Next Article in Journal
An AIE-Active NIR Fluorescent Probe with Good Water Solubility for the Detection of Aβ1–42 Aggregates in Alzheimer’s Disease
Next Article in Special Issue
Effect of Calcination Temperature on the Activity of Unsupported IrO2 Electrocatalysts for the Oxygen Evolution Reaction in Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Water Electrolyzers
Previous Article in Journal
Quercetin and Ferulic Acid Elicit Estrogenic Activities In Vivo and In Silico
Previous Article in Special Issue
Ag(e)ing and Degradation of Supercapacitors: Causes, Mechanisms, Models and Countermeasures
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 28
Issue 13
10.3390/molecules28135109
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Electrode Potential-Dependent Studies of Protein Adsorption on Ti6Al4V Alloy

by
Belma Duderija
1,
Alejandro González-Orive
2,*,
Christoph Ebbert
1,
Vanessa Neßlinger
1,
Adrian Keller
1 and
Guido Grundmeier
1,*
1
Technical and Macromolecular Chemistry, Paderborn University, Warburger Str. 100, 33098 Paderborn, Germany
2
Department of Chemistry, Materials and Nanotechnology Institute, University of La Laguna, Avda, Astrofisico Francisco Sánchez s/n, 38206 San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Spain
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2023, 28(13), 5109; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28135109
Submission received: 25 May 2023 / Revised: 23 June 2023 / Accepted: 26 June 2023 / Published: 29 June 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Exclusive Feature Papers in Electrochemistry)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
This article presents the potential-dependent adsorption of two proteins, bovine serum albumin (BSA) and lysozyme (LYZ), on Ti6Al4V alloy at pH 7.4 and 37 °C. The adsorption process was studied on an electropolished alloy under cathodic and anodic overpotentials, compared to the open circuit potential (OCP). To analyze the adsorption process, various complementary interface analytical techniques were employed, including PM-IRRAS (polarization-modulation infrared reflection-absorption spectroscopy), AFM (atomic force microscopy), XPS (X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy), and E-QCM (electrochemical quartz crystal microbalance) measurements. The polarization experiments were conducted within a potential range where charging of the electric double layer dominates, and Faradaic currents can be disregarded. The findings highlight the significant influence of the interfacial charge distribution on the adsorption of BSA and LYZ onto the alloy surface. Furthermore, electrochemical analysis of the protein layers formed under applied overpotentials demonstrated improved corrosion protection properties. These studies provide valuable insights into protein adsorption on titanium alloys under physiological conditions, characterized by varying potentials of the passive alloy.

1. Introduction

Protein adsorption on different metallic surfaces has been extensively investigated in the last 50 years [1]. Due to their specific properties such as surface passivation, which promotes enhanced corrosion resistance, low rate of metal ion release, good overall mechanical properties, and little tendency to cause adverse cell or tissue reactions, titanium, and Ti-alloys, Ti6Al4V, in particular, are widely used in surgical instruments and medical implants, especially for orthopedic and orthodontic applications [2]. The native surface oxide layer on Ti and its alloys allows tissues, proteins, and other biomolecules to interact with the surface of the biomaterial at the interface [3]. The surface chemistry as well as the structure and topography of the alloy determines the interactions between biomolecules and the biomaterial [3]. Indeed, it has been reported that the failure of an implant occurs at the interface resulting in micro-motion, inflammation, and, possibly, bone fracture [4]. To overcome these issues and ensure implant longevity, the interface between tissues and biomaterials could be optimized via smart tailoring of the surface. Physicochemical properties of metal and metal oxides formed at the surface of the Ti6Al4V biomaterial upon exposure to environmental conditions are expected to strongly influence the interaction of proteins with metal surfaces. The roughness and topography of the surface are well known to have a significant impact on cell and tissue adhesion and ultimately on the shear strength at the bone-implant interface [5]. Several different surface treatments such as polishing, anodization, and chemical etching, among others, have been largely employed to reach suitable surface conditions promoting osseointegration [6,7,8,9,10]. It has been proposed by Birch et al. [7] that by electropolishing Ti substrates an extremely smooth, leveled, reformed, and uniform TiO2 surface can be formed since the etching rate at the peaks or burrs is higher than that in depressions on the surface [11]. Changes in surface chemistry for Ti-rich alloys may be more complex, but, in general, electropolishing is expected to modify the oxide film and decrease the surface roughness. In the past, highly corrosive electrolytes [12] were used to perform electropolishing, which raises environmental and safety concerns. Kern et al. have shown that Ti and Ti-based alloys can be electrochemically etched or polished using less corrosive sulphuric acid–methanol electrolytes [13].
The factors that influence and determine protein adsorption on metallic surfaces are generally classified into three groups: the nature of the protein (i), the surface characteristics (ii), and the type of medium (iii). Structural flexibility [14], isoelectric point [15], and molecular size [16] of proteins as well as the surface area occupied by the adsorbed protein molecule directly affect the extent and strength of the adsorptive interactions between a protein molecule and a metal surface. Further, the pH of the adsorption medium, the electrolyte type, and the concentration naturally affect the ionization state of a protein and the charge of the solid surface, which both have a significant impact on protein adsorption behavior [16]. The surface charge is largely considered to be one of the factors that affect the protein adsorption behavior [17]. In fact, it should be possible to alter the protein adsorption processes by applying an anodic or cathodic overpotential. However, these effects are not well understood yet. Beykal et al. demonstrated that electrostatic interactions play a key role in total mass adsorption and the rate of adsorption of bovine serum albumin (BSA) on charged and uncharged gold surfaces [18]. Brusatori et al. observed that the rate and extent of albumin and cytochrome c adsorption on indium-tin-oxide coated waveguide sensor chips and a modified optical waveguide lightmode spectroscopy (OWLS) biosensing system were significantly increased by an applied voltage [19]. In fact, most studies have been carried out on model surfaces [20,21,22,23], but very little effort has been put on the investigation and understanding of the influence of the electrode potential on the electrostatic interactions of proteins, or other amphoteric macromolecules, with clinically relevant biomaterials such as Ti6Al4V.
In this article, we present the investigation of the adsorption of two different proteins, i.e., BSA and lysozyme (LYZ), on Ti6Al4V alloy at open circuit potential (OCP) and after applying an electrode potential. Prior to their usage, Ti6Al4V substrates are electrochemically polarized with the aim to get a smooth, thin, and reproducible oxide layer [7,11]. The surface characterization before and after the electrochemical treatment was carried out by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), Raman spectroscopy and atomic force microscopy (AFM) measurements. To investigate the effect of the electrode potential on protein adsorption, several surface analytical techniques, such as XPS, AFM, and polarization-modulation infrared reflection-absorption spectroscopy (PM-IRRAS), were employed. In situ electrochemical PM-IRRAS and electrochemical quartz crystal microbalance (E-QCM) measurements were used for the analysis of the adsorption kinetics of the two different proteins under applied potentials. BSA and LYZ were chosen as model globular protein since they are commonly present in body fluids and exhibit a quite different size and isoelectric point (pI). Considering their corresponding pIs (pI(BSA) = 4.5, pI(LYZ) = 9) [14], negative and positive overpotentials were applied to promote the adsorption of LYZ and BSA, respectively.

2. Results and Discussion

Net charge and size are expected to have a noticeable impact on protein adsorption. BSA and LYZ showing rather different isoelectric points (pI), namely, 4.9 and 11.4 [24], have been selected herein since they will be negatively and positively charged in PBS at pH 7.4, respectively. Consequently, with the aim to promote protein adsorption on Ti6Al4V alloy, positive and negative overpotentials were applied to the alloy in BSA or LYZ-containing PBS electrolyte.
Specifically, +0.25 and +0.5 V (vs. OCP) in 0.1, 2.0, and 4.0 g/L BSA-containing PBS solution and −0.25 and −0.5 V (vs. OCP) in 0.1, 2.0, and 4.0 g/L LYZ-containing PBS solution were applied for 2 h and pH 7.4.
Open circuit potential (OCP) curves registered for electrochemically polished Ti6Al4V alloy in the solutions of PBS with and without BSA and LYZ for 2 h at pH 7.4 and 37 °C are presented in Figure S1 in the Supplementary Materials. Cyclic voltammetry curves of electrochemically polished Ti6Al4V alloy in PBS solution without and with BSA/LYZ concentrations of 4 g/L are shown in Figure S2 in the Supplementary Materials. The course of the cyclic voltammetry curves indicated that the adsorption of BSA and LYZ at cathodic and anodic overpotentials was performed in a potential region where charging of the electric double layer dominates, and Faradaic currents can be neglected.

2.1. Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM)

AFM measurements were carried out to characterize the topography of the Ti6Al4V samples before and after BSA and LYZ adsorption at OCP and under an applied potential. Figure 1 shows the morphological changes on Ti6Al4V surfaces after protein adsorption.
After immersing the alloy in the protein solutions of different concentrations for 2 h, without and under applied potential, an increase in the root-mean-square (RMS) roughness of the surface could be observed for both when an overpotential was applied. This result indicates that for the negatively charged BSA, the adsorption is promoted by the positive overpotential, while the positively charged LYZ is attracted by the negative charge on the substrate surface.
Furthermore, after protein adsorption for 2 h and 37 °C at OCP for LYZ protein concentrations of 0.1 and 2.0 g/L, network-like structures could be detected with a small increase in the RMS value when compared to that exhibited by the bare alloy (see Figure S3 in the Supplementary Materials). At 4 g/L, the arising of LYZ 3D aggregates could be detected with an increase in the RMS to 3.05 ± 0.23 nm. LYZ adsorption under an applied potential of −0.5 V (vs. OCP) shows 3D aggregates even at the lowest concentration of 0.1 g/L with the RMS value of 4.05 ± 0.13 nm. When increasing the concentration from 0.1 g/L to 2.0 and 4 g/L LYZ, the amount, size, and surface coverage of 3D aggregates as well as the RMS roughness increase. The aggregates start to adsorb on top of each other and very close to others and finally collapse into a multilayered network-like structure. A very similar trend could be detected for BSA adsorption. BSA adsorption at OCP shows, at the highest concentration, the formation of 3D aggregates randomly distributed on the surface of the alloy. The RMS roughness increased slightly with BSA concentration. Further, when the BSA adsorption occurred under applied positive overpotential, the 3D aggregates were formed even at the lowest BSA concentration. With increasing concentration, the amount of the aggregates rose, forming higher network-like structures by adsorption on top of each other. The RMS roughness increased from 1.46 ± 0.14 nm for the bare alloy to the 8.04 ± 1.53 nm registered after adsorption under applied overpotential in 4 g/L of BSA. Protein adsorption at OCP is driven by a gain in entropy and the formation of attractive non-covalent interactions such as van der Waals forces and hydrogen bonds of the BSA and LYZ hydration shell [23]. During adsorption, BSA and LYZ molecules could also form an arrangement induced by electrostatic interactions between negative and positive patches in the protein known as polar ordering [23] or enclose counterions leading to the formation of growing multilayers as can be seen in the AFM images of Figure 1c,d. According to the described results, the overpotential applied to the electrode leading to the opposite surface charge increased the BSA and LYZ adsorption and subsequent growth of protein films on the Ti6Al4V alloy. This phenomenon can be associated with the attraction between negatively charged BSA or positively charged LYZ at pH 7.5 and the oppositely charged surface.

2.2. Polarization-Modulation Infrared Reflection-Absorption Spectroscopy (PM-IRRAS)

PM-IRRAS analysis of electrochemically polished Ti6Al4V specimens after BSA or LYZ adsorption at OCP or under applied potential was carried out to analyze the differences in intensities of amide I, II, and III bands, characteristic of proteins [25], which are detected after their adsorption on metal surfaces. Figure 2 shows the PM-IRRA spectra of BSA or LYZ adsorption at OCP and after applying different overpotentials, +0.25 V and +0.5 V (vs. OCP) for BSA or −0.25 V and −0.5 V (vs. OCP) for LYZ, for three different concentrations.
Figure 2a,b shows PM-IRRA spectra collected after BSA or LYZ adsorption at OCP or under applied potential in PBS containing 4 g/L BSA or LYZ, respectively. The spectral region of interest includes the amide I, amide II, and amide III bands. These bands, characteristic for all proteins after adsorption on metal surfaces [26], arise from the different vibrational modes of the polypeptide backbone of the protein. The amide I band is located approximately between 1600 and 1700 cm−1 and represents mainly 80% of the C=O stretching vibration of the amide group coupled to 10% C-N stretching and 10% in-plane N-H bending modes [27]. The amide II band is located approximately between 1500 and 1600 cm−1 representing mainly N-H bending coupled to some C-N stretching of the protein’s amide groups [28]. The amide III appears between 1350 and 1480 cm−1 and represents C-N stretching, N-H bending, C=O stretching, and O=C-N bending [28]. In this study, the analysis was focused on the amide I band of the PM-IRRA spectra due to its strong, well-defined signal. In addition, the increase in the intensity of the amide bands has been largely associated with an increasing protein concentration on the surface [29]. The rise in the intensity of the amide bands observed in Figure 2 confirms that the larger the opposite charge on the alloy surface, the higher the amount of protein adsorbed. To further clarify this effect, bar plots of the area of amide I band after peak integration for three different concentrations of BSA or LYZ at OCP and two different potentials (vs. OCP) are presented in Figure 2c,d.

2.3. X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS)

To obtain valuable information about the chemical composition of the protein-modified Ti6Al4V surfaces, XPS measurements were performed on the bare substrates before and after BSA and LYZ adsorption both at OCP and for applied overpotentials. Electrochemically promoted protein adsorption was confirmed by the appearance of the corresponding Ti, O, C, and N signals. Survey spectra of electrochemically polished Ti6Al4V before and after protein adsorption at OCP and under applied overpotential are presented in Figures S4 and S5 in the Supplementary Materials. Results obtained from their quantitative analysis are summarized in Table 1.
The intensity of the N1s peak of the samples immersed in the PBS solution containing BSA or LYZ was significantly higher under applied potential (see Table 1), confirming the adsorption of higher amounts of proteins. A deeper characterization of the surface chemistry for bare electrochemical polished Ti6Al4V substrates and Ti6Al4V specimens after BSA and LYZ protein adsorption with and without applied overpotential was carried out by means of the assessment of the high-resolution core level spectra of Ti2p, O1s, C1s, and N1s and is presented in Figure 3 for LYZ and Figure 4 for BSA.
Figure 3a and Figure 4a show the Ti2p high-resolution spectra for the result of protein adsorption in 4 g/L of LYZ or BSA at OCP on electrochemically polished Ti6Al4V specimens, respectively, while the ones registered under applied potential are displayed in Figure 3e and Figure 4e. The peak at 458.8 eV was attributed to Ti(IV) 2p3/2 and the peak at 463.4 eV to Ti(IV) 2p1/2. The contributions at 458.3 and 464.5 eV are assigned to Ti(III) 2p3/2 and Ti(III) 2p1/2, respectively [30]. The high-resolution spectra of Ti2p of the electrochemically polished Ti6Al4V after BSA or LYZ protein adsorption at OCP, Figure 3a and Figure 4a, exhibit similar features to those shown by the bare electrochemically polished samples displayed in Figure S6 in the Supplementary Materials by showing the characteristic peak at 458.7 eV of Ti(IV) 2p3/2 and the peak at 463.4 eV of Ti(IV) 2p1/2. The Ti(II) and Ti(III) contributions, present in the bare electrochemically polished Ti6Al4V specimen, were, however, not detected after protein adsorption under applied potentials, see Figure 3e and Figure 4e. Interestingly, the absence and the significantly reduced intensity of the Ti2p signal after BSA and LYZ adsorption, respectively, under applied potential is indicative of the growth of a thicker protein film under these experimental conditions, as can be seen in Table 1. The O1s region registered after BSA or LYZ adsorption was fitted to three contributions at 530.1 and 531.4 eV, which account for Ti-O and C=O bonds [31], respectively. Moreover, a peak at 532.1 eV, which represents the binding energy of O1s in CONH2 [32], was found for the sample after BSA or LYZ adsorption at OCP or after applying a potential across the interface. What is more, the Ti-O peak was noticeably reduced after adsorption in 4 g/L LYZ under applied potential and it was not found for the case of BSA (see Figure 3f and Figure 4f). These results are indicative of the adsorption of LYZ or BSA on the Ti6Al4V surface and the formation of thicker protein films for the applied overpotentials. The C1s region, Figure 3c,g and Figure 4c,g, was fitted to three contributions at 284.9, 286.4, and 288.1 eV attributed to C-C, (C-N, C-O), and (O=C-O, N-C=O), respectively. It has been reported that high-binding energy signals are caused by carbon in C-N, C-O, and O=C-N groups of the BSA and LYZ molecules [31,32]. The peak assigned to O=C-N and C-N after potential-controlled protein adsorption is significantly higher than for the alloy after protein adsorption at OCP. This indicates that higher amounts of BSA or LYZ are adsorbed on the Ti6Al4V samples when the adsorption occurs for the oppositely charged alloy surface. The N1s regions for all the samples mostly show a contribution at 400.0 eV, with a little contribution at 401.7 eV, which are attributed to N-C=O and N-H groups, respectively, which are characteristic of proteins [32], as can be seen in Figure 3d,h and Figure 4d,h.

2.4. Electrochemical Polarization-Modulation Infrared Reflection-Absorption Spectroscopy (E-PM-IRRAS) and Electrochemical Quartz Crystal Microbalance (E-QCM)

Figure 5 shows the in situ measurements carried out using the electrochemical PM-IRRAS liquid cell described in the Section 3. The spectra are showing the characteristic peaks corresponding to the amide I, II, and III bands of BSA and LYZ adsorption at 1650 cm−1, 1575 cm−1, and 1450 cm−1, respectively. The use of D2O leads to a shift of amide I band for around 18 cm−1 and amide II band for around 30 cm−1 towards lower wavenumbers, for measurement in solution compared to the measurement in air. This effect is primarily attributed to the hydrogen/deuterium exchange (H/D exchange) [33]. The applied potential does not cause any significant change in the shape of the amide bands. The increase in the intensity of the amide I band indicates that adsorption of BSA or LYZ molecules under applied potential increases with time. Figure 5a shows that after 10 min of adsorption of BSA, a significant peak of amide I could be detected with a steady increase between 20 and 40 min. Figure 5b shows a time dependent LYZ adsorption under applied potential. The adsorption of LYZ shows a similar trend with a time intensity increase of the amide I band.
The in situ PM-IRRAS measurements of BSA and LYZ protein adsorption confirmed that enhanced protein adsorption occurs for oppositely charged surfaces as a consequence of the respective polarization. In order to support the PM-IRRAS results and to understand how the proteins interact with the electrochemically polished Ti6Al4V alloy surface, we monitored the adsorption of BSA and LYZ using an E-QCM device with TiO2-coated quartz crystals. Proteins, in general, firstly adsorb onto a surface in their native conformation and then, depending on the protein-surface interaction, remain in their native conformation or unfold and spread on the surface [26,34,35]. Figure 6 shows the representative time-resolved E-QCM data showing frequency shifts registered in 4 g/L BSA or LYZ after applying two different electrode potentials, displaying characteristic time-frequency dependent profiles in response to interactions between the proteins and the surface. Upon protein injection at t = 2000 s, a marked decrease in ΔF was observed at OCP for both proteins corresponding to rapid adsorption marked by a steep drop reaching a minimum corresponding to surface saturation followed by a slow monotonic increase in ΔF, attributed to thermal drift [35].
A stronger decrease in the frequency shifts after applying potential is observed for BSA and LYZ adsorption when compared to those registered at OCP. At pH = 7.5, BSA is negative while LYZ is positively charged. When the sensor is oppositely charged, we expected to measure higher protein adsorption on the surface due to promoted electrostatic attraction. This is confirmed in Figure 6 where the measured frequency shifts (ΔF) are larger after increasing the applied potential values. Thus, the larger the overpotential is applied the higher the mass of the adsorbed protein. Figure 6a shows a drop in ΔF from −0.8 to −30 Hz after applying +0.25 V (vs. OCP) and an enhanced decrease in ΔF, i.e., from −0.9 to −93 Hz, after applying +0.5 V (vs. OCP) for BSA adsorption. In the case of LYZ adsorption, Figure 6b, a frequency shift drop occurs from −0.4 to −21 Hz after applying −0.25 V (vs. OCP) and from −0.6 to −35 Hz when −0.5 V (vs. OCP) is applied. Overall, the trends observed via QCM measurements of BSA or LYZ adsorption under applied potential are in excellent agreement with those observed via AFM and PM-IRRAS.
The amino acids present in proteins can both accept and donate a proton via reaction with their amine (-NH2) and carboxylic acid (-COOH) functional groups, respectively. This amphoteric behavior leads to a pH-dependent change of the protein charge. At pH values lower and higher than its pI of 4.9 [36], BSA carries a positive and negative net charge, respectively. LYZ, in contrast, has a much higher pI of 11.4 [24], so that BSA and LYZ have opposite net charges between pH 4.9 and 11.4. At pH 7.4, BSA and LYZ are in the normal form (N-form) with the most compact conformation [37,38]. Protein adsorption performed at OCP suggests that the adsorption process is driven by a gain in entropy and attractive non-covalent interactions such as van der Waals forces and hydrogen bonds of the BSA and LYZ hydration shell [25]. At OCP, BSA and LYZ molecules could also form an arrangement induced by electrostatic interactions between negative and positive patches in the protein known as polar ordering [25] or enclose counterions leading to the formation of a multilayer growing that could be seen in the AFM images of Figure 1a,c. According to the described results, the potential applied to the electrode increased the BSA and LYZ adsorption and growth on the Ti6Al4V alloy. However, an electrically polarized surface would naturally attract or repel protein molecules. An electric field-based interaction was proposed as one of the main mechanisms for the adsorption of a protein on electrode surfaces in previous studies [39,40,41,42,43]. The hypothesis is that this phenomenon can be associated with the attraction between negative BSA or positively charged LYZ at pH 7.4 and the oppositely charged surface.

2.5. Electrochemical Characterization

The charge transfer capabilities exerted by adsorbed BSA and LYZ on electrochemically polished Ti6Al4V surfaces without and under applied potential have been characterized by registering cyclic voltammograms in PBS (pH = 7.5). Siddiqui et al. have studied BSA adsorption on Ti3Cu alloy showing similar results to ours for the BSA adsorption on metal alloys [44]. Figure 7 shows the second cycle registered for all different samples resulting from protein adsorption plotted together. By analyzing the voltammetric peaks in the CV collected for the bare Ti6Al4V, one anodic peak A1 (corresponding to Ti (III) to Ti (IV) oxidation), and three cathodic peaks, i.e., C1 arising at −0.66 V (vs. Ag/AgCl), C2 at −0.94 V (vs. Ag/AgCl), and C3 at −1.29 V (vs. Ag/AgCl), preceding the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) can be distinguished. A similar electrochemical profile has been reported for anatase TiO2 [45]. It was observed that after protein adsorption, a significant decrease in the current peaks is observed, which is indicative of the formation of thin protein films progressively blocking charge transfer through them and limiting diffusion of electrolyte ions to the metal oxide surface. Some other studies also showed that protein adsorption stops the metal ions release by blocking electrochemical dissolution and slowing down the corrosion [46,47]. The thicker the protein film adsorbed on the surface of the alloy, the smaller the voltammetric peaks. The observed inhibition of the redox peaks in the CVs correlates well with the adsorbed amounts of protein as discussed before.
Once BSA and LYZ protein film was adsorbed on the alloy, the reduction C1 and C2 (cathodic) peaks mostly disappeared as can be seen in Figure 7, and the voltammograms showed only titanium oxidation and reduction peaks associated with the Ti (III)/Ti (IV)redox couple preceding HER with a gradual decrease in current densities associated to them.

3. Materials and Methods

Prior to their usage, Ti6Al4V alloy plates (purchased from Goodfellow) were solvent-cleaned, i.e., ultrasonicated for 15 min in pure tetrahydrofuran (≥98%, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), propan−2-ol (≥98%, Sigma-Aldrich), and ethanol (≥98%, Sigma-Aldrich). BSA (≥98%, Sigma-Aldrich) and LYZ (≥98%, Sigma-Aldrich) proteins were dissolved in phosphate buffer saline solution (PBS, pH = 7.4, Sigma-Aldrich) with concentrations of 0.1 g/L, 2.0 g/L, and 4.0 g/L.

3.1. Surface Pre-Conditioning and Electrochemical Modification of the Substrate Surfaces

Solvent-cleaned Ti6Al4V alloy plates were first ground with SiC paper (grit size 220 to 4000, WS Flex, Hermes, Paris, France) until they were mirror polished. The substrates were then rinsed in Milli-Q water and ethanol and dried under nitrogen flow. Next, the electrochemical polishing was performed in a three-electrode cell setup using Ti6Al4V plates (1 × 1 cm2) as working electrodes, a gold coil as the counter electrode, and a commercial Ag/AgCl (3 M KCl, Radiometer Analytical, Villeurbanne, France) as the reference electrode in an acidic dried electrolyte, 2.25 M H2SO4 (≥98%, Sigma-Aldrich) in anhydrous CH3OH (≥98%, Sigma-Aldrich), for 180 s at 9 V at room temperature [7]. With this system, only the portion exposed to the electrolyte, i.e., 0.785 cm2 of the surface, was electrochemically polished. A Reference 600TM (Gamry Instruments, Warminster, PA, USA) was used to carry out the chronoamperometry (CA) experiments. The Ti6Al4V plate was placed between a copper electrical contact and the aperture, which ensured that the plates were sandwiched between two perspex blocks. The AFM, XPS, and Raman measurements of Ti6Al4V samples before and after electrochemical polishing are presented in Figures S3, S4, S6 and S7 in the Supplementary Materials, respectively. The latter confirms the successful decrease in the roughness on the nano and microscale, which is accompanied by an increase in the TiO2 ratio in the oxide layer.

3.2. Protein Adsorption

The BSA and LYZ protein adsorption at pH = 7.4 on the electrochemically polished Ti6Al4V substrates were first performed whit an ex situ approach by dipping the samples in a PBS aqueous solution containing 0.1, 2.0, and 4 g/L of BSA and LYZ, separately, for 2 h at 37 °C. Second, the potential dependent protein adsorption studies were performed in a three-electrode-cell setup equipped with an Ag/AgCl reference electrode, a gold wire counter electrode, and treated Ti6Al4V substrates as working electrodes in a 4, 2, and 0.1 g/L BSA and LYZ in PBS via chronoamperometry by applying +0.25 and +0.5 V (vs. OCP, 30 min) for 2 h at 37 °C for adsorption of BSA and −0.25 and −0.5 V (vs. OCP, 30 min) for 2 h at 37 °C for LYZ adsorption. After the measurement was completed, the samples were carefully rinsed, dropwise, with Mili-Q water and dried under gentle nitrogen flux. The as-prepared samples were then characterized with XPS, AFM, and PM-IRRAS.

3.3. Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM)

AFM imaging was performed using a JPK Nanowizard III (Bruker GmbH, Billerica, MA, USA) equipped with an acoustic enclosure in alternating contact mode operating in ambient air conditions at a scan rate of 0.5–1.2 Hz. HQ:NSC18/AlBS cantilevers (75 kHz and 2.8 Nm−1, nominal radius of 8 nm, MikroMasch, Tallinn, Estonia) were used. For subsequent data processing and calculation of RMS roughness values for estimation of surface roughness, the Gwyddion open-source software [48] (V 2.56, Gwyddion) was employed. RMS roughness measurements were obtained from the average of the roughness values collected from three different 5.0 × 5.0 µm2 areas present in three equally prepared samples.

3.4. X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS)

XPS measurements were performed using an Omicron ESCA+ system (Omicron NanoTechnology GmbH, Taunusstein, Germany) equipped with a hemispherical energy analyzer at a base pressure of <5 × 10−10 mbar. Spectra were recorded at pass energies of 100 eV for survey spectra and 20 eV for core-level element spectra. A monochromatic Al Kα (1486.3 eV) X-ray source with a spot diameter of 1 mm was used. The take-off angle of the detected photoelectrons was set to 60° regarding the surface plane. XPS spectra were internally calibrated to the C1s peak (binding energy, BE = 285.0 eV). For peak fitting, a combination of Gaussian (70%) and Lorentzian (30%) distribution was used. Data analysis was performed with CASA-XPS software. Quantification was performed through an integration of the peaks with respect to the corresponding relative sensitivity factor (RSF) values. A Shirley-type background correction was used.

3.5. Polarization-Modulation Infrared Reflection-Absorption Spectroscopy (PM-IRRAS)

The adsorbed protein on electrochemically polished Ti6Al4V samples was characterized by using a Vertex 70 (Bruker Optics, Ettlingen, Germany) with an external PM-IRRAS set-up (p-polarization with an aluminum wire grid), which was modulated at 50 kHz with a ZnSe Photo-Elastic-Modulator (PMA50, Bruker Optics Germany) equipped with a ZnSe lens onto a cryogenic mercury cadmium telluride (LN-MCT) detector. The total number of scans was set as 1024. The energy resolution was set as 2 cm−1.

3.6. Electrochemical Polarization-Modulation Infrared Reflection-Absorption Spectroscopy (E-PM-IRRAS)

PM-IRRAS is used to study molecular assemblies at various interfaces. The development of a liquid PM-IRRAs cell allows the monitoring of in situ molecular assembly processes at the electrolyte/metal interface. Thus, the PM-IRRAs liquid cell setup allows the investigation of thin film formation on metallic surfaces at several electrolyte conditions, such as pH, electrolyte composition, and applied potential as well as the study of specific interactions between adsorbed molecules and the sample. The schematic representation of the cell is illustrated in Figure 8.
To examine the molecular structure of an electrolyte/metal surface in more detail, the liquid cell is inserted into the IR chamber. As can be seen in Figure 1, the cell consists of a movable block, micrometer screw-gage, sample holder for the working electrode, liquid in- and outlet, optical window, and counter and reference electrodes. The movable block can be driven back and forth by means of a micrometer screw. The samples are attached to the top of the block with vacuum. To carry out the measurements using IR radiation, the substrate is placed in front of a hemicylindric CaF2 crystal. For optimal intensities, the detector was set at an angle of 45°. Previous studies of Brand [49] have shown that when the IR path passes through new phases, the incoming intensity to the detector is affected by electrolyte thickness and optical window material (angle of incidence). The results have shown that the electrolyte thickness of 5 μm in combination with CaF2 provides very good incoming intensities at the detector. The spectral range is given by the optical window material. In the case of CaF2, it ranges from 4000 to 1000 cm−1, which allows any type of metallic substrates that reflect the IR light to be investigated [49].
However, the measurements in liquid generally show lower intensities than in air. The aperture setting was set to 2 mm and the number of scans was 1024. Since applying positive and negative electrochemical potentials (vs. OCP) in the ex situ measurements via the three-electrode setup has shown enhanced adsorption of BSA and LYZ proteins from bulk solution at physiological pHs, we next studied the in situ adsorption of BSA and LYZ using the PM-IRRAS liquid cell.
For this study, the mechanically polished Ti6Al4V samples were mounted in the PM-IRRAS liquid cell in the IR chamber, and the BSA and LYZ solution prepared in PBS (pH = 7.4 in 100 mL D2O water at 37 °C) 4 g/L BSA and LYZ were pumped in the cell with a flow of 80 µL/min, respectively. The protein adsorption on the electrochemically polished Ti6Al4V was performed by means of a three-electrode-cell, with Ag/AgCl reference electrode, a gold wire-counter electrode, and treated Ti6Al4V substrates as working electrodes integrated into the PM-IRRAS liquid cell. For BSA and LYZ adsorption, bias potentials of +0.5 V and −0.5 V (vs. OCP) were applied, respectively. First, OCP was measured for 5 min in the protein-containing PBS solution in D2O. After that, the corresponding potentials (vs. OCP) were applied for 10 min and the cell was washed with PBS in D2O. Next, the sample was brought to the optical window (around 5 µm distance) to start the IR measurement. The same procedure was repeated after 10, 20, 40, 60, 80, 100, and 120 min for both BSA and LYZ. When finished, the samples were separated from the optical window with the micrometer screw, and the PBS solution was pumped through the cell. Next, the cell was washed with D2O water by pumping it through the cell for 10 min. Afterward, the cell was disassembled and the optical window was cleaned with ethanol. The use of D2O leads to a shift of the amide I band at around 18 cm−1 and the amide II band at around 30 cm−1 towards lower wavenumbers for measurements carried out in liquid in comparison to those performed in air. It is important to mention that the use of D2O is indicated when investigating proteins to avoid overlapping of the amide I signal with water peaks. The results fit very well with the literature data [49]. This effect is primarily attributed to the hydrogen/deuterium exchange (H/D exchange) and thus to the mass of the oscillating atoms and the oscillation frequency [50].

3.7. Electrochemical Quartz Crystal Microbalance (E-QCM)

To understand how proteins interact with the electrochemically polished Ti6Al4V alloy, we monitored the adsorption of BSA and LYZ using the E-QCM device (E-QCM 10 M; Gamry Instruments) [51]. E-QCM allows tracking the changes in the resonant frequency of the sensor, which may be related to mass changes that occur due to protein adsorption upon electrochemical control using the gold-coated 5 MHz quartz crystal as the working electrode; a platinum foil serves as the counter electrode, and a Ag/AgCl electrode as the reference electrode connected to potentiostat-galvanostat Gamry 600TM. To support the results acquired from the PM-IRRAS liquid cell measurement, 5 MHz quartz crystals (Quartz Pro, Sweden AB, Stockholm, Sweden) were coated with 80 nm of Ti6Al4V and 7 nm of TiO2. The 4 g/L BSA and LYZ solution was prepared by dissolution in 10 mM PBS. After 30 min of system stabilization, a 500 µL of BSA or LYZ solution was injected into the system with a flow rate of 80 µL/min using a peristaltic pump. The protein adsorption kinetic was monitored for 2 h using Gamry Resonator software (Gamry Instruments) at 37 °C after measuring OCP for 5 min followed by applying a potential of +0.25 and +0.5 V (vs. OCP) for BSA, while −0.25 and −0.5 V (vs. OCP) were applied for the case of LYZ.

3.8. Electrochemical Characterization

A three-electrode setup cell connected to a potentiostat-galvanostat Gamry 600TM was used to carry out the electrochemical characterization of the substrates. Bare and protein-modified Ti6Al4V plates (1 cm × 1 cm) were used as working electrodes, whereas a gold coil and a commercial Ag/AgCl (3 M KCl, Radiometer Analytical) were employed as the counter and reference electrodes, respectively. The surface of the samples was exposed to the supporting electrolyte solution, namely, PBS at pH = 7.4 and 37 °C. The OCP was measured for 30 min. The charge-transfer properties exhibited by protein films were investigated by carrying out cyclic voltammetry measurements. Five consecutive cyclic voltammograms were registered for each sample at 50 mVs−1.

4. Conclusions

In the present study, we investigated the adsorption of negatively charged albumin (BSA) and positively charged lysozyme (LYZ) at physiological pH at OCP or under applied potential on electrochemically polished Ti6Al4V alloy, focusing on the impact of surface electrode potential and the concentration of the proteins. The protein adsorption under potential control at the electrolyte/Ti6Al4V alloy interface was demonstrated by means of complementary interface analytical techniques. Data extracted from AFM, XP, and PM-IRRA spectra proved the formation of firmly attached thin protein films on the metallic substrates, and the enhanced adsorption of BSA and LYZ on the alloy occurred under suitably applied electrode potentials. E-PM-IRRAS and E-QCM measurements demonstrated that electrostatic interactions play a key role in the total mass of BSA and LYZ adsorbed to charged surfaces by showing an increase of protein adsorption with time for increasing applied potentials. When the protein adsorption is performed at open circuit potential (OCP), BSA and LYZ adsorb on the surface of the Ti-alloy driven by attractive non-covalent interactions. If an overpotential is applied, the respective double layers lead to an additional electrostatic attraction of the oppositely charged protein. The results presented herein would open the door for the in situ monitoring of the evolution of the conformation and secondary structure of adsorbed proteins, together with the assessment of protein adsorption kinetics, on technical materials and upon electrochemical control by means of a highly sensitive surface analysis technique such as PM-IRRAS.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules28135109/s1; Figure S1: OCP curves registered for electrochemically polished Ti6Al4V alloy in PBS solution (black line and dots) and PBS solutions containing 4 g/L BSA (red dots) or LYZ (green) for 2 h at pH 7.4 and 37 °C. Figure S2: Cyclic voltammograms registered for bare Ti6Al4V alloy after electrochemical polishing (black line) in PBS (black line) and PBS containing 4 g/L BSA (blue) or 4 g/L LYZ (red). Figure S3: 2.0 × 2.0 µm2 AFM images of bare Ti6Al4V (a) and after electrochemical polishing at 9 V for 180 s (b). Topographic and phase contrast images are displayed in the upper left and right panels, respectively. Representative cross-section profiles are portrayed in the corresponding lower panels. Figure S4: XPS survey spectra registered for (a) bare Ti6Al4V and (b) after electrochemical polishing at 9 V for 180 s. Figure S5: XPS survey spectra of (a) electrochemically polished Ti6Al4V alloy (b); after adsorption of 4 g/L BSA at OCP (c); after adsorption of 4 g/L of BSA under applied potential (+0.5 V vs. OCP) (d); after 4 g/L LYZ adsorption at OCP and (e) after 4 g/L LYZ adsorption under applied overpotential (−0.5 V vs. OCP). Figure S6: High-resolution core-level XP spectra of (a) Ti2p, (b) O1s, (c) C1s, and (d) N1s registered for a bare Ti6Al4V sample after electrochemical polishing at 9 V for 180 s. Figure S7: Raman spectra of Ti6Al4V before (black line) and after electrochemical polishing at 9 V for 180 s (red).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, B.D., A.G.-O., V.N., A.K. and G.G.; methodology, B.D., A.G.-O., A.K. and G.G.; validation, B.D. and A.G.-O.; formal analysis, B.D., A.G.-O. and A.K.; investigation, B.D., A.G.-O. and C.E.; resources, G.G.; data curation, B.D., A.G.-O., V.N. and A.K.; writing—original draft preparation, B.D.; writing—review and editing, B.D., A.G.-O., A.K. and G.G.; visualization, B.D., V.N. and C.E.; supervision, A.G.-O., A.K. and G.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors thank the German Research Foundation (DFG) for their financial support of the project 3040106002. A.G.O. thanks NANOtec, INTec, and ULL for laboratory facilities and ULL for funding through “Projects Led by Young Researchers. Ref 2022/20276”.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We thank Markus Voigt for helpful discussions and comments.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Sample Availability

Samples of the compounds are not available from the authors.

References

  1. Gray, J.J. The interaction of proteins with solid surfaces. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2004, 14, 110–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Brunette, D.M.; Tengvall, P.; Textor, M.; Thomsen, P. Titanium in Medicine. In Material Science, Surface Science, Engineering, Biological Responses and Medical Applications; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2001; pp. 145–162. [Google Scholar]
  3. Norde, W. The behavior of proteins at interfaces, with special attention to the role of the structure stability of the protein molecule. Clin. Mater. 1992, 11, 85–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Dee, K.C.; Puleo, D.A.; Bizios, R. An Introduction to Tissue-Biomaterial Interactions; Wiley-Liss: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Sittig, C.; Textor, M.; Spencer, N.D.; Wieland, M.; Vallotton, P.-H. Surface characterization. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 1999, 10, 35–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Shayganpour, A.; Rebaudi, A.; Cortella, P.; Diaspro, A.; Salerno, M. Electrochemical coating of dental implants with anodic porous titania for enhanced osteointegration. Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2015, 6, 2183–2192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Birch, M.A.; Johnson-Lynn, S.; Nouraei, S.; Wu, Q.-B.; Ngalim, S.; Lu, W.-J.; Watchorn, C.; Yang, T.-Y.; McCaskie, A.W.; Roy, S. Effect of electrochemical structuring of Ti6Al4V on osteoblast behaviour in vitro. Biomed. Mater. 2012, 7, 035016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Gao, A.; Hang, R.; Bai, L.; Tang, B.; Chu, P.K. Electrochemical surface engineering of titanium-based alloys for biomedical application. Electrochim. Acta 2018, 271, 699–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Metoki, N.; Liu, L.; Beilis, E.; Eliaz, N.; Mandler, D. Preparation and Characterization of Alkylphosphonic Acid Self-Assembled Monolayers on Titanium Alloy by Chemisorption and Electrochemical Deposition. Langmuir 2014, 30, 6791–6799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yamauchi, R.; Itabashi, T.; Wada, K.; Tanaka, T.; Kumagai, G.; Ishibashi, Y. Photofunctionalised Ti6Al4V implants enhance early phase osseointegration. Bone Jt. Res. 2017, 6, 331–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Madore, C.; Piotrowski, O.; Landolt, D. Through-Mask Electrochemical Micromachining of Titanium. J. Electrochem. Soc. 1999, 146, 2526–2532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Beutner, R.; Michael, J.; Schwenzer, B.; Scharnweber, D. Biological nano-functionalization of titanium-based biomaterial surfaces: A flexible toolbox. J. R. Soc. Interface 2009, 7, S93–S105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Kern, P.; Veh, J.; Michler, J. New developments in through-mask electrochemical micromachining of titanium. J. Micromech. Microeng. 2007, 17, 1168–1177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Imamura, K.; Shimomura, M.; Nagai, S.; Akamatsu, M.; Nakanishi, K. Adsorption characteristics of various proteins to a titanium surface. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2008, 106, 273–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Göhring, H.; Paulus, M.; Salmen, P.; Wirkert, F.; Kruse, T.; Degen, P.; Stuhr, S.; Rehage, H.; Tolan, M. Salt induced reduction of lysozyme adsorption at charged interfaces. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2015, 27, 235103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Silva, R.A.; Urzúa, M.D.; Petri, D.F.S.; Dubin, P.L. Protein Adsorption onto Polyelectrolyte Layers: Effects of Protein Hydrophobicity and Charge Anisotropy. Langmuir 2010, 26, 14032–14038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ei, H.E.; Nakama, Y.; Tanaka, H.; Imanaka, H.; Ishida, N.; Imamura, K. Adsorption of lysozyme on base metal surfaces in the presence of an external electric potential. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2016, 147, 9–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Beykal, B.; Herzberg, M.; Oren, Y.; Mauter, M.S. Influence of surface charge on the rate, extent, and structure of adsorbed Bovine Serum Albumin to gold electrodes. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2015, 460, 321–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Brusatori, M.A.; Tie, Y.; Van Tassel, P.R. Protein Adsorption Kinetics under an Applied Electric Field: An Optical Waveguide Lightmode Spectroscopy Study. Langmuir 2003, 19, 5089–5097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ying, P.; Viana, A.S.; Abrantes, L.M.; Jin, G. Adsorption of human serum albumin onto gold: A combined electrochemical and ellipsometric study. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2004, 279, 95–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Moulton, S.; Barisci, J.; Bath, A.; Stella, R.; Wallace, G. Investigation of protein adsorption and electrochemical behavior at a gold electrode. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2003, 261, 312–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Oliva, F.Y.; Cámara, O.R.; Avalle, L.B. Adsorption of human serum albumin on electrochemical titanium dioxide electrodes: Protein-oxide surface interaction effects studied by electrochemical techniques. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2009, 633, 19–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Engelhardt, K.; Rumpel, A.; Walter, J.; Dombrowski, J.; Kulozik, U.; Braunschweig, B.; Peukert, W. Protein Adsorption at the Electrified Air-Water Interface: Implications on Foam Stability. Langmuir 2012, 28, 7780–7787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Calonder, C.; Tie, Y.; Van Tassel, P.R. History dependence of protein adsorption kinetics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98, 10664–10669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Yang, H.; Yang, S.; Kong, J.; Dong, A.; Yu, S. Obtaining information about protein secondary structures in aqueous solution using Fourier transform IR spectroscopy. Nat. Protoc. 2015, 10, 382–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Norde, W. Driving forces for protein adsorption at solid surfaces. Macromol. Symp. 1996, 103, 5–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ouberai, M.M.; Xu, K.; Welland, M.E. Effect of the interplay between protein and surface on the properties of adsorbed protein layers. Biomaterials 2014, 35, 6157–6163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Stuart, B.H. Infrared Spectroscopy: Fundamentals and Applications; John Wiley and Sons Ltd.: Chichester, UK, 2004; ISBN 0470854278. [Google Scholar]
  29. Shvab, R.; Hryha, E.; Nyborg, L. Surface chemistry of the titanium powder studied by XPS using internal standard reference. Powder Met. 2016, 60, 42–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ajami, E.; Aguey-Zinsou, K.-F. Calcium Phosphate Growth at Electropolished Titanium Surfaces. J. Funct. Biomater. 2012, 3, 327–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Pradier, C.M.; Costa, D.; Rubio, C.; Compère, C.; Marcus, P. Role of salts on BSA adsorption on stainless steel in aqueous solutions. I. FT-IRRAS and XPS characterization: Bovine serum albumin adsorption on stainless steel. Surf. Interface Anal. 2002, 34, 50–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Muñoz, A.I.; Mischler, S. Interactive Effects of Albumin and Phosphate Ions on the Corrosion of CoCrMo Implant Alloy. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2007, 154, C562–C570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Solak, E.K. Preparation and Characterization of IPN Microspheres for Controlled Delivery of Naproxen. JBNB 2011, 02, 445–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Kim, G.; Gurau, M.; Kim, J.; Cremer, P.S. Investigations of Lysozyme Adsorption at the Air/Water and Quartz/Water Interfaces by Vibrational Sum Frequency Spectroscopy. Langmuir 2002, 18, 2807–2811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kim, J.; Somorjai, G.A. Molecular Packing of Lysozyme, Fibrinogen, and Bovine Serum Albumin on Hydrophilic and Hydrophobic Surfaces Studied by Infrared-Visible Sum Frequency Generation and Fluorescence Microscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 3150–3158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Van der Veen, M.; Stuart, M.C.; Norde, W. Spreading of proteins and its effect on adsorption and desorption kinetics. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2007, 54, 136–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Larsericsdotter, H.; Oscarsson, S.; Buijs, J. Structure, stability, and orientation of BSA adsorbed to silica. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2005, 289, 26–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Dixon, M.C. Quartz crystal microbalance with dissipation monitoring: Enabling real-time characterization of biological materials and their interactions. J. Biomol. Tech. 2008, 19, 151–158. [Google Scholar]
  39. Wei, T.; Kaewtathip, S.; Shing, K. Buffer Effect on Protein Adsorption at Liquid/Solid Interface. J. Phys. Chem. C 2009, 113, 2053–2062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Peng, Z.; Hidajat, K.; Uddin, M. Conformational change of adsorbed and desorbed bovine serum albumin on nano-sized magnetic particles. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2004, 33, 15–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Vermonden, T.; Giacomelli, C.E.; Norde, W. Reversibility of Structural Rearrangements in Bovine Serum Albumin during Homomolecular Exchange from AgI Particles. Langmuir 2001, 17, 3734–3740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Nejadnik, M.R.; Garcia, C.D. Staining proteins: A simple method to increase the sensitivity of ellipsometric measurements in adsorption studies. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2011, 82, 253–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Wena, J.; Arakawa, T. Refractive Index of Proteins in Aqueous Sodium Chloride. Anal. Biochem. 2000, 280, 327–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Siddiqui, M.A.; Ullah, I.; Liu, H.; Zhang, S.; Ren, L.; Yang, K. Preliminary study of adsorption behavior of bovine serum albumin (BSA) protein and its effect on antibacterial and corrosion property of Ti-3Cu alloy. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2020, 80, 117–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Makivić, N.; Cho, J.-Y.; Harris, K.D.; Tarascon, J.-M.; Limoges, B.; Balland, V. Evidence of Bulk Proton Insertion in Nanostructured Anatase and Amorphous TiO2 Electrodes. Chem. Mater. 2021, 33, 3436–3448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Silva-Bermudez, P.; Rodil, S. An overview of protein adsorption on metal oxide coatings for biomedical implants. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2013, 233, 147–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Felgueiras, H.; Antunes, J.; Martins, M.; Barbosa, M. Fundamentals of protein and cell interactions in biomaterials. In Peptides and Proteins as Biomaterials for Tissue Regeneration and Repair; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018; pp. 1–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Nečas, D.; Klapetek, P. Gwyddion: An open-source software for SPM data analysis. Open Phys. 2012, 10, 181–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Brand, I. Application of Polarization Modulation Infrared Reflection Absorption Spectrosocpy Under Electrochemical Control for Structural Studies of Biomimetic Assemblies. Z. Phys. Chem. 2015, 230, 133–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Fu, K.; Griebenow, K.; Hsieh, L.; Klibanov, A.M.; Langer, R. FTIR characterization of the secondary structure of proteins encapsulated within PLGA microspheres. J. Control. Release 1999, 58, 357–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Höök, F.; Kasemo, B.; Nylander, T.; Fant, C.; Sott, K.; Elwing, H. Variations in Coupled Water, Viscoelastic Properties, and Film Thickness of a Mefp-1 Protein Film during Adsorption and Cross-Linking: A Quartz Crystal Microbalance with Dissipation Monitoring, Ellipsometry, and Surface Plasmon Resonance Study. Anal. Chem. 2001, 73, 5796–5804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Molecules 28 05109 g001 550
Figure 1. This figure shows 5.0 × 5.0 µm2 AFM images of (a) after LYZ adsorption at OCP (0.33 VAg/AgCl); (b) after LYZ adsorption at −0.5 V (vs. OCP (0.26 VAg/AgCl); (c) after BSA adsorption at OCP (0.33 VAg/AgCl); and (d) after BSA adsorption at +0.5 V (vs. OCP (0.25 VAg/AgCl). Images are shown for different protein concentrations.
Figure 1. This figure shows 5.0 × 5.0 µm2 AFM images of (a) after LYZ adsorption at OCP (0.33 VAg/AgCl); (b) after LYZ adsorption at −0.5 V (vs. OCP (0.26 VAg/AgCl); (c) after BSA adsorption at OCP (0.33 VAg/AgCl); and (d) after BSA adsorption at +0.5 V (vs. OCP (0.25 VAg/AgCl). Images are shown for different protein concentrations.
Molecules 28 05109 g001
Molecules 28 05109 g002 550
Figure 2. PM-IRRA spectra after BSA (a) or LYZ (b) adsorption at OCP (0.33 VAg/AgCl) or under applied potential in PBS containing 4 g/L BSA or LYZ. Bar plots showing the area after peak integration of amide I band for BSA adsorption at OCP and upon applying +0.25 and +0.5 V (vs. OCP (0.24 VAg/AgCl)) in PBS containing 0.1, 2.0, and 4.0 g/L in BSA (c), and LYZ adsorption at OCP and upon applying −0.25 and −0.5 V (vs. OCP (0.25 VAg/AgCl)) in PBS containing 0.1, 2.0, and 4.0 g/L in LYZ (d).
Figure 2. PM-IRRA spectra after BSA (a) or LYZ (b) adsorption at OCP (0.33 VAg/AgCl) or under applied potential in PBS containing 4 g/L BSA or LYZ. Bar plots showing the area after peak integration of amide I band for BSA adsorption at OCP and upon applying +0.25 and +0.5 V (vs. OCP (0.24 VAg/AgCl)) in PBS containing 0.1, 2.0, and 4.0 g/L in BSA (c), and LYZ adsorption at OCP and upon applying −0.25 and −0.5 V (vs. OCP (0.25 VAg/AgCl)) in PBS containing 0.1, 2.0, and 4.0 g/L in LYZ (d).
Molecules 28 05109 g002
Molecules 28 05109 g003 550
Figure 3. High-resolution core-level XPS spectra of Ti2p, O1s, C1s, and N1s registered after adsorption in 4 g/L of LYZ at OCP (0.33 VAg/AgCl) (a–d) or after applying −0.5 V vs. OCP (0.27 VAg/AgCl) (e–h) for t = 2 h at 37 °C.
Figure 3. High-resolution core-level XPS spectra of Ti2p, O1s, C1s, and N1s registered after adsorption in 4 g/L of LYZ at OCP (0.33 VAg/AgCl) (a–d) or after applying −0.5 V vs. OCP (0.27 VAg/AgCl) (e–h) for t = 2 h at 37 °C.
Molecules 28 05109 g003
Molecules 28 05109 g004 550
Figure 4. High-resolution core-level XP spectra of Ti2p, O1s, C1s and N1s registered for adsorption in 4 g/L of BSA at OCP (0.31 VAg/AgCl) (a–d) or after applying +0.5 V vs. OCP (0.23 VAg/AgCl) (e–h) for t = 2 h at 37 °C.
Figure 4. High-resolution core-level XP spectra of Ti2p, O1s, C1s and N1s registered for adsorption in 4 g/L of BSA at OCP (0.31 VAg/AgCl) (a–d) or after applying +0.5 V vs. OCP (0.23 VAg/AgCl) (e–h) for t = 2 h at 37 °C.
Molecules 28 05109 g004
Molecules 28 05109 g005 550
Figure 5. In situ PM-IRRAS measurement of time-dependent adsorption in PBS containing (a) 4 g/L in BSA upon applying a potential of +0.5 V (vs. OCP (0.25 VAg/AgCl) and (b) 4 g/L in LYZ under applying −0.5 V (vs. OCP (0.27 VAg/AgCl) for t = 2 h at 37 °C.
Figure 5. In situ PM-IRRAS measurement of time-dependent adsorption in PBS containing (a) 4 g/L in BSA upon applying a potential of +0.5 V (vs. OCP (0.25 VAg/AgCl) and (b) 4 g/L in LYZ under applying −0.5 V (vs. OCP (0.27 VAg/AgCl) for t = 2 h at 37 °C.
Molecules 28 05109 g005
Molecules 28 05109 g006 550
Figure 6. Frequency shift (n = 1) responses resulting from protein adsorption on TiO2-coated QCM sensors in PBS containing (a) 4 g/L BSA at OCP (0.15 VAg/AgCl) or after applying +0.25 V and +0.5 V (vs. OCP (0.12 VAg/AgCl) and (b) 4 g/L LYZ at OCP (0.15 VAg/AgCl) or after applying −0.25 V and −0.5 V (vs. OCP (0.13 VAg/AgCl) for t = 2 h at 37 °C.
Figure 6. Frequency shift (n = 1) responses resulting from protein adsorption on TiO2-coated QCM sensors in PBS containing (a) 4 g/L BSA at OCP (0.15 VAg/AgCl) or after applying +0.25 V and +0.5 V (vs. OCP (0.12 VAg/AgCl) and (b) 4 g/L LYZ at OCP (0.15 VAg/AgCl) or after applying −0.25 V and −0.5 V (vs. OCP (0.13 VAg/AgCl) for t = 2 h at 37 °C.
Molecules 28 05109 g006
Molecules 28 05109 g007 550
Figure 7. Cyclic voltammograms registered for bare Ti6Al4V alloy after electrochemical polishing (grey line) and after protein adsorption for t = 2 h and 37 °C in 4 g/L BSA at OCP (0.33 VAg/AgCl red); in 4 g/L LYZ at OCP (0.33 VAg/AgCl (blue)); in 4 g/L BSA at +0.5 V (vs. OCP (0.24 VAg/AgCl) (green); and in 4 g/L LYZ at −0.5 V (vs. OCP (0.26 VAg/AgCl) (magenta).
Figure 7. Cyclic voltammograms registered for bare Ti6Al4V alloy after electrochemical polishing (grey line) and after protein adsorption for t = 2 h and 37 °C in 4 g/L BSA at OCP (0.33 VAg/AgCl red); in 4 g/L LYZ at OCP (0.33 VAg/AgCl (blue)); in 4 g/L BSA at +0.5 V (vs. OCP (0.24 VAg/AgCl) (green); and in 4 g/L LYZ at −0.5 V (vs. OCP (0.26 VAg/AgCl) (magenta).
Molecules 28 05109 g007
Molecules 28 05109 g008 550
Figure 8. Schematic of the in situ electrochemical PM-IRRAS liquid cell.
Figure 8. Schematic of the in situ electrochemical PM-IRRAS liquid cell.
Molecules 28 05109 g008
Table
Table 1. XPS surface composition analysis in at.-% of electrochemically polished Ti6Al4V alloy substrates after 4 g/L BSA or LYZ adsorption at OCP or under applied potential for t = 2 h at 37 °C; obtained from survey XPS spectra displayed in Figure S5 in the Supplementary Materials.
Table 1. XPS surface composition analysis in at.-% of electrochemically polished Ti6Al4V alloy substrates after 4 g/L BSA or LYZ adsorption at OCP or under applied potential for t = 2 h at 37 °C; obtained from survey XPS spectra displayed in Figure S5 in the Supplementary Materials.
SampleAtomic Percentages (at.-%)
Ti2pO1sC1sN1s
LYZ at OCP3.838.748.37.4
LYZ at −0.5 V vs. OCP2.225.456.212.7
BSA at OCP2.926.961.18.9
BSA at + 0.5 V vs. OCP-18.567.813.7
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Duderija, B.; González-Orive, A.; Ebbert, C.; Neßlinger, V.; Keller, A.; Grundmeier, G. Electrode Potential-Dependent Studies of Protein Adsorption on Ti6Al4V Alloy. Molecules 2023, 28, 5109. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28135109

AMA Style

Duderija B, González-Orive A, Ebbert C, Neßlinger V, Keller A, Grundmeier G. Electrode Potential-Dependent Studies of Protein Adsorption on Ti6Al4V Alloy. Molecules. 2023; 28(13):5109. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28135109

Chicago/Turabian Style

Duderija, Belma, Alejandro González-Orive, Christoph Ebbert, Vanessa Neßlinger, Adrian Keller, and Guido Grundmeier. 2023. "Electrode Potential-Dependent Studies of Protein Adsorption on Ti6Al4V Alloy" Molecules 28, no. 13: 5109. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28135109

APA Style

Duderija, B., González-Orive, A., Ebbert, C., Neßlinger, V., Keller, A., & Grundmeier, G. (2023). Electrode Potential-Dependent Studies of Protein Adsorption on Ti6Al4V Alloy. Molecules, 28(13), 5109. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28135109

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop