Next Article in Journal
In Silico and In Vitro Assessment of Carbonyl Reductase 1 Inhibition Using ASP9521—A Potent Aldo-Keto Reductase 1C3 Inhibitor with the Potential to Support Anticancer Therapy Using Anthracycline Antibiotics
Next Article in Special Issue
Toxicity and Repellency Efficacy of Benzyl Alcohol and Benzyl Benzoate as Eco-Friendly Choices to Control the Red Flour Beetle Tribolium castaneum (Herbst. 1797)
Previous Article in Journal
Palladium-Catalyzed Synthesis of Cyclopropylthiophenes and Their Derivatization
Previous Article in Special Issue
Comment on Pyrrolizidine Alkaloids and Terpenes from Senecio (Asteraceae): Chemistry and Research Gaps in Africa
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Computer Analysis of the Inhibition of ACE2 by Flavonoids and Identification of Their Potential Antiviral Pharmacophore Site

by
Andrey Bogoyavlenskiy
1,*,
Madina Alexyuk
1,
Pavel Alexyuk
1,
Vladimir Berezin
1,
Faisal A. Almalki
2,
Taibi Ben Hadda
2,3,*,
Alaa M. Alqahtani
2,
Saleh A. Ahmed
4,
Stefano Dall’Acqua
5 and
Joazaizulfazli Jamalis
6,*
1
Research and Production Center for Microbiology and Virology, Almaty 050010, Kazakhstan
2
Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah 21955, Saudi Arabia
3
Laboratory of Applied Chemistry & Environment, Faculty of Sciences, Mohammed Premier University, MB 524, Oujda 60000, Morocco
4
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Applied Science, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah 21955, Saudi Arabia
5
Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, University of Padova, Via Marzolo 5, 35121 Padova, Italy
6
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, UTM, Johor Bahru 81310, Johor, Malaysia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2023, 28(9), 3766; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28093766
Submission received: 12 April 2023 / Revised: 25 April 2023 / Accepted: 25 April 2023 / Published: 27 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Collection Bioactive Compounds)

Abstract

:
In the present study, we investigated the antiviral activities of 17 flavonoids as natural products. These derivatives were evaluated for their in vitro antiviral activities against HIV and SARS-CoV-2. Their antiviral activity was evaluated for the first time based on POM (Petra/Osiris/Molispiration) theory and docking analysis. POM calculation was used to analyze the atomic charge and geometric characteristics. The side effects, drug similarities, and drug scores were also assumed for the stable structure of each compound. These results correlated with the experimental values. The bioinformatics POM analyses of the relative antiviral activities of these derivatives are reported for the first time.

1. Introduction

The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) is one of the human body’s main systems and is of crucial importance in the regulation of most physiological and pathophysiological conditions, including vascular tone and blood pressure (BP), remodeling of the vascular wall and heart muscle, mechanisms of development and progression of atherosclerosis, glomerulosclerosis, and other pathologies [1,2,3,4,5]. Hyperactivity of the local (tissue) RAAS, the components of which are synthesized directly in various organs and tissues (heart, kidneys, eyes, adipose tissue, pancreas), can cause Kahn, Liddle, and Bartter syndromes, ischemic nephropathy, and diabetes mellitus [5,6]. This system was especially promising in 2020 after the discovery that one of the receptors of the SARS-CoV-2 virus is the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), binding to which promotes the transport of the virus into the host cell [7,8]. Due to the widespread prevalence of COVID-19 around the world, the question of a detailed study of one of the key links in the pathogenesis of coronavirus infection, involving the ACE2 protein, is especially relevant. A detailed study of the enzyme, which is a receptor on the surface of various tissues and normally converts angiotensin II into angiotensin, has led to ambiguous conclusions. Being non-tissue-specific, the receptor is widely distributed in the heart, kidneys, small intestine, ovaries, thyroid gland, and adipose tissues. In addition to its direct bioregulatory function, it suppresses inflammation, mainly in lung tissue, participates in the transport of amino acids, and supports the vital activity of the intestinal microbiome. Thus, the ACE2 protein plays an essential role in several metabolic processes in the body. Simultaneously, along with performing many positive functions, the ACE2 protein promotes binding and transport to the host cell of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, which makes it possible to consider it a target for influencing coronavirus infection [9,10,11,12,13,14,15].
The use of inhibitors that affect the renin–angiotensin system may be a promising therapeutic strategy for combating coronavirus infection. Preliminary data on the use of ACE2 inhibitors, drugs containing this receptor in circulatory form, and angiotensin receptor II blockers indicate their effectiveness and the possibility of improving the condition and prognosis of patients with coronavirus infection taking ACE2 inhibitors [10,11].
Thus, when developing drugs to combat coronavirus infection, inhibitors of the ACE2 protein can be considered a promising group of compounds for the creation of new antiviral agents. The search for effective ACE2 blockers among various natural compounds can be conducted empirically using traditional viral models. However, this approach requires a large amount of work and considerable material costs. Therefore, in the first stage of assessing the potential capabilities of compounds, it seems appropriate to simulate their activity by molecular docking using computer programs. The promising structures selected based on the results of such a study can then be studied in more detail using appropriate experimental models, which will reduce both material costs and development time [16,17,18].
In the present work, computer docking and POM analyses of several polyphenolic and triterpenoid compounds were carried out and their possible effect on angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), which contributes to the transport of the COVID-19 virus into the host cell, was evaluated. The POM theory was of great help in the identification of two antiviral pharmacophore sites (O δ−, O′ δ−, O″ δ−) that are regenerated from parent flavonoids and their metabolites.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Docking Analysis

The choice of the ACE2 protein model was associated with the possible determination of the mechanism of action of the ligand on either orthosteric or allosteric sites of ACE2 protein activity. Therefore, the Native Human Angiotensin Converting Enzyme-Related Carboxypeptidase (ACE2)-1R42 model was chosen to analyze possible inhibition (Figure 1) [19].
A computer simulation of the interaction of 50 plant compounds of various chemical natures with the ACE2 protein was carried out, and the binding activity of the studied structures with the protein was evaluated. The analysis considered the position at which the binding energy of the protein to the ligand was the best (lowest in kcal/mol).
The interaction activity of the analyzed drugs was compared with that of standard drugs used to inhibit ACE2. Computer analysis of the selected compounds revealed that the energy used for the ligand binding to the protein ranged from −7 to −10 kcal/mol (Table 1).
Based on the fact that the selected standard comparison drugs used to inhibit ACE2 in order to reduce pressure had binding energy ranging from −6 to −8 kcal/mol (captopril, MLN4760, Lisinopril, Amlodipin), we determined the cut-off value of the binding energy of the protein to the ligand as −7.4 kcal/mol. The use of this threshold value allowed us to identify 17 compounds with potentially high inhibitory properties in relation to the ACE2 protein (Table 1).
Compounds with a binding energy of the protein to the ligand below the selected cut-off value were divided into two equal groups, the first of which mainly interacted with the second allosteric activity center of the ACE2 protein and the second of which mainly interacted with the third allosteric activity center (Table 2 and Table S1).
The RAAS is of paramount importance in the regulation of most physiological and pathophysiological conditions, from the level of blood pressure (BP) to the mechanisms of development and progression of atherosclerosis [1,2,3,4]. Therefore, the main enzymes of this system, as a rule, can affect both orthostatic and allosteric regulation. This feature of angiotensin-converting enzyme type 2 (ACE2), which has an orthosteric and three allosteric sites of activity [20,21], creates both pros and cons in the search for new compounds affecting this protein using computer modeling methods.
Highly conserved amino acid residues Lys 31, Glu35, Asp38, Met82, and Lys353 were identified in the ACE 2 structure, four of which were located in the N-terminal part of the ectodomain of the enzyme responsible for interaction with the COVID-19 S protein [22]. Therefore, ligand binding to amino acids ACE2 30–41 a.r.; 82–84 a.r.; 353–357 a.r. will directly affect the possibility of S protein SARS-CoV-2 attachment to ACE2 during invasion of the host cell. At the same time, it was found that the spike protein from SARS-CoV-2 attaches to ACE 2 in a place other than the active site of the peptidase ACE2 [23], which somewhat reduces the possibility of using statins to alter the course of coronavirus infection.
The search for compounds affecting the orthosteric site of ACE2 showed that these are mainly short peptides or drugs, based on the use of monoclonal or polyclonal antibodies [20,21]. Simultaneously, the presence of three allosteric sites located on both sides of the orthosteric site and having an additional field for interaction with amino acids creates additional opportunities for identifying new compounds capable of suppressing the sorption of SARS-CoV-2 on the surface of competent cells. In our study, 17 compounds that can effectively interact with the ACE 2 molecule were identified. Analysis of the ability to form hydrogen bonds or bind via Van der Waals forces with enzyme molecules showed that the studied compounds were clearly divided into two main groups. The first includes a group of flavones that can interact with sites from one to several amino acids of the allosteric site of the ACE2 molecule. The second group of compounds not only interacts with amino acids of the allosteric site of the enzyme molecule but is also able to form bonds of various origins with amino acids of the orthosteric site of ACE2.
Thus, it was shown that computer modeling makes it possible not only to detect whether a ligand is able to interact with a particular protein but also to evaluate the mechanism of action of such compounds. The results obtained can be used for the preliminary assessment of the activity of compounds in the development of new effective drugs.

2.2. POM Analyses

POM Theory (Petra/Osiris/Molinspiration), which was proposed by a group led by Taibi Ben Hadda in collaboration with the American NCI and TAACF, has led to great success in the pharmacology and drug-design fields of antibacterial, antifungal, antiviral, and antiparasitic agents [24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92].
Here, we treated a series of natural products 1–17 with the goal of identifying their antiviral pharmacophore sites according to the POM organigram. The identification of pharmacophore sites for these compounds was derived from the physical and chemical properties of the tested compounds using a bioinformatics POM platform (Figure 2).

2.2.1. Osiris Calculations of Compounds 1–17

The results of the pharmacokinetic properties and bioactivity score analysis are shown in the supplementary information, Figure S1 and Table S2. The drug score was very encouraging (30% < DS < 75%). The toxicity risks and molecular characteristics of 1–17 were estimated. All structures examined were found to be non-tumorigenic and non-toxic-reproductive, but mutagenic. It seems that only 2 of the 17 compounds were safe, and the majority of compounds 1–17 exhibited side effects. This led us to find more indications of metabolites with better scores.

2.2.2. Molinspiration Calculations of Compounds 1–17

The result of the Molinspiration analysis is presented in the supplementary information, Table S3. These bioactivity scores could be categorized as active (if the score was >0), moderately active (if the score was −5.0 to 0.0), or inactive (if the score was less than −5.0). Corroboration of all bioactivity parameters showed that the majority of the flavonoid derivatives were biologically active against all of the enzymes involved (Table S4).

2.2.3. Atomic Charge Calculation of Compounds 1–17

According to the results of the calculations of atomic charge shown in the supplementary information, Figure S2, it is clear that most compounds 1–17 have an (O δ−, O′ δ−, O″ δ−) antiviral pharmacophore site. Because of this, most hits are related to antiviral agents rather than antifungal or antibacterial agents. As a result, it was identified as a pharmacophore site with antiviral properties for compounds 1–17 (Figure 3).

2.2.4. Identification of Antiviral Pharmacophore Sites

The flavonoids 1–17 have been described as subjects of opening/closing ring C and present moderate to good antiviral activity scores, according to the results of the experimental and theoretical POM calculations (Figure 3).

3. Materials and Methods

Molecular modeling of the interaction of the analyzed compounds with the ACE 2 protein was carried out using a computer analysis of the ligand-binding activity to the target. Such modeling makes it possible to place the ligand in the preferred binding site of the protein and to evaluate the specificity and binding efficiency by determining the interaction energy of the components. The information obtained through molecular docking can be used to predict the free binding energy and stability of the complexes. The main goal of molecular docking is to obtain a protein–ligand complex with an optimized conformation and lower binding free energy.
For the practical application of molecular docking, a data bank is required to search for a target with the appropriate PDB format and a methodology for preparing the ligand in the form of a PDB file. Various programs are available in which the ligand can be converted to the PDB format. In our case, ligand preparation was carried out in the PyMol program 2.5.2 (https://pymol.org/2/, accessed 2 February 2022) [93,94,95,96,97,98,99]. Before direct modeling, the target and the ligand were prepared. To do this, the established structure of the selected protein underwent significant changes and was converted to the PDBQT format using the AutoDock Tools program 1.5.6. Subsequently, each ligand was also converted to the PDBQT format. The computer simulation itself was carried out using the AutoDock Vina program 1.1.2 (http://vina.scripps.edu/, accessed 2 February 2022), as well as external tools such as AutoDock Tools (http://mgltools.scripps.edu/downloads, accessed 2 February 2022) [98,99].
In this program, the protein combines with one of the ligands to form a protein–ligand complex. After entering the data, the program automatically generates a grid of the active center of the protein after which an algorithm is prescribed in the command line to determine the active sites of the ligand. As a result, the AutoDock Vina program 1,1,2 identified nine active ligand positions, with the best position being in the region with the lowest binding energy (BE) in kcal/mol. Visualization of the protein–ligand complex itself can be performed using various programs. We performed 2D visualization of the ACE2 protein with a ligand in the LigPlot+ program 2.2.5. This program allows for better visualization of the connection between the protein and ligand. This determines the amino acids that are directly linked to the ligand (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/thornton-srv/software/LigPlus/download2.html, accessed 2 February 2022) [98,99].
For a comparative study, 54 compounds were used, including four compounds used as blockers of the ACE2 protein at elevated pressure. The choice of compounds was determined based on previous studies (data are not presented) showing high efficacy of glycoside derivatives of flavonoids, methoxtflavonoids, and triterpene compounds.

4. Conclusions

We conducted a computational docking and POM study to identify the pharmacophore sites of 17 flavonoids, known as anti-viral agents. All flavonoids were successfully analyzed in silico for antiviral activity prediction, POM calculation, molecular docking, and pharmacokinetic properties. The insertion of various aliphatic and aromatic groups into the basic flavonoid structure can considerably improve its biological and antiviral activities. Antiviral prediction indicated that aliphatic/aromatic (1–17) derivatives exhibit potential antiviral effects. These findings were rationalized through molecular docking, which revealed the excellent antiviral efficacy of flavonoid derivatives. Many derivatives have shown outstanding binding energy and binding interactions with biotargets. Most flavonoid derivatives exhibited good potential in silico to inhibit HIV. The derivatives were unraveled in a stable binding conformation in the docked pocket, engaged by both hydrophobic and hydrophilic interactions. Future in vitro and in vivo studies are needed to determine whether these derivatives can be used to treat SARS-CoV-2 and HIV. The POM study confirmed the predominant antiviral profile of most compounds in series 1–17. This is highly encouraging to screen the antiviral hits as potential antiviral candidates.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules28093766/s1, Table S1a: 2D and 3D visualization of ligand binding to the protein under study; Table S1b: 2D and 3D visualization of ligand binding to the protein under study; Table S1c: 2D and 3D visualization of ligand binding to the protein under study; Table S2: Comparison of Toxicity Risks and Drug Score of compounds 1–17; Table S3: Molinspiration calculations for compounds 1–17; Table S4: Comparison of Molinspiration data for compounds 1–17; Figure S1: Osiris calculations of likeness and drug-score of compounds (1–17); Figure S2: Atomic charge calculations for compounds 1–17.

Author Contributions

The study in this manuscript was collaboratively executed by all aforementioned authors. The authors’ contributions are summarized as follows; J.J., A.M.A. and T.B.H.—supervision, investigation, and critical review; M.A., P.A., V.B. and F.A.A.—methodology, software, and revision; A.B., S.A.A. and S.D.—original draft. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by Grant No. BR10965178 “Development of original domestic drugs with antiviral activity efficient against COVID-19 and influenza” of Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan (Andrey Bogoyavlenskiy, Madina Alexyuk, Pavel Alexyuk, Vladimir Berezin from Almaty, Kazakhstan). Taibi Ben Hadda wishes to extend his sincere appreciation to Yassine Zarhloule, President of the University of Mohammed Premier, Morocco, for providing the essential laboratory bioinformatics needed to carry out this research work. The authors would like to thank the Deanship of Scientific Research at Umm Al-Qura University for supporting this work by Grant Code: (23UQU4320545DSR003).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new compounds reported.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interest or personal relationship that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. Atlas, S.A. The Renin-Angiotensin Aldosterone System: Pathophysiological Role and Pharmacologic Inhibition. J. Manag. Care Pharm. 2007, 13 (Suppl. B), 9–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Liu, J.; Zhou, Y.; Liu, Y.; Li, L.; Chen, Y.; Liu, Y.; Chen, Y.; Liu, Y.; Feng, Y.; Yosypiv, I.V.; et al. (Pro)renin receptor regulates lung development via the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol. 2019, 317, L202–L211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Patel, S.; Rauf, A.; Khan, H.; Abu-Izneid, T. Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone (RAAS): The ubiquitous system for homeostasis and pathologies. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2017, 94, 317–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Rahimi, Z.; Moradi, M.; Nasri, H. A systematic review of the role of renin angiotensin aldosterone system genes in diabetes mellitus, diabetic retinopathy and diabetic neuropathy. J. Res. Med. Sci. 2014, 19, 1090–1098. [Google Scholar]
  5. Drummond, G.R.; Vinh, A.; Guzik, T.J.; Sobey, C.G. Immune mechanisms of hypertension. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2019, 19, 517–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Laghlam, D.; Jozwiak, M.; Nguyen, L.S. Renin–Angiotensin–Aldosterone System and Immunomodulation: A State-of-the-Art Review. Cells 2021, 10, 1767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Alexandre, J.; Cracowski, J.-L.; Richard, V.; Bouhanick, B. Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and COVID-19 infection. Ann. D’endocrinologie 2020, 81, 63–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bourgonje, A.R.; Abdulle, A.E.; Timens, W.; Hillebrands, J.L.; Navis, G.J.; Gordijn, S.J.; Bolling, M.C.; Dijkstra, G.; Voors, A.A.; Osterhaus, A.D.; et al. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), SARS-CoV-2 and the pathophysiology of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). J. Pathol. 2020, 251, 228–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Vaduganathan, M.; Vardeny, O.; Michel, T.; Mcmurray, V.J.J.; Pfeffer, M.A.; Solomon, S.D. Ren-in-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System Inhibitors in Patients with COVID-19. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 382, 1653–1659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Shukla, A.K.; Banerjee, M. Angiotensin-Converting-Enzyme 2 and Renin-Angiotensin System Inhibitors in COVID-19: An Update. High Blood Press. Cardiovasc. Prev. 2021, 28, 129–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hussain, M.; Jabeen, Q.; Ahmad, F.-U.; Rehman, K.U.; Fatima, M.; Shaukat, S.; Majeed, A.; Barkat, M.Q.; Wu, X. COVID-19 and inhibitors of the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system. Expert Rev. Anti-Infect. Ther. 2020, 19, 815–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Yang, G.; Tan, Z.; Zhou, L.; Yang, M.; Peng, L.; Liu, J.; Cai, J.; Yang, R.; Han, J.; Huang, Y.; et al. Effects of Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers and ACE (Angioten-sin-Converting Enzyme) Inhibitors on Virus Infection, Inflammatory Status, and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With COVID-19 and Hypertension: A Single-Center Retrospective Study. Hypertension 2020, 76, 51–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Huang, Z.; Cao, J.; Yao, Y.; Jin, X.; Luo, Z.; Xue, Y.; Zhu, C.; Song, Y.; Wang, Y.; Zou, Y.; et al. The effect of RAS blockers on the clinical characteristics of COVID-19 patients with hypertension. Ann. Transl. Med. 2020, 8, 430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Conversano, A.; Melillo, F.; Napolano, A.; Fominskiy, E.; Spessot, M.; Ciceri, F.; Agricola, E. Ren-in-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System Inhibitors and Outcome in Patients with SARS-CoV-2 Pneumonia: A Case Series Study. Hypertension 2020, 76, e10–e12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Covino, M.; De Matteis, G.; Burzo, M.L.; Santoro, M.; Fuorlo, M.; Sabia, L.; Sandroni, C.; Gasbarrini, A.; Franceschi, F.; Gambassi, G. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angio-tensin II receptor blockers and prognosis of hypertensive patients hospitalised with COVID-19. Intern. Med. J. 2020, 50, 1483–1491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhang, Y.; Tang, L.V. Overview of Targets and Potential Drugs of SARS-CoV-2 According to the Viral Replication. J. Proteome Res. 2021, 20, 49–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Srivastava, K.; Singh, M.K. Drug repurposing in COVID-19: A review with past, present and future. Metab. Open 2021, 12, 100121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sahoo, B.M.; Kumar, B.V.V.R.; Sruti, J.; Mahapatra, M.K.; Banik, B.K.; Borah, P. Drug Repurposing Strategy (DRS): Emerging Approach to Identify Potential Therapeutics for Treatment of Novel Coronavirus Infection. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2021, 8, 628144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Towler, P.; Staker, B.; Prasad, S.G.; Menon, S.; Tang, J.; Parsons, T.; Ryan, D.; Fisher, M.; Williams, D.; Dales, N.A.; et al. ACE2 X-ray Structures Reveal a Large Hinge-bending Motion Important for Inhibitor Binding and Catalysis. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 17996–18007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Dutta, K. Allosteric Site of ACE-2 as a Drug Target for COVID-19. ACS Pharmacol. Transl. Sci. 2022, 5, 179–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Dutta, K.; Elmezayen, A.D.; Al-Obaidi, A.; Zhu, W.; Morozova, O.V.; Shityakov, S.; Khalifa, I. Seq12, Seq12m, and Seq13m, peptide analogues of the spike glycoprotein shows antiviral properties against SARS-CoV-2: An in silico study through molecular docking, molecular dynamics simulation, and MM-PB/GBSA calculations. J. Mol. Struct. 2021, 1246, 131113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Wan, Y.; Shang, J.; Graham, R.; Baric, R.S.; Li, F. Receptor Recognition by the Novel Coronavirus from Wuhan: An Analysis Based on Decade-Long Structural Studies of SARS Coronavirus. J. Virol. 2020, 94, e00127-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Yan, R.; Zhang, Y.; Li, Y.; Xia, L.; Guo, Y.; Zhou, Q. Structural basis for the recognition of SARS-CoV-2 by full-length human ACE2. Science 2020, 367, 1444–1448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Rbaa, M.; Haida, S.; Tuzun, B.; Hichar, A.; El Hassane, A.; Kribii, A.; Lakhrissi, Y.; Ben Hadda, T.; Zarrouk, A.; Lakhrissi, B.; et al. Molecular docking, DFT and POM analyses. J. Mol. Struct. 2022, 1258, 132688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kawsar, S.M.A.; Almalki, F.A.; Ben Hadd, T.; Laaroussi, H.; Khan, M.A.R.; Hosen, M.A.; Mahmud, S.; Aounti, A.; Maideen, N.M.P.; Heidarizadeh, F.; et al. Potential antifungal activity of novel carbohydrate derivatives validated by POM, molecular docking and molecular dynamic simulations analyses. Mol. Simul. 2023, 49, 60–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Akkoc, S.; Karatas, H.; Muhammed, M.T.; Kökbudak, Z.; Ceylan, A.; Almalki, F.; Laaroussi, H.; Ben Hadda, T. Drug design of new therapeutic agents: Molecular docking, molecular dynamics simulation, DFT and POM analyses of new Schiff base ligands and impact of substituents on bioactivity of their potential antifungal pharmacophore site. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 2022, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Abdellattif, M.H.; Elkamhawy, A.; Hagar, M.; Ben Hadda, T.; Shehab, W.S.; Mansy, W.; Belal, A.; Arief, M.M.H.; Hussien, M.A. Novel saccharin analogs as promising antibacterial and anticancer agents: Synthesis, DFT, POM analysis, molecular docking, molecular dynamic simulations, and cell-based assay. Front. Pharmacol. 2022, 13, 958379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Majid, S.A.; Mir, J.M.; Bhat, M.A.; Shalla, A.H.; Pandey, A.; Ben Hadda, T.; Abdellattif, M.H. A pair of carbazate derivatives as novel Schiff base ligands: DFT and POM theory supported spectroscopic and biological evaluation. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 2022, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Djouad, S.-E.; Berredjem, M.; Aoul, F.Z.H.; Bouchareb, F.; Guerfi, M.; Ben Hadda, T.; Aissaoui, M.; Belhani, B. In silico drug design and molecular docking of novel amidophosphonates and sulfamidophosphonates as inhibitors of urokinase-type plasminogen activator. J. Indian Chem. Soc. 2022, 99, 100650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Munia, N.S.; Hosen, M.A.; Azzam, K.M.A.; Al-Ghorbani, M.; Baashen, M.; Hossain, M.K.; Ali, F.; Mahmud, S.; Shimu, M.S.S.; Almalki, F.A.; et al. Synthesis, antimicrobial, SAR, PASS, molecular docking, molecular dynamics and pharmacokinetics studies of 5′-O-uridine derivatives bearing acyl moieties: POM study and identification of the pharmacophore sites. Nucleosides Nucleotides Nucleic Acids 2022, 41, 1036–1083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Chalkha, M.; Nakkabi, A.; Ben Hadda, T.; Berredjem, M.; El Moussaoui, A.; Bakhouch, M.; Saadi, M.; El Ammari, L.; Almalki, F.A.; Laaroussi, H.; et al. Crystallographic study, biological assessment and POM/Docking studies of pyrazoles-sulfonamide hybrids (PSH): Identification of a combined Antibacterial/Antiviral pharmacophore sites leading to in-silico screening the anti-COVID-19 activity. J. Mol. Struct. 2022, 1267, 133605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Ben Amor, S.; Mekious, S.; Benfekih, L.A.; Abdellattif, M.H.; Boussebaa, W.; Almalki, F.A.; Ben Hadda, T.; Kawsar, S.M.A. Phytochemical Characterization and Bioactivity of Different Honey Samples Collected in the Pre-Saharan Region in Algeria. Life 2022, 12, 927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Titi, A.; Touzani, R.; Moliterni, A.; Ben Hadda, T.; Messali, M.; Benabbes, R.; Berredjem, M.; Bouzina, A.; Al-Zaqri, N.; Taleb, M.; et al. Synthesis, structural, biocomputational modeling and antifungal activity of novel armed pyrazoles. J. Mol. Struct. 2022, 1264, 133156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Hosen, M.A.; Munia, N.S.; Al-Ghorbani, M.; Baashen, M.; Almalki, F.A.; Ben Hadda, T.; Ali, F.; Mahmud, S.; Saleh, A.; Laaroussi, H.; et al. Synthesis, antimicrobial, molecular docking and molecular dynamics studies of lauroyl thymidine analogs against SARS-CoV-2: POM study and identification of the pharmacophore sites. Bioorg. Chem. 2022, 125, 105850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Sana, T.; Qayyum, S.; Jabeen, A.; Siddiqui, B.S.; Begum, S.; Siddiqui, R.A.; Hadda, T.B. Isolation and characterization of anti-inflammatory and anti-proliferative compound, for B-cell Non-Hodgkin lymphoma, from Nyctanthes arbor-tristis Linn. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2022, 293, 115267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Bechlem, K.; Berredjem, M.; Djouad, S.E.; Sothea, T.O.; Bouacida, S.; Marminon, C.; Ben Hadda, T.; Lebreton, J.; Bouzina, A. Novel N-acylsulfamoyl-oxazolidin-2ones: Synthesis, antitumor activity, X-ray crystallographic study, molecular docking and POM analyses. J. Mol. Struct. 2022, 1262, 132935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Matin, M.M.; Matin, P.; Rahman, R.; Ben Hadda, T.; Almalki, F.A.; Mahmud, S.; Ghoneim, M.M.; Alruwaily, M.; Alshehri, S. Triazoles and Their Derivatives: Chemistry, Synthesis, and Therapeutic Applications. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2022, 9, 303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Lakhrissi, Y.; Rbaa, M.; Tuzun, B.; Hichar, A.; Anouar, E.H.; Ounine, K.; Almalki, F.; Ben Hadda, T.; Zarrouk, A.; Lakhrissi, B. Synthesis, structural confirmation, antibacterial properties and bio-informatics computational analyses of new pyrrole based on 8-hydroxyquinoline. J. Mol. Struct. 2022, 1259, 132683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Lafridi, H.; Almalki, F.A.; Ben Hadda, T.; Berredjem, M.; Kawsar, S.M.A.; Alqahtani, A.M.; Esharkawy, E.R.; Lakhrissi, B.; Zgou, H. In silico evaluation of molecular interactions between macrocyclic inhibitors with the HCV NS3 protease. Docking and identification of antiviral pharmacophore site. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 2022, 41, 2260–2273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Esharkawy, E.R.; Almalki, F.; Ben Hadda, T. In vitro potential antiviral SARS-CoV-19-activity of natural product thymohydroquinone and dithymoquinone from Nigella sativa. Bioorg. Chem. 2022, 120, 105587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Hasan, A.H.; Murugesan, S.; Amran, S.I.; Chander, S.; Alanazi, M.M.; Ben Hadda, T.; Shakya, S.; Pratama, M.R.F.; Das, B.; Biswas, S.; et al. Novel thiophene Chalcones-Coumarin as acetylcholinesterase inhibitors: Design, synthesis, biological evaluation, molecular docking, ADMET prediction and molecular dynamics simulation. Bioorg. Chem. 2022, 119, 105572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Berredjem, M.; Bouzina, A.; Bahadi, R.; Bouacida, S.; Rastija, V.; Djouad, S.-E.; Sothea, T.O.; Almalki, F.A.; Ben Hadda, T.; Aissaoui, M. Antitumor activity, X-ray crystallography, in silico study of some-sulfamido-phosphonates. Identification of pharmacophore sites. J. Mol. Struct. 2021, 1250, 131886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Chalkha, M.; El Moussaoui, A.; Berredjem, M.; Hadda, T.B.; Bouzina, A.; Almalki, F.A.; Saghrouchni, H.; Bakhouch, M.; Saadi, M.; El Ammari, L.E.; et al. Crystallographic Study, Biological Evaluation and DFT/POM/Docking Analyses of Pyrazole Linked Amide Conjugates: Identification of Antimicrobial and Antitumor Pharmaco-phore Sites. J. Mol. Struct. 2021; Accepted & under production. [Google Scholar]
  44. Rbaa, M.; Mequedade, M.; Berkiks, I.; Lakhrissi, Y.; Mague, J.; El Hessni, A.; Hadda, T.B.; Warad, I.; Zarrouk, A. Toxicological and Pharmacological Studies of a Crystal Structure Derivative of 8-Hydroxyquinoline. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 2021, 47, 6889–6900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ben Hadda, T.; Berredjem, M.; Almalki, F.A.; Rastija, V.; Jamalis, J.; Bin Emran, T.; Abu-Izneid, T.; Esharkawy, E.; Rodriguez, L.C.; Alqahtani, A.M. How to face COVID-19: Proposed treatments based on remdesivir and hydroxychloroquine in the presence of zinc sulfate. Docking/DFT/POM structural analysis. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 2021, 40, 9429–9442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Khodair, A.I.; El-Barbary, A.A.; Imam, D.R.; Kheder, N.A.; Elmalki, F.; Ben Hadda, T. Synthesis, antiviral, DFT and molecular docking studies of some novel 1,2,4-triazine nucleosides as potential bioactive compounds. Carbohydr. Res. 2021, 500, 108246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. El Faydy, M.; Dahaieh, N.; Ounine, K.; Rastija, V.; Almalki, F.; Jamalis, J.; Zarrouk, A.; Ben Hadda, T.; Lakhrissi, B. Synthesis and antimicrobial activity evaluation of some new 7-substituted quinolin-8-ol derivatives: POM analyses, docking, and identification of antibacterial pharmacophore sites. Chem. Data Collect. 2020, 31, 100593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Rbaa, M.; Hichar, A.; Dohare, P.; Anouar, E.H.; Lakhrissi, Y.; Berredjem, M.; Almalki, F.; Rastija, V.; Rajabi, M.; Ben Hadda, T.; et al. Synthesis, Characterization, Biocomputational Modeling and Antibacterial Study of Novel Pyran Based on 8-Hydroxyquinoline. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 2021, 46, 5533–5542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Bhat, A.R.; Dongre, R.S.; Almalki, F.A.; Berredjem, M.; Aissaoui, M.; Touzani, R.; Hadda, T.B.; Akhter, M.S. Synthesis, Biological Activity and POM/DFT/Docking Analyses of Annulated Pyrano[2,3-d]pyrimidine Derivatives: Identification of Antibacterial and Antitumor Phar-macophore sites. Bioorg. Chem. 2021, 106, 104480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Rauf, A.; Bawazeer, S.; Raza, M.; El-Sharkawy, E.; Rahman, H.; El-Esawi, M.A.; Uddin, G.; Siddiqui, B.S.; Khalil, A.A.; Molnar, J.; et al. Reversal of multidrug resistance and antitumor promoting activity of 3-oxo-6β-hydroxy-β-amyrin isolated from Pistacia integerrima. Biocell 2021, 45, 139–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Bawazer, S.; Khan, A.; Rauf, A.; Ben Hadda, T.; Al-Awthan, Y.S.; Bahattab, O.; Rashid, U.; Khan, I.; Nawaz, M.A.; Uddin, S.; et al. POM analysis and computational interactions of 8-hydroxydiospyrin inside active site of protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B. Biocell 2021, 45, 751–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Thasneema, K.; Dipin, T.; Thayyil, M.S.; Sahu, P.K.; Messali, M.; Rosalin, T.; Elyas, K.; Saharuba, P.; Anjitha, T.; Ben Hadda, T. Removal of toxic heavy metals, phenolic compounds and textile dyes from industrial waste water using phosphonium based ionic liquids. J. Mol. Liq. 2020, 303, 114645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Khalid, S.; Almalki, F.A.; Hadda, T.B.; Bader, A.; Abu-Izneid, T.; Berredjem, M.; Elsharkawy, E.R.; Alqahtani, A.M. Medicinal Applications of Cannabinoids Extracted from Cannabis sativa (L.): A New Route in the Fight Against COVID-19? Curr. Pharm. Des. 2020, 27, 1564–1578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Zaman, Q.; Mahmood Zia, K.M.; Zuber, M.; Jahangir, M.; Almalki, F.; Hadda, T.B.; Rauf, A. A Narrative Study of Herbal Distillates to Evaluate Physicochemical and Microbiological Characteristics. Acad. J. Food Res. 2020, 3, 15–27. [Google Scholar]
  55. Touzani, R.; Hammouti, B.; El Malki, F.; Benhadda, T. Coronavirus, COVID19, COVID-19 and SARS-CoV: A Global Pandemic, A Short Review. J. Mater. Environ. Sci. 2020, 11, 736–750. [Google Scholar]
  56. Ben Hadda, T.; Deniz, F.S.S.; Orhan, I.E.; Zgou, H.; Rauf, A.; Mabkhot, Y.N.; Bennani, B.; Emam, D.R.; Kheder, N.A.; Asayari, A.; et al. Spiro Heterocyclic Compounds as Potential Anti-Alzheimer Agents (Part 2): Their Metal Chelation Capacity, POM Analyses and DFT Studies. Med. Chem. 2021, 17, 834–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Ben Hadda, T.; Rastija, V.; AlMalki, F.; Titi, A.; Touzani, R.; Mabkhot, Y.N.; Khalid, S.; Zarrouk, A.; Siddiqui, B.S. Petra/Osiris/Molinspiration and Molecular Docking Analyses of 3-Hydroxy-Indolin-2-one Derivatives as Potential Antiviral Agents. Curr. Comput. Aided-Drug Des. 2020, 16, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Thasneema, K.K.; Thayyil, M.S.; Rosalin, T.; Elyas, K.; Dipin, T.; Sahu, P.K.; Kumar, N.K.; Saheer, V.; Messali, M.; Ben Hadda, T. Thermal and spectroscopic investigations on three phosphonium based ionic liquids for industrial and biological applications. J. Mol. Liq. 2020, 307, 112960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Guerfi, M.; Berredjem, M.; Bouzina, A.; Ben Hadda, T.; Marminon, C.; Rachedi, K.O. Novel α-sulfamidophosphonate analogues of fotemustine: Efficient synthesis using ultrasound under solvent-free conditions. Mon. Für Chem.-Chem. Mon. 2020, 151, 1859–1865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Farghaly, T.A.; Abbas, I.M.; Hassan, W.M.I.; Lotfy, M.S.; Al-Qurashi, N.T.; Ben Hadda, T. Structure Determination and Quantum Chemical Analysis of 1,3-Dipolar Cycloaddition of Nitrile Imines and New Dipolarophiles and POM Analyses of the Products as Potential Breast Cancer Inhibitors. Russ. J. Org. Chem. 2020, 56, 1258–1271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Jamalis, J.; Yusof, F.S.M.; Chander, S.; Wahab, R.A.; Bhagwat, D.P.; Sankaranarayanan, M.; Almalki, F.; Ben Hadda, T. Psoralen Derivatives: Recent Advances of Synthetic Strategy and Pharmacological Properties. Anti-Inflamm. Anti-Allergy Agents Med. Chem. 2020, 19, 222–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Rakib, A.; Sami, S.A.; Mimi, N.J.; Chowdhury, M.; Eva, T.A.; Nainu, F.; Paul, A.; Shahriar, A.; Tareq, A.M.; Emon, N.U.; et al. Immunoinformatics-guided design of an epitope-based vaccine against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 spike glycoprotein. Comput. Biol. Med. 2020, 124, 103967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Cruz-Rodrıguez, L.; Sanchez, B.; Hochwımmer, B.; Hadda, T.; Almalkı, A.; Dilsiz, N.İ.H.A.T. How to Evaluate Viral Transmission in Enclosed Areas. Medical Geology saving places from COVID-19. J. Biosci. Biomed. Eng. 2020, 1, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  64. Bechlem, K.; Aissaoui, M.; Belhani, B.; Rachedi, K.O.; Bouacida, S.; Bahadi, R.; Djouad, S.-E.; Ben Mansour, R.; Bouaziz, M.; Almalki, F.; et al. Synthesis, X-ray crystallographic study and molecular docking of new α-sulfamidophosphonates: POM analyses of their cytotoxic activity. J. Mol. Struct. 2020, 1210, 127990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Grib, I.; Berredjem, M.; Rachedi, K.O.; Djouad, S.-E.; Bouacida, S.; Bahadi, R.; Ouk, T.-S.; Kadri, M.; Ben Hadda, T.; Belhani, B. Novel N-sulfonylphthalimides: Efficient synthesis, X-ray characterization, spectral investigations, POM analyses, DFT computations and antibacterial activity. J. Mol. Struct. 2020, 1217, 128423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Elsharkawy, E.R.; Almalki, F.; Ben Hadda, T.; Rastija, V.; Lafridi, H.; Zgou, H. DFT calculations and POM analyses of cytotoxicity of some flavonoids from aerial parts of Cupressus sempervirens: Docking and identification of pharmacophore sites. Bioorg. Chem. 2020, 100, 103850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Javaid, A.; Hadda, T.B.; Tadjine, N.; Messgo-Moumene, S.; Aissat, A.E.K.; Saddek, D. In vitro evaluation of the antifungal potential of Zizyphus lotus L. against toxigenic molds of hydroponic barley. Mycopath 2019, 17, 33–37. [Google Scholar]
  68. Bawazeer, S.; Rauf, A.; Ali Shah, S.U.; Ullah, N.; Uddin, G.; Khan, H.; Hadda, T.B. Antioxidant and Enzyme inhibitory activities of extracts and phytochemicals isolated from Pistacia integerrima. Z. Arznei Gewurzpfa 2019, 23, 55–58. [Google Scholar]
  69. Amirkhanov, V.; Rauf, A.; Ben Hadda, T.; Ovchynnikov, V.; Trush, V.; Saleem, M.; Raza, M.; Rehman, T.; Zgou, H.; Shaheen, U.; et al. Pharmacophores Modeling in Terms of Prediction of Theoretical Physicochemical Properties and Verification by Experimental Correlations of Carbacylamidophosphates (CAPh) and Sulfanylamidophosphates (SAPh) Tested as New Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors. Mini-Rev. Med. Chem. 2019, 19, 1015–1027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Ben Hadda, T.; Rauf, A.; Zgou, H.; Senol, F.S.; Orhan, I.E.; Mabkhot, Y.N.; Althagafi, I.I.; Farghaly, T.A.; Alterary, S. Drug Design of Inhibitors of Alzheimer’s Disease (AD): POM and DFT Analyses of Cholinesterase Inhibitory Activity of β-amino di-Carbonyl Derivatives. Mini-Rev. Med. Chem. 2019, 19, 688–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. ELMeskini, I.; Toupet, L.; Daoudi, M.; Kerbal, A.; Moreira, D.R.; Hadda, T.B. Is It Possible for the 2-[(4-chloro-phenyl)-(3,5-dimethylpyrazol-1-yl)-methyl]-malonic acid diethyl ester to Present a Potential Candidate HIV-Integrase Inhibitor on the Basis of Its (O,N,O)-Ligand Structure. Moroc. J. Heterocycl. Chem. 2019, 18, 36–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Rachedi, K.O.; Ouk, T.-S.; Bahadi, R.; Bouzina, A.; Djouad, S.-E.; Bechlem, K.; Zerrouki, R.; Ben Hadda, T.; Almalki, F.; Berredjem, M. Synthesis, DFT and POM analyses of cytotoxicity activity of α-amidophosphonates derivatives: Identification of potential antiviral O,O-pharmacophore site. J. Mol. Struct. 2019, 1197, 196–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Rbaa, M.; Jabli, S.; Lakhrissi, Y.; Ouhssine, M.; Almalki, F.; Hadda, T.B.; Messgo-Moumene, S.; Zarrouk, A.; Lakhrissi, B. Synthesis, antibacterial properties and bioinformatics computationalanalyses of novel 8-hydroxyquinoline derivatives. Heliyon 2019, 5, e026892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Rachedi, K.O.; Bahadi, R.; Aissaoui, M.; Ben Hadda, T.; Belhani, B.; Bouzina, A.; Berredjem, M. DFT Study, POM Analyses and Molecular Docking of Novel Oxazaphosphinanes: Identification of Antifungal Pharmacophore Site. Indones. J. Chem. 2020, 20, 440–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Titi, A.; Messali, M.; Alqurashy, B.A.; Touzani, R.; Shiga, T.; Oshio, H.; Fettouhi, M.; Rajabi, M.; Almalki, F.A.; Ben Hadda, T. Synthesis, characterization, X-ray crystal study and bioctivities of pyrazole derivatives: Identification of antitumor, antifungal and antibacterial pharmacophore sites. J. Mol. Struct. 2020, 1205, 127625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Rbaa, M.; Oubihi, A.; Anouar, E.H.; Ouhssine, M.; Almalki, F.; Ben Hadda, T.; Zarrouk, A.; Lakhrissi, B. Synthesis of new heterocyclic systems oxazino derivatives of 8-Hydroxyquinoline: Drug design and POM analyses of substituent effects on their potential antibacterial properties. Chem. Data Collect. 2019, 24, 100306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Jarrahpour, A.; Heiran, R.; Sinou, V.; Latour, C.; Bouktab, L.D.; Brunel, J.M.; Sheikh, J.; Ben Hadda, T. Synthesis of New β-Lactams Bearing the Biologically Important Morpholine Ring and POM Analyses of Their Antimicrobial and Antimalarial Activities. Iran. J. Pharm. Res. 2019, 18, 34–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Kamal, A.M.; Abdelhady, M.; Ben Hadda, T. Two Novel Flavone C-Glycosides Isolated from Afrocarpus Gracilior: Pom Analyses and in Vitro Cytotoxic Activity Aganist Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Int. J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci. 2019, 11, 57–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Dongre, R.S.; Meshram, J.S.; Selokar, R.S.; Almalki, F.A.; Ben Hadda, T. Antibacterial activity of synthetic pyrido[2,3-d]pyrimidines armed with nitrile groups: POM analysis and identification of pharmacophore sites of nitriles as important pro-drugs. New J. Chem. 2018, 42, 15610–15617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Ben Hadda, T.; Talhi, O.; Silva, A.S.; Senol, F.S.; Orhan, I.E.; Rauf, A.; Mabkhot, Y.; Bachari, K.; Warad, I.; Farghaly, T.A.; et al. Cholinesterase Inhibitory Activity of Some semi-Rigid Spiro Heterocycles: POM Analyses and Crystalline Structure of Pharmacophore Site. Mini-Rev. Med. Chem. 2018, 18, 711–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Ullah, M.A.; Adeel, M.; Tahir, M.N.; Rauf, A.; Akram, M.; Hadda, T.B.; Mabkhot, Y.; Muhammad, N.; Naseer, F.; Mubarak, M.S. Synthesis, Structural Characterization and Antinociceptive Activities of New Arylated Quinolines via Suzuki-Miyaura Cross Coupling Reaction. Med. Chem. 2017, 13, 780–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Khan, H.; Khan, Z.; Amin, S.; Mabkhot, Y.N.; Mubarak, M.S.; Ben Hadda, T.; Maione, F. Plant bioactive molecules bearing glycosides as lead compounds for the treatment of fungal infection: A review. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2017, 93, 498–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Hakkou, Z.; Maciuk, A.; Leblais, V.; Bouanani, N.E.; Mekhfi, H.; Bnouham, M.; Aziz, M.; Ziyyat, A.; Rauf, A.; Hadda, T.B.; et al. Antihypertensive and vasodilator effects of methanolic extract of Inula viscosa: Biological evaluation and POM analysis of cynarin, chlorogenic acid as potential hypertensive. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2017, 93, 62–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Chander, S.; Tang, C.-R.; Al-Maqtari, H.M.; Jamalis, J.; Penta, A.; Ben Hadda, T.; Sirat, H.M.; Zheng, Y.-T.; Sankaranarayanan, M. Synthesis and study of anti-HIV-1 RT activity of 5-benzoyl-4-methyl-1,3,4,5-tetrahydro-2H-1,5-benzodiazepin-2-one derivatives. Bioorg. Chem. 2017, 72, 74–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Al-Maqtari, H.M.; Jamalis, J.; Ben Hadda, T.; Sankaranarayanan, M.; Chander, S.; Ahmad, N.A.; Sirat, H.M.; Althagafi, I.I.; Mabkhot, Y.N. Synthesis, characterization, POM analysis and antifungal activity of novel heterocyclic chalcone derivatives containing acylated pyrazole. Res. Chem. Intermed. 2016, 43, 1893–1907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Mabkhot, Y.; Arfan, M.; Zgou, H.; Genc, Z.K.; Genc, M.; Rauf, A.; Bawazeer, S.; Ben Hadda, T. How to improve antifungal bioactivity: POM and DFT study of some chiral amides derivatives of diacetyl-L-tartaric acid and amines. Res. Chem. Intermed. 2016, 42, 8055–8068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Rauf, A.; Uddin, G.; Siddiqui, B.S.; Khan, H.; Shah, S.U.A.; Ben Hadda, T.; Mabkhot, Y.N.; Farooq, U.; Khan, A. Antinociceptive and anti-inflammatory activities of flavonoids isolated from Pistacia integerrima galls. Complement. Ther. Med. 2016, 25, 132–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Sajid, Z.; Ahmad, M.; Aslam, S.; Ashfaq, U.A.; Zahoor, A.F.; Saddique, F.A.; Parvez, M.; Hameed, A.; Sultan, S.; Zgou, H.; et al. Novel Armed Pyrazolobenzothiazine Derivatives: Synthesis, X-ray Crystal Structure and POM analyses of Biological Activity Against Drug Resistant Clinical Isolate of Staphylococcus aureus. Pharm. Chem. J. 2016, 50, 172–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Mabkhot, Y.N.; Alatibi, F.; El-Sayed, N.N.E.; Al-Showiman, S.; Kheder, N.A.; Wadood, A.; Rauf, A.; Bawazeer, S.; Ben Hadda, T. Antimicrobial Activity of Some Novel Armed Thiophene Derivatives and Petra/Osiris/Molinspiration (POM) Analyses. Molecules 2016, 21, 222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Tatar, E.; Şenkardeş, S.; Sellitepe, H.E.; Küçükgüzel, G.; Karaoğlu, A.; Bozdeveci, A.; DE Clercq, E.; Pannecouque, C.; BEN Hadda, T.; Küçükgüzel, I. Synthesis, and prediction of molecular properties and antimicrobial activity of some acylhydrazones derived from N-(arylsulfonyl)methionine. Turk. J. Chem. 2016, 40, 510–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Hadda, T.B. Ranking for Scientists. 2023. Available online: https://www.adscientificindex.com/scientist/taibi-ben-hadda/91200 (accessed on 27 April 2023).
  92. Hadda, T.B. Research Excellence Awards. 2018. Available online: https://www.maroc.ma/fr/actua-lites/research-excellence-awards-une-vingtaine-de-travaux-de-recherche-et-dinnovation-primes (accessed on 27 April 2023).
  93. Mooers, B.H.M.; Brown, M.E. Templates for writing PyMOL scripts. Protein Sci. 2021, 30, 262–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Barber, R.D. Software to Visualize Proteins and Perform Structural Alignments. Curr. Protoc. 2021, 1, e292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Mooers, B.H.M. Shortcuts for faster image creation in PyMOL. Protein Sci. 2020, 29, 268–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Goodsell, D.S.; Sanner, M.F.; Olson, A.J.; Forli, S. The AutoDock suite at 30. Protein Sci. 2021, 30, 31–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Mohamed, K.; Yazdanpanah, N.; Saghazadeh, A.; Rezaei, N. Computational drug discovery and repurposing for the treatment of COVID-19: A systematic review. Bioorg. Chem. 2021, 106, 104490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Tang, S.; Chen, R.; Lin, M.; Lin, Q.; Zhu, Y.; Ding, J.; Hu, H.; Ling, M.; Wu, J. Accelerating AutoDock Vina with GPUs. Molecules 2022, 27, 3041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Kwofie, S.K.; Broni, E.; Asiedu, S.O.; Kwarko, G.B.; Dankwa, B.; Enninful, K.S.; Tiburu, E.K.; Wilson, M.D. Cheminformatics-Based Identification of Potential Novel Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Natural Compounds of African Origin. Molecules 2021, 26, 406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. The structure of the ACE 2 protein.
Figure 1. The structure of the ACE 2 protein.
Molecules 28 03766 g001
Figure 2. The Concept and Applications of POM Theory [78].
Figure 2. The Concept and Applications of POM Theory [78].
Molecules 28 03766 g002
Figure 3. Proposed mechanism of opening and closing central ring C and identification of the antiviral pharmacophore sites for compounds 1–17 [POM].
Figure 3. Proposed mechanism of opening and closing central ring C and identification of the antiviral pharmacophore sites for compounds 1–17 [POM].
Molecules 28 03766 g003
Table 1. Binding energy of the selected ligands with the studied protein.
Table 1. Binding energy of the selected ligands with the studied protein.
No.LigandBinding
Energy
(kcal/mol)
1Rhamnetin (3,3′,4′,5-Tetrahydroxy-7-methoxyflavone)−8.1
2Patuletin (3,3′,4′,5,7-Pentahydroxy-6-methoxyflavone)−7.7
3Isorhamnetin (3,4′,5,7-Tetrahydroxy-3′-methoxyflavone)−7.7
4Tamarixetin (3,3′,5,7-Tetrahydroxy-4′-methoxyflavone)−7.8
5Quercetin (3,3′,4′,5,7-Pentahydroxyflavone)−7.6
6Corniculatusin (3,3′,4′,5,7-Pentahydroxy-8-methoxyflavone)−8.2
7Dillenetin (3,4-Dimethoxy-3,5,7-trihydroxyflavone)−7.5
8Nobiletin (3′,4′,5,6,7,8-Hexamethoxyflavone)−7.8
9Hesperidin (7-Rhamnoglucoside)−9.6
10Baicalein (5,6,7-Trihydroxyflavone)−8.1
11Ayanin (5,3′-Dihydroxy-3,7,4′-trimethoxyflavone)−7.4
12Azaleatin (3,3′,4′,7-Tetrahydroxy-5-methoxyflavone)−7.6
13Ombuin (4′,7-Dimethoxy-3,3′,5-trihydroxyflavone)−7.8
14Pachypodol (4′,5-Dihydroxy-3,3′,7-trimethoxyflavone)−7.2
15Retusin (5-Hydroxy-3,3′,4′,7-tetramethoxyflavone)−7.3
16Rhamnazin (Dimethoxyflavone)−7.8
17Eupatolitin (3,3′,4′,5-Tetrahydroxy-6,7-dimethoxyflavone)−7.8
18Captopril−6.5
19MLN4760−7.4
20Lisinopril−8.0
21Amlodipin−7.3
Table 2. Features of the interaction of ACE2 protein with the ligand.
Table 2. Features of the interaction of ACE2 protein with the ligand.
No.Hydrogen BondsVan der Waals ForceAllosteric Site Surrounding Amino Acids Residues
1Asp206, Trp566, Asn210Asn397, Lys562, Ala99, Ala396, Glu208, Pro565, Leu95, Val212, Val2092
2Tyr196, Glu564, Ala396, Lys562, Glu208Leu95, Pro565, Asp206, Glu98, Gly205, Gln98, Gln102, Tyr2022
3Gly208, Tyr196, Gly205, Lys502Asp206, Ala99, Leu392, Leu952
4Tyr385, Asp350, Asp382, Aka348His378, Arg393, Phe390, Phe40, Asn394, His4013
5Asp206, Asn210, Trp566Asn397, Lys562, Ala396, Gln208, Val212, Leu95, Val209, Pro5652
6Asp206, Asp210, Trp566Ala396, Asn397, Lys562, Gln98, Pro565, Val209, Gln208, Leu95, Val2122
7Trp566, Lys562Val209, Gln564, Pro565, Leu95, Gln98, Asp206, gln208, Gly205, Tyr196, Tyr202, Gln1022
8Asn210Val212, Val209, Leu95, Pro565, Lys562, Gln205, Asp206, Tyr202, Tyr196, Gln208, Gln91, Lys94, Gln1022
9Ala248, Gln402, Glu375, Tyr385, Asp350, Ser47, Ser43Trp69, Gly68, Phe40, Asp382, Asn394, Trp349, His401, His378, Thr3473
10Trp566, Ala396, Asp206Lys562, Leu95, Val209, Asn210, Pro565, Glu564, Asn3972
11Tyr196Trp203, Gln102, Tyr202, Gly205, Asp206, Gln98, Leu95, Lys562, Glu2082
12Asp509, Ser511, Tyr199, Tyr196, Gln102Tyr510, Trp203, Asp514, Asp206, Tyr2022
13Asp350, Asp382, Ala348Arg393, Phe390, Phe40, Asn394, His401, His378, Tyr3853
14Lys562, Tyr196Trp566, Pro565, Val209, Gln208, Leu392, Leu95, Ala99, Glu2082
15Tyr196Tyr202, Trp203, Asp206, Gly205, Leu95, Glu564, Lys562, Gln208, Gln98, Ala3962
16Trp566, Ala396, Gln102Asn210, Val209, Asp206, Lys562, Pro5652
17Trp566, Glu564, Lys562, Gln98, Tyr196Pro565, Leu95, Asp206, Gln102, Tyr2022
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bogoyavlenskiy, A.; Alexyuk, M.; Alexyuk, P.; Berezin, V.; Almalki, F.A.; Ben Hadda, T.; Alqahtani, A.M.; Ahmed, S.A.; Dall’Acqua, S.; Jamalis, J. Computer Analysis of the Inhibition of ACE2 by Flavonoids and Identification of Their Potential Antiviral Pharmacophore Site. Molecules 2023, 28, 3766. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28093766

AMA Style

Bogoyavlenskiy A, Alexyuk M, Alexyuk P, Berezin V, Almalki FA, Ben Hadda T, Alqahtani AM, Ahmed SA, Dall’Acqua S, Jamalis J. Computer Analysis of the Inhibition of ACE2 by Flavonoids and Identification of Their Potential Antiviral Pharmacophore Site. Molecules. 2023; 28(9):3766. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28093766

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bogoyavlenskiy, Andrey, Madina Alexyuk, Pavel Alexyuk, Vladimir Berezin, Faisal A. Almalki, Taibi Ben Hadda, Alaa M. Alqahtani, Saleh A. Ahmed, Stefano Dall’Acqua, and Joazaizulfazli Jamalis. 2023. "Computer Analysis of the Inhibition of ACE2 by Flavonoids and Identification of Their Potential Antiviral Pharmacophore Site" Molecules 28, no. 9: 3766. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28093766

APA Style

Bogoyavlenskiy, A., Alexyuk, M., Alexyuk, P., Berezin, V., Almalki, F. A., Ben Hadda, T., Alqahtani, A. M., Ahmed, S. A., Dall’Acqua, S., & Jamalis, J. (2023). Computer Analysis of the Inhibition of ACE2 by Flavonoids and Identification of Their Potential Antiviral Pharmacophore Site. Molecules, 28(9), 3766. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28093766

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop