Next Article in Journal
Efficient Adsorption and Extraction of Glutathione S-Transferases with Glutathione-Functionalized Graphene Oxide–Polyhedral Oligomeric Silsesquioxane Composite
Next Article in Special Issue
Effects of a Semisynthetic Catechin on Phosphatidylglycerol Membranes: A Mixed Experimental and Simulation Study
Previous Article in Journal
Inhibition of Cancer Cell Proliferation and Bacterial Growth by Silver(I) Complexes Bearing a CH3-Substituted Thiadiazole-Based Thioamide
Previous Article in Special Issue
Chemical Composition Profiling and Antifungal Activity of Saffron Petal Extract
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Phytochemicals Derived from Agricultural Residues and Their Valuable Properties and Applications

1
Department of Biochemistry and Crop Quality, Institute of Soil Science and Plant Cultivation, State Research Institute, 24-100 Puławy, Poland
2
DIANA, Department of Animal Science, Food and Nutrition, Faculty of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Via E. Parmense, 84, 29122 Piacenza, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2023, 28(1), 342; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28010342
Submission received: 1 December 2022 / Revised: 21 December 2022 / Accepted: 25 December 2022 / Published: 1 January 2023

Abstract

:
Billions of tons of agro-industrial residues are produced worldwide. This is associated with the risk of pollution as well as management and economic problems. Simultaneously, non-edible portions of many crops are rich in bioactive compounds with valuable properties. For this reason, developing various methods for utilizing agro-industrial residues as a source of high-value by-products is very important. The main objective of the paper is a review of the newest studies on biologically active compounds included in non-edible parts of crops with the highest amount of waste generated annually in the world. The review also provides the newest data on the chemical and biological properties, as well as the potential application of phytochemicals from such waste. The review shows that, in 2020, there were above 6 billion tonnes of residues only from the most popular crops. The greatest amount is generated during sugar, oil, and flour production. All described residues contain valuable phytochemicals that exhibit antioxidant, antimicrobial and very often anti-cancer activity. Many studies show interesting applications, mainly in pharmaceuticals and food production, but also in agriculture and wastewater remediation, as well as metal and steel industries.

1. Introduction

The agricultural industry generates billions of tonnes of waste from the tillage and processing of various crops. The crops with the largest amounts of produced residues are rice, maize, soybean, sugarcane, potato, tomato, and cucumber, as well as some fruits, mainly bananas, oranges, grapes, and apples [1,2]. It has been estimated that European food processing companies generate annually approximately 100 Mt of waste and by-products, mostly during the production of drinks (26%), dairy and ice cream (21.3%), and fruits and vegetables (14.8%) [3].
In Table 1, the amounts of particular wastes generated worldwide are presented. Many of them are rich in biologically active compounds and have the potential to become important raw materials for obtaining valuable phytochemicals. Vegetable and fruit processing by-products are promising sources of valuable phytochemicals having antioxidant, antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, anti-cancer, and cardiovascular protection activities [4]. The applications of these agro-industrial residues and their bioactive compounds in functional food and cosmetics production were presented in many studies [5,6,7]. Moreover, due to the potential health risk of some synthetic antioxidants such as BHA, the identification and isolation of natural antioxidants from waste has become increasingly attractive. Important criteria to decide if a product or by-product can be of interest to recover phytochemicals are the absolute concentration and preconcentration factor, as well as the total amount of product or by-product per batch [8].
As interest in waste processing has been growing in recent years, many scientific papers have been published on new compounds in agro-industrial waste, new properties of valuable phytochemicals contained in crop residues and their applications. It seems necessary to summarize and collect the latest knowledge on this subject. In this work, an overview of the recent knowledge on the phytochemicals in some of the most popular food by-products, with the highest amount generated in the world, as well as on their properties and potential applications, have been presented in more detail (Figure 1).

2. Phytochemicals from Crop Residues

2.1. Sugarcane Bagasse

Large amounts of waste are generated during the processing of sugarcane. In fact, one metric ton of sugarcane generates 280 kg of bagasse. Sugarcane bagasse is one of the most abundant agro-food by-products and is a very promising raw material available at low cost for recovering bioactive substances [18,19]. Sugarcane bagasse consists mainly of cellulose (35–50%), hemicellulose (26–41%), lignin (11–25%), but also some amount of plant secondary metabolites (PSM), mainly anthocyanins and mineral substances [20,21,22,23,24,25].
Phenolic compounds are a very important group of natural substances identified in sugarcane waste. Nonetheless, steam explosion and ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE) pretreatment was applied for the production of valuable phenolic compounds from the lignin included in this residue. Chromatographic analysis revealed that sugarcane bagasse is a good feedstock for the generation of phenolic acids. The concentration of total phenolics with the Folin-Ciocalteau method was between 2.8 and 3.2 g/L. Zhao et al. [26] have identified many phenolics, mainly flavonoids and phenolic acids, in sugarcane bagasse extract (Table 2). The total polyphenol content was detected as higher than 4 mg/g of dry bagasse, with total flavonoid content of 470 mg quercetin/g of polyphenol. The most abundant phenolic acids identified in the sugarcane bagasse extract were gallic acid (4.36 mg/g extract), ferulic acid (1.87 mg/g extract) and coumaric acid (1.66 mg/g extract). Spectroscopic analysis showed that a predominant amount of p-coumaric acid is ester-linked to the cell wall components, mainly to lignin. On the other hand, about half of the ferulic acid is esterified to the cell wall hemicelluloses. The purified sugarcane bagasse hydrolysate consisted mainly of p-coumaric acid. Besides, the purified products showed the same antioxidant activity, reducing power and free radical scavenging capacity as the standard p-coumaric acid. Al Arni et al. [27] stated that the major natural products contained in the lignin fraction were p-coumaric acid, ferulic acid, syringic acid, and vanillin.
Gallic, coumaric, caffeic, chlorogenic, and cinnamic acids were the main phenolic compounds extracted from raw and alkaline pretreated sugarcane bagasse and identified by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) [28]. The aromatic phenolic compounds (p-coumaric acid, ferulic acid, p-hydroxybenzaldehyde, vanillin, and vanillic acid) were reported in sugarcane bagasse pith. Five phenolic compounds (tricin 4-O-guaiacylglyceryl ether-7-O-glucopyranoside, genistin, p-coumaric acid, quercetin, and genistein) in 30% hydroalcoholic fraction of sugarcane bagasse were identified using ultra-high performance liquid chromatography/high-resolution time of flight mass spectrometry (UHPLC-HR-TOF-MS); (Table 2). The total phenolic content was 170.68 mg gallic acid/g dry extract [19].
Phenolic compounds derived from sugarcane bagasse exhibited many biological activities, which were used in various applications. The most important biological activities and the newest and most interesting applications have been summarized in Table 3.

2.2. Maize Residues

Maize (corn Zea mays L.) bran, husk, cobs, tassel, pollen, silk, and fiber are residues of corn production. They contain substantial amounts of phytochemicals, such as phenolic compounds, carotenoid pigments and phytosterols [39] (Table 4).
Corn bran is produced as a plentiful by-product during the corn dry milling process. Similar to other cereal grains, phenolics in corn bran exist in free insoluble bound and soluble-conjugated forms. Corn bran is a rich source of ferulic acid compared to other cereals, fruits and vegetables. Guo et al. [39] isolated four forms of ferulic acid and its derivates from corn bran. On the other hand, it has been reported that the hexane-derived extract from corn bran contains high levels of ferulate-phytosterol esters, similar in composition and function to oryzanol.
Another corn waste is a husk. It is the outer leafy covering of an ear of Zea mays L. The main constituents of the maize husk extracts determined in various phytochemical studies are phenolic compounds, e.g., flavonoids [41,50]. Saponins, glycosides, and alkaloids are present mainly in the aqueous and methanolic extracts, while phenols and tannins are numerous in methanolic ones [51]. Moreover, corn husk has high contents of anthocyanins [48,52]. Simla et al. [53] reported that anthocyanins concentration in corn husks ranges from 0.003 to 4.9 mg/g. The major anthocyanins of corn husk were identified as malonylation products of cyanidin, pelargonidin, and peonidin derivatives [54].
Important by-products of the corn industry are cobs. For every 100 kg of corn grain, approximately 18 kg of corn cobs are produced. Corn cob is one of the food waste-material having a phytochemical component that has a healthy benefit [55]. They contain cyanidin-3-glucoside and cyanidin-3-(6″malonylglucoside) as main anthocyanins, as well as pelargonidin-3-glucoside, peonidin-3-glucoside and their malonyl counterparts [48].
Corn tassel is a by-product from hybrid corn seed production and an excellent source of phytochemicals (the flavonol glycosides of quercetin, isorhamnetin and kaempferol) with beneficial properties [56]. In Thailand, purple waxy corn is considered a special corn type because it is rich in phenolics, anthocyanins, and carotenoids in the tassel [57]. Besides, corn tassels could be considered a great source of valuable products such as volatile oils.
Corn pollen is another corn waste. Significant amounts of phytochemicals, including carotenoids, steroids, terpenes and flavonoids, are present in maize pollen [52]. Bujang et al. (2021) showed that maize pollen contains a high total phenolic content and total flavonoid content of 783.02 mg gallic acid equivalent (GAE)/100 g and 1706.83 mg quercetin equivalent (QE)/100 g, respectively. The flavonoid pattern of maize pollen is characterized by an accumulation of the predominant flavonols, quercetin and traces of isorhamnetin diglycosides and rutin. According to Žilić et al. [58], the quercetin values in maize pollen were 324.16 μg/g and 81.61 to 466.82 μg/g, respectively.
Corn silk, another by-product from corn processing, contains a wide range of bioactive compounds in the form of volatile oils, steroids, saponins, anthocyanins [59], and other natural antioxidants, such as flavonoids [52] and phenolic compounds [41,58,59]. In the corn silk powder, the high phenolic content (94.10 ± 0.26 mg GAE/g) and flavonoid content (163.93 ± 0.83 mg QE/100 g) are responsible for its high antioxidant activity [60]. About 29 flavonoids have been isolated from corn silk. Most of them are C-glycoside compounds and have the same parent nucleus as luteolin [44]. Ren et al. [61] successfully isolated and separated compounds such as 2″-O-α-l-rhamnosyl-6-C-3″-deoxyglucosyl-3′-methoxyluteolin, ax-5′-methane-3′-methoxymaysin, ax-4″-OH-3′-methoxymaysin, 6,4′-dihydroxy-3′-methoxyflavone-7-O-glucoside, and 7,4′-dihydroxy-3′-methoxyflavone-2″-O-α-l-rhamnosyl-6-C fucoside from corn silk. Moreover, among flavonoids, Haslina and Eva [43] determined in corn silk: apigmaysin, maysin, isoorientin-2″-O-α-l-rhamnoside, 3-methoxymaysine, and ax-4-OH maysin.
This richness of biologically active compounds results in advantageous properties and applications. The most important properties and the newest studies on the application are listed in Table 5.

2.3. Potato Waste

Approximately 40–50% of potatoes are not suitable for human consumption. Industrial processing of potatoes (mashed and canned potatoes, chips, fries and ready meals) creates huge amounts of peel as waste [66,67]. Potato peel is a non-edible residue generated in considerable amounts by food processing plants. Depending on the peeling process, e.g., abrasion, lye or steam peeling, the amount of waste can range between 15 and 40% of the number of processed potatoes [68]. Industrial processing produces between 70 to 140 thousand tons of peels worldwide annually, which are available to be used in other applications [69].
Potato peels differ greatly from other agricultural by-products because they are revalorized as a source of functional and bioactive compounds, including phenolic compounds, glycoalkaloids, vitamins and minerals [70] (Table 6).
Potato peel is a good source of phenolic compounds because almost 50% of potato phenolics are located in the peel and adjoining tissues [74,83]. The results obtained by Wu et al. [77] showed that the potato peels contained a higher amount of phenolics than the flesh. Moreover, the polyphenols in potato peel are ten times higher than those in the pulp. Potato peel extract contains 70.82 mg of catechin equivalent (CE)/100 g of phenolic and had a high level of phenolic compounds (2.91 mg GAE/g dry weight) that was found to be greater than carrot (1.52 mg GAE/g dry weight), wheat bran (1.0 mg GAE/g dry weight), and onion (2.5 mg GAE/g dry weight) [67]. The results of Javed et al. [72] showed that the total phenolic content in potato peel ranged from 1.02 to 2.92 g/100 g and total flavonoids ranged from 0.51 to 0.96 g/100 g. Phenolic acids are the most abundant phenolic compounds in potato peel. They include derivatives of hydroxycinnamic and hydroxybenzoic acids (Table 6). Kumari et al. [84], using UHPLC-MS/MS, showed that chlorogenic and caffeic acids are important components of the free-form phenolics in potato peel. The results show that phenolic acids in potato peals are not only present in their free form but also occur in bound form. Javed et al. [72] showed that the extract of potato peel contains chlorogenic acid (753.0–821.3 mg/100 g), caffeic acid (278.0–296.0 mg/100 g), protocatechuic acid (216.0–256.0 mg/100 g), p-hydroxybenzoic acid (82.0–87.0 mg/100 g), gallic acid (58.6–63.0 mg/100 g), vanillic acid (43.0–48.0 mg/100 g), and p-coumaric acid (41.8–45.6 mg/100 g). Silva–Beltran et al. [78] showed that flavonoids such as rutin and quercetin were present in potato peel at low concentrations of 5.01 and 11.22 mg/100 g dry weight, respectively.
Many studies have noted that potato peels are excellent untapped source of steroidal alkaloids, e.g., glycoalkaloids (α-solanine and α-chaconine) and aglycone alkaloids (solanidine and demissidine; Table 6) [80,81,85]. α-solanine, α-chaconine, and the glycosides of solanidine constitute about 95% of the total potato peel glycoalkaloid content [86]. Higher amounts of these compounds were found in potato peel, unlike potato flesh [87]. There are various cultural, genetic and storage factors that influence the concentration of glycoalkaloids in potato peel [88]. Concerning cultivars, it was shown that the variety with blue flesh showed the highest concentration (5.68 mg/100 g fresh weight), followed by the red-leaved (5.26 mg/100 g fresh weight), while yellow or cream flesh. In the study of Singh et al. [89] of potato peel, glycoalkaloids were detected as 1.05 mg/100 g. The results of Rytel et al. [88] showed that the glycoalkaloid content of potato peel depends on the potato cultivar and ranges from 181 mg/kg to 3526 mg/kg of fresh potato tubers.
Besides, the peel of pigmented potatoes is an excellent source of anthocyanins, e.g., pelargonidin-3-(p-coumaryoly rutinoside)-5-glucoside and petunidin-3-(p-coumaroyl rutinoside)-5-glucoside. It has been proven that their content depends on the cultivar [90]. Ji et al. [80] showed that anthocyanidin levels were higher in the peel than in the tuber. The most important beneficial properties and potential applications of phytochemicals identified in potato waste are listed in Table 7.

2.4. Soybean Residues

Soybean waste has the potential as a sustainable source of phytochemicals and functional foods. It includes both leaves, pod pericarp, and twigs, as well as the residues after seeds processing, so-called okara. Okara is the residue of soybean milling after extraction of the aqueous fraction used for producing tofu and soy drink and presents high nutritional value [109]. The results of the last studies showed that an okara contains enough bioactive compounds that make it useful to obtain value-added products for use in food production, oil extraction, nutraceutical, pharmaceutical, and cosmetic formulations. Moreover, it was stated that okara isoflavones have good antioxidant activity. Although some nutrients like protein decrease in okara during soymilk processing, it still has many other phytochemicals and nutrients, making it their least expensive and most excellent source. Since it has good antimicrobial activity, it can be used in pharmaceutical industries, thus opening up new frontiers for drug exploration [109]. Various food enriched with okara, such as biscuits and cookies, have been mentioned in the literature [110,111]. Guimarăes et al. [112] reported that food products enriched with okara contained 0.411 mg/100 mL of β-carotene and 0.15 μm/g isoflavones.
One of the main phytochemicals in soybean waste are isoflavones: daidzein, genistein, glycitein, and their glycosides (e.g., acetyl-, malonyl-, and β-glycosides) [113]. Isoflavones are compounds belonging to the flavonoid group. In addition to the well-established antioxidant effect, isoflavones exhibit estrogenic activity because of their similar structure to estrogen [113,114]. The beneficial effects of isoflavones are the prevention of hormone-dependent cancer, coronary heart disease, osteoporosis, and menopausal symptoms [114]. Kumar et al. [115] proved that daidzein expressed anticancer activity against human breast cancer cells MCF-7. The extract from soybean waste material showed total phenolic content (TPC) in the range of 27.4–167 mg GAE/g, total flavonoids from 10.4 to 63.8 mg QE/g and antioxidant activity (AOA) from 26.5% to 84.7% [114]. Moreover, their values were highest in the leaves, followed by pod pericarp and twigs. As was stated by Šibul et al. [113], soybean roots are also a good source of daidzein and genistein, as well as other phenolic compounds. The concentrations of isoflavones in roots were higher than in herbs, 1584.5 and 93.48 μg/g of dry extract, respectively. The newest study on soybean pods stated that its ethanolic extract and fractions exhibited anticancer potential against human colorectal carcinoma (HTC-116) and prostate cancer (PC-3) [116]. Moreover, it was the first analysis of this material using ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with electrospray ionization quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (UPLC-ESI-QTOF-MS), resulting in the identification of 50 polyphenols belonging to phenolic acids, flavonoids and other groups. The authors stated that soybean pods might be useful material as an active food additive or a component in dietary supplements and preparations with anti-radical and anti-cancer properties.
Soybean by-products are a good source of lecithin. Lecithin is a natural emulsifier that stabilizes fat and improves the texture of many food products, such as salad dressings, desserts, margarine, chocolate, and baking and cooking goods [117]. Moreover, it also has health benefits such as lowering cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein level in the human blood, improving digestion, cognitive and immune function, as well as aiding in the prevention of gall bladder and liver diseases.
Saponins are another important group of phytochemicals derived from soybean waste [113]. Soyasaponins have been linked to anti-obesity, antioxidative stress, and anti-inflammatory properties, as well as preventive effects on hepatic triacylglycerol accumulation [118]. One of the latest applications of saponins derived from soybean by-products was as eco-friendly agents for washing pesticide residues in the vegetable and fruit industries [119].
Compounds identified and quantified in soybean waste are specified in Table 8. The newest studies on the applications and properties of soybean waste are presented in Table 9.

2.5. Tomato Residues

During the industrial processing of tomatoes, a considerable amount of waste is generated. Tomato waste consists mainly of peel, seeds, stems, leaves, fibrous parts and pulp residues [124]. The wet tomato pomace constitutes the major part of this waste, which consists of 33% seed, 27% peel and 40% pulp, while the dried pomace contains 44% seed and 56% pulp and peel [125]. When tomatoes are processed into products like ketchup, juice or sauces, 3–7% of their weight becomes waste. The management of tomato by-products is considered an important problem faced by tomato processing companies due to their disposal into the environment [126,127].
Although tomato waste has no commercial value, it is a rich source of nutrients, colorants and highly biologically active compounds such as polyphenols, carotenes, sterols, tocopherols, terpenes, and others (Table 10) [128,129,130,131,132]. The number of these compounds depends on tomato variety, part of the tomato residues (seed, peels, and pulp), time and extraction method, used solvent, as well as fractions gained after the isolation procedure, e.g., alkaline-hydrolyzable, acid-hydrolyzable, and bound phenolics [133]. They reported a total phenolics average of 1229.5 mg GAE/kg, of which flavonoids accounted for 415.3 mg QE/kg. The most abundant phenolic acids quantified in dried tomato waste were ellagic (143.4 mg/kg) and chlorogenic (76.3 mg/kg) acids. Other phenolic acids determined in lower concentrations were gallic, salicylic, coumaric, vanillic and syringic [133]. The levels of vanillic (26.9 mg/kg) and gallic (17.1 mg/kg) was lower than those found by Elbadrawy and Sello [134] in tomato peel (33.1 and 38.5 mg/kg, respectively). Ćetković et al. [135] identified phenolic acids (chlorogenic, p-coumaric, ferulic, caffeic and rosmarinic acid), flavonols (quercetin and rutin and its derivatives), and flavanone (naringenin derivatives) as the major phenolic compounds in extracts of tomato waste. The results obtained by Aires et al. [136] showed that the major polyphenol found in tomato wastes were kaempferol-3-O-rutinoside and caffeic acid. Several papers [135,136,137,138] reported the amounts of caffeic, chlorogenic, p-coumaric acids, kaempferol and quercetin, among other phenolic compounds found in tomato by-products. In the tomato’s wastes, Di Donato et al. [139] identified two main flavonoid compunds e.g., kaempferol rutinoside and quercetin rutinoside. Rutin and chlorogenic acid were the most abundant individual phenolics found by García–Valverde et al. [140] in all studied tomato varieties.
Traditionally, the bioactivity of tomatoes and their products has been attributed to carotenoids (β-carotene and lycopene). The results of Nour et al. [133] confirmed that dried tomato wastes contain considerable amounts of lycopene (510.6 mg/kg) and β-carotene (95.6 mg/kg) and exhibited good antioxidant properties. The results obtained by Fărcaş et al. [145] confirmed lycopene as the main carotenoid of tomato waste in a concentration between 42.18 and 70.03 mg/100 g DW (dry weight). Simultaneously, peels contain around 5 times more lycopene compared to tomato pulp [146,147]. The lycopene content in peel was 734 μg/g DW, but significant amounts of β-carotene, cis-β-carotene and lutein were also determined. The study by Górecka et al. [148] showed that tomato waste could be considered a promising source of lycopene for the production of functional foods.
Peels, as one of the main residues of tomato, are a richer source of nutrients and biologically active compounds than the pulp [137,149]. Despite of high concentration of carotenoids, peels also contain a considerable amount of polyphenols. The results obtained by Hsieh et al. [97] showed that the main flavonoids detected in fresh tomato peel were quercetin, myricetin, apigenin, catechin, puerarin, fisetin, hesperidin, naringin, rutin and their levels were reported as 4.2, 2.9, 1.9, 0.9, 0.8, 0.5, 0.3, 0.2, and 0.2 mg/100 g, respectively. It has been proven that tomato peel extracts contain high amounts of kaemferol-3-O-rutinoside (from 8.5 to 142.5 mg/kg) [127], quercetin derivatives, p-coumaric acid and chlorogenic acid derivative [150,151]. The main phenolic acids identified in tomato peel are protocatechuic, vanillic, gallic, catechin and caffeic acid. Their corresponding concentrations were 5.52, 3.85, 3.31, 2.98, and 0.50 mg/100 g, respectively [134]. The results of Lucera et al. [152] showed that tomato peels contain 4.90 mg/g DW of total phenolic and 2.21 mg/g DW of total flavonoids. The total polyphenolic content in tomato peels and seeds was higher than in the pulp. On the other hand, tomato peel has a very small amount of anthocyanin [153].
Tomato seeds are considered a potential natural source of antioxidants due to their rich phytochemical profile. Many publications indicate that tomato seeds contain, e.g., carotenoids, proteins, polyphenols, phytosterols, minerals and vitamin E [154]. According to Eller et al. [155], the total content of phenolic compounds in the tomato seed extract was 20.66 mg/100 g. Quercetin-3-O-sophoroside, isorhamnetin-3-O-sophoroside, and kaempferol-3-O-sophoroside were present in the highest concentrations of the total phenolic compounds. Quercetin derivatives contributed approximately 37% of the total flavonoid content. Pellicanò et al. [156] found naringenin (84.04 mg/kg DW) as the most abundant flavonoid identified, followed by caffeic acid (26.60 mg/kg DW). Apart from phenolics, carotenoids are the next class of bioactive compounds present in tomato seeds. Qualitatively, the carotenoid composition (β-carotene and lycopene isoforms: lycopene all trans, lycopene cis 1, lycopene cis 2, lycopene cis 3) in tomato seeds is similar to that of the carotenoids in tomato fruit [157].
Tomato waste has attracted great interest due to its biological activity and potential applications of phytochemicals (Table 11).

2.6. Banana Residues

Banana (Musa spp., Musaceae family) is one of the main fruit crops cultivated for its edible fruits in tropical and subtropical regions. The main by-product of bananas is its peels, which represent approx. 30% of the whole fruit [164]. Moreover, banana waste also includes small-sized, damaged, or rotting fruit, leaves, stems, and pseudoparts. Banana peels are sometimes used as feedstock for livestock, goats, monkeys, poultry, rabbits, fish, zebras, and many other species. They are rich in vitamin B6, manganese, vitamin C, fiber, potassium, biotin, and copper [165], but also in phytochemicals with high antioxidant capacity such as phenolics (flavonols, hydroxycinnamic acids, gallocatechin), anthocyanin (delphinidin, cyanidin), carotenoids (β-carotenoids, α-carotenoids, and xanthophylls), catecholamines, sterols and triterpenes (Table 12). Banana peels are natural antacids and are helpful in acid reflux, heartburn, and diarrhea [165].
Previous studies reported that the banana peel is rich in chemical compounds as antioxidant and antimicrobial activities [167,168,169,171]. Moreover, ethanoic extract from banana peel exhibited the strongest antihyperglycemic activity in comparison with the extract from pulp, seed, and flower [172]. Phytochemicals derived from banana peel were tested as a biofungicide against Fusarium culmorum and Rhizoctonia solani and as a bactericide against Agrobacterium tumefaciens for the natural preservation of wood during handling or in service. Encapsulation is successfully investigated as the method for stabilizing the banana peel extract and its bioactive compounds during storage [173].
Other phytochemical components present in the banana peel extracts, such as ethanediol and butanediol, were determined as highly reducing agents to synthesize silver nanoparticles, which are significant to the medical and chemical industries [173].
The harvesting of the fruits in the plantation requires the decapitation of the whole; therefore, the valuable banana by-products, in addition to peels, are the pseudostem, leaves, inflorescence, and fruit stalk, but also rhizome, which can also be used as a raw material for the acquisition of phytochemicals [174]. Kandasamy et al. [170] isolated three compounds from the pseudostem and rhizome of bananas, including chlorogenic acids, cycloeucalenol acetate, and 4-epicyclomusalenone. Crude extract and isolated compounds are characterized by strong antibacterial, antifungal, antiplatelet aggregation, and anticancer activities.
Using the inflorescence of bananas, anthocyanins can be obtained as good biocolorants with attractive colors, moderate stability in food systems, water solubility, and benefits for health [175]. Cyanidin-3-rutinoside, as the main compound, could be exploited as a cheap source of natural food colorant.
The newest application and explored properties of biologically active compounds from banana residues are presented in Table 13.

2.7. Apple Residues

Poland is the main producer of apples in the world, with an annual production of over 4 million tons [177]. About 25% of apple biomass was wasted during crop and processing. Apple pomace as a waste from apple juice and cider processing consists mainly of apple skin/flesh, seeds, and stems [178]. Until recently, apple waste was used as livestock feed, bioenergy feedstock, as well as for food supplementation and pectin extraction, but still, it is far from being used at its full potential, particularly considering its application in the pharmaceuticals and cosmetics industry [179,180]. Nonetheless, apple pomace has the potential to become a source of valuable biomaterials for agriculture. It contains numerous phytochemicals in the form of pectin and dietary fibers, but also polyphenols, triterpenoids, and volatiles. Interestingly, apple pomace is a richer source of antioxidants than fresh fruits itself because it has a significantly lower content of water; moreover, many valuable bioactive compounds are found mainly in the peels and seeds [180].
Polyphenols are the main valuable constituents of apple pomace. Waldbauer et al. [181] reported that the total phenolic content in apple pomace is in the range of 262–856 mg of total phenols/100 g. This content differs between studies due to the use of different solvents, extraction conditions, and apple varieties [182,183].
Four major phenolic groups are hydroxycinnamic acids, dihydrochalcone derivatives (phloretin and its glycosides), flavan-3-ols (catechin and procyanidins), and flavonols (quercetin and its glycosides) [184,185].
Although the phytochemical composition of apple pomace has been studied for a long time, new compounds with beneficial properties are still being isolated and identified. Ramirez-Ambrosi et al. [186] identified 52 phenolic compounds using a newly developed, rapid, selective, and sensitive strategy of ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography with diode array detection coupled to electrospray ionization and quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (UHPLC-DAD–ESI-Q-ToF-MS) with automatic and simultaneous acquisition of exact mass at high and low collision energy. Among new compounds, two dihydrochalcones (two isomers of phloretin-pentosyl-hexosides) and three flavonols (isorhamnetin-3-O-rutinoside, isorhamnetin-3-O-pentosides and isorhamnetin-3-O-arabinofuranoside) have been tentatively identified for the first time in apple pomace.
One of the compounds newly identified in the last few years in apple pomace is monoterpene–pinnatifidanoside D [185]. This compound has been isolated for the first time from Crataegus pinnatifida and exhibited small antiplatelet aggregation activity.
Mohammed and Mustafa [187] and Khalil and Mustafa [188] isolated and structurally elucidated novel furanocoumarins from apple seeds. Isolated compounds exhibited promising antimicrobial activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumonia, Haemophilus influenzae, Escherichia coli, Candida albicans, and Aspergillus niger.
The main compounds determined in apple by-products with ranges of their concentrations are listed in Table 14.
Many have been written about the application of apple pomace itself. However, the present work concerns the properties and application of bioactive compounds derived from apple pomace. The newest studies reported valuable activities and interesting applications of phytochemicals from apple pomace are listed in Table 15. Preclinical studies have found apple pomace extracts and isolated compounds improved lipid metabolism, antioxidant status, and gastrointestinal function and had a positive effect on metabolic disorders (e.g., hyperglycemia, insulin resistance, etc.) [193]. As was reported by Gołębiewska et al. [194], despite medicine and cosmetics, apple pomace phytochemicals found recent applications in building and construction industries as green corrosion inhibitors and wood protectors [194].
Phenolic content is related to the antioxidant properties of apple pomace, and procyanidins are considered the major contributors to the antioxidant capacity of apples. Despite high concentrations in apples, catechins and procyanidins are very often absent in the extract from apple pomace. The exposure of polyphenols to polyphenoloxidase during apple processing caused, in addition to native apple phytochemicals, their oxidation products also represent a significant part of the overall polyphenolic fraction. Moreover, the polyphenols can interact non-covalently with polysaccharides; thus, they become non-extractable. Fernandes et al. [178] reported that such complexes represented up to 40% of the available polyphenols from apple pomace, potentially relevant for agro-food waste valuation. Moreover, it has been revealed that the use of appropriate extraction procedures, such as microwave-superheated water extraction (MWE) of the hot water/acetone, as well as additional hydrolysis, made it possible to recover these valuable compounds from apple pomace. This knowledge will allow for designing more diversified solutions for agro-food waste valuation [178]. The strong antioxidant in apple pomace is quercetin, which has protective effects against breast and colon cancer, as well as heart and liver diseases [203].
Apple is a unique plant in the Rosaceae family due to the high content of phloridzin, a major phenolic compound in commercial varieties of apples [203]. Phloridzin has anti-diabetic potential and could be applied as a natural sweetening agent [200]. Phloridzin from apple waste was also tested as the substrate for the production of food dye through its enzymatic oxidation. The yellow product, so-called phloridzin oxidation products (POP), turned out to be a good alternative to tartrazine and other potentially toxic food yellow pigments [200,201].
Interesting phytochemicals of apple pomace are triterpenoids, particularly ursolic acid. It has attracted attention because of its therapeutic potential associated with several functional properties such as antibacterial, antiprotozoal, anti-inflammatory, and antitumor [196]. Woźniak et al. [190] optimized the method of its extraction using supercritical carbon dioxide. The data obtained allowed the prediction of the extraction curve for the process conducted on a larger scale.
As has been mentioned previously, apple pomace contains some amount of seeds. Walia et al. [192] proved that also apple seed oil could be a promising raw material for the production of natural antioxidants and anticancer agents. The authors tested the fatty acid composition and physicochemical and antioxidant properties of oil extracted from apple seeds separated from industrial pomace. The dominant fatty acids were oleic acid (46.50%) and linoleic acid (43.81%).
The major constituent in apple seed is also amygdalin, which may be metabolized to toxic hydrogen cyanide [203,204]. However, in the literature, there are also several reports of the positive pharmacological activity of amygdalin. Luo et al. [205] showed its anti-fibrotic properties in the case of liver fibrosis. Song and Xu [206] proved that amygdalin exhibits analgesic effects in mice, probably by inhibiting prostaglandins E2 and nitric oxide synthesis. Despite so many above reports, there is still a need for human and animal studies to confirm the protection against the disease’s effects of apple pomace.

2.8. Winery Waste

The major winery by-products are grape pomace and marc, including seeds, pulp, skins, stems, and leaves. Bioactive phytochemicals present in residues from wine-making are mainly represented by polyphenols belonging to various groups of compounds, such as phenolic acids (hydroxybenzoic acids and hydroxycinnamic acids), flavonoids (flavanols or flavan-3-ols, anthocyanins, proanthocyanidins, flavones, and flavonols), and stilbenes and anthocyanins. The relative concentrations of the different phenolic compounds are influenced by genotype (red or white grapes), a distinct fraction of residues, as well as agro-climatic conditions [207]. The presence of polyphenolic compounds in grape residues supports the potential of the investigation and valorization of this agro-industrial waste. The compounds identified in grapes by-products with their concentrations are listed in Table 16.
The residues derived from the grape processing contain phytochemicals of interest for the production of preservatives, dyes, enriched foods, medicines, and products aimed at personal care, pharmaceutical, and cosmetic industries. The presence of bioactive compounds with antioxidant, antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, anti-tumor, and protective activity of the cardiovascular system provides possibilities for many applications [221]. The potential beneficial role of phytochemicals of grape pomace in the prevention of disorders associated with oxidative stress and inflammation, such as endothelial dysfunction, hypertension, hyperglycemia, diabetes, and obesity, is due to the mechanisms concerned especially modulation of antioxidant/prooxidant activity, improvement of nitric oxide bioavailability, reduction of pro-inflammatory cytokines and modulation of antioxidant/inflammatory signal pathways [222].
It has been proven that the antioxidant properties of polyphenols in grape pomace help to prevent radical oxidation of the polyunsaturated fatty acids of low-density lipoproteins (LDL) and hence, are conducive to the prevention of cardiovascular diseases [223]. The compounds derived from grape pomace were also tested for their anti-inflammatory and anti-carcinogenic effect [224]. Álvarez et al. [225] studied the impact of procyanidins from grape pomace as inhibitors of human endothelial NADPH oxidase and stated the decrease in the production of reactive oxygen species. A rich source of procyanidins is grape seeds. They are widely consumed in some countries in the form of powder as a dietary supplement because of several related health benefits associated with procyanidins. They present antitumor-promoting activity, inhibit growth and induce apoptosis in human prostate cancer cells, as well as significantly reducing atherosclerosis in the aorta.
Seeds contain a very broad spectrum of procyanidins, with the dominant compounds being the dimers, trimers, and tetramers of catechin or epicatechin. Higher polymers are also present but at much lower abundance. Besides, every polymer can also be found as a gallic acid ester.
Very important is the anti-microbial activity of bioactive compounds included in grapes wastes. Mendoza et al. [226] demonstrated the antifungal properties of extracts from winery by-products against Botrytis cinerea, the causal agent of gray mold, considered the most important pathogen responsible for postharvest decay of fresh fruit and vegetables. Moreover, a few reports are available in the literature about the effective action of polyphenol-rich extracts from vinification by-products against various pathogenic bacteria and insects, e.g., Listeria monocytogenes, Leptinotarsa decemlineata, and Spodoptera littoralis [1]. The potential health benefits of plant phenolics cause much interest and consideration in a lot of agri-food applications for phenolics extracted from grape wastes [16]. There are a lot of studies on the application of phytochemicals from grape pomace in the meat industry [221].
To facilitate the industrial application of wine waste polyphenols, encapsulation was recently developed to improve the stability of valuable compounds in different conditions of light and temperature [227,228].
The examples of the newest potential applications and valuable properties of phytochemicals derived from winery waste are listed in Table 17.

2.9. Citrus Residues

Citrus fruits from the family Rutaceae include oranges, lemons, limes, grapefruits, mandarins, and tangerines. They are well known for their nutritional value, as they are good sources of dietary fiber, pectin, vitamin C, vitamin B group, carotenoids, flavonoids, and limonoids (Table 18). It is estimated that approximately 140 chemical components have been isolated and identified from citrus peels, and flavonoids are the main group of phytochemicals with biological activity [245]. Afsharnezhad et al. [165] evaluated the antioxidant potential of extract from various fruit peels and stated that the maximum DPPH radical scavenging activity, total phenols, and total anthocyanins were observed in orange peels.
Citrus peels are widely used by-products for the production of essential oils, which have great commercial importance due to their aroma, antifungal and antimicrobial properties. Citrus essential oil is employed in the food industry, perfumes, cosmetics, domestic household products, and pharmaceuticals [257]. The main ingredient is limonene, accounting for more than 94% of citrus essential oil [258]. It is used as an insect-killing agent in pesticides and a good biodegradable and non-toxic solvent [257]. Furthermore, limonene has shown regulatory effects on neurotransmitters and stimulant-induced changes in dopamine neurotransmission [258].
The citrus waste contained high amounts of organic and phenolic acids, as well as flavonoids. Among flavonoids, the main compounds are flavanones and flavones (such as naringenin, hesperetin, and apigenin glycosides) as well as polymethoxylated flavones (PMFs), not found in other fruit species [259,260]. Okino Delgado and Feuri [258] indicated that polymethoxylated flavones, at a dosage of 250 mg/kg, exhibit an anti-inflammatory effect comparable to ibuprofen. The most widely studied PMFs are tangeretin and nobiletin. They are exclusively derived from citrus peels. Lv et al. [261] stated that nobiletin and its derivatives showed anti-cancer activity. Generally, anticancer activity increases with the increasing number of methoxy groups because PMFs have then higher hydrophobicity for approaching and penetrating cancer cells [244]. Moreover, PMFs exhibit a broad spectrum of other biological activities such as anti-obesity, anti-atherosclerosis, antiviral and antioxidant properties [262,263].
Among flavanones, citrus peel is rich in eriocitrin, hesperidin, diosmin, neohesperidin, didymin, and naringin. Chiechio et al. [264] used red orange and lemon extract rich in flavanones for in vivo assays on male CD1 mice fed with a high-fat diet. The results showed that an 8-week treatment with the extract was able to induce a significant reduction in glucose, cholesterol, and triglyceride levels in the blood, with positive effects on the regulation of hyperglycemia and lipid metabolism. Barbosa et al. [265] tested flavanones obtained from citrus pomace by enzyme-assisted and conventional hydroalcoholic extraction as an agent against Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica. Tested extracts decreased the expression of genes associated with cell invasion. Moreover, the results suggest that extracts and flavanones inhibit Salmonella Typhimurium adhesion by interacting with fimbriae and flagella structures and downregulating fimbrial and virulence genes.
Citrus peels also contained some flavonols, such as rutin, isorhamnetin 3-O-rutinoside, quercetin-O-glucoside, and myricetin, as well as phenolic acids, but at a much lower concentration. It has been proven that Citrus reticulata waste extract, mainly including rutin, was the most effective against gram-negative bacteria and the three pathogenesis fungi: Bacillus subtilis, Candida albicans and Aspergillus flavus [266].
Citrus seeds are also a good source of valuable components, particularly oil rich in carotenoids (19.01 mg/kg), phenolic compounds (4.43 g/kg), tocopherols (135.65 mg/kg) and phytosterols (1304.2 mg/kg) [251]. This oil was characterized by high antioxidant activity ranging from 56.0% to 70.2%.
A summary of the main phytochemical constituents, together with their concentrations in citrus residues, as well as their newest applications and properties, is presented in Table 18 and Table 19, respectively.

2.10. Olive Waste

The cultivation of olive trees is a widespread practice in the Mediterranean region, accounting for about 98% of the world’s olive cultivation. A large number of phenolic compounds occur in both olive oil and olive waste that includes both leaves and the residues of oil production [275,276]. Their chemical characterization was reported by Dermeche et al. [277]. The main groups of phenolic compounds in olive mill wastes are phenolic acids, secoiridoids, and flavonoids, and the most abundant polyphenols are oleuropein, hydroxytyrosol, verbascoside, apigenin-7-glucoside, and luteolin-7-glucoside [278] (Table 20). Olive mill wastewater obtained during oil production is a complex mixture of vegetation waters and processing waste of the olive fruit; it is characterized by a dark color, strong odor, a mildly acidic pH, and a very high inorganic and organic load [279]. The organic fraction consists essentially of sugars, tannins, polyphenols, polyalcohols, proteins, organic acids, pectins and lipids [277]. About 30 million m3 of olive mill wastewater are produced annually in the world as a by-product of the olive oil extraction process; because of the high polyphenolic content (0.5–24 g/L), this by-product is difficult to biodegrade and a relevant environmental and economic issue [280].
Polyphenols also occur in the leaves [287]. These compounds confer bioactive properties on olive leaf extracts, such as antioxidant, antimicrobial, and antitumor activity; the capacity to reduce the risk of coronary heart disease was also reported [288]. Olive leaves can be collected as a by-product during oil processing (about 10% of the total weight of the olives) but can also be a residue of olive tree pruning. Some authors estimated that about 25 kg of by-products (twigs and leaves) could be obtained annually by pruning per tree [289]. To date, this by-product is often used as animal feed, even if this natural resource rich in antioxidant phenolic compounds should be valorized [290].
The qualitative and quantitative content of phenolic compounds is often heterogeneous in olive by-products; however, several studies reported the bioactive properties of these phenolic compounds, promising potential as antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and antimicrobial agents. The antioxidant activities of olive mill wastewater and olive pomace have been demonstrated by different antioxidant assays as DPPH radical-scavenging activity, superoxide anion scavenging, LDL oxidation, and the protection of catalase against hypochlorous acid [281,291,292]. An overview of the pharmacology of olive oil and its active ingredients has been reported by Visioli et al. [293]. Recently, a novel stable ophthalmic hydrogel containing a polyphenolic fraction obtained from olive mill wastewater was formulated [294]. Among olive polyphenols, hydroxytyrosol is one of the main phenolic compounds; it can occur in its free form or as secoiridoids (oleuropein and its aglycone). For its polarity, it is more abundant in olive mill wastewater and pomace rather than in olive oil. Anticancer, antioxidant, and anti-inflammatory properties have been reported for hydroxytyrosol [295,296]. In vitro antioxidant and skin regenerative properties have been reported by Benincasa et al. [297].
Moreover, the polyphenol fraction obtained from olive mill wastewater showed activities against bacteria, fungi, plants, animals, and human cells; antibacterial activities against several bacterial species (Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus subtilis, Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa) have been reported by Obied et al. [298]. Fungicidal activities have also been reported [299]. Moreover, the effects of phenolic compounds from olive waste on Aspergillus flavus growth and aflatoxin B1 production were investigated [300,301]. The olive mill wastewater polyphenols did not inhibit the Aspergillus flavus fungal growth rate but significantly reduced the aflatoxin B1 production (ranging from 88 to 100%) at 15% concentration [302].
Finally, cytoprotection of brain cells by olive mill wastewater has been studied by Schaffer et al. [303]. The cytoprotective effects were correlated to the content of hydroxytyrosol.
These studies showed the numerous beneficial and bioactive activities of polyphenols fraction obtained by olive by-products; for their use, it is often carried out an appropriate fractionation and/or purification to control their concentration and to avoid some antagonist effects.
Various valuable properties and the newest studies on the application of biologically active compounds derived form olive waste are presented in Table 21.

3. Conclusions

The ever-increasing amount of processed food raw materials entails an increasing amount of biowaste. Their management has become a growing problem. The consulted literature shows that discussed waste still contains valuable ingredients, medicinally important phytochemicals, and good antioxidants, so it is very important to valorize them. Currently, the recovery of different valuable phytochemicals from agro-industrial waste has become an imperative research area among the scientific community because agro-industrial residues of plant materials are a cheap and natural source of bioactive compounds, which can be used in the prevention and treatment of various diseases. Despite many studies on the valuable properties and potential applications, still, not many solutions are implemented in the industry. This is probably caused by legislation that can affect the valorization of such waste biomass. There are not many regulatory and legal provisions for their use. In the European Union, the use of agricultural residues as food ingredients is regulated by the European Community Regulation (EC) No 178/2002. However, in order to use them as natural additives, proper authorization as a novel food is necessary (Regulation (EC) No 2015/2283) [304]. There is no doubt that the industrial application of the extracts needs to be regulated.
According to the circular bioeconomy and biorefinery concept, food waste should be recycled inside the whole food value chain from field to fork in order to formulate functional foods and nutraceuticals. Nonetheless, it is important to implement environmentally friendly industrial extraction procedures. Moreover, despite so many above reports, there is still a need for human and animal studies, as well as studies in the field in the case of plants, to confirm the protective effect of such phytochemicals against diseases.
Taking into account the European Union’s emphasis on the development of a circular economy and reducing the carbon footprint, it is expected that the effective application of these wastes will be carried out and that regulations will be developed in accordance with needs.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.O., I.K. and W.O.; resources, W.O., I.K.; Visualisation, M.O., I.K. and T.B.; writing—original draft preparation, M.O., I.K. and T.B.; writing—review and editing, M.O. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Santana-Méridas, O.; González-Coloma, A.; Sánchez-Vioque, R. Agricultural residues as a source of bioactive natural products. Phytochem. Rev. 2012, 11, 447–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. FAOSTAT (Statistics Division of Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations). Available online: https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QCL (accessed on 28 June 2022).
  3. Marić, M.; Grassino, A.N.; Zhu, Z.; Barba, F.J.; Brnčić, M.; Brnčić, S.R. An overview of the traditional and innovative approaches for pectin extraction from plant food wastes and by-products: Ultrasound-, microwaves-, and enzyme-assisted extraction. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 76, 28–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kasapidou, E.; Sossidou, E.; Mitlianga, P. Fruit and vegetable co-products as functional feed ingredients in farm animal nutrition for improved product quality. Agriculture 2018, 5, 1020–1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Casas-Godoy, L.; Campos-Valdez, A.R.; Alcázar-Valle, M.; Barrera-Martínez, I. Comparison of Extraction Techniques for the Recovery of Sugars, Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Compounds from Agro-Industrial Wastes. Sustainability 2022, 14, 5956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ngwasiri, P.N.; Ambindei, W.A.; Adanmengwi, V.A.; Ngwi, P.; Mah, A.T.; Ngangmou, N.T.; Fonmboh, D.J.; Ngwabie, N.M.; Ngassoum, M.B.; Aba, E.R. Review Paper on Agro-food Waste and Food by-Product Valorization into Value Added Products for Application in the Food Industry: Opportunities and Challenges for Cameroon Bioeconomy. Asian J. Biotechnol. Bioresour. Technol. 2022, 8, 32–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Rodrigues, F.; Nunes, M.A.; Alves, R.C.; Oliveira, M.B.P. Applications of recovered bioactive compounds in cosmetics and other products. In Handbook of Coffee Processing By-Products; Academic Press: London, UK, 2017; pp. 195–220. [Google Scholar]
  8. Pestana-Bauer, V.R.; Zambiazi, R.C.; Mendonça, C.R.; Beneito-Cambra, M.; Ramis-Ramos, G. γ-Oryzanol and tocopherol contents in residues of rice bran oil refining. Food Chem. 2012, 134, 1479–1483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Jiang, D.; Zhuang, D.; Fu, J.; Huang, Y.; Wen, K. Bioenergy potential from crop residues in China: Availability and distribution. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2012, 16, 1377–1382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Searle, S.; Malins, C. Availability of Cellulosic Residues and Wastes in the EU 2013; The International Council on Clean Transportation: Washington, DC, USA, 2013; p. 11. [Google Scholar]
  11. Ben Taher, I.; Fickers, P.; Chniti, S.; Hassouna, M. Optimization of enzymatic hydrolysis and fermentation conditions for improved bioethanol production from potato peel residues. Biotechnol. Prog. 2017, 33, 397–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Yanli, Y.; Peidong, Z.; Wenlong, Z.; Yongsheng, T.; Yonghong, Z.; Lisheng, W. Quantitative appraisal and potential analysis for primary biomass resources for energy utilization in China. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2010, 14, 3050–3058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Oleszek, M.; Tys, J.; Wiącek, D.; Król, A.; Kuna, J. The possibility of meeting greenhouse energy and CO2 demands through utilisation of cucumber and tomato residues. BioEnergy Res. 2016, 9, 624–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Gabhane, J.; William, S.P.; Gadhe, A.; Rath, R.; Vaidya, A.N.; Wate, S. Pretreatment of banana agricultural waste for bio-ethanol production: Individual and interactive effects of acid and alkali pretreatments with autoclaving, microwave heating and ultrasonication. Waste Manag. 2014, 34, 498–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Cruz, M.G.; Bastos, R.; Pinto, M.; Ferreira, J.M.; Santos, J.F.; Wessel, D.F.; Coelho, E.; Coimbra, M.A. Waste mitigation: From an effluent of apple juice concentrate industry to a valuable ingredient for food and feed applications. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 193, 652–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Muhlack, R.A.; Potumarthi, R.; Jeffery, D.W. Sustainable wineries through waste valorisation: A review of grape marc utilisation for value-added products. Waste Manag. 2018, 72, 99–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Rezzadori, K.; Benedetti, S.; Amante, E.R. Proposals for the residues recovery: Orange waste as raw material for new products. Food Bioprod. Process. 2012, 90, 606–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kusbiantoro, A.; Embong, R.; Aziz, A.A. Strength and microstructural properties of mortar containing soluble silica from sugarcane bagasse ash. Key Eng. Mater. 2018, 765, 269–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zheng, R.; Su, S.; Zhou, H.; Yan, H.; Ye, J.; Zhao, Z.; You, L.; Fu, X. Antioxidant/antihyperglycemic activity of phenolics from sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) bagasse and identification by UHPLC-HR-TOFMS. Ind. Crops Prod. 2017, 101, 104–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ishak NA, I.M.; Kamarudin, S.K.; Timmiati, S.N.; Sauid, S.M.; Karim, N.A.; Basri, S. Green synthesis of platinum nanoparticles as a robust electrocatalyst for methanol oxidation reaction: Metabolite profiling and antioxidant evaluation. J. Clean. Prod. 2023, 382, 135111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Rocha, G.J.; Nascimento, V.M.; Goncalves, A.R.; Silva, V.F.; Martin, C. Influence of mixed sugarcane bagasse samples evaluated by elemental and physical–chemical composition. Ind. Crops Prod. 2015, 64, 52–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Mohan, P.R.; Ramesh, B.; Redyy, O.V. Production and optimization of ethanol from pretreated sugarcane bagasse using Sacchromyces bayanus in simultaneous saccharification and fermentation. Microbiol. J. 2012, 2, 52–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Xi, Y.L.; Dai, W.Y.; Xu, R.; Zhang, J.H.; Chen, K.Q.; Jiang, M.; Wei, P.; Ouyang, P.K. Ultrasonic pretreatment and acid hydrolysis of sugarcane bagasse for succinic acid production using Actinobacillus succinogenes. Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng. 2013, 36, 1779–1785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhao, Z.; Yan, H.; Zheng, R.; Khan, M.S.; Fu, X.; Tao, Z.; Zhang, Z. Anthocyanins characterization and antioxidant activities of sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) rind extracts. Ind. Crops Prod. 2018, 113, 38–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Nieder-Heitmann, M.; Haigh, K.F.; Görgens, J.F. Process design and economic analysis of a biorefinery co-producing itaconic acid and electricity from sugarcane bagasse and trash lignocelluloses. Bioresour. Technol. 2018, 262, 159–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Zhao, Y.; Chen, M.; Zhao, Z.; Yu, S. The antibiotic activity and mechanisms of sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) bagasse extract against food-borne pathogens. Food Chem. 2015, 185, 112–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Al Arni, S.; Drake, A.F.; Del Borghi, M.; Converti, A. Study of aromatic compounds derived from sugarcane bagasse. Part I: Effect of pH. Chem. Eng. Technol. 2010, 33, 895–901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. González-Bautista, E.; Santana-Morales, J.C.; Ríos-Fránquez, F.J.; Poggi-Varaldo, H.M.; Ramos-Valdivia, A.C.; Cristiani-Urbina, E.; Ponce-Noyola, T. Phenolic compounds inhibit cellulase and xylanase activities of Cellulomonas flavigena PR-22 during saccharification of sugarcane bagasse. Fuel 2017, 196, 32–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zheng, R.; Su, S.; Li, J.; Zhao, Z.; Wei, J.; Fu, X.; Liu, R.H. Recovery of phenolics from the ethanolic extract of sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) baggase and evaluation of the antioxidant and antiproliferative activities. Ind. Crops Prod. 2017, 107, 360–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Van der Pol, E.; Bakker, R.; Van Zeeland, A.; Garcia, D.S.; Punt, A.; Eggink, G. Analysis of by-product formation and sugar monomerization in sugarcane bagasse pretreated at pilot plant scale: Differences between autohydrolysis, alkaline and acid pretreatment. Bioresour. Technol. 2015, 181, 114–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lv, G.; Wu, S.; Lou, R.; Yang, Q. Analytical pyrolysis characteristics of enzymatic/mild acidolysis lignin from sugarcane bagasse. Cellulose Chemistry and Technology 2010, 44, 335–342. [Google Scholar]
  32. Michelin, M.; Ximenes, E.; Polizeli, M.; Ladisch, M.R. Effect of phenolic compounds from pretreated sugarcane bagasse on cellulolytic and hemicellulolytic activities. Bioresour. Technol. 2016, 199, 275–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Juttuporn, W.; Thiengkaew, P.; Rodklongtan, A.; Rodprapakorn, M.; Chitprasert, P. Ultrasound-assisted extraction of antioxidant and antibacterial phenolic compounds from steam-exploded sugarcane bagasse. Sugar Technol. 2018, 20, 599–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Treedet, W.; Suntivarakorn, R. Design and operation of a low cost bio-oil fast pyrolysis from sugarcane bagasse on circulating fluidized bed reactor in a pilot plant. Fuel Process. Technol. 2018, 179, 17–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Krishnan, C.; Sousa, L.C.; Jin, M.; Chang, L.; Dale, B.E.; Balan, V. Alkalibased AFEX pretreatment for the conversion of sugarcane bagasse and cane leaf residues to ethanol. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2010, 107, 441–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Zhu, Z.S.; Zhu, M.J.; Xu, W.X.; Liang, L. Production of bioethanol from sugarcane bagasse using NH4OH-H2O2 pretreatment and simultaneous saccharification and co-fermentation. Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng. 2012, 17, 316–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Guilherme, A.A.; Dantas, P.V.; Santos, E.S.; Fernandes, F.A.; Macedo, G.R. Evaluation of composition, characterization and enzymatic hydrolysis of pretreated sugarcane bagasse. Braz. J. Chem. Eng. 2015, 32, 23–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Chandel, A.K.; da Silva, S.S.; Carvalho, W.; Singh, O.V. Sugarcane bagasse and leaves: Foreseeable biomass of biofuel and bio-products. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2012, 87, 11–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Guo, J.; Zhang, J.; Wang, W.; Liu, T.; Xin, Z. Isolation and identification of bound compounds from corn bran and their antioxidant and angiotensin I-converting enzyme inhibitory activities. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2015, 241, 37–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Bujang, J.S.; Zakaria, M.H.; Ramaiya, S.D. Chemical constituents and phytochemical properties of floral maize pollen. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0247327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Dong, J.; Cai, L.; Zhu, X.; Huang, X.; Yin, T.; Fang, H.; Ding, Z. Antioxidant activities and phenolic compounds of cornhusk, corncob and stigma maydis. J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 2014, 25, 1956–1964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Li, Q.; Somavat, P.; Singh, V.; Chatham, L.; Gonzalez de Mejia, E. A comparative study of anthocyanin distribution in purple and blue corn coproducts from three conventional fractionation processes. Food Chem. 2017, 231, 332–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Haslina, H.; Eva, M. Extract corn silk with variation of solvents on yield, total phenolics, total flavonoids and antioxidant activity. Indones. Food Nutr. Prog. 2017, 14, 21–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Tian, S.; Sun, Y.; Chen, Z. Extraction of flavonoids from corn silk and biological activities in vitro. J. Food Qual. 2021, 2021, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Lao, F.; Giusti, M.M. Extraction of purple corn (Zea mays L.) cob pigments and phenolic compounds using food-friendly solvents. J. Cereal Sci. 2018, 80, 87–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Chen, L.; Yang, M.; Mou, H.; Kong, Q. Ultrasound-assisted extraction and characterization of anthocyanins from purple corn bran. J. Food Preserv. 2017, 42, e13377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Barba, F.J.; Rajha, H.N.; Debs, E.; Abi-Khattar, A.M.; Khabbaz, S.; Dar, B.N.; Simirgiotis, M.J.; Castagnini, J.M.; Maroun, R.G.; Louka, N. Optimization of Polyphenols’ Recovery from Purple Corn Cobs Assisted by Infrared Technology and Use of Extracted Anthocyanins as a Natural Colorant in Pickled Turnip. Molecules 2022, 27, 5222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Fernandez-Aulis, F.; Hernandez-Vazquez, L.; Aguilar-Osorio, G.; Arrieta-Baez, D.; Navarro-Ocana, A. Extraction and identification of anthocyanins in corn cob and corn husk from Cacahuacintle maize. J. Food Sci. 2019, 84, 954–962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Wille, J.J.; Berhow, M.A. Bioactives derived from ripe corn tassels: A possible new natural skin whitener, 4-hydroxy-1-oxindole-3-acetic acid. Curr. Bioact. Compd. 2011, 7, 126–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Khamphasan, P.; Lomthaisong, K.; Harakotr, B.; Ketthaisong, D.; Scott, M.P.; Lertrat, K.; Suriharn, B. Genotypic variation in anthocyanins, phenolic compounds, and antioxidant activity in cob and husk of purple field corn. Agronomy 2018, 8, 271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Brobbey, A.A.; Somuah-Asante, S.; Asare-Nkansah, S.; Boateng, F.O.; Ayensu, I. Preliminary phytochemical screening and scientific validation of the antidiabetic effect of the dried husk of Zea mays L. (Corn, Poaceae). Int. J. Phytopharm. 2017, 7, 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  52. Thapphasaraphong, S.; Rimdusit, T.; Priprem, A.; Puthongking, P. Crops of waxy purple corn: A valuable source of antioxidative phytochemicals. Int. J. Adv. Agric. Environ. Eng. 2016, 3, 73–77. [Google Scholar]
  53. Simla, S.; Boontang, S.; Harakotr, B. Anthocyanin content, total phenolic content, and antiradical capacity in different ear components of purple waxy corn at two maturation stages. Aust. J. Crop Sci. 2016, 10, 675–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Deineka, V.I.; Sidorov, A.N.; Deineka, L.A. Determination of purple corn husk anthocyanins. J. Anal. Chem. 2016, 71, 1145–1150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Suryanto, E.; Momuat, L.I.; Rotinsulu, H.; Mewengkang, D.S. Anti-photooxidant and photoprotective activities of ethanol extract and solvent fractions from corn cob (Zea mays). Int. J. ChemTech Res. 2018, 11, 25–37. [Google Scholar]
  56. Duangpapeng, P.; Lertrat, K.; Lomthaisong, K.; Scott, M.P.; Suriharn, B. Variability in anthocyanins, phenolic compounds and antioxidant capacity in the tassels of collected waxy corn germplasm. Agronomy 2019, 9, 158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Duangpapeng, P.; Ketthaisong, D.; Lomthaisong, K.; Lertrat, K.; Scott, M.P.; Suriharn, B. Corn tassel: A new source of phytochemicals and antioxidant potential for value-added product development in the agro-industry. Agronomy 2018, 8, 242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Žilić, S.; Vančetović, J.; Janković, M.; Maksimović, V. Chemical composition, bioactive compounds, antioxidant capacity and stability of floral maize (Zea mays L.) pollen. J. Funct. Foods 2014, 10, 65–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Sarepoua, E.; Tangwongchai, R.; Suriharn, B.; Lertrat, K. Influence of variety and harvest maturity on phytochemical content in corn silk. Food Chem. 2015, 169, 424–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Singh, J.; Rasane, P.; Nanda, V.; Kaur, S. Bioactive compounds of corn silk and their role in management of glycaemic response. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2022, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Ren, S.C.; Qiao, Q.Q.; Ding, X.L. Antioxidative activity of five flavones glycosides from corn silk (Stigma maydis). Czech J. Food Sci. 2013, 31, 148–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Galanakis, C.M. Functionality of food components and emerging technologies. Foods 2021, 10, 128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Roh, K.B.; Kim, H.; Shin, S.; Kim, Y.S.; Lee, J.A.; Kim, M.O.; Jung, E.; Lee, J.; Park, D. Anti-inflammatory effects of Zea mays L. husk extracts. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2016, 16, 298–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Boeira, C.P.; Flores, D.C.B.; Lucas, B.N.; Santos, D.; Flores, E.M.M.; Reis, F.L.; Morandini, M.L.B.; Morel, A.F.; Rosa, C.S.D. Extraction of antioxidant and antimicrobial phytochemicals from corn stigma: A promising alternative to valorization of agricultural residues. Ciência Rural. 2022, 52, e20210535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Wang, L.; Yu, Y.; Fang, M.; Zhan, C.; Pan, H.; Wu, Y.; Gong, Z. Antioxidant and antigenotoxic activity of bioactive extracts from corn tassel. J. Huazhong Univ. Sci. Technol.-Med. Sci. 2014, 34, 131–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Habeebullah, S.F.; Grejsen, H.D.; Jacobsen, C. Potato peel extract as a natural antioxidant in chilled storage of minced horse mackerel (Trachurus trachurus): Effect on lipid and protein oxidation. Food Chem. 2012, 131, 843–851. [Google Scholar]
  67. Mohdaly, A.A.; Hassanien, M.F.; Mahmoud, A.; Sarhan, M.A.; Smetanska, I. Phenolics extracted from potato, sugar beet, and sesame processing by-products. Int. J. Food Prop. 2013, 16, 1148–1168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Lappalainen, K.; Kärkkäinen, J.; Joensuu, P.; Lajunen, M. Modification of potato peel waste with base hydrolysis and subsequent cationization. Carbohydr. Polym. 2015, 132, 97–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Chang, K. Polyphenol antioxidants from potato peels: Extraction optimization and application to stabilizing lipid oxidation in foods. In Proceedings of the National Conference on Undergraduate Research (NCUR) 2019, New York, NY, USA, 11–13 April 2019. [Google Scholar]
  70. Wijngaard, H.H.; Ballay, M.; Brunton, N. The optimisation of extraction of antioxidants from potato peel by pressurised liquids. Food Chem. 2012, 133, 1123–1130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Frontuto, D.; Carullod, D.; Harrison, S.M.; Brunton, N.P.; Ferrari, G.; Lyng, J.G.; Patar, G. Optimization of pulsed electric fields-assisted extraction of polyphenols from potato peels using response surface methodology. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2019, 12, 1708–1720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Javed, A.; Ahmad, A.; Tahir, A.; Shabbir, U.; Nouman, M.; Hameed, A. Potato peel waste-its nutraceutical, industrial and biotechnological applacations. AIMS Agric. Food 2019, 4, 807–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Samarin, A.M.; Poorazarang, H.; Hematyar, N.; Elhamirad, A. Phenolics in potato peels: Extraction and utilization as natural antioxidants. World Appl. Sci. J. 2012, 18, 191–195. [Google Scholar]
  74. Chamorro, S.; Cueva-Mestanza, R.; de Pascual-Teresa, S. Effect of spray drying on the polyphenolic compounds present in purple sweet potato roots: Identification of new cinnamoylquinic acids. Food Chem. 2021, 345, 128679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Paniagua-García, A.I.; Hijosa-Valsero, M.; Garita-Cambronero, J.; Coca, M.; Díez-Antolínez, R. Development and validation of a HPLC-DAD method for simultaneous determination of main potential ABE fermentation inhibitors identified in agro-food waste hydrolysates. Microchem. J. 2019, 150, 104147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Sarwari, G.; Sultana, B.; Sarfraz, R.A.; Zia, M.A. Cytotoxicity, antioxidant and antimutagenic potential evaluation of peels of edible roots and tubers. Int. Food Res. J. 2019, 26, 1773–1779. [Google Scholar]
  77. Wu, Z.G.; Xu, H.Y.; Ma, Q.; Cao, Y.; Ma, J.N.; Ma, C.M. Isolation, identification and quantification of unsaturated fatty acids, amides, phenolic compounds and glycoalkaloids from potato peel. Food Chem. 2012, 135, 2425–2429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Silva-Beltran, N.P.; Chaidez-Quiroz, C.; Lopez-Cuevas, O.; Ruiz-Cruz, S.; Lopez-Mata, M.A.; Del-Toro-Sanchez, C.L.; Marquez-Rios, E.; Ornelas-Paz, J. Phenolic compounds of potato peel extracts: Their antioxidant activity and protection against human enteric viruses. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2017, 27, 234–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Chen, C.C.; Lin, C.; Chen, M.H.; Chiang, P.Y. Stability and quality of anthocyanin in purple sweet potato extracts. Foods 2019, 8, 393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Ji, X.; Rivers, L.; Zielinski, Z.; Xu, M.; MacDougall, E.; Jancy, S.; Zhang, S.; Wang, Y.; Chapman, R.G.; Keddy, P.; et al. Quantitative analysis of phenolic components and glycoalkaloids from 20 potato clones and in vitro evaluation of antioxidant, cholesterol uptake, and neuroprotective activities. Food Chem. 2012, 133, 1177–1187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Hossain, M.B.; Aguilo-Aguayo, I.; Lyng, J.G.; Brunton, N.P.; Rai, D.K. Effect of pulsed electric field and pulsed light pre-treatment on the extraction of steroidal alkaloids from potato peels. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2015, 29, 9–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Rodríguez-Martínez, B.; Gullón, B.; Yáñez, R. Identification and recovery of valuable bioactive compounds from potato peels: A comprehensive review. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 1630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Albishi, T.; John, J.A.; Al-Khalifa, A.S.; Shahidi, F. Phenolic content and antioxidant activities of selected potato varieties and their processing by-products. J. Funct. Foods 2013, 5, 590–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Kumari, B.; Tiwari, B.K.; Hossain, M.B.; Rai, D.K.; Brunton, N.P. Ultrasound-assisted extraction of polyphenols from potato peels: Profiling and kinetic modelling. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 52, 1432–1439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. Friedman, M.; Kozukue, N.; Kim, H.J.; Choi, S.H.; Mizuno, M. Glycoalkaloid, phenolic, and flavonoid content and antioxidative activities of conventional nonorganic and organic potato peel powders from commercial gold, red and Russet potatoes. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2017, 62, 69–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Alves-Filho, E.G.; Sousa, V.M.; Ribeiro, P.R.; Rodrigues, S.; de Brito, E.S.; Tiwari, B.K.; Fernandes, F.A. Single-stage ultrasound-assisted process to extract and convert α-solanine and α-chaconine from potato peels into β-solanine and β-chaconine. Biomass Convers. Biorefinery 2018, 8, 689–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Hossain, M.B.; Tiwari, B.K.; Gangopadhyay, N.; O’Donnell, C.P.; Brunton, N.P.; Rai, D.K. Ultrasonic extraction of steroidal alkaloids from potato peel waste. Ultrason. Sonochemistry 2014, 21, 1470–1476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Rytel, E.; Czopek, A.T.; Aniolowska, M.; Hamouz, K. The influence of dehydrated potatoes processing on the glycoalkaloids content in coloured-fleshed potato. Food Chem. 2013, 141, 2495–2500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Singh, L.; Kaur, S.; Aggarwal, P. Techno and bio functional characterization of industrial potato waste for formulation of phytonutrients rich snack product. Food Biosci. 2022, 49, 101824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Hillebrand, S.; Husing, B.; Schliephake, U.; Trautz, D.; Herrmann, M.E.; Winterhalter, P. Effect of thermal processing on the content of phenols in pigmented potatoes (Solanum tuberosum L.). Ernaehrungs-Umsch. 2011, 58, 349–353. [Google Scholar]
  91. Singh, A.; Sabally, K.; Kubow, S.; Donnelly, D.J.; Gariepy, Y.; Orsat, V.; Raghavan, G.S. Microwave-assisted extraction of phenolic antioxidants from potato peels. Molecules 2011, 16, 2218–2232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Maldonado, A.F.; Mudge, E.; Gänzle, M.G.; Scheber, A. Extraction and fractionation of phenolic acids and glycoalkaloids from potato peels using acidified water/ethanol-based solvents. Food Res. Int. 2014, 65, 27–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Akyol, H.; Riciputi, Y.; Capanoglu, E.; Caboni, M.F.; Verardo, V. Phenolic compounds in the potato and its by-products: An overview. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Venturi, F.; Bartolini, S.; Sanmartin, C.; Orlando, M.; Taglieri, I.; Macaluso, M.; Lucchesini, M.; Trivellini, A.; Zinnai, A.; Mensuali, A. Potato peels as a source of novel green extracts suitable as antioxidant additives for fresh-cut fruits. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 2431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  95. Gebrechristos, H.Y.; Chen, W. Utilization of potato peel as eco-friendly products: A review. Food Sci. Nutr. 2018, 6, 1352–1356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  96. Amado, I.R.; Franco, D.; Sanchez, M.; Zapata, C.; Vazques, J.A. Optimisation of antioxidant extraction from Solanum tuberosum potato peel waste by surface response methodology. Food Chem. 2014, 165, 290–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  97. Hsieh, Y.L.; Yeh, Y.H.; Lee, Y.T.; Huang, C.Y. Dietary potato peel extract reduces the toxicity of cholesterol oxidation products in rats. J. Funct. Foods 2016, 27, 461–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Yang, G.; Cheon, S.Y.; Chung, K.S.; Lee, S.J.; Hong, C.H.; Lee, K.T.; Jang, D.S.; Jeong, J.C.; Kwon, O.K.; Nam, J.H.; et al. Solanum tuberosum L. young epidermis extract inhibits mite antigen-induced atopic dermatitis in NC/Nga mice by regulating the Th1/Th2 balance and expression of filaggrin. J. Med. Food 2015, 18, 1013–1021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Khawla, B.J.; Sameh, M.; Imen, G.; Donyes, F.; Dhouha, G.; Raoudha, E.G.; Oumèma, N.E. Potato peel as feedstock for bioethanol production: A comparison of acidic and enzymatic hydrolysis. Ind. Crops Prod. 2014, 52, 144–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Wu, D. Recycle technology for potato peel waste processing: A review. Procedia Environ. Sci. 2016, 31, 103–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  101. Liang, S.; Han, Y.; Wei, L.; McDonald, A.G. Production and characterization of bio-oil and bio-char from pyrolysis of potato peel wastes. Biomass Convers. Biorefin. 2015, 5, 237–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Abdelraof, M.; Hasanin, M.S.; El-Saied, H. Ecofriendly green conversion of potato peel wastes to high productivity bacterial cellulose. Carbohydr. Polym. 2019, 211, 75–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Elkahoui, S.; Levin, C.; Bartley, G.; Yokoyama, W.; Friedman, M. Dietary supplementation of potato peel powders prepared from conventional and organic russet and nonorganic gold and red potatoes reduces weight gain in mice on a high-fat diet. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 66, 6064–6072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Chimonyo, M. A review of the utility of potato by-products as a feed resource for smallholder pig production. Anim. Feed. Sci. Technol. 2017, 227, 107–117. [Google Scholar]
  105. Apel, C.; Lyng, J.G.; Papoutsis, K.; Harrison, S.M.; Brunton, N.P. Screening the effect of different extraction methods (ultrasound-assisted extraction and solid–liquid extraction) on the recovery of glycoalkaloids from potato peels: Optimization of the extraction conditions using chemometric tools. Food Bioprod. Process. 2019, 119, 277–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Khan, M.T.; Shah, A.S.; Safdar, N.; Rani, S.; Bilal, H.; Hashim, M.M.; Basir, A.; Rahman ZShah, S.A. Polyphenoles extraction from the potato peel and their utilization in biscuit. Pure Appl. Biol. 2017, 6, 1269–1275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Ding, X.; Zhu, F.; Yang, Y.; Li, M. Purification, antitumor activity in vitro of steroidal glycoalkaloids from black nightshade (Solanum nigrum L.). Food Chem. 2013, 141, 1181–1186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Kenny, O.M.; McCarthy, C.M.; Brunton, N.P.; Hossain, M.B.; Rai, D.K.; Collins, S.G.; Jones, P.W.; Maguire, A.R.; O’Brien, N.M. Anti-inflammatory properties of potato glycoalkaloids in stimulated Jurkat and Raw 264.7 mouse macrophages. Life Sci. 2013, 92, 775–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Anjum, S.; Rana, S.; Dasila, K.; Agnihotri, V.; Pandey, A.; Pande, V. Comparative nutritional and antimicrobial analysis of Himalayan black and yellow soybean and their okara. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2022, 102, 5358–5367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Park, J.; Choi, I.; Kim, Y. Cookies formulated from fresh okara using starch, soy flour and hydroxypropyl methylcellulose have high quality and nutritional value. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 63, 660–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Ostermann-Porcel, M.V.; Quiroga-Panelo, N.; Rinaldoni, A.N.; Campderrós, M.E. Incorporation of okara into gluten-free cookies with high quality and nutritional value. J. Food Qual. 2017, 2017, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  112. Guimarães, R.M.; Silva, T.E.; Lemes, A.C.; Boldrin MC, F.; da Silva MA, P.; Silva, F.G.; Egea, M.B. Okara: A soybean by-product as an alternative to enrich vegetable paste. LWT 2018, 92, 593–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Šibul, F.; Orčić, D.; Vasić, M.; Anačkov, G.; Nađpal, J.; Savić, A.; Mimica-Dukić, N. Phenolic profile, antioxidant and anti-inflammatory potential of herb and root extracts of seven selected legumes. Ind. Crops Prod. 2016, 83, 641–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Liu, W.; Zhang, H.X.; Wu, Z.L.; Wang, Y.J.; Wang, L.J. Recovery of isoflavone aglycones from soy whey wastewater using foam fractionation and acidic hydrolysis. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2013, 61, 7366–7372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Kumar, V.; Chauhan, S.S. Daidzein Induces Intrinsic Pathway of Apoptosis along with ER α/β Ratio Alteration and ROS Production. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. APJCP 2021, 22, 603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Pabich, M.; Marciniak, B.; Kontek, R. Phenolic Compound Composition and Biological Activities of Fractionated Soybean Pod Extract. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 10233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Singh, P.; Krishnaswamy, K. Sustainable zero-waste processing system for soybeans and soy by-product valorization. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2022, 128, 331–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Bragagnolo, F.S.; Funari, C.S.; Ibáñez, E.; Cifuentes, A. Metabolomics as a tool to study underused soy parts: In search of bioactive compounds. Foods 2021, 10, 1308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Hsu, W.H.; Chen, S.Y.; Lin, J.H.; Yen, G.C. Application of saponins extract from food byproducts for the removal of pesticide residues in fruits and vegetables. Food Control 2022, 136, 108877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Freitas, S.C.; Alves da Silva, G.; Perrone, D.; Vericimo, M.A.; dos S. Baião, D.; Pereira, P.R.; Paschoalin, V.M.F.; Del Aguila, E.M. Recovery of antimicrobials and bioaccessible isoflavones and phenolics from soybean (Glycine max) meal by aqueous extraction. Molecules 2018, 24, 74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  121. Silva, F.D.O.; Perrone, D. Characterization and Stability of Bioactive Compounds from Soybean Meal. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 63, 992–1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Wang, Q.; Ge, X.; Tian, X.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, P. Soy isoflavone: The multipurpose phytochemical (Review). Biomed. Rep. 2013, 1, 697–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  123. Zhou, X.; Shen, P.; Wang, W.; Zhou, J.; Raj, R.; Du, Z.; Xu, S.; Wang, W.; Yu, B.; Zhang, J. Derivatization of Soyasapogenol A through Microbial Transformation for Potential Anti-inflammatory Food Supplements. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2021, 69, 6791–6798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Laranjeira, T.; Costa, A.; Faria-Silva, C.; Ribeiro, D.; de Oliveira, J.M.P.F.; Simões, S.; Ascenso, A. Sustainable valorization of tomato by-products to obtain bioactive compounds: Their potential in inflammation and cancer management. Molecules 2022, 27, 1701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Alsuhaibani, A.M. Chemical composition and ameliorative effect of tomato on isoproterenol-induced myocardial infarction in rats. Asian J. Clin. Nutr. 2018, 10, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  126. Padalino, L.; Conte, A.; Lecce, L.; Likyova, D.; Sicari, V.; Pellicano, T.M.; Poiana, M.; Del Nobile, M.A. Functional pasta with tomato by-product as a source of antioxidant compounds and dietary fibre. Czech J. Food Sci. 2017, 35, 48–56. [Google Scholar]
  127. Bakic, M.T.; Pedisic, S.; Zoric, Z.; Dragovic-Uzelac, V.; Grassino, A.N. Effect of microwave-assisted extraction on polyphenols recovery from tomato peel waste. Acta Chim. Slov. 2019, 66, 367–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  128. Gutiérrez-del-Río, I.; López-Ibáñez, S.; Magadán-Corpas, P.; Fernández-Calleja, L.; Pérez-Valero, Á.; Tuñón-Granda, M.; Miguélez, E.M.; Villar, C.J.; Lombó, F. Plant Nutraceuticals as Natural Antioxidant Agents in Food Preservation. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 1264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Valta, K.; Damala, P.; Panaretou, V.; Orli, E.; Moustakas, K.; Loizidou, M. Review and assessment of waste and wastewater treatment from fruits and vegetables processing industries in Greece. Waste Biomass Valorization 2017, 8, 1629–1648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Fritsch, C.; Staebler, A.; Happel, A.; Cubero Márquez, M.A.; Aguiló-Aguayo, I.; Abadias, M.; Gallur, M.; Cigognini, I.M.; Montanari, A.; López, M.J.; et al. Processing, valorization and application of bio-waste derived compounds from potato, tomato, olive and cereals: A Review. Sustainability 2017, 9, 1492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  131. Perea-Dominguez, X.P.; Hernandez-Gastelum, L.Z.; Olivas-Olguin, H.R.; Espinosa-Alonso, L.G.; Valdez-Morales, M.; Medina-Godoy, S. Phenolic composition of tomato varieties and an industrial tomato by-product: Free, conjugated and bound phenolics and antioxidant activity. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 55, 3453–3461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Coelho, M.; Pereira, R.; Rodrigues, A.S.; Teixeira, J.A.; Pintado, M.E. Extraction of tomato by-products’ bioactive compounds using ohmic technology. Food Bioprod. Process. 2019, 117, 329–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  133. Nour, V.; Panaite, T.D.; Ropota, M.; Turcu, R.; Trandafir, I.; Corbu, A.R. Nutritional and bioactive compounds in dried tomato processing waste. CyTA J. Food 2018, 16, 222–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Elbadrawy, E.; Sello, A. Evaluation of nutritional value and antioxidant activity of tomato peel extracts. Arab. J. Chem. 2016, 9, S1010–S1018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Ćetković, G.; Savatović, S.; Čanadović-Brunet, J.; Djilas, S.; Vulić, J.; Mandić, A.; Četojević-Simin, D. Valorisation of phenolic composition, antioxidant and cell growth activities of tomato waste. Food Chem. 2012, 133, 938–945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Aires, A.; Carvalho, R.; Saavedra, M.J. Reuse potential of vegetable wastes (broccoli, green bean and tomato) for the recovery of antioxidant phenolic acids and flavonoids. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 52, 98–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Navarro-González, I.; García-Valverde, V.; García-Alonso, M.; Periago, M.J. Chemical profile, functional and antioxidant properties of tomato peel fiber. Food Res. Int. 2011, 44, 1528–1535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Kalogeropoulos, N.; Chiou, A.; Pyriochou, V.; Peristeraki, A.; Karathanos, V.T. Bioactive phytochemicals in industrial tomatoes and their processing by-products. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2012, 49, 213–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Di Donato, P.; Taurisano, V.; Tommonaro, G.; Pasquale, V.; Jimenez, J.M.; de Pascual, T.S.; Poli, A.; Nicolaus, B. Biological properties of polyphenols extracts from agro industry’s wastes. Waste Biomass Valorization 2018, 9, 1567–1578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. García-Valverde, V.; Navarro-González, I.; García Alonso, J.; Periago, M. Antioxidant bioactive compounds in selected industrial processing and fresh consumption tomato cultivars. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2013, 6, 391–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Szabo, K.; Diaconeasa, Z.; Catoi, A.F.; Vodnar, D.C. Screening of ten tomato varieties processing waste for bioactive components and their related antioxidant and antimicrobial activities. Antioxidants 2019, 8, 292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  142. Valdez-Morales, M.; Espinosa-Alonso, L.G.; Espinoza-Torres, L.C.; Delgado-Vargas, F.; Medina-Godoy, S. Phenolic content and antioxidant and antimutagenic activities in tomato peel, seeds and by-products. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2014, 62, 5281–5289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Kumar, M.; Tomar, M.; Bhuyan, D.J.; Punia, S.; Grasso, S.; Sa, A.G.A.; Carciofi, B.A.M.; Arrutia, F.; Changan, S.; Singh, S.; et al. Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) seed: A review on bioactives and biomedical activities. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2021, 142, 112018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Concha-Meyer, A.; Palomo, I.; Plaza, A.; Gadioli Tarone, A.; Junior MR, M.; Sáyago-Ayerdi, S.G.; Fuentes, E. Platelet anti-aggregant activity and bioactive compounds of ultrasound-assisted extracts from whole and seedless tomato pomace. Foods 2020, 9, 1564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Fărcaş, A.C.; Socaci, S.A.; Michiu, D.; Biriş, S.; Tofană, M. Tomato waste as a source of biologically active compounds. Bull. UASVM Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 76, 85–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  146. Markovic, K.; Krbavcic, I.P.; Krpan, M.; Bicanic, D.; Vahcic, N. The lycopene content in pulp and peel of five fresh tomato cultivars. Acta Aliment. 2010, 39, 90–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Stoica, R.M.; Tomulescu, C.; Cășărică, A.; Soare, M.G. Tomato by-products as a source of natural antioxidants for pharmaceutical and food industries—A mini-review. Sci. Bull. Ser. F Biotechnol. 2018, 22, 200–204. [Google Scholar]
  148. Górecka, D.; Wawrzyniak, A.; Jędrusek-Golińska, A.; Dziedzic, K.; Hamułka, J.; Kowalczewski, P.Ł.; Walkowiak, J. Lycopene in tomatoes and tomato products. Open Chem. 2020, 18, 752–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Campestrini, L.H.; Melo, P.S.; Peres, L.E.; Calhelha, R.C.; Ferreira, I.C.; Alencar, S.M. A new variety of purple tomato as a rich source of bioactive carotenoids and its potential health benefits. Heliyon 2019, 5, e02831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  150. Grassino, A.N.; Djakovic, S.; Bosiljkov, T.; Halambek, J.; Zorić, Z.; Dragović-Uzelac, V.; Petrović, M.; Brnčić, S.R. Valorisation of tomato peel waste as a sustainable source for pectin, polyphenols and fatty acids recovery using sequential extraction. Waste Biomass Valorization 2019, 11, 4593–4611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Grassino, A.N.; Pedistić, S.; Dragović-Uzelac, V.; Karlović, S.; Ježek, D.; Bosiljkov, T. Insight into high-hydrostatic pressure extraction of polyphenols from tomato peel waste. Plant Foods Hum. Nutr. 2020, 75, 427–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Lucera, A.; Costa, C.; Marinelli, V.; Saccotelli, M.A.; Del Nobile, M.A.; Conte, A. Fruit and vegetable by-products to fortify spreadable cheese. Antioxidants 2018, 7, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  153. Lim, W.; Li, J. Co-expression of onion chalcone isomerase in Del/Ros1-expressing tomato enhances anthocyanin and flavonol production. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2017, 128, 113–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Zuorro, A.; Lavecchia, R.; Medici, F.; Piga, L. Enzyme-assisted production of tomato seed oil enriched with lycopene from tomato pomace. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2013, 6, 3499–3509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Eller, F.J.; Moser, J.K.; Kenar, J.A.; Taylor, S.L. Extraction and analysis of tomato seed oil. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 2010, 87, 755–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Pellicanò, T.M.; Sicari, V.; Loizzo, M.R.; Leporini, M.; Falco, T.; Poiana, M. Optimizing the supercritical fluid extraction process of bioactive compounds from processed tomato skin by-products. Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 40, 692–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  157. Marti, R.; Rosello, S.; Cebolla-Cornejo, J. Tomato as a source of carotenoids and polyphenols targeted to cancer prevention. Cancers 2016, 8, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  158. Savatović, S.; Cetkovic, G.; Canadanovic-Brunet, J.; Djilas, S. Tomato waste: A potential source of hydrophilic antioxidants. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 2012, 63, 129–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  159. Nour, V.; Ionica, M.E.; Trandafir, I. Bread enriched in lycopene and other bioactive compounds by addition of dry tomato waste. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 52, 8260–8267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  160. Abid, Y.; Azabou, S.; Jridi, M.; Khemakhem, I.; Bouaziz, M.; Attia, H. Storage stability of traditional Tunisian butter enriched with antioxidant extract from tomato processing by-products. Food Chem. 2017, 15, 476–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Trombino, S.; Cassano, R.; Procopio, D.; Di Gioia, M.L.; Barone, E. Valorization of tomato waste as a source of carotenoids. Molecules 2021, 26, 5062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Ho, K.K.; Ferruzzi, M.G.; Liceaga, A.M.; San Martin-Gonzales, M.F. Microwave-assisted extraction of lycopene in tomato peels: Effect of extraction conditions on all-trans and cis-isomer yields. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 62, 160–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Horuz, T.I.; Belibagli, K.B. Encapsulation of tomato peel extract into nanofibers and its application in model food. Food Process. Preserv. 2019, 43, e14090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Hernández-Carranza, P.; Ávila-Sosa, R.; Guerrero-Beltrán, J.A.; Navarro-Cruz, A.R.; Corona-Jiménez, E.; Ochoa-Velasco, C.E. Optimization of antioxidant compounds extraction from fruit by-products: Apple pomace, orange and banana peel. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2016, 40, 103–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Afsharnezhad, M.; Shahangian, S.S.; Panahi, E.; Sariri, R. Evaluation of the antioxidant activity of extracts from some fruit peels. Casp. J. Environ. Sci. 2017, 15, 213–222. [Google Scholar]
  166. Kabir, M.R.; Hasan, M.M.; Islam, M.R.; Haque, A.R.; Hasan, S.K. Formulation of yogurt with banana peel extracts to enhance storability and bioactive properties. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2021, 45, e15191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Chaudhry, F.; Ahmad, M.L.; Hayat, Z.; Ranjha MM, A.N.; Chaudhry, K.; Elboughdiri, N.; Asmari, M.; Uddin, J. Extraction and Evaluation of the Antimicrobial Activity of Polyphenols from Banana Peels Employing Different Extraction Techniques. Separations 2022, 9, 165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Rebello LP, G.; Ramos, A.M.; Pertuzatti, P.B.; Barcia, M.T.; Castillo-Muñoz, N.; Hermosín-Gutiérrez, I. Flour of banana (Musa AAA) peel as a source of antioxidant phenolic compounds. Food Res. Int. 2014, 55, 397–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Behiry, S.I.; Okla, M.K.; Alamri, S.A.; El-Hefny, M.; Salem, M.Z.; Alaraidh, I.A.; Ali, H.M.; Al-Ghtani, S.M.; Monroy, J.C.; Salem, A.Z. Antifungal and antibacterial activities of Musa paradisiaca L. peel extract: HPLC analysis of phenolic and flavonoid contents. Processes 2019, 7, 215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  170. Kandasamy, S.; Ramu, S.; Aradhya, S.M. In vitro functional properties of crude extracts and isolated compounds from banana pseudostem and rhizome. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2016, 96, 1347–1355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  171. Avram, I.; Gatea, F.; Vamanu, E. Functional Compounds from Banana Peel Used to Decrease Oxidative Stress Effects. Processes 2022, 10, 248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Nofianti, T.; Ahmad, M.; Irda, F. Comparison of antihyperglycemic activity of different parts of klutuk banana (Musa balbisiana colla). Int. J. Appl. Pharm. 2021, 13, 57–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Vu, H.T.; Scarlett, C.J.; Vuong, Q.V. Encapsulation of phenolic-rich extract from banana (Musa cavendish) peel. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 57, 2089–2098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Buendía-Otero, M.J.; Jiménez-Corzo, D.J.; Caamaño De Ávila, Z.I.; Restrepo, J.B. Chromatographic analysis of phytochemicals in the peel of Musa paradisiaca to synthesize silver nanoparticles. Rev. Fac. De Ing. Univ. De Antioq. 2022, 103, 130–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Padam, B.S.; Tin, H.S.; Chye, F.Y.; Abdullah, M.I. Banana by-products: An under-utilized renewable food biomass with great potential. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2014, 51, 3527–3545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  176. Vani, R.; Bhandari, A.; Jain, Y.A. Inhibition Effects Of Banana And Orange Peel Extract On The Corrosion Of Bright Steel In Acidic Media. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering; IOP Publishing: Bristol, UK, 2021; Volume 1065, p. 012029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. CSO (Central Statistical Office in Poland). Production of Agricultural and Horticultural Crops in 2021. 2022. Available online: https://stat.gov.pl/en/topics/agriculture-forestry/agricultural-and-horticultural-crops/production-of-agricultural-and-horticultural-crops-in-2021,2,6.html (accessed on 29 June 2022).
  178. Fernandes, P.A.; Ferreira, S.S.; Bastos, R.; Ferreira, I.; Cruz, M.T.; Pinto, A.; Coelho, E.; Passos, C.P.; Coimbra, M.A.; Cardoso, S.M.; et al. Apple pomace extract as a sustainable food ingredient. Antioxidants 2019, 8, 189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  179. Uyttebroek, M.; Vandezande, P.; Van Dael, M.; Vloemans, S.; Noten, B.; Bongers, B.; Porto-Carrero, M.; Unamunzaga, M.M.; Bulut, M.; Lemmens, B. Concentration of phenolic compounds from apple pomace extracts by nanofiltration at lab and pilot scale with a techno-economic assessment. J. Food Process Eng. 2018, 41, e12629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Barreira, J.C.; Arraibi, A.A.; Ferreira, I.C. Bioactive and functional compounds in apple pomace from juice and cider manufacturing: Potential use in dermal formulations. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 90, 76–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Waldbauer, K.; McKinnon, R.; Kopp, B. Apple pomace as potential source of natural active compounds. Planta Med. 2017, 83, 994–1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  182. Li, W.; Yang, R.; Ying, D.; Yu, J.; Sanguansri, L.; Augustin, M.A. Analysis of polyphenols in apple pomace: A comparative study of different extraction and hydrolysis procedures. Ind. Crops Prod. 2020, 147, 112250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Gorjanović, S.; Micić, D.; Pastor, F.; Tosti, T.; Kalušević, A.; Ristić, S.; Zlatanović, S. Evaluation of apple pomace flour obtained industrially by dehydration as a source of biomolecules with antioxidant, antidiabetic and antiobesity effects. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Perussello, C.A.; Zhang, Z.; Marzocchella, A.; Tiwari, B.K. Valorization of apple pomace by extraction of valuable compounds. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2017, 16, 776–796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  185. Oleszek, M.; Pecio, Ł.; Kozachok, S.; Lachowska-Filipiuk, Ż.; Oszust, K.; Frąc, M. Phytochemicals of apple pomace as prospect bio-fungicide agents against mycotoxigenic fungal species—In vitro experiments. Toxins 2019, 11, 361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  186. Ramirez-Ambrosi, M.; Abad-Garcia, B.; Viloria-Bernal, M.; Garmon-Lobato, S.; Berrueta, L.A.; Gallo, B. A new ultrahigh performance liquid chromatography with diode array detection coupled to electrospray ionization and quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry analytical strategy for fast analysis and improved characterization of phenolic compounds in apple products. J. Chromatogr. A 2013, 1316, 78–91. [Google Scholar]
  187. Mohammed, E.T.; Mustafa, Y.F. Coumarins from Red Delicious apple seeds: Extraction, phytochemical analysis, and evaluation as antimicrobial agents. Syst. Rev. Pharm. 2020, 11, 64–70. [Google Scholar]
  188. Khalil, R.R.; Mustafa, Y.F. Phytochemical, antioxidant and antitumor studies of coumarins extracted from Granny Smith apple seeds by different methods. Syst. Rev. Pharm. 2020, 11, 57–63. [Google Scholar]
  189. Pingret, D.; Fabiano-Tixier, A.S.; Le Bourvellec, C.; Renard, C.M.; Chemat, F. Lab and pilot-scale ultrasound-assisted water extraction of polyphenols from apple pomace. J. Food Eng. 2012, 111, 73–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Woźniak, Ł.; Szakiel, A.; Pączkowski, C.; Marszałek, K.; Skąpska, S.; Kowalska, H.; Jędrzejczak, R. Extraction of triterpenic acids and phytosterols from apple pomace with supercritical carbon dioxide: Impact of process parameters, modelling of kinetics, and scaling-up study. Molecules 2018, 23, 2790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Delgado-Pelayo, R.; Gallardo-Guerrero, L.; Hornero-Méndez, D. Chlorophyll and carotenoid pigments in the peel and flesh of commercial apple fruit varieties. Food Res. Int. 2014, 65, 272–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  192. Walia, M.; Rawat, K.; Bhushan, S.; Padwad, Y.S.; Singh, B. Fatty acid composition, physicochemical properties, antioxidant and cytotoxic activity of apple seed oil obtained from apple pomace. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2014, 94, 929–934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Skinner, R.C.; Gigliotti, J.C.; Ku, K.M.; Tou, J.C. A comprehensive analysis of the composition, health benefits, and safety of apple pomace. Nutr. Rev. 2018, 76, 893–909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Gołębiewska, E.; Kalinowska, M.; Yildiz, G. Sustainable Use of Apple Pomace (AP) in Different Industrial Sectors. Materials 2022, 15, 1788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Rana, S.; Kumar, S.; Rana, A.; Padwad, Y.; Bhushan, S. Biological activity of phenolics enriched extracts from industrial apple pomace. Ind. Crops Prod. 2021, 160, 113158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Cargnin, S.T.; Gnoatto, S.B. Ursolic acid from apple pomace and traditional plants: A valuable triterpenoid with functional properties. Food Chem. 2017, 220, 477–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Silva, G.N.; Maria, N.R.; Schuck, D.C.; Cruz, L.N.; de Moraes, M.S.; Nakabashi, M.; Graebin, C.; Gosmann, G.; Garcia, C.R.S.; Gnoatto, S.C. Two series of new semisynthetic triterpene derivatives: Differences in anti-malarial activity, cytotoxicity and mechanism of action. Malar. J. 2013, 12, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  198. Arraibi, A.A.; Liberal, Â.; Dias, M.I.; Alves, M.J.; Ferreira, I.C.; Barros, L.; Barreira, J.C. Chemical and bioactive characterization of Spanish and Belgian apple pomace for its potential use as a novel dermocosmetic formulation. Foods 2021, 10, 1949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  199. Zhang, T.; Wei, X.; Miao, Z.; Hassan, H.; Song, Y.; Fan, M. Screening for antioxidant and antibacterial activities of phenolics from Golden Delicious apple pomace. Chem. Cent. J. 2016, 10, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  200. Haghighi, M.; Rezaei, K. Designing an all-apple-pomace-based functional dessert formulation. Br. Food J. 2013, 115, 409–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Liu, B.; Liu, J.; Zhang, C.; Liu, J.; Jiao, Z. Enzymatic preparation and antioxidant activity of the phloridzin oxidation product. J. Food Biochem. 2018, 42, e12475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Vera, R.; Figueredo, F.; Díaz-Gómez, A.; Molinari, A. Evaluation of Fuji apple peel extract as a corrosion inhibitor for carbon steel in a saline medium. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2018, 13, 4139–4159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Kruczek, M.; Gumul, D.; Kačániová, M.; Ivanišhová, E.; Mareček, J.; Gambuś, H. Industrial Apple Pomace By-Products As A Potential Source Of Pro-Health Compounds In Functional Food. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. Food Sci. 2017, 7, 22–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  204. Rabetafika, H.N.; Bchir, B.; Blecker, C.; Richel, A. Fractionation of apple by-products as source of new ingredients: Current situation and perspectives. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2014, 40, 99–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Luo, H.; Li, L.; Tang, J.; Zhang, F.; Zhao, F.; Sun, D.; Zheng, F.; Wang, X. Amygdalin inhibits HSC-T6 cell proliferation and fibrosis through the regulation of TGF-β/CTGF. Mol. Cell. Toxicol. 2016, 12, 265–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  206. Song, Z.; Xu, X. Advanced research on anti-tumor effects of amygdalin. J. Cancer Res. Ther. 2014, 10, 3–7. [Google Scholar]
  207. Teixeira, A.; Baenas, N.; Dominguez-Perles, R.; Barros, A.; Rosa, E.; Moreno, D.A.; Garcia-Viguera, C. Natural bioactive compounds from winery by-products as health promoters: A review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15, 15638–15678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  208. Pintać, D.; Majkić, T.; Torović, L.; Orčić, D.; Beara, I.; Simin, N.; Mimica–Dukić, N.; Lesjak, M. Solvent selection for efficient extraction of bioactive compounds from grape pomace. Ind. Crops Prod. 2018, 111, 379–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Eyiz, V.; Tontul, I.; Turker, S. Optimization of green extraction of phytochemicals from red grape pomace by homogenizer assisted extraction. J. Food Meas. Charact. 2020, 14, 39–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Farías-Campomanes, A.M.; Rostagno, M.A.; Meireles MA, A. Production of polyphenol extracts from grape bagasse using supercritical fluids: Yield, extract composition and economic evaluation. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2013, 77, 70–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Wang, X.; Tong, H.; Chen, F.; Gangemi, J.D. Chemical characterization and antioxidant evaluation of muscadine grape pomace extract. Food Chem. 2010, 123, 1156–1162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  212. Daniel, T.; Ben-Shachar, M.; Drori, E.; Hamad, S.; Permyakova, A.; Ben-Cnaan, E.; Tam, J.; Kerem, Z.; Rosenzweig, T. Grape pomace reduces the severity of non-alcoholic hepatic steatosis and the development of steatohepatitis by improving insulin sensitivity and reducing ectopic fat deposition in mice. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2021, 98, 108867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  213. Wittenauer, J.; Mäckle, S.; Sußmann, D.; Schweiggert-Weisz, U.; Carle, R. Inhibitory effects of polyphenols from grape pomace extract on collagenase and elastase activity. Fitoterapia 2015, 101, 179–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  214. Jara-Palacios, M.J.; Hernanz, D.; Cifuentes-Gomez, T.; Escudero-Gilete, M.L.; Heredia, F.J.; Spencer, J.P. Assessment of white grape pomace from winemaking as source of bioactive compounds, and its antiproliferative activity. Food Chem. 2015, 183, 78–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  215. Gonçalves, G.A.; Soares, A.A.; Correa, R.C.; Barros, L.; Haminiuk, C.W.; Peralta, R.M.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R.; Bracht, A. Merlot grape pomace hydroalcoholic extract improves the oxidative and inflammatory states of rats with adjuvant-induced arthritis. J. Funct. Foods 2017, 33, 408–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  216. Jara-Palacios, M.J.; Rodríguez-Pulido, F.J.; Hernanz, D.; Escudero-Gilete, M.L.; Heredia, F.J. Determination of phenolic substances of seeds, skins and stems from white grape marc by near-infrared hyperspectral imaging. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res. 2016, 22, 11–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  217. Balea, Ş.S.; Pârvu, A.E.; Pârvu, M.; Vlase, L.; Dehelean, C.A.; Pop, T.I. Antioxidant, Anti-Inflammatory and Antiproliferative Effects of the Vitis vinifera L. var. Fetească Neagră and Pinot Noir Pomace Extracts. Front. Pharmacol. 2020, 11, 990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  218. Drosou, C.; Kyriakopoulou, K.; Bimpilas, A.; Tsimogiannis, D.; Krokida, M. A comparative study on different extraction techniques to recover red grape pomace polyphenols from vinification byproducts. Ind. Crops Prod. 2015, 75, 141–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  219. Negro, C.; Aprile, A.; Luvisi, A.; De Bellis, L.; Miceli, A. Antioxidant activity and polyphenols characterization of four monovarietal grape pomaces from Salento (Apulia, Italy). Antioxidants 2021, 10, 1406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  220. Iora, S.R.; Maciel, G.M.; Zielinski, A.A.; da Silva, M.V.; Pontes PV, D.A.; Haminiuk, C.W.; Granato, D. Evaluation of the bioactive compounds and the antioxidant capacity of grape pomace. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 50, 62–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  221. Silva DS, M.E.; Grisi CV, B.; da Silva, S.P.; Madruga, M.S.; da Silva, F.A.P. The technological potential of agro-industrial residue from grape pulping (Vitis spp.) for application in meat products: A review. Food Biosci. 2022, 49, 101877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  222. Gerardi, G.; Cavia-Saiz, M.; Muniz, P. From winery by-product to healthy product: Bioavailability, redox signaling and oxidative stress modulation by wine pomace product. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2021, 62, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  223. Anastasiadi, M.; Pratsinis, H.; Kletsas, D.; Skaltsounis, A.L.; Haroutounian, S.A. Grape stem extracts: Polyphenolic content and assessment of their in vitro antioxidant properties. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2012, 48, 316–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  224. Aliakbarian, B.; Fathi, A.; Perego, P.; Dehghani, F. Extraction of antioxidants from winery wastes using subcritical water. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2012, 65, 18–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  225. Álvarez, E.; Rodiño-Janeiro, B.K.; Jerez, M.; Ucieda-Somoza, R.; Núñez, M.J.; González-Juanatey, J.R. Procyanidins from grape pomace are suitable inhibitors of human endothelial NADPH oxidase. J. Cell. Biochem. 2012, 113, 1386–1396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  226. Mendoza, L.; Yañez, K.; Vivanco, M.; Melo, R.; Cotoras, M. Characterization of extracts from winery by-products with antifungal activity against Botrytis cinerea. Ind. Crops Prod. 2013, 43, 360–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  227. Aizpurua-Olaizola, O.; Navarro, P.; Vallejo, A.; Olivares, M.; Etxebarria, N.; Usobiaga, A. Microencapsulation and storage stability of polyphenols from Vitis vinifera grape wastes. Food Chem. 2016, 190, 614–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  228. Alibade, A.; Kaltsa, O.; Bozinou, E.; Athanasiadis, V.; Palaiogiannis, D.; Lalas, S.; Makris, D.P. Stability of microemulsions containing red grape pomace extract obtained with a glycerol/sodium benzoate deep eutectic solvent. OCL 2022, 29, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  229. Soares SC, S.; de Lima, G.C.; Laurentiz, A.C.; Féboli, A.; Dos Anjos, L.A.; de Paula Carlis, M.S.; da Silva Filardi, R.; de Laurentiz RD, S. In vitro anthelmintic activity of grape pomace extract against gastrointestinal nematodes of naturally infected sheep. Int. J. Vet. Sci. Med. 2018, 6, 243–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  230. Silvan, J.M.; Gutiérrez-Docio, A.; Moreno-Fernandez, S.; Alarcón-Cavero, T.; Prodanov, M.; Martinez-Rodriguez, A.J. Procyanidin-rich extract from grape seeds as a putative tool against Helicobacter pylori. Foods 2020, 9, 1370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  231. Quiñones, M.; Guerrero, L.; Suarez, M.; Pons, Z.; Aleixandre, A.; Arola, L.; Muguerza, B. Low-molecular procyanidin rich grape seed extract exerts antihypertensive effect in males spontaneously hypertensive rats. Food Res. Int. 2013, 51, 587–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  232. Tournour, H.H.; Segundo, M.A.; Magalhães, L.M.; Barreiros, L.; Queiroz, J.; Cunha, L.M. Valorization of grape pomace: Extraction of bioactive phenolics with antioxidant properties. Ind. Crops Prod. 2015, 74, 397–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  233. Della Vedova, L.; Ferrario, G.; Gado, F.; Altomare, A.; Carini, M.; Morazzoni, P.; Aldini, G.; Baron, G. Liquid Chromatography–High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry (LC-HRMS) Profiling of Commercial Enocianina and Evaluation of Their Antioxidant and Anti-Inflammatory Activity. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 1187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  234. Hübner, A.A.; Sarruf, F.D.; Oliveira, C.A.; Neto, A.V.; Fischer, D.C.; Kato, E.T.; Lourenço, F.R.; Baby, A.R.; Bacchi, E.M. Safety and photoprotective efficacy of a sunscreen system based on grape pomace (Vitis vinifera L.) phenolics from winemaking. Pharmaceutics 2020, 12, 1148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  235. Gavrilaș, S.; Calinovici, I.; Chiș, S.; Ursachi, C.Ș.; Raț, M.; Munteanu, F.D. White Grape Pomace Valorization for Remediating Purposes. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 1997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  236. Olt, V.; Báez, J.; Jorcin, S.; López, T.; Fernández, A.; Medrano, A. Development of a potential functional yogurt using bioactive compounds obtained from the by-product of the production of Tannat red wine. Biol. Life Sci. Forum 2021, 6, 93. [Google Scholar]
  237. Asmat-Campos, D.; Bravo Huivin, E.; Avalos-Vera, V. Valorization of agro-industrial waste in a circular economy environment: Grape pomace as a source of bioactive compounds for its application in nanotechnology. In Proceedings of the 19th LACCEI International Multi-Conference for Engineering, Education, and Technology: “Prospective and Trends in Technology and Skills for Sustainable Social Development” “Leveraging Emerging Technologies to Construct the Future”, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 21–23 July 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  238. Andrés, A.I.; Petrón, M.J.; Adámez, J.D.; López, M.; Timón, M.L. Food by-products as potential antioxidant and antimicrobial additives in chill stored raw lamb patties. Meat Sci. 2017, 129, 62–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  239. Biniari, K.; Xenaki, M.; Daskalakis, I.; Rusjan, D.; Bouza, D.; Stavrakaki, M. Polyphenolic compounds and antioxidants of skin and berry grapes of Greek Vitis vinifera cultivars in relation to climate conditions. Food Chem. 2020, 307, 125518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  240. Bordiga, M.; Travaglia, F.; Locatelli, M. Valorisation of grape pomace: An approach that is increasingly reaching its maturity–a review. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 54, 933–942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  241. Chen, Y.; Wen, J.; Deng, Z.; Pan, X.; Xie, X.; Peng, C. Effective utilization of food wastes: Bioactivity of grape seed extraction and its application in food industry. J. Funct. Foods 2020, 73, 104113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  242. Crupi, P.; Dipalmo, T.; Clodoveo, M.L.; Toci, A.T.; Coletta, A. Seedless table grape residues as a source of polyphenols: Comparison and optimization of non-conventional extraction techniques. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2018, 244, 1091–1100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  243. Mainente, F.; Menin, A.; Alberton, A.; Zoccatelli, G.; Rizzi, C. Evaluation of the sensory and physical properties of meat and fish derivatives containing grape pomace powders. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 54, 952–958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  244. Gárcia-Lomillo, J.; González-SanJosé, M. Applications of wine pomace in the food industry: Approaches and functions. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2017, 16, 3–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  245. Liu, N.; Li, X.; Zhao, P.; Zhang, X.; Qiao, O.; Huang, L.; Gao, W. A review of chemical constituents and health-promoting effects of citrus peels. Food Chem. 2021, 365, 130585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  246. Yaqoob, M.; Aggarwal, P.; Rasool, N.; Baba, W.N.; Ahluwalia, P.; Abdelrahman, R. Enhanced functional properties and shelf stability of cookies by fortification of kinnow derived phytochemicals and residues. J. Food Meas. Charact. 2021, 15, 2369–2376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  247. Karetha, K.; Gadhvi, K.; Vyas, S. Peelings of citrus fruits as a precious resource of phytochemical and vital bioactive medicines during Covid: 19 periods. Int. J. Bot. Stud. 2020, 5, 342–344. [Google Scholar]
  248. Benayad, O.; Bouhrim, M.; Tiji, S.; Kharchoufa, L.; Addi, M.; Drouet, S.; Hano, C.; Lorenzo, J.M.; Bendaha, H.; Bnouham, M.; et al. Phytochemical profile, α-glucosidase, and α-amylase inhibition potential and toxicity evaluation of extracts from Citrus aurantium (L) peel, a valuable by-product from Northeastern Morocco. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 1555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  249. Barbosa, P.D.P.M.; Ruviaro, A.R.; Macedo, G.A. Comparison of different Brazilian citrus by-products as source of natural antioxidants. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2018, 27, 1301–1309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  250. Liew, S.S.; Ho, W.Y.; Yeap, S.K.; Sharifudin SA, B. Phytochemical composition and in vitro antioxidant activities of Citrus sinensis peel extracts. PeerJ 2018, 6, e5331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  251. Jorge, N.; Silva AC, D.; Aranha, C.P. Antioxidant activity of oils extracted from orange (Citrus sinensis) seeds. An. Da Acad. Bras. De Ciên. 2016, 88, 951–958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  252. Olfa, T.; Gargouri, M.; Akrouti, A.; Brits, M.; Gargouri, M.; Ben Ameur, R.; Pieters, L.; Foubert, K.; Magné, C.; Soussi, A.; et al. A comparative study of phytochemical investigation and antioxidative activities of six citrus peel species. Flavour Fragr. J. 2021, 36, 564–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  253. Lee, G.J.; Lee, S.Y.; Kang, N.G.; Jin, M.H. A multi-faceted comparison of phytochemicals in seven citrus peels and improvement of chemical composition and antioxidant activity by steaming. LWT 2022, 160, 113297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  254. Šafranko, S.; Ćorković, I.; Jerković, I.; Jakovljević, M.; Aladić, K.; Šubarić, D.; Jokić, S. Green extraction techniques for obtaining bioactive compounds from mandarin peel (Citrus unshiu var. Kuno): Phytochemical analysis and process optimization. Foods 2021, 10, 1043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  255. Huang, Q.; Liu, J.; Hu, C.; Wang, N.; Zhang, L.; Mo, X.; Li, G.; Liao, H.; Huang, H.; Ji, S.; et al. Integrative analyses of transcriptome and carotenoids profiling revealed molecular insight into variations in fruits color of Citrus Reticulata Blanco induced by transplantation. Genomics 2022, 114, 110291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  256. Saini, A.; Panesar, P.S.; Bera, M.B. Valuation of Citrus reticulata (kinnow) peel for the extraction of lutein using ultrasonication technique. Biomass Convers. Biorefinery 2021, 11, 2157–2165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  257. Lopresto, C.G.; Petrillo, F.; Casazza, A.A.; Aliakbarian, B.; Perego, P.; Calabrò, A. A non-conventional method to extract D-limonene from waste lemon peels and comparison with traditional Soxhlet extraction. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2014, 137, 13–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  258. Okino Delgado, C.H.; Fleuri, L.F. Orange and mango by-products: Agro-industrial waste as source of bioactive compounds and botanical versus commercial description—A review. Food Rev. Int. 2016, 32, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  259. Yang, X.; Kang, S.M.; Jeon, B.T.; Kim, Y.D.; Ha, J.H.; Kim, Y.T.; Jeon, Y.J. Isolation and identification of an antioxidant flavonoid compound from citrus-processing by-product. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2011, 91, 1925–1927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  260. Fava, F.; Zanaroli, G.; Vannini, L.; Guerzoni, E.; Bordoni, A.; Viaggi, D.; Robertson, J.; Waldron, K.; Bald, C.; Esturo, A.; et al. New advances in the integrated management of food processing by-products in Europe: Sustainable exploitation of fruit and cereal processing by-products with the production of new food products (NAMASTE EU). New Biotechnol. 2013, 30, 647–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  261. Lv, K.; Zhang, L.; Zhao, H.; Ho, C.T.; Li, S. Recent study on the anticancer activity of nobiletin and its metabolites. J. Food Bioact. 2021, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  262. Gao, Z.; Wang, Z.Y.; Guo, Y.; Chu, C.; Zheng, G.D.; Liu, E.H.; Li, F. Enrichment of polymethoxyflavones from Citrus reticulata ‘Chachi’peels and their hypolipidemic effect. J. Chromatogr. B 2019, 1124, 226–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  263. Zeng, S.-L.; Li, S.-Z.; Xiao, P.-T.; Cai, Y.-Y.; Chu, C.; Chen, B.-Z.; Li, P.; Li, J.; Liu, E.-H. Citrus polymethoxyflavones attenuate metabolic syndrome by regulating gut microbiome and amino acid metabolism. Sci. Adv. 2020, 6, eaax6208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  264. Chiechio, S.; Zammataro, M.; Barresi, M.; Amenta, M.; Ballistreri, G.; Fabroni, S.; Rapisarda, P. A standardized extract prepared from red orange and lemon wastes blocks high-fat diet-induced hyperglycemia and hyperlipidemia in mice. Molecules 2021, 26, 4291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  265. Barbosa PD, P.M.; Ruviaro, A.R.; Martins, I.M.; Macedo, J.A.; LaPointe, G.; Macedo, G.A. Enzyme-assisted extraction of flavanones from citrus pomace: Obtention of natural compounds with anti-virulence and anti-adhesive effect against Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Typhimurium. Food Control 2021, 120, 107525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  266. Lamine, M.; Gargouri, M.; Rahali, F.Z.; Mliki, A. Recovering and characterizing phenolic compounds from citrus by-product: A way towards agriculture of subsistence and sustainable bioeconomy. Waste Biomass Valorization 2021, 12, 4721–4731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  267. Gunwantrao, B.B.; Bhausaheb, S.K.; Ramrao, B.S.; Subhash, K.S. Antimicrobial activity and phytochemical analysis of orange (Citrus aurantium L.) and pineapple (Ananas comosus (L.) Merr.) peel extract. Ann. Phytomed. 2016, 5, 156–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  268. Khan, N.H.; Qian, C.J.; Perveen, N. Phytochemical screening, antimicrobial and antioxidant activity determination of citrus maxima peel. Pharm. Pharmacol. Int. J. 2018, 6, 279–285. [Google Scholar]
  269. Khan, J.; Sakib, S.A.; Mahmud, S.; Khan, Z.; Islam, M.N.; Sakib, M.A.; Emran, T.B.; Simal-Gandara, J. Identification of potential phytochemicals from Citrus limon against main protease of SARS-CoV-2: Molecular docking, molecular dynamic simulations and quantum computations. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 2021, 40, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  270. Achimón, F.; Leal, L.E.; Pizzolitto, R.P.; Brito, V.D.; Alarcón, R.; Omarini, A.B.; Zygadlo, J.A. Insecticidal and antifungal effects of lemon, orange, and grapefruit peel essential oils from Argentina. Agriscientia 2022, 39, 71–82. [Google Scholar]
  271. Liu, Y.; Benohoud, M.; Yamdeu JH, G.; Gong, Y.Y.; Orfila, C. Green extraction of polyphenols from citrus peel by-products and their antifungal activity against Aspergillus flavus. Food Chem. X 2021, 12, 100144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  272. Jiang, H.; Chen, H.; Jin, C.; Mo, J.; Wang, H. Nobiletin flavone inhibits the growth and metastasis of human pancreatic cancer cells via induction of autophagy, G0/G1 cell cycle arrest, and inhibition of NF-kB signalling pathway. J. Buon 2020, 25, 1070–1075. [Google Scholar]
  273. Ozkan, A.D.; Kaleli, S.; Onen, H.I.; Sarihan, M.; Eskiler, G.G.; Yigin, A.K.; Akdogan, M. Anti-inflammatory effects of nobiletin on TLR4/TRIF/IRF3 and TLR9/IRF7 signaling pathways in prostate cancer cells. Immunopharmacol. Immunotoxicol. 2020, 42, 93–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  274. Hanafy, S.M.; El-Shafea, A.; Mohamed, Y.; Saleh, W.D.; Fathy, H.M. Chemical profiling, in vitro antimicrobial and antioxidant activities of pomegranate, orange and banana peel-extracts against pathogenic microorganisms. J. Genet. Eng. Biotechnol. 2021, 19, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  275. Abbattista, R.; Ventura, G.; Calvano, C.D.; Cataldi, T.R.; Losito, I. Bioactive compounds in waste by-products from olive oil production: Applications and structural characterization by mass spectrometry techniques. Foods 2021, 10, 1236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  276. Martakos, I.; Katsianou, P.; Koulis, G.; Efstratiou, E.; Nastou, E.; Nikas, S.; Dasenaki, M.; Pentogennis, M.; Thomaidis, N. Development of Analytical Strategies for the Determination of Olive Fruit Bioactive Compounds Using UPLC-HRMS and HPLC-DAD. Chemical Characterization of Kolovi Lesvos Variety as a Case Study. Molecules 2021, 26, 7182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  277. Dermeche, S.; Nadour, M.; Larroche, C.; Moulti-Mati, F.; Michaud, P. Olive mill wastes: Biochemical characterizations and valorization strategies. Process Biochem. 2013, 48, 1532–1552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  278. Darvishzadeh, P.; Orsat, V. Microwave-assisted extraction of antioxidant compounds from Russian olive leaves and flowers: Optimization, HPLC characterization and comparison with other methods. J. Appl. Res. Med. Aromat. Plants 2022, 27, 100368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  279. Russo, E.; Spallarossa, A.; Comite, A.; Pagliero, M.; Guida, P.; Belotti, V.; Caviglia, D.; Schito, A.M. Valorization and Potential Antimicrobial Use of Olive Mill Wastewater (OMW) from Italian Olive Oil Production. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  280. D’Antuono, I.; Kontogianni, V.G.; Kotsiou, K.; Linsalata, V.; Logrieco, A.F.; Tasioula-Margari, M.; Cardinali, A. Polyphenolic characterization of Olive Mill Waste Waters, coming from Italian and Greek olive cultivars, after membrane technology. Food Res. Int. 2014, 65, 301–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  281. Alu’datt, M.H.; Alli, I.; Ereifej, K.; Alhamad, M.; Al-Tawaha, A.R.; Rababah, T. Optimisation, characterisation and quantification of phenolic compounds in olive cake. Food Chem. 2010, 123, 117–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  282. Zhao, H.; Avena-Bustillos, R.J.; Wang, S.C. Extraction, Purification and In Vitro Antioxidant Activity Evaluation of Phenolic Compounds in California Olive Pomace. Foods 2022, 11, 174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  283. Benincasa, C.; Pellegrino, M.; Romano, E.; Claps, S.; Fallara, C.; Perri, E. Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of Phenolic Compounds in Spray-Dried Olive Mill Wastewater. Front. Nutr. 2022, 8, 782693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  284. Ladhari, A.; Zarrelli, A.; Ghannem, M.; Ben Mimoun, M. Olive wastes as a high-potential by-product: Variability of their phenolic profiles, antioxidant and phytotoxic properties. Waste Biomass Valorization 2021, 12, 3657–3669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  285. Poerschmann, J.; Weiner, B.; Baskyr, I. Organic compounds in olive mill wastewater and in solutions resulting from hydrothermal carbonization of the wastewater. Chemosphere 2013, 92, 1472–1482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  286. Uribe, E.; Pasten, A.; Lemus-Mondaca, R.; Vega-Gálvez, A.; Quispe-Fuentes, I.; Ortiz, J.; Di Scala, K. Comparison of Chemical Composition, Bioactive Compounds and Antioxidant Activity of Three Olive-Waste Cakes. J. Food Biochem. 2015, 39, 189–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  287. Akli, H.; Grigorakis, S.; Kellil, A.; Loupassaki, S.; Makris, D.P.; Calokerinos, A.; Mati, A.; Lydakis-Simantiris, N. Extraction of Polyphenols from Olive Leaves Employing Deep Eutectic Solvents: The Application of Chemometrics to a Quantitative Study on Antioxidant Compounds. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  288. Taamalli, A.; Arraez-Roman, D.; Barrajon-Catalan, E.; Ruiz-Torres, V.; Perez-Sanchez, A.; Herrero, M.; Ibanñez, E.; Micol, V.; Zarrouk, M.; Segura-Carretero, A.; et al. Use of advanced techniques for the extraction of phenolic compounds from Tunisian olive leaves: Phenolic composition and cytotoxicity against human breast cancer cells. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2012, 50, 1817–1825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  289. Servian-Rivas, L.D.; Pachón, E.R.; Rodríguez, M.; González-Miquel, M.; González, E.J.; Díaz, I. Techno-economic and environmental impact assessment of an olive tree pruning waste multiproduct biorefinery. Food Bioprod. Process. 2022, 134, 95–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  290. Yeniçeri, M.; Filik, A.G.; Filik, G. The Effect of Some Selected Fruit Wastes for Poultry Feed on Growth Performance of Broilers. Palandöken J. Anim. Sci. Technol. Econ. 2022, 1, 33–41. [Google Scholar]
  291. Kreatsouli, K.; Fousteri, Z.; Zampakas, K.; Kerasioti, E.; Veskoukis, A.S.; Mantas, C.; Gkoutsidis, P.; Ladas, D.; Petrotos, K.; Kouretas, D.; et al. A Polyphenolic Extract from Olive Mill Wastewaters Encapsulated in Whey Protein and Maltodextrin Exerts Antioxidant Activity in Endothelial Cells. Antioxidants 2019, 8, 280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  292. Lafka, T.I.; Lazou, A.E.; Sinanoglou, V.J.; Lazos, E.S. Phenolic and antioxidant potential of olive oil mill wastes. Food Chem. 2011, 125, 92–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  293. Visioli, F.; Romani, A.; Mulinacci, N.; Zarini, S.; Conte, D.; Vincieri, F.F.; Galli, G. Antioxidant and other biological activities of olive mill waste waters. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1999, 47, 3397–3401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  294. Di Mauro, M.D.; Fava, G.; Spampinato, M.; Aleo, D.; Melilli, B.; Saita, M.G.; Centonze, G.; Maggiore, R.; D’Antona, N. Polyphenolic Fraction from Olive MillWastewater: Scale-Up and in Vitro Studies for Ophthalmic Nutraceutical Applications. Antioxidants 2019, 8, 462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  295. Robles-Almazan, M.; Pulido-Moran, M.; Moreno-Fernandez, J.; Ramirez-Tortosa, C.; Rodriguez-Garcia, C.; Quiles, J.L.; Ramirez-Tortosa, M.C. Hydroxytyrosol: Bioavailability, toxicity, and clinical applications. Food Res. Int. 2018, 105, 654–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  296. Bernini, R.; Merendino, N.; Romani, A.; Velotti, F. Naturally occurring hydroxytyrosol: Synthesis and anticancer potential. Curr. Med. Chem. 2013, 20, 655–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  297. Benincasa, C.; La Torre, C.; Plastina, P.; Fazio, A.; Perri, E.; Caroleo, M.C.; Gallelli, L.; Cannataro, R.; Cione, E. Hydroxytyrosyl Oleate: Improved Extraction Procedure from Olive Oil and By-Products, and In Vitro Antioxidant and Skin Regenerative Properties. Antioxydants 2019, 8, 233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  298. Obied, H.K.; Allen, M.S.; Bedgood, D.R. Bioscreening of Australian olive mill waste extracts: Biophenol content, antioxidant, antimicrobial and molluscicidal activities. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2007, 45, 1238–1248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  299. Yangui, T.; Sayadi, S.; Gargoubi, A.; Dhouib, A. Fungicidal effect of hydroxytyrosol rich preparations from olive mill wastewater against Verticillium dahliae. Crop Prot. 2010, 29, 1208–1213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  300. Abdel-Razek, A.G.; Badr, A.; Shehata, G. Characterization of Olive Oil By-products: Antioxidant Activity, Its Ability to Reduce Aflatoxigenic Fungi Hazard and Its Aflatoxins. Annu. Res. Rev. Biol. 2017, 14, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  301. Abi-Khattar, A.M.; Rajha, N.; Abdel-Massih, M.; Maroun, G.; Louka, N.; Debs, E. Intensification of Polyphenol Extraction from Olive Leaves Using Ired-Irrad, an Environmentally-Friendly Innovative Technology. Antioxidants 2019, 8, 227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  302. Bavaro, S.L.; D’Antuono, I.; Cozzi, G.; Haidukowski, M.; Cardinali, A.; Logrieco, A.F. Inhibition of aflatoxin B1 production by verbascoside and other olive polyphenols. World Mycotoxin J. 2016, 9, 545–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  303. Schaffer, S.; Müller, W.E.; Eckert, G.P. Cytoprotective effects of olive mill waste water extract and its main constituent hydroxytyrosol in PC12 cells. Pharmacol. Res. 2010, 62, 322–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  304. Palos-Hernández, A.; Fernández MY, G.; Burrieza, J.E.; Pérez-Iglesias, J.L.; González-Paramás, A.M. Obtaining green extracts rich in phenolic compounds from underexploited food by-products using natural deep eutectic solvents. Opportunities and challenges. Sustain. Chem. Pharm. 2022, 29, 100773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Agricultural residues and the properties and applications of their phytochemicals.
Figure 1. Agricultural residues and the properties and applications of their phytochemicals.
Molecules 28 00342 g001
Table 1. Amount of residues from some crops produced in the world in 2020.
Table 1. Amount of residues from some crops produced in the world in 2020.
CropGlobal Crop Production *
[Million Ton]
Residue
to Crop Ratio
Amount
of Residue **
[Million Ton]
References
Sugarcane1869.70.1189.1Jiang et al. [9]
Maize1162.42.02324.8Jiang et al. [9]
Wheat760.91.18897.9Searle and Malins [10]
Rice756.71.0756.7Jiang et al. [9]
Potato359.10.4143.6Ben Taher et al. [11]
Soybean353.51.5530.3Yanli et al. [12]
Sugar beet253.00.2768.3Searle and Malins [10]
Tomato186.83.5653.8Oleszek et al. [13]
Barley157.01.18185.3Searle and Malins [10]
Banana119.80.671.9Gabhane et al. [14]
Cucumber91.34.5410.9Oleszek et al. [13]
Apples86.40.2521.6Cruz et al. [15]
Grapes 78.00.323.4Muhlack et al. [16]
Oranges75.50.537.8Rezzadori et al. [17]
Olives23.60.122.8Searle and Malins [10]
* based on FAOSTAT, 2022, ** calculated based on the global crop production in 2020 and the residue-to-crop ratio according to cited references.
Table 2. Phytochemicals derived from sugarcane bagasse.
Table 2. Phytochemicals derived from sugarcane bagasse.
NameMW * [g mol−1]CxHyOzReferences
Phenolic acids—hydroxybenzoic acids
p-Hydroxybenzoic acid138.12C7H6O3Zheng et al. [19]
Vanillic acid168.14C8H8O4Zheng et al. [19]
Benzoic acid122.12C7H6O2Zheng et al. [19]
Protocatechuic acid154.12C7H6O4Zheng et al. [19]
Gallic acid170.12C7H6O5Zhao et al. [26]
Syringic acid198.17C9H10O5Zhao et al. [26]
Phenolic acids—hydroxycinnamic acids
p-Coumaric acid164.04C9H8O3González–Bautista et al. [28]
Cinnamic acid148.16C9H8O2González–Bautista et al. [28]
Ferulic acid194.18C10H10O4González–Bautista et al. [28]
Caffeic acid180.16C9H8O4González–Bautista et al. [28]
Chlorogenic acids354.31C16H18O9Zhao et al. [26]
Sinapic acid224.21C11H12O5Zhao et al. [26]
Flavonoids—flavonols
Quercetin302.24C15H10O7Zheng et al. [19]
Flavonoids—flavones
Luteolin286.24C15H10O6Zheng et al. [29]
Tricin330.29C17H14O7Zheng et al. [29]
Flavonoid glycosides
Diosmetin 6-C-glucoside462.40C22H22O11Zheng et al. [29]
Tricin 7-O-β-glucopyranoside492.43C23H24O12Zheng et al. [29]
Isoflavone
Genistin432.37C21H20O10Zheng et al. [19]
Genistein270.24C15H10O5Zheng et al. [19]
Others
Catechol110.11C6H6O2Zheng et al. [19]
Phenol94.11C6H6OZheng et al. [19]
Guaiacol124.14C7H8O2Zheng et al. [19]
Vanillin152.15C8H8O3Zheng et al. [19]
Isovanillin152.15C8H8O3Van der Pol et al. [30]
Syringaldehyde182.17C9H10O4Zheng et al. [19]
Piceol136.15C8H8O2Van der Pol et al. [30]
Apocynin166.17C9H10O3Van der Pol et al. [30]
Acetosyringone196.19C10H12O4Van der Pol et al. [30]
Syringaldehyde182.17C9H10O4Van der Pol et al. [30]
Creosol138.16C8H10O2Lv et al. [31]
4-Ethylguaiacol152.19C9H12O2Lv et al. [31]
Chavicol134.17C9H10OLv et al. [31]
4-Vinylguaiacol150.17C9H10O2Lv et al. [31]
4-Allylsyringol194.23C11H14O3Lv et al. [31]
* MW—molecular weight.
Table 3. Biological activities and potential applications of phytochemicals obtained from sugarcane bagasse.
Table 3. Biological activities and potential applications of phytochemicals obtained from sugarcane bagasse.
MaterialExtract/CompoundBiological Activity/ApplicationReferences
Sugarcane bagassephenolic compounds- natural antioxidant
- used in pharmacology
Al Arni et al. [27]
- antibacterial agents against the foodborne pathogens Escherichia coli, Listeria monocytogenes, Staphylococcus aureus, Salmonella typhimuriumZhao et al. [26]
gallic and tannic
acids
- deactivate cellulolytic and hemicellulolytic enzymesMichelin et al. [32]
extract- antioxidant and radical scavenging activity
- antimicrobial activity against Sta-
phylococcus aureus TISTR029 and
Escherichia coli O157:H7
- added value for the sugar industry
Juttuporn et al. [33]
- antihyperglycemic ability
- useful therapeutic agents to treat T2D patients
Zheng et al. [19]
- used for the low-cost bio-oil productionTreedet and Suntivarakorn [34]
- feedstock for ethanol (bioethanol) productionKrishnan et al. [35]
Zhu et al. [36]
- raw material for the production of industrial enzymes, xylose, glucose, methaneGuilherme et al. [37]
- raw material for the production of xylitol and organic acidsChandel et al. [38]
- used to prepare highly valued succinic acidXi et al. [23]
- used as a reducing agent in synthesizing biogenic platinum nanoparticles Ishak et al. [20]
- used as a fuel to power sugar millsMohan et al. [22]
Table 4. Phytochemicals identified in corn waste.
Table 4. Phytochemicals identified in corn waste.
NameMW [g mol−1]Molecular FormulaReferences
Phenolic acids—hydroxycinnamic acids
p-Coumaric acid164.04C9H8O3Guo et al. [39]
Ferulic acid194.18C10H10O4Guo et al. [39]
trans-ferulic acid194.18C10H10O4Guo et al. [39]
trans-ferulic acid methyl ester208.21C11H12O4Guo et al. [39]
cis-ferulic acid194.18C10H10O4Guo et al. [39]
cis-ferulic acid methyl ester208.21C11H12O4Guo et al. [39]
Flavonoids—flavonols
Rutin610.52C27H30O16Bujang et al. [40]
Quercetin-3-O-glucoside463.37C21H19O12Dong et al. [41]
Isorhamnetin-3-O-glucoside478.41C22H22O12Dong et al. [41]
Kaempferol-3-O-glucoside447.37C21H19O11Li et al. [42]
Maysin576.50C27H28O14Haslina and Eva [43]
Isoorientin-2″-O-α-l-rhamnoside594.50C27H30O15Haslina and Eva [43]
Maysin-3′-methyl ether590.50C28H30O15Tian et al. [44]
ax-4″–OH–3′-Methoxymaysin592.50C28H32O14Tian et al. [44]
2″-O-α-l-Rhamnosyl-6-C-fucosylluteolin578.50C27H30O14Tian et al. [44]
Flavonoids—anthocyanins
Pelargonidin-3-O-glucoside433.40C21H21O10Lao and Giusti [45]
Pelargonidin-3-(6″malonylglucoside)519.23C24H23O13Chen et al. [46]
Cyanidin-3-O-glucoside449.39C21H21O11Barba et al. [47]
Cyanidin 3-(6″-malonylglucoside)535.11C24H23O14Fernandez-Aulis et al. [48]
Peonidin-3-O-glucoside463.41C22H23O11Barba et al. [47]
Peonidin-3-(6″malonylglucoside)549.50C25H25O14Fernandez-Aulis et al. [48]
Other compounds
p-Hydroxybenzaldehyde122.12C7H6O2Guo et al. [39]
β-Sitosterol glucoside576.85C35H60O6Guo et al. [39]
Indole-3-acetic acid175.06C10H9NO2Wille and Berhow [49]
Vanillin154.05C8H8O3Guo et al. [39]
Table 5. Biological activity and potential applications of phytochemicals obtained from corn wastes.
Table 5. Biological activity and potential applications of phytochemicals obtained from corn wastes.
MaterialExtract/CompoundBiological Activity/ApplicationReferences
Corn brantocopherols and polyphenolic compounds - antioxidant properties
- used as bioactive compounds in cosmetics or natural substitutes (antioxidants, preservatives, stabilizers, emulsifiers, and colorings) in foods to prevent potential adverse effects associated with the consumption of artificial ingredients
Galanakis [62]
Corn huskextract- used in the treatment of diabetes because it has shown high:
- antidiabetic potential
Brobbey et al. [51]
- anti-inflammatory effectsRoh et al. [63]
Corn stigmaextract- antifungal and antibacterial activities against 23 of the studied microorganisms
- use as a functional ingredient in the food and pharmaceutical industry
Boeira et al. [64]
Corn tasselextract- used as a traditional medicine in China
- antioxidant capacity
- the high ability to inhibit the proliferation of MGC80-3 gastric cancer cells
Wang et al. [65]
tasselin A - inhibition of melanin production
- used as an ingredient in skin care whitener
Wille and Berhow [49]
Corn pollenphenolic compounds- antiradical activityBujang et al. [40]
extract- the source of functional and bioactive compounds for the nutraceutical and pharmaceutical industriesBujang et al. [40]
- the source of antioxidants and is high in nutrientsŽilić et al. [58]
Table 6. Phytochemicals identified in potato waste.
Table 6. Phytochemicals identified in potato waste.
NameMW
[g mol−1]
Molecular
Formula
References
Phenolic acids—hydroxycinnamic acids
p-Coumaric acid164.04C9H8O3Frontuto et al. [71]
Ferulic acid194.18C10H10O4Javed et al. [72]
Caffeic acid180.16C9H8O4Samarin et al. [73]
Chlorogenic acid354.31C16H18O9Javed et al. [72]
Sinapic acid224.21C11H12O5Mohdaly et al. [67]
Cinnamic acid148.16C9H8O2Mohdaly et al. [67]
Phenolic acids—hydroxybenzoic acids
Gallic acid170.12C7H6O5Javed et al. [72]
Vanillic acid168.15C8H8O4Javed et al. [72]
Protocatechic acid154.12C7H6O4Frontuto et al. [71]
p-Hydroxybenzoic acid138.12C7H6O3Chamorro et al. [74]
3-Hydroxybenzoic acid138.12C7H6O3Paniagua–García et al. [75]
4-Hydroxybenzoic acid138.12C7H6O3Paniagua–García et al. [75]
2,5-Dihydroxybenzoic acid154.12C7H6O4Paniagua–García et al. [75]
Syringic acid198.17C9H10O5Sarwari et al. [76]
Cyclohexanecarboxylic acids
Quinic acid192.17C7H12O6Wu et al. [77]
Flavonoids—flavonols
Rutin610.52C27H30O16Silva–Beltran et al. [78]
Quercetin302.24C15H10O7Silva–Beltran et al. [78]
Flavonoids—anthocyanin
Pelargonidin-3-(p-coumaryoly rutinoside)-
5-glucoside
919.81C42H47O23Chen et al. [79]
Petunidin-3-(p-coumaroyl rutinoside)-
5-glucoside
933.86C43H49O23Chen et al. [79]
Alkaloids
α-Chaconine852.06C45H73NO14Ji et al. [80]
α-Solanine868.06C45H73NO15Ji et al. [80]
Solanidine397.64C27H43NOHossain et al. [81]
Demissidine399.65C27H45NOHossain et al. [81]
Commersonine1048.20C51H85NO21Rodríguez–Martínez et al. [82]
α-Tomatine1034.19C50H83NO21Rodríguez–Martínez et al. [82]
Table 7. Biological activity and potential applications of phytochemicals obtained from potato wastes.
Table 7. Biological activity and potential applications of phytochemicals obtained from potato wastes.
MaterialExtract/CompoundBiological Activity/ApplicationReferences
Potato peelphenolic compounds- antioxidant activitySingh et al. [91]
Albishi et al. [83]
- used as a food preservative
- pharmaceutical ingredient
Maldonado et al. [92]
extract- natural food additives as an antioxidant for fresh-cut fruitsAkyol et al. [93]
Venturi et al. [94]
- food preservative
- pharmaceutical ingredient
Gebrechristos and Chen [95]
- limit oil oxidationAmado et al. [96]
- hepatoprotective effects,
- protects erythrocytes against oxidative damage
- lowers the toxicity of cholesterol oxidation products
- attenuate diabetic alterations
Hsieh et al. [97]
- protects atopic dermatitisYang et al. [98]
- amylase and feed-stock for bioethanol production Khawla et al. [99]
- antioxidant, antibacterial, apoptotic, chemopreventive and anti-inflammatoryWu [100]
- bio-oil productionLiang et al. [101]
- production of bacterial cellulose
- biopolymer production
Abdelraof et al. [102]
- antiobesity properties
- used in the production of antiobesity functional food
Elkahoui et al. [103]
Chimonyo [104]
- a source of natural antioxidants against human enteric viruses (antiviral effect on the inhibition of Av-05 and MS2 bacteriophages, which were used as human enteric viral surrogates)Silva-Beltran et al. [78]
freeze-dried aqueous extracts- use as food additivesSingh et al. [91]
glycoalkaloids- the potential of being used by the pharmaceutical industryApel et al. [105]
Potato wasteextract- as additives to biscuitKhan et al. [106]
glycoalkaloids- precursors for the production of hormones, antibiotics and anticancer drugs
- precursors for neurological and gastrointestinal disorders
- anti-cancer and anti-proliferative activities in vitro
Hossain et al. [81]
Hossain et al. [87]
Ding et al. [107]
Alves–Filho et al. [86]
steroidal alkaloids- biological properties such as antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory and anticarcinogenic activitiesKenny et al. [108]
Table 8. Phytochemicals identified and quantified in soybean waste.
Table 8. Phytochemicals identified and quantified in soybean waste.
NameSoybean ResidueMW
[g mol−1]
CxHyOzConcentrationReferences
Phenolic acids—hydroxybenzoic acids
p-Hydroxybenzoic acidherb
root
meal
138.12C7H6O322.2–38.3 a,b
4.1–32.5 a,b
51 a
Šibul et al. [113]
Šibul et al. [113]
Freitas et al. [120]
Salicylic acidmeal138.12C7H6O338 aFreitas et al. [120]
Protocatechuic acidherb
root
154.12C7H6O44.4–14.4 a,b
2.35–4.71 a,b
Šibul et al. [113]
 
Gentisic acidherb
root
154.12C7H6O4<0.08–4.78 a,b
<0.08–7.17 a,b
Šibul et al. [113]
 
Vanillic acidherb
root
meal
168.14C8H8O4<0.4–44.9 a,b
43.0–75.2 a,b
91 a
Šibul et al. [113]
 
Freitas et al. [120]
Syringic acidherb
root
meal
198.17C9H10O512.0–14.2 a,b
20.6–42.0 a,b
81 a
Šibul et al. [113]
 
Freitas et al. [120]
Gallic acidmeal170.12C7H6O577 aFreitas et al. [120]
Phenolic acids—hydroxycinnamic acids
p-Coumaric acidherb
root
meal
164.04C9H8O37.45–14.5 a,b
1.61–2.89 a,b
20 a
Šibul et al. [113]
 
Freitas et al. [120]
Ferulic acidherb
root
meal
194.18C10H10O45.89–14.0 a,b
4.55–7.66 a,b
3 a
Šibul et al. [113]
 
Freitas et al. [120]
Caffeic acidherb
root
meal
180.16C9H8O414.2–24.9 a,b
<0.08 a
61 a
Šibul et al. [113]
 
Freitas et al. [120]
Sinapic acidmeal224.21C11H12O527 aFreitas et al. [120]
Cyclohexanecarboxylic acids
Quinic acidherb
root
192.17C7H12O6399–532 a,b
111–249 a,b
Šibul et al. [113]
 
5-O-Caffeoylquinic acidherb
root
meal
354.31C16H18O9<8–235 a,b
<8 a
35 a
Šibul et al. [113]
 
Freitas et al. [120]
Flavonoids—flavonols
Kaempferolherb
root
meal
286.23C15H10O6<16–21.1 a,b
<16 a
4 a
Šibul et al. [113]
 
Freitas et al. [120]
Quercetinherb
root
302.24C15H10O7<16–278 a,b
<16 a
Šibul et al. [113]
 
Isorhamnetinherb
root
316.26C16H12O7<40–159 a,b
<40 a
Šibul et al. [113]
 
Quercitrinherb
root
448.38C21H20O11<0.06 a
<0.06 a
Šibul et al. [113]
 
Kaempferol 3-O-glucosideherb
root
448.38C21H20O1159.3–140 a,b
1.50–2.64 a,b
Šibul et al. [113]
 
Hyperosideherb
root
464.38C21H20O12<0.1–825 a,b
<0.06 a
Šibul et al. [113]
 
Quercetin 3-O-glucosideherb
root
464.10C21H20O12<0.06–967 a,b
<0.06 a,b
Šibul et al. [113]
 
Rutinherb
root
meal
610.52C27H30O167.05–4636 a,b
<2 a
49 a
Šibul et al. [113]
 
Freitas et al. [120]
Flavonoids—flavones
Apigeninherb
root
270.24C15H10O517.4–759 a,b
<8–22.3 a,b
Šibul et al. [113]
 
Baicaleinherb
root
270.24C15H10O527.8–745 a,b
<16–24.7 a,b
Šibul et al. [113]
 
Luteolinherb
root
286.24C15H10O6<40–194 a,b
<40 a
Šibul et al. [113]
 
Chrysoeriolherb
root
300.26C16H12O6<4–9.57 a,b
<4 a
Šibul et al. [113]
 
Vitexinherb
root
432.38C21H20O101.37–2.36 a,b
1.81–3.57 a,b
Šibul et al. [113]
 
Apigenin 7-O-glucosideherb
root
432.38C21H20O1014.3–261 a,b
<0.2–1.99 a,b
Šibul et al. [113]
 
Luteolin 7-O-glucosideherb
root
448.37C21H20O11<4–145 a,b
<4 a
Šibul et al. [113]
 
Apiinherb
root
564.49C26H28O14<0.06–20.8 a,b
<0.06 a
Šibul et al. [113]
 
Flavonoids—flavanones
Naringeninherb
root
meal
272.26C15H12O53.46–8.46 a,b
6.52–15.9 a,b
25 a
Šibul et al. [113]
 
Freitas et al. [120]
Hesperidinmeal610.19C28H34O1591 aFreitas et al. [120]
Flavonoids—flavanols
Catechinherb
root
290.27C15H14O6<0.4 a
<0.4 a
Šibul et al. [113]
 
Epicatechinherb
root
290.27C15H14O6<0.4 a
<0.4–36.3 a,b
Šibul et al. [113]
 
Isoflavones
Daidzinokara
meal
416.38C21H20O9920–1530 b,c
350 a
Anjum et al. [109]
Freitas et al. [120]
Daidzeinokara
herb
root
meal
254.23C15H10O4310–639 b,c
40.7–122 a,b
40.5–1702 a,b
30 a
Anjum et al. [109]
Šibul et al. [113]
 
Freitas et al. [120]
Genistinokara
meal
432.37C21H20O103280–8360 b,c
490 a
Anjum et al. [109]
Freitas et al. [120]
Genisteinokara
herb
root
meal
270.24C15H10O5380–650 b,c
15.1–39.2 a,b
159–270 a,b
50 a
Anjum et al. [109]
Šibul et al. [113]
 
Freitas et al. [120]
Glycitinokara446.40C22H22O10450 c
160 a
Anjum et al. [109]
Freitas et al. [120]
Glyciteinokara
meal
284.26C16H12O558 c
3 a
Anjum et al. [109]
Freitas et al. [120]
Saponins
Soyasaponin B Imeal943.12C48H78O182510 cSilva et al. [121]
Soyasaponin B II + IIImeal 780 cSilva et al. [121]
a expressed in mg per kg of dry extract, b depending on cultivar, c expressed in mg per kg of residues.
Table 9. Biological activity and potential applications of phytochemicals obtained from soybean residues.
Table 9. Biological activity and potential applications of phytochemicals obtained from soybean residues.
MaterialExtract/CompoundBiological Activity/ApplicationReferences
okaramethanolic and ethanolic extracts- antioxidant activity
- antibacterial activity against Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus megaterium, Escherichia coli, and Serratia marcescens
Anjum et al. [109]
podEthanolic extract and its 3 fractions- antioxidant activity
- anticancer activity against human colorectal
carcinoma (HCT116) and prostate adenocarcinoma (PC-3)
Pabich et al. [116]
soybean by-productsaponins- used to remove pesticides residues in fruits and vegetablesHsu et al. [119]
defatted soy mealisoflavones- anti-cancerous, anti-estrogenic, anti-oxidant,
anti-inflammatory, and phytoestrogen activities
- preventions of cardiovascular and
neurological disorders
Wang et al. [122]
soybean by-productssaponins- insecticidal properties
soybean mealaqueous extract- antioxidant activity
- inhibition of lipid peroxidation
- antimicrobial activity against several foodborne pathogens
- antitumoral activity towards a human glioblastoma cell line
Freitas et al. [120]
soybean cakesoyasapogenol A and its microbial transformation products- application as anti-inflammatory food supplementsZhou et al. [123]
Table 10. Phytochemicals identified in tomato wastes.
Table 10. Phytochemicals identified in tomato wastes.
NameMW [g mol−1]Molecular
Formula
References
Phenolic acids—hydroxycinnamic acids
Chlorogenic acid354.31C16H18O9Bakic et al. [127]
Isochlorogenic acid354.31C16H18O9Szabo et al. [141]
p-Coumaric acid164.16C9H8O3Nour et al. [133]
Ferulic acid194.18C10H10O4Perea–Dominguez et al. [131]
Caffeic acid180.16C9H8O4Aires et al. [136]
3,4,5-tricaffeoylquinic acid678.60C34H30O15Szabo et al. [141]
Cinnamic acid148.16C9H8O2Kalogeropoulos et al. [138]
Phloretic acid166.18C9H10O3Kalogeropoulos et al. [138]
Sinapic acid224.21C11H12O5Kalogeropoulos et al. [138]
Rosmarinic acid360.31C18H16O8Ćetković et al. [135]
Phenolic acids—hydroxybenzoic acids
Gallic acid170.12C7H6O5Nour et al. [133]
Ellagic acid302.18C14H6O8Nour et al. [133]
Vanillic acid168.15C8H8O4Nour et al. [133]
Syringic acid198.17C9H10O5Nour et al. [133]
Protocatechic acid154.12C7H6O4Elbadrawy and Sello [134]
p-Hydroxybenzoic acid138.12C7H6O3Kalogeropoulos et al. [138]
Flavonoids
Quercetin302.24C15H10O7Elbadrawy and Sello [134]
Quercetin-3-β-O-glucoside463.40C21H19O12Valdez–Morales et al. [142]
Quercetin-3-O-sophorosid626.50C27H30O17Kumar et al. [143]
Apigenin-7-O-glucoside432.40C21H20O10Concha-Meyer et al. [144]
Isorhamnetin316.26C16H12O7Kumar et al. [143]
Isorhamnetin-3-O-gentiobioside640.50C28H32O17Kumar et al. [143]
Rutin610.52C27H30O16Aires et al. [136]
Kaempferol286.23C15H10O6Perea–Dominguez et al. [131]
Kaempferol-3-O-rutinoside394.52C27H30O15Aires et al. [136]
Kaempferol-3-O-glucoside447.37C21H19O11Kumar et al. [143]
Myricetin318.24C15H10O8Nour et al. [133]
Naringenin272.26C15H12O5Elbadrawy and Sello [134]
Catechin290.26C15H14O6Perea–Dominguez et al. [131]
Epicatechin290.27C15H14O6Kalogeropoulos et al. [138]
Chrysin254.24C15H10O4Kalogeropoulos et al. [138]
Luteolin286.24C15H10O6Kalogeropoulos et al. [138]
Luteolin-7-O-glucoside 448.37C21H20O11Concha–Meyer et al. [144]
Isoflavones
Daidzein254.23C15H10O4Kumar et al. [143]
Genistein270.24C15H10O5Kumar et al. [143]
Stilbenes
Resveratrol228.24C14H12O3Kalogeropoulos et al. [138]
Carotenoids
Lycopene536.89C40H56Fritsch et al. [130]
β-Carotene536.89C40H56Kalogeropoulos et al. [138]
Sterols
β-Sitosterol414.72C29H50OKalogeropoulos et al. [138]
5-Avenasterol412.70C29H48OKalogeropoulos et al. [138]
Campesterol400.69C28H48OKalogeropoulos et al. [138]
Cholestanol388.70C27H48OKalogeropoulos et al. [138]
Cholesterol386.65C27H46OKalogeropoulos et al. [138]
24-Oxocholesterol400.60C27H44O2Kalogeropoulos et al. [138]
Stigmasterol412.69C29H48OKalogeropoulos et al. [138]
Tocopherols
Tocopherol Kalogeropoulos et al. [138]
Terpenes
Squalene410.73C30H50Kalogeropoulos et al. [138]
Cycloartenol426.72C30H50OKalogeropoulos et al. [138]
β-Amyrin426.73C30H50OKalogeropoulos et al. [138]
Oleanolic acid456.71C30H48O3Kalogeropoulos et al. [138]
Ursolic acid456.70C30H48O3Kalogeropoulos et al. [138]
Palmitic acid256.43C16H32O2Elbadrawy and Sello [134]
Palmitoleic acid254.41C16H30O2Elbadrawy and Sello [134]
Stearic acid284.48C18H36O2Elbadrawy and Sello [134]
Oleic acid282.47C18H34O2Elbadrawy and Sello [134]
Linolenic acid278.43C18H30O2Elbadrawy and Sello [134]
Linoleic acid280.45C18H32O2Elbadrawy and Sello [134]
Myristic acid228.37C14H28O2Elbadrawy and Sello [134]
Table 11. Biological activity and potential applications of phytochemicals obtained from tomato wastes.
Table 11. Biological activity and potential applications of phytochemicals obtained from tomato wastes.
MaterialExtract/CompoundBiological Activity/ApplicationReferences
Tomato seedspolyphenols
oil
- antioxidant activityZuorro et al. [154]
- high nutritional qualityEller et al. [155]
Tomato by-productsextract- natural antioxidants for the formulation of functional foods or to serve as additives in food systems to elongate their shelf-life
- oxidative stability of dairy products
- potential nutraceutical resource
- animal feed
Savatović et al. [158]
Elbadrawy and Sello [134]
Nour et al. [159]
Abid et al. [160]
Ćetković et al. [135]
Trombino et al. [161]
Tomato peelfiber- food supplement, improving the different chemical, physical and nutritional properties of foodsNavarro–González et al. [137]
lycopene- natural color or bioactive ingredientHo et al. [162]
carotenoids- natural antioxidants and colorantsHoruz and Belibagli [163]
Table 12. Phytochemicals identified in banana wastes and their concentration.
Table 12. Phytochemicals identified in banana wastes and their concentration.
NameBanana ResiduesMW
[g mol−1]
CxHyOzConcentrationReferences
Total phenolics 53,800 aKabir et al. [166]
15,180–31,450 a,cChaudhry et al. [167]
29,200 aRebello et al. [168]
Total flavonoids 16,440 bKabir et al. [166]
10,800–22,110 b,cChaudhry et al. [167]
Phenolic acids—benzoic acids
Gallic acidbanana peel170.12C7H6O577.3 fBehiry et al. [169]
Ellagic acidbanana peel302.20C14H6O8161.9 fBehiry et al. [169]
Salicylic acidbanana peel138.121C7H6O32.7 fBehiry et al. [169]
Phenolic acids—hydroxycinnamic acids
Chlorogenic acidbanana pseudostem
and rhizome
354.31C16H18O9 Kandasamy et al. [170]
Ferulic acidred banana peel
yellow banana peel
banana peel
194.18C10H10O463.55 e
34.97 e
16.8 f
Avram et al. [171]
Avram et al. [171]
Behiry et al. [169]
Sinapic acidred banana peel
yellow banana peel
224.21C11H12O535.17 e
19.44 e
Avram et al. [171]
Avram et al. [171]
Cinnamic acidbanana peel148.16C9H8O20.7 fBehiry et al. [169]
o-coumaric acidbanana peel164.158C9H8O311.2 fBehiry et al. [169]
Flavonoids—flavonols
Kaempferolred banana peel
yellow banana peel
286.239C15H10O628.80 e
9.30 e
Avram et al. [171]
Avram et al. [171]
Quercetinred banana peel
yellow banana peel
302.236C15H10O76.14 e
1.14 e
Avram et al. [171]
Avram et al. [171]
Isoqercitrinred banana peel
yellow banana peel
464.096C21H20O1210.47 e
14.54 e
Avram et al. [171]
Avram et al. [171]
Rutinbanana peel610.517C27H30O169730.8 fBehiry et al. [169]
Myricetinbanana peel318.235C15H10O8115.2 fBehiry et al. [169]
Myricetin-3-rutinosidebanana peel626.51C27H30O1722.50 dBehiry et al. [169]
Quercetin-3-rutinoside-3-rhamnosidebanana peel756.7C33H40O2012.91 dRebello et al. [168]
Kaempherol-3-rutinoside-3-rhamnosidebanana peel740.7C33H40O195.32 dRebello et al. [168]
Quercetin-7-rutinosidebanana peel610.5C27H30O168.78 dRebello et al. [168]
Quercetin-3-rutinosidebanana peel610.5C27H30O1629.87 dRebello et al. [168]
Kaempferol-7-rutinosidebanana peel594.52C27H30O154.12 dRebello et al. [168]
Laricitrin-3-rutinosidebanana peel640.16C28H32O172.22 dRebello et al. [168]
Kaempferol-3-rutinosidebanana peel594.52C27H30O1512.35 dRebello et al. [168]
Isorhamnetin-3-rutinosidebanana peel624.5C28H32O161.31 dRebello et al. [168]
Syringetin-3-rutinosidebanana peel654.6C29H34O170.63 dRebello et al. [168]
Flavonoids—flavanones
Naringeninbanana peel 84.7 fBehiry et al. [169]
Flavonoids-flavanols
Catechinbanana peel290.27C15H14O61.34 dRebello et al. [168]
Epicatechinbanana peel290.27C15H14O62.55 dRebello et al. [168]
Gallocatechinbanana peel306.27C15H14O74.20 dRebello et al. [168]
Procyanidin B1banana peel578.14C30H26O121.27 dRebello et al. [168]
Procyanidin B2banana peel578.14C30H26O1281.95 dRebello et al. [168]
Procyanidin B4banana peel578.14C30H26O127.90 dRebello et al. [168]
Other compounds
Cycloeucalenol acetatebanana pseudostem
and rhizome
468.77C32H52O2 Kandasamy et al. [170]
4-epicyclomusalenonebanana pseudostem
and rhizome
424.71C30H48O Kandasamy et al. [170]
a expressed in mg GAE kg−1 DM, b expressed in mg QE kg−1 DM, c depending on the method of extraction, d expressed in molar proportion (%), e expressed in ug/mL of crude extract, f expressed in mg kg−1 of dry extract.
Table 13. Biological activity and potential applications of phytochemicals obtained from banana residues.
Table 13. Biological activity and potential applications of phytochemicals obtained from banana residues.
MaterialExtract/CompoundBiological Activity/ApplicationReferences
Banana peelextract- as additives for formulation of bioactive compounds-rich yogurts
- antioxidants activity
- DPPH• scavenging activity
- ABTS+• scavenging activity
- α-glucosidase inhibitory activity
Kabir et al. [166]
Banana peelacetonic, ethanoic, and methanolic extracts- antioxidant activity
- antimicrobial activity against Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia Coli, Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Chaudhry et al. [167]
Banana peelextract- application as corrosion inhibitorsVani et al. [176]
Banana pseudostem and rhizomecrude extracts
(hexane, chloroform, ethyl acetate, and methanolic)
Isolates:
chlorogenic acid
4-epicyclomusalenone
cycloeucalenol acetate
- antioxidant activity
- platelet aggregation inhibitory activity
- antimicrobial activity
- cytotoxicity
Kandasamy et al. [170]
Banana peelextract- antioxidant activityRebello et al. [168]
Yellow and red banana peelhydroalcoholic extracts- the antioxidant, cytotoxic, and antimicrobial effectsAvram et al. [170]
Banana peelMethanolic extract- application as biofungicide against the growth of Fusarium culmorum and Rhizoctonia solani, and as a bactericide against Agrobacterium tumefaciens for natural wood preservation during handling or in service.Behiry et al. [169]
Banana peel, pulp, seed, and flowerEthanolic extract- very strong antioxidant activity
- antihyperglycemic activity at a dose of 350 mg/kg body weight
Nofianti et al. [172]
Banana peelWater extract contained ethanediol and butanediol- highly reducing agent for
metals used for the synthesis of silver nanoparticles
Buendía-Otero et al. [174]
Banana inflorescence - as good biocolorants with attractive colors, moderate stability in food systems, water-solubility, and benefits for healthPadam et al. [175]
Table 14. Total phenolic content (TPC), total flavonoid content (TFC), and main phytochemicals identified and quantified in apple pomace.
Table 14. Total phenolic content (TPC), total flavonoid content (TFC), and main phytochemicals identified and quantified in apple pomace.
NameMW
[g mol−1]
CxHyOzConcentration
[mg/kg dm *]
References
Total phenolic content (TPC) 2620–8560 a
1590–10,620 a
4399–8100 a
Waldbauer [181]
Li et al. [182]
Gorjanović et al. [183]
Total flavonoid content (TFC) 18,600–27,400 bGorjanović et al. [183]
Phenolic acids—hydroxybenzoic acids
Gallic acid170.12C7H6O52.22–4.80 dGorjanović et al. [183]
4-hydroxybenzoic acid137.02C7H5O317.66–69.56 cLi et al. [182]
Protocatechuic acid154.12C7H6O42.78–30.50 cLi et al. [182]
p-hudroxybenzoic acid138.22C7H6O31.16–5.80 dGorjanović et al. [183]
Cyclohexanecarboxylic acids
Quinic acid192.17C7H12O6227.4–418 cUyttebroek et al. [179]
Phenolic acids—hydroxycinnamic acids
Chlorogenic acid354.31C16H18O941.80 –160.40 c
89.0–308.3 d
38.9–312.8
960
Li et al. [182]
Gorjanović et al. [183]
Uyttebroek et al. [179]
Pingret et al. [189]
p-coumaroylquinic acid338.31C16H18O894Pingret et al. [189]
Sinapic acid224.212C11H12O52.03–7.20 dGorjanović et al. [183]
Caffeic acid180.16C9H8O40.12–0.35 dGorjanović et al. [183]
p-Coumaric acid164.16C9H8O32.52–23.11 c
0.32–0.76 d
Li et al. [182]
Gorjanović et al. [183]
Ferulic acid194.18C10H10O41.70–4.21 c
13.24–23.80 d
Li et al. [182]
Gorjanović et al. [183]
Flavonoids—flavonols
Rutin610.52C27H30O167.99–46.93 d
19.32
2.24–3.26 c
10 b
Gorjanović et al. [183]
Oleszek et al. [185]
Uyttebroek et al. [179]
Pingret et al. [189]
Quercetin302.24C15H10O77.2–14.2 d
25.2 e
Gorjanović et al. [183]
Oleszek et al. [185]
Quercetin-3-O-galactoside464.38C21H20O1280.8–165.2 dGorjanović et al. [183]
Quercetin-3-O-pentosyl434.35C20H18O1144.8 eOleszek et al. [185]
Hyperoside464.38C21H20O12434 e
122 b
Oleszek et al. [185]
Pingret et al. [189]
Isoquercetin464.38C21H20O1270 e
42
Oleszek et al. [185]
Pingret et al. [189]
Quercitrin448.38C21H20O11442.4 e
70.14–109.5 c
40 b
Oleszek et al. [185]
Uyttebroek et al. [179]
Pingret et al. [189]
Isoquercitrin464.0955C21H20O1210.65–15.5 cUyttebroek et al. [179]
Avicularin434.35C20H18O11285.6 e
81.6–125.7
24
Oleszek et al. [185]
Uyttebroek et al. [179]
Pingret et al. [189]
Reynoutrin434.35C20H18O11145.6 e
54 b
Oleszek et al. [185]
Pingret et al. [189]
Isorhamnetin 1.10–17.62 dGorjanović et al. [183]
Isorhamnetin-3-O-arabinofuranoside478.41C22H22O12 Ramirez–Ambrosi et al. [186]
isorhamnetin-3-O-pentoside478.41C22H22O12 Ramirez–Ambrosi et al. [186]
Isorhamnetin-3-O-rutinoside624.55C28H32O160.10–1.11 dGorjanović et al. [183]
Isorhamnetin-3-O-rhamnoside462.41C22H22O11 Ramirez–Ambrosi et al. [186]
Kaempferol286.24C15H10O60.62–2.46 dGorjanović et al. [183]
Kaempferol-7-O-glucoside448.38C21H20O110.03–1.19 dGorjanović et al. [183]
Quercetin-3-O-rhamnoside448.38C21H20O1134.1–121.9 dGorjanović et al. [183]
Guajavarin 434.353C20H18O11161 bPingret et al. [189]
Hyperin463.371C21H19O1264.02–92.4 cUyttebroek et al. [179]
Flavonoids—flavanonols
Taxifolin304.254C15H12O70.16–0.46 dGorjanović et al. [183]
Flavonoids—flavanols
Catechin290.27C15H14O61.50 –31.70 c
1.05–7.45 c
52
Li et al. [182]
Uyttebroek et al. [179]
Pingret et al. [189]
Epicatechin290.27C15H14O634.4–166.3 c
244
Uyttebroek et al. [179]
Pingret et al. [189]
Procyanidin594.53C30H26O132900
3408
Fernandes et al. [178]
Pingret et al. [189]
Procyanidin B2578.52C30H26O1242.8–208.1Uyttebroek et al. [179]
Flavonoids—flavanones
Naringenin272.26C15H12O50.11–0.24 dGorjanović et al. [183]
Eriodictyol288.26C15H12O60.11–0.21 dGorjanović et al. [183]
Naringin580.541C27H32O140.22–0.60 dGorjanović et al. [183]
Flavonoids—flavones
Apigenin270.24C15H10O50.31–0.48 dGorjanović et al. [183]
Apigenin-7-O-glucoside432.38C21H20O100.47–1.01 dGorjanović et al. [183]
Chrysin254.25C15H10O40.11–0.22 dGorjanović et al. [183]
Luteolin286.24C15H10O60.10–0.26 dGorjanović et al. [183]
Flavonoids—dihydrochalcones
Phloretin274.26C15H14O50.29–0.98 dGorjanović et al. [183]
Phlorizin436.4C21H24O10112–215 d
361.2 f
56.8–198.6 c
1008
Gorjanović et al. [183]
Oleszek et al. [185]
Uyttebroek et al. [179]
Pingret et al. [189]
Phloretin 2-O-glucoside452.41C21H24O11 Ramirez–Ambrosi et al. [186]
Phloretin -xylosyl-glucoside568.52C26H32O14142Pingret et al. [189]
3-hydroxyphloretin-2′-O-xylosylglucoside584.52C26H32O15 Ramirez–Ambrosi et al. [186]
3-hydroxyphloretin-2′-O-glucoside452C21H24O11 Ramirez–Ambrosi et al. [186]
Coumarins **
Aesculin340.282C15H16O95.53–10.67Gorjanović et al. [183]
(E)-12-(2′-Chlorovinyl) bergapten277.5C14H10O4Cl Mohammed and Mustafa [187]
12-(1′,1′-dihydroxyethyl) bergapten276C14H12O6 Mohammed and Mustafa [187]
12-(2′-chloropropan-2′-yl)-8-hydroxybergapten308.5C15H13O5Cl Mohammed and Mustafa [187]
12-Hydroxy-11-chloromethylbergapten332.5C13H9O5Cl Mohammed and Mustafa [187]
officinalin220C11H8O5 Khalil and Mustafa [188]
8-(tert-butyl)officinalin276C15H16O5 Khalil and Mustafa [188]
8-Hydroxyofficinalin236C11H8O6 Khalil and Mustafa [188]
Officinalin-8-acetic acid278C13H10O7 Khalil and Mustafa [188]
8-(2′-hydroxypropan-2′-yl) officinalin289C15H16O6 Khalil and Mustafa [188]
Triterpenoids
α-amyrin426.72C30H50O94.0Woźniak et al. [190]
β-amyrin426.72C30H50O41.4Woźniak et al. [190]
Uvaol442.72C30H50O253.9Woźniak et al. [190]
Erythtodiol442.72C30H50O218.0Woźniak et al. [190]
Ursolic aldehyde440.70C30H48O273.9Woźniak et al. [190]
Ursolic acid456.70C30H48O37125.1Woźniak et al. [190]
Oleanolic acid456.70C30H48O31591.4Woźniak et al. [190]
Pomolic acid472.70C30H48O4870.3Woźniak et al. [190]
Pigments ***
all-trans-neoxanthin600.884C40H56O41.14–7.11 d Delgado–Pelayo [191]
all-trans-violaxanthin600.870C40H56O41.70–18.26 dDelgado–Pelayo [191]
9-cis-violaxanthin600.870C40H56O40.23–2.37 dDelgado–Pelayo [191]
9-cis-Neoxanthin 600.884C40H56O40.56–21.92 dDelgado–Pelayo [191]
13-cis-violaxanthin600.884C40H56O40.10–0.29 dDelgado–Pelayo [191]
all-trans-antheraxanthin584.885C40H56O30.09–0.57 dDelgado–Pelayo [191]
all-trans-zeaxanthin568.886C40H56O20.08–0.52 dDelgado–Pelayo [191]
all-trans-lutein568.871C40H56O21.32–61.53 dDelgado–Pelayo [191]
9-cis-lutein568.871C40H56O20.06–1.61 dDelgado–Pelayo [191]
13-cis-lutein568.871C40H56O20.10–2.76 dDelgado–Pelayo [191]
all-trans-β-carotene536.8726C40H561.49–30.31 dDelgado–Pelayo [191]
Monoestrified xanthophylls 3.01–10.18 dDelgado–Pelayo [191]
Diesterified xanthophylls 4.93–38.39 dDelgado–Pelayo [191]
Chlorophyll a893.509C55H72MgN4O518.39–1049.26 dDelgado–Pelayo [191]
Chlorophyll b907.492C55H70MgN4O64.78–309.86 dDelgado–Pelayo [191]
Other compounds
Resveratrol228.24C14H12O30.16–0.89Gorjanović et al. [183]
Pterostilbene256.296C16H16O30.19–0.90Gorjanović et al. [183]
Pinocembrin256.25C15H12O40.22–0.39Gorjanović et al. [183]
Palmitic acid256.4C16H32O27.25 fWalia [192]
Linoleic acid280.45C18H32O243.81 fWalia [192]
Oleic acid282.47C18H34O246.50 fWalia [192]
Stearic acid284.48C18H36O21.72 fWalia [192]
Arachidic acid312.54C20H40O20.72 fWalia [192]
Pinnatifidanoside D518C24H38O12344.4Oleszek et al. [185]
* dm—dry matter, a expressed as mg gallic acid equivalent, b expressed as quercetin equivalent, c depending on the methods of extraction or apple pressing, d depending on apple varieties, e expressed as rutin equivalent, f expressed in % of the oil extracted from apple seeds, ** determined in seeds, *** determined in peels.
Table 15. Biological activity and potential applications of phytochemicals obtained from apple residues.
Table 15. Biological activity and potential applications of phytochemicals obtained from apple residues.
MaterialExtract/CompoundBiological Activity/ApplicationReferences
Apple seedscoumarins- antioxidant activity
- antitumor activity
Khalil and Mustafa [188]
Apple pomace phenolic-rich fractions: phloridzin, phloretin, quercitrin, and quercetin as major constituents- anti-inflammatory, cytotoxic activity, anticancer activity (SiHa, KB, and HT-29 cell lines)Rana et al. [195]
Apple pomacecrude extract and four fractions- antioxidant activity
- antifungal activity against crop pathogens: Neosartorya fischeri, Fusarium oxysporum, Botrytis sp. Petriella setifera
Oleszek et al. [185]
Flour from apple pomaceethanolic extractantioxidant, antidiabetic, and antiobesity effectsGorjanović et al. [183]
Apple pomaceUrsolic acidantimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, and antitumor activitiesCargnin et al. [196]
Apple peelursolic acidantimalarial activitySilva et al. [197]
Apple pomaceethanolic extract: 5-O-caffeoylquinic acid as the major compound- antioxidant and antimicrobial activity (against Propionibacterium acnes)
- application in dermal formulations
Arraibi et al. [198]
Apple pomaceExtracts (boiling water with 1% acetic acid)
and fractions
(polyphenols and carbohydrates)
- antioxidant activity
- anti-inflammatory activity
- application as a food ingredient in yogurt formulation
Fernandes et al. [178]
Apple pomacephloretin, phloridzinantioxidant and antibacterial activity (Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli)Zhang et al. [199]
Apple pomacePhloridzin oxidation products (POP)application as natural yellow pigments in gelled dessertsHaghighi and Rezaei [200]
Apple pomacePhloridzin oxidation products (POP)- strong antioxidant activity
- application as a yellow pigment
Liu et al. [201]
Apple peelextract- application as corrosion inhibitor for carbon steelVera et al. [202]
Table 16. Phytochemicals identified and quantified in grape residues.
Table 16. Phytochemicals identified and quantified in grape residues.
NameMW
[g mol−1]
CxHyOzConcentration [mg/kg dm]References
Total phenolic content (TPC) 280–7770 b,e,f
14,200–26,700 a,e
Pintać et al. [208]
Eyiz et al. [209]
Total flavonoid content (TFC) 40–1150 b,e,f
2403–4178 a,e
Pintać et al. [208]
Eyiz et al. [209]
Total monomeric anthocyanins 539–1598 a,eEyiz et al. [209]
Total proanthocyanidin 3.23–6.32 a,eEyiz et al. [209]
Phenolic acids—hydroxybenzoic acid
Gallic acid170.12C7H6O524–246 a,e
250 a
4.86–70 a,e,f
75.5 a
596.36 a
3030 c
Farías–Campomanes et al. [210]
Wang et al. [211]
Pintać et al. [208]
Daniel et al. [212]
Wittenauer et al. [213]
Jara-Palacios et al. [214]
Digalloylquinic acid496.4C21H20O14299 aGonçalves et al. [215]
Ellagic acid302.197C14H6O8620 a
8.37–64.1 b,e,f
4.315 a
Wang et al. [211]
Pintać et al. [208]
Daniel et al. [212]
Protocatechuic acid154.12C7H6O49–63 a,e
940 c
Farías–Campomanes et al. [210]
Jara–Palacios et al. [214]
Vanillic acid168.15C8H8O424–237 a,e
0.53–13.0 b,e,f
10 a
Farías–Campomanes et al. [210]
Pintać et al. [208]
Daniel et al. [212]
4-hydroxybenzoic acid138.122C7H6O39–63 a,e
0.16–1.71 b,e,f
Farías–Campomanes et al. [210]
Pintać et al. [208]
Syringic acid198.17C9H10O548–593 a,e
0.13–20.6 b,e,f
Farías–Campomanes et al. [210]
Pintać et al. [208]
Galloylshikimic acid326.25C14H14O9438.1 aGonçalves et al. [215]
Phenolic acids—hydroxycinnamic acid
Chlorogenic acid354.31C16H18O90.14–11.50 b,e,f
4.715 a
Pintać et al. [208]
Daniel et al. [212]
Caffeic acid180.16C9H8O40.41–1.68 b,e,f
9.735 a
630 c
Pintać et al. [208]
Daniel et al. [212]
Jara–Palacios et al. [214]
Caftaric acid312.23C13H12O9735.32 a
880 c
11–168 a,g
Wittenauer et al. [213]
Jara–Palacios et al. [214]
Jara–Palacios et al. [216]
cis-Coutaric acid296.23C13H12O85.3–11.8 a,gJara–Palacios et al. [216]
trans-coutaric296.23C13H12O85.5–20.7 a,gJara–Palacios et al. [216]
p-Coumaric acid164.16C9H8O36–39 a,e
0.13–1.49 b,e,f
8.175 a
510 c
Farías–Campomanes et al. [210]
Pintać et al. [208]
Daniel et al. [212]
Jara–Palacios et al. [214]
Flavonoids—flavonols
Quercetin302.236C15H10O73–15 a,e
11.3–78.9 b,e,f
200 a
2.473–15.637 c
4.7 a
2870 c
344–403 c,f
Farías–Campomanes et al. [210]
Pintać et al. [208]
Wang et al. [211]
Balea et al. [217]
Daniel et al. [212]
Jara–Palacios et al. [214]
Drosou et al. [218]
Quercetin-3-O-glucoside463.371C21H19O120.39–38.0 b,e,f
67.6 a
2374.32 a
16,900 c
475–609 c,f
Pintać et al. [208]
Gonçalves et al. [215]
Wittenauer et al. [213]
Jara–Palacios et al. [214]
Drosou et al. [218]
Quercetin-3-O-glucuronide478.362C21H18O1313.4 a
2432.29 a
15,800 c
990–1285 c,f
Gonçalves et al. [215]
Wittenauer et al. [213]
Jara–Palacios et al. [214]
Drosou et al. [218]
Quercetin-3-O-pentoside434.35C20H18O1152.0 aGonçalves et al. [215]
Quercetin-3-O-rhamnoside448.4C21H20O1149.4 aGonçalves et al. [215]
Quercetin-3-O-galactoside 2120 cJara–Palacios et al. [214]
Hyperoside464.38C21H20O120.17–5.67 b,e,fPintać et al. [208]
Rutin610.52C27H30O160.11–8.19 b,e,f
2.136 c
5.3 a
690 c
Pintać et al. [208]
Balea et al. [217]
Daniel et al. [212]
Jara–Palacios et al. [214]
Isorhamnetin316.265C16H12O76.42–72.9 b,e,fPintać et al. [208]
Isorhamnetin 3-O-glucoside478.406C22H22O1266.3 a
145–175 c,f
Gonçalves et al. [215]
Drosou et al. [218]
Myricetin318.24C15H10O8170 a
0.21–2.31 b,e,f
0.341–1.029 c
452–711 c,f
Wang et al. [211]
Pintać et al. [208]
Balea et al. [217]
Drosou et al. [218]
Myricetin-3-O-hexoside480.38C21H20O13184.6 aGonçalves et al. [215]
Myricetin-3-O-glucoside480.38C21H20O13781–1044 cDrosou et al. [218]
Quercitrin448.38C21H20O110.21–3.99 b,e,fPintać et al. [208]
Laricitrin-O-hexoside494.405C22H22O1346.8 a
216–434 c,f
Gonçalves et al. [215]
Drosou et al. [218]
Kaemferol286.239C15H10O680 a
2.45–53.1 b,e,f
3.38–5.74 c
150 c
Wang et al. [211]
Pintać et al. [208]
Balea et al. [217]
Jara–Palacios et al. [214]
Kaempferol 3-O-glucoside448.38C21H20O110.05–23.0 b,e,f
3670 c
Pintać et al. [208]
Jara–Palacios et al. [214]
Kaempferol 3-glucuronide462.4C21H18O12310 cJara–Palacios et al. [214]
Syringetin 3-glucoside508.432C23H24O13168–200 c,fDrosou et al. [218]
Quercitrin448.38C21H20O113.272–14.952 cBalea et al. [217]
Isoquercitrin464.0955C21H20O122.429–65.698 cBalea et al. [217]
Flavonoids—flavanols
Catechin290.27C15H14O61460 a
5.01–193 b,e,f
945 a
1101.7 a
10,496.63 a
12,200 c
Wang et al. [211]
Pintać et al. [208]
Gonçalves et al. [215]
Daniel et al. [212]
Wittenauer et al. [213]
Jara–Palacios et al. [214]
Epicatechin290.271C15H14O61280 a
5.80–309 b,e,f
949 a
322.5 a
8994.93 a
6340 c
Wang et al. [211]
Pintać et al. [208]
Gonçalves et al. [215]
Daniel et al. [212]
Wittenauer et al. [213]
Jara–Palacios et al. [214]
Epigallocatechin306.27C15H14O7900 aWang et al. [211]
Procyanidin dimers578.1424C30H26O123306 aGonçalves et al. [215]
Procyanidin trimers866.77C45H38O181105 a
12,920 c
Gonçalves et al. [215]
Jara–Palacios et al. [214]
Procyanidin tetramer1155.0C60H50O24806 a
16,540 c
Gonçalves et al. [215]
Jara–Palacios et al. [214]
Procyanidin B1578.1424C30H26O124858.58 c
15,500 c
Wittenauer et al. [213]
Jara–Palacios et al. [214]
Procyanidin B2578.1424C30H26O124277.04 c
4940 c
Wittenauer et al. [213]
Jara–Palacios et al. [214]
Procyanidin B3578.1424C30H26O124350 cJara–Palacios et al. [214]
Procyanidin B4578.1424C30H26O12 Jara–Palacios et al. [216]
Flavonoids—flavones
Apigenin270.24C15H10O50.58 bPintać et al. [208]
Apigenin 7-O-glucoside432.38C21H20O100.02–12.7 b,e,fPintać et al. [208]
Luteolin286.24C15H10O60.23–1.07 b,e,fPintać et al. [208]
Luteolin-7-O-glucoside448.38C21H20O110.36–4.46 b,e,fPintać et al. [208]
Flavonoids—flavanones
Chrysoeriol300.27C16H12O60.04–0.51 b,e,fPintać et al. [208]
Naringenin272.26C15H12O50.11–0.83 b,e,fPintać et al. [208]
Flavonoids-flavanonols
Astilbin450.396C21H22O113120–4200 b,eNegro et al. [219]
Flavonoids—anthocyanins
Delphinidin 3-O-glucoside465.387C21H21O124.68–54.7 b,e,f
775–936 c,f
7–57 a,e
Pintać et al. [208]
Drosou et al. [218]
Negro et al. [219]
Cyanidin 3-O-glucoside449.388C21H21O112.21–11.3 b,e,f
3–37 b,e
Pintać et al. [208]
Negro et al. [219]
Petunidin-3-O-glucoside479.41C22H23O121.28–35.4 b,e,f
77.0 a
1295–1618 c,f
Pintać et al. [208]
Gonçalves et al. [215]
Drosou et al. [218]
Peonidin-3-O-glucoside463.41C22H23O111.51–64.7 b,e,f
202.2 a
1591–2044 c,f
Pintać et al. [208]
Gonçalves et al. [215]
Drosou et al. [218]
Malvidin 3-glucoside493.441C23H25O120.80–384 b,e,f
443.0 a
12,182–17,687 c,f
Pintać et al. [208]
Gonçalves et al. [215]
Drosou et al. [218]
Peonidin-3-O-acetyl glucoside505.4C24H25O12+90.2 aGonçalves et al. [215]
Malvidin 3-O-acetyl glucoside535.5C25H27O13+96.2 a
937–1182 c,f
Gonçalves et al. [215]
Drosou et al. [218]
Malvidin 3-caffeoyl glucoside655.6C32H31O151079–1450 c,fDrosou et al. [218]
Petunidin 3-coumaroyl glucoside625.5536C31H29O14735–806 c,fDrosou et al. [218]
Peonidin 3-coumaroyl glucoside609.5542C31H29O13796–1231 c,fDrosou et al. [218]
Malvidin-3-coumaroyl glucoside639.58C32H31O144700–7232 c,fDrosou et al. [218]
Delphinidin303.24C15H11O75570 aWang et al. [211]
Cyanidin287.24C15H11O63620 aWang et al. [211]
Petunidin317.27C16H13O715,500 aWang et al. [211]
Peonidin301.27C16H13O625,320 aWang et al. [211]
Malvidin331.30C17H15O710,390 aWang et al. [211]
Terpenoids
Ursolic acid456.70C30H48O30.96–606 b,e,fPintać et al. [208]
Coumarins
Esculetin178.14C9H6O40.23–0.66 b,e,fPintać et al. [208]
Stilbenes
resveratrol228.243C14H12O30.07–3.37 b,e,f
5.3–6.2 a,e
Pintać et al. [208]
Iora et al. [220]
Fatty acids
Palmitic acid (16:1)256.4C16H32O285.43–110.97 dIora et al. [220]
Palmitoleic acid (16:1 n-7)254.414C16H30O27.04–13.21 dIora et al. [220]
Stearic acid (18:0)284.48C18H36O226.75–38.77 dIora et al. [220]
Oleic acid (18:1 n-9)282.47C18H34O2118.15–141.54 d Iora et al. [220]
Linoleic acid (18:2 n-6)280.4472C18H32O2627.21–684.47 dIora et al. [220]
Linolenic acid (18:3 n-3)278.43C18H30O211.26–19.97 dIora et al. [220]
Arachidic acid (20:0)312.5304C20H40O23.12–3.45 dIora et al. [220]
Eicosenoic acid 20:1 n-9310.51C20H38O20.89–2.57 dIora et al. [220]
Behenic acid 22:0340.58C22H44O21.47–2.42 dIora et al. [220]
Lignoceric acid 24:0368.63C24H48O21.03–1.67 dIora et al. [220]
SFA 117.79–157.07 dIora et al. [220]
MUFA 131.56–156.95 dIora et al. [220]
PUFA 647.17–695.73 dIora et al. [220]
n-6/n-3 31.43–60.80 dIora et al. [220]
SFA/PUFA 0.17–0.24 dIora et al. [220]
TFA 938.41–945.08 dIora et al. [220]
Other compounds
Vanillin152.15C8H8O325.5 aDaniel et al. [212]
trans-piceid390.388C20H22O87.75 aDaniel et al. [212]
a expressed in mg per kg of dry matter (DM), b expressed in mg per kg of fresh weight, c expressed in mg per kg of the extract, d expressed in mg per g of total lipids extracted from grape pomace, e depending on methods of extraction, f depending on varieties of grapes, g depending on the part of the pomace: seeds, skins, stems.
Table 17. Biological activity and potential applications of phytochemicals obtained from grape residues.
Table 17. Biological activity and potential applications of phytochemicals obtained from grape residues.
MaterialExtract/CompoundBiological Activity/ApplicationReferences
Fresh and fermented grape pomaceExtract - antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and antiproliferative activityBalea et al. [217]
Grape pomaceHydroalcoholic extract (saponins, tannins, and flavonoids as active constituents)- anthelmintic activitySoares et al. [229]
Grape pomaceWhole apple pomace (phenolic compounds as main constituents)- reduction of the severity of non-alcoholic hepatic steatosis
- inhibition of steatohepatitis
- improvement in insulin sensitivity
- reduction of ectopic fat deposition in mice
Daniel et al. [212]
Grape pomacecrude extract and four fractions: the most active free phenolic acids fraction- inhibitory effect on collagenase and elastaseWittenauer et al. [213]
White grape pomaceextract: catechin, epicatechin, quercetin, and gallic acid as the main active constituents- antiproliferative activity against adenocarcinoma cellJara–Palacios et al. [214]
Grape pomaceEthanolic extract- antioxidant activity
- potential application as additives to food enhancing nutritional value and improving storability
Iora et al. [220]
Grape stemextracts- prevention of radical oxidation of the polyunsaturated fatty acids of low-density lipoproteins (LDL)
- reduction of intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS)
- prevention of cardiovascular diseases
Anastasiadi et al. [223]
Grape seedsprocyanidin-rich extract- antibacterial activity against
Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori)
Silvan et al. [230]
Grape seedsprocyanidin-rich extract- antihypertensive activityQuiñones et al. [231]
Grape pomacephenolics- antioxidant propertiesTournour et al. [232]
Grape pomace“Enocianina”—anthocyanin-rich extract- radical scavenging, enzymatic,
antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activity
- application as a colorant in the food industry
Della Vedova et al. [233]
Grape pomacephenolics- photoprotective activity
- reduction of the negative effects of UV radiation on the skin, such as erythema and photoaging
Hübner et al. [234]
 
Grape pomaceextracts- wastewater remediationGavrilas et al. [235]
Grape pomace ethanolic extract- application as additives to yogurtOlt et al. [236]
Grape pomacealcoholic extract- application as a reducing agent of the precursor silver nitrate, a process that has led to the obtaining of silver nanoparticles (NP Ag) by reducing the ions.Asmat–Campos et al. [237]
Grape skinresveratrol- as an antioxidant in the meat industryAndrés et al. [238]
Grape seedsflavonoids- antimicrobial activity in meatBiniari et al. [239]
Grape steamprocyanidins- inhibition of toxic compoundsBordiga et al. [240]
Grape pulpphenolic compounds- pigment protection in meatChen et al. [241]
Grape pomaceanthocyanins- modulation of the sensory characteristic of meatCrupi et al. [242]
Grape pomacestilbenes- modulation of the sensory characteristic of meatMainente et al. [243]
Grape seedsUnsaturated fatty acids
(linoleic and oleic acid)
- substitution nitrate and nitriteGárcia–Lomillo and González-San José [244]
Table 18. Phytochemicals identified and quantified in citrus residues.
Table 18. Phytochemicals identified and quantified in citrus residues.
NameCitrus ResiduesMW
[g mol−1]
CxHyOzConcentration
[mg/kg dm]
References
Total phenolskinnow peel 13,840–27,910 a,cYaqoob et al. [246]
lime peel 5.2 bKaretha et al. [247]
mandarin peel 4.0 bKaretha et al. [247]
lemon peel 4.7 bKaretha et al. [247]
pomelo peel 6.4 bKaretha et al. [247]
rough lemon peel 4.1 bKaretha et al. [247]
citron peel 6.8 bKaretha et al. [247]
sour orange peel 30.4–1354.4 aBenayad et al. [248]
lime and orange peel 3860Barbosa et al. [249]
orange peel 7055–19,885 aLiew et al. [250]
orange seeds oil 4430Jorge et al. [251]
Total flavonoids kinnow peel 610–11,770 aYaqoob et al. [246]
sour orange peel 2.3–603.6 aBenayad et al. [248]
orange peel 854.7–2975.4 aLiew et al. [250]
sour orange peel 589.4Olfa et al. [252]
lime peel 95.3Olfa et al. [252]
orange peel 132.2Olfa et al. [252]
lemon peel 610.5Olfa et al. [252]
mandarin peel 275.9Olfa et al. [252]
Total carotenoidsorange seeds oil 19Jorge et al. [251]
Organic acids
Lactic acidorange peel90.08C3H6O35463–9861 aLiew et al. [250]
Citric acidorange peel192.1C6H8O719,587–27,910 aLiew et al. [250]
L-mallic acidorange peel134.1C4H6O53056–5064 aLiew et al. [250]
Kojic acidorange peel141.1C6H6O4111.2–116.4 aLiew et al. [250]
Ascorbic acidorange peel176.1C6H8O61.12–7.32 aLiew et al. [250]
Phenolic acids—hydroxybenzoic acids
Ellagic acidlime and orange peel302.20C14H6O8109.7Barbosa et al. [249]
Gallic acidlime and orange peel
sour orange peel
orange peel
170.12C7H6O55.7
111.3–866.7 a
8.84–17.81 a
Barbosa et al. [249]
Benayad et al. [249]
Liew et al. [250]
Protocatechuic acidorange peel154.12C7H6O424.55–65.92 aLiew et al. [250]
4-hydroxybenzoic acidorange peel138.12C7H6O326.27–42.50 aLiew et al. [250]
Phenolic acids—hydroxycinnamic acids
Ferulic acidsour orange peel
orange peel
yuzu peel
sour orange peel
mandarin peel
lime peel
grapefruit peel
lemon peel
orange peel
194.18C10H10O4360.0–17,237.7 a
154.8–477.3 a
135
139
101
18
29
18
19
Benayad et al. [248]
Liew et al. [250]
Lee et al. [253]
Lee et al. [253]
Lee et al. [253]
Lee et al. [253]
Lee et al. [253]
Lee et al. [253]
Lee et al. [253]
p-coumaric acidsour orange peel
yuzu peel
sour orange peel
mandarin peel
lime peel
grapefruit peel
lemon peel
orange peel
164.16C9H8O3242.4
101
123
52
76
16
48
18
Benayad et al. [248]
Lee et al. [253]
Lee et al. [253]
Lee et al. [253]
Lee et al. [253]
Lee et al. [253]
Lee et al. [253]
Lee et al. [253]
Chlorogenic acidmandarin peel
sour orange peel
yuzu peel
sour orange peel
mandarin peel
354.31C16H18O90.08–68.58 a
4.494
39
96
40
Šafranko et al. [254]
Benayad et al. [248]
Lee et al. [253]
Lee et al. [253]
Lee et al. [253]
Caffeic acidsour orange peel
orange peel
yuzu peel
sour orange peel
mandarin peel
lime peel
lemon peel
180.16C9H8O4384.0–1326.1 a
54.5–210.1 a
55
27
15
4
12
Benayad et al. [248]
Liew et al. [250]
Lee et al. [253]
Lee et al. [253]
Lee et al. [253]
Lee et al. [253]
Lee et al. [253]
Flavonoids—flavonols
Rutinmandarin peel
orange peel
mandarin peel
610.52C27H30O160.18–4.27 a
9.56–10.11 a
177
Šafranko et al. [254]
Liew et al. [250]
Lee et al. [253]
Flavonoids—flavanols
Catechinsour orange peel
orange peel
290.26C15H14O6378.3–1296 a
40.92–366.8 a
Benayad et al. [248]
Liew et al. [250]
Epigallocatechinorange peel 84.23–317.14 aLiew et al. [250]
Flavonoids-flavones
Apigeninsour orange peel
orange peel
270.24C15H10O538,552.1
57.91–159.67
Benayad et al. [248]
Liew et al. [250]
Diosmetin lime and orange peel300.26C16H12O63.2Barbosa et al. [249]
Vitexinorange peel432.38C21H20O1030.73–117.27 aLiew et al. [250]
Luteolinorange peel286.24C15H10O693.47–275.14 aLiew et al. [250]
Tangeretinlime and orange peel372.37C20H20O714.1Barbosa et al. [249]
Flavonoids-flavanones
Naringeninlime and orange peel
sour orange peel
272.25C15H12O54.7
5745.6–96,942 a
Barbosa et al. [249]
Benayad et al. [248]
Hesperetinlime and orange peel302.28C16H14O610.5Barbosa et al. [249]
 
Hesperidinlime and orange peel
mandarin peel
yuzu peel
mandarin peel
lime peel
lemon peel
orange peel
610.57C28H34O152326.5
0.16–15.07 a
5367
21,496
4862
6400
16,299
Barbosa et al. [249]
Šafranko et al. [254]
Lee et al. [253]
Lee et al. [253]
Lee et al. [253]
Lee et al. [253]
Lee et al. [253]
Naringinlime and orange peel
yuzu peel
sour orange peel
mandarin peel
lime peel
grapefruit peel
lemon peel
580.54C27H32O1410.2
5255
19,750
146
36
31,314
41
Barbosa et al. [249]
Lee et al. [253]
Lee et al. [253]
Lee et al. [253]
Lee et al. [253]
Lee et al. [253]
Lee et al. [253]
Narirutinlime and orange peel
mandarin peel
yuzu peel
sour orange peel
mandarin peel
lime peel
grapefruit peel
lemon peel
orange peel
580.54C27H32O14293.4
0.03–5.11 a
4734
64
10,642
559
2827
185
1342
Barbosa et al. [249]
Šafranko et al. [254]
Lee et al. [253]
Lee et al. [253]
Lee et al. [253]
Lee et al. [253]
Lee et al. [253]
Lee et al. [253]
Lee et al. [253]
Furanocumarins
Bergaptensour orange peel
lime peel
lemon peel
216.19C12H8O464
196
3
Lee et al. [253]
Lee et al. [253]
Lee et al. [253]
Bergamottinlime peel
grapefruit peel
lemon peel
338.40C21H22O481
25
16
Lee et al. [253]
Lee et al. [253]
Lee et al. [253]
Volatile compounds
Caprylaldehydesour orange peel128.21C8H16O180.5 bBenayad et al. [248]
Decanalsour orange peel156.27C10H20O167.2 bBenayad et al. [248]
Decanolsour orange peel158.28C10H22O129.8 bBenayad et al. [248]
Geranyl Acetatesour orange peel196.29C12H20O2172.7 bBenayad et al. [248]
D-limonenesour orange peel136.24C10H163939.4 bBenayad et al. [248]
β-linaloolsour orange peel154.25C10H18O2038.7 bBenayad et al. [248]
Linalool oxidesour orange peel170.25C10H18O2282.0 bBenayad et al. [248]
Linalyl acetatesour orange peel196.29C12H20O2589.1 bBenayad et al. [248]
β-myrcenesour orange peel136.23C10H161972.8 bBenayad et al. [248]
Nerolsour orange peel154.25C10H18O106.2 bBenayad et al. [248]
β-ocimenesour orange peel136.23C10H16465.2 bBenayad et al. [248]
α-pinenesour orange peel136.23C10H16350.1 bBenayad et al. [248]
β-pinenesour orange peel136.23C10H16417.6 bBenayad et al. [248]
α-terpineolsour orange peel154.25C10H18O389.5 bBenayad et al. [248]
Carotenoids
Violaxantin dilauratemandarin peel965.44C64H100O61.33Huang et al. [255]
Violaxanthin dipalmitatemandarin peel1077.7C72H116O62.07Huang et al. [255]
Zeaxanthinmandarin peel568.88C40H56O21.31Huang et al. [255]
α-cryptoxanthinmandarin peel552.85C40H56O0.10Huang et al. [255]
β-cryptoxanthinmandarin peel552.85C40H56O4.96Huang et al. [255]
Luteinkinnow peel
mandarin peel
568.87C40H56O29.26–28.89 a
0.88
Saini et al. [256]
Huang et al. [255]
β-carotenemandarin peel536.87C40H565.87Huang et al. [255]
(E/Z)-phytoenemandarin peel544.94C40H6425.07Huang et al. [255]
β-citraurinmandarin peel432.6C30H40O21.57Huang et al. [255]
Other compounds
α-tocopherolorange seeds oil430.71C29H50O2135.7Jorge et al. [251]
phytosterolorange seeds oil414.72C29H50O1304.2Jorge et al. [251]
malic acidsour orange peel134.09C4H6O5122.4–2247 aBenayad et al. [248]
a depending on methods of extraction, b expressed in mg kg−1 of fresh matter of peel, c expressed in mg kg of the extract.
Table 19. Biological activity and potential applications of phytochemicals obtained from citrus residues.
Table 19. Biological activity and potential applications of phytochemicals obtained from citrus residues.
MaterialExtract/CompoundBiological Activity/ApplicationReferences
sour orange peelacetone extract
chloroform extract
ethanol-water extract
naringenin
gallic acid
- hypoglycaemic and antidiabetic actions
- α-glucosidase inhibition
- α-amylase inhibition
Benayad et al. [248]
orange peelethanol and methanol extract- antimicrobial activity against Xanthomonas, Bacillus subtilis, Azotobacter, Pseudomonas,
Klebsiella
Gunwantrao et al. [267]
pomelo peelextract- antimicrobial and antioxidants activityKhan et al. [268]
lemon peeleriodictoyl, quercetin, and diosmetin- antiviral activity against SARS-CoV-2Khan et al. [269]
orange peelextracts: methanol/water, ethanol/water and acetone/water- antioxidant activityLiew et al. [250]
sour orange
lime
orange
lemon
mandarin
ethanol/water extracts- antioxidant activityOlfa et al. [252]
kinnow peel and pomaceextract (supercritical CO2 extraction)- antioxidant activity
- for making functional cookies
Yaqoob et al. [246]
citrus pomace (Persian lime and orange)extract rich in aglycones of flavanones, mainly naringenin and hesperetin- activity against Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar TyphimuriumBarbosa et al. [265]
lemon, orange andgrapefruit peel essential oils (EOs)- antifungal activity against Rhizoctonia solanii and Sclerotium rolfsii
- insecticidal activity against Rhyzopertha dominica, Oryzaephilus sp., and Sitophilus granarius
Achimón et al. [270]
mandarin peelExtract rich in polyphenols, mainly narirutin and hesperidin- inhibition of the growth of Aspergillus flavusLiu et al. [271]
citrus peelnobiletin- activity against pancreatic cancer through cell cycle arrestJiang et al. [272]
citrus peelnobiletin- activity against prostate cancer thanks to its anti-inflammation propertiesOzkan et al. [273]
mandarin peelpolymethoxyflavone-rich extract (PMFE)- alleviating the metabolic syndrome by regulating the gut microbiome and amino acid metabolismZeng et al. [263]
Mandarin peelpolymethoxyflavone-rich extract (PMFE)- alleviating high-fat diet-induced hyperlipidemiaGao et al. [262]
Orange and lemon peelExtract rich in flavanones- reduction in glucose, cholesterol and triglycerides levels in the blood, with positive effects on the regulation of hyperglycemia and lipid metabolismChiechio et al. [264]
Lime and orange peelExtract rich in flavanones, mainly hesperetin, hesperidin, narirutin, and naringin- antibacterial activity against Salmonella entericaBarbosa et al. [265]
Bitter orange peelExtract rich in luteolin 7-O glucoside- antioxidant activity
- activity against gram-positive bacteria and Fusarium oxysporum
Lamine et al. [266]
Mandarin peelExtract rich in rutin- activity against gram-negative bacteria and the three pathogenesis fungi: Bacillus subtilis, Candida albicans and Aspergillus flavus.Lamine et al. [266]
Orange peelExtract rich in polymethoxyflavones- antifungal activity against Aspergillus niger.Lamine et al. [266]
Pomegranate peelEthanolic and methanolic extract- activity against gram-positive, gram-negative, and two fungal pathogenic strains
- used as a natural food preserver
Hanafy et al. [274]
Table 20. Phytochemicals identified and quantified in olive waste.
Table 20. Phytochemicals identified and quantified in olive waste.
NameOlive ResidueMW [g mol−1]CxHyOzConcentrationReferences
Phenolic acids
Cinnamic aciddeffated olives148.16C9H8O22.3 a
12–205 b,c
Alu’datt et al. [281]
Zhao et al. [282]
p-coumaric aciddeffated olives
olive pomace
164.04C9H8O310.3 a
84–884 b,c
5.01 b
Alu’datt et al. [281]
Zhao et al. [282]
Benincasa et al. [283]
o-coumaric acidolive pomace164.04C9H8O370–1562 b,cZhao et al. [282]
Caffeic aciddeffated olives
leaves
OMWW *
olive pomace
180.16C9H8O43.1 a
150 b
270 b
39–420 b,c
Alu’datt et al. [281]
Ladhari et al. [284]
Ladhari et al. [284]
Zhao et al. [282]
Protocatechuic aciddeffated olives154.12C7H6O422.2 aAlu’datt et al. [281]
Hydroxybenzoic aciddeffated olives138.12C7H6O34.2 aAlu’datt et al. [281]
Vanillic aciddeffated olives
olive pomace
168.14C8H8O49.0 a
203–2530 b,c
Alu’datt et al. [281]
Zhao et al. [282]
Ferulic aciddeffated olives
olive pomace
194.18C10H10O46.9 a
23–326 b,c
Alu’datt et al. [281]
Zhao et al. [282]
Gallic aciddeffated olives
olive pomace
170.12C7H6O57.1 a
7–223 b,c
Alu’datt et al. [281]
Zhao et al. [282]
Syringic aciddeffated olives 198.17C9H10O54.1 aAlu’datt et al. [281]
Sinapic aciddeffated olives224.21C11H12O514.4 aAlu’datt et al. [281]
4-hydroxyphenyl acetic acidolive pomace152.15C8H8O3660–4450 b,cZhao et al. [282]
Secoiridoids and derivatives
Oleuropein leaves
OMWW
OMWW
olive pomace
540.54C25H32O1313,050 b
9 b
103 b
811–12,231 b,c
Ladhari et al. [284]
 
Benincasa et al. [283]
Zhao et al. [282]
Oleuropein aglyconeleaves
OMWW
378.4C19H22O83410 b
6 b
Ladhari et al. [284]
 
Verbascosideleaves
OMWW
OMSW **
olive pomace
624.59C29H36O151160 b
6 b
5 b
833–10,159 b,c
700 b
Ladhari et al. [284]
 

Zhao et al. [282]
Benincasa et al. [283]
Ligstrosideleaves
OMWW
OMSW
524.51C25H32O12360 b
21 b
56 b
Ladhari et al. [284]
 
Tyrosolleaves
OMWW
OMSW
OMWW
OMWW
olive pomace
138.16C8H10O2450 b
1870 b
4 b
182 b
2043 b
162–3514 a,c
Ladhari et al. [284]
 

Poerschmann et al. [285]
Benincasa et al. [283]
Zhao et al. [282]
Hydroxytyrosolleaves
OMWW
OMWW
OMWW
olive pomace
154.16C8H10O3130 b
4450 b
225 b
1481 b
1356–17,298 a,c
Ladhari et al. [284]
 
Poerschmann et al. [285]
Benincasa et al. [283]
Zhao et al. [282]
Flavonoids
Luteolinleaves
OMWW
OMSW
olive pomace
OMWW
286.24C15H10O62970 b
1010 b
4 b
10–3515 b,c
62.38 b
Ladhari et al. [284]
 
Zhao et al. [282]
Benincasa et al. [283]
Luteolin 7-O-glucosideleaves
OMWW
olive pomace
448.37C21H20O117620 b
150 b
42–4086 b,c
88.55 b
Ladhari et al. [284]
 
Zhao et al. [282]
Benincasa et al. [283]
Luteolin 7-O-rutinoside 594.51C27H30O15
Luteolin 4′-O-glucosideOMWW448.37C21H20O1111.48 bBenincasa et al. [283]
Rutinleaves
OMWW
deffated olives
 
olive pomace
610.52C27H30O16110 b
110 b
3.3 a
770–11,048 b,c
 
48.52 b
Ladhari et al. [284]
 
Alu’datt et al. [281]
Uribe et al. [286]
Zhao et al. [282]
Benincasa et al. [283]
Hesperidindeffated olives610.56C28H34O157.4 aAlu’datt et al. [281]
Quercetinleaves
OMWW
OMSW
deffated olives
302.24C15H10O74390 b
1060 b
37 b
5.7 a
Ladhari et al. [284]
 

Alu’datt et al. [281]
Apigenin 270.24C15H10O5 
7–469 b,c
Benincasa et al. [283]
Zhao et al. [282]
Apigenin 7-O-glucoside 432.38C21H20O1055–1345 b,cZhao et al. [282]
* OMWW—olive mill wastewater, ** olive mill solid waste, a percentage of total phenolic content based on peak areas, b expressed in mg/g dry weight, c depending on the methods of extraction.
Table 21. Biological activity and potential applications of phytochemicals obtained from olive waste.
Table 21. Biological activity and potential applications of phytochemicals obtained from olive waste.
MaterialExtract/CompoundBiological Activity/ApplicationReferences
olive leaveextract- antioxidant, antimicrobial
- antitumor activity
- reduction of the risk of coronary heart disease
Taamalli et al. [288]
OMWW *phenolic extract- antioxidant activity
- DPPH radical-scavenging activity
Kreatsouli et al. [291]
pressed olive cakephenolic compounds- superoxide anion scavenging
- LDL oxidation
- the protection of catalase against hypochlorous acid
Alu’datt et al. [281]
Olive oil mill wasteSFE extract and ethanol extract (hydroxytyrosol as the main compound)- antioxidant activity
- DPPH radical-scavenging activity
- application as an antioxidant act against peroxidation of virgin olive and sunflower oils
Lafka et al. [292]
OMWWpolyphenolic fraction- formulation of ophthalmic hydrogel containing a polyphenolic fraction Di Mauro et al. [294]
dried olive mill wastewaterpolyphenols- application as ingredients
in the food industry for obtaining functional and nutraceutical foods, as well as in the pharmaceutical industry
Benincasa et al. [297]
OMWWpolyphenol fraction- antibacterial activities against Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus subtilis, Escherichia coli, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa Obied et al. [298]
- fungicidal activities Yangui et al. [299]
olive leaves and olive pomacephenolic compounds- ability as antimicrobial, antifungal,
antitoxigenic to reduce aflatoxigenic fungi hazard and its aflatoxins
- application as a manufacturing process, like, food supplement or preservatives
Abdel–Razek et al. [300]
olive leavesIR extract- antiradical activity
- antioxidant activity
- inhibition of the growth of Aspergillus flavus and production of aflatoxin B1
- inhibition of 20 strains of Staphylococcus aureus
Abi–Khattar et al. [302]
OMWWhydroxytyrosolcytoprotection of brain cellSchaffer et al. [303]
* OMWW—olive mill wastewater.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Oleszek, M.; Kowalska, I.; Bertuzzi, T.; Oleszek, W. Phytochemicals Derived from Agricultural Residues and Their Valuable Properties and Applications. Molecules 2023, 28, 342. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28010342

AMA Style

Oleszek M, Kowalska I, Bertuzzi T, Oleszek W. Phytochemicals Derived from Agricultural Residues and Their Valuable Properties and Applications. Molecules. 2023; 28(1):342. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28010342

Chicago/Turabian Style

Oleszek, Marta, Iwona Kowalska, Terenzio Bertuzzi, and Wiesław Oleszek. 2023. "Phytochemicals Derived from Agricultural Residues and Their Valuable Properties and Applications" Molecules 28, no. 1: 342. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28010342

APA Style

Oleszek, M., Kowalska, I., Bertuzzi, T., & Oleszek, W. (2023). Phytochemicals Derived from Agricultural Residues and Their Valuable Properties and Applications. Molecules, 28(1), 342. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28010342

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop