Next Article in Journal
Advancing Our Understanding of Pyranopterin-Dithiolene Contributions to Moco Enzyme Catalysis
Previous Article in Journal
Possible Roles of Transition Metal Cations in the Formation of Interstellar Benzene via Catalytic Acetylene Cyclotrimerization
Previous Article in Special Issue
Nanoparticles of a Pyrazolo-Pyridazine Derivative as Potential EGFR and CDK-2 Inhibitors: Design, Structure Determination, Anticancer Evaluation and In Silico Studies
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 28
Issue 21
10.3390/molecules28217455
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

New Thiazolyl-Pyrazoline Derivatives as Potential Dual EGFR/HER2 Inhibitors: Design, Synthesis, Anticancer Activity Evaluation and In Silico Study

by
Mariam M. Fakhry
1,*,
Amr A. Mattar
1,
Marwa Alsulaimany
2,
Ebtesam M. Al-Olayan
3,
Sara T. Al-Rashood
4 and
Hatem A. Abdel-Aziz
5,*
1
Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Egyptian Russian University, Badr 11829, Egypt
2
Department of Pharmacognosy & Pharmaceutical Chemistry, College of Pharmacy, Taibah University, Medina 42353, Saudi Arabia
3
Department of Zoology, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh 11495, Saudi Arabia
4
Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
5
Applied Organic Chemistry Department, National Research Center, Cairo 12622, Egypt
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2023, 28(21), 7455; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28217455
Submission received: 13 October 2023 / Revised: 29 October 2023 / Accepted: 3 November 2023 / Published: 6 November 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Synthesis and Evaluation of Biologically Active Compounds from Five Membered Heterocycles)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
A new series of thiazolyl-pyrazoline derivatives (4a–d, 5a–d 6a, b, 7a–d, 8a, b, and 10a, b) have been designed and synthesized through the combination of thiazole and pyrazoline moieties, starting from the key building blocks pyrazoline carbothioamides (1a–b). These eighteen derivatives have been designed as anticipated EGFR/HER2 dual inhibitors. The efficacy of the developed compounds in inhibiting cell proliferation was assessed using the breast cancer MCF-7 cell line. Among the new synthesized thiazolyl-pyrazolines, compounds 6a, 6b, 10a, and 10b displayed potent anticancer activity toward MCF-7 with IC50 = 4.08, 5.64, 3.37, and 3.54 µM, respectively, when compared with lapatinib (IC50 = 5.88 µM). In addition, enzymatic assays were also run for the most cytotoxic compounds (6a and 6b) toward EGFR and HER2 to demonstrate their dual inhibitory activity. They revealed promising inhibition potency against EGFR with IC50 = 0.024, and 0.005 µM, respectively, whereas their IC50 = 0.047 and 0.022 µM toward HER2, respectively, compared with lapatinib (IC50 = 0.007 and 0.018 µM). Both compounds 6a and 10a induced apoptosis by arresting the cell cycle of the MCF-7 cell line at the G1 and G1/S phases, respectively. Molecular modeling studies for the promising candidates 6a and 10a showed that they formed the essential binding with the crucial amino acids for EGFR and HER2 inhibition, supporting the in vitro assay results. Furthermore, ADMET study predictions were carried out for the compounds in the study.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Even with the massive global efforts made by scientists, cancer continues to be the most serious life-threatening disease. Approximately 10 million individuals succumb to cancer annually [1]. Cancer is a pathophysiological condition characterized by aberrations in the intrinsic mechanism of cell division [2]. There are numerous cancer treatment medications on the market and in the preclinical/clinical stages. Nonetheless, several issues such as drug resistance, selectivity, distribution, and/or penetration frequently restrict their efficacy [3]. As a result, tremendous progress has been made in the conception of the cellular, molecular environment, and systemic mechanisms governing the onset, progression, and metastatic spread of cancer [4,5,6,7].
Protein kinases (PKs) constitute a substantial and most significant protein family, implicated in a wide range of disorders. Any alteration to the PK-mediated pathways has the potential to cause diabetes, cancer, or inflammation. Pks are among the most desirable targets for drugs since they control a variety of biological processes, including the cell cycle, metabolism, DNA damage/repair, proliferation, apoptosis, and survival [8]. The EGFR (Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor) is known as the transmembrane tyrosine kinase receptor, which is subdivided into four distinct transmembrane receptors, namely EGFR (HER1), HER2, HER3, and HER4. They are essential for the regulation of cellular growth, proliferation, and apoptosis by transmitting extracellular stimuli to intracellular signal transduction pathways [9]. The upregulation of EGFR has been implicated in various malignancies, including breast, ovarian, and colon cancer [10,11,12]. The overexpression of EGFR has been observed in a majority of individuals diagnosed with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), exceeding 50% of cases. Therefore, the use of inhibitors that specifically target the EGFR may enhance the prognosis and overall results for patients diagnosed with TNBC [13]. Moreover, HER2 was demonstrated in 30% of early breast cancer cases [14,15].
Dual-target inhibitors of EGFR and HER2 have been observed to have superior therapeutic efficacy in comparison to single-target inhibitors. By simultaneously inhibiting both receptors, these inhibitors can effectively suppress the downstream signaling pathways that facilitate the proliferation and viability of tumors and can effectively mitigate resistance development [14,16]. Lapatinib, an EGFR/HER2 dual inhibitor, was approved for clinical use by the FDA in 2007, signifying its significant importance in the field [17,18,19].
Thiazole-based compounds have been recognized as a significant system that emerged as a hopeful fundamental scaffold in the discovery of anticancer drugs [20,21]. However, Dabrafenib [22,23], Tiazofurin [24], Dasatinib [25], and Ixabepilone [26] are thiazole-based anticancer drugs approved or under investigation for the treatment of cancer (Figure 1). Dabrafenib (Tafinlar®) is an inhibitor for the b-Raf enzyme used for cancers associated with the mutated gene BRAF, such as BRAF-mutated melanoma [23]. Tiazofurin is an inhibitor of the IMP dehydrogenase enzyme. It is a thiazole-based molecule with potential for cancer treatment. In addition, Dasatinib (Sprycel®) is a tyrosine-kinase inhibitor that blocks Bcr-AbI and Scr kinases. It is used in the treatment of certain cases of leukemia. Moreover, Ixabepilone is a semi-synthetic natural product that stabilizes microtubules and is a highly potent anticancer agent for the treatment of breast cancer. Moreover, thiazole-based inhibitors of kinases like phosphatidylinositol-3-kinases, EGFR [27], VEGFR [28], GSK-3β [29], and BRAF [30], exhibited promising results in preclinical studies.
On the other hand, the pyrazoline moiety showed interesting biological activities like anticancer [31], anti-inflammatory [32,33], analgesic [34], antidepressant [35], and antimicrobial activities [34,36,37]. Thiazole–pyrazoline molecular hybridization into a unified framework has shown a feasible and encouraging strategy to produce useful molecules for medicinal chemistry research. This approach developed a new class of compounds centered around the thiazolyl–pyrazoline system, which has subsequently been recognized as a significant framework in the exploration of anticancer, anti-inflammatory, and antimicrobial agents [38].
In addition, a considerable number of thiazolyl-pyrazoline derivatives exhibit significant cytotoxic activity, possessing potential inhibitions against EGFR and/or HER2. For example, thiazolyl–pyrazoline derivatives I and II revealed inhibition activity against EGFR with IC50 = 60 nM and 32 nM, respectively [39], whereas their analogue compound III showed inhibition activity with IC50 = 180 nM toward HER2 [40] (Figure 1).
Furthermore, phenylthiazolyl-pyrazoline IV [41] and compound V exhibited potent cytotoxicity for MCF-7 with EGFR inhibition (IC50 = 9 and 31 nM, respectively) [27]. For compound VI, it displayed antiproliferative activity for the breast cancer T-47D cell line with inhibition activity toward EGFR (IC50 = 83 nM) [42] (Figure 1).
According to the above data and in continuation of our scholarly interest in the chemistry of thiazolyl–pyrazolines and their biological activities [43,44,45], especially as possible anticancer agents [27,46,47], our objective was to enhance and modify a novel series of innovative thiazolyl-pyrazoline derivatives (4a–d, 5a–d, 6a, b, 7a–d, 8a, b, and 10a, b) as potential dual-inhibitors against EGFR/HER2 with possible enhancement of their antiproliferative activities depending on introducing bioactive fragments like aryl-diazinyl, arylidene, isatin, or coumarin substitutions into the thiazole–pyrazoline combination as the core center (Figure 1). So, the basis and rationale of the design of target compounds as potential anticancer agents for breast cancer depend on the hybridization of the two bioactive scaffolds thiazole and pyrazoline which give greater anticancer activity by optimization of previous compounds by adding extra hydrophobic binding site and choosing the most active substituents (Cl and OCH3) in the previous work [48] which depends on inhibiting MCF-7 which represent a very important candidate as they are used ubiquitously in research for estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer cell experiments and many sub-clones, which have been established, represent different classes of ER-positive tumors with varying nuclear receptor expression levels. MCF-7 is a commonly used breast cancer cell line that has been propagated for many years by multiple groups and proves to be a suitable model cell line for breast cancer investigations worldwide, including those regarding anticancer [49] and evaluated against MCF-10a cells, which are the most common cell line used as a model for normal human breast cells. They are very structurally similar to normal human mammary epithelial cells and are usually supplemented with various factors such as hydrocortisone (HC), epidermal growth factor (EGF), and phenol red (PHR, a pH indicator), which can affect redox state as well as ER activity [49,50]. EGFR/HER2, the targets for our compounds, are highly expressed on both cell lines.
It is crucial to note that the pharmacophoric properties necessary for the inhibition of the EGFR family involve the presence of an adenine pocket located in the hinge region that necessitates a central flat hetero-aromatic ring scaffold in order to establish a crucial hydrogen bond. Additionally, a terminal hydrophobic head is required to occupy a hydrophobic sub-pocket, while a hydrophobic tail is necessary to occupy a second hydrophobic region. The hydrophobic pockets are important for increasing inhibitor selectivity [51,52]. Interestingly, the thiazolyl-pyrazoline scaffold achieved the required features for EGFR/HER2 inhibition.
The aim of this study is to optimize and increase the selectivity of the previous synthesized thiazolyl–pyrazoline series [48] by increasing the bulkiness on C4 or C5 of thiazole to find out the most effective scaffold. The synthesized thiazolyl–pyrazolines were investigated for their anticancer activity toward MCF-7. Their potential inhibitory effect of the promising compounds 6a, 6b, 10a, and 10b towards EGFR and HER2 kinases was assessed. After that, the most effective kinase and cell growth inhibitors, 6a and 10a, were then chosen in order to evaluate their potential biological mechanism of action using apoptosis in addition to the cell cycle analysis. Finally, the hybrid scaffolds for 6a and 10a were studied in silico to investigate their binding interactions at the ATP-binding sites in both kinases.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Chemistry

In first, the intermediate building blocks pyrazoline carbothioamide intermediates 1a, b were accomplished by the reaction of precursor chalcone derivatives with thiosemicarbazide [48,53] (Scheme 1). The latter carbothioamides 1a, b were refluxed with hydrazonoyl chloride derivatives (2a–d) [42] in absolute ethanol to form the S-alkylated non-isolable intermediate 3a–h, which could undergo cyclization via nucleophilic addition followed by the loss of water, in case of 2a, b; R1 = Me, or the loss of ethanol, in case of 2c, d; R1 = OEt, to furnish the 5-(aryldiazenyl)4-methylthiazoles 4a–d and 2-(arylhydrazineylidene)thiazol-4(5H)-ones 5a–d, respectively (Scheme 1).
1H NMR spectra of 5-(aryldiazenyl)4-methylthiazoles 4a–d supported the proposed structures, revealing the presence of singlets in the range δ 2.48–2.52 ppm corresponding to thiazole CH3 protons. Moreover, 1H NMR of 4a–d showed the common pattern of pyrazoline protons that appeared as three doublets of doublet around δ 3.4, 4.1, and 5.8 ppm and two singlet signals for the protons of two -OCH3 groups at δ 3.7 and 3.8 ppm. The 13CNMR of 4a–d revealed the signals of -CH3 carbon at δ 16.1–16.5 ppm, signals of -OCH3 groups carbon at δ 55.1–55.7 ppm, and the signals of C4 and C5 of pyrazoline at δ 43.7 and 62.5 ppm, respectively. On the other hand, the IR spectra of the 2-(arylhydrazineylidene)thiazol-4(5H)-one 5a–d revealed the absorption band of the C=O group at 1668-1699 cm−1. The 1H NMR spectra of 5a–d exhibited the D2O exchangeable singlet signal in the range δ 10.58–11.05 ppm for the hydrazone NH proton. The 13C NMR spectra displayed a signal of thiazolone C=O at δ 175 ppm. Moreover, the IR spectra of compounds 4b, 4d, 5b, and 5d showed the characteristic bands corresponding to the NH2 group at 3314, 3342, and 3232, 3241 cm−1.
Next, the carbothioamide 1a, b refluxed with bromoacetic acid in acetic acid to afford the thiazolones 6a, b, respectively, which reacted in refluxing absolute ethanol with different substituted aldehydes using a catalytic amount of piperidine to afford the arylidines 7a–d (Scheme 2). Additionally, thiazolones 6a, b were reacted with isatin in refluxed glacial acetic acid in the presence of anhydrous AcONa to give compounds 8a, b, respectively.
The IR spectra of thiazolones 6a, b revealed a band at 1740–1693 cm−1 due to C=O. 1H NMR spectra of 6a, b exhibited a singlet signal of thiazolone CH2 protons around δ 3.9 ppm. 13C NMR displayed a signal at δ 39.2 assigned to CH2 of the thiazolone ring and a signal at δ 187.2 assigned to the C=O carbon of thiazolone. Regarding arylidines 7a–d, their 1H NMR showed the signal of the -CH=N- proton, which was detected around δ 7.40 ppm, whereas their 13C NMR showed the disappearance of the CH2 signal at δ 39.2.
Regarding compounds 8a, b, their IR spectra displayed a characteristic absorption band at 3307–3312 cm−1 due to NH function in addition to absorption bands of carbonyl groups of thiazolone and isatin around 1680 cm−1. The 1HNMR spectra of 8a, b showed the D2O exchangeable signal of the NH proton around δ 11.1 ppm, whereas their 13C NMR displayed two signals of carbonyl carbons for thiazolone and isatin around δ 172 and 179 ppm.
Finally, the 2-bromoacetyl coumarin 9, which was synthetized via bromination of acetyl coumarin using Br2 in glacial acetic acid [54], was reacted with carbothioamide 1a, b in refluxed absolute EtOH to furnish compounds 10a, b, respectively (Scheme 3). The IR spectra of 10a–b showed the absorption band of coumarin C=O at 1730–1711 cm−1. 1HNMR spectra for compounds 10a, b revealed a singlet signal around δ 7.8 ppm due to thiazole H5. 13C NMR for compounds 10a–b showed a signal around δ 164 ppm for the C=O of coumarin.

2.2. Biological Evaluation

2.2.1. Anti-CancerActivity against MCF-7 and MCF-10A

The eighteen newly synthesized thiazolyl–pyrazoline derivatives were evaluated for their cytotoxic activity toward MCF-7 using the MTT assay, and their IC50 values were evaluated in relation to Lapatinib. Among the screened compounds, four compounds (6a, 6b, 10a, and 10b) revealed significant anticancer activity with IC50 = 4.08, 5.64, 3.37, and 3.54 µM against MCF-7 when compared to Lapatinib (IC50 = 5.88 µM) (Table 1).
On the other side, compounds 6a and 10a showed non-cytotoxic activity against MCF-10A compared with Lapatinib, where IC50 ≥ 50 µM for all of them; hence, compounds 6a and 10a were assumed to be of value to be investigated for the effective molecular target and apoptosis in MCF-7 cells (Table 2).

2.2.2. SAR Studies

According to the results in Table 1, we can conclude some correlations between the structure of the study compounds and their anticancer activity. Generally, compounds 5-(4-methoxy phenyl) pyrazoline are more active than compounds 5-(4-chloro phenyl) pyrazoline. For the thiazole, the substitution on C5 decreases the potent activity; therefore, series 6a, b and 10a, b are more potent than the other designed series. The substitution on C4 is preferred to be an H-bond acceptor group, and the bulkier group is more preferred, so series 10a, b is more potent than series 6a–b. For C4 substitution, it is worth noting that for series 4a–d and 5a–d, the p-SO2NH2 phenyl derivative is more active than p-Cl phenyl derivatives. Series 5a–d, 7a–d, and 8a–b showed relatively less activity compared to 6a–b owing to the unavailable carbonyl involved in the intramolecular H-bond (Figure 2).

2.2.3. EGFR and HER2 Kinase Inhibitory Assay

To emphasize the mechanistic studies, the most potent compounds (6a, 6b, 10a, and 10b) towards MCF-7 cells were evaluated against their EGFR/HER2 inhibitory activities. The compounds under investigation showed excellent dual inhibitions of EGFR and HER2. Interestingly, compounds 6a and 10a showed IC50 = 0.024 and 0.005 µM, respectively, toward EGFR and IC50 values of 0.047 and 0.022 µM, respectively, against HER2, in a comparative way, like Lapatinib (Table 3). Therefore, both compounds 6a and 10b were worth testing for their apoptosis induction, owing to their significant cytotoxic activity and EGFR/HER2 inhibition activity.

2.2.4. Cell Cycle Analysis

The specific phase of cell cycle arrest for compounds 6a and 10a at their respective IC50 values in the MCF-7 cell line was determined (Table 4 and Figure 3). In addition, 6a exhibited high cell accumulation (69.82%, 1.16 folds) for the MCF-7 cell line at G0-G1 (control; 62.59) whereas 10a arrests the cell cycle of the MCF-7 cell line at G1 and S phases with 66.41% (1.06 folds) and 29.55% (1.12 folds) compared with the control (62.59% and 26.33%, respectively).

2.2.5. Apoptosis Analysis

To investigate the exact cause of apoptotic activity of 6a (IC50 = 4.08 μM) and 10a (IC50 = 3.37 μM) in MCF-7 cells using flow cytometric analysis of Annexin V/PI staining. Compounds 6a and 10a showed significant total apoptotic death with 51.03% (28.17% and 17.98% for early and late apoptosis, respectively), whereas compound 10a exhibited total apoptosis of 42.66% (19.22% and 15.91% for early and late apoptosis, respectively), when compared to total apoptosis of 2.27% in the control MCF-7 (Table 5 and Figure 4).

2.3. Computational Studies

Molecular Modelling

The utilization of molecular docking was employed to evaluate the interaction between the hybrid compounds that were generated and the kinase domain of EGFR/HER2. The objective of this investigation was to offer a credible rationale for the biological activity of the compounds and to reveal their probable binding pattern. The study was conducted with the MOE 2019.01 software, specifically the molecular operating environment, employing the QuickPrep procedure. There are many crystal structures (PDB codes) of EGFR and HER2 that were obtained by downloading the PDB codes 1XKK [55] and 3RCD [56], respectively, due to their high resolution and their suitable co-crystallized ligands (Lapatinib and TAK-285, respectively). In the first stage of the study, the validation of the docking method involved the redocking of co-crystallized ligands into the active regions of EGFR and HER2. The docking position of the lapatinib derivative, 4-anilinoquinazoline, into the active region of EGFR resulted in significant interactions. Specifically, the ligand formed hydrogen bonds with the amino acids Met793, Asp800, and Leu788 (Figure 5). Furthermore, the arene-H interactions occur with the amino acids Leu844 and Leu718, and they are also facilitated by water-mediated hydrogen bonding with Thr854. Regarding HER2, TAK-285 accurately replicated the essential interactions seen between the co-crystalized ligand and the active site. Specifically, TAK-285 engaged in hydrogen bonding with Asp863 and Gly727 and formed two hydrogen bonds with Met801. In addition, there is a π-H interaction with the amino acids Phe864, Lys753, and Leu800. The minimal root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) values for co-crystallized ligand in EGFR (0.917 Å) and HER2 (0.625 Å) provide evidence for this assertion (Figure 5). The patterns of binding observed in both kinases were found to be similar for the recently synthesized thiazole-pyrazoline hybrids.
Further investigation was conducted on the recently synthesized compounds, namely 6a and 10a, which have shown potential as biologically active derivatives. These compounds were subjected to a detailed analysis and compared to the inhibitors Lapatinib and TAK-285, which were docked and co-crystallized with the binding pockets of EGFR and HER2, respectively. Based on the investigation of their binding modes as depicted in Figure 6 and Figure 7.
Compound 6a inside the EGFR binding site (S = −12.42 kcal/mol) formed H-bonds with Met793, Lys745, and Val726 and two H-bonds with Cys797 amino acids, besides two π-H bindings with Arg841. For HER2, compound 6a (S = −10.63 kcal/mol) revealed H-bonds with Met801, Asn850, and Asp863, 2 H-bonds with Thr862 amino acids, and a π-H bond with Val734 amino acid (Figure 6).
On the other hand, compound 10a in the EGFR binding site (S = −16.18 kcal/mol) achieved H-bonds with Met793 and Leu844, two H-bonds with Lys745 amino acids, π-H bonds with Val726, Thr854, and Arg841, and two π-H bonds with Asp855 amino acids. Furthermore, it formed H-bonds with Met801, Val734, and Phe731, three H-bonds with Lys753 amino acids besides π-H bonds with Val734, Phe731, and Gly729, and two π-H bonds with Arg849 amino acids at the HER2 binding site (S = −6.63 kcal/mol) (Figure 7).

2.4. In Silico Evaluation of Pharmacokinetic Parameters

The processes of absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity (ADMET) are important in the prediction of oral bioavailability. The assessment and prediction of pharmacokinetic parameters ADMET by in silico methods hold significance within the pharmaceutical sector. This phenomenon occurs due to the fact that this evaluation expedites the progression of exploration and advancement of novel pharmaceutical candidate substances. This study provides an overview of the ADMET outcomes for the compounds examined. Lipinski’s rule of five predicts the potential for a tiny compound to exhibit drug-like properties. Therefore, the SwissADME model was employed to forecast the aforementioned terms for compounds 4a–d, 5a–d, 6a, b, 7a–d, 8a, b, and 10a, b (Table S1).
The data acquired indicate that all compounds conform to the Veber rule (Table S1) without any violations, indicating their drug-like properties. However, 4b, 4d, 5b, and 5d each exhibit one violation of the Veber rule. Compounds 6a, 6b, and 7a exhibit no violations according to Lipinski’s rule. The remaining compounds demonstrate one violation, with the exception of compounds 4b, 4c, 5b, and 5d, which exhibit two violations. In addition, 4b, d, 5a–d, 6a, b, 7a–d, 8a, b, and 10a exhibited clogP values within an acceptable range, often below or approximately 5, whereas compounds 4a, 4c, and 10b. The topological polar surface area (TPSA) is a measure of the total surface area occupied by polar atoms within a molecule. The acceptable range for TPSA is often defined as 20–130 Å2.
In our study, all of the compounds analyzed were found to fall within this acceptable range. Except for compounds 5b, 6a, 6b, and 8a, all other compounds exhibit low solubility. All of the compounds did not exhibit the ability to penetrate the blood-brain barrier (BBB). P-glycoprotein (P-gp) functions as an efflux transporter responsible for the extrusion of xenobiotics from cells, hence facilitating their clearance. The compounds 4a, 4c, 5a, 7b, 8a, and 8b were determined to be non-substrates for P-gp, while all other compounds were anticipated to have this characteristic. The bioavailability scores for all compounds, with the exception of compounds 4a, 4c, 5b, and 5d, were 0.55. However, these specific compounds exhibited a bioavailability score of 0.17. Except for compounds 4a–d, 5b, 5d, and 10a, b, all other compounds exhibit favorable gastrointestinal (GI) absorption. Compounds 6a, b exhibit no pain or Brenk alerts, whereas compounds 10a, b have no pain alerts and just one Brenk warning. The remaining compounds show one pain alert and one Brenk alert (Table S1, Supplementary Materials).
The Swiss ADME platform offers a BOILED-Egg intrinsic model that can be utilized for the prediction of BBB permeability and passive gastrointestinal absorption (HIA) [57].
Figure 8 depicts the distribution of 4a–d, 5a–d, 6a, b, 7a–d, 8a, b and 10a, b on a boiled egg. No compound was detected within the yellow zone, suggesting that all compounds do not possess the ability to penetrate the BBB. The proper absorption of compounds 5a, 5c, 6a, b, 7a–d, and 8a, b was suggested by their presence in the white zone. Conversely, compounds 4a–d, 5b, 5d, and 10a, b were found outside the white region, suggesting poor gastrointestinal absorption. Out of the total chemicals examined, six were predicted to exhibit P-glycoprotein substrate activity (PGP+), as indicated by the blue dot, but the remainder of the compounds did not demonstrate interaction with the active efflux P-glycoprotein pump (PGP-), as represented by the red dot.

3. Conclusions

A series of thiazolyl–pyrazolines was designed and synthesized. Compounds 6a, b, and 10a, b possessed potent anticancer activities toward MCF-7 and served as dual inhibitors for EGFR/HER2. Among the screened compounds, four compounds (6a, 6b, 10a, and 10b) revealed significant anticancer activity with IC50 = 4.08, 5.64, 3.37, and 3.54 µM against MCF-7 when compared to Lapatinib (IC50 = 5.88 µM). Compounds 6a and 10a showed IC50 = 0.024 and 0.005 µM, respectively, toward EGFR and IC50 = 0.047 and 0.022 µM, respectively, toward HER2. 6a exhibited high cell accumulation for the MCF-7 cell line at G0-G1, whereas 10a arrests the cell cycle at the G1 and S phases. Furthermore, compounds 6a and 10a showed significant total apoptotic death. Finally, the molecular modeling studies investigated the mode of binding and potential variations in interactions between the designed derivatives and the EGFR and HER2 active sites. Thus, the thiazolyl-pyrazoline scaffold presents an interesting avenue for the discovery of more potent dual EGFR/HER2 inhibitors in the future.

4. Experimental

4.1. Chemistry

For chemistry apparatus, see the supplementary file (page 65) Carbothioamides 1a, b [40,43], N-arylpropanehydrazonoyl chlorides 2a–d [44], and 2-bromoacetyl coumarin 9 [45] were prepared following the reported methods.

4.1.1. Synthesis of the 5-(aryldiazinyl)-4-methylthiazoles 4a–d and 5-(arylhydrazineylidene)-thiazol-4(5H)-ones 5a–d

Carbothioamide derivatives 1a, b (1 mmol) and hydrazonyl chlorides 2a–d (1 mmol) in absolute EtOH (40 mL) were refluxed for 6 h. The formed precipitate was filtered, washed with EtOH, and crystallized from EtOH/DMF to yield the 5-(aryldiazinyl)-4-methylthiazoles 4a–d and 5-(arylhydrazineylidene)-thiazol-4(5H)-ones 5a–d.
  • 5-((4-Chlorophenyl)diazenyl)-2-(3-(3,4-dimethoxyphenyl)-5-(4-methoxyphenyl)-4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazol-1-yl)-4-methylthiazole (4a): Reddish orange powder, 59% yield; mp 192–194 °C; IR νmax/cm−1 3061 (C-H Ar), 2967 (C-H Ali.), 1566 (C=N), 1508 (C=C), 1244 (C-O); 1H-NMR δ 2.48 (s, 3H, CH3), 3.38 (dd, J = 18, 4.8 Hz, 1H, Ha4 pyrazoline), 3.73 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.83 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.85 (s, 3H, OCH3), 4.01 (dd, J = 18, 11.2 Hz, 1H, Hb4 pyrazoline), 5.78 (dd, J = 11.2, 4.8 Hz, 1H, H5 pyrazoline), 6.92 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H, ArHs), 7.04 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H, ArH), 7.21 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H, ArHs), 7.33-7.40 (m, 2H, ArHs), 7.49 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H, ArHs), 7.66 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H, ArHs); 13C-NMR δ 16.55 (C of CH3), 44.01 (C4 of pyrazoline), 55.57 (C of OCH3), 56.05 (C of OCH3), 56.14 (C of OCH3), 62.95 (C5 of pyrazoline), 109.70, 112.04, 114.67 (2C), 121.63, 123.24, 123.49 (2C), 127.61 (2C), 129.78 (2C), 133.33, 133.45, 140.60, 149.34, 151.52, 151.90, 157.79, 159.22, 159.91, 165.00 (C2 of thiazole); MS m/z (%) 548.88 (M+), 550.3 (M++1); For C28H26ClN5O3S (548.06): Calc.: C, 61.36; H, 4.78; N, 12.78. Found: C, 61.62; H, 4.59; N, 12.97.
  • 4-((2-(3-(3,4-Dimethoxyphenyl)-5-(4-methoxyphenyl)-4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazol-1-yl)-4-methylthiazol-5-yl)diazenyl)benzenesulfonamide (4b): Red powder, 52% yield; mp 200–202 °C; IR νmax/cm−1 3342, 3241 (NH2), 2935 (C-H Ali.), 1554 (C=N), 1509 (C=C), 1245 (C-O); 1H-NMR δ 2.53 (s, 3H, CH3), 3.43 (dd, J = 18, 6.4 Hz, 1H, Ha4 pyrazoline), 3.73 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.83 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.85 (s, 3H, OCH3), 4.05 (dd, J = 18, 12 Hz, 1H, Hb4 pyrazoline), 5.83 (dd, J = 11.2, 4.0 Hz, 1H, H5 pyrazoline), 6.93 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H, ArHs), 7.06 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H, ArH), 7.21 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H, ArHs), 7.64-7.33 (m, 4H, 2ArH + 2H of D2O exchangeable NH2), 7.79 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H, ArHs), 7.89 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H, ArHs); 13C-NMR δ 16.25 (C of CH3), 43.56 (C4 of pyrazoline), 55.10 (C of OCH3), 55.57 (C of OCH3), 55.68 (C of OCH3), 62.55 (C5 of pyrazoline), 109.25, 111.54, 114.21 (2C), 121.28, 121.59 (2C), 122.68, 126.94, 127.15 (2C), 132.89, 140.38, 143.04, 148.88, 151.53, 154.22, 157.93, 158.78, 161.17, 162.31, 165.01 (C2 of thiazole); MS m/z (%) 592.98 (M+). For C28H28N6O5S2 (592.69): Calc.: C, 56.74; H, 4.76; N, 14.18. Found: C, 56.89; H, 4.92; N, 14.31.
  • 2-(5-(4-Chlorophenyl)-3-(3,4-dimethoxyphenyl)-4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazol-1-yl)-5-((4-chlorophenyl)diazenyl)-4-methylthiazole (4c): Redish orange powder, 91% yield; mp 210–212 °C; IR νmax/cm−1 3070 (C-H Ar), 2963 (C-H Ali.), 1556 (C=N), 1509 (C=C), 1246 (C-O); 1H-NMR δ 2.5 (s, 3H, CH3), 3.43 (dd, J = 18, 3.6 Hz, 1H, Ha4 pyrazoline), 3.82 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.84 (s, 3H, OCH3), 4.07 (dd, J = 18, 12 Hz, 1H, Hb4 pyrazoline), 5.87 (dd, J = 12, 4.0 Hz, 1H, H5 pyrazoline), 7.06 (d, J = 8 Hz, 1H, ArHs), 7.30–7.52 (m, 8H, ArHs), 7.66 (d, J = 8 Hz, 2H, ArHs); 13C-NMR δ 16.1 (C of CH3), 43.48 (C4 of pyrazoline), 55.60 (C of OCH3), 55.71 (C of OCH3), 62.28 (C5 of pyrazoline), 109.28, 111.57, 121.22, 122.63, 123.10 (2C), 127.82 (2C), 128.90 (2C), 129.36 (2C), 132.27, 132.66, 140.03, 140.32, 148.88, 151.03, 151.48, 157.26, 159.31, 164.53 (C2 of thiazole); MS m/z (%) 554.86 (M++2). For C27H23Cl2N5O2S (552.47): Calc.: C, 58.70; H, 4.20; N, 12.68. Found: C, 58.88; H, 4.35; N, 12.79.
  • 4-((2-(5-(4-Chlorophenyl)-3-(3,4-dimethoxyphenyl)-4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazol-1-yl)-4- methylthiazol-5-yl)diazenyl)benzenesulfonamide (4d): Red powder, 90% yield; mp 208–210 °C; IR νmax/cm−1 3314, 3233 (NH2), 3084 (C-H Ar), 2958 (C-H Ali.), 1600 (C=N), 1509 (C=C), 1250 (C-O); 1H-NMR δ 2.52 (s, 3H, CH3), 3.45 (dd, J = 18, 4 Hz, 1H, Ha4 pyrazoline), 3.83 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.85 (s, 3H, OCH3), 4.09 (dd, J = 18, 11.4 Hz, 1H, Hb4 pyrazoline), 5.9 (dd, J = 11.4, 4.0 Hz, 1H, H5 pyrazoline), 7.06 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H, ArH), 7.31 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H, ArHs), 7.49-7.34 (m, 6H, 4ArHs + 2H of D2O exchangeable NH2), 7.80 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H, ArHs), 7.89 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H, ArHs); 13C-NMR δ 16.24 (C of CH3), 43.49 (C4 of pyrazoline), 55.60 (C of OCH3), 55.72 (C of OCH3), 62.63 (C5 of pyrazoline), 109.33, 111.59, 121.35, 121.66 (2C), 122.54, 126.98 (2C), 127.82 (2C), 128.93 (2C), 132.33, 140.55, 148.89, 151.59, 154.17, 157.83, 160.84, 162.35 (2C), 165.00 (C2 of thiazole); MS m/z (%) 597.83 (M+); For C27H25ClN6O4S2 (597.11): Calc.: C, 54.31; H, 4.22; N, 14.07. Found: C, 54.49; H, 4.34; N, 14.21.
  • 5-(2-(4-Chlorophenyl)hydrazineylidene)-2-(3-(3,4-dimethoxyphenyl)-5-(4-methoxyphenyl)-4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazol-1-yl)thiazol-4(5H)-one (5a): yellow powder, 32% yield; mp > 300 °C; IR νmax/cm−1 3077 (N-H), 3001 (C-H Ar), 2962 (C-H Ali.), 1668 (C=O), 1602 (C=N), 1512 (C=C); 1H-NMR δ 3.49 (dd, J = 18, 3.8 Hz, 1H, Ha4 pyrazoline), 3.74 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.85 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.85 (s, 3H, OCH3), 4.13 (dd, J = 18, 12 Hz, 1H, Hb4 pyrazoline), 5.84 (dd, J = 12, 3.8 Hz, 1H, H5 pyrazoline), 6.94 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 2H, ArHs), 7.10–7.14 (m, 1H, ArH), 7.20 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H, ArHs), 7.26–7.35 (m, 4H, ArHs), 7.4-7.45 (m, 2H, ArHs), 10.76 (s, D2O exchangeable, 1H, NH); 13C-NMR δ 44.02 (C4 of pyrazoline), 55.62 (C of OCH3), 56.09 (C of OCH3), 56.23 (C of OCH3), 63.42 (C5 of pyrazoline), 110.07, 112.16, 114.76 (2C), 115.85 (2C), 122.23, 122.48, 125.48, 127.63 (2C), 129.50 (2C), 131.08, 132.54, 143.37, 149.33, 152.53, 159.39, 162.02, 167.19 (C2 of thiazolone), 175.63 (C=O); MS m/z (%) 551.03 (M++1), 550.52 (M+); For C27H24ClN5O4S (550.03): Calc.: C, 58.96; H, 4.40; N, 12.73. Found: C, 59.09; H, 4.28; N, 12.85.
  • 4-(2-(2-(3-(3,4-Dimethoxyphenyl)-5-(4-methoxyphenyl)-4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazol-1-yl)-4-oxothiazol-5(4H)-ylidene)hydrazineyl)benzenesulfonamide (5b): Yellow powder, 40% yield; mp 249–251 °C; IR νmax/cm−1 3254 (NH2), 2965 (C-H Ali.), 1699 (C=O), 1598 (C=N), 1509 (C=C); 1H-NMR δ 3.51 (dd, J = 18, 4 Hz, 1H, Ha4 pyrazoline), 3.74 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.84 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.85 (s, 3H, OCH3), 4.13 (dd, J = 18, 11 Hz, 1H, Hb4 pyrazoline), 5.84 (dd, J = 11, 4 Hz, 1H, H5 pyrazoline), 6.94 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H, ArHs), 7.05-7.27 (m, 4H, ArHs), 7.35-7.62 (m, 4H, 2ArHs + 2H of D2O exchangeable NH2), 7.40-7.45 (m, 2H, ArHs), 7.9 (s, 1H, ArH), 11.01 (s, D2O exchangeable, 1H, NH); 13C-NMR δ 43.57 (C4 of pyrazoline), 55.14 (C of OCH3), 55.60 (C of OCH3), 55.77 (C of OCH3), 63.02 (C5 of pyrazoline), 109.57, 111.67, 113.31, 114.25, 114.30, 114.32 (2C), 121.79, 122.00, 126.31, 127.21, 127.36, 132.03, 132.30, 136.38, 146.59, 148.88, 152.10, 158.94, 161.79, 166.64 (C2 of thiazolone), 174.92 (C=O); MS m/z (%) 594. 35 (M+); For C27H26N6O6S2 (594.66): Calc.: C, 54.53; H, 4.41; N, 14.13. Found: C, 54.68; H, 4.52; N, 14.26.
  • 2-(5-(4-Chlorophenyl)-3-(3,4-dimethoxyphenyl)-4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazol-1-yl)-5-(2-(4-chlorophenyl)hydrazineylidene)thiazol-4(5H)-one (5c): Yellow powder, 70% yield; mp 278–280 °C; IR νmax/cm−1 3190 (N-H), 3065 (C-H Ar), 2930 (C-H Ali.), 1663 (C=O), 1601 (C=N), 1510 (C=C); 1H-NMR δ 3.52 (dd, J = 18.2, 4.5 Hz, 1H, Ha4 pyrazoline), 3.84 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.84 (s, 3H, OCH3), 4.14 (dd, J = 18.2, 11.1 Hz, 1H, Hb4 pyrazoline), 5.9 (dd, J = 11.1, 4.0 Hz, 1H, H5 pyrazoline), 7.01 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H, ArH), 7.22-7.35 (m, 6H, ArHs), 7.39-7.47 (m, 4H, ArHs), 10.58 (s, D2O exchangeable, 1H, NH); 13C-NMR δ 43.46 (C4 of pyrazoline), 55.58 (C of OCH3), 55.76 (C of OCH3), 62.67 (C5 of pyrazoline), 109.54, 111.64, 115.37, 121.79, 121.92, 125.03, 127.81 (2C), 128.96 (2C), 129.11, 132.53, 139.05, 148.87, 152.08, 161.34, 166.76 (C2 of thiazolone), 174.86 (C=O); MS m/z (%) 558.7 (M+ + 3), 554.39 (M+); For C26H21Cl2N5O3S (554.45): Calc.: C, 56.32; H, 3.82; N, 12.63. Found: C, 56.43; H, 3.98; N, 12.56.
  • 4-(2-(2-(5-(4-Chlorophenyl)-3-(3,4-dimethoxyphenyl)-4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazol-1-yl)-4-oxothiazol-5(4H)-ylidene)hydrazineyl)benzenesulfonamide (5d): Yellow powder, 80% yield; mp 292–294 °C; IR νmax/cm−1 3236 (NH2), 3098 (N-H), 3065 (C-H Ar), 2965 (C-H Ali.), 1681 (C=O), 1642 (C=N), 1513 (C=C);1H-NMR δ 3.53 (dd, J = 18.3, 4.4 Hz, 1H, Ha4 pyrazoline), 3.85 (s, 6H, 2OCH3), 4.17 (dd, J = 18.2, 11.2 Hz, 1H, Hb4 pyrazoline), 5.92 (dd, J = 11.2, 4.4 Hz, 1H, H5 pyrazoline), 7.13 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H, ArH), 7.21 (s, 2H, ArHs), 7.31 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H, ArHs), 7.37-7.47 (m, 6H, ArHs + 2H of D2O exchangeable NH2), 7.75 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 2H, ArHs), 11.05 (s, D2O exchangeable, 1H, NH); 13C-NMR δ 43.50 (C4 of pyrazoline), 55.62 (C of OCH3), 55.78 (C of OCH3), 62.76 (C5 of pyrazoline), 109.68, 111.69, 113.36 (2C), 121.81, 121.87, 127.34, 127.81 (2C), 128.97 (2C), 132.07, 132.54, 132.60, 136.41, 139.01, 146.63, 148.86, 152.12, 161.58, 167.04 (C2 of thiazolone), 174.90 (C=O); For C26H23ClN6O5S2 (599.08): Calc.: C, 52.13; H, 3.87; N, 14.03. Found: C, 52.30; H, 4.02; N, 14.16.

4.1.2. Synthesis of 2-(3-(3,4-dimethoxyphenyl)-5-(aryl)-4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazol-1-yl)thiazol-4(5H)-ones 6a, b

A mixture of 1a, b (2 mmol), bromoacetic acid (0.33 g, 2.4 mmol), and AcONa (0.4 g, 4 mmol) in glacial AcOH (5 mL) was refluxed for 8 h. Following the cooling, the solution was added to the ice–water mixture. The resulting precipitate was separated by filtration and subsequently subjected to crystallization in DCM/EtOH to give thiazolones 6a, b.
  • 2-(3-(3,4-Dimethoxyphenyl)-5-(4-methoxyphenyl)-4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazol-1-yl)thiazol-4(5H)-one (6a): White powder, 77% yield; mp 200–202 °C; IR νmax/cm−1 3008 (C-H Ar), 2963 (C-H Ali.), 1693 (C=O), 1620 (C=N), 1513 (C=C); 1H-NMR δ 3.42 (dd, J = 18.4, 4 Hz, 1H, Ha4 pyrazoline), 3.73 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.83 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.84 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.91 (s, 2H, thiazolone CH2), 4.05 (dd, J = 18.4, 11.2 Hz, 1H, Hb4 pyrazoline), 5.73 (dd, J = 11.2, 4.0 Hz, 1H, H5 pyrazoline), 6.92 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H, ArHs), 7.08 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H, ArH), 7.15 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H, ArH), 7.38–7.42 (m, 2H, ArHs); 13C-NMR δ 39.18 (C5 of thiazolone), 43.90 (C4 of pyrazoline), 55.59 (C of OCH3), 56.07 (C of OCH3), 56.18 (C of OCH3), 63.63 (C5 of pyrazoline), 110.14, 112.09, 114.68 (2C), 121.87, 122.74, 127.52 (2C), 132.97, 149.31, 152.27, 159.30, 160.99, 177.27 (C2 of thiazolone), 187.27 (C=O). MS m/z (%) 411.67 (M+). For C21H21N3O4S (411.48): Calc.: C, 61.30; H, 5.14; N, 10.21. Found: C, 61.48; H, 5.22; N, 10.35.
  • 2-(5-(4-Chlorophenyl)-3-(3,4-dimethoxyphenyl)-4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazol-1-yl)thiazol-4(5H)-one (6b): White powder, 83% yield; mp 208–210 °C; IR νmax/cm−1 3004 (C-H Ar), 2965 (C-H Ali.), 1740 (C=O), 1599 (C=N), 1510 (C=C); 1H-NMR δ 3.45 (dd, J = 18, 4 Hz, 1H, Ha4 pyrazoline), 3.82 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.83 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.93 (s, 2H, thiazolone CH2), 4.09 (dd, J = 18, 11.2 Hz, 1H, Hb4 pyrazoline), 5.79 (dd, J = 11.2, 4.0 Hz, 1H, H5 pyrazoline), 7.09 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H, ArH), 7.25 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H, ArHs), 7.36–7.44 (m, 4H, ArHs); 13C-NMR δ 39.28 (C of thiazolone), 43.79 (C4 of pyrazoline), 56.05 (C of OCH3), 56.16 (C of OCH3), 63.42 (C5 of pyrazoline), 110.17, 112.04, 121.90, 122.60, 128.15 (2C), 129.35 (2C), 132.89, 139.90, 149.30, 152.31, 160.83, 177.47 (C2 of thiazolone), 187.15 (C=O); MS m/z (%) 417.82 (M+ +2), 415.78 (M+). For C20H18ClN3O3S (415.89): Calc.: C, 57.76; H, 4.36; N, 10.10. Found: C, 57.67; H, 4.48; N, 10.34.

4.1.3. Synthesis of 5-arylidene-2-(3-(3,4-dimethoxyphenyl)-5-(4-methoxyphenyl)-4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazol-1-yl)thiazol-4(5H)-ones 7a–d

A mixture of 6a, b (0.30 g, 1 mmol), the appropriate aldehyde (1.0 mmol), and piperidine (0.2 mL) in EtOH (30 mL) was refluxed for 24 h. The produced solid was filtered and crystallized from EtOH/DMF to yield the corresponding arylidines (7a–d).
  • 5-Benzylidene-2-(3-(3,4-dimethoxyphenyl)-5-(4-methoxyphenyl)-4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazol-1-yl)thiazol-4(5H)-one (7a): Yellow powder, 66% yield; mp 294–296 °C; IR νmax/cm−1 3004 (C-H Ar), 2965 (C-H Ali.), 1682 (C=O), 1610 (C=N), 1511 (C=C); 1H-NMR δ 3.51 (dd, J = 18.2, 4 Hz, 1H, Ha4 pyrazoline), 3.73 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.85 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.86 (s, 3H, OCH3), 4.12 (dd, J = 18.2, 11.2 Hz, 1H, Hb4 pyrazoline), 5.85 (dd, J = 11.2, 4.0 Hz, 1H, H5 pyrazoline), 6.94 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H, ArHs), 7.11 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 1H, ArH), 7.2 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H, ArH), 7.41 (d, J = 2.1 Hz, 1H, ArH), 7.44–7.76 (m, 6H, ArHs), 7.88–7.98 (m, 1H, ArH); 13C-NMR δ 43.60 (C4 of pyrazoline), 55.14 (C of OCH3), 55.75 (C of OCH3), 55.80 (C of OCH3), 63.32 (C5 of pyrazoline), 110.21, 111.69, 114.30 (2C), 121.67, 122.06, 127.18 (2C), 128.18, 129.29 (2C), 129.67 (2C), 129.85, 130.61, 132.17, 133.92, 148.89, 152.06, 158.94, 161.73, 169.67 (C2 of thiazolone), 179.05 (C=O); MS m/z (%) 499.59 (M+). For C28H25N3O4S (499.59): Calc.: C, 67.32; H, 5.04; N, 8.41. Found: C, 67.19; H, 5.15; N, 8.58.
  • 2-(3-(3,4-Dimethoxyphenyl)-5-(4-methoxyphenyl)-4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazol-1-yl)-5-(4-methoxybenzylidene)thiazol-4(5H)-one (7b): Orange powder, 54% yield; mp 245–247 °C; IR νmax/cm−1 1682 (C=O), 1601 (C=N), 1510 (C=C); 1H-NMR δ 3.49 (dd, J = 18, 3.8 Hz, 1H, Ha4 pyrazoline), 3.74 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.83 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.85 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.86 (s, 3H, OCH3), 4.10 (dd, J = 18, 10.8 Hz, 1H, Hb4 pyrazoline), 5.83 (dd, J = 10.8, 3.8 Hz, 1H, H5 pyrazoline), 6.94 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H, ArHs), 7.09 (d, J = 6.4 Hz, 3H, ArHs), 7.2 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H, ArHs), 7.41 (s, 1H, ArH), 7.47 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H, ArH), 7.60 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 3H, ArHs); 13C-NMR δ 43.57 (C4 of pyrazoline), 55.12 (C of OCH3), 55.43 (C of OCH3), 55.74 (C of OCH3), 55.76 (C of OCH3), 63.22 (C5 of pyrazoline), 110.11, 111.66, 114.28 (2C), 114.83 (2C), 121.60, 122.13, 125.23, 126.34 (2C), 127.15, 130.63, 131.57 (2C), 132.26, 148.87, 151.99, 158.91, 160.54, 161.31, 169.59 (C2 of thiazolone), 179.31 (C=O). For C29H27N3O5S (529.61): Calc.: C, 65.77; H, 5.14; N, 7.93. Found: 65.59; H, 5.31; N, 7.86.
  • 5-Benzylidene-2-(5-(4-chlorophenyl)-3-(3,4-dimethoxyphenyl)-4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazol-1-yl)thiazol-4(5H)-one (7c): Yellow powder, 78% yield; mp 283–285 °C; IR νmax/cm−1 3001 (C-H Ar), 2956 (C-H Ali.), 1687 (C=O), 1609 (C=N), 1513 (C=C); 1H-NMR δ 3.54 (dd, J = 18, 4 Hz, 1H, Ha4 pyrazoline), 3.85 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.87 (s, 3H, OCH3), 4.16 (dd, J = 18, 11.6 Hz, 1H, Hb4 pyrazoline), 5.93 (dd, J = 11.6, 4 Hz, 1H, H5 pyrazoline), 7.1–7.13 (m, 1H, ArHs), 7.24–7.58 (m, 9H, ArHs), 7.67–7.69 (m, 2H, ArHs), 7.96 (s, 1H, ArH); 13C-NMR δ 46.45 (C4 of pyrazoline), 56.07 (C of OCH3), 56.50 (C of OCH3), 63.55 (C5 of pyrazoline), 110.19, 110.73, 112.09, 122.22, 128.17 (2C), 128.28, 129.37 (2C), 129.46, 129.79 (2C), 129.80, 130.17, 131.59, 139.99, 148.84, 149.34, 152.34, 152.43, 166.19, 177.46 (C2 of thiazolone), 187.16 (C=O). MS m/z (%) 503.71 (M+). For C27H22ClN3O3S (504.00): Calc.: C, 64.34; H, 4.40; N, 8.34. Found: C, 64.61; H, 4.52; N, 8.39.
  • 2-(5-(4-Chlorophenyl)-3-(3,4-dimethoxyphenyl)-4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazol-1-yl)-5-(4-methoxybenzylidene)thiazol-4(5H)-one (7d): Yellow powder, 82% yield; m.p. 250–252 °C; IR νmax/cm−1 3047 (C-H Ar), 2930 (C-H Ali.), 1688 (C=O), 1600 (C=N), 1508 (C=C); 1H-NMR δ 3.48 (dd, J = 18, 4 Hz, 1H, Ha4 pyrazoline), 3.82 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.83 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.84 (s, 3H, OCH3), 4.13 (dd, J = 18, 11.2 Hz, 1H, Hb4 pyrazoline), 5.89 (dd, J = 11.2, 4.0 Hz, 1H, H5 pyrazoline), 7.07-7.09 (m, 3H, ArHs), 7.24-7.58 (m, 9H, ArHs); 13C-NMR δ 43.50 (C4 of pyrazoline), 55.45 (C of OCH3), 55.59 (C of OCH3), 55.77 (C of OCH3), 62.97 (C5 of pyrazoline), 110.16, 111.67, 114.86 (2C), 121.65, 121.98, 125.11, 126.28, 127.77 (2C), 128.95 (2C), 130.90, 131.60 (2C), 132.49, 139.20, 148.85, 152.03, 160.60, 161.19, 169.81 (C2 of thiazolone), 179.22 (C=O); MS m/z (%) 536.57 (M++1), 534.27 (M+). For C28H24ClN3O4S (534.03): Calc.: C, 62.98; H, 4.53; N, 7.87. Found: C, 63.23; H, 4.63; N, 7.66.

4.1.4. Synthesis of 2-(3-(3,4-dimethoxyphenyl)-5-(aryl)-4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazol-1-yl)-5-(2-oxoindolin-3-ylidene)thiazol-4(5H)-ones 8a, b

A mixture of 6a, b (1 mmol), isatin (0.15 g, 1 mmol), and anhydrous AcONa (0.82 g, 1 mmol) in glacial AcOH (15 mL) was refluxed for 16 h. The resulted solid was filtered and crystallized from EtOH/DMF to afford compounds 8a, b.
  • 2-(3-(3,4-Dimethoxyphenyl)-5-(4-methoxyphenyl)-4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazol-1-yl)-5-(2-oxoindolin-3-ylidene)thiazol-4(5H)-one (8a): Orange powder, 84% yield; mp > 300 °C; IR νmax/cm−1 3307 (N-H), 3012 (C-H Ar), 2932 (C-H Ali.), 1697 (C=O), 1613 (C=N), 1510 (C=C); 1H-NMR δ 3.51 (dd, J = 18, 4 Hz, 1H, Ha4 pyrazoline), 3.73 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.85 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.86 (s, 3H, OCH3), 4.12 (dd, J = 18, 11 Hz, 1H, Hb4 pyrazoline), 5.9 (dd, J = 11, 4.0 Hz, 1H, H5 pyrazoline), 6.91–6.95 (m, 3H, ArHs), 7.02–7.05 (m, 1H, ArH), 7.11 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H, ArH), 7.21 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H, ArHs), 7.31–7.41 (m, 2H, ArHs), 7.50 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H, ArH), 8.92 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H, ArH), 11.13 (s, D2O exchangeable, 1H, NH); 13C-NMR δ 43.43 (C4 of pyrazoline), 55.15 (C of OCH3), 55.67 (C of OCH3), 55.72 (C of OCH3), 63.35 (C5 of pyrazoline), 109.88, 110.11, 111.63, 114.30 (2C), 120.41, 121.83, 122.00, 125.80, 127.18 (2C), 128.01, 131.64, 132.19, 137.24, 143.11, 148.87, 152.13, 158.94, 162.38, 169.00 (C2 of thiazolone), 172.03, 172.20 (C=O), 178.92 (C=O); MS m/z (%) 540.33 (M+). For C29H24N4O5S (540.59): Calc.: C, 64.43; H, 4.48; N, 10.36. Found: C, 64.56; H, 4.53; N, 10.51.
  • 2-(5-(4-Chlorophenyl)-3-(3,4-dimethoxyphenyl)-4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazol-1-yl)-5-(2-oxoindolin-3-ylidene)thiazol-4(5H)-one (8b): Orange powder, 87% yield; mp > 300 °C; IR νmax/cm−1 3311 (N-H), 3010 (C-H Ar), 2932 (C-H Ali.), 1681 (C=O), 1612 (C=N), 1510 (C=C); 1H-NMR δ 3.52 (d, J = 15.2 Hz, 1H, Ha4 pyrazoline), 3.84 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.86 (s, 3H, OCH3), 4.12 (d, J = 15.2 Hz, 1H, Hb4 pyrazoline), 5.9 (d, J = 12 Hz, 1H, H5 pyrazoline), 6.93–6.95 (m, 2H, ArHs), 7.01–7.16 (m, 3H, ArHs), 7.23–7.61 (m, 5H, ArHs), 8.92 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H, ArH), 11.18 (s, D2O exchangeable, 1H, NH); MS m/z (%) 547.03 (M++1). For C28H21ClN4O4S (545.01): Calc.: C, 61.71; H, 3.88; N, 10.28. Found: C, 62.03; H, 4.13; N, 10.36.

4.1.5. Synthesis of 3-(2-(3-(3,4-dimethoxyphenyl)-5-(aryl)-4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazol-1-yl)thiazol-4-yl)-2H-chromen-2-ones 10a, b

Compounds 10a, b were synthesized following the same procedure for the preparation of compounds 4a–d by using 3-bromoacetylcoumarin (9) instead of hydrazonoyl chlorides 2a–d.
  • 3-(2-(3-(3,4-Dimethoxyphenyl)-5-(4-methoxyphenyl)-4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazol-1-yl)thiazol-4-yl)-2H-chromen-2-one (10a): Green powder, 53% yield; mp 228–231 °C; IR νmax/cm−1 3066 (C-H Ar), 2995 (C-H Ali.), 1711 (C=O), 1605 (C=N), 1511 (C=C); 1H-NMR δ 3.42 (dd, J = 18, 6.8 Hz, 1H, Ha4 pyrazoline), 3.72 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.83 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.85 (s, 3H, OCH3), 4.02 (dd, J = 18, 12 Hz, 1H, Hb4 pyrazoline), 5.6 (dd, J = 12, 6.8 Hz, 1H, H5 pyrazoline), 6.96–7.06 (m, 4H, ArHs), 7.32–7.43 (m, 5H, ArHs), 7.60–7.70 (m, 2H, ArHs), 7.78 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H, ArH), 8.35 (s, 1H, ArH); 13C-NMR δ 43.16 (C4 of pyrazoline), 55.06 (C of OCH3), 55.52 (C of OCH3), 55.61 (C of OCH3), 63.68 (C5 of pyrazoline), 108.97, 110.80, 111.55, 113.86 (2C), 115.90, 119.10, 120.23, 120.46, 123.52, 124.78, 126.60, 128.36 (2C), 128.61, 131.66, 133.56, 138.29, 143.75, 148.82, 150.68, 152.26, 153.37, 158.7 (C=O), 163.58 (C2 of thiazole); MS m/z (%) 539.68 (M+). For C30H25N3O5S (539.61): Calc.: C, 66.78; H, 4.67; N, 7.79. Found: C, 66.53; H, 4.78; N, 7.85.
  • 3-(2-(5-(4-Chlorophenyl)-3-(3,4-dimethoxyphenyl)-4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazol-1-yl)thiazol-4-yl)-2H-chromen-2-one (10b): Green powder, 69% yield; mp 238–240 °C; IR νmax/cm−1 3066 (C-H Ar), 2987 (C-H Ali.), 1731 (C=O), 1603 (C=N), 1543 (C=C); 1H-NMR δ 3.34 (s, 1H, Ha4 pyrazoline), 3.92 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.96 (s,1H, Hb4 pyrazoline), 4.01 (s, 3H, OCH3), 5.56 (s, 1H, H5 pyrazoline), 6.86 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H, ArH), 7.14 (d, J = 8 Hz, 1H, ArH), 7.27–7.3 (m, 2H, ArHs), 7.35–7.40 (m, 4H, ArHs), 7.45–7.6 (m, 3H, ArHs), 7.82 (s, 1H, ArH), 8.47 (s, 1H, ArH); 13C-NMR δ 44.68 (C4 of pyrazoline), 56.13 (C of OCH3), 56.47 (C of OCH3), 64.51 (C5 of pyrazoline), 109.01, 110.72, 116.30 (2C), 119.62, 119.75, 120.98, 123.44, 124.65 (3C), 128.24 (3C), 128.75, 129.27 (2C), 131.48, 134.13, 139.45, 149.43, 151.60, 152.95, 159.80 (C=O), 164.00 (C2 of thiazole); MS m/z (%) 545.59 (M++1), 544.19 (M+). For C29H22ClN3O4S (544.02): Calc.: C, 64.03; H, 4.08; N, 7.72. Found: C, 64.24; H, 3.98; N, 7.86.

4.2. Biological Evaluation

4.2.1. Cytotoxicity

Anti-proliferative activities were done using the MTT colorimetric assay [58]. Cell viability was assessed after 48 h, and the viability was calculated relative to the control [59] (supplementary materials, page 66).

4.2.2. EGFR and HER2 Enzyme Inhibition

Four compounds (6a, 6b, 10a, and 10b) with the highest cytotoxic activities were evaluated against the EGFR and HER2 using lapatinib as the reference drug [60] (supplementary materials, page 66).

4.2.3. Cell Cycle Analysis and Apoptotic Assay

Cell cycle analysis and apoptotic assays for 6a and 10a were done according to the reported procedure [61,62] (supplementary materials, page 66).

4.3. Computational Studies

4.3.1. Molecular Modeling

The MOE (2019.0102) program was utilized for the molecular docking simulations (supplementary materials, page 67).

4.3.2. In Silico SwissADME Predictions

SwissADME [63] is an online utility that is widely recognized for its reliability and availability for free (supplementary materials, page 67).

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules28217455/s1, Figures S1–S38: NMR spectra; Figures S39–S55: IR spectra; Figures S56–S63: Mass spectra; Figures S64 and S65: 2D binding interactions of 6a and 10a; Table S1: SwissADME prediction.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, methodology, software, validation, formal analysis, investigation, resources, data curation, writing—original draft preparation, writing—review and editing, visualization, supervision, project administration, M.M.F. and A.A.M.; software, validation, formal analysis, investigation, resources, data curation, writing—original draft preparation, M.A., E.M.A.-O., and S.T.A.-R.; funding acquisition, S.T.A.-R.; conceptualization, methodology, supervision, project administration, H.A.A.-A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors acknowledge financial support from the Researchers Supporting Project number (RSP-2023/103), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

S.T.A.-R would like to introduce her thanks to Alhanof S. Algazlan, Almotaqadimah School for Smart Learning, Alhamraa District, P.O. Box 13217, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, for her contribution to the ADME study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Chhikara, B.S.; Parang, K. Global Cancer Statistics 2022: The trends projection analysis. Chem. Biol. Lett. 2023, 10, 451. [Google Scholar]
  2. Eroles, P.; Bosch, A.; Alejandro Pérez-Fidalgo, J.; Lluch, A. Molecular biology in breast cancer: Intrinsic subtypes and signaling pathways. Cancer Treat. Rev. 2012, 38, 698–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Szakács, G.; Paterson, J.K.; Ludwig, J.A.; Booth-Genthe, C.; Gottesman, M.M. Targeting multidrug resistance in cancer. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2006, 5, 219–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Burris, H.A. Overcoming acquired resistance to anticancer therapy: Focus on the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 2013, 71, 829–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Sidney, S.; Go, A.S.; Rana, J.S. Transition from Heart Disease to Cancer as the Leading Cause of Death in the United States. Ann. Intern. Med. 2019, 171, 225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Luqmani, Y.A. Mechanisms of drug resistance in cancer chemotherapy. Med. Princ. Pract. 2005, 14 (Suppl. S1), 35–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. DeVita, V.T.; Chu, E. A history of cancer chemotherapy. Cancer Res. 2008, 68, 8643–8653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kannaiyan, R.; Mahadevan, D.J. A comprehensive review of protein kinase inhibitors for cancer therapy. Expert Rev. Anticancer. Ther. 2018, 18, 1249–1270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Roskoski, R., Jr. Classification of small molecule protein kinase inhibitors based upon the structures of their drug-enzyme complexes. Pharmacol. Res. 2016, 103, 26–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Roskoski, R., Jr. A historical overview of protein kinases and their targeted small molecule inhibitors. Pharmacol. Res. 2015, 100, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Witton, C.J.; Reeves, J.R.; Going, J.J.; Cooke, T.G.; Bartlett, J.M. Expression of the HER1–4 family of receptor tyrosine kinases in breast cancer. J. Pathol. A J. Pathol. Soc. Great Br. Irel. 2003, 200, 290–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Roskoski, R. Properties of FDA-approved small molecule protein kinase inhibitors: A 2023 update. Pharmacol. Res. 2023, 187, 106552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Li, X.; Zhao, L.; Chen, C.; Nie, J.; Jiao, B. Can EGFR be a therapeutic target in breast cancer? Biochim. Et Biophys. Acta (BBA)—Rev. Cancer 2022, 1877, 188789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Flynn, J.F.; Wong, C.; Wu, J.M. Anti-EGFR therapy: Mechanism and advances in clinical efficacy in breast cancer. J. Oncol. 2009, 2009, 526963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Ignatiadis, M.; Desmedt, C.; Sotiriou, C.; de Azambuja, E.; Piccart, M. HER-2 as a Target for Breast Cancer Therapy. Clin. Cancer Res. 2009, 15, 1848–1852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Fung, C.; Chen, X.; Grandis, J.R.; Duvvuri, U. EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibition induces autophagy in cancer cells. Cancer Biol. Ther. 2012, 13, 1417–1424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ryan, Q.; Ibrahim, A.; Cohen, M.H.; Johnson, J.; Ko, C.W.; Sridhara, R.; Justice, R.; Pazdur, R. FDA drug approval summary: Lapatinib in combination with capecitabine for previously treated metastatic breast cancer that overexpresses HER-2. Oncol. 2008, 13, 1114–1119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Tebbutt, N.; Pedersen, M.W.; Johns, T.G. Targeting the ERBB family in cancer: Couples therapy. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2013, 13, 663–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Nelson, M.H.; Dolder, C.R. Lapatinib: A novel dual tyrosine kinase inhibitor with activity in solid tumors. Ann. Pharmacother. 2006, 40, 261–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ripain, I.H.A.; Ngah, N. A brief review on the thiazole derivatives: Synthesis methods and biological activities. Malays. J. Anal. Sci. 2021, 25, 257–267. [Google Scholar]
  21. Sharma, P.C.; Bansal, K.K.; Sharma, A.; Sharma, D.; Deep, A. Thiazole-containing compounds as therapeutic targets for cancer therapy. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2020, 188, 112016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Menzies, A.M.; Long, G.V.; Murali, R. Dabrafenib and its potential for the treatment of metastatic melanoma. Drug Des. Dev. Ther. 2012, 6, 391–405. [Google Scholar]
  23. Ballantyne, A.D.; Garnock-Jones, K.P. Dabrafenib: First global approval. Drugs 2013, 73, 1367–1376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Merino, P.; Tejero, T.; Unzurrunzaga, F.J.; Franco, S.; Chiacchio, U.; Saita, M.G.; Iannazzo, D.; Piperno, A.; Romeo, G. An efficient approach to enantiomeric isoxazolidinyl analogues of tiazofurin based on nitrone cycloadditions. Tetrahedron Asymmetry 2005, 16, 3865–3876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Olivieri, A.; Manzione, L. Dasatinib: A new step in molecular target therapy. Ann. Oncol. 2007, 18, vi42–vi46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Lee, F.Y.F.; Borzilleri, R.; Fairchild, C.R.; Kamath, A.; Smykla, R.; Kramer, R.; Vite, G. Preclinical discovery of ixabepilone, a highly active antineoplastic agent. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 2008, 63, 157–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. George, R.F.; Samir, E.M.; Abdelhamed, M.N.; Abdel-Aziz, H.A.; Abbas, S.E.S. Synthesis and anti-proliferative activity of some new quinoline based 4,5-dihydropyrazoles and their thiazole hybrids as EGFR inhibitors. Bioorganic Chem. 2019, 83, 186–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Abolibda, T.Z.; Fathalla, M.; Farag, B.; Zaki, M.E.A.; Gomha, S.M. Synthesis and molecular docking of some novel 3-thiazolyl-coumarins as inhibitors of VEGFR-2 kinase. Molecules 2023, 28, 689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Sharma, D.; Malhotra, A.; Bansal, R. An overview of discovery of thiazole containing heterocycles as potent GSK-3β inhibitors. Curr. Drug Discov. Technol. 2018, 15, 229–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhao, M.-Y.; Yin, Y.; Yu, X.-W.; Sangani, C.B.; Wang, S.-F.; Lu, A.-M.; Yang, L.-F.; Lv, P.-C.; Jiang, M.-G.; Zhu, H.-L. Synthesis, biological evaluation and 3D-QSAR study of novel 4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazole thiazole derivatives as BRAFV600E inhibitors. Bioorganic Med. Chem. 2015, 23, 46–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Karabacak, M.; Altıntop, M.D.; İbrahim Çiftçi, H.; Koga, R.; Otsuka, M.; Fujita, M.; Özdemir, A. Synthesis and Evaluation of New Pyrazoline Derivatives as Potential Anticancer Agents. Molecules 2015, 20, 19066–19084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Mantzanidou, M.; Pontiki, E.; Hadjipavlou-Litina, D. Pyrazoles and pyrazolines as anti-inflammatory agents. Molecules 2021, 26, 3439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Chandra, T.; Garg, N.; Lata, S.; Saxena, K.K.; Kumar, A. Synthesis of substituted acridinyl pyrazoline derivatives and their evaluation for anti-inflammatory activity. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2010, 45, 1772–1776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Vijesh, A.M.; Isloor, A.M.; Shetty, P.; Sundershan, S.; Fun, H.K. New pyrazole derivatives containing 1, 2, 4-triazoles and benzoxazoles as potent antimicrobial and analgesic agents. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2013, 62, 410–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Kaplancıklı, Z.A.; Özdemir, A.; Turan-Zitouni, G.; Altıntop, M.D.; Can, Ö.D. New pyrazoline derivatives and their antidepressant activity. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2010, 45, 4383–4387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Thach, T.-D.; Nguyen, T.M.-T.; Nguyen, T.A.-T.; Dang, C.-H.; Luong, T.-B.; Dang, V.-S.; Banh, K.-S.; Luc, V.-S.; Nguyen, T.-D. Synthesis and antimicrobial, antiproliferative and anti-inflammatory activities of novel 1,3,5-substituted pyrazoline sulphonamides. Arab. J. Chem. 2021, 14, 103408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kini, S.; Gandhi, A.M. Novel 2-pyrazoline derivatives as potential antibacterial and antifungal agents. Indian J. Pharm. Sci. 2008, 70, 105–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Takate, S.J.; Shinde, A.D.; Karale, B.K.; Akolkar, H.; Nawale, L.; Sarkar, D.; Mhaske, P.C. Thiazolyl-pyrazole derivatives as potential antimycobacterial agents. Bioorganic Med. Chem. Lett. 2019, 29, 1199–1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Lv, P.-C.; Li, D.-D.; Li, Q.-S.; Lu, X.; Xiao, Z.-P.; Zhu, H.-L. Synthesis, molecular docking and evaluation of thiazolyl-pyrazoline derivatives as EGFR TK inhibitors and potential anticancer agents. Bioorganic Med. Chem. Lett. 2011, 21, 5374–5377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wang, H.-H.; Qiu, K.-M.; Cui, H.-E.; Yang, Y.-S.; Xing, M.; Qiu, X.-Y.; Bai, L.-F.; Zhu, H.-L. Synthesis, molecular docking and evaluation of thiazolyl-pyrazoline derivatives containing benzodioxole as potential anticancer agents. Bioorganic Med. Chem. 2013, 21, 448–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Sever, B.; Altıntop, M.D.; Radwan, M.O.; Özdemir, A.; Otsuka, M.; Fujita, M.; Ciftci, H.I. Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of a new series of thiazolyl-pyrazolines as dual EGFR and HER2 inhibitors. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2019, 182, 111648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Al-Warhi, T.; Almahli, H.; Maklad, R.M.; Elsayed, Z.M.; El Hassab, M.A.; Alotaibi, O.J.; Aljaeed, N.; Ayyad, R.R.; Ghabour, H.A.; Eldehna, W.M.; et al. 1-Benzyl-5-bromo-3-hydrazonoindolin-2-ones as Novel Anticancer Agents: Synthesis, Biological Evaluation and Molecular Modeling Insights. Molecules 2023, 28, 3203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Elgohary, M.K.; Abd El Hadi, S.R.; Abo-Ashour, M.F.; Abo-El Fetoh, M.E.; Afify, H.; Abdel-Aziz, H.A.; Abou-Seri, S.M. Fragment merging approach for the design of thiazole/thiazolidine clubbed pyrazoline derivatives as anti-inflammatory agents: Synthesis, biopharmacological evaluation and molecular modeling studies. Bioorg. Chem. 2023, 139, 106724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Masoud, D.M.; Azzam, R.A.; Hamdy, F.; Mekawey, A.A.I.; Abdel-Aziz, H.A. Synthesis of some novel pyrazoline-thiazole hybrids and their antimicrobial activities. J. Heterocycl. Chem. 2019, 56, 3030–3041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Abdel-Wahab, B.F.; Abdel-Aziz, H.A.; Ahmed, E.M. Synthesis and antimicrobial evaluation of 1-(benzofuran-2-yl)-4-nitro-3-arylbutan-1-ones and 3-(benzofuran-2-yl)-4, 5-dihydro-5-aryl-1-[4-(aryl)-1, 3-thiazol-2-yl]-1H-pyrazoles. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2009, 44, 2632–2635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Abdelsalam, E.A.; Abd El-Hafeez, A.A.; Eldehna, W.M.; El Hassab, M.A.; Marzouk, H.M.M.; Elaasser, M.M.; Abou Taleb, N.A.; Amin, K.M.; Abdel-Aziz, H.A.; Ghosh, P. Discovery of novel thiazolyl-pyrazolines as dual EGFR and VEGFR-2 inhibitors endowed with in vitro antitumor activity towards non-small lung cancer. J. Enzym. Inhib. Med. Chem. 2022, 37, 2265–2282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Al-Warhi, T.; El Kerdawy, A.M.; Said, M.A.; Albohy, A.; Elsayed, Z.M.; Aljaeed, N.; Elkaeed, E.B.; Eldehna, W.M.; Abdel-Aziz, H.A.; Abdelmoaz, M.A. Novel 2-(5-Aryl-4, 5-dihydropyrazol-1-yl) thiazol-4-one as EGFR inhibitors: Synthesis, biological assessment and molecular docking insights. Drug Des. Devel. Ther. 2022, 16, 1457–1471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Fakhry, M.M.; Mahmoud, K.; Nafie, M.S.; Noor, A.O.; Hareeri, R.H.; Salama, I.; Kishk, S.M. Rational Design, Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of Novel Pyrazoline-Based Antiproliferative Agents in MCF-7 Cancer Cells. Pharmaceuticals 2022, 15, 1245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Comşa, Ş.; Cimpean, A.M.; Raica, M. The story of MCF-7 breast cancer cell line: 40 years of experience in research. Anticancer Res. 2015, 35, 3147–3154. [Google Scholar]
  50. Vale, N.; Silva, S.; Duarte, D.; Crista, D.M.A.; da Silva, L.P.; da Silva, J.C.G.E. Normal breast epithelial MCF-10A cells to evaluate the safety of carbon dots. RSC Med. Chem. 2021, 12, 245–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Liu, Y.; Gray, N.S. Rational design of inhibitors that bind to inactive kinase conformations. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2006, 2, 358–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Fabbro, D.; Ruetz, S.; Buchdunger, E.; Cowan-Jacob, S.W.; Fendrich, G.; Liebetanz, J.; Mestan, J.; O’Reilly, T.; Traxler, P.; Chaudhuri, B. Protein kinases as targets for anticancer agents: From inhibitors to useful drugs. Pharmacol. Ther. 2002, 93, 79–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Chimenti, F.; Carradori, S.; Secci, D.; Bolasco, A.; Bizzarri, B.; Chimenti, P.; Granese, A.; Yáñez, M.; Orallo, F. Synthesis and inhibitory activity against human monoamine oxidase of N1-thiocarbamoyl-3,5-di(hetero)aryl-4,5-dihydro-(1H)-pyrazole derivatives. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2010, 45, 800–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Abdelrahman, M.A.; Ibrahim, H.S.; Nocentini, A.; Eldehna, W.M.; Bonardi, A.; Abdel-Aziz, H.A.; Gratteri, P.; Abou-Seri, S.M.; Supuran, C.T. Novel 3-substituted coumarins as selective human carbonic anhydrase IX and XII inhibitors: Synthesis, biological and molecular dynamics analysis. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2021, 209, 112897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Wood, E.R.; Truesdale, A.T.; McDonald, O.B.; Yuan, D.; Hassell, A.; Dickerson, S.H.; Ellis, B.; Pennisi, C.; Horne, E.; Lackey, K. A unique structure for epidermal growth factor receptor bound to GW572016 (Lapatinib) relationships among protein conformation, inhibitor off-rate, and receptor activity in tumor cells. Cancer Res. 2004, 64, 6652–6659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Ishikawa, T.; Seto, M.; Banno, H.; Kawakita, Y.; Oorui, M.; Taniguchi, T.; Ohta, Y.; Tamura, T.; Nakayama, A.; Miki, H. Design and synthesis of novel human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)/epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) dual inhibitors bearing a pyrrolo [3, 2-d] pyrimidine scaffold. J. Med. Chem. 2011, 54, 8030–8050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Daina, A.; Zoete, V. A boiled-egg to predict gastrointestinal absorption and brain penetration of small molecules. ChemMedChem 2016, 11, 1117–1121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Tolosa, L.; Donato, M.T.; Gómez-Lechón, M.J. General Cytotoxicity Assessment by Means of the MTT Assay. In Protocols in In Vitro Hepatocyte Research; Vinken, M., Rogiers, V., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2015; pp. 333–348. [Google Scholar]
  59. Bahuguna, A.; Khan, I.; Bajpai, V.K.; Kang, S.C. MTT assay to evaluate the cytotoxic potential of a drug. ||| Bangladesh J. Pharmacol. 2017, 12, 115–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Hisham, M.; Youssif, B.G.M.; Osman, E.E.A.; Hayallah, A.M.; Abdel-Aziz, M. Synthesis and biological evaluation of novel xanthine derivatives as potential apoptotic antitumor agents. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2019, 176, 117–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Gad, E.M.; Nafie, M.S.; Eltamany, E.H.; Hammad, M.S.A.G.; Barakat, A.; Boraei, A.T.A. Discovery of new apoptosis-inducing agents for breast cancer based on ethyl 2-amino-4, 5, 6, 7-tetra hydrobenzo [b] thiophene-3-carboxylate: Synthesis, in vitro, and in vivo activity evaluation. Molecules 2020, 25, 2523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Darzynkiewicz, Z.; Bedner, E.; Smolewski, P. Flow cytometry in analysis of cell cycle and apoptosis. Semin. Hematol. 2001, 38, 179–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. SwissADME Is an Online Utility. Available online: http://www.swissadme.ch/ (accessed on 15 September 2023).
Molecules 28 07455 g001
Figure 1. The structure of thiazole-based anticancer drugs, the reported potent anticancer thiazolyl-pyrazolines that act as EGFR and/or HER2 inhibitors (I–VI), and the targeted compounds 4a–d, 5a–d, 6a, b, 7a–d, 8a, b, and 10a, b.
Figure 1. The structure of thiazole-based anticancer drugs, the reported potent anticancer thiazolyl-pyrazolines that act as EGFR and/or HER2 inhibitors (I–VI), and the targeted compounds 4a–d, 5a–d, 6a, b, 7a–d, 8a, b, and 10a, b.
Molecules 28 07455 g001
Molecules 28 07455 sch001
Scheme 1. (i) Asolute EtOH, reflux, 6 h.
Scheme 1. (i) Asolute EtOH, reflux, 6 h.
Molecules 28 07455 sch001
Molecules 28 07455 sch002
Scheme 2. (i) Bromoacetic acid, AcOH, anhydrous AcONa, reflux 8 h; (ii) Ar1-CH=O, EtOH, piperdine, reflux 24 h; (iii) Isatin, AcOH, anhydrous AcONa, reflux 16 h.
Scheme 2. (i) Bromoacetic acid, AcOH, anhydrous AcONa, reflux 8 h; (ii) Ar1-CH=O, EtOH, piperdine, reflux 24 h; (iii) Isatin, AcOH, anhydrous AcONa, reflux 16 h.
Molecules 28 07455 sch002
Molecules 28 07455 sch003
Scheme 3. (i) Absolute EtOH, reflux 6 h.
Scheme 3. (i) Absolute EtOH, reflux 6 h.
Molecules 28 07455 sch003
Molecules 28 07455 g002
Figure 2. Structure features of the synthesized series relative to their cytotoxic IC50 values.
Figure 2. Structure features of the synthesized series relative to their cytotoxic IC50 values.
Molecules 28 07455 g002
Molecules 28 07455 g003
Figure 3. Cell cycle analysis of compounds 6a and 10a in MCF-7 at concentrations of 4.08 and 3.37 µM.
Figure 3. Cell cycle analysis of compounds 6a and 10a in MCF-7 at concentrations of 4.08 and 3.37 µM.
Molecules 28 07455 g003
Molecules 28 07455 g004
Figure 4. Apoptosis analysis of 6a and 10a in MCF-7 cells.
Figure 4. Apoptosis analysis of 6a and 10a in MCF-7 cells.
Molecules 28 07455 g004
Molecules 28 07455 g005
Figure 5. (A) 3D of Lapatinib interactions in the active binding site of EGFR (1XKK); (B) 3D of TAK285 interactions in the active binding site of HER2 (3RCD).
Figure 5. (A) 3D of Lapatinib interactions in the active binding site of EGFR (1XKK); (B) 3D of TAK285 interactions in the active binding site of HER2 (3RCD).
Molecules 28 07455 g005
Molecules 28 07455 g006
Figure 6. 3D binding interactions of 6a in (A) EGFR and (B) HER2 binding pockets (for 2D binding interactions, see Figure S64, Supplementary Materials).
Figure 6. 3D binding interactions of 6a in (A) EGFR and (B) HER2 binding pockets (for 2D binding interactions, see Figure S64, Supplementary Materials).
Molecules 28 07455 g006
Molecules 28 07455 g007
Figure 7. 3D binding interactions of 10a at (A) EGFR and (B) HER2 binding pockets (for 2D binding interactions, see Figure S65, Supplementary Materials).
Figure 7. 3D binding interactions of 10a at (A) EGFR and (B) HER2 binding pockets (for 2D binding interactions, see Figure S65, Supplementary Materials).
Molecules 28 07455 g007
Molecules 28 07455 g008
Figure 8. BOILED–Egg plot for 4a–d, 5a–d, 6a, b, 7a–d, 8a, b, and 10a, b.
Figure 8. BOILED–Egg plot for 4a–d, 5a–d, 6a, b, 7a–d, 8a, b, and 10a, b.
Molecules 28 07455 g008
Table 1. Anticancer activity (IC50) of the new compounds toward MCF-7.
Table 1. Anticancer activity (IC50) of the new compounds toward MCF-7.
CompoundIC50 (µM)
4a18.55 ± 0.19
4b17.12 ± 0.15
4c18.74 ± 0.22
4d17.08 ± 0.21
5a30.24 ± 0.24
5b27.31 ± 0.26
5c28.03 ± 0.25
5d25.70 ± 0.12
6a4.08 ± 0.08
6b5.64 ± 0.11
7a17.79 ± 0.14
7b20.03 ± 0.22
7c21.16 ± 0.24
7d20.17 ± 0.19
8a21.33 ± 0.21
8b19.46 ± 0.27
10a3.37 ± 0.13
10b3.54 ± 0.07
Lapatinib5.88 ± 0.04
Table 2. IC50 values of the tested compounds toward MCF-10A.
Table 2. IC50 values of the tested compounds toward MCF-10A.
CompoundIC50 (µM)
6a≥50
6b32.81 ± 1.27
10a≥50
10b27.14 ± 1.98
Lapatinib≥50
Table 3. Inhibition activities as IC50 in µM of 6a, b and 10a, b toward EGFR and HER2.
Table 3. Inhibition activities as IC50 in µM of 6a, b and 10a, b toward EGFR and HER2.
CompoundIC50 (µM)
EGFR Kinase HER2 Kinase
6a0.024 ± 0.0050.047 ± 0.008
6b0.026 ± 0.0020.081 ± 0.006
10a0.005 ± 0.0020.022 ± 0.005
10b0.029 ± 0.0040.065 ± 0.007
Lapatinib0.007 ± 0.0010.018 ± 0.001
Table 4. The cell cycle analysis of 6a and 10a in MCF-7.
Table 4. The cell cycle analysis of 6a and 10a in MCF-7.
Compound/MCF-7DNA Content
%G0-G1%S%G2/M
6a/MCF-769.8222.068.12
10a/MCF-766.4129.554.04
Cont. MCF-762.5926.3311.08
Table 5. Apoptotic cell death of MCF-7 cells via 6a and 10a.
Table 5. Apoptotic cell death of MCF-7 cells via 6a and 10a.
Compound/Cell LineApoptosisNecrosis
TotalEarlyLate
6a/MCF-751.0328.1717.984.88
10a/MCF-742.6619.2215.917.53
Cont. MCF-72.270.760.131.38
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fakhry, M.M.; Mattar, A.A.; Alsulaimany, M.; Al-Olayan, E.M.; Al-Rashood, S.T.; Abdel-Aziz, H.A. New Thiazolyl-Pyrazoline Derivatives as Potential Dual EGFR/HER2 Inhibitors: Design, Synthesis, Anticancer Activity Evaluation and In Silico Study. Molecules 2023, 28, 7455. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28217455

AMA Style

Fakhry MM, Mattar AA, Alsulaimany M, Al-Olayan EM, Al-Rashood ST, Abdel-Aziz HA. New Thiazolyl-Pyrazoline Derivatives as Potential Dual EGFR/HER2 Inhibitors: Design, Synthesis, Anticancer Activity Evaluation and In Silico Study. Molecules. 2023; 28(21):7455. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28217455

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fakhry, Mariam M., Amr A. Mattar, Marwa Alsulaimany, Ebtesam M. Al-Olayan, Sara T. Al-Rashood, and Hatem A. Abdel-Aziz. 2023. "New Thiazolyl-Pyrazoline Derivatives as Potential Dual EGFR/HER2 Inhibitors: Design, Synthesis, Anticancer Activity Evaluation and In Silico Study" Molecules 28, no. 21: 7455. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28217455

APA Style

Fakhry, M. M., Mattar, A. A., Alsulaimany, M., Al-Olayan, E. M., Al-Rashood, S. T., & Abdel-Aziz, H. A. (2023). New Thiazolyl-Pyrazoline Derivatives as Potential Dual EGFR/HER2 Inhibitors: Design, Synthesis, Anticancer Activity Evaluation and In Silico Study. Molecules, 28(21), 7455. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28217455

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop