIPAM had good stability.

2.2. Mechanism Discussion

Figure 8A shows the mechanism during the process of RhB removal by using trapping agents of benzoquinone (BQ) and isopropanol (IPA) to capture O2·− and OH·. It can be found that the photocatalytic activity decreased after adding BQ and IPA, indicating that O2·− and OH· were the main active substances. Photoluminescence (PL) spectra were usually used to evaluate the recombination ability of photogenerated electron–hole pairs. As shown in Figure 8B, the PL peak intensity of ZnPc-g-TiO2-g-PNIPAM under excitation of 315 nm was lower than TiO2, which confirmed that ZnPc-sensitized TiO2 could effectively promote photoelectron migration. Moreover, EIS Nyquist plots of TiO2 and ZnPc-g-TiO2-g-PNIPAM were shown in Figure 8C, and the smaller arc radius indicated the higher transfer efficiency of photogenerated electron–hole pairs [25]. ZnPc-g-TiO2-g-PNIPAM exhibited a smaller arc radius than TiO2, revealing faster charge transfer capability. Figure 8D illustrated the possible mechanism of ZnPc-g-TiO2-g-PNIPAM under visible light. Band gap values of TiO2 and ZnPc were 3.19 eV (Figure 5B) and 2.15 eV, respectively, based on our previous study [26]. Under visible light irradiation, photoelectrons were generated by ZnPc and then transferred to the conduction band (CB) of TiO2. O2 obtained photoelectrons and formed O2·−. Then, H2O2 and O2·− formed OH· for pollutant removal. Therefore, ZnPc-sensitized TiO2 effectively improved the photocatalytic activity of the photocatalyst for the removal of organic pollutant under visible light.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Materials

N-isopropylacrylamide (NIPAM) was purchased from TCI (Shanghai, China) Development Co., Ltd. TiO2, 3-(methacryloxypropyl)-trimethoxysilane (MPS), triethylamine, potassium persulfate (KPS), benzoquinone (BQ) and isopropanol (IPA) were purchased by Shanghai Aladdin Bio-Chem Technology Co., Ltd. Rhodamine B (RhB), methylene blue (MB), and tetracycline hydrochloride (TC•HCl) were provided by Shanghai Macklin Biochemical Co., Ltd. Other reagents were purchased and used directly.

3.2. Characterization

Powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were created with RigakuUltima VI diffractometer using Cu-Kα radiation. Fourier transform infrared spectra (FT-IR) were recorded on Perkin Elmer Frontier spectrometer. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was analyzed by means of a JEM-6701F and equipped with an Oxford INCA PentaFET-x3 EDS system. Thermogravimetric analysis (TG) was performed by NETZSCH STA 409PC. Photoluminescence (PL) spectra were analyzed using a PerkinElmer LS55 fluorescence spectrophotometer for solid samples. UV-vis diffuse reflectance spectroscopy was analyzed using a Shimadzu UV-3600 with MPC-3100. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was performed with Thermo Scientific ESCALAB 250Xi XPS. N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms were operated on V-Sorb 2800TP.

3.3. Surface Modification of TiO2

The surface of TiO2 was modified by MPS to obtain TiO2-g-MPS. TiO2 (1 g, 12.5 mmol) was dispersed in 80 mL methylbenzene by ultrasonication for 20 min. When the mixture was heated to 100 °C, MPS (50 µL, 0.2 mmol) and triethylamine (60 µL, 0.4 mmol) were gradually added to the above solution, which was still stirred for 3 h. Then, the obtained TiO2-g-MPS was washed with water and dried at 55 °C for 24 h. Yield 47%.

3.4. PNIPAM Grafting on TiO2

The surface of TiO2 was functionalized with PNIPAM by radical polymerization to obtain TiO2-g-PNIPAM [27]. TiO2-g-MPS (500 mg) and NIPAM (250 mg, 2.2 mmol) were added to 50 mL deionized water and stirred for 30 min under nitrogen atmosphere. When heated to 70 °C, KPS solution (1 mL, 8 g/L) was added to the above solution. After stirring for 3 h, the solution was cooled down to room temperature and stirred for another 4 h. The obtained TiO2-g-PNIPAM was centrifuged and washed with deionized water. The obtained product was dried in 40 °C for 24 h. Yield 54%.

3.5. Immobilizing ZnPc on TiO2-g-PNIPAM

The detailed synthetic procedure of 2,9(10),16(17),23(24)-tetrakis[(3-carboxyacrylamide)phthalocyaninato]zinc (ZnPc) is shown in the Supporting Information (Scheme S1). TiO2-g-PNIPAM (100 mg) was dispersed into 30 mL water by ultrasound for 20 min. ZnPc (1 mg, 1 mol) was dissolved in 1 mL dimethyl sulfoxide and then added dropwise to the above solution. After stirring for 24 h, the obtained ZnPc-g-TiO2-g-PNIPAM was washed with water and ethanol. The yield was 41%.

3.6. Photocatalytic Experiments

The photocatalytic activities of photocatalysts were investigated by the removal of RhB, MB and TC•HCl under visible light. The visible light source was generated by a 300 W Xe lamp equipped with a 420 nm cut-off filter. The amount of photocatalysts was 0.3 g/L. The initial concentrations of RhB, MB and TC•HCl were 4.8 mg/L, 8.0 mg/L and 10 mg/L, respectively. Before irradiation, suspensions were stirred for 30 min to reach the equilibrium of adsorption-desorption in dark and H2O2 (1 mL) used as control. After illumination, a sample (3 mL) was taken from the suspension and the concentration was monitored by UV-2600 spectrophotometer. The characteristic absorption wavelength of RhB, MB and TC•HCl were at 554 nm, 664 nm and 357 nm [28,29].

4. Conclusions

A thermo-responsive ZnPc-g-TiO2-g-PNIPAM photocatalyst sensitized with phthalocyanines was prepared. Above LCST (26 °C), it would accelerate to separate photocatalyst from solution and had effect on the photocatalytic activity. ZnPc-grafted on TiO2 would broaden the light response range to the visible light region and improve the separation of electron–hole pairs. ZnPc-g-TiO2-g-PNIPAM exhibited high photocatalytic activity for RhB and MB removal, about 97.2% and 88.6% at 20 °C in 40 min, respectively. Meanwhile, temperature has an obvious effect on the removal of RhB, and the removal rate of RhB was reduced from 97.2% to 43.4% with temperature increasing from 20 °C to 45 °C. Furthermore, ZnPc-g-TiO2-g-PNIPAM also shows good recycle stability. Therefore, it is believed that the photocatalyst constructed by PNIPAM, TiO2 and ZnPc would have an important application in water treatment.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules27103330/s1, Figure S1. EDS spectrum and elemental mapping images of ZnPc-g-TiO2-g-PNIPAM. Figure S2. N2 sorption isotherms and pore-size distribution of TiO2 and ZnPc-g-TiO2-g-PNIPAM. Figure S3. UV-vis spectra of ZnPc in dimethyl sulfoxide. Figure S4. ZnPc-g-TiO2-g-PNIPAM transmittance with temperature in water. Figure S5. TiO2 and ZnPc-g-TiO2-g-PNIPAM dispersed in aqueous solution were left to rest for 120 min at 45 °C. Figure S6. The removal of TC•HCl with ZnPc-g-TiO2-g-PNIPAM/H2O2 under visible light. Figure S7. Kinetics curves of RhB and MB. Scheme S1. The procedure of ZnPc [30].

Author Contributions

Data curation, B.M. and Q.D.; Funding acquisition, Q.D.; Investigation, B.M. and C.L.; Writing—original draft, B.M. and C.L.; Writing—review and editing, X.C., Y.L. and Q.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Department of Science and Technology of Jilin province, grant number 20190303069SF.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Sample Availability

Samples of the compounds are not available from the authors.

References

  1. Mahmoodi, N.M.; Taghizadeh, A.; Taghizadeh, M.; Abdi, J. In Situ Deposition of Ag/Agcl on the Surface of Magnetic Metal-Organic Framework Nanocomposite and Its Application for the Visible-Light Photocatalytic Degradation of Rhodamine Dye. J. Hazard. Mater. 2019, 378, 120741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Mahmoodi, N.M.; Abdi, J.; Taghizadeh, M.; Taghizadeh, A.; Hayati, B.; Shekarchi, A.A.; Vossoughi, M. Activated Carbon/Metal-Organic Framework Nanocomposite: Preparation and Photocatalytic Dye Degradation Mathematical Modeling from Wastewater by Least Squares Support Vector Machine. J. Environ. Manag. 2019, 233, 660–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Nasr, M.; Eid, C.; Habchi, R.; Miele, P.; Bechelany, M. Recent Progress on Titanium Dioxide Nanomaterials for Photocatalytic Applications. ChemSusChem 2018, 11, 3023–3047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Nam, Y.; Lim, J.H.; Ko, K.C.; Lee, J.Y. Photocatalytic Activity of TiO2 Nanoparticles: A Theoretical Aspect. J. Mater. Chem. A 2019, 7, 13833–13859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Fang, Y.; Zheng, Y.; Fang, T.; Chen, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Liang, Q.; Sheng, H.; Li, Z.; Chen, C.; Wang, X. Photocatalysis: An Overview of Recent Developments and Technological Advancements. Sci. China Chem. 2019, 63, 149–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Sadeghfar, F.; Zalipour, Z.; Taghizadeh, M.; Taghizadeh, A.; Ghaedi, M. Photodegradation Processes. Interface Sci. Technol. 2021, 32, 55–124. [Google Scholar]
  7. Taghizadeh, A.; Taghizadeh, M.; Sabzehmeidani, M.M.; Sadeghfar, F.; Ghaedi, M. Electronic Structure: From Basic Principles to Photocatalysis. Interface Sci. Technol. 2021, 32, 1–53. [Google Scholar]
  8. Fujishima, A.; Honda, K. Electrochemical Photolysis of Water at a Semiconductor Electrode. Nature 1972, 238, 37–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kim, B.C.; Jeong, E.; Kim, E.; Hong, S.W. Bio-Organic–Inorganic Hybrid Photocatalyst, TiO2 and Glucose Oxidase Composite for Enhancing Antibacterial Performance in Aqueous Environments. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2019, 242, 194–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Schneider, J.; Matsuoka, M.; Takeuchi, M.; Zhang, J.; Horiuchi, Y.; Anpo, M.; Bahnemann, D.W. Understanding TiO2 Photocatalysis: Mechanisms and Materials. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 9919–9986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhang, C.; Liu, Y.; Zhou, J.; Jin, W.; Chen, W. Tunability of Photo-Catalytic Selectivity of B-Doped Anatase TiO2 Microspheres in the Visible Light. Dye. Pigment. 2018, 156, 213–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Yu, X.; Liu, S.; Yu, J. Superparamagnetic Γ-Fe2O3@SiO2@TiO2 Composite Microspheres with Superior Photocatalytic Properties. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2011, 104, 12–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Yuan, S.; Liu, T.F.; Feng, D.; Tian, J.; Wang, K.; Qin, J.; Zhang, Q.; Chen, Y.P.; Bosch, M.; Zou, L.; et al. A Single Crystalline Porphyrinic Titanium Metal-Organic Framework. Chem. Sci. 2015, 6, 3926–3930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Lu, W.; Xu, T.; Wang, Y.; Hu, H.; Li, N.; Jiang, X.; Chen, W. Synergistic Photocatalytic Properties and Mechanism of G-C3N4 Coupled with Zinc Phthalocyanine Catalyst under Visible Light Irradiation. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2016, 180, 20–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Guo, Z.; Chen, B.; Mu, J.; Zhang, M.; Zhang, P.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, J.; Zhang, X.; Sun, Y.; Shao, C.; et al. Iron Phthalocyanine/TiO2 Nanofiber Heterostructures with Enhanced Visible Photocatalytic Activity Assisted with H2O2. J. Hazard. Mater. 2012, 219, 156–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Gong, Z.; Li, S.; Han, W.; Wang, J.; Ma, J.; Zhang, X. Recyclable Graphene Oxide Grafted with Poly(N-Isopropylacrylamide) and Its Enhanced Selective Adsorption for Phenols. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2016, 362, 459–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Tanjim, M.; Rahman, M.A.; Rahman, M.M.; Minami, H.; Hoque, S.M.; Sharafat, M.K.; Gafur, M.A.; Ahmad, H. Mesoporous Magnetic Silica Particles Modified with Stimuli-Responsive P(Nipam-Dma) Valve for Controlled Loading and Release of Biologically Active Molecules. Soft Matter 2018, 14, 5469–5479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Duan, Y.; Ma, J.; Liu, J.; Qiang, L.; Xue, J. Facile Synthesis of Thermo-Responsive TiO2/Pnipam Composite with Switchable Photocatalytic Performance. Fiber Polym. 2020, 21, 717–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yao, B.; Peng, C.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, Q.; Niu, J.; Zhao, J. A Novel Fe(III) Porphyrin-Conjugated TiO2 Visible-Light Photocatalyst. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2015, 174, 77–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhao, X.; Liu, X.; Yu, M.; Wang, C.; Li, J. The Highly Efficient and Stable Cu, Co, Zn-Porphyrin–Tio2 Photocatalysts with Heterojunction by Using Fashioned One-Step Method. Dye. Pigment. 2017, 136, 648–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hunge, Y.M.; Yadav, A.A.; Dhodamani, A.G.; Suzuki, N.; Terashima, C.; Fujishima, A.; Mathe, V.L. Enhanced Photocatalytic Performance of Ultrasound Treated Go/TiO2 Composite for Photocatalytic Degradation of Salicylic Acid under Sunlight Illumination. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2020, 61, 104849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Feng, Q.; Tang, D.; Lv, H.; Zhang, W.; Li, W. Surface-Initiated Atrp to Modify Zno Nanoparticles with Poly(N -Isopropylacrylamide): Temperature-Controlled Switching of Photocatalysis. J. Alloys Compd. 2017, 691, 185–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Phongamwong, T.; Donphai, W.; Prasitchoke, P.; Rameshan, C.; Barrabés, N.; Klysubun, W.; Rupprechter, G.; Chareonpanich, M. Novel Visible-Light-Sensitized Chl-Mg/P25 Catalysts for Photocatalytic Degradation of Rhodamine B. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2017, 207, 326–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wu, C.; Yin, M.; Zhang, R.; Li, Z.; Zou, Z.; Li, Z. Further Studies of Photodegradation and Photocatalytic Hydrogen Production over Nafion-Coated Pt/P25 Sensitized by Rhodamine B. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2020, 45, 22700–22710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Bai, X.; Du, Y.; Hu, X.; He, Y.; He, C.; Liu, E.; Fan, J. Synergy Removal of Cr(VI) and Organic Pollutants over Rp-MoS2/RGO Photocatalyst. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2018, 239, 204–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Liu, C.; Li, Y.; Cui, X.; Liang, C.; Xing, G.; Duan, Q. Construction of a Recyclable Dual-Responsive TiO2-Based Photocatalyst Modified with ZnIn2S4 Nanosheets and Zinc Phthalocyanine for Cr(VI) Reduction under Visible Light. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 417, 129332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Li, J.; Zhou, Q.; Wu, Y.; Yuan, Y.; Liu, Y. Investigation of Nanoscale Zerovalent Iron-Based Magnetic and Thermal Dual-Responsive Composite Materials for the Removal and Detection of Phenols. Chemosphere 2018, 195, 472–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Dai, Z.; Li, D.; Chi, L.; Li, Y.; Gao, B.; Qiu, N.; Duan, Q.; Li, Y. Preparation of Porphyrin Sensitized Three Layers Magnetic Nanocomposite Fe3O4@SiO2@TiO2 as an Efficient Photocatalyst. Mater. Lett. 2019, 241, 239–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Lu, X.; Che, W.; Hu, X.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, A.; Deng, F.; Luo, S.; Dionysiou, D.D. The Facile Fabrication of Novel Visible-Light-Driven Z-Scheme CuInS2/Bi2Wo6 Heterojunction with Intimate Interface Contact by in Situ Hydrothermal Growth Strategy for Extraordinary Photocatalytic Performance. Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 356, 819–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Li, Y.; Zhao, D.; Li, Y.; Liu, Y.; Duan, Q.; Kakuchi, T. Synthesis of water-soluble and thermoresponsive phthalocyanine ended block copolymers as potential photosensitizer. Dyes Pigment. 2017, 142, 88–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Molecules 27 03330 sch001 550
Scheme 1. The synthetic procedure of ZnPc-g-TiO2-g-PNIPAM: firstly, TiO2 modified with MPS (TiO2-g-MPS); secondly, PNIPAM grafted on the surface of TiO2 by radical polymerization (TiO2-g-PNIPAM); thirdly, ZnPc sensitized TiO2-g-PNIPAM by chemical bonds (ZnPc-g-TiO2-g-PNIPAM).
Scheme 1. The synthetic procedure of ZnPc-g-TiO2-g-PNIPAM: firstly, TiO2 modified with MPS (TiO2-g-MPS); secondly, PNIPAM grafted on the surface of TiO2 by radical polymerization (TiO2-g-PNIPAM); thirdly, ZnPc sensitized TiO2-g-PNIPAM by chemical bonds (ZnPc-g-TiO2-g-PNIPAM).
Molecules 27 03330 sch001
Molecules 27 03330 g001 550
Figure 1. XRD patterns (A) and FT-IR spectra (B) of TiO2, TiO2-g-MPS, TiO2-g-PNIPAM and ZnPc-g-TiO2-g-PNIPAM.
Figure 1. XRD patterns (A) and FT-IR spectra (B) of TiO2, TiO2-g-MPS, TiO2-g-PNIPAM and ZnPc-g-TiO2-g-PNIPAM.
Molecules 27 03330 g001
Molecules 27 03330 g002 550
Figure 2. XPS spectra of ZnPc-g-TiO2-g-PNIPAM (A); Ti 2p (B) and C 1s (C); O 1s (D); N 1s (E) spectra of ZnPc-g-TiO2-g-PNIPAM.
Figure 2. XPS spectra of ZnPc-g-TiO2-g-PNIPAM (A); Ti 2p (B) and C 1s (C); O 1s (D); N 1s (E) spectra of ZnPc-g-TiO2-g-PNIPAM.
Molecules 27 03330 g002
Molecules 27 03330 g003 550
Figure 3. SEM images of TiO2 (A), TiO2-g-PNIPAM (B) and ZnPc-g-TiO2-g-PNIPAM (C).
Figure 3. SEM images of TiO2 (A), TiO2-g-PNIPAM (B) and ZnPc-g-TiO2-g-PNIPAM (C).
Molecules 27 03330 g003
Molecules 27 03330 g004 550
Figure 4. TG curves of TiO2, TiO2-g-MPS, TiO2-g-PNIPAM and ZnPc-g-TiO2-g-PNIPAM.
Figure 4. TG curves of TiO2, TiO2-g-MPS, TiO2-g-PNIPAM and ZnPc-g-TiO2-g-PNIPAM.
Molecules 27 03330 g004
Molecules 27 03330 g005 550
Figure 5. UV-vis diffuse reflectance spectroscopy of TiO2 and ZnPc-g-TiO2-g-PNIPAM (A) and the corresponding estimated band gaps of TiO2 and ZnPc-g-TiO2-g-PNIPAM (B).
Figure 5. UV-vis diffuse reflectance spectroscopy of TiO2 and ZnPc-g-TiO2-g-PNIPAM (A) and the corresponding estimated band gaps of TiO2 and ZnPc-g-TiO2-g-PNIPAM (B).
Molecules 27 03330 g005
Molecules 27 03330 g006 550
Figure 6. Photocatalytic efficiency of ZnPc-g-TiO2-g-PNIPAM/H2O2 with different amounts of ZnPc-g-TiO2-g-PNIPAM for RhB (4.8 mg/L) removal at 20 °C under visible light in 40 min (A), the removal of RhB (4.8 mg/L) (B) and MB (8.0 mg/L) (C) with prepared samples at 20 °C under visible light, photocatalytic efficiency of ZnPc-g-TiO2-g-PNIPAM/H2O2 (0.3 g/L) for RhB (4.8 mg/L) removal at different temperatures under visible light (D).
Figure 6. Photocatalytic efficiency of ZnPc-g-TiO2-g-PNIPAM/H2O2 with different amounts of ZnPc-g-TiO2-g-PNIPAM for RhB (4.8 mg/L) removal at 20 °C under visible light in 40 min (A), the removal of RhB (4.8 mg/L) (B) and MB (8.0 mg/L) (C) with prepared samples at 20 °C under visible light, photocatalytic efficiency of ZnPc-g-TiO2-g-PNIPAM/H2O2 (0.3 g/L) for RhB (4.8 mg/L) removal at different temperatures under visible light (D).
Molecules 27 03330 g006
Molecules 27 03330 g007 550
Figure 7. Photocatalytic efficiency of ZnPc-g-TiO2-g-PNIPAM (0.3 g/L) for the RhB (4.8 mg/L) removal of three cycles under visible light in 40 min at 20 °C (A), FT-IR (B), XRD (C) and SEM (D) of ZnPc-g-TiO2-g-PNIPAM after the photocatalytic reaction.
Figure 7. Photocatalytic efficiency of ZnPc-g-TiO2-g-PNIPAM (0.3 g/L) for the RhB (4.8 mg/L) removal of three cycles under visible light in 40 min at 20 °C (A), FT-IR (B), XRD (C) and SEM (D) of ZnPc-g-TiO2-g-PNIPAM after the photocatalytic reaction.
Molecules 27 03330 g007
Molecules 27 03330 g008 550
Figure 8. Photocatalytic activity of ZnPc-g-TiO2-g-PNIPAM (0.3 g/L) for the removal of RhB (4.8 mg/L) with BQ (0.1 g/L) and IPA (2.4 g/L) at 20 °C (A) under visible light; PL spectra under excitation of 315 nm (B) and EIS Nyquist plots (C) of TiO2 and ZnPc-g-TiO2-g-PNIPAM; the mechanism of ZnPc-g-TiO2-g-PNIPAM under visible light (D).
Figure 8. Photocatalytic activity of ZnPc-g-TiO2-g-PNIPAM (0.3 g/L) for the removal of RhB (4.8 mg/L) with BQ (0.1 g/L) and IPA (2.4 g/L) at 20 °C (A) under visible light; PL spectra under excitation of 315 nm (B) and EIS Nyquist plots (C) of TiO2 and ZnPc-g-TiO2-g-PNIPAM; the mechanism of ZnPc-g-TiO2-g-PNIPAM under visible light (D).
Molecules 27 03330 g008
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mao, B.; Liu, C.; Cui, X.; Li, Y.; Duan, Q. Thermo-Responsive ZnPc-g-TiO2-g-PNIPAM Photocatalysts Sensitized with Phthalocyanines for Water Purification under Visible Light. Molecules 2022, 27, 3330. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27103330

AMA Style

Mao B, Liu C, Cui X, Li Y, Duan Q. Thermo-Responsive ZnPc-g-TiO2-g-PNIPAM Photocatalysts Sensitized with Phthalocyanines for Water Purification under Visible Light. Molecules. 2022; 27(10):3330. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27103330

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mao, Bingxin, Cong Liu, Xu Cui, Yanhui Li, and Qian Duan. 2022. "Thermo-Responsive ZnPc-g-TiO2-g-PNIPAM Photocatalysts Sensitized with Phthalocyanines for Water Purification under Visible Light" Molecules 27, no. 10: 3330. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27103330

APA Style

Mao, B., Liu, C., Cui, X., Li, Y., & Duan, Q. (2022). Thermo-Responsive ZnPc-g-TiO2-g-PNIPAM Photocatalysts Sensitized with Phthalocyanines for Water Purification under Visible Light. Molecules, 27(10), 3330. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27103330

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop