Next Article in Journal
Photon Upconversion in Small Molecules
Previous Article in Journal
Simple Extraction of Cannabinoids from Female Inflorescences of Hemp (Cannabis sativa L.)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Study on the Distribution of Low Molecular Weight Metabolites in Mango Fruit by Air Flow-Assisted Ionization Mass Spectrometry Imaging

1
Key Laboratory of Crop Gene Resources and Germplasm Enhancement in Southern China, Ministry of Agriculture/Tropical Crops Genetic Resources Institute, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, Haikou 571101, China
2
Yunyang County Agricultural Technology Service Center of Chongqing, Chongqing 404500, China
3
Key Laboratory of Quality and Safety Control for Subtropical Fruit and Vegetable, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Hainan Provincial Key Laboratory of Quality and Safety for Tropical Fruits and Vegetables, Analysis and Test Center, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, Haikou 571101, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2022, 27(18), 5873; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27185873
Submission received: 19 August 2022 / Revised: 6 September 2022 / Accepted: 8 September 2022 / Published: 10 September 2022

Abstract

:
Mass spectrometry imaging is a novel molecular imaging technique that has been developing rapidly in recent years. Air flow-assisted ionization mass spectrometry imaging (AFAI-MSI) has received wide attention in the biomedical field because of its features such as not needing a pretreatment sample, having high sensitivity, and wide coverage of metabolite detection. In this study, we set up a mass spectrometry imaging method for analyzing low molecular metabolites in mango fruits by the AFAI-MSI method. Compounds such as organic acids, vitamin C, and phenols were detected from mango tissue by mass spectrometry under the negative ion scanning mode, and their spatial distribution was analyzed. As a result, all the target compounds showed different distributions. Citric acid was mainly distributed in the pulp. Malic acid, quinic acid, and vitamin C universally existed in the pulp and peel. However, galloylglucose isomer and 5-galloylquinic acid were predominantly found in the peel. These results show that AFAI-MSI can be used for the analysis of mango fruit endogenous metabolites conveniently and directly, which will facilitate the rapid identification and in situ characterization of plant endogenous substances.

1. Introduction

Mass spectrometry imaging (MSI) makes it possible to visualize distribution information of atoms and molecules on a sample surface. There are three representive MSI techniques: secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) and matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization (MALDI) mass spectrometry imaging, which both require ionization under vacuum conditions, as well as desorption electrospray ionization (DESI) mass spectrometry imaging, an open ionization mass spectrometry imaging technology [1,2,3,4]. Initially, SIMS was used to analyze the surface of inorganic materials, but it has been extended to imaging low molecular weight materials on the surface of living tissues since the 1990s [5]. Meanwhile, MALDI-MSI was developed for proteins, and then used for macromolecules such as proteins and peptides [6,7]. As new matrixes are developed, MALDI-MSI is now widely used for endogenous small molecule imaging. For example, Sun et al. [8] used a simple acetone washing method to improve the sensitivity of MALDI-MS for small molecule metabolites, including polyamines, cholines, carnitines, amino acids, nitrogenous bases, nucleosides, carbohydrates, organic acids, and vitamins.
In recent years, ion sources which can ionize at atmospheric pressure have become increasingly popular since they have the advantages of operating in an open environment, being convenient to use, with no matrix needed, being low- or noninvasive, etc. [9]. Therein, air flow-assisted ionization mass spectrometry imaging (AFAI-MSI) was developed, and has been playing vital roles in drug metabolism research and clinical molecular histopathological diagnosis. Examples include the application of AFAI-MSI techniques to study the overall distribution of s-(+)-deoxytylophorinidine in rats, metabolite profiling of nasopharyngeal tissue specimens (nasopharyngeal carcinoma and chronic inflammation of nasal mucosa), and mass spectrometry imaging of endogenous metabolites in rat kidney tissue [10,11,12]. MSI technology has also brought great hope for the spatio-temporal analysis of plant tissues. Since 2005, MSI has been used to measure the spatial distribution of plant metabolites; for example, it has been used to identify precursors or related metabolites in order to figure out how plants react to stress, and to speculate new metabolic pathways [13].
Mango (Mangifera indica L.), belonging to family Anacardiaceae, is cultured all over the world in tropical and subtropical regions. Mango fruit is very popular for its attractive flavor, and can be consumed from the immature stage to the fully ripened state. Unripened fruit can be processed into pickle, chutney, mango sauce, raw mango powder (amchoor), and green mango drink (panna), while mature fruit is used to produce pulp, squash, nectar, beverages, mango leather (Amb Papad), mango puree, mango fruit bars, frozen and canned mango slices, and jam [14]. The mango fruit provides a significant source of macronutrients including carbohydrates, lipids and fatty acids, proteins and amino acids, and organic acids. In addition, mango contains micronutrients such as vitamins and minerals [15]. Most of the compounds in mango have been identified by the combination of analytical mass spectrometry (MS) and separation techniques such as gas chromatography (GC) and liquid chromatography (LC) [16,17]. Using these techniques, samples must be homogenized and extracted before being analyzed, and therefore the spatial distribution of compounds in fruits cannot be determined. In this study, the spatial distribution of low molecular weight metabolites in mango fruit was explored by AFAI-MSI. This will shed light on revealing the spatio-temporal distribution of low molecular metabolites in mango fruit.

2. Results and Discussion

Because of the integrity of the sections, the tissue freezing medium, the scanning mode of the mass spectrometry, and the type of spray solvent had a significant influence on the imaging results; therefore, these conditions are optimized by a series of experiments before mass spectrometry imaging. In brief, it was found that the mango tissue should not be embedded, but a little tissue freeze medium added to the surface of the freezing tray to fix the sample was helpful for slicing. Then, the mango tissue was sliced into 100 μm in thickness, and 80% methanol solution (contain 0.1% ammonia) was selected as the spray solvent for scanning analysis in the negative ion mode. In order to directly observe and reveal the spatial distribution of metabolites in mango, we also observed the microstructure of the tissue section and spliced the picture into a complete figure by using the ‘MosaiX Acquisition’ function in the software AxioVision (Figure 1).
The low molecular weight metabolites of mangoes determined by using AFAI-MSI were displayed in Table 1. A representative AFAI-MSI spectrum obtained from the strongest responses of each substance in mango tissue sections is depicted in Figure 2. The deprotonated molecules [M-H] of citric acid (m/z 191.0192) and malic acid (m/z 133.0133) both have a strong intensity, which is around 4.8 × 105 and 2.7 × 105 (Figure 2A,B), respectively. Next is vitamin C (m/z 175.0241), with an intensity of 1.1 × 105 (Figure 2C). A weaker response is observed for quinic acid (m/z 191.0556) (Figure 2D), with an intensity of 2 × 104. Lastly, there are 5-galloylquinic acid (m/z 343.0676) and galloylglucose isomer (m/z 331.0675) (Figure 2E,F), which had the weakest intensity of 2 × 104.
Organic acids are essential for aerobic metabolism and serve as flavoring agents that affect fruit acidity and organoleptic qualities [18]. Mango fruit acidity is primarily attributable to citric and malic acids, although other common organic acids from the tricarboxylic acid cycle have been reported in mango fruit, such as citric, oxalic, succinic, malic, pyruvic, as well as tartaric, muconic, galipic, glucuronic, and galacturonic acids, whereas citric is the most abundant one [19,20,21,22]. Interestingly, in this study, it was found that citric acid was mainly located in the pulp, especially in the tissues closer to the seeds in all samples. However, the presence of citric acid was hardly detected in the peel and subcutaneous tissues (Figure 3A). In contrast, malic acid was distributed throughout the mango slices, with only a few places in the subcutaneous tissue showing significant amounts (Figure 3B). Pierson et al. [23] investigated the content and distribution of phytochemicals in mango peel and pulp, where the citric acid was detected by HPLC and HPLC-MS, and which was principally identified in the flesh of H10, Irwin, and Kensington Pride. The same compound was also present in the peel of the H10 variety at a lower level than the corresponding flesh. The above results indicate that the distribution of citric acid is varied among mango varieties.
Vitamin C (L-ascorbic acid), an antioxidant and immune booster, is necessary for collagen repair, prevention of scurvy, and absorption of iron [24]. As a vitamin C-rich fruit, its localization was also investigated by HPLC, and it showed that vitamin C is located in the whole mango tissue, including the pulp and peel. However, with the AFAI-MSI technique, we were able to further point out that the highest concentration is in the subcutaneous tissue (Figure 3C), which is in accordance with the phenomenon that vitamin C is preferentially located in photosynthetic cells and meristems [25]. Moreover, the higher vitamin C content in subcutaneous cells may also benefit the delaying of fruit senescence and defence against fruit diseases [26,27,28].
Quinic acid is a naturally occurring cyclohexanecarboxylic acid found in both plants and bacteria [29]. Here, the quinic acid is mainly found in the mango peel and subcutaneous tissue, which is nearly superposed with the distribution of vitamin C (Figure 3D). Related studies have shown that quinic acid is a by-product located in chloroplasts, and is produced by 3-dehydroquinic acid via the shikimate acid pathway, coupled with photosynthesis to regulate the biosynthesis of aromatic compounds in chloroplasts [30,31,32]. According to the microstructure of mango in Figure 1, there are many secretory cavities of various sizes in the mango subcutaneous tissue, which have been suggested as the primary location for storing aromatic compounds [33]. Therefore, we speculate that the higher content of quinic acid in the subcutaneous tissue of mango may be involved in the biosynthesis of aromatic compounds.
Phenolic acids are plant secondary metabolites that are important in the human diet owing to their biological activities and health benefits [34,35]. Mango contains two major classes of phenolic acids in plants: hydroxybenzoic acid and hydroxycinnamic acid derivatives, which can exist in free or conjugated form with glucose or quinic acid [36,37]. Gómez-Caravaca et al. [38] determined the presence of phenolic and other polar compounds in the edible part of mango and its by-products (peel, seed, and seed husk). They found that 5-galloylquinic acid and galloylglucose isomers were only detected in mango peel. In our case, two phenolic acid derivatives, 5-galloylquinic acid and galloylglucose isomer, could be detected, respectively (Figure 3E,F). 5-Galloylquinic acid and galloylglucose isomer are mainly distributed in the subcutaneous tissue of mango and can hardly be found anywhere else.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Plant Material

Fruits of Mangifera indica L. var. ‘Guifei’ were used in this study. The mango fruits were harvested from a local orchard in Dongfang, China. Fruit at the mature green stage had total soluble solids (TSS) of around 8%, and titratable acidity (TA) was around 1%. Mango color parameters were 65.82 (L*), −7.50 (a*), 9.26 (b*), respectively. Fresh fruit of moderate size and with an undamaged surface was selected as plant materials. The mango was cut into small pieces (about 9 mm × 9 mm), and fixed on the cryogenic platform using about 1 mL of OCT freezing medium. The samples were then mounted on a frozen tray, frozen for 30 min at −20 °C, and then sliced at a thickness of 100 µm by a cryostat microtome (LEICA XM1950UV, Leica Microsystem, Wetzlar, Germany). The microstructure was observed and photographed with a microscope (ZEISS Axio Observer Z1, ZEISS, Oberkochen, Germany) at a magnification of 100 times, before mass spectrometry imaging was performed. In this work, the experiment was repeated three times, which were named slice-1, slice-2, and slice-3, respectively.

3.2. AFAI-MS Imaging

The measurement was carried out using an AFAI ion source coupled to a Q-Orbitrap mass spectrometer (Q Exactive Plus, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The mass spectra were acquired under the negative mode, with a scan range of 70–1000 Da, a mass resolution of 70,000, an automatic gain control target of 3 × 106, and a maximum injection time of 200 ms. The spray voltage and transport tube voltage were set to 2 and 3.2 kV, respectively. N2 as spray gas was set to 0.6 MPa, and 80% methanol solution (v/v, contain 0.1% ammonia) was used as spray solvent. The spray solvent flow rate was 6 μL/min, and the air as assisting gas was set to 40 L/min. Xcalibur software (Version 2.2, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) was used to collect the data.

3.3. Data Processing

The original data file was converted into CDF format by Xcalibur software (Version 2.2, Thermo Fisher Scientific, San Jose, CA, USA), and then the file was read by mass spectrometry imaging software MassImager (MSI system workstation version 1.0, Beijing, China) to detect the type, relative intensity, and spatial position of ions for imaging analysis.

4. Conclusions

In this work, we applied AFAI-MSI to mango fruit research for the first time. Using this procedure, target compounds can be imaged in mango within a short period of time without the need for a specific chemical matrix and specific probes. Meanwhile, the technique was used to reveal the distribution of some major compounds in mango fruits. The distribution of target compounds in mango fruits is uneven, but all the compounds we analyzed showed the same trend in the location of the repeated samples. Citric acid was located in the pulp, while malic acid was evenly distributed in the whole mango tissue. Vitamin C and quinic acid were mainly distributed in the peel and subcutaneous tissue. 5-galloylquinic acid and galloylglucose isomer were found only in the subcutaneous tissues. This newly established method for mango flesh bioimaging broadens the application area of AFAI-MSI, and also contributes to gaining more insight into the biological or physiological functions of plant secondary metabolites, the identification of biomarkers, the process of metabolites biosynthesis, and the transportation of metabolites under biotic or abiotic stresses.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.Z. and F.Q.; methodology, D.Z. and F.Q.; software, B.H.; validation, D.Z. and F.Q.; formal analysis, D.Z., P.Y. and F.Q.; investigation, D.Z., P.Y. and F.Q.; resources, F.Q.; data curation, D.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, D.Z.; writing—review and editing, F.Q.; supervision, F.Q.; funding acquisition, F.Q. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work is supported by the National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (2018YFD1000500), and the major science and technology plan of Hainan province (ZDKJ2021012).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Sample Availability

Samples of the compounds are not available from the authors.

References

  1. Colliver, T.L.; Brummel, C.L.; Pacholski, M.L.; Swanek, F.D.; Ewing, A.G.; Winograd, N. Atomic and Molecular Imaging at the Single-Cell Level with TOF-SIMS. Anal. Chem. 1997, 69, 2225–2231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Stoeckli, M.; Chaurand, P.; Hallahan, D.E.; Caprioli, R.M. Imaging Mass Spectrometry: A New Technology for the Analysis of Protein Expression in Mammalian Tissues. Nat. Med. 2001, 7, 493–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Takáts, Z.; Wiseman, J.; Gologan, B.; Cooks, R. Mass Spectrometry Sampling Under Ambient Conditions with Desorption Electrospray Ionization. Science 2004, 306, 471–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Wiseman, J.M.; Ifa, D.R.; Song, Q.; Cooks, R.G. Tissue Imaging at Atmospheric Pressure Using Desorption Electrospray Ionization (DESI) Mass Spectrometry. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 7188–7192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. McMahon, J.M.; Dookeran, N.N.; Todd, P.J. Organic Ion Imaging beyond the Limit of Static Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 1995, 6, 1047–1058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Caprioli, R.M.; Farmer, T.B.; Gile, J. Molecular Imaging of Biological Samples: Localization of Peptides and Proteins Using MALDI-TOF MS. Anal. Chem. 1997, 69, 4751–4760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Amstalden van Hove, E.R.; Smith, D.F.; Heeren, R.M.A. A Concise Review of Mass Spectrometry Imaging. J. Chromatogr. A 2010, 1217, 3946–3954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sun, C.; Li, Z.; Ma, C.; Zang, Q.; Wang, X. Acetone Immersion Enhanced MALDI-MS Imaging of Small Molecule Metabolites in Biological Tissues. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2019, 176, 112797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Luo, Z.; He, J.; Chen, Y.; He, J.; Gong, T.; Tang, F.; Wang, X.; Zhang, R.; Huang, L.; Zhang, L.; et al. Air Flow-Assisted Ionization Imaging Mass Spectrometry Method for Easy Whole-Body Molecular Imaging under Ambient Conditions. Anal. Chem. 2013, 85, 2977–2982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Luo, Z.-G.; He, J.-M.; Li, T.-G.; Zhou, Z.; Huang, L.; Zhang, R.; Ma, S.-G.; Yu, S.-S.; Abliz, Z. Development of a Novel Imaging Method for Whole-Body Animal Biopharmaceutical Analysis Using High Resolution Mass Spectrometry Technique. J. Chin. Mass Spectrom. Soc. 2017, 38, 417–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chen, Y. AFAI-MSI Base Metabolomics Research of Human Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma. Ph.D. Thesis, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  12. Wang, Z.; He, B.; Sun, C.; Song, X.; He, J.; Zhang, R.; Abliz, Z. Study on Tissue Distribution of A Variety of Endogenous Metabolites By Air Flow Assisted Ionization-Ultra High Resolution Mass Spectrometry Imaging. Chin. J. Anal. Chem. 2018, 46, 406–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Boughton, B.A.; Thinagaran, D.; Sarabia, D.; Bacic, A.; Roessner, U. Mass Spectrometry Imaging for Plant Biology: A Review. Phytochem. Rev. 2016, 15, 445–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zafar, T.A.; Sidhu, J.S. Composition and Nutritional Properties of Mangoes. In Handbook of Mango Fruit; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2017; pp. 217–236. ISBN 978-1-119-01436-2. [Google Scholar]
  15. Maldonado-Celis, M.; Yahia, E.; Bedoya, R.; Landázuri, P.; Loango, N.; Aguillón, J.; Restrepo, B.; Ospina, J.C.G. Chemical Composition of Mango (Mangifera indica L.) Fruit: Nutritional and Phytochemical Compounds. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 1073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. López-Cobo, A.; Verardo, V.; Diaz-de-Cerio, E.; Segura-Carretero, A.; Fernández-Gutiérrez, A.; Gómez-Caravaca, A.M. Use of HPLC- and GC-QTOF to Determine Hydrophilic and Lipophilic Phenols in Mango Fruit (Mangifera indica L.) and Its by-Products. Food Res. Int. 2017, 100, 423–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Hu, K.; Dars, A.G.; Liu, Q.; Xie, B.; Sun, Z. Phytochemical Profiling of the Ripening of Chinese Mango (Mangifera indica L.) Cultivars by Real-Time Monitoring Using UPLC-ESI-QTOF-MS and Its Potential Benefits as Prebiotic Ingredients. Food Chem. 2018, 256, 171–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Yahia, E.M.; Carrillo-Lopez, A. Postharvest Physiology and Biochemistry of Fruits and Vegetables; Woodhead Publishing: Sawston, UK, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  19. Tharanathan, R.N.; Yashoda, H.M.; Prabha, T.N. Mango (Mangifera indica L.), “The King of Fruits”—An Overview. Food Rev. Int. 2006, 22, 95–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Shashirekha, M.S.; Patwardhan, M.V. Changes in Amino Acids, Sugars and Nonvolatile Organic Acids in a Ripening Mango Fruit (Mangifera indica L. Badami Variety). LWT Leb. Wissensch. Technol. 1976, 9, 369–370. [Google Scholar]
  21. Sarker, S.C.; Muhsi, A.A.A. Study on the Content and Interconversion of Organic Acids of Mango (Mangifera indica Lin.) at Various Stages of Fruit Development. Bangladesh J. Agric. Sci. 1981, 8, 69–75. [Google Scholar]
  22. Medlicott, A.P.; Thompson, A.K. Analysis of Sugars and Organic Acids in Ripening Mango Fruits (Mangifera indica L. Var Keitt) by High Performance Liquid Chromatography. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2010, 36, 561–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Pierson, J.T.; Monteith, G.R.; Roberts-Thomson, S.J.; Dietzgen, R.G.; Gidley, M.J.; Shaw, P.N. Phytochemical Extraction, Characterisation and Comparative Distribution across Four Mango (Mangifera indica L.) Fruit Varieties. Food Chem. 2014, 149, 253–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Diplock, A.T.; Charuleux, J.-L.; Crozier-Willi, G.; Kok, F.J.; Rice-Evans, C.; Roberfroid, M.; Stahl, W.; Viña-Ribes, J. Functional Food Science and Defence against Reactive Oxidative Species. Br. J. Nutr. 1998, 80, S77–S112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Mohammad, F. Occurrence, biosynthesis and potentialities of ascorbic acid in plants. IJPAES 2011, 1, 167–184. [Google Scholar]
  26. Pastori, G.M.; Kiddle, G.; Antoniw, J.; Bernard, S.; Veljovic-Jovanovic, S.; Verrier, P.J.; Noctor, G.; Foyer, C.H. Leaf Vitamin C Contents Modulate Plant Defense Transcripts and Regulate Genes That Control Development through Hormone Signaling. Plant Cell 2003, 15, 939–951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Barth, C.; Moeder, W.; Klessig, D.F.; Conklin, P.L. The Timing of Senescence and Response to Pathogens Is Altered in the Ascorbate-Deficient Arabidopsis Mutant Vitamin c-1. Plant Physiol. 2004, 134, 1784–1792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Pavet, V.; Olmos, E.; Kiddle, G.; Mowla, S.; Kumar, S.; Antoniw, J.; Alvarez, M.E.; Foyer, C.H. Ascorbic Acid Deficiency Activates Cell Death and Disease Resistance Responses in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2005, 139, 1291–1303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Draths, K.M.; Ward, T.L.; Frost, J.W. Biocatalysis and Nineteenth Century Organic Chemistry: Conversion of D-Glucose into Quinoid Organics. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 9725–9726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Barco, A.; Benetti, S.; De Risi, C.; Marchetti, P.; Pollini, G.P.; Zanirato, V. D-(-)-Quinic Acid: A Chiron Store for Natural Product Synthesis. Tetrahedron Asymmetry 1997, 8, 3515–3545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Minamikawa, T. A Comparative Study on the Metabolism of Quinic and Shikimic Acids in Plants. Bot. Mag. Shokubutsu-Gaku-Zasshi 1976, 89, 141–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ghosh, S.; Chisti, Y.; Banerjee, U.C. Production of Shikimic Acid. Biotechnol. Adv. 2012, 30, 1425–1431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Pan, X. Preliminary Studies on the Relationships of Quality and Ultrastructure of Mango Fruits with Different Varieties. Chin. J. J. Guangxi Agric. Univ. 1993, 12, 69–75. [Google Scholar]
  34. Brglez Mojzer, E.; Knez Hrnčič, M.; Škerget, M.; Knez, Ž.; Bren, U. Polyphenols: Extraction Methods, Antioxidative Action, Bioavailability and Anticarcinogenic Effects. Molecules 2016, 21, 901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Yahia, E.M.; Maldonado Celis, M.E.; Svendsen, M. The Contribution of Fruit and Vegetable Consumption to Human Health. In Fruit and Vegetable Phytochemicals; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2017; pp. 1–52. ISBN 978-1-119-15804-2. [Google Scholar]
  36. Mattila, P.; Kumpulainen, J. Determination of Free and Total Phenolic Acids in Plant-Derived Foods by HPLC with Diode-Array Detection. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2002, 50, 3660–3667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Burton-Freeman, B.M.; Sandhu, A.K.; Edirisinghe, I. Mangos and Their Bioactive Components: Adding Variety to the Fruit Plate for Health. Food Funct. 2017, 8, 3010–3032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Gómez-Caravaca, A.M.; López-Cobo, A.; Verardo, V.; Segura-Carretero, A.; Fernández-Gutiérrez, A. HPLC-DAD-q-TOF-MS as a Powerful Platform for the Determination of Phenolic and Other Polar Compounds in the Edible Part of Mango and Its by-Products (Peel, Seed, and Seed Husk). Electrophoresis 2016, 37, 1072–1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Microstructure of mango tissue slice, ×100.
Figure 1. Microstructure of mango tissue slice, ×100.
Molecules 27 05873 g001
Figure 2. Representative AFAI-MSI spectra: citric acid (A), malic acid (B), vitamin C (C), quinic acid (D), 5-galloylquinic acid (E), galloylglucose isomer (F).
Figure 2. Representative AFAI-MSI spectra: citric acid (A), malic acid (B), vitamin C (C), quinic acid (D), 5-galloylquinic acid (E), galloylglucose isomer (F).
Molecules 27 05873 g002
Figure 3. AFAI-MSI images of low molecular metabolites in mango: citric acid (A), malic acid (B), vitamin C (C), quinic acid (D), 5-galloylquinic acid (E), galloylglucose isomer (F). The color bar represents the relative intensity of compound ions.
Figure 3. AFAI-MSI images of low molecular metabolites in mango: citric acid (A), malic acid (B), vitamin C (C), quinic acid (D), 5-galloylquinic acid (E), galloylglucose isomer (F). The color bar represents the relative intensity of compound ions.
Molecules 27 05873 g003
Table 1. Ion formula, theoretical mass, and observed mass of low molecular metabolites in mango. The mass difference was represented as millidalton (mDa).
Table 1. Ion formula, theoretical mass, and observed mass of low molecular metabolites in mango. The mass difference was represented as millidalton (mDa).
Compound NameIon FormulaTheoretical Mass (Da)Observed Mass (Da)Mass Difference (mDa)
Citric acid[C6H8O7-H]191.0197191.0192−0.5
Malic acid[C4H6O5-H]133.0142133.0133−0.9
Vitamin C[C6H8O6-H]175.0248175.0242−0.6
Quinic acid[C7H12O6-H]191.0561191.0556−0.5
5-Galloylquinic acid[C14H16O10-H]343.0670343.06760.6
Galloylglucose isomer[C13H16O10-H]331.0670331.06750.5
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhao, D.; Yu, P.; Han, B.; Qiao, F. Study on the Distribution of Low Molecular Weight Metabolites in Mango Fruit by Air Flow-Assisted Ionization Mass Spectrometry Imaging. Molecules 2022, 27, 5873. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27185873

AMA Style

Zhao D, Yu P, Han B, Qiao F. Study on the Distribution of Low Molecular Weight Metabolites in Mango Fruit by Air Flow-Assisted Ionization Mass Spectrometry Imaging. Molecules. 2022; 27(18):5873. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27185873

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhao, Deqing, Ping Yu, Bingjun Han, and Fei Qiao. 2022. "Study on the Distribution of Low Molecular Weight Metabolites in Mango Fruit by Air Flow-Assisted Ionization Mass Spectrometry Imaging" Molecules 27, no. 18: 5873. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27185873

APA Style

Zhao, D., Yu, P., Han, B., & Qiao, F. (2022). Study on the Distribution of Low Molecular Weight Metabolites in Mango Fruit by Air Flow-Assisted Ionization Mass Spectrometry Imaging. Molecules, 27(18), 5873. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27185873

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop