Next Article in Journal
Oxidases as Oxygen Scavengers in Hypoxic Conditions: A Kinetic Model
Previous Article in Journal
Adsorption Performance of Magnetic Covalent Organic Framework Composites for Bisphenol A and Ibuprofen
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Synthesis, Electrochemical and Photochemical Properties of Sulfanyl Porphyrazine with Ferrocenyl Substituents

1
Department of Medicinal Chemistry, Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Faculty of Pharmacy, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, A. Jurasza 2, 85-089 Bydgoszcz, Poland
2
Institute of Chemistry and Technical Electrochemistry, Poznan University of Technology, Berdychowo 4, 60-965 Poznan, Poland
3
Chair and Department of Inorganic and Analytical Chemistry, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Rokietnicka 3, 60-806 Poznan, Poland
4
NanoBioMedical Centre, Adam Mickiewicz University, Wszechnicy Piastowskiej 3, 61-614 Poznan, Poland
5
Department of Pharmacology and Therapy, Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Faculty of Medicine, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, Curie Sklodowskiej 9, 85-094 Bydgoszcz, Poland
6
Chair and Department of Chemical Technology of Drugs, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Grunwaldzka 6, 60-780 Poznan, Poland
7
Department of Biomedical Sciences, Arthur A. Dugoni School of Dentistry, University of the Pacific, San Francisco, CA 94103, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2023, 28(13), 5215; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28135215
Submission received: 14 June 2023 / Revised: 29 June 2023 / Accepted: 30 June 2023 / Published: 5 July 2023

Abstract

:
Ferrocene is useful in modern organometallic chemistry due to its versatile applications in material sciences, catalysis, medicinal chemistry, and diagnostic applications. The ferrocene moiety can potentially serve many purposes in therapeutics and diagnostics. In the course of this study, (6-bromo-1-oxohexyl)ferrocene was combined with dimercaptomaleonitrile sodium salt to yield a novel maleonitrile derivative. Subsequently, this compound was subjected to an autocyclotetramerization reaction using the Linstead conditions in order to obtain an octaferrocenyl-substituted magnesium(II) sulfanyl porphyrazine. Following that, both compounds—the maleonitrile derivative and the porphyrazine derivative—were subjected to physicochemical characterization using UV-Vis, ES-TOF, MALDI-TOF, and one-dimensional and two-dimensional NMR spectroscopy. Moreover, the sulfanyl porphyrazine was subjected to various photophysical studies, including optical absorption and emission measurements, as well as the evaluation of its photochemical properties. Values of singlet oxygen generation quantum yields were obtained in different organic solvents. The electrochemical properties of the synthesized compounds were studied using cyclic voltammetry. According to the electrochemical results, the presence of electron-withdrawing oxohexyl groups attached to ferrocene afforded significantly more positive oxidation potentials of the ferrocene-based redox process up to 0.34 V vs. Fc+/Fc.

1. Introduction

Ferrocene is a metalloorganic compound that constantly catches the attention of chemists, materials researchers, and pharmacists. Although it was not the first organometallic complex reported, its discovery is considered to be the spark that started the differentiation of organometallic chemistry as a separate area of chemistry [1]. The ferrocene moiety can potentially serve many purposes in therapeutics and diagnostics, as it was found to be a sensitive probe, a chromophore, a biological marker, a redox-active moiety, and a catalytic fragment, among others [2]. Ferrocene is also known to express biological activity as a scaffold or a fragment of the chromophore, with significant anticancer, antimicrobial, and antimalarial activity [3]. Other biological activities associated with compounds possessing the ferrocene motif in their structures include antipyretic, anti-inflammatory, analgesic, and anti-hyperglycemic activity [2].
Porphyrazines (Pzs) are synthetic tetrapyrrolic macrocycles, which are aza analogs of naturally occurring porphyrins. The highly conjugated porphyrazine ring grants the molecule unique optical, electrical, and photochemical properties, rendering it potentially useful in fields such as medicine, sensors, and photocatalysis [4,5,6]. The unsubstituted porphyrazine ring is a highly nonpolar molecule that is prone to the phenomenon of π–π stacking, significantly hampering its broad use. Thus, to improve its properties porphyrazines have to be functionalized in two main approaches: by introducing or changing the ion in the macrocyclic core’s coordinating center or by the introduction of peripheral substituents at the pyrrole β-positions. Owing to such modification, the physicochemical properties of the porphyrazine may be tailored to specific applications. Among Pzs, sulfanyl Pzs have gained attention, as they were found to express good solubility and show biological activity [7,8], and to present interesting photocatalytic [9,10], electronic [11,12], and optical properties [13]. The sulfanyl Pzs bearing nitrophenoxy [14,15] and isophthaloxyalkyl substituents [16,17] recently synthesized in our group revealed a plethora of interesting photochemical and electrochemical properties. Porphyrinoids, including aza-porphyrinoids, have already been the subject of studies aiming to combine them with ferrocene [18,19]. Such combinations were found to mimic photosynthesis-active sites and were promising composites for electronic devices and molecular electrochemical sensors. Depending on the mode of connection between the two moieties, the resulting dyads may present properties either showing the separate combination of the porphyrinoid and ferrocene, or resultant properties of the combination where both molecules affect each other. The possibility of attaching several ferrocenyl moieties to the porphyrinoid has a great impact on its electronic properties and makes such molecules suitable candidates for applications as photovoltaic light harvesting and energy conversion systems, as well as intelligent surface coatings [20].
In this work, we report the synthesis and properties of novel maleonitrile and sulfanyl porphyrazine derivatives with peripheral ferrocenyl moieties. Both compounds were characterized using spectral methods including mass spectrometry, NMR spectroscopy, and UV-Vis spectrophotometry. Furthermore, the photochemical properties were assessed by means of the quantum yield of singlet oxygen generation. The voltammetric data clearly indicated defined redox features corresponding to one-electron reactions of the π-conjugated porphyrazine ring and ferrocene substituents in the periphery.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Synthesis and Characterization

A new porphyrazine derivative was prepared using a two-step synthetic pathway. First, the alkylation reaction of (6-bromo-1-oxohexyl)ferrocene (1) with dimercaptomaleonitrile disodium salt (2) in N,N-dimethylformamide with potassium carbonate as a base, following methodology developed before [21], led to novel maleonitrile derivative 3. Subsequently, after its isolation from the reaction mixture using chromatographical methods, compound 3 was used in a Linstead tetramerization reaction in n-butanol with the use of magnesium n-butoxide as a base to form a novel symmetrical magnesium(II) porphyrazine 4 (Scheme 1). As opposed to the convergent approach utilized in this study, a divergent synthetic approach to similar octakis(ferrocene)-substituted porphyrazine derivatives was proposed by Akkus and Gül [22]. In the initial step, they synthesized the magnesium(II) porphyrazine core with hydroxyl peripheral groups, to which ferrocene moieties were attached afterward by means of an esterification reaction.
The Pz 4 was subjected to purity assessment, and HPLC analyses performed in three different solvent systems confirmed the purity of the new macrocycle using detection at 370 and 670 nm (see Supplementary Data). All obtained compounds were purified using flash column chromatography and characterized by mass spectrometry and UV-Vis spectroscopy. To unambiguously identify the isolated macrocycle, NMR experiments were carried out.
In the 1H NMR spectrum of the maleonitrile derivative 3 (Figure 1), the ferrocenyl moiety CH groups appear as singlets at 4.22 ppm in the unsubstituted ring, while the CH groups in the substituted ring were observed as triplets at 4.55 and 4.79 ppm, for the hydrogens in the α and β positions, respectively. Signals of the aliphatic chain protons were assigned on the basis of 1H-1H COSY and 1H-13C HMBC experiments, from the nearest to the sulfur atom: 3.19 (triplet), 1.71 (multiplet), 1.44 (multiplet), 1.62 (multiplet), and 2.74 (triplet). The corresponding carbon atoms were assigned based on the correlations in the 1H-13C HSQC spectrum. The quaternary carbons were identified using the 1H-13C HMBC spectrum: the 79.0 ppm peak—corresponded to the ferrocene carbon in the 1 position; 112.3 ppm—carbon of the cyano group; 120.9 ppm—sp2 carbon in the maleonitrile fragment; and the peak at 203.1 ppm corresponded to the carbonyl group carbon (Figure 2).
The 1H NMR spectrum of the porphyrazine 4 shares several similarities with the spectrum recorded for 3. Again, the signals of unsubstituted ferrocene ring CH groups appeared upfield at 4.12 ppm as a triplet. The CH groups at the α and β positions of the substituted cyclopentadienyl ring were observed at 4.38 and 4.80 ppm, respectively. In this case, however, they were not observed as triplets but as broad lines. The change in the chemical shift of the aliphatic linker protons was more pronounced the closer they were to the macrocyclic ring. The proton signal for CH2 group neighboring the carbonyl (furthest from the macrocycle) was observed at 2.78 ppm, and for SCH2, it was observed at 4.47 ppm. To compare, the signals of the corresponding groups in 3 were detected at 2.74 ppm and 3.19 ppm, respectively. The carbon chemical shifts in the corresponding groups were also recorded slightly downfield, but there was no relation in regard to the distance to the macrocyclic ring. As expected, the 13C NMR signals recorded for the maleonitrile fragment in 3 were not present. Instead, two new signals were observed at 158.4 and 141.8 ppm, corresponding to the α and β positions of the pyrrole ring (Figures S1–S4).
To unambiguously determine the chemical structure of the prepared compounds, we attempted to obtain single crystals to perform single-crystal X-ray diffraction; however, up until the submission of this manuscript, no success in this matter was achieved.

2.2. Optical Properties

The UV-Vis spectra of porphyrazine 4, recorded in the organic solvents N,N-dimethylformamide, dimethylsulfoxide, and dichloromethane, revealed absorption properties typical for porphyrazine macrocycles (Figure 3). The short-wavelength Soret band exhibited absorption maxima at 380 nm in N,N-dimethylformamide and dimethylsulfoxide, and at 378 nm in dichloromethane. Long-wavelength Q bands with maxima in the 671–675 nm range were also observed. The Soret band results from the transition between the ground state and the second singlet excited state (S0 → S2), whereas the Q band corresponds to the transition from the ground state to the first singlet excited state (S0 → S1) [23,24].
The calculated values of the logarithms of the molar absorption coefficients (log ε) for these bands were in the range of 4.84–4.88 (Table 1). In addition, a low-intensity broad band was observed at about 425–525 nm and can be assigned to n-sulfur → π * transitions [13,25]. These optical properties were similar to those of other sulfanyl porphyrazines, indicating that peripheral ferrocene substituents did not significantly influence absorption features [26,27,28].
The fluorescence studies performed for the DMF and DMSO solutions of Pz 4 did not reveal any emission properties. The literature data indicated that emission quenching by sulfur atoms combined with the porphyrazine core could be a reason for the lack of fluorescence [29,30].

2.3. Photosensitized Production of Singlet Oxygen

Porphyrazine 4 was also evaluated for potential photosensitizing activity by measuring the quantum yield of singlet oxygen generation (ΦΔ). The mechanism of singlet oxygen generation is connected with the type II photodynamic reaction. Upon light absorption, the photosensitizer molecule is transformed from the ground state (S0) to the singlet excited state (S1) and then to the triplet state (T1) via the intersystem crossing process. Next, the energy can be transferred directly to the molecular oxygen in the ground triplet state, resulting in singlet oxygen formation [31]. Singlet oxygen is one of the main reactive oxygen species responsible for the cytotoxic effect of photodynamic therapy [32,33]. The comparative method was utilized for ΦΔ measurements with zinc(II) phthalocyanine as a reference and 1,3-diphenylisobenzofuran (DPBF) as a chemical quencher of singlet oxygen (Figure 4) [34,35]. Pz 4 revealed a low ability for singlet oxygen generation, with ΦΔ values of 0.064 and 0.004 in DMF and DMSO, respectively (Table 1). We also observed changes in the Pz 4 absorption, which indicates that the minor photodegradation process of Pz 4 also occurred during the singlet oxygen generation measurement. After 10 min of irradiation, the degradation of Pz 4 equaled 7.5% in DMF and 4.3% in DMSO solution.
A low tendency of Pz 4 to generate singlet oxygen with a simultaneous lack of emission properties suggests the existence of other deactivation processes of the excited state. Further advanced studies, including photoacoustic imaging and spectroscopy, are needed to determine possible non-radiative deactivation processes, including the vibration relaxation of chromophore molecules [36,37].

2.4. Electrochemical Characterization of Studied Compounds in TBAP/DCM Electrolyte

The electrochemical properties of the synthesized compounds were studied using cyclic voltammetry (CV) in 0.05 M TBAP/DCM electrolyte, as shown in Figure 5. Control measurements of 0.1 mM ferrocene (Fc) were also performed for comparative purposes. The observed major peaks of the compounds are ascribed to the one-electron transfer of the substituted ferrocene groups. The obtained data show that the ferrocene-based redox processes of 1, 3, and 4 were shifted towards more positive potentials in comparison to unsubstituted Fc. The formal potentials of 1 and 3 were equal to E0′ = 0.28 V vs. Fc+/Fc, and the E0′ for 4 was equal to 0.34 V vs. Fc+/Fc. This positive shift can be assigned to the electron-withdrawing effect of the oxohexyl groups, thus disfavoring the electron removal from the reduced form of the ferrocene group by the electrode and favoring the electron uptake by the oxidized form of ferrocene from the electrode [38,39,40]. The most positive peak potential observed for 4 (0.34 V) was probably correlated to the strongest inductive effect of the eight substituents existing close together in the 4 macrocycle. It is well known from previous publications that the redox potential of ferrocene can be tuned by the substitution of various groups. For instance, Paul et al. [38] presented a series of ferrocene-substituted electro-donating groups, such as methyl and tert-butyl. The substituents made it possible to shift the potential of the redox pair, even by about 0.5 V, towards a more negative potential than Fc [41]. In another work, Manfredi et al. presented a group of ferrocene derivatives with electron-withdrawing groups, such as thiophene rings bearing either alkyl or benzene derivatives bearing electron-withdrawing groups [42]. They observed a positive shift of the formal potential up to 0.35 V vs. Fc. Moreover, Battrejee et al. presented fifteen ferrocene-based compounds with substituents that strongly affect the redox peak position of Fc+/Fc. The authors observed a positive potential shift for p-methyl benzalacetylferrocene and ferrocylidene acetophenones. In the case of 1, where only one oxohexyl group was anchored to the ferrocene, we observed a 0.28 V shift towards more positive potentials, exhibiting that oxohexyl groups possess moderate electron-withdrawing properties.
Apart from ferrocene-based redox peaks (labeled as IIA), 4 exhibited additional features due to the electroactivity of the macrocyclic core [21,43,44]. It can be seen in Figure 6A,B that two additional peaks at 0.13 (labeled as IA) and 0.60 V (labeled as IIIA) are visible. These peaks originated from one-electron redox processes occurring at the electron-rich macrocycle. Moreover, in the cathodic range, three well-defined redox features can be distinguished at −1.0 V (labeled as IC), −1.3 V (labeled as IIC), and −1.80 V (labeled as IIIC). Such processes can also be assigned to the one-electron transfer within the macrocycle.
Porphyrazine 4 tended to adsorb on the electrode surface. Figure 7 presents CV data recorded in blank TBAP/DCM for a glassy carbon (GC) electrode that was previously immersed in a solution of 4. Well-defined redox coupling occurred at E0′ = 0.39 V. The peak-to-peak separation was only 20 mV, suggesting a surface-confined process. Such behavior could be due to the electron-rich, hydrophobic nature of the studied compounds that enables adsorption of the 4 to the surface via π-π interactions.
To obtain more insight into the adsorptive properties of 4, we deposited 4 on the GC electrode covered by multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNT). Various macrocyclic compounds have been previously deposited on the surface of MWCNT in order to construct electrocatalytic sensors [45,46,47,48]. The resultant GC/MWCNT/4 was investigated using CV in an aqueous 0.1 M HClO4 electrolyte (Figure 8). The GC/MWCNT/4 exhibited well-defined and sharp peaks that shifted positively at ca. 0.35 V versus ferrocene (curve b). The asymmetry of anodic-to-cathodic peak currents were visible. The anodic peak was ca. 1.7 times higher than the cathodic peak, which suggests some limitations in electron transfer between Fc+/Fc couples and MWCNT. The hampered electron transfer kinetics could be the result of the bulky structure of 4.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. General Procedures

All reactions were conducted in oven-dried glassware under an argon atmosphere. All solvents were rotary-evaporated at or below 60 °C under reduced pressure. The reported reaction temperatures refer to Radleys® Heat-On display temperatures. Dry flash column chromatography was carried out on Merck silica gel 60 (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) with a particle size of 40–63 μm and reverse phase on a Fluka C18 silica gel 90 (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). Thin-layer chromatography (TLC) was performed on silica gel Merck Kieselgel 60 F254 plates (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) and visualized with UV light (λmax = 254 or 365 nm). NMR spectra were recorded at 298 K on a Bruker Avance III 500 spectrometer operating at resonance frequencies of 500.250 and 125.788 MHz for 1H and 13C, respectively. Chemical shifts (δ) are quoted in parts per million (ppm) and are referenced to residual solvent peaks: 3.330 and 2.500 ppm DMSO-d6 for 1H NMR and 39.520 ppm for 13C NMR, and 8.740, 7.580, and 7.220 ppm pyridine-d5 for 1H NMR and 150.350, 135.910, and 123.870 ppm for 13C NMR. Coupling constants (J) are quoted in Hertz (Hz). The abbreviations s, t, br, and m refer to singlet, triplet, broad signal, and multiplet, respectively. 1H and 13C resonances were unambiguously assigned based on 1H, 13C, 1H–1H COSY, 1H–13C HSQC, and 1H–13C HMBC spectra. Mass spectra (MALDI-TOF, HRMS) were carried out by the Wielkopolska Center for Advanced Technologies at the Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan and at the European Center for Bioinformatics and Genomics in Poznan. UV-Vis spectra were recorded on a Shimadzu UV-1900i spectrophotometer (Duisburg, Germany). Dichloromethane (DCM, puriss. p.a., ≥99.9%) and tetrabutylammonium perchlorate (TBAP, ≥99.9%) were purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). Ferrocene (Fc) was provided by Alfa Aesar (Haverhill, MA, USA). All listed chemicals were reagent grade; thus, they did not require further purification. Dimercaptomaleonitrile disodium salt hydrate and (6-bromo-1-oxohexyl)ferrocene were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany).

3.2. Synthetic Procedures and Characterization

(2Z)-2,3-bis{[(6-ferrocenyl-6-oxohexyl)]sulfanyl}but-2-enedinitrile (3) was synthesized by adapting a previously published procedure [28]. Dimercaptomaleonitrile disodium salt (200 mg, 1075 mmol) (1), (6-Bromo-1-oxohexyl)ferrocene (2) (975 mg, 2.69 mmol), and anhydrous K2CO3 (600 mg, 4.34 mmol) were dissolved in 20 mL of anhydrous N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF). The reaction mixture was stirred at 50 °C for 72 h. Next, the reaction mixture was filtered through celite, and the solid residue was washed with 200 mL of dichloromethane (DCM). The collected filtrates were evaporated under reduced pressure, and the residual brown oil was chromatographed using (DCM: methanol, 100: 1 to 20:1, v/v) to give 3 in the form of an orange-brown oil (501 mg, 66% yield). The Rf (DCM:methanol, 50:1, v/v) was 0.29. UV-Vis (DCM) λmax nm (log ε): 273 (4.82), 345 (4.31), (DMF) λmax nm (log ε) 271 (4.36), and 347 (4.30). 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ, ppm: 4.79 (t, J = 1.8 Hz, 4H, C3-H, C4-H, FcH), 4.55 (t, J = 1.8 Hz, 4H, C2-H, C5-H, FcH), 4.22 (s, 10H, FcH), 3.19 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 4H, SCH2), 2.74 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 4H, COCH2), 1.71 (m, 4H, SCH2CH2), 1.62 (m, 4H, COCH2CH2), and 1.44 (m, 4H, SCH2CH2CH2). 13C NMR (125 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ, ppm: 203.1 (C=O), 120.9 (NC-C-S), 112.3 (CN), 79.0 (C1, ArC), 71.9 (C2, C5, FcC), 69.4 (FcC), 69.0 (C3, C4, FcC), 38.4 (COCH2), 34.2 (SCH2), 29.3 (SCH2CH2), 27.4 (SCH2CH2CH2), and 23.1 (COCH2CH2). HRMS (ESI) m/z found: 707.1178 [M + H]+, C36H39Fe2N2O2S2 requires 707.1152 [M + H]+; 729.0974 [M + Na]+, C36H38Fe2N2NaO2S2 requires 729.0971 [M+H]+.
2,3,7,8,12,13,17,18-Octakis[(6-ferrocenyl-6-oxohexyl)thio]porphyrazinato magnesium(II) (4) was synthesized using a modified literature procedure [28].
Magnesium turnings (15 mg, 0.621 mmol) and a small crystal of iodine were refluxed in n-butanol (10 mL) for 4 h. After cooling to room temperature, the reaction mixture was transferred to a flask containing 3 (0.439 mg, 0.621 mmol) and heated under reflux for another 20 h. Next, the reaction mixture was cooled to room temperature and filtered through Celite, which was subsequently washed with toluene (100 mL) and then DCM (100 mL). The combined filtrates were evaporated to dryness under reduced pressure, and a dark-blue residue was chromatographed using normal (DCM: methanol, 100:1 to 20:1, v/v), and reversed-phase systems (methanol, then DCM) to give 4 as a dark-blue film (0.143 mg, 32% yield). Rf (DCM:methanol, 50:1, v/v) was 0.24. UV-Vis (DCM) λmax nm (log ε): 378 (4.84), 675 (4.86). 1H NMR (500 MHz, pyridine-d5) δ, ppm: 4.80 (br, 16H, C3-H, C4-H, FcH), 4.47 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 16H, SCH2), 4.38 (br, 16H, C2-H, C5-H, FcH), 4.12 (s, 40H, FcH), 2.78 (t, J = 6.1 Hz, 16H, COCH2), 2.14 (m, 16H, SCH2CH2), 1.92 (m, 16H, COCH2CH2), and 1.90 (m, 16H, SCH2CH2CH2). 13C NMR (125 MHz, pyridine-d5) δ, ppm: 203.8 (C=O), 158.4 (C1, C4, pyrrole-C), 141.8 (C2, C3, pyrrole-C), 80.4 (C1, ArC), 72.8 (C2, C5, FcC), 70.5 (FcC), 70.1 (C3, C4, FcC), 39.9 (COCH2), 35.9 (SCH2), 31.4 (SCH2CH2), 29.5 (SCH2CH2CH2), and 24.8 (COCH2CH2). MS (MALDI) m/z: found: 2849 [M + H]+ C144H153Fe8MgN8O8S8, requires 2849 [M + H]+. HPLC purity was 97.6–100.0% (see Supplementary Data).

3.3. Optical Properties

The electronic absorption UV-Vis spectra were recorded in the 200–900 nm range using a Shimadzu UV-1900i spectrophotometer and high-precision 1 cm light path quartz cells (Hellma Analytics, Jena, Germany). Molar absorption coefficients (ε) were calculated using the equation:
ε = A/(c × l)
where:
A—refers to the absorbance at the given wavelength;
c—concentration of the solution [mol/dm3];
l—light path length.
A Jasco 6200 spectrofluorimeter was used to record emission spectra in DMF and DMSO solutions.

3.4. Photosensitized Production of Singlet Oxygen

The quantum yields of singlet oxygen generation (ΦΔ) were determined by the relative chemical trapping method [34,35,49]. 1,3-Diphenylisobenzofuran (DPBF, Aldrich) was used as a chemical quencher for singlet oxygen, and zinc(II) phthalocyanine was a reference with known singlet oxygen generation quantum yields (ΦΔDMF = 0.56; ΦΔDMSO = 0.67) [50]. Porphyrazine 4 and zinc(II) phthalocyanine were irradiated in DMF and DMSO solutions in the presence of DPBF with light of 670 nm from a 150 W high-pressure Xe lamp and a monochromator M250/1200/U (Optel, Opole, Poland). The light intensity was measured by a ThorLabs PM100D power and energy meter with a S120VC photodiode sensor that was set to 0.50 mW/cm2. The values of quantum yields were calculated using the equation:
ϕ Δ = ϕ Δ k sample k ref . 1 10 A ref . 1 10 A sample
where ΦΔ refers to the singlet oxygen generation quantum yield and k is the constant rate of light-induced DPBF decomposition for the sample and the reference. The expression 1 − 10−A is the absorption correction factor, with A referring to the absorbance at the irradiation wavelength for the reference and the sample.

3.5. Electrochemical Methods

An EmStat4S electrochemical analyzer was used for the electrochemical analysis (Eindhoven, The Netherlands). For non-aqueous measurements, a three-electrode system was set up, with a pseudo-reference electrode of a silver wire covered with AgCl and an auxiliary electrode of platinum wire. The working electrode was a glassy carbon electrode (GC) with a diameter of 1 mm (BASi, West Lafayette, IN, USA). Ferrocene (Fc) was introduced at the end of each test and the potential values were referred versus the Fc+/Fc redox couple. Before each electrochemical test, the GC electrode was polished with an aqueous suspension of alumina powder (Al2O3, with an average diameter of 50 nm, Buehler) on a polishing pad. Any impurities were subsequently removed using an ultrasonic bath (1:1 v/v solution of acetone and distilled water). Electrochemical measurements of 1, 3, and 4 were conducted in 0.05 M TBAP/DCM serving as the supporting electrolyte. For aqueous electrolyte measurements (0.1 M HClO4), Ag/AgCl (3 M KCl) served as the reference electrode. To prepare GC/MWCNT/4, 2 µL of MWCNT (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) suspension in DMF (1 mg mL−1) was dropped on the surface of the GC. After drying in an oven (60 °C), the GC/MWCNT electrode was immersed in a solution of 4 (1 mg mL−1) for adsorption. The resultant GC/MWCNT/4 was evaluated using CV.

4. Conclusions

The symmetrical magnesium porphyrazine derivative, possessing ferrocenyl substituents in the periphery, was synthesized and its physicochemical properties were analyzed using several methods, including UV spectrophotometry, NMR spectroscopy, mass spectrometry, and evaluation of its photochemical properties. In the absorption spectra, there were two characteristic bands for porphyrazine molecules—the Soret (short wavelengths) and the Q-bands (long wavelengths). The obtained porphyrazine showed a strong Soret band between 350 and 400 nm and a similar intense Q band in the range 650–700 nm. Pz 4 had a low ability to generate singlet oxygen, with ΦΔ values of 0.064 and 0.004 in DMF and DMSO, respectively, as measured with an indirect method using DPBF. No emission properties were recorded for the porphyrazine. The electrochemical measurements indicated that ferrocene-based redox processes of compounds 1, 2, and 4 were shifted towards more positive potentials in comparison to unsubstituted Fc. This positive shift can be assigned to the electron-withdrawing effect of the oxohexyl groups. The most positive peak potential observed for 4 (0.34 V vs. Fc+/Fc) was probably correlated to the strongest inductive effect of the eight substituents existing close together in the 4 macrocycle. Adsorption phenomena existed at carbon-based electrodes in the case of 4. Such a behavior opens up further possibilities for applying 4 in the development of modified electrodes with electroactive redox Fc+/Fc couples.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules28135215/s1: Figure S1: 1H and (13C) chemical shift values [ppm] of 3 and key correlations observed in NMR spectra; Figure S2: 13C NMR spectrum of 3 (201 MHz, DMSO-d6, 298 K); Figure S3: 1H and (13C) chemical shift values [ppm] of 4 and key correlations observed in NMR spectra; Figure S4: 13C NMR spectrum of 4 (201 MHz, DMSO-d6, 298 K); Table S1: 1H and 13C NMR data obtained for 3, including key correlations determined from 1H-13C HSQC and 1H-13C HMBC spectra; Table S2: 1H and 13C NMR data obtained for 4, including key correlations determined from 1H-13C HSQC and 1H-13C HMBC spectra.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.H.; funding acquisition, M.F.; investigation, M.H., A.L., W.P. and J.P.; methodology, M.F. and L.P.; supervision, M.P.M.; writing—original draft, M.H., A.L., W.P., T.R., J.P. and D.T.M.; writing—review and editing, M.F., M.W., D.T.M. and N.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the National Science Centre, Poland, under grant no. 2017/25/N/NZ7/01705. M.P.M. and M.H. are members of the Center of Excellence “Towards Personalized Medicine” operating under the Excellence Initiative—Research University at Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, Poland.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Sample Availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Astruc, D. Why Is Ferrocene so Exceptional? Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2017, 2017, 6–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Damljanović, I.; Vukićević, M.; Radulović, N.; Palić, R.; Ellmerer, E.; Ratković, Z.; Joksović, M.D.; Vukićević, R.D. Synthesis and Antimicrobial Activity of Some New Pyrazole Derivatives Containing a Ferrocene Unit. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2009, 19, 1093–1096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Sharma, B.; Kumar, V. Has Ferrocene Really Delivered Its Role in Accentuating the Bioactivity of Organic Scaffolds? J. Med. Chem. 2021, 64, 16865–16921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Rodríguez-Morgade, M.S.; Stuzhin, P.A. The Chemistry of Porphyrazines: An Overview. J. Porphyr. Phthalocyanines 2004, 8, 1129–1165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kudrevich, S.V.; van Lier, J.E. Azaanalogs of Phthalocyanine: Syntheses and Properties. Coord. Chem. Rev. 1996, 156, 163–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Fuchter, M.J.; Zhong, C.; Zong, H.; Hoffman, B.M.; Barrett, A.G.M. Porphyrazines: Designer Macrocycles by Peripheral Substituent Change. Aust. J. Chem. 2008, 61, 235–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Piskorz, J.; Lijewski, S.; Gierszewski, M.; Gorniak, K.; Sobotta, L.; Wicher, B.; Tykarska, E.; Düzgüneş, N.; Konopka, K.; Sikorski, M.; et al. Sulfanyl Porphyrazines: Molecular Barrel-like Self-Assembly in Crystals, Optical Properties and In Vitro Photodynamic Activity towards Cancer Cells. Dye. Pigment. 2017, 136, 898–908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Piskorz, J.; Mlynarczyk, D.T.; Szczolko, W.; Konopka, K.; Düzgüneş, N.; Mielcarek, J. Liposomal Formulations of Magnesium Sulfanyl Tribenzoporphyrazines for the Photodynamic Therapy of Cancer. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2018, 184, 34–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ge, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Yang, C.; Zhang, B.; Deng, K. Efficient Visible-Light-Driven Selective Conversion of Glucose to High-Value Chemicals over Bi2WO6/Co-Thioporphyrazine Composite in Aqueous Media. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2021, 623, 118265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Koczorowski, T.; Szczolko, W.; Teubert, A.; Goslinski, T. Sulfanyl Porphyrazines with Morpholinylethyl Periphery—Synthesis, Electrochemistry, and Photocatalytic Studies after Deposition on Titanium(IV) Oxide P25 Nanoparticles. Molecules 2021, 26, 2280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Belviso, S.; Cammarota, F.; Rossano, R.; Lelj, F. Effect of Polyfluorination on Self-Assembling and Electronic Properties of Thioalkyl-Porphyrazines. J. Porphyr. Phthalocyanines 2016, 20, 223–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Rebis, T.; Lijewski, S.; Nowicka, J.; Popenda, L.; Sobotta, L.; Jurga, S.; Mielcarek, J.; Milczarek, G.; Goslinski, T. Electrochemical Properties of Metallated Porphyrazines Possessing Isophthaloxybutylsulfanyl Substituents: Application in the Electrocatalytic Oxidation of Hydrazine. Electrochim. Acta 2015, 168, 216–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Porolnik, W.; Kasprzycka, M.; Teubert, A.; Piskorz, J. Serendipitous Synthesis of Unsymmetrical Porphyrazine: Incomplete Transesterification during Macrocyclization. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2021, 133, 108953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Rębiś, T.; Falkowski, M.; Milczarek, G.; Goslinski, T. Electrocatalytic NADH Sensing Using Electrodes Modified with 2-[2-(4-Nitrophenoxy)Ethoxy]Ethylthio-Substituted Porphyrazine/Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube Hybrids. ChemElectroChem 2020, 7, 2838–2850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Falkowski, M.; Rebis, T.; Piskorz, J.; Popenda, L.; Jurga, S.; Mielcarek, J.; Milczarek, G.; Goslinski, T. Multiwalled Carbon Nanotube/Sulfanyl Porphyrazine Hybrids Deposited on Glassy Carbon Electrode—Effect of Nitro Peripheral Groups on Electrochemical Properties. J. Porphyr. Phthalocyanines 2017, 21, 295–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Rębiś, T.; Falkowski, M.; Kryjewski, M.; Popenda, L.; Sobotta, L.; Jurga, S.; Marszall, M.P.; Mielcarek, J.; Milczarek, G.; Goslinski, T. Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube/Sulfanyl Porphyrazine Hybrids Deposited on Glassy Carbon Electrode for Sensitive Determination of Nitrites. Dye. Pigment. 2019, 171, 107660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Stolarska, M.; Glowacka-Sobotta, A.; Ziental, D.; Dlugaszewska, J.; Falkowski, M.; Mielcarek, J.; Goslinski, T.; Sobotta, L. Photochemical Properties and Photocytotoxicities against Wound Bacteria of Sulfanyl Porphyrazines with Bulky Peripheral Substituents. J. Organomet. Chem. 2021, 934, 121669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Bucher, C.; Devillers, C.H.; Moutet, J.-C.; Royal, G.; Saint-Aman, E. Ferrocene-Appended Porphyrins: Syntheses and Properties. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2009, 253, 21–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. González-Cabello, A.; Vázquez, P.; Torres, T. A New Phthalocyanine–Ferrocene Conjugated Dyad. J. Organomet. Chem. 2001, 637–639, 751–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lvova, L.; Galloni, P.; Floris, B.; Lundström, I.; Paolesse, R.; Natale, C.D. A Ferrocene-Porphyrin Ligand for Multi-Transduction Chemical Sensor Development. Sensors 2013, 13, 5841–5856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Leda, A.; Hassani, M.; Rebis, T.; Falkowski, M.; Piskorz, J.; Mlynarczyk, D.T.; McNeice, P.; Milczarek, G. Improved Electrochemical Hydrogen Peroxide Detection Using a Nickel(II) Phthalimide-Substituted Porphyrazine Combined with Various Carbon Nanomaterials. Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Akku, H.; Gül, A. Octakis(Ferrocene)-Substituted Porphyrazines. Transit. Met. Chem. 2001, 26, 689–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Giovannetti, R. The Use of Spectrophotometry UV-Vis for the Study of Porphyrins. In Macro to Nano Spectroscopy; Uddin, J., Ed.; InTech: Rijeka, Croatia, 2012; ISBN 978-953-51-0664-7. [Google Scholar]
  24. Gierszewski, M.; Falkowski, M.; Sobotta, L.; Stolarska, M.; Popenda, L.; Lijewski, S.; Wicher, B.; Burdzinski, G.; Karolczak, J.; Jurga, S.; et al. Porphyrazines with Peripheral Isophthaloxyalkylsulfanyl Substituents and Their Optical Properties. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2015, 307–308, 54–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Belviso, S.; Amati, M.; Rossano, R.; Crispini, A.; Lelj, F. Non-Symmetrical Aryl- and Arylethynyl-Substituted Thioalkyl-Porphyrazines for Optoelectronic Materials: Synthesis, Properties, and Computational Studies. Dalton Trans. 2015, 44, 2191–2207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Gonca, E.; Baklacı, Ü.G.; Dinçer, H.A. Synthesis and Spectral Properties of Novel Seco-Porphyrazines with Eight 4-Biphenyl Groups. Polyhedron 2008, 27, 2431–2435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lijewski, S.; Gierszewski, M.; Sobotta, L.; Piskorz, J.; Kordas, P.; Kucinska, M.; Baranowski, D.; Gdaniec, Z.; Murias, M.; Karolczak, J.; et al. Photophysical Properties and Photochemistry of a Sulfanyl Porphyrazine Bearing Isophthaloxybutyl Substituents. Dye. Pigment. 2015, 113, 702–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Falkowski, M.; Kucinska, M.; Piskorz, J.; Wieczorek-Szweda, E.; Popenda, L.; Jurga, S.; Sikora, A.; Mlynarczyk, D.T.; Murias, M.; Marszall, M.P.; et al. Synthesis of Sulfanyl Porphyrazines with Bulky Peripheral Substituents—Evaluation of Their Photochemical Properties and Biological Activity. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2021, 405, 112964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Mlynarczyk, D.T.; Ziental, D.; Kolasinski, E.; Sobotta, L.; Koczorowski, T.; Mielcarek, J.; Goslinski, T. Nipagin-Functionalized Porphyrazine and Phthalocyanine—Synthesis, Physicochemical Characterization and Toxicity Study after Deposition on Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles P25. Molecules 2021, 26, 2657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ehrlich, L.A.; Skrdla, P.J.; Jarrell, W.K.; Sibert, J.W.; Armstrong, N.R.; Saavedra, S.S.; Barrett, A.G.M.; Hoffman, B.M. Preparation of Polyetherol-Appended Sulfur Porphyrazines and Investigations of Peripheral Metal Ion Binding in Polar Solvents. Inorg. Chem. 2000, 39, 3963–3969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kwiatkowski, S.; Knap, B.; Przystupski, D.; Saczko, J.; Kędzierska, E.; Knap-Czop, K.; Kotlińska, J.; Michel, O.; Kotowski, K.; Kulbacka, J. Photodynamic Therapy–Mechanisms, Photosensitizers and Combinations. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2018, 106, 1098–1107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Maharjan, P.S.; Bhattarai, H.K. Singlet Oxygen, Photodynamic Therapy, and Mechanisms of Cancer Cell Death. J. Oncol. 2022, 2022, 7211485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Pola, M.; Kolarova, H.; Bajgar, R. Generation of Singlet Oxygen by Porphyrin and Phthalocyanine Derivatives Regarding the Oxygen Level. J. Med. Sci. 2022, 91, e752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Lagorio, M.G.; Dicelio, L.E.; San Roman, E.A.; Braslavsky, S.E. Quantum yield of singlet molecular oxygen sensitization by copper(II) tetracarboxyphthalocy anine. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 1989, 3, 615–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Porolnik, W.; Kasprzycka, M.; Podciechowska, K.; Teubert, A.; Piskorz, J. Synthesis and Spectroscopic Properties of Novel Dipyrrole and Tetrapyrrole-Based Photosensitizers with Various Biphenylyl Substituents. Tetrahedron 2022, 127, 133088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ng, K.K.; Zheng, G. Molecular Interactions in Organic Nanoparticles for Phototheranostic Applications. Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 11012–11042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Wieczorek, E.; Piskorz, J.; Popenda, L.; Jurga, S.; Mielcarek, J.; Goslinski, T. First Example of a Diazepinoporphyrazine with Dendrimeric Substituents. Tetrahedron Lett. 2017, 58, 758–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Swarts, P.J.; Conradie, J. Redox Data of Ferrocenylcarboxylic Acids in Dichloromethane and Acetonitrile. Data Brief 2020, 30, 105650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ayaz, S.; Shah, A.; Munir, S. Investigation of Electron Transfer Mechanistic Pathways of Ferrocene Derivatives in Droplet at Carbon Electrode. C 2022, 8, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Anari, E.H.B.; Romano, M.; Teh, W.X.; Black, J.J.; Jiang, E.; Chen, J.; To, T.Q.; Panchompoo, J.; Aldous, L. Substituted Ferrocenes and Iodine as Synergistic Thermoelectrochemical Heat Harvesting Redox Couples in Ionic Liquids. Chem. Commun. 2016, 52, 745–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Paul, A.; Borrelli, R.; Bouyanfif, H.; Gottis, S.; Sauvage, F. Tunable Redox Potential, Optical Properties, and Enhanced Stability of Modified Ferrocene-Based Complexes. ACS Omega 2019, 4, 14780–14789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Manfredi, N.; Decavoli, C.; Boldrini, C.L.; Coluccini, C.; Abbotto, A. Ferrocene Derivatives Functionalized with Donor/Acceptor (Hetero)Aromatic Substituents: Tuning of Redox Properties. Energies 2020, 13, 3937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Skvortsov, I.A.; Fazlyeva, A.M.; Khodov, I.A.; Stuzhin, P.A. Porphyrazines with Annulated Diazepine Rings. 5. Near-IR-Absorbing Tetrakis(6,7-Dihydro-1H-1,4-Diazepino)Porphyrazines and Effects of Acid Solvation on Their Spectral Properties. New J. Chem. 2020, 44, 18362–18371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Szczolko, W.; Koczorowski, T.; Wicher, B.; Kryjewski, M.; Krakowska, Z.; Tykarska, E.; Goslinski, T. Porphyrazines with Bulky Peripheral Pyrrolyl Substituents–Synthesis via Microwave-Assisted Suzuki-Miyaura Cross-Coupling Reaction, Optical and Electrochemical Properties. Dye. Pigment. 2022, 206, 110607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Kurd, M.; Salimi, A.; Hallaj, R. Highly Sensitive Amperometric Sensor for Micromolar Detection of Trichloroacetic Acid Based on Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes and Fe(II)–Phtalocyanine Modified Glassy Carbon Electrode. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2013, 33, 1720–1726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Li, P.; Ding, Y.; Wang, A.; Zhou, L.; Wei, S.; Zhou, Y.; Tang, Y.; Chen, Y.; Cai, C.; Lu, T. Self-Assembly of Tetrakis (3-Trifluoromethylphenoxy) Phthalocyaninato Cobalt(II) on Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes and Their Amperometric Sensing Application for Nitrite. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2013, 5, 2255–2260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Cruz Moraes, F.; Cabral, M.F.; Machado, S.A.S.; Mascaro, L.H. Electrocatalytic Behavior of Glassy Carbon Electrodes Modified with Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes and Cobalt Phthalocyanine for Selective Analysis of Dopamine in Presence of Ascorbic Acid. Electroanalysis 2008, 20, 851–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Yang, L.; Li, X.; Xiong, Y.; Liu, X.; Li, X.; Wang, M.; Yan, S.; Alshahrani, L.A.M.; Liu, P.; Zhang, C. The Fabrication of a Co (II) Complex and Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes Modified Glass Carbon Electrode, and Its Application for the Determination of Dopamine. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2014, 731, 14–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Kryjewski, M.; Tykarska, E.; Rebis, T.; Dlugaszewska, J.; Ratajczak, M.; Teubert, A.; Gapiński, J.; Patkowski, A.; Piskorz, J.; Milczarek, G.; et al. Porphyrazine with Bulky 2-(1-Adamantyl)-5-Phenylpyrrol-1-Yl Periphery Tuning Its Spectral and Electrochemical Properties. Polyhedron 2015, 98, 217–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Spiller, W.; Kliesch, H.; Wöhrle, D.; Hackbarth, S.; Röder, B.; Schnurpfeil, G. Singlet Oxygen Quantum Yields of Different Photosensitizers in Polar Solvents and Micellar Solutions. J. Porphyr. Phthalocyanines (JPP) 1998, 2, 145–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Scheme 1. Synthesis of compounds 3 and 4. Reagents and conditions: (i) K2CO3, DMF, 50 °C, 72 h; (ii) Mg(OC4H9)2, n-butanol, reflux, 20 h.
Scheme 1. Synthesis of compounds 3 and 4. Reagents and conditions: (i) K2CO3, DMF, 50 °C, 72 h; (ii) Mg(OC4H9)2, n-butanol, reflux, 20 h.
Molecules 28 05215 sch001
Figure 1. 1H NMR spectrum of 3 (DMSO-d6, 298 K). The symbols * and ~ indicate DMSO-d6 and water residual peaks, respectively.
Figure 1. 1H NMR spectrum of 3 (DMSO-d6, 298 K). The symbols * and ~ indicate DMSO-d6 and water residual peaks, respectively.
Molecules 28 05215 g001
Figure 2. 1H NMR spectrum of 4 (pyridine-d5, 298 K). The symbols * and ~ indicate pyridine-d5 and water residual peaks, respectively.
Figure 2. 1H NMR spectrum of 4 (pyridine-d5, 298 K). The symbols * and ~ indicate pyridine-d5 and water residual peaks, respectively.
Molecules 28 05215 g002
Figure 3. UV-Vis absorption spectra of Pz 4 in dichloromethane (DCM), N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF), and dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO).
Figure 3. UV-Vis absorption spectra of Pz 4 in dichloromethane (DCM), N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF), and dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO).
Molecules 28 05215 g003
Figure 4. Changes in the UV-Vis spectra during irradiation of Pz 4 and DPBF in (A) N,N-dimethylformamide and (B) dimethylsulfoxide.
Figure 4. Changes in the UV-Vis spectra during irradiation of Pz 4 and DPBF in (A) N,N-dimethylformamide and (B) dimethylsulfoxide.
Molecules 28 05215 g004
Figure 5. Cyclic voltammogram for Fc (a) 1 (b), 3 (c), and 4 (d) recorded in 0.05 M DCM/TBAP at a scan rate of 50 mV s−1.
Figure 5. Cyclic voltammogram for Fc (a) 1 (b), 3 (c), and 4 (d) recorded in 0.05 M DCM/TBAP at a scan rate of 50 mV s−1.
Molecules 28 05215 g005
Figure 6. Cyclic voltammograms of 4 recorded in 0.05 M TBAP/DCM in a broad potential range at a scan rate of 50 mV s−1 (A). Differential pulse voltammograms for 4 in the same electrolyte (B).
Figure 6. Cyclic voltammograms of 4 recorded in 0.05 M TBAP/DCM in a broad potential range at a scan rate of 50 mV s−1 (A). Differential pulse voltammograms for 4 in the same electrolyte (B).
Molecules 28 05215 g006
Figure 7. CV recorded in blank TBAP/DCM for GC electrode that was previously immersed in a solution of 4. The scan rate was 100 mV s−1.
Figure 7. CV recorded in blank TBAP/DCM for GC electrode that was previously immersed in a solution of 4. The scan rate was 100 mV s−1.
Molecules 28 05215 g007
Figure 8. Cyclic voltammograms for a GC/MWCNT/4 electrode recorded in 0.1 M HClO4 (curve a) and in 0.1 M HClO4 containing 0.5 mM Fc (curve b).
Figure 8. Cyclic voltammograms for a GC/MWCNT/4 electrode recorded in 0.1 M HClO4 (curve a) and in 0.1 M HClO4 containing 0.5 mM Fc (curve b).
Molecules 28 05215 g008
Table 1. UV-Vis absorption maxima (λAbs) with logarithms of molar absorption coefficients (log ε) and quantum yields of the singlet oxygen generation (ΦΔ) for Pz 4.
Table 1. UV-Vis absorption maxima (λAbs) with logarithms of molar absorption coefficients (log ε) and quantum yields of the singlet oxygen generation (ΦΔ) for Pz 4.
Solventλ1Abs (log ε)λ2Abs (log ε)ΦΔ
Dichloromethane378 (4.48)675 (4.86)-
N,N-Dimethylformamide380 (4.84)671 (4.86)0.064
Dimethyl sulfoxide380 (4.84)674 (4.88)0.004
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hassani, M.; Leda, A.; Porolnik, W.; Falkowski, M.; Rębiś, T.; Piskorz, J.; Popenda, L.; Wicinski, M.; Mlynarczyk, D.T.; Düzgüneş, N.; et al. Synthesis, Electrochemical and Photochemical Properties of Sulfanyl Porphyrazine with Ferrocenyl Substituents. Molecules 2023, 28, 5215. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28135215

AMA Style

Hassani M, Leda A, Porolnik W, Falkowski M, Rębiś T, Piskorz J, Popenda L, Wicinski M, Mlynarczyk DT, Düzgüneş N, et al. Synthesis, Electrochemical and Photochemical Properties of Sulfanyl Porphyrazine with Ferrocenyl Substituents. Molecules. 2023; 28(13):5215. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28135215

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hassani, Mina, Amanda Leda, Weronika Porolnik, Michal Falkowski, Tomasz Rębiś, Jaroslaw Piskorz, Lukasz Popenda, Michal Wicinski, Dariusz T. Mlynarczyk, Nejat Düzgüneş, and et al. 2023. "Synthesis, Electrochemical and Photochemical Properties of Sulfanyl Porphyrazine with Ferrocenyl Substituents" Molecules 28, no. 13: 5215. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28135215

APA Style

Hassani, M., Leda, A., Porolnik, W., Falkowski, M., Rębiś, T., Piskorz, J., Popenda, L., Wicinski, M., Mlynarczyk, D. T., Düzgüneş, N., & Marszall, M. P. (2023). Synthesis, Electrochemical and Photochemical Properties of Sulfanyl Porphyrazine with Ferrocenyl Substituents. Molecules, 28(13), 5215. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28135215

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop