Chemoselective Synthesis of Mannich Adducts from 1,4-Naphthoquinones and Profile as Autophagic Inducers in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Abstract

Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is a worldwide public health problem, accounting for approximately 90% of all oral cancers, and is the eighth most common cancer in men. Cisplatin and carboplatin are the main chemotherapy drugs used in the clinic. However, in addition to their serious side effects, such as damage to the nervous system and kidneys, there is also drug resistance. Thus, the development of new drugs becomes of great importance. Naphthoquinones have been described with antitumor activity. Some of them are found in nature, but semi synthesis has been used as strategy to find new chemical entities for the treatment of cancer. In the present study, we promote a multiple component reaction (MCR) among lawsone, arylaldehydes, and benzylamine to produce sixteen chemoselectively derivated Mannich adducts of 1,4-naphthoquinones in good yield (up to 97%). The antitumor activities and molecular mechanisms of action of these compounds were investigated in OSCC models and the compound 6a induced cytotoxicity in three different tumor cell lines (OSCC4, OSCC9, and OSCC25) and was more selective (IS > 2) for tumor cells than the chemotropic drug carboplatin and the controls lapachol and shikonin, which are chemically similar compounds with cytotoxic effects. The 6a selectively and significantly reduced the amount of cell colony growth, was not hemolytic, and tolerable in mice with no serious side effects at a concentration of 100 mg/kg with a LD₅₀ of 150 mg/kg. The new compound is biologically stable with a profile similar to carboplatin. Morphologically, 6a does not induce cell retraction or membrane blebs, but it does induce intense vesicle formation and late emergence of membrane bubbles. Exploring the mechanism of cell death induction, compound 6a does not induce ROS formation, and cell viability was not affected by inhibitors of apoptosis (ZVAD) and necroptosis (necrostatin 1). Autophagy followed by a late apoptosis process appears to be the death-inducing pathway of 6a, as observed by increased viability by the autophagy inhibitor (3-MA) and by the appearance of autophagosomes, later triggering a process of late apoptosis with the presence of caspase 3/7 and DNA fragmentation. Molecular modeling suggests the ability of the compound to bind to topoisomerase I and II and with greater affinity to hPKM2 enzyme than controls, which could explain the mechanism of cell death by autophagy. Finally, the in-silico prediction of drug-relevant properties showed that compound 6a has a good pharmacokinetic profile when compared to carboplatin and doxorubicin. Among the sixteen naphthoquinones tested, compound 6a was the most effective and is highly selective and well tolerated in animals. The induction of cell death in OSCC through autophagy followed by late apoptosis possibly via inhibition of the PKM2 enzyme points to a promising potential of 6a as a new preclinical anticancer candidate.

1. Introduction

Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) accounts for approximately 90% of all oral cancers and is the eighth most common cancer in men [1,2,3]. The main risk factors involved are alcohol, tobacco products, and human papillomavirus infection and it is more common in men over 60 years of age [2,4,5]. An overall five-year survival rate of 65% is estimated for this type of cancer, ranging from 84% for localized cancers to 39% for metastatic cancers [2]. Despite its incidence and mortality, diagnosis usually still occurs in advanced disease [6]. Despite its incidence and mortality, diagnosis usually still occurs in advanced disease [6].

The usual treatments in the clinic for OSCC are radiotherapy, surgery and/or chemotherapy, depending on the stage of the disease [4,5]. According to the American Cancer Society, Cisplatin, Carboplatin, 5-Fluorouracil, Paclitaxel, Docetaxel, and Hydroxyurea are the current chemotherapeutic agents in use. However, serious side effects can occur, including an increased chance of infections, bruising or bleeding, fatigue, and nerve and kidney damage, highlighting the need for new and effective antineoplastic drugs that can improve disease outcome and overcome toxicity.

Naphthoquinones are present in plants, animals and microorganisms and some derivatives have been described with cytotoxic and antitumor activity [7,8]. Their mechanism of action involves mainly DNA damage via the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), inhibition of topoisomerase II enzyme, reactivation of the p53 suppressor protein, and endoplasmic reticulum stress apoptosis induction [8]. Several research groups are trying to improve the antitumor effects of naphthoquinones by performing chemical modifications. In this context, Mannich’s reactions are widely used in medicinal chemistry since they favor the bioavailability and water solubility of the compounds, and due to their simplicity and scalability [9,10].

In the present study, we promote a multiple component reaction (MCR) among lawsone (1), benzylamine (2), and arylaldehydes (3) to produce sixteen chemoselectively derivated Mannich adducts of 1,4-naphthoquinones in good yield (up to 97%). Moreover, we investigate their antitumor activity and molecular mechanisms in a series of in vitro and in vivo assays using OSCC and normal oral human cell models.

2. Experimental Section

2.1. Chemistry

2.1.1. Materials and Methods

The reagents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Brazil and were used without further purification. Column chromatography was performed with silica gel 60 (Merck 70–230 mesh, Darmstadt, Germany). Analytical thin layer chromatography was performed with silica gel plates (Merck, TLC silica gel 60 F₂₅₄), and the plates were visualized using UV light. The indicated yields refer to homogeneous materials purified by chromatography and confirmed by spectroscopic techniques. Melting points were obtained on a Thermo scientific 9100 apparatus and were uncorrected. Infrared spectra were collected using KBr pellets on a Perkin-Elmer (Waltham, MA, USA) model 1420 FT-IR spectrophotometer, and the spectra were calibrated relative to the 1601.8 cm⁻¹ absorbance of polystyrene. ¹H and ¹³C NMR were recorded at room temperature using a Varian Mercury 300 or Varian Mercury 500 MHz, in the CDCl₃. The chemical shift data were reported in units of δ (ppm) downfield from solvent, and the solvent was used as an internal standard; coupling constants (J) are reported in hertz and refer to apparent peak multiplicities. High-resolution mass spectra (HRMS) were recorded on a MICROMASS Q-TOF mass spectrometer (Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA).

2.1.2. General Procedures for Synthesis of Naphthoquinones 5

A 50 mL round bottom flask containing a solution of 4 (0.6 mmol), potassium carbonate (3.0 mmol) and methylchloroformate (0.66 mmol) in dry THF (15 mL) under argon atmosphere was stirred for 24 h at room temperature. Then, the mixture was filtered under low pressure and washed with dichloromethane. The solution was concentrated in low pressure and the residue was crystallized using a dichloromethane/hexane (or pentane) mixture. The compounds 5a–i were obtained as yellow solids in good yields.

Methyl benzyl((4-chlorophenyl)(3-((methoxycarbonyl)oxy)-1,4-dioxo-1,4-dihydronaphthalen-2-yl)methyl)carbamate (5a). Light yellow solid, m.p. 140–142 °C dec., 97% yield. IR (KBr, cm⁻¹): ν 2955, 1979, 1774, 1682, 1672, 1448, 1313, 1293, 1269, 1228, 1205, 1188, 1160, 945, 800, 767, 723, 701, 686. ¹H NMR (500.00 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ ppm: 7.94–7.75 (m, 4H), 7.34 (d, J 8.7 Hz, 2H), 7.28–7.23 (m, 2H), 6.91 (d, J 7.3 Hz, 1H), 6.86 (d, J 1.4 Hz, 1H), 6.82 (d, J 10.5 Hz, 3H), 4.89 (d, J 16.9 Hz, 1H), 4.32 (d, J 16.8 Hz, 1H), 3.68 (s, 3H), 3.68 (s, 3H). ¹³C NMR (125.0 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ ppm: 183.2, 178.2, 157.0, 150.9, 150.8, 138.5, 136.7, 135.4, 134.9, 134.8, 132.5, 131.6, 130.9, 130.2, 129.2, 128.8, 128.6, 128.3, 127.4, 127.2, 127.0, 126.7, 126.5, 126.3, 56.6, 55.0, 53.6, 48.8. HR-ESIMS calc. for C₂₈H₂₂ClNNaO₇ [M + Na]⁺: 542.0977. Found: 542.0949. Δ 5.2 ppm.

Methylbenzyl((3-((methoxycarbonyl)oxy)-1,4-dioxo-1,4-dihydronaphthalen-2yl)(phenyl) methyl)carbamate (5b). Yellow solid, m.p. 128–130 °C dec., 97% yield. IR (KBr, cm⁻¹): ν 2956, 1776, 1673, 1448, 1312, 1295, 1269, 1226, 1189, 1160, 1120, 948, 763, 734, 700, 690, 681. ¹H NMR (500.00 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ ppm: 7.93–7.88 (m, 2H), 7.87–7.82 (m, 2H), 7.29–7.25 (m, 3H), 7.24–7.21 (m, 2H), 6.94 (t, J 7.7 Hz, 2H), 6.86 (s, 1H), 6.84 (d, J 7.0 Hz, 2H), 4.83 (d, J 16.8 Hz, 1H), 4.40 (d, J 16.8 Hz, 1H), 3.68 (s, 3H), 3.67 (s, 3H); ¹³C NMR (125.0 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ ppm: 183.3, 178.2, 157.0, 150.9, 150.7, 138.8, 137.3, 135.4, 135.3, 134.9, 131.6, 130.2, 128.8, 128.3, 127.7, 127.4, 127.0, 126.6, 126.5, 126.3, 56.6, 55.6, 53.5, 48.8. HR-ESIMS calc. for C₂₈H₂₃NNaO₇ [M + Na]⁺: 508.1366. Found: 508.1361. Δ 1.0 ppm.

Methylbenzyl((3-((methoxycarbonyl)oxy)-1,4-dioxo-1,4-dihydronaphthalen-2-yl)(4-nitrophenyl)methyl)carbamate (5c). Light yellow solid, m.p. 124–126 °C, 90% yield. IR (KBr, cm⁻¹): ν 2952, 1796, 1779, 1688, 1524, 1347, 1284, 1189, 1163, 793, 715, 702, 681. ¹H NMR (500.00 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ ppm: 8.15 (d, J 8.8 Hz, 2H), 7.91–7.88 (m, 1H), 7.87–7.77 (m, 3H), 7.56 (d, J 8.5 Hz, 2H), 6.94–6.88 (m, 4H), 6.79 (t, J 6.7 Hz, 1H), 5.05 (d, J 16.8 Hz, 1H), 4.32 (d, J 16.8 Hz, 1H), 3.73 (s, 3H), 3.65 (s, 3H); ¹³C NMR (125.0 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ ppm: 182.9, 178.1, 157.0, 147.2, 146.2, 138.2, 135.4, 134.9, 134.0, 131.6, 131.0, 130.2, 128.4, 128.2, 127.1, 126.8, 126.7, 126.3, 124.6, 123.8, 56.7, 55.0, 53.8, 49.0. HR-ESIMS calc. for C₂₈H₂₂N₂NaO₉ [M + Na]⁺: 553.1217. Found: 553.1208. Δ 1.6 ppm.

Methylbenzyl((4-bromophenyl)(3-((methoxycarbonyl)oxy)-1,4-dioxo-1,4-dihydronaphthalen-2-yl)methyl)carbamate (5d). Light yellow solid, m.p. 155–156 °C, 63% yield. IR (KBr, cm⁻¹): ν 2954, 1774, 1682, 1672, 1448, 1323, 1312, 1292, 1226, 1187, 1161, 1120, 947, 767, 700, 691, 683. ¹H NMR (500.00 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ ppm: 7.92–7.81 (m, 4H), 7.47 (d, J 8.5 Hz, 2H), 7.20 (d, J 8.1 Hz, 2H), 6.94 (t, J 7.6 Hz, 2H), 6.87 (d, J 7.4 Hz, 2H), 6.82 (t, J 7.2 Hz, 1H), 6.78 (s, 1H), 4.88 (d, J 16.8 Hz, 1H), 4.35 (d, J 16.8 Hz, 1H), 3.71 (s, 3H), 3.69 (s, 3H). ¹³C NMR (125.0 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ ppm: 183.1, 178.2, 156.9, 150.9, 150.8, 138.5, 137.2, 135.3, 134.8, 134.8, 131.7, 131.6, 130.2, 129.5, 128.3, 127.0, 126.7, 126.5, 126.3, 120.8, 56.6, 55.1, 53.6, 48.8. HR-ESIMS calc. for C₂₈H₂₂BrNNaO₇ [M + Na]⁺: 588.0471. Found: 588.0437. Δ 5.8 ppm.

Methylbenzyl((4-fluorophenyl)(3-((methoxycarbonyl)oxy)-1,4-dioxo-1,4-dihydronaphthalen-2-yl)methyl)carbamate (5e). Salmon solid, m.p. 124–126 °C dec., 76% yield. IR (KBr, cm⁻¹): ν 2956, 1775, 1683, 1673, 1449, 1314, 1274, 1226, 1191, 1157, 943, 768, 700, 689. ¹H NMR (500.00 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ ppm: 7.95–7.81 (m, 4H), 7.27 (dd, J 8.6 and 5.5 Hz, 2H), 7.08 (t, J 8.8 Hz, 2H), 6.97 (t, J 7.6 Hz, 2H), 6.87 (d, J 7.5 Hz, 3H), 6.78 (s, 1H), 4.77 (d, J 16.7 Hz, 1H), 4.41 (d, J 16.7 Hz, 1H), 3.72 (s, 3H), 3.68 (s, 3H). ¹³C NMR (125.0 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ ppm: 188.0, 183.0, 168.3, 165.1, 161.7, 155.7, 155.4, 143.4, 140.1, 140.0, 139.6, 138.2, 138.1, 136.4, 135.0, 134.6, 134.5, 133.1, 131.8, 131.5, 131.3, 131.1, 120.4, 120.1, 61.4, 60.0, 58.3, 53.5. HR-ESIMS calc. for C₂₈H₂₂FNNaO₇ [M + Na]⁺: 526.1272. Found: 526.1273. Δ 0.2 ppm.

Methylbenzyl((3-((methoxycarbonyl)oxy)-1,4-dioxo-1,4-dihydronaphthalen-2-yl)(p-tolyl)methyl)carbamate (5f). Yellow solid, m.p. 163–164 °C, 67% yield. IR (KBr, cm⁻¹): ν 2955, 1774, 1682, 1671, 1447, 1282, 1266, 1186, 1164, 1119, 1071, 942, 800, 769, 716. ¹H NMR (500.00 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ ppm: 7.93–7.82 (m, 4H), 7.09 (d, J 3.8 Hz, 4H), 6.95 (t, J 7.5 Hz, 2H), 6.85 (d, J 7.6 Hz, 3H), 6.77 (s, 1H), 4.77 (d, J 16.2 Hz, 1H), 4.39 (d, J 16.7 Hz, 1H), 3.69 (s, 3H), 3.66 (s, 3H), 2.27 (s, 3H). ¹³C NMR (125.0 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ ppm: 183.4, 178.3, 156.9, 151.0, 150.5, 138.8, 137.1, 135.6, 135.3, 134.9, 131.6, 130.2, 129.5, 129.4, 128.3, 127.6, 127.0, 126.6, 126.5, 126.3, 56.6, 55.6, 53.4, 48.7, 20.9. HR-ESIMS calc. for C₂₉H₂₅ClNNaO₇ [M + Na]⁺: 522.1523. Found: 522.1525. Δ 0.4 ppm.

Methylbenzyl((3-((methoxycarbonyl)oxy)-1,4-dioxo-1,4-dihydronaphthalen-2-yl)(4-methoxy phenyl)methyl)carbamate (5g). Brown solid, m.p. 150–152 °C dec., 55% yield. IR (KBr, cm⁻¹): ν 2999, 2956, 2851, 1775, 1696, 1683, 1669, 1446, 1268, 1281, 1226, 1190, 1176, 1159, 1114, 940, 764, 717, 696, 686. ¹H NMR (500.00 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ ppm: 7.96–7.85 (m, 4H), 7.14 (d, J 8.6 Hz, 2H), 6.99 (t, J 7.4 Hz, 2H), 6.89 (t, J 7.1 Hz, 1H), 6.85 (d, J 7.3 Hz, 2H), 6.81 (d, J 8.8 Hz, 2H), 6.71 (s, 1H), 4.63 (d, J 15.9 Hz, 1H), 4.44 (d, J 16.8 Hz, 1H), 3.73 (s, 3H), 3.72 (s, 3H), 3.64 (s, 3H). ¹³C NMR (125.0 MHz, DMSO-d6, TMS, δ ppm): 182.8, 177.7, 158.6, 150.6, 149.6, 138.3, 129.6, 127.7, 126.4, 126.1, 125.8, 125.7, 113.7, 56.1, 55.0, 52.9, 48.7, 47.9. HR-ESIMS calc. for C₂₉H₂₅ClNNaO₈ [M + Na]⁺: 538.1472. Found: 538.1472. Δ 0 ppm.

Methylbenzyl((3-((methoxycarbonyl)oxy)-1,4-dioxo-1,4-dihydronaphthalen-2-yl)(m-tolyl) methyl)carbamate (5h). Deep yellow solid, m.p. 135–136 °C dec., 61% yield. IR (KBr, cm⁻¹): ν 2956, 1779, 1674, 1448, 1271, 1225, 1192, 1120, 972, 949, 769, 739, 700, 689. ¹H NMR (500.00 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ ppm: 7.93–7.89 (m, 2H), 7.87–7.82 (m, 2H), 7.18 (t, J 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.06 (d, J 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.02 (d, J 7.9 Hz, 1H), 6.99 (s, 1H), 6.95 (t, J 7.5 Hz, 2H), 6.85 (d, J 7.7 Hz, 3H), 6.80 (s, 1H), 4.79 (d, J 16.7 Hz, 1H), 4.40 (d, J 16.7 Hz, 1H), 3.68 (s, 6H), 2.21 (s, 3H). ¹³C NMR (125.0 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ ppm: 183.3, 178.2, 156.9, 150.8, 150.6, 138.9, 138.1, 135.3, 134.9, 131.6, 130.2, 128.7, 128.6, 128.4, 128.3, 127.5, 127.1, 127.0, 126.6, 126.5, 126.3, 124.3, 56.6, 53.5, 51.8, 48.7, 21.3. HR-ESIMS calc. for C₂₈H₂₂ClNNaO₇ [M + Na]⁺: 522.1523. Found: 522.1515. Δ 1.5 ppm.

Methylbenzyl((3-chlorophenyl)(3-((methoxycarbonyl)oxy)-1,4-dioxo-1,4-dihydronaphthalen-2-yl)methyl)carbamate (5i). Light yellow solid, m.p. 150–152 °C, 81% yield. IR (KBr, cm⁻¹): ν 2955, 1779, 1684, 1672, 1448, 1296, 1282, 1259, 1229, 1193, 1158, 1121, 946, 800, 701, 689. ¹H NMR (500.00 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ ppm: 7.90–7.80 (m, 4H), 7.38–7.27 (m, 3H), 7.21 (m, 1H), 6.92 (t, J 7.5 Hz, 2H), 6.87 (d, J 7.2 Hz, 2H), 6.83 (s, 1H), 6.79 (t, J 7.2 Hz, 1H), 4.94 (d, J 16.8 Hz, 1H), 4.31 (d, J 16.7 Hz, 1H), 3.71 (s, 3H), 3.67 (s, 3H). ¹³C NMR (125.0 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ ppm: 183.0, 178.2, 150.9, 150.7, 140.4, 138.5, 135.3, 134.8, 134.5, 133.8, 131.6, 130.7, 130.2, 128.6, 128.3, 127.6, 127.1, 127.0, 126.7, 126.5, 126.3, 125.5, 56.7, 54.9, 53.7, 48.8. HR-ESIMS calc. for C₂₈H₂₂ClNNaO₇ [M + Na]⁺: 542.0977. Found: 542.0954. Δ 4.2 ppm.

2.1.3. General Procedures for Synthesis of Naphthoquinones 6

A 50 mL round bottom flask containing a solution of lawsone (1, 5.7 mmol), arylaldehyde (2, 6.3 mmol), and benzylamine (3, 6.3 mmol) in dry THF (20 mL) under argon atmosphere was stirred for 1 h. Then, DBU (6.0 mmol) and methyl chloroformate (14.25 mmol) were added and the mixture was stirred overnight at room temperature. The solvent was removed under low pressure and the obtained residue was purified by column chromatography on silica gel using a hexane/ethyl acetate mixture as a gradient. The compounds 6a–i were obtained as red solids in very good yields.

Methyl benzyl((4-chlorophenyl)(3-((methoxycarbonyl)oxy)-1,4-dioxo-1,4-dihydronaphthalen-2-yl)methyl)carbamate (6a). Brown solid, m.p. 108–110 °C, 80% yield. IR (KBr, cm⁻¹): ν 3342, 3063, 3030, 2955, 1686, 1657, 1593, 1449, 1370, 1336, 1308, 1262, 1212, 730, 700, 532. ¹H NMR (500.00 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ ppm: 10.01 (s, 1H), 7.84 (dd, J 7.7 and 0.9 Hz, 1H), 7.79 (d, J 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.76 (td, J 7.5 and 1.3 Hz, 1H), 7.68 (td, J 7.5 and 1.3 Hz, 1H), 7.32 (d, J 8.5 Hz, 2H), 7.18 (d, J 8.1 Hz, 2H), 6.92–6.84 (m, 4H), 6.80 (m, 2H), 4.94 (d, J 16.9 Hz, 1H), 4.37 (d, J 16.8 Hz, 1H), 3.68 (s, 3H). ¹³C NMR (125.0 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ ppm: 192.2, 183.2, 183.1, 161.9, 140.9, 140.3, 135.4, 135.1, 134.8, 134.5, 133.5, 132.7, 131.5, 131.1, 130.1, 129.8, 129.1, 128.8, 128.7, 128.6, 127.9, 127.5, 127.1, 126.4, 126.3, 125.7, 122.9, 51.8, 44.5, 35.2. HR-ESIMS calc. for C₂₆H₂₀ClNNaO₅⁺ [M + Na]⁺: 484.0922. Found: 484.0928. Δ 1.2 ppm.

Methyl benzyl((phenyl)(3-((methoxycarbonyl)oxy)-1,4-dioxo-1,4-dihydronaphthalen-2-yl)methyl)carbamate (6b). Red oil, 79% yield. IR (KBr, cm⁻¹): ν 3065, 2359, 2336, 1661, 1593, 1573, 1369, 1281, 759, 731, 699, 576, 557, 531. ¹H NMR (500.00 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ ppm: 10.03 (s, 1H), 7.97–7.93 (m, 1H), 7.85 (ddd, J 17.4, 7.6 and 0.7 Hz, 1H), 7.81–7.76 (m, 1H), 7.72 (ddd, J 5.9, 4.3 and 1.1 Hz, 1H), 7.29 (dt, J 17.1 and 8.3 Hz, 3H), 7.24–7.16 (m, 3H), 6.94–6.85 (m, 3H), 6.81 (t, J 7.0 Hz, 2H), 4.93 (d, J 16.8 Hz, 1H), 4.43 (d, J 16.8 Hz, 1H), 3.80 (s, 3H). ¹³C NMR (75.0 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ ppm: 193.4, 183.8, 182.0, 177.8, 156.7, 155.6, 141.4, 140.3, 134.9, 134.8, 133.2, 133.0, 130.6, 129.8, 129.5, 128.6, 128.4, 128.0, 127.4, 126.4, 125.9, 123.6, 54.3, 52.5, 48.1. HR-ESIMS calc. for C₂₆H₂₁NNaO₅⁺ [M + Na]⁺: 450.13. Found: 450.41. Δ 1.9 ppm.

Methyl benzyl((4-nitrophenyl)(3-((methoxycarbonyl)oxy)-1,4-dioxo-1,4-dihydronaphthalen-2-yl)methyl)carbamate (6c). Yellow solid, m.p. 142–144 °C, 72% yield. IR (KBr, cm⁻¹): ν 3321, 2957, 2857, 2455, 2362, 2326, 1687, 1656, 1595, 1517, 1449, 1375, 1308, 1291, 1262, 1211, 1118, 1044, 730, 701, 679, 653. ¹H NMR (500.00 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ ppm: 8.06 (d, J 8.7 Hz, 2H), 7.79 (d, J 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.66 (d, J 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.61 (td, J 7.5 Hz, J 1.1 Hz, 1H), 7.47 (td, J 7.4 and 1.1 Hz, 1H), 7.33 (d, J 8.5 Hz, 2H), 6.99 (d, J 7.5 Hz, 2H), 6.93 (t, J 7.4 Hz, 3H), 6.85 (t, J 7.2 Hz, 1H), 4.80 (d, J 16.3 Hz, 1H), 4.67 (d, J 16.4 Hz, 1H), 3.57 (s, 3H). ¹³C NMR (75.0 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ ppm: 185.9, 178.3, 170.6, 156.6, 153.9, 144.8, 140.2, 135.3, 133.1, 131.0, 130.3, 129.7, 127.9, 126.9, 126.7, 126.4, 126.3, 125.7, 125.1, 124.3, 122.8, 122.4, 113.9, 55.9, 51.9, 48.1. HR-ESIMS calc. for C₂₆H₂₀N₂NaO₇⁺ [M + Na]⁺: 495.1163. Found: 495.1138. Δ 5.0 ppm.

Methyl benzyl((4-bromo-phenyl)(3-((methoxycarbonyl)oxy)-1,4-dioxo-1,4-dihydronaphthalen-2-yl)methyl)carbamate (6d). Orange solid, m.p. 150–152 °C dec., 75% yield. IR (KBr, cm⁻¹): ν 3355, 1687, 1656, 1449, 1382, 1336, 1309, 1291, 1264, 730, 701, 681, 611. ¹H NMR (500.00 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ ppm: 7.83 (d, J 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.76 (d, J 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.71 (t, J 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.61 (t, J 7.4 Hz, 1H), 7.42 (d, J 8.3 Hz, 2H), 7.09 (d, J 8.0 Hz, 2H), 6.90 (d, J 3.9 Hz, 4H), 6.81 (sl, 2H), 4.88 (d, J 16.4 Hz, 1H), 4.48 (d, J 16.2 Hz, 1H), 3.64 (s, 3H). ¹³C NMR (75.0 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ ppm: 184.1, 182.6, 174.9, 157.3, 141.8, 141.0, 134.1, 133.9, 132.2, 131.6, 130.9, 130.7, 129.7, 128.5, 127.7, 126.4, 126.2, 125.8, 125.5, 122.5, 118.1, 55.9, 52.7, 51.6, 49.1, 48.9, 45.5, 38.7, 37.1, 33.4, 29.6, 28.8, 28.7, 23.5. HR-ESIMS calc. for C₂₆H₂₀BrNNaO₅⁺ [M + Na]⁺: 528.0417. Found: 528.0406. Δ 2.1 ppm.

Methyl benzyl((4-fluor-phenyl)(3-((methoxycarbonyl)oxy)-1,4-dioxo-1,4-dihydronaphthalen-2-yl)methyl)carbamate (6e). Red oil, 72% yield. IR (KBr, cm⁻¹): ν 3335, 3065, 3031, 2924, 2853, 1700, 1671, 1649, 1524, 1508, 1363, 1338, 1257, 1158, 1043, 726, 696, 523. ¹H NMR (500.00 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ ppm: 7.80 (dd, J 7.7 and 0.9 Hz, 1H), 7.66 (dd, J 7.6 and 0.9 Hz, 1H), 7.60 (td, J 7.5 and 1.3 Hz, 1H), 7.45 (td, J 7.5 and 1.3 Hz, 1H), 7.09 (dd, J 8.2 and 5.7 Hz, 2H), 7.00 (d, J 7.2 Hz, 2H), 6.98–6.91 (m, 4H), 6.89–6.84 (m, 2H), 4.81 (d, J 16.3 Hz, 1H), 4.70 (d, J 16.3 Hz, 1H), 3.54 (s, 3H). ¹³C NMR (75.0 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ ppm: 187.9, 179.8, 171.0, 162.2, 159.0, 157.4, 141.2, 134.2, 130.6, 128.6, 128.0, 127.9, 127.6, 127.5, 127.1, 126.4, 125.9, 125.8, 125.0, 115.7, 114.5, 114.2, 69.9, 55.9, 52.6, 51.8, 49.0, 44.5. HR-ESIMS calc. for C₂₆H₂₀FNNaO₅⁺ [M + Na]⁺: 468.1218. Found: 468.1212. Δ 1.3 ppm.

Methyl benzyl((3-methyl-phenyl)(3-((methoxycarbonyl)oxy)-1,4-dioxo-1,4-dihydronaphthalen-2-yl)methyl)carbamate (6h). Red oil, 92% yield. IR (KBr, cm⁻¹): ν 3071, 1660, 1633, 1594, 1575, 1349, 1282, 968, 915, 828, 787, 729, 708, 666, 575. ¹H NMR (500.00 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ ppm: 7.80 (d, J 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.68 (d, J 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.62 (t, J 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.47 (t, J 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.30 (d, J 7.4 Hz, 1H), 7.25 (d, J 7.4 Hz, 1H), 7.05 (t, J 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.00 (d, J 7.5 Hz, 2H), 6.94 (t, J 7.5 Hz, 2H), 6.88–6.85 (m, 3H), 4.84 (d, J 16.3 Hz, 1H), 4.71 (d, J 16.3 Hz, 1H), 3.53 (s, 3H), 2.20 (s, 3H). ¹³C NMR (75.0 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ ppm: 187.0, 178.9, 170.3, 156.7, 143.9, 140.6, 135.7, 135.4, 133.4, 131.4, 130.8, 129.7, 127.9, 126.9, 126.8, 126.7, 126.3, 125.7, 125.1, 124.9, 124.3, 122.8, 115.4, 55.6, 51.8, 48.5, 20.9. HR-ESIMS calc. for C₂₇H₂₃NNaO₅⁺ [M + Na]⁺: 464.1468. Found: 464.1458. Δ 2.1 ppm.

Methyl benzyl((3-chloro-phenyl)(3-((methoxycarbonyl)oxy)-1,4-dioxo-1,4-dihydronaphthalen-2-yl)methyl)carbamate (6i). Red oil, 75% yield. IR (KBr, cm⁻¹): ν 3332, 2945, 1593, 1571, 1360, 1275, 1215, 1159, 970, 783, 727, 690, 525. ¹H NMR (500.00 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ ppm: 7.79 (d, J 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.66 (d, J 7.3 Hz, 1H), 7.61 (t, J 7.4 Hz, 1H), 7.47 (t, J 7.3 Hz, 1H), 7.21 (t, J 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.10 (d, J 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.05–7.02 (m, 2H), 6.98 (d, J 7.1 Hz, 2H), 6.93 (t, J 7.0 Hz, 2H), 6.86–6.85 (m, 2H), 4.73 (s, 2H), 3.56 (s, 3H). ¹³C NMR (75.0 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ ppm: 179.1, 156.8, 147.1, 140.3, 135.2, 133.6, 133.5, 132.5, 132.3, 131.7, 130.9, 130.1, 129.1, 128.1, 127.1, 126.9, 126.6, 125.7, 125.3, 125.3, 125.0, 124.5, 124.2, 55.4, 52.2, 48.3. HR-ESIMS calc. for C₂₆H₂₀ClNNaO₅⁺ [M + Na]⁺: 484.0922. Found: 484.0924. Δ 0.4 ppm.

2.2. Biological Assays

Cells and reagents. Human SCC-4, SCC-9 and SCC-25 cells, derived from a human oral tongue SCC were obtained from the ATCC (CRL-1624; CRL-1629 and CRL-1628, respectively) and maintained at 1:1 DMEM/F12 (Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium and Ham’s F12 medium; Gibco, Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA) supplemented with 10% (v/v) FBS (fetal bovine serum; Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA) and 400 ng/mL hydrocortisone (Sigma-Aldrich Co., St. Louis, MO, USA). Primary normal human gingival fibroblasts were obtained from the ATCC (PCS-201-018), maintained in DMEM supplemented with 10% (v/v) FBS, and used in a maximum of 6 passages. Cells were grown in a humidified environment containing 5% CO₂ at 37 °C. For all biological experiments: compounds and controls lapachol, shikonin, and doxorubicin were solubilized in 100% DMSO (Sigma-Aldrich) to a final concentration of 10 mM. Carboplatin in water (Fauldcarbo^®; Libbs Farmacêutica, São Paulo, SP, Brazil) was used as a standard anticancer compound.

Cell viability assay (cytotoxicity) and stability assay. To assess cell viability, cells were grown in triplicate in 96-well plates (5 × 10³ cells/well) until confluence when treated with the different compounds as in Machado et al. [11]. Briefly, DMSO in the same concentrations was used as a 100% cell viability control. After 48 h, cells were incubated with 5 mg/mL MTT reagent (3-(4,5-dimethyl-2-thiazolyl)-2,5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazolium bromide) (Sigma-Aldrich Co., St. Louis, MO, USA) for 3.5 h. Formazan crystals were dissolved in MTT solvent (DMSO/methanol 1:1 v/v) and the absorbance at 560 nm was evaluated using an EPOCH microplate spectrophotometer (BioTek Instruments, Winooski, VT, USA) with background absorbance at 670 nm subtracted. Each of the eighteen compounds was tested at six or seven different concentrations, ranging from 0.3 µM to 200 µM in cancer cell lines (SCC-4, SCC-9 and SCC-25) and 0.4 µM to 300 µM in normal primary human gingival fibroblast. Controls (carboplatin, lapachol, shikonin, and doxorubicin) were tested in six or seven different concentrations ranging from 5 µM to 1000 µM. For assays using cell death inhibitors, cells were incubated with ZVAD (Sigma-Aldrich Co., St. Louis, MO, USA); Necrostatin-1 (Sigma-Aldrich Co., St. Louis, MO, USA) at 50 µM for 2 h, and then treated with 1 × IC₅₀ of compound 6a or control (DMSO) for an additional 24 h, for 3-MA at 5000 µM for 2 h, and then treated with 2 × IC₅₀ of compound 6a or control (DMSO and shikonin).

For the stability test, compound 6a and controls (carboplatin and doxorubicin) were prepared at concentration of 2 × IC₅₀ and stored in the incubator at 37 °C for 0, 1, 3, 6, 12, 24 or 48 h before SCC9 cell treatment (5 × 10³ cells/well). After the desired treatment time was reached, the medium containing the compound was replaced with untreated culture medium and the MTT assay was performed at the end of both experiments.

Hemolysis assay. Human blood was used as approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Fluminense Federal University—Nova Friburgo-RJ (CAAE: 43134721.4.0000.5626). The erythrocytes were collected by centrifugation at 1500 rpm for 15 min, washed with PBS (phosphate buffer saline) with 10 mM glucose and counted in an automatic cells counter (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA). The erythrocytes were then plated in 96-well plates, at a concentration of 4 × 10⁸/well in triplicates, and 10 µL of the compounds added at a final concentration of 400 µM in PBS with glucose (final volume of 100 µL). 10 µL of PBS were used as negative control and 10 µL of PBS with 0.1% Triton ×100 as a positive control. Data reading was performed with EPOCH (BioTek Instruments, Winooski, VT, USA) at 540 nm absorbance and statistical data were generated with the GRAPHPAD Prism 5.0 program (Intuitive Software for Science, San Diego, CA, USA).

Clonogenic assay. The SCC9 strain and primary human fibroblasts were grown in duplicates in 24-well plates (5 × 10⁴ cells/well) and incubated for 24 h. Then, they were treated with the most selective compounds with 2 × IC₅₀. DMSO was used at the same concentrations as a control for 100% of viability. After 5 days of incubation, the culture medium was removed and the cells were fixed with absolute ethanol (500 µL) for 10 min, then stained with crystal 0.05% violet (Sigma Aldrich) in 20% ethanol (500 µL) for 10 min and washed with distilled water. The plates were scanned to quantify the inhibition of the formation of colonies. Then, crystal violet was solubilized in 33% acetic acid and added to the 96-well plate. Finally, the absorbance was read in a spectrophotometer (EPOCH, BioTek Instruments, Winooski, VT, USA) (595 nm).

In vivo acute toxicity study. The acute toxicity study for compound 6a was performed as in the work of Macedo et al. [12]. Briefly, the assay was carried out with C57BL/6 female mice at twelve weeks of age via intraperitoneal injection and was approved by the University Animal Ethics Board under registration number 982. All experiments were performed in accordance with Brazilian guidelines and regulations. Dosing and analysis were performed according to OECD guidelines 423 and revised by Parasuraman [13]. Each animal group had n = 3 and received only one intraperitoneal injection (Day 0) of compound 6a dissolved in 3 mL of PBS and 3% of DMSO. Control group animals received only 3% DMSO in PBS. The first dose of the compound was 100 mg/kg. Subsequent dose levels (150 mg/kg and 200 mg/kg) were determined based on the result obtained in the previous dosage. The animals were examined every day, twice a day, for the mortality and morbidity for 14 days, when all animals were anesthetized (ketamine 100 mg/kg and xylazine 10 mg/kg) and sacrificed by cervical dislocation followed by gross necropsy and histology of the main organs. The animals’ body weight and average food consumption were measured every 7 days as an indication of morbidity, and the following signs were assessed: tremors; convulsion; salivation; diarrhea; lethargy; pain signs; increased rear arching and defect in mobility. The necropsy included an examination of the external characteristics of the carcass; external body orifices; the abdominal, thoracic, and cranial cavities; organs/tissues liver, thymus, right kidney, right testicle, heart, and lung.

Video microscopy. SCC-9 cells previously plated the day before the experiment, were treated with 2 × IC₅₀ of compound 6a and transferred to a culture chamber adapted to a Nikon Eclipse TE300 microscope (Nikon, Melville, NY, USA) under controlled conditions of CO₂ and temperature (5% and 37 °C, respectively). For 72 h, phase contrast images of the same field were captured every minute using a Hamamatsu C2400 CCD camera (Hamamatsu, Japan). The same experimental conditions were used for control (DMSO). The images of each experimental condition were integrated into videos using ImageJ software (National Institute of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA).

Autophagy assay. Cells of the SCC9 lineage were plated in 96-well plates (5 × 10³ cells/well). After 24 h, they were treated with 2 × IC₅₀ of compound 6a or with the controls shikonin, DMSO or serum-free medium. 12 h before labeling, half of the wells were treated with the autophagy inhibitor 3-Methyladenine (5 mM) (Sigma). For labeling at the indicated times, the DMEM medium was removed from the wells, replaced with 100 µL of the autophagosome marker (Autophagy Assay KIT, MAC138-Sigma-Aldrich), and then incubated for 30 min in the incubator (37 °C and 5% CO₂). After this time, the cells were washed and photographed in an inverted fluorescence Zeiss microscope for 16 h for Shikonin and 36 h for compound 6a.

ROS production. The hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂) luminescence detection assay was performed using the ROS-Glo™ H₂O₂ assay kit (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). To perform the experiment, 1 × 10⁵ SCC9 cells were plated in DMEM F12 10% FBS medium per well in a 96-well plate and, after 24 h of incubation, the medium was removed and wells treated with 2 × IC₅₀ of compound 6a in SCC9, or with the controls DMSO and doxorubicin. Cell-free wells were used as a control. Menadione (M9529-Sigma-Aldrich) was used as a positive control. After the indicated time, the H₂O₂ substrate was used for all treatments, and the plate was incubated for the remaining 2 h. After 3, 6, and 24 h, the detection solution was added and the plates with the samples remained at room temperature for 20 min, followed by reading using the luminometer (Turner Designs, TD 2020, San Jose, CA, USA).

Cell cycle and SubG1 analysis. To evaluate the action of compound 6a on the cell cycle, cells of the SCC9 lineage were plated in a 6-well plate (5 × 10⁵ cells/well) as described in [14]. After 48 h of treatment, cells were trypsinized and stained with propidium iodide (75 µM Sigma) in the presence of NP-40 (Sigma). DNA content was analyzed by collecting 1 × 10⁴ events using a FACScalibur flow cytometer. The data were analyzed with CellQuest (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) and FlowJo (Tree Star Inc., Ashland, OR, USA) software.

Effector caspases activation and Phosphatidyl serine exposure analysis (apoptosis). Cells of the SCC9 lineage were plated in 6-well plates (5 × 10⁵ cells/well), trypsinized 48 h after treatment, labeled using the Annexin V-FITC Apoptosis detection Kit according to the manufacturer’s protocol (BMS500FI, Invitrogen) and analyzed by cytometry flow as described in [15]. Furthermore, 5 × 10⁴ SCC9 cells were plated in a 24-well plate containing 1 mL of DMEM/F12 with 10% FBS per well. CellEvent™ Caspase-3/7 Reagent (#R37111, Invitrogen) was diluted in culture medium according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Hence, 24 h after plating, cells were treated with Caspase-3/7 Reagent and 2 × IC₅₀ of substance 6a or DMSO as a control. Cells were analyzed by flow cytometry at the time of 48 h of treatment.

Statistical analysis, IC₅₀ calculation. IC₅₀ values for MTT assays were obtained by non-linear regression using the GraphPad Prism 5.0 software (GraphPad, San Diego, CA, USA) from at least three independent experiments. Data are presented as means ± SD. A dose-response (inhibitor) vs response curve using the least squares method was used to determine the IC₅₀, SD and R2 of the data. The selectivity index was calculated as S.I. = IC₅₀ of the compound in normal oral fibroblast cells/IC₅₀ of the same compound for each oral cancer cell line (SCC-4, SCC-9 and SCC-25) and the mean was calculated when indicated.

2.3. In Silico Studies

Molecular docking analysis. A reverse docking approach was employed to evaluate the potential targets of the most promising compound 6a and further provide a putative mechanism of action. Five proteins known as targets of lapachol, and other naphthoquinones were chosen: DNA-binding domain of topoisomerase I (PDB code 1K4T), IIα (PDB code 5GWK) and IIβ (PDB code 3QX3), ATPase domain of topoisomerase IIα (PDB code 1ZXM), human pyruvate kinase M2 (hPKM2, PDB code 3SRD). The three-dimensional structures of 6a, shikonin, and lapachol were constructed and optimized using the Spartan’10 software and molecular docking studies were carried out using Autodock Tools 1.5.7 and Autodock Vina 1.1.2 [16] as described elsewhere [17,18]. The conformation of the ligands with the lowest binding energy with each enzyme was analyzed using Discovery Studio Visualizer 2019 (Dassault Systèmes BIOVIA, San Diego, CA, USA, 2019) and Pymol v. 1.2r2 (ThePyMOL Molecular Graphics System, Version 1.2r2 Schrödinger, LLC, New York, NY, USA). Since 6a was assayed as a racemic mixture, we docked both R and S enantiomers. According to their binding modes, our results suggested that the enantiomer R contributes mostly to the cytotoxic activity. Thus, we focused our analysis on this enantiomer.

Prediction of toxicity and pharmacokinetic properties. The Smile structure of the compounds evaluated was obtained using the ChemDraw software (https://www.perkinelmer.com/category/chemdraw, accessed on 3 August 2022). The values of calculated octanol-water partition coefficient (cLogP), molecular weight (MW), number of hydrogen bond acceptors (nON), number of hydrogen bond donors (nOH/NH), and topological polar surface area (TPSA) were calculated using the SwissADME web server (http://www.swissadme.ch/, accessed on 3 August 2022). Other predictions, such as absorption, distribution, and metabolism, were performed with the admetSAR 2.0 server (http://lmmd.ecust.edu.cn/admetsar2, accessed on 3 August 2022). The most selective compound was analyzed, and carboplatin and doxorubicin were used as controls.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Chemistry

To obtain the naphthoquinone derivatives 5, it was initially necessary to synthesize the Mannich’s bases 4, through a reaction involving three components (3-MC), namely lawsone (1), aromatic aldehyde (3), and benzylamine (2) (Scheme 1). All bases were obtained as red solids in good yields as we described in previous work [19,20,21]. Then, the bases were reacted with methylchloroformate, potassium carbonate using dry THF as solvent at room temperature during 24 h, resulting in compounds 5 in good yields in the range of 55–97% (Scheme 1).

The structures of the compounds were elucidated by spectroscopic techniques (see Section 2 and Supplementary Materials). In the ¹H NMR spectrum analysis of compound 5b, two singlets could be observed at 3.68 and 3.67 ppm for methyl of carbamate and carbonate groups and two doublets at 4.83 ppm (d, J 16.8 Hz, 1H) and 4.40 ppm (d, J 16.8 Hz, 1H) corresponding to hydrogens methylene of the benzyl group. The two signals at 183.3 and 178.2 ppm in ¹³C RMN corresponding to carbonyl groups confirm the presence of the naphthoquinone moiety.

On the other hand, any attempt to obtain a monoalkylated derivative where we varied the stoichiometry of the K₂CO₃ base and/or the methylchloroformate, or even reducing the reaction time, led to the recovery of starting material 4 or the formation of product 6. However, when performing the three-component Mannich reaction followed by addition of DBU base and methylchloroformate in a one-pot reaction, after one hour at room temperature, we obtained the monoalkylated compounds of type 6a–i as a red solid in good yields that in the range of 69–89% (Scheme 2).

The structures of the compounds were elucidated by spectroscopic techniques (see Section 2 and Supplementary Materials). In the ¹H NMR spectrum analysis of compound 6a, two singlets could be observed at 10.01 and 3.68 ppm for free hydroxyl group and methyl of carbamate group, respectively, confirming the monoalkylation, and two doublets at 4.94 ppm (d, J 16.9 Hz, 1H) and 4.37 ppm (d, J 16.8 Hz, 1H) corresponding to hydrogens methylene of benzyl group. The two signals at 192.2 and 183.2 ppm in ¹³C RMN corresponding to carbonyl groups confirm the presence of the naphthoquinone moiety.

We believe that the nature of the base is responsible for directing the production of mono (5a–i) or dialkylated (6a–i) products, i.e., small bases, such as K₂CO₃, lead to the formation of products 5a–i, and bulky bases, such as DBU, lead to the formation of products 6a–i. For this, we carry out the alkylation reaction of product 4a, e.g., by treatment with DBU and methylchloroformate in dry THF as solvent, and we observe the formation of only compound 6a. Thus, based on such experimental evidence, we propose the sequence of intermediates in Scheme 3.

All compounds were characterized by physical methods of analysis, such as ¹H and ¹³C NMR, high resolution mass spectrometry and spectroscopy in the infrared region (See Supplementary Materials).

3.2. Biological Activity

3.2.1. Cytotoxicity and Selectivity, Hemolytic Potential, and Stability of the New Compounds

Initially, the sixteen Mannich adducts (5a–i, 6a–e, 6h–i) were submitted to the MTT assay. First, the assay was performed on the SCC9 oral cancer cell lineage and as controls we used known chemotherapeutic agents, namely carboplatin, gold standard for the treatment of oral cancer [22,23], doxorubicin, a naphthoquinone used in the treatment of some cancers [24,25], shikonin and lapachol, naphthoquinones with antitumor potential well described in the literature [26,27]. Of the sixteen compounds tested, all of them showed dose-dependent cytotoxicity and were subsequently tested on untransformed primary human gingival fibroblasts (

Table 1. Determination of IC₅₀ and selectivity index of Mannich adducts from naphthoquinones. SCC-9 (OSCC cells) and normal human gingival fibroblasts were treated with the indicated compounds for 48 h and cell viability was determined as indicated in materials and methods. Shown from left to right: compound nomenclature, SCC-9 tumor or normal fibroblast, IC₅₀ (μM), SD and selectivity index (IS) from at least 3 independent experiments. IS = IC₅₀ of the compound in cells of normal oral fibroblasts/IC₅₀ of the same compound for oral cancer lineage SCC-9. SD = standard deviation. Most selective compound were gray shaded.

Compounds	SCC9—Oral Cancer		Primary Gengival Fibroblast		Selective Index (S.I.)
	IC50 (µM)	SD	IC50 (µM)	SD
5a	23.2	0.05	37.5	0.09	1.61
5b	28.5	0.04	55.7	0.04	1.95
5c	24.8	0.07	38.3	0.09	1.54
5d	38.8	0.02	69.1	0.01	1.78
5e	22.1	0.07	40.1	0.05	1.81
5f	22.2	0.06	45.7	0.07	2.05
5g	21.0	0.08	35.5	0.05	1.68
5h	24.9	0.12	49.1	0.05	1.97
5i	23.9	0.05	42.6	0.09	1.77
6a	56.2	0.07	186.6	0.07	3.31
6b	82.2	0.02	229.8	0.06	2.79
6c	56.1	0.09	148.1	0.05	2.63
6d	73.0	0.03	155.1	0.04	2.12
6e	73.2	0.06	196.7	0.06	2.68
6h	11.1	0.17	53.7	0.08	4.83
6i	70.7	0.14	73.5	0.14	1.03
Doxorrubicin	7.2	0.04	18.68	0.40	2.57
Carboplatin	223.0	0.04	192.8	0.03	0.85
Lapachol	42.1	0.08	101.6	0.09	2.41
Shikonin	1.8	0.02	1.72	0.05	0.95

). Anticancer activities of these compounds are reported here for the first time.

The degree of selectivity of these compounds can be expressed by their selective index (SI). A high SI value ≥ 2 of a compound represents a selective toxicity towards cancer cells, while a SI value < 2 is considered generally toxic, such that it can also cause cytotoxicity in normal cells. We observed that compounds 6a (IS: 3.31) and 6h (IS: 4.83) were the most selective (Table 1, highlighted), being superior to other naphthoquinones already tested against OSCC in the literature [28,29]. These naphthoquinones derivatives mentioned were even more selective than the controls.

The initial screening was performed with the SCC9 cell line because it is more sensitive to antitumor agents. As selectivity is one of the main factors that assess the effectiveness of chemotherapeutic agents, it becomes important to consider other oral cancer cell lines, so compounds with an S.I. above 3 were selected for testing in two more tumor cell lines (SCC4 and SCC25). We found that among the three most selective compounds, only 6a maintained the selectivity index above 2 with an IS of 2.36, surpassing carboplatin (IS 0.847) and lapachol (IS 1.66). Furthermore, doxorubicin (IS 3.39) was the unique control that showed selectivity, but it is not commonly used to treat oral cancer. Only compound 6a was used for the following assays since it presented selectivity on average against all OSCC cell lines tested (

Table 2. Characterization of the most selective compounds in other OSCC cells. The IC₅₀ (μM) of three different OSCC cell lines (SCC 4, SCC-9 and SCC-25) and normal fibroblast cells followed by the average of the selectivity index of compounds 6a and 6h were calculated in the same way as in Table 1. All experiments are results of at least 3 independent experiments.

	Oral Tumor Cells							Primary Gingival Fibroblast		Average S.I.
Compound	SCC9		SCC25		SCC4		Mean
	IC50	S.D.	IC50	S.D.	IC50	S.D.		IC50	S.D.
6a	56.24	0.07	87.28	0.04	92.81	0.06	78.70	186.60	0.07	2.36
6h	11.10	0.17	56.60	0.05	98.39	0.03	44.58	53.73	0.08	1.29
Carboplatin	223.00	0.04	264.00	0.02	195.00	0.06	227.50	192.80	0.03	0.85
Doxorubicin	7.20	0.04	1.12	0.06	5.87	0.03	4.73	18.68	0.40	3.94
Lapachol	42.12	0.08	85.85	0.07	55.32	0.05	61.09	101.60	0.09	1.66
Shikonin	1.81	0.02	1.50	0.05	1.91	0.05	1.74	1.72	0.05	0.98

).

Supporting the MTT assay, which indirectly correlates with cell viability, a clonogenic assay was performed, which directly quantifies the accumulation of cells by a given treatment. The clonogenic assay assesses the ability of a cell subjected to a particular treatment to self-duplicate and form a colony [30]. Cells of the SCC9 lineage and human primary fibroblasts were treated with the equivalent of two times the value of IC₅₀ (2 × IC₅₀ 112.48 µM) of compound 6a and the carboplatin control. Both compound 6a and carboplatin showed high cytotoxicity in the tumor cell line, while in fibroblasts, treatment with compound 6a induced a low cytotoxicity in these normal cells (Figure 1A), in which more than 70% of the cells were viable and able to form colonies. With carboplatin, less than 50% of these normal cells maintained their ability to form colonies. These results reinforce that compound 6a presents good selectivity, being more cytotoxic to tumor cells than in normal cells in a more efficient manner than carboplatin, corroborating the MTT results.

Furthermore, to discard any surfactant activity of the compounds, which could lead to unspecific cytotoxicity through cellular membrane damage, a hemolytic assay was performed and showed that compound 6a and controls do not have hemolytic potential, showing less than 3% hemolysis compared to positive control, triton X-100, which represents 100% of cell lysis in red blood cells (Figure 1B). Studies in the literature show that other synthetic naphthoquinones also lack hemolytic potential [18,28,29,31]. Together, these data indicate that compound 6a is selective against oral cancer tumor cells and non-hemolytic, making in vivo testing possible.

To be considered a good drug, the compound must have relative stability at 37 °C comparable to drugs already in use. To assess the stability of the new compound, 6a and the controls were pre-incubated for different time intervals at 37 °C (0, 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h) at a concentration of 2 × IC₅₀ to later be tested for 48 h for their cytotoxicity against SCC9 cells. The results indicated that all three compounds, 6a, carboplatin, and doxorubicin, are stable even after 48 h of pre-incubation at 37 °C (Figure 1C) with little variation in the cytotoxicity induced by them.

3.2.2. Acute Toxicity In Vivo

Pre-clinical tests in animals are very important for drug development and for understanding the therapeutic potential of new molecules [13]. Thus, compound 6a was submitted to the acute toxicity test in C56BL/6 mice to study its toxic potential. The first group of animals received the dose of 100 mg/kg with no changes in morbidity and mortality (

Table 3. Acute toxicity study: morbidity, mortality, gross organs necropsy and histology of mice treated with compound 6a. For more information and results, see Supplemental Table S1.

Treatment	Dose mg/kg a	Change in Body Weight	Change in Food Consumption	Morbidity b	Mortality	Gross Necropsy c	Histology d
Control	0 n = 3	Absent	Absent	Absent	Absent	No alteration	Normal
6a	100 n = 3	Absent	Absent	Absent	Absent	No alteration	Mild kidney and portal hyperemia and mild liver intracytoplasmic degeneration
	150 n = 4	Absent	ND e	Low activity and back-arching	50% of death	Precipitaded compound in loco	Mild arterial and venous hyperemia at the lung, kidney and liver portal and liver intracytoplasmic degeneration
	200 n = 3	ND e	ND e	Low activity and back-arching	100% of death	Precipitaded compound in loco	Mild arterial and venous hyperemia at thelung, kidney and liver portal and liver intracytoplasmic degeneration at time of death

^a Dose level for each subsequent group was determined based on the result after the previous lower dosing. n stands for the number of animals used in each experiment. ^b Morbidity symptoms were analyzed every day, two times a day and were considered as: tremors, convulsion, salivation, diarrhea, lethargy, coma, signs of pain, and mobility defect. ^c Gross organ necropsy of liver, thymus, right kidney, right testicle, heart, major lymph nodes and lung. ^d Histopathology of the lung, kidney, heart, liver and spleen was accessed by trained pathologist and are summarized here. ^e Not detected.

). Afterwards, 200 mg/kg was tested in another group where changes such as decreased activity and back-archingin animals, which can be a sign of pain, were observed. In this group, all the animals died on the 6th day after treatment. To establish a dose that is lethal in 50% of the animals (LD₅₀) [32], we tested 150 mg/kg in four animals. Morbidity changes, such as decreased activity, were observed in two animals and blindness of one eye was observed in one animal. The other two animals remained normal during the role experiment. Seven days after treatment the two animals that presented morbidities died and the others remained alive and normal until the 14th day, suggesting that the LD₅₀ is close to 150 mg/kg (Table 3), a value comparable to that found for carboplatin in animal tests [33]. There was no significant difference in body weight between living animals at the end point (Supplementary Material). The results of the histopathological analysis shown in Table 3 indicate that the 100 mg/kg, 150 mg/kg, and 200 mg/kg groups demonstrated moderate portal hyperemia and intracytoplasmic vacuolar degeneration in the liver, while in the kidneys few signs of renal damage were found by observation of hyperemia, at this point. A similar result has already been reported in the literature with derivatives of 2-hydroxy-3-anilino-1,4-naphthoquinones [31]. Furthermore, in the 150 mg/kg and 200 mg/kg groups, discrete signs of a possible inflammation in the lungs were observed due to the presence of a focus of peribronchial lymphocyte infiltrate that were absent in the lower dose group.

3.2.3. Molecular Docking of Compound 6a

The enzymes Topoisomerases I and Topoisomerase II act on DNA replication and chromosome segregation. Topoisomerase II is an important therapeutic target of anticancer and antibacterial agents [34,35]. To obtain more information about the mechanism of action of compound 6a responsible for the cytotoxic effects, we investigated whether this compound could bind to these enzymes, which are targeted by lapachol and other naphthoquinone derivatives [36,37,38,39,40]. The controls lapachol, topotecan, and etoposide, known inhibitors of topoisomerases I and II, respectively, were compared to 6a regarding the binding mode to these enzymes. In this session the results will shortly be presented. The detailed analysis of compound 6a and its possible targets can be found in the Supplementary Material.

Molecular docking studies with topoisomerase I (Figure 2A) indicated that lapachol intercalates between the base pairs +1C/+1G and −1T/−1A, as does the inhibitor topotecan, while its aliphatic chain binds to the minor groove of DNA as previously shown by Cavalcanti et al. [28]. Unlike topotecan and lapachol, 6a exploits several amino acid residues in the enzyme, which can help stabilize its binding pose. The binding energy of the 6a complex (−8.7 Kcal/mol) with topoisomerase I was similar to that of lapachol (−8.4 Kcal/mol), and higher than that of topotecan (−11.5 Kcal/mol). In the case of the topoisomerase IIβ, this compound explored interactions similar to those observed for lapachol and etoposide, but the binding mode was different. The binding energy of 6a (−8.6 Kcal/mol) was higher than etoposide (−14.7 Kcal/mol) and similar to lapachol (−8.9 Kcal/mol) (Figure 2B), indicating that compound 6a has lower binding affinity with Topoisomerase I and II enzymes than the chemotherapeutic controls already known as inhibitors and comparable to lapachol, reinforcing the potential of this compound.

However, the main anticancer activity of this new naphthoquinone derivate may arise from the inhibition of targets other than topoisomerases. The PKM2 protein plays an important role in cancer cell energy metabolism, in addition to being able to act as a transcription cofactor for various types of oncogenes. The overexpression of PKM2 is also related to multidrug resistance, metastasis, and angiogenesis [41]. It has been demonstrated that lapachol is able to impair the metabolism of cancer cells by targeting the PKM2 enzyme [42], as well as shikonin, another naphthoquinone [43,44]. In our docking studies, both lapachol and shikonin (lapachol, −6.8 Kcal/mol; shikonin, −7.1 Kcal/mol) (Figure 2C) occupied the entrance of the ATP binding cavity, an allosteric inhibition site of the enzyme. Although 6a was not superimposed with lapachol or shikonin, it still bound to the ATP binding cavity in a deeper region with apparent higher affinity (−7.6 Kcal/mol) than these controls and explored a more complex region, where the phosphate groups of ATP bind to a homologous enzyme [45]. These results correlate with the selectivity determined for these compounds in OSCC cells and indicate a possible mechanism of action. New drugs that can inhibit PKM2 activity are needed for both clinic and research, and compound 6a may prove useful in this context.

3.2.4. Predicted Toxicity and Pharmacokinetic Properties

A set of relevant properties of compound 6a was calculated for the evaluation of chemical and biological properties and compared with controls used in the clinic (carboplatin and doxorubicin) from its 2D chemical structure using SwissADME and admetSAR 2 servers. The Lipinski “rule of 5” is used to evaluate oral bioavailability according to four parameters. The parameters are: (1) logarithm of the octanol/water partition coefficient (LogP < 5); (2) number of hydrogen bond acceptors (nON < 10); (3) number of hydrogen bond donors (nOH/NH < 5); and (4) molecular weight (MW < 500 Da) [46]. Compounds with two or more violations of these criteria probably do not have good permeation and absorption. Overall, compound 6a fulfilled the Lipinski “rule of 5” with no violation to the rule, compared to controls, whereas doxorubicin scores three and carboplatin zero (

Table 4. Physico-chemical descriptors related to pharmacokinetic properties 6a in comparison to the chemotherapy drugs doxorubicin and carboplatin.

Compounds	cLogP	nON	nOH/NH	MW	Lipinski’s Violations a	TPSA (Å2)
6a	2.54	5	1	461	0	83.91
Doxorubicin	−2.10	12	6	543	3	206.1
Carboplatin	−1.79	6	4	371	0	126.6

^a Number of violations to the Lipinski “rule of five”: logP < 5; MW, molecular weight < 500; nON, number of hydrogen bond acceptors < 10; and nOH/NH, number of hydrogen bond donors < 5.

).

Another parameter used to predict the quality of the new compound, the topological polar surface areas (TPSA), was estimated for 6a, doxorubicin and carboplatin. TPSA is used in chemistry to model medicinal product absorption and optimize a drug ability to permeate cells. The TPSA of a compound is defined as the sum of the surface area of all polar atoms, which consist mainly of oxygen and nitrogen, as well as hydrogens [47]. Compounds with a TPSA greater than 140 Å have low permeability in the cell membrane, while molecules with PSA lower than 60 Å have high permeability and human intestinal absorption [48]. The TPSA of 6a was 83.91 Å (Table 4), suggesting a moderate cell permeability that was better than doxorubicin (206.1 Å) and close to carboplatin (126.6 Å).

To reinforce the rule-based prediction of absorption and permeability, we also predicted the bioavailability of compound 6a using a QSAR-based method available within admetSAR 2.0 server. The results showed compound 6a with good oral bioavailability (

Table 5. Properties analyzed in admetSAR. The properties analyzed were oral bioavailability, substrate and P-gp inhibitor. The analysis was performed with compound 6a and the chemotherapeutic agents, carboplatin and doxorubicin as controls.

ADMET	6a	Carboplatin	Doxorrubicin
Oral Bioavailability	+0.63	−0.60	−0.91
P-glycoprotein inhibitor	+0.82	−0.99	−0.92
P-glycoprotein substrate	−0.56	−0.99	+0.95

). Doxorubicin and carboplatin on the other hand were predicted to have a poor oral bioavailability. Indeed, experimental studies have demonstrated the low oral bioavailability of these drugs [49,50], proving the reliability of our predictions, which in turn supports that compound 6a is more likely for oral delivery, unlike the anticancer drugs evaluated. Taken together, these analyses suggest a good oral bioavailability of 6a in comparison to controls.

Furthermore, one of the challenges of chemotherapy is the multiple drug resistance (MDR) phenotype of patients to chemotherapy leading to treatment failure and cancer relapse. The phosphoglycoprotein (P-gp) enzymes family, one of the main MDR effectors are an efflux transporter protein family that constitute a mechanism of resistance to drugs [51]. Compound 6a was predicted to be an inhibitor of P-gp multidrug transporter, but not a substrate, in opposition to doxorubicin. Additionally, carboplatin was not predicted as substrate nor inhibitor of this P-gp (Table 5). These predictions are in agreement with the experimental data available for both control drugs [49]. All the above in silico analyses suggest that compound 6a, in addition to having a good pharmacological profile, might be orally absorbed, could also act as a P-gp inhibitor, and is not substrate of P-gp, increasing its likelihood as a good drug lead.

3.2.5. Investigation of the Cell Death Pathway

After defining that the compound 6a is selective and tolerated in animals (LD₅₀: 150 mg/kg), that the molecule is a possible ligand to topoisomerases and PKM2 enzymes and that it presents a desirable pharmacological profile, we next aimed to determine the cell death pathway induced by this compound. Chemotherapy plays an important role in inducing different types of cell death, such as apoptosis, necrosis/necroptosis, and autophagy. Hence, the determination of cell death pathways is essential for the development of new antitumor drugs [52].

Apoptosis is a process of programmed cell death that occurs through a sequence of molecular events, such as cells shrinkage, DNA fragmentation and cell releases of membrane-enclosed contents called apoptotic bodies [53]. We used time-lapse video microscopy images (Figure 3A and Supplementary Video S1) to analyze whether the morphological characteristics would indicate cell death morphology by apoptosis. We verified that the cells treated with 6a did not suffer shrinkage and did not present small membrane blebs throughout the analyzed time (Figure 3A). On the other hand, after 24 h of treatment, membrane bubbles appeared and grew progressively, followed by an increase in the number and size of vesicles inside the cells with subsequent membrane permeabilization, which were not observed in the DMSO control (Figure 3A). One of the possible mechanisms of death induction that leads to morphological phenotypes similar to that observed is the production and accumulation of ROS in cells. Different naphthoquinones are capable of inducing production of ROS, being one of the properties that most confer antineoplastic characteristics to this class of substances [36,54,55]. The oxidative activity of compound 6a was compared with another naphthoquinone already shown to be a major producer of ROS, menadione. There was a low production of ROS in SCC9 cells treated with compound 6a, close to that observed for DMSO and inferior to the positive control menadione, showing that compound 6a does not trigger ROS production (Figure 3B).

In order to better investigate the process of cell death, we performed assays with the pan-caspase inhibitor ZVAD and with the necroptosis inhibitor necrostatin, or in combination, in which we observed no significant difference in the percentage of cell viability between the different conditions (Figure 3C), indicating that possibly neither apoptosis nor necroptosis is the cell death mechanism involved in 6a cytotoxicity. Considering the result of the video microscopy images (Figure 3A and Supplementary video), the vesicles present inside cells could be an indicative of cell death induced by autophagy. In fact, studies show that some naphthoquinones have the potential to induce cell death by autophagy, with shikonin [56,57], plumbagin [58,59], and alkannin [60] as examples. As seen in Figure 3D, the autophagy inhibitor 3-MA [61] reduced cell death induced by 6a and the control shikonin. To confirm the autophagic phenotype, we performed the labeling of autophagosomes where it was possible to visualize the small vesicles formed after 36 h of treatment with 6a, demonstrating the greater presence of vesicles compared to the positive control of serum-deprivation and similarly to shikonin (Figure 3E). Moreover, this phenotype was completely reversed by treatment with autophagy inhibitor (3-MA), strongly suggesting that the observed death occurs by autophagy.

Pyruvate kinase M2 (PKM2) is an enzyme that plays a key role in tumor progression, both in gene transcription and in the production of ATP and intermediates of the glycolytic pathway, through the Warburg effect [41,62]. Through molecular docking, we proposed that 6a possibly inhibits PKM2 with a stronger binding affinity than that observed for already known inhibitors, such as lapachol and shikonin. In OSCC, PKM2 expression is associated with cell growth, invasion, and tumor progression [63,64,65]. Therefore, it is possible to correlate the results of molecular docking with cell death assays. Compound 6a, when inhibiting PKM2, possibly leads the tumor cell to energy deprivation, entering the autophagic process in search of building blocks and ATP.

Although autophagy is a process associated with cell survival, when it occurs in excess and for long periods, it can trigger late cell death by apoptosis or necroptosis [66,67]. We subsequently investigated these late cell death pathways by flow cytometry. Through these analyses, we observed that the process of autophagy resulting from the treatment with 6a may cause a late apoptosis process (only after 48 h and which is not reversible with ZVAD alone). Treatment of SCC9 cells with 6a led to a ~50% stain for single positive phosphatidyl serin exposition (Figure 4A), DNA fragmentation in ~60% of the cells (Figure 4B, Sub-G₁ DNA-content), and activated effector caspase 3/7 labeling (Figure 4C) in ~22%, all indicative of death by apoptosis. The results in Figure 4D reinforce these results, where treatment with ZVAD alone led to no change in the cell viability in contrast to treatment with 3-MA where there is an increase in cell viability compared to treatment with 6a alone. However, when ZVAD is associated with 3-MA, there is a greater protection from the death process. The same result was observed for shikonin, which indicates that these naphthoquinones can act similarly in OSCC cells, but 6a is 2.4 times more selective than shikonin. It is noteworthy that 6a does not induce any significant cell cycle alteration in SCC9 cells (Supplementary Figure S2) and induces a low level of PI positive cells indicative of necrosis (Figure 4A).

Recent studies showed that PKM2 knockout inhibits the AKT/mTOR signaling pathway in cancer cells by suppressing protein expression important in glycogen synthesis, which contributes to the process of cell death by autophagy [68]. These results are related to those seen for naphthoquinone plumbagin, a PKM2 inhibitor, which is capable of inducing cell death by autophagy followed by apoptosis in SCC via the p38 MAPK and PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathways [69], for shikonin, which inhibits PKM2 and other glycolytic enzymes, inhibiting intracellular ATP levels through PI3K/Akt/mTOR inhibition pathways [69], and for shikonin, which inhibits PKM2 and other glycolytic enzymes, inhibiting intracellular ATP levels through PI3K/Akt/mTOR inhibition [61]. The results obtained for 6a indicate that this is a promising compound for the treatment of OSCC, being capable to act as an inhibitor of enzymes essential for tumor cell metabolism, leading to cell death by autophagy and apoptosis, being selective, tolerable in animals, and with good pharmacokinetic characteristics.

4. Conclusions

In summary, sixteen new Mannich adducts from naphthoquinones were synthesized and evaluated for their antitumor potential in OSCC cells. Compound 6a was very cytotoxic (56 µM) and selective (SI 2.36) among those tested and at levels comparable and generally superior to chemotherapeutic controls; and is slightly toxic at concentrations below 150 mg/kg in animals, but well tolerated at 100 mg/kg. Compound 6a was shown to have a pharmacokinetic profile within desirable parameters for drug development. This compound is possibly able to bind to enzymes important for tumor progression, such as PKM2 and topoisomerases in allosteric inhibition sites. Our data show that this compound can induce cell death by autophagy followed by late apoptosis in the OSCC, showing promise for future preclinical trials.