Next Article in Journal
In Situ Polymerization of Linseed Oil-Based Composite Film: Enhancement of Mechanical and Water Barrier Properties by the Incorporation of Cinnamaldehyde and Organoclay
Next Article in Special Issue
An Undefined Interaction between Polyamines and Heat Shock Proteins Leads to Cellular Protection in Plasmodium falciparum and Proliferating Cells in Various Organisms
Previous Article in Journal
Pestalotiopsis Diversity: Species, Dispositions, Secondary Metabolites, and Bioactivities
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Trypanosoma cruzi TcrNT2 Nucleoside Transporter Is a Conduit for the Uptake of 5-F-2′-Deoxyuridine and Tubercidin Analogues
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Phenotypic Evaluation of Nucleoside Analogues against Trypanosoma cruzi Infection: In Vitro and In Vivo Approaches

by
Ludmila F. de A. Fiuza
1,
Denise G. J. Batista
1,
Roberson D. Girão
1,
Fabian Hulpia
2,
Paula Finamore-Araújo
3,
Mustafa M. Aldfer
4,
Ehab Kotb Elmahallawy
4,5,
Harry P. De Koning
4,
Otacílio Moreira
3,
Serge Van Calenbergh
2 and
Maria de Nazaré C. Soeiro
1,*
1
Laboratório de Biologia Celular, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Av. Brasil, 4365 Manguinhos, Rio de Janeiro 21040-360, Brazil
2
Laboratory for Medicinal Chemistry (Campus Heymans), Ghent University, Ottergemsesteenweg 460, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
3
Laboratório de Virologia Molecular, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 20000-000, Brazil
4
School of Infection and Immunity, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow 62694, UK
5
Department of Zoonoses, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Sohag University, Sohag 82524, Egypt
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2022, 27(22), 8087; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27228087
Submission received: 12 October 2022 / Revised: 7 November 2022 / Accepted: 8 November 2022 / Published: 21 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Medicinal Chemistry Studies of Neglected Diseases)

Abstract

:
Chagas disease, caused by Trypanosoma cruzi (T. cruzi), is a serious public health problem. Current treatment is restricted to two drugs, benznidazole and nifurtimox, displaying serious efficacy and safety drawbacks. Nucleoside analogues represent a promising alternative as protozoans do not biosynthesize purines and rely on purine salvage from the hosts. Protozoan transporters often present different substrate specificities from mammalian transporters, justifying the exploration of nucleoside analogues as therapeutic agents. Previous reports identified nucleosides with potent trypanocidal activity; therefore, two 7-derivatized tubercidins (FH11706, FH10714) and a 3′-deoxytubercidin (FH8513) were assayed against T. cruzi. They were highly potent and selective, and the uptake of the tubercidin analogues appeared to be mediated by the nucleoside transporter TcrNT2. At 10 μM, the analogues reduced parasitemia >90% in 2D and 3D cardiac cultures. The washout assays showed that FH10714 sterilized the infected cultures. Given orally, the compounds did not induce noticeable mouse toxicity (50 mg/kg), suppressed the parasitemia of T. cruzi-infected Swiss mice (25 mg/kg, 5 days) and presented DNA amplification below the limit of detection. These findings justify further studies with longer treatment regimens, as well as evaluations in combination with nitro drugs, aiming to identify more effective and safer therapies for Chagas disease.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Chagas disease (CD), a tropical neglected disease, is caused by the hemoflagellate parasite Trypanosoma cruzi (T. cruzi) [1,2]. Due to population mobility from Latin America, CD also represents a public health issue in non-endemic areas, affecting more than six million people worldwide [3,4,5]. CD transmission involves vectorial transmission by triatomine bugs, blood transfusion, organ transplantation, vertical transmission and oral routes by the ingestion of parasite-contaminated food and drink [6,7,8]. CD displays two sequential clinical phases: the acute and the chronic phases. The acute phase is mainly asymptomatic/oligosymptomatic, being characterized by positive parasitemia [9,10]. In immune competent individuals, the parasitism is controlled (but not eliminated), and the disease progresses to the second, chronic stage, characterized by sub-patent and intermittent parasitism. In most cases, the infected individuals remain asymptomatic, but 30–40% develop serious clinical alterations due to cardiac and/or digestive disorders [2,11].
CD treatment is restricted to two old oral drugs that are in clinical use for more than 5 decades, i.e., the nitro-heterocyclic derivatives nifurtimox and benznidazole (Bz). Both have severe limitations due to their limited efficacy, particularly in the chronic stage, the long duration of treatment and the occurrence of resistant parasitic strains. Moreover, the unpleasant side effects often result in treatment dropout [12,13,14]. New, safe, effective and short-course therapies for CD are therefore urgently awaited.
Since the parasites are purine auxotrophic and thus dependent on the acquisition of purine nucleobases and nucleosides from host cells, they are very vulnerable to inhibitors of purine salvage pathways or subversive substrates [15]. Recently, the cloning and characterization of T. cruzi purine and pyrimidine transporters of the Equilibrative Nucleoside Transporter (ENT) family has reported [16,17], and amastigotes display the highest transcriptional levels for all four ENT genes [16]. The high substrate affinity of these ENTs and their different substrate affinities from mammalian transporters represent an adaptation to their intracellular localization [15,16] and reinforces studies using nucleoside and/or nucleobase analogues as potential therapeutic weapons. Indeed, the nucleoside antibiotic tubercidin is well known to exert potent activity against T. cruzi, and experimentally induced resistance to this drug was linked to nucleoside transport deficiencies [18]. However, tubercidin was too toxic to use against Chagas disease, and safer analogues need to be identified while retaining the anti-parasite activity. In this context, the synthesis and phenotypic analysis of a series of modified nucleosides have been performed. Some analogues with promising activity were identified, specially towards the intracellular forms of the parasite but up to now, failed to achieve full in vivo sterilization [19,20,21,22]. The activity of antiprotozoal nucleoside analogs depends on the presence of suitable nucleoside transporters in the target cells [23,24,25], and thus the differences in the substrate recognition between protozoan and human transporters can be exploited to increase specificity [26].
In the present study, three analogues (two 7-derivatised tubercidin, 1 (internal code FH11706) and 2 (FH10714) and one 3′-deoxytubercidin, 3 (FH8513)) were further assayed (Figure 1) on distinct parasite forms and strains in 2- and 3D cell cultures. Their activity was further explored in a mouse model of acute T. cruzi infection. Also, a T. cruzi nucleoside transporter, TcrNT2, was shown to mediate the uptake of tubercidin and its 7-substituted analogs.

2. Results

2.1. In Vitro Activity and Selectivity against Intracellular Forms of T.cruzi (Tulahuen Strain)

The 7-(3,4-Difluorophenyl)tubercidin (1, FH11706), 7-(3-fluoro,4-chlorophenyl)tubercidin (2, FH10714) and 7-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-3′-deoxytubercidin (3, FH8513) gave excellent activities against intracellular forms of T. cruzi (the Tulahuen strain), with EC50 values ranging from 0.2 to 1.11 µM. Compound 3 (FH8513) displayed a 10-fold higher potency as compared to Bz. Compounds 2 (FH10714) and 3 (FH8513) also showed encouraging EC90 values in the low µM range. The derivatives exerted a low to moderate toxicity against L929 cells, resulting in high selectivity against (SI > 100), a condition sine qua non for valuable hits (Table 1).

2.2. In Vitro Activity against Bloodstream Forms of T.cruzi (Y strain)

Next, the compounds were screened against the other relevant form of human infection, the bloodstream trypomastigotes (BT). The analogues were active against BT, and compound 3 (FH8513) displayed EC50 and EC90 values comparable to those of Bz (Table 2).

2.3. In Vitro Cardiotoxicity

To assess potential cardiotoxicity, uninfected cardiomyoblasts (H9C2) monolayers were inspected after 24 h of drug incubation. FH11706, FH10714 and Bz were not cardiotoxic up to 300 µM, while FH8513 gave an IC50 value of 267.5 µM (Table 2). To further investigate cardiotoxic events after longer periods of drug exposure, 2- and 3D H9C2 cultures were incubated for seven days. Pentamidine (Pt) and Bz were used as positive and negative controls, respectively (Table 3). The nucleoside analogues were toxic on the 2D cultures after seven days of drug incubation, resulting in IC50 values ranging from 18.57–47.71 µM. On the other hand, FH10714 and FH8513 showed mild measurable toxicity (IC50 values 180 and 199 µM, respectively) towards the organoids.

2.4. In Vitro Activity against Intracellular Forms T. cruzi (Y strain) in 2D and 3D H9C2 Cultures

Next, the derivatives were further investigated during the infection of both 2D and 3D H9C2 cultures incubated for seven days with 10 µM of each compound. This concentration represents the EC90 value of Bz against the intracellular forms of T. cruzi [27] and is recommend as a first filter in a screening cascade of novel hits for Chagas disease [28]. The parasite load was determined by both light microscopy and qPCR. A high reduction in the parasitism of the 2D and 3D cultures was observed for all tested compounds (83.8–100%) as determined by the light microscopy evaluation. qPCR analysis achieved comparable results, confirming the promising anti-T. cruzi activity of the derivatives in both the monolayers and microtissues (Table 4).

2.5. In Vitro Analysis of Derivatives Uptake by TcrNT2 Thymidine Transporter

To investigate whether the TcrNT2 thymidine transporter might be involved in the uptake of the nucleoside analogues, the transporter was expressed in a Leishmania mexicana strain from which LmexNT1.1 and LmexNT1.2 had been deleted (LmexΔNT1; [17]). As previously shown, the deletion of this NT1.1/1.2 locus creates a virtual null background for the uptake of adenosine and pyrimidine nucleosides in Leishmania spp. [17,29]. The T. cruzi thymidine transporter had already been implicated in the transport of, and resistance to, tubercidin [17,18] and expressing it in this Leishmania strain should make a sensitive test for uptake of tubercidin analogues. Accordingly, tubercidin, FH10714 (a 7-aryl-substituted tubercidin), FH8513 (a 7-aryl-substituted 3′-deoxytubercidin) and pentamidine (the positive control) were tested on the promastigotes of LmexCas9 LmexCas9ΔNT1 and LmexCas9ΔNT1+TcrNT2 (Table 5). In line with the Finley et al. report from 1988 [18], the present data confirmed that tubercidin is indeed a substrate for TcrNT2 as, when expressing this carrier in Cas9ΔNT1, the cells were over 30-fold sensitized to the analog, with an EC50 of 0.82 ± 0.13 µM (p < 0.001). FH8513 displayed only marginal effects on Cas9 and Cas9ΔNT1, with EC50 values around 100 µM, with the highest concentration tested in the assay. The introduction of TcrNT2 significantly sensitized the cells to this compound, resulting in an EC50 of 31.1 ± 0.5 µM (p < 0.01), showing that (1) TcrNT2 mediates the uptake of FH8513, a 3′-deoxytubercidin analog and (2) that unmodified L. mexicana promastigotes are not sensitive to 3′-deoxytubercidins because of the limitations of trans-membrane transport. This explains, at least in part, why T. cruzi are more sensitive than Leishmania spp. to this class of compounds [20]. In contrast, the tubercidin analogs FH11706 and FH10714 had no effect on any of the three L. mexicana strains. Of note, both compounds feature fluoro substitutions on positions 3 and/or 4 of the 7-phenyl ring. When these were 3- and/or 4-chloro substitutions instead (TH1012, FH3147) or even an unsubstituted phenyl ring (TH1004), Cas9 was sensitive to the analogs, and the deletion of LmexNT1 caused high levels of resistance, which were mostly reversed upon the introduction of TcrNT2. Most clearly, LmexCas9 was highly sensitive to 7-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)tubercidin FH3147 (EC50 8.4 ± 1.6 µM) but became insensitive upon the deletion of LmexNT1 (EC50 > 100 µM), which was reversed upon the expression of TcrNT2 (EC50 13.7 ± 1.3 µM). These observations show that TcrNT2 can transport 7-aryltubercidins, although this ability could not be demonstrated for FH11706 and FH10714. The insensitivity of the L. mexicana promastigotes to these compounds is likely because of the inherent insensitivity of the cells to the fluorinated analogues rather than an inability of LmexNT1 or TcrNT2 to take up 7-aryltubercidins. Apart from the sensitivity data presented above and in Table 5, direct measurements of the affinity of tubercidin and some 7-substituted analogs for LmexNT1 were performed using [3H]-adenosine as the substrate. As shown in Figure 2, tubercidin showed high affinity for LmexNT1 (Ki 5.8 ± 0.6 µM; n = 3), and 7-substitution with phenyl or chloro, if anything, enhanced the affinity: FH3169 Ki 2.8 ± 0.2 µM (p < 0.05) and TH1004 Ki 3.8 ± 0.3 µM (p > 0.05). These data demonstrate that 7-aryl-substituted tubercidins are good substrates for both LmexNT1 and TcrNT2 but that T. cruzi is substantially more sensitive to this class of compounds than L. mexicana.

2.6. In Vivo Analysis of the Derivatives in a Mouse Model of Acute Toxicity and T. cruzi Infection

The high activity and selectivity of the derivatives against all relevant parasite forms and DTUs of the parasite prompted us to check their efficacy in a mouse model of acute toxicity and T. cruzi infection. Then, proof-of-concept assays were carried out according to the guidelines established by the FIOCRUZ Committee of Ethics for the Use of Animals as described in Material and Methods.
All derivatives were given orally to male Swiss mice for five consecutive days at a dose of 50 mg/kg/day, following the suggested screening cascade for the identification and progression of new chemical entities for CD [31,32]. The mice were observed for 5 days for overt toxic events, but none were evident. Thus, a proof-of-concept study was performed in T. cruzi-infected mice. The infected animals were treated (gavage, once a day) for 5 consecutive days with the derivatives (25 mg/kg/day) or Bz (100 mg/kg/day), starting drug administration at the parasitemia onset, usually on day 5 dpi, following doses and protocols already established for the other nucleoside derivatives [22]. FH11706, FH10714 and FH8513 suppressed the parasitemia, resulting in reductions of 98.4, 99.58 and 99.48%, respectively (p < 0.05), similar to Bz (Figure 3A). The nucleoside analogues, particularly FH11706 and FH8513, strongly protected the animals against the loss of weight induced by the acute experimental T.cruzi infection (Figure 3B).
The molecular analysis of the blood parasite load demonstrated that all compounds failed to provide a sterile cure since all treated animals displayed positive qPCR. At 77 dpi, blood samples were collected by heart puncture from animals treated with FH11706, FH10714, FH8513 and Bz. In all groups, a low parasite DNA amplification was detected (0.038 ± 0.016, 0.046 ± 0.038, 0.287 ± 0.017 and 0.187 ± 0.082 eq par/mL, respectively), being below the limit of detection (0.47 eq par/mL). The vehicle-treated animals presented the highest parasite DNA amplification (1.17 ± 0.45 eq par/mL).

2.7. In Vitro Washout Assays in T. cruzi-Infected L929 Cultures (Tulahuen Strain)

To explore in vitro parasitic exhaustion, T. cruzi-infected L929 cultures were incubated for seven days with the compounds at 10 μM. Then, fresh drug-free medium was added and replaced every 48 h. After seven days of incubation, the number of released parasites into the supernatant was quantified by light microscopy. All of the derivatives reduced the number of released parasites, but only FH10714 cleared the parasitism (Figure 4).

3. Discussion

As part of a previous broader screening of nucleoside analogs, three derivatives, named FH11706, FH10714 and FH8513, were identified as promising anti-T. cruzi agents [19,20,21], and in the present study, they were further evaluated in vitro and in vivo. The findings corroborated the earlier reports regarding the high potency of tubercidin analogues, especially FH8513, which was about 10-fold more active than benznidazole when its intracellular forms (Tulahuen strain in L929 cell cultures) were assayed [19]. Also, FH8513 displayed an outstanding effect against bloodstream forms, with EC50 value like Bz.
FH11706, FH10714 and FH8513 were low-to-moderate toxic to monolayers of different cell lines (fibroblasts L929 and cardiomyoblasts H9C2). As 3D structures may behave more closely to in vivo responses and are claimed as an important scientific tool to identify safer and more potent drugs [29,30], cardiac microtissues were evaluated. The H9C2 microtissues failed to detect cardiotoxicity for these tubercidins or for pentamidine, a well-known toxic drug [33]. It is possible that the cardiac spheroids present lower permeability to these compounds, as already reported for other drugs [34,35,36]. However, when the anti-T. cruzi activity of the derivatives was further investigated using the 2D and 3D cultures of H9C2 infected with the Y strain, the light microscopy and qPCR analysis revealed that all derivatives sustained high potency against the intracellular forms in both cultures, similarly as Bz. This shows that the nucleosides did penetrate well into the artificial tissue despite the lack of toxicity.
In protozoa, all genes known to encode for nucleoside and nucleobase transporters are of the Equilibrative Nucleoside Transporter family [15,37], although there have been suggestions that some highly specific nucleobase carriers for uracil, adenine and hypoxanthine may belong to a different gene family but, if so, this other gene family has not yet been identified [38,39]. Recently, the four T. cruzi ENT genes were cloned and characterized, and the findings showed a specific adenine transporter (TcrNB2, [17]), a hypoxanthine/guanine transporter (TcrNB1), an inosine/guanosine transporter (TcrNT1) and a thymidine transporter (NT2) [16]. The observation of Finley (1988) [18] that tubercidin resistance in T. cruzi is associated with the loss of uptake of thymidine prompted us to test whether TcrNT2 can mediate the uptake of tubercidin and its analogues. Using the previously described L. mexicana Cas9ΔNT1 strain [17,40] to express TcrNT2, the present data demonstrated the sensitization of Cas9ΔNT1+TcrNT2 to tubercidin and multiple analogues, including 3′-deoxytubercidin analogue FH8513 and 7-aryl and 7-halogen tubercidin analogues. FH11706 and FH10714 had no effect on any of the L. mexicana strains. This is most likely the result of Leishmania promastigotes simply not being sensitive to these 7-fluorophenyl-substituted analogues, as 7-substituted tubercidins were shown to be high-affinity substrates of LmexNT1. Thus, 7-substituted tubercidins, such as tubercidin itself, are most likely taken up by TcrNT2. This was demonstrated by the observation that the expression of TcrNT2 in LmexCas9ΔNT1 sensitized the cells highly significantly sensitized the cells to the multiple 7-substituted tubercidin analogs, FH3169, TH1012 and FH3147.
The in vivo efficacy studies are in line with previous data reporting that despite the strong suppression of parasitemia, the nucleoside derivatives did not achieve a full sterile cure in a mouse model of a T. cruzi acute infection with the standardized oral administration protocols [19,20,21,22,41]. The lack of a sterile cure has been associated with the inactivity of the derivatives on the non-metabolically active and non-dividing trypomastigotes and/or the existence of dormant/persistent forms of the parasite [22,41]. Parasitic recrudescence has been studied in several models and is partly related to the dormant/persistent forms that may spontaneously arise and that can resume cell proliferation after removing the pressure induced by different stress factors and/or even voluntarily by mechanisms not yet understood [42,43]. The washout assays revealed that only FH10714 eliminated the parasitism after seven days of incubation in the L929 monolayers. In fact, although FH10714 appeared to eliminate the parasite from 3D cultures, it was incapable to promote a parasitological cure in vivo when given once a day, for 5 days at 25 mg/kg. Given the oral route of administration, it must be considered that suboptimal acid stability, intestinal absorption and chemical stability in vivo may limit the availability of the compound in the animal model, and these issues need urgent further investigation.
Although not providing a full animal cure, qPCR values revealed that in vivo treatment using the nucleoside analogues resulted in very low levels of parasitism (consistent with observations using the 3D cultures), being lower than the CD reference drug. These findings argue in favor of additional studies of pharmacokinetics and/or longer periods of in vivo drug administration, as well as in combinatory protocols. Also, future analysis of an extended duration in vitro washout using a larger panel of T. cruzi strains may provide additional information to move new nucleoside analogues to animal studies since drug sensitivities may be related to differences in T. cruzi strain response and replication rates [44,45].

4. Conclusions

The present data report the in vitro potency of nucleoside derivatives against T. cruzi, with EC50 values inferior to Bz against intracellular forms and comparable against bloodstream forms. Their uptake appears to be mediated by the TcrNT2 nucleoside carrier. The compounds were highly active in vivo but failed to induce a complete parasitological cure when given orally for 5 days, justifying further studies with longer treatment regimens, as well as evaluation in combination with nitro drugs, aiming to identify more effective and safer therapies for Chagas disease.

5. Material and Methods

5.1. The Studied Compounds

The synthesis and characterization of FH11706, FH10714 [46] and FH8513 [19] were previously reported. Benznidazole (Bz) was purchased from Laboratório Farmacêutico do Estado de Pernambuco (Brazil). For in vitro analysis, stock solutions were prepared at 20 mM in 100% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), and compounds serially diluted (2-fold) in RPMI culture medium, with the final DMSO concentration never exceeding 0.6%, which does not induce cellular damages to mammalian cells and T. cruzi parasites [47]. For in vivo assays, Bz was formulated using 3% Tween 80 in distilled water and the nucleoside analogues in 10% (v/v) EtOH, with 1.1 mM aqueous citrate buffer pH 3.2 and dosed according to animal body weight.

5.2. In Vitro Cultures of Mammalian Cells

L929 cell lines were used to evaluate the effect of the nucleoside derivatives on the cellular viability of mammalian host cells and to assess their activity against intracellular forms of T. cruzi (Tulahuen strain expressing E. coli β-galactosidase gene, DTU VI) as reported [27]. 2D and 3D culture systems of rat cardiomyoblast cell lines (H9C2(2-1)) were used to evaluate cardiotoxicity and to test the derivatives’ activity on intracellular forms (Y strain, DTU II) [48]. In all assays, the cell cultures were maintained at 37 °C under an atmosphere of 5% CO2.

5.3. The Obtention and Maintenance of the Parasites

Bloodstream trypomastigotes of the Y strain (DTU II) were obtained by cardiac puncture of infected Swiss Webster mice on the parasitemia peak to perform drug sensitivity assays [49]. Trypomastigote forms of the Tulahuen-β gal strain were collected from the supernatant of previously infected L929 cell cultures (host/parasite cell ratio 10:1) [22]. The intracellular forms T. cruzi were studied by the infection of L929 and H9C2 (2D and 3D) cell cultures infected for 48 and 24 h with trypomastigotes of Tulahuen-β gal and Y strains, respectively [50]. The Leishmania mexicana-Cas9 T7 strain (LmexCas9) was derived from L. mexicana WT promastigotes by expression of the Streptococcus pyogenes Cas9 nuclease gene ‘Cas9′ and maintained on 32 μg/mL hygromycin [51]. This strain and the derived strains Cas9ΔNT1 and Cas9ΔNT1+TcrNT2 were cultured in HOMEM medium supplemented with 10% of FBS and 1% Penicillin-Streptomycin antibiotic in unvented flasks at 25 °C [52]. The Cas9ΔNT1 strain is identical to Cas9 except that the LmexNT1.1/NT1.2 locus encoding the L. mexicana adenosine/ pyrimidine transporters was excised using Cas9 [17,40]. Cas9ΔNT1+TcrNT2 is the further modification of that strain by the expression of the T. cruzi nucleoside transporter 2 (TcrNT2) gene in it [17], using the vector pNUS-HcN [53]. Appropriate antibiotics were added for the selection and maintenance of transfectants.

5.4. The In Vitro Toxicity on Mammalian Cell Cultures

L929 cells seeded in sterile 96-well microtiter plates were exposed or not to increasing concentrations (up to 200 µM) of the compounds. After seven days of incubation, the cell growth of treated cultures was compared to untreated control cells (100% cell growth). Cellular viability was assessed through AlamarBlue® (resazurin sodium salt) colorimetric assay, and the results were expressed as % reduction in cell growth/viability compared to untreated control, and an IC50 value determined [27]. For the assays using H9C2 cultures, 25 × 103 cells/well were seeded in a 96-well microtiter plates (flat and U bottoms, precoated with agarose 1% for preparing 2- and 3D matrices, respectively) and maintained at 37 °C [48,54].
The cardiac cultures were exposed or not to increasing concentrations of the nucleoside derivatives (up to 300 µM), and after seven days of incubation, their physiology and morphology was evaluated by light microscopy. Cell viability was measured using the PrestoBlue® (PB) colorimetric assay, the results evaluated as % reduction in cell growth/viability compared to untreated control, and an IC50 value determined [54]. The data results from at least two independent experiments done in at least duplicates.

5.5. The In Vitro Activity of the Compounds against Intracellular Forms of T. cruzi (Tulahuen and Y strains) in L929 and H9C2 Monolayers, Respectively

In an initial step, nucleoside derivatives were assayed against intracellular forms of Tulahuen-β gal strain in L929 cell lines [27]. Assays were performed in sterile 96-well microtiter plates with 4 × 103 cells/well and 4 × 104 parasites/well (host/parasite cell ratio 1:10). After the establishment of infection (48 h), increasing concentrations (up to 30 µM) of the compounds were added, and the cultures maintained at 37 °C for seven days. Untreated-infected controls represented 100% growth. Parasite burden was analyzed by adding the substrate CPRG (chlorophenol red ß-D-galactopyranoside) followed by measurements (spectrophotometrically) at 570 nm. The results were expressed as percentage of reduction in parasite growth compared to untreated cells, and EC50 values were calculated. Bz was used as a positive control [27,55]. To investigate the effect of the compounds against intracellular forms of the Y strain, rat cardiomyoblasts (2D cultures of H9C2) were seeded in 24-well plates and, after 24 h of platting, were infected with bloodstream trypomastigotes (20 parasites per host cell). After 24 h of interaction, the infected cultures were rinsed to remove non-internalized parasites and incubated with 10 µM of the tested compounds. After seven days of treatment, the cultures were fixed, stained with Giemsa, and 200 cells were quantified by light microscopy. The results were expressed as % of reduction in parasite burden [56]. The data results from two independent experiments performed in at least duplicate were obtained.

5.6. The In Vitro Activity of the Compounds against Intracellular Forms of T. cruzi (Y strain) in H9C2 Organoids

3D cultures of H9C2 cells were obtained as described [54], and 24 h after plating, the spheroids were infected (or not, control) with bloodstream trypomastigotes of T. cruzi (strain Y), using 20 parasites per host cell. After 24 h, infected spheroids were incubated with 10 µM of the tested compounds for seven days, and then the spheroids were transferred one by one to an Eppendorf tube, with the aid of a pestle they were mechanically macerated following an established protocol [57] with minor adaptations. The parasite load was quantified by light microscopy [55] and qPCR [54], and the results were expressed as % of parasite death. The data results from two independent experiments performed in at least duplicate.

5.7. The In Vitro Activity of the Compounds against Bloodstream Forms of T. cruzi (Y strain)

To analyze the compound activity against bloodstream trypomastigotes of T. cruzi (Y strain), 5 × 106 mL of parasite were added in 96-well microtiter plates and incubated for 2 or for 24 h at 37 °C in RPMI culture medium in the presence or absence of each compound (up to 30 µM). The death rates were quantified by light microscopy using a Neubauer chamber to determine the EC50 [49,58]. The data results from two independent experiments performed in duplicate were obtained.

5.8. The In Vitro Activity of the Compounds against Leishmania mexicana Promastigotes

The EC50 values for nucleoside analogues against Leishmania mexicana promastigotes of the Cas9, Cas9ΔNT1 and Cas9ΔNT1+TcrNT2 strains used a resazurin-based assay, as described [59]. Briefly, the assays were performed in standard HOMEM medium and culture conditions, in white opaque 96-well plates. For each test compound (stored as a 40 mM stock solution in 100% DMSO at −20 °C), a doubling dilution was performed over 2 rows of the plate, keeping the last well free as no-drug control with HOMEM only (23 doubling dilutions; highest concentration 100 µM). To each well, 100 µL of HOMEM containing 2 × 105 cells of the appropriate L. mexicana line was added, and the plates incubated for 72 h at 25 °C, followed by the addition of 20 µL of resazurin solution and further incubation for 48 h. Fluorescence was read on a FLUOstar OPTIMA plate reader (BMG Labtech, Germany), at an excitation wavelength of 544 nm and an emission wavelength of 620 nm. The EC50 values were determined by the GraphPad Prism 8.0 software using an equation for a sigmoid curve with variable slope. Pentamidine was used as positive control, and every experiment was independently performed at least 3 times independently.

5.9. In Vitro Analysis of Derivatives Uptake by TcrNT2 Thymidine Transporter

Uptake of 50 nM 2,8-3H-adenosine (American Radiolabelled Chemicals (ART0287A), 40 Ci/ mmol) was exactly measured, exactly as described [26]. Briefly, promastigotes were washed into the standard assay buffer (AB) by centrifugation, and aliquots of 100 µL containing 107 parasites were incubated with the radiolabel on top of an oil layer in a microfuge tube, for exactly 5 s. The incubation was stopped by the addition of 800 µL of ice-cold 1 mM adenosine in AB and immediate centrifugation through the oil layer to separate cells from the remaining extracellular radiolabel. Cell pellets were collected in scintillation vials after flash freezing in liquid nitrogen, by cutting of the tip of the microfuge tube. The promastigotes were then solubilised in 1% SDS, and scintillation fluid was added (Scintlogic U, Lablogic), and radioactivity was quantified in a Hidex 300SL scintillation counter (Lablogic). Data was plotted using non-linear regression with an equation for a sigmoid curve with a variable slope in Prism v8 (GraphPad).

5.10. In Vitro Washout Assays in T. cruzi-Infected L929 Cultures (Tulahuen Strain)

T. cruzi-infected L929 cultures (using the Tulahuen-β gal strain) were exposed or not to 10 µM of each nucleoside derivative, and the RPMI culture medium (containing the tested compounds) replaced every 48 h. After seven days of incubation, the cultures were rinsed with 0.1 M phosphate buffered saline (PBS), and drug-free culture medium was added for another seven days of incubation, replacing the drug-free medium every 48 h. Parasites released into the supernatant of the cell cultures were quantified using light microscopy, and the parasite burden into the infected cultures was analyzed by adding the substrate CPRG (chlorophenol red ß-D-galactopyranoside) followed by spectrophotometric measurements at 570 nm. The results were expressed as percentage of reduction in parasite growth compared to untreated cells, and EC50 values were calculated. Bz was used as a positive control [27,55]. The data results from two independent experiments done in at least duplicate.

5.11. In Vivo Analysis of the Derivatives in a Mouse Model of Acute Toxicity and T. cruzi Infection

Male Swiss Webster mice (18−20 g; 4−5 weeks of age) were obtained from the Institute of Sciences and Technologies in Biomodels (ICTB-FIOCRUZ), housed with a maximum of 5 animals per cage and kept in a specific pathogen-free (SPF) room at 20−24 °C under a 12 h light and 12 h dark cycle. All animals received sterilized water and food ad libitum. The animals were acclimatized for 7 days before the experiments. To detect possible toxic events, nucleoside analogues and Bz were orally given to non-infected Swiss male mice (n = 2) for 5 consecutive days, with a fixed dose of 50 mg/kg (0.1 mL). On day 5, all animals were euthanized to inspect toxic and subtoxic symptoms [49]. For a proof-of-concept study, animals were infected by i.p. administration of 104 bloodstream trypomastigotes (Y strain), and drug administration started at the onset of parasitemia (6 dpi), only using mice with detectable parasitemia. Control mice groups were age-matched and housed under identical conditions. The following experimental groups were used (3 mice per group): untreated (infected vehicle-treated control) and treated (infected and treated with derivatives or with benznidazole). The derivatives and Bz were given orally (gavage) for five consecutive days at 25 mg/kg and 100 mg/kg, respectively, once a day. Parasitemia levels in T. cruzi assays were individually checked by light microscopic counting of parasites in 5 μL of blood, as described [22]. For blood qPCR analysis, 500 µL of blood was diluted in a 1:2 volume of guanidine solution and heated for 60 s in boiling water, followed by DNA purification using High Pure PCR Template Preparation Kit (Roche Applied Science) and quantitative real-time multiplex PCR assays. TaqMan probes were used for quantification of both T. cruzi satellite nuclear DNA and internal amplification control (IAC), as described in Duffy et al. (2013) [60], using the following primer and prober sets: Cruzi1 5′-ASTCGGCTGATCGTTTTCGA-3′ (750 nM), Cruzi2 5′-AATTCCTCCAAGCAGCGGATA-3′ (750 nM), Cruzi3 FAM-5′-CACACACTGGACACCAA-3′-NFQ-MGB (50 nM), IAC Fw 5′-ACCGTCATGGAACAGCACGTA-3′ (100 nM), IAC Rv 5′-CTCCCGCAACAAACCCTATAAAT-3′ (100 nM) and IAC Tq 5′-VIC-AGCATCTGTTCTTGAAGGT-NFQ-MGB-3′ (50 nM). The cycling conditions were a first step of 10 min at 95 °C, followed by 40 cycles at 95 °C for 15 s and 58 °C for 1 min. The amplifications were carried out in a Quantstudio 3 real-time PCR system (Applied Biosystems), with the threshold set at 0.02 in all runs. Standard curves were constructed for absolute quantification through the serial dilution of total DNA, ranging from 105 parasite equivalent to 1 parasite equivalent per mL of blood, obtained with a negative blood sample in guanidine-EDTA. Parasite load was expressed as equivalent of parasite DNA per mL of blood [61].

5.12. Statistical Analysis

The analyses were obtained through nonlinear regression analysis by GraphPad Prism v 9.0 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA). Statistical analysis was performed using an ANOVA single factor test with the level of significance set at p ≤ 0.05.

5.13. Ethics

All animal studies were carried out in strict accordance with the guidelines established by the FIOCRUZ Committee of Ethics for the Use of Animals (CEUA L038-2017).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.d.N.C.S., S.V.C. and H.P.D.K.; methodology, L.F.d.A.F., D.G.J.B., R.D.G., P.F.-A., M.M.A. and E.K.E.; formal analysis, M.d.N.C.S., S.V.C., L.F.d.A.F., O.M., F.H. and H.P.D.K.; investigation, M.d.N.C.S., S.V.C. and H.P.D.K.; resources, M.d.N.C.S., S.V.C. and H.P.D.K.; data curation, M.d.N.C.S., F.H., O.M., S.V.C. and H.P.D.K.; writing—original draft preparation, M.d.N.C.S., L.F.d.A.F., F.H., S.V.C. and H.P.D.K.; writing—review and editing, M.d.N.C.S., L.F.d.A.F., F.H., S.V.C., O.M. and H.P.D.K.; visualization, M.d.N.C.S., L.F.d.A.F., S.V.C., O.M. and H.P.D.K.; supervision, M.d.N.C.S., S.V.C. and H.P.D.K.; project administration, M.d.N.C.S. and S.V.C.; funding acquisition, M.d.N.C.S., L.F.d.A.F., F.H., S.V.C. and H.P.D.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The present study was supported by grants from Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ), Conselho Nacional Desenvolvimento científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) and Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. M.N.C.S. and O.M. are research fellows of CNPq and CNE researchers. M.M.A. was supported by a studentship from the Government of Libya. E.K.E. was supported by a Daniel Turnberg Travel Fellowship from the UK Academy of Medical Sciences and a Newton Research Travel Grant from the Royal Society.

Institutional Review Board Statement

All animal studies were carried out in strict accordance with the guidelines established by the FIOCRUZ Committee of Ethics for the Use of Animals (CEUA L038-2017).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All relevant data are included in the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Sample Availability

All relevant data are included in the manuscript.

References

  1. WHO Neglected Tropical Diseases—GLOBAL. Available online: https://www.who.int/health-topics/neglected-tropical-diseases (accessed on 9 October 2022).
  2. Pérez-Molina, J.A.; Molina, I. Chagas Disease. Lancet 2018, 391, 82–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. DNDi Chagas Disease|DNDi. Available online: https://dndi.org/diseases/chagas/ (accessed on 9 October 2022).
  4. Hotez, P.J.; Booker, C. STOP: Study, Treat, Observe, and Prevent Neglected Diseases of Poverty Act. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2020, 14, e0008064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Lidani, K.C.F.; Andrade, F.A.; Bavia, L.; Damasceno, F.S.; Beltrame, M.H.; Messias-Reason, I.J.; Sandri, T.L. Chagas Disease: From Discovery to a Worldwide Health Problem. Front. Public Health 2019, 7, 166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Restrepo Zambrano, M.; Rouset, F.; Carrasco, O.F.; Echeverría Murillo, D.; Costales, J.A.; Brenière, S.F. Congenital Chagas Disease in the Ecuadorian Amazon: Maternal Screening at Delivery and Evaluation of Risk Factors Associated with Vector Exposure. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2019, 101, 1350–1358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Guarner, J. Chagas Disease as Example of a Reemerging Parasite. Semin. Diagn. Pathol. 2019, 36, 164–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Coura, J.R.; Viñas, P.A.; Junqueira, A.C. Ecoepidemiology, Short History and Control of Chagas Disease in the Endemic Countries and the New Challenge for Non-Endemic Countries. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 2014, 109, 856–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Bern, C. Chagas’ Disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 2015, 373, 456–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Rassi, A.; Rassi, A.; Marcondes de Rezende, J. American Trypanosomiasis (Chagas Disease). Infect. Dis. Clin. N. Am. 2012, 26, 275–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Rassi, A.; Rassi, A.; Marin-Neto, J.A. Chagas Disease. Lancet 2010, 375, 1388–1402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Mazzeti, A.L.; Capelari-Oliveira, P.; Bahia, M.T.; Mosqueira, V.C.F. Review on Experimental Treatment Strategies Against Trypanosoma cruzi. JEP J. Exp. Pharmacol. 2021, 13, 409–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Bahia, M.T.; Diniz, L.d.F.; Mosqueira, V.C.F. Therapeutical Approaches under Investigation for Treatment of Chagas Disease. Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs 2014, 23, 1225–1237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zingales, B.; Miles, M.A.; Moraes, C.B.; Luquetti, A.; Guhl, F.; Schijman, A.G.; Ribeiro, I. Drug Discovery for Chagas Disease Should Consider Trypanosoma cruzi Strain Diversity. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 2014, 109, 828–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Campagnaro, G.D.; De Koning, H.P. Purine and Pyrimidine Transporters of Pathogenic Protozoa—Conduits for Therapeutic Agents. Med. Res. Rev. 2020, 40, 1679–1714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Campagnaro, G.D.; de Freitas Nascimento, J.; Girard, R.B.M.; Silber, A.M.; De Koning, H.P. Cloning and Characterisation of the Equilibrative Nucleoside Transporter Family of Trypanosoma cruzi: Ultra-High Affinity and Selectivity to Survive in the Intracellular Niche. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA)-Gen. Subj. 2018, 1862, 2750–2763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Aldfer, M.M.; AlSiari, T.A.; Elati, H.A.A.; Natto, M.J.; Alfayez, I.A.; Campagnaro, G.D.; Sani, B.; Burchmore, R.J.S.; Diallinas, G.; De Koning, H.P. Nucleoside Transport and Nucleobase Uptake Null Mutants in Leishmania mexicana for the Routine Expression and Characterization of Purine and Pyrimidine Transporters. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 8139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Finley, R.W.; Cooney, D.A.; Dvorak, J.A. Nucleoside Uptake in Trypanosoma cruzi: Analysis of a Mutant Resistant to Tubercidin. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 1988, 31, 133–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hulpia, F.; Van Hecke, K.; França da Silva, C.; da Gama Jaen Batista, D.; Maes, L.; Caljon, G.; de Nazaré, C.; Soeiro, M.; Van Calenbergh, S. Discovery of Novel 7-Aryl 7-Deazapurine 3′-Deoxy-Ribofuranosyl Nucleosides with Potent Activity against Trypanosoma cruzi. J. Med. Chem. 2018, 61, 9287–9300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Bouton, J.; Ferreira de Almeida Fiuza, L.; Cardoso Santos, C.; Mazzarella, M.A.; Soeiro, M.d.N.C.; Maes, L.; Karalic, I.; Caljon, G.; Van Calenbergh, S. Revisiting Pyrazolo[3,4-d]Pyrimidine Nucleosides as Anti-Trypanosoma cruzi and Antileishmanial Agents. J. Med. Chem. 2021, 64, 4206–4238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lin, C.; Ferreira de Almeida Fiuza, L.; Cardoso Santos, C.; Ferreira Nunes, D.; Cruz Moreira, O.; Bouton, J.; Karalic, I.; Maes, L.; Caljon, G.; Hulpia, F.; et al. 6-Methyl-7-Aryl-7-Deazapurine Nucleosides as Anti-Trypanosoma cruzi Agents: Structure-Activity Relationship and in Vivo Efficacy. ChemMedChem 2021, 16, 2231–2253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Cardoso-Santos, C.; Ferreira de Almeida Fiuza, L.; França da Silva, C.; Mazzeti, A.L.; Donola Girão, R.; Melo de Oliveira, G.; da Gama Jaen Batista, D.; Cruz Moreira, O.; Lins da Silva Gomes, N.; Maes, L.; et al. 7-Aryl-7-Deazapurine 3′-Deoxyribonucleoside Derivative as a Novel Lead for Chagas’ Disease Therapy: In Vitro and in Vivo Pharmacology. JAC-Antimicrob. Resist. 2021, 3, dlab168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Hulpia, F.; Campagnaro, G.D.; Scortichini, M.; Van Hecke, K.; Maes, L.; De Koning, H.P.; Caljon, G.; Van Calenbergh, S. Revisiting Tubercidin against Kinetoplastid Parasites: Aromatic Substitutions at Position 7 Improve Activity and Reduce Toxicity. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2019, 164, 689–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Hulpia, F.; Mabille, D.; Campagnaro, G.D.; Schumann, G.; Maes, L.; Roditi, I.; Hofer, A.; De Koning, H.P.; Caljon, G.; Van Calenbergh, S. Combining Tubercidin and Cordycepin Scaffolds Results in Highly Active Candidates to Treat Late-Stage Sleeping Sickness. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 5564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Vodnala, S.K.; Lundbäck, T.; Yeheskieli, E.; Sjöberg, B.; Gustavsson, A.-L.; Svensson, R.; Olivera, G.C.; Eze, A.A.; De Koning, H.P.; Hammarström, L.G.J.; et al. Structure–Activity Relationships of Synthetic Cordycepin Analogues as Experimental Therapeutics for African Trypanosomiasis. J. Med. Chem. 2013, 56, 9861–9873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Wallace, L.J.M.; Candlish, D.; De Koning, H.P. Different Substrate Recognition Motifs of Human and Trypanosome Nucleobase Transporters. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 26149–26156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Romanha, A.J.; de Castro, S.L.; Soeiro, M.d.N.C.; Lannes-Vieira, J.; Ribeiro, I.; Talvani, A.; Bourdin, B.; Blum, B.; Olivieri, B.; Zani, C.; et al. In Vitro and in Vivo Experimental Models for Drug Screening and Development for Chagas Disease. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 2010, 105, 233–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Katsuno, K.; Burrows, J.N.; Duncan, K.; van Huijsduijnen, R.H.; Kaneko, T.; Kita, K.; Mowbray, C.E.; Schmatz, D.; Warner, P.; Slingsby, B.T. Hit and Lead Criteria in Drug Discovery for Infectious Diseases of the Developing World. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2015, 14, 751–758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Vasudevan, G.; Carter, N.S.; Drew, M.E.; Beverley, S.M.; Sanchez, M.A.; Seyfang, A.; Ullman, B.; Landfear, S.M. Cloning of Leishmania Nucleoside Transporter Genes by Rescue of a Transport-Deficient Mutant. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1998, 95, 9873–9878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Alzahrani, K.J.H.; Ali, J.A.M.; Eze, A.A.; Looi, W.L.; Tagoe, D.N.A.; Creek, D.J.; Barrett, M.P.; De Koning, H.P. Functional and Genetic Evidence That Nucleoside Transport Is Highly Conserved in Leishmania Species: Implications for Pyrimidine-Based Chemotherapy. Int. J. Parasitol. Drugs Drug Resist. 2017, 7, 206–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kratz, J.M.; Gonçalves, K.R.; Romera, L.M.; Moraes, C.B.; Bittencourt-Cunha, P.; Schenkman, S.; Chatelain, E.; Sosa-Estani, S. The Translational Challenge in Chagas Disease Drug Development. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 2022, 117, e200501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Soeiro, M.d.N.C. Perspectives for a new drug candidate for Chagas disease therapy. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2022, 117, e220004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Soeiro, M.d.N.C.; de Castro, S.L. Screening of Potential Anti-Trypanosoma cruzi Candidates: In Vitro and In Vivo Studies. Open Med. Chem. J. 2011, 5, 21–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Loessner, D.; Stok, K.S.; Lutolf, M.P.; Hutmacher, D.W.; Clements, J.A.; Rizzi, S.C. Bioengineered 3D Platform to Explore Cell–ECM Interactions and Drug Resistance of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Cells. Biomaterials 2010, 31, 8494–8506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Costa, E.C.; Moreira, A.F.; de Melo-Diogo, D.; Gaspar, V.M.; Carvalho, M.P.; Correia, I.J. 3D Tumor Spheroids: An Overview on the Tools and Techniques Used for Their Analysis. Biotechnol. Adv. 2016, 34, 1427–1441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Tredan, O.; Galmarini, C.M.; Patel, K.; Tannock, I.F. Drug Resistance and the Solid Tumor Microenvironment. JNCI J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2007, 99, 1441–1454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. De Koning, H.P.; Bridges, D.J.; Burchmore, R.J.S. Purine and Pyrimidine Transport in Pathogenic Protozoa: From Biology to Therapy. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2005, 29, 987–1020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. De Koning, H.P. Pyrimidine Transporters of Trypanosomes—A Class Apart? Trends Parasitol. 2007, 23, 190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Campagnaro, G.D.; Alzahrani, K.J.; Munday, J.C.; De Koning, H.P. Trypanosoma brucei Bloodstream Forms Express Highly Specific and Separate Transporters for Adenine and Hypoxanthine; Evidence for a New Protozoan Purine Transporter Family? Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 2018, 220, 46–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Alfayez, I.A. An Investigation of 5-Fluorouracil Resistance in Leishmania and Trypanosoma Species. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  41. Lin, C.; Hulpia, F.; da Silva, C.F.; Batista, D.d.G.J.; Van Hecke, K.; Maes, L.; Caljon, G.; Soeiro, M.d.N.C.; Van Calenbergh, S. Discovery of Pyrrolo[2,3-b]Pyridine (1,7-Dideazapurine) Nucleoside Analogues as Anti-Trypanosoma cruzi Agents. J. Med. Chem. 2019, 62, 8847–8865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Barrett, M.P.; Kyle, D.E.; Sibley, L.D.; Radke, J.B.; Tarleton, R.L. Protozoan Persister-like Cells and Drug Treatment Failure. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2019, 17, 607–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Sánchez-Valdéz, F.J.; Padilla, A.; Wang, W.; Orr, D.; Tarleton, R.L. Spontaneous Dormancy Protects Trypanosoma cruzi during Extended Drug Exposure. eLife 2018, 7, e34039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Rodríguez, M.E.; Rizzi, M.; Caeiro, L.D.; Masip, Y.E.; Perrone, A.; Sánchez, D.O.; Búa, J.; Tekiel, V. Transmigration of Trypanosoma cruzi Trypomastigotes through 3D Cultures Resembling a Physiological Environment. Cell. Microbiol. 2020, 22, e13207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. MacLean, L.M.; Thomas, J.; Lewis, M.D.; Cotillo, I.; Gray, D.W.; De Rycker, M. Development of Trypanosoma cruzi in Vitro Assays to Identify Compounds Suitable for Progression in Chagas’ Disease Drug Discovery. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2018, 12, e0006612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Natto, M.J.; Hulpia, F.; Kalkman, E.R.; Baillie, S.; Alhejeli, A.; Miyamoto, Y.; Eckmann, L.; Van Calenbergh, S.; De Koning, H.P. Deazapurine Nucleoside Analogues for the Treatment of Trichomonas Vaginalis. ACS Infect. Dis. 2021, 7, 1752–1764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Simões-Silva, M.R.; Nefertiti, A.S.G.; De Araújo, J.S.; Batista, M.M.; Da Silva, P.B.; Bahia, M.T.; Menna-Barreto, R.S.; Pavão, B.P.; Green, J.; Farahat, A.A.; et al. Phenotypic Screening In Vitro of Novel Aromatic Amidines against Trypanosoma cruzi. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2016, 60, 4701–4707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Farani, P.S.G.; Ferreira, B.I.S.; Gibaldi, D.; Lannes-Vieira, J.; Moreira, O.C. Modulation of MiR-145-5p and MiR-146b-5p Levels Is Linked to Reduced Parasite Load in H9C2 Trypanosoma cruzi Infected Cardiomyoblasts. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 1436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Timm, B.L.; da Silva, P.B.; Batista, M.M.; da Silva, F.H.G.; da Silva, C.F.; Tidwell, R.R.; Patrick, D.A.; Jones, S.K.; Bakunov, S.A.; Bakunova, S.M.; et al. In Vitro and In Vivo Biological Effects of Novel Arylimidamide Derivatives against Trypanosoma cruzi. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2014, 58, 3720–3726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Guedes-da-Silva, F.H.; Batista, D.G.J.; Meuser, M.B.; Demarque, K.C.; Fulco, T.O.; Araújo, J.S.; Da Silva, P.B.; Da Silva, C.F.; Patrick, D.A.; Bakunova, S.M.; et al. In Vitro and In Vivo Trypanosomicidal Action of Novel Arylimidamides against Trypanosoma cruzi. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2016, 60, 2425–2434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Beneke, T.; Madden, R.; Makin, L.; Valli, J.; Sunter, J.; Gluenz, E. A CRISPR Cas9 High-Throughput Genome Editing Toolkit for Kinetoplastids. R. Soc. Open Sci. 2017, 4, 170095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Al-Salabi, M.I.; Wallace, L.J.M.; De Koning, H.P. A Leishmania major Nucleobase Transporter Responsible for Allopurinol Uptake Is a Functional Homolog of the Trypanosoma brucei H2 Transporter. Mol. Pharm. 2003, 63, 814–820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Tetaud, E.; Lecuix, I.; Sheldrake, T.; Baltz, T.; Fairlamb, A.H. A New Expression Vector for Crithidia fasciculata and Leishmania. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 2002, 120, 195–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. de Almeida Fiuza, L.F.; Batista, D.d.G.J.; Nunes, D.F.; Moreira, O.C.; Cascabulho, C.; Soeiro, M.d.N.C. Benznidazole Modulates Release of Inflammatory Mediators by Cardiac Spheroids Infected with Trypanosoma cruzi. Exp. Parasitol. 2021, 221, 108061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Nefertiti, A.S.G.; Batista, M.M.; Da Silva, P.B.; Batista, D.G.J.; Da Silva, C.F.; Peres, R.B.; Torres-Santos, E.C.; Cunha-Junior, E.F.; Holt, E.; Boykin, D.W.; et al. In Vitro and In Vivo Studies of the Trypanocidal Effect of Novel Quinolines. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2018, 62, e01936-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Santos, C.C.; Zhang, H.; Batista, M.M.; de Oliveira, G.M.; Demarque, K.C.; da Silva, N.L.; Moreira, O.C.; Ogungbe, I.V.; Soeiro, M. de N.C. Phenotypic Investigation of 4-Nitrophenylacetyl- and 4-Nitro-1 H -Imidazoyl-Based Compounds as Antileishmanial Agents. Parasitology 2022, 149, 490–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Bombaça, A.C.S.; Dias, F.d.A.; Ennes-Vidal, V.; Garcia-Gomes, A.d.S.; Sorgine, M.H.F.; d’Avila-Levy, C.M.; Menna-Barreto, R.F.S. Hydrogen Peroxide Resistance in Strigomonas Culicis: Effects on Mitochondrial Functionality and Aedes Aegypti Interaction. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2017, 113, 255–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Ferreira de Almeida Fiuza, L.; Peres, R.B.; Simões-Silva, M.R.; da Silva, P.B.; Batista, D.d.G.J.; da Silva, C.F.; Nefertiti Silva da Gama, A.; Krishna Reddy, T.R.; Soeiro, M.d.N.C. Identification of Pyrazolo[3,4-e][1,4]Thiazepin Based CYP51 Inhibitors as Potential Chagas Disease Therapeutic Alternative: In Vitro and in Vivo Evaluation, Binding Mode Prediction and SAR Exploration. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2018, 149, 257–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  59. Rodenko, B.; Wanner, M.J.; Alkhaldi, A.A.M.; Ebiloma, G.U.; Barnes, R.L.; Kaiser, M.; Brun, R.; McCulloch, R.; Koomen, G.-J.; De Koning, H.P. Targeting the Parasite’s DNA with Methyltriazenyl Purine Analogs Is a Safe, Selective, and Efficacious Antitrypanosomal Strategy. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2015, 59, 6708–6716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Duffy, T.; Cura, C.I.; Ramirez, J.C.; Abate, T.; Cayo, N.M.; Parrado, R.; Bello, Z.D.; Velazquez, E.; Muñoz-Calderon, A.; Juiz, N.A.; et al. Analytical Performance of a Multiplex Real-Time PCR Assay Using TaqMan Probes for Quantification of Trypanosoma cruzi Satellite DNA in Blood Samples. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2013, 7, e2000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Guedes-da-Silva, F.H.; Batista, D.G.J.; Da Silva, C.F.; De Araújo, J.S.; Pavão, B.P.; Simões-Silva, M.R.; Batista, M.M.; Demarque, K.C.; Moreira, O.C.; Britto, C.; et al. Antitrypanosomal Activity of Sterol 14α-Demethylase (CYP51) Inhibitors VNI and VFV in the Swiss Mouse Models of Chagas Disease Induced by the Trypanosoma cruzi Y Strain. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2017, 61, e02098-16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Structural formulae of the compounds under study. Internal codes between brackets.
Figure 1. Structural formulae of the compounds under study. Internal codes between brackets.
Molecules 27 08087 g001
Figure 2. Uptake of 50 nM [3H]-adenosine by LmexNT1.1 expressed in L. mexicana promastigotes from which both original alleles of LmexNT1.1/NT1.2 and of LmexNT2 had been deleted by CRISPR/cas9. Incubation time was 10 s, well within the linear phase of uptake [30]. Symbols represent averages of triplicate determinations, and error bars indicate ± SEM when not shown error bars fall within the symbol. The graph shown is a single experiment in triplicate, representative of three identical, independent repeats.
Figure 2. Uptake of 50 nM [3H]-adenosine by LmexNT1.1 expressed in L. mexicana promastigotes from which both original alleles of LmexNT1.1/NT1.2 and of LmexNT2 had been deleted by CRISPR/cas9. Incubation time was 10 s, well within the linear phase of uptake [30]. Symbols represent averages of triplicate determinations, and error bars indicate ± SEM when not shown error bars fall within the symbol. The graph shown is a single experiment in triplicate, representative of three identical, independent repeats.
Molecules 27 08087 g002
Figure 3. FH11706, FH10714, FH8513 and Bz activity on male Swiss mice infected with 104 bloodstream trypomastigotes (Y strain). (A) Parasitemia curve. (B) Percentage (%) of mouse weight variation.
Figure 3. FH11706, FH10714, FH8513 and Bz activity on male Swiss mice infected with 104 bloodstream trypomastigotes (Y strain). (A) Parasitemia curve. (B) Percentage (%) of mouse weight variation.
Molecules 27 08087 g003
Figure 4. Light microscopy quantification of parasites released into the supernatant of L929 infected with T. cruzi (Tulahuen strain) after washout assay. Values are the average of two independent determinations. All compounds were statistically significative (p > 0.05) compared to untreated cultures (control).
Figure 4. Light microscopy quantification of parasites released into the supernatant of L929 infected with T. cruzi (Tulahuen strain) after washout assay. Values are the average of two independent determinations. All compounds were statistically significative (p > 0.05) compared to untreated cultures (control).
Molecules 27 08087 g004
Table 1. Activity of the studied compounds against intracellular forms of T. cruzi (Tulahuen strain), toxicity on L929 cells and selective indexes (SI) after seven days of compound incubation.
Table 1. Activity of the studied compounds against intracellular forms of T. cruzi (Tulahuen strain), toxicity on L929 cells and selective indexes (SI) after seven days of compound incubation.
CompoundActivity on Intracellular Forms Toxicity on L929
IC50, µM
SI *
(EC50, µM)(EC90, µM)
Bz1.97 (1.36 to 2.86)5.54 (2.66 to 8.42)>200>101.5
FH11706 (1)1.11 (0.62 to 1.97)>30118.5 (75.31 to 186.4)106.7
FH10714 (2)0.47 (0.24 to 0.93)6.19 (0.58 to 12.96)55.75 (48.37 to 64.25)118.6
FH8513 (3)0.20 (0.10 to 0.41)1.61 (0.32 to 2.90)22.27 (13.63 to 36.38)111.3
* SI represent the ratio of IC50 and EC50 values (IC50/EC50). Data represent the average of three independent determinations; 95% of confidence intervals are indicated.
Table 2. Activity of the studied compounds against bloodstream trypomastigotes of T. cruzi (Y strain), toxicity on H9C2 and respective selective indexes (SI) after 24 h of compound incubation.
Table 2. Activity of the studied compounds against bloodstream trypomastigotes of T. cruzi (Y strain), toxicity on H9C2 and respective selective indexes (SI) after 24 h of compound incubation.
CompoundActivity upon Bloodstream FormsH9C2
IC50 µM
SI *
EC50, µMEC90, µM
Bz6.9 (3.9 to 12.5)19.62 (11.5 to 33.5)>300>43.48
FH11706 (1)17.58 (12.7 to 24.4)>30>300>17.06
FH10714 (2)13.40 (9.1 to 19.7)>30>300>22.39
FH8513 (3)5.9 (3.8 to 9.3)16.73 (5.3 to 53)267.5 (235.1 to 304.4)45.34
* SI represents the ratio of the IC50 and the EC50 (IC50/EC50). Values are the average of three independent determinations; 95% of confidence intervals are indicated.
Table 3. Cardiotoxic profile (IC50) of the studied compounds using 2D and 3D cultures of H9C2 after seven days of compound incubation.
Table 3. Cardiotoxic profile (IC50) of the studied compounds using 2D and 3D cultures of H9C2 after seven days of compound incubation.
CompoundsIC50 (µM)
2D3D
Bz>200>200
Pt45.98 (15.39 to 137.4)>200
FH11706 (1)47.71 (32.62 to 69.79)>200
FH10714 (2)41.82 (25.23 to 69.30)180.8 (153.6 to 208)
FH8513 (3)18.57 (11.36 to 30.36)199.8 (120.4 to 331.4)
Values are the average of three independent determinations; 95% of confidence intervals are indicated.
Table 4. Activity of the studied compounds (10 µM, seven days of incubation) against T. cruzi (Y strain) infection of H9C2 (monolayers and spheroids). The parasite load was determined by light microscopy and qPCR quantification.
Table 4. Activity of the studied compounds (10 µM, seven days of incubation) against T. cruzi (Y strain) infection of H9C2 (monolayers and spheroids). The parasite load was determined by light microscopy and qPCR quantification.
Compound% of Death Rate by Light Microscopy Quantification % of Death Rate by qPCR
3D
2D 3D
Bz10098.4 (98.1 to 98.7)100
FH11706 (1)99.25 (98.83 to 99.67)91.6 (86.2 to 97)85 (79 to 91)
FH10714 (2)10093.5 (93.46 to 93.54)67 (38 to 96)
FH8513 (3)99.14 (97.9 to 100)83.8 (67.5 to 100)94 (90 to 98)
Values are the average of two independent determinations; 95% of confidence intervals are indicated.
Table 5. Effects of tubercidin and its analogues on promastigotes of the LmexCas9, LmexΔNT1 and LmexΔNT1+TcrNT2 strains.
Table 5. Effects of tubercidin and its analogues on promastigotes of the LmexCas9, LmexΔNT1 and LmexΔNT1+TcrNT2 strains.
Cas9Cas9ΔNT1LmexΔNT1+TcrNT2
EC50 (μM)EC50 (μM)EC50 (μM)Sensitization (fold)p vs. Cas9ΔNT1
Tubercidin1.02 ± 0.1625.7 ± 0.940.82 ± 0.1331.2<0.001Molecules 27 08087 i001
1 (FH11706)>100>100ND Molecules 27 08087 i002
2 (FH10714)>100>100>100 Molecules 27 08087 i003
TH101252.5 ± 0.3280 ± 1896.6 ± 0.32.9<0.001Molecules 27 08087 i004
FH31478.41 ± 1.61>10013.7 ± 1.257.3<0.001Molecules 27 08087 i005
FH31690.24 ± 0.062.00 ± 0.190.32 ± 0.056.3<0.01Molecules 27 08087 i006
TH100437.0 ± 0.23138 ± 10101 ± 0.51.37<0.05Molecules 27 08087 i007
3 (FH8513)>100100.5 ± 0.931.1 ± 0.53.2<0.01Molecules 27 08087 i008
Pentamidine0.87 ± 0.101.25 ± 0.221.12 ± 0.171.11>0.05
EC50, 50% effective concentration determined in a resazurin-based assay; sensitization is determined as the ration of the EC50 values of the Cas9ΔNT1 and Cas9ΔNT1+TcrNT2 strains. The p value is based on an unpaired, two-tailed Student’s t-test comparing the EC50 values of the same two strains (n ≥ 3).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fiuza, L.F.d.A.; Batista, D.G.J.; Girão, R.D.; Hulpia, F.; Finamore-Araújo, P.; Aldfer, M.M.; Elmahallawy, E.K.; De Koning, H.P.; Moreira, O.; Van Calenbergh, S.; et al. Phenotypic Evaluation of Nucleoside Analogues against Trypanosoma cruzi Infection: In Vitro and In Vivo Approaches. Molecules 2022, 27, 8087. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27228087

AMA Style

Fiuza LFdA, Batista DGJ, Girão RD, Hulpia F, Finamore-Araújo P, Aldfer MM, Elmahallawy EK, De Koning HP, Moreira O, Van Calenbergh S, et al. Phenotypic Evaluation of Nucleoside Analogues against Trypanosoma cruzi Infection: In Vitro and In Vivo Approaches. Molecules. 2022; 27(22):8087. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27228087

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fiuza, Ludmila F. de A., Denise G. J. Batista, Roberson D. Girão, Fabian Hulpia, Paula Finamore-Araújo, Mustafa M. Aldfer, Ehab Kotb Elmahallawy, Harry P. De Koning, Otacílio Moreira, Serge Van Calenbergh, and et al. 2022. "Phenotypic Evaluation of Nucleoside Analogues against Trypanosoma cruzi Infection: In Vitro and In Vivo Approaches" Molecules 27, no. 22: 8087. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27228087

APA Style

Fiuza, L. F. d. A., Batista, D. G. J., Girão, R. D., Hulpia, F., Finamore-Araújo, P., Aldfer, M. M., Elmahallawy, E. K., De Koning, H. P., Moreira, O., Van Calenbergh, S., & Soeiro, M. d. N. C. (2022). Phenotypic Evaluation of Nucleoside Analogues against Trypanosoma cruzi Infection: In Vitro and In Vivo Approaches. Molecules, 27(22), 8087. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27228087

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop