Next Article in Journal
Fuel Characteristics and Removal of AAEMs in Hydrochars Derived from Sewage Sludge and Corn Straw
Next Article in Special Issue
Optimization Studies and Compositional Oil Analysis of Pequi (Caryocar brasiliense Cambess) Almonds by Supercritical CO2 Extraction
Previous Article in Journal
Design and Synthesis of Novel Helix Mimetics Based on the Covalent H-Bond Replacement and Amide Surrogate
Previous Article in Special Issue
Supercritical Fluid Microcellular Foaming of High-Hardness TPU via a Pressure-Quenching Process: Restricted Foam Expansion Controlled by Matrix Modulus and Thermal Degradation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Binary Diffusion Coefficients for Short Chain Alcohols in Supercritical Carbon Dioxide—Experimental and Predictive Correlations

by
Cecília I. A. V. Santos
1,*,
Ana C. F. Ribeiro
1 and
Valentina Shevtsova
2,3
1
CQC-IMS, Department of Chemistry, University of Coimbra, 3004-535 Coimbra, Portugal
2
Mechanical and Manufacturing Department, Mondragon University, 20500 Arrasate-Mondragón, Spain
3
Ikerbasque, Basque Foundation for Science, 48011 Bilbao, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2023, 28(2), 782; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28020782
Submission received: 2 December 2022 / Revised: 10 January 2023 / Accepted: 10 January 2023 / Published: 12 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Supercritical Fluid Techniques)

Abstract

:
Experimental binary diffusion coefficients for short-chain alcohols in supercritical carbon dioxide were measured using the Taylor dispersion technique in a temperature range of 306.15 K to 331.15 K and along the 10.5 MPa isobar. The obtained diffusion coefficients were in the order of 10−8 m2 s−1. The dependence of D on temperature and solvent density was examined together with the influence of molecular size. Some classic correlation models based on the hydrodynamic and free volume theory were used to estimate the diffusion coefficients in supercritical carbon dioxide. Predicted values were generally overestimated in comparison with experimental ones and correlations were shown to be valid only in high-density regions.

1. Introduction

Research on supercritical fluids (SCFs) science and technology has advanced in the past decades at both academic and industrial levels due to the broad applications of SCFs. Supercritical technologies are employed in a multitude of areas such as food, cosmetics and pharmaceuticals by replacing traditional organic solvents [1,2] oil industries (for biodiesel preparation purposes [3]) or working fluid (for shale gas recovery [4]). More recently, new technologies have been developed to take advantage of SCFs’ excellent heat transfer properties, employing them as heat transfer fluids, e.g., in heat and power plants [5], or in the development of new geothermal energy systems [6,7], as they have the advantage of being environmentally friendly when compared with conventional methods that pollute or contribute to the greenhouse effect. Still within the topic of global warming, supercritical technologies have been specially investigated as a valid approach to mitigating climate change, namely through carbon capture and storage (CCS) mechanisms [8,9]. Carbon dioxide, amidst supercritical fluids, has been largely used due to its chemical stability, substantial inertness, low critical temperature, relatively non-toxicity, non-flammability and availability in high purity at a relatively low cost. Above its supercritical point, (pc = 7.38 MPa, Tc = 304.18 K) carbon dioxide becomes a fluid (scCO2) that can expand like a gas but has the density of a liquid [10,11]. This low viscosity, combined with its high solute diffusivity gives it superior solvating properties and mass transfer characteristics in comparison with more conventional solvents (e.g., liquids). Indeed, these features, together with the ability to solvate numerous polar and non-polar compounds, justify the green solvent label given to carbon dioxide and its large range of applications.
While it is relatively easy to find literature sources with data on phase equilibria and/or solubilities of diverse compounds in supercritical CO2 [12,13,14], information on their transport properties is scarce. Transport properties, together with solubility data, are necessary information for the design of processes wherein mass transfer is the dominant rate mechanism, such as chemical reactors or process development and efficiency improvement of supercritical fluid extraction. Lack of fundamental thermodynamic data required for process design and scale up also restrains the development of supercritical fluid technologies up to an acceptable commercial level of performance. Hence, binary diffusion coefficients are parameters needed in almost all useful models for multicomponent diffusivity. They are also of critical importance to properly illustrate transport properties due to the reduced number of models and the limited conditions in which the existent theoretical and empirical models, capable of describing diffusion, are valid. Moreover, since most real systems are multicomponent, knowledge of mass transfer rates and understanding of the transport processes of solutes in supercritical carbon dioxide justify themselves in order to comprehend the role that individual and overall mass transfer coefficients play as intrinsic contributors to multicomponent diffusivities.
Model systems such as supercritical carbon dioxide combined with short chain alcohols, are important in the pharmaceutical and food industries, namely in supercritical fluid extraction and supercritical fluid chromatography processes [12,15,16,17], where alcohols act as modifiers (cosolvents) to improve the selectivity and efficiency of the CO2 extraction process. These scCO2+alcohols-model systems are also of high significance in the petroleum and natural gas industries, where methanol and ethanol may act as inhibitors to prevent hydrate plug formation on wells, in the Rectisol process and in the production of alcohols from syngas [8,9,10]. In this sense, quantitative knowledge of rate mechanisms, such as binary molecular diffusion of alcohols in supercritical carbon dioxide, is crucial for equipment design, process development and efficient operation of supercritical fluid extraction, but also for the improvement of empirical models so that it becomes possible to accurately predict properties in multicomponent mixtures.
We present results for the experimental measurements of binary diffusion coefficients of several short chain alcohols, e.g., methanol, ethanol, 1-propanol, 2-propanol and 1-butanol, in scCO2, covering a wide density range both close and far from the critical point in order to understand the transport phenomena occurring in those systems. Classical empirical correlations are also used to estimate the diffusion coefficients and the predicted results and experimental data are compared.

2. Results

2.1. Experimental Diffusion Coefficients for Alcohols in Supercritical CO2

Diffusion coefficients for short chain alcohols, methanol, ethanol, 1-propanol, 2-propanol, and 1-butanol, in supercritical carbon dioxide, at a pressure of 10.5 MPa and at temperatures ranging from 306.15 to 331.15 K, are presented in Table 1. Values for density and viscosity [18] for supercritical carbon dioxide in the same range of temperatures are also presented. The diffusion coefficients were obtained from an average of at least six replicate dispersion profiles, and the standard deviation was estimated from the averaged diffusion coefficients over different wavenumbers for each run, over repeated runs.

2.2. Predicted Diffusion Coefficients for Alcohols in Supercritical CO2

Given the need for accurate data on the transport properties of solutes in scCO2 and the impracticability of experimentally measuring all the systems of interest, at all operation conditions, it is important to be able to rely on models that provide a consistent estimation of the diffusion coefficients. Molecular dynamics simulations are an effective alternative but require some experimental data to establish MD parameters [20]. Great effort has been devoted to creating expressions valid for predicting their diffusion in supercritical fluids, and the literature is rich in empirical models for their prediction. They can be commonly classified in two groups: models constructed on the base of rough hard sphere principles [21,22,23] and hydrodynamic models based on the Stokes–Einstein equation [24,25,26,27,28,29,30]. A big number of these models present some limitations, failing in their estimations of D for polar or asymmetric solutes, or cannot be applied over a wide range of temperatures and pressures, nor near the critical point.
Here, we have chosen to test our experimental data against the improved Stokes –Einstein models developed by Vaz et al. [29], where universal parameters valid for scCO2 were introduced in the original hydrodynamic correlations developed by Wilke-Chang [25], Scheibel [31] and Lusis–Ratcliff [32]. We also test predictive equations from Sassiat [24] and Lai–Tan [28]’s models, developed and /or validated for solutes diffusing in supercritical carbon dioxide, and He and Yu [23]’s model based on free volume theory.
In general, these correlations have specific constants obtained from the fitting of a relatively large database of different solutes, and introduce correction parameters such as solvent viscosity and solute molar volume or molecular weight. While the classical models such as Wilke–Chang, Scheibel and Lusis–Ratcliff, originally developed for diffusion in liquids, are expected to fail in predictions of diffusion coefficients in regions of low viscosity (as the original Stokes–Einstein equation does), the modified equations by Vaz et al., together with Sassiat, Lai–Tan and He and Yu models, built for solutes in supercritical carbon dioxide, should be able to provide more accurate predictions.
The ability of the above-mentioned models to predict diffusion coefficients, when compared with the experimental ones, is evaluated in terms of the average absolute deviations (AAD%), calculated from:
A A D   % = 100 n i = 1 n D e x p D c a l c D e x p i
where the subscripts “exp” and “calc” refer to the experimental and calculated diffusion coefficients, respectively, and n is the number of experimental points.
The results obtained for the various correlations tested for the prediction of diffusion coefficients of methanol, ethanol, 1-propanol, 2-propanol and 1-butanol in supercritical carbon dioxide are shown in Table 2.

3. Discussion

Historically, CO2 has been treated as a nonpolar solvent, comparable to alkanes due to its low dielectric constant and dipole moment, whereas recent studies suggest that it has the potential to act as both a weak Lewis acid and Lewis base [33]. Additionally, strong theoretical and experimental evidence indicates that CO2 can participate in conventional and nonconventional hydrogen-bonding interactions. For example, experimental investigations reveal the formation of conventional hydrogen bonds between an oxygen atom of CO2 and hydroxyl (–OH) groups [34]. These site-specific solute–solvent interactions may help to understand the fundamental nature of scCO2 as a solvent and contribute to the interpretation of our experimental results.
The diffusion coefficients for alcohols in supercritical CO2, illustrated in Figure 1, show a marked increase as the temperature rises, probably related but not limited to the increase in the kinetic energy of the molecules. Alcohols with higher molecular weight appear to be less affected by the temperature increase. Indeed, the heavier alcohol 1-butanol shows an increase of 56% in the mobility over a 25 K temperature interval, whilst the diffusion coefficient for the lighter alcohol methanol increases up to 100%.
The hydrogen bonding between the CO2 and OH groups, in the particular case of 1-propanol and 2-propanol, gives rise to different structures; they are linear and spherical structures, respectively, suggesting differences in the solute due to exposure to the solvent. The solute–CO2 interactions are favored over the solute–solute ones in promoting the electrostrictive effect of the CO2 molecules (that is, causing the solvent to contract), the effect being more significant in the case of 1-propanol. This statement is also in agreement with the results presented in Table 1 for the diffusion of these alcohols. In fact, when comparing isomers 1-propanol and 2-propanol, the latter is seen to diffuse slower than the linear molecule, with approximately a 10% decrease in the diffusion coefficient. If one considers the molecule’s shape, 2-propanol is branched and thus a more spherical molecule, with a slightly bigger molar volume, indicating lesser electrostriction of CO2 molecules by this alcohol when compared with the other isomer. The entities of this alcohol offer more frictional resistance to motion through the scCO2 and, consequently, the alcohol’s diffusion coefficient is minor. This observation is in agreement with other studies that found that linear molecules generally tend to diffuse faster than spherical molecules of the same molar volume, both in liquids [35] and supercritical fluids [36].
Another interesting observation is that the relationship between the diffusion coefficient and temperature for these solutes is non-linear, and the coefficients for polynomial fit are presented in Table 3. Previous studies have shown that this non-linear relationship, with an inversion of the slope in the region where the mobility is the maximum for scCO2, can be explained by the presence of the Widom line [10,37]. The presence of this transition zone, contrary to a simple homogeneous supercritical state space, splits the phase diagram into two supercritical regions: liquid-like and gas-like. The latter are considered extensions of the subcritical liquid and gas phases [38,39,40], where supercritical fluid properties continuously change over a narrow temperature range. Widom line presence has been verified by experimental and theoretical studies [39], and the crossing of this region is associated with a minimum value of the thermodynamic factor, this behavior being explained by the free volume increment associated with density variation [41], thus affecting the transport properties of supercritical carbon dioxide. Interpretations and definitions of the Widom line are still subject of some debate. A general principle estimates the Widom line from the locus of maxima of different thermodynamic response functions that originate at the critical point [42]. Since different functions give rise to slightly distinct lines, sometimes these changes are referred also as the Widom region. When based on transport properties, the separation between liquid and gas-like regions is generally defined by the minimum of the kinematic viscosity [43].
The maximum of mobility (in terms of the inverse of the kinematic viscosity) for pure CO2 at 10.5 MPa and the inflection point for density curves, calculated from the data obtained from NIST [18], take place at around T ≈ 322 K. This is also in accordance with isobaric MD simulations [39], experimental results obtained for CO2 [44] and similar studies in the literature [10,19,37,40]. Inflection points obtained from the fitting of the dependence of the diffusion coefficients with temperature, for each of the systems studied here, are observed at temperatures between 319 K (for the smaller molecule methanol) and 325 K (for butanol). This small shift in the temperature where the transport properties change can be related to the molecular interactions occurring in the solution. For methanol, it may be the result of strong hydrogen bonding between the solute and the solvent giving rise to a more ordered and less dense diffusion media for the methanol molecules to diffuse in; meanwhile, for the bulkier molecules, it is possible that the increased viscosity of the mixture, in contrast to a smaller viscosity of the pure CO2, plays an important role even in this range of very dilute solutions.
Table 3. Coefficients for third order polynomial fitting of the temperature dependance of the diffusion coefficients for short chain alcohols in supercritical carbon dioxide.
Table 3. Coefficients for third order polynomial fitting of the temperature dependance of the diffusion coefficients for short chain alcohols in supercritical carbon dioxide.
SoluteAB102 C104 DR2Inflection Point
Methanol−670763.66−20.012.100.999319
Ethanol−660162.60−19.792.040.997323
1-Propanol−716267.70−21.302.200.997323
2-Propanol−442141.79−13.011.340.998324
1-Butanol−583555.03−17.301.770.998325
When analyzing the diffusion coefficients D for a determined solute in carbon dioxide, it is common to use density instead of the operating temperature and pressure, since these two parameters define supercritical carbon dioxide density and viscosity. Figure 2 shows the behavior of the diffusion coefficients for the short chain alcohols here studied in supercritical CO2 in isobaric conditions (a pressure of 10.5 MPa and temperatures ranging from 306.15 to 331.15 K). The values of density for supercritical carbon dioxide were obtained from NIST [18].
The diffusion coefficient for alcohols in scCO2 decreases with the increasing density of supercritical CO2, and the reason for this decrease is related to the larger number of molecular collisions and the reduced mean free path accessible for the molecules. As the density increases, solvent molecules are closer, and this restricts the movement of solute molecules in the media.
Empirical correlations have been tested to verify their ability to correctly predict the experimental values found here. The empirical equations used were based in hydrodynamic and free volume theory. Figure 3 presents some of the predictive curves for each of the short chain alcohols under study, and for the models which overall showed a better agreement with experimental data.
In general, none of the equations was able to predict the behavior of the diffusion coefficients determined experimentally over the complete density range. Predictive curves for the diffusion coefficients were overestimated, even by the models developed for diffusion in supercritical carbon dioxide. Notwithstanding, AAD% is generally low due to the high number of experimental runs; the relative deviations from experimental data in the lowest density regions can go up to 100%, and estimation is poor independent of the size of the molecules, even if the majority of the equations contemplate a parameter accounting for the size of the solute.
Yet, for the higher densities of scCO2 (> 600 Kg m−3), all models, independent of the theory they are based on, can provide a reasonable estimation of D (between 3 and 20% deviation), which is a good approximation if we also take into account the uncertainties associated with the experimental measurements. Modified equations by Vaz et al. [29] for Wilke and Chang and Lusis–Ratcliff hydrodynamic correlations, built based on the dependance of D on the solvent viscosity and incorporating a parameter based on the size of the solute (molar volume), together with He and Yu model, show the best agreement with experimental data. Finally, in this range of densities, an increase in the molecular size (molecular weight and molar volume) produces closer predictions to the experimental results, probably because most of the models were developed and tested for solutes of a relatively large size. In conclusion, they can be assumed to be reliable models for the calculation of the diffusion coefficients of solutes in supercritical CO2, particularly for new unknown systems at any condition in which information is completely absent.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Materials

Methanol 99.99% (CAS Number: 67-56-1) was supplied by Fisher Scientific, ethanol absolute 99.97% (CAS Number: 64-17-5) was supplied by VWR Chemicals Prolabo, 1-propanol >99.5% (CAS Number: 71-23-8) was supplied by TCI Europe, 2-propanol pro analisis >99.8% (CAS Number: 67-63-0) was supplied by Sigma-Aldrich and 1-butanol >99.8% (CAS Number: 71-36-3) was supplied by RCI Labscan. Each liquid was used as received, with no further purification. CO2 with purity higher than 99.995% (water content <40 ppm) was supplied by Air Liquide.

4.2. Equipment and Experimental Procedure

The Taylor dispersion technique (TDT) here employed has been optimized for the measurement of high pressure and supercritical fluids [19,45], namely scCO2, and is represented in Figure 4. It operates upon the fundamental basis of TDT: a pulse of a solute that is injected into a solvent stream, flowing under a laminar regime through a circular cross section capillary tube, will widen due to the joint action of convection occurring in the longitudinal axis and molecular diffusion occurring in the radial direction. Diffusion studies in supercritical CO2 are conditioned by the critical parameters of carbon dioxide, temperature and pressure, that is, Tc = 304.18K and pc = 7.38MPa [46]. Determination of the diffusion coefficients is achieved by injecting, in the start of each experiment, a pulse of 5 μL of solute through a 6-port injection valve (Knauer model A1357, Knauer, Berlin, Germany) into CO2 at a constant stream rate of 0.3 cm3 min−1, maintained by a HPLC analytical pump (Jasco PU-4185, Jasco Inc., Hachioji, Japan). The pump head has a custom designed cooling device attached to it; temperature is regulated by a Peltier module controlled by a circulating water bath set to 260.15 K (Lauda Eco RE415G, Lauda, Lauda-Königshofen, Germany). This cooling device is aimed to keep CO2 in the liquid state, allowing for the pump to pressurize it above its critical pressure into the diffusion tube. A heat exchanger of 1.5 m long is placed at the pump outlet and used for preheating subcooled liquid CO2 to its supercritical state before the injection valve. The diffusion tube consists of a stainless-steel capillary tube of (30.916 ± 0.001) m length and 0.375 mm inner radii. It is coiled on a channeled aluminum cylinder in the form of a helix with 0.36 m diameter for both support and temperature regulation and kept at the study temperature ±0.1 K using a temperature-regulated water bath (Grant GD100, Grant Instruments Keison, Chelmsford, UK). Dispersion of the injected samples is monitored using a FT-IR refractometer (Jasco FT-IR 4600, Jasco Inc.), placed at the outlet of the dispersion tube and equipped with a high-pressure demountable cell (Harrick, Pleasantville, NY, USA), optimized for the best possible signal-to-noise ratio [45]. The detector is connected to a computer for digital data acquisition (Spectra Manager v.2 software by Jasco) allowing it to follow the response curves corresponding to the changes in the stream with time and in terms of absorbance/transmittance infrared spectra at wavenumbers corresponding to the different vibration modes of the molecules studied here. The pressure in the system is controlled by a back pressure regulator (Jasco BP-4340, Jasco Inc.) together with a pressure sensor (Jumo dTrans p30, JUMO Process Control, Inc., East Syracuse, NY, USA) for maintaining ± 0.05 MPa accuracy. Data were recorded at increments of 4 cm−1 and at time intervals of 4 s for each measurement. Diffusion coefficients are the average of at least six injections of sample.
Calculation of the diffusion coefficients from the absorbance–response curve of the solute is performed using the same procedure described for conventional TDT [19,45,47,48,49], with the assumption that small changes in concentration C are directly proportional to variations in absorbance. Diffusion coefficients are extracted from the experimentally measured signal by fitting the response curve to:
A t = A 0 + A 1 t + A 2 t 2 + R C t C 0 = A 0 + A 1 t + A 2 t 2 + Δ A t R t exp 12 D ( t t R ) 2 R 2 t
where the three first terms A0 + A1t + A2t2 reflect the drift and curvature of the baseline due to small concentration and temperature variations; tR is the retention time of the peak, R = (∂A/∂C)λ is the sensitivity of the detector (directly dependent on the wavenumber at which the measurements are carried out) and ΔA is the peak height relative to the baseline.

4.3. Preparation of Experiment

The procedure to select the working wavenumbers for each solute and the experimental protocol have been explained in detail previously [19,45], so only the most relevant points are mentioned below.
Transmittance in the infrared spectra of pure solutes, that is, methanol, ethanol, 1-propanol, 2-propanol, and 1-butanol, at 298.15 K and 0.1 MPa and for supercritical CO2, at 306.15 K and 10.5 MPa, were obtained prior to the experiment and are represented in Figure 5.
Supercritical CO2 spectra present a region of high absorbance (minimum transmittance) at wavelengths 3500–3800 cm−1 that superimposes upon the main stretching frequencies for the alcohol functional group (O–H bond). Even so, these solutes can be identified by their O–H bond bending frequencies [50], although in our experimental measurements, the signal exhibited by this vibration mode is too small to be fitted. Vibration modes, corresponding in general to C–C single bond and C–H bond stretching and bending of these solutes, appear in the supercritical CO2 IR transparent regions and originate a signal that corresponds to the dispersion of the pulse of the injected solute in supercritical CO2. Thus, from the analysis of the IR spectra in Figure 5, we have followed, with time, the vibration modes identified in Table 4.

5. Conclusions

Molecular diffusion coefficients for short-chain alcohols in supercritical CO2 were measured by the Taylor dispersion technique in the temperature range of 306.15 to 331.15 K and along the 10.5 MPa isobar.
Diffusion coefficients increased non-linearly with temperature; bulkier and non-linear molecules were less influenced by the temperature effect. The non-linear dependence of diffusion coefficients upon temperature can be explained by the presence of a Widom line within the range of temperatures and pressures studied, a region wherein the supercritical fluid goes through a transition between a liquid-like and gas-like state. The observed behavior is in also agreement with other molecular dynamics and experimental studies for solutes diffusing in supercritical CO2.
Dependence on density was analyzed, with diffusion coefficients showing a decrease with an increase of carbon dioxide density, as expected. Various correlation models were assessed to estimate the diffusion coefficients, with the best results obtained by the modified equations by Vaz et al. and He and Yu models in the higher-range densities. In general, classical equations were not able to predict diffusion coefficient behavior within all the conditions studied here, but can be a helpful tool for new systems in which information is completely absent.
These studies are equally valuable, since they provide qualitative information about the dependence of the D coefficients upon the number of methylene groups for short chain alcohols in supercritical CO2, helping us to understand the main features of the results and providing transport data necessary to model the diffusion of these solutes in pharmaceutical and industrial applications.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization and methodology C.I.A.V.S. and V.S.; Investigation: C.I.A.V.S., formal analysis, C.I.A.V.S., A.C.F.R. and V.S., Writing—review and editing, C.I.A.V.S., A.C.F.R. and V.S., funding acquisition, C.I.A.V.S. and A.C.F.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by FEDER –European Regional Development Fund through the COMPETE Programme and FCT—Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, for the KIDIMIX project POCI-01-0145-FEDER-030271, and by “The Coimbra Chemistry Centre” which is supported by the Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT), Portuguese Agency for Scientific Research, through the programmes UIDB/00313/2020 e UIDP/00313/2020 and COMPETE. V.S. acknowledges support from micro4IloT (Grant No. KK-2021/00082) from the Basque government and PID2020115086GB-C33 financed by MCIN/AEI of the Spanish Government.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Knez, Ž.; Pantić, M.; Cör, D.; Novak, Z.; Knez Hrnčič, M. Are Supercritical Fluids Solvents for the Future? Chem. Eng. Process.-Process Intensif. 2019, 141, 107532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Badens, E.; Masmoudi, Y.; Mouahid, A.; Crampon, C. Current Situation and Perspectives in Drug Formulation by Using Supercritical Fluid Technology. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2018, 134, 274–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Bensaid, S.; Hoang, D.; Bellantoni, P.; Saracco, G. Supercritical Fluid Technology in Biodiesel Production: Pilot Plant Design and Operation. Green Process. Synth. 2013, 2, 397–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Yuan, Q.; Zhu, X.; Lin, K.; Zhao, Y.P. Molecular Dynamics Simulations of the Enhanced Recovery of Confined Methane with Carbon Dioxide. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2015, 17, 31887–31893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Koytsoumpa, E.I.; Bergins, C.; Kakaras, E. The CO2 Economy: Review of CO2 Capture and Reuse Technologies. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2018, 132, 3–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Buscheck, T.A.; Bielicki, J.M.; Edmunds, T.A.; Hao, Y.; Sun, Y.; Randolph, J.B.; Saar, M.O. Multifluid Geo-Energy Systems: Using Geologic CO2 Storage for Geothermal Energy Production and Grid-Scale Energy Storage in Sedimentary Basins. Geosphere 2016, 12, 678–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. McDonnell, K.; Molnár, L.; Harty, M.; Murphy, F. Feasibility Study of Carbon Dioxide Plume Geothermal Systems in Germany−utilising Carbon Dioxide for Energy. Energies 2020, 13, 2416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Baena-Moreno, F.M.; Rodríguez-Galán, M.; Vega, F.; Alonso-Fariñas, B.; Vilches Arenas, L.F.; Navarrete, B. Carbon Capture and Utilization Technologies: A Literature Review and Recent Advances. Energy Sources Part A Recovery Util. Environ. Eff. 2019, 41, 1403–1433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Vilarrasa, V.; Makhnenko, R.Y.; Rutqvist, J. Field and Laboratory Studies of Geomechanical Response to the Injection of CO2. In Science of Carbon Storage in Deep Saline Formations: Process Coupling across Time and Spatial Scales; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  10. Gaponenko, Y.; Mialdun, A.; Shevtsova, V. Diffusion of Quinine with Ethanol as a Co-Solvent in Supercritical CO2. Molecules 2020, 25, 5372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Guo, P.; Liu, S.; Yan, J.; Wang, J.; Zhang, Q. Experimental Study on Heat Transfer of Supercritical CO2 Flowing in a Mini Tube under Heating Conditions. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 2020, 153, 119623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Secuianu, C.; Feroiu, V.; Geana, D. High-Pressure Vapor-Liquid Equilibria in the System Carbon Dioxide + 1-Butanol at Temperatures from (293.15 to 324.15) K. J. Chem. Eng. Data 2004, 49, 1635–1638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Secuianu, C.; Feroiu, V.; Geanǎ, D. High-Pressure Vapor-Liquid Equilibria in the System Carbon Dioxide and 2-Propanol at Temperatures from 293.25 K to 323.15 K. J. Chem. Eng. Data 2003, 48, 1384–1386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Fourie, F.C.v.N.; Schwarz, C.E.; Knoetze, J.H. Phase Equilibria of Alcohols in Supercritical Fluids. Part I. The Effect of the Position of the Hydroxyl Group for Linear C8 Alcohols in Supercritical Carbon Dioxide. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2008, 47, 161–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Staby, A.; Mollerup, J. Separation of Constituents of Fish Oil Using Supercritical Fluids: A Review of Experimental Solubility, Extraction, and Chromatographic Data. Fluid Phase Equilibria 1993, 91, 349–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Brunner, G. Supercritical Process Technology Related to Energy and Future Directions-An Introduction. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2015, 96, 11–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Brennecke, J.F.; Eckert, C.A. Phase Equilibria for Supercritical Fluid Process Design. AIChE J. 1989, 35, 1409–1427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lemmon, E.W.; McLinden, M.O.; Friend, D.G. Thermophysical Properties of Fluid Systems. In NIST Chemistry Webbook; NIST Standard Reference Database No. 69; National Institute of Standards and Technology: Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  19. Santos, C.I.A.V.; Barros, M.C.F.; Ribeiro, A.C.F. Diffusion of Ethanol in Supercritical Carbon Dioxide—Investigation of ScCO2-Cosolvent Mixtures Used in Pharmaceutical Applications. Processes 2022, 10, 660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Stubbs, J.M. Molecular Simulations of Supercritical Fluid Systems. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2016, 108, 104–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Catchpole, O.J.; King, M.B. Measurement and Correlation of Binary Diffusion Coefficients in Near Critical Fluids. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res 1994, 33, 1828–1837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Funazukuri, T.; Kong, C.Y.; Kagei, S. Binary Diffusion Coefficients of Acetone in Carbon Dioxide at 308.2 and 313.2 K in the Pressure Range from 7.9 to 40 MPa. Int. J. Thermophys 2000, 21, 651–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. He, C.H.; Yu, Y.S. New Equation for Infinite-Dilution Diffusion Coefficients in Supercritical and High-Temperature Liquid Solvents. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res 1998, 37, 3793–3798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Sassiat, P.R.; Mourier, P.; Caude, M.H.; Rosset, R.H. Measurement of Diffusion Coefficients in Supercritical Carbon Dioxide and Correlation with the Equation of Wilke and Chang. Anal. Chem. 1987, 59, 1164–1170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wilke, C.R.; Chang, P. Correlation of Diffusion Coefficients in Dilute Solutions. AIChE J. 1955, 1, 264–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Tyn, M.T.; Calus, W.F. Temperature and Concentration Dependence of Mutual Diffusion Coefficients of Some Binary Liquid Systems. J. Chem. Eng. Data 1975, 20, 310–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lusis, M.A.; Ratcliff, C.A. Diffusion in Binary Liquid Mixtures at Infinite Dilution. Can. J. Chem. Eng 1968, 46, 385–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lai, C.C.; Tan, C.S. Measurement of Molecular Diffusion Coefficients in Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Using a Coated Capillary Column. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res 1995, 34, 674–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Vaz, R.v.; Magalhães, A.L.; Silva, C.M. Improved Stokes-Einstein Based Models for Diffusivities in Supercritical CO2. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng 2014, 45, 1280–1284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Magalhães, A.L.; Vaz, R.V.; Gonçalves, R.M.G.; da Silva, F.A.; Silva, C.M. Accurate Hydrodynamic Models for the Prediction of Tracer Diffusivities in Supercritical Carbon Dioxide. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2013, 83, 15–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Scheibel, E.G. Correspondence. Liquid Diffusivities. Viscosity of Gases. Ind. Eng. Chem. 1954, 46, 2007–2008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. RatcIiff, G.A.; Lusis, M.A. Diffusion in Simple-Complex Forming Liquid Mixtures. Ind. Eng. Chem. Fundam. 1971, 10, 474–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Raveendran, P.; Ikushima, Y.; Wallen, S.L. Polar Attributes of Supercritical Carbon Dioxide. Acc Chem. Res. 2005, 38, 478–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Fujii, A.; Ebata, T.; Mikami, N. Direct Observation of Weak Hydrogen Bonds in Microsolvated Phenol: Infrared of OH Stretching Vibrations of Phenol-CO and -CO2 in S0 and D0. J. Phys. Chem. A 2002, 106, 10124–10129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Hayduk, W.; Buckley, W.D. Effect of Molecular Size and Shape on Diffusivity in Dilute Liquid Solutions. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1972, 27, 1997–2003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. González, L.M.; Bueno, J.L.; Medina, I. Determination of Binary Diffusion Coefficients of Anisole, 2,4-Dimethylphenol, and Nitrobenzene in Supercritical Carbon Dioxide. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2001, 40, 3711–3716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Chatwell, R.S.; Guevara-Carrion, G.; Gaponenko, Y.; Shevtsova, V.; Vrabec, J. Diffusion of the Carbon Dioxide-Ethanol Mixture in the Extended Critical Region. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2021, 23, 3106–3115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Simeoni, G.G.; Bryk, T.; Gorelli, F.A.; Krisch, M.; Ruocco, G.; Santoro, M.; Scopigno, T. The Widom Line as the Crossover between Liquid-like and Gas-like Behaviour in Supercritical Fluids. Nat. Phys. 2010, 6, 503–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Banuti, D.T.; Raju, M.; Ihme, M. Between Supercritical Liquids and Gases—Reconciling Dynamic and Thermodynamic State Transitions. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2020, 165, 104895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Gaponenko, Y.; Gousselnikov, V.; Santos, C.I.A.V.; Shevtsova, V. Near-Critical Behavior of Fick Diffusion Coefficient in Taylor Dispersion Experiments. Microgravity Sci. Technol. 2019, 31, 475–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Mareev, E.; Aleshkevich, V.; Potemkin, F.; Bagratashvili, V.; Minaev, N.; Gordienko, V. Anomalous Behavior of Nonlinear Refractive Indexes of CO2 and Xe in Supercritical States. Opt. Express 2018, 26, 13229–13238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Imre, A.R.; Deiters, U.K.; Kraska, T.; Tiselj, I. The Pseudocritical Regions for Supercritical Water. Nucl. Eng. Des. 2012, 252, 179–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Bell, I.H.; Galliero, G.; Delage-Santacreu, S.; Costigliola, L. An Entropy Scaling Demarcation of Gas- And Liquid-like Fluid Behaviors. J. Chem. Phys. 2020, 152, 191102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Nishikawa, K.; Tanaka, I. Correlation Lengths and Density Fluctuations in Supercritical States of Carbon Dioxide. Chem. Phys. Lett 1995, 244, 149–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Santos, C.I.A.v.; Barros, M.C.F.; Faro, M.P.R.T.; Ribeiro, A.C.F. FTIR as Powerful Tool for Measurements of Diffusion in Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Using Taylor Dispersion Method. Processes 2022, 10, 1528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Suehiro, Y.; Nakajima, M.; Yamada, K.; Uematsu, M. Critical Parameters of {xCO2 + (1 − x)CHF3} Forx = (1.0000, 0.7496, 0.5013, and 0.2522). J. Chem. Thermodyn 1996, 28, 1153–1164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Santos, C.I.A.V.; Ribeiro, A.C.F.; Esteso, M.A. Drug Delivery Systems: Study of Inclusion Complex Formation between Methylxanthines and Cyclodextrins and Their Thermodynamic and Transport Properties. Biomolecules 2019, 9, 196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Callendar, R.; Leaist, D.G. Diffusion Coefficients for Binary, Ternary, and Polydisperse Solutions from Peak-Width Analysis of Taylor Dispersion Profiles. J. Solution Chem. 2006, 35, 353–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Santos, C.I.A.V.; Esteso, M.A.; Lobo, V.M.M.; Cabral, A.M.T.D.P.V.; Ribeiro, A.C.F. Taylor Dispersion Technique as a Tool for Measuring Multicomponent Diffusion in Drug Delivery Systems at Physiological Temperature. J. Chem. Thermodyn. 2015, 84, 76–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Morin, P.; Caude, M.; Richard, H.; Rosset, R. Carbon Dioxide Supercritical Fluid Chromatography-Fourier Transform Infrared Spectrometry. Chromatographia 1986, 21, 523–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Diffusion coefficient for methanol, ethanol, 1-propanol, 2-propanol, and 1-butanol in scCO2 at p = 10.5 MPa and at different temperatures from 306.15 to 331.15 K. Dots are experimental values and dashed lines the fitting.
Figure 1. Diffusion coefficient for methanol, ethanol, 1-propanol, 2-propanol, and 1-butanol in scCO2 at p = 10.5 MPa and at different temperatures from 306.15 to 331.15 K. Dots are experimental values and dashed lines the fitting.
Molecules 28 00782 g001
Figure 2. Diffusion coefficient for methanol, ethanol, 1-propanol, 2-propanol and 1-butanol in scCO2 at p = 10.5 MPa and at different temperatures from 306.15 to 331.15 K. Dots are experimental values and dashed lines are the fitting.
Figure 2. Diffusion coefficient for methanol, ethanol, 1-propanol, 2-propanol and 1-butanol in scCO2 at p = 10.5 MPa and at different temperatures from 306.15 to 331.15 K. Dots are experimental values and dashed lines are the fitting.
Molecules 28 00782 g002
Figure 3. Experimental and predicted diffusion coefficients for methanol, ethanol, 1-propanol, 2-propanol, and 1-butanol in scCO2 at pressure p = 10.5 MPa and at temperatures from 306.15 to 331.15 K.
Figure 3. Experimental and predicted diffusion coefficients for methanol, ethanol, 1-propanol, 2-propanol, and 1-butanol in scCO2 at pressure p = 10.5 MPa and at temperatures from 306.15 to 331.15 K.
Molecules 28 00782 g003
Figure 4. Schematic representation of the high-pressure Taylor dispersion set-up.
Figure 4. Schematic representation of the high-pressure Taylor dispersion set-up.
Molecules 28 00782 g004
Figure 5. Transmittance infrared spectra of pure solutes. IR spectra for methanol, ethanol, 1-propanol, 2-propanol, and 1-butanol were obtained at 298.15 K and 0.1 MPa. IR spectra for supercritical CO2 was obtained at 306.15 K and 10.5 MPa.
Figure 5. Transmittance infrared spectra of pure solutes. IR spectra for methanol, ethanol, 1-propanol, 2-propanol, and 1-butanol were obtained at 298.15 K and 0.1 MPa. IR spectra for supercritical CO2 was obtained at 306.15 K and 10.5 MPa.
Molecules 28 00782 g005
Table 1. Measured diffusion coefficients D for short chain alcohols in supercritical CO2 at pressure p = 10.5 MPa, calculated density ρ and viscosity η [18] for supercritical CO2 at different temperatures from 306.15 to 331.15 K.
Table 1. Measured diffusion coefficients D for short chain alcohols in supercritical CO2 at pressure p = 10.5 MPa, calculated density ρ and viscosity η [18] for supercritical CO2 at different temperatures from 306.15 to 331.15 K.
T/Kρ
/kg/m3
η
/(10−5 cP)
(DMethanol ± SD)
/(10−8 m2 s−1)
(DEthanol a ± SD)
/(10−8 m2 s−1)
(D1-Propanol ± SD)
/(10−8 m2 s−1)
(D2-Propanol ± SD)
/(10−8 m2 s−1)
(D1-Butanol ± SD)
/(10−8 m2 s−1)
306.15752.306.371.54 ± 0.061.49 ± 0.011.42 ± 0.061.35 ± 0.011.25 ± 0.05
311.15690.795.511.83 ± 0.051.76 ± 0.08 1.61 ± 0.03
316.15604.794.522.01 ± 0.081.98 ± 0.051.87 ± 0.091.75 ± 0.031.66 ± 0.07
321.15489.183.492.18 ± 0.102.10± 0.081.95 ± 0.121.84± 0.091.73 ± 0.08
326.15393.922.852.50 ± 0.112.48 ± 0.18 2.07 ± 0.12
331.15338.032.573.18 ± 0.143.06 ± 0.182.66 ± 0.152.44 ± 0.122.22 ± 0.14
Notes: a From Ref. [19]; SD stands standard deviation of the mean. Standard uncertainties are uc (T) = 0.01 K and uc (p) = 0.005 MPa. The expanded uncertainties are uc(D) ≅ 0.05 × 10−8 m2 s−1 ((level of confidence 0.95).
Table 2. The average absolute deviation (AAD%) for the predictive equations in the estimation of the diffusion coefficients for short chain alcohols in supercritical CO2 at pressure p =10.5 MPa and at different temperatures from 306.15 to 331.15 K.
Table 2. The average absolute deviation (AAD%) for the predictive equations in the estimation of the diffusion coefficients for short chain alcohols in supercritical CO2 at pressure p =10.5 MPa and at different temperatures from 306.15 to 331.15 K.
Model AAD%
MethanolEthanol1-Propanol2-Propanol1-Butanol
Wilke–Chang a8.194.542.984.313.21
Scheibel a13.149.929.1010.8610.59
Lusis–Ratcliff a11.155.813.494.843.30
Lai-Tan4.595.286.988.5810.46
Sassiat20.9714.6611.7813.7611.67
He and Yu8.635.133.895.274.56
Notes: a Modified models by Vaz et al. [29] The number of points for methanol, ethanol and 2-propanol is 36. The number of points for 1-propanol and 1-butanol is 24.
Table 4. Infrared absorption wavenumbers followed for the measurement of diffusion of alcohols in scCO2.
Table 4. Infrared absorption wavenumbers followed for the measurement of diffusion of alcohols in scCO2.
AlcoholVibration ModeAbsorption Wavenumber
MethanolC–C single bond1032 cm−1
C–H bond2830 cm−1
C–H bond2943 cm−1
EthanolC–C single bond1087 cm−1
C–H bond2973 cm−1
1-PropanolC–C single bond1066 cm−1
C–H bond2963 cm−1
2-PropanolC–C single bond1112 cm−1
C–H bond2887 cm−1
C–H bond2972 cm−1
1-ButanolC–C single bond1075 cm−1
C–H bond2934 cm−1
C–H bond2975 cm−1
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Santos, C.I.A.V.; Ribeiro, A.C.F.; Shevtsova, V. Binary Diffusion Coefficients for Short Chain Alcohols in Supercritical Carbon Dioxide—Experimental and Predictive Correlations. Molecules 2023, 28, 782. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28020782

AMA Style

Santos CIAV, Ribeiro ACF, Shevtsova V. Binary Diffusion Coefficients for Short Chain Alcohols in Supercritical Carbon Dioxide—Experimental and Predictive Correlations. Molecules. 2023; 28(2):782. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28020782

Chicago/Turabian Style

Santos, Cecília I. A. V., Ana C. F. Ribeiro, and Valentina Shevtsova. 2023. "Binary Diffusion Coefficients for Short Chain Alcohols in Supercritical Carbon Dioxide—Experimental and Predictive Correlations" Molecules 28, no. 2: 782. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28020782

APA Style

Santos, C. I. A. V., Ribeiro, A. C. F., & Shevtsova, V. (2023). Binary Diffusion Coefficients for Short Chain Alcohols in Supercritical Carbon Dioxide—Experimental and Predictive Correlations. Molecules, 28(2), 782. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28020782

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop